Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9A - Report on Massage Therapy Ordinance MEETING DATE: AGENDA #: PREPARED BY: AGENDA ITEM: DISCUSSION: ,., t', 4646 Dakota Street S.E. Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 16, 2009 9A BILL O'ROURKE, CHIEF OF POLICE CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A REPORT ON THE MASSAGE THERAPY ORDINANCE Introduction The purpose of this report is to provide the City Council with information regarding massage therapy. Historv At the August 3, 2009, City Council meeting Drs. Beth Westie and Rachel Moore of Kes Chiropractic addressed the Council during the public forum. They spoke of a massage therapist hired by another provider in the building they share, that was unlicensed and who has been criminally charged with sex crimes in another community. It was their belief that every employer should be required to conduct a background investigation on every perspective massage therapist and, even better, that all persons practicing message therapy in Prior Lake should be licensed. The Council directed that staff review applicable Minnesota Statutes and Section 303 of the City Code relating to the issuance of licenses to persons providing massage therapy. The Council also directed that the Community Safety Advisory Committee review and make recommendations with respect to this matter. Current Circumstances Minnesota Statute 471.709 states: "Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, a municipality shall not require a massage therapist to obtain a license or permit when the therapist is working for or an employee of a medical professional licensed under chapter 147 or 148." Section 303.1100 of the Prior Lake City Code is consistent with the above and states, "The practice of massage therapy is hereby declared to be distinct from the practice of medicine, surgery, osteopathy, chiropractic, physical therapy, or podiatry. Persons duly licensed in this State to practice medicine, surgery, osteopathy, chiropractic, physical therapy, or podiatry, or those who work solely under the direction of any such persons and athletic directors or trainers under contract to a school district, private college, or public university, are hereby expressly excluded from the provisions of this Section." The individual cited by Drs. Westie and Moore was working for a licensed physical therapist and therefore not subject to any licensing requirement by the City. www.cityofpriorlake.com 11" ",PflP~ fJ&2.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 As instructed by the City Council, this issue has been reviewed by the Community Safety Advisory Committee (CSAC). This Committee has developed a brochure with information about how to get a background investigation on someone from the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. The brochure is already available at various locations around town and via the City's website. It is the hope of the CSAC that more individuals, groups, organizations, and businesses conduct background investigations prior to hiring an individual for a position that affords them contact with those most vulnerable. ISSUES: It must be noted that in the case of the individual referred to by Drs. Westie and Moore, nothing would have shown up on the background check because that individual has only been charged with and not convicted of any offenses to date. Moreover the City may not be more restrictive than State Statute and require licensure in situations where the statute clearly prohibits such action. In this case it is recommended the CSAC brochure on background checks be provided to message therapist when their licenses renew with a short message that the City and its CSAC recommend background checks for all persons conducting such work. We will communicate this information to Drs. Westie and Kes. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Incrementally more copies of the brochure will be consumed which will entail some additional City cost for copying. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Adopt the recommendations of the staff and CSAC as outlined in this report. 2) Take no action. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Alternative 1. ReVie1[1 ~L_ Frank BOYles'{) a, 1ger