HomeMy WebLinkAbout99-027 Variance
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Metro Waters - 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106-6793
Telephone: (651) 772-7910 Fax: (651) 772-7977
Ms. Jane Kansier
Planning Coordinator
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue, SE
Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714
:....~..r......-'..,.~...'i...;.[.......I; ~~D \:!J [g m~\l
,"'r- I I
\ \ } L
:,/ J! i
:,(; JUN 161999 I
!. : ;" \ ~ Ii
:.,' \ : II
! 1\\ i \ I
IJ UL I
June 11, 1999
L
RE: JADERLOT BLUFF SETBACK VARIANCE APPLICATION, 14962 PIXIE POINT CIRCLE,
PRIOR LAKE
Dear Ms. Kansier:
I have reviewed the materials submitted relative to the subject variance request, and have recently viewed
the property. Last August 4, 1998, I provided you a letter for a similar proposal on the same property.
That variance application also included a lot width variance request. Has the ordinance been amended such
that a lot width variance is no longer needed?
The latest drawing submitted represents an improvement over the original submittal. The current proposal
sites the proposed structure 17 feet from the bluff top versus six feet as previously proposed.
At the time I commented on the variance request last year, I was unaware of the fact that the lot at 14962
Pixie Point Circle was in common ownership with the applicant's adjacent lot at 14960 Pixie Point Circle.
Had I known that, I would have recoInmended the lots be combined, as per Minnesota Rules 6120.3300,
subpart 2., D (relative to the requirement to combine substandard lots of record). Had the City of Prior
Lake adopted a compliant shoreland ordinance within the original time fraIne required by the DNR, this
provision would have been included in the city's shoreland ordinance.
As indicated in my earlier letter, the intent of bluff regulations is to protect the visual and physical
characteristics of bluffs. I also stated that I would be more supportive of a structure setback an additional
15 to 20 feet further from the bluff than the original proposal. Opportunity exists to further decrease the
bluff setback. I note the proposed garage is 38 feet deep. This could easily be reduced to the more typical
22 to 24 feet. Consideration of a five foot front yard setback would also decrease the bluff setback
variance. Reducing the garage depth to 24 feet, along with a five foot front yard setback would bring the
structure an additional 19 feet from the bluff without reducing the square footage of the living area of the
home.
If approved, how will the lake be accessed from the building site? Currently the bluff face appears fairly
well stabilized with vegetation. Stairways and landings are the preferred means for accessing the
DNR Information: 651-296-6157 · 1-888-646-6367 · TTY: 651-296-5484 · 1-800-657-3929
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Who Values Diversity
" Printed on Recycled Paper Containing a
".., Minimum of 1 0% Post-Consumer Waste
-------------- --
-------------
Jane Kansier
June 11, 1999
page 2
waterfront on bluffs and steep slopes. Structural or topographic alteration of the bluff and bluff impact
zone is discouraged.
As is the case with any variance, the applicant must demonstrate a hardship exists, and that if denied the
variance, the property in question cannot be put to reasonable use. While the revised building layout more
closely complies with the requirements of Prior Lake's Shoreland Zoning Ordinance, it is the opinion of
the DNR that further revision to the development plan (reduction of garage dimensions and front yard
setback) can significantly reduce the bluff setback variance without materially modifying the applicant's
desired home design.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed variance. If you have any
questions, please call me at 772- 7910.
Sincerely,
~~
Patrick J. Lynch ill
Area Hydrologist
J-
.
.
Project #99-027
Bob Jader Variance
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss.
COUNTY OF SCOTT )
Doc. No. T 1 05945 File--4
Vol. 95 Page 197 cert. 31695
OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES
scon COUNTY. MNNESOTA
Certified Filed on
08-04-1999 at 12:10 [ lAM Y1 PM
Pat Boeckman, Registrar of Titles 01
by G ,Deputy Fee: $20.50
The undersigned, duly qualified and Deputy City Clerk of the City of Prior Lake, hereby
certifies the attached hereto is the original true and correct copy of
2f/~
Dated this _ day of July, 1999.
(City Seal)
(.,
I:ldeptwork\blankfrm\truccopy.doc
RESOLUTION 99-09PC
Kelly Meyer
Deputy City Clerk
X~bwJG'-\o
\(j~~p~~
RESOLUTION 99-09PC
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 33.00 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A
SETBACK FROM TOP OF BLUFF OF 24.00 FEET INSTEAD OF THE
REQUIRED SETBACK OF 57.00 FEET.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Robert Jader has applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit
the construction of a single family residence with attached garage on property located
in the R-1 (Suburban Residential) District and the SD (Shoreland Overlay) District at
the following location, to wit;
14962 Pixie Point Circle, legally described as Lot 12, First Addition to Eastwood,
Scott County, MN.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as contained in
Case #99-027 and held hearings thereon on June 14, 1999.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light andair, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property
values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the
Comprehensive Plan.
t'
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is
possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variance will not
result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties,
unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, and
danger to the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort,
morals or in any other respect be contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and
Comprehensive Plan.
5. The legal building envelope for the lot is severely pie shaped. This limits the width of
a structure and pushes the structure further towards the lake and top of bluff to obtain
a reasonable building width. The applicant has modified the footprint, reducing the
requested variance.
\ \fs 1 \sys\dept\planning\99fi1es\99var\99-027\re9909pc.doc 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
" ..
6. There is justifiable hardship caused by the bluff and pie shaped lot as reasonable use
of the property does not exist without the granting of the variance. Reasonable use
for this property would include a house of similar bulk and height as the adjacent
structures, and with similar setbacks to the top of bluff.
7. The proposed house will be setback farther from the lake and top of bluff than the
existing cabin as well as the adjacent structures.
8. The proposed structure with the variance granted is within DNR recommendations.
9. The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. The variance will not serve merely as a
convenience to the applicant, and is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship.
10. The contents of Planning Case 99-027 are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby approves the
following variance for future single family dwelling and detached garage;
1. A 33.00 foot variance to permit setback from top of bluff of 24.00 feet instead of the
required 57.00 foot setback from the top of bluff (as determined by the slope
becoming less than 18%).
The following are conditions which must be adhered to prior to the issuance of a building
permit for the proposed structure:
1. Gutters must be on the house and garage to direct water towards the street rather than
the bluff and lakeside of the lot.
2. An engineer's report must be submitted with the building permit, including
recommendations on drainage, stormwater run-off and erosion control as stated in
Ordinance 1104.305.
3. This permit will be processed under the previous Zoning Ordinance as the variance
application was received prior to May 1, 1999. This allows for a 5-foot side yard
setback on one side and a 10- foot side yard setback on the other side with 10 foot
building separation. The required front yard setback is 25 feet.
4. The variance must be recorded and proof of recording submitted to the Planning
Department within 60 days. Pursuant to Section 5-6-8 of the City Code, the variance
will be null and void if the necessary permits are not obtained for the proposed
structure within one year after adoption of this resolution.
\ \fs 1 \sys\dept\planning\99files\99var\99-027\re9909pc.doc
2
~_. ,..
.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on June 28, 1999.
~~m
\ \fs 1 \sys\dept\planning\99files\99var\99-027\re9909pc.doc
3
Project #98-070
Bob Jader Variance
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss.
COUNTY OF SCOTT )
The undersigned, duly qualified and Deputy City Clerk ofthe City of Prior Lake, hereby
certifies the attached hereto is the original true and correct copy of
RESOLUTION 99-10PC
Dated this riA. day of August, 1999.
(City Seal)
I:ldeptworklblankfnnltruecopy.doc
,
~
\,
'"
RESOLUTION 99-10 PC
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR A VARIANCE
PREVIOUSLY GRANTED (RESOLUTION 98-19PC).
BE IT RESOL YED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Robert Jader had applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit
the a lot width of 44.38 feet rather than the minimum required of 50 feet for a
substandard lot to be buildable on property located in the R-1 (Low Density
Residential) District and the SD (Shoreland Overlay) District at the following
location, to wit;
14962 Pixie Point Circle, legally described as Lot 12, First Addition to
Eastwood, Scott County, MN.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for a variance as contained in
Case #98-070 and held hearings thereon on August 10, 1998.
3. The Board of Adjustments determined the hardship criteria were met and
subsequently adopted Resolution 98-19PC granting a variance to lot width.
4. Resolution 98-19PC specifically requires the necessary permits be obtained within
one year after adoption of the resolution (August 10, 1999) or the variance will be
null and void.
5. The required and necessary permits have not been granted by the City, nor will they
be granted, prior to August 10, 1999 due to the recent bluff setback variance granted
on the same property on June 28, 1999.
6. The Planning Commission has determined an extension of the time limit is reasonable
due to the above factors to allow the variances to expire on the same date.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby approves the
following:
f: \dept\planning\9 8files\9 8var\98-070\extres.doc 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
'"
t,
1. A time extension to Resolution 98-19PC to allow the applicant until June 28, 2000 to
obtain the necessary and required permits implement the variance granted.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on July 12~
Anthony Stamson, Chair
CDT:
f:\dept\planning\98files\98var\98-070\extres.doc
2
RESOLUTION 99-07PC
A RESOLUTION DENYING A 40.00 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A
SETBACK FROM TOP OF BLUFF OF 17.00 FEET INSTEAD OF THE
REQUIRED SETBACK OF 57.00 FEET.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Robert Jader has applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit
the construction of a single family residence with attached garage on property located
in the R-1 (Suburban Residential) District and the SD (Shoreland Overlay) District at
the following location, to wit;
14962 Pixie Point Circle, legally described as Lot 12, First Addition to
Eastwood, Scott County, MN.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as contained in
Case #99-027 and held hearings thereon on June 14, 1999.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property
values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, the
proposed variance will result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air
to adjacent properties, unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets, increase
the danger of fire, and danger to the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair
health, safety, comfort, morals or in any other respect be contrary to the Zoning
Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
5. The legal building envelope for the lot is approximately 2,400 square feet. The
applicant has control over the house design and shape, such that the hardship created
has been created by the applicant. Reasonable use of the property exists with a
smaller building footprint.
f: \dept\planning\99files\99var\99-027\re9907pc.doc 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
6. While there is a bluff on the lot, there is no justifiable hardship caused by the bluff as
reasonable use of the property exists without the granting of the variance.
7. The granting of the variance, as originally requested, is not necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The
variance will serve merely as a convenience to the applicant, and is not necessary to
alleviate demonstrable hardship. The factors above allow for an alternative structure
to be permitted with a reduced variance or none at all.
8. The contents of Planning Case 99-027 are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby denies the
following variance for future single family dwelling and detached garage (as shown in
attached Exhibit A);
1. A 40.00 foot variance to permit setback from top of bluff of 17.00 feet instead of the
required 57.00 foot setback from the top of bluff (as determined by the slope
becoming less than 18%).
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on June 28, 999.
f:\dept\planning\99files\99var\99-027\re9907pc.doc
2
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
AYf:,. ~!:re.
LINr:.
---,
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
./
...........---".;\.......~.-
_A,.._~._ .....'...---....
~-~~
~~~
~JZ L-A)Le
~
AJ.,J.. t7'MeN~"N$. '-0""" ""fZ..1.P1-\ll:.
'r.7~7". "'Nt:> ~P-T~" t71(II\f;$N~"'~
~t7 c:>N ':7UIZ'/!l!'Y ",., ~17T
J;iHc;,oI""~ll-lb ....Nt:> t:::>,o.-re.t:>
vUI-I~ z5, jq<HI
f'rzoFO?etl ~ITe rLA N
J~rz. fZ.e71I?eN"e
~a...e I" - 7..0 I -t:)-
f!,IZDWN~t'N. ~oNNe~ ~ MUHJ..eNIPDH
STAFF REPORTS
AND
MINUTES
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
SITE:
PRESENTER:
REVIEWED BY:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
PLANNING REPORT
5A
CONSIDER A BLUFF SETBACK VARIANCE FOR
ROBERT JADER, Case File #99-027
14962 PIXIE POINT CIRCLE
JENNITOVAR,PLANNER
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
YES --2L NO
JUNE 28, 1999
On June 14, 1999 the Planning Commission held a public hearing considering a
40 foot variance to allow a structure to be setback 17 feet from the top of bluff
rather than the required 57 feet. After closing the public hearing and continued
discussion, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a resolution
granting a 33 foot variance to allow a setback of 24 feet from the top of bluff,
rather than the required setback of 57 feet. The resolution was to include a
condition regarding gutters and an engineering report along with the findings of
fact as discussed. The resolution is attached.
DISCUSSION:
Procedurally, the Planning Commission should deny the original request and
adopt the revised request. Attached is Resolution 99-09PC approving a 24-foot
setback from the top of bluff rather than the required 57-foot setback. Also
attached is Resolution 99-07PC denying the original request.
RECOMMENDATION:
The attached resolutions are consistent with the Planning Commission's
direction. The staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolutions.
ALTERNATIVES:
L:\99FILES\99V AR\99-027\99027PC2.DOC
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
1. Adopt Resolution 99-07PC denying the bluff setback variance and Resolution
99-09PC approving a 24-foot setback from top of bluff as directed of staff to
prepare.
2. Table or continue discussion of the item for specific purpose.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Motion and second adopting Resolution 99-07PC.
Motion and second adopting Resolution 99-09PC.
L:\99FILES\99V AR\99-027\99027PC2.DOC
Page 2
RESOLUTION 99-09PC
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 33.00 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A
SETBACK FROM TOP OF BLUFF OF 24.00 FEET INSTEAD OF THE
REQUIRED SETBACK OF 57.00 FEET.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Robert Jader has applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit
the construction of a single family residence with attached garage on property located
in the R-1 (Suburban Residential) District and the SD (Shoreland Overlay) District at
the following location, to wit;
14962 Pixie Point Circle, legally described as Lot 12, First Addition to Eastwood,
Scott County, MN.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as contained in
Case #99-027 and held hearings thereon on June 14, 1999.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light andair, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property
values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is
possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variance will not
result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties,
unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, and
danger to the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort,
morals or in any other respect be contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and
Comprehensive Plan.
5. The legal building envelope for the lot is severely pie shaped. This limits the width of
a structure and pushes the structure further towards the lake and top of bluff to obtain
a reasonable building width. The applicant has modified the footprint, reducing the
requested variance.
\ \fs 1 \sys\dept\planning\99files\99var\99-027\re9909pc.doc 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
6. There is justifiable hardship caused by the bluff and pie shaped lot as reasonable use
of the property does not exist without the granting of the variance. Reasonable use
for this property would include a house of similar bulk and height as the adjacent
structures, and with similar setbacks to the top of bluff.
7. The proposed house will be setback farther from the lake and top of bluff than the
existing cabin as well as the adjacent structures.
8. The proposed structure with the variance granted is within DNR recommendations.
9. The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. The variance will not serve merely as a
convenience to the applicant, and is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship.
10. The contents of Planning Case 99-027 are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby approves the
following variance for future single family ~welling and detached garage;
1. A 33.00 foot variance to permit setback from top of bluff of 24.00 feet instead of the
required 57.00 foot setback from the top of bluff (as determined by the slope
becoming less than 18%).
The following are conditions which must be adhered to prior to the issuance of a building
permit for the proposed structure:
1. Gutters must be on the house and garage to direct water towards the street rather than
the bluff and lakeside of the lot.
2. An engineer's report must be submitted with the building permit, including
recommendations on drainage, stormwater run-off and erosion control as stated in
Ordinance 1104.305.
3. This permit will be processed under the previous Zoning Ordinance as the variance
application was received prior to May 1, 1999. This allows for a 5-foot side yard
setback on one side and a 10- foot side yard setback on the other side with 10 foot
building separation. The required front yard setback is 25 feet.
4. The variance must be recorded and proof of recording submitted to the Planning
Department within 60 days. Pursuant to Section 5-6-8 of the City Code, the variance
will be null and void if the necessary permits are not obtained for the proposed
structure within one year after adoption of this resolution.
\ \fs 1 \sys\dept\planning\99files\99var\99-027\re9909pc.doc
2
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on June 28, 1999.
Anthony Stamson, Chair
ATTEST:
Donald R. Rye, Planning Director
\ \fs 1 \sys\dept\planning\99fi1es\99var\99-027\re9909pc.doc
3
RESOLUTION 99-07PC
A RESOLUTION DENYING A 40.00 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A
SETBACK FROM TOP OF BLUFF OF 17.00 FEET INSTEAD OF THE
REQUIRED SETBACK OF 57.00 FEET.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Robert Jader has applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit
the construction of a single family residence with attached garage on property located
in the R-1 (Suburban Residential) District and the SD (Shoreland Overlay) District at
the following location, to wit;
14962 Pixie Point Circle, legally described as Lot 12, First Addition to
Eastwood, Scott County, MN.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as contained in
Case #99-027 and held hearings thereon on June 14, 1999.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property .
values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, the
proposed variance will result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air
to adjacent properties, unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets, increase
the danger of fire, and danger to the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair
health, safety, comfort, morals or in any other respect be contrary to the Zoning
Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
5. The legal building envelope for the lot is approximately 2,400 square feet. The
applicant has control over the house design and shape, such that the hardship created
has been created by the applicant. Reasonable use of the property exists with a
smaller building footprint.
f: \dept\planning\99fi1es\99var\99-027\re9907pc.doc 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
6. While there is a bluff on the lot, there is no justifiable hardship caused by the bluff as
reasonable use of the property exists without the granting of the variance.
7. The granting of the variance, as originally requested, is not necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The
variance will serve merely as a convenience to the applicant, and is not necessary to
alleviate demonstrable hardship. The factors above allow for an alternative structure
to be permitted with a reduced variance or none at all.
8. The contents of Planning Case 99-027 are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby denies the
following variance for future single family dwelling and detached garage (as shown in
attached Exhibit A);
1. A 40.00 foot variance to permit setback from top of bluff of 17.00 feet instead of the
required 57.00 foot setback from the top of bluff (as determined by the slope
becoming less than 18%).
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on June 28, 1999.
Anthony Stamson, Chair
ATTEST:
Donald R. Rye, Planning Director
f:\dept\planning\99files\99var\99-027\re9907pc.doc
2
. -
~...,~~..~.":::~'<-.:~;.o..;:::-;",~""","_....-;__";'_"':"..o,..,....-............:.O-_...;.~-.-.'i...;:_.:.' ,.;. ',_ _ ;".". -_~'..:..:..:;-::;:~_':'::'.~:..:.'; '_..:'.l..'':'' ;._--.__..:...._~_c.;;.:,.__.".
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
./
-"""-"'....-"....,,~-
-^.........~.... ....~---_.".
~-,.-."
~
---\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
~JZ L..A-)Le
@
A.L-J.. /;7IMeN~"N$. "O""o...F-.l,~
17"'7". ~NI::> ~~~" I7IMF-N'7tO,,*
~t7 c>N ?t!1Z'{!l!:"'" P.:tr' ~17T"
J;JHc&IN~ll-lb '-"NI::> I?~~t:>
JUI-l~ Z7, r"lqg
fFOFo7eo ~ITe F"LA N
JAOel2- fZ.e':7ll?eNc.e
~t..e. )n ..... 1..0 I -C'
j:!.IZO'NN ~tlN I ~oN~e~ ~ M U H l..e N l""D H
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
SITE:
PRESENTER:
REVIEWED BY:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
PLANNING REPORT
4A
CONSIDER A BLUFF SETBACK VARIANCE FOR
ROBERT JADER, Case File #99-027
14962 PIXIE POINT CIRCLE
JENNITOVAR,PLANNER
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
_X_ YES NO
JUNE 14, 1999
On August 10, 1998 the Planning Commission granted a 5.62-foot variance to
allow a lot area of 44.38 feet wide at the 25 foot minimum required front yard
setback. The Planning Commission considered a 44.38 foot variance to allow a
proposed house to be setback 6.92 feet from the top of bluff, rather than the
required 57 feet (determined by 18% slope). The item was continued to allow the
applicant to produce alternatives. The Planning Commission had suggested the
structure be modified to be setback an additional 20 feet from the top of bluff,
rather than the proposed 6.92 feet. The applicant never presented such
information and withdrew his bluff variance request. The applicant is now
requesting a bluff setback of 17 feet rather than the minimum required 57 feet
(determined by 18% slope). The lot is located in the First Addition to Eastwood
subdivision on Prior Lake.
DISCUSSION:
The Planning Department received a variance application from Bob Jader who is
proposing to remove an existing structure and construct a new single family
residence on the property located at 14962 Pixie Point Circle. First Addition to
Eastwood was platted in 1954. The property is located within the R-1 (Suburban
Residential) and the SD (Shoreland Overlay) districts. The ownership of the
adjacent Jader residence has been changed to be considered a separate lot.
The ownership of Lot 13 is that of Robert and Elizabeth Jader and Lot 12 (this
lot) is in the name of Robert Jader.
F:\DEPT\PLANNING\99FILES\99V AR\99-027\99-027PC.DOC
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
The building envelope (Exhibit B) is averaged to be 36.5 feet by 66 feet (2400
square feet). Exhibit C is the preliminary house plan of the proposed structure.
The footprint of the structure is 2912 square feet. The previously requested
variance had a footprint of 2891 square feet. It consists of an 826 square foot
attached garage and a 2076 square foot dwelling on one level with a walkout
basement.
Attached as Exhibit D, is a copy of Planning Commission minutes and the staff
report from August 10, 1998. It includes three surveys for permits issued with
building footprints less than 2000 square feet. All of these lots have bluffs on
them. The house with the tuck under garage has a footprint of 1264 square feet.
The two houses without the tuck under garage have footprints of 1412 square
feet and 1812 square feet. In all of these cases, the required setbacks and
constraints of the lot were the primary consideration for the footprint size. Staffs
recommendation remains the same as the ordinance and other factors have not
changed.
This variance is being processed under the previous Zoning Ordinance as a
completed application was received prior to May 1, 1999. If a variance is
granted a condition must be made to the resolution allowing one 5 foot side yard
setback with 10 foot building separation and one 10 foot side yard setback. If
the variance is denied, the required side yard setback under the new Zoning
Ordinance will allow a 5-foot setback with a building separation of 15 feet. An
additional side yard setback of 2 inches is required on all sidewall exceeding 40
feet. This results in an additional setback of approximately 8.5 feet on one side
and an additional 3.5 feet on the other side.
The DNR has not commented on this request. A letter from them will be
available prior to the public hearing.
VARIANCE HARDSHIP STANDARDS
1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship
with respect to the property.
This criteria goes to whether reasonable use can be made of the property if
the Ordinance is literally enforced. The hardship related to literal
enforcement of the bluff ordinance is dependent upon reasonable use of the
property. Considering other bluff lots have been built upon with smaller
building footprints than proposed here, reasonable use of the property can
exist with a smaller house that fits the legal building envelope.
2. Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique
to the property.
F:\DEPT\PLANNING\99FILES\99V AR\99-027\99-027PC.DOC
Page 2
There are unique circumstances are the lot width and topography. The lot is
unique as to topography and shape. However, a reasonable use still remains
on the property with a building envelope of approximately 2400 square feet.
3. The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and is not the
result of actions of persons presently having an interest in the property.
The hardship, with respect to the bluff setback, is caused by the applicant's
house design and over sized garage size. These are conditions of which the
applicant has control over and can modify to meet the criteria of the
ordinance.
4. The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces
substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest.
There is an existing cabin on the lot and there are structures on adjacent lots
with similar bluff setbacks. The requested variance does not observe the
spirit and intent of the ordinance. The granting of the bluff ordinance may not
contrary to the public interest as the adjacent structures are setback a similar
distance, and the proposed structure will be setback further from the top of
bluff than the proposed structure.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has concluded the variance request to bluff setback does not meet all four
of the criteria as the applicant has control over the house size and design and
smaller foot prints have been located on other lots with a building envelope of a
smaller size. If the requested bluff setback is denied, the Planning Commission
may direct staff to prepare a resolution approving a 5 foot and 10 foot side yard
setback as there may be hardship and considering the application was received
under the old ordinance, but a building permit will be issued under the new
ordinance.
ALTERNATIVES:
1. Adopt Resolution 99-07PC denying the bluff setback variance.
2. Table or continue discussion of the item for specific purpose.
3. Approve the variance to bluff setback, or any other variance, because the
Planning Commission finds a demonstrated hardship under the zoning code
F:\DEPT\PLANNING\99FILES\99V AR\99-027\99-027PC.DOC
Page 3
criteria. In this case, the Planning Commission should direct staff to prepare
a resolution with findings approving the variance request.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Motion and second adopting Resolution 99-07PC.
F:\DEPT\PLANNING\99FI LES\99V AR\99-027\99-027PC.DOC
Page 4
RESOLUTION 99-07PC
A RESOLUTION DENYING A 40.00 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A
SETBACK FROM TOP OF BLUFF OF 17.00 FEET INSTEAD OF THE
REQUIRED SETBACK OF 57.00 FEET.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Robert Jader has applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit
the construction of a single family residence with attached garage on property located
in the R-l (Suburban Residential) District and the SD (Shoreland Overlay) District at
the following location, to wit;
14962 Pixie Point Circle, legally described as Lot 12, First Addition to
Eastwood, Scott County, MN.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as contained in
Case #99-027 and held hearings thereon on June 14, 1999.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property
values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is
possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variance will not
result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties,
unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, and
danger to the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort,
morals or in any other respect be contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and
Comprehensive Plan.
5. The legal building envelope for the lot is approximately 2400 square feet. The
applicant has control over the house design and shape, such that the hardship created
has been created by the applicant. Reasonable use of the property exists within the
2400 square foot legal building envelope.
\\fs 1 \sys\dept\planning\99files\99var\99-027\re9907pc.doc 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
6. While there is a bluff on the lot, there is no justifiable hardship caused by the bluff as
reasonable use of the property exists without the granting of the variance.
7. The granting of the variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. The variance will not serve merely as a
convenience to the applicant, and is not necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship.
The factors listed above allow for an alternative structure and garage to be permitted
without the variance.
8. The contents of Planning Case 99-027 are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby denies the
following variances, as shown in attached Exhibit A (survey) for future single family
dwelling and detached garage;
1. A 40.00 foot variance to permit setback from top of bluff of 17.00 feet instead of the
required 57.00 foot setback.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on June 14, 1999.
Anthony Stamson, Chair
ATTEST:
Donald R. Rye, Planning Director
\ \fs 1 \sys\dept\planning\99fi1es\99var\99-027\re9907pc.doc
2
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
~JZ I-A)Le
-^-...---"....-\.'....'"'~.,--
-"..._~.........,-.. ".--........,-.--
~'""\."...----
~~.......,.,......-...
---\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
~
AU. /;JltAeN~"N$. TD"'D&fZ..~F'I-llc.
t7p..7~. ,.NI7 ~F-TB/'GJL l7I/Y1gN'!>for.lS-
~/:? C'N '7U1:Z',{!BY ~ ~t::"T
J;lNt.&IN~INb "Nt:> t.:>~~/:?
JUNe- 25, ,qqg
r~ro?el7 71TI::. PLA N
IN/e1Z- fZ.e?ll?eNc.~
~J.e I" ~ 2..0 I -t::).
~'NN?PN, "'ONt-.!e.~ ~ MUHJ..eHIPDH
06/15/98 MON 10:43 FAX 6124474245
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
III 003
lP
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
Impervious Surface Calculations
(To be Submitted with Building pennit Applicalion)
For All Properties Located in the Shoreland District (SD).
The Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage Permitted in 30 Percent.
-
Property Address ---If1t..2 ~/)(l S. ~-r ~~
Lot Area ~tftPz. Sq. Feet x 30% = ..............--*'7 ~ Ff
....********...*****.*.....***********************....**************.***
HOUSE
LENGTH WIDTH SQ. FEET
fVY~ x~ = ?"C7"
x =
"!>& x 'Z1.. -= ~
ATTACHED GARAGE
TOTAL PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE......................
1A~
DETACHED BLDGS
(Garage/Shed)
x
x
TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS....................... ".t:).-
DRlVEW A YIPA VED AREAS
(Driveway-paved or not)
(Sidewalk/Parking Areas)
l'Z.
x )Yy~,
x
...
1170
=:
~
x 9Z-
""
~~
TOT.AL P A 'YED AREAS..................._....................
1~1&
PAnOS~ORcHESmEcKs
(Open Da:b 'A" min. opcllin~ between
boards. with a pervious surface below,
are not considered to be imp~io\ls)
1"0
)0
x
X
iCP
...
=
x
=
TOTAL DECKS................................_........................ I hO
OTHER
x
X
=
=
TOTAL OTHER.........................................................
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
lUNDE!fIOVER
Prepared By W\l\\arn }2. ~h~r
4-ZoC;O
i~2 7>
.
Date -AI z? J~
Company e>Y1'wn~ j~~J , Mvh~p>h Phone # "$J.77;"'~
LEGAL BUILDING ENVELOPE
APPROXIMATELY
2400. SQUARE FEET
EXHIBIT B
/1
/
.0 /
.rV
,l~;; /
~~,if'/
/
/
~
'-...
'-...
'-...
1
i
,j
\1
iJ
, .I
1~
I
Bldg area '= 2889 Sq. Ft.
Lot area '= 14.924 Sq. Ft.
Coverage '= 19.36%
c>e
c>,
'0~
<:(0\
Scale: 1" = 30'
''0
.--J\
<:( \ I~
-'(,g~ L__Pixie Point Circle
DESCRIPTION
I hereby certify that this survey. plan, or
report wos prepored by me or under my direct
supervision and thot I om a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the Laws of the State
of MInnesota.
r52.._ /'kP~
6ot;-':--~~2S 'JVAI IQq8' Reg. No. 8140
Lot 12
FIRST ADDITION TO EASTWOOD
Scott County, Minnesota
Assumed bearIngs shown
o Denotes Iron monument
(EX~I~) ~apo~
BRANDT ENGINEERING & SURVEYING IDrsrnu\VJrnll~
1600 West 143rd Street, Su ite 206 ~ JUN 30 I!W ~
Burnsville, MN 55306
(612) 435-1966 J28-1-98
ml
. . ~"~:r"". II . fll I I I f
~o .ff1,!! .1 1!= .
o I iU~jl' '1 }I~ I I I :.'
i J 11~I~v If t:fJ i l:: :
-~g. i .IIJrI l b!' I ' f j
rJ f ijI .. 11 ' I. ,
00 ~11~IJIPl1J j'~1 Sf '
.... IIU "I I.. I~ ;
)..
~
. i
I~'
i:
.,
I
~ j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
\}'
\
. \
~.
EXHIBIT C
PROPOSED LAYOUT
DECK
c:
o
n1
" "
000
LJOU"
1
'" AT., E IO! IN'"
I
1
I
1
1
1
I",
I
,
.,EA
~
CD
.
n
i
-
:--------; r==========:====
I III
I I II
I . I II
FO'l"!R .111
. I II
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
_..J
.
.'"
,...----
I
I
I
,--- ----..,
I
I
en
.Q
i
CiJ
0'
o
S-
ea
CD
!
==
o
KITCHEN
0-
CD
en
:I
.
==
CD
~
t
CD
::s
9-
::sa
ea
o
::s
...
::s-
eD
~
iJ
S"
n
CD
en
ea
iJ
~
;-
Q,
"
I
1
1
I
I
L__________________
. .
Ii ----------
(C;
------1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
______J
GAI:lAGE
Flntftlor -1114....LI
~LInI -1_......
T_ . "..... II.
'f
J
EXHIBIT D
(-
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 10, 1998
1.
Call to Order:
The August 10, 1998, Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Vice Chair
V onhof at 6:33 p.m. Those present were Commissioners Cramer, Criego and V onhof,
Planning Director Don Rye, Planner Jenni Tovar and Recording Secretary Connie
Carlson.
2. Roll Call:
V onhof
Kuykendall
Criego
Cramer
Stamson
Present
Absent
Present
Present
Absent
3. Approval of Minutes:
The Minutes from the July 27, 1998 Planning Commission meeting were approved as
presented.
C"
4.
Public Hearings:
A. Case #98-070 Consider a lot width riance and bluff setback variance for
Robert Jader, 14962 Pixie Point Circle.
Vice Chair V onhof read the public hearing statement.
Planner Jenni Tovar presented the Planning Report dated August 10, 1998 on file in the
office of the City Planner.
Staff concluded the variance request for lot width is substantiated with hardships
pertaining to the lot the applicant has no control over. However, the variance request to
bluff setback does not meet all four of the criteria as the applicant has control over the
house size and design and smaller foot prints have been located on other lots with a
building envelope of a smaller size.
The DNR submitted a written objection to granting the bluff setback variance stating the
physical and visual integrity of the bluff is compromised on the proposed location of the
structure. The DNR does not object to the variance to the lot width.
1:\98files\98plcomm\pcmin\nm081098.doc
'./
. ,- .
. ,,' ~ . . . . . " -
.__~-."~_ '~_".,,-_;..;.,'':- ~,,;,..:..--,v,,,~;';",.'::"';. _.._.,~;,.~."-,.,,,:,,,--_:,,: ~"'.;", '.~ ~, -
(
Questions from the Commissioners:
Cramer: Were the existing structures built before the Bluff Setback Ordinance was in
effect? Tovar responded they were. The Ordinance went into effect in December of
1995.
Comments from the public:
Bob Jader, 14960 Pixie Point Circle, said he resides in the adjacent 6,000 square foot
home which he hopes to sell and build a smaller home on this lot. He has been informed
this is a two step process, first, receive the variance to build, then go through the building
permit process. Many other items must be satisfied to get the permit, soil borings,
engineering certified landscaping plan, erosion control, etc. He purchased the property
long before the Bluff Ordinance. Mr. Jader feels his proposed home is well within the
impervious surface requirements and fits in with the surrounding environment and
structures. However, with the erosion on his neighbor's property it is not a good time to
be requesting a variance.
("
Mr. Jader is working with Mr. Harte and a number of engineers to make sure there will be
no slope erosion. He feels what he is proposing is reasonable. Mr. Jader stated ifhe can
satisfy the Commissioners that what he is doing is reasonable, then satisfy the City he
does not know how the variance can be denied. Mr. Jader went on to say literal
enforcement of this ordinance would result in a very significant financial loss. Mr. Jader
presented a letter to the Commissioners from an architect indicating what kind of
structure could be built in the building envelop. Mr. Jader feels he is taking all the
necessary steps to meet the requirements of the City. Mr. Jader presented pictures of his
current landscaping which has the exact same topography as the proposed building site.
Mr. Jader plans to do the same landscaping on the proposed property.
Mr. Jader is planning to provide significant precautions to avoid erosion. He will
guarantee there will not be any erosion. Mr. Jader pointed out other lakeshore lots that he
feels are not comparable to his property. He feels the plan presented is reasonable.
Commissioner Criego asked Mr. Jader ifhe considered a multi-level home, and ifhe did,
why'not select it. Mr. Jader said they wanted one floor living. The reason for the height
is because of the surrounding structures, and he doesn't want it to look like an outhouse.
Criego pointed out the architect (in his letter) indicated there was not enough square
footage, but if a multi-level building was constructed there would be enough square
footage. Mr. Jader responded they did not discuss multi-levels.
Donald Johnson, 14966 Pixie Point Circle, opposed this structure in his letter dated
August 4, 1998. He is the neighbor, along with Mr. Harte, who had slope failure. There
is a law suit against the City for the failure on his property. (There is no law suit at this
time.) He feels the City should not waste anymore taxpayer's money dealing with slope
failure.
1:\98files\98plcomm\pcmin\nm081098.doc
2
"
~ .+.'-.- +--~_._'._.+._-~-.~-'.~'~"-"~'+'--'
(
Elizabeth Jader, 14960 Pixie Point Circle, owner of property, gave a brief history of the
property. She pointed out regulations have changed drastically in 1998. This property
will be their retirement home. Mrs. Jader feels they are the enemy invading their own
property. Now she has to deal with strangers to make decisions that will affect her life.
They have invested a lot of money and time in this process.
Marv Mirsch, 15432 Red Oaks, (seasonal home) wanted to remind the Commissioners
the Bluff Ordinance was to protect bluff lands, erosion, strength and appearance. There is
no doubt there is erosion. The City of Prior Lake has a no-fail procedure. He feels the
Bluff Ordinance is for appearance only. Mirsch went on to explain the DNR bluff
interpretation.
Brunette Johnson, 14966 Pixie Point Circle, said she lives in a small home on the bluff.
The bluff has not moved in 50 years with all the rain and storms. She feels Mother
Nature was taken away when Mr. Jader sold the property, removed 100 trees and all the
natural vegetation. If there was a bluff ordinance in place earlier, the bluff would not
have failed and they would have their hill. She asked the Commissioners not to pass the
vanance.
Michael Harte, 14964 Pixie Point Circle, has the home with all the damage on the slope.
He believes if the engineering is done correctly the damage will be rectified. He is
working with Mr. Jader. Mr. Harte feels Jader's proposal is not unreasonable. Harte
asked the Commissioners to consider the proposal.
Commissioner Criego questioned Mr. Harte on why his bluff restoration proposal was
rejected by the City.: Mr. Harte explained the time line and variance process.
Bob Jader stated he feels sorry for Johnsons and Hartes. What he is proposing will not
affect the J ohnsons and will protect the 1akefront.
The public hearing was closed at 7:26 p.m.
Comments from Commissioners:
Criego:
. There are two views: 1) to build on a substandard lot; and 2) to protect the slope.
. The DNR opinion is trying to demonstrate a little flexibility so all parties are
satisfied. Mr. Lynch shows some leniency toward the applicant. In his letter he
basically states he does not like where it is but given an additional 15 or 20 feet, it
may be suitable. He could have said "1 disagree completely and follow the
ordinance." The Planning Department has to enforce the Ordinance. It is up to the
Planning Commission and City Council to vary from the ordinance.
. Mr. Jader has to understand what he is doing impacts other people.
. Question to Mr. Jader - The garage is very large, if a two car garage was proposed
instead of a four car garage, would you be able to move the building back? Mr. Jader
1:\98fi1es\98plcornm\pcmin\nm081098.doc
3
'J
,_.~......,.>,._..",.._~,~'_.~~;,;...:...,~...:..;...;:;;.;",,~..,.L.J"..,_._._,~"_"_'_.~'_."-'"'._"___' .'"
~.~. .-.;"" ~,~- .,.-:...._,~.."........_-'_.;_.__... ~_.'_......,,~.._-..,..... ---~-""._..",:.... ,.', -.,.,'. ..
(\
did not feel it had an impact because of what he is going to do to the bluff. He is right
up to the setbacks.
. Question to Staff - What is the process to ensure a stronger bluff? Rye said there is
limited ability to move dirt and all the vegetation on a bluff under the current
ordinance. The basic presumption of the Bluff Ordinance is any kind of development
activity, construction or landscaping will be held to the absolute minimum. That's
the point the ordinance takes. If anyone wants to do something different there is the
option of a variance or applying to have the code amended.
. Applicant has done wonders on his current home. The fact is the City is trying to
protect the bluff. The City is being sued for bluff failure at this time.
. Moving the house back to the footprint proposed by the staff, in his opinion would
put it in a tunnel. The applicant needs to build closer to the bluff but not where the
applicant proposes.
. The DNR tells us they do not want any destruction of the bluff or shoreline.
. Propose an alternative to what the applicant requested.
I (~"
"
Cramer:
. The lot width variance is not a problem, there is a definite hardship.
. Explained the hardship criteria.
. The initial bluff ordinance was far more stringent than it is now. This new ordinance
is more lenient to build closer to the bl~ff. Everyone has a different opinion on how
close is right.
. The DNR has commented on this proposal, they are not happy with this proposal
whether it is a personal opinion or not.
. The building envelope still makes reasonable use of the lot. There are a lot of issues
with the bluff failure.
. Cannot support the bluff setback variance.
. Agreed with Criego if the setbacks were further back he would look at this again.
V onhor:
. With regard to applicant's comments and inaccurate information from staff, staffhas
always made an effort to do the right thing.
. The Planning Commissioners are part of the community, not part of the staff. The
Commissioners have an interest in this community.
. He has seen applicant's property. The Jaders have a nice home and have done a nice
job with it. However, the Harte property had slope failure and has really come into
question.
. Under the variance process we consider the four hardship criteria. Agreed with
Cramer's comments to the lot width.
. The variance to the bluff setback are not met in this case. Especially when there is a
2,000 to 2,400 square foot foot print.
. There are buildable alternatives.
. Cannot support the variance.
1:\98ft1es\98plcomrn\pcrnin\mn081098.doc
4
'J
r"'>- --~'--~-----'->'.'_""-"_~J_'~_'_"""'_r.',.....,.J_ _.. .
("
Open Discussion/Comments:
Criego: This issue is whether the building envelope is big enough. Would like to offer a
compromise and give a variance based on the DNR's recommendation. The DNR is
super conservative but they are willing to go a few extra feet. There is a hardship. They
would have to put up a 2 or 3 story building.
Cramer: Agreed with Criego in one respect, there could be some leniency with the lake
setback because of the other houses. W ouId be willing to consider.
V onhof: Stand with previous statement. There has been a bluff failure adjacent to this
property. The adjacent homes are multi-level. Anyone story house is going to look
small against a two or three story house. No testimony has been given to alter me from
our ordinance.
Cramer: Cannot picture the building envelope tonight without the proper information.
This property is buildable. Suggested to continue and have applicant check into going
back at least 20 feet.
Cramer and V onhof explained there are two other commissioners not present who mayor
may not have different views.
(
Bob Jader responded he would like to continue to next month.
MOTION BY CRAMER, SECOND BY CRIEGO, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 98-
19PC GRANTING A 6.92 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT A LOT WIDTH OF 44.38
FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 50 FEET TO BE BUILDABLE.
Vote taken signified ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
Commissioner V onhof opened the public hearing.
MOTION BY CRAMER, SECOND BY CRIEGO, TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC
HEARING CONSIDERING A BLUFF SETBACK FOR ROBERT JADER (CASE FILE
#98-070) TO SEPTEMBER 14,1998.
Vote taken signified ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
5. Old Business: None
6. New Business: None
1:\98files\98plconun\pcmin\nm08 I098.doc
5
"
AGENDA ITEM:
SUBJECT:
SITE:
PRESENTER:
REVIEWED BY:
PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION:
, , . ~ . . .
.' ._<'.;.._,,~..~ ._'....C-,-,,____._ _..~,_....'~. __~"...,._. ..,...:....-_......--.; ~,'.~
. .-~._._..> __~~''''P,.'' ,.~'.".... ....._. .u.,_.,._,..:...:."..... ...... _'.._.~'._... .___... ...
PLANNING REPORT
4A
CONSIDER A LOT WIDTH VARIANCE AND BLUFF
SETBACK VARIANCE FOR ROBERT JADER, Case
File #98-070
14962 PIXIE POINT CIRCLE
JENNITOVAR,PLANNER
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
YES -X.. NO
AUGUST 10,1998
The Planning Department received a variance application from Bob Jader who is
proposing to remove an existing structure and construct a new single family
residence on the property located at 14962 Pixie Point Circle. The lot is 44.38
feet wide at the 25 foot minimum required front yard setback. Section 5-8-12 of
the City Code requires that substandard lots have a minimum lot width of 50 feet
to be buildable. Be'cause the City Code does not specify what measurement
distances are in, the setbacks and other numerical ordinance requirements
cannot be rounded. Thus, the existing lot width at the front yard setback is less
than 50 feet and requires a variance. The lot is located in the First Addition to
Eastwood subdivision on Prior Lake.
There is also a bluff on the property. The proposed structure is located 6.92 feet
from the top of bluff, rather than the required 57 feet. The 57 foot setback is
based on where the grade of the slope becomes less than 18%. Therefore, a
44.38 foot variance is required.
DISCUSSION:
Lot 12, First Addition to Eastwood was platted in 1954. The property is located
within the R-1 (Suburban Residential) and the SD (Shoreland Overlay) districts.
The applicant does not own either of the adjacent parcels. Lot attributes are as
follows:
'J
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
. . ..
. ... ..*'"-.--...."- ....'
, . ,-.";'.,.~ >.....-----:........-.-...
-
.. .._.~. ., ..... ,-., ~ -.'
Size Requirement to Variance
be Buildable Requested
(as a substandard lotl
Area 14,924 sq. feet 7,500 sq. feet N/A
(above 904 ell
Lot Width 44.38 feet 50.00 feet 5.62 feet
(measured at setbackl
OHW Width 95 feet N/A N/A
(approx.)
The building envelope (Exhibit B), is averaged to be 36.5 feet by 66 feet (2400
square feet). Exhibit C is the preliminary house plan of the proposed structure.
The footprint of the structure is 2891 square feet. It consists of an 891 square
foot attached garage and a 2000 square foot dwelling portion all on one level.
There is a basement indicated on the plans (stairs shown) and possible bonus
room above the garage.
Attached as Exhibit D are three surveys for permits issued with building
footprints less than 2000 square feet. All of these lots have bluffs on them. The
house with the tuck under garage has a footprint of 1264 square feet. The two
houses without the tuck under garage have footprints of 1412 square feet and
1812 square feet. In all of these cases, the required setbacks and constraints of
the lot were the primary consideration for the footprint size.
The DNR has submitted a written objection to granting of the bluff setback
variance stating the physical and visual integrity of the bluff is compromised on
the proposed location of the structure. The DNR does not object to the variance
to the lot width.
VARIANCE HARDSHIP S1 ANDARDS
1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in undue hardship
with respect to the property.
This criteria goes to whether reasonable use can be made of the property if
the Ordinance is literally enforced. The variance request to lot width is an
existing condition. There is a hardship with respect to the property because
those dimensions cannot be changed to meet the criteria of the ordinance.
The hardship related to literal enforcement of the bluff ordinance is also
dependent upon reasonable use of the property. Considering other bluff lots
have been built upon with smaller building footprints than proposed here,
reasonable use of the property can exist with a smaller house that fits the
legal building envelope.
L:\98FILES\98V AR\98-070\98-070PC.DOC
'J
Page 2
-""-,~,-"",-.,,,:'.~-, :~-~-.:...~;._::..;,~:-._:,;.;~~:.....~~:.:......:;-",._._, ,~;;",:_- ~ ~--~- .,~~.;; .. .:..__:~.~;~-,~':' ""'
2. Such unnecessary hardship results because of circumstances unique
to the property.
The unique circumstances are the lot width and topography. Considering lot
width is an existing condition created in 1954 and cannot be altered to meet
the ordinance requirements, hardship does exist for lot width. The lot is
unique as to topography and shape. However, a reasonable use still remains
on the property with a building envelope of approximately 2400 square f~et.
3. The hardship is caused by provisions of the Ordinance and is not the
result of actions of persons presently having an interest in the property.
The lot is considered to be substandard. While the lot area is 14,924 sq. feet,
the lot width is only 44.38 feet at the required front setback. These are
conditions which have been existing since the property was platted in 1954.
The lot width is a hardship that is not the result of the applicant's actions.
The hardship, with respect to the bluff setback, is caused by the applicants
house design and four stall garage size. These are conditions of which the
applicant has control over and can modify to meet the criteria of the
ordinance.
4. The variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, produces
substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest.
The intent of a minimum lot width of 50 feet is to allow for a structure that can
meet the required setbacks and still be of a reasonable size. Considering
there is an existing cabin on the lot and there are structures on adjacent lots
with similar lot widths, granting the lot width variance observes the spirit and
intent of the ordinance and is not contrary to the public interest. The granting
of the bluff setback variance is contrary to the intent of the bluff setback
requirement and public interest and cannot be compensated for in any other
way on this lot with other considerations or modifications.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has concluded the variance request for lot width is substantiated with
hardships pertaining to the lot that the applicant has no control over. However,
the variance request to bluff setback does not meet all four of the criteria as the
applicant has control over the house size and design and smaller foot prints
have been located on other lots with a building envelope of a smaller size.
ALTERNATIVES:
L:\98FILES\98V AR\98-070\98-070PC.DOC
'J
Page 3
. ....."...,..,......;, .'.-.~,_.~,,,..........- .. ... ..-....-...... ...../
1. Adopt Resolution 98-19PC approving the variance to lot width and adopt
Resolution 98-20PC denying the bluff setback variance.
2. Table or continue discussion of the item for specific purpose.
3. Approve the variance to bluff setback because the Planning Commission
finds a demonstrated hardship under the zoning code criteria. In this case,
the Planning Commission should direct staff to prepare a resolution with.
findings approving the variance request.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Motion and second adopting Resolution's 98-19PC and 98-20PC.
L:\98FILES\98V AR\98-070\98-070PC.DOC
'J
Page 4
. ...;--",..----:~_.._._..,......_~~.,'"". .
EXHIBIT A
CERllF1CA 1E OF SURVEY
for
BOB JADER
J28-1-98
/
/
/
41
.~ /
l~;; /
~ ~ ctJ' /
/
/
(
'"
'"
'"
'" /
"'z
'"
"''' I
'" "-..1',/
'" ""
'" ""
1- s <<<'" " ,,,,/
,<. '10 '-
11'6" '-
06'. '"
Ip '"
'" /8'}
'- /0' ;0
'- /,,>.0
'" 'b
'V
1--;
I
---:------,
...
\ "
\
\
\
jQ \
l."lQ \
\..\)~~
{~
~O? (5 \ '
-1- .../ \..--'\ \
~J- ,- ~ lo,'t'bl
i:'/~~ \ ~~(,"I \
~ V'.~ ~~'\ \ \
~ \ \,\j~~ \
.(1.'6 \ \
.p V,-\ \ \
~ \ \
\ \
\ \ \
\ \
., \ \
\ J
L--- \
\
\
\
...........-.j
11
I I
.x
u
o
.0
q;
III
. 0\.
<:(0\
Bldg area = 2889 Sq. Ft.
Lot area = 14,924 Sq. Ft.
Coverage = 19.36%
<:(\--/-\ e
J~q~ '-__Pixie Point Circle
Scale: 1"
30'
DESCRIPTION
I hereby certify that this survey, plan. or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I om 0 duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the Lows of the State
of Minnesota.
~2~~ Reg. No. 8140
Lot 12
FiRST ADDITION TO EASTWOOD
Scott County, Minnesota
Assumed bearings shown
o Denotes iron monument
(EX~ing) ~
BRANDT ENGINEERING & SURVEYI~G [Df~lilO'llJ~F!
1600 West 143rd street, Suite 20q I~ JUN 301900 I~
Burnsville, MN 55306
(612) 435-1966 J28-1-98
.-- ...-_._~._-~"';"';'-~""" ~..'--'- ....-....-'-. ......._~. -". _.. .. .
07-07-1998 03:08PM
~~,~.._!!.v~. .,_~ VA....' ...,'"
1 612 4352929
P.01
ow..... ..... ............. ---
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
Impemous Suna(e Calculations
(To be submiued with Bvi1c!iD~ l'ermitApplic:adotl)
For All Properties Located. in the Shoreland Distri
The Maxilnum Impervious Surface Coverage Permitted.
Property Address , ~ q , l.. ? be. \ b ))0 1 NT C. H~C.L'-
Lot ANa I L" q Z'" Sq. Feet x 30% - --...-.-.. It It' I <)Q - f'r.
.*..***...********...*..*******.*****.....*****..***..........*.........
LENGTH
WIDTH
SQ. FEET
x
x
x
-
HOUSE
==
::
ATTACHED GARAGE
TOTAL PlUNCI1'LE STRuCTURE-.....-.
.....r....
"Z~~~
.....
14'1
-
DETACHED BLDGS
((jara&tfSbeci)
x
;It
TOTAL DETACHED BU1LDINGS~'-......- 92C)
x
x
x
==
DRI"If,W A YfPA VED AREAS
(OriVeWSy.pand or not)
(SicltwalkIParking Areas)
=
~
TOTAL PA YED AREA5.--...-....-.-...-
It
X
~
PATlOSIPORCHESIDECKS
(Opal Decks 'I,' min. openina bdWftD
boards. wid! a pu9iouS surf#e below.
'" _ coasillered 10 be illlpa'Viawl)
=
x
=
"l6
~
TOTAL DECKS..----------
'.
0iHE1l
x
=
x
=
TOTAL OTIIER..-.....-
....w ..,.
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
~VE:R
prep~By R..'A:Y BR-fJ.!V})\
Company~ I5Nt t ~r)I~V.
I 3~IU
\ s 6J ,
Date 7 J'VL'( lC,qy
Phone # ~ J ]']5'6
"
TOTRl P.01
.M~;' ,,:,. :"'_""',0.._ ..C'". _*".~ ._':-..~._i .'_.. .:....._.. .., - ,,:....:;..-4......,~.~ " ._, '-"-
LEGAL BUILDING ENVELOPE
APPROXIMATELY
2400. SQUARE FEET
EXHIBIT B
/
.4J /
.tV
.ti;; /
~ ~:J';
/
/
(.
"
"
"
/
-------,
\
/ // -1 -1 \
// / /~ I I -" \
///::~~~ g \
/ / / /1.'/1/./'//0 :S
~~ / ~/!/1%%!- :l
/0;; /~~)$/ j!? \
// / ,,?~~~ ~ \..l'\lQ \
/ / /(0~f~i;~ ~ ~ /'/ /. ~J.
I / //~~////. ~ / / 'i ~\..\)
/ / /:'"f.1~1,~/.~~~/ ~ ~o? rfi \
/'/, /,II? I'll /.1'/.// /~".".
~/. 1',.. '/ :r.~~};/I'// .y./ /"..". '1- r L- -, \
0~/'.%l;1:./~ ~"../,:/;: ~ _..1 - \ ~
~~~~~~/:~~fj%/' ~...<t.;.\ ~~lG\\
~/~:;: / ~,: / / l7o\\" r..(;....q, \ \
?-;//// f..--. '" /// ~\ ~~ \
/ '/ //;) / ".. \ e\'~ \ \
/ / J<r:5/r"./ ~,/ /': \
/ / /'0~V/ ". /',/ V,-\ \ \
/1 ---, / / / 7J/ /".///.. \
. I L-.... /// / / -. ~ \ \
\ II /'V' ~ / // / ~~ \ \
I\...../ f ( <: 11'':>':> / \ \ \
~ ,~~ \ \
.t' ') ,?- is ., \ \
7 / ,11'>, \
()IJ.. \..___J \
" / ') A..
,,/ ( <) \
", <-
"', Y', \
'" / '^
'. A. / ' \
" " ''1<
,,',' ---- -....\
,,' )
, , I
lit S<<':>" 'Vi
'<~&/o "
06" "
If/ "
" 1.& }
" Cyfo
" /",.0
" ~
'V ~
II
Bldg area = 2889 Sq. Ft.
Lot area = 14,924 Sq. Ft.
Coverage = 19.36%
<:(\-!-\ e
J~q~ L__Pixie Point Circle
Scale: 1" = 30'
DESCRIPTION
I hereby certify that this survey. plan. or
report was prepored by me or under my direct
supervision and that I om 0 duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the Lows of the State
of Minnesota.
~-/9vP~
~;-=02S 'J'VAI \qt:}g- Reg. No. 8140
Lot 12
FIRST ADDITION TO EASTWOOD
Scott County, Minnesota
Assumed bearings shown
o Denotes Iron monument
( EX~lng) ~opos~
BRANDT ENGINEERING & SURVEYING~[~@~O'l!1~I~
1600 West 143rd street, Su ite 206 JON 301900
'J
Burnsville, MN 55306
(612) 435-1966 J28-1-98
..__......:::...-.-'~.~. -_:-..~-~-
~_.~~n.~~c"-"'~ I
I
l,
~l
r---
~_._~_oJ
.
,
.0-='- .., . 'f"' '-
-----=-::-'[_. .' '0.. _~" ~ . .
~._"
. .-c __ _
. ::;..- ..
..0. .. ~
.' i
i I
I
~
\l
~
I. ;f
I ~
A J
11
\.-1
?
I
J
- i
;.I~',i
. ".--J
\~:
~
/' '_.~- I,
;/ "
t" r
:e=-.. I
; ., - ..
. .-- ~--~~-t
, , i i
.. - ..-U-~___ :
(J
I-
-
In
-
:I:
X
W
.<>
q
,
d
t
-::J.
.t.
III
J:
i
I
I
...l"
6'
~
/
!
0-
o
;
i
i
I
I
/
.-l ,
,
,
I
,
,
\\l
'S-
;t
~
I
/
,;
/
-----
../'
~.
~ '.-'0".
_:~...:' ..t>.. .~.
-.
''w.~
0:"';-.
.'
. ~~
/-~:
J
-
~
;U
1
o
-f).
~'-:}" :"':~;...~~.,
"~~~r
. :t~~~.'~
~~f~
:j4;11~
_.... :.. -,,--:"::."- , ..~2""~ .;...
~!~ ~-~-~~.'" .
. . _..'1-...._";....~. -~~ -
j
j
~.
.,..
;~
.., : I
~ .~. i I
.1 . \ i
, 'i I i
, .
I
, ,
~ , . ; - '. f i
j : \
. j 1
i\
I
{ : \
i i
I \
I i i
I \
.
I
\
\
+.~.~~'"'"" .
-..;.. ..;,.,,~S'_,
._~:~.~~ .
'~.... ~ ~;-~
-....~.;...:..';.:;~.".
'/
-t'"
7ft
'_-G~,
': "E i;:.
- "il .;
M
.
C
I-
-
a:l
-
:1:
><
LLI
_~~~;~,. .L.
-------
t-
W
W
U.
"
tJ)
~
(.0
N
,...
~
~o'~.-.~
. .;z Ci
QI
.c.
.LJ
11-1.
o
6
.r-!
.LJ
III
U
o
.-l
t-
Z
-
a:
0.
b
o
u.
,
j'lj
cJ
~
~Iot
~
~ .
~...
- ...
v. ..
'"
o
'"
<D
~
'"
'"
..
.... II.
0) o.
/. ~o "-
0, B.Q. ~
I ... ....
.;.."?,o ~
...:.......0:...,1._- a,.
;,;..' I ......... -.c:- _
: F;;"~ '" ;';. :~- - -_
r{f I
~
(
/\E~
......
".
;;..
'"
:::::i((Jg
o~ I..;
: OC02C: 0
...... ., ..,;:: .,
CZI'_lU~ "_
~ s:o ~
.....'0'" !..
~s~;;'J2
rJ eoc: q,
o~-t
l/)
'2 co
>,N Il'l
.LJ I"")
511} 0\
o...-t _
u.c. a
.LJ ...-t
.LJ'O .LJ
.LJ.4J III
o'~ ;;:
.u'r.l '"
CI)~ .-l
II} r:a
... '" ~
[Ij Cd !-J
:.::: III
c5~ .E
::l U
o 0 a1
t5 ::x::.c. c:l
~ 0::'0 _
~ =1 QI :,")
..... ~ "" _r.;
2- 8. g
--g ~ 8 z
15 ...:l 0..
~
~
/
/
/
'"
~O 'os __
3.oq t>s . F I IV
?? 101 Jo
Q)
~
3
10
- (Tl
\0-
o
-
\0-
0...
N...
ON
C1'N
. .....
...Jr-
w
"
cY')
N
.t.J
o
.-l
6
~
.-l
In
QI
01
III
!-J
III
0\
C'
C
..-\
.t.J
II}
..-i
><
QI
c
O.
..-i
.t.J
III
:>
~ I
~I
III
~i
C'
r.:
.r-!
.t.J
lI}
...-t
><
CII
lI}
QI
.t.J
o
r.:
CII
o
QI
.c.
.LJ
11-1
o
0..
o
'.t.J
I.D
.
Il'l,
I"")
Cl'I
" "
~
\
I
\
\
\
I
\
\
I
\
\
\
\
.. i
, "'0
\ ~'9
,
I
"
'.
".
"'" ' 'r
""...... {_ ~ t
'........., I~'
, 0
"" I ,tl~ I
.,.. . \
l '~...
_._ __:'_";~____:'_"'_~"1"'1'U'~
"
~
I
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
.
,
,
,
~
J~.
-~
o lot
.
,
.
,
\
,
,
"
//
, l=--
"
"
~--
"
--~
"
x
o
c
VI
'"
o
_ __J"Il. __
(')
--'.;:I:;.}-'
.....--... ,..-
-~=~~=~~~==~=-~;~--- ~,.
-----...... ---...---------- --...... -- -.....
r 0 (1 z '. ",
, - .I!\..CU:L _. .
--------z fl-:Ir -l .,.... ",
---~~~.:::- 93c r1
___:xl ...J..
~ -
.u---~-2-~-------.----- ".
. ~~=~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~+~~
.-,------ - --.- .---.out}!-
---------------------~--
--------...-..... --- ----
. ~ -..... ----------......
...............-
.
------..
I
'---
~
:II
-<
EXHIBIT D
NORTHWOOD ROAD
~
I
k
~ ,
\
G\
~
po
G\
'"
HOUSE FOOTPRINT
1 052 sa FEET
;. b" I
. ,.
, '
"jl;\ /
~ .
~ "
~ : r.
- .
I
GARAGE FOOT PRINT
"
...--
:
, I
.
,
760 sa FEET
PER . ~... r O~\..I( LINE
. CITY OF PR
, PLAN,NrNG DEP;OR LAKE
~ "'- ~
,-
,-"
__... ",'" ,1'
--..... ,,'"
.....-.....
.,-
-,-
.-..-
... ~~'
-",- .
-----...-.---..--..
-------...---------. .....
;~ n --
...---
----... -- --... --.. ---. - --.....,--..
---...
.....-...
--. <t. of 15 ft. Sanitary
Sewer Easement
...
g
Jt
:s:
--...-......
-........-...........
---...--.........
--- 930 _
--....
----~
TOP OF BLUFF PE Fi
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
PLAN NING DEPT
"
---
C;Ob
- LOT LINE AS SCALED PER PLAT
OF NORTl-IW()() n
Q) 836 sa FEET
. ...:11....,,J'(f'o.-U> I dt.ur. 1"Icrl"" MI ..4?<l)
.' t;P; ~~)./ ,:::::':.;:~ r~' ~ ~~;
- j. ,~''',
, ~f'W)""" \
. _~t ..,./~,<:t U) \
"". :/ ~''''~:.I~~~:7#ll ~/ ~-8----
.0 . r,; ~ l>l .",
./ l'l N " 'i in 0
.........1 : ~~.# ---~ .,.-'. .. i (Ji 0.. ~
~,bf .. ~,.< I :~ :1 ~~ Vi
'....,... a 19 8.3 ..'..::J. ,'. !: 0 · ~
.. -~~-s:o;:,..... ""\" ,::!It rrl f;,
~ / '.,~' .' ,," ~
J ,BlUFFS -~ ,........ ; Arl'ACHED GARAGE
.... PL<\NNIN~Tg~ lrNE: <\S E~T._. ~.' 0 . ~
..f ,,: . STABL/SHEO. 'BY\ ... ~ .
, I.,b' .' ", \. .' CITY OF ~~?R'~,f ',/
\ /. 0,6"" ~~b'~~" FOOTPRINT -'
J'::.;.t ....'.,....,i
.:' .," 6 -.~~.~..~..
,.' .-:..... o~~ .... ..................
. . . b~ . '..
/ ': ~ """mc~,:,:,'~>".~.'.~.:f.',,'~.".::'19:~:' :t.\<c:."iiXui i,;\.... /."
.'u/;j ;.:.::c...'.,,,..".....,..~ ;.jH;;T:~2::t::::.Zi::,;,.". ."
~.:.:.:'.::~:.:..;::>~~~" .', . .... ..... ._" .:..:..:.f ;l~{,
................. c,' '. ....... . pb ..' .... ...... ............ [1l~
::::::::::::::::t" ' .... ........ &16".....
.................1.. ~b.~..~::....'...:........:.:::::..:::::.: ........ ,,6 ..'
-"-.--'.'..-----,..' ~L6 .., -. O~6 ..-
:,./1
"'---"t
'9
: ir,o_;..
':\~.;-...
l..........
,,'" 11.3
.
.
.
~
~..
.R
'Q
jl"
!~
lib
/.g
... I1J
....
o.
f;,
"0
:r.':n
00
c."O
11I0
l'llll
l'l
o
'"
I1l
:./
[.-
'y"h
/,
....
b.!.."
---~.
'" .
o '.'
. _'~ O'l~'
"
. h(b'
./Cl,b'
/( q~b
~~./T"
b .
916
',.-- -.- 9.17 .::;-~.#~..#
Q}~ ......~..._.~.
" ,(~ (\h"
~lO ." ..
. - .;.,~~
EXHIBIT 0
--~----
..
~
~
:
.
..0
/.
QUAKER TRAIL
~~~
~,
~ I-~,
.. -~~
.. '.
v)
r :.'~
~-
; '::i
;,
C'I
).
~
~
c.
"'1
1
HOUSE FOOTPRINT
(;~ ~
_.n~
~
,.
..t-. .t-.
r... ','
'.J ,..',
I Ii
-.J
Vl ;:::)
-_1
576 SQ FEET
~ ~ h
IJ~ '
, ~ t>
0If.>
(J(~t
i..lf
)
. 009 . ",
-."
.~.. g','. -............... .~
_..---:--~--:-:-:- '
'., ",
", '.',
RESOLUTION 98-19PC
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A 6.92 FOOT V ARlANCE TO PERMIT A LOT
WIDTH OF 44.38 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 50 FEET TO BE
BUILDABLE
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Robert J ader has applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit
the construction of a single family residence with attached garage on property located
in the R-1 (Suburban Residential) District and the SD (Shoreland Overlay) District at
the following location, to wit;
14962 Pixie Point Circle, legally described as Lot 12, First Addition to
Eastwood, Scott County, MN.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for lot width variance as
contained in Case #98-070 and held hearings thereon on August 10, 1998.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property
values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is
possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variance will not
result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties,
unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, and
danger to the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort,
morals or in any other respect be contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and
Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the subject property are unique to such property,
and do not generally apply to other land in the district in which such land is located.
The unique circumstances applicable to this property include the substandard lot size
and the fact that the property was platted prior to the incorporation of the city.
1:\98files\98var\98-070\re981 9pc.doc 'I 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S .E.. prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
_/
/. . - - . ,,~_'_' ._...... <._ _0. '"
6. The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. The variance will not serve merely as a
convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship.
7. The applicant has met all of the conditions of Section 5-8-12 G) for development on a
substandard lot.
8. The DNR does not object to the lot width variance.
9. The contents of Planning Case 98-070 are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case. pursuant to Section 5-6-8 of the
Ordinance Code the variance will be deemed to be abandoned, and thus will be null
and void one (1) year from the date of approval if the holder of the variance has failed
to obtain any necessary, required or appropriate permits for the completion of
contemplated improvements including a future structure.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby grants and
approves the following variance, as shown in attached Exhibit A (survey);
1. A 6.92 foot variance to pennit a lot width of 44.38 feet instead of the required 50 feet
to be buildable.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on August 10, 1998.
Anthony Stamson, Chair
ATTEST:
Donald R. Rye, Planning Director
1:\98files\98var\98-070\re9819pc.doc
'}
2
RESOLUTION 98-20PC
A RESOLUTION DENYING 44.38 FOOT VARIANCE TO PERMIT SETBACK
FROM TOP OF BLUFF OF 6.92 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQillRED 57 FEET.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Adjustment of the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota;
FINDINGS
1. Robert Jader has applied for variances from the Zoning Ordinance in order to permit
the construction of a single family residence with attached garage on property located
in the R-1 (Suburban Residential) District and the SD (Shoreland Overlay) District at
the following location, to wit;
14962 Pixie Point Circle, legally described as Lot 12, First Addition to
Eastwood, Scott County, MN.
2. The Board of Adjustment has reviewed the application for variances as contained in
Case #98-070 and held hearings thereon on August 10, 1998.
3. The Board of Adjustment has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property
values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is
possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variance will not
result in the impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties,
unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, and
danger to the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort,
morals or in any other respect be contrary to the Zoning Ordinance and
Comprehensive Plan.
5. The legal building envelope for the lot is approximately 2400 square feet. The
applicant has control over the house design and shape, such that the hardship created
has been created by the applicant. Reasonable use of the property exists within the
2400 square foot legal building envelope.
6. While there is a bluff on the lot, there is no justifiable hardship caused by the bluff as
reasonable use of the property exists without the granting of the variance.
1:\98fi1es\98var\98-070\re9820pc.doc ,1
I
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
..,,,,,-.~,--~_._~.,,,""'.~,. '.-.~'~ ..~
7. The granting of the variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. The variance will not serve merely as a
convenience to the applicant, and is not necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship.
The factors listed above allow for an alternative structure and garage to be permitted
without the variance.
8. The DNR has submitted a written objection to this request, stating the visual and
physical integrity of the bluff would be compromised if the variance is granted.
9. The contents of Planning Case 98-070 are hereby entered into and made a part of the
public record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the Findings set forth above, the Board of Adjustment hereby denies the
following variances, as shown in attached Exhibit A (survey) for future single family
dwelling and detached garage;
1. A 44.38 foot variance to permit setback from top of bluff of 6.92 feet instead of the
required 57 foot setback.
Adopted by the Board of Adjustment on August 10, 1998.
Anthony Stamson, Chair
ATTEST:
Donald R. Rye, Planning Director
2
1:\98fi1es\98var\98-070\re9820pc.doc
'J
.' -'..-,~_..-'--~-;-
SENT BY: DNR METRO;
8 - 5 - 98 8 : 11 ;
6127727573 =>
6124474245;
#1/1
M innesotu Departlnent of Natural Resources
Metro Waters-1200WamerRoad, St. Paul, MN 55106-6793
Telephone: (612) 772-7910 Fax: (612) 772-7977
Ms. Jane KansiLT
planning Coordinator
City ofPriorl.ake
16200 Easle Creek Avenue. SlJ
Prior Lake. Minne.'I()t\l 55372- t 714
KI:I: JADl:!.RLOT WID1BAND BLUFF SETBACK VAI~.JANC~Al'PUCATlON, 14962 PIXlR l'OINT ClRClli,PRlOR
LAKE
Dea.. Ms. KlII1:iicr:
1 have revic:wcd lhc IJllllL...rials you subnlit1ed to me with respcd to the lot widlh and bluff setback variance request. from Bob Jader
at '4962 Pixie Point Circle. Please consid1.T the following comments at the AugtJ.<;t 10. 1998 Planning commillllion hearing.
Earlier this year, and on nume1"01L<; Ol;CllAinns last year, DNR slatTbave visited the adjacent parcel (Lot 13) to deal with a bluff
failure To date, me rcsloration wurkhas not)'et been ClOO1pleted lk blUlk, above elevation 904', is vtcy stCL"P in this IfCllofPrinr
J .alee. The intent of the shorcland regulations rClItrictitig disturhana: of soil and vegetation aD IIOd near bluils, as wcll L'l bluff
i'letoacks fot gtrulo.'lurl;S, is to protcol both the; visualalld phyaic:lll attributes C1fthcse fragile tOPU141."liphic fClllun:s.
T looked closely 111 the 9JJ.ve'j wbich W$lJ includOO with your mailing. 1 strongly encoura.ge the e;lty to C81'efully consider the; request
bdi:n:e tban. While the DNR 18 not opposed to lhe lot width variance, nor to the JClcvc10pmcnt of the lot, we do nut support the
bluLl'sctbsc.k VlUilUJQe request l1lI proposed. More e;arefulcOQsidcraliOll of the lot conlttrain~ could be QOO:li.Jerai in the design of
the structU1'e. DNR JU:.tnnmends the blu1f Sl:tback be dalial, IIlld the applie;ant redesign the prepaRed home to more closely comply
with existmg bluff setback requirements. I would be men: 14upportive of a structure which is scI. back an additional 1 5 to 20 f~'i
1rom t1H: bluft"than is ~tJy depicted. on the SJ(Ye'j. possible waYll to acwmplish this might j""h~ downsizing the home and/ur
garage, reoonfigunng any deck or porch, at conllidL-nng . house style which minimi:l.C8 the building footprint while III.IlXimizing
useahtc living area (a 2-staY,:Ii:c" exatJ1I'llc). I al11l1 suggest the city consiUL't', if necesqry, a front yard ll&.'lhack variance which would
allow encroachment of II strUCture closer to pixie Point Circle than is normality allowed.
In the illt~ of avoiding potentio.l fut\ll'e problems with slope failure, and in lhc spirit of the intent of the slJOrt:llilllJ rnllJ1agcmcllL
program. T.>NR ~aros denial of the bluff ::JClbli'-1\r. vlAriam~ as proposed, but doc:s not oppose the IlJ1prova! of the 101 wicllh
"arianoc:. It appCa1"ll the impc:rviuu:i :iWfaa: coverage and sideyard setback can be met.
Thank. you for ~nsiderin8 these DNR ~mmendations. If you have any questions. plc:ase call me aL 772.7910.
Sincerely.
-. i.:.~~')' . I . .." . - .
. S:, \ l/"I ~A \ I ......t."l j.---..~....
\. .\-,'_.'v" \~
Palrick;. Lyncti:1Ir,
. \
Area ltydrologi!ll''-.)
P"R \Ilr",nl;llil.lll: bl:!_~llb-("I1.~7. I-XliI) ')t,C, (,()()(l .. Try: (.1' :>11(, ';..11.:-1. l-lWtI.(,:,I .l').!~)
:\1\ 1:'1":11 (ll'Jlh,,'wnil\ 1"1\11\1".:"1
~'Ih\ V:l;'h~'" l'I\,'r",I\
ft. "llUh'",1 ",lit I~, ~..:: ~'kd 1'.11'\" (\'III.liIUl~I~ ..
'-~ "h:I:III~III; III l(j'~ Pl~"'! t \'lhllllll,'1 \'w',...!I,'
"
141 003
. f......
08/04/98 TUB 15:29 FAX 612 452 5550
CAMPBELL
August 4,199B
Erom: Donald E. Johnson
14966 Pixie point circle
prior Lake Mn. 55372
To: Prior Lake Planning Commiasion
Regarding; Variance request for Lot 12 Eirst Addition To
Eastwood.
I am applaud the Prior Lake p.lanning C
consider a variance of 50.0B foot setba
tbe bluff for tnis lot, this property m
the definition of a Bluff as noced in t
98-01.
issj,on would
)c from the top of
ets all criteria of
e Bluff Ordinance
I oppose tbis request for a 5D.OB Loot
following reasons,
for the
1. Lot 12 First Addi t.i.on To Eastwood wo ld nave ample space
to construct a bome using_the presen 18~ slope secback
wi thout undue hardship wi tl1 respect 0 the property.
2. Since tne borne construction on lot 1 First Addition To
Eastwood major slope failure has ace rred on lot 13 and
lot 14 in 1997 also slope failure oc urred on lot 13 and
lot 12 in 1998, Xhis variance would nlY augment the
instability of this blufr and could ause more slope
.failure. THIS BLUPF ORDIANCE CLEARLY DEFINES THE BLUFF
SETBACK AND SHOULD BE ADHERED TO.
3. By qranting this variance it could c use future slope
xajlure that would cause undue hards ip to ocher homes
built on tbis bluff.
I feel this variance should not be gran ed for lot 12 and I
also feel very strongly that all new ho e construction on
this bluff should be denied until the c use of the slope
failure jn 1997 and 1998 has been defin d and repaired
Sincerely
'J
Correspondence
L\TEMPLA TE\FILEINFO.DOC
"-'~" ,>..<......~. ,; ~_..~..,~~.._..:".:.;.. "'..
FILE COpy
August 16, 1999
Robert Jader
14960 Pixie Point Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Recording of Variance Extension and Assent Form
Dear Bob:
The purpose of this letter is to advise you Resolution 99-10PC approving a time
extension for a variance previously granted on property located at 14962 Pixie
Point Circle must be recorded. A building permit will not be issued until proof of
recording has been submitted to the Planning Department. The variance will be
null and void per Section 1108 of the City Code within one year if the project is
not completed or if construction has not commenced (Assent Form).
Enclosed is a certified copy of the original to be recorded at the Scott County
Recorders office. Also included is a copy for your records. The other copy is to
be stamped as recorded by the recorders office and returned to the Planning
Department as proof of recording.
Additionally, the enclosed Assent Form must be signed by all property owners
and returned to the Planning Department prior to issuance of any necessary
permits.
If you have any questions about this matter, please contact me at 447-4230.
Sincerely,
:J~
1:\98files\98var\98-070\recdlet2.doc
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
ASSENT OF APPLICANT
File #99-027
As Approved by Resolution #99-09PC
The undersigned hereby assents to the following:
1. I have read the conclusions and conditions of said Resolution, and I am familiar with
their contents and with the content of the exhibits.
2. I fully accept all of the terms and conditions of said Resolution.
3. I understand Section 1108.400 ofthe Prior Lake Ordinance Code provides as follows:
1108.413 Revocation and Cancellation of a Variance. A Variance may be
revoked and canceled if the Zoning Administrator determines that the
holder of an existing Variance has violated any of the conditions or
requirements imposed as a condition to approval of the Variance, or has
violated any other applicable laws, ordinances, or enforceable regulation.
1108.414 After One Year. No Construction Reauired. All Variances shall be
revoked and canceled if 1 year has elapsed from the date of the adoption
of the resolution granting the Variance and the holder of the Variance
has failed to make substantial use of the premises according to the
provisions contained in the Variance.
1108.415 After One Year. New Construction Reauired. All Variances shall be
revoked and canceled after 1 year has elapsed from the date of the
adoption of the resolution granting the Variance if a new structure or
alteration or substantial repair of an existing building is required by the
Variance and the holder has failed to complete the work, unless a valid
building permit authorizing such work has been issued and work is
progressing in an orderly way.
1108.416 Upon Occurrence of Certain Events. If the holder of a Variance fails
to make actual use of vacant land, or land and structures which were
existing when the Variance was issued and no new structure, alteration
or substantial repair to existing buildings was required; or if a new
structure was required by the Variance and no building permit has been
obtained, the Variance shall be deemed revoked and canceled upon the
occurrence of any of the following events:
(1) A change in the Use District for such lands is made by amendment to
the Zoning Ordinance by the City Council.
\ \FS 1 \SYS\DEPT\PLANNING\99FILES\99V AR\99-027\ASSENT.doc
1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
(2) Eminent domain proceedings have been initiated to take all or any
part of the premlses described in the Variance. .
(3) The use described in the Variance becomes an illegal activity under
the laws of the United States of America or the State of Minnesota.
(4) Title to all or part of land described in such Variance is forfeited to
the State of Minnesota for nonpayment of taxes.
(5) The person to whom the Variance was issued files a written statement
in which that person states that the Variance has been abandoned.
The statement shall describe the land involved or state the resolution
number under which the Variance was granted.
(6) The premises for which the Variance was issued are used by the
person to whom the Variance was issued in a manner inconsistent
with the provisions of such Variance.
4. I understand the granting by the City of this Resolution is in reliance on the
representations that I will fully comply with all of the terms and conditions of said
Resolution. I understand and agree upon notice of non-compliance with any term or
condition, I shall immediately cease conducting activities pursuant to the notice or
will take all actions necessary to accomplish full compliance with said notice and
conditions of the Resolution.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
DATE
SIGNATURE OF OWNER
14962 PIXIE POINT CIRCLE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY
\ \FS 1 \SYS\DEP1\PLANNING\99FILES\99V AR\99-027\ASSENT.doc
2
. -. "'-' ,'-- - .......' .....,. .....,.". &'_.:.~,-... ..:,":" ,i.. __ :..-..:.. _ ___~. "c', /.:., ,~ ,.;':;-". ,.,., ~ ,.),'. ~C.""
July 30, 1999
Robert Jader
14960 Pixie Point Cir. SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Recording of Approved Variances
Dear Bob:
The purpose of this letter is to advise you the resolution approving a 33 foot
variance to permit a setback from top of bluff of 24 feet instead of the required
setback of 57 feet for your property located at 14962 Pixie Point Circle must be
recorded within 60 days of approval or the variance will be null and void per
Section 5-6-6 of City Code.
Enclosed are two certified copies of the original and a copy for yourself. One of
the copies is to be recorded at the Scott County Recorders office by August 26,
1999. The other copy is to be stamped as recorded by the recorders office and
returned to the Planning Department as proof of recording.
If you have any questions about this matter, please contact me at 447-4230.
Sincerely,
QaIU/:C !~I!.--
~nifer Tovar
Planner
'enc.
J:\template\rf:cdlet. do,((
16200 cagle CreeK Ave. ':'.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
6-28-1999 12:35PM
FROM JADERENTERPRISES 8440402
J~~1!
P. 1
5001 W. 80th Stree[, Suite 730 . Bloomington. MN 55437 · 612.-844-0402
June 28, 1999
.,,1\,..0.:.--;"
\~~.w 28~
FAX 447-4245
Ms. Jenni Tovar
Planner
Prior Lake
Dear J enni:
J have reviewed theinform.ation you provided regarding my vanance request
and I find Resolution 99-09PC satisfactory. I believe that J can work with
this variance and build a structure which will meet the expectations of all
affected parties. If you, or the Plannmg Commission have any questions,
please feel free to let me know.
Also, I would request that the variance that I was given last August, I believe
it was Resolution 98-19PC approving a lot width variance. be extended to
correspond to the approved bluff setback most recently approved. Please let
me know if there is any problem.
I want to thank you and the Planning COIlllJ1ission fOT the time and
understanding that I bave been given.
Serving The SoftwQ:r'e Industry
_.,:_-.,-~~-,~._..
FILE COpy
June 23, 1999
Bob Jader
14960 Pixie Point Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: Agenda and Agenda Report
Dear Bob:
Attached is a Planning Commission Agenda and Staff Report for June 28, 1999. You or
your representatives are expected to attend the meeting. You will be given the
opportunity to speak regarding your proposal and the staff report. If you cannot attend
the meeting, please call me so your item can be deferred to the next Planning
Commission meeting.
For your information, your variance to lot width will expire on August 10, 1999. If you
would like an extension, please request so in writing. We will need your request as soon
as possible as there are only three Planning Commission meetings prior to August 10.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 447-4230.
'ncerely, ~
.J0a1
nni Tovar
lanner
Enclosure
f:\dept\planning\99files\99var\99-027\agdlet.doc Page 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
SE~~ BY: DNR METROj
..
June 11, 1999
6-11-99 3:29PMj 6127727573 =>
6124474245j
#1/2
Minnesota Deparlnlent of Natural Resources W ,
Metro Waters - 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul,:MN 55106-6793 l' . \J"'<
Telephone: (651) 772-7910 Fax: f..65 ) ) 772-7977 f\j ~ y
~~(~I }c~~~,v 'A,,:'cY t()-
...Jl \) ~ ..> 'b~ (l\j"~
J' ~ .,y \() \ {f" '\ ~..r- 0
:j-. ~\vf''!t> f' ~ ~ _ ~\\}I' << '
~ ~ ~.J lJu ~ ~~. ~
~~ ,of' vi
~ c,.~ 4. V
\\
~
Ms, Ja.ne Kansier
Planning Coordinator
City of Prior Lalce
16200 Eagle Creek Aven1.le, SE
Priorl"ake, Minnesota 55372-1714
RE: JADER LOT BLUFF SETBACK V ARlANCE APPLICATION. 14962 PIXIE POINT CIRCLE,
PRIOR LAKE
Dear Ms. Kamier:
1 have reviewed the materials submitted relative to the subject variance request, and ha.ve rec.:ently viewed
the property. Last August 4, 1998, I provided you a lener for a similar proposal on the same property.
That variance application also included a lot width variance request. Has the ordinance been amended such
that a lot width variance is no longer needed?
The latest drawing submitted represents an improvement over the original submittal. The current proposal
sites the proposed structure 17 feet from the bluff top versus six feet as previously proposed.
At the time I commented on the variance request last year, I was unaware of the fa(:t that the lot at 14962
Pixie Point Circle was in corrunon ownership with the applicant's adjaCent lot at 14960 Pixie Point Circle.
Had I known that, I would have reeommended the lots be combined. as per Minnesota Rulcs 6120.3300,
subpan 2.. D (relative to the requiremenllo combine substandard Jots of record). Had the City of Prior
Lake adopted a compliant shoreland ordinance within the original time frame required by the DNR. this
provision would have been included in the city's shoreland ordinance.
As indicated in my earlier letter, the intent of bluff regulations is to protect the visual and physical
characteristics ofbluff's. I also stated that I would be more supportive of a structure setback an additional
15 to 20 feet further from the bluff than the original proposal. Opportunity exists to funher decrease the
blun" setback. I note the proposed garage is 38 feet deep. This could easily be reduced to the more typical
22 to 24 feet. Consideration of a five foot front yard setback would also decrease the bluff setback
variance. Reducing the garage depth to 24 feet. along with a five foot front yard setback would bring the
structure an additional 19 feet from the bluIrwithout reducing the square footage of the living area of the
home.
1f approved. how will the lake be accessed from the building site? Currently the bJufl" face appears fairly
well stabilized with vegetation. Stairways and landings are the preferred means for accessing the
\')~Rlnr\lnllillil)n:(1."iI-:!%-(1I57 . J-HHH-646..6.'l,67 . TTY:tlSI2W,."i4H4 · I H(l()('.""!..N:?')
,\11 blllal (IPI'''r1l111ity 1.:JllI1I,,~.:r
WI1.. Vail I':' DiI'L'r,iry
... l'rllllP.l1 nllllfl,';y,~I~II'.'1I1,-,r (;.1,'t.l""l1n ~
..: Minirrll"" f)1 1n~ P,,,,I.f~lIfm"'''''' W:o:;w
SE~r BY: DNR METRO;
6-11-99 3:29PM; 6127727573 =>
6124474245;
#2/2
Jane Kansier
June II, 1999
page 2
waterfront on bluffs and steep slopes. Structural or topographic alteration ofLhe blutfand bluffimpact
zone is discouraged.
As is the case with any variance. the applicant must demonstrate a hardship exists, and that jf denied the
variance, the property in question cannot be put to reasonable use. While the revised building layout more
closely complies with the requirements of Prior Lake's ShoreJand Zoning Ordinance, it is the opinion of.
the DNR that further revision to the development plan (reduction of garage dimensions and front yard
setback) can significantly reduce the bluff setback variance without materially modifying the applicant's
desired home design.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed variance. If you have any
questions, please call me at 772-7910.
Sincerely,
u;-:.~) {.-' ~J .,.Hr7 _._-'
\ (~'.J/l;::- . .~-\ ~- -
--S
Patrick J. Lynch III
Area Hydrologist
May 12,2000
Bob Jader
J ader Ente~rises
5001 W 80t Street, Suite 730
Bloomington, MN 55437
RE: Expiration of Variances
Dear Bob,
Just a reminder your variances granted at 14962 Pixie Point Circle will expire on June 28,
2000. I have spoken to your architect, Steve Licht at Charles Cudd Co. and he is aware
of the variances expiring and intends on submitting a permit application within the next
two weeks. This will allow for adequate plan review such that your building permit can
be approved and issued prior to June 28. Please let me know if you have any questions.
-j~
L:\99FILES\99V AR\99-027\EXPnotice.doc
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
>--~ - ,-- ,~.'-:: ""'";, - ~
May 5, 1999
Bob Jader
14960 Pixie Point Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
RE: City of Prior Lake Review for Application Completeness for Variance
Dear Bob:
On April 26, 1999, the City of Prior Lake received all of the necessary submittals for an
application for the above referenced variance. This letter serves as your official
notification that the application is now complete.
The tentative date of the public hearing before the Planning Commission is June 14,
1999. We will notify you if this date changes. We intend to publish your request in the
Prior Lake American on May 29, 1999 and send notice to persons owning property
within 350 feet by June 4, 1999.
To assist us in preparing your request, please provide us with a floor plan of proposed
structure. This information helps the Planning Commission in having the information
necessary to determine the reasonableness of your proposal.
Generally, the Planning Commission makes a decision on variances request within 60
days. Occasionally, however, due to meeting schedules, it is sometimes necessary to.
extend the 60-day review period. Considering you have recently asked the item be
placed on the June 14th meeting rather than the May 24th meeting, we are extending the
60-day review timeline an additional 60 days from June 24, 1999 to August 23, 1999.
While we expect a decision to be made prior to this, this extension allows for a
continuance if necessary.
If you have questions relative to the review process, or related issues, please contact
me directly at 447-4230.
Sincerely, ."f
~d~
f:\dept\planning\99files\99var\99-026\completr.doc Page 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
April 26, 1999
Ms. Jenni Tovar
Prior Lake Planner
Dear Jenni:
Thanks for the information regarding the front setback data that you sent me.
The front yard setbacks for those properties that you do not have records are
as follows:
Lot 8 & 9, Robert & Carol Peterson. Structure is setback 43'.
Lot 10, Juliana David. Structure is setback 31'.
Please note that these are setbacks from structure to the "as traveled" street.
I hope this provides you with the information you need.
Sincer~ly ,/~
/~:
"' I
~, ""/~i
~.....~
,
BQb-Jader
RDJ/wp
Miscellaneous
L:\TEMPLA TE\FILEINFO.DOC
";;i..~..:,..._....~;~;i;.~~..,~1U;~l"O""" ;:",.,:.~"",~...",.,.,..;,~"",:,-~,,,._...., ,_":,"'.':'M'.:;'"''''__'''_''___'''
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E. / Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Phone (612) 447-4230, Fax (612) 447-4245
Type of Application: Brief description of proposed project (attach additional
o Rezoning, from (present zonin~) sheets/narrative if desired)
to (proposed zonini)
o Amendment to City Code, Compo Plan or City Ordinance
o Subdivision of Land
o Administrative Subdivision
o Conditional Use Permit
FJ Variance
o Other:
QCj-OJ-7
fV E vJ ~ E <;'"CD b-A 1)J);g ~ f/()JVJ e-
Ta :e: Bw-a ()N (I1K&%f'llF
L 0 @ / Lf~.2 tPner; PtJ:uur
al2c/~.
Applicable Ordinance Section(s):
t--jE:
Work Phone: (p (2-
C/ l/... 01( () 2--
Property Owner(s) [If different from Applicants]:
Address:
Home Phone: Work Phone:
Type of Ownership: Fee _Contract for Deed _ Purchase Agreement___
Legal Description of Property (Attach a copy if there is not enough space on this sheet):
Len- 12.1 FJ;:.<c;:J frj)>>s~~ TO I5~WOf/)O
To the best of my knowledge the information provided in this application and other material submitted is correct. In
addition, I h e read the relevant sections of the Prior Lake Ordinance and procedural guidelines, and understand that
appUca . wi be o.....d .ntil deemed camplete by the PlannlDg Dtredor or usI%"A-
ft CJcr
Date
Date
Fee Owner's Signature
--------
--=
=
TffiS SPACE TO BE FILLED IN BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY COUNCIL
APPROVED
APPROVED
DENIED
DENIED
DATE OF HEARING
DATE OF HEARING
CONDITIONS:
~
-
Date
Sigrlature of Planning Director or Designee
lu-app2.doc
~~~~~_.....!'..,......!~_~w~,.ir;.';\.~'il.~,,-:,,\-;Z;~)1;'~;~':;::~';:::~~i;'''''''i-'r.~:'::'.~"'-
,t' ....
~~~- -------_.-..:..---~-~~--~--
I
\
\
i
I
I
\
\
\1
II
1\
\
\
RECEIPT # 34543
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
16200 EAGLE CREEK AVE SE
. - -
PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372
(612) 447-4230, FAX (612) 447-4245
~'
DATE~ ~ \ ~ll Z~" C)~
I
I
~
dollars
Invoice #
$
, r' (, ......
I' i/, : 'J': .
, .. I i ~v
Ii..' '
f'
! !
[ C/
\
\
r
V'--\ , ! f
I ij 1 ! r.~ (~\
; ; ! :\{ f" (;, ,I;it, ,,'....'\ { 1(, : \ ,"j",,, ---
! \. {. .L/, !;; .. \. Lt-' -' ' /d [/ ~/~
Receipt Olerk for the City oiPrior Lake
Robert D. or Elizabeth A. Jader
(,'1 ._J ,n .
14960 Pixie Point Gir, 447-2716
Prior Lake, MN55372
.. -r L!s-e,
!f
l
!1~( -t_" \
$ ...:;;::A.~ I
15..(/~\
~ --- \
W~badt I
._ ~.'::--.,..:-:__:_.,.- ~--'-T"'" -- .'''''-,--- ,- ,,---~ ~ --;7:r':""1'c-:'~-:"--'~ ~ ~-
NotWflSt Bank Minnesota, N.A.
Bloomington Office
7900 Xerxes Avenue South
Bloomington, MN 55431
612-667-9378
M'
Memo
.
NOTICE OF HEARING TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING:
A BLUFF SETBACK VARIANCE. MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACK IS
25 FEET OR WHERE THE SLOPE IS LESS THAN 18% WHICHEVER IS
GREATER;
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FUTURE SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLING ON
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE R-1 (URBAN RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT AND THE
SD (SHORELINE OVERLAY) DISTRICT IDENTIFIED AS 14962 PIXIE POINT
CIRCLE.
You are hereby notified that the Prior Lake Planning Commission will hold a public
hearing at Prior Lake Fire Station #1, located at 16776 Fish Point Road SE (Southwest of
the intersection of C.R. 21 and Fish Point Road), on: Monday, June 14, 1999, at 6:30
p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible.
APPLICANT: Robert Jader
14960 Pixie Point Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
SUBJECT SITE: 14962 Pixie Point Circle, legally described as Lot 12, First
Addition to Eastwood, Scott County, MN.
REQUEST: The applicant is intending to remove an existing cabin and
construct a single-family house with attached garage. The
proposed house does not meet the setback from the bluff (as
measured where the slope becomes less than 18%).
If you are interested in this issue, you should attend the hearing. Questions related to this
hearing should be directed to the Prior Lake Planning Department by calling 447-4230
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. The Planning
Commission will accept oral and/or written comments. Oral or written comments should
relate to how the proposed construction and requested variances are or are not consistent
with the above-listed criteria.
Prepared this 25th day of May, 1999.
Jenni Tovar, Planner
City of Prior Lake
Mailed June 4, 1999
L:\99FILES\99V AR\99-027\99-027MN.DOC 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
'-
"'-.
"-
'--....
"'-.
"'-.
"
"'-.
"
'--....
"'-.
"'-.
"'-.
"-
"
"
"-
"
"-
"'-.
"
"
,,-'
"- /
"I
s
-------------l
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
.\
\
{PF'Id" l-N'-~ J
~
~
/~
/
/
/
/
JlrI-L tlIMla"N~loN~ T..~I'-
_ tlt'-TA.. N4D ~~ N"-e.
~ e:>N ~pve '(. ~ I3I2PoHt>r
l:N6-IN~\2.IN6. 4 $UJ2.ve:t'lN6
DP-TlSP JUNe 'Z.? I J't'lO
FP-OFtJseo ?ITc: PLf..N
J~t>e~ J<e~\DeNc.e
. ~ 1"'" '2P1_.:I'1I
/
/
I
/
/
t3\ZC'WN-:L>H. ~Nl--1e\Z.. ~ MU\-Il..f=NPoH / ~'T~T~
-,"~,._....,_.'.""'" .~,~.__,..-.!'t4-:'" .........:..._.,'-.:.._
- '.- ,-..... - .._. ...-.. ....~.~....'--,..,
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL
COUNTY OF SCaTI' )
)ss
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
of the City .~t~or Lake County of Scott, State of
Minnesota, being d.uI sworn, says on the ~ day oi~ ' 1999, she served
attached list of persons t9 have an interest in the ~ ... ~
by mailing to them a copy thereof,
enclosed . envelope, postage prepaid, and be depositing same in the post office at
Prior Lake, Minnesota, the last known address of the parties.
Subscribed and swom to be this
day of , 1999.
NOTARY PUBLIC
MAILAFFD.DOC
PAGB
NOTICE OF HEARING TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING:
A BLUFF SETBACK VARIANCE. MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACK IS
25 FEET OR WHERE THE SLOPE IS LESS THAN 18% WHICHEVER IS
GREATER;
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FUTURE SINGLE F AMIL Y DWELLING ON
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE R-1 (URBAN RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT AND THE
SD (SHORELINE OVERLAY) DISTRICT IDENTIFIED AS 14962 PIXIE POINT
CIRCLE.
You are hereby notified that the Prior Lake Planning Commission will hold a public
hearing at Prior Lake Fire Station #1, located at 16776 Fish Point Road SE (Southwest of
the intersection of c.R. 21 and Fish Point Road), on: Monday, June 14, 1999, at 6:30
p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible.
APPLICANT: Robert Jader
14960 Pixie Point Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
SUBJECT SITE: 14962 Pixie Point Circle, legally described as Lot 12, First
Addition to Eastwood, Scott County, MN.
REQUEST: The applicant is intending to remove an existing cabin and
construct a single-family house with attached garage. The
proposed house does not meet the setback from the bluff (as
measured where the slope becomes less than 18%).
If you are interested in this issue, you should attend the hearing. Questions related to this
hearing should be directed to the Prior Lake Planning Department by calling 447-4230
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. The Planning
Commission will accept oral and/or written comments. Oral or written comments should
relate to how the proposed construction and requested variances are or are not consistent
with the above-listed criteria.
Prepared this 25th day of May, 1999.
Jenni Tovar, Planner
City of Prior Lake
To be published in the Prior Lake American on May 29, 1999.
L:\99FILES\99V AR\99-027\99-027PN .DOC 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
/
JEC.
1
O. 2
c.-(.., 7
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE ~~~
i' Ji ""_0 ~ ..J..?"""'~ ----..;:;:::~~
lVl.aULIS \ ...."'(;)'" . 0 ~ ~
IS " .7" It .00 1%7 ;:<..r . $ "
~ ~~~ ~, · V . J
" )/ ~ ~
, ./(/ ~
~
25 T. //5 R.
22
o "
12 I~ 14
PRIOR
LAKE
"ST
<< S.
~. N
\
.J___
.. -.--.-.......
~; IS ~ '~'~;~~;.;;.~~n
I l~r 11";:'1 1:1 Jlli: :.':;n l.~...U
i (inl...!:' t.......IIN!: I::~ L" \ : ;":"".
i l~.: ".~ ....,: I,; t. .: ') ( ~ t -'..i..
! ~.~I~~. ~~: .;.:':~I"_...':'~I~':.', - ,- ":
L L:.::;.-,:.,:.,,;;~. . _ I
, \
M
s
FEe 1989
SEP. 1986
OCT. 19d"
AUG. 19810
SEPT. 1981
JUNE 1'80
..LUll 197& J
......, "77
...
25 -115- 22
~-
'"
I
,
,
I
i
I
j
i
I
I
I
I
0 0 0 \.D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \.D 0* ~ 0):0
0 0 0 ~ 0 \.D 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0* SlJ ~O
0 0 ~ U'1 ~ 0 f-' W W f-' f-' W U'1 W* ~ .......tJ)
W I W \.D 0 \.D 0 f-' ~ ~ W W ~ 0 ~* ~
~ I ~ U'1 0 U'1 0 0'1 f-' f-' f-' f-' 0'1 W 0'1* SlJ f-'~
W I W U'1 0 U'1 W \.D 00 00 f-' f-' W ~ W* '< .......SlJ
-J I -J W ~ W U'1 0 0 0 -J -J 00 ~ 00* ro f-'X
I * t"l \.D
'dl 'd ::!:I t%J 'd t%J 'd ::!:I 'd ::!:I 'd ::!:I t%J 'd* \.DtJ)
::tI1 ::tI tJ) 00 ::tI 00 ::tI tJ) ::tI 00 ::tI 00 00 ::tI* \.D'<
HI H ~ 0 H 0 H ~ H ~ H ~ 0 H* lJl
* rt
f-'::tI 'df-'::tI 'df-'C;O):O'd):OZ'df-'~ ":I~'d):o":l'dW::tI 'df-'O'df-'O 'df-':S:'df-':S: 'df-'t%J:S:OO~~'df-'t%J* Z f-'ro
~O ::tI~O ::tI~Ot%J~. ~O::tl~ I:"'~' 1-:31:"'0-J0 ::tI~O::tl~O ::tI~H::tI~H ::tI~OHO~O::tl~O* SlJ ~i3
\.DttJ H\.DttJ H\.Dl:"'oo~OI-:3::t1H\.D Of-'O~t%J::tIoottJ H\.DOH\.DO H\.DOH\.DO H\.D~~f-' ":IH\.D~* i3
0'It%J 00'lt%J OU'1H . Z~OU'1H ::tIO' t%J1-:3 t%J OU'1GlOU'1Gl O~~O~~ O~~ O~~* ro ~
o::tl ::tIO::tl ::tIoo~:s:" ..t%J::tIoo~ t%J .. 1-:3 Gl::tl ::tIol:"'::tIOI:"' ::tIoo ::tIoo ::tIO'I t%J:S:tJ):>:::tIO'I * ~
1-:3 1-:3 o ttJ 00 Zt%JttJ tJ)~1-:3 ):0 ):0 t%J t%J O):o~~O 0* ~
'd I:"''d 1:"''d):oH 0 1-:31:"''d):o OZO :>:1-:3 1:"''dtJ)I:"''dtJ) 1:"''d1:"'1:"''d1:"' I:"''d 'd ::tI1:"''d * f-'
HO ):oHO ):oH ZttJ~~ ):oH t%J1-:3~~0 ":1):0 ):oH ):oH ):oH ):oH ):oHI:"'OIOt%J~):oHI:"'* ):0 0'1
~ :><l~ :><l~:>:t%JH t%J:><l~:S: t%J ~::tIC; :><l~t%J:><l~t%J :><l~0:><l~0 :><l~ I:"'O::tlGl:><l~ * p..
H~ t%JH~ t%JH ool:"'\.DI-:3I:"'t%JH oo::tlf-' 1-:30'd~ t%JH t%JH t%JH t%JH t%JHC;Ht%JH):ot%JHC;* p..
t%J t%J t%J0 I:"'W::!:It%J t%J01 O'do Glt%JH t%J~ t%J~ t%J~ t%J~ t%J::tItJ)~OGl t%J::tI* t"l
t%J ~'d~ ~ ):oH 01:"'0~ ):0 ::tIoO):o Zo ~~~~~~ ~'d0~'d0 ~ 1-:3):Ot%J~ * ro
'dl:"' 'd<:):O::!:l\.Dt%J1-:3 'd<: HU'1t%JGl":lt%J~ 'd~~t%J 'd~* lJl
I-:3H I-:3H OH 0 t%J::tI OH ~tJ)0'I'dt%J1:"'tJ) 0t%J 0t%J o 1-:30 0 * lJl
~ ~ HO I:"' ZO HO \.Dt%JW~ 0 H~ HI-:3 HttJ HttJ HI:"' ):O~O HI:"'*
8~ U'10~ U'1~ U'10 ZU'1~ U'1 01:"' U'1~::!:IU'1~::!:I ~~~~~~ U'1~~ <: ::tIU'1~~*
U'1H U'1 OH C;HU'1 00 ~ W::tI U'1 ::tIU'1 ::tI U'1 U'1t%J 'dU'1 *
::tIt%J W::tIt%J W WZ~. OW f-'::tI ~ :>: ~O~~O~ W W W U'1~tJ) W *
1-:3 -J 1-:3 -JO OGl -JO rH t%J ~ -J0:><l-J0:><l -JO ~ t%J -JO *
tJ)::!:I ~tJ)::!:I NH 0'1 H::tII-:3~H 0<: ~ U'1 'd ~H ~H ~H ~H ~H):oOt%J::tI ~H):o*
t%J I t%J ::tI 101-:3):0):0 ::tI U'1t%J 0'1 t%J ::tIt%J ::tIt%J ::tI:S: ::tI:>: ::tI ~ <: ::tI *
):01 ):0 \.Dt%J oo~ 0'1 1-:3 00 00 ":I H ":1*
I tJ) O'I'df-'H tJ) W t%J tJ)1:"' tJ)1:"' I:"'Gl I:"'Gl tJ)t%J 0 tJ)t%J*
C; I ~ t%J O~-JZtJ) t%J ::tI t%J):o t%J~ t%J~ t%J~ t%JH t%J t%JH*
~ I \.D 0'I0t%J 00 ::tI :><l :><l*
r 1-:30~::tI ~ tJ) 00 tJ)t%J tJ)t%J t%J t%J*
t%J I t%J :>: H<: 0 0 ><: ><: ::tI ::tI*
::tI I ::tI t%J OH Z Z *
I ~ ::!:I 0 I
I t%J I
I I
~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
0 I 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 f-'.
0 I 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 lJl
f-' I f-' f-' I f-' f-' f-' f-' rt
I I
01 0 01 0 0 0 0 Z
001 00 001 00 00 00 00 1-:3 SlJ
01 0 0 0 0 0 0 ....... i3
01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ro
I
0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 tJ) ):0
-J I -J -J -J -J -J -J n p..
f-' I f-' f-' f-' f-' f-' f-' ::r p..
\.D I \.D \.D \.D \.D \.D \.D t"l
I ro
III
U'1 U'1 U'1 U'1 U'1 U'1 U'1 tJ) lJl
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 't'l
\.D \.D \.D \.D \.D \.D \.D f-' I:"'
ro
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tJ) lQ
W W W W W W W 't'l SlJ
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I-'
f-' f-' f-' f-' f-' f-' f-' tJ) :s:
0'1 0'1 0'1 0'1 0'1 0'1 0'1 't'l 0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W p..
ro
U'1 U'1 U'1 U'1 U'1 U'1 U'1 tJ) I-'
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 't'l ro
U'1 U'1 U'1 U'1 U'1 U'1 U'1 ~ t"l
U'1 U'1 U'1 U'1 U'1 U'1 U'1 tJ)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 't'l
-J -J -JI -J -J -J -.J U'1
tJ)
't'l
0'1
tJ)
't'l
-J
00
't'l
00
00
't'l
\.D
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ><:
0 0 0 01 01 0 0 ro
0 0 0 01 01 0 0 SlJ
0 0 0 01 01 0 0 t"l
I I
::tI ::tI ::tI ::tI I ::tI1 ::tI ::tI ::tI
t%J~ 1:"'t%J~ 1:"'t%J~ 1:"'t%J~ 1:"'t%J~1 1:"'t%J~ 1:"'t%J~ 'd
):oU'1 O):oU'1 O):oU'1 O):oU'1 O):oU'11 O):oU'1 O):oU'1 SlJ ~tJ)
tJ)0 1-:3tJ)0 1-:3tJ)0 1-:3tJ)0 1-:3tJ)01 ~tJ)0 ~tJ)0 t"l ):00
~~ '~~ '~~ '~~ '~~r r~~ '~~ n \.DO
o -J o -J 00 -J o -JI o -J o -J ro O~
00 f-'001 f-'OO ~OO 0001 000 000 I-' f-'~
Of-' ~Of-' 00f-' \.D0f-' 0'1001 U'100 ~Oo I:"'
OW OW Of-' 00 0001 O-J 00'1 # 0
f-' 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~
f-' f-' f-' f-' f-' f-' f-'
tJ) tJ) 00 tJ) tJ) tJ) tJ)
1-:3 1-:3 1-:3 1-:3 1-:3 ~ ~ I:"'
ro
):0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ):0 ~ lQ
0 0 SlJ
~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ I-'
Z Z
'd
~
t%J
tJ)
rt
SlJ
rt
r: f-'
lJl
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \D 0 0 0 0 * 8 0;J::<
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tv 0 0 0 0 * ill ""rJ
W W f-' f-' W W '" '" '" f-' 111 f-' tv tv 0 * ~ ,-(0
f-' f-' f-' f-' I 111 111 0 0 0 f-' 0 f-' 111 111 W * tv
'" '" '" '" I \D \D 0 0 0 '" f-' '" 00 00 tv * ill f-'8 t~
\D \D \D \D I f-' f-' W W W \D tv \D "" "" W * "<: '-ill
0 0 -J -J I "" "" tv tv tv W -J W tv tv -J * en f-'><
I * ti \D
::I:I '1:1 ::I:I '1:1 I ::I:I '1:1 '1:1 ::I:I '1:1 ::I:I t%j '1:1 ::I:I '1:1 ::I:I * \D(O
(0 ~ (0 ~ I (0 ~ ~ (0 ~ (0 (0 ~ (0 ~ (0 * \D"<:
8 H 8 H I 8 H H 8 H 8 rJ H 8 H >-3 * tJl
I * rt
(O'1:If-'(O '1:1 f-'G)'1:I f-'G) I '1:If-';J::<'1:If-';J::< '1:If-'C-i '1:If-'C-i'1:lf-'C-i '1:If-'t:l (of-'''l::;: '1:If-'t:l '1:If-'~'1:If-'~ '1:If-'~'1:I* ~ f-'en
8~""8 ~""O~""O I ~""t"~""t" ~""O ~""O~""O ~""OHOHt%j~""O ~"" ~"" ~""O~* ill tva
t%jH\Dt%j H\D~H\D~ I H\DHH\DH H\D~ H\D~H\D~ H\D~OO~(OH\D~ H\D8H\D>-3 H\DIIlH* a
<:O-J<:I 0-Jt:l0-Jt:l I O-JrJO-JrJ 0'" 0'" 0'" O"'~C:: (o80"'~ O"'::I:IO"'::I:I 0",t%j0* en tv
t%j~Wt%j1 ~tvO~tvO I ~ot%j~ot%j ~oo ~oo ~oo ~'" >::~>-3t%j~'" ~""t%j~""t%j ~o~~* tv
~ ~I ~ ~ I ::;: ::;: ::;: t:l 0 ~ t:l ~ ~ 8 * R"
t"'1:I I t"'1:I t"'1:I I t"'1:IIIlt"'1:I1Il t"'1:I t"'1:I t"'1:I t"'1:I "l~~~t"'1:I t"'1:IHt"'1:IH t"'1:I t"* f-'
~;J::<H~I ;J::<HR";J::<HR" I ;J::<H ;J::<H ;J::<HR" ;J::<HR";J::<HR" ;J::<Ht%j~>-3 ;J::<Ht%j ;J::<H~;J::<H~ ;J::<Ht:l;J::<* ;J::< '"
~>:: ~>:: ~>:: I~>::~~>::~ ~>:: ~>:: ~>:: ~>:: ::I:It%jIIl~>:: ~>::t%j~>::t%j ~>:: ~* p..
~t%jH~ t%jHt%jt%jHt%j It%jH t%jH t%jHt:l t%jHt:lt%jHt:l t%jHR"t" ~~t%jHR" t%jH t%jH t%jHR"t%j* p..
t%j t%jt%j t%j(O t%j(O I t%j t%j t%j0 t%j0 t%j0 t%j (o'1:IH t%j t%jt%j t%jt%j t%j * ti
t"~ t" ~'1:I~~'1:I~:~'1:It%j~'1:It%j ~'1:1~ ~'1:1~~'1:1~ ~ III ::I:IrJ~~ III ~8~~8~ ~'1:1~~: en
(0 '1:1(0 '1:I~(oH~ '1:1~ tJl
~ 00 Ot" 0t"1 OG) OG) 0 0 0 o t:lt" 0 8H * tJl
H~ Ht" Ht" HH HH HC-i HC-i HC-i H t" H t-:I *
~~ ~~t%j~~t%j 111~t%j111~t%j ~~"l ~~"l~~"l 111~t%j H>-3 111~t%j 111~8111~>-3 l11rJiiil11 *
111 8111>-38 111 8111'1:1~ 111 8 111 t%j111 t%j l11H 111*
W W "lW "l W t%jW t%j W H W HW H W >-3-J(O W >-3 W W W~t%jW*
-JrJ -JrJ~-JrJ~ -JrJ~-JrJ~ -JrJ8 -JrJ8-JrJ8 -JrJt%jf-' -JrJt%j -JrJ -JrJ -J 8-J*
tvH tvHt%jtvHt%j tv~ tv~ tvHt-:I tvHt-:ltvHt-:I tvH o;J::<(O tvH tvH tvH tv(O::I:Itv*
~ ~t:l ~t:l ~G) ~G) ~G) ~G)tv<:t%j ~G) ~ ~ t%j *
rJ ~ ~ (0 (0 t%j t%j t%j t%j~ ;J::< *
t" (OH (OH t%j t%j ~~ ~~ ~~ (OC-i <: (OC-i (0 (0 *
t%j t%jrJ t%jrJ t%j0 H t%j0 t%j t%j C-i ~
~ ~ ~ rJ ~ ~ *
(0 (0 (0 t:l t:l t:l t%j *
~ 0 (0 (0 t%j *
~ ~ ~ ~ *
I
I
I
tv tv I tv tv tv tv tv t:l
0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 ....
0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 III
f-' f-' I f-' f-' f-' f-' f-' rt
I I
0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 I ~
00 00 I 00 00 00 00 00 I 8 ill
0 0 I 0 0 0 0 01 '- a
0 0 I 0 0 0 0 01 rJ en
I I
0 0 I 0 0 0 0 01 (0 ~
-J -J I -J -J -J -J -JI 0
f-' f-' I f-' f-' f-' f-' f-'I ::r p..
\D \D I \D \D \D \D I \DI ti
I I I en
I I I OJ
111 1111 111 111 111 111 I 111 I (0 III
0 01 0 0 0 0 I 0 I 'tl
\D \DI \D \D \D \D I \D I f-' t"
I I en
0 0 0 0 0 01 0 I (0 LQ
W W W W W WI W I 'tl ill
tv tv tv tv tv tvl tv I tv I-'
I I
f-' f-' f-' f-' f-' f-' I f-' I (0 :s:
'" '" '" '" '" '" I '" I 'tl 0
"" "" "" "" "" "" I "" I W p..
I I en
111 111 111 111 111 111 I 111 I (0 I-'
0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 I 'tl en
111 111 111 1111 111 111 I 111 I "" ti
I I
111 111 111 111 111 111 I 111 I (0
0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 I 'tl
-J -J -J -J -J -J I -J I 111
I I
I I (0
I I 'tl
I I '"
I I
I I (0
I I 'tl
I I -J
I I
I I (0
I I. 'tl
I I 00
I I
I I (0
I I 'tl
I I \D
I I
tv tv tv tv tv tv I tv I ><:
0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 I en
0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 I ill
0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 I ti
I I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~I ~
t"~tv t"t%jtv t"t%jtv t"t%jtv t"t%jtv t"t%jtv I t"t%jtvl t"- '1:1
0t"111 0;J::<111 0;J::<111 0;J::<111 0;J::<111 0;J::<111 I 0;J::<1111 0 ill >-3(0
>-3(00 >-3(00 >-3(00 >-3(00 8(00 8(001 >-3(001 8 ti ;J::<rJ
I "" '~"" '~"" '~"" '~"" 1~.p.1 I ~~ I I 0 \DO
8:11:\D o -J o -J o -J o -J o -JI o -JI 0 en 08
rJ 0 f-'OO f-'OO f-'OO f-'OO f-'001 f-'001 f-' I-' f-'8
>-300 -J0f-' "'Of-' 1110f-' 1110f-' ""Of-'I WOf-'1 f-' t"
OW t:loo t:l'" t:l'" t:l'" t:l1111 t:lWI :II: rJ
1Ilf-'f-' 0 tv f-' 0 01 tvl 0
t" f-' f-' f-' f-' f-' I f-' I ~
0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 I (0 I
rJ 8 8 8 >-3 >-3 I 8 I t"
~ I I en
I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I LQ
0 I I ill
0 t:l ~ ~ ~ ~ I t:l I I-'
rJ Z I ~ I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I 'tl
I I ~
I I
I I t%j
I I (0
I I rt
I I ill
I I rt
I I ~ tv
I I OJ
0 0 0 0 0 I!> 0 0 I!> 0 0 0 0 * >-'3 0:J:'
0 0 0 0 0 tv 0 0 ;:. 0 0 0 0 * ~ ;:.()
w 0'\ 0'\ I-' ;:. IJ1 ;:. I-' IJ1 I-' I-' I-' I-' * ~ .......to
;:. 0 0 tv 0 0 0 IJ1 0 IJ1 , W I-' I-' , * tv
0 0 0 ;:. 0 I-' 0 W 0 W I I-' -.J -.J I * ~ 1-'>-'3 ...
I!> w W 0 I!> I-' I!> -.J 0 -.J , I-' tv tv , * '< .......~
W tv tv ;:. I!> IJ1 I!> -.J tv -.J I -.J I!> I!> I * 11l 1-'><
, I * ti I!>
'tI 'tI 'tI 'tI :Il tl=:I 'tI :Il tl=:I 'tI , 'tI :Il 'tI , * I!> to
::0 ::0 ::0 ::0 to to ::0 to to ::0 I ::0 to ::0 I * I!>'<
H H H H >-'3 () H >-'3 () H , H >-'3 H , * tJl
I , * rt
'tII-'Z 'tI1-'C-i 'tI1-'C-i 'tI1J1:J:' 'tI1-'C-ito;:'I':I:j3:'tII-'C-i 'tI1-'>-'3d:J:''tI:J:'Z'tII-'>-'3 ''tII-'3:1 'tI1-'~'tII-'~ I 'tI1-'* Z 1-'11l
::0;:.0 ::0;:.0 ::0;:'0 ::0001:' ::o;:.tl=:I>-'3tvHtl=:I::o;:.tl=:I ::O;:.:Iltl=:l>-'3' >-'30::O;:':Il'::O;:'H ::o;:.tl=:I::o;:.tl=:I , ::0;:'* ~ tvS
Hl!>tl=:I HI!>~ HI!>~ Htv~ HI!>I':I:j 1J1::O>-'3HI!>I':I:j HI!>Oto~O~::OHI!>OIHI!>() HI!>~HI!>~ I HI!> * S
0001:' 00'\ 00'\ 000 OWI':I:j'tl to::OOWI':I:j 01J1~ . ::;:OIJ1~' O;:.~ 00'\ 00'\ , O-.J* 11l tv
::00 ::0 eo ::0 eo ::0 ::O-.J::O:J:'::O>-'30::O-.J::O ::O-.J 3:" .. tl=:I::O-.J 1::000 ::O-.Jtl=:I::O-.Jtl=:I I ::ow * tv
tl=:I ::;: ::;: 1-'3: tl=:IE=10 'tI tl=:I toO tIl to to' tl=:I >-'3 >-'3 I * R"
1:''tI 1:''tI 1:''tI I:'IJ1 1:''tI0< tIl~OI:''tIO< 1:''tI H 0 >-'31:''tI 'l:''tII:'' 1:''tI:IlI:''tI:Il , 1:''tI* I-'
:J:'HR" :J:'HR" :J:'HR"I :J:'otIl :J:'H tl=:I I:':J:'H :J:'Htl=:IZtIl~~ :J:'Htl=:Il:J:'H I :J:'H :J:'H I :J:'H* :J:' 0'\
~~ ~~ ~~ ~>-'3tl=:1 ~~R"~::otl=:lH~~R" ~~ tl=:IH tl=:I~~ ,~~d' ~~::o~~::o , ~~* 0.-
tl=:IHI:' tl=:IHd tl=:IHd tl=:I:IlZ tl=:IH() >-'3::O>-'3tl=:1H() tl=:IHdtol:'l!>>-'3l:'tl=:IHdltl=:lH I tl=:IH tl=:IH 1 tl=:IH* 0.-
tl=:IH tl=:IO tl=:IO to tl=:I:Il H~ tl=:I:Il tl=:I~ I:'w:Iltl=:l tl=:I~' tl=:IR"1 tl=:IR" tl=:IR" I tl=:I* ti
~'tIS ~'tI~ ~'tI~ ~toO H ol:'() , , ~~~~~~ , ~'tI: 11l
>-'3Z ~'tI~IJ1~~ ~'tI~ ~'tI :J:':Ill!>tl=:I>-'3~'tI 1~'tIdl I tJl
O:J:" 0 0 01:'1J1' I':I:j 01:' 00 0 tl=:I::O 00' Otl=:l' , 0* tJl
H HC-i HC-i to Htl=:Il-' tl=:I Htl=:I H'tI I:' ZO H'tI1 HtIl' HI:' HI:' , H*
~~I:' ~~1':I:j ~~1':I:j IJ1tl=:1 IJ1~ZOZ>-'3dlJ1~Z 1J1~ IJ1d ZIJ1~ '1J1~~' lJ1~tl=:IlJ1~tl=:I I 1J1~*
IJ1 IJ1 tl=:Il-' ~tl=:IlJ1 tl=:I IJ1 OH C-iHIJ1 '1J1 , IJ1 ZIJ1 Z , IJ1 *
W C-i W H W H W W I ~W W WZ~'()W IW I W tl=:IW tl=:I I W *
-.J()O -.J()>-'3 -.J()>-'3 -.J -.J()::;:tv -.J()::;: -.J() oQ -.J() '-.J()~' -.J() -.J() , -.J()*
tv::O~ tvH~ tvH~ tv tvH:J:'O tol:'tvH:J:' tvH 0'\ H~>-'3tvH tvH I tvH::otvH::O I tvH*
::OQ ::OQ ::0>-'31-' tl=:I ::0>-'3 ::0 Id>-'3 ~::o ::03:' ::0 ::0 , ::0*
toto tl=:I tl=:I ()tl=:Il!> ::otIl ()tl=:I I!>tl=:I to ()()I d d 1 ()*
0 to::O ~~ fu~ ~~ fu~ to O'\'tII-'H to I:'QI totl=:l totl=:l I 1:'*
tl=:IZ tl=:I~ tl=:I O~-.JZto tl=:I tl=:I:J:" tl=:I~ tl=:I~ , tl=:I*
0 ()~ 0 I!> O'\Otl=:l :Ill I *
d d to I:' tl=:I to I:' ~O::;:::o totl=:l' I:' I:' , to*
tl=:I tl=:I H<: 0<' 0 ~ I *
Z Z tl=:I ()H , ::;: , *
~ :Il() 1 I
tl=:I I I
I , ,
tv tv tvl tv tv tv tv I tv I d
0 0 01 01 0 0 0 , 0 , f-'.
0 0 01 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 I III
I-' I-' 1-" I-' I-' I-' , I-' , I-' , rt
I I I ,
0 0 a' 0 0 0 , 0 I 0 , Z
eo eo eo, eo eo eo I 00 , eo , >-'3 ~
0 0 01 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 I ....... S
0 0 a' 0 0 0 I 0 , 0 , () 11l
I I I I
0 0 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 I 0 , to is:
-.J -.J -.J 1 -.J -.J -.J I -.J I -.J 1 n
I-' I-' I-' I I-' I-' I-' , I-' , I-' , ::r 0.-
I!> I!> I!> , I!> I!> I!> I I!> , I!> , ti
I I I I 11l
, 1 , , tJl
IJ1 IJ1 IJ1 I IJ1 IJ1 IJ1 I IJ1 I IJ1 I to III
0 0 0 I 0 0 0 , 0 , 0 , 'tl
I!> I!> I!> , I!> 1 I!> I!> I I!> I I!> I I-' I:'
I , I , 11l
0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 , 0 I to l!l
w w w w w W, W I W , 'tl ~
tv tv tv tv tv tvl tv , tv , tv I-'
I I I
I-' I-' I-' I-' I-' 1-" I-' , I-' , to 3:
0'\ 0'\ 0'\ 0'\ 0'\ 0'\1 0'\ 1 0'\ I 'tl 0
;:. ;:. ;:. ;:. ;:. ;:., ;:. , 01> , w 0.-
I 1 I 11l
IJ1 IJ1 IJ1 IJ1 IJ1 1J1' IJ1 , IJ1 , to I-'
0 0 0 0 0 01 0 I 0 I 'tl 11l
IJ1 IJ1 IJ1 IJ1 IJ1 1J1' IJ1 I IJ1 , ;:. ti
I , ,
IJ1 IJ1 IJ1 IJ1I IJ1 IJ1I IJ1 I IJ1 , to
0 0 0 0 0 a' 0 , 0 , 'tl
-.J -.J -.J -.J -.J -.JI -.J I -.J I IJ1
, , ,
I I I to
, , , 'tl
I , , 0'\
, I ,
1 , , to
I I I 'tl
, , , -.J
I I I
, I , to
1 , , 'tl
, I , eo
I , ,
, I , to
, , , 'tl
I I I I!>
, , ,
tv tv tv tv tv tv I tv I tv I 0<
0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 , 0 , 11l
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 I 0 , 0 I ~
0 0 0 I 0 0 0 , 0 I 0 , ti
I I 1 1
::0 ::0 ::01 ::0 ::0 ::0 , ::01 ::0 , ::0
l:'::Otv l:'::Otv l:'::Otvl I:'::otv 1:'::0 tv 1:'::0 tv I 1:'::0 tv , 1:'::0 tv , 'tI
01:'1J1 01:'1J1 01:'1J1 01:'1J1 01:'1J11 01:'1J1 , 01:'1J11 01:'1J1 , ~ >-'3 to
>-'3 too >-'3 too >-'3 to 0 >-'3 to 0 1 >-'3 to 0 I >-'3 to 0 I >-'3 to 0 , >-'3 to 0 , ti :J:'()
, IJ1 , IJ1 I IJ1 I IJ1 , ;:'1 , ;:. , I ;:'1 , ;:. , n I!> 0
>-'3#0 >-'3#0 >-'3#0 >-'3#0 >-'3# I!> >-'3# I!> I >-'3# I!> , >-'3# I!> , 11l 0>-'3
() 0 () 0 () 0 () 0 Cl 0 () 0 , () 0 Cl 0 I I-' 1-'>-'3
>-'300 >-'300 >-'300 >-'300 >-'300 >-'300 I >-'300 >-'300 , I:'
01-' 01-' 01-' 01-' oeo 00'\ , 01J1 0;:' , # ()
tIltvW tIltvtv tIltvl-' tIltvo tIll-'O tIll-'O I tIll-'O tIll-'O , 0
I:' I:' I:' I:' I:' I:' , I:' I:' , ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 ,
Cl () Cl () Cl Cl , Cl Cl , I:'
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ , 11l
, I I I , , , I , , l!l
0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 , ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 , I-'
tIl :J:' :J:' :J:' :Il I':I:j 1 tl=:I d ,
, I
, ,
I I
I ,
I I 'tI
I , :J:'
I I Q
I , tl=:I
I I to
I , rt
I I ~
I , rt
I I C W
I , 1Il
0 0 'J:l 0 0 'J:l 0 'J:l * 1-3 0;1>
0 0 II> 0 0 t\) 0 II> * III II>()
f-' W U'1 W 0 U'1 W U'1 * X .......1))
f-' 1 II> 0 II> 1 U'1 1 0 'J:l 1 0 * 'tl t\) ..'
-..] 1 0 0 0 1 t\) 1 I-' 'J:l 1 0 * III f-'1-3
t\) w 1 'J:l 0 'J:l 1 W 1 1I1 -..] 1 0 * "< .......Ill
0'\ II> 1 W t\) W 1 'J:l 1 W 'J:l 1 t\) * ro f-'X
1 1 1 1 * Ii 'J:l
~ '0 1 :I: tEl '0 1 '0 1 tEl '0 1 tEl * 'J:ll))
tEl ~ 1 I)) I)) ~ 1 ~ 1 I)) ~ 1 I)) * 'J:l"<
() H 1 1-3 () H 1 H 1 () H 1 () * lJl
0 1 1 1 1 * rt
~ 'df-'~ 1 'dI-'Ztl:J:''d;l>Z'df-'Z 1 'df-'t< 1 tl:I:-..]t:tj'd'df-'tl 1 tl~'d:J:'Z * Z f-'ro
tl ~II>O 1 ~II>OtEll-3' 1-30~1I>0 1 ~1I>t< 1 tEllf-'H~~II>O 1 tEl 1-3 , 1-30 * III t\)::!
I)) H'J:lZ 1 H'J:ltEll))~O~~H'J:ltEl 1 H'J:lO 1 1))000f-'~HH'J:lO 1 I))~~~~ * ::!
oeoE:: 1 oeot< ' ~oeot< 1 oeo><: 1 I))ZO'J:lQ 1 * ro t\)
'0 ~-..] 1 ~O :.:.. .. tEl~O 1 ~eotl 1 :.: :I:1-3()~eot< 1 :.:.. .. tEl * N
~ tl 1 tEl 0 ttI I)) tEl 1 1 0 H H ;I> 1 o ttI I)) * R"
H t<'d 1 t<'d H 0 1-3t<'d 1 t<'d:I: 1 H Q~'dt<'dl)) 1 H 0 1-3 * f-'
~ ;l>Ht:tj 1 ;l>HR"ZttI>:~ ;l>HR" 1 ;l>H 1 Z :I: E::;I>H 1 ZttI>:~ * ~ 0'\
:>:>: 1 :>:>: tElH tEl:>:>: 1 :>:>:R" 1 tEl tEl :>:>:;1> 1 tElH tEl *
tEl tElHttI 1 tElHt<I))t<'J:lI-3t<tElHt< 1 tElH 1 I)) I))~ tElH 1 1))t<'J:lI-3t< * 0..
tl 1 tEl 0 1 tElH t<w:I:tEl tElH 1 tEly 1 I-3H~ tElR" 1 t<w:I:tEl * Ii
1 ~'d~ 1 ~'ds~:I:~f;;~~'ds 1 ~'d~ 1 H ()tEl~ 1 H Ot<() * ro
1 1 1 1 ;I> ~I)) 'd() 1 ;I>:I:'J:ltEll-3 * lJl
1 o tEl 1 0;1> 0 tEl~ 0;1> 1 OH 1 H O:I: 1 o tEl~ * lJl
1 H><: 1 H t< ZO H 1 H() 1 tl H~ 1 t< ZO *
1 ~~tEl 1 U'1~t<U'1tl ZU'1~t< 1 ~~tEl 1 U'1 ~tElU'1~H 1 U'1tl Z *
1 1 U'1 OH yHlI1 1 , 0 tEl~U'1 I)) , OH yH*
1 (.oJ , (.oJ y(.oJZ~' ()(.oJ Y 1 (.oJ ;I> 1 (.oJ E:: (.oJ 1-3 , (.oJZ~' () *
, ,-..]() , -..]()ooQ -..]()O , -..]() 1 'J:l H-..] H 1 OQ *
1 t\)~ , t\)~~~tl~~I-3t\)~~ , t\)HI)) 1 t\) tElE::t\) Z 1 0'\ H~1-3 *
, , , ~tEl 1 1 tEl 1 Itll-3 ~ *
, I)) , I))I))'J:ltEl I))~ 1))1)) , ~~ , 0 I)) , 'J:ltEl I)) *
1 tEl 1 OO'\'df-'H 0 , , -..] 1-3:': :>: , O'\'df-'H *
, , tElZO~-..]ZI)) tElZ , , U'1 ~G5 , O~....:iZI))*
, 1 'J:l 0'\ 0 tEl , , 0 ~ , 'J:l O'\OtEl*
, 1 ~O~~ , I)) , tEl, H , ~O~~*
1 1 H< , , H t< , H<*
, 1 tEl ()H 1 , Z ;I> , ~ ()H1t
, 1 ~ :I:() 1 , () , :I:()
, 1 tEl 1 1 1 tEl
1 , 1 1 1
1 t\) 1 t\) 1 t\) 1 t\) 1 tl
1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 t-'.
, 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 lJl
, f-' 1 f-' , f-' , I-' , rt
1 1 , 1 ,
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Z
, eo 1 eo 1 eo 1 eo 1 1-3 III
0 1 0 , 0 1 0 , ....... ::!
0 1 0 1 0 1 0 , () ro
, , 1 1
0 , 0 , 0 , 0 , I)) ;I>
-..] , -..] , -..] , -..] , (J 0..
f-' , I-' 1 I-' 1 I-' , p- o..
'J:l , 'J:l , 'J:l , 'J:l , Ii
, 1 1 1 ro
, , , 1 lJl
1I1 , 1I1 1 1I1 1 1I1 1 I)) Cl
0 , 0 1 0 1 0 1 'tl
'J:l 'J:l 1 'J:l , 'J:l , f-' t<
1 , 1 ro
0 0 1 0 , 0 , I)) lQ
(.oJ W 1 (.oJ , (.oJ , 'tl III
t\) t\) , t\) 1 t\) 1 t\) f-'
, 1 1
f-' f-' , f-' 1 I-' 1 I)) :.:
0'\ 0'\ 1 0'\ 1 0'\ 1 'tl 0
II> II> 1 II> 1 II> 1 (.oJ 0..
1 , 1 ro
U'1 1I1 1 1I1 1 1I1 1 I)) f-'
0 0 1 0 1 0 1 'tl ro
1I1 U'1 , 1I1 1 1I1 , II> Ii
1 1 1
1I1 1I1 1 1I1 1 1I1 1 I))
0 0 1 0 1 0 1 'tl
-..] -..] 1 -..] , -..] , U'1
, 1 1
, , 1 I))
1 , , 'tl
, 1 1 0'\
1 1 1
1 1 , I))
1 1 1 'tl
1 1 1 -..]
1 1 1
1 1 , I))
, 1 1 'tl
, 1 1 eo
1 1 1
, , 1 I))
, , , 'tl
1 1 1 'J:l
, , 1
t\) t\) , t\) 1 t\) 1 ><:
0 0 1 0 1 0 1 ro
0 0 1 0 , 0 , III
0 0 , 0 , 0 , Ii
, 1 1
~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 ~
t<tt1t\) t<t:tjt\) 1 t<~t\) , t<~t\) 1 '0
OOlI1 OtEllI1 1 0t<U'1 , 0t<1I1 1 III 1-31))
1-3()f-' 1-3t<f-' 1 1-31))0 1 1-31))0 1 Ii ;I>()
':>:'J:l 1t<'J:l 1 1 1I1 1 , 1I1 1 (J 'J:l0
o tEl 0'\ 000 , 1-3#0 , 1-3#0 , ro 01-3
0><:0 oZO , () 0 , () 0 , f-' f-'1-3
t\)tElO 1-'-0 1 1-300 , 1-300 , t<
-t\) I))f-' 1 Of-' , Of-' 1 # ()
tt11))0 ttI 0 1 tt1t\)U'1 , tt1t\)1I> , ~
t< t<1-' , t< 1 t< ,
Of-' 01)) 1 0 1 0 1
()I)) ()1-3 , () , () , t'
:>:1-3 :>: , :>: , :>: , ro
1 ~~ , , 1 , 1 lQ
g~ , 0 , 0 , III
otl , 0 , 0 , f-'
f-'tl f-'Z ttI 1 ttI ,
Z , ,
1 ,
1 1
, ,
, , '0
1 1 ~
, 1
, 1 tEl
, 1 I))
, 1 rt
, , III
1 1 rt
1 , 0:: II>
, , lJl
~'-
I~)
eat"
~
~(.to
~;:-::
.......1
".n"
.J,J."
.,.t:I.
I
-
-
-
:..
i"O '"
il1l (l':
1-4 -
i 111 rr.
i:D u:
i (/I -.;
! 0 0-
1-1 Z:D
1111 111-
iX -Iii
1"0. ct,;
o :D'::
I:D Zlf:
):J 0-
I:D -IC:
IH 0'::
II C
i -< (/I"';
! 111
I):J z'"
I ~ t)l1:
I ):J 111~
I -< :D.:!
I C
...;
."I.JJ:;:O
0......:10
~~~
~?~
. ITj
<-t."F?
~~n
ITjtn~
5~~
~:;:o."
8 ~
)> tI1
~
~
-~.
. ........
.......
.
.
.
I:
.
~
......
......
.....
.
:::
-
f
~
C
0-
'"
...
...
'"
.;.:
.(;
I
_________J
l
(.
i
~
[1
I!
~
)>
o
o
:ll
m
VI
VI
(')
o
:ll
:ll
m
(')
-I
o
Z
:ll
m
o
C
m
VI
-I
m
o
"0.....
::t (j\
o t\:)
.... 0
\;'0
~~
~ (0
3::(5"'
:5" Q
::l ro
ro ro
~ ~
s-~
(]"Iro
(]"I'
w(fl
-....] ,
t\:)rn
I
.....
-....]
.....
~
1
(
1
1
~
\
l
i
i
.
(
Ii
\ !
~{
\'
.
-I
~
.
_ ',~<' _. "'.,__--::_~>=".;""-"n;
----------- ----------
~.
By
:',<, :1.~ .2.:>1 inquent ~.i;.A...:i
. /A..u:.sfer entered thl.
~~~~
c~~Ud1tOr
Deputy
Doc.~....4?-(
Vat CIs- ~ea.. _~ I(,--'~
OFFiCiOF'fiE cFliliB -
8COTT COUNTY, ....-..orA
Certihcf lied.
JUt I ~_ ftMtJ 3 P.
~ II.
~.T,",-_.ofI'J
P.r ~.... ......."a. .2-iB
by ~,.." 0Ipu(r :;;) ~
Warranty Deed by Individual
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $1.65
Date: ~.\ ~).. \ ~ ~ ~ , 1998
\
'tl . ~nFICATE AECEIYlD
^... :. '.."nFICAn NOT__
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, ROBERT D. JADER and ELIZABETH A.lADER,
husband and wife, Grantors, hereby convey and warrant to ROBERT D. lADER, Grantee,
real property in Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Lot 12, FIRST ADDITION TO EASTWOOD, Scott County, Minnesota.
,; 5- ()L{7-o13-Q
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, and subject to
restrictions, reservations and easements of record. if any.
~ The Seller certities that the Seller does oot know of any wells on the descrihed re~t1 property.
LI A well disclosure certificate accompanies this docwnent.
IJ The Seller certifies that the status and numher of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last
previously filed well diliclosure certiticate.
Total consideration for this tram.fer is less than $5(l()
11>> CJlJ or Prior UQ 8ubdMU.1n reguIIdona, .
.. forth In 8ecIIan 8 0I1le CIJ CodI 01 Pdar......
MIIIMIcM. do.., eo 1hII~.
. ~lls,q~"'" ROBERT
. . : .If~~~ fi
No. frr ~S- /".-p.LI /\BETH A. lAD
Deed Tall he~ of $ /,r-,s -
STATE OF MINNESOTA paid thisL2::day 0~J9.::t:r
~~County Treasurer
COUNTY OF SCOTT Conservation Fee Paid
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this .J.Q.. day of July, 1998, by
ROBERT D. JADER and ELIZABETH A. lADER, husban . , Grantors.
r ~';;^~~;:-;T~';;',.;~ ".; ;"";.. 1lTU"~ '^~~-' ~___ _..._ _ ...
I SIGNATURE OF PERSON T KING ACKNOWLEDGMENT
ftm~J
Cheek here if all or a of Ihe property is regislered (farrens) I!!I
. . ..-.---_ __0. .__._... __ ...____. ____
j
r -Um
,
i
l. .
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
HUEMOELLER & BATES
16670 Franklin Trail
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Tax statements thr the real propeny dtscrihed
in l.hi~ instrument should be sent to:
Robert D. lader
14960 Pixie Point Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
_,__~_...._....-~~~:.:L__~~.;....:..:c..*..., "-.__-,-,_:;.
",........:.."'...,.~.~-_..~..~., --
, "_. ".-- -.' -". '-"~~" ."-*-. ~ --,.;....~ -;', ._".~...:.. .
EXHIBIT C
~
PROPOSED LAYOUT
DECK
000
z
o
~
. .
;!
CD
C>>
(')
....
c::
C>>
-
& U I T E ,
I
I
{j
LiOD"
I
6ATp;E~IN6
,
I
I
I
I
I
:TV
,
p;EA
!~
,...----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'------
-----,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
KITCIolEN :
I
I
- ------'
en
.Q
c::
C>>
""
CD
0'
o
....
C>>
CQ
CD
~
==
It-,
" '
,
. \
o
r--------, p::==============
. .p, "
I I II
I III
I . II.
FO"l"!I<.11I
. I II
III
111
III
III
III
III
III
III
'"
_.J
--------------------
-ii----------
0-
CD
en
3
l>>
==
CD
.,
T H .\
Q.
CD
"tS
CD
:s
Q.
-.
:s
CQ
o
:s
GARAGE
....
:so
CD
ili
QJ
-.
:s
(')
CD
en
CQ
al
::s
....
CD
Q.
.
------l
~
I
______J
'f
~
Flnl flaor - 1.....11. U
~ IAnl . 13111 ~ II.
.,....... - ...,.--.
LEGAL BUILDING ENVELOPE
APPROXIMATELY
2400, SQUARE FEET
EXHIBIT B
/
4.t
.~ /
.~~ /
~~cif'/
/
/
(
""-
""-
""
i
j
l,~
t.1
~:\1
!
-------,
U DER N,EW ORDINANCE....
/ /; 1 '1 1 ~OO SQUARE FEET,11
/;;/~ I I -X \
/////~~~ g \
~,%~~~:~0 ~
/~ /0..;/ ~ \
'/ / .<<~~~~ ~/ \.,\,fl \
/ ~ '/$j!i~~ / ~ ~~\)~~
/ /~ ~;~1fjf(!~f~~/ ~ -,\0" 0< \
//J?y".,;((lh~// 'i/~~ / ~/ ,
~ 7~ /c, '<1., I;;j;///~ ~ ./ A' '1-- -1 \- - 'I \
~/W;~1' //V'/ / /' #~ \ - \~lo.'t\;)
~ ~~~.,z; I /////~!Z;./., ,?;>.\ / C \
~ '/./~~ / ~ Ji"L(;~ /-.. ..c~""
?"~ :/---:::' / ~ ,../ / /',' ~~", t;~\ \ \
;' (....-- '/ / ./' ~ ~\ '0~'t- \
/)j),[;/. " \/' \ \3\; \ \
( ~.': /' / 7//'~' /\ \
/ r;:{ ,/ / ~\- ' It' \
/ / //~V/ /' ,//> V,-, \ \
/1 ~ / / // ~/ / / ,v" \
. I L..... . / / / / / / , ;,0, ' ~ \ \
I \ 1/ /' '^ ,/ / / / ~ ~ 4i \ \
\...../ ~V / '>~ . ~ \ \ \
^-ll < " l'i~.> /
~ '/ ",,??~J'\5' \1- \\ \
7ltj / ,,1'.>.., . \
( > It-- \.__ J
"" / '> ^ ~ \
"" / / < )t,,,,~ \'
"" <., y t. \
" <..
"" "" )./', \
"" / '^
""" \
"" V'- y/ <
",,-"" ~~
"",, /
" " /
l' s <<<"" " V /
<. '/'0"
~6" "
06'... ""
~ "" / 4.t
ol'
"" /&.~
" /0' !O
" / Vj .(:5
""- cV>
V ~
<('<v
. "lK
oC)" "co
~ C)f),'
~ "
Bldg area = 2889 Sq. Ft.
Lot area = 14,924 Sq. Ft.
Coverage = 19.36%
c\e
G\\'
.0~
'( 0\
'(\;\ e
lc,g b L
Seal e: 1 "
- 30'
Pixie Point Circle
DESCRIPTION
I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the Laws of the State
of Minnesota.
~=oz~~ .. Reg. No. 8140
Lot 12
FIRST ADDITION TO EASTWOOD
Scott County, Minnesota
~ Assumed bearings shown
o Denotes iron monument
(~iSti~) ~opo~
BRANDT ENGINEERING & SURVEYING D rn@rnO\Y1rn n
1600 West 143rd Street, Suite 206 JUN 301998 U
Burnsville, MN 55306
(612) 435-1966 J28-1-98
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
AV&. ~~~
1..1 N r=.
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
FJ:2It)JZ L..A)Le
-^-"__^A _"'--~"_
--"".""",--~-,,--..- .....,/,......-...................-...
~'""\.,,-~
...............~-'......,..~-
@
AJ,J... VtMI::N<;;ft1N$, -ro""'O&fZ.:~
'f7J>.T~. ~NI7 ~~.f3.p.C.}L l'7llY\g}oI'?ION$
~t? "*' >UJz',(~Y' t;!Iy' ~t7T
PNt&(N~INb ~NI? I?....-rep
JUNf! 25, ,qt:f6
f'Ft'r"~e17 ~)Te f'LA N
J~rz. JZ.e?'l?eNc,~
~)-....e J II -:0. 2-0 J -0"
--~~~
-~_~~J .~_--r.. .J.
&tZOWN?PN "'t'NNe.~ fa MUHL.eNIPDH
I .
"," .'.. 11..
EXHIBIT A
3-/0 -9~
CERllFlCA TE OF SURVEY
J28-1-98
for
BOB JADER
\
11
I I
.x
U
o
:e
"
Vl
lfl
"
/
/
:...'" /
.'V
.ti;; /
/~~./
/
/
(
""-
""- I /
""- ""- / ( ')
""-( <
""- " "
""-" /
"V' /
""- V
""- " "
""- " "
;j; "''''~ " /
s",. ~/O " V
"6'- "-
06'_ ""-
It- ""-
"- ~o ^'
" 0 . '"
" O' <0
" ""- / Irj ,&0
V <
1~
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
J
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
---- --....\
''0 \..
yO\
81dg areo = 2889 Sq. rt.
Lot oreo = 14,924 Sq. rt.
Coveroge = 19.36%
y\i-\ e
J!=-'-Si: L__Pixie Pain t Circle
Scale: 1" = 30'
DESCRIPTION
I hereby certify thot lhis survey, pion, or
report wos prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I om 0 duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the Lows of the Stole
of Minnesota.
~-/9vP~r
6a--te~ 2"5 IVAI 1 '1'18' Reg. No. 8140
Lol 12
FIRST ADDITION TO EASTWOOD
Scott County, Minnesota
Assumed bearings shown
o Denotes iron monument
(EX~i~:; ~
/
/
BRANDT ENGINEERING & SURVEYING ~rn@ EO\Yl~ ~W
1600 West 143rd Street, Suite 20'6 ~JlJN 3 0 I~ ~Il
Burnsville, MN 55306
(612) 435-1966 J28-1-98
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
~~ l-A)l.e
-^-:::~~.~,. --~-,
~""'-,.-
--~...........~
---\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
@
All /;I/MeN~"N$. TO~O&FZ-.J..P>>lC.
'!7A7~, ,..1-//7 ~F-T~JL T?1r>'\~'!>,OJ.JS
~l? c>N >U/2'VIJZ'(" P-tY' ~t7T
liN<&fNeelz-ll-lb ....Nt:> I?~-re.t:>
.JUN!:! "Z5, r<1<16
/
/
~ /
V
rrzoF07E.tI ?ITe FLAN
J Al7ef<. J2.e~ll?e Nl-E:
SoGAl.-P- I" ..... 1..0 I -0'
~WN';;>()N, ~c?NNe~ ~ MUHL.eNI"'"ClH
LI:.UJ-\L DUILUII~u t:N V t:LUf-It:
EXHIBIT B
APPROXIMATELY
2400. SQUARE FEET
,/
/
:..I.v /
.tV
.ti;; /
~~~./
/
/
z..
""'-
""'-
""'-
I
i
.\
...
...1
:i
'1
-1~
I
rV>
~
. 0"-
\( 0\
Bldg area = 2889 Sq. Ft.
lot orea = 14,924 Sq. Fl.
Coverage = 19.36%
'e
'-.1\
\( \'-
IL\g b"L
Pixie Pain t Circle
Scale: 1"
30'
DESCRIPTION
I hereby cerllfy that this survey, plan. or
report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Registered
land Surveyor under the lows of the State
of Minnesota.
~y 9vP~
Dote. (/2 S J'V/J 1 g<:3.r Reg. No. 8140
lot 12
FIRST ^DOITION 10 E^STWOOD
Scott County. Minnesota
^ssumed bearings shown
a Denotes iron monument
(EX~i~) ~opo~
BRANDT ENGINEERING & SURVEYING [D)C'; IJ! O'iffIJ!I~
1600 West 143rd street, Suite 206 I~ JUN 301990 I~
Burnsville, MN 55306
(612) 435-1966 J28-1-98
[-r~
..
......
\,
~.. '\
.~
"...r-
......."'" ..
-..- .....~-;.:....~~ '. ~-~ -
. :-=-,
,. '1
"
.-'
.-