Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout98-48RESOLUTION 98-48 RESOLUTION OF THE PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF REQUEST FOR VARIANCE, CASE NO. 97-132, DENYING A SETBACK VARIANCE FOR THE TRASH ENCLOSURE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14180 COMMERCE AVENUE MOTION BY: KEDROWSKI SECOND BY: PETERSEN WHEREAS, on April 6, 1998, the Prior Lake City Council considered an appeal by Burdick Properties of the Planning Commission's denial of a request for a variance to rear yard setback adjacent to residential property requirement for the property legally described as Lot 4, Block 1, James 1st Addition; and the City Council directed staff to prepare a resolution upholding the decision of the Planning Commission and bring it forward for consideration on April 20, 1998; and the City Council finds that the request for variance does not meet the standards for granting variances set forth in Section 5-6-6 (C, 1-4) of the City Code, and that the appellant has not set forth adequate reasons for overturning the decision of the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the Planning Commission's decision denying the request for variance should be upheld, and said variance should be denied. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE: FINDINGS Burdick Properties, represented by Mr. Mark Kelly, applied for a variance from Sections 5- 4-1E of the City Code and Section 4.1D of the Zoning Code in order to permit a 16.3 foot rear yard setback for property adjacent to property zoned residential for an existing trash enclosure rather than the required 60 foot setback as drawn in Exhibit D on property located in the B-1 (Limited Business) District at the following location, to wit; 14180 Commerce Avenue, legally described as Lot 4, Block 1, James 1 st Addition. The Planning Commission reviewed the application for variance as contained in Case File #97-132, held hearings thereon on January 12, 1998 and January 26, 1998. The Planning Commission continued discussion to February 23, 1998 and March 9, 1998, and denied the applicant's request. ,-r :\c0un~l~res~ltkti\planxeaXrs9848cc .doc. 16200 ~ag~e~reeK Ave. ~.L., ~'norLaKe, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (61~f~7-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUN~TY EMPLOYER 3. Burdick Properties appealed the decision of the Planning Commission in accordance with Section 5-6-3 (A) of the City Code. 4. The Prior Lake City Council considered this appeal on April 6, 1998 and directed staff to prepare a resolution upholding the decision of the Planning Commission. The City Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, the existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on property values in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance on the Comprehensive Plan. The City Council has determined that there are not unique circumstances or conditions regarding the property. The applicant is responsible for knowledge of city ordinances. The trash enclosure was constructed within the setback in violation of City Ordinances. Any hardship, was caused by the actions of the applicant. There were no unique characteristics to the property, which would constitute a hardship, prior to the construction of the building. The City Council finds the intent of setback standards is top provide buffers between adjacent land uses in order to mitigate against unnecessary interference with use and enjoyment of property. The proposed variance for trash enclosure cannot meet the intent of the ordinance because the odor from the trash enclosure. The denial of the requested variance does not constitute a hardship with respect to literal enforcement of the ordinance as there exists reasonable use of the property without the variance. 9. The contents of Planning Case File #97-132 are hereby entered into and made a part of the public record and the record of the decision for this case. CONCLUSION Based upon the Findings set forth above, the City Council hereby: Upholds the decision of the Planning Commission denying a 43.7 foot setback variance to permit a rear yard setback adjacent to property zoned residential of 16.3 feet rather than the required 60 feet for an existing trash enclosure as shown in Exhibit D, which exhibits are incorporated into this resolution. The applicant must remove or relocate the subject trash enclosure by August 1, 1998. In the event the applicant fails to remove the trash enclosure by August 1, 1998, the City Attorney is hereby authorized to commence appropriate legal action to compel removal of the trash enclosure. r:\councilXresoluti\planresXrs9848cc.doc Page 2 Passed and adopted this 20th day of April, 1998. {Seal} YES Mader X Kedrowski X Petersen X Schenck X Wuellner ABSENT Mader Kedrowski Petersen Schenck Wuellner City Manage, City of~ NO r:\councilXresoluti\planresXrs9848cc.doc Page 3 684 Excelsior Boulevard D~c~lsioc, ~ 55331 SUFIVEYOI~'S ~ draw~ ~ the w~st wall (brick face) o£ the t~ buildings on Iz~t 4 and r~t 5, Block 1, ~ ~ST N~OITIC%~, SCott Cotmty, Minmesota. Also the local, on of the trash. enclosure. ~ l~cated by m~ th/s 26th day of November, 1997. :E~TIFICATE EXHIBIT Scale: I inch = 40 feet D 12-01-97 .