HomeMy WebLinkAbout5D Crystal Bay PUD Amend
4646 Dakota Street S.E.
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
PLANNING REPORT
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
5D
CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF AN
AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT FINAL PLAN KNOWN AS CRYSTAL
BAY
DANETTE WALTHERS-MOORE, COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIRECTOR
_X_ YES NO-N/A
JULY 14,2008
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
PRESENTER:
INTRODUCTION:
The Crystal Bay Planned Unit Development (PUD) was approved by the City Council on
December 1, 2003. The approved PUD Plan included 24 townhouse units in 12
buildings. The proposed townhouses were a 3-story walkout, attached single family style
dwelling with an attached garage. Each of the units in these buildings included a 3-car
garage, rear yard decks, and approximately 4,610 square feet of floor area. The buildings
are 34' high at the front, with exteriors consisting of a combination of brick and stucco.
In October of 2004, the 212 Development Group and Manley Brothers Construction were
granted a minor amendment to the originally approved PUD. The proposed amendment
affected the style, size and exterior elevations of the townhouse units. The 3-story
walkout buildings were replaced with a rambler style unit, with a 3-car attached garage, a
rear yard deck and a four season porch. The exterior of the building consisted of Hardie
Board siding and shakes, rather than stucco and brick. The ground floor area of the units
remained the same, and the units fit into the existing envelope lots.
The current 212 Development Group request involves a minor amendment to allow for
the reconfiguration of eight (8) attached townhome units (totaling 16 units) to instead
allow for sixteen (16) detached single-family units. The structures, which will be slightly
reduced in size, will be located within the confines of the previously approved building
envelopes.
1:\08 files\08 pud's\crystal bay amend\pc report.doc______ 'ty f . I k
WWW.CIOpnOrae.com
Page 1
Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245
ANALYSIS:
Section 1106.607 of the Zoning Ordinance allows the City Council to approve minor
amendments to an approved PUD Plan by resolution following notification of all owners
of property within the PUD. A minor amendment includes "changes that increase
conformity with Ordinance requirements; decreases in residential density, leasable floor
area, building height, impervious surface and/or required parking provided such
decreases have a minimal impact on the overall character of the approved Final PUD
Plan as determined by the Zoning Administrator; minor building additions and floor plan
modifications that do not increase parking requirements or reduce useable open space;
and changes that are specified as minor amendments in the approved Development
Contract. "
The main issue is whether or not the proposed amendment will change the character of
the PUD. The amendment does not change the number of units or increase the ground
floor area of the buildings. The proposed amendment does decrease the amount of
impervious surface by approximately 332 square feet. It should also be noted that the
proposed single-family homes will contain the same design, color palette, materials, and
scale, with the exception of having space between the individual units. The spacing
between the proposed single-family homes will maintain a 10 foot separation.
The applicants conducted a neighborhood meeting on July 9th to discuss the proposed
changes to the PUD plan. The developer indicated that six property owners (from within
the Crystal Bay PUD) were in attendance and a variety of issues were discussed.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission must review the proposed amendment to the Final PUD and
make a recommendation to the City Council. The staff suggests the proposed amendment
is minor, and will not greatly alter the character of the PUD.
ALTERNATIVES:
1.. Recommend approval of the amendment to the PUD Final Plan.
2. Recommend denial ofthe request, based on specific findings of fact.
3. Continue this item to a date specific, and provide the developer with direction on the
issues that have been discussed.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning staff recommends Alternative 1, with the following conditions:
1. The developer shall provide a revised grading plan.
2. The developer shall submit revised impervious surface calculations and plans
reflecting the revised impervious surface totals.
1:\08 files\08 pud's\crystal bay amend\pc report.doc
Page 2
ACTION REQUIRED:
A motion and second to recommend approval of the amendment to the Final PUD Plan
for Crystal Bay with the conditions detailed in the staff report.
EXHIBITS:
1. Applicants' Narrative
2. Engineers' Letter
3. Existing Building Plans and Elevations
4. Revised Building Plans and Elevations
1:\08 files\08 pud's\crystal bay amend\pc report.doc
Page 3
June 18, 2008
\fD) If ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~
;..'\ C!"i 'UN 1 9 2008 ~
\ 'Ij ,J
!u,
"
!2Yr
. _....~ ..--
=
City of Prior Lake:
Attn: Jeff Matzke
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
Re: Crystal Bay Townhomes
Dear Mr. Matzke,
I am writing this letter to let you know our intentions for the new Crystal Bay project.
We are planning to build single family homes instead of the existing townhomes on the
site. The design for the new homes will be the same as before. We will construct the
new homes with the same building materials as well as the same color scheme to ensure
we keep the site uniform.
Sincerely,
212 Development Group ^ \\
~ ~ ~- f \.\\\J
Paul R. Mollett, Project Manager
TTO
SSOCIATES.
ENGINEERS Be LAND SURVEYORS, INC.
June 18, 2008
City of Prior Lake
Attn: Jeff Matzke
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
RE: CRYSTAL BAY TOWNHOMES
Job No. 2-08-0192
Dear Mr. Matzke:
The enclosed exhibit shows the proposed single family layout on the remainder of the
Crystal Bay Townhome development. The homes (including sidewalk and front stoop)
are 65 square feet less impervious than the twinhome square footage previously
proposed, with the exception of Lot 17. The home on Lot 17 was reduced to stay 5'
from the common, angled lot line with Lot 16. That home Is 137 square feet less
Impervious. The overall impervious area of the homes is reduced by 982 square feet
from the original approval. The overall driveway area has increased by 650 square
feet. Therefore, the overall net difference In Impervious area is 332 SQuare feet less
than what was approved with the original application.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Otto Associates
Engineers and Land Surveyors, Inc.
~):i);#e-
Cara Schwahn Otto, P.E.
encl.
cc: Tom Helland, Kllngelhutz Development
Paul Mollett, Klingelhutz Development
9 WEST DIVISION STREET - BUFFALO, MINN. 55313 - (763) 682-4727 FAX (763) 682-3522
j
'J .;~;;;~;-;;';;;s~~;;s-;;'~;;J~ I 'n
.,/ A31NV'" Ih..
J _"ft.
I
~1!.li
· .Ir~
.1@li
-,-
.;
/I
.
I
1
"
,.,~
;
9 ON'" S .LO,
S3~OHNMOl 3)1Vl HOIHd
-n
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II i
II
ll" ~y
II
III
III
II
II
II
II
II
II
11
II
-II
.~
~ ~~
:l i:~
II C~
-II ~
II -.
11
II
II
~ ~
= ex>
I!!!!l I
@ ~
;
b
~
~~
;~
_I i1
II
II
II
II
-Ll---n
I II
I II
I II
I II
I II
I II
I 1\
--f II II
I ,.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1\
II
__JI
n
,. ::
u 1\
.. ::
a 1\
I. ~t.l\
oW II
iil II
,. II
U
--1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
__111
I ,. II
I 1\
I II
1 1\
I II
I 1\
I II
I II
-r\--;-U
1\
1\
1\
II
- -IJ
I
~I
1:-
~;
;,
~
II
II
II
II
II
II ......J
II
II
::1l
c -~
Z
-I
01
I
~
~ ~ ~
.l'
~T
1 I
li I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i I
li :
I.~
~ I
liN'
X I :
· Ii I I
li R I L
~
\ I r
;. I I
li I I
; I I
. · I Ii
11 I
),.,. I
f+-ifl
i
'ii
~
~
r
~ I
L
'. '.
~(
i
~
i;
c
Z
-I
0>
~
~ .a.
liil;
l~ II
;g
~c
~~
;:<-'u-.
~
I n
I "
I ~ ~
r ,I _\.. ,ft
J~;\! _,.';~_~'~~ ... ~;~~T'
It-':: .~~i~ t:I.I!! '~ou" ~ I l~ fr
a~: ulli :~~1 )1j ~ ~ ~ I L f. ' ~
~; I u th~ :~ .-~=~ I \ I =- ,.,
-, I -.- ~i : J ~~'~ ~~lm ,... "::, ou~ ':- iir i ~
I I ~ ~ . ~ \- ~ ~;~ ,~ ~~; ~~ .___1
I ---- " _, ,
I ~~~~ ~ I'~ II" II '> I-
I --- "'=i: I II I '
I ---- i--: r iii I ~ r ..
I I ' I I I' r.-_J "" I
I L_J_...r L,_,) I -..._
~'-"I L~,-_ II
:1, i ~l~! \, t' :1111'.11\1 ~I
'-F _._.! [. J.. ~ I ..- \, I ; .... iItilI III
-.-. ,.~ .00;.. :"I *' Jal -.-. i.-.-.-.-. ~
~ f I I III " It ,UI h I
I'" I I' I" ~'iil v I t
I' : d ! _1__ ,
,IL-- --- I elM 1__
.-'.. -
,- .. .. '" ..
",,)ql{---:n I r,:;;..-;rn
I =====<.1~ ,I' t M1It'IW I I 'I
I X') ~ II t;.,. fl . I i\.tIIl I,
..... ....1 - --~EiIli U '-..,.---fl~ L ~ ",} f/1t1I ,I,
I i I ~~:~'.Jnr-;;;'--ll . ~ i + i $ :"'-Tlr--.-.-' ~
I I I --~ -~--- IL":' I I I v Ii! II
r,'---. _J l~_ ,;-'r I I Ii" '
I r In rr &'1 IT f'i! I I ~ &~
I I ~.... .'1 r.~_:lb""~;;L_______L --:!l-
I ll--' -- -It r [... ~ -If R'OlLT" -,
~ ! ~;, , :!h~~ -~~-i ~
~ : t-::c ! \ I I \ _._._._.
lIi~r m ~ 1L A i ~ ~ L
~ I u~ ! f.1 9 r;-J _ ),_ I
~: : ~!I :1.'3 i )~~ If I r ~""
~_. m : ~l ;~ii I ~ ~
., .' .. J.: ? ~I JU'a_ ~ . I '
illi-~~!L ..&<Il'IW \r- t I I I .
il~~.l _Ii U 'L J- 1 - -" ~ tI..
~... I ~'II
HW : I~
--
-
,
I r
1'1
1,1
'.'1
II M'IUS.
I I
'.!CD
....Jq..:::_ __
II 3
;~~..
-..T.....
1;1 i;rm
fi1-::.
;e~l~
~ia~~
.~IU
It
i:i(D -
I I
I ~ I
II
':1
"I
1,1
li~
.....
I
t':
I I
,I
'1
.w ~.i
I !m;~ i
ui;
t' II
..
:[ * If
Z~, II
- ' ~_~~. I I
i;,lii .~:
~ I I
~ II I
I. J::--l!
!m~~ ~ I
l~l; I 1
R~.II : .:
I I
I I
I f
I I
I I
-II
!!!J
W4'
....
....
EXISTING
.,
.....
..;..
......
~
HW
... ...
I ~
~
-'
..~
~
~
-
.:.....
.,
.....
i-.-1M4\HL
* I ~~~~~~~_C~~..~~~.~~~.~...',~
LI i!~ S II~IUI; CRYSTAL BAY TOWNHOMES
~- 2 ~ 18.' ~~ijl LOT 5 AND 6
Q Iii 15" iF ~_ :::
I)~--lrm,
I 'h ~ I/UJ!
II
t
~
~_ .-d
c
Z
-I
01
~~
~~
f=. nm----"l1]
,ll, I.'
u' ,
~ jjl 1
" 'I Ii!
hiJ'l.. I :.'
~ ~,
___________J
1;
. ,-m------l
ii~!
~i I !
1\1' !
~ i: ~ ,;:
'I ! I.'
! ! Ii!
! ! ~i
.. I
~_ _ ___mJ
~
~, - - - - - - - - i ~
A\. <~
'-V
k
c
Z
-I
0>
~~
~c~,.
~~~
:0;; <;:) "-d'
~"-I
.~
lJ ~~ nJ11I1
r.J ~l ~Il~r~ I
~
-. -
~
~
-
....
r-v I f'" -r... I ""
'V~
.
~
II ~ ~
~ ~, ~_. fA<.:
'-V
~
,~T
'4~~ I\:.\~
R~ I-d'
i'.-
~I~'
~-:;::;.
~
~v
I
I
I
I
~
. ,
-
~
I'-d ~
-
CRYSTAL SAY TOWNHOMES
:OT 5 A" ffifg @ ~ a \w (g
- D.
SI:P - 8 tW4
iiiil~~~
,
Ri
'"
i ,.
ti;: ~I
,"' j i~
I
I
~
ll'v'W.
l/lt.L
XOd
I
:;> I
cS
E:
cS I
c:)
~c
I
c:) I
~:> I
C' ~ I
I
I
~~ I'
<~
~~ I
i:~ I
~~ I
.."
,~
~~ I
-~ I
PROPOSED 1'1
~
I
I
I
r
\
--I
I
I
T-T
I I
I I
-- ,/
\
\
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
ti
w
J:
VI
fa
~o
2~
~~!
~~~
i1j~~
~~f
~~
0::'"
(,)
PROPOSED
i
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
I
/
i
:'''"' . ";,~
11
! J
-I
i
I
PROPOSEDi
F___E_<cn
': I
,~'~ ~ ~
~' ,
i :
" ;
U nn_________l
\ --- -- - - - - - - - - ~
,i I
J ,
Iii i
--------------'
I
.~
PROPO-SED
~':--.-------(
. , ,
: - ~ : :
:" ~)___m____-1"""",
I
I ~
r~ ~
I
~~
1,1
.
- .
~