HomeMy WebLinkAbout10A - Crystal Bay PUD Amendment
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA #:
PREPARED BY:
AUGUST 4, 2008
10A
DANETTE WALTHERS-MOORE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES DIRECTOR
AGENDA ITEM:
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
CRYSTAL BAY
DISCUSSION:
Introduction
The 212 Development Group has applied for approval of an amendment to the
Planned Unit Development (PUD) known as Crystal Bay on property located
south of CSAH 82, directly east of Fremont Avenue and approximately % mile
west of CSAH 21.
Historv
The Crystal Bay Planned Unit Development (PUD) was approved by the City
Council on December 1, 2003. The approved PUD Plan included 24
townhouse units in 12 buildings. The proposed townhouses were a 3-story
walkout, attached single family style dwelling with an attached garage. Each
of the units in these buildings included a 3-car garage, rear yard decks, and
approximately 4,610 square feet of floor area. The buildings are 34' high at
the front, with exteriors consisting of a combination of brick and stucco.
In October of 2004, the 212 Development Group and Manley Brothers
Construction were granted a minor amendment to the originally approved
PUD. The proposed amendment affected the style, size and exterior
elevations of the townhouse units. The 3-story walkout buildings were
replaced with a rambler style unit, with a 3-car attached garage, a rear yard
deck and a four season porch. The exterior of the building consisted of Hardie
Board siding and shakes, rather than stucco and brick. The ground floor area
of the units remained the same, and the units fit into the existing envelope lots.
Current Circumstances
The current 212 Development Group request involves a minor amendment to
allow for the reconfiguration of seven (7) attached townhome units (totaling 14
units) to instead allow for fourteen (14) detached single-family units. The
structures, which will be slightly reduced in size, will be located within the
confines of the previously approved building envelopes (site plan and building
elevations attached).
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 14, 2008 and
recommended approval of the request.
ISSUES:
Section 1106.607 of the Zoning Ordinance allows the City Council to approve
minor amendments to an approved PUD Plan by resolution following
notification of all owners of property within the PUD. A minor amendment
includes "changes that increase conformity with Ordinance requirements;
www.cityofpriorlake.com
r:\council\2008 agenda reports\08 04 08\crpt\~rge~~4~~OO / Fax 952.447.4245
decreases in residential density, leasable floor area, building height,
impervious surface and/or required parking provided such decreases have a
minimal impact on the overall character of the approved Final PUD Plan as
determined by the Zoning Administrator; minor building additions and floor plan
modifications that do not increase parking requirements or reduce use able
open space; and changes that are specified as minor amendments in the
approved Development Contract."
The main issue is whether or not the proposed amendment will change the
character of the PUD. The amendment does not change the number of units
or increase the ground floor area of the buildings. The proposed amendment
does decrease the amount of impervious surface by approximately 332 square
feet. It should also be noted that the proposed single-family homes will contain
the same design, color palette, materials, and scale, with the exception of
having space between the individual units (building elevations attached). The
spacing between the proposed single-family homes will maintain a 10 foot
separation.
The applicants conducted a neighborhood meeting on July 9th to discuss the
proposed changes to the PUD plan. The developer indicated that six property
owners representing the 14 dwelling units presently constructed (from within
the Crystal Bay PUD) were in attendance and a variety of issues were
discussed.
The City Council must review the proposed amendment to the Final PUD plan
and determine whether the amendment is consistent with the purpose of a
PUD.
FINANCIAL
IMPACT:
Approval of this amendment to the Planned Unit Development may assist in
facilitating the construction of new dwelling units, which will contribute to the
City's tax base.
ALTERNATIVES:
The City Council has the following alternatives:
1. Adopt the resolution with conditions approving the amended final PUD Plan
for Crystal Bay.
2. Deny the resolution approving the final plat.
3. Defer this item and provide staff with specific direction.
Staff recommends Alternative #1, with the following conditions:
1. The developer shall provide a revised grading plan.
2. The developer shall submit revised impervious surface calculations
and plans reflecting the revised impervious surface totals.
RECOMMENDED
MOTION:
1.
second to adopt a resolution approving the amendment to
Plan for Crystal Bay, subject to the listed conditions.
Reviewed by:
r:\council\2008 agenda reports\08 04 08\crystal bay-cc report.doc
2
Motion By:
Second By:
WHEREAS, The 212 Development Group has submitted an application for an amendment to the
Planned Unit Development Final Plan known as Crystal Bay; and
WHEREAS, The proposed amendment is a "minor amendment" for administrative and procedural
purposes; and
WHEREAS, The Prior Lake Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment to the Final
PUD Plan on July 14, 2008; and
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission found the amendment to the Final PUD Plan to be
consistent with the purpose of a PUD and in substantial compliance with the approved
preliminary plan and recommended approval of the Final PUD Plan; and
WHEREAS, The Prior Lake City Council considered the proposed Final PUD Plan on August 4,
2008; and
WHEREAS, The City Council finds the Final PUD Plan in substantial compliance with the approved
Preliminary PUD Plan; and
WHEREAS, The City Council finds the PUD Final Plan is compatible with the stated purposes and
intent of the Section 1106 Planned Unit Developments of the Zoning Ordinance.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE,
MINNESOTA as follows:
1. The Recitals set forth above are incorporated herein.
2. The Amended Planned Unit Development Final Plan is hereby approved subject to the following
conditions:
a) The developer shall provide a revised grading plan.
b) The developer shall submit revised impervious surface calculations
and plans reflecting the revised impervious surface totals.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2008.
YES
NO
I Haugen
I Hedberg
I Erickson
I LeMair
I Millar
Haugen
Hedberg
Erickson
LeMair
Millar
Frank Boyles, City Manager
www.cityofpriorlake.com
Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245
CRYSTAL BAY PUD AMENDMENT
IJ~~I~ ~'R(~
j i \ J)JJ 11 I I;
. 0~'~
~\lllllnlllll, 0llilTFn:>:
@ Ililllllll
,~B
Project Site UW I~ B
\ ' }l-~
COUNTY HWY 82 \
I
~ ~
~ ~
L/;AY KNOLLS RD
lWlJ ~ \If 1If IT[
~I ~
Vi ~
S59
~-,
I r
I
I I \
~
/
/
/
/
\
N
+-
- - Feet
o 115 230 460 690 920
CJ
tit:..
~
CJ)
><
UJ
-r
.....1
." .
I
- 1-.....
..
I'
'.~
.';1 '
'-. ~.f'
I
i -'
..
- ~ 81. ~ i.. i'; -;
9 GNV 9 1.0., i ~ 8 ~ 2 ~ ,.. T"'"
S3~OHNM013)fVl8018d llld.l:i.:i:::l=.
I'
I
=X ST \JG
.;~';:u'~~.~~;;.~~;';~-;'~;~~~ ~
A31~~'W I!!!!
~
li:I!~II~
ii:!!ill
D ,_ r .
Iii .
~ .
lilb'
I
1''''' "I
,'" '" " ". II
II
II
II
II
U
"
II
II
II
II
"
= a::
~ I
@ ~
~~~
if L- -~
~:
, I ~.;~
~-,...;" .~...; I __~
- ! ~'l !-;' ...1711
III t:. 1'_ liO/ X II
I ! , . . "
~ ." ' j II
l .' " --Ll---n
) I II
I II
I II
I II
I II
I II
I II
I II
--11 II
II t.
II
II
II
II
II
II
"
II
II
"
II
II
II
__JI
n
II
II
II
II
II
a "
Il11t 2. ~ ! !
.'Jut ~"::
Jlli ~ II
U
---ll
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- _] IJ
I t. II
,r : ::
tV I II
'. o. I II
I "
I "
" I I I
'I -x--T1--,.u
- ~ . '"
; t\IIr-=;:-l~- '"J ::
Le.1 I r- "- "
r-" -----4. l - - L -U
IN "Q;U.. I. ..,...... !~
~~
i~
~~
ii
.~
~~
~~
~~
=:
.....-
t
......,...11I
'L:......,.
@!!]
~ ~
..
(
...
I
1
~ l
-","' "'~=.;j,
. -'.'~'-~;_-:.'~'-- ,i~\f'.<J,;~:iri I
r -t' ----=-- ::.:::------=-=1'\
rn l-c ~ c--
,~~J: -= _'_._
I~~I
! J._I __ - -
'l- .-------. -- ---
l~~-I
.1 ~ ,- -- ----
i_~'--I
:,-11-1 i
,o_lJ,I_- -----.-
1-['1 1--'
,I~:! \1 !
:d 11 ;j. ~-I'---- - -- ..-
(I'il! .1
ill._J,'._=_J ------.
l...l .;:-.... --]~rr ---:-:-::',~
, ""'f"~
_-=-,.~---:H~;:': j__~ll_~=:
I -=-n ---------: -: - -11
-T-l::--:-.:: -==-.d I
: -J. "\____..1 --1
l~r'-I[ ,
I~-~~ -.11'- -- r
I,j--II i
------~- .~---]-
I
\
-'
.1 II II I 11111111.......,..,..'. ~.,,",,,,,, (", ,j .V'~""......d....1!F6.....,M.~.:...;....~ ',","-""J'-'~"lollWilIIIllI'""
o
UJ
CJ)
o
n
o
rr
"
J-{u-'Utit:u
,
- -.-.::--JI
____._J_~__..__~__._. -
:>~o::>os=)
/r~"",
I "!"~ ,
II 'It'. ',.
Ai )U~~jl
~~'" l~" ;
\"".J'. ..
\\ i:T:__: __,_,:~
.;,. --_._,---
\.~~C
June 18, 2008
City of Prior Lake:
Attn: Jeff Matzke
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
Re: Crystal Bay Townhomes
Dear Mr. Matzke,
I am writing this letter to let you know our intentions for the new Crystal Bay project.
We are planning to build single family homes instead of the existing townhomes on the
site. The design for the new homes will be the same as before. We will construct the
new homes with the same building materials as well as the same color scheme to ensure
we keep the site uniform.
Sincerely,
~ 212 Development oro. up A ~.~~>. ,
~___ (l \\'~
. \ .-/ '~. ". \jV~J
Paul R. Mollett, Project Manager
TTO
SSOCIATES
ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS, INC.
June 18, 2008
City of Prior Lake
Attn: Jeff Matzke
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
RE: CRYSTAL SAY TOWNHOMES
Job No. 2-08-0192
Dear Mr. Matzke:
The enclosed exhibit shows the proposed single family layout on the remainder of the
Crystal Bay Townhome development. The homes (including sidewatk and front stoop)
are 65 square feet less impervious than the twinhome square footage previously
proposed, with the exception of Lot 17. The home on Lot 17 was reduced to stay 5'
from the common, angled lot line with Lot 16. That home is 137 square feet less
impervious. The overall impervious area of the homes is reduced by 982 square feet
from the original approval. The overall driveway area has increased by 650 square
feet. Therefore, the overall net difference in impervious area is 332 SQuare feet less
than what was approved with the original application.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Otto Associates
Engineers and Land Surveyors, Inc.
~jJ{)Jd:e-
Cara Schwahn Otto, P.E.
encl.
cc: Tom Heiland, Klingelhutz Development
Paul Mollett, Klingelhutz Development
9 WEST DIVISION STREET - BUFFALO, MINN. 55313 - (763) 682-4727 FAX (763) 682-3522