Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10A - Annual Report on Wellhead Protection Plan MEETING DATE: AGENDA #: PREPARED BY: PRESENTED BY: AGENDA ITEM: DISCUSSION: ISSUES: 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT JULY 19,2010 10A STEVE ALBRECHT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS STEVE ALBRECHT ANNUAL REPORT ON WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN Introduction The purpose of this agenda item is to inform the City Council about the status of the Wellhead Protection Plan implementation. Historv, The State of Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) requires cities that use groundwater for their public water supply to develop Wellhead Protection Plans (WHPP) to help protect groundwater from contamination of the aquifer from which their wells draw water. The contaminants from which cities must protect their groundwater sources include; household chemicals, watershed practices, industrial contaminate sources, septic systems, and others. Current Circumstances The City of Prior Lake completed its WHPP in 2007 and is currently in its third year of implementation. The plan requires an annual report and periodic evaluations. The MDH evaluated implementation of the Prior Lake WHPP for the first time this spring. The Prior Lake WHPP includes specific action items required to be performed by the City during the life of the plan. Specific categories include: well management, potential contaminate source properties, other potential contaminate sources, general public education, and data collection. The following is a summary of implementation efforts made during the 2009-2010 reporting period, including an explanation of the proposed effect: 1. Connection of Industrial Park orooerties to Citv sewer and water and abandonment of existina seotic svstems and wells. The Pavek Property has been connected and the Integra Property has received a permit for connection. This eliminates two active industrial property septic systems and wells from the City's Wellhead Protection Area. 2. Installation of Wellhead sianaae. Signs have been installed in both the City's eastern and western Drinking Water Supply Management Areas. These signs alert residents and business owners that they need to be careful about how they manage household and commercial hazardous waste as their properties are located in this critical zone. FINANCIAL IMPACT: ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED MOTION: Reviewed by: 3. Drinkina Water Consumer Confidence Reoort. Inform public of test results and procedures used to protect water supply. 4. Advertise household hazardous waste collection and disoosal. By encouraging proper disposal of chemicals, less pollution to surface and groundwater occurs. 5. Contaminate source database. data collection. An up to date database of contaminates in the wellhead area helps the City target its educational efforts. 6. Emeraencv reSDonse coordination. City Emergency response staff met with Engineering Department staff to further wellhead protection awareness and coordination. In addition to all ongoing wellhead protection activities, the following areas will be a focus of WHPP implementation in the 2010-2011 reporting period: 1. Installation of monitoring wells in the Industrial Park and Cardinal Ridge Park to monitor both potential chemical contaminants and storm water interactions with the City's eastern wellhead. 2. Promote proper sealing of wells in the city and townships by posting information on website and newsletters. 3. Develop and overlay wellhead protection district to restrict activities and uses potentially harmful to the City's water supply. Staff will be evaluating the best means of providing a more robust wellhead protection program in 2011. Contamination of the City's water supply would substantially impact the health, safety and welfare of the residents. Currently the City is unable to provide dedicated staff hours to this effort in- house. Elimination of the Civil Engineer Position in 2008 and the Public Works Coordinator Position in 2010 have left this important responsibility un-staffed. The City has attempted to utilize the Water Resource Engineer position for this activity. However based on workload and available hours, there is not the time available to adequately complete this task without reducing other water quality priorities. As part of the 2011 Budget Staff will provide options for the City Council considering both in-house and external resources to better manage Wellhead Protection. In order to accomplish the above Wellhead Protection tasks the 2010 Budget has identified $55,000 for construction of monitoring wells and another $7,500 for consultant assistance for contaminate source data collection and database set up. The City Council should accept this report and provide any direction with regards to wellhead protection. None required. frank Boyles, City Manager 2 R\Collncil\2010 Agenda Reports\07 19 10\Wellhead Protection Peport,docx R21 WI R2J IV "~".,j <\'~>~' ':'~r;.,'~"'f Prl.or Lake SE ~ ~ -;.~l.&f~. .:,i~ _-~' ,'1: '.J ~~:~. Drinking Water Supply ....:::~~~~~:~ Management Area (DWSMA) MN-00364 10 year 'lime of Travel Eastern WHPAslDWSMA Public Water Supply Wen (!> Primary o Emergency Response Area o WeUhead Protection Area (WHPA) ~ DWSMA I \' DWSMA Vulnera bUity Boundary H = High Vulnerability L = Low Vulnerability 0.3 o 0.3 Miles + ~I Approved N""ember 28. 2005 Western WHPAIDWSMA Prior Lake 6 Drinking Water Supp{v Management Area (D WSMA) MN-00365 10 year Time of Travel Public Water Supply Well o Primary D Emergency Response Area D WeDhead Protection Area (WHP A) '<1 1::1 DWSMA .~ L = Low Vulnerability 0.2 o 0.2 Miles + ~I Appro.ood No.ember 28.2005