HomeMy WebLinkAbout3A CDA Response to RFP
4646 Dakota Street S.E.
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA #
PREPARED BY:
OCTOBER 1, 2008
3A
PAUL SNOOK, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY {CDA}
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR DOWNTOWN
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENDA ITEM:
DISCUSSION:
The Scott County Community Development Agency (CDA) has
submitted a response to the City's Request for Proposals for Downtown
Redevelopment.
Attached are the following:
1. Redevelopment Proposal from the Scott County CDA
2. A list of the questions presented by City staff and the
corresponding response by Scott CDA and Dunbar
Development.
3. List of developers RFP was sent to
4. Memo regarding developer feedback
5. A memo from the City's financial consultant, Ehler's &
Associates, in follow-up to the CDA's presentation at the August
18th City Council work session.
The City Council held a work session August 18th to review and discuss
the proposal, and ask questions of the CDA and Dunbar Development.
Features of the proposal include:
General
· A four story mixed use development of independent senior
housing and neighborhood retail
· Scott CDA has been successful in developing, owning and
operating senior housing in New Prague, Savage, and
Shakopee
· The concept for neighborhood retail would be to provide a
retail location that would be acceptable in the marketplace
for neighborhood business owners to conduct their service
related businesses.
· A condition of proceeding with the development would be to
secure either a master tenant or have a significant amount
of the retail space pre-leased.
Develooment Plan
· 54 senior apartment units (18 one bedroom; 18 one
bedroom + den; 18 two bedroom)
· 11,225 square feet of neighborhood service retail
www.cityofpriorlake.com
Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245
Land Acauisition
· CDA would work with the City in the acquisition of parcels
· CDA is confident of arriving at a land cost that will allow
economic viability of the proposal.
Market
· For residential/housing, CDA has secured a third party
independent analysis from Maxfield Research
· Analysis shows that a market exists for this development
proposal in this location in Prior Lake at this time.
· For retail, CDA views this to be the most challenging market,
and is ongoing in its market analysis for the space.
· A master tenant or significant level of pre-leased space will
be a contingent factor in allowing CDA to move forward with
this development.
Desian
· Southeast corner of Main Avenue and Eagle Creek Avenue
(Hwy 21)
· A plaza at the corner of the building
· Public, surface parking behind the building
· Amenities such as benches, public gardens and a fountain
· Architecture takes cues from older and newer buildings in
downtown Prior Lake
· Design is in keeping with the Downtown Building Design
Guidelines
· Storefronts open on to Main Ave
. Common areas for the apartments are at street level and
include a community room with kitchen, exercise room,
library, and woodshop.
· Apartments will meet the needs of residents, including extra
wide entry doors, handicapped adaptable kitchens and
bathrooms, individual heating, ventilation and air
conditioning, and remote storage lockers
. Concept drawings do not suggest final development; CDA is
open to input to clearly define the final design
Financina
· CDA will use Springsted, Inc. as the financial advisor
. Housing component - CDA will use its tax exempt authority
for bonding
. Commercial/Retail - will use more conventional financial
model
Challenaes
· Land acquisition
· Potential relocation
· Acceptable neighborhood retail tenancy
· Potential environmental conditions; need for
abatement/clean-up
ISSUES:
Number of Prooosals Received
After sending out forty-one request for proposals, we received one
response, from the Scott Count CDA. Staff followed up with a majority
of the developers. Many of the them suggested that they are interested
in submitting a proposal and see potential in downtown Prior Lake, but
for a variety of reason~, the timing is not right to submit at this time. It is
difficult to know the potential for redevelopment when only one proposal
is received. See related attachments:
Senior Housina
Senior housing has a significant presence in the downtown area with
Lakefront Plaza, which has seventy-nine living units. Does the city want
another 54 units of senior housing in the downtown? A range of
housing elements makes for a more vibrant downtown in terms the mix
of people inhabiting downtown and the wider retail market that
downtown residents would support.
o
Retail
The goal as outlined in the Request for Proposal is to have a downtown
that has a mix of uses and design character rich enough to attract
people to live downtown, and cause people to linger, visit more
commercial and retail establishments, and spend more money.
The CDA proposal lacks a detailed market analysis for the retail
portion. The CDA states that it is ongoing in their market analysis for
retail, that this is the most challenging market, and that the retail
component, working through a master tenant, will be a contingent factor
in allowing the CDA to move forward with the project.
In the workshop meeting with the City Council, the CDA stressed that
service related businesses, medical related (clinics 1 offices), and public
uses would be a good fit in the ground level retail space at this time
(similar to the Hamilton building in downtown Savage), until the retail
market rebounds. The CDA proposal falls short of the RFP goal of
having a strong retail component to the project.
Parkina
The CDA proposal includes underground parking dedicated to
residents. The proposal would not include a general public parking
structure as specified it he RFP. The CDA and Dunbar Development
are of the opinion that the suburban market is not comfortable with an
urban style parking ramp. A ramp would be more conducive to an office
setting.
In addition to not providing for a parking structure, the proposal does
not provide a significant number of surface parking for the 11, 000
square feet of retail.
Ownershio / Financina
The CDA, a public entity, would be the owner of the building. By statute
the CDA is required to pay real estate taxes on the retail 1 commercial
portion of the project. Taxes would be market rate on the retail 1
commercial portion, and on the housing portion it would be payment in
lieu of taxes (PILOT). Typically, PILOT is 1/3 of what taxes are for a
ALTERNATIVES:
privately developed and owned project. Public ownership by the CDA
and consequent PILOT would likely eliminate the City's ability to create
a TIF district and use tax increment financing, whether it be for this
project, to assist in creating additional downtown parking, or to use in
redeveloping other areas of the downtown.
The financing structure the CDA anticipates would be taxable bonds for
the retail! commercial component and tax exempt bonds backed by the
City, CDA and County for the residential portion.
Offer and pass a motion recommending that the City Council not move
forward with Scott County Community Development Agency's
Downtown Redevelopment Proposal; and
1. As outlined by Ehlers & Associates, direct staff to identify
specific developers that have projects that the City believes are
similar to their goals. Find out if they will be interested in future
opportunities for redevelopment when the market improves, and
if there are specific items in the RFP that are barriers for them
submitting a proposal; work to modify those barriers to
accommodate both the City and developer; and, authorize re-
issuance of the Request for Proposals for Downtown
Redevelopment at a future date;
- or-
2. Do nothing at this time