HomeMy WebLinkAbout10A Segregate City and MCES Sewer Billing~~ PRI~~
~ ~
ti
U ~
"MVESO~/
4646 Dakota Street S.E.
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 16, 2009
AGENDA #: 10A
PREPARED BY: STEVE ALBRECHT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
JERILYN ERICKSON, FINANCE DIRECTOR
AGENDA ITEM: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A REPORT IDENTIFYING SEWER AND
WATER RATE ISSUES AND A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SE-
GREGATION OF THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES (MCES) CHARGE FROM THE CITY SEWER RATE.
DISCUSSION: Introduction
The purpose of this agenda item is for the City Council to receive a report
on the status of the City Sewer and Water rate study, to consider approval
of segregating the MCES Sewer Charge from the City's sewer rate, and to
provide direction on the MCES Sewer Charge for the proposed 2010 Fee
Schedule.
Histo
The City of Prior Lake operates and maintains a sewer collection and wa-
terdistribution system. The estimated replacement value of the City's
sewer and water infrastructure is more than $200 million and its operation
and maintenance are funded through sewer and water rates.
On June 1, 2009 Staff provided a presentation to the City Council on the
rate analysis program developed for the. City by Bolton & Menk.
On September 10, 2009 the MCES notified the City that the Met Council
had adopted a 3.8% increase to the overall charge to cities for the treat-
ment of municipal wastewater for 2010 and that additional increases can
be expected over the next four or five years. The actual change for each
city will vary depending on their flow as a percentage. of the overall flow.
The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities represented cities on this
issue and pushed for an interim phased-in approach to the increase.
The increase was a result of the MCES changing their methodology for
calculating municipal wastewater charges and shifting from the reliance on
Sewer Access Charges (SAC) which are charged to new homes and busi-
nesses as a part of construction. This change was ultimately necessitated
by the economic downturn as it relates to building permits and a lack of
flow.
In order to provide sewer capacity for cities the Met Council has upgraded
their facilities to meet projected needs. The debt incurred as part of those
upgrades has been apportioned to user rates and SAC's. Because the
SAC funding has dramatically decreased and is projected to continue to
www.cityofpriorlake.com
R:~~'oiu~ai1~2009 ~geud~ ,e~ortsi] t I b O~~~ie2%~r,~ZR~i~~~~-~i~~o~ Fax 952.447.4245
decrease, the MCES in order to maintain operations has recommended
and the Met Council has approved this change.
The actual impact to the City of Prior Lake is dependent on previously
constructed capacity and actual flow. In 2009, the MCES charge to the
City of Prior Lake is $1,048,717.53 for sewage treated at the Blue Lake
Wastewater Treatment Facility in Shakopee. This computes to a charge
of $1.75 per 1,000 gallons of wastewater. This amount is currently in-
cluded as a component of the City's $3.65/1,000 gallon charge for waste-
water to residents. The basis for that estimate was an estimated 597.8
MG of flow for the City. In reality, the City will produce closer to 560 MG
of sewage in 2009. This decrease is due to a decline in new homes and
reduced inflow and infiltration.
A breakdown of the City's 2009 sewer rate of $3.65/1,000 gallons would
be as follows:
2009 2010
$ 1.90 City Rate 52% $1.90 City Rate 49%
$ 1.75 MCES Rate 48% $1.98 MCES Rate 51
$ 3.65 Total 100% $3.88 Total 100%
The 2010 municipal wastewater charge to the City of Prior Lake will be
$1,150,015.84 or $1.98/1,000 gallons based on an estimated flow of 560
MG. This equates to an increase of 13% to the City's 1,000 gallon rate.
This is due to decreased flow from the City as outlined above and the
MCES' capacity that has been previously constructed for the City.
Current Circumstances
City Staff plans to bring a draft Rate Study to the City Council in early
2010. It is Staff's intention to include the 20-year Water and Sewer Rate
Study as part of the 2011-2015 Capital Improvement Program for City
Council approval. This will provide long term planning for water and sewer
rates and long term enterprise fund budget review and input for the City
Council. As part of preparation for that report staff would like the City
Council to provide direction on the following items:
1) Currently, the City charges the MCES charge as a component of
the sewer rate. For 2010, Staff proposes to segregate the MCES
sewer charge rate from the Sewer Rate to reflect the City's current
charge of $1.90/1,000 gallons and MCES proposed charge of
$1.98/1,000 gallons. The MCES is proposing to increase sewage
rates for the next couple years and Staff believes it is important for
the City Council and residents to see that these increased charges
are not due to City changes or cost increases.
2) Currently, the City records all water and sewer revenues in a single
fund (Water & Sewer Fund). Staff believes separate funds should
be established to ensure transparent tracking of expenses and
long term rate planning. This ensures that water and sewer rates
RaCounsil17009 Agenda Reportsil 1 16 091Sewer l~ ater Rate A~enda.,doc
will reflect the actual cost of these separate operations and each
fund will be self-supporting.
3) Minimum fund balance for utility funds. Staff believes the City
Council should establish minimum fund balance reserves (unre-
stricted net assets) for these funds to ensure that the reserves and
the rates are managed in a manner that reflects the City's long-
term financial strategy. Rate adjustments would be implemented
when reserve balances are at or approaching the established min-
imum threshold.
The minimum fund balance reserve could be tied to the yearly total
fund budget or the operations and maintenance portion of the fund
budget. An additional component of a minimum fund balance re-
serve would be for emergency projects such as the CR 21 Water-
main Project which cost the City $716,000. A substantial portion of
the City's water and sewer system is at least 30 years old and,
therefore, ongoing maintenance needs are expected to continue.
The City's water and sewer revenues are also not evenly distrib-
uted due to seasonal peaks and bi-monthly billing and, therefore, a
fund reserve is required to provide cash flow.
4) The City does not have a long term water and sewer rate planning
document. Staff believes this long term plan is an integral part of
sound financial planning and budgeting for the City. As discussed
above staff believes that as part of the CIP process the Council
should annually review this document. Any recommended rate
changes would be addressed as part of the annual budget proc-
ess.
ISSUES: The City Council will be asked to adopt the City's Fee Schedule in De-
cember so that fees are set at appropriate levels for 2010. For that rea-
son staff is recommending that the City Council approve the segregation
of the MCES Charge from the Sewer rate. Staff will be recommending
that the increase from the MCES be passed along to the utility customers
for 2010. The MCES rate would be adjusted to reflect rates to be charged
to the City for 2010. Should the City Council elect not to pass along this
rate increase by the MCES the impact will result in the City's fund reserves
being utilized for this amount and an acceleration of a need for a City
Sewer rate increase which is currently not anticipated to be needed until at
least 2013 depending on what rate strategy is adopted by the City Council
in 2010.
It should be noted that based on preliminary information received by the
City it is anticipated that the MCES's rates will continue to increase annu-
ally in excess of 4% for the next 4-5 years.
FINANCIAL There is no impact to the City's reserves or funding if the MCES rate in-
IMPACT: crease is passed along to the users. Should the Council elect not to pass
through these costs it will result in an acceleration of a City rate increases
P:ACc~uneih2009 .A~enda Reports\11 16 09~Secv~r 13'atax Rate f~~en~a.cloc
in the future. The date and impact of future rate increase will need to be
determined by the City Council in 2010. Based on preliminary analysis
and items 2 and 3 above a City rate increase for Sewer operations may be
needed as soon as 2012 if the rate increase is not passed through to us-
ers.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Provide direction to City Staff on the issues highlighted in the report
2. Approve a resolution approving the segregation of the MCES Charge
from the City Sewer Rate.
3. Table the Resolution for a specific reason.
4. Deny the Resolution.
RECOMMENDED Alternative#1
MOTION:
R:AC:ounci1~2.009 Ag~rrda Reporis111 16 (391S~:~rer ~Tiater F~a~P Agen*ia.doc
/~ PRI~~
/ ~ ~
ti
u x
\~NNESO't
4646 Dakota Street S.E.
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
RESOLUTION 09-XXX
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SEGREGATION OF THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (MCES) CHARGE FROM THE CITY SEWER RATE.
Motion By: Second By:
WHEREAS, Sewage from the City of Prior Lake flows to the MCES Blue Lake Wastewater
Treatment Facility in Shakopee, MN; and
WHEREAS, The MCES has constructed facilities based on the flow that it estimates it will receive
from the City of Prior Lake; and
WHEREAS, The MCES controls the costs to be charged to the City of Prior Lake; and
WHEREAS, The City Water & Sewer Fund annual budget includes the cost charged by the MCES;
and
WHEREAS, Currently, the City of Prior Lake charges a sewer rate of $3.65/1,000 gallons to utility
customers without identifying its component parts; and
WHEREAS, This rate includes. implicit rates of $1.75 for the MCES charge and $1.90 for the City
sewer rate; and
WHEREAS, The City believes it is appropriate to reflect the separate charges for the City Sewer
Rate and the MCES Sewer Rate on the utility bill to facilitate full understanding by
sewer users.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE,
MINNESOTA as follows:
1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein.
2. Staff is authorized to show the City and MCES Sewer Rates separately on the Official City Fee
Schedule and on the utility bill.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 16th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2009.
YFG
nm
Hau en Hau en
Erickson Erickson
Hedber Hedber
LeMair LeMair
Millar Millar
Frank Boyles, City Manager
www. cityofpriorlake. com
F~:tc~u,cin~un~ r~~en~~ ~e~~resti7 ~ ~ ~ ~s~~~~~7~~~~; /Fax 952.447.4245