Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPresent: Park Fee Study CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT February 5, 2001 6A Frank Boyles, City Manager AGENDA ITEM: PARK FEE STUDY PRESENTATION (Greg Ingraham) DISCUSSION: History: The City Attorney has recommended that the City conduct an analysis of the various fees we charge to assure that the fees are financially defensible and conform with state statute, A study regarding the storm water area charge has recently been completed and adopted by the City Council as well. Current Circumstances: Ingraham and Associates has been working to complete a report (attached) on our park dedication and park support fee. Ingraham has completed similar reports for other metropolitan area communities, including Bloomington and Shakopee. Greg Ingraham will provide a report to the City Council which examines our current park support and park dedication fees and proposes a new fee and method of applying the fees, The new fees are based upon projections of the cost and number of parks and trails which will be needed as a result of development. Conclusion: The City Council should hear Mr. Ingraham's report and may take this opportunity to ask any questions you may have about the study. ALTERNATIVES: (1) Receive this report for consideration on February 20,2001 or March 5, 2001. (The Feb. 2(jh meeting agenda is already getting lengthy). (2) Receive the report and consider implementation of the new fees under Agenda Item 88. RECOMMENDED MOTION: As the Council determines. 16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245 1:\CQUNCIL\AGNRPTS\2001\PARK FEE STUID'n~oPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ,- T 1 1Ii , 1 '-nr f1\ '-if In r City of Prior Lake, Minnesota Park and Trail Fee Study February 1, 2001 Prepared by: ASSOCIATES Planners & Landscape Architects 1510 Como Ave. S.E. Minneapolis, MN., 55414 Phone: 612.377.2500 1 I ~Il Prior Lake - Park and Trail Fee Study I. Executive Summary A. Purpose of the Study The City of Prior Lake uses a variety of funding sources to acquire and develop parks and trails. The most important funding source is dedication of land or fees from new development. The park dedication requirement is designed to enable new growth to pay for parks and trails that are designed to serve that new growth. The purposes of this study are to: ~ Determine the location, magnitude and recreation needs of new development. ~ Determine the existing and future park and trail needs. ~ Determine the estimated land acquisition and park and trail construction costs. ~ Evaluate the adequacy and appropriateness of the existing park and trail dedication requirements and the city park support fee. ~ Establish a rationale nexus (reasonable relationship) and prepare recommendations for park and trail fees and funding. B. Assumptions The City of Prior Lake will continue to experience residential and commercial-industrial growth over the next 20 years. New growth requires the provision of new park and trail facilities. The basic premise behind this study is that new development should pay for the park and trail facilities designed to serve their needs. New facilities designed to serve new growth should not be the responsibility of the existing taxpayers. Conversely, park dedication fees from new development should not be used to pay for renovation or repairs to existing parks. The City should adjust its park dedication fees to meet the projected system costs. The separate park support fee should be eliminated and the funding replaced through park and trail dedication and other sources. Park and trail replacement funds should be budgeted annually to allow for systematic and planned replacement and repair of park facilities and trails as they wear out and need capital repair or replacement. 1 c. Recommendations I) Revise the park and trail cash dedication fee to $1,685.00 per new residential unit and $3,550.00 per gross acre of new commercial-industrial development. Park and trail fees are based on system acquisition and development costs divided by the forecast number of new dwellings and new C-I space. The fees are proportional to the demand placed upon the system by new development. 2) Eliminate the park support fee for development that IS subject to the new dedication requirements. 3) Funding needs for existing uncompleted projects and projects designed to meet current needs should be funded primarily through the existing park fund balance and general fund. 4) The City should continue to fund park and trail capital replacement on an annual basis. Capital replacement should be funded from the General Fund budget, not the park fund. Annual park dedication funding will decline as the community approaches full development and park capital funding needs will shift from primarily new construction to primarily replacement. 5) Park and trail dedication fees should be evaluated and adjusted every year based on the cost of land and the cost of park and trail construction. II. Existinf! Conditions A. Existing Park and Trail System Prior Lake has an excellent system of existing parks, open space and trails to serve the community. The City park system consists of 33 sites on approximately 517 acres. Of those 517 acres there are 247 acres of active and passive park land. These parks range from small one acre mini-parks to large, 100+ acre community parks like Lakefront. The remaining 270 acres are natural resource and open space sites. These contain woodlands, wetlands and meadows. Most of these open space sites are not suitable for active recreation use, but are important for natural resource preservation. Neighborhood parks are the backbone of the park system. Residents and Prior Lake businesses rely on these parks to meet local recreation needs. Community parks like Lakefront and The Ponds provide recreation for the entire community. Community parks provide active athletic facilities and some also provide passive recreation such as picnics, nature study, water access and bird watching. Conservation and open space lands are also important for a feeling of open space, preservation of natural resources and passive recreation. 2 Iii fi . ~II Prior Lake has a network of approximately 33 miles of sidewalks and trails. These trails primarily serve the central area of the city and provide connections to parks, schools, shopping, neighborhoods and commercial areas. B. Existing Park Dedication and Fee System - Land Dedication or Dedication Fee Prior Lake City Code requires dedication of land equivalent to 10% of the gross area of new subdivisions for public park, trails, wetlands or open space or a cash park dedication payment equivalent to the value of 10% of the land. The current park dedication fee is based on a land value of $13,000.00 per acre. This results in a dedication fee of $1 ,300.00 per gross acre ofland. - Park Support Fee The City currently charges an $850.00 park support fee per new housing unit. This fee is collected at the time of building permit. C. Existing Commercial-Industrial Park Dedication Requirements The City currently requires commercial-industrial development to dedicate park land or pay a fee in lieu of a land dedication. Commercial-industrial developments use parks and benefit from a quality municipal park system. In addition to the general benefits of a park and trail system, the most direct business use of public park facilities is by adult sports leagues (typically organized and sponsored by businesses) and park shelter use for company events. These uses typically occur in larger community parks and account for approximately 10%-20% of municipal park and trail system costs. The magnitude of the commercial-industrial park dedication should match its demands upon the system. It is estimated that approximately 10% of park and trail use in Prior Lake is attributable to commercial-industrial development use. This estimate is based upon typical business participation in sports leagues, picnic shelter use and trail mileage. D. Existing Developer Construction Requirements Prior Lake currently requires the land developer to grade and seed the park land to be dedicated and to grade any trails. The updated subdivision ordinance proposes a park dedication credit when the developer also constructs the trail. The ordinance also gives the developer credit for public park facilities that are constructed which meet city standards. 3 III. Assumptions A. Growth Forecasts New residential and commercial -industrial de~elopment creates a need for additional parks and trails. The Prior Lake Comprehensive Land Use Plan assumes the addition of approximately 6,250 households and 330 acres of commercial-industrial development in the city between 2000 and when the city is fully developed. The population at full development is estimated to be approximately 32,000. The year 2020 population forecast is 28,500. B. Existing Needs and Contemplated Improvements The City has several parks that are in a phased sequence of development, have been acquired, but are not yet completely developed or are to be acquired to meet existing needs. Most of these park development projects are part of the city's five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The Prior Lake Comprehensive Plan also calls for the acquisition of two parcels: One approximately 15 acre parcel and One 24 acre parcel. These two parks are designed to meet existing and future recreation demand. Funding for these acquisitions and development are not included in the 2001-2005 CIP. The need for an additional community park to serve adult athletic needs has been well documented. The existing community parks serve youth and adult athletics and are located in the south half of the City. A new community park should be acquired and developed to primarily serve adult athletics. The site should be from 25 to 40 acres in size. The Park and Trail System Plan includes three potential locations for the new community park. See the Park System Plan map for search area locations. The land within the north portion of Spring Lake Park was considered for an athletic field complex as part ofthe 1999 park bond referendum.. This location is still a potential site for the new community park. Land in the northwest comer of the city and land within the future business park (north of CR 42 and west of CSAH 18) are also potential candidate sites for the new athletic facility. The northerly sites would provide a greater balance of facilities as the existing community parks are all located in the southern portion of the city. The addition of an adult athletic facility would allow The Ponds community park to meet the growing demand for youth athletics. The Ponds fields are currently used for adult softball, five nights a week and many weekends. C. New Park and Trail Facilities An updated Park and Trail Master Plan, which has not yet been incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan, was prepared to guide the acquisition and construction of new parks and trails. The Master Plan is designed to meet the city's park needs at full development (approximately year 2025-2030). The Park and Trail Master Plan is based on local needs identified in the Prior Lake Comprehensive Plan and national standards for parks and trails. Copies of the Park and Trail Master Plan maps are attached and included by reference. 4 IT! 11 I ~Il According to the Park and Trail Master Plan, new growth will require the addition of approximately nine new neighborhood parks, additional conservation and open space land and approximately 40 miles of new trail. New development will also increase the need for the 15- acre and 24-acre parks and an additional community park (currently planned for in the Comprehensive Plan). These facility needs are based on service area demands (having a neighborhood park to serve a 1/3 mile radius at:ea) and population needs (having approximately one acre of park and open space land for every 75 residents). The service area needs and per capita needs are based on National Recreation and Park Association standards and are designed to match current park service and per capita ratios in Prior Lake. This means the new growth areas will have a similar amount of parks as the existing developed part of the community. See the attached Prior Lake Park Master Plan for location of park service areas. Trail needs are based on the need to provide trails to serve new growth and to connect new development with the rest of the community and to interconnect Prior Lake trails with adjacent community's trails. This results in a need for approximately 40 miles of new trails. It is estimated that approximately four miles of the planned 40 miles of new trail may be on SMSC Trust land. Of the remaining 36 miles of new trail, approximately 18 miles are planned next to collector roads. These collector trails serve regional and community purposes and would be financed largely from other existing sources. See the attached Prior Lake Trail Plan for the location of existing and planned trails. D. Prototypes 1. Neighborhood Park Construction Costs A concept plan for a prototype neighborhood park is attached. It is based on nationally recognized standards for neighborhood parks and is similar to the configuration of Carriage Hills Park. The purpose of the neighborhood park prototype is to establish a benchmark and cost estimate for neighborhood park development costs. Development of the seven and half acre site according to the prototype plan would cost approximately $200,000. This amount includes internal park trails, but does not include external trail corridor or connector trails. The $200,000 figure is used to calculate the average construction cost for future neighborhood parks that are needed to serve new development. 2. Community Park (Athletic Facility) Construction Costs An adult athletic park is needed in Prior Lake. A new adult facility will better serve adult users and will open up existing fields for youth sports use. The Park and Trail Plan has three potential locations for a 25-40 acre park. One search area encompasses undeveloped County Park land at the north end of Spring Lake Regional Park. The two other search areas are on private land in the north and northwest part of the city. Development of an adult athletic facility on one of the search area locations is estimated to cost approximately $1,500,000 (land not included). This is based on costs for similar facilities in the Twin City metropolitan area and an average per acre development cost for athletic parks. Since the adult athletic facility is designed to serve existing and future demand, the cost of the acquisition and construction of the park should be shared 5 equally between existing residents and business and new residential and commercial-industrial development. E. Financial 1. Existing Park and Trail Fund Balance - The total park acquisition and development fund balance is $l,137,000 (January 2001). 2. Capital Improvement Projects The Prior Lake CIP lists park development projects for the years 2001-2005. These projects are primarily completion of existing park and trail development projects or new construction project designed to meet current needs. The estimated cost of these planned projects is $1,115,000. Funds for these projects are to come from the existing park and trail fund balance. 3. New Park and Trail Land Acquisition Acquisition and development of the following new parks and trails is shown on the updated Prior Lake Park and Trail Master Plan. One 25-40 acre community park site (to serve existing and future needs) $1,787,500 Eleven parks (7.5 to 24 acre each, nine parks for new development) $6,720,000 Open space and conservation areas (approximately 70 acres) $1,400,000 Trail right of way 18 miles $1,199,000 (50% of new trails requiring right of way at an average of20 feet wide) Park and Trail Land Acquisition Cost Less park land acq. attributed to existing needs Costs attributable to new development $11,106,500 - $ 2,903,250 $ 8,203,250 4. New Park and Trail Construction Costs Eleven (11) neighborhood parks ($200,000 each) = $2,200,000 One (1) Community Park - Adult Athletic Facility = $1,500,000 Trail system - 18 miles of trail ($85,000/mile) = $1,530,000 $5,230,000 less proportion of parks attributed to existing needs - $1,715,000 Park and Trail System Construction Cost $3,515,000 attributable to new development (as of January 1, 2001) 6 I" 11 . ~1l1 ': 5. Total New Cash Needs for New Parks and Trails The following is the total estimated park and trail requirements attributable to new development. Land Acquisition $ 8,203,250 Park and Trail Construction $ 3,515,000 Total $11,718,250 6. Replacement of Existing Facilities There is also a need for funds for park facility replacement. Park dedication funds should not be used for capital replacement. Listed below are three potential funding sources for meeting existing capital replacement needs (i.e replacing play equipment or re-paving sections oftrail). a. Transition Fees The city has an existing inventory of approximately 1,200 vacant already platted lots. These lots and subdivisions were approved under the existing park dedication fee and park support fee requirements. Accordingly, the existing policy should be used to fund the park and trail improvements in these subdivisions. b. General Fund The general fund is also an appropriate source for park and trail replacement funding. This can be planned through the five year CIP and allocated through the annual budgeting process. c. Bond Referendum A voted bond referendum is also a possible source of park and trail replacement and revitalization funds. A package of replacement projects could be assembled for consideration by the Prior Lake voters. IV. Analysis A. Land Valuation Analysis - The cost of land in Prior Lake has risen sharply in the last ten years. The higher land value results in higher park acquisition costs. The park dedication fee should reflect these land values and should be designed to closely match the equivalent value of a land dedication requirement. The updated Prior Lake Park and Trail Plan calls for nine new neighborhood parks to serve new growth, plus two new neighborhood parks and one new community athletic facility to meet a mix of new and existing needs. Approximately 40 miles of new trail are also planned. The park and 7 trail dedication fees are based in part on the value of these lands. The locations of new park and trail lands can be grouped into six general location categories: Vacant Rural - Undeveloped land, currently zoned agriculture, guided for rural residential use. This area is not intended to receive municipal sewer and water. Vacant - LD Residential - Undeveloped land, currently zoned agriculture, guided for future low-medium density residential use. Vacant - HD-MD Residential - Undeveloped land, currently zoned agriculture, guided for future medium and high-density residential use. Vacant - Business - Undeveloped land, currently zoned agriculture, guided for future business- office use. Lake shore - Lake shore, currently zoned for single family residential development. Open space and conservation - Land that may have physical development restrictions (i.e. wetlands, slopes, etc.) and may be accepted for partial park dedication credit if it provides passive recreation and/or natural resource value. Estimated Per Acre Land Values - Valuation Range Average Valuation Vacant Rural $12,000 - $22,000 $20,000 Vacant LD Res. $50,000 - $60,000 $55,000 Vacant HD-MD Res. $75,000 - $100,000 $85,000 Vacant Business $75,000 - $100,000+ $100,000 Lake Shore $60,000 - $200,000 $100,000 Open Space/Cons. $10,000 - $40,0000 $20,000 B. Park Land vs. Cash Dedication Minnesota State Statute 462.358 allow cities to require a reasonable portion of any proposed subdivision to be dedicated to the public for use as parks, playgrounds, trails, wetlands or open space or the municipality may accept an equivalent amount of cash from the applicant based on the fair market value of the land. There is a need for approximately 210 acres of new land for parks and open space in Prior Lake. There are approximately 1,900 vacant acres of land in Prior Lake. The planned new park and trail system represents approximately 10% of that developable land area. The value of those 210 acres of land is approximately $11,100,000 (year 2000 values). The construction of the new parks and trails is estimated to cost approximately $5,230,000 (year 2000 dollar estimate). This results in a total cost of approximately $16,330,000 in year 2000 dollars to complete the planned park and trail system. Since the recreation system is designed to meet 8 II! w I nil build-out needs, the cost of the park and trail additions would be spread over a +25 year period. Approximately $4,600,000 of that park/trail land acquisition and construction cost is attribut~.ble to existing needs and the existing population and employment base. New parks and trails attributable to existing needs are assumed to be: Land and New/. Cost attributable Construction Existing to existing Proportion development Community Park $3,287,500 50% $1,643,750 24-Acre Park $1,520,000 50% $ 760,000 15-Acre Park $1,700,000 50% $ 850,000 New trails $2,729,000 50% $1,364,500 Total $4,618,250 Half of three planned parks and half of the trail system additions were attributable to existing development and half to new development. This proportion is based on the city being approximately half developed. Therefore approximately $11,700,000 of the park and trail system additions are attributable to new development. The proportional system cost (land plus construction) of the new parks and trails represents approximately 10% of the vacant land value (approximately $120 million for 1900 acres). Therefore, the proposed dedication of 10% of the land or cash in lieu ofland equivalent to 10% ofthe land value is appropriate. C. Calculation of New Fees Park and trail acquisition and construction costs attributable to new development = $11,700,000 Residential share of use = 90% 90% x $11,700,000 = $10,530,000 Commercial-industrial share of use = 10% 10% x $11,700,000 = $1,170,000 New residential growth 6,250 dwelling units Commercial-industrial growth 330 acres Per unit residential share $10,530,000/6,250 units = $1,685/unit Per acre commercial-industrial share $1,170,000/330 acres = $3,545/acre v. Recommendations A. Revised Park and Trail Fees Revise the park and trail cash dedication fee to $1,685.00 per new residential units and $3,550.00 per gross acre of new commercial-industrial development. These fees or equivalent land dedication will allow for the acquisition and construction of nine new neighborhood parks, half 9 of the future non-collector trail system, a proportion of a new community park and portions of the 15-acre and 24-acre parcels. Park and trail fees are based on system acquisition and development costs divided by the forecast number of new dwellings and new commercial-industrial space. The fees are roughly proportional to the demand placed upon the syst~m by new development. The per residential unit measure was chosen based on the ability to accurately track and update the residential dwelling numbers and the ease of administering the land/fee collection at the time of subdivision. The unit numbers treat each dwelling unit equally and do not attempt to account for differences in the occupancy of dwellings, the number of bedrooms, or individuals' use of the parks. For example, senior housing may be perceived as having a lesser use of the park system and the feeling may be that a senior development should not have to pay the full park and trail fee. However, many seniors are active park users and probably use trails more often than the average resident. The per acre fee for commercial-industrial development is simple to administer and treats all commercial-industrial development equally. B. An Example The City has the option to require land dedication or a cash payment in lieu of a land dedication. The City can require up to 10% of subdivisions land area for park and open space purposes. In certain instances the city may require a dedication of less than 10% of the land area. In that instance the park dedication requirement will be satisfied bya. combination of land a cash payment. The following is a typical example. Proposed development 300 dwelling units on 100 acres of land (200 single family lots and 100 townhomes). 10% land dedication requirement = 10 acres Land dedication as requested by the City = 7.5 acres. Proportion of required dedication satisfied by land = 75% (7.5 acres/l0 acres = 75% ) Additional cash dedication requirement = $126,375 25% x 300 dwelling units = 75 units 75 units x $1,685 per unit fee = $126,375 Total dedication requirement = 7.5 acres ofland plus $126,375 cash payment 10 II! ] I 1111 VI. Comparison to Other Cities A 1999 survey of park dedication requirements in Minnesota found an average cash park dedication fee of $1,350.00 per single family residential unit among 20 growing metropolitan area communities. 1999 park dedication rates for cities near Prior Lake were: 1999 Park Dedication Fees City Single Family Unit Commercial-Industrial Feel Acre Chanhassen $1,200 park + $400 trail $4,500 park + $1,500 trail Eagan $1,235 park + $150 trail $3,375 park + $880 trail Eden Prairie $1,850 $5,500 Lakeville $1,325 5% ofland value Rosemount $1,000 $1,100 Savage $1,300 $3,150-$4,550 Shakopee $1,200 $3,880 VII. Implementation Whenever a new fee or regulation goes into place a decision must be made as to what projects are subject to the old regulations and fees and what are subject to the new regulations. For revised park dedication requirements and fees the implementation is straightforward. Since the new park dedication fees are based upon subdivision of property, the updated fee requirement should only apply to new subdivision application and projects that occur after approval of the new fee schedule. Existing platted lots should be subject to the fees that were in place when they were platted. These lots have paid a park dedication fee and owe a park support fee at the time of building permit issuance. Development proposals, which are currently going through the public process and have submitted a complete subdivision application (as determined by city staff) should be subject to the existing fee requirements. All new subdivisions proposed after the date of approval of the updated park and trail dedication fees should pay the new fee or dedicate land as required by City Code. This method of implementation is consistent with past city practices. The park land dedication or cash dedication should be conveyed by the developer at the time of final plat approval. VIII. On2oin2 Maintenance Park dedication fees rarely keep up with the rising cost of land and park and trail construction. The park and trail fee policy/regulation update must include a mechanism to reflect changing land values and the valuation increase when utilities become available. Most park and trail land is dedicated or purchased when utilities are at or near the site and the demand for the park or trail is pending. Therefore, except for one park and some trails in the rural area, the park land values reflect values for land with existing or planned access to municipal utilities. Since land and park construction prices are cyclical and subject to broad and localized influences, the valuation portion of the park and trail fee should be evaluated and adjusted on a regular basis (annually or 11 every two years is recommended). This keeps the fee requirements current and ensures that the city is not requiring too Iowa dedication (thereby transferring costs to the existing taxpayers) or too high a dedication (unduly burdening new development). ' IX. Attachments 1. Prior Lake Park Master Plan - January 22, 2001 2. Prior Lake Trail Master Plan - January 22, 2001 3. New Neighborhood Park Prototype 4. New Neighborhood Park Construction Costs 5. 1999 Park Dedication Survey of Minnesota Cities X. References and Source Materials- 1. City of Prior Lake & Prior Lake Comprehensive Plan - 1999 2. City of Savage 3. City of Shakopee Park Dedication Study - 1999 4. City of Bloomington Park Dedication Study and Ordinance - 1996 5. Edina Realty 6. Minnesota Center for Survey Research- Leisure in the Twin Cities Area by Laurie Manteufel and Rossana Armson, 1996 7. Minnesota State Statues 8. Park Dedication Survey of Minnesota Cities - Ingraham & Associates, 1999 9. National Parks and Recreation Association - 10. Recreation, Park and Open Space Standards and Guidelines by Roger Lancaster, 1990 11. Park, Recreation, Open Space and Greenway Guidelines by James Mertes and James Hall, 1996 12. Scott County, Minnesota 12 ITI ~ I Ii II " OlD ~Iil ~~ ~~ !il~ is! :ill ~ e lD ;$ ~<< ~* ~I~ @ ~ ~. ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 c ~\~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;II \!'I 0 all -t en In en %8m\Z~"':b" !il \cz~...~~ I -< Z 0 J;j Il ~ In ill .. ~ :l S! ill ~ sa ,~ n ~ " ~ . B :::1 "'6 i" 6 ~ ~ ", 2 1111 IlflU .... -'IE i I I "J ~ ~.. ~ -fill ~ , r ~II .... . '1!~1 I - II. ,. e OO("~ 1H'1~:ill~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ()~n~en~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z Z i!: lD ~ !il ~ ~ ~ ~ () Sl g i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'iilr"~i :~g!~~ ~~~:;::ss ;Jj -:: - c.. I: !; ... I: ~ ~ I:: J;j !!; : ~ 21 ~ ~ J;j ,.. g ~ c c ::a 2 c c us 5 l;fi5~- c~ 5 Park Master Plan City of Prior Lake Park Dedication Study ..:.tII..,.:....r,.. - . ~ ....a............... 11100llll0_..- .......... __1If1.4 p: I12II114IIlD tIl7-1010 _......~ '- DID ~m iii" ~i !iI,.. ii ., ~ ~ ~ Jd ~ PI ~ i:l ... Ilf I' ~<~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ il ;!i il '"' .. III II .. .... _ :!:_ liii~g~iii ~ ~ i!l!"!i!2~~'t' - ~ !i!~ !f~~~S ~igj ~ PI~!i!"2! ill z td -<~""n n ~ :f '" ~ c II' ....~..,} i 111111 ~ ~ I- i~ i.IUI .... 101' .. . I Trail Master Plan ..:......'.:.....~ ~ ~..............a_ tllOa..____ ......-- ~~ mr... .... - - City of Prior Lake Park Dedication Study IT! 11 lIlT 1 . . ~ +=0- SIGN .. .......:..,...' .~ ...........-.... 1510 COmo Ave. So. lIinn.apoll.. lIinnesota 111-177-1500 fill: m-1010 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE PARK DEDICATION STUDY N 12/26/2000 Prior Lake Neighborhood Park Prototype Prelim/nary Cost Estimate Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost SITE PAVING I SURFACING Parking w/ curb 24 SP 1000 $ 24,000.00 Bituminous path (8') 1550 LF 15 $ 23,250.00 Engineered wood fiber-play area 244 CY 19.5 $ 4,758.00 Poured-in-place rubber/asphalt base 100 SF 17 $ 1,700.00 Softball Ag lime infield 1 LS 4000 $ 4,000.00 Multi-use court (paving + uprights) 1 LS 29000 $ 29,000.00 Subtotal for paving / surfacing $ 86,708.00 PLANTING Shade tree - 21/2" cal. 35 EA 235 $ 8,225.00 Coniferous tree - 16 EA 250 $ 4,000.00 Sod/restoration 1 LS 3000 $ 3,000.00 Mulch 1 LS 500 $ 500.00 Subtotal for planting $ 15,725.00 WALLS & STRUCTURES Open picnic shelter 1 LS 9000 $ 9,000.00 Play Equip-Toddler 1 LS 12000 $ 12,000.00 Play Equip-School Age 1 LS 28500 $ 28,500.00 Play Equip-Swings 1 LS 1500 $ 1,500.00 Curb edging 350 LF 6.5 $ 2,275.00 Portable bath room screen 1 LS 3000 $ 3,000.00 Subtotal for walls & structures $ 56,275.00 SITE FURNISHINGS Bleachers 1 LS 4000 $ 4,000.00 Softball Field/backstop & protective fence 1 LS 5000 $ 5,000.00 Soccer Goals (pair) 1 EA 2000 $ 2,000.00 Benches 5 EA 650 $ 3,250.00 Picnic tables 5 EA 800 $ 4,000.00 Grills 2 EA 220 $ 440.00 Trash receptacles 4 EA 550 $ 2,200.00 Bike racks 1 EA 275 $ 275.00 Signs (traffic, directional & site 2 LS 750 $ 1,500.00 Subtotal for site furnishings $ 22,665.00 GRADING & UTILITIES Neighborhood Template Cost Estimate.xls Page 1 Hi 11 I ~Il 12126/2000 Storm sewer 1 LS $ Water 1 LS $ Electricity 1 '. LS $ Subtotal for utilities $ Subtotal $181,373.00 5% contingency $ 9,068.65 TOTAL $190,441.65 Neighborhood Template Cost ~stimate.xls Page 2 1 'Ii !l. N r; I~ J: J: if ."." ~ Ir m i I i j ~ ~ ~ U> U> U> U> i! I i i ~ "U "" ~ ij ::J ti 3 ij" ~ l I iil i :;- I DJ ~" f ~ ~ r ::J 3 S" .. .., ii'iQ i ::J r is . .. ~ i' ~ .. "2. ~ a :;- J: ~ ,.... ~ ~ ~ Q S" ~ - I 0 ::J ii 5: ~ ~ or !' .. ::J >I- ::J 8,' ~ l!l - - N- ~ & !l: l!l '" r:l w ~ ~ ~ 0 .Cl - ~ t ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ... '" ~ "'w 1'> w .,. ~ ~ ~ * 8~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ; Cl 0- +il' 1 H 3 I .i &> ~ I lIT lIT S" lIT f H en !! [ ::J ::J f 1 i [ ::J i . [ Q. Q. ::r f Q. i (~ Q. ::r ::r i c ill ii II II ~ II II ~ ~ ~ ; &. a- ~! . a- a- ~ . lD i(.i f t 9. Sl i ~ i ~ i: . ii' Z 5 I ~ ~- a. ~ ~ a. . a. i_ II ~ ~ . . . J! ~ II'.: If Sl.~ z Ii I U i JI ig z II i"l I I Ii' ~ 19 Sl. I! Sl. Sl. If [~5l. a. g 5l.11- ~ li'ii' lIT r! Sl. I . f~ II" l ~ CD ~ I!. i Sl . Sl. :f a. I a tl ::J a- ~81 '" n 5l.'" I: Sl. Q. af ~ ... 1 . -"I ~ E . If Sl.Sl. . ~ 5l. r+ 1 t ::J ~I- I =. I i = - ..... _a Q. ~i 3: ~ S" ~ . #. II II" ::ro8 n .... 308 c '" il"~ ~ c Sl Sl. lO ~~ !i Sl. ~ a c I co !!:c ::J ! ~ c c c ~I ~I lO ~ Sl. c ~ il" 5l. .B~ II" ~ ~ ::J 0 co ::J ::J "" ~ ::J co B-.- ::J .. :- I . "" . c ! . a il :0 c ""~ ~ ::J ~! II" c o . CD '" i ::J a ~ Q. . a J. ~ ::J_ "" [ i i II" Q. i i 5l.~ . a ~ I I I N iS~ :: ~"~ t!!l!! ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ "8 ~ ~ c:i ~1l 8 1 :0 - ~ ~. "'>I- .. ~ i iS~ :: ~I ~ frt ~ !!l i~ l!l ..... 8 is 8 ~ ~ E ~f"i 8 ~ "'>I- ~ ~ ~ i~ ,~ is j iS~ :: 8 is ~"~ ~8 ~ ~ ~ f~ . ~ -+ ~1l 8 "I ~. Sf "'>I- ~g ,~ is is!S :: ~I ~8 . ~ ~ i 8 i!i ~ ~ ~ t!!1: '. 5~ c: c: ~1l 8 :oi! ~ il~ -+ ~.. Sf "'>l- . ~I I: ~ l!l is ~ 8 8 is ~ 'I: - :o;r ~. if: i! 2 c i '" 2 ~l i I ~ Ii . i ~ ." [ 11- ~ ~ Ii' [ I [ s- [ i ~ a ::r ~ ~ ~ Sl. ~ 1~ ~ ~ If iila i i ~ ii' . i .. . I. a Sl i ::J i I ~[ ~i . ilt i~ f ~ a Ii Q. a II Iii a I. ~ i Sl. Ii .a i I l iii" Q.cZ i C I ~ ~ -z [{j 1 i! Ii it 51 ~i~ !-If R f Z i5 i- ~ ~~ i i !l ~~ l - I i! R "II .f a- ~ [ il Z II f[ Sl. 5l.[ Sl. ~ ii - 11- #. ~ #. i~ Sl. l ~ If I if .. i . t~ . .. ~ 5l. ~ f iii" ~ ,.. Sl. Sl. If 5l. 51; jjI a. ::J a. .. a. if Q. 5l. f . .. 5l. i . ~a '" .. .. i" B. B. a 11- a ::J Q. Q. I;ll ~~ j ~"~ e iil' ~ ~m! If ~ Ii :;" ..~ '" 8 ... i-:: ~ 3 f~ II:! ~ ~ ~ i!t -Ql ~1l ~1 ~~ ~ ~ or I ~ =>1- 5 '" c i: ~~l ,... '" ..... r II '" It ~ ~~ J I~ If ~~ ~~ ;' CIlA ~ pt 8 ... Sf it c;;~i ~ ~ 2:-:: ~ ~1l ~~ ..... fl ill _ D .. ~ =>1- i ~ :0 ,.. -::( If ~ l~.. ..- ,..& In l I 1111 'l 'i ... ll. ... ~ ~[ :i ~ II j iil~ · I:s'" Q a. ~..;o< n s,!ils, = Ill. = t~i!.g .. =P.... i ~.~i ::a" I~. if" l. ...... [~ f iP: i! ... ~ ... ~ ... lJ ... ~ ... lJ ~ i P ~ ~ i ~ l! ~ -< f!l g ... "0 .. ~ f!l"'D (/) 8' (/) (/) ~ ::u::u o~~. ~ g I ~ i i [.5f!l~.a"~" Q.i~l ai Eo .. .(:; ... ~ ;j (:; 21 0'" !l;! ~ ~ ~ ~ l!: ~ -n [ .!..[ Sl. st iil iil [if S .510 iil[!} .8i'Z'.z "~!J~~i." ~ g Iii! I; 0 lB ~Q. o~'" ~ j .....g. ~ I; ~ ta~ ~~ ~~ [ ~ tf 5 F"''' "j '" iiI i!.~ st ~ i 8 8 8 ~ i : i ii! S, . i!. &> .. ~ o ~ ~ -. [i!. .. II 'ii1 lr ~ lD " Q. 1'> ~ '" ~ C '" 2.~ ~ ~.g:i~ Q.~Sl,~ a. a ~ ~ ~ ~ . i!. 'l ~ 5~~ 5 a:..!!!. i I; '" #. Sl, lD i!. ~ ~ ~ ~ i:l ~::4..~;: ~~~~8 ~ ~ i! ~ ~ ';nJ~ ~ ii- I; if i!. lD a ~ ~ i ~ Sl, ~~ Ii ~ [ Sl,~ ig ~ ~ 5'!~" ~ if II = i!.~ ~ ~ 5 st 5 ~1i5 S, !l ~ifc.. . Q. [~g a ~ iil if Sl, i 10 [ !!: ~ ~ ~ ~ i i i ~ i i ~ i cO ~;: * 8 ~ ~ C ~ ~::~ g K iiI i! ill ~ 0 ~ i!. ~2'ljll II:. iillD ~ - .. """ ... ~ jSiiSl. :lI!}cjjl; ~ Sl!!!. 3 i!. D.iil; "" ii!.- i ".z~ 5i .. c S, + ,~[ ~ 8~ !1 8 [ R ~ i~~ ~ iil"i 'l ..~'l ..~ IO~K [ t:ii1[ ~[ j ~!..z !Sl.z if'", ~~~i.~ ~[i. l!'l- So 'lIS" ~iHt ~~ .....if ~ liI.lO~ '" ~""8. Sl. "'lSl, ~~. il .. 1ft. K ~ Cil K ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 i ::u i '< 8~ ~1l =il- 8~ ~1l =il- 8~ il 8~ ~i -~ "0 ~. !; =- 1 i i ! f ! Iii I ~ ~.. 311 If f f .... fI ~~ [ .. ~ ~~ ;: ~Hl:: ~ l:l 3l"l ~ ~~ * ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ if D.if[ if ~[i [ III iil" ii! glq ~ .~if ~ ~lll Sl.g i .+ ~~.. Sl. "'..i. ~ c: ::J s= j (~~ [ ~::J i C Glc.. i: i!. m m m ~ -&> I.. i; +.. ~~ ilr ~~ "'- n .. ;"i!. " '" g[ ::;i i ~ lr~ 51 -., 5i ~ i III " Sl, Sl. iil ~l ~ Sl, ~fi I ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ... 8 ~ ... -... 2 ~~ l!S ,,110 '" ... - ~~ ~ ~~ ~1Io ...~ ~ ~~ ""110 ...~ ~ ~~ "'110 ~ ~ "8ii"nO lD -galii~ifa ~" ~ 'l [ II a g! i!." ii1~ ~ ~ i s" ~ i ~~ ~ ~ i ~ii5 ~ i. 1&19.. E".z :1;~Sl.I;~~K~i. c Ul - ii~" iiI g; ~ [j"l3' iiI .. ~ i: II ~ Sl. ~~ 'l ~ ~ i [[ ~~ ~ ~ ...-At~[i as ~~ ii1:i ~ ~ g: g: ~ ~ l!! ... I :: ~ l:!l S ~ "" Sl! ...... Q) - l:S l:!l is ~ ... ll! ... ~ - ~ l:!l _ ~ '" ~ ii1 ., 10 !!!. i Q, ~ I t i t - = i ,8. g f~ Ii! &' .. !i! fit - ~ f~ '" -' ." I>> ~ ~, o ! ~ - 6' :;, en c ;! ~ I en { ,. ..... co ~ Co> t!!!I: '. ~ c:1: r Ul ~~ ~ ~ 8:liiS51 &> ;ll[ ~I.,~ !;.<QSo/l 'l~So i st~:I1; ....~ ~ii'Sl,iiS~K~lt9i ~ ~ Ii!. i ~ ~ E".z Ii" is. " ~i ~1;Sl.~i.i!i~ _<~~ ill; ..;;.g8. ~!!....Q. ~ a.~ .. ..li~i Sl, g.Sl, ! K ~g [ ~ I!. ~ ~ tli I: t!!o .. !l: ..- -" ;z: fl fi a · i ~mi la.. ~i:- _."& !! ..fit a. _ .. ~ ~.. !!l. II fliCllA a~r - .. ~ .. ~ f~ a! I!. !l:s i. 8,..