HomeMy WebLinkAbout98-052 Variance - Denied
RESOLUTION 98-14PC
DENYING A 9.0 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A 41 FOOT SETBACK FROM
THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OF PRIOR LAKE INSTEAD OF THE
REQUIRED 50 FOOT SETBACK FOR PROPOSED DECK
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment ofthe City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Tom Vidmar has applied for a variance from Section 5-8-3 of the City Code on
property located in the R-l (Urban Residential) and SD (Shoreland Overlay) Districts
at the following location, to wit;
4307 Grainwood Circle, legally described as Lot 18, Grainwood Park,
Scott County MN.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for a variance as contained in
Case #98-052 and held a hearing thereon on May 26, 1998.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the requested setback variance
upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated
traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on
property values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. The granting of the setback variance is not necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The applicant has an
alternatives to construct a deck within the legal building envelope. The variance will
serve merely as a convenience to the applicant.
5. The Board of Adjustment finds the applicant has created his own hardship through the
design of the house built by the applicant in 1996. At that time, the applicant was
aware of the required OHW setback (50.5 feet using setback averaging). The
ordinance has not change to negatively affect the building envelope of the property
since 1996.
6. The Board of Adjustment finds the spirit and intent of the ordinances cannot be met if
the variance is granted.
16200 E~~I~fi~~~etr~~~~<g~~9~i~rce~~e, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (6{21ga47-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
7. The Board of Adjustment has concluded reasonable use can be made of the property
without the variance.
8. The contents of Planning Case 98-052 are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby denies the
following variance for 4307 Grainwood Circle, as shown in Exhibit A (survey and legal
description);
1. A 9.0 foot variance to permit a 41 foot setback from the OHW of Prior Lake
instead ofthe required 50 foot setback.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on May 26, 1998.
~ ~
Anthony Stamson, Chair
1: \98fi1es\98var\98-052\re9814pc.doc
Page 2
SIJ,>EY PREPARED FOR:
TO M VIDMAR
14300 SALEM AVE. SO.
SAVAGE, MN. 55376
Valley Surveying Co., P. A.
SUITE /20-C, /6670 FRANKLIN TRAIL
FRANKLIN TRAil OFFICE CONDOMINIUM
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372
TElEPHONE (6/2) 447- 2570
EXHIBIT A
PRIOR
~l. LAkE
I 90:?:?0
0.... 3 ....95
~ '.:'':,. $110"ElINE
..., ,..
",,- \\
'-.....q
~\
~\
I,
./
EXISTI HG
HOUSE:
\
\
\
)
~O--
~O
.'
.C.EI...
119.13
'18f"
'. 000
G~~\~~ .
,:.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
loot 18, GRAINWOOD PARK, Scott County, Minnesota. Also showing all visible
imp~ovements and enc~oachments onto o~ off f~om said p~ope~ty if any.
NOTES' Benchma~k Elevation 921.39 top of the ga~age slab on loot 17 on survey.
91;.0 Denotes existing g~ade elevation
( 920.6 ) Denotes p~oposed finished g~ade elevations
~ Denotes p~oposed di~ection of finished surface d~ainage
~
Set the proposed ga~age slab at elevation 920.78
Set. the top of block at elevation 921.11
The lowest floor elevation will be at 912.21
Net Lot Area above elevation 904.0 = 8,179 sq. ft.
Net proposed impervious coverage = 30 %
Rev. 4/30/98 To show location of house t
Improvements I 8 proposed deck
Rev. 6/12/96 lb chong" sl.. of driveway to
W::tof~fie~O~13~~W~f of 300/.
Rev. 6/6/96 To show proposed hse. a grade
flevatlons olso exist cobin removed.
Rev. 3/6/9& To show proposed house for
variance request.
Rev. 2/26/96 To show sq. fl.
o
I
SCALE
30
60
I
I herftby certify that 'hi, sorvey was prepor<<1
by me or under my direct supervision and thot
10m 0 duly licen"~?t:nd SlIrIeyor under 'he
10 . 0 he S,ot'l<:,innesot,t.
...--.,.......'?.../~.{::.-/ J:- "'..".~.,_
t;.oo""",..~...."... ..... . r _~...,4'.........,r-......Sl>
Oo'e - <' l/cen.. No. 10183
IN
FEET
o O.no'n 1/2 Inch x 14 inch iron
monumen' s., and marked by
llc.n.e No. 10183
. Denotes iron monument found
II Denotes P. K. Nai' set
FIl.E No. 8216
800K~PAGE~
Vote taken signified ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
B. Case #98-052 Tom Vidmar is requesting a 9 foot variance to permit a 41 foot
setback from the ordinary high water mark of Prior Lake instead of the required 50
feet for the property located at 4307 Grainwood Circle.
Planner Jenni Tovar presented the staffreport dated May 26, 1998, on file in the office of
the City Planner.
The applicant is requesting a 9 foot variance to permit a 41 foot setback from the OHW
of Prior Lake rather than the required 50 foot minimum setback for proposed deck.
Lot 18, Grainwood Park was platted in 1944. In 1996, the Vidmar's applied for the
following variances:
1. A 5' front yard setback variance to permit a 20' setback instead ofthe required
25';
2. A 5.57' side yard setback variance to permit a side yard setback of 4.43' instead
ofthe required 50.5';
3. A 5.5' variance from the lake shore setback permitted under Section 9.1(D)2 to
permit a lakeshore setback of 45' instead of the required 50.5'.
Staff had recommended denial ofthe request because there was an alternative to build a
structure within the legal building envelope. The item was continued by the Planning
Commission to a later date to allow stafftime to review the revised plan submitted by the
applicant at the meeting. The Planning Commission never made a decision on the request
because the applicant withdrew the application and met the required setbacks.
The approved plans from the building permit indicate the patio doors to be on the west
side of the house, behind the garage and on the north side facing the lake. The city noted
on the plans that no deck could be built facing the lake. Therefore, the applicant only
placed patio doors facing the lake. The applicants constructed this house with the full
knowledge the closest they could construct their house, including a deck was 50.5 feet
using setback averaging.
The applicant is now requesting a variance to allow a proposed deck to be 41 feet from
the OHW rather than the required 50 feet.
Staffhas concluded the variance request to OHW setback does not meet the hardship
criteria. The hardship, if any, was caused by the applicant and reasonable use ofthe
property exists without the variance.
Comments from the public:
Tom Vidmar, 4307 Grainwood Circle, said he wanted to go back to 1996 with comments
from the DNR stating "the deck is of modest size". Vidmar quoted comments from the
1:\98fi1es\98plcomm\pcmin\mn052698.doc
4
Commissioners agreeing to a suspended deck. He did not come back before the
Commissioners because of constraints by the builders. He ran out of time and was
waiting for the City to pass the substandard lot ordinance with the 5 foot side yard
setback. Mr. Vidmar said the former planner told him to go ahead and plan a deck. He
felt his hardship is that the lot is small, long and narrow. Mr. Vidmar said at the time of
the variance the lake setback was 75 feet. He was under the assumption he could see the
lake when he built on it. The side door was put on as a catwalk. Mr. Vidmar presented
pictures of the neighborhood with lake setbacks much closer than he is asking. Referring
to previous comments from the commissioners two years ago he feels he can have a deck.
Craig Hinz, 3314 Grainwood Circle, explained if Vidmar's deck was built on the side it
would hinder his property values. Also, his view of the lake would be blocked.
The hearing was closed.
Comments from the Commissioners:
Criego:
. Does not remember the exactly what took place at the hearing two years ago. But the
important point is lake setback at the time was 75 feet. There was setback averaging
with the two adjacent neighbors and came up with 50.5 feet. This Commission has
always been stringent on moving towards the lake. There are a number of
Commissioners who do not agree with the lake setback change to 50 feet. The intent
is to protect the lake both aesthetically and from a water quality standpoint.
. Understands there are other homes on the lake that severely impact both of those
items.
. Does not believe the hardship has been met. Applicant still has use of the property.
. Would not have allowed a deck to be within that 75 foot setback two years ago. We
would have made sure the deck was within the setback averaging.
Cramer:
. Does not believe the hardship criteria has been met. The Commissioners are split on
the setbacks. To go any less than 50 feet does not make it a hardship, especially in
this case. This house was constructed when the setback was 75 feet.
. Cannot agree with this variance.
V onhof:
. Concurred. The variance hardships have not been met.
. There are alternatives within the legal building envelope.
Stamson:
. Agreed.
Tom Vidmar, 4307 Grainwood, said he understands the Commissioners do not want
people encroaching any further. He feels he is not asking for an unusually large deck and
does not feel he is encroaching on the neighbors. Obviously if there was a problem the
I :\98fi1es\98plcomrn\pcmin\mn052698.doc
5
neighbors would be at the meeting. Mr. Vidmar said he tried to work with the City in
building a small house. When the building official approved the doors on the second
floor, the assumption was for a deck.
Criego:
. Going back to notes of March 25, 1996 - explained his comments regarding the front
and lake setbacks.
. Mr. Vidmar said he has a 3 car garage.
MOTION BY CRAMER, SECOND BY VONHOF, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 98-
14PC DENYING A 9 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A 41 FOOT SETBACK FROM
THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OF PRIOR LAKE INSTEAD OF THE
REQUIRED 50 FOOT SETBACK FOR A PROPOSED DECK.
Vote taken signified ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
Tovar explained the appeal process.
C. Case #98-048 Consider Amendment to City Code and Zoning Ordinance
relating to the engineering certification requirements for building permit
applications on properties determined to have a bluff.
Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier presented the Planning Report dated May 26, 1998 on
file in the office of the Planning Director.
In January, 1998, the City Council adopted Ordinance #98-01, which established the bluff
setback requirements. The ordinance also established a requirement for engineering
certification that any excavation, fill or placement of a structure on a property determined
to have a bluff will not cause any slope to become unstable, and will not interfere with
adequate drainage for the site or adjacent properties, will not obstruct, damage, or
adversely affect existing sewer and drainage facilities, stormwater runoff, downstream
properties, wetlands, or bodies of water, or will not result in erosion or sedimentation.
This engineering certification is required before any building permit will be issued on a
lot considered to have a bluff.
On April 20, 1998, the City Council revisited this issue. The primary concerns related to
the potential cost ofthe required engineering study, the willingness of engineers to certify
the studies, the need for the studies for minor additions, decks or garages, and the ability
of property owners to reasonably comply with the ordinance. After much discussion, as
outlined in the minutes ofthe Council meeting, the Council determined the potential cost
of the study is not unreasonable. The Council did decide the issues of the willingness of
the engineers to certify the reports and the need for a study for minor additions, decks and
garages should be referred back to the Planning Commission for further study.
In discussing this issue with several engineers, it appears some are reluctant to certify the
slope will not fail. This is basically due to the fact there are several factors over which
1:\98fi1es\98plcomm\pcmin\mn052698.doc
6
I
if J/t 1'Yt/\""
PUBLIC HEARING
Conducted by the Planning Commission
* t1~-~7,
~\a; c;l1 '.
q8'-1)5~ ~4~ !3. 4~-D%
J
The Planning Commission selcomes your comments in this matter. In fairness to all who
choose to speak, we ask that, after speaking once, you allow everyone else to speak
before you address the Commission again and limit your comments to clairification or
new information. Please be aware this is the principal opportunity to provide input
on this matter. Once the public hearing is closed, further tesitmony or comment will
not be possible except under rare conditions. The City CouI}ciI will not hear
additional testimony when it considers this matter. Thank you.
ATTENDN~CE-PLEASEPRINT
Is-r/Ye i~aJj& {~'37
PHl.1ST.DOC
PAGE I
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
SITE:
PRESENTER:
REVIEWED BY:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
PLANNING REPORT
4B
CONSIDER AN ORDINARY HIGH WATER (OHW)
SETBACK VARIANCE FOR TOM VIDMAR, Case File
#98-052
4307 GRAINWOOD CIRCLE
JENNI TOVAR, PLANNERJ~
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
YES .lL NO
MAY 26,1998
The applicant is requesting a 9 foot variance to permit a 41 foot setback from the
OHW of Prior Lake rather than the required 50 foot minimum setback for
proposed deck.
DISCUSSION:
Lot 18, Grainwood Park was platted in 1944. In 1996, the Vidmar's applied for
the following variances:
1. A 5' front yard setback variance to permit a 20' setback instead of the
required 25';
2. A 5.57' side yard setback variance to permit a side yard setback of 4.43'
instead of the required 50.5';
3. A 5.5' variance from the lakeshore setback permitted under Section
9.1 (0)2 to permit a lakeshore setback of 45' instead of the required 50.5'.
Staff had recommended denial of the request because there was an alternative
to build a structure within the legal building envelope. The item was continued
by the Planning Commission to a later date to allow staff time to review the
revised plan submitted by the applicant at the meeting. Attached are the
minutes from March 25, 1996. The Planning Commission never made a decision
on the request because the applicant withdrew the application and met the
required setbacks.
The approved plans from the building permit indicate the patio doors to be on the
west side of the house, behind the garage and on the north side facing the lake.
L:\98FILES\98VAR\98-052\98-052PC.DOC Page 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
The city noted on the plans that no deck could be built facing the lake.
Therefore, the applicant only placed patio doors facing west and used windows
in place of patio doors facing the lake. The applicants constructed this house
with the full knowledge that the closest they could construct their house,
including a deck was 50.5 feet using setback averaging.
The applicant is now requesting a variance to allow a proposed deck to be 41
feet from the OHW rather than the required 50 feet. Attached is a legal building
envelope indicating an area on the west side of the house (where patio doors are
located) where a deck could be built.
VARIANCE HARDSHIP STANDARDS
1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship
with respect to the property.
This criteria goes to whether reasonable use can be made of the property if
the Ordinance is literally enforced. The property has been utilized as a single
family residence by the applicant for 2 years. Reasonable use of the property
has existed and will continue to exist as a single family dwelling without the
variance. There is no hardship with respect to the property. The legal
building envelope and placement of the patio door on the west side of the
house allow for a deck and reasonable use of the property.
2. Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique
to the property.
There are no unique circumstances of the lot that warrant granting of the
requested variance. The applicant was aware of the required 50.5 foot
setback when they built the house. Considering there have been no
significant changes to the Zoning Ordinance affecting the circumstances of
the property and reasonable use, there is no hardship.
3. The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and is not the
result of actions of persons presently having an interest in the property.
The applicant constructed this house in 1996. At the time, it was clear that
the required OHW setback was 50.5 feet. The applicant was aware of the
requirement and constructed a house with patio doors on the west side of the
house to accommodate a future deck. There is no hardship with respect to
the ordinance, as the ordinance has not changed resulting in a negative
impact on the property. The hardship is caused by the actions of the
property owner in the design of the structure constructed two years ago.
4. The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces
substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest.
L:\98FI LES\98V AR\98-052\98-052PC.DOC
Page 2
The applicant was aware of the setback requirement in 1996. Therefore, the
granting of the variance does not observe the spirit and intent of the
ordinance and is contrary to the public interest.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has concluded the variance request to OHW setback does not meet the
hardship criteria. The hardship, if any, was caused by the applicant and
reasonable use of the property exists without the variance.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the variances requested by the applicant, or approve any variances
the Planning Commission deems appropriate in the circumstances.
2. Table or continue discussion of the item for specific purpose.
3. Deny the application because the Planning Commission finds a lack of
demonstrated hardship under the zoning code criteria.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Adoption of the attached Resolution #98-14PC denying the variance to OHW
setback.
L:\98FI LES\98V AR\98-052\98-052PC.DOC
Page 3
RESOLUTION 98-14PC
DENYING A 9.0 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A 41 FOOT SETBACK FROM
THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OF PRIOR LAKE INSTEAD OF THE
REQUIRED 50 FOOT SETBACK FOR PROPOSED DECK
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Tom Vidmar has applied for a variance from Section 5-8-3 of the City Code on
property located in the R-1 (Urban Residential) and SD (Shoreland Overlay) Districts
at the following location, to wit;
4307 Grainwood Circle, legally described as Lot 18, Grainwood Park,
Scott County MN.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for a variance as contained in
Case #98-052 and held a hearing thereon on May 26, 1998.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the requested setback variance
upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated
traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on
property values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. The granting of the setback variance is not necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The applicant has an
alternatives to construct a deck within the legal building envelope. The variance will
serve merely as a convenience to the applicant.
5. The Board of Adjustment finds the applicant has created his own hardship through the
design of the house built by the applicant in 1996. At that time, the applicant was
aware of the required OHW setback (50.5 feet using setback averaging). The
ordinance has not change to negatively affect the building envelope of the property
since 1996.
6. The Board of Adjustment finds the spirit and intent of the ordinances cannot be met if
the variance is granted.
I:\98files\98var\98-0.5Th'e9-B14pc.dos; Page 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. :::i.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
7. The Board of Adjustment has concluded reasonable use can be made of the property
without the variance.
8. The contents of Planning Case 98-052 are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby denies the
following variance for 4307 Grainwood Circle, as shown in Exhibit A (survey and legal
description);
1. A 9.0 foot variance to permit a 41 foot setback from the OHW of Prior Lake
instead of the required 50 foot setback.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on May 26, 1998.
Anthony Stamson, Chair
ATTEST:
Donald R. Rye, Planning Director
1: \98fi1es\98var\98-052\re9814pc.doc
Page 2
SIJP'-'E,y PREPARED FOR:
TOM VIDMAR
'4300 SALEM AVE. SO.
SAVAGE, MN. 55378
Valley Surveying Co., P.A.
SUITE 120-C, 16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL
FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372
TELEPHONE (612) 447-2570
EXHIBIT A
/'
, .',
\
\
\
J
~o--
~o.
.'
\c,
\~
EXISTING
HOUSE
.C'.n.
91'.13
'18,"
'. OOQ
G~l>-\~~ .
~
,:',
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Lot 18, GRAINWOOD PARK, Scott County, Minnesota. Also showing all visible
improvements and encroachments onto or off from said property if any.
NOTES' Benchmark Elevation 921.39 top of the garage slab on Lot 17 on survey.
91i'O Denotes existing grade elevation
( 920.6) Denotes proposed finished grade elevations
~ Denotes proposed direction of finished surface drainage
~
Set the proposed garage slab at elevation 920.78
Set. the top of block at elevation 921.11
The lowest floor elevation will be at 912.21
Net Lot Area above elevation 904.0 = 8,179 sq. ft.
Net proposed impervious coverage = 30 %
Rev. 4/30/98 To show locotlon of house.
Improvements, 8: proposed deck
Rev. 6/12/96 To change size of driveway to
1r~:'I,;,,rc~0~t3'1v~wge of 30 %
Rev. 6/6/96 To ~w proposed hst. a grade
e'evallons olso exls' cobin removed.
Rev. 3/6/96 To show proposed house for
variance request.
Rev. 2/26/96 To show sq. fl.
o
I
SCALE
30
60
I
, hereby certify that this survey was prepared
by me or under my direc' superviSion ond 'ho'
10m duly licens.:.~ nd s....01. or under 'he
I 0 he stote1;.<~innesotPt
~;':4!.ct>~;'-;1. ;~~_
Da,. llc.n.. No. 10/83
IN
FEET
o Oenot.s 1/2 Inch x 14 Inch Iron
monument s.t and marl<.d by
lic.ns. No. /0183
. Denot.. iron monument found
. Oeno'" P. K. N<1il se'
FILE No. 8216
BOOK --1!L-PAGE ~
CITY OF PRIOR'LAKE
Impervious Surface Calculations.
. .' (To be Submitted with Building Penn It Application)
. . . Fo'r All Properties' Located in theShoreland District (SD).
the Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage Pel1l1itted in 30 Percent
. .
. .
. Property Address..'L\'?b..,.G:rr~~~~S3~C~~~ ,. N~ ',~,'
.,~~
. "
, .
.. . .
Lot Area;e\,~' ~~e.. €c... C\~~Sq.Feet x 30%=.............. 1.)1 'S~. 1
*****.*.~.******************.*********.*****************.***************
HOUSE
. LENGTH'
'O~ '~ }c
.--t..~.3~ x
x
. WIDTH
~'?Z.
3\.~3
==
. SQ. FEET
.~. .......:t
\'2.. no . .
.,~,q
==
ATTACHED GARAGE'
=
.
. . TOTAL PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE...........~..........., \'1'-l1, ','..'
DETACHED BLDGS
(Garage/Shed)
x
.x
. .
. .
. . . .
. .
TOTALDET ACHED BUILDINGS.......................
nRIVEW A YIp A VED AREAS. .
(Driveway-paved or not) . '.
. (Sidewalk/Parking Are<ls) .
\ 0 X "t..e) " ="7 ~
. \ S . x . \'\.,p == "'Z..'-\ t)
l. : S x Vi ' == \'-Z..~ ' 'S
, TOTAL P IvEt ~AS:............;,:;~.......::.::........ '
lt1S. $.
" .
. '.~
. o'
P A TIOSIPORCHES/DECKS
(Open Decks W' min. opening between
boards, with' a pervious surface below;
are not considered to be Impervious)
x =
X ==
X ==
. . . . .
TOTAL DEcks.... It.. ..t......., if... .,...... II.. ..~.. tIU ~.... ..... ...
' ',' ",' ..l.' - . ,
OTHER
Y .,'
^ . .
=
x
=
(,. .
. ," . . ,
T9T AL. OTHER~...,~.......,.. .,~".~... ....... ,~............,.........
TOTALIM~ERVIOUS SURFACE I
UNDE~C\ .... I
Prepareii~y \V~~ e~. ... Date~-:20 -"I'D .
Company ~ ~ \ ~IS~~"'N.\~~CA;I~. Phone#~
. , , .' " . '.' " . "
"1..f.12"L?". "-l.1 .
\'l.~ ., I
SURVEY PREPARED FOR:
TOM VIDMAR
14300 SALEM AVE. SO.
SAVAGE I MN. 55378
LEGAL BUILDING ENVELOPE
Valley Surveying Co., f? A.
SUITE 120-C I 16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL
FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM
PRIOR LAKE I MINNESOTA 55372
TELEPHONE (6/2) 447- 2570
PRIOR
~ El lAkE
~ ~. 10~:~~:0
. I'
. \ \ . . SHORElINE
II .
"'0 \~
",,- \\
"', :
ElliS TI NO
HOUSE
.!.\
~\
\ \
./'
~CI
\~
.C. n.
919.13
9ls,n
· . 000
G~I>-\~~ .
,
c..~'1'..
"\~,~. ..1
..~~ t:
" (,\.- lr
C\~
~.'
I.',
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Lot 18, GRAINWOOD PARK, Scott County, Minnesqta. Also showing all visible
improvements and encroachments onto or off from said property if any.
NOTES' Benchmark Elevation 921.39 top of the garage slab on Lot 17 on survey.
~
9li'0 Denotes existing grade elevation
(920.6 ) Denotes proposed finished grade elevations
---~ Denotes proposed direction of finished surface drainage
Set the proposed garage slab at elevation 920.78
r
Set. the top of block at elevation 921.11
The lowest floor elevation will be at 912.21
Net Lot Area above elevation 904.0 = 8,179 sq. ft.
Net proposed impervious coverage = 30%
Rev. 4/30/96 To show locallon of house I
improvements, 8 proposed deck
Rev. 6/12/96 To chonge size of driveway 10
1S~~'~fi:~~0~d1vm?e or 30 %
Rev. 6/6/96 To ~ow proposed h st. a grade
elevallons also exlsl cabln removed.
SURVEY PREPARED FOR:
TOM VIDMAR
14300 SALEM AVE. SO
SAVAGE. MN 55378
Valley Surveying CO.. P. A.
.$!IITE 120-C. 16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL
FI.ANKLlN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM
PRIOR LAKE. MINNESOTA 55372
TELEPHONE (612) 447-2570
.j
SUfVl) ffl)(.r\ 6()rl Jclinj
rVff7if.
~
'-..
PRIOR
~ El LAkE
'0 902'20
..... / 3 /95
\'~_..
\ \ ~HORE'l'IYE
" \\-
'b \..
'9 \ ':
"
EXISTING
HOUSE
....~. -::;;ry :0
'" .C.EL.
~.........- 9"U3
, 91~'"
. 0'0
~O
G~tA\~
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Lot 18, GRAINWOOD PARK, Scott County, Minnesota. Also showing all visible
improvements and encroachments onto or off from said property if any.
NOTES' Benchmark Elevation 921.39 top of the garage slab on Lot 17 on sucvey.
91;.0 Denotes existing grade elevation
(~?~~Denotes proposed finished grade elevations
~
~ Denotes proposed direction of finished surface drainage
Set the proposed garage slab at elevation 920.78
Set the top of block at elevation 921.11
The lowest floor elevation will be at 912.21
Net Lot Area above elevation 904.0 = 8,179 sq. ft.
Net proposed impecvious coverage = 30%
Rev. 6/12/96 lb Ghallll' .Iu at drt_ylo
1.l'~101='''fI~"W9e at 30 %
Rev. 6/6 196 i'O'ihow propoHd ..... . GroeN
el~vatlonl oliO eJCi.t cabin removed.
RIV.3/6/96 To IIlOW propond _ for
variance request.
Rev. 2/26/96 To show sq. ft.
o
I
SCALE
30
60
I
IN
FEET
o Denotes 1/2 inch J( 14 inch ,ron
monument Sit and marked by
LIcense No 10183
. Denotes iron monument found
(Ii Denotes P K Nail set
FILE No. 8216
800K~"A6E~
!-.1'
~ .
. tjJ .
.~
'?:J2'.O"
~ ~, .'
1'~
5'.q"
~.....;
6OE>'f>
F1nILY~M
7 , 15
call for Fireplace
ROUgh-in Inspection and
Finallnspec\ioll.
LIVING ~M
\I t ,'Ii
.U LUsting" required
& shall be Installed pe~
manufacturers specs.
~ _ _tA.K't:T
VI ",y'C-
~..:
<.l> '.:
-' .
o' . ..:... ... ...... ..~..
t'I" .",:,> '
V ..:
~,F1 '\
t:OT ..\J~S:
~.
:L:
..i
ooi
~~
~
'E.
\.5'.,,"
DII'IETIE
\~1 ~ 101
;.
_ _~,Q((rE"" i
T1l-t - - - .~.
Ul'lIZ~S NO'l'
HE.AOEIl.S ,.o.t%l\..L
: \1)'2~\O
l'J" OH.
If..~
~
~
oJ
..t)
o
t'l
~
:;~
:
~
HUI ~ S:;;t:1i~~;::
~~ .~i 11'--/
<Ca: Will ..,!~
..J <lII[;:)"2'r::1-
a:~ UJf3~'6~<(
O ~:j:f~~
~fj .!t:(J)
ii:t:' 111M If~
Q. :e ~ a: .- '<510; l-
ll: ~8a:"i5:r::w
LLW '-~III 8l::~(/)
~r 11~1111
L,
u-
I I:: 11'1:,
I ~._._- ---,,", ":,1.,'
I r----- I: ,
-______---...-J. ,
----..---..---.. .
-~- ,
" "
,_'oJ;;'
: ,
II
"
@.'-lIlllifj----,'
"~'{4: "
~!1-~];I" i", E::J'
,._,c I l '
~ ",' ,"'cC',".,
: I, - -. ---';
. " , ] ! ~ ! i; , I ! '
" : ; /I,
;1', ' :i
Cft:3
[::1
I' ,
1:1
J:
,
"
i',
i';'
ai;
lL~
11,1:,1,1111,1'
,i, ,;:!
Ie-=:]
i 1
, '
E:l
!,
t'-'==~j
l_, ~-~_,~',.-, ~,"
L ,_.'_.~~
L~
I:_~=-
I-=-~~~
I, [~=:
[=.J I'i
7-
o
r
<z.
ai?
.-1:'-
W ..
t
UJ
-l
iil,
~ll~
~ 1!~1
~gh
- ~l! ti
7..
o
~.
q;'
:::>b
IjJ I
J :..
Gi /'
ci~
GJ
Ct'
>~
'r
'.
,~.
-!!:
Kuykendall:
This is an improvement and compliment applicant on existing structure. Supportive.
MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY CRIEGO TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 96-
07PC.
V ote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Criego, Wuellner and Kuykendall. MOTION
PASSED.
A recess was called at 8:26 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:32 p.m.
.~
4.D 96-023 - REQUEST FOR VARIANCES BY THOMAS AND CHERYL
VIDMAR, FOR PROPERTY AT 4307 GRAINWOOD CIRCLE.
The Planning Department received a variance application from Thomas and Cheryl
Vidmar, who proposed to remove an existing cabin and construct a new house on the
subject site. Construction of the house would result in the following variances and
setbacks;
1. A 5' front yard setback variance to permit a 20' setback instead of the required
25';
2. A 5.57' side yard setback variance to permit a side yard setback of 4.43'
instead of the required 50.5';
3. A 5.5' variance from the lake shore setback permitted under Section 9.1(D)2 to
permit a lakeshore setback of 45' instead of the required 50.5'.
Michael Leek presented the Staff Report dated March 25, 1996 with a recommendation of
denial based on the lack of hardship and the fact the applicants have legal alternatives
which would allow reasonable use of the property.
Thomas Vidmar, 14300 Salem Avenue South, Savage, stated they are proposing a change
in plans. The home was designed in what he considers "in the spirit" of the .
neighborhood. He feels the deck size is not oversized for the home. It is three feet in
front of his neighbor's home. Mr. Vidmar also feels his home design is comfortable for a
growing family. Mr. Vidmar said they would like to shrink the garage down to a 10 foot
third stall which would bring it up to a six and one half foot side yard setback. There is
24 feet from the garage door to the street. He does not think they overstepped their
bounds for what they want to do and are open to suggestions.
Comments from Commissioners:
Wuellner:
MN032596.DOC
PAGES
. Distance from garage to street. Leek explained the measurement is from the property
to the right-of-way line. It is 20 feet from the right-of-way line. In this case the right-
of-way is narrow compared to what would be done today.
. Appreciate the property owner is willing to deal with the width of the third stall. The
Commission has granted 5 foot side yard variances in the past.
Mr. Vidmar presented a new plan to the Planning Commission. The staffhad not seen
the plan before and could not verify the dimensions.
Criego:
. The neighbor's setback is around 20 feet.
. The front yard setback is okay from the garage to the street; would rather give that up
than the lakeshore variance because it is consistent with the neighbor's variances.
. Concern lies in the side yard. There is plenty of room to bring back to 10 feet.
. A three car garage is nice but not necessary.
. Supportive of the lake shore and road side variances.
Loftus:
. Agree with comments by Commissioner Criego.
. Neighboring Lot 17 had a smaller building envelop.
. A three car garage is not a hardship.
. Stay within the ordinance guidelines.
. Supportive of the street variance and a small deviation to the deck.
Kuykendall:
. Applicant proposing a three level home with a total floor area of approximately 3,400
sq. feet.
. Neighbors (Lot 17) proposed a three car garage and ended up with a two and one-half
car garage.
. There was no hardship on the side yard variance.
. Difficulty finding a hardship on the 20 foot street side. .
. Mr. Vidmar said their plan has been considerably down sized to get an impervious
surface coverage of 30%.
Criego:
. The applicant has tried to reduce the impervious surface by building three levels.
Kuykendall:
. The neighborhood is unique and is the only hardship.
. Leek said there had been one or two constructions in the area that were less than 20
feet. Probably around 18 feet.
. Support front yard setback.
. No lakeshore setback - only for a suspended deck.
MN032596.DOC
PAGE 9
Loftus:
Suggestion to the applicant to get a new design and review with staff.
Leek said staff s recommendation would be the same with a two car garage.
Wuellner:
Applicant has to work within the building envelop. A two and one-half garage is
reasonable and it is not a hardship to want a three car garage.
MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY WUELLNER TO CONTINUE THE REQUEST
TO APRIL 22, 1996.
Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Wuellner, Criego and Kuykendall. MOTION
PASSED.
Commissioner Criego requested staff to look into a comment made regarding the
neighbor who did not follow the setback requirement. Leek said he would check into the
matter and report back.
4.E 96-017 - VARIANCE REQUEST BY GENE AND COLEEN TREMAINE FOR
PROPERTY AT 16500 INGUADONA BEACH CIRCLE.
The Planning Department received a variance application from Gene and Coleen
Tremaine, who propose to construct a new house on the subject site. Construction of the
house would result in the following variances and setbacks;
1. A 2,302 square foot variance to permit a lot area of 5, 198 square feet instead
of the required 7,500 square feet;
2. A 2 foot lake shore setback variance to permit a lake shore setback of 48 feet
instead of the 50 feet permitted under Section 9.3(D)2;
3. A 7% variance to permit impervious surface coverage of 37% instead of the
permitted 30%
4. A 14 foot variance to permit a front yard setback of 11 feet instead of the
required 25 feet; and
5. A 2 foot variance on the West to permit a side yard setback of 8 feet instead of
the required 10 feet.
Michael Leek presented the Staff Report dated March 25, 1996 with a recommendation to
approve the requested variances. Staff concluded the hardship criteria were met with
respect to the lot area, impervious surface coverage, and perhaps front yard setback, but
not with respect to the requested lakeshore and side yard setback variances. Staff
recommended the request be tabled to allow applicant to consider alternative designs. Pat
Lynch of the DNR faxed a minor modification of the deck which was consistent with
staff's recommendation.
MN032596.DOC
PAGEl 0
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
4D
CONSIDER FRONT, SIDE AND LAKE SHORE
SETBACK VARIANCES FOR THOMAS AND
CHERYL VIDMAR
4307 GRAINWOOD CIRCLE
R. MICHAEL LEEK, CITY PLANNER
DONALD R. RYE, PLANNING DIRECTOR
YES .x.. NO
MARCH 25, 1996
SITE:
PRESENTER:
REVIEWED BY:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
The Planning Department received a variance application from Thomas and Cheryl
Vidmar, who proposed to remove an existing cabin and construct a new house on the
subject site. Construction of the house would result in the following variances and
.setbacks;
1. A 5' front yard setback variance to permit a 20' setback instead of the required
25';
2. A 5.57' side yard setback variance to permit a side yard setback of 4.43'
instead of the required 50.5';
3. A 5.5' variance from the lake shore setback permitted under Section 9.1 (D)2 to
permit a lakeshore setback of 45' instead of the required 50.5'.
DISCUSSION:
The subject site was platted as a part of GRAIN WOOD PARK in 1944, prior to its being
annexed into the City of Prior Lake. Like many properties in this area the subject site
was developed with a seasonal cabin. The applicants propose to remove the cabin and
construct a new, single-family house with attached 3-car garage.
Section 9.3(D)2 permits new structures on undeveloped lots to have a lakeshore setback
equal to the average setback of the existing structures on the adjacent properties or a
setback of 50', whichever is greatest. In those cases where an existing structure is first
being removed, the City has in the past deemed the site undeveloped, and applied setback
averaging. The average of the adjacent setbacks in this case would apply, and would be
50.5'. The proposed house would be setback 55', but the proposed deck would require a
setback variance of 5.5'
16200 ~?lle'~9X~18.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Section 9.12(B)1(a)10 permits a substandard lot of record to have one 5' side yard
setback in certain circumstances. This provision does not apply in the present case
because the applicants' proposed house would encroach in other required setbacks. The
proposed side yard setback on the West is less than 5' .
Variance Hardship Standards:
1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship with
respect to the property.
This criteria goes to whether reasonable use can be made of the property if the Ordinance
is literally enforced. The proposed house would have 3 levels. The fIrst level as indicated
on the attached survey would have a floor area of about 1,184 square feet. The size of the
proposed house could be reduced by 5.5' in order to comply with the lakeshore setback
average. This would result in the loss of 176 square feet of area for a net area on the fIrst
floor of 1,008 square feet. The applicant could also consider locating a deck on the West
side of the proposed house.
Similarly, the side yard setback requirement could be complied with by reducing the size
of the garage and/or shifting it somewhat to the East. This is an approach the
Commission has taken in the past. (See e.g. V A95-25, Ron and Kim Anderson) It
appears to staff that even if these steps were taken, a small front yard setback variance
might be required to accommodate both the garage and house. Because there appear to
be a number of design alternatives available to the applicants, staff has concluded that
reasonable use of the property can be made while still complying with lake shore and side
yard setback requirements. Thus, staff has concluded that this criterion is not met.
2. Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique to the
property.
Because staff has concluded that there is no undue or unnecessary hardship this criterion
is, de facto, not met.
3. The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and is not the result of
actions of persons presently having an interest in the property.
Any hardship results not from the application of the provisions of the Ordinance, but
from design decisions made by the applicants. Thus, this criterion is not met.
4. The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces
substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest.
9623V APC.DOC/RML
2
The proposed house would result in a structure not inconsistent with other houses in the
area. Thus, it does not appear that the requested variances would be contrary to the
public interest.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the variances requested by the applicants, or approve any variances the
Planning Commission deems appropriate in the circumstances.
2. Table or continue discussion of the item for specific purpose.
3. Deny the application because the Planning Commission finds a lack of
demonstrated hardship under the zoning code criteria.
RECOMMENDATION:
Because staff has concluded that the applicants have legal alternatives which would allow
reasonable use of the property, and thus that the Ordinance criteria are not met, staff
recommends Alternative No.3.
ACTION REQUIRED:
A motion adopting Resolution 9609PC.
9623V APC.DOC/RML
3
)
~
('f")
N
o
I
\C
Q'\
w~
~~i
~i; ~I
~U I
5 ~ .
'GJ
I :
I :
LJ
~ j
~--
"
"
i
1
i1! I ~ ~
i! 1 1__,___
~_L __II', ~j
! i ., ~
Iii __II;
, .,o------r
~~
C) 0
' i
~"
, :, ~: '! !'
'I. ~, .,.
"
'j
.,. , ~
'.'P-_m_,
~\ ~') ,
.
~ ; I
96-023VA
SURVEY PREPARED FOR.
TOM VIDMAR
14300 SALEM AVE SO.
SAVAGE, MN. 55378
Valley Surveying Co., P. A.
SUITE 120-C I 16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL
FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372
TELEPHONE (6/-2) 447 - 2570
O!CW
\
\
\
)
_ 00 '//
~ll!I~
',CI
, -
EXISilNG
HOUSE
TO
~~~
000
G~p.\~~
_r\'~
C\'C".... ~
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Lot 18, ~AINWOOD PARK, Scott County, Minnesota. Also showing all visible
imp~ovements and enc~oachments onto O~ olf f~om said p~ope~ty if any.
NET AREA ABOVE ELEV 9040' 8,179 SO. FT.
PROPOSED HOUSE, GARAGE So DRIVE/IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
2,453 SQ. FT. '30 % COVERAGE
~
R.-v.3/6/96 To JI'low "ropos.d hous4' for
vorionc. r~quu'
Rn-. 2/26/96 To ,now 5Q. (t
o
I
SCALE
30
60
I
IN
FEET
o DenOf'f'S 1/2 inch t I. inch iron
motfument ,., and martf.d by
lie.on No lo,a 3
. Denotes Iron monumMt (ound
~ Oenot~5 P K No" J~'
FILE No. 8216
8001< ~PAGE~_
r
fILE COpy
April 14, 1998
Tom Vidmar
4307 Grainwood Circle NE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Variance Application
Dear Mr. Vidmar,
The City is in receipt of your variance application for proposed deck. The
following information needs to be submitted prior to continued review of your
application:
· Complete revised survey indicating exact location of house as constructed
and exact dimension of deck and proposed setback from the ordinary high
water (OHW) of 904.0 el. of Prior Lake. As part of the survey we will need
existing and proposed impervious surface.
If we receive the information by 4;30 p.m. on Thursday, April 16, 1998 we can
process your application for public hearing on April 27, 1998. If we receive it
after that day, then we will proceed to schedule your item on the next available
Planning Commission agenda. Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
ce~r jVL~
Planner
16200 E1g'~~JMIS~~,8~~~}vmiffi~~ 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
SURVEY PREPARED FOR:
TOM VIDMAR
14300 SALEM AVE. SO.
SAVAGE. MN. 55378
Valley Surveying Co.. P.A.
SUITE 120-C, 16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL
FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372
TELEPHONE (612) 447-2570
PRIOR
~ Cl LAKE
. 90
/0 2.20
~ ~ "3"95
\\ ~ SHORe"
~ \ ~ ...IIYE
" \t.
-Do" \~
"
Il
EXISTING
HOUSE
~ .--'-
1ilI:io,: ..... /~tL.-'"
,...// 919.1'
.-" 918f.
· 00
~O
G~f>.\~
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Lot 18, GRAINWOOD PIIRK, Scott County, Minnesota. IIlso showing all visible
impeovements and enceoachments onto oe off feom said peopeety if any.
NarES' Benchmaek Elevation 921.39 top of the gacage slab on Lot 17 on sucvey.
919.0 Denotes existing geade elevation
"
CJl20.D Denotes peoposed finished geade elevations
~
~ Denotes peoposed dicection of finished ~cface dcainage
Set the pcoposed gacage slab at elevation 920.78
Set the top of block at elevation 921.11
The lowest flooc elevation will be at 912.21
Net Lot I\cea above elevation 904.0 = 8,179 sq. ft.
Net pcoposed impecvious covecage = 30"1.
R.v. 6/12/96 1b chang. slz. of drl-r 10
m,'1'1o '="\'I~' of 30 %
R.v. 6/6/96 i'O'7hOw propaHd ..... . 9ra.
el~Yatlon. also e.ill t::c*fn remewed.
Rov. 3/6/96 To MOW proposed _ for
voriance requH'.
Rev. 2126/96 To show sq. fl.
o
I
SCALE
30
60
I
IN
FEET
o Dettotes 1/2 inch x '4 inch iron
monument set and mortl:ed by
License No 10183
. Denotes iron monument found
ell Denotes P f(. Nail set
FIlE No. 8216
BOOK~PAGE~
~
Planning Case File No.
Property Identification No.
City of Prior Lake
LAND USE APPLICATION
98 ~ &02-
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E. / Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Phone (612) 447-4230, Fax (612) 447-4245
Type of Application: Brief description of proposed project (attach additional
o Rezoning, from (present zoning) sheets/narrative if desired)
to (proposed zoning)
o Amendment to City Code, Compo Plan or City Ordinance
o Subdivision of Land
o Administrative Subdivision
o Conditional Use Permit
rsa Variance
J~JJJ,()~ 0+ Q , C)' cl.t:{ ~ b,\ }.O"'
lJJ \ cl..... L <.J. c1.<. ('k ~<.. ~
Applicable Ordinance Section(s):
o Other:
Applicant(s): ~;'""~~::
Address: 1-\ ~C> ~ l"'C'~
Home Phone: t..\l...\('\. 1-~'\~
C\~(.\-t \), t
Work Phone: t\(,l\- o~~ 3
Property Owner(s) [If different from Applicants]:
Address:
Home Phone: Work Phone:
Type of Ownership: Fee _ Contract for Deed _ Purchase Agreement -----"
To the best of my knowledge the information provided in this application and other material submitted is correct. In
addition, I have read the relevant sections of the Prior Lake Ordinance and procedural guidelines, and understand that
applications will not be pr essed until deemed complete by the Planning Director or assignee.
._~' - ~ ~0/?Y
Applicant's ignatnre Date ~ ·
Fee Owner's Signature
Date
THIS SPACE TO BE FILLED IN BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY COUNCIL
APPROVED
APPROVED
DENIED
DENIED
DATE OF HEARING
DATE OF HEARING
CONDITIONS:
Signature of Planning Director or Designee
lu-app2.doc
Date
....-::..-..~--....i",,_.....c!~.....__,.'V-_ "",~"~~_~,""""-~1llA.,,,,olk_-
u~","~^,~__--.......--,~-,,~ ~ ,....~,;;~_..~~_...
the sum of
for the purpose of
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
RECEIPT # 32426
J /__ c:j _L2/Y
'-I- / ~~
DATE:
dollars
)
I
! 11[-1/10 /v'[" ce..
",,'" I, '--4/1,,/ - __
i
I
.1 ~ _~
,'" // /- / f.j,/1 "
. .:.. :. ---.~ / .',,-~
$
/ ')() pi)
/ I /j
// t/:)J/l /~_! / .. ,./ ~~..., >;'-' 'j
i I '.' '-, v v-,~/" { i/Vjr-"';~
\C, - ' Receipt Clerk for the City of Prior Lake
BUILDING PERMIT #
BUILDING PERMIT #
1,200.00
700.00
1,500.00
Building Permit Fee
Plan Check Fee
State Surcharge
Park Support Fee
SAC
Plmb Pmt pp#
Mech Pmt mc#
Mech Pmt mc#
SwrlWtr Pmt sw#
Pressure Reducer
Water Meter
Tree Preservation Deposit
SwrlWtr Connection Fee
Water Tower Fee
Builder's Deposit
Other
Total
Building Permit Fee
Plan Check Fee
State Surcharge
Plmb Pmt pp#
Mech Pmt mc#
(Heating only - $65.00)
(Htg & Air - $100.00)
(Fireplace - $40.00)
(Air - $40.00)
SwrlWtr Pmt sw #
Other
Total
-~:,
'IHOMAS S. OR C
!I@A 1[1 'fir "Ii .
4307 GRAlNWOOD CIRCLE .
PRIOR I..AB:E, MN 55372
~";",
pay to thet :re"
orCler q/.~ ,
a ~.f
5067
17-1/910
.lOt:
At'
I:.€) 1 L___~l~.ii - ~ 11Io ~~.....~..!. SQliI?~ iJ@H
\
i
I
\
HI
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE.
Illlpervious Sutface Calculations
. ., (To be Submitted with Building Penn It Application)
. . . F6r All Properties' Locate'd in the Shoreland District (SD).
_the Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage Per.mitted in 30 Percent
. Property Address.... L\~ b"1' G:.l"~~ "'~~~C\~~ . N~: .
Lot Area ,eo, -, ~ .' a..~\).i €L. C\CJot~Sq.Feei x 30% == .............. '1...41?'? 1
.****~**~*.***********'*****.***************************.***************
ATTACHEr> GARAGE'
. LENGTH' . WIDTH
.,,?~.,.iC : ?"2-
--z.~.':3'3 x3\ .~3
x
=
. SQ. FEET
.............:(,
\'2. no .
'"1:30 .~
HOUSE
=
=
.
TOTAL PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE...........~...........
\~4t..',:'
DETACHED BLDGS
(Garage/Shed)
x
.x
. . .
TOTALDET ACHED BUILDINGS.".~...........".....
DRIVEWAYfPAVED AREAS'
(Drivew,ay-paved ornot) .
. (Sldewalk/Parking Are<ls) .
\OX ~e) '. =7~
. \ S . x \ \..c> = 2"-\ t:)
l.:S x\~= \"'2..'3.5
TOTAL p IvEt ;ilitAS.............;,~~,.......~.~.........
lojS. $..
. . .~-
. .
P A TIOSfPORCHES/DECKS
(Open Decks W' ml.n. opening between
boards, with' a pervious surface below;
are not considered to be Impervious) .:
x ==
X =
.~ =
','
.,' .'
TOTAL D leeks.......-. .............................~..n.~............
. . " - '<', ' .'
..
OTHER
';',;.:,'
X....
=
x
~
t,. .
. " .
TOTAL' OTHER~.";,...,.......~,..,..........,,..............1t.,.....
. . . . .
" ' '.. .'
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ,I '1..u,'Z:Z.qJ'
UNDE~C\ ..... .... . . . . I \l.-e..j I
. Prepared By \V~~, ~\A~.J . .... ...... ..... . . . ,. Date3-?o :"'1 CO '. .' .
... CnmpanY~~11~S"~~~~~~CO.I?A.Phone#~
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL
COUNTY OF SCOTT )
)ss
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
6 . -. of the City of Prior Lake, County of Scott, Stale of
Minnesota, being duly om, says on the ~ day Of~ 1998, she served
the attached list of persons to hav~ an interest in the ~ u..AL-
\j d\e.-tt:v'Vt1 J ../ # qB'" DS z.- , by mailing to them a copy thereof,
enclosed in an envelope, postage prepaid, and be depositing same in the post office at
Prior Lake, Minnesota, the last known address of the parties.
Subscribed and sworn to be this
day of , 1998.
NOTARY PUBLIC
MAILAFFD.DOC
PAGS
NOTICE OF HEARING TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING VARIANCES:
A 9 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A 41 FOOT SETBACK FROM THE
ORDINARY HIGH WA TER MARK OF PRIOR LAKE (904 EL.) INSTEAD
OF THE REQUIRED 50 FEET
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF DECK ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE R-1
(URBAN RESIDENTIAL) AND SD (SHORELAND) DISTRICTS IDENTIFIED AS
4307 GRAINWOOD CIRCLE.
You are hereby notified that the Prior Lake Planning Commission will hold a
hearing at Prior Lake Fire Station #1, located at 16776 Fish Point Road SE
(Southwest of the intersection of C.R. 21 and Fish Point Road), on: Tuesday,
May 26, 1998, at 6:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible.
APPLICANTS:
Tom Vidmar
4307 Grainwood Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
PROPERTY
OWNERS:
SAME
SUBJECT SITE: 4307 Grainwood Circle legally
described as Lot 18, Grainwood Park, Scott County, MN.
REQUEST:
The applicant is intending to construct a 10 foot by 20 foot
deck to an existing single family residence. The proposed
setback from the Ordinary High Water mark is 41 feet, rather
than the required 50 feet.
The Planning Commission will review the proposed construction and requested
variance against the following criteria found in the Zoning Ordinance.
1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship
with respect to the property.
2. Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique
to the property.
_L:\9SEILES\9SV Affi9S-052\9S-052I?N.DOC 1
16200 Eagre CreeK Ave.S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
3. The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and is not the
result of actions of persons presently having an interest in the property.
4. The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces
substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest.
If you are interested in this issue, you should attend the hearing. Questions
related to this hearing should be directed to the Prior Lake Planning Department
by calling 447-4230 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday
through Friday. The Planning Commission will accept oral and/or written
comments. Oral or written comments should relate to how the proposed
construction and requested variances are or are not consistent with the above-
listed criteria.
Prior Lake Planning Commission
Date Mailed: May 13, 1998
L:\98FI LES\98V AR\98-052\98-052PN .DOC
2
SURVEY PREPARED FOR:
TOM VIDMAR
14300 SALEM AVE. SO.
SAVAGE, MN. 55378
Valley Surveying Co., P.A.
SUITE 120-C, 16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL
FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTII 55372
TELEPHONE (612) 447-2570
PRIOR
~l LAkE
90;? ;?o
10" 3 "95
~ \\~ S"o""lllV"
'b \.
"~\i
I'
.
I,
t,
I,
./
EXISTING
HOUSE
\
\
\
)
^oo~
~..~~
.(.El.
919.13
918,"
. 000
G~~\~~ .
',.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Lot 18, GRAINW<X>D PARK, Scott County, Minnesota. Also showing all visible
improvements and encroachments onto or off from said property if any.
NOTES' Benchmark Elevation 921.39 top of the garage slab on Lot 17 on survey.
~
91;.0 Denotes existing grade elevation
(920.6) Denotes proposed finished grade elevations
~ Denotes proposed direction of finished surface drainage
Set the proposed garage slab at elevation 920.78
Set the top of block at elevation 921.11
The lowest floor elevation will be at 912.21
Net Lot Area above elevation 904.0 = 8,179 sq. ft.
Net proposed impervious coverage = 30 %
IN
FEET
60
I
Rev. 4/30/96 To show IDeation of house,
improvements, 8 proposed deck
Rev. 6/12/96 To chonge size of driveway to
1r~t,I~Fce,;,~0'gh~v~W9o of 30 %
Rov.6/6/96 To ~owproPosod h... a 9rado
elevations 0110 exist cabin rtmoved.
Rev. 3/6/96 To show proposod house for
variance request.
Rev. 2/26/96 To show sq. ft.
I hereby certify thot thi. 5Ufvey was prepared
by me or under my direct sl1pervi,ion and that
I am 0 duly licensed };f.nd S.....eyor under fhe
J9rfi 0 he Stat~1/:~n..ot
a..,.~~6"I.:..:1.k.or.~~""",",.
Oate llcen.. No. 10/83
o
I
SCALE
30
o Denofes 1/2 Inch . 14 Inch Iron
monument u, and martced by
license No '0183
. Denotes Iron monument found
~ D,note. P K. Noll s.,
FILE No. 8216
800K~PAGE~
Mr.John R. Casanova
4295 Grainwood Circle NE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Ms. Shirley Thielen
15609 Calmut Avenue NE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Mr. & Mrs. Ronald Anderson
4301 Grainwood Circle NE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Tom Vidmar
4307 Grainwood Circle
Prior Lake MN 55372
Mr. & Mrs. Craig Hinz
4313 Grainwood Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
MN Dept. of Natural Resources
Attn: Pat Lynch
Division of Waters
1200 Warner Road
St. Paul, MN 55106
Mr. Joey Frechette
4280 Grainwood Circle NE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Mr. Mark Roepke
4300 Grainwood Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Ms. Barbara Cioci
4290 Grainwood Circle NE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Mr. & Mrs. Michael Theisen
4310 Grainwood Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
J
1\
S//2
'. J
SEC.35 TLi
5' " 00 L/ ' I
~~,03
I
...
~{~
rp'~
~..
~ ~~ ~
I
1.
,
.1
~;O.
.-
O'
'."
. '~i~ ~5-' 0:35-- Ow.-Q
CITY OF PRIOR LAKt
J5,3'gA-
~Q
(JQ
~~
~@'
~Ir)
Q;
PRIOR ACRES
. ,
~', '-!>
o
o
o
00
tv
0'1
f-'
\D
W
lJ1
o
W
f-'
tv
o
o
f-'
o
W
\D
-..J
o
o
f-'
o
W
\D
lJ1
'0
~
H
tz:! :r:: tz:! '0
0-3 00 00 ~
:J:l 0-3 () H
'0 oI>>y'0 01>> y:r::'00-3tt1'OoI>>y
~tvtz:!~tvOO' ~:J:l~tvO
HooZHootz:!C:::O ZHootz:!
OoZOo><:oo. :>::00><:
~ H~ 0-3 00 ~
Q>1j Qt:lOttl~~ Qt:l
~~~~~>1jZ~tz:!H~~>1j
:>::H :>::H~0-3 ~0-3:>::H~
tz:!Z:J:ltz:!Ztz:!i><tvHtz:!tz:!Ztz:!
~ ~() oo(}t:l ~()
:S:0:J:l:s:0:r:: tv:J:l :s:o:r::
ZOZZOtz:!-..JoI>> OZOtz:!
t:lt::l t:l0-3-..J 0-3>1j t:l0-3
tz:! 0-3tv:J:l 0-3
lJ1(}~lJ1(}tz:!lJ1 i><0-3lJ1(}tz:!
lJ1H(J)lJ1H tv tz:!lJ1H
W~OW~ OOi><w~
-..J(}Z-..J(} tz:!:J:l-..J(}
tvt"' tvt"' ~ootvt"'
tz:! tz:! <: tz:!
H
Z Z () Z
tz:! tz:! tz:! tz:!
~~
0:>::
Q:J:l
~~
HO
Ztz:!
~'O
0:>::
Otz:!
t:l
()
H
~
()
t"'
tz:!
tv
o
o
f-'
o
00
o
o
o
-..J
f-'
\D
lJ1
o
\D
o
W
tv
f-'
0'1
01>>
lJ1
o
lJ1
lJ1
o
-..J
f-'
\D
\D
\D
f-'
\D
\D
\D
~
t"'Qtv
0~lJ1
0-3:J:lo
IHW
oZoI>>
o~o
-..JOo
0lJ1
tt1t:lo
t"'
0'0
Q~
I:>::
o
00
:J:lC:::
0-3
t"'
o
0-3
:J:l
~
Qtv
~~
HW
ZoI>>
~o
00
O-..J
t:lo
'0
~
:>':
o
c:::
0-3
t"'
o
0-3
:J:l
o
o
f-'
o
W
\D
lJ1
o \D 0
o W 0
f-' lJ1 f-'
f-' 0 f-'I
W tv WI
tv f-' tv.
00 I-' 001
I
:r:: tz:! '01
00 00 ~I
0-3 () HI
I
'0 0I>>(}t"'lJ10-3 '0 '0 0I>>(}I
~W;:UOW~Z~W;:UI
Hf-':J:lC:::\D (}Hf-':J:l1
OWHH OWHI
~ QOOOOOO:S:~ QI
Q <:0:J:l0 Q
~~:J:l~~~~~~:J:l
:>::Hf?>t"':r::~Q:>':Hf?>
tz:!Z tz:! H:J:ltz:!Z
~() >1j(}Q ~()
:S:0><::>::0:J:ltz:!:S:0><:
ZOZ><:c::: ZOZ
t:l0-3 ~0-3() t:l0-3
:r:: 0-3:P10 :r::
lJ1(}HoI>>:r::>::~lJ1(}H
lJ1H:J:lO 'OlJ1H:J:l
W~ tv:J:lOO' W~
-..J(}:r::o<:tz:!O-..J():r::
tvt"'Htvtz:!~"'ltvt"'H
tz:!Z <: tz:!Z
N 8~ N
tz:!tz:!
~
H
()
:J:l
tv
o
o
f-'
o
00
o
o
o
-..J
f-'
\D
lJ11
o
\D
o
W
tv
f-'
0'1
01>>
lJ1
o
lJ1
lJ1
o
-..J
~
t"'Qtv
0~lJ1
0-3:J:lo
IHW
oZW
f-'~O
\D0f-'
00'1
t:lo
o 0
o 0
01>> 01>>
01>> 01>>
lJ1 lJ1
f-' f-'
f-' f-'
:r:: '0
00 ~
0-3 H
'001>>0-3'001>>0-3
~w:r::~w:r::
HOOHOO
~-..J~~-..J~
QOO QOO
~~OO~~(J)
:>':H :>::H
tz:!Zf?>tz:!Zf?>
~ ~
:s:0():s:0(}
Zo:r::Zo:r::
t:ltz:! t:ltz:!
~ ~
lJ1(}><:lJ1(}><:
lJ1Ht"'lJ1Ht"'
W~ W~
-..J :S:-..J :s:
tvZ tvZ
tz:!<: tz:!<:
H H
t:l t:l
~ ~
tv
o
o
f-'
o
00
o
o
o
-..J
f-'
\D 1
lJ1
o
\D
o
W
tv
f-'
0'1
01>>
lJ1
o
lJ1
lJ1
o
-..J
f-'
\D
\D
\D
~
:>':
~
t"'Qtv
0~lJ1
0-3:J:lo
IHW
oZW
f-'~O
000f-'1
0lJ1
t:lo
'0
~
:>::
0* 0-3
o * III
W * ><
0'1 * '0
\D * III
tv* '<
tv* CD
* ti
:r:: tz:! '0*
00 00 ~*
0-3 () H *
*
'OoI>>y:S:'00-3"'l'OoI>>y*
~tvOH' ~H~tvO *
H\D:r::t"'O ~H\D:r::*
OlJ1Z~' OOOlJ1Z *
~ :J:l OO0-3~ *
Q~C:::tt1~~ Q~*
~~(}[::j~tz:! ~~():
:>':H:J:ltz:! ~:r:::>':H:J:l*
tz:!ZOO tvHOtz:!ZOO*
~:J:l~\D(}:S: ~:J:l*
:S:OZHO:J:ltz:!:S:02:*
ZOO -..J 2:00*
t:l<: :s: t:l<:*
:J:llJ1 0 :J:l *
lJ1() W ~lJ1(} *
lJ1H tv 0-3lJ1H *
W~ 0 QW~ *
-..J f-' :J:l-..J *
tvZ Qtv2: *
tz:! tz:! tz:! *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
o 0
o 0
tv tv
01>> 01>>1
tv tvl
o 01
f-' f-'I
I
:r:: '01
00 ~
0-3 H
'00I>>~'00I>>~
~WO~WO
HOZHOZ
~f-'~~f-'E:
Qt:l Qt:l
~~Z~~Z
:>':H :>,:H
tz:!Zf?>tz:!Zf?>
~ ~
:s:0:>'::s:0:>::
ZOH2:0H
t:l:S: t:l:s:
ttI ttI
lJ1(}tz:!lJ1(}tz:!
lJ1H~lJ1H~
W~t"'W~t"'
-..J ><:-..J ><:
tv2: tvZ
tz:!t"' tz:!t"'
tv
o
o
f-'
o
00
o
o
~ ~
t:l t:l
tz:! tz:!
~ ~
00 00
o 0
Z 2:
tv
o
o
f-'
o
00
o.
o
o
-..J
f-'
\D
lJ1
o
\D
o
W
tv
f-'
0'1
01>>
lJ1
o
lJ1
lJ1
o
-..J
f-'
\D
\D
\D
~
t"'Qtv
0~lJ1
0-3:J:lo
IHW
oZW
f-'~O
-..J0f-'
001>>
t:lo
'0
~
:>::
o
-..J
f-'
\D
lJ1
o
\D
o
WI
tvl
I
f-'I
0'1 I
01>>1
I
lJ11
o I
lJ11
I
lJ11
01
-..JI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f-'
\D
\D
\D
o
o
W
0'1
\D
tv
tv
\D
W
lJ1
o
W
lJ1
00
()
o
~
'0
~
t"'Qtv
0~lJ1
0-3:J:lo
IHW
oZW
f-'~O
0'I0f-'
OW
t:lo
~
:>':
Z
III
S
CD
ottl
0I>>~
.......(}
o
-..J0-3
.......Ill
\D><
00
(J)
'<
f-'Ul
art
.. CD
aS
o
f?>
o
o
is:
0.
ti
CD
Ul
Ul
tv
o
o
f-'
t:l
1-'-
Ul
rt
o
00
o
o
Z
III
S
CD
is:
0.
ti
CD
Ul
Ul
o
-..J
f-'
\D
0-3
.......
()
00
()
::r
lJ1
o
\D
o
W
tv
00
'0
f-'
t"'
CD
(J) l!l
'0 III
tv f-'
f-'
0'1
01>>
lJ1
o
lJ1
lJ1
o
-..J
00 :s:
'0 0
W 0.
CD
00 I-'
'0 CD
01>> ti
00
'0
lJ1
00
'0
0'1
00
'0
-..J
00
'0
00
(J)
'0
\D
f-'
\D
\D
\D
><:
CD
III
ti
~
'0
III 0-3(J)
ti :J:l(}
() \DO
CD 00-3
I-' f-'0-3
t"'
=1:1: ()
o
~
t"' 0-3
CD ><:
l!l
III
I-'
'0
r5
tz:!
00
rt
III
rt
~ f-'
Ul
\.0
o
o
tv
tv
tv
f-'
...,J
o
o
tv
tv
tv
f-'
...,J
o
o
W
W
Ul
...,J
tv
o
\.0
o
o
o
tv
\.0
::r:: 't:1 ::r:: t%J 't:1
00 :t! 00 00 :t!
>-3 H >-3 n H
't:1f-'OO't:1f-'OO 't:1~~oo't:1~n't:1~~
:t!Ul::r:::t!Ul::r:: :t!WHH' >-30:t!WH
HmHHmH Hf-'n~O>-3CHf-'n
00:t!00:t! OO::r::H. ZZOO::r::
:t!\.Ot"':t!IOt"' :t! ~ .. >-3:t! ~
t%J tJ::l GltJ::l<:lD:t! GltJ::l
~g~~g~ ~~t"'~~~~~~t"'
~~~~~~ ~HtJ::lt"' >-3H~HtJ::l
tJ::l~ tJ::l~ ItJ::lZ tJ::lf-'nOtJ::lZ
0>-3 C>-31 :El1?>~0::r::tJ::l :Ell?>
~>-3::r::~>-3::r::1~0 tvtJ::l ~O
Z HZ HIZOnnf-'t"'~zon
~tJ::l )::ltJ::l1 O::r::~f-'t"'C O::r::
<:t"' <:t"' I t%J Z t%J
Ul tJ::lUl tJ::lIUln:t! OOUln:t!
UlZZUlZZIUlH~\.O HHUlH~
WtJ::l WtJ::l IW:t!t"'f-' )::lZW:t!t"'
...,J ...,J l...,JntJ::l~ ~Gl...,JntJ::l
tv tv I tvt"' f-' 0 tvt"'
I tJ::l>-30 zn tJ::l>-3
::r::1 00 ::r::
tJ::lo :t! tJ::l
Htv 1><'t:1 H
OOf-' tv 00
t%Jf-' f-' tJ::l
Z m Z
00
:t!
tJ::l
n
o
:t!
o
00
't:1
:t!
H
Z
>-3
t%J
o
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I .
I
I
I
.
f-'
\.0
\.01
\.0 I
I
:t!1
t"'Ztvl
OOUlI
>-3:t!01
It-3WI
f-'::r::UlI
I?> 01
tvGlOI
:t!f-'I
)::l01
H I
Z I
:El I
o I
o I
o I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
tv
o
o
f-'
o
00
o
o
o
...,J
f-'
\.0
Ul
o
\.0
o
W
tv
f-'
m
~
Ul
o
Ul
Ul
o
...,J
:t!
t"'Gltv
O:t!Ul
>-3)::l0
IHW
oZ~
f-':Elo
000
0\.0
lDOO
t"'
0't:1
~~
I~
o
00
~~
t"'
o
>-3
~
o
o
W
W
Ul
...,J
tv
o
o
tv
Ul
Ul
tv
~
\.0
W
Ul
o
W
o
...,J
::r:: tJ::l 't:1
00 00 :t!
>-3 n H
't:1~lD::r::W>-3~'1:l~lD
:t!tv)::lOf-'~tJ::l:t!tv)::l
H\.O::rJCO t"'H\.O::rJ
oolDOOo t"'oolD
:t! ie:>-3 OOO:t! ie:
t"'Gl~@>-3~Zt"'Gl~
~~~>-3~~~~~~
tJ::lZ I><HH:t!tJ::lZ
:Eln oon>-3 :Eln
~OH ~Gl~OH
ZOO...,JOO )::<ZOO
ono>-3>-3Gl on.
HO:t!)::ltJ::l H
Uln otJ::l1>< Uln
UlH mtJ::l UlH
w:t! >-300 w:t!
...,J tJ::l...,J
tvZ :t! tvZ
tJ::l <: tJ::l
H
n
tJ::l
tv
o
o
f-'
o
00
o
o
o
...,J
f-'
\.0
Ul
o
\.0
o
W
tv
f-'
m
~
Ul
o
Ul
Ul
o
...,J
f-'
\.0
\.0
\.0
:t!
t"'Gltv
O:t!Ul
>-3)::l0
IHW
oZ~
o:Elo
0000
000
lDOO
t"'
0't:1
~~
I~
o
00
~C
>-3
t"'
o
>-3
~
o
o
tv
Ul
Ul
tv
~
* >-3
* SlJ
: .a
* SlJ
* '<
* CD
* 'i
tJ::l *
00 *
n *
*
't:1~~oom~Gl't:1*
:t!w >-3tvH.:t! *
HO . Ul:t!tJ::lH *
Oo~ 00, 0 *
:t! t"'~>-3:t!*
Gl~O~ n *
~~:t!S~~~~:
~HOoo<:tJ::lH~*
t%JZtJ::l H:t!>-3tJ::l*
:El't:1~t"'H)::l *
~o~ot"'nt"'~*
ZOtJ::l tJ::l)::l Z*
o Z~ *
mn 0 *
Uln WtJ::l>-3:t!Ul*
UlH f-'Z)::l>-3Ul*
w:t! ~>-3I><Glw*
...,In f-'tJ::l ~...,J*
tvt"' :t!OOGltv*
tJ::l t%JtJ::l *
o:t! *
:t!<:oo *
HtJ::l *
n:t! *
tJ::l<: *
H *
n *
tJ::l
o
o
o
00
tv
m
f-'
\.0
tv
Ul
o
~
tv
Ul
::r::
00
>-3
tv
o
o
f-'
o
00
o
o
o
...,J
f-'
\.0
I
I
UlI
01
\.01
I
01
WI
tvl
f-'
m
~
Ul
o
Ul
Ul
o
...,J
f-'
\.0
\.0
\.0
Z
SlJ
3
CD
I?>
OlD
~:t!
'-n
o
...,J>-3
'-SlJ
\.O~
00
00
'<
f-'Ul
ort
.. CD
03
o
o
o
5:
0-
'i
CD
Ul
Ul
o
...,.
Ul
rt
Z
>-3 SlJ
'- 3
n CD
00
()
::r
5:
0-
'i
CD
Ul
Ul
00
'd
f-'
t"'
CD
00 l!)
'd SlJ
tv I-'
00 ~
'd 0
W 0-
CD
00 I-'
'd CD
~ 'i
00
'd
Ul
00
'd
m
00
'd
...,J
00
'd
00
00
'd
\.0
t"'
o
>-3
I
o
o
\.0
~
CD
SlJ
'i
:t!
't:1
SlJ >-300
'i ~n
() \.00
CD 0>-3
I-' f-'>-3
t"'
'*" n
o
~
t"' >-3
CD ~
l!)
SlJ
I-'
lD
t"'
o
n
~
I
o
o
~
't:1
~
tJ::l
00
rt
SlJ
rt
~ tv
Ul
TOM VIDMAR
/4300 SALEM AVE. SO.
SAVAGE, MN. 55378
Valley Surveying Co., F? A.
SUITE 120-C, 16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL
FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372
TELEPHONE (6/2) 447 - 2570
PRIOR
~ ~l. 902.~AkE
~ ~ /3/95
. \\ ~HORcl/Nc
,.~~ \~
~~~
.~\.:.....
\ I
I
- -~
\v)
\~
-/-
\
DECK
EXIST! NG
HOUSE
)
~OO~
/~~
GARAGE
SLAB EL.
918.99
.C. EL.
919.13
918,89
x. 000
G'?-~\~'-N .
....:oo/\\~
~:p. -\~e --
~. 0 Oe
'S6~
I
,,'
7 C.'~10.'
"\,. "I'
q' 0.1
qtli- ~
t,\ ~C\..
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Lot 18, GRAINWCOD PARK, Scott County I Minnesota. Also showing all visible
improvements and encroachments onto or off from said property if any.
NOTES' Benchmark Elevation 921.39 top of the garage slab on Lot 17 on survey.
919.0 Denotes existing grade elevation
)(
C 920.6 ) Denotes proposed finished grade elevations
LEGAL BUILDING ENVELOPE
SURVEY PR EPAR ED FOR:
TOM VIDMAR
14300 SALEM AVE. SO.
SAVAGE, MN. 55378
Valley Surveying Co., F? A.
SUITE 120-C, /6670 FRANKLIN TRAIL
FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372
TELEPHONE (612) 447 - 2570
PRIOR
~ EL LAKE
I ~ /0' 902,20
~.~^.. ~ /3/95
, ,....,'. \ I, ~HORE"l/NE"
.~ \ ,
~. .. 01
"'.Do \ J>
<;l~' \~
, ~~'\\\:
~ .......- -- - - - -
"C1
1-./
\
EXISTING
HOUSE
GARAGE
SLAB EL.
910.99
.C. EL.
919.13
918/89
x', 000
G~~\~~ .
.,3 . 0.... I\~
60'O\~~ '.
,. 0 O~
'S E> <:>
I
'7 c..~"~o.
\,q' 0."
qfl+ c::
:, C\... yo
()~
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Lot 18, GRAINWOOD PARK, Scott County, Minnesota. Also showing all vis
impeovements and encroachments onto oe off feom said peopeety if any.
NOTES' Benchmark Elevation 921.39 top of the gaeage slab on Lot 17 on survey