HomeMy WebLinkAbout9D - Report Re: Change in Refuse Collection System
4.. PRI~
~n~\ 4646 Dakota Street S.E.
U'W"" Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
~ESO~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA #:
PREPARED BY:
MAY 5, 2008
9D
JANE KANSIER, BUILDING AND TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
DIRECTOR
AGENDA ITEM:
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A REPORT OUTLINING A PROCESS FOR
CONSIDERING A CHANGE IN THE REFUSE COLLECTION SYSTEM
DISCUSSION:
Introduction
The purpose of this report is to review the step-by-step process for considering
a change to the refuse collection system in the City of Prior Lake. The staff is
seeking Council input with respect to the objectives it would like to achieve.
Histol"\l
The 2030 Vision and Strategic Plan was updated and adopted on May 7,2007.
Included in the 2030 Vision is an element for Community Capital Assets. Part
of that Vision element is a five-year goal to provide community leadership in
energy conservation.
The Council has expressed an interest in exploring the variQus options for
refuse collection. On April 21,2008, the City Council reviewed a report on the
alternatives for refuse collection. The Council expressed an interest in further
review and asked the staff to provide a report on the process for any potential
change.
Current Circumstances
Minnesota Statutes Section 115A.94 (Exhibit A) provides a city the option to
implement "organized collection." Organized collection is a system under
which only a specified hauler or group of haulers is authorized to collect solid
waste within a defined service area.
The City's current system for refuse collection involves licensing of haulers,
who may then enter into contracts with City residents to provide collection
services. This system does not constitute organized collection under Section
115A.94. The process of changing from the City's current method of refuse
collection to a system of organized collection would take more than six
months.
This period of more than six months is the result of Section 115A.94's
requirement that, at least 180 days before changing from the current system to
a system of organized collection, the City Council must, by resolution,
announce its intent to establish organized collection. In addition, the
Council must provide notice of and hold a public hearing before adopting a
resolution announcing its intent to establish organized collection. (The earliest
possible hearing date, based on notification requirements, is June 2,2008.)
www.cityofpriorlake.com
Phone 952.44'1.9800 I Fax 952.447.4245
The following is an outline of that process and the tasks required at each step
of the process.
1. Publish Hearing Notices:
~ Prepare a notice including a statement the City is considering changing
the current system and a description of the potential change.
~ Publish notice of the public hearing in the Prior Lake American at least
2 weeks prior to the hearing date.
~ Mail notice of the public hearing to all haulers licensed within the City at
least 2 weeks prior to the hearing date.
2. Public Hearing:
~ The Council must conduct a formal public hearing on the potential
change to the current system.
~ At the hearing, anyone wishing to speak must be allowed the
opportunity.
3. Resolution:
~ Following the public hearing, the Council must adopt a resolution
announcing the intent to establish organized collection.
~ The resolution must include a basic outline of the system being
considered by the City.
~ No new system may be implemented for at least 180 days.
4. Planning Period:
~ The planning period lasts at least 90 days from the date of the
resolution of intent.
~ The City must invite all licensed haulers to participate in the process.
~ The City must conduct meetings with the haulers and other interested
parties to develop plans for an organized collection system.
~ City staff drafts plan based on discussions.
5. Review Period:
~ For at least 90 days from the end of the planning period, the City must
meet to discuss the draft plan with all licensed haulers expressing an
interest.
~ Staff revises plan based on any agreed changes.
6. Adopt Revised Plan:
~ This step occurs only at the expiration of the 90-day review period or if
the City and all persons licensed to operate solid waste collection
services in the City agree upon the revised plan, in which case the
full 90-day review period is not required.
~ The City Council makes specific findings of fact that:
1) Describe in detail the procedures it used to plan and to attempt
implementation of organized collection through an arrangement
with collectors who expressed interest; and
2) Evaluate the proposed organized collection method in light of at
least the following standards:
. Achieving the stated organized collection goals of the city or
town;
. Minimizing displacement of collectors;
. Ensuring participation of all interested parties in the decision-
making process; and
. Maximizing efficiency in solid waste collection.
~ The City Council adopts a new ordinance prescribing the revised
ISSUES:
FINANCIAL
IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDED
MOTION:
Reviewed by:
collection system.
7. Implement Revised Plan:
~ Depending on the system of organized collection selected by the City,
establish collection as a municipal service, solicit bids for contracts,
issue new licenses, or take other steps necessary to implement the
selected system of organized collection.
~ Advertise change to residents.
A chart illustrating this timeline is attached to this report as Exhibit B.
The staff has already been contacted by representatives of Allied Waste who,
on behalf of the local haulers, have asked to meet with City representatives to
develop a plan for area-based collection that would meet the needs of the City
and the haulers. The Council may wish to direct the staff to meet with the
haulers informally to solicit their input before taking any further action.
If the Council wishes to place limitations only on the collection days for
different geographic areas, while continuing to utilize the open licensing
system currently in place, the City could implement such an approach without
going through the process set forth in Minnesota Statutes 115A.94 and
described above. If, however, the Council wishes to establish organized
collection, then the process described above must be followed. In that case,
the Council should schedule a public hearing date of no earlier than June 2,
2008, and direct staff to take the necessary steps to prepare for the public
hearing. The staff would prepare a resolution of intent for adoption following
the public hearing.
The cost of additional review includes publication and mailing costs, staff time,
and consulting time. The overall costs of a change in the collection system will
depend on the system chosen by the City.
The Council has the following alternatives:
1. Determine whether the staff should meet with the currently licensed
haulers to solicit input.
2. Schedule a public hearing and direct staff to prepare the necessary notices
for publication and mailing.
3. Do nothing.
As per the City Council's discussion.
() f
~,1dJ~
Frank B~t' Manager
EXHIBIT A
2007 Minnesota Statutes
115A.94 ORGANIZED COLLECTION.
Subdivision 1. Definition. "Organized collection" means a system for collecting solid waste in which a
specified collector, or a member of an organization of collectors, is authorized to collect from a defined geographic
service area or areas some or all of the solid waste that is released by generators for collection.
Subd. 2. Local authority. A city or town may organize collection, after public notification as required in
subdivision 4. A county may organize collection as provided in subdivision 5.
Subd. 3. General provisions. (a) The local government unit may organize collection as a municipal service
or by ordinance, franchise, license, negotiated or bidded contract, or other means, using one or more collectors or an
organization of collectors. (b) The local government unit may not establish or administer organized collection in a
manner that impairs the preservation and development of recycling and markets for recyclable materials. The local
government unit shall exempt recyclable materials from organized collection upon a showing by the generator or
collector that the materials are or will be separated from mixed municipal solid waste by the generator, separately
collected, and delivered for reuse in their original form or for use in a manufacturing process. (c) The local
government unit shall invite and employ the assistance of interested persons, including persons licensed to operate
solid waste collection services in the local government unit, in developing plans and proposals for organized
collection and in establishing the organized collection system. (d) Organized collection accomplished by contract or
as a municipal service may include a requirement that all or any portion of the solid waste, except (1) recyclable
materials and (2) materials that are processed at a resource recovery facility at the capacity in operation at the time
that the requirement is imposed, be delivered to a waste facility identified by the local government unit. In a district
or county where a resource recovery facility has been designated by ordinance under section 115A.86. organized
collection must conform to the requirements of the designation ordinance.
Subd. 4. Cities and towns; notice; planning. (a) At least 180 days before implementing an ordinance,
franchise, license, contract or other means of organizing collection, a city or town, by resolution of the governing
body, shall announce its intent to organize collection and invite the participation of interested persons, including
persons licensed to operate solid waste collection services, in planning and establishing the organized collection
system. (b) The resolution of intent must be adopted after a public hearing. The hearing must be held at least two
weeks after public notice and mailed notice to persons known by the city or town to be operating solid waste
collection services in the city or town. The failure to give mailed notice to persons or defect in the notice does not
invalidate the proceedings, provided a bona fide effort to comply with notice requirements has been made. (c)
During a 90-day period following the resolution of intent, the city or town shall develop or supervise the
development of plans or proposals for organized collection. During this 90-day planning period, the city or town
shall invite and employ the assistance of persons licensed as of the date of the resolution of intent to operate solid
waste collection services in the city or town. Failure of a licensed collector to participate in the 90-day planning
period, when the city or town has made a bona fide effort to provide the person the opportunity to participate, does
not invalidate the planning process. (d) For 90 days after the date ending the planning period required under
paragraph (c), the city or town shall discuss possible organized collection arrangements with all licensed collectors
operating in the city or town who have expressed interest. If the city or town is unable to agree on an organized
collection arrangement with a majority of the licensed collectors who have expressed interest, or upon expiration of
the 90 days, the city or town may propose implementation of an alternate method of organizing collection as
authorized in subdivision 3. (e) The city or town shall make specific findings that: (I) describe in detail the
procedures it used to plan and to attempt implementation of organized collection through an arrangement with
collectors who expressed interest; and (2) evaluate the proposed organized collection method in light of at least the
following standards: achieving the stated organized collection goals of the city or town; minimizing displacement of
collectors; ensuring participation of all interested parties in the decision-making process; and maximizing efficiency
in solid waste collection. (t) Upon request, the city or town shall provide mailed notice of all proceedings on the
organization of collection in the city or town. (g) If the city or town and all the persons licensed to operate mixed
municipal solid waste collection services and doing business in the city or town agree on the plan, the city or town
may implement the plan without regard to the 180-day period specified in paragraph (a).
Subd. 5. County organized collection. (a) A county may by ordinance require cities and towns within the
county to organize collection. Organized collection ordinances of counties may: (1) require cities and towns to
require the separation and separate collection of recyclable materials; (2) specify the material to be separated; and
(3) require cities and towns to meet any performance standards for source separation that are contained in the county
solid waste plan. (b) A county may itself organize collection under subdivision 4 in any city or town that does not
comply with a county organized collection ordinance adopted under this subdivision, and the county may implement,
as part of its organized collection, the source separation program and performance standards required by its
organized collection ordinance.
Subd. 6. Organized collection not required or prevented. (a) The authority granted in this section to
organize solid waste collection is optional and is in addition to authority to govern solid waste collection granted by
other law. (b) Except as provided in subdivision 5, a city, town, or county is not: (1) required to organize collection;
or (2) prevented from organizing collection of solid waste or recyclable material. (c) Except as provided in
subdivision 5, a city, town, or county may exercise any authority granted by any other law, including a home rule
charter, to govern collection of solid waste.
Subd. 7. Anticompetitive conduct. (a) A political subdivision that organizes collection under this section is
authorized to engage in anticompetitive conduct to the extent necessary to plan and implement its chosen organized
collection system and is immune from liability under state laws relating to antitrust, restraint of trade, unfair trade
practices, and other regulation of trade or commerce. (b) An organization of solid waste collectors, an individual
collector, and their officers, members, employees, and agents who cooperate with a political subdivision that
organizes collection under this section are authorized to engage in anticompetitive conduct to the extent necessary to
plan and implement the organized collection system, provided that the political subdivision actively supervises the
participation of each entity. An organization, entity, or person covered by this paragraph is immune from liability
under state law relating to antitrust, restraint of trade, unfair trade practices, and other regulation of trade or
commerce.
History: 1987 c 348 s 27; 1989 c 325 s 26,27; 1990 c 600 s 1,2; 1991 c 337 s 46; 1993 c
249 s 20,21
EXHIBIT B
Refuse Collection Project Schedule
I MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR
Publish & Mail 2 ';II eeks
Hearing Notice () ()
Public Hearing ()
Resolution of ()
Intent
Planning Period I) 90 Days ()
Review Period ~ 90 Da~ 's ()
Adopt Revised ()
Plan
1~lement () :>
Revised System
Publish & Mail
Hearing Notice
Refuse Collection Project Schedule
Step 1
I MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR
2wE"eks
() ()
Tasks:
· Prepare a notice including a
statement the City is considering
changing the current system and a
description of the potential change
. Publish notice of hearing in Prior Lake
American
· Mail notice to all haulers licensed by
the City
Public Hearing
Refuse Collection Project Schedule
Step 2
I MAY JUN JUl AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR
()
Task:
· The Council must conduct a formal public
hearing on the potential change to the current
refuse system.
· At the hearing. anyone wishing to speak to
the issue must be given the opportunity.
. Following the hearing. the Council must adopt
a resolution of intent outlining the proposed
collection system.
Resolution of
Intent
Refuse Collection Project Schedule
Step 3
I MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FED MAR APR
() Task:
-Following the hearing. the Council must adopt
a resolution announcing the intent to establish
an organized collection system
-The resolution must include a basic outline of
the proposed collection system.
Planning Period
Refuse Collection Project Schedule
Step 4
MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR
90 Days
[""
"
() Tasks:
- Invite all licensed haulers to
participate In planning process.
- Conduct meetings with haulers
and others to develop plan for
collection system.
-City staff drafts plan based on
discussions
Review Period
Refuse Collection Project Schedule
Step 5
MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR
:l
90 Dal '$
()
Tasks:
· For at least 90 after a plan is
prepared, the City must meet
with all licensed haulers to
discuss proposed plan.
· Make any agreed changes to
proposed plan.
I I
Adopt Revised
Ordinance
Refuse Collection Project Schedule
Step 6
I MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEe JAN FEB MAR APR
Tasks:
. This ~ tep occ...Jrs only after aweemer t is real :hed or
at expil'ation 01 9O-day period.
. The (ounci! nust mal (e spec! flc findings of f.lct
· The (ouncll Must formally a< opt ordnance.
()
Implement
Revised System
Refuse Collection Project Schedule
Step 7
MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR
Tasks:
· Implement new system
· May include:
· Solicit bids
· Issue New Licenses
· Develop routes
· Advertise notice to residents
. Require residents to contract with different haulers.
I I I I I I
()
>