HomeMy WebLinkAbout98-070 Variance - Withdrew
TO: Jenni Tovar
FROM: Bob Jader
RE: Bluff Setback V riance For 14962 Pixie Point Circle
r
! r-.." r;:-> r::::::. 0'''' -" - '-,-,
:! j\ , I~: G U::::. n \'// i ~~l r~> '
: Ilj~) (--':~- ~u~~-__,._ ! i "
i r \ I
: ;, " OCT 2 , 1998
; 1\ \
. U L: '----__._______
. -- ::,_./' ~
October 19, 1998
L
---.J
CC: Frank Boyles, Mayor and Council
I have decided to withdraw my request for a bluff setback variance. Based
upon recent experiences, it appears as though I have two reasonable
options to consider.
Option Number One. Spend additional thousands of dollars re-designing
house plans and HOPE that this new plan will meet the Planning
Commission's requirements for reasonableness and also satisfy the DNR,
whose opinion, which I believe is without legal jurisdiction and is absent
any scientific or factual data, seems to carry the greatest amount of weight.
I find it ironic that the DNR is so concerned about possible erosion that
might occur as a result of building a very reasonable structure and yet their
silence is deafening as tons of soil have eroded into Prior Lake from the
excessive wakes.
Option Number Two. Spend those additional thousands of dollars for legal
assistance to help me "RECLAIM" my property.
To-date I have spent thousands of dollars developing a conservative and
reasonable plan for a single family dwelling which I had planned to build
and to reside in. I ask, would a reasonable person invest over a half
million dollars to build a residence that he will live in, and risk this
personal investment to the possibility of erosion? My existing house which
is next to the lot I would like to build on, was built on the exact same slope
eight years ago and has experienced no problems with erosion.
The City's Planning Dept., its Planning Commission and the DNR have all
expressed opposition to my plan. The city Planning Dept. has indicated
that they will oppose anything that is outside of their interpretation of the
Bluff Ordinance and their defined Building Envelope.
I purchased this property, long before there was a bluff ordinance. The
City's position and its proposed "building envelope" are in effect, a
condemnation of my property. This is a 15,000 sq.ft. lot with 100 feet of
lakeshore, and the city has declared that only approx. 2,000 sq.ft of land
can be used to build a structure. I suppose you could argue that that only
constitutes an 85 % condemnation. Not only is the City refusing to allow
the building of a reasonable structure, but the cottage that currently exists
on the property, which recently suffered serious storm damage, cannot be
restored because of the Bluff Ordinance. What do I do to reclaim and/or
recover my six figure investment?
There has been a tremendous over-reaction to the erosion problems which
have occurred on the adjoining property. I realize and agree that there
should be concern for possible erosion. However, what I have planned to
do by building on this lot and by constructing engineering certified
landscaped retaining walls, it would actually secure the bluff and prevent
any potential erosion. It is my personal opinion that the erosion problems
which have occurred, are the result of actions or in-actions on the part of
the builder and the City of Prior Lake.
I also feel that the City's position puts my property in much greater danger
of erosion by NOT allowing me reasonable developmental access to my
property and the City must be held responsible for any and all erosion
damage which occurs in the future. It is also very unreasonable, though
somewhat amusing, for the City to force me to spend thousands of dollars
to meet and satisfy the astetic evaluations of those whose primary area of
expertise is in making and interpreting governmental ordinances.
Thank you for your time and feel free to call me if you have any questions.
RESOLUTION 99-10 PC
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR A VARIANCE
PREVIOUSLY GRANTED (RESOLUTION 98-19PC).
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment ofthe City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Robert Jader had applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit
the a lot width of 44.38 feet rather than the minimum required of 50 feet for a
substandard lot to be buildable on property located in the R-1 (Low Density
Residential) District and the SD (Shoreland Overlay) District at the following
location, to wit;
14962 Pixie Point Circle, legally described as Lot 12, First Addition to
Eastwood, Scott County, MN.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for a variance as contained in
Case #98-070 and held hearings thereon on August 10, 1998.
3. The Board of Adjustments determined the hardship criteria were met and
subsequently adopted Resolution 98-19PC granting a variance to lot width.
4. Resolution 98-19PC specifically requires the necessary permits be obtained within
one year after adoption of the resolution (August 10, 1999) or the variance will be
null and void.
5. The required and necessary permits have not been granted by the City, nor will they
be granted, prior to August 10, 1999 due to the recent bluff setback variance granted
on the same property on June 28, 1999.
6. The Planning Commission has determined an extension of the time limit is reasonable
due to the above factors to allow the variances to expire on the same date.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby approves the
following:
f: \dept\planning\98files\98var\9 8-070\extres.doc 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
..
1. A time extension to Resolution 98-l9PC to allow the applicant until June 28, 2000 to
obtain the necessary and required permits implement the variance granted.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on Jnly 12~ _
. . --r-
Anthony Stamson, Chair
eDT:
f: \dept\planning\98files\98var\98-070\extres.doc
2
r
\
"
.'
DOC. NO. 98381 FILE t ~
VOL q 5 PAGE / if st. CERT t., ~<;-
OffiCE OF THE REGI RAR OF nTLES
SCOTT COUNTY. MINNESOTA
THIS IS THE FILING INFORMATION OF THE DOCUMENT
fILEMt/H1S Of ACE ON
..Dil..O 6' 1! IS /I. ..u.
PAT BOECKMAN, REGISTRAR Of TITLES
xC?~ ~~L,t
c:iy!Jcr~- ~
File No. 98-070 Robert Jader
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)88.
COUNTY OF SCOTT )
The undersigned, duly qualified and Deputy City Clerk of the City of Prior Lake, hereby
certifies the attached hereto is a true and correct copy of the original.
Resolution 98-l9PC Variance to Lot Width
on file in the office of the City Planner, City of Prior Lake.
&-w~
Bret Woodson
Assistant City Manager
Dated this 14th day of September, 1998.
,,,\,',\\ '"
,_,~'.\:-. ~~.::\:;.:i
~'.<...:." "/
} ~~) :'(City Seal) , .
~r~\~' -~
. "'-J: ..~. ~ -,
':. \\
"2(:...,.
.,."'.':'>.....
.' , "-
\ S,,)
TRUECOPY.DOC
PAGE J
r
)
'- -
.,.
RESOLUTION 98-19PC
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A 6.92 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A LOT
WIDTH OF 44.38 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 50 FEET TO BE
BUILDABLE
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Robert Jader has applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in .order to permit
the construction of a single family residence with attached garage on property located
in the R-l (Suburban Residential) District and the SD (Shoreland Overlay) District at
the following location, to wit;
14962 Pixie Point Circle, legally described as Lot 12, First Addition to
Eastwood, Scott County, :MN. -
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for lot width variance as
contained in Case #98-070 and held hearings thereon on August 10, 1998.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property
values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is
possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variance will not
result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties,
unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, and
danger to the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort,
morals or in any other respect be contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and
Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the subject property are unique to such property,
and do not generally apply to other land in the district in which such land is located.
The unique circumstances applicable to this property include the substandard lot size
and the fact that the property was platted prior to the incorporation of the city.
1:\98files\98var\98-070\re9819pc.doc 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
t
; ~,
/
/
'...,
EXHIBIT A
CERTlF1CA TE OF SURVEY
for
BOB JADER
J28-1-98
-------,
"
\
\
\
\
\
\
\.
r- '\.- _ -; \
tr<-~ lo"b)
"."'.~ ~~~ \ \
'*' \ I.l"~ \
~e \ \
4' v,-"\ \ \
~ \ \
\ \
\ \ \
\ \
., \ \
\ J
l.--- \
\
,
\
.........'-.\
11
I I
.x
u
o
.Q
..
II>
in
,....
/
4,
.~ /
.~;; /
~ ~,if";
/
/
(
........
........
........
'" /
'" -( <.,
........ "
"" /
........ 'V',/
........ "
........ "
J\I oS ~~<'" 'V /
<;'6':/0 '"
00'0 ........
f1, '"
........ !.d> }
, ()" '"
, /""'0
'" ~
'V
--,
<(\-f-\e
J~ CJ~1-__Pixie Pain t Circle
81dg area = 2889 Sq. Ft.
Lot area = 14,924 Sq. Fl.
Coverage = 19.36'"
Scale: 1" = 30'
DESCRIPTION
I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I om a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the Lows of the State
of Minnesota.
~2~~ Reg. No. 8140
./
Lot 12
FIRST ADDITION TO EASTWOOD
Scott County, Minnesota
Assumed bearings shown
o Denotes iron monumen t
(EX~i~) ~
BRANDT ENGINEERING & SURVEYI~G [D)r@130'l!lI3I~i
1600 West 143rd Street, Suite 206 ~ JJN 30l9OO ~
Burnsville, MN 55306
(612) 435-1966 J28-1-98
Staff Reports
L:\TEMPLA TE\FILEINFO.DOC
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
SITE:
PRESENTER:
REVIEWED BY:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
PLANNING REPORT
6A
CONSIDER REQUEST TO TABLE A CONTINUED
PUBLIC HEARING FOR A LOT WIDTH VARIANCE
AND BLUFF SETBACK VARIANCE FOR ROBERT
JADER, Case File #98-070
14962 PIXIE POINT CIRCLE
JENNITOVAR,PLANNER
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
YES .lL NO
SEPTEMBER 14, 1998
On August 10, 1998 the Planning Commission heard this request for a lot width
and bluff setback variance. Upon reviewing the hardship criteria and taking
public input, the Planning Commission approved the variance to lot width.
Because the applicant was willing to modify the house layout and site plan
accordingly, the bluff setback request was continued to the September 14, 1998
meeting.
On September 2, 1998, the Planning Department received a letter from the
applicant stating he could not meet the deadline for the September 14, 1998 and
is not sure when the revised plans will be ready. We have sent the applicant a
letter extending the required 60 days decision period from September 18, 1998
to November 17, 1998. Another extension cannot be granted and the item could
be heard by the Planning Commission on September 28, October 12, October
26, or November 9, 1998. Once the revised plans are received, notices will be
mailed to all properties within 100 feet as originally notified. If revised plans are
not received, the item will be heard as originally requested on November 9,
1998. Attached is the applicant's request for tabling the item.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends tabling the item indefinitely allowing the applicant time to
revise plans. The request will be heard before the statutory 60 day deadline with
a 60 day extension.
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Table the item indefinitely. Item will be heard on or before November 9,
1998.
2. Continue the item to a specific date.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Motion and second to table the item. The item will be heard on or before
November 9, 1998 and new hearing notices will be sent.
L:\98FILES\98V AR\98-070\98070PC2.DOC
Page 2
9-02-1998 10:54AM
FROM JADERENTERPRISES 8440288
P.2
September 2, 1998
To: Ms. Jenni Tovar
From: Bob Jader
Re: Continuance Of Vatiance Request
FAX 447-4245
Please be advised that I will not be prepared to make a presentation to the
Planning Commission as was previously scheduled. J \.t this time I am not
certain when I will be prepared, however I will notify the Planning
Department when I will be prepared. I realize that th ~ requested continuance
expires with the November 17th meeting. If you nee, . additional information,
please feel free to contact me.
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
SITE:
PRESENTER:
REVIEWED BY:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
PLANNING REPORT
4A
CONSIDER A LOT WIDTH VARIANCE AND BLUFF
SETBACK VARIANCE FOR ROBERT JADER, Case
File #98-070
14962 PIXIE POINT CIRCLE
JENNITOVAR,PLANNER
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
YES .lL NO
AUGUST 10, 1998
The Planning Department received a variance application from Bob Jader who is
proposing to remove an existing structure and construct a new single family
residence on the property located at 14962 Pixie Point Circle. The lot is 44.38
feet wide at the 25 foot minimum required front yard setback. Section 5-8-12 of
the City Code requires that substandard lots have a minimum lot width of 50 feet
to be buildable. Because the City Code does not specify what measurement
distances are in, the setbacks and other numerical ordinance requirements
cannot be rounded. Thus, the existing lot width at the front yard setback is less
than 50 feet and requires a variance. The lot is located in the First Addition to
Eastwood subdivision on Prior Lake.
There is also a bluff on the property. The proposed structure is located 6.92 feet
from the top of bluff, rather than the required 57 feet. The 57 foot setback is
based on where the grade of the slope becomes less than 18%. Therefore, a
44.38 foot variance is required.
DISCUSSION:
Lot 12, First Addition to Eastwood was platted in 1954. The property is located
within the R-1 (Suburban Residential) and the SD (Shoreland Overlay) districts.
The applicant does not own either of the adjacent parcels. Lot attributes are as
follows:
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Size Requirement to Variance
be Buildable Requested
(as a substandard lot)
Area 14,924 sq. feet 7,500 sq. feet N/A
(above 904 ell
Lot Width 44.38 feet 50.00 feet 5.62 feet
(measured at setback)
OHW Width 95 feet N/A N/A
(aoorox.)
The building envelope (Exhibit B), is averaged to be 36.5 feet by 66 feet (2400
square feet). Exhibit C is the preliminary house plan of the proposed structure.
The footprint of the structure is 2891 square feet. It consists of an 891 square
foot attached garage and a 2000 square foot dwelling portion all on one level.
There is a basement indicated on the plans (stairs shown) and possible bonus
room above the garage.
Attached as Exhibit D are three surveys for permits issued with building
footprints less than 2000 square feet. All of these lots have bluffs on them. The
house with the tuck under garage has a footprint of 1264 square feet. The two
houses without the tuck under garage have footprints of 1412 square feet and
1812 square feet. In all of these cases, the required setbacks and constraints of
the lot were the primary consideration for the footprint size.
The DNR has submitted a written objection to granting of the bluff setback
variance stating the physical and visual integrity of the bluff is compromised on
the proposed location of the structure. The DNR does not object to the variance
to the lot width.
VARIANCE HARDSHIP STANDARDS
1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship
with respect to the property.
This criteria goes to whether reasonable use can be made of the property if
the Ordinance is literally enforced. The variance request to lot width is an
existing condition. There is a hardship with respect to the property because
those dimensions cannot be changed to meet the criteria of the ordinance.
The hardship related to literal enforcement of the bluff ordinance is also
dependent upon reasonable use of the property. Considering other bluff lots
have been built upon with smaller building footprints than proposed here,
reasonable use of the property can exist with a smaller house that fits the
legal building envelope.
L:\98FILES\98V AR\98-070\98-070PC.DOC
Page 2
2. Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique
to the property.
The unique circumstances are the lot width and topography. Considering lot
width is an existing condition created in 1954 and cannot be altered to meet
the ordinance requirements, hardship does exist for lot width. The lot is
unique as to topography and shape. However, a reasonable use still remains
on the property with a building envelope of approximately 2400 square feet.
3. The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and is not the
result of actions of persons presently having an interest in the property.
The lot is considered to be substandard. While the lot area is 14,924 sq. feet,
the lot width is only 44.38 feet at the required front setback. These are
conditions which have been existing since the property was platted in 1954.
The lot width is a hardship that is not the result of the applicant's actions.
The hardship, with respect to the bluff setback, is caused by the applicants
house design and four stall garage size. These are conditions of which the
applicant has control over and can modify to meet the criteria of the
ordinance.
4. The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces
substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest.
The intent of a minimum lot width of 50 feet is to allow for a structure that can
meet the required setbacks and still be of a reasonable size. Considering
there is an existing cabin on the lot and there are structures on adjacent lots
with similar lot widths, granting the lot width variance observes the spirit and
intent of the ordinance and is not contrary to the public interest. The granting
of the bluff setback variance is contrary to the intent of the bluff setback
requirement and public interest and cannot be compensated for in any other
way on this lot with other considerations or modifications.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has concluded the variance request for lot width is substantiated with
hardships pertaining to the lot that the applicant has no control over. However,
the variance request to bluff setback does not meet all four of the criteria as the
applicant has control over the house size and design and smaller foot prints
have been located on other lots with a building envelope of a smaller size.
ALTERNATIVES:
L:\98FILES\98V AR\98-070\98-070PC.DOC
Page 3
1. Adopt Resolution 98-19PC approving the variance to lot width and adopt
Resolution 98-20PC denying the bluff setback variance.
2. Table or continue discussion of the item for specific purpose.
3. Approve the variance to bluff setback because the Planning Commission
finds a demonstrated hardship under the zoning code criteria. In this case,
the Planning Commission should direct staff to prepare a resolution with
findings approving the variance request.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Motion and second adopting Resolution's 98-19PC and 98-20PC.
L:\98FI LES\98V AR\98-070\98-070PC.DOC
Page 4
/
o
:.. /
.'V
i~;; /
~ ~,{Jj
/
/
~
--....
--....
--....
/
~
i
EXHIBIT A
CERTIACA TE OF SURVEY
for
BOB JADER
J28-1-98
-------,
...
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
3r" 'L--, \
\ :b'l
'? u' ~tt<"\ lOl,\
l7 v.~ ~~~ \ \
~ \ \,~<:~ \
,/'.<6 \ \
.p v'-\ \ \
,) \ \
\ \
\ \ \
\ \
.., \ \
\ J
L-- \
\
\
\
'-----J
11
I I
-'"
u
o
.0
a;
l/)
to
r-.
~
//
1 -, / //~
~ II /''^~~
I\..../ 7i / <."'" ",<<
A ~ "'.~
'\>; / '<,'":,,,\5'
j / ,"'.>.
( )4-
" /} /')
"( ~ y
, <"
--""', )./',
--""', / '^,
--.... V',/ ~
,,' ,
,-', )
'- , /
I\t <<:..... '-,- /
<5'<. ~ 1 '- V'
'll'6',0 "
06'. "
It- --....
--.... /&.~
'- /0' ~
" /"5.<:5
--.... ~
V
c\e
G\\
'0~
<:( 0\
Bldg area = 2889 Sq. Ft.
Lot area = 14,924 Sq. Ft.
Coverage = 19.36%
<:(\-t\ e
J~'1~ L__Pixie Point Circle
Scale: 1"
30'
DESCRIPTION
I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I om 0 dul y Registered
Lond Surveyor under the Lows of the State
of Minnesota.
~~~~ Reg. No. 8140
Lot 12
FIRST ADDITION TO EASTWOOD
Scott County, Minnesota
Assumed bearings shown
o Denotes iron monument
(EX~i~~ ~
BRANDT ENGINEERING & SURVEYI~G ~rn@ O\Ylrg ~I
1600 West 143rd street, Su ite 206 ~ JllN 301998 ~
Burnsville, MN 55306
(612) 435-1966 J28-1-98
07-07-1998 03:08PM
'!-'lit~_._~_v~. .l_~~ VA..... ........v
1 612 4352929
P.01
CI~ OF PRIOR LAKE D [g@[gD \W ~ IT-I~!
Impemous Surfaee Calculations r --.--.';, I
(To be ~ubmiue4 with ~"i1dinJ pennit Appli_Oft) . I! I JUl - 9 1998 ! i!
For All Properues Located In the Shoreland Distn~!(" ). : i
The Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage Permitted f3'O ........__._J:../ i
---...--. I
Property Address ( ~q b '- ? b( \ 6 'Pc? IN T ~ H'2..c..L..'-
LotArea J~, qZ~ Sq.Feet x 3OV~ s.............. it ~." )'Q- f!r.
..........*......**.....................................................
LENGTH
WIDTH
SQ. FEET
x
x
x
...
HOUSE
""
ATtACHED GARAGE
::
TOTAL PRINCI1'LE STRUCTt]RE.......... .......... 'Z ~ 9 ~
......
14CJ
DETACHED BLDGS
((jaragelSbed)
x
x
-
'tOTAL DETACHED BUlLDINGS-a'_........ 92f:)
x
x
x
""
DFJVEW A YfPA YED AREAS
(Drtvcway.~vec1 or not)
(SicicwalkIParking Areas)
at
;=
TOTAL P A YED AREA5.-.......-......-.-...-
x
X
!!II
PATIOSIPORCHES/DECKS
(Open DeckS Yo" min. openklf ~
IJoIrds. with. pel'\'icIuS surfKe below.
..1Ia& c~ 10 be illl~iaus)
""
x
""
TOTAL DECKS..---.....-----
CJh
~
.
OTHER
x
""
x
...
TOTAL OTBER...........-
",... IIH_ 1J .....,.
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
~VER
Prepared By f2-'4Y B R.. M})"\
Company~ 15Nt I ~()ilY.
j-~/U
, S 63 t
Date 7 J'VL'( J,)99
Phone # ~J 1']56
TOTAl P. 01
EXHIBIT B
LEGAL BUILDING ENVELOPE
APPROXIMATELY
2400. SQUARE FEET
/
-------,
\
J. / // 1 1 \
-jo\ro /;;?~ I I -'" \
+~,o'j, /////~*~ ] \
/ / / / 1/. /1/.%I/; ...,
b</: / :&,!/%~! :i
/~ /'0',e~/ ~ \
/ ,4{-6~~2/"~/ t.^i~Q \
/ ///(~~h~~ ~~/// ~~
/ / //~?J//. ~ / /' -:/- '\3\"\)
/ //-'(9'p~;t~~W--0 -,\o<?o< \
/,//".tl//:~~:~///~,?/// / -t- r '- .. \
0d/d f/?;/~/:/.;;/-/////: %::/./....-;: ~ ~ _.1 - \ ~
'%.?~~J'~ //~f2m/' ~~.\ .\ l'-'l't\i
~ ~';(// / / //"-'"'/ J , '? or \3tr(,'r \
~~1f:;/ ,/ r J ~ / / ~U'.~ ~~i \ \
-:/~// /~,/ ./// ~ \ ~~f \
/ Ii' r./ " ./ 0\; \ \
I / 1/\5/// /. /' /\ \
I / ''YJ~y/./ ./ ,/'/ v'-\ \ \
/1 ---, //7; //.v \
'I L.... //././,......./ . ~ \ \
\ 1/ /'"" / //,....... ~~ \ \
I\...../ It' / ,<-1-- "."'", / \ \ \
6' ,~~ \ \
.:{;' '/ ,?- t5' .., \ \
7 /,~ \
( > ~ L-- J \
"" I '> A.
""( / <) \
, <..
""', Y', \
"" " // '^, \
"" V"y '(
"" ' " ----- --J
", :;
" , /
1-- "''''~ ' /
S<'~l" V
11'6'_ 0 "
0<9. ""
~ "" <v
.
"" I~.~
" 10' !O
" It/).o
"" <V>
'V ~
I
<v
.r& /
.ti;; I
~~cb"/
/
/
~
""
""
""
II
'0~
~O\
Bldg area = 2889 Sq. Ft.
Lot area = 14,924 Sq. Ft.
Coverage = 19.36%
''0
~ \'1--\
J~<t~ L__Pixie Point Circle
Scale: 1"
30'
DESCRIPTION
I hereby certify that this survey, plan. or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I om 0 duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the Lows of the State
of Minnesota.
~2~~ Reg. No. 8140
Lot 12
FIRST ADDITION TO EASTWOOD
Scott County, Minnesota
Assumed bearings shown
o Denotes iron monument
(EX~i~) ~pos~
BRANDT ENGINEERING & SURVEYING ~r~~O\Yl~llffi
1600 West 143rd Street, Su ite 206 ~ JUN 30 I9!ll ~
Burnsville, MN 55306
(612) 435-1966 J28-1-98
r-~-.---_....~- ~ /--:JC~::= '~'--,.~-.- '.
- -.
-- ".
. .,~- "
-" ..., ;
;-...~,,-
~
Il
\-l.
JJ
o
I-
-
m
-
::I:
X
W
'1
'I ,
i L\..J
\~__ul
.Q
t
~
I
J
q
,
8
--
J I
I
I
~.. ~
I
~
'S"
i.
~
1
~
"
~
/ :~-- I
/ . !
i
~I
- --=t --...t
, I
I :
~:ljt- - - i
.t.
1ll
J:
D"
,
F1
~
-::s:
o
CJ
/
I
/
/
J
/
1
1
i
/
!
;
/
. -"
---
'~
,....'t:""f; ....,
. ,.-. - ..,.... ,~ ',- ;.,...... .;
'._,~JA~{~~~F
.. :.......,;.~.~.:.~..
.:~~..__~".; .-:''' ..-s~ .
",f,~X ..... _~4 .
'.'L,;.(i~~~". ..
. f.;t$.,. :~;'...;;~::~' "'~'
~.
","
/
J
-
~
~
1-
o
-1)
1
\
i
I
<\
..
1\
: \
; !
I
i
\
'IJ
"'10":.':-'~.;.
,.........
-
,
m
...]~:':
.. ;;'fi ~
.M ..
C
I-
-
m
-
J:
><
w
I-
W
W
u..
CJ
(/)
lll:t
CD
C\I
~
~
OVOOr
.
...'"
;
~~
c
o
.~
,v
III
t)
o
...-I
I-
Z
-
a:
a.
~
o
o
u..
,
/ .',\ ...... 'i~
! t : I: f -........'-.......7 ~
:' ~.. I ~ ............ ,v
, III" I .,.9
:::>: 4 ~
ol". 0 _ .
o ~ '~r--
~ ~ · ~O"\
~ ~i / ~~
v ~..
g . D'V 0 >.
Q " III \.I
' 0 ~ III
~. ~ ~ < 2
::~j~~ ~~~
o~Q. ~ l,v\;.l
"?-~.... ! g-o
~-~ / < ~ ~
!:j ',"~: ~ .. \1~ C III
.. C~~"" ;: C '0
. ~i .....:- Eo ~ '!l
"('4' '" ,;; N
~ '" ,v
· 5 m
o.~
o~
tl.'g
.o'~
.0. III
(/j,v
III
mill
~Ill
C5 Q)
III
:l
o 0
~ r.il.c
1-1 "
~ '0_
..... N: :,,~
---B_N~_~
~ .g~ ~
o ....:l
j'lJ
CJ
~
r......
'J
t""l,J
~o 'Os _~
3.oQt>s -S:l1v
?? 101 Jo ~ IOIOJiJo
II ~IIMJV
/
/
,
G)
~
3
It>
-0\
.
o
N,
ON
O\N
. ,
..Jt-
W
.-
.
0..
Q1
.c
,v
\;.I.
o
C")
N
,v
o
...-I
5
..0
III
...-I
It.:
Q1
01
III
\.I
III
0"'
0'1
,..
.::i
,v
III
..-j
X
Q1
5
.~
,v
III
Q1 ., ~
.c ...-I'
,v Q)
Q)
'0
III
\.I
0'1
0'1
C
.~
,v
III
.~
X
Q)
II)
Q1
,v
o
C
Q1
o
\;.I
o
0.
B
Ui
co
Ll'l
C"')
0'\
8
.-/
,v
III
:>
Q1
...-I
r:a
.!II:
!.I
III
.E
t)
C
Q1
c::l
I.D
~
1.0 It
C"')
0'\
-~
D.'"
>,
\
I
\
\
.
.
\
\
,
.
\
\
,
'~ '
I
I
\
\
I
\
,
1--
h
l'1i i
Z
III .... J>
::; ~
,.,
III
III
a
I
I
~
:ll
-<
EXHIBIT D
NORTHWOOD ROAD I
~
,
l
~ )
G\
P
~
P
G\
'"
-----
-.(,
y,
:::
,
HOUSE FOOTPRINT
1052 sa FEET
,
"
t> "'"
G~ "
CII. .
:. . fi--
jlw,
:n .
... ,
:ll '
! :
. .
r
/
/
%
o
<:
VI
'"
r'
GARAGE FOOT PRINT
"
~
760 sa FEET
PER . ~.... ; O"'lI..K LINE
. CITy OF PRI
" PL4N1:!.ING DEPr OR lAKE
......-..
-------------~---------------~
.. ~...
.... _..' ,,,'
r 0 (") z -. -'.
. -1!lD..o..._..
-.--.--~ R ~ ~ --"-f-'
-------~--- 935 _
;Eo -. ::tlo__u__n__h.
_.._---.....- - ....-
::tl < ." _"_. _.n.
--.--!!:'-~---------n----1-.. - - ...n__ ...--..-......-..~ 6
-::_::-_:::::_::_:~::::--IIT - :::: ,---- -~C=:::- _:-:~-~::~~~::-
----------------~- -','....., ~
'"
.....-
~~ n .'
..--""
--..-
...-.....
-......-....
"''''''-..
...........
- '- ct. of 15 ft. Sanitary
Sewer Easement
VI
B
i:
%
-:--..........
............ -----------..,
'. - =::
---.---.>-----
r
--..-...._.l;. ---.
--- 930 _
-......
-.....-....-......
-..... ..
....-..
'.
TOP OF BLUFF PE R
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
PLANNING DEPT
PER PlAT
-
~...._-_..
.. -----..-- :-=:::~~
r" r_ ," "'~1
. .
t
,.
T
I
.1
L' (
.
I.
---.- " ...1
r~""~"'-""--"-'C "r
I .
. .
! 1...
f
t--." -..
;
-"".~
L
~
o
~ v\
~\-;
,~
~
/"
,-"
{)
: ,-' l'l
....... t .... ('l
/". r ..'----'"
.:::,,~'~j.!!.(k,
- / .):~~'"
J " . 81 UFF - , "., .,', ;
,.' PlANN,~&Tg~~ ~ \""-- " 0 ~
\. . """ "'filE AS ESrABl~ " ~
..- at CI
. ..' ,,~: ", \.. ......... Tt OF ~~OR 'lAI<tJ
r \.. 0,6" O. ,. ~
b"- ,q,
\l}' 9tO --.--
.-....:.._,..~.,...:.:.:, 'P~ ......._i~___ ._..S~iti~ _....,_~-~.
._._" ~ .- .?.'1 rtf-, .._..~..- .... ~/f.
..... '~i{"~c0J:~~0~E;(j~.j':!ifir:,,
fIt,
9-1, . ._ ." .. ..., -..-- . "tl, .
iLl
(11 ~
. "". fI~
"....... ll6
U6 ....
^~_.......'..._._.~~~.:.:.-__. ~. .,1" 910':
~." ovo .- ::-:~~----- -f.
. ,06 .
". I
I
,
I
-".1.
: ('
:"
:"
0/ ~
". 0
<-~ U)
",' '"
~
-...." !<.-
"<..J
<.
.
.
~
,
..?-....,
,. 7"--'.\1L .
04'
.h"49.93.
,._........~.
(;)
.~ X>
j~ :tJ
.. t>
r11 C'l
rT1
~~::c::-~~ i
r ----r---~
s
~..
.R
'0
!'"
!:;,
:Ib
.: ,g
" '1l
\l
., ~ ~
I_~, 0 0
~ c. \l
III 0 ..
l'l \I)
l'l
0
. h(b~
..' ~'./r''''
9.16 ..-- '.~, .~. .
H. .\[6 ...... (::V
o . " o.
J y. . . ,fb
. "'., !,b
, , " 6 --"
. .: /O,,-b. .. ....
/,.' '--... btb .
/ . ...", ~~~
~tb
~!,b
,t
,t
l~
/,
. 0
Cl
. ....._~_.....
:,
.. ,[~
6 ........... ..."..,,--
.",b
~ ,b
.. ...' "q..b
..' ~,
.::::::.:::::::(, b
.................1.. .6 "."
,..~~~. 'Jt66 :...
,.". """ .~.~.:. -
"'''
EXHIBIT D
.. t!
\, ~
'. 8
~ :
.
..
::
QUAKER TRAIL
i
.
.
..
..0
~,..
I
i
I
---,-----1
..:..:.__i4J_.,....4__-,.__
.,
t.)
t;]
'll
~
'1l
N 1lI
. t.)
'b
()
~ I~,
:: )..;
..
,
Vl
."
olD ,~:)
~
..
C:,
'h
".tl
C:l
hl
1
\ HOUSE FOOTPRINT
,'-.,\
. <:~
" \;:
'"
836 sa FEET
:::,::~!:'( ?Or~1 dt~ not il\elv~~)
,':' " "'"' ;:: rt,
,','., .....;. rTj
t~";/' ~
"'I .
;,./ ;:;" en \
f ~-~- -h-7---.--r-
') el g
.f i ~
i: 0"
,I: !" ITI
o
r~: .
-,
~
.-
.f'_t
t~ -
'J ,..,1
I If
~'J
lfl >)
'.1 . .
..
,~
"
~
--,
'-<
<:
c.'\
ATTACHED GARAGE
FOOTPRINT -.
,.-.-'
/t .
.~.//
576 sa FEET
'/c."b'
.::t..iI- ,~
."::'\ q-.;.
~ , f,
(Jb'
: ~ (.
()ff.
.-.' Qtf:
6lfl _.~. IJf
,~ to
. 909
,
-~ ....~...~.~.~.. .!.
907
RESOLUTION 98-19PC
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A 6.92 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A LOT
WIDTH OF 44.38 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 50 FEET TO BE
BUILDABLE
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Robert Jader has applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit
the construction of a single family residence with attached garage on property located
in the R-1 (Suburban Residential) District and the SD (Shoreland Overlay) District at
the following location, to wit;
14962 Pixie Point Circle, legally described as Lot 12, First Addition to
Eastwood, Scott County, MN.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for lot width variance as
contained in Case #98-070 and held hearings thereon on August 10, 1998.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property
values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is
possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variance will not
result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties,
unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, and
danger to the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort,
morals or in any other respect be contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and
Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the subject property are unique to such property,
and do not generally apply to other land in the district in which such land is located.
The unique circumstances applicable to this property include the substandard lot size
and the fact that the property was platted prior to the incorporation of the city.
1:\98files\98var\98-070\re9819pc.doc 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
6. The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. The variance will not serve merely as a
convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship.
7. The applicant has met all of the conditions of Section 5-8-12 (j) for development on a
substandard lot.
8. The DNR does not object to the lot width variance.
9. The contents of Planning Case 98-070 are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case. Pursuant to Section 5-6-8 of the
Ordinance Code the variance will be deemed to be abandoned, and thus will be null
and void one (1) year from the date of approval if the holder of the variance has failed
to obtain any necessary, required or appropriate permits for the completion of
contemplated improvements including a future structure.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby grants and
approves the following variance, as shown in attached Exhibit A (survey);
1. A 6.92 foot variance to permit a lot width of 44.38 feet instead of the required 50 feet
to be buildable.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on August 10, 1998.
Anthony Stamson, Chair
ATTEST:
Donald R. Rye, Planning Director
I:\98files\98var\98-070\re981 9pc.doc
2
RESOLUTION 98-20PC
A RESOLUTION DENYING 44.38 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT SETBACK
FROM TOP OF BLUFF OF 6.92 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 57 FEET.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Robert Jader has applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit
the construction of a single family residence with attached garage on property located
in the R-1 (Suburban Residential) District and the SD (Shoreland Overlay) District at
the following location, to wit;
14962 Pixie Point Circle, legally described as Lot 12, First Addition to
Eastwood, Scott County, MN.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as contained in
Case #98-070 and held hearings thereon on August 10, 1998.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property
values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is
possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variance will not
result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties,
unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, and
danger to the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort,
morals or in any other respect be contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and
Comprehensive Plan.
5. The legal building envelope for the lot is approximately 2400 square feet. The
applicant has control over the house design and shape, such that the hardship created
has been created by the applicant. Reasonable use of the property exists within the
2400 square foot legal building envelope.
6. While there is a bluff on the lot, there is no justifiable hardship caused by the bluff as
reasonable use ofthe property exists without the granting ofthe variance.
1:\98files\98var\98-070\re9820pc.doc 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
7. The granting of the variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. The variance will not serve merely as a
convenience to the applicant, and is not necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship.
The factors listed above allow for an alternative structure and garage to be permitted
without the variance.
8. The DNR has submitted a written objection to this request, stating the visual and
physical integrity ofthe bluff would be compromised if the variance is granted.
9. The contents of Planning Case 98-070 are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby denies the
following variances, as shown in attached Exhibit A (survey) for future single family
dwelling and detached garage;
1. A 44.38 foot variance to permit setback from top of bluff of 6.92 feet instead of the
required 57 foot setback.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on August 10, 1998.
Anthony Stamson, Chair
ATTEST:
Donald R. Rye, Planning Director
1:\98files\98var\98-070\re982Opc.doc
2
SENT BY: DNR METRO;
8 - 5 - 98 8 : 11 ;
6127727573 =>
6124474245;
#1/1
Minnesota Departn1ent of Natural Resources
Metro Waters - 1200 WamerRoad. St. Paul, MN 55106-6793
Telephone: (612) 772-7910 Fax: (612) 772-7977
Augultl 4, 1 998
Ms. Jane KllI1siLT
Planning Coordinator
City of Prior l.alce
If>200 Eagle Creek Avenue. SE
Prior l.lIke. Minne."IC)U! 55372-t714
KH: lADHRLOTWID1HANDBLUFF SETBACK VARIANCJJAl)PLICATlON, 14962 PIXIR "OIN"J' ClKCLl::,PRlOR
T.AKE
Deal' Ms. KlIllliicr:
1 have revic:wc:d Ihc malL.'fials you submit1ed to me with respect tu lhc tot width IUld bluff setback variance rcquc!ll. fTQn1 Bob Jadt.."C
at 14%2 Pixie Point Circle. Pleasc consiw..T the following comments 111 the AUg1J.,t J O. 1998 Planning commission hearing.
Earlier this year, and on numel"OlL'I nccllllinns last yeM. DNR staff have visited the adjlWel1t plU'CCl (Lot J 3) to deal with a bluff
failure To date, the n::sIOl'8tiun wurk has not }'lit been Cll.'lI11pIeted. 'I1M: blink. above elevation 904', is very StL",-1' in this IlCCIl of Prior
Lake. The intent of the shorcland regulations relltricting d.isturbllna: of soil and vegetation on and near bluns. as well L~ bluff
lIetbF.1Cks for SlJ'ucturcs, i:t to protect both the;; visual alld phy.i~1I1 attributes of these fragile topu~:nlphic rcalurc..'l.
T looked closely qt the swvey which WiUI inclwkd with your mailing. J strongly encourage the city to CiU'efuUy conllidcr the request
betOl'e than. While the DNR is not opposed to Ihe lot width valiance, nor to the redevelopment of the lot, we do nut suppurt thc
blulI'sctbld:; V!UilUKle request as proposed. More c&refill considerahun of the lot constraintA could be wnsiden:d in the design of
~ structure. DNR ra:ummends the blu1f Sitbacl.:: be datigd, IU'ld the applicant redesign the proposed home to more closely comply
wlth existmg bluff setback requirements. I would be more lIupp~lJ1ive of a structure which is lid. b~k an addilionall 5 to 20 falt
from the bluft'Than is currently depided on the survey. PUlISiblc waYlllo lMXOffiplish this might inch. downsizing the home and/or
garage, cooonfiguring any deck or porch. or conllidL.,;ng . house style which minimizC8 the building foolprint while maximizing
u!leahle living an:a (a 2-sby, b exlll'l1plc). I .Jltn suggest the city cccWl.k't, if NlI:eIWUY. a front yard llClback varillll~ which would
allow encroachment of a W'W.111.lrC clOKr to Pixie Point Circle than is normally allowed,
In the intere81 ofavoiding potential future prublc:ms with slope failure, and in the spirit of the intcllt ofth"" soon::llilllJ rnlll1agcmcm
program, T>NR ~s denial of t.he bl\lJf llClba\.lk varianC4: as proposed, but does not opposc the llflProval of the 101 witllh
variance. It appellI'll the impc;rviuult :NCfacc coverllgt;\ and sidey8.l'd sctback can be met,
Thank you for considerin" these DNR reenmmendations. J1' you have any questions. pl.:ase call me at 772~ 7910.
SinceJ'c::Jy,
'-"':"1 . I .... .- ,
I... ( \1 "1 1 ....-1""''1 j
\ ).~;,~. \l:~:.' 'J-/\~~.--- -"....
Patrick ;. Lync:J{ii? \
, \
Mea I Iydrologi!'lf""',)
P"R loll"",,"ali(,": ()12-2'lo-t>IS7. I..~()O }t.t, hOOO - TTY: (d' :>ll(, ''-IN-l. 1-)0\011.(>.'" .I').~,l
..\ 11 F'IU:ll ()Plh~I''':lIillr. 1'11l1~lu. ~'I
\~'I\I\ V:Plh~.. 1J1\ ,'NII\
ft. Prlllh'..1 ~\lllh~,,::\'kd j1.II\~'1 ('\.llI.lj,IIf~I~.l
'-.I '.Il:I:III~m.. 1)1 10', Ill'''! (',111'0111111,'1 \V.l"!~'
08/04/98 TUE 15:29 FAX 612 452 5550
CAMPBELL
August 4,1998
From: Donald E. Johnson
14966 Pixie Point C.ircle
Prior Lake Mn. 55372
To; Prior Lake Pla~ning CommiQsion
~egarding ; Variance request for Lot 12 First Addition To
Eastwood.
I am applaud the Prior Lake ~lanning C
consider a variance of SO.OB foot setba
the bluff for th.is lot, this property m
the definition of a Bluff as noted i~ t
98-01.
I oppose this request for a 50.08 foo~
following reasons,
iss.i.on "'auld
k from th.e 'top of
ets all criteria of
e Bluff Ordinance
ariance for the
1. Lot 12 First Addition To Eastwood 11I'0 ld have amp.le space
to construct a home using the pres en 18.. slope seCback
wi thout undue hardship wi th respect 0 the property.
2. Si~ce the home construction on lot 1 First Addition To
Eastwood major slope failure has occ rred on lot 13 and
lot 14 in 1997 also slope failgre oc urred on lot 13 and
lo't 12 in 1998, This variance would nly augment the
instability of this bluff and could ause more slope
fai.lure. THIS BLUFF ORDIANCE CLEARLY DEFINES THE BLUFF
SETBACK AND SHOULD BE ADHERED TO.
3. By granting this variance it could c use future slope
~ailure that would cause undue hards ip to other homes
built on this b~uff.
I reel this variance should not be gran ed for lot 12 and I
also feel very strongly that all new ho e construction on
this bluff should be denied until the c use of the slope
fail ure :in 1997 and 1998 hat> been defin d and repaired
Sincerely
.. ~~
141 003
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 10, 1998
1. Call to Order:
The August 10, 1998, Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Vice Chair
V onhof at 6:33 p.m. Those present were Commissioners Cramer, Criego and V onhof,
Planning Director Don Rye, Planner Jenni Tovar and Recording Secretary Connie
Carlson.
2. Roll Call:
Vonhof
Kuykendall
Criego
Cramer
Stamson
Present
Absent
Present
Present
Absent
3. Approval of Minutes:
The Minutes from the July 27, 1998 Planning Commission meeting were approved as
presented.
4. Public Hearings:
A. Case #98-070 Consider a lot width variance and bluff setback variance for
Robert Jader, 14962 Pixie Point Circle.
Vice Chair V onhof read the public hearing statement.
Planner Jenni Tovar presented the Planning Report dated August 10, 1998 on file in the
office of the City Planner.
Staff concluded the variance request for lot width is substantiated with hardships
pertaining to the lot the applicant has no control over. However, the variance request to
bluff setback does not meet all four of the criteria as the applicant has control over the
house size and design and smaller foot prints have been located on other lots with a
building envelope of a smaller size.
The DNR submitted a written objection to granting the bluff setback variance stating the
physical and visual integrity of the bluff is compromised on the proposed location of the
structure. The DNR does not object to the variance to the lot width.
1:\98files\98plcomrn\pcmin\rrm081098.doc
Questions from the Commissioners:
Cramer: Were the existing structures built before the Bluff Setback Ordinance was in
effect? Tovar responded they were. The Ordinance went into effect in December of
1995.
Comments from the public:
Bob Jader, 14960 Pixie Point Circle, said he resides in the adjacent 6,000 square foot
home which he hopes to sell and build a smaller home on this lot. He has been informed
this is a two step process, first, receive the variance to build, then go through the building
pennit process. Many other items must be satisfied to get the permit, soil borings,
engineering certified landscaping plan, erosion control, etc. He purchased the property
long before the BlufIOrdinance. Mr. Jader feels his proposed home is well within the
impervious surface requirements and fits in with the surrounding environment and
structures. However, with the erosion on his neighbor's property it is not a good time to
be requesting a variance.
Mr. Jader is working with Mr. Harte and a number of engineers to make sure there will be
no slope erosion. He feels what he is proposing is reasonable. Mr. Jader stated ifhe can
satisfy the Commissioners that what he is doing is reasonable, then satisfy the City he
does not know how the variance can be denied. Mr. Jader went on to say literal
enforcement of this ordinance would result in a very significant financial loss. Mr. Jader
presented a letter to the Commissioners from an architect indicating what kind of
structure could be built in the building envelop. Mr. Jader feels he is taking all the
necessary steps to meet the requirements of the City. Mr. lader presented pictures of his
current landscaping which has the exact same topography as the proposed building site.
Mr. Jader plans to do the same landscaping on the proposed property.
Mr. Jader is planning to provide significant precautions to avoid erosion. He will
guarantee there will not be any erosion. Mr. Jader pointed out other lakeshore lots that he
feels are not comparable to his property. He feels the plan presented is reasonable.
Commissioner Criego asked Mr. Jader if he considered a multi-level home, and ifhe did,
why-not select it. Mr. Jader said they wanted one floor living. The reason for the height
is because of the surrounding structures, and he doesn't want it to look like an outhouse.
Criego pointed out the architect (in his letter) indicated there was not enough square
footage, but if a multi-level building was constructed there would be enough square
footage. Mr. Jader responded they did not discuss multi-levels.
Donald Johnson, 14966 Pixie Point Circle, opposed this structure in his letter dated
August 4, 1998. He is the neighbor, along with Mr. Harte, who had slope failure. There
is a law suit against the City for the failure on his property. (There is no law suit at this
time.) He feels the City should not waste anymore taxpayer's money dealing with slope
failure.
1:\98files\98plc:omm\pcmin\mn081098.doc
2
Elizabeth Jader, 14960 Pixie Point Circle, owner of property, gave a brief history of the
property. She pointed out regulations have changed drastically in 1998. This property
will be their retirement home. Mrs. Jader feels they are the enemy invading their own
property. Now she has to deal with strangers to make decisions that will affect her life.
They have invested a lot of money and time in this process.
Marv Mirsch, 15432 Red Oaks, (seasonal home) wanted to remind the Commissioners
the Bluff Ordinance was to protect bluff lands, erosion, strength and appearance. There is
no doubt there is erosion. The City of Prior Lake has a no-fail procedure. He feels the
Bluff Ordinance is for appearance only. Mirsch went on to explain the DNR bluff
interpretation.
Brunette Johnson, 14966 Pixie Point Circle, said she lives in a small home on the bluff.
The bluffhas not moved in 50 years with all the rain and storms. She feels Mother
Nature was taken away when Mr. Jader sold the property, removed 100 trees and all the
natural vegetation. If there was a bluff ordinance in place earlier, the bluff would not
have failed and they would have their hill. She asked the Commissioners not to pass the
variance.
Michael Harte, 14964 Pixie Point Circle, has the home with all the damage on the slope.
He believes if the engineering is done correctly the damage will be rectified. He is
working with Mr. Jader. Mr. Harte feels Jader's proposal is not unreasonable. Harte
asked the Commissioners to consider the proposal.
Commissioner Criego questioned Mr. Harte on why his bluff restoration proposal was
rejected by the City. Mr. Harte explained the time line and variance process.
Bob Jader stated he feels sorry for Johnsons and Hartes. What he is proposing will not
affect the Iohnsons and will protect the lakefront.
The public hearing was closed at 7:26 p.m.
Comments from Commissionen:
Criego:
. There are two views: I) to build on a substandard lot; and 2) to protect the slope.
. The DNR opinion is trying to demonstrate a little flexibility so all parties are
satisfied. Mr. Lynch shows some leniency toward the applicant. In his letter he
basically states he does not like where it is but given an additional 15 or 20 feet, it
may be suitable. He could have said "I disagree completely and follow the
ordinance." The Planning Department has to enforce the Ordinance. It is up to the
Planning Commission and City Council to vary from the ordinance.
. Mr. Jader has to understand what he is doing impacts other people.
. Question to Mr. Jader - The garage is very large, if a two car garage was proposed
instead of a four car garage, would you be able to move the building back? Mr. Jader
1:\98files\98plcomm\pcmin\nm081098.doc
3
did not feel it had an impact because of what he is going to do to the bluff. He is right
up to the setbacks.
. Question to Staff - What is the process to ensure a stronger blufl? Rye said there is
limited ability to move dirt and all the vegetation on a bluff under the current
ordinance. The basic presumption of the Bluff Ordinance is any kind of development
activity, construction or landscaping will be held to the absolute minimum. That's
the point the ordinance takes. If anyone wants to do something different there is the
option of a variance or applying to have the code amended.
. Applicant has done wonders on his current home. The fact is the City is trying to
protect the bluff. The City is being sued for bluff failure at this time.
. Moving the house back to the footprint proposed by the staff, in his opinion would
put it in a tunnel. The applicant needs to build closer to the bluff but not where the
applicant proposes.
. The DNR tells us they do not want any destruction of the bluff or shoreline.
. Propose an alternative to what the applicant requested.
Cramer:
. The lot width variance is not a problem, there is a definite hardship.
. Explained the hardship criteria.
. The initial bluff ordinance was far more stringent than it is now. This new ordinance
is more lenient to build closer to the bluff. Everyone has a different opinion on how
close is right.
. The DNR has commented on this proposal, they are not happy with this proposal
whether it is a personal opinion or not.
. The building envelope still makes reasonable use of the lot. There are a lot of issues
with the bluff failure.
. Cannot support the bluff setback variance.
. Agreed with Criego if the setbacks were further back he would look at this again.
V onhof:
. With regard to applicant's comments and inaccurate information from staff, staffhas
always made an effort to do the right thing.
. The Planning Commissioners are part of the community, not part of the staff. The
Commissioners have an interest in this community.
. He has seen applicant's property. The ]aders have a nice home and have done a nice
job with it. However, the Harte property had slope failure and has really come into
question.
. Under the variance process we consider the four hardship criteria. Agreed with
Cramer's comments to the lot width.
. The variance to the bluff setback are not met in this case. Especially when there is a
2,000 to 2,400 square foot foot print.
. There are buildable alternatives.
. Cannot support the variance.
1:\98ti1cs\98plcomm\pcmin\mn081098.doc
4
Open Discussion/Comments:
Criego: This issue is whether the building envelope is big enough. Would like to offer a
compromise and give a variance based on the DNR's recommendation. The DNR is
super conservative but they are willing to go a few extra feet. There is a hardship. They
would have to put up a 2 or 3 story building.
Cramer: Agreed with Criego in one respect, there could be some leniency with the lake
setback because of the other houses. Would be willing to consider.
Vonhof: Stand with previous statement. There has been a bluff failure adjacent to this
property. The adjacent homes are multi-level. Anyone story house is going to look
small against a two or three story house. No testimony has been given to alter me from
our ordinance.
Cramer: Cannot picture the building envelope tonight without the proper information.
This property is buildable. Suggested to continue and have applicant check into going
back at least 20 feet.
Cramer and V onhof explained there are two other commissioners not present who mayor
may not have different views.
Bob Jader responded he would like to continue to next month.
MOTION BY CRAMER, SECOND BY CRIEGO, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 98-
19PC GRANTING A 6.92 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A LOT WIDTH OF 44.38
FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED SO FEET TO BE BUILDABLE.
Vote taken signified ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
Commissioner V onhof opened the public hearing.
MOTION BY CRAMER, SECOND BY CRIEGO, TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC
HEARING CONSIDERING A BLUFF SETBACK FOR ROBERT JADER (CASE FILE
#98-070) TO SEPTEMBER 14,1998.
Vote taken signified ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
5. Old Business: None
6. New Business: None
1:\98files\98plcomm\pcmin\rnn081098.doc
s
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
SITE:
PRESENTER:
REVIEWED BY:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
PLANNING REPORT
SA
CONSIDER REQUEST BY ROBERT JADER FOR TIME
EXTENSION FOR A VARIANCE PREVIOUSLY
GRANTED, Case File #98-070
14962 PIXIE POINT CIRCLE
JENNITOVAR,PLANNER
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
YES l NO
JULY 12, 1999
On August 10, 1998 the Planning Commission heard this request for a lot width
and bluff setback variance. Upon reviewing the hardship criteria and taking
public input, the Planning Commission approved the variance to lot width
(Resolution 98-19PC). This variance will expire on August 10, 1999.
On June 28, 1999, the Planning Commission approved a resolution to the top of
bluff setback for the same lot (Resolution 99-09PC). Mr. Jader has requested an
extension of the time limit for Resolution 98-19PC in order to submit a building
permit compliant with both resolutions. He is requesting a proposed extension to
June 28, 2000 to be consistent with the expiration of Resolution 99-07PC.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission has typically granted 90 day extensions in similar
requests. In this case, a 90 day extension would give the applicant until
November 10, 1999, to obtain a building permit. The building permit is valid for
180 days.
Staff recommends approval of a 90 day extension to November 10, 1999.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Grant an extension as requested.
2. Deny the extension as requested.
3. Continue the item and provide staff with specific direction.
1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
ACTION REQUIRED:
Motion and second to adopt Resolution 99-10PC, granting a 90 day extension of
time to a variance previously granted.
L:\98FI LES\98V AR\98-070\98070PC3.DOC
Page 2
Correspondence
L:\TEMPLA TE\FILEINFO.DOC
....+ ~., ._"-'-"'--'--~ ~,"':':'-,_.."".:.~,':_-~. -,,-'.
6-28-1999 12:35PM
FROM ~ADERENTERPRISES 8440402
P. 1
J~~
5001 W. 80th Street, Suite 730 · Bloomington, MN 55437 · 61Z-844-Q402
June 28, 1999
FAX 447-4245
Ms. Jenni Tovar
Planner
Prior Lake
Dear Jenni:
J have reviewed the information you provided regarding my valiance request
and I find Resolution 99-09PC satisfactory. I believe that.J can work with
this variance and build a structure which will meet the expectations of all
affected parties. If you, or the Plannmg Commission have any questions,
please teel free to let me know.
Also, I would request that the variance that I was given last August, I believe
it was Resolution 98-19PC approving a lot width variance. be extended to
correspond to the approved bluff setback most recently approved. Please let
me know if there is any problem.
I want to thank you and the Planning Commission for the time and
understanding that I have been given.
Serving The Sa{twQ.l'e lndustry
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE 16200 EAGLE CIU;EK AVENUE SE, PRIORLAKE, MN55372
Date; ~1ILN1 z." .5e;
Number of pages including coJer sheet; .fu
To:
Pat Lynch
From:
Connie Carlson
Division of Waters
Planning Dept.
City of Prior Lake
Phone: 77 2...7 91 0
Faxphone;772....7977
CC:
Phone:
Fax phone:
(612)447-4230
(612)447-4245
REMARKS: 0 Urgent 0 For your review 0 Reply ASAP 0 Please COID1llent
~:, .1?&/P~~~__
l.p'~l .lJe,r.eVv<~~~Y'~~
~-d wtU ~*&~ l~fz--
~rtWJ:fLft~~~
~. ~ l~i~~U~'
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E.
Prior Lake, MN 55372
FAX # 447-4245 - TELEPHONE # (612) 447-4230
FAX COVER SHEET
lo.--a t -CJ!
TO: sUe-~ fka-
. FROM: J,nf7A -rDIIClf-
SUBJECT: Jdia.y VCVr\ ~
DATE:
TIME:
/ : )~\
FAX#:
~tJ .
MESSAGE:
FYI:-
Number of Pages Sent (Including This Page):
3.
"
.
"'''',..'
TO: Jenni Tovar
FROM: Bob Jader
RE: Bluff Setback V riance For 14962 Pixie Point Circle
I~I~ ~ ~ 0 WI ~!rm!
/1:\\ I OCT 2 I ~8 ,ill
,UUt 'i'//
I _.1 L/
L
October 19, 1998
CC: Frank Boyles, Mayor and Council
I have decided to withdraw my request for a bluff setback variance. Based
upon recent experiences, it appears as though I have two reasonable
options to consider.
Option Number One. Spend additional thousands of dollars re-designing
house plans and HOPE that this new plan will meet the Planning
Commission's requirements for reasonableness and also satisfy the DNR,
whose opinion, which I believe is without legal jurisdiction and is absent
any scientific or factual data, seems to carry the greatest amount of weight.
I find it ironic that the DNR is so concerned about possible erosion that
might occur as a result of building a very reasonable structure and yet their
silence is deafening as tons of soil have eroded into Prior Lake from the
excessive wakes.
Option Number Two. Spend those additional thousands of dollars for legal
assistance to help me "RECLAIM" my property.
To-date I have spent thousands of dollars developing a conservative and
reasonable plan for a single family dwelling which I had planned to build
and to reside in. I ask, would a reasonable person invest over a half
million dollars to build a residence that he will live in, and risk this
personal investment to the possibility of erosion? My existing house which
is next to the lot I would like to build on, was built on the exact same slope
eight years ago and has experienced no problems with erosion.
The City's Planning Dept., its Planning Commission and the DNR have all
expressed opposition to my plan. The city Planning Dept. has indicated
that they will oppose anything that is outside of their interpretation of the
Bluff Ordinance and their defined Building Envelope.
I purchased this property, long before there was a bluff ordinance. The
City's position and its proposed "building envelope" are in effect, a
condemnation of my property. This is a 15,000 sq.ft. lot with 100 feet of
lakeshore, and the city has declared that only approx. 2,000 sq.ft of land
can be used to build a structure. I suppose you could argue that that only
constitutes an 85 % condemnation. Not only is the City refusing to allow
the building of a reasonable structure, but the cottage that currently exists
on the property, which recently suffered serious storm damage, cannot be
restored because of the Bluff Ordinance. What do I do to reclaim and/or
recover my six figure investment?
There has been a tremendous over-reaction to the erosion problems which
have occurred on the adjoining property. I realize and agree that there
should be concern for possible erosion. However, what I have planned to
do by building on this lot and by constructing engineering certified
landscaped retaining walls, it would actually secure the bluff and prevent
any potential erosion. It is my personal opinion that the erosion problems
which have occurred, are the result of actions or in-actions on the part of
the builder and the City of Prior Lake.
I also feel that the City's position puts my property in much greater danger
of erosion by NOT allowing me reasonable developmental access to my
property and the City must be held responsible for any and all erosion
damage which occurs in the future. It is also very unreasonable, though
somewhat amusing, for the City to force me to spend thousands of dollars
to meet and satisfy the astetic evaluations of those whose primary area of
expertise is in making and interpreting governmental ordinances.
Thank you for your time and feel free to call me if you have any questions.
o 16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E.
) Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714
ADDRESS CORRECTION REQUESTED
j
I
______"""'--0--"''''"'''''"-- ~
'~~C~~. . /;11,
"Q.!;.-~ ~ " A r i:\'lt
0::- .oW 1-,~, ". .PBSl. \/L-tfl
Q - r"i,(;":'il I
~oe' .. - '" 10:___ 1'1
_...."..~,If i.. i~=- - -3 ~ :~l
~.flI.fLM .i
~VfIN~ 6055il5 j..,
1
.If
JEFFREY W. SHEA
14958 PIXIE POINT CIR SE
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
.15q~ ~a O~/O.1/~~ ,-
dHEAq~e ~S~7~~0.12 -
RETURN TO SENDER
SHEA
~55a EDMUND BLVD
M~NNEAPOL~S MN Ss~ob-aq~3
'S'!!.~"?~-~~;g-h;Ph
'$$ 'a "? '\\o~'~"f!
-;:,".0. /
~24$~)7~44
A. THOMSEN
14968 PIXIE POINT CIRCLE
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372
'fHOMQb8 SS.::I7c:'!30.1a .1Q~7 aa 08/0.1 /q8
RETURN TO SENDER
THOMSON
ae.1.1 SUNSET BLVD
MINNEAPOL~S MN SS~.1b-~a~a
j
A
f
.",.l
ROBERT & CAROL M. PETERSON
378 GULF PINES DR.
PORT ST. JOE,FL 32456
P~f~~70 T~~~~~O~Q7 ~~90 10 08/07/90
RETURN TO SENDER
PETERSON
TEMPORAR~LY AWAY
RETURN TO SENDER
,11...1'11..."111'1.11.. .'1'111111.11......1""111111.1"111
FILE COpy
October 19, 1998
Bob Jader
14960 Pixie Point Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Variance Hearing
Dear Mr. Jader:
On September 14, 1998 the Planning Commission tabled your request to allow for
revision of your proposed site and house plans. Due to statutory timelines on variance
requests, a decision must be reached by the City regarding your application prior to
November 17, 1998. At this time, we have scheduled your item for the November 9,
1998 Plannil)g Commission. Please submit your revised plans and survey by October
30, 1998.
Should you need more time you have two options. You can formally withdraw your
variance request in writing and re-apply in the future. In this case your filing fee will not
be refunded or waived upon a future submittal. Your other option is to waive the City's
statutory requirement to make a decision on your application within 60 days. In this
case, you must sign and return the attached waiver.
You must submit your revised survey and plans, letter of withdrawal, or signed waiver by
October 30, 1998. If we do not receive a response from you, we must proceed to
present your request to the Planning Commission based on the information we have. If
you have any questions about this matter, please contact me at 447-4230.
Sincerely,
()Jf'&A~
~~ Tovar
Planner
enclosure: Waiver
1:\98files\98var\98-070\remdrltr.doc
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
,
WAIVER OF 120 DAYS
MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 15.99, A COPY OF wmCH IS ATTACHED,
REQUIRES THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE ("CITY") TO APPROVE OR DENY A ZONING
RELATED APPLICATION WITHIN 60 DAYS OF RECEIVING A COMPLETED
APPLICATION. THE CITY MAY EXTEND THE TIMELINE BEFORE THE END OF THE
60-DA Y PERIOD BY PROVIDING YOU WRITTEN NOTICE.
THE CITY RECEIVED YOUR APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE AND
DETERMINED IT WAS COMPLETE ON 7/20/98 . ON 8/19/98 .
THE CITY PROVIDED YOU WITH WRITTEN NOTICE THAT IT WAS EXTENDING THE
TIMELINE FOR REVIEW AN ADDmONAL 60 DAYS UNTIL 11/17/98
BY LAW, ANY EXTENSION BEYOND 11/17/98 . MUST BE
APPROVED BY THE APPLICANT. YOU HAVE REQUESTED/AGREED TO AN
EXTENSION BEYOND 11/17/98 . THE REASON FOR THE EXTENSION IS AS
FOLLOWS:
BY SIGNING THIS WAIVER YOU ACKNOWLEDGE:
A) RECEIVING A COpy OF MINNESOTA STATUTE SECTION 15.99;
B) THAT YOU WERE ADVISED THAT THIS WAIVER AFFECTS YOUR
PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THAT YOU MAY WANT TO REVIEW IT WITH
AN ATTORNEY;
C) YOU HAVE AGREED TO THE EXTENSION;
D) YOU WAIVE ALL RIGHTS UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTE SECTION
15.99.
SIGNATURE OF THE APPLICANT:
PRINT NAME OF THE APPLICANT:
DATE:
l:\deptwork\waiver.doc
Article 18
DEADLINE FOR AGENCY ACTION
Section 1. (15.99) (TIME DEADLINE FOR AGENCY ACTION.)
Subdivision 1. (DEFINITION.) For purposes of this section, "agency" means a department, agency, board,
commission, or other group in the executive branch of state government; a statutory of home rule charter city,
county, town, or school district; any metropolitan agency or regional entity; and any other political subdivision of
the state.
Subdivision 2. (DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE.) Except as otherwise provided in this section and
notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, an agency must approve or deny within 60 days a written request
relating to zoning, septic systems, or expansion of the metropolitan urban service area for a permit, license, or
other governmental approval of an action. Failure of an agency to deny a request within 60 days is approval of the
request. If an agency denies the request, it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time that it denies
the request.
Subdivision 3. (APPLICATION, EXTENSIONS.) (a) The time limit in subdivision 2 begins upon the
agency's receipt of a written request containing all information required by law or by a previously adopted rule,
ordinance, or policy of the agency. If an agency receives a written request that does not contain all required
information, the 60-day limit starts over if the agency sends notice within ten business days of receipt of the
request telling the requester what information is missing.
(b) If an action relating to zoning, septic systems, or expansion of the metropolitan urban service area requires
the approval of more than one state agency in the executive branch, the 60-day period in subdivision 2 begins to
run for all executive branch agencies on the day a request containing all required information is received by one
state agency. The agency receiving the request must forward copies to other state agencies whose approval is
required.
(c) An agency response meets the 60-day time limit if the agency can document that the response was sent
within 60 days of receipt of the written request.
(d) The time limit in subdivision 2 is extended if a state statute, federal law, or court order requires a process to
occur before the agency acts on the request, and the time periods prescribed in the state statute, federal law, or
court order make it impossible to act on the request within 60 days. In cases described in this paragraph, the
deadline is extended to 60 days after completion of the last process required in the applicable statute, law, or order.
Final approval of an agency receiving a request is not considered a process for purposes of this paragraph.
(e) The time limit in subdivision 2 is extended if; (1) a request submitted to a state agency requires prior
approval of a federal agency; or (2) an application submitted to a city, county, town, school district, metropolitan
or regional entity, or other political subdivision requires prior approval of a state or federal agency. In cases
described in this paragraph, the deadline for agency action is extended to 60 days after the required prior approval
is granted.
(f) An agency may extend the timeline under this subdivision before the end of the initial60-day period by
providing written notice of the extension to the applicant. The notification must state the reasons for the extension
and its anticipated length, which may not exceed 60 days unless approved by the applicant.
Section 2. (EFFECTIVE DATE.)
Section 1 is effective July 1, 1995, and applies to any written request submitted after that date.
l:\deptwork\waiver.doc
FilE COpy
tq?t /1
Mafeh 24, 1998
Bob Jader
14960 Pixie Point Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Recording of Approved Variance
Dear Bob:
The purpose of this letter is to advise you the resolution approving a lot width
variance on property located at Lot 12, Pixie Point Circle must be recorded within
60 days of approval or the variance will be null and void per Section 5-6-6 of City
Code.
Enclosed are two certified copies of the original and a copy for yourself. One of
the copies is to be recorded at the Scott County Recorders office by October 9,
1998. The other copy is to be stamped as recorded by the recorders office and
returned to the Planning Department as proof of recording.
If you have any questions about this matter, please contact me at 447-4230.
I~:::t. 1 jpv'C<.A-.J
~;er T ar
Planner
16200 E!~!H~I~~~&p7~~~~HtS'fLake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
9-02-1998 10:54AM FROM JADERENTERPRISES 8440288
P.1
1'.
.
\.
JADER
ENTERPRISES
Dab::
?
2-
Number of if
FAX
To:
,11\'JIFA/~~" 7?Jt//!..,.e:
From: BOB lADD
Phooc:
FaxphoDe; ~9'?-7'~o/',
cc:
Phone:
612 8~4 0402
Fax pbouc: .. . 612-344-00288
REMARltS:
o Urgcm /~- For )'OQE" review 0 Reply AS, ~
o Plc:ase commCDt
aA~~ '
Pk~~' t I! /h"-e L:zel~ flit S
;s Of'~ d r ( . P r) tfv\. rn ,? e-I ~// ;;
) h ,Id . ----zff. c_ ,
~7~'7 ..'
J IY/. /L
/
,/
-.
/'
,j/
9-02-1998 10:54AM
FROM JADERENTERPRISES 8440288
P.2
.
.. 1
.;
September 2. 1998
To: Ms. .Tenni. Tovar
From: Bob Jader
Re: Continuance Of Variance Request
FAX 447-4245
Please be advised that I will not be prepared to make a presentation to the
Plarming Commission as was previously scheduled. J \.t this time I am not
certain. when I will be prepared, however I will notify the Planning
Department when I will be prepared. I realize that tb ~ requested continuance
expires with the November 17th meeting. If you nee(. additional infonnation,
please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
FilE COpy
August 19, 1998
Bob Jader
14960 Pixie Point Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Extension of Sixty Review Period for Variance Requests
Dear Mr. Jader:
The City of Prior Lake received your variance application on May 29, 1998. The
application was incomplete as submitted. The additional information was submitted, and
the application was completed on July 20, 1998. The purpose of this letter is to advise
you the 60 day deadline for City of Prior Lake action on your variance requests has
been extended an additional 60 days from September 18, 1998, to November 17, 1998.
The reason for the additional 60 day extension is to due to the Planning Commission's
request to continue this item until the September 14, 1998, Planning Commission
meeting.
You must submit your revised survey and plans by September 3, 1998 to remain on the
September 14, 1998 agenda. If you cannot make this deadline, please let me know and
a continuation will be requested. If you have any questions about this matter, please
contact me at 447-4230.
SinCerelY" J
~'Iv1t1 ~{?(jJ
nni Tovar
anner
1:\9Bfjl~\98yar\98-07j)\6.0daYlet.dQc
16200 Eagle creek Ave. ~.J::., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Metro Waters - 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106-6793
Telephone: (612) 772-7910 Fax: (612) 772-7977
August 4, 1998
Ms. Jane Kansier
Planning Coordinator
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue, SE
Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714
l~l
100-6181
. .
~
RE: JADERLOT WIDTIIAND BLUFF SETBACK V.L\..lll^.NCE ..o\PPLICATION, 14962 PLXIE POINT CIRCLE, PRIOR
LAKE
Dear Ms. Kansier:
I have reviewed the materials you submitted to me with respect to the lot width and bluff setback variance request from Bob Jader
at 14962 Pixie Point Circle. Please consider the following comments at the August 10, 1998 Planning Commission hearing.
Earlier this year, and on numerous occasions last year, DNR staffhave visited the adjacent parcel (Lot 13) to deal with a bluff
failure. To date, the restoration work has not yet been completed. The bank, above elevation 904', is very steep in this area of Prior
Lake. The intent of the shoreland regulations restricting disturbance of soil and vegetation on and near bluffs, as well as bluff
setbacks for structures, is to protect both the visual and physical attributes of these fragile topographic features.
I looked closely at the survey which was included with your mailing. I strongly encourage the city to carefully consider the request
before them. While the DNR is not opposed to the lot width variance, nor to the redevelopment of the lot, we do not support the
bluff setbaclc variance request as proposed. More careful consideration of the lot constraints could be considered in the design of
the structure. DNR recommends the bluff setback be denied, and the applicant redesign the proposed home to more closely comply
with existing bluff setback requirements. I would be more supportive of a structure which is set back an additional 15 to 20 feet
from the blufftban is currently depicted on the survey. Possible ways to accomplish this might include downsizing the home and/or
garage, reconfiguring any deck or porch, or considering a house style which minimizes the building footprint while maximizing
useable living area (a 2-stoIy, fa- example). I also suggest the city consider, if necessary, a front yard setback variance which would
allow encroachment of a structure closer to Pixie Point Circle than is normally allowed.
In the interest of avoiding potential future problems with slope failure, and in the spirit of the intent of the shoreland management
program, DNR recommends denial of the bluff setback variance as proposed, but does not oppose the approval of the lot width
variance. It appears the impervious surface coverage and sideyard setback can be met.
Thank you for considering these DNR recommendations. !fyou have any questions, please call me at 772-7910.
Sincerely,
~V~~~
Patrick J. Lync(m\
Area Hydrologist"'-J
DNR Information: 612-296-6157,1-800-766-6000 . TTY: 612-296-5484,1-800-657-3929
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Who Values Diversity
ft Printed on Recycled Paper Containing J
'-41 Minimum of lOCk Post-Consumer Waste
August 4, 1998
.;~ r;::;:-r-=:1 0-;::-;; '.;~1::"::
::":!~ 1-:L5 111'li
I ~
L
From: Donald E. Johnson
14966 Pixie Point Circle
Prior Lake MN. 55372
To: Prior Lake Planning Commission
Regarding: Variance request for lot 12 First Addition to
Eastwood.
I am amazed that the Prior Lake Planning Commission would
consider a variance of 50.08 foot setback from the top of
the bluff for this lot. This property meets all criteria of
the definition of a Bluff as noted in the Bluff Ordinance
98-01.
I oppose this request for a 50.08 foot variance for the
following reasons.
1. Lot 12 First Addition to Eastwood would have ample space
to construct a home using the present 18% slope setback
without undue hardship with respect to the property.
2. Since the home construction on lot 13 First Addition to
Eastwood, major slope failure has occurred on lot 13 and
lot 14 in 1997, also slope failure occurred on lot 13
and lot 12 in 1998. This variance would only augment the
instability of this bluff and could cause more slope
failure. THIS BLUFF ORDIANCE CLEARLY DEFINES THE BLUFF
SETBACK AND SHOULD BE ADHERED TO.
3. By granting this variance it could cause future slope
failure that would cause undue hardship to other homes
built on this bluff.
I feel this variance should not be granted for lot 12 and I
also feel very strongly that all new home construction on
this bluff should be denied until the cause of the slope
p~;97~ bas been defined and repaired.
Sincerely '~
Cc: Timothy J. Dwyer, Attorney At Law
Susan Lea Pace, Prior Lake City Attorney
08/04/98 Tlffi 15:29 FAX 612 452 5550
CAMPBELL
III 001
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
Attl)rneys ~l( Law
Thl1l11n.~.I. Camphdl
Rogel' N. Knllmm
Thomas M. Scott
Janll::~ R. WQbton
EHiou B. Knetsch
S\I~san Ll.:\'I Pace
(612) 452~5000
Fax (612) 452-5550
Joel J. Jamnik
AnJn::1 Mt.:Dowdll'oehlt:r
Marthe\\' K. Bmkl*
John F. Kc:l1r
Ma[thew). Foli
M:.lrjiluerite M. McCarn,ll1
O(,:~lrllt: T. Stt:phcnsoll
.,-4./)11 1i..-I'n(~.'J in \t.i."~1ll~"1I1
FAX COVER SHEET
ore.","",..!,
G.lry G. FUL:h~
NAME:
NAME:
PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGElS) TO:
t!onn/~ &rl>on
JU1ny 70vw
NAME:
NAME:
SENDER: SL ~c.~
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES:
TRANSMISSION STARTED: Date
if-l/ /'i (
FAX NO. (612) 452-5550
(INCLUDING COVER PAGE)
Time '3: 40
KdLo
IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CALL
AT (612) 452-5000.
RE:
'COMMENTS:
o ORIGINAL TO FOLLOW BY MAIL.
Mance OF CONFlDENTlALIlY
The IrlfCll'mllti,m con~.ined in and tr811&mlnad with this facsimile Is;
'. SUBJECT TO THE ATTOANEY.CLlENT PRIVilEGE:
2. ATTORNEY WORK PRODUr;:T; OR
3. CONFIDENTIAL.
It is intended only far the individual or entity dil&ignated .balfe. You arc: hereby notifilld that IiIny diueminatlon. diliUibutlon. copVlng or usa
of or r.liance upon the inforlTlllltion contllinlld in or tra",mitted with this rlC$imile by or to anyone other than the recipililnt designated ebove
by the sendar i, u"'8uthorized and striCtly prahlblted. If you "ave received this faclilmlle in errQr, plllase notify CAMPBELL KNUTSON BY
TELEPHONE A.T 16121 452-5000 IMMEDIATELY. Any facsimileerroneouslyl:ransmitted to you should be ImmadiEltelv returned to the sender
by U.S. Mllil or. if authorintion is granted by..nd.r. destroyed.
Suire 317 · Eagandale Office Center · 1.380 Corporate Center Curve · Eagan, MN .55121
08/04/98 TIm 15:29 FAX 612 452 5550
CAMPBELL
141 002
~~
cr~ 11futVt-
FAX From
Donald E.John
Da t e ./:Jt,ft "IIY ~,~
Fax To : 5~t/} ~,J L(-! 2. ?r.J .c-
Fax Number 6-/.). 4/":;...2 - 5"5"0
Number of Pages in luding
cover pa ge .5
Su s ~~ Wfu,0 'foe.( r u,'v< -rh,J
F'Cl;< P&~~ cdrL
. / ,. 'vn (, -/-'/' if:T w.p /' /I'ft-or 140 ~J t? f-
./ L 2-"J
2 2.2. - 7 Y't:,
/0 ~'jc.,wJf'ffilj /'s
08/04/98 TUE 15:29 FAX 612 452 5550
CAMPBELL
August 4,1998
From; Donald E. Johnson
14966 Pixie Point Circle
Prior Lake Mn. 5~372
To; Prior Lake Planning CommiBsion
~egaIding ; Variance request for Lot 12 First Addition To
Eastwood.
I am applaud the Prior Lake ~ldnning Co
consider a variance of 50.08 foot setba
the bluff for this lot, this property m
the defini tioh of a Bluff as noted in t
98-01.
I oppose this request for a 50.08 root
following reasons,
ission would
k from the top of
ets all criteria of
e Sluff Ordinance
ariance for the
1. Lot 12 First Addi tlon To East.wood wold have ample space
to construct a home using the presen 18-1' slope se'Cback
without undue hardship with respect 0 the property_
2. Since the home construction on lot 1 First Addition To
Eastwood major slope failure has ace Ired on lot 13 and
lot 14 in 1997 also slope failure oc urred on lot 13 and
lot 22 in 1998, This variance would nly augment the
instability of this blufr and could ause more slope
.t'ai.luIfl. THIS BLUFF ORDIANCE CLEARLY DEFINES THE BLUFF
SETBACK AND SHOULD BE ADHERED TO.
3. By granting this variance it COUld c use future slope
failure ~hat would cause undue bards ip to ocher homes
built on ~bis b1.uff.
I reel this variance should not be gran ed for lot 12 and I
also feel very strongly that all new ho e cons~ruction on
this bluff should be denied until the c use of the slope
failure In 1997 and 1998 hat;; been defin d and repa.ired
Sincerely
, I........
laJ 003
08/04/98 !tIE 15:30 FAX 612 452 5550
CAMPBELL
141 004
NOTICE OF HEARING TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOW NG VARIANCES:
A 5.62 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A 44.38 DOT LOT WIDTH AT
THE FRONT YARD SETBACK INSTEAD OF Jj E REQUIRED 50 FEET;
AND
A SO.OB FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A SE1i CK FROM THE TOP
OF BLUFF OF 8.92 FEET RATHER THAN TH EQUIRED 18" SLOPE
SETBACK OF 57 FEET
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FUTURE SINGLE MIL Y DWELLING ON
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE R-1 (URBAN RESIDE TIAL) DISTRICT AND
THE SD (SHORELINE OVERLAY) DISTRICT IDENTI ED AS 14962 PIXIE
POINT CIRCLE.
You are hereby notified that the Prior Lake Plannin Commi5sion will hold a
hearing at Prior Lake Fire Station #1 j located at 16 76 Fish Point Road SE
(Southwest of the intersection of C.R. 21 and Fish Pint Road), on: Monday.
August 10.1998. at 6:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter $ possible.
APPLICANT: Bob Jader
14960 Pixie Point Circle
Prior lake, MN 55372
PROPERTY Same
OWNER:
SUBJECT SITE: 14962 Pixie Point Circle, legally scribed as Lot 12, First
Addition to Eastwood, Scott Count, MN.
REQUEST: The applicant is intending to rem va the existing structure
and build a single family house w attached garage, The
proposed house will meet all othe setbacks and impervious
surface coverage. The existing I t of record is 44,38 feel
wide at the front yard setback ra er than the required 50
feet The lot consists of 14,924 s usre feet. The proposed
house is to be located 6.92 feet ~ m the top of bluff rather
than the required 57 foot setba determined where the
slope beComes les5 than 18 perce t from the top of bluff.
J '\ARFll F~\ARVAR\!:tR.nA~\9R-093PN.DOC
,l.
08/04/98 TilE 15:30 FAX 612 452 5550
CAMPBELL
The Planning Commission will review the proposed c struction and requested
variances with respect to the follbY/ing criteria found in t e Zoning Ordinance.
1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinilnce would resu in undue hardship
with respect to the property.
2. Such unnecessary hardship results because of rcumstances unique
to the property.
3. The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ord ance and Is not the
result of actions of persons presenUy having an nterest in the property.
4. The variance observes the spirit and intent of thl Ordinance, produces
substantial justice and is not eontrarY to the pu ic interest.
If you are interested in this issue. you should attend the hearing. Questions
related to this hearing should be directed to the Prior L ke Planning Department
by calling 447-4230 between the hours of 8:00 a.m and 4:30 p_m. Monday
through Friday. The Planning CommIssion w/IJ a ept oral and/or written
comments. Oral or written comments should rela to how the proposed
construction and requested variances are or are not nsistent with the above-
listed criteria.
Prior Lake Planning Commission
Date Mailed: July 30. 1998.
I .\a"l=lI 5:~\aA\lAQ\~A.nj:l~\AA..nA:,tPN_DOC
.. -.,
I4J 005
2
612 452 5550
TUE 15: 30 FAX
08/04/98
/
:v /
~ /
'/
"
'"
"-
IgJ 006
CAMPBELL
CERllFlCA TE OF S
for
BOB JADE
JLO~ I-~
...
.~
.0' ,'0
.:? 0".
~ '"
~
--,
~.
\ "
\
~ \
~ \
u
III \
u,
r-. \
\
,.. "- - ..., \ ~
- J i L"','\;
~~'r \
..'Do.\.. S~ \
~ "\ ~<-f \ \
Jr.e \; \
,(''v-~I \ \
\ \
~ \
\ \ \
\ \ \
~ J
\ - \
L.-
\
\
\
1
I
l ",1 Q
~
9\.. \)
-1~
I
"-
"
"-
'-
/ "
/8.~
10. If
/fij~
~
.0'-
-\
July 28, 1998 11:04AM
From: T Feehan
Fax #: 612-494-3661
Page 2 of 3
A NON-REGISTERED
PROFESSIONAL HOME
DESIGN SERVICE
/
July 27,1998
Dear Mr. Jader:
Upon your request, I have reviewed the information provided with respect your property
defined as Lot 12, First Addition to Eastwood, in the City of Prior Lake.
The City defined building envelope, which is in accordance with the Prior Lake Bluff Setback
ordinance restricts construction beyond the 946 contour thereby limiting the building
envelope to a maximum of approximately 2,075.00 square feet. When you account for the
shape of the building area which narrows to only 20 feet in width at the street side of the
property and the fact that you obviously would not construct a dwelling with such an irregular
shape, you would be left with about 1,500.00 square feet of building square footage. I would
then subtract from that figure 0 minimum of 650 square feet for garage space which gives
you 0 balance of 850.00 square feet of main level living space.
It is my Professional opinion that it would be inadvisable to try to design such 0 .Post Cord"
type structure for this site as defined. The limited main level living space is highly restrictive
and the massing of such 0 small structure would have 0 negative visual impact tending to give
the dwelling the appearance of on outbuilding to one of the surrounding homes.
Sincerely,
Tom Feehan
Feehan's Residential Architecture
l
~
,.j
o
-
'/J
~
"
E"'-o
o
0\
+
v
o
C\
M
.....
0\
r---.
.....
0\
00
N
0\
0'\
M
C\
~
o
C\
v
o
C\
t"-oo
.....
0"
00
M
C\
0"
M
C\
.....
V
0\
~
C\
.....
V
0.
to"d
179tEt68Zt9
UO+^~l dZO:170 86-17t-ln~
/
/
/
"
tjutj \JAUc.t<
, ,;..
.(), ,10
-:? () 1),'
~ "
<v
11
I I
~
o
o
.a
+'
Q)
(I)
lo
,.....
l~1~
~~
~ \.. \)
O~
-,\0 Y
~ .J
1~
I
/
L..... ct/ /' V'- A. .
\ <\' / ,>' y "'",
",./ :;"' <:: <... ,....,.}''''6'
Ii) " "~'>"
~. / > 4-
7 () /')
/ y
<. <-
" )-.-^"
'" / '^"
""./ <
-../'v "
" ;>
"" /
"" " " /
l' ~~~ 'v
s<. ~lO "" / ~
~Q ~ .
(9.... 1.0 ~
If- ~ <:5.
"" , O' ~
<tj .~
"""" /~
'V ~
"" "" /
""(
.'"
""
""
""
G\\
- 2889 Sq. Ft.
Bldg area --14,924 Sq. Ft.
Lot area -=- 19.36%
Coverage -
~
0\0
<(
<{\-+-\ e
7-24-1998 1: 17PM
FROM JADERENTERPRISES 8440288
P. 1
. '
JADER
ENTERPRISES
Dare: -1.' z. f..' ,
Number of pc gcs iDCludiDg cover $bcet: :;2..-
FAX
To:
~#/I/X 77f V /f/C
From: BOil .JADER.
,
..'
Pboae::
Fax pbr;me:
CC:
'-1117- 7'2 '1~
PhoIIe: 61~
flu phoae: '6J2...844-0288
REMA.lt.KS: 0 Urgc:ar.
o For )'OUI rmew 0 Reply AS ~ 0 Pleast: commeDt
5$#VI: ~tA J;:nI~~ c~ f')AI 71>'.3:>. S:~t./lS'r; 11-
~ U;7 U. ;I:'/I/ €r- 6///(/tSl.rVto€ :'S':l;?he /:J1l /~ A--T q if 1.(4 TIA.
OTHete SI4Rt/E r J N~rE7J ON 0!AN1;, 164 IVd1A'-~
, /
]);vorC4-re It gtt.u)J:J:rVG- pM!)-6tO/,L ~
1fT 9r, r jJtb;1S8 C?4Pr:r
, /"" )
~2'
5/'
7-24-1998 1: 18PM
FROM JADERENTERPRISES 8440288
P.2
. ..
~ L)7h
~~1- 9
-eet
l.v
:-
,~
I'). ^:>
.'.1 0)
0) -.
"v<t/
~
1
I La t-
11
s
"'"
.............
.............
"
"
.............
.............
e,J u.pf Se.~c.k.. {S'(il c;{erh1 i~d a.s
~ s' from fttJ DF o.lvff or
\b17o wnie,h(.~". i'S~-kr.
"
~. ,..~
~ f1.-/~1 ' \
I '0' I '>
(~ I ... ,
'- / 6e" -
'~-
J5-211-94
(f:,~~~.-y~
f'o/{. S'llJ~,",->f-_
1(!"('7 - ;1.,'70
f f_Sirl"bacK- Bf\ v:.tl
. \dl f'J
fyJ\ t
S;dr.iQ.ttl- &fb
~ 0'" !lid'
10' CAe ~;
..-- -SO' 0 f+ W SLi
\ r:L~~"~
. \---- 30" W'JAA ~
~(
-
I. -,~.
JUL 20 '98 10:04AM HUEMOELLER & BATES
, P.1/2
FAX TRANSMISSION
HUEMOELLER & BATES
166'70 F"RANI<LJN Tl'll'llL
FRIOR l.AJ(~, MN 5537 e
(612) 447-2131
F.....: (6 I ~I 447-5628
To:
Jenny - City of Prior Lake
Date:
July 20, 1998
lof2
Fax#:
447-4245
Pages:
From:
Julie Deutsch, secy.
Robert J ader
Subject:
I CONFIDENTiALITY NOTICE; The do/:ummt{.l') at.'cOll1patlying this/ax cantain co~/ide"liCJ.I inji.mnacioll which is legally
privilege(I. n,e i,!lol1rlQci()Tl i.f i/lttnJed (J/I~Y for dIe use (1' thl illtended redp;ent. ({,vou Ufe /1m rllt' imended redpitml,
you (lfe hereb,v hocified tlll;lc 1;1/'1)' disc/osul'/!, (,"()p.vlng, Jil;tribwion or tl,,' laking oj' an.V tJ.C:lion in rl!/iant:e OIL the t:/lntefl'S
0/ the cell!'t.'fJpieJ injonl'lQtion exc/!pl iLl" diret." delivery I/) Ihe illtended ret:ipielJ/ 1UJmed (lbo,'e is slrid~y pf/JhiMllfd. If
yol(. havl! rt!Cf!ivt!J /',if lILt in emJr, pJlfase na/lf.v us immedi(,Jle~v hy 'elephant! 10 arrange JiJr relurn of ,he oriRiIJal
do(;ul7Ulnts Iv U.\".
COMMENTS:
Enclosed for your information is a copy of the receipt I received last Friday for
payment of lhe state deed tax when I recorded Mr. lader's warranty deed for LOt 12,
First Additioll to Eastwood, with the Scott County Registrar of Titles.
JUL 20.':.~.. )~.~.~4AM ~I,!EM?~~L~R & BAT~S .. . ".-.' .:., \. :n" '"P.2/2' ..:;. ,:. :.'
~~;I~~;~~~~~~~~'~~;,ii~i~i,~r~~~~J-~\~
I~r.t'\~. .,11'.' :.;,.".\:....:!~tJ".:. ,,':O:~0tl~ff.~';:r~.)4.~J.,...:\1~., I' 1/, (il" ..:.~~1:..".~:~.'",;,~.;..... '.1 '."~ 11,~ l.. -~"h.'~ ,.....,..,. . . .!..~l~ I.:!''',. ',' . .1": I, ,~," ", ", ~l W.... ,~..~-:I,oIf~~n:r'~~~,~.~. \!...;:p.A.~r::\;.:.....J!r~i?'i\.,.. ~!;'\-i..,. '.. ....
:"~.I!. '~"'" "~t ,': " ~.," 'r ;' .,. ,:,".;~!;:,,: :::. ':.':"(,' :1:: ro,', '....' ,. ,,' . .,;; .....'. ,", . .' . '.:::' ..~....: . ..,..; -'=': :::..: '....;, .:' '~'''n ,~',~Ilj.-::;!-\::\' '~ !:.: ;-::'~:',:.:;~"':. >:;~.~' .:::~: i,. '~~T: ::"l~ .:! .f, '~'/
'.
..'
~.' . "
'.."','
',' .
..... ," ..
"
.. .' ._"- :, ~~~ ~.:..a' ....:~~ .
SCOTI COUNTY, MINNESOTA
THOMAS E. MUELKEN
THOMAS L. HENNEN
COUNTY AUDITOR
COUNTY TREASURER
HUEMOELLER & BATES
98/07/17
14;45
AUD#
RECEIPT # 491838
SERVICE-OBJECT
RECEIVED FOR
YEAR F/A# CLIENT/PROJ#
MIA
TOTAL
9/2321
9/2326
DUE
DUE
OTHER
OTHER
GO\J.STATE DEED
GOV.CONSER.FEES
1. 65
5.00
PAID.By'CASH OR YOUR CHECK #
12764
TOTAL
TENDER
CHANGE
6.65
6.65
THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT VALID AS P. RECEIPT
UNTIL YOUR CHECK HAS CLEARED THE BANK
CUSTOMER RECEIPT
. .: ,,'.
. ~:
',,, ..
,; ,
. ",
" .'"
'.
,'_'.:, . ,'.,!:::,"_ .0'" "f:' ......, "0" .
'f::W:r~,",~b"::~;';;:[ tJ:~'~{.~:;i!~;(i~~';;~:;~:k:~~;~~~:;i~.;::\\;~,;i;i,c'~~;.i;~i;~'.~,~c:i#~~~~~:~':~~:t~4j*7;:f:}~~)::%,j
.... '..
.' :'N-': '; ': ~ "-'
:.;, "
.'., '
:. .,
:, ',~. "0 ..
'" .
.,
. "'u
"
,
", .
\ '.~
. .
:! I::
. '.
, :' ~ " .'
, . . ~ .
, ~. i' 'i .
. . ,
.", '.
..
. '..::..,..
FILE COpy
July 7, 1998
Bob Jader
14960 Pixie Point Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Variance Application
Dear Bob,
The City has received your revised survey dated June 25, 1998 relating to a variance
application for the proposed single family dwelling located on Lot 12, First Addition to
Eastwood. The following information needs to be submitted prior to continued review of
your application:
. Section 5-8-12 allows for a 5' side yard setback on a substandard lot if they are not
in common ownership with an adjacent lot. Therefore, the lots must be in separate
ownership for a variance to be considered. Currently, Lots 11 and 12 are in the
same ownership. Proof of recording of the warranty deed transferring ownership of
one of the lots is required.
. Because the house has been located closer the street, your impervious surface has
decreased. Please submit a revised imperious surface worksheet.
Once we receive the necessary information, review of your application can commence.
The processing time is approximately three weeks upon submittal of a completed
application. The timing of your request is dependent upon a completed application and
regularly scheduled Planning Commission meetings.
You have also inquired about soils engineering and bluff documentation requirements.
The current ordinance requires an engineer's report to be submitted prior to issuance of
a building permit. A Bluff Agreement is also required to be signed by the property
owners and recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. I have enclosed the current
Bluff Ordinance and Bluff Agreement. This information is not required to continue
review of your variance application.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
f1J/1-1/1AA 0~v
~/~:;
Planner
L:\98FILES\98V AR\98-070\INCML TR3.DOC
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
FILE COpy
July 7, 1999
Robert Jader
14960 Pixie Point Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Agenda and Agenda Report
Dear Bob:
Attached is a Planning Commission Agenda and Staff Report for July 12, 1999.
You or your representatives are expected to attend the meeting. You will be
given the opportunity to speak regarding your proposal and the staff report. If
you cannot attend the meeting, please call me so your item can be deferred to
the next Planning Commission meeting.
The meeting is located at the Fire Station on Fish Point Road. It is on the south
side of C.R. 21, east of Hwy 13. If you have any questions, please contact me at
447-4230.
'j~
Enclosure
f:\dept\planning\98files\98var\98-070\agendlet.doc Page 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
FIl.f copy
June 22, 1998
Bob Jader
14960 Pixie Point Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Variance Application
Dear Bob,
The City has received your revised survey dated June 16, 1998 relating to a variance
application for the proposed single family dwelling located on Lot 12, First Addition to
Eastwood. The following information needs to be submitted prior to continued review of
your application:
. The proposed driveway setbacks need to be indicated on the survey. City
Ordinance requires a minimum 5 foot sideyard setback for driveways.
. Your surveyor must indicate the proposed building setback to top of bluff and from
the required bluff setback. [These dimensions are from the north eastern corner of
the proposed house (where the "P" in "proposed house" is written on the survey) to
the 936 contour and to the 946 contour].
. Section 5-8-12 allows for a 5' side yard setback on a substandard lot if they are not
in common ownership with an adjacent lot. Therefore, the lots must be in separate
ownership for a variance to be considered.
As requested, I have enclosed the bluff ordinance. Once we receive the necessary
information, review of your application can commence. The processing time is
approximately three weeks upon submittal of a completed application. The timing of
your request is dependent upon a completed application and regularly scheduled
Planning Commission meetings. Please call me if you have any questions.
since~J~
Of: Tovar
Planner
L:\98EILES\98V AR'I98-070\INCML TR2.DOC
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
June 22, 1998
Ms. Jenni Tovar
City of Prior Lake
Dear Ms. Tovar:
I am enclosing a copy of the survey you gave to me showing me where the
existing ordinances would allow me to place my building. Based upon our
recent discussions, I have expressed my concern regarding the Bluff
Setback requirement. I would very much appreciate it if you could provide
me with copies of the actual ordinances, which you reference; i.e. Bluff
Setback requirements, side and front setbacks, etc. If I have those available,
along with your definition of where the top-of-bluff is located, it will allow
me to provide you with your required data without having to incur
additional expenses with repeated visits to the engineer. I am assuming that
information, such as one foot elevation requirements vs. two foot, exists in
the actual ordinances.
Also, would you please note on the survey I have included, where the bluff
setback location is, in relation to the Hart's existing property.
Thanks for your assistance.
FAX.COVER SHEET _
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
16200 Eagle Creek A venue S. E.
Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372
(612) 447-4230 - Telephone (612) 447-4245 - Fax
DATE: 11--1 c:; --9~
TO: 60b ~c&/
TIME: /0; 30
FAX #: gL/1- ();;) gi
COMPANY:
) ......-r;
FROM: \.. M~ I 0 V A-IZ-
SUBJECT: ~Vid(,5 ~c{CL
Message:
Number of pages sent including this page:
'3
NOVEMBER 22, 1996
Dear Builder/Surveyor:
On November 18, 1996 the Prior Lake City Council adopted an ordinance modifying the
defInition of impervious surface. The change adds gravel driveways to the defInition of
impervious surface. The effect of this on new construction will be irrelevant, as paved
driveways are required on new construction. The effect on existing parcels could be
significant in some cases. The new definition is as follows:
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: The portion of the buildable parcel whicl, has a
covering which does not permit water to percolate into the natural soiL
Impervious surface shall include, but not be limited to, all driveways and
parking areas, whether paved or not, sidewalks greater than 3' in width, patios,
tennis and basketball courts, swimming pools, covered decks and other
structures. Decks open to the sky and having open joints of at least one-fourtlz
inch (1/4'') and sidewalks 3' in width or less shall be exemptedfrom the
calculation of impervious surface. The impervious surface of a lot shall be
documented by a certificate of survey unless exemptedfrom this requirement by
the Zoning Administrator.
In order to better administer the impervious surface requirements, the City has created a
worksheet to be submitted with all building permit applications for property located in the
Shoreland District (SD). The impervious surface requirement only applies to property
located in the Shoreland District. The Shoreland District includes all property located
within 1,000 feet ofa significant body of water such as Prior Lake, Spring Lake, Mystic
Lake, Markley Lake, etc. and the tributaries leading to them. If you are unsure of the
zoning, please call us.
Please feel free to call us if you have questions regarding the worksheet. Thank you for
your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Q:;~ j ~r(MJ
Planner
IMPL TR.DOC/JKT
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E.. Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORT,;:'<!Ti :::-'lPLOYER.
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
Impervious Surface Calculations
(To be Submitted with Building Pennit Application)
For All Properties Located in the Shoreland District (SD).
The Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage Permitted in 30 Percent.
Property Address
Lot Area Sq. Feet x 30% = ..............
************************************************************************
LENGTH
WIDTH
SQ. FEET
HOUSE
x
x
x
=
=
ATTACHED GARAGE
=
TOTAL PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE......................
DETACHED BLDGS
(Garage/Shed)
x
x
TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS.......................
DRIVEW A YIP A VED AREAS
(Driveway-paved or not)
(Sidewalk/Parking Areas)
x
=
x
x
=
=
TOTAL P A YED AREAS.........................................
P A TIOSIPORCHES/DECKS x =
(Open Decks W' min. opening between X =
boards, with a pervious surface below,
are not considered to be impervious)
X =
TOT AL DE CKS.... .... ........ ........... ................. ............
OTHER
x
x
=
=
TOT AL OTHER..... ......... .... ..... ........... ........ .............
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
UNDER/OVER
Prepared By
Date
Company
Phone #
June 3, 1998
Bob Jader
14960 Pixie Point Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Variance Application
Dear Bob,
The City is in receipt of your variance application for the proposed single family dwelling
located on Lot 12, First Addition to Eastwood. The following information needs to be
submitted prior to continued review of your application:
,l-
. The mailing list submitted is inaccurate. It appears the list was based on a lot other /0\
than Lot 12, First Addition to Eastwood. Enclosed is the list you submitted. The . ~ Ij)\\~'\b
proper list should include Lots 9-15 of First Addition to Eastwood and Tracts C, D,(9fc
and E of RLS #1. The list, corrected map and mailing labels need to be submitted., _ cJ ~
. An impervious surface worksheet must be submitted. This worksheet is to be tJ.' 01 lPl \ \P
completed by your surveyor. If it exceeds 30% a variance must be requested. This
can be combined into this application.
. The minimum lot width at the 25 foot front yard setback is 50 feet. Please revise /Ll ~cl vI, "'- oiL
your survey by indicating the lot width at the 25 foot front yard setback on your
survey.
. The proposed driveway need to be indicated on the survey. City Ordinance requires
a minimum 5 foot sideyard setback for driveways. VUlCL (J.'o ju."'ir sA1(jT.~)'-
. One foot contours are required to get an accurate determination of the bluff and top
of bluff. The survey submitted indicates two foot contours. While this gives us a
general idea of the bluff locatio'); when you apply for a variance or building permit,
one foot contours are required'COnce we review the revised survey, your surveyor
must indicate the proposed builCling setback to top of bluff and from the required
bluff setback.)
Once we receive the necessary information, review of your application can commence.
The processing time is approximately three weeks upon submittal of a completed
application. The timing of your request is dependent upon a completed application and
regularly scheduled Planning Commission meetings. Please call me if you have any
questions.
Sin~;~ Jf1;r{W
~i Tovar
~ner
L:\98ETLES\98V ARl98..D70\TNCOMLTR.DOC
16200 Eagre creeK Ave.-S.c., Pnor-LaKe~Wlmnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNllY EMPLOYER
,I ~ 2-~
~ ~~;
~
~
APPLICA TIONS
&
APPLICA TION
MA TERIALS
L:\TEMPLATE\FILElNFO.DOC
- ------------ -- - -- -... -
t
Planning Case File No.
Property Identification No.
City of Prior Lake
LAND USE APPLICATION
qfJ -() 7V
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E. / Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Phone (612) 447-4230, Fax (612) 447-4245
Type of Application: Brief description of proposed project (attach additional
o Rezoning, from (present zonin~) sheets/narrative if desired)
to (proposed zonin~)
o Amendment to City Code, Compo Plan or City Ordinance '< e r
o Subdivision of Land
o Administrative Subdivision
o Conditional Use Permit
o Variance Applicable Ordinance Section(s):
o Other:
Applicant(s):
Address: '1
Home Phone:
Property Owner(s) [If different from Applicants]:
Address:
Home Phone: Work Phone:
Type of Ownership: Fee _ Contract for Deed _ Purchase Agreement ---
To the best of my knowledge the information provided in this application and other material submitted is correct. In
addition" I h, a,ve,rea,~ rel.vant .eelion. of the Prior Lak. Ordinance and procedural g, uidelines, and understand that
apPIi~a""";iUv~" p .roeessed until deemed eompl.te hy the Plan Ding m....tor or a"Ig~."",19
-.57 ' ""~______ \/" '2(.) r
plicant's ~a.tUre Date(
V
Date
Fee Owner's Signature
THIS SPACE TO BE FILLED IN BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY COUNCIL
APPROVED
APPROVED
DENIED
DENIED
DATE OF HEARING
DATE OF HEARING
CONDITIONS:
Signature of Planning Director or Designee
lu-app2.doc
Date
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
16200 EAGLE CREEK AVE SE
PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372
RECEIPT# 32448
DATE: Jd.a~n/fb
Qollars
~1XUUt~
Receipt Clerk for the. ity of Prior Lake
$ t ~O, 00
BUILDING PERMIT #
BUILDING PERMIT #
ROBERT D. OR ELIZABETH A. JADER
'<ill, _ I"U _ ..,ov-,,~_. 1[7
I
PIXIE POINT CIRCLE, SE
lOR LAKE, MN 72
'ee
!Yl Marquette Bank
A Prior Lake
Office of Marquette Bank, N.A.
16817 Duluth Avenue SE.
Poor Lake, MN 55372
--
i~bU.
,
i
If
, .r
MEMO
At'
1 Deposit
ion Fee
.
!, I.
.0 bOB
Total
NOTICE OF HEARING TO CONSIDER THE FOllOWING VARIANCES:
A 5.62 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A 44.38 FOOT LOT WIDTH AT
THE FRONT YARD SETBACK INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 50 FEET;
AND
A 50.08 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A SETBACK FROM THE TOP
OF BLUFF OF 6.92 FEET RA THER THAN THE REQUIRED 18% SLOPE
SETBACK OF 57 FEET
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FUTURE SINGLE FAMilY DWELLING ON
PROPERTY lOCATED IN THE R-1 (URBAN RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT AND
THE SD (SHORELINE OVERLAY) DISTRICT IDENTIFIED AS 14962 PIXIE
POINT CIRCLE.
You are hereby notified that the Prior Lake Planning Commission will hold a
hearing at Prior Lake Fire Station #1, located at 16776 Fish Point Road SE
(Southwest of the intersection of C.R. 21 and Fish Point Road), on: Monday,
August 10, 1998, at 6:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible.
APPLICANT: Bob Jader
14960 Pixie Point Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
PROPERTY Same
OWNER:
SUBJECT SITE: 14962 Pixie Point Circle, legally described as Lot 12, First
Addition to Eastwood, Scott County, MN.
REQUEST: The applicant is intending to remove the existing structure
and build a single family house with attached garage. The
proposed house will meet all other setbacks and impervious
surface coverage. The existing lot of record is 44.38 feet
wide at the front yard setback rather than the required 50
feet. The lot consists of 14,924 square feet. The proposed
house is to be located 6.92 feet from the top of bluff rather
than the required 57 foot setback determined where the
slope becomes less than 18 percent from the top of bluff.
L:\98EILES\98V AR19&-093\98-093I?N .DOC 1
16200 Eagfe Creek Ave.S.E.,-Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
The Planning Commission will review the proposed construction and requested
variances with respect to the following criteria found in the Zoning Ordinance.
1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship
with respect to the property.
2. Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique
to the property.
3. The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and is not the
result of actions of persons presently having an interest in the property.
4. The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces
substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest.
If you are interested in this issue, you should attend the hearing. Questions
related to this hearing should be directed to the Prior Lake Planning Department
by calling 447-4230 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday
through Friday. The Planning Commission will accept oral and/or written
comments. Oral or written comments should relate to how the proposed
construction and requested variances are or are not consistent with the above-
listed criteria.
Prior Lake Planning Commission
Date Mailed: July 30, 1998.
L:\98FILES\98V AR\98-093\98-093PN .DOC
2
/
~4.; /
"-
.CV /
~;r
)~.
CO/
/
~
~
~
OF SURVEY
CERTlFlCA TE
for
BOB JADER
J28-1-9
~..
.,
<v
11
I I
..lie:
U
o
.0
-+J
<1>
(f)
, ,,;"
.()" "ro
.;? ()f\,'
~ '"
ll.)1~
~~
i3 \..:V
0\
.x;.oY .
~ .J
in
"
1~
I
-
\..-
"'"
"'"
~
/ ~4.;
1\
/&.~
/ O' !'o
"'" / C0 ~C5
~ cy
"-J ~
'0~
0\
\(
c
DI..J_ ~r~~
n
'JRRQ C::n
\ p) -
/
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL
COUNTY OF SCOTT )
)ss
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
, of the City of Prior Lak C unty of Scott, State of
Minnesota, being duly rn, says on the ~day of , 1998, she served
the attac~ list of persons to have an interest in the
q -10 , by mailin them a copy thereof,
enclosed in an envelope, postage prepaid, and be depositing same in the post office at
Prior Lake, Minnesota, the last known address of the parties.
-,
Subscribed and sworn to be this
_day of ,1998.
NOTARY PUBLIC
MAILAFFD.DOC
PAGB
-.-
~
" n \ ~~
~rg~
S 1/2 SEC.
30 T. 1/.
L,
~
\.. ~.:~ €.
~~\otl-
~
I )' v'
(I "'o"~\
.' ,Il ;<""~
t!.vr=:~ I?'? :
1.52""11.2 ZllUZ' ~
0;;5-0 0;40 t!)';;,c
... ha ~;j..
'. I~S .. ...
~ .~
..,.0 QQ
.,. ~
~~ .$
q,~ .,
~4;
~~
~.,
"
.---..r 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 >I- >-3 000
0 ~ 0 0 tv 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01> 0 >I- tlJ 01>::0
tv 0 tv f-' U1 f-' tv tv 0 0 0 tv tv U1 tv >I- ~ '-n
0 0 0 f-' 0 f-' U1 U1 W W I W I 'I 'I 0 'I >I- 0
'I 0 'I '" f-' '" CO CO tv tv I tv I '" '" 0 '" >I- tlJ '1>-3
f-' w f-' ~ tv ~ 01> 01> W W I W I tv tv 0 tv >I- '< '-tlJ
'" U1 '" W 'I W tv tv 'I 'I I 'I I CO 'I tv 'I >I- CD ~X
I I >I- 11 CO
:r: l'l 'tl :r: l'l 'tl :r: 'tl :r: 'tl
--
0 0 0 \0 0 0 '" >-'3 otll
0 0 0 ~ 0 0 '" $lJ ~:t:I
IV IV .... lJ1 .... .... '" x ......n
I ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ '" '0 0
I -..I -..I IV 0 IV lJ1 '" $lJ -..1>-'3
I I -..I -..I ~ 0 ~ ~ '" '< ......$lJ
CD I .... .... -..I IV -..I ~ '" CD \OX
I '" Ii CD
:t:I I :I: 'tl :I: t:I:J 'tl n '" 00
t:I:J I 00 :t:I 00 00 :t:I 0 '" '<
n I >-'3 H >-'3 n H Z '" ....00
0 I '" ort
f :t:I I 'tl~>-'3'tl~>-'3 'tl~OOO)>o'tl)>oZ'tl~OO 'tlw:;:'tl~ '" Z .. CD
0 I :t:I....H:t:I....H :t:I....c::t:I:J>-'3. >-'30:t:l....c:: :t:I~t:I:J:t:Io '" $lJ 03
00 I HW::;::HW::;:: HOt:I:JOO>-'30>-'3:t:1HOt:I:J H-..IOOHCD '" 3 IV
I 0....00....0 0\0 z. Z:;:o\O oot"'o\O '" CD
'tl I :t:I >-'3:t:1 >-'3 :t:I t:I:J::;::.. ..t:I:J:t:I t:I:J :t:I t:I:J:t:I '" IV
:t:I I ....:I: ....:I: ....t"'0 tll 00 ....t"' 000< .... '" R' w
H I t"'lJ10<t"'lJ10< t"'lJ1t"'H 0 >-'3t"'lJ1t"' t"'o< t"'lJ1 '"
Z I )>00 )>00 )>oOt:I:JZtll><~ )>oOt:I:J )>0 n::;::)>o 0 '" )>0
>-'3 I :><: :I::><: :I: :><: Zt:l:JH t:I:J:><: Z :><:~ :><: '" 0-
t:I:J I I t:l:JOO t:l:Joo t:l:Joo OOt"'\O>-'3t"'t:l:JOO t:I:J R't:l:Joo '" 0-
0 I I >-'3R' >-'3R' >-'3n t"'W:I:t:I:J >-'3n 0 >-'3 '" Ii
I I ::;:: ::;:: ::;:: t"'H ot"'n::;:: t"' ::;:::t:In::;:: '" CD
I I ZOOC-jZOOC-j ZOOO)>O:I:\Ot:I:J>-'3ZOOO Z:~Zgj '" 00
I I t:I:J~ t:I:J~ t:l:JC:: 0 t:I:J:t:I t:l:JC:: '" 00
I I Q t"' ZO Q '"
I I lJ1 t:l:JlJ1 t:I:J lJ1 :I:lJ10 ZlJ1:I: lJ1~t"'lJ1 '"
I I lJ1 lJ1 lJ1 OH C-jHlJ1 lJ1 0lJ1 '"
I I W t"'W t"' W WZ~. nw WH>-'3W '"
I I -..I -..I -..I oQ -..I -..It"'>-'3-..1 '"
I I IV :><:IV :><: IV ~ H~>-'3IV IV t:l:JlV '"
I I t:I:J t:I:J '0>-'3 ~ 00 '"
I I 0 0 \Ot:I:J 00 :;:~ '"
I I 8 c:: ~'tl""H '"
I I Q O~-..IZOO '"
I I :I: :I: \0 ~Ot:I:J t:I:J '"
I I >-'3o:;::t:I :t:I '"
I I ::;:: H~ '"
I I t:I:J nH '"
I I Z :I:n
I I >-'3 t:I:J
I I
I I tv tv 0
I I 0 0 .....
I I .... .... 00
I I W W rt
I I
I I 0 0 Z
I I CD CD >-'3 $lJ
I I 0 0 ...... 3
I I 0 0 n CD
I I
I I 0 0 00 ~
I I -..I -..I ()
I I .... .... :T 0-
I I \0 \0 Ii
I I CD
I I 00
I I lJ1 lJ1 00 00
I I 0 0 '0
I I \0 \01 .... t"'
1 I CD
I 1 0 0 00 LQ
I I W W '0 $lJ
I IV IV IV ~
I
I .... .... 00 ::;::
1 ~ ~ '0 0
I ~ ~ W 0-
I CD
I lJ1 lJ1 00 ~
I 0 0 '0 CD
I lJ1 lJ1 ~ Ii
I
I lJ1 lJ1 C/l
I 0 0 '0
I -..I -..I lJ1
I
I 00
I '0
I ~
I
I 00
I '0
I -..I
I
I C/l
1 '0
I CD
I
I C/l
I '0
I \0
I
1 .... .... 0<
I \0 \0 CD
I \01 \0 $lJ
I \0 \0 Ii
I
I :t:I :t:I :t:I
I t"'Otv t"'Otv 'tl
I O)>olJ1 O)>olJ1 $lJ >-'300
I >-'3:><:.... >-'3::0:.... Ii )>on
I IQtv IQtv () \00
I ot"'~ ot"'~ CD 0>-'3
I ot:I:Jo ot:I:JO ~ ....>-'3
I wZo tvZo t"'
zw ZIV =II: n
0 0 0
c::
Z
t"' >-'3
CD 0<
LQ
$lJ
~
'tl
~
t:I:J
00
rt
$lJ
rt
C IV
00
SCOTT COUNTY
AUDITOR
COURTHOUSE 103
428 HOLMES STREET SOUTH
SHAKOPEE, tv!N 55379-1379
(612) 496-8160
f)/j p, I
C(j''CJIO 1J~
'.~D rn (C; mll~lr~i i;:.'
IUJr--
\ \ t (, . Ii 1'1 I i I .. ~ .'
Ii \\\ I
! i 1\ \ i
j L.~ \.~\ L"".~o~.."_"_~-~'_'
JUN-11-98 THU 2:06 PM
l_...._-----.-<-.-<-'~.-...~r~-- -_.~..' ~.~.
THOMAS L. HENNEN
AUDITOR.
Fax: (612) 496-8174
DATB:
6-1/-90
PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING TO:
NAME:
~J" ." 1'- -e 7;; I./tl r-
COMPANY:
e ;-1-'1 t?~ Pr.'-"/J,. tcR'~,
PHONE #;
FAX#:
NUMBER OF PAGES:
"1
(INCLUDES COVER PAGE)
MESSAGE:
...s:-.42. 0 #. LA ~r:L -P,..Oflf ..15 o./; :&/ ~ ... Ne tU /'-5 r ~,.. A .~
VLrIILlLee-.. 7rde-T E ~ RLS IP ( ;5 ~1I;'k/Y ,nar-
m,;+!J l ~ I (Jd ' bILl- hA n.<:' I" ~ t: I6c/ ~ /- f- tl7t Y (Q 4.. Y .
~r 'A,roS 6.1;,/ ~1!.T'P1<r:=.P ,
PLEASE CALL IF INFORMATION IS INCOMPLETE OF ILLEGIBLE.
NAME:
G./H4Krf/~r-
TELEPHONE #:
Zrlt?6 - ? /6S-
All Equal Oppol'lul'JicyISq/irl}! A ",a'e Emplo)'tlr
JUN-11-98 THU 2:06 PM
06~11/l~~6 l4:ae f~O" S~6~~ SYSTEMS
P. 2
TO 4968174
f'. ~ 1
'f1~-
TO, GAK t{
June 3, 199B
Bob Jader
14960 Pixie Point Circle
Prior Lake. MN 55372
<: -
J.- ,e:;- ~ J .~
RE; VarjanC8AppH~ion lr~~ ~ ~ <
Dear Bob. V~ .;:Y
The City is in receipt of your variance application for the proposed singl. famlfy cfweUing ~ I
localed on Lot 12, FIrst Addition to Eastwood. The following information needs to be "u
su milled prior to continued review of your application:
Themailinglistsuttmiltwdislnac:curate.ltapparsthelistw. belied on a totO othr
tl'Ian lot 12. Fll'$t Addition to Eastwood. Enctosed is the list you submitted. The
proper I~t shOUld include Lois 9--15 of First Addition to Eastwood and Tracts C, 0,
and E gf RLS #1. The list, COITected map and mailing tabets need to be submi
. worksheet must be submitted. This workst'1eet is to be
rveyor. tf it exceeds 30% a VElriance must be requ&S'ted. This
this application.
at the 25 f()Qt from yarG setback. is 50 feel Please revise
"g the Jot width i1iIt the 25 foot front yard liil!tback on your
'I ~ to be indicated on the survey. City OrdInance requires
yard Mtbeck 10r driveways.
uired to gm ~n aOCUr1lte determlnaticm of the blUff'and lOp
luff. 'Tho survey tiubmitted il1dk:ates tlYO fwt contours. While tP1is Qives us 8
general idea of \he bluff loca1ion, when you apply for a varilJnt:e or building permit,
one ~ conto\Jt$ iirw requlroG. O;"\C$ we review the revised survey,' your survwyor
mu.t indicate the proposed building !,Jetbac:k to top of bluff and from the requIred
bluff setback.
On~ WI! recei". the neonsary information, review of )'Our appflcation can commence.
The ~e5ing time i5 appro~~y three weeks upon sUt)mittBl of 8 comp,eWd
application. The timing of )'QUr rwquest is dependent upon a c:ornpleted application and
regularly sc:heduled P&anning Commissiop meetings. Please c;all me if you have any
Questions.
i
1&200~8mlil!y.~~~~~~~S5372'171q I Ph. (612)4474230 / Fu(612)447-4245
Al'i EQUAl. Q1"!'01'miNITY EMPLO'I'EA
TOTAL P.1l
JUN-jj-98 THU
2: 07 PM
..
o
'"
l,11
Q:l
~
I>l
o
o
~
""
t-.l
w
..J
o
o
Q
W
I>l
w
.,J
lOll
o
'"
1111
12>1
>1>01
L\ll
I
"1;11
;Ill
I-i I
I
~~~~ ~~g~~~!~~i "I;I~~"I;I~~I"I;I~~"I;I~~ "I;I~~
~!H~n ~:~~~~H~~: ~:~~~~~~:~~g~~~ ~:g
~~ O~~C ~O~ o~ o~ IO~~O~~ o~~
~l~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~. I~O~~O~ ~c~
~~:~"I;I ~~~~~~ ~~~~H: ~~~"I;I~ ~~~
~~I>~~~~Z >~~ ~Hz>I-i~15HO>HO HO
~~ I~~ ~W~~~ ~~~~~I ~ ~~ ~
~H~~I~H~ ~>~H~ H ~H I H~~H~ H~
O~8a' ~ ~HZ ~ ~~ ~~I ~ ~ ~
~I~~:i~~~~~~i~~ ~~~i~~i~~~2~~:I~~
lid Cdiiil, HZ! ~ H~I!;I1i; H!!o'i, ~ tsIl ~
~O :~~~~~~ ~~j:~~~~~~:~~~~8~:~~~.
~ ~n~~~ ~n~:~n ~n :~~~~~~:~~~
~ I>lH o~~ ~H Il-..lH I>lH 1L\l~~~~~I"'~~
~ ~~~i~ ~~I ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~
J.. r.ol'"i < tol'"i: to to: > )' : >
~ t/ilQ H ~O' I:l:l t'iI Y c:.. c:..
~ Ii ~!ii: ~ ~ 1;
to ~ I tE ~ ll:l
i ~: ~ ~
I
I
'-'I
01
01
~I
1
0'
1>>1
01
'"
..
Q
o
'"
....l
-.J
..,J
~
~
Q
Q
..
~I
.,J
..,J
..,J
co
..
~
\-I
'"
'"
w
ID
'"
U'l
Q
~
I/o>
...l
~
H
~
~
to
l".l
l-..l
'"
..
I-'
g
Q:l
c
'"
'"
....
""
ID
\l'1
Q
'"
o
w
'"
1-'1
"'I
.1
U'l
'"
lJ\
U'I
o
...l
~
'"
\0
Ib
1
1
,
1
I
I
\-II
\0 1
'" I
\0'
I
~I
~~~i
1 ~>l> I
c ..,J I
~ .. I
.O~I
0l,111
01
\-I ,
t;O I
>-3 ,
I
1
I
1
,
1
1
I
1
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
,
""'
S~~
I"'~
Q:l!l..,J
~8Q
U'l t-'
0'"
o
\-I
tJ;l
t-3
~
i
o
o
\-I
~
Cl'I
\0
W
rc
lid
H
..
..,J
\-I
10
r.n
..
...
o
1,.1
tu
I-' I
CJ'\I
.1
111
o
(J1
(J1
'"
-l
~
=
r.o
~
ffi
I-j
'"
o
o
~I
o
IJ>
01
01
I
01
...ll
I-' I
101
1
I
U11
01
1.0 ,
I
0'
WI
""
I
\-II
0'\1
.,
I
1111
01
(J1'
I
l,111
01
-l'
1
I
~I
101
Ibl
WI
I
I:;-l~~:
o 1111
... 01
1l-3~r
c:li:-..JI
....801
W ~I
oW 1
"',
~ 1
(ll I
..;! 1
1
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
E;
i
~
H
'"
o
o
I-'
'"
CD
'"
..
o
...l
to'
ID
lJ1
Q
1.0
o
W
'"
\-I
CJ'\
.
111
Ol
,-",
I
111 I
01
...J I
I
,
,
,
,
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
1
I
1-'1
'" ,
\0 I
""
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
l
,
I
1
,
,
I
1
1
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
~e~
'~'"
o ...l
.... 0
~ ~
0""
~
\-I
rn
t-5
~
o
o
o
""
L\,l
""
-J
o Q ~ Q O~
o 0 ~ e O~
~ '" ~ W ~~
...l ~ o..,J ~~
~ CJ'\ Q ~ ~~
~ ~ 0 N "'~
~..,J L\l..,J "'~
It
~ tl:l I:l;I IQ I 'l:I ..
~ tt.i I:r.l ~ I ~..
> ~ r.l HI I-i'"
I ..
~~~~~l'"i~~"I;I>~~~~I~W~.
~""HII:l>l>l':Il:l;I~' ~0~.1iI:I1 0....:i0..
~W~H"'~to 0 ~H~~'~~~It
~~ ~~;:iZ"'" :i~~~: ~Q~:
tIlO ~ tI.l ~,tr.lSI-il"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :~~~:
~ ~~~H ~tJl~~~I~ ,..
H~ H r.ol:;-l\O~~~H 'O"l;l~"
~ tJl~ ~""8~ ~toll':lH ,..
~~~i~~~=~~~i~;:~~Q:
O~ O~ 0 Ilill" a~II:"'tJ;l~..
~rn H I:;-l li:;O ~ I 0"
~~H~~ ~~ ~U'lli:; I ~~,..
U"1...~'-">-:3 OH c:..HlJ11-2 Il.l~ ..
l.l W l.l:;;::C:::;' n"" I N :;1;"
....:in .,In o~li:; ...lr.l I~ ..
l-..lH "'H ~ H~~NH 1111 "1;1.
~ II:l 10~ ~ ~ I~ ~,..
I.O~ ~ I ~.
rn I)) ~~""H tQ I !,..
~ tJl ..~..,J~rn ~ I.
",::-:'a-Ol':l I ,..
tjo~~ : Ii:
I7d r.lH I ..
~ tl:l~ :
1
~ I ..,
01 '"
01 0
1-" I-'
,
0' 0
1lIl' I>>
01 0
C I 0
o 0
.,J ..,J
~ ~
.. ID
~
H
tv
o
o
~
o
QII
o
o
o
...l
l-l
10
lJ1
o
1.0
(,n \11
o c:.
~ III
o ..
loll W
WI""
I
~, \-I
'" I '"
11"' ~
I
\111 IJ1
Q I =
111 1 o.n
I
"" 111
01 Q
...l' -.J
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
,
I
,
I
I
I
1
,
,
1
~ I ~
\0' W
\0 , '"
'" I 10
I
~ I ilI:l
l:"eNIt'i1Jl1W
Q l,1110>U'l
"" OI...r.oO
b~~ ~~~
~80 ~ 0
o ~ '" ~
O~ 00
o 0
... ?-
m m
I-il t-:l
o
I,ol
l'-'
I-'
d)
.
U1
o
(J1
r.n
o
-J
~
\0
\tJ
'"
:>:l
~~~
~~~
'I-il""
~ ..~ ;;
N I-'
""
'"
\-I
[0
t-:l
~
i ~
P. 3
i
(D
I-i
oa:l
"'II/l
.....n
~
....~
~~
CZl
~
'<
I-'Ill
~rr
.. nl
~!:'l
'"
IE:
~
~
.
N
~
(1l
III
III
~
1-'"
In
rt
I-il
.......
n
I'/.l
Ii-
f
f1I
~
~
III
m
(f,l
'tl
~
lb
I:ll u:l
't:I III
W 1-1
ta
'l:l
l.J
~
It
....
~
~
~
CIl
'C1
(J1
(f,l
"0
d'I
:g
.,J
.g>
l%l
to
'l:l
'"
io(
ell
ill
'1
llI:l
'l;I
III
~
nl
....
""
t-:lrn
~~
bioi
i
t"
(D
I.Q
ill
1-1
~
~
L'l
Co
rt
il'
rr
i: ~
lD
JUN-11-98 THU
2:08 PM
~
r------' ~ I
,..-- ~
1-1
~
~
\t:J
G
f
Q
Cl
I-'
1-"
~I
... I
\0'
,
'l:l II1 'l:ll
:D Ul ~I
H ...; 1-1,
~~~:~~I~~i:
I-I"'~ I-IID 1-1'" ,
0'" 0<3', 0<7\ I
~Q:l :o;l-J:D.,J 1
t11l:l ~Il:l e1:l~:
51-1 1-1 .. I
llct::l :X~ x:=
1-1 H 1-1
Ii':l'" ti:l1tl ltl~
~~~ ~8~~S~
~~~ g~~~~~
..Ji"HOl ....It'''1 ...In
100)1-1 r-.>1-li:dNH:>;l
1I:I:;r:: :c ::c I
~~ 11>0 tr.I~:
Ii':l t;tj~ :'l~:
w I;' I
I<; 0 1
:E; ~I
1
1
1
.> I
0'
0,
1-'1
1
01
(PI
01
01
,
01
...JI
1-'1
\0 I
1
I
UlI
01
'" ,
I
<;>1
WI
~v I
I
1-'1
"'"
"",
I
U11
01
(;1,
I
(;11
01
....]1
1
,
,
1
I
,
I
I
1
1
I
I
,
1
I
1
,
1-'1
""
\01
1.01
I
t1:o<:1~:
~fu~:
I >l>'
....."'1
~I-'g
"'"
I:>
, 1
,
,
,
I
,
,
I
1
1
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
i~
In
I:;':
I 1
,0
10
'tli:\
I
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
b~~
I"ifnCl
, I/>
1oiI-'"
n 0
..;11-'0
fJl
Q
'"'
'"'
f-'
W,
~
~
-.l
o
<::>
I-'
f-'
-.l
..,
\D
'"
o
o
...
o
C;J
o
o
o
-.l
I-'
1.0
U'I
o
'"
Q
W
r-.>
I-'
<l'I
>l>
ill
o
U1
U1
o
-J
I-'
'"
'"
IJ:l
S
Q
I
o
o
tl
Q 0
c Cl
I,..l W
.... r'1
~ en I
.. ....'
o 01
,
~ '<ll
tIl :D 1
t-i HI
I
~:ltr.I~~~tr.I i
O-J O-J 1
11:I.... :c.... 1
I
~:::::;.:~:si"l
~5~=~~
i~~i;g~
I-I~ 1-12:
~e1 ~~
.... ....
....It'''1 -.In
tul-l !.>H
liD ::0
~ ~
1;1:I ro
[r,j CD
:n
S~~
..;Itl:lO
1 II>
~#~
..;11-'0
"'1
== ...'
b :
n 1
~ '
1 ,
o 1
o 1
n '
1
I
1
1
I
I
I
1
I
1
I
1
I
1
*
...
>I-
oto
It
"
*
Jt
...
"
*
'"
'<l...'<ln1l>....1;'~~~ ~I-'~~!.>...
:c...~~dlJ:l~l-I= ::c...~I-I~.
~:8~~~~;~~ ~:~~i~:
1-1;';: '65 S3~ ....~...
t~w~~n ~~ ~~~ ~:
~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~:
~Ii':l~~ tl:l~~..;IO ~~tr.I~"
~"Cl~=-' ' :J:ll:l~ IIQQ~ll:l:
otf.j }oo'ltlZl:'J3' 03;2;t"*
ill~O"" "'~ ~ U'I~~ at
U1~2;'" Z>U1 U1..;1~~ '"
W <l'I C...;U1 .... fJl.
-.In 100) :=1;1:I"'" .,In....
~I-I "'" ..;I I-' ~I-I""'"
~~ >="';<3', := <l'I ...
)II n I ..
><11> ~.....
1;1:I l-l IJII!.>"
I1lIol .... ...
~t-..l t\oJ .
::c ..
< >I-
H
n
Q
CI
o
'"
-.l
....l
C;J
=
~
OJ
o
D
r'
o
I)>
o
o
o
-.l
...
\0
I
U'I1
01
"'"
I
01
WI
~.,I I
I
r'1
('II
...,
1
Ul I
01
U11
,
UlI
0;;,1
.-1 1
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
,
,
I
r'
'"
'"
ID
o
14>
o
""
o
...
w
Cl
ell
o
a'I
...j
-.l
.,J
o
CI
o
'"
.,J
-.l
lZl
~
[{.l
n
'<l
:=
H
~
t..>
o
01
1-'1
I
01
~I
0,
0'
I
01
-..I 1
,... I
\D I
,
.
Ill.
01
'" 1
I
ClI
WI
1'.>'
,
1-'1
""
...,
1
UlI
QI
lJl,
1
Ul 1
01
-..II
1
1
1
,
.
1
,
.
1
I
I
I
,
I
,
,
,
1-'1
""
14>1
\&II
I
:>;\.
~!~:
1>-3'"
C~-..ll
}oo'OOI
U10""
t:I"',
...'
S \
I
Ei :
tI '
Z '
1
1
I
,
I
,
.
I
,
1
I
I
.
1
P. 4
g
~
0<
/1)
1"1
;;~
........n
I-'
I-'''i
~~
(J>
II:l
..."al
.a.rt
.. CD
fJl:!l
w
2;
~
CD
ll'
..
I'.>
~
/D
III
1lI
1:1
.....
III
rt
..;I
.......
n
In
(']
l"
z:
III
a
IV
ii
r'
i
ell
III
lD
t'
CD
I/J ~
'" ~
to.> I-'
rn
'tl
w
III
'i
~
o
~
I-'
~
rn
'"0
U'I
rn
'"0
""
fJJ
'tl
...
I/J
'tl
(J>
tIl
'tl
'"
~
III
"'l
:o;l
~
III
P'l
l'l
(1)
I-'
...;tI:l
lI>'n
~~
~~
0<
*'
I:'l
CD
~
III
......
~
~
!;tl
~
III
rt
i
to.>
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
Impervious Surface Caleulatioll S
(To be SubmiUed with 8uildine PcmUt AppUCI1ior 1
For AU Properties Located in the Shoreland Di 1 triet (SD).
The Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage Permit:,d in :30 Percent.
Property Address Lo"\" JZ r ~ \ q..~\ A-Ds)\l1Df\.). ~lb b-'A--~-Wt)CJD
Lot Area I [-) 1 ~2l\ Sq. Feet x 30% = ...., ' ....... 4 ~ 11 <;Q t n:
..............****..........****......**..****........***............***
'rrD' r~ rC~ r~ 0 \\i~7Tl-\ ..:s,'
II LE_ \::7 -, L~~iJ'
, I
I. ~ 199d__ ..
\.",I ......, Io.-I-'W I. ..':""1 MI'I
t f"'\UI~1 .,.JI"-'\L.Jl.-r"'\l-I\l1 L-r"".r- r\.1.JL-....;." D441!J400
Uijil~/Y8 BUN lU~4J tAl ~1244'T424S
l:l'n U}O' I'!UUK1...A.M;
LENGTH
WlD1H
SQ. 1EET
HOUSE
x
...
An-ACHED GARAGE
x
X
::
--
..
TOTAL PRINCIPLE STRtTCTUIlE _n. .. .............. 2J!~f!34
DETACHED BLOGS
(GIfIIeIShed)
x
..-
~....
x
TOTAL DETACHED BtJlLDll'GS-.. '" -.--.
x - J -;'1
x -
x - --!i!)O
...---
DRlVEWA YIPA YED AlmAS
~.)''''',," or 1IOt)
(Sidewalk/hitting AtcaS)
TOTAL PAVED AREAS.......--....-. ..i --.. ~ 6 S q
PArtOSlPORCHESlDECKS x. ~
(0pI.q J)ccb ~.. .;a. operUlIi between --
x =
botrds. wi1b . parviout surtace below.
_not ~vnsidered to h impcrrious) .....11 -..
x ='
- ~-
TOTAL DECKS................................................ .1It .........".....
OTHER.
~f'{\f2 Y
'8
x
x
1'L
>=
/' ,
'-;l )
.............-~
...
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
~VB
Prepared By -52J1Y BJ<1lliJD7
Company B R~\ Dr G-N (. t 'S U)'<. \J
06
UD2.lt l
l 4:~3 I
Date -16 ~lJLdI J o/Jj'
Pbone#_Sq) 51~A
TOT.At OTHEL..............41......................... ....' ..............
NOV-20-98 FRI 3:46 PM SCOTT CO RECORDER
FAX NO, 6124968138
P. 3
rOr1ll No. 7-M-WaftIMY .Deed
~.-4lIb, or """_.t\Ip
ID LodI.11I '(I)
....... u.m.. c.. . "..... (una)
No ckliDqueDI t.ucs and tr.....rer eatend; Cetl:i&.ate
of Real Bale Value ('1fi1cd ( )aol rcquirc4
Cettific:alc of Real Ealalc Value No.
().Jf~_. - ] I . 19 f"b
;::r- d.;>>c - ~-~-v~
~ Coury Auditor
~~ -
I -/c/CJY?
~t~ C...(way .l:;i'I.C,!ltt..t .nd lItle, II\G.
Z~;J rrci"'l~~ ;-3I.'c.~!. f' O. DOll 300
ShillkofJlfC, MN b5.37lt
LAP ?;, -;J )..
~C:... 862.0a:s:u.
VClI. ,.,_ ea
o.~~na. gt~'rW& o. -
:lIC:-~ coaaTl, G::IPUCl'l'.a.
Ui..a r1b4 0110
By
Deputy
STATB DEED TAX DUB HEREON: $ 2.004.75
Dale: 0ecember30.1ES8
(~b ra:ardlD&data)
~ LL CERTIFICATE" RECEIVED
--fl"-WELL aRTIRCATE NOT AfOWfB
fOR VALUAJIl.e COIllSIDERATION.
Johnson-ReI8nd CcndIuctIon. Inc.
_ ~ wader the laws otMrn-r..
hel'r:by ~,) and wattailt(s) to
Kati ,erine E. Harte
, Grantor,
OfiWt:C(S). real property ill Scaft Coualy. )lin--IOIA" ~ as fallGws:
Lot Thirteen (13). FIr&t Addklan to EaIlwood. ScCIlI County, MIM8ICU,ICCOI'dInQ 10 lh8 pial Ih..d on fie or d
'9COtd In the office of the Registrar d TlIIe8i ScCIIt Caunty, Mln,...
e:;...s- -ot;.{7 -~ r3-~
t,JgCther with aU he.rcd.itam.cata BJ.ld 8p1M11'tell8DC:eS hP.~"1 thereto subject to the foUawiaa acepIia:ms:
Coven&nts, condlllons. t"8IIIrIctIorw 1IIlCI1l1 i : -... a d 1"BCOl"d, If any.
The eetlr..X' CtHtIfte8 thIIIl~ _Ier does norlmow d any_Is on the desc:r1bed ..... JIII......tf.
NO'f~~f
~~~th~~ b.e~OIl of $ ~.?5
IS~day of 19~
~lo~~'I.JC
C c. ounry Treasurer
anservatlon F~e Paid
.Affl.I Deed Tu Stamp Hen
__= Inc.
By. J.W ~
Its VIe8 p~
By:
STATBOP MInr8da
COUNtY OF Scott
}N.
Ita
'fb ~ 'oregcmg matrumCXlt was ac:knowIedpd before me this 30th day of O""':'~1b8r
h:' :JJ.$. SWftart and
l \~ . \I1t.e pl"Dl2ir4lW'11 and the
of J~-A""~ C4YMlln1il11tvt Inc. _ a ~ on
~d ,r the laws or MI,."... , on behalf of the eo.JAlI~
1996
, ,
/1)
~ ' .... ,JEANNE .... SEGLER
. \..... t,ogr~R'" PUIU
'-~":' "'COMIIIIS.!ilQIII ~~S(lTA
,... .........U "ill.&Clllll
-NOTAIUAL IT...... OIlSML (0ll0J'lCD TI1Ul ClIl.INIIQ
,.. Iw.. _......., --... ...........-.-.Jd
.. _ \II (..... _.... ...... cCOIuIa,=
n-. OlS'nWWIINT9'AS I*U'1"IID lIT (NAWBAHDADDPilIS);
ScdI County AbIataCt and TIIie,lnc.,
223 South Hames Stresti P.O. Bale 300
Shakapee, M~ 65319
Kacherine E. Harte
14964 Pixie Point Cirele
Prior Lake, MN 55372
WMftllrl , 1f/6
D rncsrno'Wrn ~
(.AI.. 101998 '1
L
-----'-~.
Warranty Deed by Individual
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $1.65
Date: ~ ~\ u. \. \) , 1998
\
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, ROBERT D. lADER and ELIZABETH A. lADER,
husband and wife, Grantors, hereby convey and warrant to ROBERT D. lADER, Grantee,
real property in Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Lot 12, FIRST ADDITION TO EASTWOOD, Scott County, Minnesota.
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, and subject to
restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any.
I8l The Seller certities that the Seller does not know of any wells on the described real property.
o A well disclosure certiticate accompanies this document.
o The Seller certities that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last
previously tiled well disclosure certiticate.
Check here if all or par of the property is registered (Torrens) 181
Total consideration for tlils transfer is less tllan $500
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF SCOTT
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of luly, 1998, by
ROBERT D. lADER and ELIZABETH A. lADER, husban . , Grantors.
I NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR 011IER TITLE OR RANK) l ~u_ ._
SIGNATURE OF PERSON T
e
JAMESO.'BA1ES
~ PU8LIC l'tHIElOl'A
", DAKOrA COUN'fV
MJ~ EIp.JenI1.JOllO
-
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
Tax statements ti.)f the real property descrihed
in this instrument should he sent to:
HUEMOELLER & BATES
16670 Franklin Trail
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Robert D. lader
14960 Pixie Point Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
" ",.."-'.
Warranty Deed by Individual
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $1.65
Date: ~ \.,.... \ ~ \ \) , 1998
\
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, ROBERT D. JADER and ELIZABETH A. JADER,
husband and wife, Grantors, hereby convey and warrant to ROBERT D. JADER, Grantee,
real property in Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Lot 12, FIRST ADDITION TO EASTWOOD, Scott County, Minnesota.
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, and subject to
restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any.
I:;IJ The Seller certities that the Seller does not know of any wells on the descrihed real property.
o A well disclosure certiticate accompanies this document.
[J The Seller certities that the status and numher of wells on the descrihed real property have not changed since the last
previously tiled well disclosure certiticate.
Check here jf all or pa of the property is registered (Torrens) 181
Total consideration for this transfer is less than $500
The CIty of Prior Lake Subdivision regulallona. ..
set forth In Section 6 of the City Code of PrIor Lake.
MinneIOt8. do not apply to this eppIlcatIon.
. .,
9y. . ate: ')..1 ,slq~ --
1+<. ,,10 ,..r !lll(~ PlannIng ~
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF SCOTT
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of July, 1998, by
ROBERT D. JADER and ELIZABETH A. JADER, husban , Grantors.
NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK)
It~
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
Tax statements for the real property descrihed
in this instrument should he sent to:
HUEMOELLER & BATES
16670 Franklin Trail
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Robert D. Jader
14960 Pixie Point Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
if
Ci
1
~
-
r'
:-.:......~,
:;,,'"''
~..:.
t!'
j
.~
1~
Q
~
f'
,"'-" .
....'"f".::.
-' :.~ >.>:,..:....~ . .
. . .-.::;T....:. ~'.~
~~~':'.f
::~ ~f~~~)_'w
:
:~.
~ A "
'"
q:"- ;
......i
-.....
..:>:..
.~5~~
l~~ ~." .....$."a":.....'
~~<~!.;" .
";:: .7'.....~
J. .~""~..
. '---.
l
"-:f
/
/
I
/
/
I
I
--------:--- -
~..
~
?
S.
1\\
I
/
/
I
/
i
i
~' ui
o
o
I
I
/
m
X
:I:
-
CD
-
~
o
~
1\1
r
~ -- - '-r f(l'
i
i ,
t-+-- __.; _..
.,
" t.
----c~
/
I --, /
~
P
I
!
I
b
1"'-
=\
, ,
r
c
<>'
il(
"""'
I
I ----..\'..
."-- --....
! .
~~l !
I "'. '
I "
I.
Sd1
j
. I
I
I
I
I
~
-~
l!
T-
.!\
~
r
f \
\l_
l
~ _ _/.-:-<~ "... ...~__,l
~ ~
-:r -:::-~~~:l.----
-~..".__._~-J
ft
r ~-_..'_ ..,,-.. _--=---...__ ____ _----._____-------........__
~
fr
....y
.3
it
I
-+-
I
--I
...f-
_.~,
~', , I
-~.-
I
I
I
-+--
i
I
TO
V\ Gl
I oJ) CJ)
0
0 ~
I
I I :s: r I :J:
: I I
./
V"l
~ U1
(5'
cj1
~~
o
U\
G'Vl
[.
;Vlj~
- -
t UJi{pcpJ Aw.l~'P7!J ~ $+
:C/rl/[p;/ f r)V..... SUr{O U7 W"" Ie') h.tV.-,+
La t u); d th GA.;/" t-::(") 8 F Y s{ fbc; t rr.:...
\
~ I t1x;,r _<-'i \",c )1 -', -IT) de kff11f("JL
.2>zoct 01 utf- 11.Io.i..-~tJiJ/, - r,L;;~ t,\j;\( 1\..2?cf
t,/Lf~ 'i)('C ( ~ct1:)(uc. -tv b I ,--It~r (O....€4.
~
\
t
5
II>
).
<
t'ot
- ...
!
I .
EXHIBIT 8
LEGAL BUILDING ENVELOPE
APPROXIMATELY
2400 SQUARE FEET
.//
\
11
I I
-'<
u
o
i3
'"
III
'0
"
/
:...'" /
.n"
.ti;; /
~;:~. /
/
/
(
""'"
""'"
""'"
""'" /
"""'(
""'"
""'"
""'"
""'"
1~
'\
I
----- -...\
'I
'"
~
~
. '0 \..
((0\
81dg area = 2889 Sq. Ft.
Lot area = 14.924 Sq. Ft.
Coverage = 19.36%
'e
'.....1\
((\1-
J~\ji: L__Pixie Pain t Circle
Scale: 1"
30'
DESCRIPTION
I hereby certify that this survey. plan. or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I om a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the Lows of the State
of Minnesota.
~/ 9vE~
Dote ~ 2 S J'VN 1 <:)'18' Reg. No. 8140
Lot 12
FIRST ADDITION TO EASTWOOD
Scott County. Minnesota
Assumed bearings shown
o Denotes iron monumen t
(~~i~) ~opos~
BRANDT ENGINEERING & SURVEYING ~~@ @ O~~ II~'
1600 West 143rd Street, Suite 206 ~ JUN 30199U ~
Burnsville, MN 55306
(612) 435-1966 J28-1-98
~ ~
LLI
W
0 u..
t- O
- CJ)
CO
-. ~
:I: c.o
X C\I
U.I ,...
~ "'oJ
Z , <:> '"
..
"l .
Q.- ..'
- v 4>.,
a: <:> .,. ..
,;;'
c..
I-- j'<J <:>
0 .....
cJ 0,
0
LJ..
,
..
....
;
~O:ilT
c
o
.~
J.J
It:
U
o
'\ ,.-1
j~"-7-..........:5
f 0'\
-l.> :::
/3 .::; r--
.., ~. 0 ~
f.~'7 / ::
Q " OJ ...
(() '""""' It:
~ <' ::l
'\t ~
'\t to?
J.J~
~-o
Q.) >.
::: CO
.S ro
:<:
.:::- 0 CU 0
o Q, ~
.r Ci;;; ~ 0
~"~~f.~
a: $rfu ~
......"t:>'" ....
~ $Q.-;;'0.9
o12o~ QJ
u 0"- 0 Q.
'-U "
Q.
/
/
/
/
/
/
Cc
~o 'OS __ __
.?oqi>$ orIN ~
10 I Jo ou/ 10ld JiJd
./ 1i/1/t1N
4>
:::s:.
5
./
to
()'
--
o
N .....
o N
()' N
.....
.-
--
0...
..J 1-
W
".-..
'.-I
(\,;
'9
;'N
J.J
,...
:3 [1J
0..-;
U..:::
. .w
J.Jro
J.J (lJ
-o.~
t) It:
Cf.lJ.J
OJ
Cf.l ;g
:::::
-<
o
(lJ
:Q
o c
ti ~..:::
H C::ro
~ N ~
- C"'l 0
~- Q.
--c; J.J 0
U) 0...
5 ....::i 0...
(j)
..:::
.w
~
o
M
N
J.J
o
,.-1
o
..D.
co
,.-1
u::
(j)
C"\
co
...
lO
U'
0'
:::
-~
.w
OJ
c
C
.-(
x
(l)
...:
~
~
~
(j)
(l)
,...
:u
"-'
o
0..
o
J.J
0.'
'C
r.:
\..;
v
"-f)
c::J
If")
M
~
15
v
:::
....,
J.J
t1)
.-<
X
(l)
V)
(l)
.w
o
,...
(jj
o
J.J
co
:>
(j)
.-i
~
~
\..;
co
~
;::
U
:::
(j)
c:l
\D
1.:1 ,
M
0\
:0
-~
b
z
I
j/ ~'
F1
J......T
....1
L
'i
l -
:' : I l,t
1,,'0
! 'l I
"
,r' I
,.~r
EXHIBIT D
QUAKER TRAIL
.
r
~
.
.
_;.0
f
~
~i':"':-;'':'.J ra...._..,.u___
;
I
I
'7"'-~
!
,'''''',<:::::
~.
# _ II 3
.
.
';
"
~~
-u
:t:lJ
00
c<l
<1\0
fTlVl
fTI
o
,..,
'"
't'
;,
'"
~
'J ..:
"I. II
IJ.~ ;-::
"J
,
:1::
. .
'""
0:
.' . ''\:
--
:>.' ,
~ ,...... .-
".
. ,:..--::,1-:>
:.;,oJ '1'"n
.::I.,......
..'
,'"
'. . i~ J,
~ ,~h" .
..... ~"..O'f .?i~-_. .' ..'
,~" ~..
-,. u..,' CI~r~ .
. :', -~I-'I . Of: Pf?i;;;~'.-. : .
Cl . -[t. ,~!- . -!,rQ..-1~ .
...~ "./'<:~Y/(Q.. . m If'
( ?./,,':.f.. . . j;'... .
f.fiI . .=-.- p" . ._~~..~:~:~: 1,1fl
,f'
~ ....~~.~~:~~~._...-
0,.
"'il!- ..... ..
<,. ......0
\.
J.
l ~ ".., .
. . O'f.I~ . '.
. .' .,1~...... '.
,~, .
\..l~ "-..
"LO
(,t,1;.
,t,#l
~ (.
. !~. .
o. "., ..,..
..........
."1'> .
'r, ," "
. t..
. .-I'tl ," ," ~~<
. ._:~ -... .- 'a, .
.. O~':'
...,.,... ..'
'].~f; . _.-
c;(:~ . .
.. "1.1.
fl".
:.t, _
'}..
,le
',~ t
. , 6 .
" " 9' . '.....-
^ 6 ........... .. ....... .:>:/' :. 0:;;..:::....:.::.::.:.:.. :::-'.::" :::....::::..: ..
.::;: ........ ............. .'. .(~/., ~',:- .. ....... ............. ...
....... ........ j{/'
...=:2!1;,',t~:.>L?; .....~~~';~~ ~~,"- ~- ';
~'l to .
,n~
. :: If"
_. 0 ~ ~ ..' -. .'
. H~
'J^
.'
,( .~
"r!,:
~.{' ...
~"
0",
"
.1--
'- ,
:: -t P
t(ii ~
A .\
,
,
\
'----,
. \
\
\
\
,
,
\
\
I
EXHIBIT D
NORTHWOOD ROAD
~-
-----
~
8
::r
-<
~ G1
i ~
~, ."
p
G'.
....
I
,
~
i
...:.
"
,
\
,
.
~\ .
\..oo~ .
, tycJT~-'--'-~-
\ 0~ ;!
, O'~'I.
\. -:: I
", . : ,
"', J: ;-'-i
............ I. ~. ,'~_
...... IN .
.... . l~
", ! 10'
"~, ! i~ I
....; i
""r--t, !
i I '"'-.
i I I
-! '-; I
--_', \' I
" ,"'rt.
r , .'
., .
I .
Ii
~
'I';'
" .
AlO
..c C'I ::D
VI ~ ....
'" )> ."
If\ C"; &;
o ,., M
--.-.-~'
HOUSE FOOTPRINT
1052 sa FEET
,
"
1/ ~'.
nO'
l' ;
" ~
'l
Ii_
I
/
~
o
C
\Il
'"
, -
/-
. .
r
GARAGE FOOT PRINl
,;l.._~.
~- ---
al- --
If'
(]I ,
~".~...__..'
""-
760 sa FEET
t,
D=-..... ,.: __.....-' ~-4L.K L!NE
' ...." ~I, Y OF FR/
P:"I.l.f\If::./f>iG DEFT OR LAKE
..c~. ro. ".;'
.,.) ..'-
. ~ -...
r 0 n z
------~-zY}%:; ----.----- ___
~ ^ z _~__ _'::" 1
--------~ .......:; .,.........
--::0 I .
::;; o' 0 ----..-----['
------~-- - -- -.
::0<-"
<:_::L-~----i[
... r ,:.
~-
---
. . . - It. ot 15ft. SanITary
Sewer Easement
o
III
g
;:
'.. -..... ...
~~~:-...__...
...... --. -
T)? OF 9L:.JFF PEF.
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
P~ANNI~JG DEP:
Jr~Ei....9CI.u, .. ______..:-;____.
----- f -_____n__ .L..:t.-_+ _______________ ~_-
: '-----~~~~~~~~~~~:~~~,.-.~-~-:i~E!~Q,~gii~~::.- .~.--::; S06-':-~ UNE AS SCALED
..... '06 _-.~-----N3Z_____ ,,-- ,~ OF
:<~~=:~::::~:r~~,~'~~:---'---s-:~y.~~.. _. ___=":.~~:.~~~~~.~:, I _._ _' _~~.~!HWOC D
:~-:~~~~~~~
::: :::::':::: ::~::::
- +-..
-~ -. - ------
:::::::::::::::f~:
PER PLAT
,
..
June 30, 1998
Ms. Jenni Tovar
Prior Lake Planning
Ms. Tovar:
Please review the revised survey. I hope it meets your requested
modifications. Please call and let me know if any other changes are needed.
I am still unclear about what constitutes a sub-standard lot and if I need to
have the two properties in different ownership. Please explain and advise.
I will await your response before we proceed.
Bob Jader
'ID 1m @ rn OIW rn ~l
iul{\ I vUN 301998 1M I I III
I I 'I I
I I
.'0(,.
/
/
CERllF1CATE OF SURVEY
J28-1-98
for
BOB JADER
-------,
<v
"
,'~
.C)' ,10
~C)~'
~ '"
11
I I
..:It:
()
o
-0
-+-J
Q)
en
l{)
r--.
/ ~/
~
.~ /
.ti;; /
~cfJ~'/
/
/ 1---; /
/ ~ 11 /'V'-
~ I\....-/ . 1'1 / / '> 1-- ~ o.
'" 7' ~~~
'1-~") " ,,>? :if,j'
'" 7 / ,,'57'>"
"--- "--- / ( '> 2. It-
'" / <./ <y'>
~" <--
'" " " Y' "
"''' / '^
'" "v--.y/ "(
'" " " "
'" "" j)
l' S '?'?.?'" " V /
:.? '10"
~6" "-
0&.. '"
If/ '" / ~
'" !.&' . ~
"- Cy~
"- / (rj .0
'" ~
"V ~
\...--
· 0\.
<:( 0\
G\e
G\\.
Bldg area = 2889 Sq. Ft.
Lot area = 14,924 Sq. Ft.
Coverage = 19.36%
<:(\-i-\ e
J~gbL
Pixie Point Circle
Scale: 1" -
30'
DESCRIPTION
I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the Laws of the State
of Minnesota.
~~/ ?riP~.
~~() 2 '5 JVIJ ) C198" Reg. No. 8140
Lot 12
FIRST ADDITION TO EASTWOOD
Scott County, Minnesota
Assumed bearings shown
o Denotes iron monument
C~isti~) ~opos~
BRANDT ENGINEERING & SURVEYING D rncsrnD~rn [II
1600 West 143rd Street, Suite 206 JUN 301900 i@1
Burnsville, MN 55306
(612) 435-1966 J28-1-98
J\JN \ 6 19W \~J
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
for
BOB JADER
J28-1-98
/
o
:-. /
,ry
.ti;; /
~~cb'"/
/
/
(
"'"
'" J" /
" " / (,
'" -( ~:
"'" " "
"''' /
"'" " v^- v /
'" ""
"'" ""
l' s <<<"'" " V /
<. '10"
~6" ........
O&~ '"
~ "'"
"'"
"'"
"'"
V
('
,~
.C)" ,,<0
~ C)f)..'
" "
<v
-------,
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
-----j
11
I I
-X
U
o
.0
-+J
Q)
(f)
L[)
"
r
-1
1~
-;,.
~
~ 6'. \
~~. \
',? If
~tr~
\
~.~e,(:../ <.
V',--,
~
\
\
\
~
\
1.---\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
j
L--
(;\e
C~\\ .
/ 0
~
I&.~
ICY ro
/ tr5 ,0
~
~
.0~
(( 0\
Bldg area = 2889 Sq. Ft.
Lot area = 14,924 Sq. Ft.
Coverage = 19.36%
((\-1-\0
Seal e: 1"
30'
Pixie Point Circle
DESCRIPTION
I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the Laws of the State
of Minnesota.
~1*;;; )~ Reg. No. 8140
Lot 12
FIRST ADDITION TO EASTWOOD
Scott County, Minnesota
Assumed bearings shown
o Denotes iron monument
(~isti~) cEopo~
BRANDT ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
1600 West 143rd Street, Suite 206
Burnsville, MN 55306
(612) 435-1966 J28-1-98
CERllF1CA TE OF SURVEY
for
808 JADER
J28-1-98
<v
-------,
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
--...........--\
..lie
()
o
-0
..t-J
<V
(I)
"
,~
.C)' ,ro
~ C)f\,'
~ "
11
~.:/ / <<// )$ ,10'
~ / / ; ; /: :.);/ "lI,ot.t+ '" t4 0
~?JC) / ///<< / /~ ~
/' / /C)/ "/: '/ // y ;~
/ / / / /Oj~ ~ /: // / \ .-
, / //j~ ~~C);( / /
, / / / /~~ / // / ~.) ~vi.
'" ~ ,,,,;; / / / / / /kGr /
''to;.:). / ,.)
If)
'"
/
4.J
~ . /
.CV
.t;;; /
~!V;>./
/
/ 1 ~
/ ~ r /''V'-
~ I "- / ~ / ~1-- ..?
"'" Y ( 1<"1<"~~
, ~ ')
" 7 /
"'" "'" / ( '>
" <. <. ", 'tf~
"'" 'J~
*' '" v'" /
"'" y
"'" ""
"'" ""
l' s <<<"'" " V /
:.? '10'
<;(6" "
0&... "'"
~ "'" / 4.J
ol'
"'" I~.~
, 10' ~
" / ~ .0
"'" ~
V ~
-t- r t--\
..J
~~. \ \
~~. \ \
'/ V. \
~V~ \
\ \
\ \
\
V,--"\ \
~ \.
\ \
\ \
\ \
~ \
\ .:L_J
L-~
~V'\
...
~--...........
~
<b
~."
.1\
;r.O
~
~
· {\"--
<:( 0\
c\e
G\\
Bldg area = 2889 Sq, Ft.
lot area = 14.924 Sq. Ft.
Coverage = 19.36%
<:(\+\e
Scale: 1" - 30'
Pixie Point Circle
DESCRIPTION
I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Registered
land Surveyor under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
~712~~ Reg. No. 8140
lot 12
FIRST ADDITION TO EASTWOOD
Scott County, Minnesota
Assumed bearings shown
o Denotes iran monument
C~isti~) ~opo~
BRANDT ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
1600 West 143rd Street, Suite 206
Burnsville, MN 55306
(612) 435-1966 J28-1-98
o E7)7 -.. LJ7h
-' 7 0/:3 (.,1,.9
street
, ~~~o
~ (t'
J5-211-94
!~g?/~~Cd~
/ cf)/f S't-u~~______
i(C/'7- ;2 ~'7o
(.boy
~
.-
,~
I~ ")
.~j 0)
"O)h'
. v <{)
~
'"
Sc 'j.
J. I
G \J
/
/
/
/
-d rd" &tbad s
,/ \ S, t'fll 8,^1d.
.' "" ~;dl.. · I .
/ --.- ~orc d
. --- '\ - 10' ()^, ~i e..
----- -so' 0 H-W St.tba
\ Jl~~ '{1Yd
,--- \......---- 3()~b Wlro< ~
. ~CL
\
~0
(j
-1 11
L -l- 5
I
Bldg area = 2819 Sq. Ft.
Lot area = 14,661 Sq. Ft.
Coverage = 19.23 %
Scale: 1" 30'
DESCRIPTION
I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the Laws of the State
~f 'nesota.
~
Date ~ 't ~PR... 19 '7 S' Reg. No. 8140
Lot 13
FIRST ADDITION TO EASTWOOD
Scott County, Minnesota
Assumed bearings shown
o Denotes iron monument
(~,iSti~) ~opos~
~~
BRANDT ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
1600 West 143rd Street, Suite 206
Burnsville, MN 55306
(612) 435-1966 J5~211-94
<6 ~Ll-o.J- 80
Pf
5Mvt- )v~n ,,~ Ct.'f:r-CIJ-) jJy/
u 1"2J
d.
~i~ {
l~ t~ ~.