HomeMy WebLinkAbout98-143 Variance
"-
riLE COpy
November 9,1998
Thomas Mansk
14840 Oakland Beach Avenue
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Recording of Approved Variances
Dear Tom:
The purpose of this letter is to advise you the resolution approving front yard
setback and OHW variances on property located at 14840 Oakland Beach
Avenue must be recorded within 60 days of approval or the variance will be null
and void per Section 5-6-6 of City Code.
Enclosed are two certified copies of the original and a copy for yourself. One of
the copies is to be recorded at the Scott County Recorders office by December
23, 1998. The other copy is to be stamped as recorded by the recorders office
and returned to the Planning Department as proof of recording.
If you have any questions about this matter, please contact me at 447-4230.
Sinc;reIY,. .yJf7JW1
nni~r
lanner
.l:\98filEl.!:l\98'(ar\98-143\r.ecdlet. doc
16200 cagle creeK Ave. ::l.c., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
..
~
File No. 98-143 Thomas Mansk
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss.
COUNTY OF SCOTT )
Doc. No. T99321
Vol. 84 Page 64
File L\51~
eert. 28061
OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES
SCOTT OOUNTY. MNNESOTA
Certified Filed on
11-13-1998 at 11:40 [t<I AM [ ] PM
Pat Boeckman, Registrar of Titles
01
by U ,Deputy Fee: $20.00
The undersigned, duly qualified and Deputy City Clerk of the City of Prior Lake, hereby
certifies the attached hereto is a true and correct copy of the original.
Resolution 98-33PC Variance to Front Yard Setback and OHW Setback
on file in the office of the City Planner, City of Prior Lake.
Dated this 9th day of November, 1998.
(City Seal)
TRUECOPY.DOC
~~
Bret Woodson
Assistant City Manager and Acting Deputy
City Clerk
PAGE 1
RESOLUTION 98-33PC
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 2.1 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A 22.9
FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 25 FOOT
FRONT YARD SETBACK AND A 9 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A 41 FOOT
SETBACK FROM THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK (OHW)
RATHER THAN THE REQUIRED 50 FOOT SETBACK
FROM THE OHW OF PRIOR LAKE
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment ofthe City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Thomas Mansk has applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in order to
permit the construction of a residential addition to an existing structure on property
located in the R-l (Urban Residential) District and SD (Shoreland Overlay) District at
the following location, to wit;
14840 Oakland Beach Avenue, legally described as Tract A, Registered Land
Survey No. 97, Scott County, Minnesota.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as contained in
Case #98-143 and held hearings thereon on October 26, 1998.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variances upon
the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property
values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variances on the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is
possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variances will not
result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties,
unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, and
danger to the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort,
morals or in any other respect be contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and
Comprehensive Plan.
5. The existing house is located 22.9 feet from the front property line and 36 feet from
the OHW of Prior Lake. This proposed addition will not encroach any closer to the
property lines than what is existing.
1:\98files\98var\98-143\re9833pc.doc 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
6. In 1996, the applicant was granted a variance to the OHW setback for residential
addition and detached garage. Upon approval of the variance, the Planning
Commission suggested a re-design of the site. The applicant took the advice of the
Planning Commission and has now re-designed the site.
7. The granting of the variances are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. The variances will not serve merely as a
convenience to the applicant, and are necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship.
The factors listed above do not allow for an alternative reasonable location for the
closet addition to be permitted without the variances.
8. The contents of Planning Case 98-143 are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby approves the
following variances:
1. A 2.1 foot variance to permit a 22.9 foot front yard setback instead ofthe required
25 foot front yard setback for proposed residential addition; and
2. A 9 foot variance to permit a 41 foot setback from the OHW of Prior Lake instead
of the required 50 foot setback;
subject to the following conditions:
1. The improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the survey
submitted by the applicant, and attached hereto as Exhibit A.
2. The 10 foot by 8 foot room located 0.7 feet from the west property line must
be removed.
3. The existing gravel driveway must be restored to lawn with seed or sod.
4. The existing shed must be removed or compliant with the Zoning Ordinance.
These conditions are to be incorporated into the building permit for the proposed
improvements.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on October 26, 1998.
An~
~TEST:
Donald R. Rye, PI
1:\98fi1es\98var\98-143\re9833pc.doc
2
"'-
AVE.
2
Valley Surveying Co., I? AeXHIBIT A IID:-')I[:;@lei U'W l:ll~'~') I
SUITE 120-C'J 16570 FRANKLIN TRAIL ~ I
FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM OCT I 3 1998 II
PRIOR LAKE J MINNESOTA .55372
TELEPHONE (6/2) 447-2570
04k
g2~.13 .(44'0.
:
4 /;-~
4'u~
922.Sg
.
PlY/OfT
,el.. L..
6;' 90 41(;; .
~ I /9;' 6 ,
ristered Land Survey No. 97, Scott County, Minnesota. Also showing all
ovements and encroachments onto and off from said property if any.
925.17 top nut of hyd. near the NW corner of property.
3 existing grade elevations.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
OCTOBER 26, 1998
1. Call to Order:
The October 26, 1998, Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chairman
Stamson at 6:30 p.m. Those present were Commissioners Cramer, Kuykendall, Stamson
and Vonhof, Planning Director Don Rye, Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier, Planner
Jenni Tovar and Recording Secretary Connie Carlson.
2. Roll Call:
V onhof
Kuykendall
Criego
Cramer
Stamson
Present
Present
Absent
Present
Present
3. Approval of Minutes:
The Minutes from the October 12, 1998 Planning Commission meeting were approved as
presented.
4. Public Hearings:
5. Old Business:
Kuykendall questioned ring road status. Rye responded it will be coming up.
6. New Business:
~
A. Case File #98-143 Thomas Mansk is requesting a front yard setback of 22.9 feet
rather than the required setback of 25 feet; and an Ordinary High Water
setback of 41 feet instead of the required 50 foot Ordinary High Water setback.
Planner Jenni Tovar presented the Planning Report dated October 26, 1998, on file in the
office ofthe City Planner.
Thomas Mansk is proposing to construct a 32 foot by 26 foot residential addition. Part of
the existing house will be converted back into a garage, as originally built, and the
proposed addition will accommodate additional living area. The lot area above the 904
OHW of Prior Lake is 10,000 square feet. There is an existing house on the lot located
0.7 feet from the property line. The applicant is requesting the following variances:
A 2.1 foot variance to permit a front yard setback of 22.9 feet rather than the required
setback of 25 feet; and a 9 foot variance to permit an OHW setback of 41 feet instead of
the required 50 foot OHW setback.
1:\98fi1es\98plcomm\pcmin\nm 1 02698.doc
Staffhas concluded the variance requests for OHW setback and front yard setback are
substantiated with hardships pertaining to the lot that the applicant has no control over.
Comments from the Public:
Applicant Tom Mansk, 14840 Oakland Beach, explained his proposed addition.
Comments from the Commissioners:
V onhof:
. This is the second time in two years we have seen this property. Lesser variances are
requested.
. Agreed with staffs recommendations. The four hardship criteria have been met.
. Recommend any variance approval would be contingent upon two conditions: 1)
That portion of the structure that comes closer to the lake be removed; and 2) The
existing gravel driveway be removed and returned to grass after the other driveway is
put in.
Kuykendall:
. Noticed there was a storage addition on the property.
. Mansk explained it was a temporary storage building built because of the storm
damage this summer. He will remove it with the new structure.
. Tovar pointed out the impervious surface was under 30%. The ordinance allows for
water storage.
. Comply with the zoning ordinance with the shed.
Cramer:
. Hardship criteria has been met. Applicant has put forth consideration in removing
some of the existing structure that is not conforming to the ordinance.
. Support variance with conditions set forth by Commissioner V oOOof.
Stamson:
. Agreed with staff and Commissioners, the hardship criteria has clearly been met.
. Agreed with the additional conditions by Commissioners.
Open discussion:
Kuykendall:
Questioned the overhangs. Mansk explained the situation with the existing garage.
MOTION BY VONHOF, SECOND KUYKENDALL, APPROVING RESOLUTION 98-
33PC APPROVING A 2.1 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A 22.9 FOOT FRONT
YARD SETBACK INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 25 FOOT FRONT YARD
SETBACK AND A 9 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A 41 FOOT SETBACK FROM
1:\98fi1es\98plcomm\pcmin\mn 102698.doc
2
THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK (OHW) RATHER THAN THE REQUIRED
50 FOOT SETBACK FROM THE OHW OF PRIOR LAKE WITH THE ADDITIONAL
CONDITIONS:
. REMOVE THAT PORTION OF STRUCTURE CLOSEST TO THE LAKE.
. REMOVE THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY AND RETURN TO GRASS AFTER THE
NEW DRIVEWAY IS IN PLACE.
. THE SHED MUST COMPLY WITH THE CITY ORDINANCE.
Vote taken signified ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
7. Announcements and Correspondence:
A. Proposals for Planning Commission Bylaw changes.
Planning Director Don Rye gave a brief overview of the Bylaw process for changes.
Discussion followed with a recommendation by the Planning Commission to City
Council changing the chair appointment process.
B. Joint meeting with City Council.
Planning Director Don Rye updated the Commissioners with the City Council's
suggestion to hold a joint meeting with the Planning Commission to discuss issues of
mutual importance. Some issues would be variances, downtown development and the
Planning Commission involvement, review the County Road 42 corridor, appeal process,
Planning Commission's long term planning and involvement with City Council.
Other suggestions included: Staff prepare a brief discussion paper or statement addressing
the issues, including pro's and con's; Available strategic planning on a city web site;
Infrastructure for high tech, where is Prior Lake at and how do we address those issues;
Digital high tech; Another issue is the physical infrastructure - transfers in to the
subdivision and space for future utility uses. What role does high tech infrastructure play
in the planning commission's role?
This would take a couple of sessions. Alternate sessions with City Council's and
Planning Commission's regular meetings. Basically a two hour meeting before City
Council's workshop and vice versa.
8. Adjournment:
The meeting adjourned at 7:12 p.m.
Donald Rye
Director of Planning
Connie Carlson
Recording Secretary
1:\98fi1es\98plcomm\pcmin\nm 1 02698.doc
3
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
SITE:
PRESENTER:
REVIEWED BY:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
PLANNING REPORT
6A
CONSIDER FRONT YARD SETBACK AND OHW
SETBACK VARIANCES FOR THOMAS MANSK, Case
File #98-143
14840 OAKLAND BEACH
JENNITOVAR,PLANNER
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
YES -1L NO
OCTOBER 26, 1998
Thomas Mansk is proposing to construct a 32 foot by 26 foot residential addition.
Part of the existing house will be converted back into a garage, as originally built,
and the proposed addition will accommodate additional living area. The lot area
above the 904 OHW of Prior Lake is 10,000 square feet. There is an existing
house on the lot located 0.7 feet from the property line. The applicant is
requesting the following variances:
A 2.1 foot variance to permit a front yard setback of 22.9 feet rather than
the required setback of 25 feet; and
A 9 foot variance to permit an OHW setback of 41 feet instead of the
required 50 foot OHW setback.
DISCUSSION:
RLS #97 was approved by the City Council in December of 1981. The property
is a riparian lot located within the R-1 (Suburban Residential) and the SO
(Shoreland Overlay) district. The lot contains 10,000 square feet above the 904
elevation. It is 100 feet wide and approximately 100 feet deep. There is not a
bluff on the property and the existing structure is located above the regulatory
flood protection elevation. The applicant does not own either of the adjacent
parcels. As a part of this proposal, the applicant will be removing the existing 10
foot by 8 foot room located 0.7 feet from the westerly lot line.
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
The legal building envelope is approximately 16 feet wide by 85 feet long. The
existing structure is located out of the legal building envelope. In the vacant area
on the lot, the building envelope is 12 feet deep at the narrowest point. The
existing structure is 20 feet deep and 42 feet wide. The garage was converted to
living space by a previous owner, so there is no garage on this site. It is
unknown when the house was originally built, but a permit was issued in 1984 for
alterations. The off-street parking consists of a gravel driveway and parking
area. Impervious surface will be under 30% with the proposed addition and
driveway.
In 1996, the applicant received a variance to allow a OHW setback of 40 feet to
allow the construction of a 7 by 14 foot addition and 22 by 32 foot detached
garage. Attached is Resolution 96-24PC detailing the approval. Upon receiving
this variance, the Planning Commission had suggested a redesign of the site.
The applicant took this under advisement, and never built the garage or addition
as originally proposed. The plan has been revised as presented in this variance
application.
VARIANCE HARDSHIP STANDARDS
1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship
with respect to the property.
This criteria goes to whether reasonable use can be made of the property if
the Ordinance is literally enforced. There is a hardship with respect to the
property because the legal building envelope cannot reasonably
accommodate a garage. It is reasonable for a property owner to have a
garage. The proposed 32 foot by 26 foot addition is reasonable and literal
enforcement of the ordinance would not allow such an addition.
2. Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique
to the property.
The unique circumstance is the lot depth and the fact the lot is riparian. The
lot is approximately 100 feet deep. Considering the front yard setback is 25
feet and the OHW setback is 50 feet, this leaves a building width of 25 feet.
However, because the OHW 904 el. meanders to cut into the lot, the actual
buildable width is 12 feet at the narrowest width and 23 feet at the deepest.
There is hardship with respect to the property.
3. The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and is not the
result of actions of persons presently having an interest in the property.
The lot is considered to be substandard. The lot area is 10,000 sq. feet, the
required lot area for a riparian lot is 15,000 square feet. There is no existing
L:\98FILES\98V AR\98-143\98-143PC.DOC
Page 2
garage on the property and the lot area or depth cannot be modified to meet
the ordinance provisions. The proposed 32 foot by 26 foot addition is
reasonable and the hardship is not the result of the property owner. .
4. The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces
substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest.
Considering the existing structure is setback 36 feet from the OHW and 22.9
feet from the front property line, the proposed OHW setback of 41 feet and
front yard setback of 22.9 feet can preserve the spirit and intent of the
ordinance as the encroachments are less than what is existing. The granting
of the variance is not contrary to the public interest as a garage will be
created, providing for storage and screened off-street parking.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has concluded the variance requests for OHW setback and front yard
setback are substantiated with hardships pertaining to the lot that the applicant
has no control over.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Approve the variances requested by the applicant, or approve any variances
the Planning Commission deems appropriate in the circumstances.
2. Table or continue discussion of the item for specific purpose.
3. Deny the application because the Planning Commission finds a lack of
demonstrated hardship under the zoning code criteria.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Adoption of the attached Resolution #98-33PC approving the variances as
requested.
L:\98FILES\98V AR\98-143\98-143PC.DOC
Page 3
RESOLUTION 98-33PC
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 2.1 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A 22.9
FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 25 FOOT
FRONT YARD SETBACK AND A 9 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A 41 FOOT
SETBACK FROM THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK (OHW)
RATHER THAN THE REQUIRED 50 FOOT SETBACK
FROM THE OHW OF PRIOR LAKE
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Thomas Mansk has applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in order to
permit the construction of a residential addition to an existing structure on property
located in the R-l (Urban Residential) District and SD (Shoreland Overlay) District at
the following location, to wit;
14840 Oakland Beach Avenue, legally described as Tract A, Registered Land
Survey No. 97, Scott County, Minnesota.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as contained in
Case #98-143 and held hearings thereon on October 26, 1998.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variances upon
the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property
values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variances on the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is
possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variances will not
result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties,
unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, and
danger to the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort,
morals or in any other respect be contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and
Comprehensive Plan.
5. The existing house is located 22.9 feet from the front property line and 36 feet from
the OHW of Prior Lake. This proposed addition will not encroach any closer to the
property lines than what is existing.
1:\98files\98var\98-143\re9833pc.doc 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
6. In 1996, the applicant was granted a variance to the OHW setback for residential
addition and detached garage. Upon approval of the variance, the Planning
Commission suggested a re-design of the site. The applicant took the advice of the
Planning Commission and has now re-designed the site.
7. The granting of the variances are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. The variances will not serve merely as a
convenience to the applicant, and are necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship.
The factors listed above do not allow for an alternative reasonable location for the
closet addition to be permitted without the variances.
8. The contents of Planning Case 98-143 are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby approves the
following variances:
1. A 2.1 foot variance to permit a 22.9 foot front yard setback instead ofthe required
25 foot front yard setback for proposed residential addition; and
2. A 9 foot variance to permit a 41 foot setback from the OHW of Prior Lake instead
of the required 50 foot setback;
subject to the following condition:
1. The improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the survey
submitted by the applicant, and attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on October 26, 1998.
Anthony Stamson, Chair
ATTEST:
Donald R. Rye, Planning Director
1: \98files\98var\98-143\re9833pc.doc
2
Valley Surveying Co., P. AeXHIBIT A j1D~')i'; @ L~ Utl Itl.~~~
SUITE 120-C', 16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL ~l !
FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONOOMINlUM . OCT I 31998 I
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA .55372
TELEPHONE (612) 447-2570
I AVE.
~2
O..q~
g2~ .13 {..qJt1 D '
... 886'0
'~/Q $;"1
00 -?nll
'O~~
.......
4v~
Jt1v~
Sl22.5Sl
p~ 10 Fr
'~I... l.
6/ ~ 90~ 41(~'
I /95 . 6 ,
'gistered Land Survey No. 97, Scott County, Minnesota. Also showing all
rovements and encroachments onto and off from said property if any.
l. 925.17 top nut of hyd. near the NW corner of property.
~s existing grade elevations.
"
UJ\ \ I
...
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
Impervious Surface Calculations
.. (To be Submitted with Building Penn it Application)
For All Properties Located in the Shoreland District (SD).
The Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage Permitted in 30 Percent.
Property Address . \'-\ el\o O~\L\~~D'B-e~c..~ l\J~V\\)€-
....
131'198
Lot Area -M-tl'lro. .a..~Q\le...e\. C\c'-\. ~ Sq. Feet x 30% :::; .............. ?:>oc)u.
*********** ************************************************************
LENGTH WIDTH SQ. FEET
'-\ 2.. x 7-0 = 'Oy.o
\0 x .., =., 0
\.? x \0 =\S
TOTAL PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE......................
cf.-'<'~T
HOUSE
A TT ACHED GARAGE
'1"Z:.S
DETACHED BLDGS
(Garage/Shed)
x
x
bRlVEW~ YIP A VED AREAS
.. (Driveway-paved or not)
(SidewalkIParking Areas)
TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS.;.....................
l..\X~= 6c)4
x =
x
=
TOT AL PAVED AREAS.........................................~ ~
P A TIOS/PORCHES/DECKS
(Open Decks v." min. opening between.
boards, with a pervious surface below,
are not considered to be impervious) ",
x
x
=
=
'X
=
T.OT AL DE CKS.... ~ ....... ............. ........ ......... ................
OTHER
. .5~o.:. f'
'N ~\...,) 'w..e- [\..'M'(\
4 x ~
"?>"2.. . X '-to
=
\\.0
~"2,
=
T.OT AL OTHER.... i...................................................
e>'-\~
"2.:2.. 1U
1~3'1
TOT ALIMPERVIOUS SURFACE
~VER '.
prepared~< .up. \J e...~'t"'~Date '2. - 'Z.S _q Q
.. Company .'J" \~~\ 6'JR\J~':Je~. I e ~. . Phone # _4~1 - ~<; 10
EXISTING CONDITIONS
ED FOR:
R C/O
'V
.VD.
. 55337
Valley Surveying Co., F! A.
SUITE 120-C, 16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL
FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372
TELEPHONE (612) 447 - 2570
o
~.t'~ '.'.\;
D22 15 4.~' "1~1<,'
. ~ '~,.,
11 ,.~
.,' .". . , ~
4v~..
+1I~'
SlII.5D
II
,... .
'-FiIOIi
~l.. I..
6; 90 4Jr~
<1/9;'6 <<;;;
)ESCRIPTION :
~ract A, Registered Land Survey No. 97, Scott County, Minnesota. Also showing all
risible improvements and encroachments onto and off from said property if any.
/
/
./
Y'"
.-
SIIUOCATION
~
;-'
",,/
///2
SEC.
30 T. //5 R. 2/
-'- -.---.....-r....
,JtfllP'3;'\'1 R'L'~I::'?6
.....n un i
!
C...:.:.. .
I. .. :... 1'0_ .
.\:; '.~~.
OAKLAND
",a, "'0."-7 BEACH
2121$7
/ 1.3.
.,73rt"';;;j.:;1
z,....
SI)) ,or:. /1
/(J. 8'S' J-/
J ~ 2"n_
..,
:'
~
\:
Otl
)0.57)
~
. I
J. & '130' 00/- 1
: - Ll.
t...~, 1.;:; n
.
..
!
ZUlZI
.q: l:!
c
>
c; I ~
a:
>
tow... MACAe
I'.'"
p,'e+,''j
If) A
:JtF. 930. {jo~' ()
/
/ '
-".i.8_~O'--"" .
--- 640.4'. ...-
.....
....
.. 552 n
:J! i j
JIIIII
"LI )1
11.:/
\,
WILLIAM J. SC;
COUNTY SUHVi
SCOTT ':QUNTY, '"
"
,
'j', i OCT I 3 1998
!U\~I
I
s
\
\
\
J
----------
\
-------
I ,~~~
\,., ""IT"--'-j
I ~
,:-.1 C")
:"~J -
@ g
l~'!i
r:--=:::,.'-'~'-' 'J
. - .' )
i''''.
EE
EB
EE
~
i
~
0.
EB
D
D
EB
o
[]J
Ef3
(
(
\
\
)
.---------..-'
\
~; ,"l'u;\
~~~) U:.
r-'.' -,"
I,~;j ~
~5> r.
i!"'j 15
.~
.-----/"
~
..,
--cr
.
~
'"
..,
~
~
,.!.
..
.,
~
_. ~/:J. -;.. L .
.,
I
!
"='
'"
rn
I i I
! I ~
"
I '
ill
B
EB
~
" .
..--",
-{'
,
'"
--.,.
~
~
'-'
~
'\;
~
~
~
1
-
--cr
--
V)
~
~
~
-I
=:1
'-'~11
"
--'-0
~
~
M
g
....~~
._//
/
./
,/'
/
/
~/
- /'
/.
,/
/
,
I
I
y
-:.
~\
'<
-
..
:r-
_t
~
~ - ----,- -.
~
M
- I
I
I
~
.. -~
t-~ I ..~
..l ---t- .-..
~
..
,--
~
\
..~
EE
~tt.....
~
~
t
~
~
~
~
-...
"
~
~
\oj
~
~
'"
"'1C1
........
..'
'\)
_t"'o(
I
1L
~
~
7
? \;%\i>'~
~ ,.,-
r:;, C~
',-'.' -,
- ,,",
, '
, .. !~.. ~ ~
I ~ i---
1 - ,'---
I .
i
I I
G~..
r-
\ ,::",:",
................_~~._..
'-'.-
-
~~
.... ...
~~
~ ~
7' S
-
-
.. ::---
!::: ""
-"
,..
~
l'
"
.......-......r'
"
,~
.,.. ~
......1
()
..
,.,
~
-
~
"'
~
~
- 0 'l
v."
".' -.
;.... -\
-.::::.~ '01
0 ""
,.
')
.~
~
'-t
.::
"-
""
'"
I\'
....
~
-
~
...
...
~
"
<J"\.
"' ~
-,< ~
~
~
~
.~
~
....)
~
~
~
--
"'"
0:.
.::
~
....
<<.
'"
...
1:""
~
I
.. --,.
" "
, -
-
- , -
- . ""'
"
-
."-
~
-
.
-~
~
I '-
I \N
.~
~'"'-
-r-
-~
C? ~ ~ ~~
~~~ ~
-
~
-
0"'--
.
\
~'a
~
to:>
~
'(
-
l"
..c:
~
...
::.;:=""~
.~I co .
-'I 8
'~:JI ~
. -~I
, >,!
t5
c
.1
'--.'-j
I' -=.."":L
/:-.-=- .
.~, i c.=5.~1
-..!:
-~
-j:;
....
~
.J-I
>/
/'
,"
,/
RESOLUTION 9624PC
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT A LAKE SHORE
SETBACK OF 40 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 75 FEET TO PERMIT
1) THE REMOVAL OF A PORTION OF THE EXISTING HOUSE WITH A,
LAKESHORE SETBACK OF APPROXIMATELY 37 FEET AND THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A 7' BY 14' ADDITION; M'D 2) THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A 22' BY 32' DETACHED GARAGE
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Thomas Mansk has applied for a variance from Section 9.3 '(A,2) of the Zoning
Ordinance in order to permit the construction of a 7' by 14' addition to a single
family dwelling and the construction of a 22' by 32' detached garage on property
located in the R-1 (Suburban Residential) District and the SD (Shoreland Overlay)
District at the following location, to wit;
14840 Oakland Beach Avenue, legally described as Tract A, Registered Land
Survey No. 97, Scott County, Minnesota.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variance as contained in
Case #96-035 and held hearings thereon on May 13, 1996.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variances upon
the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property
values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variances on the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is
possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variance will not
result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties,
unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, and
danger to the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort,
morals or in any other respect be contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and
Comprehensive Plan.
1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E.. Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQL:AL OPPORTU':I1Y c."lPLOYEH
-. . -'-<\..11'1.1.. U""JJnD~ h
/'
//
5. The special conditions applying to the subject property are unique to such property,
and do not generally apply to other land in the district in which such land is located.
Among the conditions applying to the subject property which the Board of
Adjustment relied upon are its steep slopes.
6. The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. The variance will not serve merely as a
convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship.
The application of the required setbacks leave no legal buildable area
7. The contents of Planning Case 96-035 are hereby entered into and made a part of the.
public record and the record of decision for this case. Pursuant to Section 5-6-8 of the
Ordinance Code these v<h-lances will be deemed to be abandoned, and thus will be
null and void one (1) year from the date of approval if the holder of the variance has
failed to obtain any necessary, required or appropriate permits for the completion of
contemplated improvements.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment" hereby grants and
approves the following variances;
1. A variance to permit a 7' by 14' addition to the south side of the existing house which
will be located 40' from the Ordinary High Water Mark instead of the required 75
feet. The construction of this addition involves the removal of a portion of the house
which is setback 37' from the lakeshore.
2. A variance to permit the construction of a 22' by 32' detached garage which will be
setback 40' from the Ordinary High Water Mark instead of the required 75 feet.
These variances are granted with the following terms and conditions;
1. The improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the site plan
submitted by the applicant, and attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on July 22, 1996.
~~y~~
2
.......
04k".!
g2~.I3 41\ta
4ve:
1l'1I~
!U2.5~
.
f.) J::J
IT/Oft
C:l.. l..
6/ < 90< 41(~
I /95 . 6 ~
~istered Land Survey No. 97, Scott County, Minnesota. Also showing all
'ovements and encroachments onto and off from said property if any.
925.17 top nut of hyd. near the NW corner of property.
!s ex i.sting gt'ade elevations.
:>VE EL. 904.0 = 10,000 SQ. FT.
:;URFACE COVERAGE NET PROPOSED: 24.6%
,!
,
.;
I
.! ,l
/It /,i j
,
, ,
,. . i
I' / r
, \
" ,
96-032 - MICHAEL LEITCHMAN - VARIANCE REQUEST FOR THE PROPERTY
AT 3044 170TH STREET TO CONSTRUCT A SINGLE F AMIL Y HOME.
Michael Leek presented information from the Planning Report dated April 22, 1996.
Staff recommended approval of the requested variances. Staff feels the hardship criteria
had been met.
Mike Peters, 4048 134th Cir, Savage, the builder for the applicant, explained the layout
of the home on the property. .
Comments from Commissioners:
V onhof:
. Hardship criteria has been met. In favor of request.
Wuellner:
. Agrees
Criego:
. Mr. Peters pointed out the common driveway for the neighbors on the back of the
property .
. In favor.
Loftus:
. No comments from the DNR.
Kuykendall:
. In favor
MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY CRIEGO, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 96-
13PC.
Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Criego, Wuellner, V onhof and Kuykendall.
MOTION CARRIED.
." 96-035 - THOMAS MANSK - VARIANCE REQUEST FOR PROPERTY AT 14840
/" OAKLAND BEACH AVENUE TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION AND GARAGE.
Michael Leek presented the information from the Planning Report dated May 13, 1996.
There was no recommendation by Staff.
Hydrologist Pat Lynch from the DNR had no objection.
Comments from public:
MNOS I 396.DOC
PAGEl 2
Tom Mansk, 14840 Oakland Beach, explained the home layout. He has very little space
in his home and would like to have a two car garage for storage.
Comments from the Commissioners:
Wuellner:
. A garage is a necessity.
. Reduce the amount of variance on the addition. W ouId rather see a street variance
over a lakeshore variance.
. Supports granting the variance to the garage.
Criego:
. Distance from the garage and the front yard is 25'.
. The only request is for the lakeshore setback.
. Standard garage depth is around 22 feet.
. Fine with variances.
Loftus:
. No additional comments.
V onhof:
. Rather see the off street parking spaces.
. Criteria is met.
. Garage is a necessity.
Kuykendall:
. Applicant explained the reasons for not attaching the garage.
. Supports the variances.
MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY VONHOF, TO DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE
A RESOLUTION GRANTING THE REQUESTED VARIANCES.
Discussion: Hardship has been met.
Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, V onhof, Criego, Wuellner and Kuykendall.
MOTION CARRIED.
Commissioner Loftus left at 11 :21 p.m.
OLD BUSINESS:
MNOSI 396.DOC
PAGEl3
. .,-
Planning Case File No.
Property Identification No.
City of Prior Lake
LAND USE APPLICATION
q~.- Jt-l3
~S-r1~-(x)I- ()
4 '
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E. / Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Phone (612) 447-4230, Fax (612) 447-4245
Type of Application: Brief description of proposed project (attach additional
o Rezoning, from (present zonin~) sheets/narrative if desired)
to (proposed zoning)
o Amendment to City Code, Compo Plan or City Ordinance . ~.~I ;1dr4 b"~( C) tit,,- /AIJ-,. ~ ....1
o Subdivision of Land
o Administrative Subdivision
o Conditional Use Permit
r:a Variance Applicable Ordinance Section(s):
o Other:
Applicant(s): ~i (z. ~~. ~, E.
Address: /1/_ t ~-O;;~ ~> . . .L ~v
Home Phone: .~ - / Work Phone:
Property Owner(s) [If different from Applicants]:
Address:
Home Phone: Work Phone:
Type of Ownership: Fee --X:- Contract for Deed _ Purchase Agreement -----'"
Legal Description of Property (Attach a copy if there is not enough space on this sheet):
To the best of my knowledge the information provided in this application and other material submitted is correct. In
addition, I have read the relevant sections of the Prior Lake Ordinance and procedural guidelines, and understand that
applications will not be processed until deemed complete by the Planning Director or assignee.
-zZ~ /I;?//,~ //J --/1-1'1
a::ad /?1~ Date
/() -/5 -~~
Fee Owner's Signature Date
THIS SPACE TO BE FILLED IN BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE
PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED DENIED DATE OF HEARING
CITY COUNCIL APPROVED DENIED DATE OF HEARING
CONDITIONS:
Signature of Planning Director or Designee Date
lu-app2.doc
"-
'.,
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
RECEIPT # 33729
/()/13/9R
.
DATE:
"- ------ ~ ~ollars
$
/50 cD
BUILDING PERMIT #
BUILDING PERMIT #
1,200.00
700.00
1,500.00
Building Permit Fee
Plan Check Fee
State Surcharge
Park Support Fee
SAC
Plmb Pmt pp#
Mech Pmt mc#
Mech Pmt mc#
Swr/Wtr Pmt sw#
Pressure Reducer
Water Meter
Tree Preservation Deposit
Swr/Wtr Connection Fee
Water Tower Fee
Builder's Deposit
Other
Total
Building Permit Fee
Plan Check Fee
State Surcharge
Plmb Pmt pp#
Mech Pmt mc#
(Heating only - $65.00)
(Htg & Air - $100.00)
(Fireplace - $40.00)
(Air - $40.00)
Swr/Wtr Pmt sw #
Other
Total
NOTICE OF HEARING TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING VARIANCES:
A 2.1 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A FRONT YARD SETBACK OF 22.9 FEET
RATHER THAN THE REQUIRED SETBACK OF 25 FEET; AND
A 9 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT AN OHW SETBACK OF 41 FEET INSTEAD
OF THE REQUIRED 50 FOOT OHW SETBACK
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENTIAL ADDITION ON PROPERTY
LOCATED IN THE R-1 (URBAN RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT AND THE SD
(SHORELINE OVERLAY) DISTRICT LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS:
Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 97, Scott County, Minnesota.
You are hereby notified that the Prior Lake Planning Commission will hold a hearing at Prior
Lake Fire Station #1, located at 16776 Fish Point Road SE (Southwest of the intersection ofC.R.
21 and Fish Point Road), on: Monday, October 26,1998, at 6:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as
possible.
APPLICANTS:
Thomas Mansk
14840 Oakland Beach Ave.
Prior Lake, MN 55372
PROPERTY
OWNERS:
Same
SUBJECT SITE:
14840 Oakland Beach Avenue
REQUEST:
The applicant is intending to construct a 32 foot by 26 foot residential
addition to an existing single family house. The proposed addition
encroaches into the required 25 foot front yard setback 2.1 feet and 9
feet into the required 50 foot OHW setback from Prior Lake.
The Planning Commission will review the proposed construction and requested variance against
the following criteria found in the Zoning Ordinance.
1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship with respect to
the property.
2. Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique to the property.
3. The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and is not the result of actions of
persons presently having an interest in the property.
~:\98EILES\98V AR\98-143\98-143F'N.DOC 1
16200 Eagle CreeK Ave.- SE, Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
4. The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces substantial
justice and is not contrary to the public interest.
If you are interested in this issue, you should attend the hearing. Questions related to this
hearing should be directed to the Prior Lake Planning Department by calling 447-4230 between
the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. The Planning Commission will
accept oral and/or written comments. Oral or written comments should relate to how the
proposed construction and requested variances are or are not consistent with the above-listed
criteria.
Prior Lake Planning Commission
Date Mailed: October 15, 1998.
L:\98FILES\98V AR\98-143\98-143PN .DOC
2
EPAR ED FOR:
~NSK
<LAND,;8EACH AVE.
'E, MN: 55372
-5616
Valley Surveying CO., I? A.
SUITE 120-C', 16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL
FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372
TELEPHONE (612) 447-2570
04~{
g2~.I3 4Jl10
...$$6'0
-'/0 8,.,
00 ~t'\"
'O\7~
....
..
4v~
Jl1u~
5)22.59
~
PlY/OfT
. ~I... l..
6/ < SO< 41(~'
I /SS . 6 c.;:
DESCRIPTION:
Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 97, Scott County, Minnesota. Also showing all
visible improvements and encroachments onto and off from said property if any.
Benchmark El. 925.17 top nut of hyd. near the NW corner of property.
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL
COUNTY OF SCOTT )
)ss
STATE OF l\41NNESOTA)
f the City of Prior Lake~tyof Scott, State of
Minnesota, beingdUlyswo , says. on the J~ayof . .. , ..1998, she served
the attached list of persons to have an interestinthe~AttA ~ ~L
\J~ :1:*Ci~'" /40 . . .. by mailing to them a copy thereof,
enclosed in an . envelope, postage prepaid, and be depositing same in the post office at
Priol'LalCe, Minnesota, the last known. address of theparties~
Subscribed and sworn to be this
___ day of ,1998.
NOTARY PUBLIC
r'
MAILAPFD.DOC
PAGB
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
Impervious Surface Calculations OCT 13 Igqg
... (To be Submitted with Building Penn it Application) . . .
For All Properties Located in the Shoreland Districti{SD);
The Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage Permitted in-30.Percefit..
Property Address. \~e~oO~~\~~Q'B~~c..~. l,,~V\\.)€-
-..
Lot Area ~t)ro. .o...bc'Je...e\.c;tN.9-. Sq. Feet x 30% ::;..............~Oc:)C).
*********** ****************~*********************.*********************
LENGTH WIDTH SQ. FEET
q1... x '-'0 = e~o
\'0' x , -,0
'\ ,? x \0 = \~
TOTAL PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE......................
q'"Z:.s
tZ:.~~T
HOUSE
ATTACHED GARAGE
DETACHED BLDGS
(Garage/Shed)
x
x
TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS.......................
I.
bRfVEW~Y/P A VED AREAS
. (Driveway-paved or not)
(Sldewalk/Parking Areas)
1..\ .x~=
X . =
6c)4
,
x
=
TOT AL PAVED AREAS.......................................~.. ~
P A Tl0S/PORCHES/DECKS
. (Open Decks I;''' inln. opening between.
. boards. with a pervious surfaee below,
are not considered to be impervious)
x
x
=
=
'X
==
TOTAL DECKS... II ..,.~ ii ...~ .... I" ...... .... ........, .................
OTHER
.. 5~o<:lf>
N ~'-t..) . ~e. (\..W~
'.\ x ~.
~"Z.... X -z.to
=
\\.0
.~ :(2,
=
T_OT AL OTHER......................................................... .
e,,,-\~
1-1-'2..1U
I '12z.3.'1
CO -z.~-'\ Q
. .
TOT ALIMPERVIOUS SURFACE
~VER ".
preparedB-i', Dp,\Je..~,\..1.
Company \)~\~\6~&~~~:J~'l f>.R.
Date
. Phone #~ "'1.~1 0
000
o IC 0
II> 0 0
01 0 -.J I
-.J I 0 <1\ I
01 1.11 1.111
<1\ I -.J <1\ I
1 I
tE:I '01 tE:I '01 ::t: tE:I
IJ.l ::0 I 1J.l::O I IJ.l IJ.l
() HI () HI t-,l ()
I I
~~O~'O~Z'O~~'~~~IJ.l~'OYI'O'O~IJ.lII>~~'O'O~
II> tE:I~. ~O::O1l> I ~-.J~OHOtE:ll ::OO::ot-,l~HtE:I::OO::O
00 IJ.l 0 ::OHOO 1 1.11 cZ ~IH tE:I 1.11::ot-,lH tE:I
1.11 . ~01.11 I 1.11 ::OO~~IO~Z'O IJ.l::OO~Z
OO><:~.. ..tE:I::OOO><:'HI.11..()tE:lO I::OOt-,l~::ot-,lO::OOt-,l
o ~ IJ.l 'Z tE:I::O~1J.l1 ~ CO '0 ~
O~H 0 t-,l~O~IQ~ ~ ()I~ ~~~~O~ ~
~~Z~~~ ~~~It-,l~()OtE:l~::t:I~~ tE:I~~~~
~~tE:lH ~tE:I~~~IO ~Z::O~~I~~~~::OtE:lH~~~
~OIJ.l~ICt-,l~tE:I~OIZ ~tE:ltE:lWtE:lltE:I Zt-,l::ot-,ltE:I
~ ~W::t:tE:I ~ I H::O ~Z I IJ.l H~ IJ.l
H O~()~ I::t:ZH~~ QI~ ~ IJ.l()Z~ ~
~::t:ICtE:lt-,lZ I HQIJ.lO~ 0 I Z 1.11t-,l~ Z
o tE:I::O 1 ~t-,lIJ.l::O ~ I 1.11' Z~
~ ZO ~ ~OtE:lt-,l 01 ::01-' tE:I ::0
1.110 Zl.11tE:1 Z QW I 1.11 ~oZt-,lOI.11 ~
OH YHI.11~ ~ ~II> 11.11 ~ ~tE:ll.11
wZC' ()W() H::O Q-.J I W Y I ~~W Y
OQZ -.J::t: 0 tE:lOO I -.J ~ -.J
<1\ H::Ot-,l~ ~ <1\ I~ ~O IJ.l ~ ~
10t-,l~~ ~ 11>0 IJ.lI I ~~ tE:I ~
ICtE:I 1J.l~ <: 00 <I-' I CIC::O~ C
<1\'OI-'H tE:I W ()I-' I ~ <~ ~
O~-.JZIJ.l W IJ.lW I HZ
IJ.l IC::O<1\OtE:I IJ.l II> ~ I ()~
tE:I t-,lo~::O tE:I I () 1 tE:I
~ H< W 0 I
tE:I ()H W::O I
Z::t:() 1.11 '0 I
t-,l tE:I -.J I
I I
~I ~I
01 0 I
~I 1-'1
WI WI
I I
01 01
001 001
01 01
01 0 I
I I
01 01
-.JI -.JI
1-'1 1-'1
ICI ICI
I I
I I
1.111 1.111
o 01
IC ICI
I
01
WI
~I
I
~I
<1\1
11>1
o
o
II>
o
-.J
o
<1\
IC
01:>
1.11
o
o
o
~
o
o
I-'
I-'
~
~
-.J
::t:
IJ.l
t-,l
~
tE:I
~
()
::t:
~
tE:I
o
W
~
I-'
<1\
01:>
1.11
o
1.11
1.11
o
1.11
1.11
o
-.J
1.111
01
-.JI
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-'1
ICI
ICI
ICI
I
::01
~::O~I
0~1.111
t-,l1J.l~1
1 0 I
t-,l:ll:~1
() 0
t-,ll-'O
01-'
~OO
~
o
()
~
I
o
o
~
I-'
IC
IC
IC
C)
("")
,..-,
::0
1J.l~
tE:ll.11
()IC
t-,lW
10
WO
00
II>
~O
'0
I
~
I-'
1.11
w
CD
CO
ex:.
~
tE:I
I
o
tv
I-'
II>
o
~
()
IC
~
1.11
o
I-'
I-'
1.11
::0
~t-,l~1
0::t:1.11
t-,ltE:l~
I~IC
OtE:lW
oZO
W-O
IJ.lW
~ 0
~I-'
01J.l
()t-,l
~~
00
I-'Z
1
I
~I
01
1-'1
WI
I
01
001
01
01
I
01
-.JI
~I
ICI
I
1
1.111
01
ICI
I
01
WI
~I
1
1-'1
<1\1
01:>1
I
1.111
01
1.111
I
1.111
01
-.JI
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I-'
IC
IC
IC
o
o
I-'
1-'1
~I
tv
-.J
'0
::0
H
o 0 IC 0'" t-,l
o 0 ~ 0... ll>
~ I-' 1.11 1-'''' ><
-.J IC 0 IC... 'tl
IC ~ I-' ~... ll>
II> 0 1.11 0... '<
I-' 1.11 W 1.11'" fl)
... Ii
::t: tE:I '0 ::t: tE:I '0'"
IJ.l IJ.l ::0 IJ.l 1J.l::O'"
t-,l () H t-,l () H'"
...
'01-'t-,l1J.lII>~~'OI-'t-,l '01-'1J.l0::t:-.J~'O'01-'1J.l'"
::OIl>Ot-,l~HtE:I::OII>O ::OIl>CtE:lII-'H::O::OII>C'"
HOOO 1.11::ot-,lHOOO HOOIJ.lIJ.l<1\I-'::OHHOOIJ.l'"
O~O'O IJ.l::OO~O OW~ IJ.lZOW~'"
::OIC ~::ot-,lO::OIC ::O-.JZ~ ::t:t-,l()::o-.JZ'"
OcO '0 0 0 H H ...
~O ~~~O~O ~O~H Q~'O~O~'"
~~a~~tE:I~~~a ~~~~ ::t:tE:I~~~~:
tE:I~t-,lZt-,l::ot-,ltE:l~t-,lltE:l~tE:llJ.l 1J.l::O tE:I~tE:I...
~~::t: 1J.l~~~~::t::~~~H t-,l~~~~~:
ztl 1.11t-,l~ ztl 'Ztl~~ ~lJ.lztl~...
1.11' Z~ I ZH'"
I-' tE:I ~ I ~ 0 ~ ...
oZt-,lOl.11tE:1 Il.11tE:1 1.11 ::OtE:ll.11tE:1...
I-' ~tE:ll.11~ 11.11~ 0 tE:lZI.11~'"
I ~~W() IW() W ~t-,lW()'"
~ -.J::t: I-.J::t: IC ~H-.J::t:...
o IJ.l ~ I ~ ~ ~~ ...
I-' tE:I > I > I tE:I~ ~ ...
IC ::O~ <: I <: 0 IJ.l <:...
<~ t:r:l 1 -.J t-,l~ ...
HZ I 1.11 ~t-,l ...
()~ I 0 t-,lQ ...
tE:I I t:r:l....
I H'"
I Z...
I ()
1
I
~I
01
1-'1
WI
I
01
001
01
o
o
o
~
-.J
IC
II>
I-'
IC
~
1.11
o
I-'
I-'
1.11
~
I.11tE:1
1.11~
W()
-.J::t:
~
~
tE:I
o
-.J
I-'
IC
1.11
o
IC
o
W
~
I-'
<1\
II>
1.11
o
1.11
1.11
o
-.J
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
1-'1
ICI
ICI
ICI
I
::01
~t-,l~
0::t:1.11
t-,ltE:l~
I~IC
OtE:lW
oZO
~ -0
IJ.ltv
~ 0
~I-'
01J.l
()t-,l
~~
00
I-'Z
::0
~t-,l~
0::t:1.11
t-,ltE:l~
I~IC
OtE:lW
oZO
1-'-0
IJ.lI-'
~ 0
~I-'
01J.l
()t-,l
~~
00
I-'Z
~
o
~
W
o
00
o
o
o
-.J
I-'
IC
1.11
o
IC
o
W
~
I-'
<1\
01:>
1.11
o
1.11
1.11
o
-.J
I-'
IC
IC
IC
Z
ll>
;3
fl)
O~
-.J::O
......()
~
ICt-,l
......ll>
~><
IC
ICIJ.l
00'<
lD
rt
I-'fl)
1.11;3
I-'
W
~
5:
j:l.
Ii
fl)
lD
lD
1.11
I-'
o
.....
lD
rt
t-,l
......
()
IJ.l
l1
::r
Z
ll>
;3
fl)
5:
j:l.
Ii
fl)
lD
lD
IJ.l
'tl
I-'
~
fl)
IJ.l l!l
'tl ll>
~ ~
IJ.l ~
'tl 0
W j:l.
fl)
IJ.l ~
'tl fl)
01:> Ii
IJ.l
'tl
1.11
IJ.l
'tl
<1\
~
~
-.
~
F
IJ.l
'tl
-.J
IJ.l
'tl
00
IJ.l
'tl
IC
><:
fl)
ll>
Ii
::0
'0
ll>
Ii
l1
fl)
~
:II:
t-,l1J.l
~()
ICO
ot-,l
I-'t-,l
~
~
I
'0
o
IJ.l
t-,l
I
()
o
~~
G1tE:1
tE:I::O
IJ.l
H
~
I-'
~
fl)
l!l
ll>
~
IJ.l
rt
ll>
rt
~
lD
.. >-:3 otIl
.. ~ -.l~
.. ~ ........()
.. tv
.. ~ 10>-:3
.. "< .......~
IJ1 .. fD f-I><
.. 11 10
~ .. 1Otf.l
tl::l .. CD"<
() .. 1Il
0 .. rt
~ 'tl .. Z f-IfD
t:I ~ .. ~ 1J1=
tf.l H .. =
0 .. fD f-I
'tl ~ .. W
~ .. It>
H t" .. IJ1
~ ~ .. 6: f-I
..
tl::l tl::l.. Q.
t:I .. 11
I~: fD
1Il
.. 1Il
..
IJ1 ..
IJ1 ..
W ..
-.l..
tv ..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
t:I
....
1Il
rt
Z
>-:3 ~
....... =
() fD
tf.l 6:
(')
~ Q.
11
(J)
1Il
tf.l 1Il
'tl
f-I t"
(J)
tf.l ILl
'tl ~
tv i-'
tf.l :s:
'tl 0
w Q.
(J)
tf.l i-'
'tl fD
Ii" 11
tf.l
'tl
IJ1
tf.l
'tl
0'\
tf.l
'tl
-.l
tf.l
'tl
CD
tf.l
'tl
10
to<
fD
~
11
~
'tl
~ >-:3tf.l
,(,-..., 11 ~()
c::) (') 100
(J) 0>-:3
,-,-t i-' f-I>-:3
t"
'**' ()
(,,) ~
t"
(J)
ILl I
~ 'tl
i-' 0
tf.l
>-:3
I
()
0
~~
Qtl::l
tl::l~
tf.l tf.l
rt H
~ ~
rt
r:: tv
1Il
0 0>1- ~ olD
0 0>1- III ....:J~
fo' fo'>I- ~ ......()
"" "">l- t\)
0 0>1- III 10>-:3
....:J ....:J>I- '< ~~
fo' 00 00>1- CD
>l- Ii 10
~ :Il 'tl>l- 1000
tEl 00 ~>I- 00'<
~ () >-:3 H>I- III
0 >I- rt
~ 'tlfo'>-:3'tlfo'>-:3>1- Z fo'CD
t.1 ~"":Il~"":Il>l- III U1S
00 HooOHooO>l- S
O""~O""~>I- CD fo'
'tl ~o ~o >I- ....:J
~ 00 00 >I- ~
H t"0 t"0 >I- ""
~ :r>:r>:r>:r>:r>:r>>I- 5: 0
tEl ~~~~~~: (:l.
t.1 Ii
~~tI.l~~tI.l: CD
III
lD::>ol ::>ol>l- III
lD >I-
U1tEl ~~ >I-
U1:r> >I-
W() W() >I-
....:J:Il ....:J:Il >l-
t\) t\) >I-
~ ~ >I-
>I-
>I-
00 00 >I-
tEl tz:l >I-
>I-
>I-
>l-
t\) t.1
0 t->-
fo' III
W rt
0 Z
00 >-:3 III
0 ...... S
0 () CD
0 00 5:
....:J n
fo' ::r (:l.
10 Ii
CD
III
U1 00 III
0 'tl
10 fo' t"
CD
0 00 lQ
W 'tl III
t\) t\) i-'
fo' 00 s::
a\ 'tl 0
"" W (:l.
CD
U1 00 i-'
0 'tl CD
111 "" Ii
111 00
0 'tl
....:J U1
00
'tl
a\
00
'tl
....:J
00
'tl
00
00
'tl
10
fo' ><
10 CD
10 III
10 Ii
~ ~
t"~t\) 'tl
0t"111 III >-:300
>-:3t1.lfo' Ii :r>()
I 10 n 100
>-:3=#:00 CD 0>-:3
() 0 i-' fo'>-:3
~lOo t"
....:Jfo' =#: ()
1Il 0 ~
0 t"
0
S3 () t"
::>ol CD
I lQ I
0 III 'tl
0 i-' 0
C,) :r> 00
>-:3
I
()
0
~~
G'ltEl
tEl~
00 00
rt H
III ~
rt
~ fo'
III
//2
SEC.
30 T. //5 R. 2/
i: .~ ..:.',
I.... :... r._.....
.l:;....:...;~ ....
2:921)7
/I. 3 J,.
.,orr'::/"J;::> i
29.1....
S/7}/t:h
I{J. 8'S H
~
'I
I,.
",
SO.6T)
1\ <J. 'f(
fO(1ueU"
). ~ ,130" DO / "1
,.
! iO ,j~ A
..
o
0:
~.IJJ It
2"126
4
c:;
a:
>
~
..
,..
lit
...
~
..
..
::
Pie+,'tj
I () A
E.0.1" NACKIE
2..11$
~(r q30- 003-(j
th
;Iff - 130 - (JO~- ()
.-- 808.30 .-.
.' '"
..-- 640..... .......
....
.. ,~Z..
. -tiS
OCT I 3 1998
WILl-lAM J. SC:
COUNTY SURvl
SCOTT \:QUNTY, ."
"
I'
,I
, '/
'~./
5
L
\
co i
OJ I,
(J)
;J
.:::~~
I
~....
.. -+- 0\)
t-jr\ ..,
..' -..
<"'b
..
....;r-
\
.~
ffi
~~
~
""
':J
~
~
~
....
"
~
~
\;
~
~
'"
~
.......
...'
'\)
~
-
\3
.....
V)
'\;
~
~
I
~
~
~\
~
"
'-0
~
<\
""I
j ,
,
('I") ,
= JI
g.-
"..~
-
...
::r-
-,
~
1'"" -.
~ .... ::- 0 ."" ,..,. .~ ~ ." -
- - - ...., ..- --
~ .-, "'- ~
..
~
-::-
l
~ ~
~ -J.
~ ~
~ '-
'-J)
< \
"
N
....
...
i I \
)
~
l-~
~~
g~'
o
~
-
~
"
~
'"
..
t>
.
~
....
"
,~
~.
.}-
....
"
,,-(
o
o
(.
~-
\.~ ::;.
-.., " ~
"':l(. ~
-
~
r.,
t.
,,"
....~
..
()
i"
i ..J..
'=:'
"
.r-....'
"
'"
J.
;r-
~
~
""
~
--
.
""
~
.....:: ..
-
-
~ .J..
~ ~
~~
.. "
l:Q~
-
('t)
~
C>
C)
t'-~
'3'
("
,
~
~ ..
~
~ -
, ')I.,
.~ t,
....:t
......
:
I
I
\
\
I
I
-.J
C)
C)
--\
w
7Q
to
o:J
rC.
"'h
~.
....
~.
..,
,-
~
~-
-
"i_
-
~-
:1-
<;:).
,
~
.,.
~
-
\
- t~
,~ ~
~ ~ ~ <l
'L'~ ~ ~
$~ ~ ~-
~
~
t.~
1
~
--
.J..
~
~.
r
<:'l
r=t
WE.
Valley Surveying Co., P. AeXHIBIT A i!O)\i;: (2:; loi liD i:ir]
SUITE 120-C -, 16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL ~ ~
FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM ~ OCT I 3 1998 III J I
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA .55372 L:;/
TELEPHONE (612) 447-2570
"
04k'<:
g2~ ./3 41\1 D
... sS6'o
-'/0 S;-,
00 -2n/,
'o~~
.....
4v~
4'v~
Sl22.Sg
PlY/OR
'~I... I....
5 / ~ 90~ 4 k~ .
I /95 . 5 4.;
stered Land Survey No. 97, Scott County, Minnesota. Also showing all
rements and encroachments onto and off from said property if any.
925.17 top nut of hyd. near the NW corner of property.
existing grade elevations.
"
04~
(.
Sl22.13 41\1a
Spll, "01/
F"enc. 0.:/'
W...,
4v~
1\I1I~
g22.ISO
t
;:.) J::J
'T/Ofr
Ct... L..
(5/ 2 902 4 Jr:.c--
I /95 . 6 ,
teced Land Sucvey No. 97, Scott County, Minnesota. ^lso showing all
~ments nud enceoachments onto and off feom said property if any.
9L5.17 top nut of hyd. neac the NW cornec of propecty.
~x i.sting gt"ade elevations.
EL. 904.0 = 10,000 SQ. FT.
FACE COVERAGE NET PROPOSED = 24.6%
0010
TELEPHONE (6/2) 447 - 2570
IU \}I
"LEGAL BUILDING ENVELOPE
",
04~
c(4IVO '
, ,
"/0
o
"00
"
,
4v~
IVU~
~
PIT/Oil'
, ~I... L..
6/2 902 4/(;:: .
I /95 . 6 ,
\", ,.)1>
\' ')
)ESCRIPTION:
~ract A, Registered Land Survey No. 97, Scott County, Minnesota. Also showing all
risible improvements and encroachments onto and off from said property if any.
lenchmark El. 925.17 top nut of hyd. near the NW corner of property.
116.8 denotes existing grade elevations.
l(
OT AREA ABOVE EL. 904.0 = 10,000 SQ, FT.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
FOR:
C/O
Valley Surveying Co., F? A.
SUITE 120-C, 16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL
FRANKLIN TRAIL OFFICE CONDOMINIUM
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372
TELEPHONE (6/2) 447 - 2570
f?\G (~I~~ T':.~~J:~ \;<:.<
\1 \q- "::'
~j)\ . I'
!. ( OCT I 3 \eep;: ::;
:~' I ~~V '1:'
I I ~ I 1 : !
'\VJ
L \V
).
55337
o
~~ ,'..
"I.. '. "~ I.
5122.13 4"'~:i(.()..
. U ,"'.
4'- '
.,.~ .
, ~1I~'
SlZ2. SSl
l
,....
,- C"I
'1l0R
~I... I...
6/< 90< 4Jrp"
I /95 . 6 c;;;:
CRIPTION:
,ct A, Registered Land Survey No. 97, Scott County, Minnesota. Also showing all
.ible improvements and encroachments onto and off from said property if any.
... -
,~ :1\' '\aEACH
I \ \.. I
I,,~=-=~~
" t-
4 l~~ACH- i--- 6 r
,
.)....
~
~\
~
1
MANAGI
REN(59 Ql0
o~
\,;
j
I
I
-0
t'(
1-:;'
; r(
-i
I
;
~
I ; ,
~
I ' 1
(
..------' m
-tr
I '
"
~
.
':>
""
'-'
-.;,
o;;:!. H
..
..
~
--------.~
i. ..--...... ---
ill
....
JC. ....,
'-\\.
..
~
~
"
I
'J
.--....
~
~
~
,
~
'-'
~
\;,
~
~
--------
l
)
r
m f:B E8
.....
0
EB ..
AI l m
· v:; ':
1
..
J ~
'-----' ...-
I
....---.
,
1= =
0
-
i ~ m
i
;
; ~
; : I
. n
,
.~~
II
I. 'I D
I ill
...1 M
:"~J -
(~V ~
I'!."'_
,..-.==- .." . - "'
,
-----
ro--
t'8i
~
\
(