The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About96-023 Variance - Withdrew '~_"./" '.~'''''';4'..~':'"'''_''' ".,.,,::-.,.,........ ",.~"':.~,_-': -" .:."'--'....,,,.....:...~0."""..... .:_"'.""-'_~"C~_., ..-. .,,,......;'~.",,.\o-'.. ,":"~ <. .~' ~._ '. _.._,.:~"...;...."...::..~:'O:""""~.:;;...~';r-"',~.':>;!"'.,.\~'-",.,'...;'.._,:...~._.~......._J-,~.:.....:....~..-".~..:...~;.{,,~"~.""'_... ~ ....,t."'".._.. ",.;'....-,<<.....~.'"~_...___,..........~.............;.;._~......;.....;..._._~.... June 12, 1996 Thomas and Cheryl Vidmar 14300 Salem Avenue Savage, MN 55378 Re: Case File #96-023 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Vidmar: I received your note requesting to close out your variance application and I will do so today. Enclosed is your $50.00 filing fee check. If you have any questions do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ~ & ItUl vt (]L;\JPft~ I Connie Carlson Planning Dept. Secretary enc. ~ ----------~._~------- - -- - T_ J ~~ .~-':_;,-;;- ""',~ 17-1/910 7~/)i~';~ , I $ ~tf> a(br.s 'f' .... .,. I 16200 ~~n'treek Ave. S.L Prior Lake, Minnes6tR"s5372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER (c. //-7.//t>~ '. 1'. ,/0 1 , ! -1 ,( i.! . /' ~:/? 'J yJ< ..7 ,/::lJ!2rr (~*7( /~~/(/ . /- '/. ~ ~ Ii _, ! ..-\.f..::...... .' ....... y / ,>'" jI / if /l /.i(. (./C/( f'<(/ t/ ' / ,-.. l.:";.Af..- .~.\,.. __"... ~ L-t' _/ / 0~/J,t/ '/1//-: 7" /./ .1 )1:,/" g/~? 4/;/ "./ v '-\4' \::.(;- iA;...c1.'L/ t t:r ( t U /...(.t>t, "c.r~ , ': /'/4 ./'&4.,I/</)/t .:/,. . J::;.'(<2fl;~;'~c T.-.x:-L~/' .. I 4::.1/. ~~/ ,..' - (" / t. / fJ I: -U~,:5//A ,. i,:'z,2~-Clf~)/;I)(;;~;/vi4{ k: ?:~e/1def>ci!e}:t.~ '. /o//t/:!_~.:>~// ,"li/.~;~;':~'/Z 7('.' c:::/,[' .'1/....... -l.-- .' /';"'" G>{ -", ',' c.',/(..... ~~~;~~i(:{~f~~:; (/t(X~!({ c:-/;~-r;t./'4t!,t~.<< 6?7iCiu:r / y'.~', f-~'-' . (. ../.. / /~//-J ') G' -? ';&;?/ ~/? i> c:l' Y 7U '-'/~76- ,(''i //' JCt'~/i/~':'((,1 a '/'!\-?, ~ 'f ,. "\.//k '{"U4.' / ..- '../.... ". '" ,'} "" i'i/'./" . ...... .'~ .' '{.~;' '/'/{?l/~;~{/c '/ l {,. v "1 '^ w I \~.x J \fv, ~~- 0~/ ~ \O~~V /' PLANNING REPORT SITE: PRESENTER: REVIEWED BY: PUBLIC HEARING: DATE: 4D CONSIDER FRONT, SIDE AND LAKE SHORE SETBACK VARIANCES FOR THOMAS AND CHERYL VIDMAR 4307 GRAINWOOD CIRCLE R. MICHAEL LEEK, CITY PLANNER DONALD R. RYE, PLANNING DIRECTOR YES --X- NO MARCH 25, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: INTRODUCTION: The Planning Department received a variance application from Thomas and Cheryl Vidmar, who proposed to remove an existing cabin and construct a new house on the subject site. Construction ofthe house would result in the following variances and setbacks; 1. AS' front yard setback variance to permit a 20' setback instead of the required 25'; 2. A 5.57' side yard setback variance to permit a side yard setback of 4.43' instead of the required 50.5'; 3. A 5.5' variance from the lake shore setback permitted under Section 9.1(D)2 to permit a lakeshore setback of 45' instead of the required 50.5'. DISCUSSION: The subject site was platted as a part of GRAINWOOD PARK in 1944, prior to its being annexed into the City of Prior Lake. Like many properties in this area the subject site was developed with a seasonal cabin. The applicants propose to remove the cabin and construct a new, single-family house with attached 3-car garage. Section 9.3(D)2 permits new structures on undeveloped lots to have a lakeshore setback equal to the average setback of the existing structures on the adjacent properties or a setback of 50', whichever is greatest. In those cases where an existing structure is first being removed, the City has in the past deemed the site undeveloped, and applied setback averaging. The average of the adjacent setbacks in this case would apply, and would be 50.5'. The proposed house would be setback 55', but the proposed deck would require a setback variance of 5.5' 16200 ~8~~~t<eWW~rs.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Section 9. 12(B)I(a)1O permits a substandard lot of record to have one 5' side yard setback in certain circumstances. This provision does not apply in the present case because the applicants' proposed house would encroach in other required setbacks. The proposed side yard setback on the West is less than 5' . Variance Hardship Standards: 1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship with respect to the property. This criteria goes to whether reasonable use can be made of the property if the Ordinance is literally enforced. The proposed house would have 3 levels. The first level as indicated on the attached survey would have a floor area of about 1,184 square feet. The size of the proposed house could be reduced by 5.5' in order to comply with the lake shore setback average. This would result in the loss of 176 square feet of area for a net area on the first floor of 1,008 square feet. The applicant could also consider locating a deck on the West side of the proposed house. Similarly, the side yard setback requirement could be complied with by reducing the size of the garage and/or shifting it somewhat to the East. This is an approach the Commission has taken in the past. (See e.g. V A95-25, Ron and Kim Anderson) It appears to staff that even if these steps were taken, a small front yard setback variance might be required to accommodate both the garage and house. Because there appear to be a number of design alternatives available to the applicants, staffhas concluded that reasonable use of the property can be made while still complying with lakeshore and side yard setback requirements. Thus, staff has concluded that this criterion is not met. 2. Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique to the property. Because staff has concluded that there is no undue or unnecessary hardship this criterion is, de facto, not met. 3. The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and is not the result of actions of persons presently having an interest in the property. Any hardship results not from the application of the provisions of the Ordinance, but from design decisions made by the applicants. Thus, this criterion is not met. 4. The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest. 2 9623V APC.DOC/RML The proposed house would result in a structure not inconsistent with other houses in the area. Thus, it does not appear that the requested variances would be contrary to the public interest. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the variances requested by the applicants, or approve any variances the Planning Commission deems appropriate in the circumstances. 2. Table or continue discussion of the item for specific purpose. 3. Deny the application because the Planning Commission finds a lack of demonstrated hardship under the zoning code criteria. RECOMMENDATION: Because staffhas concluded that the applicants have legal alternatives which would allow reasonable use of the property, and thus that the Ordinance criteria are not met, staff recommends Alternative No.3. ACTION REQUIRED: A motion adopting Resolution 9609PC. 9623V APC.DOC/RML 3 ~ ~ ~ CJ\ r "":::;---:11 : ' : :.~J~ , '~ ~ ~\ ,m'c' , I' ~i! It- ~j" ., ' C9 '8 W [:. I~ 'i: :""""', 1 ; , : 5 I::; '~~lHf.A' ,,' ,':., ,Mr,~fffS:I~~i I ~:i I 'I ~ ',,' I')' "; ~[1'U!I! L'LJ:~,' t~ I : h l ,'" /!(~. To='FF 'I ~,JlT _ ,:.. ._",_"._~,,:~,,'~,.,I,', 'V7^:,,' '~; i ~~v;;bJ , ' "--OJ i IJ~' "i I I' -1t,J -" ;;,\\\J' " ,,~ -' '0, - 'J:k\~ H!;tjY1'~ ':: 'I' -, -, ! I , ! :,' I!' ,I ,IV.~'. I I I < '~ ,~,c , , ;~ u8' ' LZ;-jc , ' J~, I I ,'~" I I" ';' .,," '~' fC,-,:~,~ , " I '\\' ~ l ' ,_ ' I I " ' I ' , ' \ , ,"" ,--, A _'" I , " _ __ , .' _' ,'" ~ "" ,h II ~8 ~~-~~: II llf' , " : , :~ I IIp;;wv'':g1JF f--+- 1 ' ~ I' t1l1 1__'_ Ii' I I, i _' I, _-', ' I I" , ' ;:;r;- ,e<' , ," _ _ . _' ' 1 ' Iii'." f-!rCIlt1g I ~ LUIIII\ ~1if ' ~ I) ; I~ =,," I j".-'II~~t~,\ :'~ · ~ i~: '-~'A~~I'~ ~,\ "'~t .~ I ,', _._' J' ;' .T._~'\ , , "":'l'l -' " ' _ ' "I ' ,ii~~~"~~ \ . ' ' ,i I .: ' l'~ __ I'," ' ~.j.,' i'>.: 'PI', ~K~..ti 1'! i i ,~ ~~ ! I, !~11" L[,' 7,-",'-1 - ~ i " ~ _ ' I ' ' ' '" .- ",- 1 I I . ' . _', 11 -, '-T I" "~, "'~,)"-'-JL_::'I.~Jt--Tl' ~:@:'i tl ;-' I .j'i-- _I'-j I ' ,I:l' 1"I~ql0 C> i '-~/ 'I J" r'.II\...'~' ~JI . I~ " i;,'ITTV~';!I ~ D,~i!~~' ,!I ~~ ~l~.l ~ ,II d .' I I .---1 l! I j I '.' . -- n " ,I 1 '1 i ' i ' '!,' ,== -~"" "=='1 irti ,~~~. ~ I ..;.,.l.","..;.....l.,.L~_ f... I ......._.._...., \ '1" ~ ...o.o.l - 'I. '- . ~ I', Ii l I LJ SURVEY PREPARED FOR: TOM VIDMAR 14300 SALEM AVE. SO. SAVAGE. MN 55378 96-023VA Valley Surveying CO.. P. A. SUITE f20-C, 16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM PRIOR LAKE. MINNESOTA 55372 TELEPHONE (6~2) 447 - 2570 PR fOR ~l LAkE '0/ ;02 20 ~ /95 1\ 3H ~ '.~ O"El/NE "0 \. " \\ "Cl , - \ \ \ J _oO~ .....;,y- _ DEel( EXISTING HOUSE TO ~~~ 000 G~~\~~ ...(""\..~ C\T'.... ~ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 18, ~RAINWOOD PARK, Scott County, Minnesota. Also showing all visible imp~ovements and enc~oachments onto O~ off f~om said p~ope~ty if any. NET AREA ABOVE ELEV 9040 , 8,179 SO. FT. PROPOSED HOUSE, GARAGE a DRIVE/IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 2,453 SQ. F T ~ 30 % COVERAGE ~ o I SCALE 30 60 I Rev. 3/6/96 To snow propost!'d houn for variance request, Rev. 2/26/96 To show sq. n. IN FEET o DenotlS 1/2 inch x /4 inch iron monu~n' s.t and mar/(ftd by lieenn No 10/83 . Oenotu iron monomMlt found II Denotes P K Na;1 nt FILE No. 8216 BOOK ~PAGE~__ RESOLUTION 9609PC A RESOLUTION DENYING A REQUEST FOR LAKE SHORE, FRONT AND SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCES BY THOMAS AND CHERYL VIDMAR IN CONNECTION WITH A PROPOSED NEW HOUSE ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE RI-URBAN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT AND SD-SHORELAND DISTRICT AT 4307 GRAINWOOD CIRCLE. BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota; FINDINGS 1. Thomas and Cheryl Vidmar have applied for variances from Section 4 and 9 of the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit the construction of a new house on property located in the RI-Urban Residential zoning district and the SD- Shoreland District at the following location, to wit; 4307 Grainwood Circle, legally described as Lot 18, GRAINWOOD PARK, Scott County, Minnesota. 2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variance as contained in Case 96-023V A and held a hearing thereon on March 25, 1996. 3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variances upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variances on the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The request does not meet the Ordinance criteria, in that the applicants have legal alternatives to make reasonable use of the property. 5. The granting of the variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The variance would serve merely as a convenience to the applicant, but is not necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship. 7. The contents of Planning Case 96-023V A are hereby entered into and made a part of the public record and the record of decision for this case. 16200 ~8~~~<(!?2WN-k. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER CONCLUSION Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby denies the requested variances. Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on March 25, 1996. Richard Kuykendall, Chair ATTEST: Donald R. Rye, Planning Director 9609PC.DOC/RML 2 Kuykendall: This is an improvement and compliment applicant on existing structure. Supportive. MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY CRIEGO TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 96- 07PC. Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Criego, Wuellner and Kuykendall. MOTION PASSED. A recess was called at 8:26 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:32 p.m. 4.D 96-023 - REQUEST FOR VARIANCES BY THOMAS AND CHERYL VIDMAR, FOR PROPERTY AT 4307 GRAINWOOD CIRCLE. The Planning Department received a variance application from Thomas and Cheryl Vidmar, who proposed to remove an existing cabin and construct a new house on the subject site. Construction of the house would result in the following variances and setbacks; 1. A 5' front yard setback variance to permit a 20' setback instead of the required 25'; 2. A 5.57' side yard setback variance to permit a side yard setback of 4.43' instead of the required 50.5'; 3. A 5.5' variance from the lake shore setback permitted under Section 9.1(D)2 to permit a lake shore setback of 45' instead of the required 50.5'. Michael Leek presented the Staff Report dated March 25, 1996 with a recommendation of denial based on the lack of hardship and the fact the applicants have legal alternatives which would allow reasonable use of the property. Thomas Vidmar, 14300 Salem Avenue South, Savage, stated they are proposing a change in plans. The home was designed in what he considers "in the spirit" of the neighborhood. He feels the deck size is not oversized for the home. It is three feet in front of his neighbor's home. Mr. Vidmar also feels his home design is comfortable for a growing family. Mr. Vidmar said they would like to shrink the garage down to a 10 foot third stall which would bring it up to a six and one half foot side yard setback. There is 24 feet from the garage door to the street. He does not think they overstepped their bounds for what they want to do and are open to suggestions. Comments from Commissioners: Wuellner: MN032596.DOC PAGES · Distance from garage to street. Leek explained the measurement is from the property to the right-of-way line. It is 20 feet from the right-of-way line. In this case the right- of-way is narrow compared to what would be done today. · Appreciate the property owner is willing to deal with the width of the third stall. The Commission has granted 5 foot side yard variances in the past. Mr. Vidmar presented a new plan to the Planning Commission. The staff had not seen the plan before and could not verify the dimensions. Criego: · The neighbor's setback is around 20 feet. · The front yard setback is okay from the garage to the street; would rather give that up than the lakeshore variance because it is consistent with the neighbor's variances. · Concern lies in the side yard. There is plenty of room to bring back to 10 feet. · A three car garage is nice but not necessary. · Supportive of the lake shore and road side variances. Loftus: · Agree with comments by Commissioner Criego. · Neighboring Lot 17 had a smaller building envelop. · A three car garage is not a hardship. · Stay within the ordinance guidelines. · Supportive of the street variance and a small deviation to the deck. Kuykendall: · Applicant proposing a three level home with a total floor area of approximately 3,400 sq. feet. · Neighbors (Lot 17) proposed a three car garage and ended up with a two and one-half car garage. · There was no hardship on the side yard variance. · Difficulty finding a hardship on the 20 foot street side. · Mr. Vidmar said their plan has been considerably down sized to get an impervious surface coverage of 30%. Criego: · The applicant has tried to reduce the impervious surface by building three levels. Kuykendall: · The neighborhood is unique and is the only hardship. · Leek said there had been one or two constructions in the area that were less than 20 feet. Probably around 18 feet. · Support front yard setback. · No lakeshore setback - only for a suspended deck. MN032596.DOC PAGE 9 .. Loftus: Suggestion to the applicant to get a new design and review with staff. Leek said staff s recommendation would be the same with a two car garage. Wuellner: Applicant has to work within the building envelop. A two and one-half garage is reasonable and it is not a hardship to want a three car garage. MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY WUELLNER TO CONTINUE THE REQUEST TO APRIL 22, 1996. Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Wuellner, Criego and Kuykendall. MOTION PASSED. Commissioner Criego requested staff to look into a comment made regarding the neighbor who did not follow the setback requirement. Leek said he would check into the matter and report back. 4.E 96-017 - VARIANCE REQUEST BY GENE AND COLEEN TREMAINE FOR PROPERTY AT 16500 INGUADONA BEACH CIRCLE. The Planning Department received a variance application from Gene and Coleen Tremaine, who propose to construct a new house on the subject site. Construction of the house would result in the following variances and setbacks; 1. A 2,302 square foot variance to permit a lot area of 5, 198 square feet instead of the required 7,500 square feet; 2. A 2 foot lake shore setback variance to permit a lakeshore setback of 48 feet instead of the 50 feet permitted under Section 9.3(D)2; 3. A 7% variance to permit impervious surface coverage of 37% instead of the permitted 30% 4. A 14 foot variance to permit a front yard setback of 11 feet instead of the required 25 feet; and 5. A 2 foot variance on the West to permit a side yard setback of 8 feet instead of the required 10 feet. Michael Leek presented the Staff Report dated March 25, 1996 with a recommendation to approve the requested variances. Staff concluded the hardship criteria were met with respect to the lot area, impervious surface coverage, and perhaps front yard setback, but not with respect to the requested lake shore and side yard setback variances. Staff recommended the request be tabled to allow applicant to consider alternative designs. Pat Lynch of the DNR faxed a minor modification of the deck which was consistent with staff s recommendation. MN032596.DOC PAGEIO June 4, 1996 Mr. Thomas Vidmar 14300 Salem Ave. So. Savage, MN 55378 Dear Torn: Could you please send a letter to the Planning Office withdrawing your request for variance so that we may close out the file and return the $50.00 recording fee to you. As this is my last day with the City of Prior Lake, any questions you might have in the future can be directed to either the Planning Director, Don Rye, or the department secretary, Connie Carlson. V ery ~Jy yours, ~j.</b~~~~ R. Michael Leek Associate Planner cc. File 96-023V A 16200 E'J~r~e~~~.E., Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER March 18, 1996 Thomas and Cheryl Vidmar 14300 Salem Ave. S. Savage, Minnesota 55378 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Vidmar: This letter is to inform you that your March 12, 1996, application for a variance to construct a new house on property located at 4307 Grainwood Circle in Prior Lake has been reviewed by the City's Planning office, and has been found to be complete. The request will be scheduled for hearing before the Planning Commission on March 25, 1996. You will also receive a copy of the staff report which will be prepared during this week. Should I or other Planning staff have additional questions or concerns we will be in touch with you as soon as possible. Should you have any questions feel free to call me at any time. Very truly yours, "// .7 ? ;/'}, 7~~~./.~' R. Michael Leek Associate Planner cc. File 96-023V A 16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER NOTICE OF HEARING FOR; 1. A 5 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO PERMIT A 20 FOOT SETBACK INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 25 FEET; 2. A 5.57 FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE ON THE WEST TO PERMIT A SIDE YARD SETBACK OF 4.43 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 10 FEET; AND 3. A 5.5 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE LAKE SHORE SETBACK PERMITTED UNDER SECTION 9.1(D)2 TO PERMIT A LAKESHORE SETBACK OF 45 FEET TO A PROPOSED DECK INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 50.5 FEET; THE ABOVE-LISTED VARIANCES RELATING TO THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW HOUSE LOCATED IN THE RI-SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL AND SD-SHORELAND ZONING DISTRICTS. You are hereby notified that the Prior Lake Planning Commission will hold a hearing at Prior Lake Fire Station #1, located at 16776 Fish Point Road SE (Southwest of the intersection of C.R. 21 and Fish Point Road), on: Monday, March 25, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. APPLICANTS: Thomas and Cheryl Vidmar 14300 Salem Ave. S. Savage, Minnesota SUBJECT SITE: 4307 Grainwood, legally description as Lot 18, Grainwood Park, Scott County, Minnesota. REQUEST: The applicants propose the construction of a new house with attached garage as shown on the attached survey reduction. The Planning Commission will review the proposed construction and requested variance against the following criteria found in the Zoning Ordinance. 1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship with respect to the property. 2. Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique to the 9623V APN.DOC 1 16200 ~ Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER property. 3. The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and is not the result of actions of persons presently having an interest in the property. 4. The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest. If you are interested in this issue, you should attend the hearing. Questions related to this hearing should be directed to the Prior Lake Planning Department by calling 447-4230 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. The Planning Commission will accept oral and/or written comments. Oral or written comments should relate to how the proposed construction and requested variances are or are not consistent with the above-listed criteria. Prior Lake Planning Commission Date Mailed: March 14, 1996. 2 9623V APN .DOC RML DNR METRO REGION TEL:612-772-7977 Mar 20,96 10:47 No.003 P.Ol Project Review Worksheet ". \ DNR. - Division of Waters I Metro Region Project Name 7l~ ( C4~ ~~cr ~ IIdI"l4'w"e., 11U!.T' . Project Type (check aU that apply): [J Preliminary Plat o Final Plat )!(VarilJ1C8 [] Subdivision i'~ '\ OPUD C Other i. \ ... \ DNa. Jurisdiction (answer all): ....... . . , .~ . . , , " Yes No Yes No Floodplain a a Shrnland ... 0 (M.S. I03F. 10l) (M.S.103F.20J) Yes No Yes No Protccited Waters 0 0 Watl:t Appropriation 0 0 <M.S. I 030..245) CM.S.I03G.2SS) ...... ~.. '.', .. Comments .Jr- ~ _u__ ~ L__ -- ~~_ ~.e~ ~ ~-"-::. ~~~~~~~ L ~.q'-;;~ ~ ro~ ~~~ ' ~~ w"'::J ,~-~- .~~ __ '.s ( Mt9~,...,- .~~. 'i> \ " " '^ . \ . ,'J' --:':I:i,:'r.~' r'" . . ~. , i . , . ..... . ". o. r'_,. \ Recommendations Il1d Proposed Conditions . V~/"'(e4 a... "?f.1~~/ AI.-I-. - - 'T~~ ~ ~ . . Revlewer~ Titl......... ~ YPhono 712.1'ID Dote ZO ~ ~ '", KOHLRUSCH SCOTT/CARVER ABSTRACT CO., INC. 128 West 3rd Avenue P.O. Box 355 Shakopee, Minnesota 55379 REPRESENTING: rra Commonwealth ~ Land Title Insurance Company ~~~~~l::::(~~tM~ffi~H:g~::::::~:::::~~:~~:::~::::~:::::::::::~:::::::~:~::~:::~'::::~":::~~::::::::::':::':'~::::~:::::::r:::::::::::::::::::::~~::::::::::::::::t~~~~:~::::~:::::::::::::~::~:::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r::::rrr::::::::::::::::::::::rr:rr:::::::::::::t::::t::tm!r::~~:~Jl::&t$mi~~ According to the records of the BRC Tax System in the Office of the County Treasurer, Scott County, Minnesota, the following is a list of primary tax payers of property lying within 100 feet of the following described property: Lot 18, Grainwood Park, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, SCOTT County, Minnesota. Kenneth D. & Barbara K. Larson 5420 Southwood Drive Bloomington, MN 55437 Mark A. Roepke 4300 Grainwood Circle Prior Lake, MN 55372 John R. & June L. Casanova 4295 Grainwood Circle Prior Lake, MN 55372 James A. & Robin R. Riccioli 4290 Grainwood Circle Prior Lake, MN 55372 Greatland Homes Corp. 2051 Killebrew Drive #105 Bloomington, MN 55425 Michael E. & Cheryle Theisen 4310 Grainwood Circle Prior Lake, MN 55372 Thomas S. & Cheryl M. Vidmar 14300 Salem Ave. S. Savage, MN 55378 Robert C. & Shirley A. Thielen 15609 Calmut A v. NE Prior Lake, MN ,55372 Craig A. & Cynthia Hinz 4313 Grainwood Circle Prior Lake, MN 55372 Michael J. & Toby Ellen Finley 4131 Eau Claire Tr. NE Prior Lake, MN 55372 Joey D. Frechette 4280 Grainwood Circle N.E. Prior Lake, MN 55372 'D"NL DATED: March 6, 1996 at 8:00 a.m. KOHLRUSCH SCOTT/CARVER ABSTRACT CO., INC. File No. S-3721 NOTE: This search was prepared with due diligence and every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this search, however, Kohlrusch Scott/Carver Abstract Co., Inc. accepts no liability for errors and/or omissions herein. 96-023VA SURVEY PREPARED FOR: TOM VIDMAR /4300 SALEM AVE. SO. SAVAGE, MN. 55378 Valley Surveying Co., F!A. SUITE 120-C, 16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372 TELEPHONE (6/2) 447-2570 ~ .Do" PRIOR Cl. 90 LAkE 10 2.20 / .3 /95 ~HORELIIYE \ DECK '.c) \--' ) ,,0.00 ";/ ~~~ EXISTING HOUSE NOTE: CABI N TO BE REMOVED \ ~~ 000 ~\~~ G~~ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 18, GRAINWOOD PARK, Scott County, Minnesota. Also showing all visible improvements and encroachments onto or off from said property if any. NET AREA ABOVE ELEV. 904.0 = a,179 SQ. FT. PROPOSED HOUSE, GARAGE a DRIVE / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE = 2,453 SQ. FT. = 30 % COVERAGE. Rev. 3/6/96 To MOW proposed hoUH for variance request. Rev. 2/26/96 To show sq. ft. o \ SCALE 30 IN 60 I FEET o Denotes 1/2 inch x 14 inch iron monument Nt and morlced by license No 10/83 . Denotes iron monument found ~ Denotes P K. Nail set FILE No. 8216 BOOK 213 PAGE ~_