The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About96-026 Variance VA qlo-tXl1o PID# 2. ~ ~~I) CITY OF PRIOR LAKE APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE .~Applicant: 13:-: ~e).. 1'f-:1:.;::; ~ ~1<~ ~ f~Home Phone: tJ t;- t9 -/6' / ~ Address: / # A tY- . Il Work Phone: Property CMner: W,-t.)..,,'-a-., -€i7l'~lLn B;.e.-S'+1l d Home Phone: rf-d.~ -.b~r# Address: t.I;.s;-ps;- 1/7-1( If"'e . k/ '1lf..e~-IO(}'?/ so Work Phone: Type of CMnership: Fee ~ " Contract' Purchase Agreement Consultant/Contractor: DIA" ;'1' k {t3~ Wt:f""n-d Phone: 4-~ 7 ~ 9~ ~.b Existing Use of Property: Legal Description of Variance Site: Variance Requested: ..> P Cl:-.$ ~ Present Zoning: /(- / j (J h 6 4 7 +71. qJ.r a do Yt ~ 13 e cz-c/J, f" (~/ve) .s-rl-~~t e 38' crt, ,i-.l;vEJ;V/u') Lahe Has the applicant previously sought to plat, rezone, use permit on the subject sitr or any part of it? What was requested: When: Disposition: obtain a variance or conditional Yes X N) Describe the t~ of improvements proposed: a. /f/'{1W h d I?-v ~ / SUBMISSION REOUIREMENI'S: (A)Completed application foon. (B)Filing fee. (C>:Property SUrvey indicating the proposed developnent in relation to property lines and/or ordinary-high-water mark; proposed building elevations and drainage plan. (D) Certified from abstract firm, names and addresses of property owners within 100 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. (E)Cornplete legal description & Property Identification Number (PID). (F)Deed restrictions or private covenants, if applicable. (G)A parcel map at 1"-20 '-50' showing: The site developnent plan, buildings: parking, loading, access, surface drainage, landscaping and utility service. L t'#r. f f)-II d>1 VL f9..~ ONLY COMPLErE APPLICl\TIONS SHALL BE ACCEPl'ED AND REVIEWED BY THE PLANNIN:; ca.1MISSION. To the best of my knowledge the information presented on this foon is correct. In addition, I have read Section 7.6 of the Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance which specifies requirenents for variance procedures. I agree t~~ovi~ inf~tion and follow the procedures as outlined in the Ordinance. ~_ Applicants SigrfatureFol- 1<,1--/ e L /tPUI1-4V12h SUbmitted this J.6.day of ~.. c,.k. 19.2.b w~A-<8~ Fee CMners Signature THIS SPACE IS 'IO BE FILLED OUT BY THE PLANNI~ DIRECl'OR PLANNING mMMISSION CITY COm.J:IL APPEAL APPRClVID APPROVED DENIED DENIED DATE OF HEARl~ rATE OF HEARlN:; <DNDITIONS: Signature of the Planning Director Date · REIMBURSEMENT COST TO THE CITY: Manager make a recommendation to City Council for Council action. MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY WUELLNER, FOR STAFF TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS AND BRING BACK TO THE COMMISSION FOR REVIEW. V ote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Wuellner, Criego, V onhof and Kuykendall. MOTION CARRIED. Chairperson Kuykendall closed the public hearing. ()f1~..~ 4.B 96-026 - MURIEL ROUNAVAR VARIANCE REQUEST FOR 16594 r C- INGUADONA BEACH CIRCLE: STREET AND LAKESHORE VARIANCE fJ^ REQUESTS. The Planning Department received a variance application from Muriel Rounavar who proposes the constn,lction of a new house with attached 3-car garage on the subject site, which is legally identified as Lots 6 and 7, "INGUADONA BEACH", Scott County, Minnesota. The applicant requests 3 variances; 1) a 17.5' lakeshore variance to permit a lakeshore setback of 37' instead of the 54.5' feet permitted under the lakeshore setback averaging provision of the Shoreland Ordinance, and 2) a 5' front yard setback variance to permit a setback of20' instead of the required 25', Michael Leek presented the information from the Staff Report dated April 8, 1996. Staff concluded reasonable use of the property can be had, and legal alternatives exist to accomplish the applicant's objectives and thus the Ordinance criteria had not been met. Patrick Lynch, III, Area Hydrologist of the Department of Natural Resources submitted a letter of objection to the requested variances stating he does not feel an adequate attempt to design a structure which considers the lot constraints and required provisions of the Shoreland Zoning Ordinance had been made. Comments from the public: Bud Waund spoke on behalf of the applicant and the current owners ofthe property. Mr. Waund handed out information packets to the commissioners and went on to explain the proposal and changes. He said he met with Staff and was told of the new Shore land Ordinances and realized the proposed home was too large for the lot. According to Mr. , Waund's calculations and compromises the house does fit into the building envelop. Staff did not previously view the revised plan and calculations. Muriel Rounavar, 16037 Northwood Road NW, lived on Prior Lake for 5 years and owned lake property in Michigan for almost 30 years. She is aware of ecology and the environment and is not trying to put a white elephant on the lot. She feels she is not MN040896.DOC PAGE 6 asking for the world just asking to be fair and would like to see her home on this property. Bill Brastad, 4808 11 th Ave South, Minneapolis, stated they bought the property 42 years ago and at the time the property was in Spring Lake Township. It was a summer cottage. All the neighbors have turned their summer homes into year round homes. He would like the applicant to have the home she really wants. He has been at other hearings and applicants were granted several variances. He is urging for a fair setback from the lake so the buyer's home will not have to be back further from the rest of the neighbors. A recess was called at 8:50 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:57 p.m. Comments from Commissioners: V onhof: · Clarification from the staff and applicant's lakeshore measurement. Leek read Ordinance Sec. 9.3D2 regarding setback averaging from the Ordinary High Water (0- H- W) mark or 50 feet whichever is greater, and further explained the measurements. · Measurement from lakeshore - Leek explained the 904 O-H-W measured from the adjoining lots. There is a specific survey that shows the 904 O-H- W elevation. · Cannot see where the hardship criteria has been met especially with the building envelop. Wuellner: · Cannot disagree with V onhof. The law is very exact. · There is no choice but to deny the request. The hardship criteria has not been met. A home can be built within the envelop. Criego: · No further comments. Loftus: · Leek explained the average lakeshore setback. · Rye said the operable dimension is now a setback of 37 feet. · The neighbors are closer to the lake because of existing variances and circumstances. · Question of property being a substandard lot in the Shore land District. Leek stated the lot exceeds 10,000 sq. feet which is substantially larger than the 7,500 sq. feet which is buildable without a variance under the Shoreland Ordinance. · The slope is not a location issue. · Mr. Waund said they are proposing a triple garage. Also a neighbor is interested in buying part of the adjoining Lot 8. If applicant sold part of the lot, she would be able to build the house she designed. They could shift the house on the lot. · Leek said there are a couple of issues related to that and pointed out the lakeshore measurement. Selling part of the lot is shrinking the building envelop. It would also MN040896.DOC PAGE 7 require an administrative land division where variances would be required. The process would have to be approved by City Council. There are many variables being talked about. Kuykendall: . Based on the information there is a buildable area of 40 feet by approximately 75 feet. . Waund: The new plan for the house is proposed at approximately 2,900 sq. feet including the garage. . Leek asked what is the proposed finished lower level of the house be? Mr. Waund said where between 2,200 and 2,300 sq. feet. . The Commission has to work within the variance hardship standards. The applicant can put a reasonable one story house as well as a two story house on the lot. Muriel Rounavar said she wanted a one story as a retirement home and wants all living space on one floor. She doesn't feel the neighbors would like a two story house. Bob DeMarse, 16576 Inguadona Beach Circle, said there is probably not a legal lot size in the area. The applicant would make a reasonable improvement to the area. MOTION BY VONHOF, SECOND BY CRIEGO, TO DENY THE APPLICATION BECAUSE OF FINDING A LACK OF DEMONSTRATED HARDSHIP UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE CRITERIA UNDER RESOLUTION 96-12PC. Discussion: The Commission has to follow the restrictions and ordinance. The applicant can build a very nice house within the building envelop. This does not prohibit the applicant from building a home. The DNR is also stating there is not a hardship. V ote taken signified ayes V onhof, Criego, Wuellner, Loftus and Kuykendall. MOTION DENIED. Commissioner Kuykendall closed the pubic hearing. A recess was called at 9:29 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:31 p.m. OLD BUSINESS: Joint Meeting with City Council on May 20, 1996. Chairman Kuykendall will draft an annual report. There was a short discussion on Planned Unit Developments. Don Rye briefed the Commissioners on a letter from the Met Council regarding the Comprehensive Plan. MN040896.DOC PAGES .. Minutes of the Prior Lake City Council May 6, 1996 DECISION IN THE MATTER OF REQUEST FOR vARIANCE, CASE NO. 96-015V A. Upon a vote taken, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, and Mader; nays by Kedrowski and Schenck, the motion carried. F. Consider Approval of Resolution 96-43 Denying a Variance Appeal by Muriel Rounavar of Planning Commission Decision in Case 96-026. - The item was introduced by the Mayor, and Planner Leek explained the request and recommendation per the Staff Agenda Report. The Mayor recognized the petitioner, Ms. Muriel Rounavar, who noted the characteristics of the lot, her desire to not have a narrow dwelling, and the need for a single level living area. She said site and building aesthetics are important. She does not want to put up retaining walls. She introduced Mr. Bud Waund who presented photos and graphic information about the site and the proposed home. He questioned comments by Department of Natural Resources staff regarding the variance, and terminology in City staff report, which were referenced by the Planning Commission. He offered a "reality check" on the ordinance variance hardship standard. He referred to the buildable areas on lots in several newer subdivisions. He said the petitioner is seeking permission to build on a smaller area or "envelope." Also, he cited the typical size of lots in the Sand Point area. He summarized the bases for the two variances, and stated the proposed home would significantly enhance the area. Councilmember Schenck questioned whether the graphic information presented by Mr. Waund was the same as in the agenda packet. Mr. . Waund said the material presented was different, and staff just received the survey because the petitioner just got it. The City Attorney inquired whether the deck shown on the graphics presented to the Council was involved with the variance. Planner Leek said it was not evaluated since it was not part of the original submittal. Mr. Waund said the deck is proposed and w~ designed to comply with ordinance standards. A brief discussion ensued about the deck which would be required to comply with ordinance minimum standards or a separate variance would be required before a permit would be issued. The Mayor asked if "setback averaging" were used, would variances be required? Planner Leek referred to red lines on a site -drawing shown by7 8 M050696X.DOC Minutes of the Prior Lake City Council May 6, 1996 Mr. Waund, and he explained how averaging works. The variance action requested would still be needed. The Mayor questioned the relevancy of averaging since it did not account for line-of-sight or view considerations. Planning Director Rye commented on averaging provisions of the Shoreland Management Ordinance. Councilmember Greenfield inquired about the setbacks of adjoining structures. Planner Leek responded referring to the available site data. Councilmember Kedrowski asked whether the proposed deck would impact ground coverage calculations; Planner Leek said it would not since decks are not calculated as impervious surface. MOTION BY MADER, SECONDED BY GREENFIELD, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 96-43 DENYING A VARIANCE APPEAL BY MURIEL ROUNA V AR OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION IN THE MATTER OF REQUEST FOR VARIANCE, CASE NO. 96-026V A Upon a vote taken, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader and Schenck, the motion carried. 8. NEW BUSINESS A. Consider Approval of a Lease Agreement with Scott County for Radio Transmitter for Police Communications. - The item was introduced by the Mayor. The City Manager explained the proposed agreement and the recommendation. MOTION BY GREENFIELD, SECONDED BY KEDROWSKI, TO APPROVE THE LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SCOTT COUNTY AND THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE REGARDING A RADIO TRANSMITTER FOR POLICE COMMUNICATIONS AND TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT. Upon a vote taken, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Mader and Schenck, the motion carried. B. Consider Review of Outstanding 1995 and 1996 City Council Directives. - The City Manager reviewed the Staff Agenda Report. He explained that only pages with pending items were produced for the packet. Councilmember Kedrowski asked for clarification of the relationship M0l10696X.npC 9 STAFF AGENDA REPORT DATE: 7F R. Michael Leek Associate Planner/Acting Assistant Planner Consider Approval of Resolution 96-43 Denying a Variance Appeal by Muriel Rounavar of Planning Commission Decision in Case 96-026 May 6, 1996 AGENDA #: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: INTRODUCTION: On March 25,1996, by Resolution 9612PC (a copy of which is attached) the Planning Commission denied the request of Muriel Rounavar for 1) a 13 foot lakeshore setback variance to permit a lakeshore setback of 37 feet instead of the 50 feet permitted under Section 9.3(0)2, and 2) a 5 foot front yard setback to permit a front yard setback of 20 feet instead of the required 25 feet. The variances were requested in connection with the proposed construction of a new house with attached 3-car garage on property located in the R 1- Suburban Residential and SO - Shoreland districts. The applicant appealed the decision of the Planning Commission, stating "The Building Envelope is too small... ." Initial references to a setback variance of 17.5 feet were based on the setbacks shown on the applicant's survey for the adjacent properties. It was discovered that this survey did not reflect the setback variance granted in 1995 for Lot 5, Inguadona Beach. As a result of the variance granted to Lot 5 the average lakeshore setback would be less than 50 feet, and thus the permitted setback would be 50 feet. ANALYSIS: The Commission's denial of the requested variances was based the following factors; 1. The large size of the subject site (12,332 square feet in area and 111.06' wide at the right-of-way line), 2. The fact that the Section 9.3(0)2 of the Ordinance allows a lakeshore setback of 50 feet rather than 75 feet, and 3. The size of the legal building pad (about 3,445 square feet). The Commission concluded that the applicant could readily construct a similarly-sized residence on the subject site while 16200 ~~&~R~~.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER complying with the Ordinance requirements. The survey accompanying the attached report to the Planning Commission identifies the required front and lakeshore setback lines, and clearly demonstrates that there is ample, legal buildable area on the subject site. Judicious redesign of the proposed house and garage would bring them into compliance with the required setbacks, while still permitting a similarly- sized (and substantial) house. ALTERNATIVES 1. The City Council may uphold Ms. Rounavar's appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of her request for variance. 2. The City Council may uphold the denial by the Planning Commission of Ms. Rounavar's request for variance. RECOMMENDATION Alternative No.2, support of t Planning Commission's denial of the requested var' ceo ACTION REQUIRED: 2 ROUNAPPL.DOC/RML RESOLUTION 96-43 RESOLUTION OF THE PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL DENYING A V ARlANCE APPEAL BY MURIEL ROUNA V AR OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION IN THE MATTER OF REQUEST FOR VARIANCE, CASE NO. 96-026V A MOTION BY: WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, Mader SECOND BY: Greenfield the Prior Lake City Council conducted a hearing on the 6th day of May, 1996, to act on an appeal by Muriel Rounavar of the Planning Commission's denial of a request for lakeshore and front yard setback variances for property legally described as Lots 6 and 7, "INGUADONA BEACH", Scott County, Minnesota; and the City Council finds that the request for variance does not meet the standards for granting variances set forth in the City's Zoning Ordinance at Section 7.6(C)(1-4), and that the appellant has failed to set forth adequate reasons for overturning the decision of the Planning Commission; and the City Council has determined that the Planning Commission's decision denying the request for variance was appropriate and consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, that it hereby upholds the Planning Commission's denial of the request of Muriel Rounavar for variance. Passed and adopted this 6th day of May, 1996. {Seal } Andren Greenfield Kedrowski Mader Schenck YES X X X X X NO Andren Greenfield Kedrowski Mader l)enCk 16200 ~~3ePeek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER PLANNING REPORT AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: SITE: PRESENTER: REVIEWED BY: PUBLIC HEARING: DATE: 4.B CONSIDER VARIANCE FOR MURIEL ROUNA V AR 16594 INGUADONA BEACH CIRCLE R. MICHAEL LEEK, CITY PLANNER DONALD R. RYE, PLANNING DIRECTOR YES -X- NO APRIL 8, 1996 INTRODUCTION: The Planning Department received a variance application from Muriel Rounavar who proposes the construction of a new house with attached 3-car garage on the subject site, which is legally identified as Lots 6 and 7, "INGUADONA BEACH", Scott County, Minnesota. The applicant requests 3 variances; 1) a 17.5' lakeshore variance to permit a lake shore setback of 37' instead of the 54.5' feet permitted under the lake shore setback averaging provision of the Shoreland Ordinance, and 2) a 5' front yard setback variance to permit a setback of20' instead of the required 25'. DISCUSSION: The subject site is wider than required by either the R1 or Shoreland districts. It measures 111.06' along the front property line and 101.20' along the lake shore side, as opposed to 86' and 90' front widthl75' width at OHW required by the districts respectively. At 12,332 square feet in area, it larger than required by the R1 district and the minimum required for non-conforming lots in the shoreland districts (12,000 and 7,500 square feet respectively) There is a narrow strip of land between the property boundary and shoreline. The survey provided by the applicant does not indicate the area of the proposed house. Staff "digitized" the area, and found that the footprint of the house contains about 2,022 square feet. The garage measures about 34' x 34', or about 1132 square feet in area. The proposed driveway is 30' wide at the street; the Zoning Ordinance permits a maximum driveway width of24' at the curb. The survey indicates that impervious surface coverage would be 29%, i.e. less than the permitted 30% coverage. However, the surveyor has included a note that the calculation was based on calculations provided by the owner, and was not verified by looking at a house plan. In the event that the Commission were to grant the requested variances, it 16200 I!S.gct~~fu~~ve. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER should require that the impervious surface calculation be verified by the surveyor without reservation. The communication from Bud Waund, agent for the applicant, to Michael Leek of City staff (a copy of which is attached) indicates that he has used the setbacks for adjacent Lots 5 and 8 in drawing the proposed setback lines. The survey does not show the 46' lake shore setback granted last year for an addition on Lot 5/16604 Inguadona Beach Circle. This grant of this variance was based on the small size of the lot (6,300 square feet), its narrowness (50.71' at the street), and the severe slope on the property. (See Res. 9532PC, a copy of which is attached. Attached to this report is a copy of the survey submitted by the applicant which shows the approximate location of the lake shore setback line permitted under Section 9.3(D)2 and the front setback line. As can be seen from this illustration, there is ample buildable area on the site is the setbacks requirements are met. The minimum distance between these 2 setback lines is about 40'. Variance Hardship Standards: 1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship with respect to the property. This criteria goes to whether reasonable use can be made of the property if the Ordinance is literally enforced. It also goes to whether the applicant has legal alternatives to accomplish the development efforts without the requested variances. The subject site in this case is quite large, and its "buildability" is enhanced by the ability to make use of Section 9.3(D)2 of the Shoreland Ordinance, which reduces the required lake shore setback to 50'. The building pad which results when the setback requirements are applied is also quite large, and would permit reasonable use of the property in the form of the construction of a very substantial house with attached garage. For the above-stated reasons, this criterion is not met. 2. Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique to the property. Because staff has concluded that literal enforcement of the Ordinance would not result in undue hardship, this criteria is, de facto, not met. Moreover, by virtue of its size and shape, the subject site has no unique characteristics which would necessitate the granting of the requested variance. 3. The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and is not the result of actions of persons presently having an interest in the property. Because staff has concluded that there would not be an undue hardship if the Ordinance were literally enforced, this criterion is not met. survey. 9626V APC.DOC 2 4. The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest. The applicant's request is an example of what is sometimes referred to as "variance/setback creep", i.e. the granting of a variance for one property gives rise to increased requests on adjacent or nearby properties based on the argument that the requested variance is insignificantly greater. Particularly in this case involving a site with substantial buildable area, this sort of "creep" runs counter to the spirit and intent of the Ordinance, and is contrary to the public interest. AL TERNA TIVES: 1. Approve the variances requested by the applicant, or approve any variances the Planning Commission deems appropriate in the circumstances. 2. Table or continue discussion of the item for specific purpose. 3. Deny the application because the Planning Commission finds a lack of demonstrated hardship under the Zoning Ordinance criteria. RECOMMENDATION: Because staffhas concluded that reasonable use of the property can be had, that legal alternatives exist to accomplish the applicant's objectives, and thus that the Ordinance criteria are not met, staff recommends Alternative No.3. ACTION REQUIRED: A motion adopting Resolution 9612PC. 9626V APC.DOC 3 ~ 1..0 C'I o I \C) 0\. , 'I FW ~ ~ ! ~ 'I 'T+= ' ',. " ~ i i i i [:. ~ ' l! L C ' 1 ,~: 1: I:;; ~ :1f.P ~, ' ,uj IlJ-JrJ1f'lT.1............r. ~b- ,\ .,,' I I, L:., . ,I '<\:, '4IW lei '. ~ '! ,I N . l) ,,~-~; '. 'll'~ J , ' I tfiJ=1 ! II ~,~ ~<Il!' '"f(-,i, Ii I~ , '!~'J ,') L' J I L' ~ .v; 'fit" .' '. ' ' !' ,1.~' ' , 'J i~ - I ,~ ffi :;;"iJ . ,. ',. 'V ;1r t-..' ' , ' ~ ! ,Il~, ~'r:;,;~~j':I'I' ,',,< ~,: ~!,', !,~kl:! ,_1\' '.i<~ , ,,,,.! ~.J ',," 1., ,:;','"!'" ~'" I I ' Ie-'-,' .. 'I ,\ ~ . , i" " ,=f= :', I ' . !'i. ~l, ~ 'II 1\\ l ,__ ,::1" ' ,....~' illJ..riJ ,'~ ~ ,J,=' ' ~[_ ~~ llil:'ill. ; : ~ :'~ I Ii ~~'v'- :~' ,T" , I ., ~;"" r '-: J' , .Il!" i', ".'J"Z(t" ry~ I,' ' ' . \ 1 " :' i " U I' Q,,'! ' " ' ' klcl: - rr b. =fl,:;:J i-:--' '. ,; ; : I I', 'Q,," f ' ,~ II-;d':\ , ':~~7~Wr:1) f-~'~'I' i: ' " t f " I', ~ ~ T-~ I U' ,,!ttr' ~ ,",c': -I'W' - ,- LI~' ~ ,," l ' \ t>ffl: IE' 1,l,,\IDQ''' '. II ' ~~ " ' ~~ ~'FI ',' I j',. XGr.~'l,~' ~. If", --~~.T ,,~'l I II / J _,,,> ! ' I" ' , ". .:.t cc".;c IV} ~~,~iI' ~'=. . '.L'''i: n" 'I\" J\',"" ,/~ >J ,,:~ I I''.J'' , I ' .;~'J '~~\3 \\' ' +-+- '/' I ~ I" ~'E; , . ' , ' ~ I r .....,.:.,' C$i 111 ~ I )Y,' · I -l;;,. ,',,-~ ~I~'~II ~,--_~ ,--l'l'I' 1~~ ",/'.'TI 'i! '-:'I" I " ~ Ii ' II; , . l . ,114LY' [;11!:rJr i ",.: 1 , t! ." n; __ ~ l. ,_~_'.J" ,7z... 11'" r':--iil,~ Pc' . ,.. 'II I I I' \ -" 'C,' "., ..1! ,," · ,,,' " ' 'n , " '. ;' l ' " I~ I' ' l n--.J -~~i' ,"..- . ." I , ..dl'!lIL"-. ' ., " '.~' . I . , I .,1' '1,Ii '. ~il ' ~;:I ,........ ..... ...:.....~\3.T11! ....: , ., ) ~ ,;'[,~,~~ I '.--- I . ~ -~ I ,~b ' o ' , I , , __I . . ~ .'. '. . .' . ~ . . . ---~ 96-026VA ~~\O~ \.fl.~€. Valley Surveying Co.. P. A. SUITE 120-C, /6670 FRANKliN TRAIL FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM PRIOR LAKE ,MINNESOTA 55372 TELEPHONE (6/2)447-2570 SURVEY PREPARED FOR: BUD WAUND 14198 COMMERCE AVE. NE PRIOR LAKE, MN. 55372 44' t EXISTINO HOUSE '1110 EL. 9U.45 I' C y line of lot 7 S84ltS7'Oe"E 101. 7 plot --~ 100. 81 me ~i (' I , I "- ~ ,. /L.L / 1/ /~.~-'~- -9~'.'-- ' _ 65;- ___ Af'I'1j!.O)l.IMA11!. L-A~Orz.e. ~~V- U NE (SO' reJt. ~. 9. ~(O):Z,) DE;SCRIPTION: Lots 6 and 7, "INGU^DON^ BF)\CH", Scott County. Minnesota. Mso showing all visible impr:ovements and encroachments onto and off fcom said pcopet"'ty if any. ~ LOT AREA = 10,099 SO FT., AREA BETWEEN LOT LINE BEL. 904' 2,233 sa. FT TOTA L AREA = 12,332 SO.FT. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE = 2 9 % o r SCALE 20 40 NOTE IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE WAS BASED ON CALCULATIONS FURNISHED BY THE OWNER, WE 01 D NOT VI EW A HOUSE PLAN TO VERIFY Rev. 3/12/96 To ,hOW propo.td hOUlf' e. lm~loUA StJrloc. a n.w Iq.ft. or~. t herltby certify 'hOt tNs IIJr'vey WG' pnpond by me or undfr my dirt<:'f J~ervi.ion and 1M' I gtJ1A. duly I/Cfln,ed Lon ~r Ut1d4H' th. )lSw. ~th. Sta11 0' n 0 I _~ ',C..of . o Otnot., 1/2 inch If 14 inch iron monuml!nt J.t and marhd by Lic!n,~ No /0/83 . Ol!r1ofu iron mOfJ\Jm~nt found 1:1I DeMo''''1 P I< Nail ~,., !tJo'" Lice"" No. /0183 IN FEET PilE No 4594 800K ~PME ~ NOTICE OF HEARING FOR THE FOLLOWING VARIANCES; 1. A 17.5 FOOT LAKE SHORE SETBACK VARIANCE TO PERMIT A LAKE SHORE SETBACK OF 37 FEET INSTEAD OF THE 54.5 FEET PERMITTED UNDER ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 9.3(D)2 (i.e. SETBACK AVERAGING); 2. A 5.0 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO PERMIT A SETBACK OF 20 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 25 FEET. ALL RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW HOUSE WITH ATTACHED 3-CAR GARAGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE R1- SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL AND SD-SHORELAND DISTRICTS. You are hereby notified that the Prior Lake Planning Commission will hold a hearing at Prior Lake Fire Station #1, located at 16776 Fish Point Road SE (Southwest of the intersection of C.R. 21 and Fish Point Road), on: Monday, April 8, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. APPLICANT: Muriel Rounavar 16032 Northwood Road Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 SUBJECT SITE: Lots 6 and 7, Inguadona Beach, Scott County, Minnesota, located on Inguadona Beach Circle SW. REQUEST: The applicant proposes the construction of a new house on the subject property. The proposed construction will result in the following requested variances; 1. A 17.5 FOOT LAKESHORE SETBACK VARIANCE TO PERMIT A LAKESHORE SETBACK OF 37 FEET INSTEAD OF THE 54.5 FEET PERMITTED UNDER ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 9.3(D)2 (i.e. SETBACK AVERAGING); 2. A 5.0 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO PERMIT A SETBACK OF 20 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 25 FEET. The Planning Commission will review the proposed construction and requested variance against the following criteria found in the Zoning Ordinance. 16200 ~~~W~ve. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship with respect to the property. 2. Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique to the property. 3. The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and is not the result of actions of persons presently hnving an interest in the property. 4. The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest. If you are interested in this issue, you should attend the hearing. Questions related to this hearing should be directed to the Prior Lake Planning Department by calling 447-4230 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. The Planning Commission will accept oral and/or written comments. Oral or written comments should relate to how the proposed construction and requested variances are or are not consistent with the above-listed criteria. Prior Lake Planning Commission Date Mailed: March 28, 1996. 2 9626VAPN.DOC DNR METRO REGION TEL:612-772-7977 Apr 03,96 11:35 No.017 P.Ol :~;, . . ,', . :\ ~ tMTri;T$,@iJ ~ ~DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division ofWatcn. 1200 Warner RoJd. St Paul. MN SSJOG ~..' ".\ . ! . ,. : \ PHONE N0772..7910 . ,~!' FILE NO. :~" ' '\' . Apri14~ 1996 I h : ,. . \ \ ~'. II . , '. .:..'~; I .' .~ . . ., ~. j \ ' \ ,"" I Mr. Michael Leek ~. City DfPrior Lake 16200 EaaIe C.. AVCIlUG S.B. Prior Lab. Min~ 55372.1714 U: ROUNA V AR. VARIANCE REQUEST. LOTS 6 ct 7, JNGUADONA BBACH, n..w Mr. Laok: t 1 have JeViewcd the malarials Sllbmitted lIlong with the subject varimce request.. Based upon my review. I wish to express opposition to the ......linB of the varilUKlO u requested. Setb-=k ave.. wu designed to IIddres. situations liko tbi. one whereby development could occur within the raquiIed. set:ba: area wilhou.t varirmce. ND !'1P.1npt hu been mlde to mc::cl the standard.: Allowing this home closer to tho lake will OItablish B new bcndunuk for setbBGk BVeraaina wilen the adjacent pargc}s are rc-dcvclopod. The 8PPlicmlt dcaI not IIppCIIf to have made py afIbrt to delip a stru~ that contidcrs the: constraints oCthe .m.Ilow Jot. '. I IIOlo the ocwth waD oftbc thr'Dc-IbIII gage is 34"1aDg. nus ill a pat..dB811091Cf than a sleftdard aaraJlC? If it were ra:Iuccd to a t;No .taI1 av.. Ole entire stnx;turo shifted north on tho Jot" and Jivin,c splICe were added to tho roar of the g..-age. I believe the 1* setback varianco eouId be eliminated. I have seen bctIcr attempts to c;:oJI'Jply with the required zoniD& provisions on loti a lot smaller and .ballowet than this one. Tho pJ.n does DOt indic:aIc whather or not . deck is ilu:1udcd in the dcIip. _The ~p)jaml.bouId be mado 8\VaRl thal ~ deck mUll IIIso meet...,~ .~~Tho homo desisn should be IDDbd at carefUlly to see if door. IR includecl which mil)' result in request for futuro varia&cc if/when a future addition is planned. _ _ """""l I trust tho applicanl win be required to demonstrete hlll'dship before the Pl.wng Commission. I look forwlU'd to 1'eYiewing tho Findings ofFect and ConclUlionl for this varilbCCl request. Asain. the DNR is opposed to this variance. We do not fDOI that .... adequate attempt hu been made to design D structure which considers the lot goDsCramts and n=quirccl provisions of your sharchmd zonln' ordinance. Please call me at 772.7910 if you have lIlY quostiOlll. Sincxnly, ~fU ~~ Pldrick J. L~ m Area Hydroloplt AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITV EMPLOYER '.', \,<"'1llI!\;o,~"..' '." DNR METRO REGION TEL:612-772-7977 Rpr 03,96 11:36 No.017 P.02 .", . 51,1""IT ""r.-.Rll;D I'DR: eu 0 WAUND 141'. CaMMl!"eE .VE, /II e:. .-RIOR I.AIC!. MH. 55;172 VolI~ Surveyi"; Co.. P. A. SUln, /ICI-C. ""0 """''''/(L/N r"AIl. F""'NJrI..IH rlflt/L 0"",,, CO/vOQM/N'IIM ""'Oil LAIf". H'",H.JOTA H:J72 T(L!PHO~r t./21~" '870 ,,1'\0" _..~.. B \.~~E ':. DUell I P'tfON I l.CM:. . lIll4 .,. -lllClJAIlCINA llrACN". _~~ <<:011II.". "~M..ol:;.. At... _L", .U "~.n>l. impraw--.nlla .n~ .nc~~ft~. an~a .~ a" traM ..id prop.~tv If any. ~ L.OT .REA' 10,0" sa. n.. AlflA 811TWEF;N LoOT 1.INI! a EI.. lJO~' Z.JJJ SQ. FT. TorA 1;., ."I'A' , 2,332 SQ,FT. IMF"F;RVIOU$ SUR'.CI cavE""'GE '29 '" CI I SeALI ao 40" I, /IfOTE IWI!"VlOIJ$ cOVIRAGlt IItAS IlUrD ON C...CULAl'ION5 1lUR/lt11M1El '(fI 'n41 ~C'" Wi 01 I) /IfOT 1111\11 . HOUIl! "-"'" TO vElilI..... .... Jill,.. ". .__...__ . 1M.......... ....... ..... ,..'r. .... . ,,.,,.,.., ....,,~ ,...... -.... - ...... '" ........., ~ ..- -- ~.,.-- -.... /",::;1'" ..... ~ . ..... " 'ff 'eET Q 110....' II ...,. .14.... ..... -...--..... L.~",. 1If. 'Of.~ '" ......,.. I'. ..-..- .... . 0.".,"" It """ '.' I'll., ".. .... 1l:IGIl' ~_r....!!- RESOLUTION 9532PC A RESOLUTION GRANTING A LAKESHORE SETBACK VARIANCE TO PERMIT A 46 FOOT SETBACK INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 75 FEET, A VARIANCE TO PERMIT A SIDE YARD SETBACK OF 5 FEET ON THE SOUTH INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 10 FEET, AND A FRONT YARD SETBACK OF 20 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 25 FEET FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A LIVING ADDITION TO PROPERTY IN THE R-l SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND SD- SHORELAND DISTRICT AT 16604 INGUADONA BEACH CIRCLE. BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota; FINDINGS 1. Jerry Halliday has applied for variances from Section 4.2 of the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit construction of a living area addition to an existing house on property located in the RI-Suburban Residential and SD-Shoreland districts at the following location, to wit; 16604 Inguadona Beach Circle, legally described as follows; Lot 5, Inguadona Beach, Scott County, Minnesota 2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the Application for Variance as contained in Case #V A9532 and held a hearing thereon on September 25, 1995. 3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing.and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variances on the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variances will not result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties, unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, and danger to the public safety, unreasonably 16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 4,h-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER diminish or impair health, safety, comfort, morals or in any other respect be contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. 5. The special conditions applying to the subject property are unique to such property, and do not generally apply to other land in the district in which such land is located. Among the conditions applying to the subject property which the Board of Adjustment relied upon are its size and severe slopes. 6. The granting of the variances is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The variance will not serve merely as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship. 7. The contents o(Planning Case V A95-32 are hereby entered into and made a part of the public record and the record of decision for this case. Pursuant to Section 5-6-8 of the Ordinance Code this variances will be deemed to be abandoned, and thus will be null and void one (1) year from the date of approval if the holder of the variance has failed to obtain any necessary, required or appropriate permits for the completion of contemplated improvement. CONCLUSION Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby grants and approves the following variances; 1. A variance to permit a 46 foot lake shore setback; 2. A variance to permit a 20 foot front yard setback; 3. A variance to permit a 5 foot side yard setback on the South. These variances are granted with the following terms and conditions; 1. The new, southerly wall be I-hour rated; 2. Erosion control be maintained in connection with the completion of the project which is the subject of this request; Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on September 25, 1995. ~~o~~r Donald R. Rye Planning Director 2 FROM =EDIN~ RE~LTY PRIOR L~KE 447 4735 1996.03-30 16=15 #608 P.02/03 J1 ;'- t/ It. a-e L ~ ; ? 1- @- It S 6 41., h /ke:vf;- K d V-IL ~ ~' ~ The Se f-l~-~ L,- "'-e ~ k5 f! d tf 6' (H"...~,,~,,/ v...".~ c..) .s-... l-" r ..s- a H- e:I 'I '+ I ~ f S(.c,rv7l!l'cI S+~&f.t:t h r rr ~ -F cJ ".. L fI' f-" f?'". ~ J;" f-'It.... C.Q:...5 r:- s /k ;- .> ,-.s ~ f Th-P c.. L".s e so 'f- I'tJ,' "- ~ - I 0 ~c; ~ 1 .J. ~~ 6 oJ 'f-A- CQe.~ e S ; -f w, ~ ~ ~ 6-r:! L- (?s.s l~ 'Y t1 f.4.. ~~c.s Co4.-;# To ~ P ("/ , '- h + ~ f-( c"P"' A/'.t:1 r "f-li... · .J21"}/ ~ r~U) n /A.t! e-L,st!'s7- rc;; ;.~ r-- . -Fa I- L-u h ~ s,' hoL. IE -L ~ it. ~4f../ Th.e ~~7 U~'-7;7 (!) ~ e/,:s f-Q..,-~ To /h ciS ? p f .. FROM =EDIN~ RE~LTY PRIOR L~KE 447 4735 1996.03-30 16=15 ~608 P.01/03 Joan & Bud Waund \. 447-4413 ~.~ TO: FAX: COMPANY: J'1/c-h.4.BL j p~h - 4 47 -" Lf-:J.. 'I-.s L/ Iv' o-.E py-./""()Ji- / I-~h. e ~" r" TOTAL PAGES INCLUDING COVER: ,2, FAX 447-4735 COMMENTS: r'vtl dr-e.vK h W/r- Th,e 5 e :l-64.e.-K RESOLUTION 9612PC A RESOLUTION DENYING A REQUEST FOR; 1. A 13' LAKESHORE VARIANCE TO PERMIT A LAKE SHORE SETBACK OF 37' INSTEAD OF THE PERMITTED 50' UNDER SECTION 9.3(D)2 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; 2. A 5' FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO PERMIT A SETBACK OF 20' INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 25'; FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW HOUSE WITH ATTACHED GARAGE ON PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 6 AND 7, "INGUADONA BEACH", SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA, AND LOCATED IN THE RI-SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL AND SD-SHORELAND DISTRICTS. BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota; FINDINGS 1. Muriel Rounavar has applied for variances from Sections 4 and 9 of the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit the construction of a new house with attached garage on property located in the RI-Suburban Residential zoning district and the SD- Shore land District at the following location, to wit; Lots 6 and 7, "INGUADONA BEACH", Scott County, Minnesota. 2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variance as contained in Case 96-026V A and held a hearing thereon on April 8, 1996. 3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variances upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variances on the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The request does not meet the Ordinance criteria, in that reasonable use of the property can be obtained if the Ordinance is literally applied, and legal alternatives exist for placing a house and garage on the property. 16200 ~8~~<(92~. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 5. The granting of the variances is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The variances would serve merely as a convenience to the applicant, but is not necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship. 7. The contents of Planning Case 96-026V A are hereby entered into and made a part of the public record and the record of decision for this case CONCLUSION Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby denies the requested variance. Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on April 8, 1996, 1996. Richard Kuykendall, Chair ATTEST: Donald R. Rye, Planning Director 9612PC.DOC/RML 2 May 24,1996 Bud and Joan Waund Edina Realty 14198 Commerce Avenue, Suite 100 Prior Lake, MN 55372 Dear Bud and Joan: Enclosed is your check in the amount of $50 for the recording fees for Muriel Rounavar. Sincerely, LuUL1A)y. ~~ Connie Carlson 7 Planning Dept. cc enc. I~l JOAN H. OR DUNRITH WAUND SOLD REALTY ~ ~ ... -~.~?/ ~LAKE, MN 55372 3/1 .l-- r;;J&~l _ ?:Yf, T ~-~ .~~ ;;~~~- ~ ~ ..., Pri Lake .. Offlc~f Marquette Bank Shakopee. N.A. 16817 Duluth Avenue SE Prior Lake. MN 55372 ~~ PAL 4r - _.I ~~:~~ l__1 19 ?b I $ .5'~,.~..~.. 75-194/919 BRANCH 1 DOLLARS MVP ~ 16200 ~\'If'~reek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesd'tWIS5372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EivlPLOYER ..:....,,,,. ....~;~'U\l.lI!'I't~_ .....;:11I11 .. ~:....,. . -:',...., ~"'llf,'t"!~..--':'~J~~~~:4),~~~,~~!' . FROM :EDINR RERLTY PRIOR LRKE 447 4735 1996,05-01 13:38 #608 P.01/01 Joan & Bud Waund , \" 447-4700 ~ 447-4413 ~.-=::.-J TO: FAX: M / /-/k.?tJ> j.. L ?e K J.} If 7 -- If:;.. 1.1 S- . L'" Iv ",.J: ?,.. I-~ V' i-~. It ~ . .? L ~ vt n.. -h:C/ / pr . COMPANY:. TOTAL PAGES INCLUDING COVER: L FAX 447-4735 2 1/Le;;9- pr-/I ~W~ COMMENTS: y'~ J..6..eI '~/~/i->"~ pd " Tt, ~ A:Jt.c.-1-~"k-Q ~ ~ I · / '-:-.. j, ,I:- h 1/ f: ~,,; r." t:P VI.. 1/ If' 9' 6 - 6) ;)... b .:t-,~ "Q/ ~ L "'J~ ') h.E3' h c..... ~ ,.~ at- TA.r Pha- PI. I-,!,,:~'Q t':a'">-r1 i7'l /..J..r,'o *"7 Uet!'i-~"~9 ~.tPr'I-j. e-7it.. .' P'. . Th~ .y.~r h-1I44.J;, ~_.~h - /V#tt.'",L.}J c-- I~ h;'f T' j- 1-->) ,r", .t!'... &- Y' ~J>t.1,. f "k- Q ~v If Ilrf/ ./'~,. / . t'" 4 f'L... t' /. X t> P." -f- / h. 4 -I- ///" _ ...s: p T Il-t- M.-J '-===9- ,/ , f v~ ;:=; " -/.'0. ~;'> ~;;;o Th e- #.. r (' OL_.L- ~ d"'>a-~ /' II#' Th..~.R-S' ,; .l?t. / I~""':' ~/ "-d' ""'" ~~\(. . T.hr 1:;-~z.t"'" . '\ Edlna'ReaIty..j 447-4700 14198 Commerce Avenue NE Prior Lake, MN 55372 [HG:l "\"'111,1.- ..~ April 12, 1996 [;-~ r= ~ \Y O'tl @ ~~'\ ;..!... r.\', \ I. ~~. s .. !' i Ii;'" Ii I) If :: l ;I !\ r\\ \ APR I 5 1996 Ii II I IU~I / City of Prior Lake 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue Prior Lake, MN 55372 To: Donald Rye, Planning Director FAX: 447-4245 Re: Variance Hearing on Monday, April 8th, 1996 Subject Site: Lots 6 and 7, Inguadona Beach, Scott County, Minnesota, located on Inguadona Beach Circle SW. (16594 Inguadona Beach Circle) We would like to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission regarding our variance application. We request that we be allowed another hearing on the subject for the following reason: . The Building Envelope is too small Sincerely, fJLuJj~ ~uriel Ruona , Fee Owner 16229 Franklin Trail SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 440-1514 PHONE N0772_7910 ~~T~Ti>@1J& ~DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RE Division of Waters, 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN D rn cs rn D'W rnl~\ \ APIl 5 1900:,\\.) I \ j;/ ! I CES _ _J FILE NO. April 4, 1996 Mr. Michael Leek City of Prior Lake 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E. Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 RE: ROUNA V AR VARIANCE REQUEST, LOTS 6 & 7, INGUADONA BEACH, Dear Mr. Leek: I have reviewed the materials submitted along with the subject variance request. Based upon my review, I wish to express opposition to the granting of the variance as requested. Setback averaging was designed to address situations like this one whereby development could occur within the required setback area wi1hout variance. No attempt has been made to meet the standard. Allowing this home closer to the lake will establish a new benchmark for setback averaging when the adjacent parcels are re-developed. The applicant does not appear to have made any effort to design a structure that considers the constraints of the shallow lot. I note the north wall of the three-stall garage is 34"long. This is a great deal longer than a standard garage. If it were reduced to a two stall garage, the entire structure shifted north on the lot, and living space were added to the rear of the garage, I believe the lake setback variance could be eliminated. I have seen better attempts to comply with the required zoning provisions on lots a lot smaller and shallower than this one. The plan does not indicate whether or not a deck is included in the design. The applicant should be made aware that a deck must also meet structure setback. The home design should be looked at carefully to see if doors are included which may result in request for future variance if/when a future addition is planned. I trust the applicant will be required to demonstrate hardship before the Planning Commission. I look forward to reviewing the Findings of Fact and Conclusions for this variance request. Again, the DNR is opposed to this variance. We do not feel that an adequate attempt has been made to design a structure which considers the lot constraints and required provisions of your shoreland zoning ordinance. Please call me at 772-7910 if you have any questions. Sincerely, fU !u\Jif/ Patrick 1. L;tch ill Area Hydrologist AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER FROM :EDIN~ RE~LTY PRIOR L~KE 447 4735 1996,01-31 14:17 "599 P.01/02 TO: Don .~ FAX: FAX 447-4735 I COMMENTS: Dqh - :z::;.,.... D)'.J.c-~.ss/'J.....y '~JW"~. . (.7 I 15 ~t;L p-.'- l4/ ~ -H, .P4 f- Lv JJ j,,. ), _ /? ~ rJ;.. f" D A/' /C P / ell.s-e . . / . J:1 PrO r It; 1- ~ l""" A /" h-.. It' r:t:. T)... ,-...s J- P &:- d ~~b _I o/.o.c L..o ..... P IlL 7- W' j, 1 ~ / -/ ~ &t 5orL-l-..s . AL". f- T~t> L-~ kl-s4;-p O~'1t"'.s ;--l~~.J//~ /I,t ~(." 1/- J-:fr-J>::> o-::F- .?1f--n.~1 6~/t-,~~.;1.. rh t> 5J.r i'vry ~,.'",--~ -.,.~... /' ~.-...~;. . T ~ . ~ L- J. J '-, J.V #.. -'" r h. ~ c:; L,.",.. hp r__. -- ~ ~ TJ.u... -j=)'y..c -r- J I..- e;,j~ " _L D J r TJI"J'&. 7'- Cd~#'" t- dlJ> ~i"'...?i'-..., _ ,.y;. 'r>'~' ; h /? 6" "/~ Th.-~I- /C So 15;;..~/~~ 447-4700 14198 Commerce Avenue NE Prior Lake, MN 55372 I Edina Rea~ [Btir '.1'1111'''- ~..':':::t FROM :EDIN~ RE~LTY PRIOR L~KE 447 4735 1996,1211-31 14: 17 #599 P.12I2/1212 ..df:ii.:....:.'..::.)..... ..' 4.'I''t:t..t.\i........ ... ., .~ :,,~~~~ :i';,~}\"~ J,.llll..-KD 'VARa"....ry DEED'. ,'" , .' . Porn1 So:- )1-:-'-:--' OIW"'L.O '~IJL.I."'N. Glih.. ,..... U..M. y,u.., .\.~ ..... :'.~>~~ ,: CDr~~,.,lnR to ......'..14'-;"..'.. "., I' ~ . I.U.....n.... U';~n..oy"nch,.I\I,,"1... (in31,. . ,il !~~~~~~r;~;.:i:t\.::i;:: ::;~::r'~+! <:.:: /...::~, :: .' . .' .. '. . '. ' . :i~' )ti~'\..{.:...'.1..ll7.T'I. "!.~". h' l't .ik A . t '. 67 '. j~~:.. ::,;i~.: :~~:: \"<'!:.\' '. ~ 1~!'i.: J,1tuctt t:C.e ,. ..A:lacle e.1Lis._._..---...-.-...~-.-:.-...d..dCl!l of.____..._.....y~--_..-:--.-.--..-..-. 19...._.... ,i..... t .:;~~ 1 ..,.....' .....,... .:; . I . . ,:::r.:t~-:; ~,6t~..~~~: '.:.' ';:. ' '.Property Qlo!nlilrS of' !nLtuadona Beach and 'r...:in Isles Assoeinte, Inc. ~::: {;~~,;::tF..,~<.:;.::','.:.:'<. /f:': '.: . . . . ..' g:: .fgfi;;{.~.'~~1'J;D;~~:lo;,.: undflr aloe law, of tILe' State of....._..aiTJ.l.1~!li~ta---~..........--...-.---, party of thIS first parf.. und . \l~~ '.:,; j.(,:.., .',,:. :','. i~~;'il I.;. :,', ,d.'.. , ::~\!'~; 'l':(:;':';~':'i'" 0:'./.:.' < -:rr,opeity O"lners of Ingu.a~n.a., Inc., a Hinncsota corporat.ion, ",..... :\I"\"~"~' ..... ". . Scott.' Hinnesota .~;; r :U~q.;:; 01 ths' Co:u.nty f?/..:.....::...--..-................----...............----.-.-aJ1,r,l State 0/-__.........-._.---.--.......----......-..................... .--.-- i~?I:. j.rt:,~;j{'par't~.~X.~L~~::ol tl~,; second .'I,a.rt. . . . . .~:;\S::r;~~f;~i:.';.i..~;:~:,:.:;,:~.h.: ':"~:>: .' ..:' . WitJll1:sse:ch. Tha.t t1~tJ said. party (If the.f1.rst 1)art, in e01uidtJration of tho ..l~.: ./'.:.1..... '''''''''''''0' '. Dol' t.'-, on\ ~1 +1.. rl..l 1 \~, ".L' DO...,~.",.n~, I .; \'. :' ;: ::il,;;~:'I'UJ1!-: 01.. ....n$j!~.--.-~-*!l.r..:~\.,-P...~-!-..~.L.R-.~'rt...Q-....I.Ir.X"...E:QJ;)-w...;.o.n!olo..Y.M. }.L1l.~_e___~~1JJ ;:;;,.c..cr..".'r.1.C1n.....m.......-.- ......,.,..~.'"",.), "'/.i ...,J;:,r~::'to it in.:7utnd paid by t7106 srJ.id part..Y.....___of tlL" s6coltd pa.rt. tl~c receipt 'rJJ'~cr(fofi.. 'Lcrcby ac1cnol~l4dl!;;c1. "If;' .J..".... "..' '. . ,,. "-'1 ::l..tS:OUCCQssors . :::.\ :'~;~1"'~.:'doCB 7LerBby Gr(r.nt. Ba.T/!a~.".. Sell, (&7H1 C01LVCY JJ.1i.Lo the $aLcl part-l..______..,o/ the noon,. part...........--.---.--.. i ~> "',~:L :,JJ'.!~#'A. a~.d Qui,pu. Forever. a.ll the tract.._.._. or parcel........o/,lriud lyinf /'Sntt bC#7J.! in tlL'lJ qou.nty of ! :.' ". ..,....:. _.._......Sc.o.tt.--..............:,-........- ..and St(r.tc of Mi,7Ion./J.!ota. r.Ze80'rn)Ctl as follows. to-wit: 1 _;:;0', ":tJ;~-:-...-:lj:'.,..:...r~.'-':':".:r......_~:~- :.: :1....._..._,.,. _. _., ,. 'd' . t . I ~..M on ". . .. I ;.,~+ ~;~~)i<All.;Cirive'Jays rind walk in Inguadona Beach in said .Scott. County~ Hinnesot.a. .And also' a '~~i~J J~{~r~'" tract. : de.'scribed as follo\oo1s;'- Commencing at .th~ Southwest corner of Lot. 1 in 5aic Int;:u:l.c;i~r"a ;:.;:;' ::[;~::~:.Bea.ch.;...and 'h,i.nning ,t.hence Northeasterly alOl1g .the .WestF.'X"ly side of lot.s 1 to 1; inclusive. >;.~';~:r~..in:.~~1d'InGuaa()na.B~achi thence Eastcr1y along the liortl1 side of Lots 14 to 19 incl~7i"e( . ,.. "';'-' t.o t.he East ltn~ at said Inguado'1a Beach; thcmce' due NOl'th to the \-Jatar' 5 edt;e of pl'j.or : '. .' .'1':', Laka i~ said Scott Count::!, l':inne:sota; .t.hence \':esterly ~nd Soutlll-1Elsterly a.long saici ,.;~.te::r- '.s ":,;,, edge t.o a. po~.nt ly1.11~ Nort.h .5~~O)2" He5t of. t.he point of baginnine;; thence S:luth 54012 I East .:.; t.o the place oj;' beginninG; in' s;nid. IhZ\~llci.ona Boaeh, Scott County, l';innr:sota. E;.:co',"l::' all \ :. i;. ,that parcel of' land lying and being situate in In~u1!.dDna Eeach described as rollo~ls: ! . """". Commenc,ing at the .SoutlwEl.st. corner or Lot 1:3, thence Northeasterly a.long the ~/e.5 t 5 ide 09 ':":: sa;i.d LOt 1) to' the most. Nort.horly corli;;)r of Lot 1), t.hence Eastmrly along t.he North sici.e I .: . ;:\. of Lots 14 and. 15 to the center of the North line of La'\< 15; thence Northerly to the ': :: .::.:: \.rater' s edge of Prior Lake on a.n extensio:i 01" a line dra\om throUgh the cent.er of said lot ;" : ~~', . 15 from South to North;' t.hence 'tJester1y and South-:.,esterly along said loIater' s edge to a ! "'> ;"';.point"in. a line extendod to said water's edge frOM a point.. in t.he rear line o~ Lot 1:3, ! '.:::.~ )""-Fift.e'el1' feet Northerly from tria Southeast corner of sa.id Lot 1). running' Northl.tester1y to : .:.- ::. the Southwest cOl.'ner of 'u,'t 1); t.hence on said la.st desc:r:-ibcd extended 1ine to the ";)lllce 'of . begtnning. according to the plat. of Inguadona veach on file and of record in the office 0';1: ". the Re"ister 01: Deeds in and. f'or Scott CDunty. Hinnt!lsota Subjaci:. -to .t.he :r;:ir,ht c~ :. '""~""'" peacefUl. passa.ge over said land which is hlllreby reservod by the grc.i"otors in ra"o~ 'of 1;.he l~ owne:r.s. oi. the r.ell\aihing lots in Inguador:a Beach and i'l.:~n Is 141nds . . '1 . i . &nd enjOj~cnt of j.. " I i . I ,'.. " . ._. "~"':"~ .'(a.)' Peaceful pa5sage shall exclude a~' motor .vehicular traffic over ar-d ! ..... '.; DEED TA~ ~ . acroSS said lake5hore e)(oept on' tha a9pt'oach on the l~orth end of the ciriv,aHay, I...... . " ;" 1f2~i$ ;" of which runs North and South on t.11e East siua OJ7 Iri~uad\,na :Beach Ad.ditio:; ~ ~nd: I:; {~~'~~1 :;. a.t the We~t a\')pr():~ch of tho clr~\'c!\':3.Y, \'lhen davc1cpdd, '.,hic:h a.buts l.ot ~ of .said ~ . . . (f,..;~!t1( '. :. plat.; no rer;c~:;I 5{-;;:,11 i;l13 e1"ect~)d on ::'he lr,k.:il~l-lOr~; and onlY the o\mcrs of those: I F:t.i;i'.1'D1]' lots abuttinr,:: 1~hCl la.koshore nllve the t'it~ht to build 3.nd. Wlintai.n one dock ;"r:d ; .i .1~''''':-:-7.'~ . stair101ay em 'the lake front abutting .such .1nkC!shore lot. out at no ti:lle ~h,,-ll (..) I . . I '1 ~ >.... To I'lave and to Hold the SanHl:. 'l'ogetlLlJr with all the '..crc(lita.II"e1~ts and appl~r~r:.HanCr;g. : ~~ ~. ~;th.dr61J,'LeO beltm-ting or in: anywise ap'p8rl4i1J.in~. to the, sa.id. pa.rt..y..........of the second pa.rt,._._~~R...1'iMI-<CaSSors. ~..{J> Wr.c;i.;;,v'..<a1Ld aB8itt'I~', Forever. .I,[ncl the saia pa.rty of tho 11r8t part, for it'6l1 am.l itlS Iu.coe.S-fors. dQSS ]\ ~ ~:cove7loa.nt u;i,th 1;7L1:. ,aid part.:~..__._....ol the SMOJl,tl part,._..i.ts...su.c.cc.ssh'Q;i:BB a,,,d Q.ssigIl-8. tha.t it ha.f not ~:,d gjnLacle, ilo.7I.e. exeou.ted or 1'1I,p'crcil Q.lLY aot or thing whrJhocvcr whcrob]J t1~e ~bOV6 d6scribed premises Ill; g ,..or any.part thereof. now or n.t 017,71 ti,ne 7LtJj7Ca./to"', sha.1l or 1/l,ny be; 1:,1'Lperilc(Z, c7wrl1ccl 07 i,z.o't.m.bcrcd I cl) '.. ' . . " -:;Ii ~ [':.7,Jz. (l,ll,y 1U.UJ/,7LlJT. l.tJ'~(j.t80/3V6)',.........-----.--..m...-.........---..-..................__...___.ou......... .......__._____m.............. . ..............____.._m..~ '. '.' ~ , ~:: ..0 '....~:"-~T..----..-:-..................,--;-:-~-._...... .".--..-----..." ..................--------..-.........I.....--.---..--......I~... ......11.....----....................... ....-....-.-------.--- ..-................. ..........-......:._- ....::t. ()....._~....~-.----.- a;n.~ t7/,o titr.~ to tlLO a.~9VC Itr~J~tcd. pre~l'lo~sc." (t!!ain.st (Ill, "crsO/u la.fIJ~ILllJJ claim.i/l.1! tho B(171I.C . '~":'I J .8rr~m., thrO'll.I1'L or ~7/'clcr 1-t. 6:'DOOpt lte7J'/,,'. lor a.ny. lu;rcr.",bofo'r/J 71l-cntI.o7Lcd. t7M !/Q.,d pllort'!) of thflftrs/J pa rt :,: :"I':';! ..~~~{~\ T,J:.J;~~~,. ~JL~ D~flJ~~d. If'. T c5~imQt'ly Wllcmmf. Tho &ft.icZ first. part.'!) htal ~(z,r',..~'C(L --f.l;I!~'~" '.' ,,'" .,' ..........,;.. r J'" . 1)1'aso1l-/;' /;U lJt!, tJ:lJcazt.tuJ. ;.i' its uOI'luJra.tc 71oa.71LB by i-l8._f.t~.i.lr.H:;1,D.u . ~'.,'.:f~L<::e:,;~!;~~:;}~:h~~!~;:'~~~ . ," , ~~~~'U~.::~~~~:r.:::J~::.d--;~~;.;~t~~~~~~~t' .!;~ :lHc0~~;~ora;ii6~'~h~s ~o.se2~) '.,~\-:" .~._I' . ':'".; . . ... r " _,r ,~"', ..~ :~ j::;:.rf},~ . . ", - ~"-":":1'.' '.I::J",::.: ~.~ .'. . ".:-:' ,iii;'PreIJ6JLC~ of ) ,;\1 . :'-\/.:,:, ~ ~,.!.r;,~";,'~~~ ,..:/ ~ ,. t . !..' . . ...~.!:c,...~...:::I..f>."'.;.J[~..:-.;f.......c:.-r......__...m--... ~ '.j" !).... ,-./ /- _,.' ,;. ,...:.-'f7L-tO':;"""=1--::--,_..l:,.....1...-;;.../.=:r;..._n._.-m-.- . .:';'l::'~ :,,-"'i~ .! \ . \._. '. ,../7"0... ",:_J.,.2 J . . ' . I' :' .'. j' .n..'tQ, 0-U ?':"I.td 1(; :-~1 '"7'. j) OJ . . " : .... ~ l~ ,~ .I 't rt' . ..l~'-'"" .>l:,(~)the la.kelifront be obsth:t.:t\'ld or \lseo"t"., int.c~'j~(:l-C '.'I\T.1l '.~.S~~ _." b:,~ :.tnc. blh{".~:', .ll:'t, .()~.~nl1t'$ \ ,.r J'.l1;:;un,d(')na, i..~:~H1Ch., . .3 ~'..I'~i ,~Ji...\n"I.~l .' ...'....,. .~.I..... ,_ "1" ].\'.,..\ '1" .1""cr'-',-,u \r""r'" .... n .", .... '1 "I!' ... .'"............~.. _ II l. Il" ... I\". _~Ill) Cum..:'! .1.\;1... '1.~ ..I,H" l':":l : .'! , .; \ . I ., . I I , .:'.', RESmVlllG :to the property .' sai.d iakeshorej and j' '.1 . . RESERVl1'JG to the property ,'.' "., across .the sai.d lnke5hore ,".". SllBJ~T to the fo1:1ololing: o...mers of Inguaciona Bench "perpetually t.he USe . pfi;rpetua.lly o\Onf:l'l:'S ot Ttdn Islesl lhe right or peaceful. passaGe over and strip' above 'describ-;d~ and' . . . i i ......... .m..' .._..... ...~-::.-;.:.;.umm....~...........~..~__~...-....,-;:.... .............. 1" ~ " .._ ......... 7,~ "'It ..;.;-r:'....~t1,.''''~ki'q(....r-...c...G. . .__......._.....0000..... _.... .1\l.~ ~_..., .Cnairm::m 1'1. J 'p..:>...,"~.--...- / .,.. .r8..-."J:~-'''''''''' T' ''i'f':J.(.<:rttll.. 'I . I ,. f' , i / f' .....~... ,,' -..,./t' . ." . .... ..". ., ..- G-~. . ." .~"',-.. ,"N' ~.. .' .. . ...1....../,.- ~.,.._.l~,._ '_',. "'D'"nL;;.~-r' ~ ~.fo.t..l.n.l..." :1..-....-.- :~r.~..o(";.t. .....L. ~{;;lhc~J.n I LII.... ..$.ecr_ct.ar.y.......... ......... ';~\: enjoytTlr::nt of so.id lai~o front ~ 11 c;d.:;.t.once on ~'cbruary lIS. 1965, . .... .........--------------.....-.. .,.--,.---... ..-.. I. ~: ;': .")..~~" ;"; I, " ," ..I ":\:::i":~ .. ~ '" I, ." ;; 'j', ' . i . . . . ~ . .'. . "... . " .. " ." . .' . - -~-:- ~ 20 ~8 ~1 28 ~, ~I ~~ ~2 ~~ ~~ . ~ 4 . - ">'(..:~~~'- ':... ..' 6 ~ ... . .... ~. . . . ':'-'~7\!~~~.';;:!>~~; .~. .. ..' t .7 8;' '..~"',: NEW ABSTRACTS CONTINUATIONS CLOSING SERVICE REGISTERED PROPERTY ABSTRACTS TITLE INSURANCE RECORDING SERVICE SCOTT COUNTY ABSTRACT AND TITLE, INC. 223 HOLMES STREET, P.O. BOX 300 SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 V~b-l>~ David Moonen and Dale Kutter Telephone: (612) 445-6246 FAX: (612) 445-0229 January 8, 1996 o /C.c.-" 00 (~ Joan Waund Edina Reality 14198 Commerce Avenue Prior Lake, MN 55372 To whom it may concern: According to the 1995 tax records in the Scott County Treasurers Office the following persons are listed as owners of property which lie the following described property: 6 & 7, Inguadona ott County, Minnesota. ior Lake City Administrator 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue Prior Lake, MN 55372 Kenneth R. & Evelyn Falkum 16568 Inguadona Beach Circle Prior Lake, MN 55372 Timothy R. Collins Et Al 16614 Inguadona Beach Circle Prior Lake, MN 55372 Brian J. & Sandra M. Mattson 16575 Inguadona Beach Circle Prior Lake, MN 55372 Jerry D. & Angela Halliday 16604 Inguadona Beach Circle Prior Lake, MN 55372 Richard I. & Katherine Baker 16585 Inguadona Beach Circle Prior Lake, MN 55372 Marilyn J. DeMaree 16576 Inguadona Beach Circle Prior Lake, MN 55372 Cheryl A. Garner 16595 Inguadona Beach Circle S. Prior Lake, MN 55372 James S. & Sue Arrington 403 Duck Lake Drive Austin, TX 78734 Donald J. Rahbain 16615 Inguadona Beach SW Prior Lake, MN 55372 SCOTT COUNTY ABSTRACT AND TITLE, INC. ;/y ,,(J 7~J Dave E. Moonen President DUfL . . ..',li-\CT _ _:~r MEMBER MINNESOTA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION AGENT FOR CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY March 29, 1996 Muriel Rounavar 16037 Northwood Road Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 Dear Ms. Rounavar: This letter is to inform you that your application for a variance to construct a house on the property identified as Lots 6 and 7, Inguadona Beach, Prior Lake has been reviewed by the City's Planning office, and has now been found to be complete. The request will be scheduled for hearing, as you requested, before the Planning Commission on April 1, 1996. You will also receive a copy of the staff report which will be prepared during the week of April 1, 1996. Should I or other Planning staff have additional questions or concerns we will be in touch with you. Should you have any questions feel free to call me at any time. Very truly yours, //A~~~' R. Michael Leek Associate Planner cc. File 96-026V A 16200 ~~~eW~:IIS.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER NEW ABSTRACTS CONTINUATIONS CLOSING SERVICE REGISTERED PROPERTY ABSTRACTS TITLE INSURANCE RECORDING SERVICE SCOTT COUNTY ABSTRACT AND TITLE, INC. 223 HOLMES STREET, P.O. BOX 300 SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379 David Moonen and Dale Kutter Telephone: (612) 445-6246 FAX: (612) 445-0229 January 8, 1996 Joan Waund Edina Reality 14198 Commerce Prior Lake, MN Avenue 55372 To whom it may concern: According to the 1995 tax records in the Scott County Treasurers Office the following persons are listed as owners of property which lies within 100 feet of the following described property: Lots 6 & 7, Inguadona Beach, Scott County, Minnesota. City of Prior Lake City Administrator 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue Prior Lake, MN 55372 Kenneth R. & Evelyn Falkum 16568 Inguadona Beach Circle Prior Lake, MN 55372 Timothy R. Collins Et Al 16614 Inguadona Beach Circle Prior Lake, MN 55372 Brian J. & Sandra M. Mattson 16575 Inguadona Beach Circle Prior Lake, MN 55372 Jerry D. & Angela Halliday 16604 Inguadona Beach Circle Prior Lake, MN 55372 Richard I. & Katherine Baker 16585 Inguadona Beach Circle Prior Lake, MN 55372 Marilyn J. DeMaree 16576 Inguadona Beach Circle Prior Lake, MN 55372 Cheryl A. Garner 16595 Inguadona Beach Circle S. Prior Lake, MN 55372 James S. & Sue Arrington 403 Duck Lake Drive Austin, TX 78734 Donald J. Rahbain 16615 Inguadona Beach SW Prior Lake, MN 55372 SCOTT COUNTY ABSTRACT AND TITLE, INC. /~,,(J~~ ..... ~....,~.'...:-..~ '-- ':m~ACT } / Dave E. Moonen President .~ ~,;;r MEMBER MINNESOTA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION AGENT FOR CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY , ...., ..j.....' '.' :~' i :.~:<? ,-. ", ! I,' ."_ :. ..,j"'. . .;.!'<'......: .. \: . " ") ~ .,' : '.' . " ,./ . . ~',.. .. " " .~. ... . , .:." . . ' I <l -Z o a <( :;) \0 ,.. l.: ., .: ... .-/ FROM :EDIN~ RE~LTY PRIOR L~KE 447 4735 1996.1213-3121 16: 16 #61218 P.12I3/1213 , i I J Vblley Surveying Co., F!A. ' .lUrTE. 120-C, 16610 FRANKLIIII TRAIL ~RIlNKI.1.II\1 TRAIL OFFICE COIIIDOMINIUM PRIOR LAkE, MINNESOTA 55372 TE.LE.PHONE (6IZ) 447-z570 .... Y PREPARED FOR: WAUND cOMMERCE AVE. N.E. LAKE, MN. 55372.. .. ""OI'O.~D IIOl,Isr --- .. ~. -....:... --l 1- . I I --...----.-.;. '" 1D ../t.. "" ~''1 IIII' ... , I DlllyrWIlY r ~, ,1/ . . . ~ \..~\C.E. J a /.. 'a~..f ,. C"_~. - _...... I ~.. -4:---, :/ r.'.~/I'fG I . IIOUBI! L ITo 81' . IlllilOyrD) ./ .1 ~ ,f DESOlIPl'ICN ; Lots 6 and 7, "DGJADtJliIA BEACH", sc:ott County, Klnnesota. Also /IIhoWing all visi.ble iRlpro!/llIMmtG 8nCI encroachments onto and off frClll Mi.., ~.opllt'ty if MY, . /.:, .' . I ~ ~. I iff FILE 96-26VA \..(t.~E Valley Surveying Co., P.A. SUITE /20-C, /6670 FRANKLIN TRAIL FRANKLIN TRA-/L OFFICE CONDOMINIUM PRIOR LAKE. MINNESOTA 55372 TELEPHONE (6/2) 447 - 2570 / SURVEY PREPARED FDR: BUD WAUND 14198 COMMERCE AVE. NE PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372 44' 't EXISTIN6 HOUSE W,O EL. NZ .45 ,-, C 'I :~ r! E WAll.. - y II'M of lot 7 5840S7'OeoE 101.7 plat ---100.81 m. 91... . I I I ,,~\O~ r----_ I lit 31 -........:..- I!!' -7 1---____ ~-"---1 I ) /.,. Q4~<4G€'....1 I I - I a.......... .~~. f . ----- ~I '" l~/ 1(1 ~ I It I .. ~ --:::- . --- -,.,7.... I ...... ~ DESCRIPTION: Lots 6 and 7, "INGUAOONA BEACH", SCott County. Minnesota. Also shO'W'ing all visible improvements and encl:'oachments onto and off fcom said pcopecty if any. ~ LOT AREA = 10, 099 SO. FT., AREA BETWEEN LOT UN E 8 EL. 904 = 2,233 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA = 12,332 SO. FT. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE = 2 9 % o I SCALE 20 40 I NOTE IWERV10US COVERAGE WAS BASEO ON CALCULATIONS FURNISHED BY THE OWNER, WE 010 NOT VIEW A HOUSE PLAN TO VERIFY Reov. 3/12/96 To show P"OP'osed MuM 8 Impervloul SurloCt a MW 5q.ft. Of"1tO , n~r~by certify f"at 'hit fA.Jf'Wy was pr.~ by rM or under my dftef ,~..vi.ion ortd rfKJt ~dulY licenHd La .,.,.,or under tM iw:~th. . Stat. of ot . ,.-' IN FEET o D.notn' /2 inch x 14 inch iron f7\0ttument ..t and marlred by Lic.nu No_ 1018.3 . Oenotes iron monurMftt found is Denotes P K. Noil Jet nLE No. 4594 BOOK ~P/IGE ~ Inguadona Beach Circle ~ .'l- .... ~. ,., ,( . ~-' .-- -~ '. . f~. '~.. ::~ / :.C........ :----( j.- Influadona Beach rircle o }:'i~ \ ( 'r. ~: ( ~16 1277 OWNERS DUPLICATE CERTIFICATE' T ra'nsfer from No. 22nd- day of 770 Originally registered the 19 25 Volume 1 April page 48 llRJE Clil-ll (55'1r~PJrrr({])N !/tale.. 0/ J(f/rvneJotaJ. }ss ~,f .A ,A: / ._A L,.L/ .//j (' b7 ' . rg/j.tu/~'//Y~Cf7"W':lY.4har 700',Ml.tu; 0./ Scott mmJ' '1'- . ' William A. Brastad and. Jean A. Brastad, husband. and wife, as Joint tenants and. not as tenants in common or to the survivor. 0/ de 58'17 lOth Ave. So.. (~uno/ 0/-. Hennepin ~ 1weo de oeo?J City ~ Minneapolis ami YtaU. ~ Minnesota fee simple of a?t eJlalQ. to e(Jit: 0/ cwuI Ut de flloww':f d~01<eled ktd 4etaatd in tIt6 ~oan~ 0/- Scott a?ul Y'taU 0/ .~?~(}ta, . {(oJ eoit: Lots six (6) and seven (7), in Inguadona Beach on Prior Lake, according to the plat on file and. of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds in and for said county and state. Only persons of the white race can hold title on this tract known as Inguadona' Beach. ~ PID:250950060 !/it7'ed to t.k enaunl"anceJ, IienJ and MUei'e<Jt?wted 'r t.k me1M1'id ~n, 01' ~ he4<e01t/ and ~'ed to 'de ~#fht6 01' en0em61'U4tC1Xl d{(kJIi,,?, ad fu'ou<<fed ~,. .9.?~ 5()8.25 vllul/JlaJoIa Ylattile4 1.9~.9 ?UNndy" . ,." .. I. fIJe,/M, cl.aimd, ()oJ<"'i'aa1'l;Jt;1/7o"C<XiJU/~q{uuk"det.uuJo"t.k{Xl'MU<<eUOno/de ~uted' y~, rukJ d~tJtaUaz,Mwt~J<eIoO'tf,k-o/l'e~' 2. !!i2e Iie-" 0/ an? wa; o/"dftea'nl O'Jd~1JIenl;'1' which. de ~ had not leen. d# at t.k rkte 0/ de ~ 0/ u&,. , .1. d'1 ka.Je r" a IwPiod ?wl tu=edM'j d"ee ye,"r6 {uhe,. dtJPe iJ adaol tJCaFtUm 0/ de tfMNliJr>> d~l'/ ~. sflJ "'iha t,t /uelk h'ihwo16 {~,. the land,. 5. !/itch "'?ht <I a/Vieae:' ~!< "'1hl to o/pe<u' 'Md {Xll/teJt dd O'/!p~f. 0'4 iJ alkud'r diJ chofih: . 6'. !!i2e "'?ha 0/ a1l1 jee14Jon t,/, pc.Jde6d/O,. {oulc" rfe,,.t 01' CtJ/llPact;'1' rIeed I_Ill de ()(lI'JlCI' 0/ t.k ..,4azte 0/ Utk.. !!i2at de dat'a. is III_Piea. is 0/ d~ rife 0/- 39 and is andel! no William A. Brastad to Jean A. Brastad .yeaP<J, . ~~. " That:,the said Jean A. Brastad is of the age of 35 years, is married to William A. Brastad and is under no disability. J.. ,mhtllt51llllllhtrtOf. fha.ue he/<Canto d~ m7?tame ,"iuJ a,(~ d~6ea1 0/ 11'1 ~, tI~ , 7t.h rI~ 0/- ~ ' 10$- CT/? III ~ 1/ lvllJlli.a~Al U 1Lt;{~ (flrf))/a/tY{~~Ct/L~~?af/~~.7k~~~~cd~1///~~?V;)tCQk~!l:2~~,a/.Iu/~ ~_. ...,~ ~. DOCUMENT KIND OF' DATE OF'REGISTRATlON DATE OF' - NUMBER INSTRUMENT MONTH DAY YEAR HOUR INSTRUMENl AMOUNT RUNNING IN rAVOR OF' SIGNATURE OF' REGISTRAR A.M. P.M. - ;~~, & PMp"!! lt~<u CIIneM;06 Ingua.dona. Be.a.c & ~I ra.u.t W. WVU11VL61U che.n 70'l1 e. e.e Aug. 10 1967 1: 30 6/6/67 Tw.&t . r M.60 c.Utte., Inc.. V4 by MalLY Lou Ve.u;t.&c t,. dp : Cfllki:4:t )te. F. Hannen,. e.:tcll ~anded, . f'Mpell l<u ,\IneM ~6L'ngua.aona. .1Se.a.c. fi S/Pa.ui.. W. WeJrmelUl/U che.n 70'l'l us, & Aug. 10 1967 1 ; 30 6/7/67 T~ r A4t~~, o;~i" Vd (,t,'k '.. ~"" bll MaJUJ Lou Ve.u;t.&elt dpty 70'l3 l/V PlLopeM;if OWneJL6 06 Ingu ~ S/Pa.ui.. W.WeJunelUlk. ~c:e. Aug. 10 1967 1r 30 5/7/67 1 e.:tc. Be.a.ch & TLOOt Illl.e..s AlIda e., by MalLY Lou RpelLt6 ;.d nc, ~/P~ui.. W WeJunelUlk1J!.c ~~, 7024 l/V Auy . 10 1967 11 30 8/1/67 1 e.:t~ , . PlLOpe.lL:ty OwnelUl 06 . y MY Lou ve.u;t.& elt, , T.." . ~. 8498 "'nt. Zoft. '. ".:/'a.c..t~, . iJlLd. Oe:t, :U 1969 4: 30 10/28/6~ The. Public. n...,.,. II It 1..' ~. IJ . x....YMt!f. "ftJ aM.iJ .:U-. _A.'-" . IV. tf~ 8551 OlLdeJl. Vec.. 4 1969 1 11/19/6~ Re.g.t.6.t1u:r1r. 06 T.u.e.e..s n. j,9f1~L / . 1 ff 1'l870 ~~C.V. Ju.l./j' 9 1974 4 5/4/74 1 e.:tc. CUy 0 6 P JLi.olL Lake. tc:I'..:JI _. ,. . Me, ~ - j') I) f. . I.. A) I- 12871 ~.C.-v; Ju.l.y. 9 . 1974 .4 5/4/74 1 e.:tc . CUy 0 6 P lLi.olL Lake. ( ~~~ 0_1 J~'.v 'I..,.., Me, - . . .. p' r1 . - f :tJj n pt d..,.....~~.:.:....._~__...__. . ----------,.:-.-- File No. 316 VOLU ME 6 rAGE 156 " ~? 1277 William A. Brastad and Jean A. Brast'aa:;nuii'!)a.Dd. an<b W N E R wife, as joint tenants and not as tenants in cODBIIon or to the survivor. . , ~. Scott fl1~Nn~~T ". ~j.::.. j LlMrmD WARRANTY DEED.. . Corporation to i;,dlvllunl; . . . Form No;. 21";---'_-"""" l-Iinnoonta Uniform ConvoYkocing manks (iliall. OIWALD "UliILlaHINO eo.. Haw Ut.."'. "11101.... . . W1lhi.;:j1 n'h:etthtt'.l? ,. .M ade thiS......_......._}.~.~~.._.:.~.......day of.___.......,.~g~:t!..._._...........~.., I9..??.., between . Property Owners of Inguadona Beach and T~in Isles Associate, Inc. I 1 I I- I i :','1 "d' ID IDi ;:.j C)' '0 Cl: . :'r.: aJ~ 0 +>; Q) ~11 fJ (j} .c: ._...m..............................-..... .......-.... -- -- ..--...................-...-......--.. ......... ..---- --- ------ -- ....--.- --..--......... ................ --. - -- --........................ ., ~ 0........................ and the title to the above granted premises (/.f1alnst all persons lawfully claiming the same o :.1' Qfrom, through or under it, except items, if any, hereinbefore mentioned, the said party of the first part : I, .swill !y~rrant and Defend, . -- ..- .. '.__ J(t~','J;":'~t;~i5. .~~ ~Ef:~~g~f:j~;~~~~? .,~ :~(C():i('p6ra.tioArrliJ.s no seo'.1) ':f..~ ". RESERVTIJG to the property said lakeshore; and RESERVL\G to the property across .the said lakeshore SUBJECT to the followimr: "', .(a) Peaceful passage shall exclude any motor vehiculr-.r traffic over and .' DEED TA~; . across said lakeshore except on the approach on the :~orth end of the an.vei-lay, I I~;~~ of vlhich runs }iorth and South on the East side of Iriguadona Beach Addition, and: Il'\Y.~?(.>.1~~:i. at the 1tJest a;iproach of the drivcHay, "hem dcvelop0d, \olhich abuts Lot J of said: ~,z,~j{,~,: . plat; no fences shhll be erected on the 1<~k0shore; and only the mmcrs of those: r~}'7;Y:Yo~] lots abuttinr; tho lakeshore have the rifht to build and ffiaintai.n one dock and ! I ......'-<-- , stairway or, the lake front abutting suc!: lakes:-,ore lot, but at no time shall (~) , I _! ~ " To Have and to Hold the Same, Together with all the hereditaments and appurtenances t ~: rl fit,hereunto belonging or in' anywise appertaining, to the said part..:y:..__.....of the second part,....~~,;;...811.9.CeSSo'rs. E-< ',Il- ~Jr.fJ:i.;;.s-^and assigns, Forever, .and the said party of the first part, for itself and its successors, does ~~covenant with the said part..y....._____of the second part,...j.ts..,su.c.cesdl't1.izs and assidns, that it has not ~:!made, done, execltted or suffered any act or thing whatsoever whereby the above described prelltises ~~or any part thereof, now or at any time hereafter, shaU or may be imperiled; charged or incu,mbered '). r.::.UL any 7nanner whatsoever ,............---...............-..........--...---...---........-----.-... -- ..----- ............................... - . ..........--......--.......~ , .. . . ,'.;F "~, corporation under the laws of the State of.......J~liD.O~;?Q.:t.fL........................, party of the first part, and '/,:"')(.: -,." .:'t.'."'~' ,T(;;\~:' ~:';; '. ".' . Pr.operty Ovmers of Inguad'lna, Inc., a Hinncsota corporation, " J;: r thC . t . f . Scott . d Stt I Hinnesota ;:'J\;A'; 0, . e .o.un. y 0 ................................................................an a eo............................................................................ ;:.h...part...Y.....,:..~..of the second part, .',i::'\:\;:;"'I: ' ' ." ", Witnesseth, That the said party of the first part, in consideration 01 the o'i""; :-su~n ~ f...Qn~...P.9:j,;1,,~.r..J.:P.l-.!?Q) ...~Dg...9.:tth~J;.,.gQ.Q.d...v.mi..yf.t..J.u..a'Ql.e...~9.r.sid~r.r.:t..~Qn..................DOtm;.f-?~ I "'.i'::" to.t 7,1Lhand paod by the sa.d part..';i........of the second part, the rece~pt whereof~s hereby acknozpledgcd, :'-::/d.... . , .' tJl. 1ts successors . does hereby Grant, BargaLn, Bell, and Convey unto the sa~d par ..............of the second part,...................... ; , h'fl.}.-m an~ assigns, Forever, all the tract........ or parceL......olland lyin!} and beind in the County 01 I ._'".-:~.,""',.s.~.f?:t.t.....:..,..........,............ ..and State of Minnesota, described as follows, to-wit: I ::}\df,- Ail'-dri';~~;ys ';a~d\~alk--in'Inguadona' B~ach in said. Scott County, Ninn~sota. And"also a L ;";;, tract d~scribed as folloH5;' Commencing at the Southwest corner of Lot 1 in said Ine;uadqna Beach;' and running thence Northeasterly along the ,we.sU;'rly side of Lots 1 to lJ inclusive, in s~id Inguadona Beach; thence Easterly along the North side of Lots 14 to 19 inclusive; to the East line of said Inguadona Beach; thence due North to the water's edge of Prior i Lake in said Scott County, Hinnesota; thence \':esterly and SouthHesterly along said Hater ,;s edge to a point lyinr; North .54012' i'Jest of ,the point of beginning; thence South 54012' East to the place. of beginning in said Insuadona Beach, Scott County, Einnp.sota. Excc~')t all i .that parcel of land lying and being situate in Inguadona Beach described as follows: . Commencing at the Southwest cOFner of Lot 1), thence Northeasterly along the Hest side of, said Lot I) to the most Northerly corner of Lot IJ, thence Easterly along the North side I of Lots 14 and 15 to the center of the North line of Lot 15; thence Northerly to the I Hater's edge of Prior Lake on an extensio~ of a line dravm throUgh the center of said Lot 15 from South to North; thence Westerly and SouthHesterly along said water's edge to a ! . point in. a line extended to said ,.,rater I s edge from a point in the rear line of Lot 1), ! . Fifteen feet Northerly from the Southeast corner of said Lot lJ, running North\..resterly to the Southwest corner of'Lot I); thence on said last described extended line to the olace of beginning, according to the plat of Inguadona Beach on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Scott County, Minnesota. Subject to.the ~iV1t of i peaceful passage over said land wnich is hereby reserved by the gro....tors in favorof the h owners of the remaining lots in Inguadona Beach and 7~in Islands. I ! use and enjoyment of i. I I i I i O\.mers of Inguaciona Bellcn 'perpetually 'l:.he perpetually owners of T\-.fin Isles/the right of peaceful passage over and strip above described, and . 'I -'I I i '" I "....1.... I I I. . -;:', .", .-: i~(<"\. ..' '.'.,:, '\<: ,.:i}.;..,:.i::~ln'presc.~~7e of ) . .. i;,J ,,,./ /\-z'7- ",)''/ ~ I.+I:;......~.(... .~:}=-;r~~~.~.................... ~ --~/:;;;~~1:-:;:;,ti:;:~=:~Z..J.... . ii' ....... -;. U,/ II v.r' r:'1 ~ . /:);.......... (';')the lakdifront bel..Yobsti'c,cted or used to 'Lnte:.'~~(;rc ','(iT.il _~__"___.q :iy ...the. b\tc~:_ .lclt, .o~.'.'nc'i.'~S :. d:~ In2:uadona ;3(~:J.ch.. 3:',1'1; c t u1" '.:~ ::'::',''-,,'. '.:-" ," t\1," 1;;;".:;11.)1'(; uescribed hr,rcin, i'-':':i 'i"~:-" ........ ....-- ----- -- --.... _..--~..~....--.................~......~.........~;................. ...__-- ...,/' , i,,'// J1 ',' ..- ..,Ar...-;o. 4" ' ill. --"""'.. ..,.--."'~c:;:."......f.h~..................... ~ ...;',j;:lll~ .L;~.l. 77-- I Cn2.irm'-'~n / n'~'''-'"",,'' / ." js......,:............)7...rY'8J.(.Ctl.l:\, , . . / "f' , ;; / / . '-."t... / '-.,-/' ." :'- . '..., . .... / . , .:,.. .~.':./.::~;(.{:/.:?;-:;,;:./.L..:,4::.!~.t-.tl,..c. ~ :L...... ;~.~..~..oc~.t 'L. ;:\:1h02.1n Its.... ..S.ecr.c:t.ar.y......... .......... ,..:C enjoyment of said la::o front . t. .-, , If. 1(':"5 :; eX1.3." c:~,,<:~__~~__~_~,?ru~~X__:J, J?_ ! 96-026VA ,~\o1t \..~\(E Valley Surveying Co., F?A. SUITE 120-C, 16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372 TELEPHONE (612) 447 - 2570 SURVEY PREPARED FOR: BUD WAUND 1419B COMMERCE AVE. N.E. PR lOR LAKE, MN. 55372 44' t: I ~ I I /11 ~4J .... !Ii I I? I , -- :_-~e~_ . ---~--=--- -;4~ '_ 65;-____ ~"'MA11!. LA~oaze. ~~lI- UNE. t.:SO' R!JjI. ~. 9. '(0)30) , , "~~..e.~,,~.,:>, /' ":--:f' I - - / 1/ /' ~o ). DESCRIPTION: Lots 6 and 7, "INGUADONA BEACH", Scott County, Minnesota. Also showing all visible improvements and encroachments onto and off from said property if any. LOT AREA = 10, 099 SO. FT. ,AREA BETWEEN LOT UN E 8 EL. 904 = 2,233 SQ. FT: TOTA L AREA = 12,332 SQ. FT. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE =29 % o I SCALE 20 . IN 40 I NOTE IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE WAS BASED ON CALCULATIONS FURNISHED BY THE OWNER, WE 010 NOT VIEW A HOUSE PLAN TO VERIFY REN. 3/12196 To show propos.d hou.. ' 8 ImperviOUS SUrfoc. S new sq.ft c:na . I hereby certify that this *1rVey was pr.pdI'fd by me or under my direct aupervlWoit ond that ~~~!y I/cenafd Lan Uridtr tM )lJw, 5""' S~ote of no. . /~ r 1 ^ FEET o Denotes 1/2 inch )( 14 inch iron monument s.t and marked by License No 10183 . Denotes iron monument found II Denote!f P K. Nail set FILE No. 4594 BOOK 206 flAG( 69