HomeMy WebLinkAboutOctober 14, 1996
REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
MONDAY, October 14, 1996
7:00 p.m.
1. Call Meeting to Order:
2. Roll Call:
3. Approval of Minutes:
4. Public Hearings:
A. Case #96-097 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER
REZONING OF LAND FROM A-I (AGRICULTURAL) AND C-I
(CONSERVATION) TO R-l (SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL) FOR THE
MARK HYLAND PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3520 154TH STREET.
5. Old Business:
6. New Business:
A. LINKAGE OF REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AREAS.
7. Announcements and Correspondence:.
Meeting with Pat Lynch from the MN Dept. of Natural Resources.
8. Adjournment:
16200 ~9(hQfek Ave. S.E.. Prior Lake. Minnesota60072-1714 / Ph. {612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNI1Y EMPLOYER
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 23, 1996
1. Call to Order:
The September 23, 1996, Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chairman
Criego at 7:02 p.m. Those present were Commissioners Kuykendall, Wuellner, Stamson,
Vonhofand Criego, Director of Planning Don Rye, Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier,
Planner Jane Tovar and Recording Secretary Connie Carlson.
2. Roll Call:
Wuellner
Kuykendall
Stamson
V onhof
Criego
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
3. Approval of Minutes:
MOTION BY KUYKENDALL, SECONDED BY VONHOF, TO APPROVE THE
SEPTEMBER 9, 1996, MINUTES AS SUBMITTED.
Vote taken signified ayes by Wuellner, V onhof, Kuykendall, Criego and Stamson.
MINUTES APPROVED.
4. Public Hearings: None
5. Old Business:
A. CASE 96-081 RICHARD AND SHERRY CROSS VARIANCE (CONTINUED)
The Planning Department considered this variance request on September 9, 1996. At that
meeting, the applicant testified there is an existing 12' by 24' deck along the back of the
house, even though it is not shown on the survey. The proposed addition would extend 4
feet beyond this deck. The Planning Commission continued this item to September 23,
1996, to allow the staff to investigate whether a permit had been issued for the deck.
The house on this site was built in 1982. The site plan included with the permit
application does not show a deck. There are no other permits on file for this site, except
for a residing permit issued in 1995. There was also testimony about the setbacks on the
adjacent properties, so the staff also researched the permits issued for the adjacent lots. A
variance and a building permit were issued for the construction of an addition to the
house to the west of this property (3809 Island View Circle, or Lot 5) in 1995. This
addition is located 56' from the OHW, which is consistent with the location of the
MN092396.DOC
PAGEl
existing deck on that house. In 1989, a permit to allow the construction of an addition to
the house to the east (3845 Island View Circle, or Lot 4) was issued. The addition is
located 76' from the OHW; however, the survey shows a deck located about 70' from the
OHW.
Section 9.3 (0,2) of the Zoning Ordinance allows the City to average the setbacks of the
structures on the adjacent lots. In this case, the average setback is 63 feet. Since the
proposed addition on this lot has a setback of 56' , a variance is still required. Staff
recommended denial based on the lack of demonstrated hardship.
Comments from the public:
Sherry Cross, 3827 Island View Circle, submitted three letters of support of the variance
from her neighbors.
Comments from Commissioners:
V onhof:
. Agrees with staff. The variance hardship standards are not met. Specifically with the
options available with the property utilizing the setback averaging, it gives applicant a
greater building envelop for an addition than they have right now.
. Suggest to go with setback averaging.
Kuykendall: .
. Applicant stated she bought the home in 1986. The deck was on when applicants
bought the home.
. Averaging would move it to 56 feet. There are other building alternatives.
. Hardship standards are not met but would be in favor of setback averaging based on
the fact the two neighboring properties had recent variances.
Wuellner:
. Applicant said the existing deck is 12 feet in width and approximately 24 feet in
length.
. The house has been here since 1982 and the deck was there before applicant bought
the house. Applicants should not be held accountable for a deck they did not build.
. Supports an addition in reflection of the existing structure. There are no other
alternatives to add on to their home.
. The neighbors have similar variances.
Stamson:
. The proposed addition is four feet further than the deck.
. Agree to grant a variance up to the existing deck.
. Kansier explained applicant can replace the deck but not another structure.
. The hardship criteria has not been met.
MN092396.DOC
PAGE 2
Criego:
. Applicant said the home is 1448 sq. feet plus two-thirds of the lower level. There is
no room to add on toward the front of the home.
. It is not a substandard lot.
. Agrees with staff. There is not a hardship.
Open Discussion:
Setback averaging of 63 feet at the closest point. Applicants could have a room 8 feet at
the shortest point times the length of the home. There are alternatives to accomplish
applicant's objectives. The averaging does not require a variance.
MOTION BY KUYKENDALL, SECOND BY VONHOF, TO DENY THE VARIANCE
REQUEST BASED ON THE FACT THERE WERE NO HARDSHIP STANDARDS.
Vote taken signified ayes by Kuykendall, V oOOof, Stamson, Wuellner and Criego.
MOTION CARRIED.
6. New Business:
A. CASE 96-086 JULIE AND PAUL YTTRENESS REQUEST THE FOLLOWING
VARIANCES: TO PERMIT A FRONT YARD SETBACK OF 50 FEET FROM THE
CENTERLINE OF A COLLECTOR STREET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 85 FEET;
A VARIANCE TO PERMIT IMPERVIOUS LOT COVERAGE OF 31.6% RATHER
THAN THE MAXIMUM 30% IMPERVIOUS LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED; A
VARIANCE TO PERMIT A FRONT YARD SETBACK OF 19.68 FEET RATHER THAN
THE REQUIRED 25 FEET FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELLING ON
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE R-l (URBAN RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT AND THE
SD (SHORELAND OVERLAY) DISTRICT IDENTIFIED AS 2818 CENTER STREET.
Planner Jenni Tovar presented the information from the Planning Report dated September
23, 1996. Julie and Paul Yttreness are proposing to construct a 67 by 23 foot dwelling
with a 21 by 12 foot deck on the vacant lot located at 2818 Center Road. Based on the
survey submitted by the applicant, the impervious surface of the lot, with the proposed
dwelling and driveway, is 31.6 percent, which is greater than the maximum impervious
surface of30 percent allowed (Section 9.3 B of the Zoning Ordinance) in the Shoreland
District. A variance of 1.6 percent of impervious surface is being requested.
The staff has concluded the size and the physical characteristics of the lot are a hardship
outside of the applicants' control. In addition, there are no legal alternatives for the
location of the proposed dwelling. However, the variance to setback from the centerline
of North wood Road can be minimized by placing the house 9.23 feet towards the
northeast comer of the lot, making the side yard setback along the deck 10 feet. Also, the
variance to impervious surface can be eliminated if reductions to the driveway are made.
MN092396.DOC
PAGE3
Comments from the public:
Ken Williamson, 23476 France Circle, Lakeville, represented the applicants. The
driveway is very short (24.67 feet) and 16 feet in width and is tough to take 25% out.
The best impervious surface reduction with 12 feet and 45 feet is 30.8 % with a driveway
reduction.
Stamson:
. Concurs overall with staff. The variance is necessary.
Wuellner:
. Mr. Williamson stated the home will be a split entry home.
. Could eliminate some variances by reducing the size of the home and redesign the
home.
. There are other alternatives.
V onhof:
. Unique 6,000 foot property with front on two streets.
. The impervious surface coming in at 31.6% is less significant than on a 15,000 square
foot lot. 1.6% impervious surface.
. Applicants trying to utilize the property the best way they can.
. There should be at least two parking spaces off street.
. Previously platted under Spring Lake Township.
. Qualifies under the hardships.
Kuykendall:
. The deck is elevated which is a trade off from a patio with more impervious surface.
. Rye asked if the entry was at grade. Mr. Williamson said it was.
. Support staff recommendation.
. Supports the impervious surface variance as well to have a reasonable size driveway.
Criego:
. Mr. Williamson does not see moving the house 9 feet to the northeast would be a
problem. It is difficult to stay within the impervious coverage because of the
driveway. He stated they have done many revisions to meet the percentage. The
house is 1053 sq. feet.
. Agrees with Kuykendall and staff recommendation.
Open Discussion: Applicant can not move the driveway. Northwood Road is a collector
street.
MOTION BY KUYKENDALL, SECOND BY VONHOF, TO APPROVE VARIANCESIDESCRIBED BY STAFF IN ADDITION TO THE REQUESTED IMPERVIOUS
SURFACE VARIANCE OF 31.6% REQUESTED BY APPLICANT.
MN092396.DOC
PAGE 4
Discussion: The driveway is so close to the intersection it is important to have a full
driveway.
Vote taken signified ayes by Criego, Kuykendall and V onhof, nays by Wuellner and
Stamson. MOTION CARRIED.
B. CONSIDER APPROV AL OF RESOLUTION 96-33PC CONCERNING
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS 1 AND 2.
Director of Planning Don Rye presented the information from the Planning Report dated
September 23, 1996.
The City Economic Development Authority has set a public hearing for October 7, 1996
to consider modifications of Development Districts 1 and 2. Minnesota Statutes requires
the Planning Commission make a finding the proposed expansion is in conformance with
the "general plan" ofthe City. The general plan for these purposes is the Comprehensive
Plan 2010. The issue is whether the proposed modifications of the two development
districts is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. Both areas are commercial and
industrial in nature and are designated for such use on the Land Use Plan element of the
Comprehensive Plan. In addition, staff believes the modifications are consistent with the
following policies:
. Encourage a mixture and diversity of industrial and commercial land uses that will
remain relatively stable under changing economic conditions.
. Establish and maintain an economic development and redevelopment program
through support of the Economic development Authority and its goals.
. Encourage and provide for the revitalization of the City through the development or
redevelopment of existing and new commercial and industrial facilities.
. Increase employment opportunities.
. Strengthen the City tax base.
. Support broad-scale community development activities using available and
appropriate fmancing to fund the public redevelopment cost.
Comments from Commissioners:
Kuykendall:
. Supports, however, objects thinking beyond piece meal planning. There is an absence
of the visual connection between the two commerical districts.
. Rye explained both areas are included in the development district. This is expanding
the development district which includes down town.
. City needs a economic redevelopment plan besides the Comprehensive Plan.
. Is the City involved with the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) for
getting funds? Rye said it is hard to qualify for.
. The City should go a step further in the resolution dealing with the City's EDA.
MN092396.DOC
PAGES
Wuellner:
. Supports
Stamson:
. Supports.
V onhof:
. Has the School District commented on this issue?
. Rye said the City Manager has talked to them and generally the City has not heard
any discontent from the District. The City has been very conservative in using tax
increment fInancing.
. Supports and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Criego:
. Total approval of the Resolution. This was the intention all along.
MOTION BY VONHOF, SECOND BY WUELLNER TO APPROVE RESOLUTION
96-33PC FINDING THE PLAN FOR MODIFICATION OF DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 2 CONFORMS TO CITY PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT
OF THE LOCALITY AS A WHOLE.
Discussion: The City should capitalize on this vehicle. Approve everything and add
"whereas as further development to down town". Bring visual closure to the rest of the
community.
Rye suggested staff to do research for specifIc requirements for redevelopment and bring
back a resolution.
Vote taken signifIed ayes by V onhof, Wuellner, Kuykendall, Stamson and Criego.
MOTION CARRIED.
7. Announcements and Correspondence:
Discussion on Planning Issues - State Highway 13, Proposed Long Term Access and
Development Plan.
. ModifIcations were based on comments from the public hearing.
. Task Force recommendation for full motion four way intersections for Franklin Trail
at Highway 13 and Franklin Trail and Anna Trail.
. A pedestrian trail along Highway 13.
MN092396.DOC
PAGE 6
. Pat Lynch from the DNR would like to come out and speak October 14, around 6:00
p.m.
. V onhof explained designing roads for or against traffic. Traffic should be encouraged
off 13. Highway 13 is critical to Prior Lake.
. Noise control is going to be the new concern for the country. Design will have to be
considered.
8. Adjournment:
MOTION BY KUYKENDALL, SECOND BY WUELLNER, TO ADJOURN THE
MEETING.
The meeting adjoined at 8:15 p.m.
Don Rye
Director of Planning
Connie Carlson
Recording Secretary
MN092396.DOC
PAGE 7
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
SITE:
PRESENTER:
REVIEWED BY:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
Applicant:
Location of Property:
Comprehensive Plan
Designation:
Current Zoning:
Adjacent Land Use and
Zoning:
PLANNING REPORT
4A
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A ZONE CHANGE
FROM THE A-1 (AGRICULTURAL) AND THE C-1
(CONSERVATION) DISTRICTS TO THE R-1 (SUBURBAN
RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT
APPROXIMATELY 27 ACRES LOCATED AT THE
NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF COUNTY ROAD 82
AND FOXTAIL TRAIL
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
DONALD R. RYE, PLANNING DIRECTOR
_X_ YES NO-N/A
OCTOBER 14, 1996
Integrity Development
James M. Halik, President
14869 Manitou Road
Prior Lake, MN 55372
This site consists of approximately 27 acres of vacant
land located directly north of County Road 82 (154th
Street) east of The Wilds development and directly west
of Foxtail Trial
This property is identified as R-UMD (Urban Low to
Medium Density Residential) on the 2010
Comprehensive Plan. This designation provides for a
range of densities from 2.5 unites per acre (single family
detached homes) to 10 units per acre (a mix of housing
types in a Planned Unit Development).
A-1 (Agricultural) and C-1 (Conservation). The southern
portion of this site is also located within the Shoreland
District.
North: Single family dwellings on large lots, zoned C-1
and A-1
16200 ~a!lW~Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (~\7-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
South: Single family dwellings on large lots zoned C-1
East: Vacant land and a single family dwelling on a
large lot, zoned A-1
West: The Wilds golf course and development, zoned
PUD 9-93
Comprehensive Plan
Designation:
All of the surrounding area is designated as R-UMD on
the 2010 Comprehensive Plan.
Streets/Access:
This site is adjacent to County Road 82 on the south
and Foxtail Trail on the east. Access to the site is off of
Foxtail Trail. The Transportation element of the
Comprehensive Plan identifies a north-south minor
collector street connection from County Road 82 to
County Road 42, which is basically an extension of
Foxtail Trail. In addition, there is an east-west street
from Wilds Parkway to Foxtail Trial shown on the plan.
Natural Features:
This site includes a large wetland, rolling terrain and
several stands of mature trees. The slope adjacent to
the wetland exceeds 20% in some areas. These
features must be addressed prior to the development of
the property through the tree preservation requirements
and the wetland, storm water and erosion control
provisions of the City Code.
Public Utilities:
Sanitary sewer and watermain service is readily
available to this site through existing mains located in
County Road 82.
ANALYSIS:
The applicant is requesting a zone change to the R-1 district to allow for future
development of this site. At this time, no specific plans for the property development
have been submitted, although the applicant has indicated a potential townhouse style
development for this site. Two-family dwellings and townhouses are a conditional use in
the R-1 district, with a maximum density of 3.5 units per acre, and a maximum coverage
of 18-22 percent.
The criteria for granting a zoning change include the following:
1. There was a mistake in the original zoning
2. Conditions have changed significantly since the current zoning was adopted.
3. The Comprehensive Plan has been amended.
96097PC.DOC
Page 2
Any of these criteria can be used to evaluate a request for rezoning.
The "Year 2000 Comprehensive Plan" for the City of Prior Lake, adopted in 1982,
designated this area as "Agricultural". The A-1 and C-1 districts are appropriate for that
designation. However, with the adoption of the 2010 Comprehensive Plan in June,
1996, this area was added to the Municipal Urban Service Area and designated as R-
LJMO. The R-1 district is an appropriate zoning district for the R-LJMO designation.
The Planning staff believes that this request meets criteria #2 and #3. The addition of
this property to the MUSA is a significant change. Furthermore, the Comprehensive
Plan has been amended to include this area in the R-LJMO designation. The proposed
R-1 zoning is consistent with that designation.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Recommend the City Council approve the zone change as requested.
2. Table or continue the public hearing to a date and time certain and provide the
developer with a detailed list of items or information to be provided for future
Planning Commission review.
3. Recommend denial of the application based upon specific findings of fact.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Alternative #1
ACTION REQUIRED:
A motion recommending the City Council adopt an ordinance rezoning this property to
the R-1 district as proposed.
REPORT ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. Zoning Map
3. Engineering Comments
4. Copy of Application
5. Copy of Hearing Notice
96097PC.DOC
Page 3
\ ~';', ,
,~""':"--
~,7-":"-:,
'J~,,-- ,I .
"
ec~-
, ,
j ,
p ~.
1-==-
~
~
':I,
,j' '~ "" ~ n.-,! "
.. , ;-..:.J! , /r
, ;',~~f () (___i/"~-
. / j=
~: 'c--,j,~- ~-:;:
! ! " ~. ~
t__~~::--l ' I 1
M '.. _ l . '_~
1---.- f- '" i:-=-"- --' I
l -1
~
'----j"
~~'~ I
I '.
~, ,:==]
...
Ii-
, .
, '
-'
, ,
//'
,/
. ,.;:;,.-
,
,
~ \ ',.
",
I "
,
\
=
_L
l(~,
,_......7~. ~ ,-----:-
:
.:::_-~
" 3::-+'-
. __ I'
, u L 'l,,' ~
..~~
"i
~ ~ ~ I C
I,.,~.
~
~'
....:.
'i.
\ \
(...
':"':'
-----,-j.-.-~
\ "?t
/ - ...:~x
, ---CV(>'
. :!-.-
--===~\.~'
~,=~.-
-~
::i
~':I
,-"'1
,
,I
I
M
!I
;
~
ill
~
, ~
~.:z-.
-~~.>
" .~(.
. ';1,;
..... ~II-
'- -,
'~l :~
l.,~i:" ,..~
' ..L,-+""
;--;; ., . .,'
-~'.-.=- t ...-
. .-. -" .
, , , ,',
-,
i[:'7
:~\~!
~ f4l;g
j ~ i: (5
-}ii~~
I I>
. ~
~~
~ a
i :1
__1 t
SC}
='O~
~t"\
'---,
~.\
,
i ~ "'-"'v
I
I
'~.1
k'1_
- cs.M '"
\\ "'
i I ,', ~
\1, . .---=r~
'.. "< .-.~'- -~!-----.._.... ----
:"'\- '~.~ -. - -"'. ......
I
..--..I
~ I
,1"---.,_ - I
1: ;ASS LAK~, ~
~, , . I
" . '\ ;' I
-,' I '.J I
, 'l. , 1---..' I
,. ~
~S~D-"~- >)
- . - - --......---..
i:
;--
".-
I
I
I
I. ..
~
I __
J
.J-
1
,
, "
.r
./.. -
!Qd?~32
: \""~~--
~'"C"_....:.
. ..:::::~.~ ...'
-~ .
....;-~ ~.u
---
,.: '.\1YSTIC LAKE '_
'.....
'- ,
~
)
(
..:~
L.
<7
- ..,
I
J
I
I _,II.' A 1
I -. ..
I .
_1-- J,I___ ---L
I __ CSAMI:I__
I
J: ~-
r---..I-~
I
I
I
I
"-
.
.
u
:\
t 1iIIIIU'"flll...'''.'..........................
........ : ?
...
/ /'
'/
;;~
R-1 ;,' ...;;:..?
.;icf:-''' '
UPPER PRIOR LAKE
~
~...
~,
f5
..,.
~-
:.t', C.?!
"~/'
~--:t \.~~;:?~-,,~
- :~--~""'_:"\
:lo-- . I. ....,
f ~....,.:1..'~: \.~\
,.. '/~.x.
~~ --.-- ,,.. ...._.-..0~~{
-....." ;:- ::-~.~. . f)'..,.
'-'. .~
~. .
~~
,,~
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
JOHN WINGARD, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER
OCTOBER 8, 1996
ZONE CHANGE REQUEST BY INTEGRITY DEVELOPMENT
The Public Works Department has completed its review of the application by Integrity
Development to rezone 27 acres of land north of County Road 82 and east of The Wilds.
The following are our review comments:
Wetlands/Storm Water Runoff
The site contains several wetlands that will need to be protected. The wetlands drain in a
southerly direction to a culvert that crosses C. R.. 82. The culvert outlets along the south
edge of C.R. 82 and then the runoff from the site drains overland approximately 200 feet
to Crystal Bay, which is a shallow bay on the north edge of Upper Prior Lake.
New development on this site will be required to provide water quality treatment ponds to
treat the storm. water runoff before discharging into the wetlands.
Streets
The City's Transportation Comprehensive Plan identifies a north/south street to be
constructed through this site from C.R. 82 to C.R. 42. The street has been identified as
Fox Tail Trail and the street is included in the City's State Aid Street System. The State
Aid System identifies Fox Tail Trail to be a 36' wide urban street with 2000 ADT in year
2016.
Attached is a copy of Figure 8 from the Transportation Plan that shows the roadway
configuration of Fox Tail Trail.
Sanitary Sewer and Watermain
Sanitary sewer and watermain service is readily available to the site. A 15" trunk sanitary
sewer is located on the north side of C.R. 82 and a 16" trunk watermain is located along
the south edge ofC.R. 82.
The site is within the City's MUSA Development Boundary.
L:\96REZON\96-097RZ\ENGCOM.DOC
(II
~
:i t
-
"
~ -!-
.
. .
1 1
I. :
.....--
.-.- . ---
. .
.
.
.
.
.
:
It)
.....
o
N
a:
ct
w
>
I
z
z 0
~ ~
~ a:
.... ::>
~ ~
~ -
~ LL
o z
fr1 0
Z ()
g w
~ z
<( :i
~
~ ~
~ ~
ll. C
C) ct
= ~
U C
W
C
Z
w
:i
:i
o
o
w
a:
~
ffi-' :!: ~
&1-;
:!S c
..e.
City of Prior Lake
LAND USE APPLICATION .'
Planning Case File No. 1 b- 0 91
Property Identification No.';)5 ~134-C04-'=
~~ - '1 ~4-- cc'+- 7
;1'5- '.,Lt- cc+ ~
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E. / Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Phone (612) 447-4230. Fa."( (612) 447-4245
Type of Application: Brief description of proposed project (attach additional
jZI Rezoning, from C../ (present zonin~) sheets/narrative if desired) ~
\ to fZ - l (proposed zonin~) ~~ P~J,-v?-, ~z-,-...l-:-:::tJ
,
o Amendment to City Code, Compo Plan or City Ordinance (' ..
Zc-r..<--~ -th.
o Subdivision of Land ~~ ~7-y
/ SD - 2 ;;- ".J il"1..-;i
o Administrative Subdivision
o Conditional Use Permit
o Variance Applicable Ordinance Section(s):
I
Applicant(s): I /VT?;;" 6 /Z IT'1 O~~' EL.-CPr>J L<:7'v/"
Address: 14gb'?) mAN l/7)tJ RD. PIZ.I tl2 L.4 I::::. C J /V'I IV . S-53,2-
Home Phone: 4-4D ..- -:3 0 0 t::J Work Phone: 4Zj~ -3000
Property Owner(s) [If different from Applicants]: SAM e=- ,
Address:
Home Phone: Work Phone:
Type of Ownership: Fee Contract for Deed -X- Purchase Agreement -----'"
Legal Description of Property (Attach a copy if there is not enough space on this sheet):
S /E7iir A-rr;Q C. }-/ b-C::;
To the best of my knowledge the information procided in this application and other material submitted is correct. In
addition, I have read the relevant sections of the Prior Lake Ordinance and procedural guidelines, and understand that
apPIi:' wUl no' be p,.cessed ~n'i1, deem~mplete by the Planning DI....,,", ., assign...
1/ 61 \ L~ J-
--/ (" ~ ~ . ~ :\, \ ~'. ~ '-~ ~ ~ _ 2L(-9 ~
Applicant's Signature..---'- - '" Date
~7~/- q - ?'/. 91
Feepwner'~r~ -.- Date
(
-
THIS SPACE TO BE FILLED IN BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE
PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED DENIED DATE OF HEARING
CITY COUNCIL APPROVED DENIED DATE OF HEARING
CONDITIONS:
Signature of Planning Director or Designee Date
PARC~_ A
That part of the Northeast Quarter of Sect!Qn 34, TownShiP US. Range 22,
Scot t CQunt y , l1inne:cta, described a:: f cllo.,.: C:;);u..ncin; at the scut htlfest
corner of said Northeast QUarter: thanes cn a.n asSumed bearing of North 01
degrees 07 minutes 2S seconds Mest alcn9 the west line of said Northeast
Quarter, a di:Jtanca of 1205'.3$. feat; thenca South n d~raes 49 .inutes 00
~econds East, a diatanca of 44....81 fast; thenca North 84 degrees 32 adnutas
58 seconds Eaat, a d.1stanc8 of 60~QO feet; ;thencl! Ncrth SO d~ 52
minutes 06 seamds .East, a di.:stanca of 253.55 feat; thanes eASterly and
scutheaster~ 224.97 feet alan; & tangential curve, concave to the
southwest" radlus .150.00 feat. central angle 85 degren S5 unutes 51
seconds: thenC3 South 37 .degrea 22 ainutes 39 se=nds West. a d1=tanca of
596.05 feet to the point of beg1nning; thenca North a, degraes SO arinutes
15 se=n~ West. a distanca of 52!. 61 feet to a poi.nt on said Illest line
distant 532.1' feet north of said SQuihwest eomar' of the Northeast Quarter
as lleasured along aid west Une: thence South 01 degres:s 07 linutes 25
sec~nd= East, along said...eat Une. a di.stanca of 532.1' feat to said
southwest cgrneri thenc=; ScutH :89-' cfe9ress SO Unut2:S 47 seconds East. along
the south Une of said Northeast Quartsr. a dis'tanC2 of 497.47 feet to the
intersection with a line bearing South 02 degrees 13 minutes 4' seconds
~est frc= the pc1nt of beginning; thenC2 North OZ degrees 13 _inutes 49
seccnds East. a distanc: of S32..4Q fest to the point of beginning.
, .
P'uaz. B (I!evised 1/J.7/91.) .
':ha,1: . par: c~ -t=a Ncr~east Quar-..er of Sec'--ion 34 ,
Township U~, aange 22, Sc=1:: c::mrt'".l, Him1esci:a clesc::"~ecl
as ~ollows: Seq1 ro'\1 nq at; a poin't: en the west line o~
said Bort!:1("as;: Quar-..ar a dis't:anca Q~ 532.1.9 ~'t %1~ 0:
the scut:1west cocer of said Kort:least: Quar-~; ~enc.e on
an assumed bearing- of Horth 1. deg:'ee 07 minu't:as 25
seconds West: aJ.onq sa.icl west: 'line a cUstance c~ 673.19
fsei:; thence South 72 ;4eqrees 49 minu1:8S 00 seconcs East
a clis1:anc:a of 444.81. faei:: ~enc:a Kerth 84 ~es 32
minu1:as ~8 secQtlas Eas't: a c!i:stanca of 60.00 feet; thence
Ho~..h 80 clegrees 52 minutas 06 sec~nn~ East: a dis1:.ance ot
253.55 feet; thence Bastarly a.nc:l Southeasterly 224.97
feet alonq a t:anc;ential C".u'Ve, c::oncave = the scu't:.!:lwes't,
radius 150. 00 t.ee't:, can=a.l anqle 85 clec;raes 5S m.im1tas
51 seconds: thei:ce Se:u1::b. 37 d.ec;::ees 22 miJ:ui:as 39 secends
West a ciisi:anca o~ 598. OS tee1:; t1:.enca N'o~ 89 c1eg:rees
SO minutes 15 seccnes Wes't a. distanca ot 528.61 teet to
the point of beqim1i.nq.
10.072 Ac::es
PARCEL G
That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 34, Townshi?
115, Range 22, Scott County, Mi~nesota described as follows:
Commencing at the southwest corner of said Northeast Quarter;
thence on a~ assumed bearing of North 1 degree Q7 minutes
2S seconds West along the west line of said Northeast Quarter
a distance of 1205.38 feet; the~ce South 75 degrees 27 minutes
35 seconds East a distance of 500.74 feet; thence North
86 degrees 34 minutes 45 seconds East a distance of 298.05
feet; thence southeasterly 166.2~ feet along a tangential
curve, concave to the Southwest, radius 118.71 feet, central
angle 80 degrees 13 minutes 12 seconds to the point of ~eginning
of the land to be described; thence South 13 degrees 12
minutes 03 seconds East a distance of 276.35 feet; thence
Southeasterly 99.87 feet along a tangential curve, concave
to the East, radius 785.91 feet; central angle 7 degrees
16 minutes 50 seconds; thence South 20 degrees 28 minutes
S3 seconds East a distance of 558.07 feet;, thence Southeasterly
98.91 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the West,
radius 274.53 feet, central angle 20 degrees 38 min~tes
38 seconds; thence South 0 degrees 09 minutes 45 seconds
West a distance of 25.00 feet to a point on the south line
of said Northeast Quarter a distance of 128,00 feet west
of the southeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of said
Northeast Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 50 minutes 15
seconds West along said south line a distance of 688.35
feet to a point 497.47 feet east of the southwest corner
of said Northeast Quarter; thence North 2 degrees 35 minutes
46 seconds East a distance of 537.28 feet to a point 536.79
feet North of the south line of said Northeast Quarter and
532.20 feet East of the west line of said Northeast Quarter;
thence North 37 degrees 22 minutes 39 seconds East a distance
of 592.10 feet to the point of beginning.
( 6<<;:~ddJ ....
..,.::;..- ------ - _..:::.:. - ..: --~
.- :,
.~ I
~bl
~"'J
':~I
:::~I
-:1
I
( ".....) I'" 1. "n. e. T. · 10'2 .~ I .
-~'!o.aa.:,:-::t____-:"_~Ih_. S:v~-:, tho. N.,"'I .r fh. N.L "'4
... -------- N. ..... ...
- CM:".l"14'n"l.: ~ ......,,' n.r.
7/0.U
EXHIBIT A
AL VERNE ACRES
N..e'SO',s't.
.n.n
".....
;
III
z
..
.
..
~
N. 1;"..t .... IiI.E. t/4
.... '~ao.oa'.:..
( Ita It.....)
...
::
.;
...
e
o
-
~
"(\"(1..
of'
..
a
.,;
..
..
;Ii
...
.. ..
~S!
~f.
f\C.'"
fl.~\
c.~
PAR'CEL
'''.&Z5 AI:.
-.
:~
.S u
- .
..;~
..0.02'
"..1.
~ TSoOO
)'
.
..
..
..
.~
~
..
Cl..
';st
..
PARCEL 0
5.426 A~.
PARCEL C
6:~1a A.c:.
E
. \0&1.
a
Ac.
....,~.. ..e.'" -.
t ""'1' H'!
So ,';".r .... IlL ". .r .... N.!. V4
..
o
1
~
!!
..
..
-
6.36'3
~
~
o
V
~'..Sc"".(.
;l .,
~
)i~
~l
'....
:0.
: ~;
. ..
,;, Ji
~ wi
.. ..
i ~
"-
.
.
j
wi
.' It-Tas.,! _
A-l." so
L. ".IT
.' PARCEL
\ ,
Ac.
"
~'"
'J~.i
F
~
PARCEL A
.. :: 6.3+6 Ac.
,. ,.
t;'
. ..
. ..
';' ~
":0
,..
..-
,:"z
PARaEL 'H
I
6.66 Ac:.
PARCEL G
..
..
"- ...;
. ..
..,
Z i
!
7.009 Ac.
~ r.;,
Ii--
. .' 2 ---'RCi'Ao--
)'Uo.,
~. I...... ., the
I S ~ T~
f".21...)3
--. .. \,0',,' 31-
l~.,..t1
--- - --
· IrRAIL
~ ,t,I1.' I
K.~. 1/4 ~.a".so ,5":',_
~"jR== I
o
,..
l
."
13 n. 57
''!Ia.oo
I..
. ~~i ..
. "'j
:jl>'~
~, ..
~,
..... .
'Z. .
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER REZONING OF LAND FROM
A-1 (AGRICULTURAL) AND C-1 (CONSERVATION) TO R-1 (SUBURBAN
RESIDENTIAL) FOR THE MARK HYLAND PROPERTY
You are hereby notified that the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing
at Prior Lake Fire Station #1, located at 16776 Fish Point Road, SE (Southwest
of the intersection of CR. 21 and Fish Point Road), on Monday, October 14,
1996 at 7:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter.
The purpose of the public hearing is to consider rezoning approximately 27 acres
of vacant land located directly north of County Road 82 (154th Street), east of
The Wilds development and west of Foxtail Trail from th~ A-1 (Agricultural)
district and the C-1 (Conservation) district to the R-1 (Suburban Residential)
district.
If you desire to be heard in reference to this matter, you should attend this public
hearing. The Planning Commission will accept oral and or written comments. If
you have questions regarding this matter, contact the Prior Lake Planning
Department at 447-4230.
~Q.~~
~ne Kansier, Planning Coordinator
City of Prior Lake
Mailed October 4, 1996
~6097H.N. DOC
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E.. Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQCAL OPPORTlNITY EMPLOYER
.,.-,
lLANNING REPORT
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
SITE:
PRESENTER:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
6A
Linkage of redevelopment plan areas
Priordale Mall and Downtown
Donald Rye, Planning Director
YES _X_NO-N/A
October 21, 1996
INTRODUCTION: At the September 23 Planning Commission meeting, one of the
agenda items dealt with the expansion of the Redevelopment Districts containing the
Downtown area and Priordale Mall. During the discussion, Commissioner Kuykendall
expressed concern over the lack of a direct visual connection between the two areas and
the seeming lack of a plan to deal with this issue. Subsequently, staff indicated the jssue
would be reviewed and a recommendation brought back to the Commission.
DISCUSSION: While the Comprehensive Plan contain policies relating to commercial
development, only one seems to address the concern expressed by Commissioner
Kuykendall. That policy states "Establish a theme for positive identification for
redevelopment of existin~ commercial areas in focal locations includin~. but not limited
to. Gateway. Downtown and Priordale." While this policy does not speak to a direct
physical or visual connection, it does encourage the development of a common theme for
the major commercial areas which would serve to tie these areas together in peoples
minds if not visually. This policy mayor may not be considered sufficient for the
intended purpose.
Currently, there is not a Redevelopment Plan for the redevelopment districts. Staff
believes such a plan is necessary to provide more detailed guidance for the redevelopment
areas than is provided in the Comprehensive Plan. It would be appropriate for such a plan
to address the concern raised in this report.
It is appropriate for the Commission to recommend to the City Council that such a
provision be included in any redevelopment plan for the Downtown and Priordale Mall
areas. It is not necessary for such a recommendation to be in the form of a resolution.
AL TERNA TIVES:
16200 ~~~~Ave. S.E., Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
"
1. Recommend to the City Council that a redevelopment plan for the Priordale Mall
and Downtown areas include a provision for visual and functional linkages
between the two areas.
2. Take no action.
RECOMMENDATION: Alternative 1
ACTION REQUIRED: Motion and second that the Planning Commission
recommends to the City Council that it direct the inclusion of a provision in any
redevelopment plans for the Priordale Mall and Downtown areas that requires
visual and functional linkages between the two areas.
Document2lDR
2