HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-032 Variance
File No. 96-032 Variance
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss.
COUNTY OF SCOTT )
The undersigned, duly qualified and ~ City Manager of the City of Prior Lake, ~
hereby certifies the attached hereto is a true and correct copy of the original.
Resolution 96-13PC
on file in the office of the City Planner, City of Prior Lake.
?~ f ('7
Dated this Zt;fMday of ~A {0i--, 1996.
Doc. .372938
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER f~
SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA I f1
Certified Jiled and or Recorded on D
JUN.j) b 1996 ({ Ii- M.
~~--h4t)
Pat Boec~~an, County Recorder
by_
Deputy
16200 E1\~eoC'~Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota tm~2-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
RESOLUTION 9613PC
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A 25 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A FRONT
YARD SETBACK OF 60 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 85 FEET FROM THE
CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD 12, AND A 14 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT
A REAR YARD SETBACK OF 11 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 25 FEET,
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE F AMIL Y HOUSE WITH
ATTACHED, 2-CAR GARAGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3044 SPRING LAKE
ROAD, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 7, AND THE WEST HALF OF LOT 6,
SPRING LAKE VILLAGE, SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Michael Leitchman has applied for variances from Sections 4 of the Zoning
Ordinance in order to permit the construction of a single family house with an
attached, 2-car garage on property located in the RI-Suburban Residential and
SD-Shoreland Districts at the following location, to wit;
3044 Spring Lake Road, legally described as Lot 7 and the West half of
Lot 6, Block 33, SPRING LAKE VILLAGE, Scott County, Minnesota.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variance as contained
in Case 96-032V A and held a hearing thereon on May 13, 1996.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variances
upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public
safety, the effect on property values in the surrounding area and the effect of the
proposed variances on the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it
is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variances
will not result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent properties, unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets,
increase the danger of fire, and danger to the public safety, unreasonably
diminish or impair health, safety, comfort, morals or in any other respect be
contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
16200 ~g~&<(9~~CAve. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
~ .'
,
5. The special conditions applying to the subject property are unique to such
property, and do not generally apply to other land in the district in which such
land is located. Among the conditions applying to the subject property which the
Board of Adjustment relied upon are the severe impact of the setback from Spring
Lake Road/Co. Rd. 12 on the available buildable area.
6. The granting of the variances is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. The variances will not serve merely as
a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable
hardship.
7. The contents of Planning Case 96-032 are hereby entered into and made a part
of the public record and the record of decision for this case. Pursuant to Section
5-6-8 of the Ordinance Code the variance will be deemed to be abandoned,
and thus will be null and void one (1) year from the date of approval if the holder
of the variance has failed to obtain any necessary, required or appropriate permits
for the completion of contemplated improvements.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby grants and
approves the following variances;
1. A 25 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A FRONT YARD SETBACK OF 60
FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 85 FEET FROM THE
CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD 12,
2. AND A 14 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A REAR YARD SETBACK OF
11 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 25 FEET
3.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on May 13, 1996.
~n~cWJ
irector
9613PC.DOCIRML
2
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
SITE:
PRESENTER:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
4.F
Consider variance for Michael Leitchman
3044 Spring Lake Rd.lCo. Rd. 12
R. Michael Leek, City Planner
YES -X. NO
April 22, 1996
INTRODUCTION:
The Planning Department received a variance application from Michael Leitchman. Mr.
Leitchman wishes to construct a single-family house with attached 2-car garage on the
subject site. The proposed structure would have a front yard setback of 60 feet instead of
the required 85 feet from the centerline of Co. Rd. 12, and a rear yard setback of 11 feet
instead of the required 25 feet. The proposed impervious surface coverage is 18.4%, less
than the permitted 30%. Thus a variance is not requested for coverage.
DISCUSSION:
The subject property is zoned Rl-Suburban Residential and is located in the SD-
Shoreland District. The subject property was is located in the original plat of Spring
Lake Village. As can be seen from the attached survey, literal application of the Zoning
Ordinance requirements would result in a very limited building area; about 23' at its
widest point.
The proposed house itself has a "footprint" of about 1,040 square feet. The applicant has
evaluated other locations for the proposed house, most notably flipping the plan so that
the garage and driveway would be closer to the East property line. However, the County
has indicated to the applicant that the proposed driveway location is preferred because it
provides the optimum line of sight. As can be seen from the survey, the proposed front
yard setback is consistent with the setback of the existing house to the East. The
proposed house location would also maintain substantial separation from that house.
Variance Hardship Standards:
1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship with
respect to the property.
This criteria goes to whether reasonable use can be made of the property if the Ordinance
is literally enforced. It also goes to whether the applicant has legal alternatives to
16200 ~~~IS.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
accomplish to the requested variance. Particularly because of the manner in which Co.
Rd. 12 (which has a greater setback requirement than a local street) wraps around the
subject site, literal enforcement of the setback requirements result in an essentially
unusable buildable area, and thus an undue hardship. For this reason this criterion is met.
2. Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique to the
property.
The hardship results directly from the application of the Ordinance requirements to this
lot, which is a part of a plat which pre-existed the requirements. These circumstances are
unique to the subject property.
3. The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and is not the result of
actions of persons presently having an interest in the property.
The inability to use the subject property without a variance is the result of the application
of the Ordinance requirements, and is not the result of any actions of the applicants.
4. The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces
substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest.
The structure resulting from the addition proposed by the applicants would be similar in
scale to other houses in the neighborhood, and would have a front yard setback also in
keeping with other houses in the neighborhood. Thus, granting the variance would
observe the spirit and intent of the Ordinance.
AL TERNA TIVES:
1. Approve the variances requested by the applicant, or approve any variances the
Planning Commission deems appropriate in the circumstances.
2. Table or continue discussion of the item for specific purpose.
3. Deny the application because the Planning Commission finds a lack of
demonstrated hardship under the Zoning Ordinance criteria.
RECOMMENDATION:
Because staff has concluded that the request for meets the Ordinance criteria, staff
recommends Alternative No.1, approval.
ACTION REQUIRED:
A motion adopting Resolution 96I9PC approving the applicant's request for variance.
9632V APC.DOC/RML
2
VA qh - D5l--
PID# ;3-1 - I:J 3 () 't S- 0
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE 19,';-
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
~APPlicant: ~. ~"'~ . Home Phone: ;-.]o?- ,H-Q..:J.'
Address: Go ~ ~i3.. JV~tfX/7\ Ccrrl~ trJ /J~" Work Phone:
Property Owner: _ .~-r Home Phone:
Address: .:j044 1i()fv1.st. . Work Phone:
Type of Ownership: Fee.~ ~..,~r~ct Purchase Agreanent
Consultant/Contractor:. 711 '~..J. ~ Phone: &'9..r-v~ 9'6
Existing Use
of Property: ,/71.a:n.() Present Zoning: RI
Legal Description
of ~ariance Site: ~ ~ )~:)~rJ, ;2J~-j;J~ n ~ vV~
Var~ance Requested: & (;,.. I ~?71 tCll JJ.. .
Has the applicant previously sought to plat, rezone,
use penuit on the subject site or any part of it?
What was requested:
When: Disposition:
obtain a variance or conditional
Yes X tb
Describe the type of improvements prof.X)sed:
/n'J1l4! dt2
tf
SUBMISSION REOUIREMENI'S:
(A)Completed application form. (B)Filing fee. (C)Property Survey indicating the
prof.X)sed developnent in relation to pror;erty lines and/or ordinary-high-water mark;
prof.X)sed building elevations and drainage plan. (D)Certified from abstract firm,
names and addresses of property owners within 100 feet of the exterior boundaries of
the subject pror;erty. (E)Complete legal description & Pror;erty Identification Number
(PID)'. (F)Deed restrictions or private covenants, if applicable. (G)A parcel IlE.p
at P-20'-50' showing: The site developnent plan, buildings: parking, loading,
access, surface drainage, landscaping and utility service.
'~?;r! ~
1~714
J. ~ .AN-di
ONLY COMPLETE APPLICATIONS SHALL BE ACCEPTED AND REVIEWED BY THE PLANNI~ c:cMMISSION.
J
TO the best of my knowledge the information presented on this form is correct. In
addition, I have read Section 7.6 of the Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance which specifies
requirements for variance procedures. I agree to provide information and follow the
pt"ocedures as outlined in the Ordinance. m:<.lJ (E~
,\pplicants Signature
:!f'Z;I~_/c;TJ~
Fee GWners Signature
Submitted this Lday of Cl~
19.2i.
THIS SPACE IS 'lD BE FILLED OUT BY THE PLANNI~ DIRECI'OR
PLANNING <XlMMISSION
CITY COmr::IL APPEAL
APPROVED
APPROVED
DENIED
DENIED
DATE OF HEARI~
DA.TE OF HEARIN3
<DNDITIONS:
Signature of the Planning Director
Date
Yo-UJL VA
SURVEY PREPARED FOR:
MIKE PETERS
4048 134TH CIRCLE
SAVAGE, MN 55378
Valley Surveying Co., P.A.
SUITE 120-C, 16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL
FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM
PRIOR LAKE. MINNESOTA 55372
TELEPHONE (612) 447 - 2570
/
/
~--
/
/
/
, ~...'
(( v
Hub E'L
926 62
')Z5, I
N89044'08"E
--66,82 ___
Hub EL
9.l5.1'5
'"
""/
//
(:'
/, ,,'
;;:\(?~ >,.'
'\ /"---
, .,~
,0 Do
^eO\..'V~ ./
,.' ,'f) 'I" 0"
.,~,.,; ~o;
~:~ l>i't- ",'"
"" 0 1,.'
//0)
~
z
..
..
//
o.
,;,
({ "
q
.,'
q"
/"~
~- , . ~ _.15.00..
;~ /
925.4 ~ ~:
'_-;;_-1"''''5
81" I
-~I,;
,r.~ J@--]
oze,' '< o~R~ P:~:~;[O ., eJ
r '0/1 ~-_ I
~I I
",^- G4R4GE' J.
;;:: .., ~ _ 92'.8
~I~ ,\
Dl ' : ,
921,0 \ I ~
:f
_ __ __ _ _ _ -J,' Hob n
49.)3.-. - _11 928.30
u_ ""8.l). n
,~
,',
2:.\
.....
12.33
\
wi }1J
C -
., 01
E-C\J
c-
00.0
,... ~
~\OO
--0
--z
(XISTlNQ
HOU~[
'....
'-.
~.~;o
'"
.......
~~D
; --14. T-_
925.0
O(CK
--
/Va
_25.00._
,
I ~
I
I
91Z,J
I~
4S
~AV~L~O -=-t-
--------
------
Df'^SCRIPTION
fJot 7, nnd the west half of Lot 6, Block 33, Spring Lake Village, Scott Connty,
Minnesota. AI"o showing the location of the proposed house as staked this 12th
day of March, 1996.
NOT~S' Benchmark El. 926.G2 top of the Northwesterly setback hub.
~
924.2 Denotes existing grade elevation
"
~ Denotes proposed finished grade elevations
Denotes pcoposed direction of finished sue-face dr.ainagp.
Set the proposed garage slab at elevatio 926.37
Set the proposed top block at elevatio 927.00
'('he lowest flooc elevation will be 923.96
Lot Acea ~ 12,160 sq. ft,
Np.t impecvious covee = 18.4%
o
I
SCALE
20
40
I
f hereby certify th"t tN. ~y was prepared
by I'M' or lInder my di,.ecf Jf.4'erv;.;on and thot
, am a duly licensed Land Swwyor under tn.
~Ol tIl. Slat. 01 :::;ro;r
Caa'"~~-'\
Oat. .J -17 - Tt;. lic.n.. No. 10/83
IN
FEET
o Denotn 1/2 inch x 14 inch iran
monut"Mnt nt and morkf!d by
license No 10183
. O~motes Iron mo"uml!'nt found
~ Denotes P K NOli ~~;
FILE: No, 3765
800K~PAGE:~
CORRECTED
NOTICE OF HEARING FOR A REQUEST FOR THE FOLLOWING
VARIANCES;
1 15 FOOT FRONT YARD VARIANCE TO PERMIT A FRONT YARD
SETBACK FROM THE CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD 12 OF 60
FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 85 FEET;
2 14 FOOT REAR YARD VARIANCE TO PERMIT A SETBACK OF 11
FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 25 FEET;
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE WITH ATTACHED
GARAGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE RI-SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL
AND SD-SHORELAND DISTRICTS
You are hereby notified that the Prior Lake Planning Commission will hold a hearing at
Prior Lake Fire Station #1, located at 16776 Fish Point Road SE (Southwest of the
intersection ofC.R. 21 and Fish Point Road), on: Monday, April 22, 1996, at 7:00 p.m.
or as soon thereafter as possible.
APPLICANT: Michael Leitchman
664 Crazy Woman Canyon Road
Buffalo, Wyoming 82834
SUBJECT SITE: Lot 7 and the West 1/2 of Lot 6, Block 33, Spring Lake Village,
Scott County, Minnesota, as shown on the attached survey copy.
REQUEST: The applicant proposes the construction of a single-family house
with 2-car attached garage. The proposed structure would result in
a front yard setback of 60 feet instead of the required 85 feet, and a
rear yard setback of 11 feet instead of the required 25 feet.
The Planning Commission will review the proposed construction and requested variance
against the following criteria found in the Zoning Ordinance.
1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship with
respect to the property.
2. Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique to the
property.
16200 E>8&&P~t~~CAW~s.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
3. The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and is not the result of
actions of persons presently having an interest in the property.
4. The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces
substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest.
If you are interested in this issue, you should attend the hearing. Questions related to this
hearing should be directed to the Prior Lake Planning Department by calling 447-4230
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. The Planning
Commission will accept oral and/or written comments. Oral or written comments should
relate to how the proposed construction and requested variances are or are not consistent
with the above-listed criteria.
Prior Lake Planning Commission
Date Mailed: April 11 , 1996.
96030PN2.DOC/RML
2
l~
RESOLUTION g>e
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A 25 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A FRONT
YARD SETBACK OF 60 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 85 FEET FROM THE
CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD 12, AND A 14 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT
A REAR YARD SETBACK OF 11 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 25 FEET,
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE F AMIL Y HOUSE WITH
ATTACHED, 2-CAR GARAGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3044 SPRING LAKE
ROAD, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 7, AND THE WEST HALF OF LOT 6,
SPRING LAKE VILLAGE, SCOTT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Michael Leitchman has applied for variances from Sections 4 of the Zoning
Ordinance in order to permit the construction of a single family house with an
attached, 2-car garage on property located in the RI-Suburban Residential and
SD-Shoreland Districts at the following location, to wit;
3044 Spring Lake Road, legally described as Lot 7 and the West half of
Lot 6, SPRING LAKE VILLAGE, Scott County, Minnesota.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variance as contained
in Case 96-032V A and held a hearing thereon on ~;:'I996.
;' ,t7/ 13
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variances
upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public
safety, the effect on property values in the surrounding area and the effect of the
proposed variances on the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it
is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variances
will not result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent properties, unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets,
increase the danger of fire, and danger to the public safety, unreasonably
diminish or impair health, safety, comfort, morals or in any other respect be
contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
16200 ~liM~~~. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
5. The special conditions applying to the subject property are unique to such
property, and do not generally apply to other land in the district in which such
land is located. Among the conditions applying to the subject property which the
Board of Adjustment relied upon are the severe impact of the setback from Spring
Lake Road/Co. Rd. 12 on the available buildable area.
6. The granting of the variances is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. The variances will not serve merely as
a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable
hardship.
7. The contents of Planning Case 96-032 are hereby entered into and made a part
of the public record and the record of decision for this case. Pursuant to Section
5-6-8 of the Ordinance Code the variance will be deemed to be abandoned,
and thus will be null and void one (1) year from the date of approval if the holder
ofthe variance has failed to obtain any necessary, required or appropriate permits
for the completion of contemplated improvements.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby grants and
approves the following variances;
1. A 25 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A FRONT YARD SETBACK OF 60
FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 85 FEET FROM THE
CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD 12,
2. AND A 14 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A REAR YARD SETBACK OF
11 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 25 FEET
3.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on Aprtl... 1996.
7~13
Richard Kuykendall, Chair
ATTEST:
Donald R. Rye, Planning Director
9613PC.DOC/RML
2
96-032 - MICHAEL LEITCHMAN - VARIANCE REQUEST FOR THE PROPERTY
AT 3044 170TH STREET TO CONSTRUCT A SINGLE F AMIL Y HOME.
Michael Leek presented information from the Planning Report dated April 22, 1996.
Staff recommended approval of the requested variances. Staff feels the hardship criteria
had been met.
Mike Peters, 4048 134th Cir, Savage, the builder for the applicant, explained the layout
of the home on the property.
Comments from Commissioners:
V onhof:
. Hardship criteria has been met. In favor of request.
Wuellner:
. Agrees
Criego:
. Mr. Peters pointed out the common driveway for the neighbors on the back of the
property.
. In favor.
Loftus:
. No comments from the DNR.
Kuykendall:
. In favor
MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY CRIEGO, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 96-
13PC.
Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Criego, Wuellner, V onhof and Kuykendall.
MOTION CARRIED.
96-035 - THOMAS MANSK - VARIANCE REQUEST FOR PROPERTY AT 14840
OAKLAND BEACH AVENUE TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION AND GARAGE.
Michael Leek presented the information from the Planning Report dated May 13, 1996.
There was no recommendation by Staff.
Hydrologist Pat Lynch from the DNR had no objection.
Comments from public:
MNOSI396.DOC
PAGEI2
June 5, 1996
Scott County Recorder
Courthouse 113
428 Holmes Street South
Shakopee,~ 55379
AT1N: June
Dear June:
I am returning Resolution 96-13 (Michael Leitchman Variance) for your recording. I
added "Block 33" to the legal. Please file and send the fee to my attention at the address
below. Thank you.
Sincerely,
(Jo[tWL MJdft-
Connie Carlson /
Secretary
celene.
16200 E?cl~t::reek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesd'tcfIS5372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
,
I /
l...)
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MEMO
Michael Leek
Connie Carlson
April 16, 1996
Michael Leitchman Variance
On April 15, 1996, I talked to Pat Lynch, from the Department of Natural Resources
regarding the Leitchman Variance. He said he had "no comment" on the matter and if
you needed anything further to let him know.
Document3
PAGE
NOTICE OF HEARING FOR A REQUEST FOR 15 FOOT FRONT YARD
VARIANCE TO PERMIT A FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM THE
CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD 12 OF 60 FEET INSTEAD OF THE
REQUIRED 85 FEET FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE
WITH ATTACHED GARAGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE Rl-
SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL AND SD-SHORELAND DISTRICTS
You are hereby notified that the Prior Lake Planning Commission will hold a hearing at
Prior Lake Fire Station #1, located at 16776 Fish Point Road SE (Southwest of the
intersection ofC.R. 21 and Fish Point Road), on: Monday, April 22, 1996, at 7:00 p.m.
or as soon thereafter as possible.
APPLICANT: Michael Leitchman
664 Crazy Woman Canyon Road
Buffalo, Wyoming 82834
SUBJECT SITE: Lot 7 and the West 1/2 of Lot 6, Block 33, Spring Lake Village,
Scott County, Minnesota, as shown on the attached survey copy.
REQUEST: The applicant proposes the construction of a single-family house
with 2-car attached garage. The proposed structure would result in
a front yard setback of 60 feet instead of the required 85 feet.
The Planning Commission will review the proposed construction and requested variance
against the following criteria found in the Zoning Ordinance.
1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship with
respect to the property.
2. Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique to the
property.
3. The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and is not the result of
actions of persons presently having an interest in the property.
4. The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces
substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest.
16200 ~~~~~2k~. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
If you are interested in this issue, you should attend the hearing. Questions related to this
hearing should be directed to the Prior Lake Planning Department by calling 447-4230
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. The Planning
Commission will accept oral and/or written comments. Oral or written comments should
relate to how the proposed construction and requested variances are or are not consistent
with the above-listed criteria.
Prior Lake Planning Commission
Date Mailed: April 11 , 1996.
96030PN.DOC/RML
2
NEW ABSTRACTS
CONTINUATIONS
CLOSING SERVICE
REGISTERED PROPERTY ABSTRACTS
TITLE INSURANCE
RECORDING SERVICE
SCOTT COUNTY ABSTRACT AND TITLE, INC.
223 HOLMES STREET, P.O. BOX 300 SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379
David Moonen and Dale Kutter
Telephone: (612) 445-6246
FAX: (612) 445-0229
q to 03 L 1'1t1f..-
April 1, 1996
Post-it'" Fax Note
l
7671
Mike Peters
4048 134th Circle
Savage, MN 55378
Fax #
Fax #
To Whom it may concern:
According to the 1996 tax records in the Scott County Treasurer's office,
the following persons are listed as the owners of the property which lies
within 100 feet of the following described property:
Lot 7 and the West Half of Lot 6, Block 33, Spring Lake Village, according
to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the
County Recorder in and for Scott County, Minnesota.
THOMAS R & LYNN A STEFFEN
3070 CREEKVIEW CIRCLE
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
TIMOTHY D SANDEY &
PATRICIA M KEENAN
2986 SPRING LAKE RD SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
MARQUETTE BANK - LAKEVILLE
POBOX 458
LAKEVILLE MN 55044
TODD A RHEA
3013 SPRING LAKE RD SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
MICHAEL E & MARY K LEITCRMAN
14300 ARNERICH ROAD
LOS GATOS CA 95030
DAVID L & MARTHA L AURINGER
3019 SPRING LAKE RD SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
BARBARA KUBASTA
3068 170TH ST SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
DAVID G HUBERTY
3051 SPRING LAKE RD SW
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
GEORGE ELPHICK
3040 CREEKVIEW CIRCLE
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
WARREN DERICKSON
3031 SPRING LAKE RD
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
PRIOR LAKE STATE BANK
16677 DULUTH AV
POBOX 369
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
sconCMIY.....
~
Slatefl......
l)lJ e- .-^
/piq 7' J,
David E. Moonen
President
MEMBER MINNESOTA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION
AGENT FOR CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
RECEIPT
No 2 7 6 7 7
DATE (;,/11-00
CITY OF
PRIOR LAKE
4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E., PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372
Received of rtf) IY w1MMfA~' MiCWu-P ~r'v~
whose addreS~egal ~:~iPtion is
c
the sum of/. ~lJi). " do I I ars
'1J~) ,~
$ ,Of~
SURV EY PREPARED FOR:
MIKE PETERS
4048 134 TH CIRCLE
SAVAGE, MN. 55378
/
/
/
Valley Surveying Co., f? A.
SUITE /20-C, /6670 FRANKLIN TRAIL
FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372
TELEPHONE (612) 447 - 2570
/
/
/
/
",,-'\
, ,....
(; V
\
Hub El.
926.62
926.1
N89044'08"E
---66.82 _n
Hub EL.
925.25
--
..,
//
//
"0
~()
(),
o \
(; ~.
\
___ 48.33---
-.25.00 --
/
./
(.".
t', v
,<>, 'v'
" '
~ ,
':I
925.4 ( 926~
...... : \...
'0
,..;
,-
':
/
Cll
~. ,
~.E'l.
.' \^'
, '-
~;
./'----
~ '\ \' ~
,0 ()l
{)\,1,;~ '
e,.,. ~ ":f'
~<:' 17~" ~
s\ ~ ~e
~ ~ ()i 1- ",'"
~ 0 1,.'
o
,
,
/
26
"'- /
"'- /'
~l.
J
~.33
I
I
18
~I ~
...
v
~
...
lL
}I
924.8
~
~
,
'"
~.
"'-" \
"~.\
9<,
~'S9
",
22.33
I
r--.
~ _ 4925.8 --
~ll (916.0) :\
I, \
921.0 \; ~ . \
I.
_ _ _ __ _ _ _ ~/ Hull EL.
48.33--- _~J1926.30
----..
I
,
I
iii }LI
o -
~ 0)
E-N
0-
00.0
f'- ~
"":100
--0
-;--Z
I
EXISTING
HOUS E
-
( 926 2 )
~o
HUb
925
/
/
/
/~..
=-__ 1__
1 .-
j
~-=-14.1- _
----
925.0
DECK
---
''',
Ii
f
I
_____ I
~..........._l
~o
920 .15
-- 25. 00--
I
I
,
I
922.3
<<I
~l
,
'<
---
Jls
TRAVELED
-----------
~
920.75
t
DESCRIPTION
Lot 7, and the west half of Lot 6, Block 33, spring Lake Village, Scott County,
Minnesota. Also showing the location of the proposed house as staked this 12th
day of March, 1996.
NOTES' Benchmark El. 926.G2 top of the Northwesterly setback hub.
924.2 Denotes existing gcade elevation
)(
( 926.2 ) Denotes proposed finished gcade elevations
---.. Denotes proposed direction of finished surface drainage
Set the proposed gacage slab at elevatio 926.37
Set the pcoposed top block at elevatio 927.00
The lowest floor elevation will be 923.96
Lot Area = 12,160 sq. ft,
Net impervious cover = 18.4%
o
I
SCALE
20
I
IN
40
I
f hereby certify that this survey was prepared
by me or under my direct supervi.ion and that
I am a duly licensed Land S~or under th~
.~of the State of Minn 10:?1
;:::;;.j~~ ,~ <~.-\
Date ,. /7 ~ 7 Licen.e No. lO/B3
FEET
o Denotes 1/2 inch x 14 inch iron
monument set and marked by
License No 10/83
. Denote5 ire') monument found
6D Denotes PI<. Narl set
PILE No. 3765
BOOK
213
PAGE
68
------"--".----~
--~~-~
-~---
96-032VA
SURVEY PREPARED FOR:
MIl< E PETERS
4048 134 TH CIRCLE
SAVAGE, MN. 55378
/
/
//
Valley Surveying Co., F?A.
SUITE /20-C, /6670 FRANKLIN TRAIL
FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372
TELEPHONE (6/2) 447 - 2570
./
.. ,
, ,.....
(; v'
\
Hub H.
926 .62
926./
/
//
N89044'OS"E
--66.S2 ---
Hub EL.
925.25
./
,/
/
/.
/
//
/'
--
;;,
"0
~r.
............ -
(),
'" \
(; v'
\
~
~.
~'"
/
I" /
I " """//
(,'\.
" v
) ,-'
, ( ,
" '
~ ,
~::;
/---
~ '\~
,0 Dt
\ n' ,
u , v ~ /
,-;!,e --0 ~,<::; of::>'
,,,-\ "r; . v 'l <y1li
~:~ ~ 1.- ~~
~ 0~'
o
,
/
/
-' ; .. - -.25.00--
:~ /
,-
925.4 ( 926.0) ,:
,--;; --1924.5
~ @I. I
rs~ o/@.
6 0 I I PROPOSED I ~
928.4 _' -.J ~ HOUSE ..:
r 16 I
---48.33---
, \),
~~ \
Iu
~
~
Iu
...
-
'.
"0
@I
~ I~
//- V'
I
'128 'f
, :
/~:
Hub E L. '
7~
./
924.8
. LA.I
en _
o -
Q) en
E-C\J
0-
o Q. 0
.... ~
"":100
--0
"7-Z
I
EXISTING
HOUS E
"'"
~
"~
"
......
~"
,
,
............"......
".
22.33
~ _ J925.8
; l' \ (926 0 ) : \
I, \
927.0 \;0
:~
,:
I,
_ _'" __ _ _ _ l'Hub EL.
48.33--- _-'11926.30
(92 6 ~)
~__ 1--
-: .-
- -- 14. 7- ,
925.0
9<,
....5g
DECK
,--
I~
~ .4S
..........-------
..........-------
---
--25.00. -
I ~
I
I
922.3
.1
iDl
." I
---....
- t'
~~~ELED
..------
----------
---------
920.75
~
or~.sCRI PTION
Lot 7, nnd the west half of Lot 6, Block 33, Spring Lake Village, Scott County,
Minnesota. Also showing the location of the pcoposed house as staked this 12th
day of Mat:"ch, 1996.
NOTES' Benchmat:"k El. 926.G2 top of the Nocthwesterly setback hub.
924.2 Denotes existing gt:"ade elevation
)(
( 926.2 ) Denotes pcoposed finished grade elevations
--.. Denotes pt:"oposed direction of finished surface dr.ainage
Set the pt:"oposed gat:"age slab at elevatio 926.37
Set the pt:"oposed top block at elevatio 927.00
'L'he lowest floot:" elevation will be 923.96
Lot Area = 12,160 sq. ft,
Net impet:"vious cover = 18.4%
o
I
SCALE
20
I
IN
40
I
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly licensed Land Scrveyor under the
,~. of the State of M~. e..oo~~/
C;~_44_v,
Dote '" /7' - 7 License No. /0/83
FEET
o Denotes 1/2 inch x 14 inch iron
monument set ond marked by
LIcense No /0/83
. Denotes Iron monument found
~ Denotes P K Nail set
FILE No. 3765
BOOK
213
PAGE
68