HomeMy WebLinkAbout98-59RESOLUTION 98-59
RESOLUTION DENYING A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE 2010
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP AND ZONE CHANGE REQUEST FOR
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4520 TOWER STREET
MOTION BY: SCHENCK
SECOND BY: WUELLNER
WHEREAS,
Stonewood Development submitted an application to amend the City of
Prior Lake 2010 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map from the C-CC
(Community Retail Shopping) to the R-HD (High Density Residential)
designation, and to amend the Zoning Map from the B-3 (General Business)
district to the R-3 (Multiple Residential) district for the property legally
described as follows:
Lot 1, Block 2, Enevid First Addition; and That part of Outlot A, Enevid
First Addition, contained within the following described tracts: That part of
Lot 1, Block 3, Brooksville Center 1st Addition, according to the plat on file
in the office of the County Recorder, Scott County, Minnesota, described as
beginning at the southwest comer of said Lot 1; thence North 00 degrees 04
minutes 17 seconds West record bearing, along the west line ot' said Lot 1,
300.00 feet to the south line of a roadway and utility easement; thence North
89 degrees 55 minutes 43 seconds East along said south line 51.99 feet:
thence North 28 degrees 34 minutes 57 seconds East along the southeasterly
line of said easement 247.34 feet to the south line of South Anna Lane, now
known as Tower Street; thence southeasterly along said south line 105.18
feet, along a nontangential curve, concave to the southwest, having a central
angle of 2 degrees 21 minutes 55 seconds, a radius of 2,547.98 feet and the
chord of said curve bears South 75 degrees 28 minutes 12 seconds East;
thence South 74 degrees 17 minutes 15 seconds East, tangent to said curve
39.82 feet; thence South 1 degree 30 minutes 45 seconds West a distance of
379.84 feet; thence South 71 degrees 30 minutes 13 seconds West 316.39
feet to the point of .beginning. Together with that part of the south half of
vacated South Anna Lane, known as Tower Street, which lies between the
northerly extension of the easterly line of said property and the
southwesterly extension of the westerly line of Lot 2, Block 1, Brooksville
Center 2nd Addition, according to the recorded plat thereot:
and
WHEREAS,
legal notice of the public hearing was duly published and mailed in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes and Prior Lake City Code; and
r:\council~resoluti\planres\rs9859cc.doc Paee I
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612)'447-4245
AN EQUAk OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
WHEREAS,
the Planning Commission conducted public hearings on December 8, 1997,
and on April 13, 1998, for those interested in this request to present their
views; and
WHEREAS,
on April 13, 1998, the Planning Commission recommended denial of the
proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and the proposed Zoning
District Change; and
WHEREAS,
on May 4, 1998, the Prior Lake City Council considered the application to
amend the 2010 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to designate the above
described property to the R-HD designation and to rezoned the same
property to the R-3 District; and
WHEREAS,
the City Council received the recommendation of the Planning Commission
to deny the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment and zone change
along with the staff reports and the minutes of the Planning Commission
meetings; and
the City Council has carefully considered the testimony, staff reports and
other pertinent information contained in the record of decision of this case.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE,
MINNESOTA, that the proposed amendment to the 2010 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to
designate the above described property as R-HD (High Density Residential) and to rezone the
above described property to the R-3 (Multiple Residential) district is hereby denied based upon
the following findings of fact.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The supply of available commercial land in the City of Prior Lake is minimal. Approval of
this proposal will reduce the available supply of land by three acres.
2. It is in the best interest of the City to maintain the existing supply of commercial land for
future development.
3. The applicant has not provided any information to indicate the existing Comprehensive Plan
designation and zoning of the property is incorrect.
r:\councilh'esoluti\planres\rs9859cc.doc Page 2
Passed and adopted this 4th day of May, 1998.
{Seal}
Mader
Kedrowski
Petersen
Schenck
Wuellner
YES NO
I X Mader
xX Kedrowski
Petersen I
XX Schenck /
W~llner . ~ i1[ /
Frank Boyles,~ M~n/ger
City ofPrio~ ~'
r:\council~resoluti\planresXrs9859cc.doc Page 3