HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP95-08 Site Plan
- -
/107,3 /Ud~n~
PI.- ~~'1~ce-
ADDITIONAL ~
MA TERIAL/PLANS
A V AILABLE IN
LARGE SCALE.
SEE THE
PLANNING
DEPARTMENT FOR
ASSISTANCE AT
(952) 447-9810.
YEAR: 11q;;- / ~~/l.u-;
.;
~SOLUTION 95-69
RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF
A PUBLIC BUILDING, (PRIOR LAKE
PUBLIC WORKS/P ARKS MAINTENANCE FACILITY), WITHIN THE B-P,
BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT ON OUTLOT B,
WATERFRONT PASSAGE ADDITION.
MOTION BY: GREENFIELD
SECOND BY: KEDROWSKI
WHEREAS, The City of Prior Lake applied for a Conditional Use Permit, (CUP)
under Section 7.5 of Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance 83-6; and
WHEREAS, the CUP application is to permit the construction of a public building
within the B- P, Zoning District; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a hearing on the CUP application on July
24, 1995;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission proceeded to hear all persons interested in said
application and persons interested were afforded the opportunity to
present their views and objections to the granting of said CUP; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 95-19PC recommending
approval of the CUP subject to 5 conditions contained therein; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of Prior Lake considered the CUP on August 7, 1995;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council reaffirms the recommendation of the Planning
Commission to approve the CUP application subject to the following
conditions:
1. Amendment of the Landscape Plan to incorporate additional trees along the berm
located on the north side of the principal building.
2. Successful amendment of the Zoning Ordinance to permit accessory structures within
the B-P, Business Park Zone.
3. Approval of the final plat of "Waterfront Passage 2nd Addition."
4. Site plan approval from the City Development Review Committee.
5. Filing of this document with the Office of the Scott County Recorder.
"V A03RS" 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTIJNITY EMPLOYER
...
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR
LAKE, that it hereby approves the CUP for the City of Prior Lake to construct a
public building on Outlot B, Waterfront Passage Addition, located within the B-P,
Business Park Zoning District.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution will be forwarded to the Office
of the County Recorder, Scott County, for filing.
Passed and adopted this 11h day of July. 1995.
YES NO
ANDREN X ANDREN
--
GREENFIELD X GREENFIELD
--
KEDROWSKI X KEDROWSKI
--
SCHENCK X SCHENCK
--
SCOTT X SCOTT
--
{Seal}
RES95-69
"V A03RS"
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
..
CONSENT AGENDA:
PREPARED BY:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
BACKGROUND:
DISCUSSION:
4 (b)
KEN SHERMAN, ENGINEERlNG TECHNICIAN
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 95-71,
APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PUBLIC
WORKS/P ARKS MAINTENANCE FACILITY (PROJECT 95-04
AUGUST 7,1995
The purpose of this Agenda item is to approve plans and
specifications and to receive authorization to advertise for bids for
Project 95-04, construction of a new public works/park
maintenance facility.
On June 19, 1995, the City Council approved the selection of
BR W Elness as architects for the Prior Lake Public W orks/Parks
Maintenance Garage.
BRW Elness has prepared two contracts. Contract "A" includes all
the work for the main building project and contract "B" is for the
construction of the salt /sand storage shed. Contract "A" has 11
alternates.
The bid opening date for this project is September 7, 1996.
Construction is scheduled to begin in the fall of 1996 with
completion in July of 1997.
Alternates are used within the bidding process to meet the pre-
established contract dollar allotment. For contract "A" a number of
variables can have an impact on the final cost of a project
including:
16200 Eagle Creek Ave., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN FOI JAI. OPPORnJNlTY EMPLOYER
A) The bidding climate (The prices are currently heading upward)
B) Number and type of contractors bidding
C) Type and quantity of components that have been added and
deducted through the design process
D) The cost estimates for the building thus far are just that. Only
the fInal bids will tell what the construction cost for this building
will be.
Some of the alternates listed in the attached section are "adds" and
others "deducts". Experience shows that if larger components are
listed as additions, better bids can be obtained than if they were
listed as deducts. The logic is that if a contractor wants a bigger
project, they will have to make it worthwhile to the owner.
Attachment 1 lists each of the proposed alternates. The city may
award the project including or excluding any or all of the
alternates.
Complete construction plans for Council review are available at the
office of the Director of Public Works.
AL TERNA TIVES: The alternatives are as follows:
1. Approval of Resolution 95-71. Approves the plans and
specifIcations and authorizes the advertisement for bids.
2. Do not approve Resolution 95-71 for specifIc reasons.
3. Table this item for specifIc reasons.
RECOMMENDATION: The recommendation is alternative #1, approve Resolution 95-71
FINANCIAL IMP ACT: This project is fInanced by a combination of sources including
$360,000 Building Fund Contribution, $250,000 Trunk Reserve
ACTION REQUIRED:
Fund Contribution, $250,000 Enterprise Fund Contribution and
$2,140,000 in bond proceeds to be reimbursed over a twenty year
period from the Capitol Facility Account Charge paid by each
utility customer.
REVIE
RESOLUTION 95-71
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS ON
CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC WORKS/PARKS MAINTENANCE FACILITY
(PROJECT 95-04)
MOTION BY:
WHEREAS:
SECONDED BY:
pursuant to Resolution 95-54 which the City Council
approved on June 19, 1995, the City Engineer and the
City's Architect, BRW Elness, has prepared plans and
specifications for the construction of the Public Works/Parks
Maintenance Facility.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR
LAKE, MINNESOTA, that:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is
attached hereto and made a part of hereof, are hereby
approved.
2. The City Manager shall prepare and cause to be inserted
in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an
advertisement for bids upon the making of such
improvement under such approved plans and
specifications. The advertisement shall be published not
less than 21 days prior to bid opening, shall specify the
work to be done, shall state that bids will be opened, and
that all bids will be received by the City until 9:30 A.M. on
September 7, 1995, at City Hall,16200 Eagle Creek
Avenue. All bids received by this deadline will be opened
at the Fire Hall, 17676 Fish Point Road at 10:00 A.M. for
project "A" and 10:30 A.M. for project "B".
No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with
the City Manager at the city hall by the 9:30 A.M.
deadline set forth above and accompanied by a cash
deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check
payable to the City of Prior Lake for five (5) percent of the
amount of such bid.
~S71,DOC;..
1620u eagle creek Ave., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447.4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
3. The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids for
any reason as determined solely by the City.
Passed and adopted this 7lb day of August, 1995.
YES
NO
Andren
Greenfield
Kedrowski
Schenck
Scott
Andren
Greenfield
Kedrowski
Schenck
Scott
Frank Boyles
City Manager
City of Prior lake
{Seal}
res9571 :\r\resoluti
RES957I.DOC
PUBLIC WORKSIP ARKS MAINTENANCE FACILITY
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Alternate 1: Eliminates an entire structural bay of vehicle storage (approximately 4800
s.f.). The alternate includes space that is most easily expanded at a later
date. This alternate provides the greatest cushion in case the bids are all
very much above the estimate. It is very unlikely that this will be needed.
Alternate 2: Provides a less expensive concrete wall panel surface at the exterior of the
storage and maintenance area. The aggregate surface will be the same with
or without the alternate, but there would be no variation or contrast (made
by hand troweling various surfaces to make the walls more interesting) if
the alternate is not added. Since Fabcon's plant (the lead supplier) has been
on an extended strike, we are concerned about the potential increased costs
and limited ability for this low-cost/local supplier to be in the competitive
position they were just two months ago.
Alternate 3: Specifies a high quality, easy to maintain floor coating nearly identical to
that in the new Fire Station. This can be added now or at any point in the
future.
Alternate 4: Includes a "tower" design to the north elevation of the office area. This is a
non-functional design, which is to symbolically match the towers at the
Fire Station and City Hall.
Alternate 5: Adds a storage and shelving package. It has been our experience that this
"accessory" or equipment bid can be either reasonable or excessive
depending upon bidding conditions, and it may be less expensive for the
City to purchase direct. The alternate allows us to chose.
Alternate 6: Reduces the number of skylights in the Vehicle Storage area, just in case
we need to reduce the project cost by a relatively small amount.
Alternate 7: Eliminates the painting of the walls and features in the Vehicle
Maintenance area (the high profile portion of the building) should a small
adjustment in cost be necessary.
PWALTI!RN.DOC
------------------
Alternate 8: Eliminates the bulk lube provisions at the vehicle storage (not vehicle
maintenance) area, used by crews to perform quick and simple tasks
without either having to drive into a service bay, or without having to
perform the work manually (e.g. opening a container of motor oil to top off
an engine).
Alternate 9: Substitutes heavy timber construction in lieu of concrete for the exterior
storage bins. The timber is not as permanent or substantial, but less
expensive.
Alternate 10
& 11: Provides for base heating and ventilating system modifications.
PWALTERN.DOC
- - ---- - - - - - - - - ----
Minutes of the Prior Lake City Council
August 7, 1995
c) Consider Approval of Resolution 95-69 Approving a Conditional UseRes. 95-69
Permit to Allow a Public Building in the I-I Business Park District. Allow Public
d) Consider Approval of Ordinance 95-10 Amending City Code Title 3'DB~dg. . in Bus.
o ~str~ct
Chapter 12 of the Outdoor Concert Ordmance. Ord. 95-10
Outdoor Concert
MOTION BY GREENFIELD, SECOND BY KEDROWSKI TO
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS (a) thru (d).
Upon a vote taken, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Schenck
and Scott, the motion carried.
5. PRESENTATIONS:
None
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:45 P.M.
A. Public Hearing to Consider Approval of Resolution 95-63 Authorizing
Vacation of 'Waterfront" Platted Within Sunset Shores Public hearing
was called to order at 7:45 p.m. Mayor Andren called the public
hearing to order at 7:45 p.m. Assistant Planner Garross presented an
overhead and discussed details of the request by the applicant, James
Senstad and Colleen Monyihan to vacate property originally dedicated
to the public in 1931 when Sunset Shore was originally platted.
Neither the DNR or public utility companies have indicated any
objections.
MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECOND BY SCHENCK TO ADOPT Res. 95-63
RESOLUTION 95-63 APPROVING THE VACATION OF Vacate water-
front in
WATERFRONT LOCATED ADJACENT TO LOT 6 AND 7'Sunset Shores
SUNSET SHORES.
Upon a vote taken, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Schenck
and Scott, the motion carried.
MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECOND BY SCOTT, TO ADJOURN
THE PUBLIC HEARING.
Upon a vote taken, ayes by Andren, Greenfield, Kedrowski, Schenck
and Scott, the motion carried.
.
M80795C.DOC
2
RESOLUTION 9519PC
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A PUBLIC BUILDING, (PRIOR LAKE PUBLIC
WORKS/PARKS MAINTENANCE FACILITY), WITHIN THE B-P, BUSINESS
PARK DISTRICT AT OUTLOT B, WATERFRONT PASSAGE ADDITION.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. The City of Prior Lake has applied for a Conditional Use Permit, (CUP) under
Section 7.5 of Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance 83-6.
2. The CUP application is to permit the construction of a public building within the B-
P, Business Park Zoning District.
3, The legal description of the subject site is Outlot B, Waterfront Passage Addition.
4. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the CUP application as contained in Case
#CU9503, and held a hearing thereon on July 24,1995.
5. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the. proposed CUP related to
conformance to the district and all general regulations of the Zoning Ordinance;
compliance with the performance standards listed as items 1-9, Section 7. 5D of the
Zoning Ordinance; siting and landscaping of the site to produce a harmonious
relationship of buildings and grounds to adjacent buildings and properties;
provision of a total visual impression and environment which is consistent with the
environment of the neighborhood; organization of vehicular access and parking to
minimize traffic congestion in the neighborhood; preservation of the objectives of
the Zoning Ordinance and consistency with the Comprehensive Plan.
6. The proposed public building, (Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility), can
be approved with conditions which will make it possible to use the subject property
in such a way that the proposed CUP will not result in the impairment of an
adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties, unreasonably increase
congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, and danger to the public
safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort, morals or in any
other respect be contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
1620<!f:&gIt~"Creek Ave., Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 44/4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY E,-,lPLOYER
7. The contents of Planning Case CU95-03 are hereby entered into and made a part of
the public record and the record of decision for this case. Pursuant to Section 5-6-8
of the Ordinance, the CUP will be deemed to be abandoned, and thus will be null
and void one (1) year from the date of approval if the holder of the variance has
failed to obtain any necessary, required or appropriate permits for the completion of
contemplated improvement.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby grants and
approves the CUP subject to the following conditions:
1. Amendment of the Landscape Plan to incorporate additional trees along the berm
located on the north side of the principal building.
2. Successful amendment of the Zoning Ordinance to permit accessory structures within
the B-P, Business Park Zone.
3. Approval of the final plat of "Waterfront Passage 2nd Addition."
4. Site plan approval from the City Development Review Committee.
5. Filing ofthis document with the Office of the Scott County Recorder.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on July 24, 1995.
Tk~aI~ pd
Thomas V 0 of, Ch .
ATTEST:
~{I~1f ~
'aId R. Ry
Planning Director
"RE9S 19PC"
2
2
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JULY 24,1995
The July 24, 1995, Planning Commission Meeting was called to order by Commissioner
V onhof at 7 :00 p.m. Present were Commissioners Arnold, Roseth, Loftus and V onhof,
Intern Commissioner Criego, Planning Director Don Rye, Assistant Planner Deb Garross,
Associate Planner Michael Leek and Secretary Connie Carlson.
ROLL CALL:
Arnold
Kuykendall
V onhof
Loftus
Roseth
Present
Absent
Present
Present
Present
REVIEW MINUTES OF THE JULY lOt 1995 MEETING:
MOTION BY ROSETH, SECOND BY LOFTUS TO APPROVE THE JULY 10, 1995
MINUTES.
Vote taken signified ayes by Arnold, Loftus, Roseth and Vonhof. MOTION CARRIED.
CASE #CU95-03 - CONSIDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE CITY
OF PRIOR LAKE TO LOCATE A PUBLIC BUILDING (rUBLIC WORKS AND
PARK MAINTENANCE BIDLDING) IN A B-P ~ BUSINESS PARK ZONING
DISTRICT:
Assistant Planner Deb Garross presented the information in the Planning Report dated
July 24, 1995.
The purpose ofthis item is to consider a conditional use permit, (CUP), filed by the City of Prior
Lake to locate a public building, (Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility), on Outlot B,
Waterfront Passage Addition. In order to construct the maintenance facility as proposed, the City
of Prior Lake must review the site according to the performance criteria for CUP's listed in
section 7.5 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Public buildings are listed as a CUP within the Zoning Ordinance for the B-P, Business Park
District. The subject site consists of approximately 12 acres and is a triangular piece of
property located south of CSAH 21, east of Adelmann Street and north of the south corporate
boundary of Prior Lake.
The subject site was subdivided by the City of Prior Lake in July, 1993 and later purchased by
the City, (in 1994), with the express intent of constructing a new maintenance building on the
property. The site was chosen by the City due to its close proximity to the existing maintenance
building, (located north of Prior Lake Baptist Church), and to serve as a major "anchor" to
MN7249S.DOC
PAGE I
Waterfront Passage Business Office Park. The City Council selected the architect BRW Elness,
to prepare plans and specifications for the 3.0 million dollar project. The City Council approved
the building design and authorized the preparation of plans and specifications for construction of
the maintenance building on June 19, 1995 via Resolution 95-54.
The site and building plans have been designed to conform to City codes and be aesthetically
sensitive to the planned future industrial development within the Business Office Park. The
building will be constructed with brick and decorative block on the front office area, and
aggregate surfaced concrete panel walls on the larger storage areas of the building. The proposal
contains a flat roof system however, a sloped standing seam metal roof is used for accent at the
front office areas. The building has been designed to be compatible with the new fire station.
The site plan indicates a salt/sand storage building which is proposed to be located behind the
principal structure, and nestled in a wooded area, to screen the structure from public view. Staff
recommends the landscape plan be amended to provide additional trees along the berm, located
on the north side of the principal building. Staff is of the opinion that the site and buildings have
been designed in a manner that is consistent with the performance criteria outlined in the Zoning
Ordinance. The approval criteria for conditional uses primarily focus on conformity and
integration of the use into the existing neighborhood. The landscape plan and exterior building
design have been developed in order to complement the B~P District and anticipated future land
uses.
One issue that is outstanding related to the CUP proposal concerns the 6,000 square foot,
accessory building proposed to house sand and salt. The current B-P zoning standards are
extremely limited with respect to permitting accessory buildings. Staff is in the process of
drafting language to permit accessory structures within the B-P Zone provided they be totally
screened from public view; are limited in size to 15% or less of the principal building; are
constructed with materials similar to the principal building and are located in the rear yard of the
subject site.
Staff recommended approving Resolution 95-19PC to City Council for approval of the proposal
to locate a public building (Public Works and Park Maintenance facility), within the B-P,
Business Park Zoning District.
JeffOrtel ofBRW Elness Architect, Inc. explained the process of the project. Mr.Ortel
expressed the excellent working relationship with City Staff and the overall impact the
facility will have on the City.
There were no comments from the audience.
Comments from Commissioners:
Arnold: concern of business/office parks for the City to provide the facilities that are the
anchors for such a park; (Garross - not typical, but the City did the initial subdivision.)
supports the facility; economic savings for the City.
Roseth: questioned the main 3 story building (Mr. Ortel explained the mezzanine area
and the tower); the tower is a non~functional item similar to the fire hall and city hall
MN7249S.DOC
PAGE 2
buildings; (Mr. Ortel also explained the salt and sand storage building and its function.);
site for runoff of salt - will not go into the neighboring pond or woods; sewer and water
available; expansion was considered in the design.
Loftus: Would anything negative happen if the ordinance was amended? (Garross-
when the business office park regulations were put together the allowance for accessory
buildings were omitted. It does specify "accessory uses" but there is nothing that is
permitted house any of those types of uses.); important to identify the limitations and
external appearance of the accessory structure.
Criego: Comment on the fuel tanks and gas pumps; (Rye -nothing to prohibit in the
office park as long as rigid conditions are met.) (Ortel- decided oil below grade for fuel
tanks; all you will see is a concrete slab and 2 dispensing tanks; the entire storage system
is below grade with extensive monitors around it.)
V onhof: having the detention pond on site is a good plan; issue of a salt and sand facility
and buying the salt and sand off season at a lower price; no impervious surface issues;
further anticipation for development on this site; (Rye - designed for expansion); facility
needs should last approximately 10 years - depends on how fast the City grows; possible
city park in the future; all maintenance, park and public utilities of the City will be stored
on site.
MOTION BY ARNOLD, SECOND BY LOFTUS, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 95-
19.
There was no discussion.
Vote taken signified ayes by Arnold, Loftus, Roseth, V oOOof. MOTION CARRIED.
A recess was called at 8:03 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:08 p.m.
CASE #V A95012 - CONTINUATION OF THE MCKNIGHT & ASSOCIATES
REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY AT 4660 LORDS STREET:
Associate Planner Michael Leek stated he and Planning Director Don Rye met with Bud
Waund and Brent Johnson of Edina Realty representing the applicants. As a result of the
meeting the site plan was redrawn to reflect the changes in the side yard setback, front
yard setback and a lower impervious surface coverage of 32.9%. The City received a
letter from Pat Lynch, of the Department of Natural Resources recommending denial of
the requested variances. Staff received two calls in opposition to the variances: Barb
Stark, 15283 Edgewater Circle, calling on behalf of herself and husband, stating their
objection to the lakeshore variance and impervious surface coverage. A similar call was
also received from Jerry Meysenbourg.
There was no comment from the applicant.
MN7249S.00c
PAGE 3
-------------------- - --------------- -- - - - ---------------.-
DATE TIME
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
INSPECTION NOTICE
PERMIT NO. qS - 45'
CALLED-IN
SCHEDULED
COMPLETED
ADDRESS \'1D13 ~M~"-
OWNER
E TELEPHONE NO.
l.U 0 FOOTING DPLUMBING RI
u.. 0 FRAMING 0 MECHANICAL
~ 0 INSULATION 0 WATER HOOKUP
Q 0 WALL BD. 0 METER SETrrURN ON
~ 0 FINAL 0 SEWER HOOKUP
~ 0 FOUNDATION 0 SEPTIC INSTALL.
~ o DE MOL. 0 SEPTIC MAINT.
:; 0 FIRE PREVo 0 PLUMBING FINAL
~ COMMENTS: ~\tM\.~ ~ ~
:ci i j~ ,tYY.1 S(1 tl ('-f}1 t\--(/nC/)/lytJ h
~ .- L II fi . ~, ' '[lJ"[-J/v
ffi .?, c(p ('JJ ;tu (}-r L/) <-
~ - H'i ,c r;u(- (<Z()u 1:11 f /lVN ,.( .J-nc 31!7c~,--e~ "
5 +r~-'-- C~6'iJV) s:.~A t;-, {}1A__/2-t'1-j tar n1t s&'rr-o
>- (I \. .
a:
f2 - ~ /\fI~ ~/~ ~~Il vJ:f ..,. h~~ _ ~Yi, J 'fa d
~ _u~ (Y L-~Qol 0) lVJ.2~_d
~
~
~
::e
l.U
a:
:5
@
a:
l.U 0 WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED
Q 0 CORRECT WORK AND PROCEED
o 0 CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING
o 0 CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. INSPECTOR WILL RETURN,
o STOP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR.
o INSPECTION REQUIRED, CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS.
CONTR.
DSITE INSPECTION
o EXCAV.lGRADINGIFILLlNG
o LAKESHORE/WETLANDS
o COMPLAINT
o FOLLOW-UP
o SEPTIC FINAL
o FIREPLACE
o
jt181/Vl. .dd!1
o PHOTO TAKEN
call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance.
Owner/Contr. on site
Inspector
447-4230
WPtihl CopyllnspeclO<'S File
Yellow CopylSihl Nolice
DATE:
FILE NAME: SP
CHECKED BY:
SITE PLAN APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR:
COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, INSTITUTIONAL,
PUBLIC, AND SEMI-PUBLIC DEVELOPMENTS
*****
APPLICATION AND FEE ($200.00) WILL BE ACCEPTED ONLY IF ALL OF
THE REQUIRED MATERIALS LISTED BELOW ARE SUBMITTED.
Property Owner: City of Prior Lake
Address: 16200 Eagle Creek Ave SE
Applicant: City of Prior Lake
Address: 16200 Eagle Creek Ave SE
Phone: 447-4230
Phone: 447-4230
W Elness Architects Inc.
(Jeff Oertel)
Phone: 612/373-4619
~/2'1lq~
Date I
rjrJ
D te
TEN (10) ASSE:MBLED SETS (24" X 36") OF EACH OF THE FOLLOWING:
-t.. 1.) }C. ACCURATE CERTIFIED SURVEY (showing existini conditions on the site,
within 50' of the site, and the Legal Description).
..J..
"'I
2.)
3.)
DETAILED SITE PLAN (based on current certified survey).
GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN (including storm water runoff
calculations and a map produced by a Professional Engineer; erosion
control plans using MPCA's, Best Manae-ement Practices standards).
i-..
4.)
UTILITY PLAN (including proposed sewer, watermain, storm sewer lines,
and profiles of the utilities larger than 4" in diameter, produced by a
Professional Engineer).
LANDSCAPE PLAN (can be on combined sheets, produced by a Landscape
Architect).
i
5.)
~
6.)
SIGN PLAN (can be on combined sheets).
'i.
i.
.J..
1.
i..
1-
JfQ
JJA
7.) FIRE PROTECTION PLAN (showing fire lanes, hydrants, post indicator
valves, and siamese connections which may be shown on the Site or
Utility Plan).
8.) BUILDING PLANS (exterior wall elevations and floor layout).
9.) TRASH ENCLOSURE (provisions can be on combined sheets).
10.) LUMINARE PLAN (of all outside and building exterior lighting which may
be on combined sheets).
11.) ONE LEGIBLE AND REPRODUCIBLE WRI'ITEN NARRATIVE (describing
the proposal and variances requested).
12.) A COMPLETE APPLICATION FORM SIGNED BY THE PROPERTY FEE
OWNER (S).
13.) APPLICATION FEE PER CURRENT CITY OF PRIOR LAKE FEE
SCHEDULE.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDED IF IT APPLIES:
~ ONE ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS REQUIRED IF THE PROPOSAL
~ ABUTS OR ACCESSES A COUNTY ROAD.
15.) ONE ADDITIONAL SET OF PLANS REQUIRED IF THE PROPOSAL
ABUTS OR ACCESSES A STATE HIGHWAY.
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION WHICH
MAY BE SUBMITTED AFTER THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMITTEE'S APPROVAL:
1.) SITE PLAN
2.) LANDSCAPE PLAN
3.) BUILDING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
4.) LUMINARE PLAN
5.) WRITTEN NARRATIVE
6.) 15 COMPLETE SETS OF THE ABOVE DATA (1-5) IN SIZE 11" x 17" OR
LARGER, ASSEMBLED AND FOLDED TO 8.5" x 11."
7.) ONE COMPLETE SET OF THE ABOVE DATA (1-4) IN SIZE 8.5" x 11",
CLEAR AND LEGIBLE TRANSPARENCIES.
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED IN ADDITION
TO THE ABOVE WHEN REQUESTING PUBLIC FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE:
8.) A SHORT NARRATIVE ON THE GROWTH EXPANSION NEEDS OF THE
BUSINESS.
9.) A SHORT NARRATIVE ON THE COMPANY'S MARKET AND TRENDS IN
THE INDUSTRY.
IIIKIII
Thresher Square
700 Third Street So.
Minneapolis,
MN 55415
612/339-5508
Fax 612/339-5382
BRW ELNESS ARCHITECTS INC
tZ.t:t t>>:?-bdP
JOB #
FILE I
MAle
DELlVER~ DIRECT
1HR 2HR 3HR ~
STANDARD
(4:30PM)
Date 7-14;. 1?"
TRANSMITTAL
FEDEx I UPS PRIORITY
(1 0:30AM)
OTHER
TO:
~ I errt- I.A>~ t..-I rr-- p r:::r J ~ F-./ ;,
1 (p ~p ep-6rI-E:- ~~~ p,-"'f!:.., .0$.1:::.
J~IP~ L-~~ Ml~ ~5"'Zy,'7_- 1114-
p... IT N: t7t;a:.~ br ~'t2-, ~
FROM:
~e ~~I-Y
RE: --f{t-,o~ ~1?-~ t1.b-INr-~t-tb-t'1be. fAl,.
ITEMS: .
II ..J- '1
--s Ir~ \ &r~f71r-lL.r. t7~1 N~
LA ?J=:.Lr( f L..J......t P~Pf"~ , ~
f7L-P-wJ..l4l ~ st-JE::Y' l ~L-e-"P.IIPt-l~
REMARKS:
Jane Kansier
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Jane Kansier
Jay Scherer
Don Rye; Gary Staber
Public Works Maintenance Building Inspection
Monday, August 19, 1996 12:42PM
Attached are the results of my inspection of the maintenance building on August 16, 1996.
< < File Attachment: PWLAND.DOC> >
Page 1
INTEROFFICE MEMO
CPTO: Jay Scherer, Building Inspections
FROM: Jane Kansier, Planning Coordinator
DATE: August 19, 1996
RE: Public Works Maintenance Building at 17073
Adelmann
I inspected this property on Friday, August 16, 1996. The landscaping plan is
incomplete as follows: ,I '1'1\ ....~' 't: 'u' 1C L~I ~ .;:; 'i)f:...
it- L V r-.
· The plan requires two (2) ornamental trees on either side of the walkway to
the front (south) entrance of the building, and three (3) deciduous trees in the .
If:- O/'-' .....'IIQ 7
southwest corner of the building. These trees were missing. '\ W \ L. L ~ . I
· The tree at the northwest corner of the south parking lot should be a Dee \ D Ltc 4 ::5
deciduous tree rather than the ornamental tree in place. TD C I ~ FU k..\..
LO c..A- \"1.C
· The plan shows a deciduous tree located at the southeast corner of the south
parking lot. This tree is also missing. If /...-..;) H..'- DO 5lf7
· There should be one (1) deciduous tree located adjacent to the parking area
on the south side of the building. ~ L-~ 1.LL 00 :siq; ('-l)-.u)Ef{<;'l\,al.\~lI' 4.-~;:!.sr;
;4 c.~~ <::.f)0(' 1\ ,
· The area immediately east and north of the building has not been sodded or \'---... ,r-: I
seeded at this time. This area should have a 2' sod panel behind all curbs, DON t.::....
while the remainder is seeded.
In light of the fact that this work has not been completed, I cannot issue a final
acceptance of this project.
Please let me know if you have additional questions.
c: Don Rye
Gary Staber
pwla"'d,doc
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
GARY STABER, BUILDING OFFICIAL
DEB GARROSS, ASSISTANT CITY PLANNER
SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR MAINTENANCE BUILDING
AUGUST 18, 1995
The purpose of this memo is to provide a summary of comments related to the review of
the Public Works/Parks Maintenance Facility plans dated 7-31-95. The plans were
prepared by BRW Elness Architects for construction of a building located at 17073
Adelmann Street, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Waterfront Passage 2nd Addition.
The plans were reviewed according to the applicable sections of Zoning Ordinance 83-6.
In addition, the site and structure were issued a Conditional Use Permit, (CUP), to
construct a public building in the B-P, Business Park Zone on August 7, 1995 via
Resolution 95-69.
CUP95-03 Conditions of Approval:
1. Amendment of the Landscape Plan to incorporate additional trees along the berm
located on the north side of the principal building.
2. Successful amendment of the Zoning Ordinance to permit accessory structures within
the B-P, Business Park Zone.
3. Approval of the final plat of "Waterfront Passage 2nd Addition."
4. Site plan approval form the DRC.
5. Filing the CUP with Scott County.
SITE PLAN REVIEW:
1. Zoning Ordinance 6.5D specifies: "All offstreet parking areas shall have access from
driveways..... Said Driveway access shall be limited to 24' in width at the public
street." The plan sheets indicate a driveway width in excess of the 24' permitted by
the Zoning Ordinance. The plan sheets should be amended to correct the driveway
width or the City should initiate a Zoning Ordinance amendment to allow a wider
driveway for properties in the B-P, Business Park Zoning District.
2. Zoning Ordinance 6.6 specifies the Maintenance Facility requires 2 Offstreet Loading
Berths, not less than 35'.
16200 Eagle Creek Ave., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372.1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
3. The landscape plan submitted with the plan sheets is consistent with the provisions of
the Landscape Ordinance. No further revisions are required.
4. A separate sign permit is required prior to approval of any signage on site. The plan
sheets do not adequately address proposed signs, therefore this review does not
contain a sign plan review.
5. The Zoning Ordinance specifies all rooftop mechanical equipment be screened from
VIew.
6. The number of parking spaces is consistent with the required # of spaces assuming:
7. Proposed Parking: 30 spaces/1 handicapped space
8. Required Parking: Offices: (1/250 sq. ft. floor space) = 13
Vehicle Maintenance: (4 per service stall) = 4
Industrial: (1 per each employee on max. shift) = 9
Total spaces required: 26
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of the building permit and/or final certificate of occupancy should be subject to
the following conditions:
1. Successful amendment of the Zoning Ordinance to permit accessory structures within
the B-P, Business Park Zone.
2. Approval of the final plat of "Waterfront Passage 2nd Addition."
3. Site plan approval form the DRC.
4. Filing the CUP with Scott County.
5. The plan sheets should be amended to correct the driveway width or the City should
initiate a Zoning Ordinance amendment to allow a wider driveway for properties in
the B-P, Business Park Zoning District.
6. The Maintenance Facility requires 2 Offstreet Loading Berths, not less than 35'.
7. A separate sign permit is required prior to approval of any s.ignage on site.
8. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from view.
'j
~I'\~
c reV\
)\J~
---
Allowable Area
505.1.3
Allowable Area Increase
Separation on all sides
100 % Increase
505.2
Unlimited Area
Type B, 53, F1, Areas are sprinklered
A3 (Allowable) 18,200 s.f. A3 ( Provided) 1,150 s.f.
H4 (Allowable) 22,400 s.f. H4 ( Provided) 6,098 s.f.
B (Allowable) 24,000 s.f. B (Provided) 5,463 s.f.
Occupant Load
\'7:> - Offices i I ,) "-J'IJ tp
Multi-purpose
Lockers
e - Shops I! J~() tp
Ii Veh. Mamt. /Mezz.
rl Veh. Storage
q ~/v ,-
~
5~.~ Mezzanine at Vehicle Maintenence
- Mezzanine Area 771 s.f.
Room Area 5328 s.f.
14.5 %
@N- D Only one Exit Required
Occupants f N tuh.'
33 <u, " i I itLf/> P5P
76 OIJ
18
20 . .. ( (
61 q f' s.x.rV1 u> 1'1
147
3251 s.f.
1150 s.f.
900 s.f.
1920 s.f.
6098 s.f.
29,241 s.f.
4 ~'\ .-feuh 'SxJ\A tU Sl-tr11
Multi-purpose Room 116
When room partition is in place, the west side assembly area (440 s.f. requires only
one exit. (Table lO-A occupant load factor 15 occupant load 30<50)
G.~ tt 5tl ~d lO((AJt11t.} -
IBKBI
Thresher Square
700 Third Street So,
Minneapolis.
MN 55415
612/339-5508
FdX tlI2/339-5382
-
BRW ELNESS ARCHITECTS INC
July 6, 1995
Gary Staber
Prior Lake Inspections Department
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E.
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Prior Lake Maintenence Facility
Dear Gary,
The following is our interpretation of code issues for the maintenance facility. I also
included a response to a couple of questions raised at our meeting of July 6,1995.
The building should be classified
Type II-N
Fully Sprinklered
Occupancy Classifications
Offices/Lockers 5,463 s.f. Type B
Multi-purpose 1,150 s.f. Type A3
Vehicle Maintenence 6,098 s.f. Type H4
Vehicle Storage 29,241 s.f. Type S3
Shops (Wood Assembly, Metal Sign Assembly, Latex paint,
One Hour Flammable Storage Cabinets)
1,920 s.f. Type F1
307.1.4
Occupancy Separations (See attached illustration)
F1 - H4 One Hour
S3 - H4 One Hour
A3 -H4 Four Hour
F1 - S3 One Hour
S3-B N
F1 - B N
A3-B N
Liquid Storage Lube Room
144 s.f. One Hour Rating
302.1
Exception 2.2, Office and parts storage need not be separated from
vehicle maintenence (H4)
~
1
\~l \)J( 6
~~& ~
~v~'~ 1'r
~~I
'n ",'\,-0-" I
\ \D@ ~)V
'J
-
The plan proposes to install a one hour rated door with electic strike maintaining the
one hour seperation between B occupancy and S3, This is a change from our earlier
discussion of using a one hour corridor at room 119. We are trying to avoid the one
hour corridor because there is alot of duct work going through that space that would
require dampers.
We are no longer proposing a structural wood deck at plan room 130. Instead we are
proposing 3/4" T & G cedar as a finish. We are also proposing the 3/4" T & G
cedar as a finish in offices 125, 127, 128, 129, 137, 138. Attached is the flame spread
rating for this finish.
If you have any questions, concerns or comments, please give me a call.
INTEROFFICE MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Gary Staber, Building Official
Jane Kansier, Planning coordinator~
April 1 , 1997
RE:
City Maintenance Center
I have talked with Paul Hokeness about the Planning Department punch list for
the Maintenance Center. All of the Planning Department items pertained to the
landscaping on the site. Paul explained that City staff will be doing this
landscaping, and will have it completed in May, 1997, weather permitting. I have
agreed to the changes he is proposing, and to the schedule. Paul will notify me
when the landscaping is completed; at that time, we will do a final inspection. I
presume the Planning checklist will then be completed.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please let me know if you have any
questions.
c: Paul Hokeness
L :\9 6 F I LES\96 SITE P L \PWMA I N\GA RY M E MO. DOC
--
TO:
FRANK BOYLES
GREG ILKKA
GARYSTABER
RALPH TESCHNER
Jl'\N~ \06
FROM; PAUL HOKENESS
SUBJECT: FINAL PAYMENT FOR MAINTENANCE CENTER
DATE: MARCH 26, 1997
The contractor (Rochon) has satisfied all of their requirements and any remaining
improvements or modifications are the responsibility of the City, therefore, I would
recommend that we make final payment for the maintenance center following the April
7th Council meeting. The contractor has completed all of the items which were on our
punch list, as well as those items on the inspection slips which we felt were their
responsibility. The exception would be the blacktop corrections in the back of the
building, and we have agreed to a $500.00 deduct for this item, and will be making the
repairs ourselves.
I have noted on the inspection slips all of the items which have been completed by the
contractor and those which we will be responsible for. We had decided earlier in the
project that we would take a $2,000.00 deduct on the rooftop screening, as we didn't
know if it would be necessary (we weren't sure at the time if the rooftop units would even
be visible). If rooftop screening is necessary we will be responsible for providing the
screening and would do so this summer.
We also took a deduct on the landscaping knowing that we could save money and end up
with a better product by doing it ourselves. We made modifications to the landscaping
plan based on availability and practicality. We will end up with more trees on this site
than were originally called for, however, they may be different species and perhaps end
up in different locations. We will work with Jane K. to satisfy the requirements ofthe
landscaping plan.
I am recommending that we make final payment to Rochon for the maintenance center
and would suggest that building, engineering, and planning make their final inspections.
If there are any remaining concerns department representatives should speak to me.
16200 Eagle Creek Ave, S.E" Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph, (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
I
r
PUblIc- }0<OY~~ ,~irr\-Q.MU/,fi
Ut~of~ p~'Y'-- //
;/ .l
/ I
/ fY\i~fl":J t-r~/ /
/
""~"""', '
.... --'.,
" .......
", '-..
/
,." ....
{afJ 0 ~ i 1\5~-ho'-\ }
/
/
/
/
,,{
, /~
..,/ "
~iF
0]
I
I
~".
/
.;2::-
.~
'\
/
/
1'''-
~
1
/
/
1//
I
/
~
~
~" ,,'
\ '
"',
,
\
, '.
~ .
l '-,
"
/
/
'. .
", .~
!
~/
""J
VEGETATION L1MITS(TYP,)
" ~. 7\) ,
H '\,P::> ;.:. c) ii) i . -::p r'r\
o ,', " \
J I \ I I I I ,
.(~
:-~
(
r
BERMS(TYP.)
& SOD L1MITS(TYP.)
,r'
/'
/
J'
/
)
~\rl
u ____d ',>1' - m _I