HomeMy WebLinkAbout9C - Matson Addition Prelim
.:
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA #:
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
AGENDA ITEM:
DISCUSSION:
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
,.;1,';
FEBRUARY 5, 2001
9C
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
DON RYE, PLANNING DIRECTOR
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING
THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR "MATSON ADDITION"
History: Gary Matson has applied for a Preliminary Plat for the
property located on the north side of Centennial Street, west of Candy
Cove Trail and south of CSAH 13. There is an existing house located
on the easterly portion of this property.
On January 16, 2001, the Planning Commission considered this
preliminary plat application. The Planning Commission recommended
approval ofthe preliminary plat subject to the following conditions:
I. Prior to final plat approval, the developer must submit a
landscaping plan as required by Section 1007.100 of the
Subdivision Ordinance.
2. A minimum 10' wide drainage and utility easement must be
provided along the front and rear lot lines of each lot, and a
minimum 5' wide drainage and utility easement must be provided
along the side lot lines of each lot. A 15' wide drainage and utility
easement must be provided along the west lot line of Lot 1, Block
1, to maintain the existing sewer easement.
A draft copy of the Planning Commission meeting minutes is attached
to this report for your information.
Current Circumstances: The preliminary plat consists of 0.94 acres
to be subdivided into 2 lots for single family residential development.
Lot 2, Block 1, is the site of the existing dwelling. Lot I, Block I, is
the proposed site of a future dwelling. The proposed lots meet the
minimum lot area and frontage requirements for the R-I district. Lot I
is 18,120 square feet with 86 feet of frontage, and Lot 2 is 22,860.61
square feet in area with 108 feet of frontage.
1:\OOfiles\OOsubdiv\preplat\matson\matson cc,doc p~ I
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. 5.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph, (952) 447-4230 / Fax (':Jb2) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
T- -
'l:
, ..
'iT
FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES:
Access to the lots is from Centennial Street. There is no public right-
of-way or parkland dedicated in this plat. In addition, there are no
required or proposed utilities, including sanitary sewer, water mainsl
or storm sewer proposed. These services are located in the road right-
of-way. Sewer and water stubs to serve Lot I were previously
installed in Centennial Street.
.J ',',
This development is also subject to the Tree Preservation requirements
of the Zoning Ordinance. A tree inventory for Lot I has identified 65
caliper inches of significant trees. The developer is allowed to remove
25%, or 16.25 caliper inches, for the building pad and driveway
without replacement. The preliminary grading plan submitted shows
the removal of20 caliper inches, or 30.7%, for the building pad.
Therefore, the developer will be required to replace 3.15 caliper inches
at a rate of 1/2 caliper per inch for each inch removed. In this case,
replacement will be satisfied by one new tree. Since all of the tree
replacement occurs on the new building site, this requirement can be
included as a condition of the building permit for the site.
The Issues: The only issues in this preliminary plat are the
landscaping plan and the need for utility easements. Prior to final plat
approval, the developer must submit a landscaping plan that meets the
provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance. The final plat must also
include the required easements.
Conclusion: The Planning Commission concluded the preliminary
plat is consistent with the Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance
requirements. The Planning Commission recommended approval of
the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to final plat approval, the developer must submit a
landscaping plan as required by Section 1007.100 of the
Subdivision Ordinance.
2. A minimum 10' wide drainage and utility easement must be
provided along the front and rear lot lines of each lot, and a
minimum 5' wide drainage and utility easement must be provided
along the side lot lines of each lot. A 15' wide drainage and utility
easement must be provided along the west lot line of Lot 1, Block
1, to maintain the existing sewer easement.
Bud1!et Impact: Approval of the preliminary plat will allow the
developer to proceed to the final plat, which will in turn allow the
construction of one new house. The new house will contribute to the
City's tax base.
The City Council has three alternatives:
1:\OOfiles\OOsubdiv\preplat\matson\matson cc,doc
Page 2
RECOMMENDED
MOTION:
REVIEWED BY:
I. Adopt Resolution #0 I-XX, approving the preliminary plat of
Matson Addition with the finding that the preliminary plat is
consistent with the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive PI~
and the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances.
2. Deny the preliminary plat on the basis it is inconsistent with the
purpose and inten~ of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances
and/or the Comprehensive Plan. In this case, the Council should
direct the staff to prepare a resolution with findings of fact for the
denial of these requests.
3. Defer consideration of this item for specific reasons.
The staff recommends Alternative #1.
A motion and second to approve Resolution OI-XX, approving the
Preliminary Plat to be known as Matson Addition subject to the stated
conditions is requ. d.
Frank
1:\OOfiles\OOsubdiv\preplat\matson\matson cc,doc
Y- ... l
Page 3
t
, ..
"Tr
/2..
RESOLUTION 01~
RESOLUTION OF THE PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING
THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "MATSON ADDITION"
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
WHEREAS: the Prior Lake Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on January 16,
2001, to consider an application from Gary Matson for the preliminary plat of Matson
Addition; and
WHEREAS: notice of the public hearing on said preliminary plat has been duly published and
posted in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes and Prior Lake
Ordinances; and
WHEREAS: all persons interested in this issue were afforded the opportunity to present their
views and objections related to the preliminary plat of Matson Addition for the record
at the Planning Commission hearing; and
WHEREAS: the Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed the preliminary plat
according to the applicable provisions of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision
Ordinances and found said preliminary plat to be consistent with the provisions of
said ordinances; and
WHEREAS the Prior Lake City Council considered an application for preliminary plat approval of
Matson Addition on February 5, 2001; and
WHEREAS: the City Council finds the preliminary plat of Matson Addition to be consistent with
the 2020 Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA:
A. The above recitals are incorporated herein as if fully set forth.
B. The preliminary plat of Matson Addition is approved subject to the following conditions:
1) Prior to final plat approval, the developer must submit a landscaping plan as required by
Section 1007.100 of the Subdivision Ordinance.
2) A minimum 10' wide drainage and utility easement must be provided along the front and rear
lot lines of each lot, and a minimum 5' wide drainage and utility easement must be provided
along the side lot lines of each lot. A 15' wide drainage and utility easement must be provided
along the west lot line of Lot 1, Block 1, to maintain the existing sewer easement.
Passed and adopted this 5th day of February, 2001.
16200 Eagle Creek Ave, 5,E" Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
l:\OOfiles\OOsubdiv\preplat\matson\rsO1 xxCC.d0cEQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Page 1
I Ii r 1
~
I
111
YES
NO
Mader Mader
Gundlach dundlach
Ericson Ericson
Petersen Petersen
Zieska Zieska
{Seal}
City Manager
1:\OOfiles\OOsubdiv\preplat\matson \rsO 1 xxee.doe
,;i ,.
Page 2
Planning Commission Meeting
January 16,2001
~
D. Case File #00-082 Gary Matson is requesting a preliminary plat consisting of a
total of 0.96 acres to be subdivided into 2 lots for the existing single family dwelling and
one new single family dwelling for the property located on the north side of Centennial
Street, west of Candy Cove Trail and south of TH 13.
Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier presented the Planning Report dated January 16, 2001, on
file in the office of the City Planning Department.
The purpose of the public hearing is to consider an application for a preliminary plat for the
0.94 acre site located on the north side of Centennial Street, west of Candy Cove Trail and
south of TH 13. The preliminary plat, to be known as Matson Addition, is the site of a single
family dwelling at 5366 Centennial Street. The proposed plat consists of 0.94 acres to be
subdivided into 2 lots for single family dwellings. Lot 2, Block 1, is the site of the existing
dwelling. Lot 1, Block 1, is the site of a future dwelling. The proposed lots meet or exceed
the minimum lot area and frontage requirements for the R-l district.
The proposed preliminary plat meets the standards of the Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning
Ordinance. If the preliminary plat is to proceed, it should be subject to the following
condition:
1. Prior to final plat approval, the developer must submit a landscaping plan as required by
Section 1007.100 of the Subdivision Ordinance.
2. A minimum 10' wide drainage and utility easement must be provided along the front and
rear lot lines of each lot, and a minimum 5' wide drainage and utility easement must be.
provided along the side lot lines of each lot. A 15' wide drainage and utility easement
must be provided along the west lot line of Lot 1, Block 1, to maintain the existing sewer
easement.
Staff recommended approval of the preliminary plat of Matson Addition as presented and
subject to the condition listed above, or with specific changes directed by the Planning
Commission.
Atwood questioned the parkland dedication. Kansier responded. The amount will be minor.
Comments from the public:
Gary Matson, felt Jane explained the situation well.
Comments from the Commissioners:
Criego:
. Approve
Atwood, Stamson, V onhof and Lemke:
. Concurred
L:\O I files\O I plancomm\O I pcminutes\mnO 1160 I.doc
11
In f
.
nil
Planning Commission Meeting
January 16,2001
MOTION BY CRIEGO, SECOND BY STAMSON, RECOMMEND CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AS REQUESTED WITH STAFF'S
CONDITIONS.
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION'CARRIED.
E. Case File #00-00-086 The Church of St. Michael is requesting a variance to the
maximum uilding wall length to building height for the new addition ~o . Michael's
School on pr erty zoned R-2 (Low to Medium Density Residential) Dis lct located at
16280 Duluth A nue. .
.f
.r
~
Planning Coordinator ne Kansier presented the Planning Report date~fJanuary 16,2001, on
file in the office of the C~Planning Department. ,/
<)
,t
The Planning Department rece'yed an application for a variance tlallow the construction of
an addition to the existing St. M"khael's school building on the pfoperly located at 16280
Duluth Avenue. The proposed ~ddi~'on is located on the so u... t~~side of the existing school,
and is 142' long and 26' high. The lowing variance is therefore requested:
:"v
,r
A variance to permit a structure witfi building wall<Jength to building height ratio of
5.46: 1 rather than the maximum ratio 4: 1 (City Code Section 1107 .2202, ~8,b).
,i
II
St. Michael's school is located at the northwest uad&nt of Duluth Avenue and Pleasant
"
Avenue. The property consists of a combination 9l.mplatted and platted parcels. It is in the
process of being replatted into one large parcel. I
St. Michael's is in the process of expanding th~~ChOOI. The first phase, planned for
construction in 2001, consists of the south addition. Pha 2 is planned for construction
within the next 3 to 4 years. There are no iecific plans fo this second phase. Based on the
applicant's drawing, construction of the second phase also ~ms to require the purchase of
additional property. II \
The proposed request does not appeaAo meet the hardship criteria in that a legal alternative
exists. The applicant can redesign the west side of the addition to \peet the maximum ratio of
length to height. The staff the7efi Ie recommends denial of this request.
"
\
Comments from the public: \
/ \
Rollie Brouillard, Parish Administrator for the Church of St. Michael, in~oduced the project
architect John NightingaM. \
John Nightingale, Pryl Manager for St. Michael's from DRL Group in M~apo\is,
explained the proj~t and future phasing for the school. Nightingale felt adding~\p'e bump-out
would be a detriment to the building. The homeowners have been notified and it'fere has
not been any ~blems, felt St. Michael's should be able to proceed. \
AtwoOd;!;~iOned how the bump-outs would affect the master plans. Nightingale
responde it would effect the design of the phasing and be in the way and has no function.
Atwoo asked if they would be back to the drawing table. Nightingale said they would and
L:\OI files\O1 plancomm\O Ipcminutes\mnOII60l.doc
12
Location Map
N
A
1000
I
o
1000 Feet
I
III
]
I
III
~
l!
~
I _
III
III .,
. ~. ,II
~ \ tll
G I _I'
~ · ~'C
I ! Eh
r
.
i
I
I'
f
.
15~lO) i
~~?u i
.~ Iii -< ..
~~~
uolJlijj
~~~
...,
l':I~~h i
i .. X
, J' &
....
j
~
~
i;
il
i
I I I
~ ~g~ I
; J~f ..
~ I~i ~
I II i
I I
I
~
~;g
~r!l
~.~~
~~.~.'-'
~c '1';'\
""( . "
3~r-;:; \;>.1
o::b.~ (...1
..,., """I I :~l
...... UUI:
. '-'-.)1
,;:= -
"== -...oo -,
I
~
~~~
~N~
~n
Iii!!
jl~ I"
:j\j\ I~
,GE i:
in i~
IIn
=i
'm
!~
:>
Illllu~ell Ii ~
. '.flr IIi ~
Ih.,h1u II I
III cl;I' J..
'Hil" ,
1";8111( II .
ihllh' II
I ~ijilI~I.;
hPI~HI! h
Iii er"IJ I
Iii 111.r e
1.111 Ill!,
d'lillltlfi J
,i ..I.. )II
UUti!ljj
".
ai
I
I
~
I
!
,--
I j
r I
J
L__
-t--- __ /
lll\ 7__
Be / __
......"_...... -........
"I
i
+, .,
''''1 .
\ ". /
"j '\ Y
I ,1.
, i \- r-,
"I ( I,
\ ., ~ J
'--, 'I '_"
\" : " ~
_ -..... "1 -" , g
"..., / \ I ~
1 >( \ I ~
.. ~ \ '.,
. , v
I I 1...__
I i
I :
I
I t
r-
_--1
I
/
110.70
-.....
-
-
.~
llilijllllilillilillillllllilljlllili I
~
~ ~-rt~i---=.i=.iiiii
-liiiiiiiiiii&iMi~=.=~~=~~4;~4q~q~m
illiii';;!illlli!illll!III"'III'I'!
I
e
. -
. III
~II "
r~I,la
I i III
Ii ~ _I'
· I I'e
i I ill
;8Cl I
~~~ j
"'oli-<
I:"'~
zg>
Ultn~
t:)oO
~~Z
I~I'~
1m
i
~
"tJ
~
r-o
~i
~~
en):;
0:0
Z",<
~G)
t:I
3
o
z
~ !
rill I J i
!,p I !Ill
i~i I I II !
ddll I I
z m\ ;il I
S! =,\ Ii,. ~
U' ~~~\; ii . "
~ (J'
1
~
I\)
IT! r
~~~.
"'-,
t~~
I! \'\
I I .
! :
..... IEII - ~a
) ~ ~ ftl!
'" 1 1- - - l'i
-....... / 1~
......0 / _. iC
'.[....----' I // ....-:..:. :"'......... ~M
----.--..l;r-7-/./ .~
., ./" +. / . /' tt
'I ..... ~"'i '/". :
". " / / -----,
A /~' / " I I
. ........ / J' / I
~. / / / *
. I / ,/ T
i I I' , I
, I 'Wi i ~ !
----ii/--r--- I
r--
: ,
: i
,
L__
/
i
" '.
+r\i ...
\ ,I .....
, 1
. \ ,(
1 \
J , ' \\ r--,
\ lis I
~ \ \ I I
'" \ I, ~ J
'--, 'I '-, I
\, : " i
--..... '1 -" I i
I......... " ......,.. " \. I ~
) 'I 1 --< \ I i4
... ~ \ '.,
. ( v
I I L..__
I I
I :
I t
---
r--
---I
I
........
~l~
~
&
~~~
~N_
aU
r~
.;~
.!t~ "V
~!I:<< ~
;11 I
I ~
en
~
~
~
I
, . --------e5===a~isii!i
ililililiiiiillillllliliiliiiiiiiijil I
Ii
--------iai==E~iiiiii
--iiiiiiiiiiiii'=.~~.~!~.~~~~..q.q~
liiiiiilliillilililliflfll"'fll'I'j
~ I
nl
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE:
PLANNING/ENGINEERING
Ralph TeschIler, Finance Director
MATSON ADDITION - preliminary
(assessment/fee review)
November 29, 2000
TO:
FROM:
RE:
A .96 acre parcel in 36-115-22 (pIN #25 936 033 0) is proposed to be platted into Matson
Addition. The property was initially served with sewer and water utilities in 1975 under Project
75-2. These lots were 100% assessed for frontage and trunk acreage charges. Under the original
assessment roll this parcel was assessed lateral front footage of 204' and a trunk acreage
assessment of .93 acres.
Since utilities are available to the property site, the cost for the extension of services internally
will be the responsibility of the developer. In addition to these improvement costs, the
subdivision will be subject to the following City charges:
Collector Street Fee
Stormwater Management Fee
$1500.00/acre
$3180.00/acre
Lot 2 Block 1 Matson Addition would be exempt from these fees since an existing home is
located on this parcel. The remaining lot (Lot 1 Block 1) would be subject to the application of
these City charges which would generate the following costs to the developer based upon a net
lot area calculation of .42 acres as provided within the site data summary sheet of the
preliminary plat description:
Collector Street Fee:
.42 acres @ $1500.00/ac = $630.00
Storm Water Mana2ement Fee:
.42 acres @ $3180.00/ac. = $1,336.00
These charges represent an approximate cost of $1,966.00 for the newly created lot within
Matson Addition. Assuming the initial net lot area of the plat does not change, the above
referenced collector street and storm water charges would be determined and collected within the
context of a developer's agreement for the construction of utility improvements at the time of
final plat approval.
There are no other outstanding special assessments currently certified against the property. Also,
the tax status of the property is current with no outstanding delinquencies.
16200 Eagle Creek Ave, S.E" Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph, (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
H:\SPLlTS\M.tson.doc