Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFebruary 26, 1996 REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MONDAY, February 26,1996 7:00 p.m. 1. Call Meeting to Order: 2. Roll Call: 3. Approval of Minutes: 4. Public Hearings: 4.A PHEASANT MEADOWS - PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE SCHEMATIC PUD, REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT. 12.5 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF STH 13, SOUTH OF 170TH STREET AND EAST OF SUNSET HILLS ADDITION. 4.B REPEAL OF SECTION 6-3-1 OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING ABBREVIATED SUBDIVISION PROCESS. 5. Old Business: 6. New Business: 1995 Variance Summary Report. 7. Announcements and Correspondence: 8. Adjournment: 16200 ~9Gmek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 6618172-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER l)0qf1 - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 12, 1996 The February 12, 1996, Planning Commission Meeting was called to order by Chairman Kuykendall at 7:01 p.m. Those present were Commissioners Criego, Kuykendall, Loftus and V onhof, Planning Director Don Rye, Assistant Planner Deb Garross, Associate Planner Michael Leek and Recording Secretary Connie Carlson. ROLL CALL: Criego Wuellner V onhof Loftus Kuykendall Present Present Present Absent Present REVIEW MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING: MOTION BY VONHOF, SECOND BY WUELLNER TO APPROVE THE JANUARY 22, 1996 MINUTES. Vote taken signified ayes by Vonhof, Wuellner, Criego and Kuykendall. MOTION CARRIED. Commissioner Loftus arrived at 7:05 p.m. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING DRIVEWAY WIDTH. The public hearing was opened and a sign-up sheet was circulated to the public in attendance. Assistant Planner Deb Garross presented the information in the Planning Report dated February 12, 1996. Staff recommends the Planning Commission make a motion to City Council to adopt the proposed amendment as written or with changes. Comments by Commissioners: Criego: . Question: What do other communities have for widths for commerical driveways? Garross replied this standard is typical and has been used by the City of Prior Lake, especially out in the Office Park. Staff felt this issue had to be clarified in the MN021296.DOC PAGEl Ordinance. It is a width that is workable as far as fire and safety access as well being able to maneuver large trucks. · Question: In a residential area where you may have a commerical conditional use permit, how does that apply? Garross explained this amendment is written for the specific uses and not tied to the zoning district itself. Wuellner: . Question: Is there a limit to the number of driveways commercial or residential property can have? Garross explained it was not. V onhof: . Question: All the other provisions that provide for driveways, like setbacks would still apply? Garross replied "Yes". Loftus: . Garross explained this issue has been around for the year or two and should have been addressed earlier in the Zoning Ordinance. It came about recently because of the commerical development and new buildings and will be used quite often. Kuykendall: . Comment on minimum slope of one half percent. . Traffic concern especially County Road 42 - Scott County standards would apply? . Rye said Scott County will not allow direct commericallindustrial traffic on to County Road 42 at all. . Concern for a far wide right turn - if they have to swing out to make the comer. The alternative is to have a one-way directional slope (one-way in, one-way out). . Possibly at another time the City should research one way entrances. . Supports staffs recommendation and act positively. MOTION BY VONHOF, SECOND BY LOFTUS TO RECOMMEND CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT AS WRITTEN TO AMEND SECTION 6.5D OF THE PRIOR LAKE ZONING ORDINANCE 83-6. Votes taken signified ayes by V onhof, Loftus, Criego, Wuellner and Kuykendall. MOTION CARRIED. Commissioner Kuykendall closed the public hearing. 2. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING FENCES IN THE SHORELAND DISTRICT. The public hearing was opened and a sign-up sheet was circulated to the public in attendance. MN021296.DOC PAGE 2 Associated Planner Michael Leek presented the information in the Planning Report dated February 12, 1996. Staff recommends the Planning Commission to direct a motion to City Council to adopt the proposed amendment as written or with changes. Leek read a letter from Jeanne Robbins and Eric Davis who are in opposition of the proposed changes to the Ordinance. Comments from the audience: Tom Foster, 5795 Shannon Trail, commented on the proposal indicating the see-through visibility should be equal to a chain link fence. Mr. Foster said he has seen chain link fences that have inserts in them and maybe there should be additional definition. Question of whether the existing fences would be grandfather in. Leek answered "Yes". Linda Wiecher, 5455 Shore Trail, stated she fully supports the draft. Peter Brodin, 5425 Shore Trail, supports the spirit of the amendment. Question on the enforcement and is a permit required? Rye stated there is not a permit required for a fence and would be enforced on a complaint basis. Comments from Commissioners: Loftus: . Leek explained the purpose of the Ordinance. . Felt the comments were good by Jeanne Robbins and Eric Davis' letter. . Enforcement question is good. Someone in the middle of construction would have to remove or stop construction of the fence. It would be more rational to have this go through the permit process. Otherwise without some mechanism to discover before the fence is built it is just inviting trouble. Leek explained the problems with the permit process and the volume of permits. If the City requires a fence in the lake shore setback area, the City will have to require a permit for any fence built in the City. It is a lot of volume on top of a large volume of permits already. Rye commented the City has a number of ordinances that are primarily enforced through a complaint basis. Simply, there is not enough time available to the staff that is here, it is impossible to go out and keep on top of everything that goes on in this community. And it is getting to be more so than less. V onhof: . It seems the City has taken a middle road stand. In looking over the survey of the other cities, they generally prohibit any fencing within the 75' lake shore setback MN021296.DOC PAGEl area. Prior Lake is going half way, while not prohibiting fences, the City is limiting them. . Leek explained City Council did not want to come down so hard that fences were not permitted at all but they did want to protect sight line issues for lakeshore properties. Note they were also sensitive to fences for pools which are required. . Supports this Ordinance and would go further to support an amendment prohibiting them. . The letter by Jeanne Robbins and Eric Davis brought up good points. . If the variance criteria were met fences could be allowed. . Personally feel the chain link fences along the lake are unattractive. Wuellner: . Leek explained the lake shore accessory structures. . Limited visibility. . A natural vegetation fence could be put in for privacy. . The hardship criteria would be the same as the variance criteria. . Safety issues for fencing along lake. . People who live on the lake have more property regulations compared to the people who do not live on the lake. This just another one of the those rules that do not have any substance to it that are going to be restrictive to the people who pay a great amount of taxes who live on the lake. . A privacy fence in my opinion is not unreasonable. It can be enhancing to the lifestyle not only within the confines of the privacy fence but on either side of it as well. . Does not support this. Criego: . Initial response was negative. . Prior Lake is unique with homes close to the lake, others far. Some of the ones close to the lake are old cabins and someone might want to put up a hedge. A hedge is prettier than a fence and could solve the problem. . There are many lake entrances by snowmobiles. If you are a neighbor living next to a snowmobile trail you might elect to put up a fence. . Would prefer to see no fences than go half way. But there are going to be situations where fences are appropriate. . Rye explained there are a number of reasons a person needs a fence. Criteria do not work well with ancillary things like fences and accessory structures. They work well with a principal structure. Kuykendall: . Generally feels opposed to any fence in that area. . Most of the cities in the survey generally favor no fence. . "Fence" should be defined as opposed to any other kind of barrier. . Aesthetically, fences are not attractive. MN021296.DOC PAGE 4 . Understands the neighbor's perspective to keep the view open. . If the problem is keeping children or animals confined, that can be accomplished within the 75' setback. . If a person wants privacy there is a certain area within the property which can be achieved with a solid fence or chain link fence. . Creative landscape can accomplish both privacy and safety. . Sees the practical issue of enforcement. . If the Ordinance is in place it should require a survey and a permit. The burden ends up being a costly process for the homeowner. . Does not like self-enforcing. . Does not meet the intent of the whole setback area of the lakeshore. . Opposed. Open discussion: Loftus: . This is a freedom vs. regulation issue. Lean toward the freedom side. Because this covers the entire shore land district I am not comfortable without having first hand knowledge of what the uses are. If it is an abuse situation the City should address the problem. If it is a single issue, it should not be made into an enforcement issue. V onhof: . The reason we have a special shore land district is because the City is deemed a significant area that needs special protections and has different regulations entirely than any other residential district in the city. We have accepted the fact on many occasions that the lakeshore has special restrictions. Nobody has purchased a home on the lake that is not aware to some degree that there are some restrictions. It is a unique area and needs special protection. This is a situation that applies to everything in the city. As it is written, it will effect all existing fence today which would automatically become a non-conforming use. This is all future based. We are getting a little tied up on what is existing and what is the future. I agree with the setback averaging and would go further and make it illegal to have fences at all within the area because there are alternatives. The objective is to deal with the fact of sight lines on the property. Criego: . The ordinance is too restrictive. The variance process could solve the problem. Wuellner: . Disagree the variance process would solve anything. When there is no problem why set up a more restrictive ordinance. Kuykendall: . Recommend no fences. MN02129600C PAGES . Need definition of "fence". No one has provided a hardship. MOTION BY WUELLNER, SECOND BY CRIEGO, TO NOT RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING FENCES IN THE SHORELAND DISTRICT. Leek pointed out staff had no recommendation for support. The reason is the December report to City Council concluded and recommended that staff did not see rationale at this point in time for adopting an amendment. It is before the Commission because the Council disagreed with staff. Rationale: Lack of enforcement is not supportive to this ordinance. Vote taken signified ayes by Wuellner, Criego, Loftus and Kuykendall. Nays by Vonhof. MOTION PASSED. Commissioner Kuykendall closed the public hearing. New Business: The Wilds There was a brief discussion on The Wilds issues and its financial affects on the City. Rye explained the worst case would be if they were in a condition where nothing happened for an extended period of time. The City will not be out. The golf course is successful. Commissioner Kuykendall will not be at the next meeting. The workshop is scheduled for March 23, 1995. MOTION BY KUYKENDALL, SECOND BY LOFTUS TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. Vote taken signified ayes by Kuykendall, Loftus, Criego, V onhof and Wuellner. MOTION CARRIED. The meeting was adjourned at 8:35 p.m. Don Rye Director of Planning Connie Carlson Recording Secretary MN021296.DOC PAGE6 PLANNING REPORT PRESENTER: PUBLIC HEARING: DATE: 1 CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARINGS TO CONSIDER THE SCHEMATIC PUD, REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR "PHEASANT MEADOW" WILLIAMS DEVELOPMENT LLC, REPRESENTED BY TERRY SCHNEIDER 12.5 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF STH 13, SOUTH OF 170TH STREET AND EAST OF SUNSET HILLS ADDITION DEB GARROSS, JOHN WINGARD, PAUL HOKENESS _X_ YES _NO-N/A FEBRUARY 26, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: SITE: INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this item is to consider three distinct but related applications: Schematic PUD, Rezoning and Preliminary plat for the project known as "Pheasant Meadow." The three applications are being considered at the same time because of the interrelationship of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances concerning Planned Unit Developments. Each application requires a separate public hearing. The Planning Commission Chair should call all three public hearings to order simultaneously. A separate motion in the form of a recommendation to the City Council, will be required for each application. To assist the Planning Commission and facilitate the public hearing process, the following draft resolutions and ordinance are attached to the agenda packet: l. Resolution 96-04PC Resolution recommending the City Council approve the Schematic PUD for Pheasant Meadow to allow a cluster, townhome development on the 12.5 acre subject site. 2. Ordinance 96-06 Ordinance rezoning the subject site from R-I, Suburban Residential to PUD 3-96. 3. Resolution 96-05PC Resolution recommending the City Council approve the preliminary plat of Pheasant Meadow subject to conditions. The resolutions and ordinance are in draft form and should be amended to incorporate facts, findings and conditions as determined by the Planning Commission during the course of the public hearings. REVIEW PROCESS: The proposed PUD and Rezoning are interrelated and should be considered together. The Schematic PUD sets forth the concept land use and development pattern for the project. In this case, the developer proposes a cluster development consisting of a variety of townhome styles for the subject site. The rezoning is integral to the PUD because it will create a PUD overlay zone which will specify the special standards and conditions under which the property may develop. Draft Resolution 96-04PC outlines the standards and conditions for approval of the Schematic PUD of Pheasant Meadow. Draft Ordinance 96-06 provides for the creation of the overlay zone for PUD 3-96, Pheasant Meadow. Subdivision Ordinance 87-10 identifies all of the components required for a preliminary plat. The preliminary plat is the legal document identifying the proposed lot locations, areas and dimensions, road PHEASPC.OOC I 16200 IDiyle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER location, storm sewer, grading, location and grade of sewer and water as well as proposed tree planting. Once preliminary plat approval is granted by the City Council, the property owner has a vested interest in the plat. For one year following preliminary plat approval, no ordinance amendment shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout, dedication required or permitted by the approved preliminary plat. Draft Resolution 96-05PC outlines the conditions for preliminary plat approval for Pheasant Meadow. SITE ANALYSIS: The subject site consists of 12.5 acres of land located between STH 13 and 170th Street, (CSAH 12), and east of the Sunset Hills neighborhood. The site is surrounded by single family housing to the north and west; vacant land to the east (planned for Neighborhood Business in the 2010 Comprehensive Plan); STH 13 and the "city limits" boundary of the City of Prior Lake to the south, (single family homes are located in Spring Lake Township south of STH 13); and Woodview Park to the southwest of the subject site. The entire site is zoned R-l, Suburban Residential. The Year 2000 Comprehensive Plan designates the site for Medium Density Residential land use. The Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan designates the site for Low to Medium Density Residential land use. The site has been tilled for many years. There are no wetlands nor steep slopes on site. There are approximately 100 trees located along the east and west sides of the site however only 1/4 of the trees are species regulated by the Tree Preservation regulations of the Zoning Ordinance. The land is gently rolling and slopes generally from a high point on the northern part of the site to the southwest. pun REGULA nONS: The PUD section of the Zoning Ordinance is interpreted and applied to development sites as indicated below. A PUD is a tool the Zoning Ordinance provides which allows for the development of property with some modification of Zoning standards which are identified in the PUD section of the Ordinance. The Zoning Ordinance defines PUD as: "Planned Unit Development - A tract of land which will contain two or more principal structures which may incorporate a variety of land uses developed under unified ownership or control, the development of which may be unique and of a substantially different character than that of the surrounding area. .. "Residential Planned Unit Development - A use where the nature of residency is non-transient and the major or primary focus of the development is not service oriented For example, residential apartment, manufactured home parks, time-share condominiums, townhouses, cooperatives, and full fee ownership residences would be considered as residential planned unit developments. To qualify as a residential planned unit development, a development must contain at least five (5) dwelling units or sites. .. A PUD allows for the option to cluster units and develop a site with a mixture of land use types. A PUD requires more open space (20%) for private or public open air recreational use than the (10%) requirement for park dedication in a standard subdivision. In a PUD, standards for streets, utilities, setbacks, number of units permitted on a lot can be modified. A standard subdivision does not allow for any modification of the street, utility and setback standards identified in the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances unless a specific variance is granted with the preliminary plat. Zoning Ordinance Section 2.4 explains: "Except for Planned Unit Developments, all buildings and uses in each district shall be subject to the requirements listed under Section 3 through 9. Planned Unit Development standards may be applied to any Residential Districts at the request of the land owner and at the discretion of the City Council. Where Planned Unit Development standards differ from the original district standards, the Planned Unit Development standards shall apply. .. The PUD process is available to anyone that desires to develop a property consisting of 10 acres of land or more. The PUD is not a vehicle for the City to take more from a development than the Zoning Ordinance defines. Rather a PUD is a vehicle to allow flexibility in project design and the preparation of a unified, PHEASPC.DOC DO 2 planned, site development. The City can encourage modifications to the location and amount of common space; the location design, setting of dwelling units, location adjacent to existing collector or arterial streets and physical characteristics of the site via granting additional density bonuses outlined in Section 6.12, 7. PUD's are often applied for in cases where there are unique natural features on site. However, existing site natural features are not required in order to file a PUD application. The PUD is a tool which allows the developer the density permitted by the Zoning Ordinance by being able to cluster units in a manner which preserves natural amenities. For example, the standard subdivision process only permits the City to take 10% of the land for public recreation and/or open space. If the City desires more land than the 10% dedication, it must be purchased from the developer. In a PUD, the natural features can be preserved by the use of cluster design which permits the unit density to be located outside of the natural features, via modifications to setback, street and utility requirements. More open space is preserved because of the cluster design and modifications, not through decreasing the unit density below what is permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. SCHEMA TIC PUD AND REZONING ANALYSIS: The applicant has filed a PUD which is consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, Year 2000 Comprehensive Plan which is effective until the Metropolitan Council approves the 2010 Comprehensive Plan. There are several policies from the Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan which lend guidance to the review of the PUD application. See Exhibit A for a list of the specific policy language. The proposal is to develop a cluster project consisting of 50 townhome units with a variety of unit designs ranging from 2 to 4 units attached, with walkout, full basement and 1/2 basement options. Staff is of the opinion the proposed units will be compatible to existing structures in the neighborhood. The adjacent properties are developed with a mixture of housing unit types, architecture, values, age and exterior materials. A similar land use pattern using town homes as a transition to single family homes, exists to the northeast of the subject site. West Edge Estates PUD 8-93, has successfully integrated higher density, multiple family development with existing single family development homes located in Willows Sixth and Westbury Ponds Additions. In addition, the proposed PUD will provide a transition area as well as future customer base for the neighborhood commercial property located east of the subject site. The following elements of the proposed PUD indicate consistency with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance: . No density bonuses are requested for the PUD. . The townhome development concept will provide a transition between the Sunset Hills neighborhood and the future neighborhood commercial land use planned for the property located east of the site. . The proposed units will be compatible to the existing structures in the neighborhood. The proposed exterior materials consist of vinyl siding with brick accents, aluminum soffits, and asphalt shingles with a variety of roof pitches are similar to existing development in the neighborhood. . The four types of units proposed are rambler walk-outs; rambler units with full basements, split entry walk-outs and split entry look-out units. . Each unit is proposed to have a double attached garage. . All units are proposed to be owner occupied. . The units will be served by public sewer and water. . All streets are proposed to be public and conform to City specifications for public streets. . The PUD will include two sidewalks and a park trail which will link CSAH 12 (170th Street) to Woodview Park and the future neighborhood commercial district planned east ofthe subject site. PHEASPC.DOC DO 3 The following table indicates the standard PUD requirements of the Zoning Ordinance related to the Pheasant Meadow PUD proposal: Table 1 STANDARD REQUIREMENT ~~_~~~,,:,'..'~!!!1 natural features. with the exception of Trees which will be preserved via Tree ""~"'j .... ....... ....... ....Provlde..2.S'...Setback..ftom. Perimeter of PUD n::::::::.::i!:!!!~~I\.~I;,g.ll~~::::::::: Proposed Density (}::~r9P'#'~#!:WgMs::;::::( Proposed Open Space PROPOSED PUD :::::::::,':'::1:\'::':::\11'1'1.111::':'::,'::::'.1::.:':..'11 .... :::::~~~~~~;~~;~~~{~~~~~[~~~:[:~~~~~1jl~[t[:~:[:~[ ....... ......... In summary, the proposed PUD is consistent with the purpose and intent of the PUD section of the Zoning Ordinance. The intent of the PUD ordinance is set forth in paragraph I of Section 6.12 of the Zoning Ordinance. It states; The provisions of this section are intended to nrovide residential areas which can be develQped with some modifications Qf the strict anvlication Qf regJilations of the R-I, R-2, R-3 and R-4 Residential Districts.... . " (Emphasis added) Section 6.12 then goes on to state that; PUDs can be develoned within anv Residential District with the ~ population densi(y of number of living units permitted to be constructed in general cO'1formance with the .Zoning District in which it is located. PHEASPCDOC DO 4 Section 6.12 then sets forth the policy that "rather than strictly enforcing the concept of uniformity of housing types in each district, this provision will encoura~e: (Emphasis added) I. Flexibility in residential land development to benefit from new technology in building design and construction and land development. 2. Variety in the organization of site elements. building densities and housing types. 3. Higher standards of site and building design through the use of trained and experienced Land Planners, Registered Architects and/or Landscape Architects to prepare plans for all Planned Unit Developments. 4. Preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics and open space. 5. More efficient and effective use of land., open space and public facilities. In other words, the PUD ordinance permits the City to establish PUDs in ~ residential district. It does not mandate where or under what conditions PUDs can be established, except that a PUD must, of course, comply with the requirements of Section 6.12(A) of the PUD ordinance. It must also have been established in compliance with the procedure spelled out in Section 6.12(8). Section 6.12(1-5) are not characteristics of a PUD which are mandated, but rather are development design features which the City may encourage singly one or in combination with the others. The way in which the City encourages developers to provide the design features or elements set forth in 1 - 5 is by allowing more or less flexibility from the provisions of the zoning district in which the PUD is located. The proposal for Pheasant Meadows does provide "variety in the organization of site elements, building densities and housing types. Specifically, the proposal provides for "clustering" of the housing units. It also provides variety in housing types ranging from 2 to 4 unit buildings with a variety of floor plans. While it is a townhouse proposal overall, not all of the building contain the same number of units. In addition, some of the units are multi-level, providing further diversity in the types of housing units to be provided by the development. The clustering of units also allows for more efficient use of the land available on this site. REZONING ANALYSIS: The purpose of the Schematic PUD is to provide map(s) and documents which identify the location and parameters of a proposed development. The Schematic PUD is by design, a concept proposal indicating the general land uses and access for a development. In order to implement a PUD, an ordinance must be adopted to identify the location of the PUD zone. Proposed Ordinance 96-06 is attached for this purpose. PRELIMIJ:"lARY PLAT ANALYSIS: The subject site is owned by Williams Development LLC, represented by Mr. Terry Schneider. The subject site is proposed to be developed with 50 townhome units, public streets and one cul-de-sac. The developer proposes to install a five foot sidewalk along the west side of Pheasant Meadow Lane and along the south side of Spruce Road. The preliminary plat indicates the proposal is to access the project via Pheasant Meadow Lane. An alternative is provided indicating a neighborhood street connection from Pheasant Meadow Lane to Balsam Street. The alternative would result in the elimination of two units and is not proposed by the developer but rather, has been shown on the preliminary plat at the request of City staff. The developer proposes to construct one large storm water pond on the southeast part of the site. The small pond indicated on the southwest part of the site has been included in order to provide a visual amenity for the development as well as to provide a natural transition area between the proposed development and the single family homes located in Sunset Hills Addition. The application narrative specifies: "The project has been designed to take advantage of the natural topography and the wooded park area to the southwest of the site, and serve as a transition from the single family neighborhood to the west and the heavy traffic impacts of 8TH 13 and the commercial area farther to the east. The design of the units are PHEASPC.OOC DO 5 generally Rambler walk-out units or Split entry units with three four unit structures close to 1 70th street and the balance in two unit structures. Each townhome would be offered for sale as an individual owned unit. A townhome association will be formed which would own and maintain all of the common area of the site as well as the exterior of the units. It is anticipated the rambler units would market to empty nesters with only two people per unit, and the split entry units marketed to younger couples, with an estimated person per unit count of between 2.5 and 3.. The total estimated population for the project is 118 persons (50 families, 90 to 100 adults and 18 to 28 children). The project has approximately 49% of the site as open space that is available for open air recreation and would be protectedfrom development as part of the townhome association documents. The dwelling units have been sited to allow them to take advantage of the natural topography of the site and provide a significant number of units to be orientated toward the wooded park land to the west of the site. The common open area would provide ease of access to the park area. The physical characteristics of the site (lack of tree cover) and surrounding road impacts are greatly enhanced by the layout and grouping to the townhomes that follow the natural topography, orient themselves away form STH 13 and toward the east and west. " PLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW: The preliminary plat indicates the development will be served by Pheasant Meadow Lane with the easterly extension of Spruce Road to the vacant neighborhood commercial property. The name of Spruce Road should be changed to a street name which is not currently used within the City of Prior Lake. The developer does not desire to construct the westerly street connection to Balsam Street. Staff recommends the street connection be installed in order to provide neighborhood connection and the ability of residents of Sunset Hills Addition to access the future neighborhood commercial district without having to drive on CSAH 12. The connection will not create excessive traffic because only the residents of Sunset Hills Addition and Pheasant Meadow would likely utilize the access. The street connection is consistent with policies of the Year 2000 and Year 2010 Comprehensive Plans as well as a requirement of the Subdivision Ordinance. Staff recommends the developer consider rotating the 4 unit building, (proposed Lots 47 - 50) to front on the Balsam Street extension. Rotating the unit would result in an increased setback of the units to CSAH 12. The City Engineer is concerned about the close proximity of the unit to CSAH 12 due to the likelihood of a future upgrade to the street. The unit currently meets the required setback standard however, when CSAH 12 is improved, a sidewalk or trail will be located on the south side of the road which according to the proposed plat, would be located approximately 35' feet from the unit. The applicant did not request any modification of setback requirements for the PUD. However, the preliminary plat indicates the following units have decks which will encroach into the proposed setbacks: Unit 23-24; Unit 22, Unit 1, Units 29-30, and Unit 50. The preliminary plat should be amended for the aforementioned units to show decks and/or other structures conforming to the setback standards or amend the PUD application to request a modification of setbacks for the aforementioned units. One possibility would be for the developer to request a front yard setback modification from 25' to 20' feet which would allow for construction of the units as proposed yet meet setback standards along the edges of the plat. I. The name "Spruce" Road shall be changed to a street name which is not currently used in the City of Prior Lake. 2. Balsam Street should be connected to Meadow Lane as indicated by the alternative shown on the preliminary plat. 3. Units 47 through 50 should be rotated to front on Balsam Street, in order to provide additional separation from CSAH 12. PHEASPC.DOC DO 6 4. The preliminary plat should be amended or the developer request a setback modification for the PUD so there is no structure, (deck), encroachment into the setback areas adjacent to the boundaries of the plat. 5. The application refers to the future intended use of covenants and/or homeowner association agreements for maintenance of the exterior of structures as wen as common grounds. The developer should submit a draft of the covenants and/or agreements as a condition of preliminary plat, as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. Landscl\Pe Plan Review: Based on the review of the Landscape Plan for the Pheasant Meadow PUD (revised 12/21/95) the requirements of the landscape ordinance, Section 6.10, are met in the following regards; The ordinance requires either 1 tree per unit for multi-family projects or 1 tree per 40' of perimeter, whichever is greater. The number of trees required by perimeter calculation is greater in this case (approximately 2,611 feet of perimeter divided by 40' equals 65 trees vs. 50 trees by unit calculation). . The plan provides 80 trees, which exceeds the required number by 15 trees. Section 6.1 O(E)4(b) requires that at least 20% of the required trees be larger than the required minimum. . The plan provides 20 trees, or 25%, which are larger than the minimum. This exceeds the requirement by 5%. 1. The landscape plan should be amended to show the required irrigation system as per the Zoning Ordinance. 2. In the opinion of staff, the landscape plan should be amended to add additional shrubs and ornamental trees around the entry monument. . NOTE: A letter of credit equaling 125% of the estimated cost of landscaping and irrigation system wi\l be required at the time of buildini permit issuance. This letter of credit wi\l be held until one year after installation of the last material. Subdivision Identification Sil:ns: The Prior Lake Sign Ordinance specifies that two signs, not to exceed 50 square feet of sign area are permitted on private property at each principal entrance to a development. The preliminary plat indicates an entrance monument wi\l be located southwest of the intersection of Pheasant Meadow Lane and CSAH 12. The Sign Ordinance requires the developer to include a covenant, establishing responsibility for maintenance of the sign(s) over the entire project. The covenant must be approved by the City Attorney and recorded on the property title(s). In addition, appropriate easements shan be provided for the approved signs on the property where the signs are to be located. 1. The developer should provide the required covenants and easements for proposed entry monuments as required by Sign Ordinance 94-6. Tree Preservation: The site is devoid of tree cover with the exception of the eastern and western boundaries. A tree location survey was submitted with the preliminary plat. The tree species located on site are: Boxelder, Maple, Elm, Oak, Ironwood, and Poplar ranging from 6" to 112" in caliper. The majority of mature trees are Elm and Boxelder which are not regulated species for purposes of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. According to the survey, 26 of the 100 trees located on site are species regulated by the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The developer is responsible to submit a tree preservation plan indicating the number, location and caliper inches of regulated trees proposed to be removed and those trees to be retained. It appears from the PHEASPC.DOC DG 7 grading plan that approximately 8 regulated trees, (30%) would be affected by grading for Units 27, 28, 29 and 30. Three regulated trees, (11.5%) would be removed from grading proposed for the large storm water pond on the southeast part of the site. Although the total tree removal is less than 50%, (41.5% proposed), the tree loss associated with grading for the units will likely require tree replacement. A tree preservation plan is required in addition to the tree location survey submitted by the developer. At that point, staff will be able to determine the replacement program for the development in accordance with the Tree Preservation regulations set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. 1. The developer should be required to submit a tree preservation plan as required by the Zoning Ordinance. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS: Easements/Ri~ht-Of- Way: The preliminary plat shows the dedication of 55 feet of right-of-way for Pheasant Meadow Lane and Spruce Road which should be adequate to meet City standards for a 32' wide street with a 5' wide concrete walk on one side. The required right-of-way for Balsam Street is 50' for a 32' wide street without a sidewalk. 1. The developer will be required to dedicate 50' of right-of-way for 170th Street on CSAH 12, at the time of fmal plat, to accommodate the future upgrading of this street to a two (2) lane urban design with bituminous trails. 2. The developer will be required to dedicate drainage and utility easements over the southeast stormwater pond and all sewer and water lines constructed outside of the dedicated right-of-way. 3. The developer shall be responsible to acquire additional temporary and permanent drainage and utility easements on Lots 3 and 4 of Block 5 of Sunset Hills Addition to allow for the construction of the 8" sanitary sewer line proposed to be constructed along the common lot line in between these lots. The developer will be responsible for all costs associated with obtaining these easements. Gradin~/Erosion Control: Almost the entire parcel will be disturbed by the grading required to prepare the site. The north half of the site will be cut 2' to 4' to allow the site to drain to the south. The south half of the site will be filled 2' to 7' in the street and building pad areas and cut 4' to 6' in the ponding areas. The grading plan proposes to construct 4' to 6' high berms along the north edge of the Highway 13 right-of-way line and along the south edge of the 170th Street right-of-way line. The berms will help to screen the townhouse units from the street. The development will be required to comply with City erosion control standards. Special care shall be taken to prevent erosion from occurring onto the City's park property. Sanitary Sewer: An 8" sanitary sewer line has been stubbed to this site at the Balsam Street location The invert elevation of the sewer stub is 861.7 and the developer feels that this elevation is too high to adequately serve this development. Therefore, the developer proposes to construct an 8" sanitary sewer line in between the houses on Lots 3 and 4 of Block 5 of Sunset Hills Addition. The 8" sewer line extension will require 200' of off-site improvements, removal and replacement of 2 driveways, removal and replacement of 50' of street in the Spruce Trail cul-de-sac, and restoration of the yards disturbed by the sewer extension. The existing sanitary sewer line that the developer proposes to connect to is at invert elevation 956.0, or 5.7' lower than the Balsam Street sewer stub. 1. The developer should re-examine if the sanitary sewer line on Balsam Street would be deep enough to serve this site. If the Balsam Street sewer line will not work, then the developer will need to construct the sewer line in between the houses on Lots 3 and 4 of Sunset Hills as shown on the preliminary utility plans. PHEASPC.DOC DG 8 2. The sanitary sewer layout shall include an 8" sanitary sewer stub in Spruce Road to serve the future development to the east. 3. If the sanitary sewer line is extended in between Lots 3 and 4 of Block 5 of Sunset Hills Addition, the developer will be responsible for all costs associated with the sewer extension including obtaining easements and restoring private and public property. Storm Sewer/Wetlands/Water Ouality: Storm water runoff that will be discharged from the site will drain in a southwesterly direction through a series of ponds, ditches and pipes located in Woodview Park, then across Sunset Trail (County Road 81) and into Spring Lake. To minimize the impacts from this development to Spring Lake, the developer proposes to construct a water quality treatment and rate control pond in the southeast comer of the site. This pond will be able to be enlarged to the east to also serve the undeveloped property to the east. (There are no existing wetlands located on the site). The developer proposes to excavate the east end of the existing pond in Woodview Park to create a small settling basin to treat the stormwater runoff from the development plus the east half of the Sunset Hills Addition. The developer proposes to construct a small pond in the west central area of the site. The pond's function will be primarily aesthetic because it is too small for effective water quality treatment or rate control. Therefore, the City recommends that this small pond be deleted. Instead the area could be used as an open space with additional landscaping or an active play area for residents of the development. 1. The small pond located in the west central portion of the site should be deleted. Streets/Access/Circulation: The preliminary plat indicates streets, sewer and water will be installed by the developer per City specifications. All streets and utilities are proposed to be public. All streets are proposed to be built to City standards with a 32 foot back-to-back bituminous surface, mountable concrete curb and gutter. The street connection to 170th Street or CSAH 12 shall be constructed to match the location of the Walnut A venue intersection. The proposed street connection to CSAH 12 has adequate sight distance. The street layout plan also shows the construction of a stub street to the east called Spruce Road. This street will be a future connection to the undeveloped property to the east. The City staff has asked the developer to also provide a connection to the west to the stub street called Balsam Street, which was constructed in 1987 with the Sunset Hills Addition. The developer is reluctant to provide the street connection to Balsam Street because of the loss of two units. Also, the developer conducted a neighborhood meeting and the residents in attendance apparently expressed a desire not to have Balsam Street extended. City staff and the Scott County Highway Department feel that the street extensions of Balsam Street and Spruce Road would minimize the number of accesses and crossings onto CSAH 12. The extension of Balsam Street would eliminate a dead end street that does not have a turnaround. The City's snow plowing crews currently have to back up on Balsam Street to plow the street. 1. Balsam Street shall be extended from the existing street stub near the west property line of the site to Pheasant Meadow Lane. 2. Spruce Road should be moved to the south approximately 100' feet in order to provide enough depth to lots in the future neighborhood commercial district to the east. The road relocation can be accomplished without loss of units within the development. Some modification to the large storm water pond south of proposed Spruce Trail may be required as a result of the road relocation. PHEASPC.OOC DO 9 Watermain: Water main service is available to serve this site from an existing 16" line located on the north edge of l70th Street and from an existing 6" line in Balsam Street. The preliminary utility layout plan shows a connection to the 16" watermain in l70th Street. The developer will be responsible for all costs associated with the connection to the 16" watermain including the costs to remove and replace l70th Street, traffic control, detours, wet taps, etc. The watermain construction within CSAH 12 will require a County permit. If Balsam Street is required to be extended, then the 6" watermain should be looped to the west to provide for this connection. If Balsam Street is not required to be extended, then the City would prefer not to have the 6" line extended in between the townhouse units. As shown on the preliminary plans, the developer will be required to extend an 8" watermain in Spruce Road to serve the future development to the east. An 8" watermain should also be extended to the south plat line to serve possible future development to the south of Highway 13. 1. An 8" watermain shall be extended to the south plat line to serve possible future development to the south of Highway 13. 2. As shown on the preliminary utility plans, the sanitary sewer layout shall include an 8" sanitary sewer stub and an 8" watermain stub in Spruce Road to serve the future development to the east. FINANCE REVIEW: The subject site, (PID # 25-910-005-0), was served with water and sewer utilities in 1973 under Project 72- 7 and was assessed 820' of frontage and 22.2 acres for trunk acreage charges. Of these charges only 150' and 2.82 acres were assessed currently. The remainder of the 22 acres was deferred and there is no city record of payment on either this parcel or the adjacent 10 acre parcel, (PID # 25-910-005-1), that was previously sold to Howard Monnens. There are no other outstanding special assessments currently certified against the subject site. The tax status of the property is current with no outstanding delinquencies. The application of City charges for Trunk Sewer & Water Fee, Lateral Sewer & Water Fee, Stormwater Management Fee and Collector Street Fee represent an approximate cost of $2,400.00 per lot for the 50 proposed units within Pheasant Meadow PUD. Assuming the initial net lot area of the plat does not change, the above referenced fees would be determined and collected within the context of a developer's agreement for the construction of utility improvements at the time of fmal plat approval. PARK AND RECREATION REVIEW: The subject site is located in the Spring Lake/Willows Planning District identified in the Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan. There are a number of parks located in close proximity of the subject site including: Woodview Park, Sunset Hills Park, and Willows Park. The Year 2010 Comprehensive Plan indicates there should be a trail connection through the subject site linking the future regional trails along CSAH 12 and STH 13 to Woodview Park. In addition, there should be a pedestrian link from the development site to the neighborhood commercial property to the east. The preliminary plat indicates a combination trail/utility easement connecting Pheasant Meadow Lane with Woodview Park. The trail/utility easement serves several purposes providing a bituminous trail, paved access for City maintenance vehicles as well as an easement for sanitary sewer. The proposed trail/easement is planned to run along the edge of a small wetland and the rear of Lots 3 and 4, Block 5, Sunset Hills Addition. Although the proposed traiVeasement serves multiple purposes for the developer, the trail location is not recommended by staff. The sidewalk located on the west side of Pheasant Meadow Lane should extend to the end of the cul-de-sac and connect with a bituminous trail located between Units 26 and 27 which extends to the west side property line of the plat. The trail is recommended for this location because it provides better access to Woodview Park and the topography is more suitable in this PHEASPC.DOC DO 10 location for connection to the proposed trail system within the park. In addition, a trail in the staff recommended location will not infringe on the rear property lines of existing homes in the Sunset Hills neighborhood. 1. Staff recommends the small pond located on the west part of the site be deleted from the plan. It has been the experience of staff that ponds of the size proposed create more of a nuisance related to mosquito breeding grounds as well as unsightly conditions for the majority of time no water is held in the pond. The proposed pond is too small to hold water on a permanent basis and will likely only be wet during and shortly after rain and/or when frozen ground conditions exist. As an alternative the developer should be encouraged to provide additional landscaping in the area of the proposed pond and/or an active play area for residents of the development. 2. A 5' wide concrete sidewalk should be constructed along the entire length of Pheasant Meadow Lane to the end of the cul-de-sac and be connected to an 8' bituminous trail to be located between Units 26 and 27 to the west edge of the plat. The specific trail location to be determined by staff. 3. A 5' wide concrete sidewalk should be located on the south side of Spruce Road which should be constructed with the installation of other streets in the PUD. 4. A 30' wide trail easement over the 8' bituminous trail shall be given to the City of Prior Lake at the time of final plat. 5. The park dedication for the preliminary plat will be a cash in lieu of land, the amount to be determined at the time of fmal plat. (The cash dedication amount is determined by multiplying 1.25 acres (10% of the gross acreage for the site) by $1,300.00 per acre to determine the total cash dedication for the project. The cash dedication is estimated at $1,625.00. Staff will work with the developer to determine whether it is more cost effective for the trail to be installed by the developer or by the City of Prior Lake. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt Resolution 96-04PC, (recommending the City Council approve the Schematic PUD of Pheasant Meadow), Ordinance 96-06, (recommending the City Council approve the rezoning of the site to PUD), and Resolution 96-05PC, (recommending the City Council approve the preliminary plat of Pheasant Meadow subject to the conditions outlined therein). 2. Continue the public hearing to a date and time certain to allow the developer and/or staff to provide additional information specifically requested by the Planning Commission. 3. Recommend the City Council approve Resolution 96-04PC, Ordinance 96-06, and Resolution 96- 05PC with changes specifically directed by the Planning Commission. 4. Based upon expressed findings of fact, recommend the City Council deny part or all of the applications based upon inconsistency of the proposal with specific regulations of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and/or specific policies of the Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Alternative # 1 or 3. ACTION REQUIRED: A motion to recommend approval of the Resolutions and Ordinance as written or with changes directed by the Planning Commission. A separate motion to close each of the three public hearings, (Schematic PUD, Rezoning, Preliminary Plat), is in order. PHEASPCDOC DG 11 RESOLUTION 9S-04PC RESOLUTION OF THE PRIOR LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE SCHEMATIC PUD FOR PHEASANT MEADOW. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: WHEREAS: the Prior Lake Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on February 26, 1996 to consider an application from Williams Development LLC, for Schematic PUD for Pheasant Meadow; and WHEREAS: notice of the public hearing on said Schematic PUD has been duly published in accordance with the applicable Prior Lake Ordinances; and WHEREAS: the Planning Commission proceeded to hear all persons interested in this issue and persons interested were afforded the opportunity to present their views and objections rdated to the Schematic PUD of Pheasant Meadow; and WHEREAS: the Planning Commission finds the Schematic PUD are consistent with the Year 2000 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS: the Planning Commission finds the Schematic PUD of Pheasant Meadow in harmony with both existing and proposed development in the area surrounding the project; and WHEREAS: the Planning Commission finds the proposed Schematic PUD of Pheasant Meadow is compatible with the stated purposes and intent of the PUD section of the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS: the Planning Commission finds the proposed Schematic PUD of Pheasant Meadow adequately provides for internal organization, uses, appropriate densities, circulation, parking facilities, public facilities, recreation areas and open space. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY mE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA, that it recommends the City Council approve the Schematic PUD for Pheasant Meadow subject to the following: 1. Subject to installation of Balsam Street from Pheasant Meadow Lane to the eastern 16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER terminus of Balsam Street located within the plat of Sunset Hills Addition. 2. Approve the Schematic PUD Plan Map for Pheasant Meadow 12-21-95. 3. Approve the cluster, townhome development consisting of 48 townhome units. 4. Rezone the 12.5 acre subject site from R-l, Suburban Residential to PUD 3-96. 5. No minimum setback standard from the units to the platted lot line of all proposed lots. 6. The following zoning standards shall apply to the PUD of Pheasant Meadow: STANDARD REQUIREMENT PROPOSED PUD Maximum Density 4.5 Proposed Density 4.15 ::::BM!#m::~::Yi~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::t::::::::::::::::::@!@,,:::t::::::::::::::::t::::::I:::::::::::::::{:::::::t:::::::::::::::::::::::B9~i::~::III::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I:::"~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;::: Required Open Space 20% Proposed Open Space 51.8% (public or Private) (2.5 acres) (6.24 acres) ~1A." Setback :::JWqii,@f$:::sum::::::\:{::;gii.P\\:~~~::::::::::::\::::::::r:::::::::r::::::q::::::t:::::::::i:llil:llillllll.::::~i,g!':!:!!:!!!~~~::!:!.!!!::!~:I:i:::::I::::::::i.l!111111:1.1..11..1::::::i.:::::...:....::.:....:1 :::$,~!liW~:!: ... ..::.. ::::::\):::}:{{::?/. ::::::::i:;:;:::::::..:. ...... ..... .::::;::::::;:;:::;:;::::::::::::::::::: Passed and adopted this 26th day of February, 1996. YES NO KUYKENDALL CRIEGO LOFTUS WUELLNER VONHOFF KUYKENDALL CRIEGO LOFTUS WUELLNER VONHOFF Dick Kuykendall, Chair Planning Commission Donald Rye, Director of Planning City of Prior Lake CITY OF PRIOR LAKE ORDINANCE NO. 96-06 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 5-2-1 OF PRIOR LAKE CITY CODE AND AMENDING SECTION 2.1 OF PRIOR LAKE ZONING ORDINANCE 83-6. The City Council of the City of Prior Lake does hereby ordain: The Prior Lake Zoning map, referred to in Prior Lake City Code Section 5-2-1 and Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance No. 83-6 Section 2.1, is hereby amended to change the zoning classification of the following legally described property from R-l, Suburban Residential to PUD 3-96. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 114, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota lying northwesterly of State Trunk Highway No. 13, and west, south and westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest comer of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence East (assumed bearing) along the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 375.80 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence on a bearing of South a distance of 200.00 feet; thence East a distance of 13.10 feet; thence South 4 degrees 52 minutes 42 seconds East to the centerline of said State Trunk Highway No. 13, and there terminating. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. Passed by the City Council of the City of Prior Lake this _ day of ,1996. ATTEST: City Manager Mayor Published in the Prior Lake American on the _ day of ,1996. Drafted By: Prior Lake Planning Department 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue Prior Lake, MN 55372 PHEASPC.DOC DG RESOLUTION 96-05PC RESOLUTION OF THE PRIOR LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "PHEASANT MEADOW" SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OUTLINED HEREIN. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: WHEREAS: the Prior Lake Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on February 26, 1996 to consider an application from Williams Development LLC, for the preliminary plat of Pheasant Meadow; and WHEREAS: notice of the public hearing on said preliminary plat has been duly published and posted in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes and Prior Lake Ordinances; and WHEREAS: the Planning Commission proceeded to hear all persons interested in this issues and persons interested were afforded the opportunity to present their views and objections related to the preliminary plat of Pheasant Meadow; and WHEREAS: the Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary plat according to the applicable provisions of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and found said preliminary plat to be consistent with the provisions of said ordinances; and WHEREAS: the Planning Commission finds the preliminary plat of Pheasant Meadow to be consistent with the Year 2000 Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA, that it hereby recommends the City Council approve the preliminary plat of Pheasant Meadow subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the Schematic and Preliminary PUD for Pheasant Meadow to allow a cluster, townhome development. 2. Approval of Ordinance 96-06 establishing a PUD zone for Pheasant Meadow. 3. The preliminary plat should be amended QI the developer request a setback modification for the PUD so there is no structure, (deck), encroachment into the setback areas adjacent to the boundaries of the plat. 4. The landscape plan should be amended to show the required irrigation system as per the Zoning Ordinance. RS960SPC.DOC 16200 ~le Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 5. The landscape plan should be amended to add additional shrubs and ornamental trees around the entry monument. 6. A Tree Preservation Plan be submitted to the City in accordance with Section 6.16 of the Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance. 7. The developer should submit a draft of the covenants and/or agreements as a condition of preliminary plat, as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. 8. The developer should provide the required covenants and easements for proposed entry monuments as required by Sign Ordinance 94-6. 9. Per Ordinance 94-01, a minimum of 30' setback from the 100 Year Flood Elevation to all building pads and house locations is required. 10. A 5' wide concrete sidewalk should be constructed along the entire length of Pheasant Meadow Lane to the end of the cul-de-sac and be connected to an 8' bituminous trail to be located between Units 26 and 27 to the east edge of the plat. The specific trail location to be determined by staff. 11. A 5' wide concrete sidewalk should be located on the south side of Spruce Road which should be constructed with the installation of other streets in the PUD. 12. A 30' wide trail easement over the 8' bituminous trail shall be given to the City of Prior Lake at the time of final plat. 13. The park requirement for the subdivision will be a cash dedication in lieu of land, the amount to be determined at the time of final plat. 14. The developer should re-examine if the sanitary sewer line on Balsam Street would be deep enough to serve this site. If the Balsam Street sewer line will not work, then the developer will need to construct the sewer line in between the houses on Lots 3 and 4 of Sunset Hills as shown on the preliminary utility plans. 15. The name "Spruce" Road shall be changed to a street name which is not currently used in the City of Prior Lake. 16. Balsam Street should be connected to Meadow Lane as indicated by the alternative shown on the preliminary plat. 17. Units 47 through 50 should be rotated to front on Balsam Street, in order to provide additional separation from CSAH 12. 18. Spruce Road should be moved to the south approximately 100' feet in order to provide enough depth to lots in the future neighborhood commercial district to the east. The road relocation can be accomplished without loss of units within the development. Some modification to the large storm water pond south of proposed Spruce Trail may be required as a result of the road relocation. 19. Dedication of 50' of right-of-way for 170th Street on CSAH 12, shall be required at the time of final plat, to accommodate the future upgrading of this street to a two (2) lane urban design with bituminous trails. RS960SPC.DOC DG 20. Dedication of drainage and utility easements shall be required at the time of final plat, over the southeast storm water pond and all sewer and water lines constructed outside of the dedicated right- of-way. 21. The developer shall be responsible to acquire additional temporary and permanent drainage and utility easements on Lots 3 and 4 of Block 5 of Sunset Hills Addition, prior to the construction of the 8" sanitary sewer line proposed to be constructed along the common lot line in between these lots. The developer will be responsible for all costs associated with obtaining these easements. 22. As shown on the preliminary utility plans, the sanitary sewer layout shall include an 8" sanitary sewer stub and an 8" watermain stub in Spruce Road to serve the future development to the east. 23. An 8" watermain shall be extended to the south plat line to serve possible future development to the south of Highway 13. 24. The small pond located in the west central portion of the site shall be deleted. 25. Five complete full-size and one 11" x 17" set of the preliminary plat indicating all required changes identified herein, shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to submission of a final plat for the development. Said full-size plan sheets shall be at the same scale as the final plat. 26. The preliminary plat is valid for 12 months from the date of approval by the City Council. Failure to submit the final plat of the within the required time frame shall cause the preliminary plat to become null and void. YES NO KUYKENDALL CRIEGO LOFTUS VONHOFF WUELLNER KUYKENDALL CRIEGO LOFTUS VONHOFF WUELLNER Dick Kuydendall, Chair Prior Lake Planning Commission Donald Rye, Director of Planning City of Prior Lake RS960SPC.DOC DG ;. ~ 9(0 - 01 PID# ~{O ,(X)'5 -() APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENl' WITHIN '!HE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE Property CMner: Address: 1535 SUbdivider: Address : Williams Development LLC Bavarian Shores Dr. Chaska. MN same as above same as above 443-2244 Phone: 55118 Phone: Nme of SUrveyor: Lot Surveyors, Inc. Nme of Ehgineer: Roger A. Anderson & Assoc. Phone: 560-3093 Phone: 546-701 I:) Legal Description of Property: See attached ~~91 00050 Property Identification amber (pm): Present Zoning: R-l Property Acreage: 12.01:) rl~rp!:: Deed Restrictions: No X Yes If so, please attach. Bas the applicant previously sought to plat, rezone, obtain a variance or conditional use petm.it on the subject site or arrj part of it: No x Yes What was requested: When I have read section 6.11 of the Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance which sets forth stipulations and requi.renents for Planned Unit Developnents. I agree to provide the infomation and do the work in accordance with the provisions of the Ordinance. Dec. ,19..2.i.. --.. DESCRIPTION TRACT A: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 114, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota lying northwesterly of State Trunk Highway No. 13, and west, south and westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest comer of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence East (assumed bearing) along the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 375.80 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence on a bearing of South a distance of 200.00 feet; thence East a distance of 13.10 feet; thence South 4 degrees 52 minutes 42 seconds East to the centerline of said State Trunk Highway No. 13, and there terminating. ~ 0/ ~ J~-q/o: ~-(', CITY OF PRIOR LAKE APPLICATION FOR REZONIro Applicant: Address: Bane Phone: Property OWner: same as above Address: same as above Oonsul~: ProJect Develo ers, Inc. attn: Terr Schneider Address: 6 So. Hwy 169 Phone: 545-0505 St. Louis Park, MN 55426 location of proposed rezoning: So. of 170th st, east of Sunset Hills subdivision Present Zoning: R -1 Proposed Zoning: R -1 (PUD) Property Acreage Existing use to be rezoned: 12.05 acres of Property: Vacant Intended use(s) of property: Residential -For sale Townhomps Williams Development LLC 1535 Bavarian Shores Dr., Chaska, MN ti>rk Pb:>ne: Phone: 55318 443-2244 ~ons for ~est: To allow the 50 unit townhomp projp~r rn np constructed on tne site Deed Restrictions: X N:> Yes If so, please attach. Bas the Applicant previously sought to plat, rezone, obtain a variance or conditional use peIIllit on the subject site or any part of it: X N:> Yes What was requested: When: SJEMISSION REDUIREMENl'S: (A) Canplete application fonn. (B) Canplete legal description & Property Identification Nl.1aCer (pm). (C) Filing fee. (D)Deed restrictions, if necessaIY. (E)Fifteen copies of a site plan and Certified SUrvey, drawn to scale showing existing and proposed structures, lot boundaries, foliage and tOIX'9rap~ on site and within three hundred (300) feet of the property. (F) Soil tests, if pertinent. (G)Certified fran abstract finn the names and addresses of property. owners within 300 feet of the exterior of the property lines of the subject . property. ONLY CDMPLEl'E APPLICATIONS WILL BE m.vIEWED BY THE Pf..ANNIN; (lEttISSION. . To the best of lIrl knowledge the infonnation presented on this fom is correct. In addition, I have read Section 7.9 of the Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance which specifies requirements for rezoning pr -.- es. I agree to provide infonnation and follow the ures as outlin~ e Ord" ee. tv/,' 12/8/95 Date 12/8/95 Date mIS ~ION 'ID BE FILLED IN BY THE Pf..ANNIN; DIRECl'OR Pf..ANNIN; CDMMISSION CITY comx::IL APPlO1ED APPlO1ED DENIED DENIED mTEOFfIE'ARIm MTE OF BE'ARIm CDNDITIONS: Signature of the Plaming Director Date -r---' I-NAME Williams Develoanent, LLC II 'AY""'" City of Prior Lake ~I' ORDER OF _ !. one thousand twenty-two and 00/00 ------------------ DOLLARS mEa."=' ! C~ ~E..r:lE]X ~~~ ~ (612) 474-J200 900 West 78th Street " Chanhassen. Minnesota 55J 17 DATE 12/11/95 75-563/910 $ 1022.00 MEMO p:; 2:15 II_ Y4.' lIP 1:01:1 .005 b ~ 21: ~l.00 ..,.,..- ~...- --~,1.,...oC...-:-..'n~,~~~:4",.~"jII~~..~;,r"I~~)~..~!.}~~:J4~::~,~_:;.:'~~~~Ji..~~~t:~~~~~.:.,...:I.;;...~,,!-~'~~~-.,~~;_~"'.~:..1J'~~;.....~=;.i~~~-:<..1'"~""'""~~~"'-F~...".':" RECEIPT Ila 26297 / g.. - / /. CJ.)- DATE CITY 0 F PRIOR LAKE 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E.. PRIOR LAKE. MN 55372 .~ ',""-- / ,/ /..,' .....1/ '" Rece i ved of" 11~1/),'.tA .)r '..-i~ !, L (0";:'/1-, / Y"/ C({(t'l.-1?14.,.- whose address and/or legal description is/ ,) , I It' ' .l.,;.-(./~I . th f' --(, I J t \ It! /,/./,/ '-,;'~-,;,.~.tj,/,.. ,;- ~,:-:-r', !z."1 .- '~,I '-i',I('.1 e sum o~'~.:':, I ,:'Ii v':. ;, .,. for the purpose of .' 1~:::Y:"!iZ,l---dollars , J " i 1 '/>-:r / /~ ,Ill ()l( !r;;:t.:/;..,/( (. .YO!' 1/ f/{y' ?"r ;.~l t,! .... i(~ <;., .... I';" V ',G.: ., . f '~I::"<':'/' i;/. ':..- '_<. i.,(: J .I /. ,,- $ I v t l . ; c. ,:.,' Reference ~nvb'ice No. , i / I" i: i ;' / ( 1'1 I (' j., (' {Iil' t >..._.:.'_: to' _ ~,l i v,.,,', /.,';.."'..,.,t' /.. --- Receipt Clerk for the City of Prior Lake PROJECf NARRATIVE PHEASANT MEADOW pun 12/8/95 We are proposing a rezoning to R-1 PUD to allow for construction of 50 townhome units on 12.05 acres of property located south of 170th St. and east of Sunset Hills Addition. The property is currently vacant, and has been tilled in the past. Their are few trees actually located on the property. The resulting density for the development would be 4.15 units per gross acre. The property is currently owned in fee title by Williams Development LLC. The project has been designed to take advantage of the natural topography and the wooded park area to the south west of the site, and serve as a transition from the single family neighborhood to the west and the heavy traffic impacts of Hwy. 13 and the commercial area farther to the east. The design of the units are generally Rambler walk-out units or Split entry units with three four unit structures close to 170th St. and the balance in two unit structures. It is anticipated that the sewer, water and streets would be put in by the developer to city standards and dedicated to the City as public improvements. It is expected that site grading would begin as soon as weather permits in the spring of 1996 with utilities and streets being installed as soon as site grading is completed. As noted on the preliminary utility plans, the sewer service would be between two homes on Spruce Trail. We have met with the two affected homeowners, and have received their concurrence with our using the present utility easement between their homes, subject to our restoring any yard or driveway that is damaged during construction, as well as adding several new trees adjacent to the easement. We would anticipate construction of a model unit during the summer of 1996 with sales of townhomes to begin at that time. It is anticipated that the project would take approximately two years to sell out. Each townhome would be offered for sale as an individual owed unit. Their would be a townhome association formed that would own and maintain all of the common area of the site as well as the exterior of the units. The final make-up of rambler vs. split entry townhomes will depend somewhat on market demands for each type of unit. Based on our preliminary site plan the project would contain 18 Rambler walk-out units, 8 Rambler units with full basements, 10 Split entry walk-out units, and 14 Split entry look-out units. It is anticipated that the rambler units would market more to the empty nester market with only two people per unit, and the split entry units marketing to younger couples, with an estimated person per unit count of between 2.5 and 3. This would result in a total of estimated people in the project of 118. This would therefore result in 50 families, 90 to 100 adults and 18 to 28 children. The project has a building coverage of 1.64 acres or 13.6% of the site. The project has approximately 5.9 acres (49% of the site) of open space that is available for open air recreation and would be protected from development as part of the townhome association documents. In reviewing the criteria for density increases within a PUD we feel we meet most if not all of the criteria. The project has approximately 49% of the site available as open space available to all residents. The dwelling units are sited to allow then to take advantage of the natural topography of the site and provide a significant number of the units to be orientated toward the wooded park land to the west of the site. The common open area would provide ease of access to the park area. The primary access to the site is off of 170th street an major collector street. The physical characteristics of the site (lack of any tree cover) and surrounding road impacts are greatly enhanced by the layout and grouping to the townhomes that follow the natural topography, orient themselves away from Hwy 13 and towardsethe east and west. December 7, 1995 ~~ ~~ Summit ~--.. Envirosolutions ~ ~. Mr. Terry Schneider Interchange Tower, Suite 1970 600 South Highway 169 St Louis Park, Minnesota 55426 Subject: Results of the Wetland Determination at 170th Street SE A Portion of the NEIA of Section 10, Township 114 North, Range 22 West Prior Lake, Minnesota Summit Project No. 954910 Dear Mr. Schneider: Summit Enviroso1utions, Inc. has completed a wetland determination on the site at 170th Street SE and TH 13, Prior Lake, Minnesota. ,Before visi1ingthe site, Summit reviewed the National Wetlands Inventory map and the Scott County Soil Survey. These maps indicate that wetlands are not present on site. On December 6, 1995, Summit conducted an on-site wetland determination of the property. The site was assessed for the presence of wetlands based on the three we~and criteria (hydrology, vegetation and soils) as outlined in the methodology of the 1987 and 1989 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manuals. Based upon our fmdings, Summit has determined that there are no jurisdictional wetlands on the subject property. We appreciated the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have, questions' regarding this letter, please contact our office. Sincerely, Summit Envirosoludons, Ine. . -----. ~cJm.uJ~ David M. Weeonan Environmental Scientist DMWIhs cc: Jeff Williams Roger Anderson 10201 Wayzata Boulevard. Suite #100. Minneapolis, MN 55305. Phone (612) 5~5-8888. Fax (612) 595-0888 Offices Strategically Located Nationwide ~.-------. -, ";'.! ,. " . ..:t..~: t . j. " ~: :":, PHEASANT MEADOW P.U.D. P.U.D. DATA SUMMARY TOTAL AREA: 12.05 AC. R/W AREA: 3.12 AC. (25.9%) ., ;! ,', ~ .~ .: i' , " ~: :. :, ::~, BLDG. COVER AREA: 1.64 AC. (13.6%) LOT COVERAGE AREA: 2.69 (22.3%) COMMON AREA: 6.24 AC. (51.8%) LAND USE: MULTI-FAMILY (TWIN & QUAD HOMES) SETBACKS: 25' FROM EXTERIOR PROPERTY LINES AND R/W TOTAL UNITS: 50. DENSITY: 4.15 UNITS / GROSS ACRE LOT AREAS: SEE DETAIL BELOW PHASING: ALL CONST. TO BE COMPLETED IN ONE PHASE EST. POPULATION BREAKDOWN: EST. NO. OF F AMIL YS: 50 EST. NO. ADULTS: 90-100 EST. NO. TOTAL CHILDREN: 18-28 EST. NO. SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN: 14-22 (INCLUDED IN ABOVE) EST. BEDROOMS MINIMUM 50 BEDROOMS BASED ON MAIN LEVEL DEN & UNFINISHED LOWER LEVEL ADDITIONAL 134 BEDROOMS MAX. IF ALL OPTIONAL SPACE CONVERTED. " ' ',' '.', . . ; ~ u.. ~ i 0 "i. ~ _ q; i !) () ~ z <( -' a.. u 1= <( :::!i w J: U (J) c:i ~ a.. ~ t-: VI .~ C!U< =:J I- a:~~ ~~~ a<~ <w::i wa: ::iVlW I-::i:lo: :i<:5 VI:Ja: ~~Q Zalf 0.:> < a u ; I ~ I ~ ~ i: ~ 11 ~ If h! -< & ~ ft ~ i .. . '/:?f:j::.).'.i~;,'/ ......:-;.j >. ..' ..;:;'..0" .,f-- , /1" , ...-"'- !:., I /1' :', / // , / , , , , L___..l__.J ,- ...- .... (~..<~--:./...-/ ;:~~i~~/~\ .''''~' ~ \ / . ..j \'--f':-:-/ \~ -" I / .~ u I _ -I ,":: - I \;~ ~ I ',;. :;. :: I I ~ I I I ,,~ " .....-.....,.1 ", if ~ h ~ ~ r . I r I 9 ~ i s ; i ili ~ ; ~ i ~ 4 91 i ~ ~ ~ . ~ 'j! ~ ~,= ~~ : I . ~ ~ J ~ I ~ ;;! f;l z ~ ' ~ l!: ~:: I; . , . ,33 ~ ~ i . .. r'l ~ . li " ~ :" . u I"P , : !l1 _,' !; I I 9 ill 3a' ~ 2 . 8 ~ i3hi .K ....... ~ ~ t! ili ~ i e r " "tl !" tt j!! ~ .. I l I III .. >l ~ Iii ~ I i! g !" ! n .. ~ ~ R II !! ~ ~ 2 II t 0 i! . VI 2 222 i ~ , . ~ t i ~ tz ~ ! 0 ... ~ ~ :: = c ! 2 ~ 9 ~ -. ! ,:.', '~ :<:,": ,\,'\ ".\ .:.. "," I. . n ~ ~ - .. i ~ ~ ~~ .. il ~11 OI:! it' .. ft~ ~ .., .. z a~ ~ :; e : ~ 8~ ~ : ~ ; :; 1Cd~ u E = : . ~ iali ! ~ 'l . ll' : ~ ~IH ~ :! ~ oC :.! i ~i:~ < ~ ; ! ; ". en ~ ~ 3 6 i ~ ~ ~ ~ . u 0 I'! eS~s ~bI Vulley SurveyinC) Cu., P A :.,'IIIL I~U L. r;;."l/l'lIU Illt,lt ("'/ILl ";Of~L>v"'lllllIM 166.,0 ffMNI<UN TRAil. 5 E. PRlon lAKE. MINNfSOTh 5~31Z TfLEf"IK)N( (GI2) 447.2510 \'-~': ~:'::~~(~~. "i::i:.;-.. ; . .1 CO:"R~AD NO. 12_: (170 T/i ~mF" T) ,s i~ --..-- "r IR"A \ C"~T r""I 0'" I J 2 ?\ J ~\ · ~\ ' "\ . ,='!-L;..' I. ... ,..c.i ,I' . ~...: "'-.:' ~ '::= .. ~ i I i I , I l , , : ,.' .I.:';::;::" .// ,,- '. . .~. ." ." .... I . ,. 0; . .' ,/ v,.,' / /.',~" .... ./ ,/, /' ,\A . " ,.' ./ '." ,. r .~. ../ / .' / /1.~...' t pO:~ ... .- \.~ At.\~".'''''''''' /.'"c.~.g.~ . . iI"':' t\O' /' ..:~;....-" - o~. ' ./ ..... .(D. ",0'1 -10'\ ./ .....:. .>.,<1' 13.... / .' ,,'~'!f. l' ..... .{IU~ o~o <;\0\& ~~c,~ ~.... ./ '" ut.SCOol",11lll 1<1,&0;1"" .".1 ....., .. ,_ 0;...'''......, ....~~,... ... ,.... :....."...... .-.".' ~I' s"..II.... "" 1o'_"'t nl., "".". ;;00, .;....11 .......... 10.__.'" II"": ....._...'..'11 ,.t" ro...... ""'" ..;._,.....l;...-i ....L. _II. _ ....~'...I,.... 1_ tull....Io... .....1......1 11_. c.._I... ., ,~ ,,,,''''_1 ..~....... _, ,..1' :.....1......' ._.,.1.... .. 1'.. :-,.,'..--, '--"h.' ,.......... I.~' \~._... ,_......, .._ :... -'... 110... ... ..I'~ :.....,........ _..... .... u.~ :__...._1 ............ .. a...I....... :.,' :1:...... ....., I. ,.", ........ .. ..."I....,....r I." ......... ....._.......... ,,_.... ...........-....:... :"."'6 <l10:I...._~' _~~.:~.. (:.61 ~6.:::._::"~. '..~I :~.:-::'.. ::~ ':.' :...:":':~I. ''':":::. '-:-. I::.. ..:": '~.:' ...:. __... .~h.....U..... c:-..,..., I.. ~....'~"I_..ll,...',) . t....'.-......... ......._1....'................. ,,,,10... ....:.;..10..... ,"Mo'''' __I ......, ..r 14" _,~...I .....,.h.. ... I.... .........._1 .......,..e' ...' .....U... '''. '_1.. 1110. iI_" II. :_U .:.......,. ,-.1............ '.._..1..." .... .-..It...... .;..-....1... ... "'" _'fI..'" ." ....... .1 ....u a.....,......, .._.....~ .1' 1_ ....."........, .._1'1..... ,....... ._, ....._s t .;:t.~. ......... ,.... ......Ih 110...... INl" .....,-.., 00;0.-.".' ...- .... loeI"""'", .......-...;. . '1>.''''_ ... ;.$........ I'." ... U... ,..la' .... ... ,........ ... ..... I..... .... '0$ _;,.,.,'h__ a ,_." ......Ut""h.. I....' .1_ ...U .-.... 11_ .. .U......... ..'- 1olo,)..... ....1' .,....... ..... ......-,...: ..I .~,..... .U..,_.....r "'".- .....'1 ,_. ..... . ..,........... _f :....:,. i....U ,......... .:"",,, .. .U~I"'_ ..,- .....IA (_II ,"-- ....., .. .1........... ... \~... _ ..~.... 'ot ~ 1.....1'.,_1,.... _I'... U,... .u'.._ ,..,... or- ,... ....I.. 101' I...;......." , .......... ._~ .. .,..,........ o:r 4IM...... (tv' U. "... ......,.., INItII'........ ~~ . _dIw CfOI"'" -.. ....., .................-........ "lOCt ........IAOft .............. .....,1.11....... i...... s..v.,cw ",--"'lo.-. "tto- SMt." ua-....... ....'. ( .1 ." ,. hI._~~..--NO 0..- .:-'..h...... \....., -.... riLl NO~ IIO)It 2:..:- ~I ',:.'\ \ I --I----T----r~ I -:- F: to .' T .-1 - - - 'f--~ I ~, t:1 I L..;:_J I I I ~ z I I I 0: I I I ~ ~ ,....., I I I :> , I I r---L ___L !_~~_IJ ----- C=l=Jiii J: \ \ L:J \ \ \ I I ______.J I I 3:,:lJC: :':~3-~:J - - ~ - - - ~ I -T~-~~-rO wi \ ~ .0 01 ., "I \ ~ () 0: I ,. ,r.i I 1!5 _J I ;i, I ~ ",I h I t- I 1:- .J \ 0 'J ;? ~ -c _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ' I J, :- \ 0 I ~r, - ~ ~=~_-m.K ~,oi1f - f,LON- ~VOif t~"O" J 'I: ~ -- -- -~- -r ----- I .... ; ---I] I I , : ,nil _J__ :/ _---=--=-..J ' I i i I' , , (' L " ....., -'-- " , \ \ \ ~. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ ' I \ , \", \ /)\ .../ " " . jj:: \\ .( z o ~ is ~ ~ , U " " " ~ '" " ~" // ~ ~ 4 % 05 I!'_ 00 ~ ~~ a"'iil! ""t: cJ" i1Iz ~Q!i oI(!U;~ S!~. ;_=;;ii i;;m ~ ~i:~~ ~S! r5t~~~!1E ~~~ ~;~~~~l ~~O 02' 1)1 iN ~~i ~~~;;d e",_ ile15:5iE~l.\ " " " " " " " " / /' " ' " " " " " " " " " iL t " ~ Z ~ Z I I ' I I. 9\:5 I '~:n I I--~A" I ;'J ,~ (:, t 5 I .=1 I ~ :: : I 0 I z. ~ I~ () I~(); _ 0 ~ It I S ~? I ~ ., ~ l:i ~f':- -, f I il! 0 I J"o ..J .. _L_;:. ---,;;r.;;rnr ,-, c_" ~ . g 2 ~ u '" o o X 2i ~ Q z e ~ N~ 4 ~)i~ ~~ _~I~ Sol ~ I E:"i~ ~S ~ ~IIiO. ;.; t!... ~~~.. I'" ~~~~~ l;U3 rl~",'" ...,..21 ~~a'! o ~ m ~ ~!i .Ji '" l'lili~ ; ~iSl~ ~ >!,J, iiiJ~: ~ -~~g va i ;; ~~ i~ ~ l'le: ,t:s ~ ~~~;, 8 2,,~~L!:!~ ~ ~~:~~ ~ .. ::lia:;;l~ " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " / " " / " ~ .. / " " ~ '" 0: :> '" ~ " " " " I '" s . H ! n '€3-i_' i i\ ii ~ I - ----~ I~-- - I I !: I Lfj w ! : LI ~ ~ I = I I I I ' \. ,-____-1 -----------~ <D I- -<( ..J a.. >- a: -<( z ~ ::J w a: a.. q:3<( ~..Jf- n.1-0 Zt/l ~wW O~Z cILZ <(0- w-'~ ~!!;!..; I-W:X: ZO<( <(t/l-' t/l~a:: <(<(0 ~:JO:: n.~IL cJ ;E VI I Ui III . ~ 1 t ~i i ~ I ~ it ~ 1; .. i i ! i 0: / " ~ !. r I i o i . a 0 ! b ;: ! oj , -i Or o i ; !; to :. ~ : o 9 I r I ----- ~ I I \ - : ,.-." , ,.~,- - ". - - - - - ~ : ~ ! ! il c . 0 , : 0 ) I ~ _ _ ~ ,,') L_ I II I 1 T--~.--'o ---, ~'5 I A A ~ ~ . Ii. qd \ 0 ~)' ~= ,i,.J I d t d t ~ t : t jj f i ill \ u:, c ,'r I I ")' -- I' t- I _nnu-- u__~ : ,; \:: "'J aL'~ _ :::- 11(3~lS HiOLJf-l{oNa-'-'-o-.L<~__'11 -1' ~ _ _ --'-- ~ v ~ A1NnOJ I -- X I .... ~_--2-<. ~~ ': - - I! .' _ .__,.' .__.---,. t<<. : I ~ I ~ ~ i I Si i. i 0 I ,~ .~ t N >--~ A- i I ;,; I (,'){ I ,'; I - z .... ::~ I 0 I o' <( :In H: ~~i ~ ~ i~~~ i ~g ....J ll: L ,: :56 .u 0z ~o ~Vi 0::0 0[5 .:d G:: .( ".- ~.' . -7----!- I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I -....J------;1 ,'~2' .,..~.-:," i I ~- =- t, 1-':- - - T - - - - - I, ,,'~, t- ,,~ -\ I; r--' I 01 ," L L__J I I i!" J I I J . il I I ~,' I c-' I I ,c ,,__~t__hUJ---L_-__- ITJ:ll r-' L~J ....-,...1 ~ H Iii r-- , , I , I ri 1-, . " : L.! - . , . ~-- ! \! I I III ! III i\ 1 II I II n \1 . I 'ld1 I I II II t1JIIIltJ I' \ II .1 II hill I { { { '\ I I '\1 i\nuhll hM ,I' i I 1 !l d1li h I . HI rl .. t at . / '\ !1~111 . 1',1 ill ';1,1 II, ' 11111 I i I / / / / / / / / I I lilli, tll!.!: ldiil , itibi, lli:i;\ lal'" I! If,II'l'l ; ~~ II! ,~l,ilt 'II II / / , I / 'I 'I /lJ' 11,11 'i, I jJli<<I- 1'1 Ijl!! i)' II. ':!I' /1': !II: l!dl!I!Il\:\lII:!j I,i I I tl Iii :111\111, / II ,,, .\'19 'I 'II' ,.( ill 'I, 1'1,' III / / / I' 'I' I. 'I..! illl i\:l'~ I:l Ih II '.:1 I I 1\IlIll:I' I / / / 111 1f:11 !!l\\lli!\ 111\ Uli!! 1!! mil \1 \111 !\ 11:li l!WI Ii ~ I ~ .! ,.....~~ !lIi ~nin ~; !~!I 1\ Hi II \; I!lllim\!!!l ~. . ., .. . , /-,//-"-" / / / . // ~ .." / //. ",,/,/' / , I I / I " / c!~< ~...I.... 0.1-0 z'" ~ww o~z oo.z ~g:E ~~w I-Wlo: zo< <",...J "'~D:: <<{o w_- J:...JD:: o.~o. ~ \11 , ~ i' < i I ~. i ~ i o }. I ~ i I ~ I ~ t t ~ t: . &~ ~! i a: Iii' ~ iii' i ~ ~5i: ~ i- · .Iii j~ b ,.5, gl!: !5~X '<i -~! ~ n .' . . ; b I S I , , ~ ~ . -K t o ~ II . ;; ~ - , -~ 6~ U) . < u.. ~ ci i 0 ~ '. l ~ ~;: n < 0 I Z 0: ::(( :;: I eJ d l- f <( :;:: ~ a:: ~ w Vl >- a:: <( I- Z <( Vl ~l . - - ;,,;,-,~, ~: - - - -]-1:'-- T _ _ --;.- - ,- 0 [.J : ~~ 0\ u ,:2 I .: \ _J ,j: \ ~= : i'i: I _" I'~ I 0 I~; I ~ _ _ _ _ _ I I __ \ jl;: I 1& - 1- - - j I - () ,;r , .. _,_ ,_~.'S ,"1li[\r _ _ L _ _ " ' " " C'. , i' _ _ __ _Z,l ON 0\108""7- -1' 1 ,I ~ ' ,^lNnO::J _ r- ,,,.,,~, i iJ~ .( ., I , , , I _ _ _.JJ ~~< =!-II- 0.....0 ~~~ o~z oa.z ~g~ ~~.J ...Wl><: zo< -<I/l--' 1/l~lX: ~:!:Q :r--'lX: o..~o.. - ::::--- ~ ~-=.- \ \ c \ \ \ \ \ ti ;!; .. , t:! i' . i 1 ~.g .. " ~ I qt ~ 1 ffi i i ~ I ~ <0( Q: a: i i 8" i .. / / / / / / ; . . ~ I !! : ;' ~ Hl h" t' 00 n / / / / / / /' //// , I I / / / I ________-.J-------.J 3:.:~8 ~.: ~:~ (,') _ _ _ T _ -_.- - ,0 - - -, \ ,. 0\ -. I \ 0 ;;:\ ,- I I --' r'~ \ -- I \ .;' \ 0 I f \ \ 0 B: I I ,_ , -c hi - - - - - -c133~lS- H'i6[if It.LON O'v'og- hNnOJ t'J ~? r.j .' :( ,L: ,. ~~ <c ~? ~~ ... ~ d ,~ 1"" ~~~......" --I I I I I I __J r----- I I ,..1 u. m / / / / / / / / ~ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / // / I / - I I -.-----J -.~ / / / / / / / / :; :~ [:I: ;. ,-. ii ~;: It .' .u~_ .....;- ..'_1 ...', ~,::rt:':"~ ~- - ---f- ,~.~- a.. _ . n_.'"It~" tc_-I.-". e6!:";'~_ ., s~ ~:_ 5a ::~ - Ii ~~. · H ..- 'u'. ~JJJIOI :.~:~:: !! f ~l'.~'. 'HIt 'l!fl (J'III n" ':lA'- J_ I I ___\________ -1~1 I 1"ii---- -'UN- ! \ ~: _ ' 'd _f;l,'t ~~ I(tl' 8 -.1,4- ; - -n\'l - ______ -W,lf ! ~ to ~ U. . 1 0 I. t -<t- : l~ i c:: w ;;: w Vl ::;; c:: o I- Vl o:d I- W W c:: I- Vl .(,) 0-,<( ::i-J.- a:...O ZVl :;=WW O::l!Z OQ.~ <(O::l! W-' ::l!~W ...WloC: ZO<( <(Vl-' Vl::l!lx: <(<(0 ~3[ Q.~ 'f~'t.' ~ I ~ \~ g.; en . ~ l' ~ii ~ I, ~ it. ~ l; ./. &, i!1 a: 'tIlt- ! !~ I I 5 ~ i ! i ~ b t j. l ~ i " , - .,:. I!' . ~ Vl W ...J G: o Q: Q. .0 ~:l< ......... Q.ZO ~"'~ O::liZ OQ.Z <0- ",...J::Ii ::Ii~ - ....l&J~ ~~:5 ~::Iia:: ",<0 it3lf ~ ~.'I-~e:- ~ ti 11; I ~ ~ I -, t'~ ..p ~ . ~ i l . o al ~ - ":::t ~ ; it -- -::,"/- rt I }: .- .( ~ I l-"w ,., f' . i : t , . , ~ ! I . l . I <0 I I.L I ~ i 0 , I ~ ~n <0 I ::,i~~ ;-; 13 < J- -' A. i ! u O. . . ! 0) 1,-,- - - - - ~.;- - r ~ - - - -, il I ,~~ ~;; .~ i 'I 0\ I ,'J I , 0 . . I ASS. . I I S i] i; ~ 0 oj~ \ ~ - I;' 'i:'~ I 0 I oi · t · t · t · t ;; : t IS! -~ I': \ ;; i IJ ;? b"( i ~~ i? i -"~ __ \ 0 ,I;f I~' I ~. :i I -~ _. I ~ll ,:', , I i. 0 I -. _ _ -- _ - - - -1i33~:jIS-dlOnf - Z.- 5N-~'lf08" X~~no~' 1 L_ - - - - - - - - - -- - ~ - -,-"- - L _:~ , 9 '3 I II It _ It .. II I!: .. I'. - - -r- ..::. ~~__. . ~.. ~~' ~ i---r- .7........ --...--...... I I I ________.J______.J ..... c.:i~ ':U'i-- :(1 -;:: -_~ - ---' I I, .~, t, ~, C1 I 'r""i I I L__'J I 1 I I I 1 1 I ,. 1 ,_, I I 'I I: I r---L----- ^___L__ ~UJ --,-- --, I I I , I 'n I I I I I --'---_.J ,", '--'....J ~ ill m ill m ill :ll m m [ ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ II ! t f f f f iIi ~ ~ ~ ~ " to ~ ~i II II Ii II II !l \ II II II 11 Ii II \ \ R ./ ~m 1~ ~i ~~fi~~~ it i! hi! u u~uh ~~ ~h~w~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ i Ii ~mdl . .~ x j ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ /' I" I "1,11 ././ ',1.-\ I'I:,I\!, it! I I' , . !1;111\ i . r1 - I I ~ . I I I I I I, ~: '111 :1 II II! !11I 'IHlll!1 !', 'I I ill I I II!.!!: Il' . 'I" "1'\'\ '11','.11 'I' . 11\"1'.1.1 / I j'j 'l'II'I( 'I' ',\"11,11 "II I",' d,,'" ./ ./ ./ / :1 \11' \ ill:ii\ll!11 \I\!I! Ii! m ii I! 1111 1\ illil i!ll:l(i! / / III !I!I ~~!!~~~~~ Iii! mlil !iI m!1 I: Hi II !; IIiI! m!l!:!l 4 . . ~ . . . . ., ., . . ':/ ./ / i ! 'I' . illl . Iii ill",: J!I\.I 1 NIl!' .I-',ll U':l~i ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ; x ./ ./ ./ , I I / '// z <( -' a.. w a.. <( u Vl o z <( -l .u ~::i~ 0:>-0 z'" ~ww o::lEZ oQ.Z ~g~ ::lE~uj >-Wlo: zoO( <(f)..J "'::lEa: ~~Q ::I:..Ja: Q...JQ. ~ u ;E ~ it ~ i- ~ . ~ ~ i 011 ~ i i ~ I IS it o , . ~ t; -< & ~ IS ! : g ! '" q i j: f f' i ! ! ~ it ; r ~H '. , ~ ~K t . ~ .I ! ~ ~ -I - ------~;,,~':':.=:'==--=~:;..,.=.- J -7--'.'..;.- I !i " I, >-- II- i i'I \' " I I I ,'11 II I I ' " I " " I , ! II , Ii r < " ", ,J (, , ! tI, I ! i ~ J I II, I ,i,! !,', Ii! \ 11 :' ! - ------ --~ , "Ii "",d ,:q i " I" I i,l ":,,,1 "I I'll I!I' '1\. '\ " II I I t 1, "" 'I. I,,! I 'I, '1110 l' \ I, I,', I',', 'I ",! ,\'" "",, d.A, I I' I, I I , ( I I,,! I, ,IIi" i ',{III' ~ I: I , .( , I l !d t /: I I .J' I,i I':' . I, \1 I ; "'II,,, ,(, , 01 I I' ,', I 'I ' I ,I, '\ i,' "II! \,1,1,1 'Ll I, '"~I 1" I' ',:1 " I, ' , 'II, -:[d--r'l I, " ',__ fr-il I '--I' --'r-IL__,~_ --+-'1 I! --!r--I,- r \, '. L_ ,-~ \~i~='\-- 1,111 -r-i -\\-lii -\1 r- ['- -II r-I -Ii r-I -;\-11 -i\- r- [ 1[- r-I c~. -- -~--- ~ \ ~ ~ 1 ~ , ; 1c . ... J ~ (', ~) " ~ Q o ( ... ~ 1- 1 ~ " ~ ... 1: .. -:l , (' ,.) I . 1: 1 J I r r .1 J 'J , ~ r 1 I ~ J ~ J r- 1 .. r P- I J J -, oJ n '1 ~ - J J ?: ~ j . 1 . ~ 1 i , , t I I I , , I I i " I' t 1 - r 1'-' ' -- . 1'1'1' I I ! I r ---j 1 "I :1; I 'I I .,. i ':1 , "\ '>'l '7\~'~'" \ '" )1, rv,,1 r..~\.L.V(1""'r""~ /1\:-lW..,...._'v.;l ~ ..., ----- ~- - j -1 I / I ! : ! I I - -I (..'(:'7 \'\'f' i t I. f l .---.-- _ -. ~ I :~;P-'--~~tt-' " · IT --'-' - ,._~~-~- _~~~_::I :; -- ~ \ tV ie--- --- - I , I I I I I ;; ,'. \> ~\ =-L - ! 1 I .-;---;"'-~-:'~~7-;p'~.- I ,,~; -,;:::-~;:;;'1 I ..::;.:::;~:'::. :: ': '-1 I ~~''i~~-~--~~-~::''~:, -~ ; I -" : .-....-........ '" i- ... ... -. ,~ , t , " j -~, i I .- -.J I .cc:.+_________ "I \ " : ", :"l.~~.~-.~~.'"~ , . I --I t 1 1, : It I I~ \ Ii! -r~ , I 1-1 i \" . , .v' ;~ . I f-~' .,: ' . ,:" I I I, ,- .-\ 1-- 'oJ....~ ," \'-('111 1- --,..11 II 1, I' I I:"L__II W - ''''",) ..J , '1 I ..,...1' L---..J. ::I ....-~~:_:t:_::~ 1 t l - -, -t- . -- T ~ I ~ ., ~__v-;..' I i : I I i n - ",,-----. t I 1 ! I I I' i \ I I I I I I I \ ~.c......,,,.,.1 --, .. ., " I. - .'=-,~..-,','..'. ".:: ,'C,;~ ---:-;~.~"~, :~r-v- . ~ . I I I "..."".-.. .._."...vj , , . I I I ---I t-~" ~'L c ., -".. I ~i::, - -' -"J""~- ~j~ 1- J .\<-.-- :~u - . --:;-:;- ~1;-1- .------... -"-----'~T.. ~;~~~~._._." ___'= ~_'lf~';;:t__ _____ _____ ...-.....-..- --.-..--.-" -'~:--~ ~.'_J --,-. ------. ~,~ .n..____ t -- - .~ l/~ j' - --~~r)I~.- ;...~;,.::.;f:--j1.~~-~.~-=.~'-':;--- ~:-._ '~I.. ". , ~ .. r 'Q1I ". ...., . d 1\ .:tJ. ~ --1' n II II ~ WCO';-1~". ------- . ,. 1....,1 I .f J < I', ;. I I ! i I I, I I. '"'' iJT';' I I, " . I' ': , I'I.~~__~,....J. ,- 7 \ "'I' i , ' . I \ , I , j \ ! t --\ . ..~!~ 'l-.l_::~~: -~~ 1;;;rr :::.t.'. .'~r"'" ~ 1 '" . ! I: " I i .........~.. 9 -u.'l'~ """" ,:vVt ..,...- - "J&"...., . ..... ~ . , j. , ~ r j ';'-,. -.--t-. -,jl1- l.'1-:1\'S ~~~,~\ A - _~ :~_-:~.~~-: J} ,; hi I 'f I , - I i I I I. L.I'" ':!'lI"<tr..LS C"7. \'\("tfl \.T '.-" ~ " "'.''''/~ ........./ -...~ ..'" "';.'W'~ ......, I -....... - . C I \I So ;; S- I I i I I I ~-_.- ." .~ "'..... I 1 a. ;f .. -r.:T; ............lo; '1,",1I.1.. ,:. ~ r.;;;~- I ."'\"'I"~ '.( -- roo- ,- "'10' -,......... Il -"-~l.; ! f~'" \' "' \ . ... .. .......... --.... ..-~ ----- t. -'1'"~~ L' ~ '. . 0/'. ~... \. -'t-. I ," , ., -"" I........ ...-<.----......- " -; r' l I' 1 ...,. . .. ,,.,J I I" 'l @- " , < .' . ~ ;~ " -t . r ........".,.,....,.. """""I'I.'l""""" I~ "\"""''''' , . S'..'II ,1.f'C .....,l...o;.....vl _n__un____~.~- "-"+". j J .."; to " t .;: ;, ." ~ J 1'-'7'l , ~ -' , 1 ' ' T ~ ; ~;1 ~- .~ " . ., J' ; ~il l' 1~ I ~ ',1 " i; 1 ~I ~~ i + , ~,,: l I 11- I T"_..n.'_ 1 ; . . } , l - - " Jl 1 1 , .- . 1', , . ., ~ . , r '\ '1 J ii' ~ ., ~f . ,I 0 .q~ , t ~! ~ i ~ *,,~ 1 ~ /"" ., . d 1 ~~ ! " -, . .'.1 ~ , I '11 II I I : , 1- ---~-- , ' ' : ,-- -=.~_ ~=_ i~ -I ,- -= -~ r~ i ~ I ' ~ I ,;:;\ " ;, " -j -,<." .. ; .~l ,',I; ~.. , , { ,~ , ~ 1 " :1' -, ' ~, ~ ~~ ;: JJ \.-:.-:ot'<;C E~~I,.~.:.,~-~:~~_\,'-~~~--- -I S, t lOl.l ;, ; ; -~ 1./ :~ t~ ~.4 , '.-.., . ; ~ ~ ; - I , !, l{~ ~f ,""'''' iIi, .~:;~~ ~. _i ~ t" I .. " ~ I ~"; ~ -' .~ ~ '~i ;: ~ " !"'g; j';; -' ~ ~ ... .~/ .. ',:1 ~~~'~ ~ ( J i f 1- t '. I I ~ \~, ~\ " , ",cr . .j. . J 1_'( l ;." .. ~ ~ ~ 1 -411J. 1 ;oIl i ~h '" " . .. _ I ~ .. '1 , ~ ~ r J '" ~- ~'-------Hl ... -';'~I ,=-- t"i! ! l i i ~~ ~ b\ r ~1;. ~ ",,:- ~;: ! ;1 ~ll =1! " ~ ,I t.it .,. '-' r,~ ~t? ~ ~.. ' .. '1 ~ 1 t . . ~~ ! 1! " ~'''' l--J" i' .'~l'" ' - ,~' ,\ \ ';,' , j ) r :~I H j, ~ I ", J; I) \.{j: .!11;'.. : ; .': ~.~ ,: .~ ~ J .1:. G .. ~ ill I ~ ~_""_ ~d ~~'I -~ .., I' I j ! c'~ "1 . t J J '" . J ~ r , (. ~ ~ ~ 1~ J ~ ! t-. J ~---- I ~ '/.' , ---1 . , " 01: J~ ~ r $~j L ~ 'l' Ci -1 I \- ~ . !~il I '#,~ !! ~~ _J , I I i -1 . J I-LJ~ l,l ~ ! : I ~ ; L -J;' ii' : : ., . \- l .J . r '" .. ~ : ~ I J , ! ~ ( .. :. ~ II "i...., , I Ii; III I ,!' ' .,.' I . -- ' "''1:;. ! ... I. ~ ~, 01 ~ ~ \- " ... '? V' ; ... ~ ; J ;' G-t- P,:: I r ~ t ..1 il: ~!. L- ~I "'!' J , $: ;r .-11 I \- .. <C ., ..J ) ) J IJ (\ r ~ ~ . " ~i=C ~=-= '.. -'"''"''''-""'-'==- ! ~ ~ L . . J , . t. <C ) J I J ,/. .( ,., ,( ~.__.. ----_.._--~_._----_._-_._.- . . - 1 ~ -- 11 ~ ~ . a < .J 1 1- ? < - < lifT : Illr 11\lr i 1\lr ; Illr , , I I 1 Illr ~ -, 1'\lr ~ - I- < > J j ~ ~ J - l- I- , < ] " I ~ 7 J a ! .1 I - ," "- " ~ . J -' J r :1 t- o J -:J 'I J . oi- 1IIIr Illr lilT IIII Illr Illr IfTr rr-II Ir-rT :' :' 1111 : : Illr rllf Illr Illr lilT '-liT j - : . . . . ". " 1, -i~ J ~ , , . " " It ic y....., r..........d r-" t71J-"'O~l"'l7~/.Lro"l\"C1.S'f'l ~ J . - > ~ ~ . j I" . . . ~ , -1 ; ~~;,-p-t t ~L rl'-~' I .; -, )l",;i II I ! , ! I , ! I ++ t~ .l, I , l' , I I .._--:-:;,;... ''':;::''~'l j=_~ ----O~ I ..... ., ~j : I L. . ~- )- I i I .1 :1': 1- 11.1 [, ~ i :H: . '. , 1 -I- ) I , ,- .... ;1 Li J . 'I I . [ I ;1 Ii :\ I , Lj- i 1- -1----- .~ ~~.~"- ~;:t,:"::-l -_.'"--;:-;...- 'l " t' --, I I I' 1'1 I! I 1 I I, .~ I . .. ..J I' . -- .~ --l, 'I, I I I i! I" I I 1,,1 -1 i I --- _!I.J --.1 ..J_? \"S....f hi ..it !i; (1~ '" ", rt: i , . , " , . , . . , ; , ' , . ~ i ; " ~ :- .~ " . ~ ~i , I I I I TI, , I ill i rt , I" 1- -- ~n I, , j L- ~ .. ,.. r.....,d '"1100.'..,1 ..L'~:tIJ F-="~r~~:-l.".' ~r~.t~r- i~ ~ :i! fl')!~, ~-e :;1 111 Ii .. ., . or I'": ~I 11 ] I ..- .-.-' J-:':"'\ ,I :1 Yr"'" >: ~I i1 ~ ~ !~I 'I: L-.. -; I~ - ~ }-11:/.._..... ~ " 'Ie: 1 -- l! ~: ! ~~ 1 :, .;. :"t ., i I ;: :; _~_ : l~i '~ 1__ iit W l! .~ i'~ , r -' €~": ',)- G-l~;l ~11':'r~~r--": ' .. , .' (~ 1J8"I:j ~oo~ , .: -!!j.-"'::.;';...J \!J ~l,~ -, ." ~.i ..; - ~~Il ~ ~\ ,~"-'~~7. ~ lh 11b f: : -;>;, /' i ~l ;" ,----r-::...:.. I ,.~ /": .... >.--- ...ri----i. .11 .....:' I .\/' J' , ~l .,.0 I ""...~~._~..,. . 'I '~I'._ _,._ _.: :Ii ,I . ~ i .,_--:::.;.;:.. I' I P. ~ ; =rl. -"" = =- =+---~~ . ~ . ~ . ~ ~.' ~ ! 1 " ;! : ~: 1 ." ~ ~!d 1, ~ -@ ~: ; I I I : :.j':l::1 I ; , : t ! l . j ~ .' II--h , i"inl '1:1:11:1 1'1 :1 -, j! 'IH I :' . i .\ --~- - <\ 1'~- /..U t--0,' +--~ ~ ..,.. --- '~~ ".----- ~@-=--'-~'" \ I.~.r..; ; 'L' iiI j , . J 'J T"'II f--!- - " . \ I ~l I , '" : ~fl '~~':'; hrn..--/ g,) ~ ..... f.-<iOOjl-, l ~r' ~ ... ~ll J l ~ d'r:; r - - -- 17'-. t--=----.." ,",IT -. , I --; I ....--~ -- " C--I-: i'l w.: --~ K1~~ -- ~ ,/ '11 .-.'- ';.;,.t'l----- n.... . __.~.n_ _ .. I , ....... ~- ..~...- 7 I ~~"",~--,;r '1 ~ II " I I I ~~,~. i....... .... ....~~ I I ,.... -..--.--.--.- ---.--:;.:;,-- '--. r- I 11 1\ I; I I L ______. , -- ~ :;"\ ~ .!./ - ~ r- - - - - I. i: Ii L_____ i '-, $~-I : ,--l- I 1-' I I I I 11 !1 !' I- I I I I !. I: I; L____ - - ..1: , ... . i1 1~ 'l ~t ., ;~ :~ " " ~ I 'I .; , ;\ ~ ~ . d rl., ,.." . l.,-,I'<;' , , 1~H 1 ~j1 f~ ! , ;i! J i'~;; i!! I :T i' i fl_ r- -J"""'~-F-=-~~ ...;- ~ : I I ~-~~~ .- ~ ,~_!1 ~~~ it:: - .- .., j 1 / !) r --. -, , 1 , ~ r . ! ~ i I $ ! ! j , ~ - ; ~ i. -- ---.--.--. .-. .- 1 L-.___ - , 1--- ~I I~ . /1'- !,/ II . {~=-JJ:- i ! i/ 'I! ~,t ~ ~ ~1 t : 1, ~ :~ ~ ....1 ~ T 1 I I ~ . l. J l ,. ,. l,..~ ~ iU 1 ~H j --i'1 -'L"" .. .. v H ~ ~ ....._. 8-' . - .. _u__. __. __ - . (....... ~..., .....1'l'..1-'"),0. r'" t..l-""f'~.l.-o;("107~_ .........., ... ..~.~ ~ 1,1 i ji~' s ~!E f .~; I 1 < ~ 1 " ~1l I j'r . l:? ! . :. -~ ~;~ ~ -. t , l i t , , ., G , 01' ,,~ ~1.. ~f j I I :. r~~~ " i? . ~ ! " : -(' .~ ~ ~ ^~ . . r J , i. , , j 1 : t -r-- ~ 1; J;. > c.\,~ 'j....-." -J --'"" I. ,..../< ~-.,' ,,-. I.. I ..., ". ,. L:J"" ~ . .., ~ t' . ? ., . J , . t' . 7 ~ " " J ... . " . 0 . ~ ',:11 . ' .. t 11~ J ~.. . -.. 4:/ ,: :1 J... ,1 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE SCHEMATIC PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, (PUD), PRELIMINARY PLAT AND REZONING FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS "PHEASANT MEADOW" You are hereby notified that the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at Prior Lake Fire Station #1, located at 16776 Fish Point Road, SE (Southwest of the intersection of CR. 21 and Fish Point Road), on Monday, February 26, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter. The purpose of the public hearing is to consider the Schematic PUD and Preliminary Plat, (subdivision), of the following legally described property into a 50 unit, townhome development to be known as "Pheasant Meadow." The 12.5 acre site is also proposed to be rezoned from R-l, Suburban Residential to PUD. The subject site is legally described as follows: Legal Description: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 114, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota lying northwesterly of State Trunk Highway No. 13, and west, south and westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence East (assumed bearing) along the north line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 375.80 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence on a bearing of South a distance of 200.00 feet; thence East a distance of 13.10 feet; thence South 4 degrees 52 minutes 42 seconds East to the centerline of said State Trunk Highway No. 13, and there terminating. Or more commonly described as approximately 12.5 acres of land located south of 170th Street (County Road 12), and about 100' east of the intersection of Balsam Street and Spruce Trail in Prior Lake, Minnesota. A complete copy of the PUD and Preliminary Plat applications are available for review at the Prior Lake Planning Department located at 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue, Prior Lake, MN 55372. An 11 x 17" copy of the maps can be mailed to you by contacting Deb Garross, Assistant City Planner, at 447-4230 between the office hours of 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM, Monday through Friday. If you desire to be heard in reference to this matter, you should attend this public hearing. The Planning Commission will accept oral and or written comments. If you have questions regarding th~'ij~ing Department at 447-4230. Deb Garross Assistant City Planner To be published in the Prior Lake American on Saturday, February 10, 1996. DATE MAILED: February 7, 1996 PHEASPN.DOC I 16200 ID@e Creek Ave. S.E.. Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER i.-~i ~ ~ ~ It ~~ hi . II It -- .:.- 'ilK1 ..,......v~ 'ft, ! ! f',f ,,~,' > , ~,- , 'i'4f1i<4""':' ~. ) ~ ~;~>AL_ '" v . '. 1J? ... EXHIBIT A ", /- I . , \ \ \ --L YEAR 2000 (EXISTING) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: /; ,y m---. r' '~ ,.y --- .- -----:- -~ PRIOR LAKE CO PREHENSIVE PLAN '- _ "..._,.-,_' ;:\.~"'~7""" Land Use Plan A major de~arture concerning residential development indicated in this plan ~s the recognition of early medium density platting. Much of Central and a small portion of Markley Neighborhoods were originally developed at an average size of 7500 square feet per lot. -In earlier community plans, the small lot subdivisions were ignored to the extent that they have lumped with the low density or 10,000 square foot lots. This was done in spite of a zoning district which recognized the existing small lot platting and provides specific locations for new duplexes. The density ranges outlined herein more closely recognize past development patterns and may provide additional housing opportunities consistent with this diversity. \- Policy 1 - To foster housing diversity consistent with previously developed land, all future urban development will be categorized within three density ranges. Low Units 0-4 Average 2 ~edium 4-8 6 High 8-16 12 The u e limits are like Uni which ~nducement to rovi e var~et to save va uable natural features. Generally high density nousing, lim~ted to three stories above ground, is recommended in conjunction with existing and proposed shopping areas or along major transportation routes. Two and three story row houses and apartment buildin~s would be possible in th~se areas. Medium density housing ~s recommended in older neighborhoods as well in close proximity to potential employment centers and along transportation routes. Housing types include duplexes, quad homes, row or town houses as well as single family dwellings. The low density areas may include single family dwellings on individual lots as is most of the construction in Prior Lake but would also be suitable for any of the above listed housing types ~as long as densities remain within the 0-4 unit per acre range. Policy 11 - Based upon existing available land within the urban service district, the City of Prior Lake will encourage 150 maw housinq units per year to facilitate extens~on of utilities ~und the lake of Prior Lake and to fil~ prev~ously "skipped over an now as sewer and water ava~ a -e. f Housinq Goals The four geographic areas of Prior Lake when divided into nei~hborhoods, total fifteen separate residential choices ava~lable to a ~rowing population. When completely developed, these areas w~ll accommodate up to 20,000 people. By the year ~990 only slightly more than one half of that potential will have been utilized. The 11,550 people will be living in 3700 separate households. CUrrently, the City expects that approximately 21% of these units or up to and inClUding the proposed Metropolitan Council full share goals of 300 units will be low and moderate income housing. The first community attempts at providing low cost housing emphasized opportunities for the elderly but a balanced program including low and moderate income family housing is necessary to serve existing residents of Prior Lake. The plan accepts the recommended full share goals for low and moderate income housing of 456 new subsidized units and 261 new modest cost housing units by the end of the 1980's. In addition, the 323 units which currently ~rovide inade~ate housin~ will be recommended for rehabilitat~on where poss~ble or demol~tion. Housinq Policies Encourage the development of low and moderate income housing opportunities of up to 25% of all available units in the City. Desirable sites for new low and moderate income housing are situated in approximatelr one half of the fifteen neighborhoods on scattered s~tes. These neighborhoods include Martinson, Shady Point, BOUdin-Oakland, Markley, South, Central, Five Hawks and Spring Lake-Willows. Seek opportunities to create new low cost housing in Central, Five Hawks and Spring Lake-Willows. Grainwood, Northwood, Spring Lake-Willows, Five Hawks, Central and Lakeside-Gatewood each include enough deteriorating and substandard housin~ to justify a public program of neighborhood rehabil~tation. It is possible that three of the six would be suitable for rehabilitation programs which could be carried out by the Scott County Housing and Redevelopment Authority. 5. Investigate city wide code enforcement programs as a way to encourage individual modernization and rehabilitation. .;t 1 . ~ t 3. 4. 't 2. 6. The existing platting ordinance should be reviewed emphasizin~ clarification of procedures for developers as an aid ~n speeding subdivision review processes. 7. )/< 8. Portions of Markley, South, Five Hawks Neighborhoods will be recommended as areas lot single family construction than is now help decrease housing cost. Increase the density bonus in the existing Planned Unit Development section of the zoning ordinance as a way to encourage more use and Ultimately a more diverse mix of housing types and densities. and Central for smaller possible to housing diversitr could be encouraged particularlr if high density construct~on were to be emphasized along H~ghway 13. Neither nei~hborhood contains a commercial service center and one shared fac~lity would appear to be ap~ropriate at some time in the future but not during this plann~ng period. Population growth in West Neighborhood is likely to be delayed until the other fourteen neighborhoods have been substantially developed. The. holding capacity of West Neighborhood alone approaches 2,000 people. Sprinq Lake-Willows Bounded by Spring Lake to the west, Prior Lake to the north, Five Hawks Neighborhood to the east and Highway 13 to the south, Spring Lake-Willows is a rapidly developing area of the city. It includes a state operated public access to Prior Lake, 1,000 feet of undeveloped lakeshore at Spring Lake Park, a private swimming beach and marina as well as one neighborhood park. A second neighborhood park south of 170th Street has been dedicated through the platting process. A surprising number of substandard housing units have been identified in the neighborhood. Built as seasonal dwellings, it appears that many can be replaced without a public funding effort. There are relatively few two family or ~ownhouses in the neighborhood and no apartments. The proximity of Highway 13 suggests that higher density units may be desirable ~n small amoun~s. Medium dens~ty construct~on is suggested near the ~ntersection or ~/u~n street and H~gnway ~3. Ne~ther ne~~noornood con~a~ns a commerc~a~ serv~ce cen~er and one shared fac~lity would appear to be appropriate at some time in the near future but not durin~ this planning period. Population growth in West Neighborhood ~s likely to be delayed until the other fourteen neighborhoods have been substantially developed. The holding capacity of West Neighborhood alone approaches 2,000 people. is limited to other arterials and collectors. to minor arterials is limited; however, they local transit trips. B. Colle treets co d'stribute traffic to e arterial system generally at s~eeds. -They conne .ne~ghborhoods w~~h~n and between subreq1ons. Access includes minor arterlal~, vLl~e~ ~ol~ectors, local streets, and direct land access. They are also designated for local transit trips. Direct land access are suitable for C. to accommodate and ~inor arterials include a proposed rerouting of Trunk Highway 13 ~n a no~h-south orientation to the west of Spring Lake, existing Trunk H~ghway 13, County Road 12/21 and County Road 23. The r~routing of Trunk Highway 13, which would be accomplished by the M~nnesota Department of Transportation, is not likely to take place until after the rear 2000. Projected traffic volumes from the south are not antic~pated to greatly increase during the next 20 years, whereas local traffic will increase to the ~oint of significantly slowing through traffic with the add~tion of additional traffic control devices. Long Range relief can be B. Collector Streets ollector Streets are designed to collect traffic from local streets and direct it to the arterial street system. Collectors will be designed to include 80 foot rights-of-way with 44 feet devoted to paving. Direct land access is possible but local street intersections will be spaced to minimize the number of four-way stops. 1. Franklin Trail 2. 160th Street 3. 170th Street - County Road 81 - Northwood Road 4. Duluth Avenue 5. Crest Avenue - 145th Street 6. County 83 7. County 17 Some additions to the Functional Classification System involve Northwood Road, Crest Avenue south of County 42 and Duluth Avenue. The addition of Duluth Avenue recognizes an existing pattern which will become more extensively used as development moves north of the lakes. The linking of 170th street and Northwood Road is intended to remove through traffic from S~ring Lake Park and to connect the west neighborhoods w~thin the proposed urban districts. Similarly the Crest Avenue connection to County Road 21 will provide access between the two north neighborhoods and the proposed industrial land reserve. C. Local Streets Local Streets collect and distribute traffic between developed land and the system of collectors and arterials. They provide access to the pro~erties which abut them. Local S~reet aesign ~s careru~~y rev~ewed br the Staff, Planning Comm~ssion ana C~ty Counc~l to determ~ne co~liance with the c~~y ~ubd~vis~on Hegu~at~ons. Transportation im~rovements to be undertaken by Prior Lake during the next f~ve years include one collector and three local streets. Improvement cost for the collector will be shared between the developer of the adjoining subdivision and the assignment of gas tax revenues. One of the local streets will be paid entirely through assessments while the other two will be financed partially through assessments and the rest throu~h the general fund. The relative proportion of shared cost ~s calculated for each project. Northwood and Martinson, have considerable development ~otential which requires only sub-trunk and lateral sewer l~nes and watermain extensions. The technical portion of Prior Lake's was prepared by Orr-Schelen-Mayeron recommends the construction of three sufficient capacity to accommodate The public utilities plate identifies recommended projects. Comprehensive Sewer Report and Associates. The report trunk sewers to provide growth in the near future. the priority of the three d These Policy 2 utility ~sK~ppea exist"n occur in YEAR 2010 (DRAFT) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1995-2010 !~ - ~ ~~ l..'v ~\. E ~ 0 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE MINNESOT A DECEMBER,1995 MISSION The following Mission Statement was adopted by the City Council on February 6, 1995: The City of Prior Lake is committed to serving the common good of its residents by promoting, among other things, community values, environmentally sensitive community development, robust business growth, fmancial stability, public safety, and diverse recreational opportunities. VISION The Vision of the community at full development was also adopted February 6, 1995 as part of the Strategic Plan. The ultimate community should be comprised of development which is balanced among residential, commercial, and other land uses. PRIOR LAKE STRATEGIC PLAN THE VISION Adopted February 6, 1995 "At buildout the City of Prior Lake will be balanced between residential, commercial and business. Strong neighborhoods and homeowner associations will characterize most developments, .!!eighborhoods will be connected bv transl'ortation amenities for pedestrians and motor vehicles. Platting will be encouraged through larger Planned Unit Develo ments to preserve natural features. While sin Ie amil dwellin wil d' ant housin '!xpe, to omes (for empty nesters) and multi-family developments on major arterials are ~xpecte<L "Neighborhood commercial centers will predominate, although a few community commercial centers will exist. Commercial development will be localized primarily to major arterial intersections involving State Highway 13, County Road 42, County Road 44, County Road 21, County Road 12, County Road 82 and 83. One regional center is expected at the intersection of County Roads 42 and 83. "Smaller businesses will be predominant. The focus will be on office, light industrial and light manufacturing. Small office, warehouse, and industrial developments are expected along County Road 21. One or more corporate office parks are expected. Business concentrations are expected along State Highway 13, County Road 21 and County Road 42. 2 CHAPTER 2 The Comprehensive Plan contains goals, objectives and policies to guide public and private land use, development, redevelopment and preservation of all lands and waters within the City. These elements have been developed in conjunction with the City's tradition of planning and in response to the statutory requirements under the Metropolitan Land Planning Act (MLP A). The Metropolitan Council, adopted its "Regional Blueprint" in September, 1994, pursuant to State Law; it serves as a policy guide for determining the degree to which City plans are consistent with the regional goals and policies. This document and related materials published by the Metropolitan Council were consulted during the preparation of the Plan. The City has developed the vision and goals through special studies, strategic planning sessions, and this updated Plan. This material has been designed as the guide for the ctpvplopmeat and implementation of the several elements of this Plan. The City's Mission Statement, Vision Statement, and the Goals and Objectives of the Comprehensive Plan are located at the beginning of the Plan to provide the basis for all other Plan elements. This promotes consistency throughout the Plan and it is helpful when the City finds it appropriate to evaluate and to update all or some of the elements. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES A. GOAL: SUITABLE HOUSING AND ENVIRONMENT Encourage the development of suitable housing in a desirable environment. OBJECTIVE No.1: Provide opportunities for a variety of affordable high quality housing. POLICIES: a. Codes and ordinances relating to development, redevelopment, and maintenance of housing shall be adopted and periodically reviewed to ensure specific direction is provided regarding affordable uses in each district and regarding minimum development standards. b. Review annually the current and planned programs of the Scott County Housing and Redevelopment Authority. c. Maintain development standards and housing policies that allow for low and moderate cost housing opportunities 10 d. Develop and consider for adoption a code enforcement program for existing housing. e. Develop and maintain regulations that pennit a mix of housing ~es, sizes and price ranges to be provided throughout the City. OBJECTIVE No.2: Maintain a choice of and encourage development of quality residential environmen~ POLICIES: a Maintain a variety of residential densities (dwelling units per acr~. b. Fn~ure that puhlic. ~ervices and on-site unprovements are compl~ted at the time ofre~irlpntil'll opvelopmpJ'lt. c. The burden of a satisfactory transition from one density or dwelling tyPe to another is the rests with the developer seeking development plan approval. d. Discourage new residential subdivisions in isolated areas that have little or no potential to either develop into a viable neighborhood or to assimilate with an established neighborhood. e. Consideration of development plans for multiple dwellings in areas so designated on the Land Use Guide Plan should include the following design-related items: (i) New developments should not isolate existing single family dwellings by inhibiting pedestrian and/or vehicular access. (2) New development completely surrounded by single family dwellings, should be discouraged in favor of large scale planned unit developments which are more conducive to a mix of housing styles with shared amenities. (3) There should be convenient access to collector and arterial streets and to available transit so to not unduly contribute to congestion on local residential streets. (4) Large common open areas may provide an effective transitional use to other uses. 5) Location near permanent public and private open spaces may compensate for the impact of the higher density. ~. f. Create and enhance neighborhoods that provide parks and open spaces, public access to natural amenities located on and ad' acent to e SI e. an pe es an ages throughout and among adjacent neighborhoods. mcorporate historical and natural features to the maximum feasible extent. Provide pedestrian access to commercial and industrial centers, ~ublic land~, and ~chool~ ~void designs that isolate neighborhoods. Provide traffic or pedestrian circulation within and between developments. 11 g. h. J. Avoid or mitigate encrn~('hrnp11t by incompatible land uses which can have a negative impact on the residential living environment. Mitigation measures include, but are not limited to, the use of open space, benns,denselands' . k. low higher density multiple dwelling housing in areas within close proximity of existing support services and facilities, and where there is adequate access to collector and arterial streets. 1. Ensure new development includes design features such as bufferin screemng, an spatial separation from collector and arterial streets; and from anticipated adverse environmental impacts including, but not limited to, noise and air pollution. m. Link neighborhoods to each other, and to parks, schools and commercial centers VIa local streets or edestrian trails. n. Ensure su IVISlOns are designed to avoid direct private drive access _ from and to major collector and arterial streets. o. Promote innovative subdivision design and housini products tlifou~h the lLc;e of the planned unit development process and similar techniques. p. A void locating high density housing to primarily serve as a buffer or as a land use suited for absorbing negative impacts of adjacent land uses. High density housing should only be developed in those areas near support and commercial services. q. Support development designs that are tailored to environmentally sensitive areas containing rugged topography, wetlands, and woodlands. r. Code enforcement shall be used to keep illegal uses and physical deterioration from compromising the value and integrity of the housing stock within the community. s. Parking lots shall be screened to reduce the impact upon adjacent uses. 1. Privatization of natural and historic features should be regulated to promote neighborhood identity and to allow the community to share the inherent value of prominent features. u. Neighborhoods and other land uses should be planned and developed in accordance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Development proposals shall be thoroughly reviewed and evaluated to determine consistency with City plans and policies. v. Proposed revisions to the Land Use Guide Plan and requests for major extensions of public services or utilities to accommodate the proposed development and land uses shall be considered only after a thorough review and analysis of the City public facilities plans, potential environmental impacts, and merits of the changes. 12 POLICIES: Vehicular Traffic Flow a. Classify and design city streets and highways to serve specific functions in accordance with sound traffic engineering principles. b. Cooperate with County and State jurisdictions to keep through- traffic on arterials at minimum disruption of local circulation and residents. c. Maintain standards of land use at intersections to avoid congesting arterial interchanges with circulation of local traffic. d. Require new plats to demonstrate a continuity of street patterns and street access to adjacent arcels within proposed neighborhoods. e. equire arterial and major collector access WI ou use 0 neighbor- hood streets for high density and high intensity use concentrations. f. Access to arterials and major collectors shall be by public street only. g. Establish a minimum interval between arterial highway interchanges and local intersections and. private driveways which is consistent with reasonable traffic engineering standards. h. Plan for and provide public access to public waters with a minimum impact upon residents. Pedestrian Access i. ie~~e ~edestrian and limited vehicular access to neighborhood Qarks and vehicle access and parking areas to community playfields and City parks from minor arterials or maior collectors. (1) Provide for low maintenance natural greenway trail systems for recreational purposes from which all motor vehicles are banned. (2) Provide for availability and maintenance of surfaced walkways between major activity centers. (3) Restrict use of motorized vehicle activities to appropriate limited areas. J. Elementary schools should be located on at least minor collector streets and afford maximum pedestrian access and safe efficient vehicle and bus access. k. Junior high or middle schools should be located on at least minor arterial streets and provide a balance of safe access for pedestrians and vehicles. 1. High schools should be located at intersections of at least minor arterial streets for a higher degree of vehicle access as well as safe pedestrian access. m. A trail svstem should be developed in a manner that provides access within and among neighborhoods, business districts, schools, 18 Allowable uses for islands include seasonal cabins, public parks and open space. Private recreational facilities such as a pavilion or picnic facilities for a homeowners association may also be allowed. Corresponding Zoning: A-I (Agriculture) URBAN LOW-TO-MEDIUM DENSITY (R-L/MD) Purpose This classification is characterized by a low-to-medium range of residential densities that provides opportunities for a variety of housing options. Single family detached homes at the lowest of the urban densities are typical uses. Lower densities are often required to preserve and protect environmentally sensitive areas. Single family attached dwellings such as duplexes, townhouses, and fourplexes should be allowed as both pennitted and conditional uses and may be mixed with detached homes in Planned Unit Developments. Detached single family homes adjoining the Town Center and other older established areas on smaller lots are uses that would be supported by this classification. Support facilities compatible with neighborhoods and accessory uses are consistent with the Plan. Development Location Criteria · Appropriate for all areas with effective transition from major collector and arterial streets; but not adjacent to arterial street interchanges. · Determination of specific districts characteristic of this classification will be based upon consideration of several factors including, but not limited to, topography, geography, existing development and character of the surrounding area, transportation system access, and market conditions. · Final density and development design will be a function of adopted zoning and subdivision standards and procedures. Density Densities up to ten dwelling units per acre may be allowed, where developments with higher density and those with a mix of housing styles will primarily be realized in Planned Unit Developments. Density should be expressed through several distinct zoning classifications which, among other standards, reflect various minimum lot dimension and area requirements. 26 Minimum Requirements for Development New subdivisions for single family detached dwellings should have at least one acre which can support the minimum standard of approximately 2.5 dwelling units per acre or of 12,000 sq. ft. lot area (net of typical public improvements). Zoning standards should include standards which recognize the substantial number of older and smaller lots; the minimum lot size of 6,000 sq. ft. has been deemed an appropriate size conforming with the character of most of those areas. The minimum area for Planned Unit Developments should be 10.0 acres in order to provide for the open space and mix of housing styles at higher densities. Public street frontage is required for all development, unless alternate access is expressly approved by the City for a Planned Unit Development or similar arrangement. Utilities All city utilities required; utilities must be under contract for construction for land to be classified R-L/MD. Typical Uses Single family detached dwellings; other dwelling designs by conditional permit and/or Planned Unit Development; schools; churches; recreational open space, parks, and play grounds with public utilities; and public buildings. Corresponding Zoning R-1 (Low Density Residential) and such additional classifications, including provision for Planned Unit Developments, needed to implement the range of allowable densities and to express the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for this classification. URBAN HIGH DENSITY (R-HD) Purpose This classification is characterized by dwellings other than single family detached houses at the higher residential densities. The dominant construction form is attached homes and apartments; single family detached houses may be allowed in a Planned Unit Development. This classification is intended to provide an opportunity to create population centers and to accommodate the demand for affordable housing located near community activity areas. Development Location Criteria . Development of attached homes and multiple family dwellings is appropriate near major parks and other open space, along collector streets and near Town Center and other commercial centers. 27 COMMUNITY STRUCTIIRE This Plan emphasizes neighborhood planning through the use of planning districts that focus on smaller areas of the community. A series of hearings were conducted by the Planning Commission during the summer of 1993 to obtain a sense of the community from the residents of the several Neighborhood Planning Districts identified in this plan. Participants were provided written descriptions of the Neighborhood Planning Districts, including draft District Objectives prepared by the City Staff. The observations and recommendations received have been integrated with the appropriate sections of this plan, primarily in the respective sections regarding the Planning Districts. LAND USE - PLANNING DISTRICTS: The community has been divided into fifteen neighborhood planning districts based upon the location of arterial streets, lakes, wetlands, steep slopes and other topographic features and development patterns. The districts provide manageable geographic areas for analysis and identification. Spring Lake/Willows: Spring LakelWillows, in the southwestern portion of the City, covers approximately 300 acres, bounded on the south by State Highway 13, on the west by Spring Lake, on the north by Prior Lake, and on the east by the rear lot line of lots that front on the west side of Willow Lane and the drainage area between Inguadona Beach and the Willows Subdivision. The neighborhood is divided into areas that are north and south of 170th Street. The neighborhood contains some of the community's oldest subdivisions and its history is related to the resort community that once was the focal point for the community. The District is bounded by Prior Lake to the northeast and Spring Lake to the southwest. The major roads within the District are 170th Street (County Road 12), Sunset Trail (County Road 81) and State Highway 13. There are compatibility problems within the District due to the prevalence of snuiUlots that are located adjacent to the County Roads and State Highway. Inadequate buffer areas, lack of pedestrian and bike trails and direct driveway access to the regional roadways are the major development issues within this neighborhood. 40 A majority of the neighborhood has been developed with low density single family lots. Limited higher density housing opportunities may be available adjacent to both State Highway 13 and 170th Street through Planned Unit Developments. Future development should include buffer areas adjacent to the County Roads and State Highway 13 which incorporate design options such as greater lot sizes, building setbacks, berms and dense screening to protect residents from the impacts associated with the roadways. A trail system that connects existing neighborhoods to the parks, State Highway 13 trails, Five Hawks Elementary School and public lands adjacent to Prior and Spring Lakes are important potential improvements for this neighborhood. Future development should emphasize the historical, recreational, resort, and natural features that are characteristic of this area. The neighborhood's only commercial district and its major entry point is southwest of the intersection of 170th Street and State Highway 13. The limited business district contains nonconforming uses, and unplatted land. The uses have direct access to State Highway 13 which should be eliminated with any future platting activity. Future redevelopment activity on this highly visible comer should be neighborhood oriented. The intersection of County Road 81 and State Highway 13 is a major entry point into the community. An entrance feature and landscaping should be placed near this intersection to identify the City's boundary and to create Prior Lake's sense of place. DISTRlCT OBJECTIVES: 1. Incorporate buffer areas with development of properties adjacent to County Road 12, and State Highway 13 that will protect residential development from noise and litter and will provide separation from business uses. 2. A trail system should link neighborhoods to the business district, Five Hawks Elementary School, public parks, Prior and Spring Lakes and Spring Lake Regional Park. 3. The business district should be upgraded to provide effective pedestrian and traffic circulation. Area redevelopment should eliminate the private drive access to State Highway 13 and the non-conforming uses should be replaced with permitted uses. Landscaping, paved parking, sidewalks, and attractive building design should be featured. 4. A local road should connect 170th Street to State Highway 13. A frontage road connecting 170th Street to Five Hawks Avenue should be provided as part of the ring road circulation system. 41 HOUSING ELEMENT INTRODUCTION This Housing Plan provides a profile of Prior Lake's housing and its residential neighborhoods. The profile includes a description of the housing supply, tenancy, conditions, demographics, cost (single family ownership and rental), housing assistance and housing capacity. From this information, an analysis was made which identifies housing issues and needs. The analysis, issues and needs were used to develop the housing goal, policies and strategies to effectively implement the goal and policies. The last section contains the housing plan and program. Projections of housing, population and employment are as of June 30, 1995. Field work, rents, and occupancy-vacancy information is as of July 1994. The City of Prior Lake, Scott County Housing and Redevelopment Authority and Minnesota Housing Finance Agency all have important roles in implementing the housing plan. This chapter of the City's Comprehensive Plan satisfies the housing requirements of the Mandatory Planning Act and requirements of Chapter 462C of Minnesota Statutes which requires a housing plan prior to the sale of mortgage revenue bonds. HOUSING PROFILE - INVENTORY SUPPLY Prior Lake's housing supply consists of approximately 4,958 dwelling units. The supply is diverse with respect to type, size, age, cost and tenancy. Single family housing predominates and represents over 76 percent (3,781 units) of the supply. This percentage has been increasing and is likely to continue to increase in the near term because of favorable market factors, the number of approved residential subdivisions and the City's favorable setting for single family housing. Multiple family housing represents the next largest category. Its percentage has decreased (14.03% in 1990 to 12.85 % in 1995). In 1995, building permits for 51 new multiple family units were issued. However, between 1986 and 1995, no new multiple family units were constructed. The number of duplexes and townhouses is increasing somewhat but the percentage is falling _ the 252 units in this category represent 5.08 percent of the total housing. The number and percentage of mobile homes and single family seasonal homes is also declining as these units are replaced by permanent housing. Figure 1, Monthly Building Permits 1992 - June 1995, illustrates the recent building permit activity for single family, duplex, townhouse, seasonal and mobile housing units. The graph does not include reservation housing units or the multiple family permits (51 units) taken out in 1995. Table 1, Residential Units, provides a breakdown of the number of dwelling units by type as of June 30, 1995. 57 TABLE 3 HOUSING STOCK JUNE 30, 1995 Single Family Duplex & Townhouse Multiple Family Total Single F~ily Duplex & Townhouse Multiple Family Total 113 595 853 2.28 12.00 17.20 *lncludes 38 units that have been demolished since 1990, and excludes new units built on the reservation in 1994 and 1995. Source: Thibault Associates; 1990 U.S. Census; Prior Lake City Records Methodology: 1990 US Census data was updated based on construction of781 new units from 1990 through June 30, 1995. 708 new single family units were assumed to be owner. 22 new duplex and townhouse units were verified as owner. 51 new multifamily units were assumed to be rental. Table 4, Tenancy and Occupancy, provides a combination of information based on the 1990 U.S. Census updated to June 30, 1995 based on known vacancy rates in the multiple family developments and estimated vacancy rates and occupancy levels in single family units. 63 Table 12, Distribution of Housing Values for Owner-Occupied Units, compares 1990 unit values with 1994 unit values. TABLE 12. DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSING VALUES FOR OWNER-OCCUPIED UNITS Less than $15,000 1 0.0 24 $15,000 to $19,999 2 0.1 2 $20,000 to $24,999 3 0.1 5 .13 $25,000 to $29,999 - 0 0.0 15 .40 $30,000 to $34,999 5 0.2 0 0 $35,000 to $39,999 5 0.2 4 .11 $40,000 to $44,999 11 0.4 7 .19 $45,000 to $49,999 18 0.6 27 .72 $50,000 to $59,999 59 2.0 80 2.12 $60,000 to $74,999 258 8.9 217 5.76 $75,000 to $99,999 1,106 38.1 1,317 34.93 $100,000 to $124,999 522 18.0 945 25.07 $125,000 to $149,999 328 11.3 455 12.07 * $150,000 to $174,999 192 6.6 258 6.84 $175,000 to $199,999 148 5.1 167 4.43 $200,000 to $249,999 129 4.4 162 4.30 $250,000 to $299,999 71 2.4 48 1.27 $300,000 to $399,999 28 1.0 29 .77 $400,000 to $499,999 8 0.3 6 .16 $500,000 or more 6 0.2 2 .05 TOTAL 2,900 100.0 3,770* 100 Source: Thibault Associates; 1990 U.S. Census; Scott County Assessor *Note that this figure does not represent the actual number of owner-occupied housing units as of 1994,but rather the number which have been assessed. This is due to the gap in time between when a unit is constructed and when it is assessed. Methodology: 1990 data was obtained from the 1990 US Census. 1994 data was obtained from the Scott County Assessor's records. 78 HOUSING GOAL. POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES The City has five Goals. The first Goal deals with housing and the environment. The Goal is stated below. HOUSING GOAL: Encourage the development and maintenance of suitable housing in a desirable environment. To achieve the housing goal, Prior Lake's neighborhoods and diverse housing supply must be maintained. Older units may need to be rehabilitated. Quality building and excellent site design are important to insure new multiple family housing and other housing meets the needs of the residents and to be positive additions to the neighborhoods. Adherence to the housing objectives and policies which follow will result in achieving the housing goal. Objectives and policies in support of this goal are listed below. OBJECTIVE 1 - Affordable Quality Housing: Provide opportunities for a variety of affordable quality housing. POLICIES: a. Codes and Ordinances - Codes and ordinances relating to development, redevelopment, and maintenance of housing shall be adopted and periodically reviewed to ensure specific direction is provided regarding affordable uses in each district and regarding minimum development standards. b. Scott County HRA - Review annually the current and planned programs of the Scott County Housing and Redevelopment Authority. c. Allow for Low and Moderate Cost Housing - Maintain development standards and housing policies that allow for low and moderate cost housing opportunities. d. Housing Mix - Develop and maintain regulations that permit a mix of housing types, sizes and price ranges to be provided through the City. OBJECTIVE 2 - Quality Residential Environments: Maintain a choice of and encourage development of quality residential environments. POLICIES: a. Density - Maintain a variety of residential densities (units per acre). b. Community Structure Concept - Utilize a community structure concept that is focused upon neighborhoods as the framework for developing and redeveloping residential areas. c. Residential Development - Ensure that public services and em-site improvements are completed at the time of residential development. d. Industrial/Commercial Encroachment - Protect residential areas from industrial and commercial encroachment to the maximum practicable extent; recognizing that the degree of encroachment may vary with 94 isolated single family developments, which are part of an urban neighborhood. e. Developer's Burden - The burden of a satisfactory transition from one density or dwelling type to another rests with the developer seeking development plan approval. f. Viable Neighborhoods - Discourage new residential subdivisions in isolated areas that have little or no potential to either develop into a viable neighborhood or to assimilate with an established neighborhood. g. Multiple Family Development - Consideration of development plans for multiple family dwellings in areas so designated on the Land Use Guide Plan, should include the following design-related items: 1) New developments should not isolate existing single family dwellings by inhibiting pedestrian and/or vehicular access. 2) New development completely surrounded by single family dwellings, should be discouraged in favor of large scale planned unit developments which are more conducive to a mix of housing styles with shared amenities. 3) There should be convenient access to collector and arterial streets and to available transit so to not unduly contribute to congestion on local residential streets. 4) Large common open areas may provide an effective transitional use to other uses. h. Code Enforcement Program - Develop and consider for adoption a code enforcement program for existing housing. OBJECTIVE 3 - Open Space Preservation: Provide suitable passive open space for the preservation of the natural environment and the enjoyment of residents. POLICIES: a. Ponding and Wetlands - Retain natural ponding areas and, as applicable per state law, wetlands. b. Large Planned Unit Developments - Promote platting of large planned unit developments. METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT BACKGROUND In 1995, the Minnesota legislature passed the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. Tl)e Act is a new effort toward developing regional solutions to the problems of the declining tax base in older communities, urban sprawl, and affordable housing in suburbs. The Act created three funds administered by the Metropolitan Council to assist communities in cleaning up polluted land (Tax Base Revitalization Account), developing innovative projects to revitalize neighborhoods and encourage efficient development (Livable Communities Demonstration Account), and to develop affordable and life-cycle housing in the suburbs (Local Housing Incentive Account). 95 Affordable housing for the metropolitan area is based on 80 percent of the median family income and with no more than 30 percent of the gross family income spent on housing. Using the 1994 incomes, the Metropolitan Council has calculated this to be $500 per month for rent and $115,000 for the purchase price of a home. The Metropolitan Council has evaluated cities in the metropolitan area and established "benchmarks" for clusters of communities. An "index" which shows how each City compares with the benchmark was also computed, Table 26, Prior Lake Index and Benchmark, is the Metropolitan Council's computation for Prior Lake. The GOAL column represents the City's negotiated goals. The estimated Affordable and Life-Cycle Housing Opportunities Amount (ALHOA) for Prior Lake in 1997 is $26,557. Prior Lake has passed a resolution electing to participate the Local Housing Incentives Account Program which is under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act. TABLE 26. PRIOR LAKE INDEX AND BENCHMARK Single family detached Multifamily Source: Metropolitan Council 81% /19% 70-75% / 25-30% .CJ~IN]lE~:;\i!~~!!\;i )~.lJE~CHl~:f~RK' 'C ' 1.8/acre 1.9 - 2.3 acres 9/acre 10 - 11 acres 75% - 25% Ownership Rental '''e. 1!"r'(J$;T1'Iio.Tn """",4;11I' ";~"!'.IJ""1'Ii>T:e'" rnrA'V"*n"17"'!"f;.~,,. r ':<>;:::::.Gtltm.a;l:,'t.u~&Jw)j:"" 'iih'kf{;, '.clL':"':~~T~;::;;'ih~4;, ~,#"._. ", .~:"".-:>\,;_',i:';:.;:.,,:.<:'::.:::>....c f,'_,.'......_:.-_, .._:.".,)>~,~'-, .',,:.'~.:. __:.__iF>: ~'/'. ':':, ,::,:"".-:. ,";'-"",:''''fA'''''':'--'""" ,.i,:<:",,,,:~',,,,,,,-,, "'-_" -,-'-,.'- _,"':{~,'}><'>:'::- 71% 64% - 69% 39% 32% - 53% ~;t~!iJj~(~~~;'~~ltr~I J2~QJ~~~.~~:;:::r4;; r'GQ'..", 20% 35% - 38% 35% 1.9/acre 11/ acre Process The participation process can be divided into the following three steps: 1. By November 15, 1995 Declare intent to participate by adoption of a resolution so stating intent. The City passed this resolution on October _, 1995. 2. By January 15, 1996 - Negotiate and establish affordable and life-cycle housing goals for Prior Lake. 3. In 1996 - Submit an Action Plan to implement the goals. The specific goals consistent with the Livable Communities Act which have been prepared will be followed by development of an Action Plan, both of which will be adopted as amendments to this Housing Plan. 96 PLANNING REPORT AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: PRESENTER: PUBLIC HEARING: DATE: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN Al\1ENDMENT TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 6-3-1, ABBREVIATED SUBDIVISION PROCESS R. MICHAEL LEEK, ASSOCIATE PLANNER _X_ YES _NO-N/A FEBRUARY 26, 1996 INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this item is to consider repeal of Section 6-3-1 of the City Code and Section 6-3-1 of the Subdivision Ordinance which outlines a foreshortened, or abbreviated subdivision process in certain cases. BACKGROUND: At its meeting of February 5, 1996, the City Council directed staff to prepare an amendment to the City Code and Subdivision Ordinance repealing the Abbreviated Subdivision Process. A copy of Section 6-3-1 is attached to this report. The rationale for repealing Section 6-3-1 is that it does not substantially shorten the subdivision process. A shortened process, Administrative Land Division, is still available for subdivisions resulting in 3 or fewer parcels. AL TERNA TlVES: 1. Recommend the City Council repeal Section 6-3-1 of the Subdivision Ordinance 2. Recommend the City Council amendment Section 6-3-1 of the Subdivisi~n Ordinance. 3. Recommend the City Council not repeal Section 6-3-1 of the Subdivision Ordinance. ABBSUBPC.OOCIRML 16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E.. Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1, recommendation of repeal of Section 6-3-1. ACTION REQUIRED: A motion to recommend the City Council repeal Section 6-3-1 of the Subdivision Ordinance. A separate motion to close the public hearing is in order. ABBSUBPC.DOCIRML 2 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE ORDINANCE NO. 96-XXX AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 6-3-1 OF THE CITY CODE AND SECTION 6-3-1 OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE (87-10), ABBREVIATED SUBDIVISION PROCESS. The City Council of the City of Prior Lake does hereby ordain: Section 6-3-1 of the City Code and Section 6-3-1 of the Prior Lake Subdivision (87-10) are hereby repealed in their entirety. This ordinance shall become effective from and after its passage and publication. Passed by the City Council of the City of Prior Lake this _ day of , 1996. ATTEST: City Manager Mayor Published in the Prior Lake American on the _ day of , 1996. Drafted By: City of Prior Lake 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 ABBRSUBD.DOCIRML SECTION: 6-3-1 : 6-3-2: 6-3-3: 6-3-4: 6-3-5: 6-3-1: (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) CHAPTER 3 PROCEDURE FOR SUBMISSION OF PLATS Abbreviated Subdivision Process Standard Subdivision Process Preliminary Plat Procedure for Final Plat Approval and Recording Effect of Subdivision Approval ABBREVIATED SUBDIVISION PROCESS: This process is designed to expedite the platting process in certain instances, provided the following conditions are met: The subdivision will not create more than six (6) lots. All lots must conform to applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements unless there is a specific exception as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance requirements. (Ord 93-15) All utilities are available to the site and are of adequate size. The subdivision will not interfere with the proper development of adjacent properties. The sketch plan, preliminary plat and final plat may be submitted contemporaneously. They shall be reviewed by City Staff prior to any formal application to the City Council. The City Council shall hold a public hearing to act on the preliminary and final plats. Notice of the hearing shall be published at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing in the official newspaper. Notice of the hearing shall also be mailed to all property owners within five hundred feet (500') of the exterior boundaries of the plat. On site signs notifying the public of a pending subdivision shall be posted at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. 6 PLANNING REPORT AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: PRESENTER: PUBLIC HEARING: DATE: 6 1995 VARIANCE SUMMARY REPORT R. MICHAEL LEEK, ASSOCIATE PLANNER YES X NO-N/A - - FEBRUARY 26, 1996 INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this item is to provide the Planning Commission with information regarding 1995's variance activity. It is hoped that this information will give the Commission information which will be useful in evaluating new variance requests, and also in evaluating the possible need for changes in the City's zoning ordinance. DISCUSSION: During 1995 the Planning Commission reviewed 43 requests for variance. The nature of the individual requests and their disposition are contained in the the attached table. Of the 43 requests heard, 32 (74.4%) were approved (4 ofthose with modifications from the original requests), 8 (18.6%) were denied, and 3 were withdrawn. The most common request was for a variance from the side yard setback requirement on one or both sides of the property. Side yard setback variances were requested in 19 (44.2%) of the variance cases. The second most common request was for a variance from the lakeshore setback requirement, with 12 (27.9%) lakeshore setback variances requested. Following closely behind were requests for variance from the impervious surface, with 11 (25.6%) variances requested. The nature of the requests for variance is probably very familiar to the Commission, and similar to previous years. In light of the presumption in the Zoning Ordinance that "lots of record" are buildable it would make sense to make the process of developing such lots less cumbersome than it is at present. The nature of the requests also suggests that the Commission and City Council consider amending the Zoning Ordinance (including the shore land provisions) to more efficiently accomodate development of lots in the shore land district. 16200 fl~~resQJffie:w~IS.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER F or example, one 5' side yard setback could be permitted so long as 10' or 15' of separation is maintained between structures for fire safety purposes. In 1995, such a provision might have eliminated 13 requested individual variances. As another example, the City could adopt the 50' lakeshore setback found in the MnDNR's regulations. In 1995, such a change might have eliminated 3 requested individual variances. AL TERNA TIVES: 1. Accept the report and direct that it be transmitted to the City Council for information. 2. Accept the report, direct that the report be transmitted to the City Council for information, and direct further study of possible ordinance revisions in response to the report. ACTION REQillRED: A motion accepting the report, and directing further action revising the if appropriate. 2 95V ASUPC.DOC/RML ~ < ~ ~ 00 ~ u z < ~ < > -n 0'\ 0'\ ,...-I Q) t:: o Z Q) t:: o Z Q) Q) t:: t:: o 0 zz "'Cl "'Cl Q) Q) ;> ;> "'Cl8 "'Cl"'Cl"'Cl8"'Cl"'Cl"'Cl"'Cl"'Cl ~o. "'Cl~~~o.~~~~~ o 0 ~13 Q) 0 0 0 ~o 0 0 0 0 II II ~ '13'13 II II II ~ II II II II II o.o.~ Q) Q) o.o.o.~ 0.0.0.0.0. <t:<t:MOO<t:<t:<t:M<t:<t:<t:<t:<t: Q) 00 t1:l .. ro 00 .. ~ c.8 Q) Q).a ~oo ~ u ~ is t E ~~~ ;> m Q) 0 8 >-. ~ ~ ~Q)~~:f -u g u g m '.g ~ .o~o:S~ ~= "'Cl ..... .. Q) U .... ,..J ~~~mu "'Cl..m >-. "'Cl m "E <t: ] ~ c.8 ~ Q) ~ ;:j ro..... >-. >-''''Cl 0 "'Cl >-..9 >-. (..I.. Q) "",,:; ._ ;> Q) . Q) "'Cl ro I-< m 15 I-< "'Cl C'" "'Cl .- >-. Q) ..... 0 Q)'- m 'Cii m ..... 0.. ~ ~~o.:l/"').....tit::EO ~ E m t"- m Q) 8.-,J:::: Vi .- ~ 0\ ~ ~ ~ -g:. ~ \O~~~.. ~~~ --OM ~l/"')l/"')N"<t'- _ l/"') M- NM"<t'l/"')-NM"<t'l/"') - .. Eo-< m ~ 00 ...... Q) ::r:: t:: Q) ci ~ ..0 Q)l/"') t::"<t'2> rooo?' UMOO ~ Q) S o a::l ~ Q) ,..., N o I l/"') 0'1 <t: > "'Cl"'Cl Q) Q) ;> ;> o 0 .. .. 0.0. 0.0. <t:<t: U p.. \.0 o l/"') 0'1 "<t' "7 U ~Q)Q)~ U S S UZZ~ U p.. 00 - l/"') 0'1 t"- "<t' I l/"') 0'1 U U "'Cl"'Cl"'Cl"'Cl~ Q) Q) Q) Q) ro ;> ;> ;> ;> .. o 0 0 0 "'Cl II II II ll-S 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.'- <t:<t:<t:<t:~ t:: "'Cl "'Cl <t: t:: "'Cl 0 t:: .- N m Q) 'S: ~ ...... ro"'Cl ....:l"'Cl Q) t:: ,J::::,;s ..... Q) t:: ;> "'Cl 0 .~ "'" 00 .. ro t:: ..... ..... >-. Q) 0 .;!.l .@ 15 oo.@ . S Q) 0 is .S E 0. ~ ~~] .s ~Q) 0 ".. o t1:l-S U-O _.fl Q)~~ ~ c::: u U m ~ ~ .~ ~ 0 8 C:::~"'Cl u ~a5 c:::~ .9 g ~ t:: m" .9 "<t' t)o:S >-.~l/"') mOl ~N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ 0 ~ ~ E "'Cl ...... ...... If''l,, t: ....:l Q) ~ o~~StQ)ti~g ~ >-'i: Q) 0 o.~"'CloS .....Q)O' E,J::::C:::Q) Q) C:::,J:::: 0 ro._ ..... t1:l m got:: ..... ~ ';::;,c :'S! ,J:::: Q) t1:l ~ 0 Q) ro c.... ~ ..... .. .- c::: u ..... ~ "'Cl ..2 ~ s:: 0'1 .~ j ~ :9'~ ~ ~ NO~ _N__N>-Nl/"')....:l....:l-N- Q) m ;:j o ,J:::: .g U >-. .. ro .. o 0. E Q) ..... ro "'Cl Q) .. .. ro 0 >-.,J:::: Q) m "'Cl Q) 'Cii~ - \0 o\~ c::: o m o Q) .. "'Cl .. ...... Q) o "'Cl c::: ro "'Cl .. ro ~ o ::r:: ..... c::: Q) E 0. o - Q) ;> Q) o .. Q) ~ ~] ....:l u ..00 o c::: 'C Q) p..~ M o I l/"') 0'1 <t: > "<t' l/"') 00 I I l/"') l/"') 0'1 0'1 <t:<t: >> Q) .. ro U "'Cl - :.a U >-. c::: Q) o c::: N 0 'C ~ ~~ ~.E Z~ \0 t"- 00 I I l/"') l/"') 0'1 0'1 <t:<t: >> "'Cl"'Cl"'Cl Q) Q) Q) ;>;>;>"'Cl o 0 0 Q) II II ll'::: 0. 0. 0. a:> <t:<t:<t:O ~ g ~~o:S ~ggQ) g o:S o:S ~ o:S~~ti ~"'Cl"'Cl,J:::: "'Cl~~] ~>-'>-'ro >-.1515- Q) 0 0 0 :'S!~~c.8 m ~ \O~S::~ ..... Q) t:: m Q) ;:j E 0 go ~ ~ _ "" u ~ ~ ~ ~ OoU..... "'Cl~uQ) C:::OO~ a ro Q) ,..., ....:lu.J"'Cl ::r:: as ~ a ~ ~ E E ::r::j~E=: 000'10- 00-- I I I I l/"') l/"') l/"') l/"') 0'10'10'10'1 <t:<t:<t:<t: >>>> m Q) ~ '(3 o m m <t: ~ ~ 00 ~ u ~ Q) t: Q) m Q) .. p.. Q) ,J:::: ..... " - ~ u Q) 0 00- roa::l .. " Q)- ;> ..... o 0 u....:l Q) ~ u .. u ~c.8.g .. Q) .. ~ g c.8 m t1:l ~ g 'g u .~ ;> ro " oS t -S ~ g-0.Q) ~ Q) .. .- "'Cl 0 -g:.o~ OI-Q) C"iN~ M -- N M 0'1 - \.0 15 Q) [~ ~ ,.g ,J::::' u..... Q) m ;> ro "'Cl Q) .. ~ oO,J:::: Q) c::: u C1'l ~o"a ro > 0 .~ ....:lQ)"<t'~ ..u"<t'C! o ;:j ...... ~ 'C .. "<t' ..... p..a::l-~ N - I l/"') 0'1 <t: > M"<t' l/"') - - - I I I l/"') l/"') l/"') 0'10'1 0'1 <t:<t: <t: >> > U p.. 0'1 o l/"') 0'1 "'Cl Q) ;> "'Cl"'Cl8 Q) Q) 0. ~ ~ ~ llll~ 0.. 0.. C <t:<t:~ Q) ~c:::oo ro ~ .9 t . ~ .t:: ;> ...... "'Cl 0 .. "'Cl u "'Cl ro Q) .. .. u c.8c.8~ ..Iod..lod" u u ;:j ro ro m o:So:S~ ~ ~.9 "'Cl"'Clt: ~ ~ Q) >-.>-.0.. Q) Q) E "'Cl "'Cl ...... . Cii . Cii -g:. l/"') NOIM .... NM u ~ :E ::l ~ 0( ;> .,.. 0\ UU 0...0... lrl \0 - - lrl lrl 0\ 0\ UUUU 0...0...0...0... '<to-M 'I"""""'l ~ ~......... lrl lrl lrl lrl 0\0\0\0\ ~ Z 00 CIi ~~ CIi 1-1 "0 ~ ..... ~ '"C:l d) ;> '"C:l'"C:l'"C:l '"C:l8'"C:l"O d) d) d) d) 0.. d) d) ;> ;> ;>"0 ;> 0.. ;> ;> o 0 0 .~ 0 CIi 0 0 l5.. l5.. l5.. t:: l5.. ~ l5.. l5.. 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. d) 0.. ~ 0.. 0.. <c~<c<CO<C'<t~<C 00 0 ro ..... ~ ~ t:: 0 ro"O o..~ ~ < ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ U Z < ; < > In 0'\ 0'\ ~ ,;,.i C) d) "0 CIi 4-< o t:: .9 ..... C) .s d) 00 I::lt) t:: t:: ~ o I::lt) C) ,9 __ ,9:E d) ~ <I) .........0 ~ ;::l I::lt) OO~ro ~o CIi d)~ C) d) d)~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1-1 ..... ro a C) t:: C) ~ ~ 1-1 I::lt) 81-18 o"OcBl-I c.ScB~ c.S C) a d) ,9 1-1 ,.. t:: 1-1 <I) C) ....... ;::l ~ ;::l C)>'t::~ oo~o oo~ ,~ -<::: ._CIi C) '''' Z C) ........... ro gj;9 gjro !5 .8 a ..D 0 d) t::"O o..e 00 ~ ;> 0 "0 "0 .- 00 0 a.- ~ 000"000 a a t::'E'"2 >.t:: 00 5\0 a '"2 ~>.8.~~a 8.'"2 'S: "0 >. ~"O a 8 d) d) ~ 8 ~ 1-0 t:: d) .- d) .... - - .... d)Cd"O.....ool-< vv ..... 0.. .- t:: ~ ';f.. 'en 'en V\ ';f.. t:: 8r--0O8lrloO\ 000 __lrl(;:;;iM-<<:tV\\oC"l<<:tc.l:: r--..~ rn __r-__C"lM--C"lMC"l I-< >. d)~ - 00 I::lt);> t:: 0 d)~ d 00 ;>,N ~ - ~ 00 l:! I-< Q) :E :q .g> 8. ~ oo~ooro ]]J38::E CIi CIi Q) . 00 "O'"C:lro~.,g ';; e -5 ~ gp 8o~~8 ~ C) :.a I-< ;::l c:o t:: t:: ro o 00 00 ;::l 1-<00 d)"O ] t:: <C ro t:: I::lt)d) 'a ~ I-< ..... Uoo I::lt) t:: :.a - '5 c:o d) I::lt) ro I-< o ..... 00 ~ - r- o 00 - - C"l C"l C"l , , lrl lrl 0\ 0\ ~<C :>:> M C"l I lrl 0\ ~ :> r-000\0 ___C"l I 1 I I lrl lrl lrl lrl 0\0\0\0\0\ <C<C~~~ :>:>:>:>:> U 0... o C"l lrl 0\ "0"0"0 d) d) d) ;>, ;> ;> ;> 0..888 80..0..0.. 8~~~ ~~ '5t:: o 0 ooZ d) d) ~~ .......... t:: t:: o 0 ~~~ C) ~ C) ro..D ro ..D.......D ..... d) ..... ~ 00 ~ "O"Od) I-< a I-< ro ___ 0 ;>,~~ ..... 00 'E t:: ~ 00.- c.l::c.l::.,g U 0... \0 C"l lrl 0\ r- o -u '0... lrlr- 0\C"l ulrl UO\ "0 "0 d) d) ;> '"C:l"O;>"08 d)d)8d) 0.. ;> ;> 0.. ;> 0.."0 ooo..orod) l5.. l5.. ro l5.. ~ . 2 0.. 0.. ~ 0.. '" d) ~~~~~o "Ci "0 t:: d) d) 5 ~ I-< 0..' 0..'"2 ~o d) C) o a tS .~ ","",d);> ~a~~ o ;::l C) C) ._ 0" ro ro .....oo..D..D :.a\O.......... "O-~~ ro ~"O d) "0 \0 1-1 I-< d) 4-< ~ 0 ~ 0 ~~ g.~g] l5..ac.l::.,g I-< ..... cB3 d) I::lt) ro t:: I-< 0 d) ,_ ;> ..... o:.a C)"O ..... d) ro d) ~J9 ~eo ]~~gb ..... 00 I::lt) I-< t:: 5 ~ cB o ._ 4=< "0 "0 t::"O a ad)a>. >. 0.. >. ..... 8 t:: ~.... ~ 0 ,- ~ ,- c.l:: o;.oo~oo C"l'<tlrl<<:t\O~ 00 d) C) a 'C ro ;> t:: I::lt) .- __00 C"lN~_ ca, . _C"lM,-,,-C"lM'<tlrl t:: d) - d) ~ >. d) - I-< :E 00 "0 a t:: d) ..D o ~ '<t C"l , lrl 0\ ~ :> t:: o 00 I-< d) "0 t:: <C 8 ~ "0 a t:: o ~ lrl C"l , lrl 0\ <C :> "0 t:: ro ~ - u ro ,_ $-t:t::: i:: g~~d) ~~ooo .- c:o ::I:: ~ 8 00 ~ C) ~ ~ .~ .s t::~t::ca o .,g .... d) ~E-~::I:: r-ooO\ C"lC"lC"l I I , lrl lrl lrl 0\0\0\ ~~~ :>:>:> N U 0... 0\ C"l lrl 0\ ~--g--g ti~>>"'O d) "0 0 0 d) ;::l ~ l5.. l5..'2 0" ,-<::: 0.. 0.. d) ~~~~O "0 d) a I-< ;>,.,g ..... Cf.l t:: d) ~~ d) I::lt) ro I-< <I) ;> o u d) u c.S I-< ;::l Cf.l 00 ;::l o 'E d) 0.. 8 .... ';f.. 00 0\00 _ \0 M _NM t:: o ~ .....J "0 s::: ro _ ro d)ca ] I::lt) ,~ 2 ::E::E u ~ g CI ~ ::l 00 ~ <( ;> ..... 0\ o M I lrl 0\ <C :> - ~ r.l~ >~ o~ ~.z~ ~s::; '2 ~~' d) -< 0 ~ < ~ ~ ;:J rJ'J. ~ U Z < ; < > tn ~ ~ ~ '" '<:t U U U U 0 r--- U - - U U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ V') V') C"l M V') '<:t 00 0'1 0'1 0 M M M M M M U U '<:t 0 V') V') V') V') V') V') \0 0'1 0'1 0'1 0'1 0'1 U U 0'1 0'1 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0 "'0"'0 d) d) d) d) d) d) d) d) d) d) d) d) ;> ;> ;> ;> ;> ;> ;> "'0 "'0 "'0 ;> "'0 ;> ;> ;> ;> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d) d) .~ 0 d) 0 0 0 0 I-< I-< I-< I-< I-< I-< I-< ...... ...... I-< ...... I-< I-< I-< I-< 0..0..0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. c: c: c: 0.. c: 0..0.. 0..0.. 0..0..0.. 0..0.. < 0.. d) d) d) 0.. d) << 0..0.. <<< << < 0 0 0< 0 << ~ o ~ ;9 d) en "'0 d) I-< I-< ~ 0 ;>-'"J:: ..... en c: d) o~ tt:l~ "'0 I-< ~ ;>-. d) "'0 ...... en ~ o 00 -\0 0\0 C"l'<:tV')C"l'<:t _ C"l - C"l M d) ~ U I-< d) S G3 ;..; U "J:: o ~ d) ~ ~ c: ;>-.0 ~"'O "'0 ~ ...... ~ - 01) - c: ~...... ::r:'<:t S~ d)\O ....... - C"l M I V') 0'1 < :> "'0 ~ ----;>-. ~.g .~ 'c;j .t= .... "'0 en "'0 r~ ~- I-< ~ ..a V') r--- ~ . '-" - d) t: d) .~ d) ::r: ] .E d) OI)~ g S :>~ M M I V') 0'1 < :> ~ o d) "'0 ~ ____ I-< ~..a .~ ~ ..... 0 :g.s ~ d) d) en d) 01) d) t; e t; "J::~"J:: ~ 01) ~ ~-g~ - ~- OI)~ 0'1 C. V') '<:t . ..... '<:t ;> ;.::: . C"l '-"- - I-< E-< en "J:: ~ o 0 ~ "J:: d) 00 ~a3~ "'0 en ~ ]]~ ~~~ ~ :3::!: . ::!:~~~ '<:t M I V') 0'1 < :> .....: I-< E-< ~ o d) "'0 01) c: .- ..... en .~ d) 4..; o d d) S d) o ~ - 0.. ~ I-< ..a ~ o "J:: en d) ~ ~ - ~ 0'1 '<:t - "'i: E-< en d) I-< o "J:: 00 ~c: .- ~ :=: ~ :.E~ ~ 'a d)~ =0 .g~~ < V') 00 V') M I V') 0'1 < :> "'0"'0 ~ ~ ;>-'d)"'O .g:g~::;;- 'c;j .: ;>-. g .....end"'O ~ d) 0 ~ ~~tt:ll-< ~ ..a '<:t . r--- 00 _ ~; ca. ~\.'4("f")~l"""""I d) ;> .~ .,!:l en '2 's "'0 ~ ~ 4..; o ~ 0.. en ~ ~ d) ~ "'0 ~ oo:@ ~ .~ ..... o -....:l "'0 ~ ;>-. d) "'0 .- en ..... en d) ~ c: o .- en '> :.a "'0 ~ - c: o 'c;j '> :.a "'0 ~ - ~ ~ ~ en en d) c: .- en ~ ~ c: .- d) - en .- ~ d) ;> :g I-< o 01) c: ~ 0.. I-< ..a "'0 ~ ;>-. d) "'0 .- en ti_ d) en ~~ d) d) ;S;S c: c: o 0 "'0"'0 ~ ~ ;>-.;>-. d) d) "'0"'0 ....-4 ...... en en ~ ~ V') V') '<:t V') d) ;> .~ I-< ..... en '2 's ~ ~ 4..; o ~ 0.. en ~ ~ d) ~ "'0 ~ :@ .~ ..... o ....:l M - - C"l 't: ~ d) ~oo~ ..... . ~ ~ c: ...... ...... ~ I-I-t -4 ~]-ga3~ c: ".. 0 = d) ~~~~t; en :E g "'0 ~ ~ t: a 0 d"'OO~>. ~~uaoo "'0 ;>-. 00 ~ 00 s:~-=:::o ~d~~~ 00 ~ c: ....:l 0 I-< I-<OO~ ""':d) d)......~ I-<ti ~z~~t~] d)t::' I-< ~d)>-o ~r:~::r:~oo~ ;>-. r- 0.. ~ en 0 ;so\.s~O'~o::: g - .;!a 0 0 8 - .5 "0 ..El ~ ~ "J:: 8 E-<....:lUJoo-l'<:tE-<'<:t ~ 00 ..... 00 ~ ~ ..... 'a' .a ~ ~ 000 d)'<:t ;>\0 .8\0 00 '<:t \0 M I V') 0'1 < :> r--- M I V') 0'1 < :> 00 0'1 M M I I V') V') 0'1 0'1 << :>:> o '<:t I V') 0'1 < :> _ C"l M '<:t'<:t '<:t I I I V') V') V') 0'10'1 0'1 << < :>:> :> u S:2 u o Cl ~ :J en g:: -( ;> ..... 0\ .". ~ -< ~ ~ ~ 00. ~ U ~ ~ -< > It) ""- ""- ~ u u ~ ~ ~ ~ <: ;> .,.. 0\ '"E c:e :>- .g (\) 'Vi l5 ........c: en en (\) (\) ~~ 00.....:1 l"'1 t"-- "";N c o en i u c :>- - 'g ~ "'0 1i3 c c:e .- I-< a::l