The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBuilding Permit 94-0348 Z - - - O W � � I,.�J�� C G//1 a Gf�'r �eS� �lC � � i L�t Sa-.�..9- L�.�� > � O � W i ` 0 W r�Uv a 4? - 4Zab � � O 2 O - � W DATE TIME CITY OF PRIOR LAKE CALLED-IN INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULEO PERMIT NO . Q � � 4 � COMPLETED 9 � 2 � �4 � � �(,/ ADDRESS �'7v P�G-� � OWNER CONTR. �. TELEPHONE NO. l j❑ FOOTING LUMBING RI ❑SITE INSPECTION � ❑ FRAMING � MECHANICAL ❑ EXCAV./GRADING/FILLING � ❑ INSULATION ❑ WATER HOOKUP ❑ IAKESHORE/WETLANDS � O WALL BD. ❑ METER SET/TURN ON ❑ COMPLAINT Z O FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOKUP O FOLLOW-UP Q � FOUNDATION ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL. O SEPTIC FINAL 2 � DEMOL. ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FIREPLACE J❑ FIRE PREV. ❑ PLUMBING FINAL � Q = MENTS: J Z � � � W a ¢ � OO �� O � w DATE TIME CITY OF PRIOR LAKE CALLED-IN INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED PERMIT NO. ��3,� COMPLETED 0 � ADDRESS '�'`'��/¢�/�'�T ST OWNER CONTR. � TELEPHONE NO. tL ❑�OOTING ❑PLUMBING RI ❑SITE INSPECTION i1�F qqMING O MECHANICAL ❑ EXCAV./GRADING/FILLING � INSULATION ❑ WATER HOOKUP ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS �❑ WALL BD. ❑ METER SET/TURN ON ❑ COMPLAINT z � FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOKUP O FOLLOW-UP Q❑ FOUNDATION ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL. O SEPTIC FINAL _ ❑ DEMOL. ❑ SEPTiC MAINT. ❑ FIREPLACE J❑ FIRE PREV. ❑ PLUMBING FINAL � = COMMENTS: � � � �` � Z O � ,, � a � o� ° � O � � O � w o � � � � W a ¢ � o , � 0 � _� �,.� ll l . � _ � / 'w 1 Q �v� o i ��i. C l C-`.=�sl� v�� r 1"- � u r, ��v�. Z Q �� o� �- 01/� 1 �- �`t �rl �L Z.'S ��• W �U S�r.w �51 2�iC� �"a �c�.w �Y�, V� � /1ii1 �� f � �.. t c. �-r .- ^ � -G.7� � a u�.. 4 - -� �,. V t o � �" � G4 � Uc�.� i L�, �oa� O' �L]� � �� W . F PRIO o � ,'� ITY OF PRIOR LAKE '. Wh„° F;'� � �� BUILDING PERMIT, �. P��k c�� 3. Yellow Applirant �' TIFICATE OF ZONYNG COMPLIANCE LITY CONNECTION PERMIT �� -->) i � �'�H.vESO�� Permit No. �l� � �� DIRECTIONS t. DATE= SPACES NUMBERED 1 THRU 17 MUST BE FILLED IN BEFORE PERMIT IS ISSUED (Please Print or Type and sign at bottom) 5/ 11 / 94 BUILDING INFORMATION 2. SITE ADDRESS 11. SIZE OF STRUCTURE 4770 P1 easant Street cHe� �w�a�n> (Depth) 3. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 12. NO. OF STORIES LOT 3 BLOCK 1+ DUt� Ot B p�p -- �� One � � , � 13. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ADDITION Langhorst First Addition 4. OWNER (Name) (Address) (Tel. No.) 14. FLOOR AREA APPORTIONMENT USE Steve Nielsen 5788-150th St, Prior Lake, MN 447-6541 5. ARCHITECT (Name) (Address) (fel. No.) Ya Colb Associates 717 3rd Ave SE Rochester MN 6�1-9040 6. BUILDER (Name) (Address) (fel. No.) 15. NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS OR SEATS C� �;rt-I:+r�� t�, �.i � �� i NC- C-� �P�,-=�-r�o�,� $ Z_' j�` L-� OCCUPANTS 7. TYPE OF WORK Fireplace p Septic p Heating p Plumbing p Reroofing p Porch p SEATS New Construction � Alterations O Addition p Finish Attic p Residing p Finish Esasement p 16. ESTIMATED VALUE Chimney0 Misc. .�?a�� eSt, � B. PROPERTY AREA OR ACRES 9. PROPERTY DIMENSIONS 10. CULVERT SIZE 17. COMPLETION DATE Sq. Ft. , 84g acres Width Depth Yes No November 1994 I hereby certity that 1 have furnished information on this application which is to the best of my knowledge true and correct. I also certify that I am the owner or authorized agent for the above mentioned property and that all construction will conform to all existing state and local laws and will proceed in accordance with submitted plans. I am aware that the building official can revoke this it for just cause. urthermore, I hereby agree that the city official or a designee may enter upon the property to perform needed inspections. X /��-�/ ,.- ��!�iC /�/� � " � �- l " � ` I T Signat License No. Date � FOR ADMINISTRATIVE USE SETBACKS: Required MATERIAL FILED WITH APPLICATION Actual SOILTESTS O ENERGYDATA Frorrt Back Side Side PROPOSED GRADE FOUNDATION OFF STREET PARKING PILING LOGS O PERCOLATION TESTS p IN RELATION TO CURB OR CROWN PLANS & SPECS ^g� SETS OF STREET SPACES REQ. � USE OF BUILDING ' X'-- .=. ��y \��:c� SPACES ON PLAN SURVEY ,� COPIES PERMiT VALUATION �� - �� PLOT PLAN O TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: I�I IV V � Amount Brought Fonvard .................. $�� 1�� (.(�� Occupancy Group A� I H R M Park Support F �� .f�>�' �-.�...... $ � � _ .... .... Division 1�£'�3 < SAC ........ �...'�� ..... $ � ' '�+c'' �.r = � ........:..... Permit Fee ................................... $ , � r �` Collective Street Fee �.�.�.�..�.�.:�.... $� _ �-�_ �_ , �• �� Pian Checkin Fee $ I� (�� l C� Sewer Tap ................................... $ g......................... �� z License Check Fee ......................... $ State Surcharge ............................. $ � 2'c y � �?'�. - Pressure Reducer .......................... $ Penalty....................................... $ Meter Horn ................................... $ SepticSystem ............................... $ ' Water Meter ........... ................. $ �-( �c� , -- � Other ,,,,,,,,,,, $ Check if O Sewer & Water Connection Fcc F..-�... $--� � �'c� -�n .............................. . �- �j Deterred p Water Tower Fee �..:.- ::.'.:/.°.�..... $ � c� - c• � Subtota . ............................. $ 1 ! � 1M1'ater Tap ................................... $ This Apiica B bm s Your Building Permit W ro .� Builder's Deposit ............................ �r By Date l �--t '� � � Other ......................................... $ � - Total Due .............................. $ Z � Certificate of Occupancy , Paid /. � Recei t No. LL Issued — Date �� B This is to certify that the request in the above application and accompanying documents is in accordance with the Citry Zoning Ordinance and may proceed as uested. This document when signed By the City Planner constitutes a temporary Cert�cate of Zoning compliance and allows construction to commence. Before occupancy, a Certificate of cupancy must be issued. Ciry Planner Date Special Conditions if any 24 Hour notice for all inspections 447-4230 9:00 a.m. • 10:00 a.m. ��'� �`�� .n� ..�� 4. r � f � �, : j �`-+wn . _ . � +; �� .� � _ . :. _ , ,.,>:. .� ; . ; ,, � .. . ; , . �, � y � _ � . . BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST � NAME OF APPLICANT ,��-�� `�=- � �--�� APPLICATION RECEIVED � �� C 7 �� The City of Prior Lake BUILDING Department has reviewed the , building permit application for construction activity located at ., Accepted Denied Accepted With Corrections � Reviewed by: .<�� -�, ='---_, Date � _�� L �� Comments � ��lZ� �;,. -�� -ti. ��:.r.. �-�_ - c' – �� < � �— � "� ,� .� �, � � -`1 � '� � i I� � �i � � c =�-� C� n,..�l � ��, . ,� ��,= ��-��S<'f�J`�— �� 1`' � � � � �� c�� -a� � �� .'�s �� r � � y � �_ '� �,��—� � t -' v' L� � > , r� -.—�� - � ��o �-� ��r � `-��-- - � t"� � � � � v � l"� ,� � r [� � � � � _'," �`L, � ��r�, A � z � �-�. o��. �_ �, �I /"�c. �-,�� t �r�--�� r�'�-�,,�� f ,�% -.�,� i �� =�.� �-5v� ._e �` ,�- �c�..s�,. �c..,�.\ ,�'c'E',w�� <— ^ {.l'��'—s^ C _ � C (��C , _ /;;' -(�_. � � � ,�%Ce � . �-� � � � � .�,: �- ,�'-�--�_,,,�� : � � �� C -� l �� l -�� 2=� �v � �-r �.�'`k _ � "The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid." �� , ,_ , .. , � .., � ,�� .�.. � � / � , ' LS ENGINEERS, INC. R PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER3 200 SOUTH MAIN STREET LE SUEUR, NIl1 56058 (612) 665-6255 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT DATE:-_ July 29, 1994 JOB NO. 94-200b TO: Jose Rivas PROJECT: Buildinct Shell Design __ Yagqy Colby Assoc. Prior Lake Commercial Development FROM: Gene D er Prior Lake, MN Summary of Work: On July 29, 1994, I visited the site of the building shell design for Prior Lake Commercial Development in Prior Lake, Minnesota, to provide Special Inspection Services for reinforcing placement in concrete masonry. At the time of my observation, the Contractor was off site. The following is a summary of my observations. Field Observation Notes: I. General status of work A. Footings are installed with the exception of interior pad footings. B. Exterior masonry walls and interior masonry shear walls are installed up to grade. C. Walls were not backfilled. II. Ge:,eral obs2rvatians. A. Shear wall on Grid 3- At the east end two dowels are installed for corefilling as required. However, one of the dowels falls within the column pier adjacent to the end of the wall and is separated from the end corefill by the face shell of the block wall. To remedy this, the Contractor should knock out the end face shell of the wall so that the 8" corefill can be poured integral with the column pier. �vo verticals should be installed in the 8" corefill at the end of this wall. ' Field Observation Report � Page 2-Prior Lake Commercial Development July 29, 1994 i B. Shear Wall on Grid C- At the north end, two (2) dowels for 8" corefill with 2-#5 verticals exist as required. However, the core appears very "tight" due to the way block was layed-up in this Iocation. The Contractor should provide a cleanout at the bottom of this corefill to insure concrete gets installed full height of this grout lift. C. 24" corefill for beam bearing at grid location 1B- An additional vertical bar and corefill is required at the east end of the existing dowels. I marked this location on the face of block in the field. D. 24" corefill for beam bearing at grid location 1D- An additional vertical bar and core=ill i� re�uired at the east end of the existing dowels. I marked this location on the face of block in the field. E. Column piers along the east and south walls require #3 ties at 10" on center. Ties must be added to achieve the required spacing. F. The bond beam along the top of 12" walls on the east and south sides of the building must run continuous thru vertical tube locations and column piers. The Contractor will need to knock out some face shells in order to achieve this. G. The areas the Contractor appears to have provided for vertical tubes as required by Detail R/Al2 along the east and south walls generally appeared satisfactory with a couple of exceptions. Additional tubes are required near the column piers at grid locations 3F and 6B. H. The column footing at Grid location 2C is installed with top of footing at 97'-4" and anchor bolts directly in the footing in lieu of a pier as i:.ter�ded. Thess a:�chor �olts should be abandoned, and a pier installed per Detail B/Al2. The Contractor will need to drill and grout dowels to footing and install reinforcing as detailed. Also, add new anchor bolts at top of pier. EMD/mas cc: Bob Copeland, Copeland-Mithun Gary Staber, Building Official, City of Prior Lake LS ENGINEERS, INC. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS 200 SOUTH MAIN STREET LE SUEUR, IrIl1 56058 (612) 665-6255 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT DATE: 8-3-94 JOB NO. °4-200B TO: Jose Rivas PROJECT: Bldct. Shell Design Yaqgy/Colby Associates Prior Lake Commerical Development FROM: Jennifer Sydow �S Prior Lake, MN Summary of Work: On August 3, 1994, I visited the site of the Building Shell Design for Prior Lake Commercial Development in Prior Lake, Minnesota, to provide Special Inspection services for reinforcing in concrete masonry. The following is a summary of my observations. Field Observation Notes: I. General status of work A. Concrete grout for core filled masonry was poured in exterior masonry walls to approximately 4' above grade. II. General Observations A. Exterior wall along west wall l. Observed pouring of corefills along wall and placement c� re�::forci^g centered in wall. B. Continuous bond beam along top of 12" walls on the east and south sides of the building. 1.. The necessity for removal of debris from the bond beam prior to pouring concrete grout was discussed with the Contractor. JBS/mas cc: Bob Copeland, Copeland-Mithun Gary Staber, Building Official, City of Prior Lake BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST NAME OF APPLICANT � '' �I�. � `J��"� � APPLICATION RECEIVED / � � "" ( The City of Prior Lake PLANNING Department has reviewed the buildi g permit application for construction activity located at � �7 � � C �-�c �... Accepted� Denied Accepted With Corrections Rev iewed by : �� t�� =►ti��- ��_� Date � � �3 1� —,—� ;" --_� ^ Comments • �r �-�t��-r ,�^ � , -� r -_ , . �� _ � 0 L�% . � _- `�� ' �� - � i. � L_._ _ , "The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid." � I , • � r� 1 1 • j . , . .. � A ,� . . . � + t + � ' • � . , � r . � . � . � - .. ' w •i +,. ! , ' .. . . . . � '!.. ♦ . ` �- . ' , , � �� O� Iluntu��dou Eu�u�eerui�; & Euviroumeutal � 662 Cromwell Ave�ue St. Paul, Miiwesota 55111-1776 (612) 645-3601 TO: Yaggy-Colby Associates DATE: July 22, 1994 717 3rd Avneue SE Rochester, MN 55904 PROJECT NO: 4122 94-239 PROJECT: PRIOR LAKE CENTER BLDG-PROJ 4135 HWY 13 & PLEASANT ST PRIOR LAKE, MN INTRODUCTION This report concerns the soil compaction testing we performed for the Prior Lake Center Project in Prior Lake, Minnes�ta. Dale Allen of Yaggy-Colby Associates authorized this work on July 14, 1994. SCOPE OF WORK The scope of our recent work consisted of the following activities: l. Performance of forty-two field in-place soil density tests on an intermittent basis as requested by Yaggy- Colby Associates. 2. Dztermination of the compaction characteristics of each type of soil encountered in aur field density tests. 3. Comparison of the test results to the compaction ievels requirzd by the project specifications. TEST I�IETHODS AN'D RESULTS Details of our recent testing are included on the attached data sheets. The field density tests and determinations of compaction characteristics were performed in general accordance with the ASTM procedures indicated on the data she�ts. Review of the test results indicates compaction meets project specifications in all test areas except # 10. REIi.aRKS The samples from tne ir.dividual field density� tests ha��e been disca: ded. A representative sampl� of each of the soils on w•hich compaction charact�ristics ��ere determined will be retained at our laboratory until completion of the project. HLPtiTL\'GDOti E\GL`TEERL\G & Eti�'IRO\�1E�TaL, LtiC. 1 �. ii � i B , ,_ N' `� - '� ` / R �,-. y: , ;�; As a mutual protectiou to clients, the public and ou�selves,.all Iluntiugdon reporu are sub►uined as the coufidential property of clients, and authorizitiou for publication or statewents, conclusious or extractions from or re�ardiug our reports is reserved pendiug our prior written approval. �J _ `�n;,. �� H l f l : _ DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL PROJECT NAME: PRIOR LAKE CENTER BLDG PROJECT NO: 4122 94- PROJ 4135 PAGE: 2 TEST NUMBER: 1 2 3 4 DATE TAKEN: 7/ 14/94 7/ 14/94 7/ 14/94 7/ 14/94 LTIVIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Sandy lean Sandy lean Sandy lean Sandy lean (Moisture-Density Sample Number) clay with a clay, brown clay, brown clay with a little gravel, (CL)-2 (CL)-1 little gravel, brown (CL)-1 brown (CL)-1 LOCATION: 8' W of 8' W of 40' W of 40' W of SE Corner of SE Corner of SW Corner of SW Corner of Building Building Building Building ELEVATION OF TEST: 946' 943' 943' 946' DEP'I'H BELOW EXISTING GRADE: At grade 3' 3' At grade FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION: Method Nuclear Density Direct Transmission, AST'M:D2922-91 (-#4 Basis) Dry Density (pc� 118 111.5 109.5 118 Moisture Content (%) 11.0 15.8 10.9 11.0 Plus #4 Material (%) 8 None None 10 LABORATORY COMPACTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL: I�iethod AST1�i:D698-91, Procedure "A", (-#�4 Basis) Niaximum Dry Density (pc� 118.4 117.5 118.4 118.4 Optimum Moisture (%) 13.3 14.3 13.3 13.3 CO�IPACTION TEST RESUI,TS: Compaction (%) 100 95 95 100 Specified Compaction (! ) 95 95 95 95 ATTE�iTION: Density tests are valid at the location and elevation of the test only. No representation is made as to the adequacy of fill and compaction at locations and elevations other than those tested. The tests were performed by J. Fixsen. (SG-222) DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FII.L PROJECT NAME: PRIOR LAKE CENTER BLDG PROJECT NO: 4122 94- PROJ 4135 PAGE: 3 TEST NLTMBER: 5 6 7 8 DATE TAKEN: 7/ 14/94 7/ 14/94 7/ 14/94 7/ 14/94 UNIFIED SOII, CLASSIFICATION: Sandy lean Sandy lean Silty & clayey Sandy lean (Moisture-Density Sample Number) clay, brown clay with a sand, fine clay with a (CL)-1 little gravel, to medium little gravel, brown (CL)-1 grained, brown (CL)-1 greyish brown (SM-SC)-3 LOCATION: 18' N& 8' W 18' N& 36' W 4' W of 25' N& 5' W of SE Corner of SE Corner SW Corner of SW Corner of Building of Building of Building of Building ELEVATION OF TEST: 933.5' 943' 945.5' 946.5' DEPTH BELO`V EXISTING GRADE: At grade At grade 1.5' At grade FIELD DENSITY DETER�l�1INATION: Method Nuclear Density Direct Transmission, ASTM:D2922-91 (-##4 Basis) Dry Density (pc fl 116 118.5 111.5 118.5 Moisture Content (�) 11.6 12.8 11.7 9.5 Plus #4 Material (%) None 5 None 15 LABORATORY CO�IPACTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL: Niethod AS'I'11�1:D698-91, Procedure "A", (-#4 Basis) Maximum Dry Density (pc� 118.4 118.4 114.9 118.4 Optimum Moisture (%) 13.3 13.3 14.8 13.3 CO�IP�CTI0�1 TEST RESULTS: Compaction (%a) 98 100 97 100 Specified Compaction (%) 95 95 9� 9� ATTE`TIO� : Density tests are valid at the location and elevation of the test only. No representation is made as to the adequacy of fill and compaction at locations and elevations other than those tested. The tests were performed by J. Fixsen. (SG-?22) DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FII,L PROJECT NAME: PRIOR LAKE CENTER BLDG PROJECT NO: 4122 94- PROJ 4135 PAGE: 4 TEST NUMBER: 9 10 11 12 DATE TAKEIV: 7/ 15/94 7/ 15/94 7/ 15/94 7/ 15/94 LTNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Sandy lean Sandy lean Sandy lean Sandy lean (Moisture-Density Sample Number) clay with a clay, brown clay, brown clay with a little gravel, (CL)-1 (CL)-2 little gravel, brown (CL)-1 brown (CL)-1 LOCATION: 15' N& 27' W 15' N& 27' W 15' N& 27' W 18' N& 36' E of SE Corner of SE Corner SE Corner of of SW Corner of of Building of Building Building Building ELEVATION OF TEST: 949' 947' 944' 949' DEPTH BELOW EXISTING GRADE: At grade 2' S' At grade FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION: Method Nuclear Density Direct Transmission, ASTM:D2922-91 (-#4 Basis) Dry Density (pc� 118 106.5 117 118 Moisture Content (%) 11.7 17.2 10.8 11.4 Plus fi4 Material (%) 10 None None 8 LABORATORY COVIPACTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL: Method ASTM:D698-91, Proceriure "A", (-�#4 Basis) Maximum Dry Density (pc� 118.4 118.4 117.5 118.4 Optimum I�loisture (%) 13.3 13.3 14.3 13.3 CO�iP�►CTI0�1 TEST RESULTS: Compaction (%) 100 91 98 100 Specified Compaction (%a) 95 9� 95 95 AT"TENTI0�1: Density tests are valid at the location and elevation of the test only. No representation is made as to the adequacy of fill and compaction at locations and elevations other than those tested. The tests were performed by J. Fixsen. (SG-?22) DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL PROJECT NAME: PRIOR LAKE CENTER BLDG PROJECT NO: 4122 94- PROJ 4135 PAGE: 5 TEST NUMBER: 13 14 15 16 DATE TAKEN: 7/ 15/94 7/ 15/94 7/ 15/94 7/ 15/94 IJNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Sandy lean Sandy lean Sandy lean Sandy lean (Moisture-Density Sample Number) clay with a clay with a clay with a clay with a little gravel, little gravel, little gravel, little gravel, brown (CL)-1 brown (CL)-1 brown (CL)-1 brown (CL)-1 LOCATION: 25' N& 9' E 40' N of 36' N& 48' E 36' N of of SW Corner SE Corner of of SW Corner SE Corner of of Building Building of Building Building ELEVATION OF TEST: 947' 943' 945' 945' DEPTH BELOW EXISTNG GRADE: At grade At grade At grade At grade FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION: Method Nuclear Density Direct Transmission, ASTM:D2922-91 (-�#4 Basis) Dry Density (pc� 119 119 116 114.5 Moisture Content (%) 11.2 12.2 12.6 13.7 Plus #�4 Material (%) 10 10 5 5 LABORATORY COMPACTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL: l�iethod ASTNi:D698-91, Procedure "A", (-�#4 Basis) l�faximum Dry Density (pct� 118.4 118.4 118.4 118.4 Optimum Moisture (%) 13.3 13.3 13.3 13.3 CO�fP�CTION TEST RESULTS: Compaction (%a) 100 101 98 96 Specifieri Compaction (%) 95 95 95 95 ATTE�iTION: Density tests are valid at the location and elevation of the test only. No representation is made as to the adequacy of fill and compaction at locations and elevations other than those tested. The tests were performed by J. Fixsen. (SG-222) DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL PROJECT NAME: PRIOR LAKE CENTER BLDG PROJECT NO: 4122 94- PROJ 4135 PAGE: 6 TEST NUMBER: 17 18 19 20 DATE TAKEN: 7/15/94 7/15/94 7/15/94 7/15/94 LINIFIED SOIL CLASSIF'ICATION: Sandy lean Silty & clayey Silty & clayey Silty & clayey (Moisture-Density Sample Number) clay with a sand, fine sand, fine sand, fine little gravel, to medium to medium to medium brown (CL)-1 grained, grained, grained, greyish brown greyish brown greyish brown (SM-SC)-3 (SM-SC)-3 (SM-SC)-3 LOCATION: 36' N& 50' E 40' N of 38' N& 52' E 33' N of of SW Corner SE Corner of of SW Corner SE Corner of of Building Building of Building Building ELEVATION OF TEST: 946' 947' 947' 949' DEPTFi BELOW EXISTING GRADE: At grade At grade At grade At grade FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION: Method Nuclear Density Direct Transmission, ASTM:D2922-91 (-#4 Basis) Dry Density (pc� 118.5 112.5 116 115.5 Moisture Content (%) 11.2 12.2 11.9 12.5 Plus #4 Material (%a) 8 None None None LABORATORY CO�tPACTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL: Method ASTM:D698-91, Proceriure "A", (-�#4 Basis) Maximum Dry Density (pc� 118.4 114.9 114.9 114.9 Optimum Moisture (%) 13.3 14.8 14.8 14.8 CO�IP�CTION TEST RESULTS: Compaction (%) 100 98 101 100 Specified Compaction (%) 95 95 95 95 ATTE�TION: Density tests are valid at the location and elevation of the test only. No representation is made as to the adequacy of fill and compaction at locations and elevations other than those tested. The tests were performed by J. Fixsen. (SG-'??2) DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FII,L PROJECT NAME: PRIOR LAKE CENTER BLDG PROJECT NO: 4122 94- PROJ 4135 PAGE: 7 TEST NUMBER: 21 22 23 24 DATE TAKEN: 7/ 15/94 7/ 15/94 7/ 15/94 7/ 15/94 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Silty & clayey Silty & clayey Sandy lean Sandy lean (Moisture-Density Sample Number) sand, fine sand, fine clay, brown clay, brown to medium to medium (CL)-2 (CL)-2 grained, grained, greyish brown greyish brown (SM-SC)-3 (SM-SC)-3 LOCATION: 34' N& 50' E 51' N& 39' E 50' N& 56' E 50' N& 24' E of SW Corner of SW Corner of SW Corner of SW Corner of Building of Building of Building of Building ELEVATION OF TEST: 949' 941' 941' 946' DEPTH BELOW EXISTING GRADE: At grade At grade At grade At grade FIELD DENSITY DETER�IINATION: Method Nuclear Density Direct Transmission, ASTM:D2922-91 (-#4 Basis) Dry Density (pc� 111 109.5 116.5 117.5 Moisture Content (%) 15.1 14.5 13.3 11.9 Plus �4 Material (%) None None None None LABORATORY CONiPACTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL: Niethod ASTM:D698-91, Procedure "A", (-#4 Basis) l�farimum Dry Density (pc fl 114.9 114.9 117.5 117.5 Optimum Moisture (%) 14.8 14.8 14.3 14.3 COI�fP�CTION TEST RESULTS: Compaction (%) 97 95 99 100 Specified Compaction (�a) 9� 95 9� 95 ATTE�TION: Density tests are valid at the location and elevation of the test only. No representation is made as to the adequacy of till and compaction at locations and elevations other than those tested. The tests were performed by J. Fixsen. (SG-2`??) DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL PROJECT NAME: PRIOR LAKE CENTER BLDG PROJECT NO: 4122 94- PROJ 4135 PAGE: 8 TEST NUMBER: 25 26 DATE TAKEN: 7/15/94 7/15/94 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Silty sand with Silty sand with (Moisture-Density Sample Number) gravel, fine gravel, fine to medium to meriium grained, dark grained, dark brown (SM)-4 brown (SM)-4 LOCATION: 54' N& 70' E 52' N& 27' E of SW Corner of SW Corner of of Building Building ELEVATION OF TEST: 946' 947' DEPTH BELOW EXISTING GRADE: At grade At grade FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION: Method Nuclear Density Direct Transmission, ASTM:D2922-91 (-#4 Basis) Dry Density (pc� 123.5 125.5 Moisture Content (%) 10.5 10.3 Plus #4 Material (%) 22 22 LABORATORY COMPACTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL: �lethod ASTM:D698-91, Procedure "A", (-#4 Basis) Maximum Dry Density (pc� 130.4 130.4 Optimum Moisture (%) 9.1 9.1 CO�fP:�CTION TEST RESULTS: Compaction (%a) 95 96 Specified Compaction (%) 95 9� ATTEr'TION: Density tests are valid at the location and elevation of the test only. No representation is made as to the adequacy of fill and compaction at locations and elevations other than those tested. The tests were performed by J. Fixsen. (SG-222) DENSITY TFSTS OF COMPACTED FILL PROJECT NAME: PRIOR LAKE CENTER BLDG PROJECT NO: 4122 94- PROJ 4135 PAGE: 9 TEST NUMBER: 27 28 29 30 DATE TAKEN: 7/ 18/94 7/ 18/94 7/ 18/94 7/ 18/94 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Sandy lean Sandy lean Sandy lean Sandy lean (11Zoisture-Density Sample Number) clay with a clay with a clay with a clay with a little gravel, little gravel, little gravel, little gravel, brown (CL)-1 brown (CL)-1 brown (CL)-1 brown (CL)-1 LOCATION: 25' S& 20' E 50' S& 25' E 25' S& 15' W 20' W of NW Corner of NW Corner of NE Corner of NE Corner of Building of Building of Building Building ELEVATION OF TEST: 947' 950' 945' 943' DEP'I'H BELOW EXISTING GRADE: At grade At grade At grade At grade FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION: Method Nuclear Density Direct Transmission, ASTM:D2922-91 (-#4 Basis) Dry Density (pc� 116.5 117 112.5 113 Moisture Content (%) 14.2 10.7 15.4 15.3 Plus #4 Material (%) 7 7 8 7 LABORATORY CO�IPACTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL: Method ASTM:D698-91, Procedure "A", (-#4 Basis) Maximum Dry Density (pc� 118.4 118.4 118.4 118.4 Optimum Moisture (%) 13.3 13.3 13.3 13.3 CO�IP:�CTION TEST RESULTS: Compaction (%) 98.5 99 95 95.� Specitied Compaction (%) 95 9� 95 9� ATTE�'TION: Density tests are valid at the location and elevation of the test only. No representation is made as to the adequacy of fill and compaction at locations and elevations other than those tested. The tests were performed by C. Kopp. (SG-222) DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL PROJECT NAME: PRIOR LAKE CENTER BLDG PROJECT NO: 4122 94- PROJ 4135 PAGE: 10 TFST NUMBER• 31 32 33 DATE TAKEN: 7/18/94 7/18/94 7/18/94 LTi�1IFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Sandy lean Sandy lean Sandy lean (Moisture-Density Sample Number) clay with a clay with a clay with a little gravel, little gravel, little gravel, brown (CL)-1 brown (CL)-1 brown (CL)-1 LOCATION: 20' W& 30' S 30' E& 45' S 40' E& 45' S of NE Corner of NW Corner of NW Corner of Building of Building of Building ELEVATION OF TEST: 947' 948' 950' DEPTH BELO`V EXISTING GRADE: At grade At grade At grade FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION: Method Nuclear Density Direct Transmission, ASTM:D2922-91 (-#4 Basis) Dry Density (pc� 114 116.5 117 Moisture Content (%) 14.2 13.9 13.5 Plus #4 Material (%) 6 8 8 LABORATORY CONfPACTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL: Method ASTM:D698-91, Proceriure "A", (-#4 Basis) Maximum Dry Density (pc� 118.4 118.4 118.4 Optimum Moisture (%) 13.3 13.3 13.3 COItPACTION TEST RESLTLTS: Compaction (%) 96.5 98.5 99 Specified Compaction (%) 95 95 95 ATTENTIO�': Density tests are valid at the location and elevation of the test only. No representation is made as to the adequacy of fill and compacdon at locations and elevations other than those tested. The tests were performed by C. Kopp. (SG-22?) DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL PROJECT NAME: PRIOR LAKE CENTER BLDG PROJECT NO: 4122 94- PROJ 4135 PAGE: 11 TEST NUMBER: 34 35 36 37 DATE TAKEN: 7/ 18/94 7/ 18/94 7/ 18/94 7/ 1 S/94 UiVIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Sandy lean Sandy lean Sandy lean Sandy lean (Moisture-Density Sample Number) clay with a clay with a clay with a clay with a little gravel, little gravel, little gravel, little gravel, brown (CL)-1 brown (CL)-1 brown (CL)-1 brown (CL)-2 LOCATION: 30' S& 18' W 30' N& 30' E 25' N& 20' W 40' W of of NE Corner of SW Corner of SE Corner NE Corner of Building of Building of Building of Building ELEVATION OF TEST: 948' 950' 950' 942' DEP'I'H BELOW EXISTING GRADE: At grade At grade At grade At grade FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION: Method Nuclear Density Direct Transmission, ASTM:D2922-91 (-#4 Basis) Dry Density (pc fl 117.5 118.5 117 115 Moisture Content (%) 12.9 12.4 13.2 12.8 Plus #4 Material (%a) 8 7 7 8 LABORATORY COI�iPACTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL: I�lethod ASTM:D698-91, Procedure "A", (-#4 Basis) Nfaximum Dry Density (pc� 118.4 118.4 118.4 117.5 Optimum Moisture (%) 13.3 13.3 13.3 14.3 CO�tPACTION TEST RESULTS: Compaction (%) 99.5 100 99 98 Specified Compaction (%) 95 9� 95 95 A'I"TEti'TIO�': Density tests are valid at the location and elevation of the test only. No representation is made as to the adequacy of fill and compaction at locations and elevations other than those tested. The tests were performed by C. Kopp. (SG-2??) DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL PROJECT NAME: PRIOR LAKE CENTER BLDG PROJECT NO: 4122 94- PROJ 4135 PAGE: 12 TEST NUMBER: 38 39 40 41 DATE TAKEN: 7/ 18/94 7/ 18/94 7/ 18/94 7/ 18/94 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Sandy lean Sandy lean Sandy lean Sandy lean (Moisture-Density Sample Number) clay with a clay with a clay with a clay with a little gravel, little gravel, little gravel, little gravel, brown (CL)-1 brown (CL)-1 brown (CL)-2 brown (CL)-2 LOCATION: 20' W of 25' S& 40' W 25' S& 35' E 30' S& 30' E NE Corner of NE Corner of NW Corner of NW Corner of Building of Building of Building of Building ELEVATION OF TEST: 944' 948' 948' 950' DEP'TH BELOW EXISTING GRADE: At grade At grade At grade At grade • FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION: Method Nuclear Density Direct Transmission, ASTM:D2922-91 (-#4 Basis) Dry Density (pc� 119 117 114 117.5 Moisture Content (%) 12.0 12.9 14.9 12.6 Plus �#4 Material (%) 8 7 7 7 LABORATORY COI�fPACTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL: l�iethod ASTM:D698-91, Procedure "A", (-#4 Basis) Maximum Dry Density (pc� 118.4 118.4 117.5 117.5 Optimum Moisture (%) 13.3 13.3 14.3 14.3 CO�tP�CTIO�I TEST RESULTS: Compaction (%) 100.5 99 97 100 Specified Compaction (%a) 9� 9� 9� 9� ATTE�iTION: Density tests are valid at the location and elevation of the test only. No representation is made as to the adequacy of fill and compaction at locations and elevations other than those tested. The tests were performed by C. Kopp. (SG-2?2) DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL PROJECT NAME: PRIOR LAKE CENTER BLDG PROJECT NO: 4122 94- PROJ 4135 PAGE: 13 TEST NUMBER: 42 DATE TAKEN: 7/18/94 i.JNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Sandy lean (Moisture-Density Sample Number) clay with a little gravel, brown (CL)-2 LOCATION: 40' W& 40' S of NE Corner of Building ELEVATION OF TEST: 950' DEPT'H BELOW EXISTING GRADE: At grade FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION: Method Nuclear Density Direct Transmission, ASTM:D2922-91 (-#4 Basis) Dry Density (pc fl 114 Moisture Content (%) 14.1 Plus �#4 Material (%) 7 LABORATORY COI�IPACTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL: Method ASTM:D698-91, Procedure "A", (-#4 Basis) Maximum Dry Density (pc� 117.5 Optimum Moisture (%) 14.3 CO�IPACTION TEST RESULTS: Compaction (%) 97 Specified Compaction (%) 95 ATTE\TIO:�t: Density tests are valid at the location and elevation of the test only. No representation is made as to the adequacy of fill and compaction at locations and elevations other than those tested. The tests were performed by C. Kopp. (SG-2�2) . , , ..�. . �, � � . • ' � � . �. � . . � ..� � • .� . ••� .. �. � : . :� . .�• � • � • . ..• z . :�- �. � � •� • �� • . � • . � .� � • � -. . . � . � • � � • •• • ��MVW��W�OO�■�/■�■��■� ■ �p�■nA�■�n��v��n��■�n��vW W�� v��v��■��0�■��■�v■��■��u�� /�� nO��v�■�u��u�■��/�u��n��W��nW��W�� ■��W�uO��vOW�O�q��■�v�u�vn��W�� n��uW O�n��AOn��v■��O�A�d��A�voO■■��v �Wn�■W W��oO�■0�■■ /��n�� ■ d9W�n vv■��W��v � ■ : V��W��■�� q�n��A■� ■ v��■v�v■ W■W �W■�v��v��0�v�a�� O��W��■�O�W��O��W��OW� ■� u�u�m��uu■d�a �o��u��m�um ■ m��m�a��■� ��■�� ■ ■ u��w�m■��tu�aa�w��■■u��u��■��■�� ■ ��o��■�uo��w��c��u�� u m��os��n�c�uom��moumm ■ �v��vW�WW ��/�� : ■ u �� ■��wu��aw��u�auu �a��aq■um�wm ■��■■��t�u�m� ■�/�hqn ■ ■��►�� ■ . ��om�oo��ra��■■�u�m�uma��■�ow ��t■�� uu�t��u��m��mo�m�amu� u■��w�WOa�a�u�m��uucm��nm�mu�am�� u��■�� W��l�O�vp��vn��OW�O�� 0��■�� ■n�O��v� �u� ■ �� WW �Wv �v�■�v��■��■ qqW6� ■uu�omam�.� w� ■ u�aa � . ■ • • • ' � � �� . � ,. ' • � • ' � � .. �. � . . � ..� , • � • .. �. � . ••� : . :. . .�� • � � • . •�• s • • • • � •i • •� • � 1�': • ' • -� • . � -. • � � • •' • � O�n��n�� W��d��/��O��n�■■�/��O�u■q�■� �■��//��■��v��O��u�/��n��OOnO■v/ u��W�■ V ■��■■��■��■■��0■■��n/��v��OW�� /�■��■■��uvO��n�p��W ��W�� O�v� �■�W��/��■�OV��■��O�u��■■��0��■W��n A��■A��v��nA■�v��■■�■��O�d�n��vAn�O�� au��wu��W■��m��ou��m��■■w�a� ■ �m��o�■u��■n��o��u�u��my��m�um� ■ . o�■�w�� ■ • m�ma� �� 0�� W ■ u�O/vn �� W /�� ■ ��■�u� �0 W � W � W � ■■��W�Mn�■��■�0��utW ■ ■ W��O��■��u��v�On��W��■ d��n�W�n��OV�a��v�v��■OO��W�� ■ ��v�/O�n�u�nvO�in�i.4�W �■��u� Ot��■�■■u��OGi�O��■W�� ■��■W� ��W�OW�v��J��n�o��,��/t��w� ■ �■■u�O��v��0� ■■��d��■�iiVO��■ ■ WtWW �► qt��A� vr/O� q��W�nOAUn��'�■�W��v�■■��O�v�� ■ ��f��Op�u�■�qv� ■��t■ ■ ��t�■�� /J■�W��eW��/■��17n��W��OO� ■ � �/��OV��LW��v��nO��v\VV�O�■/� V ��q�ud�v'/��n��O��a��n W�n■� u��W�W/W�/I��oO�� W�vO�� 0��/.��WOa��/�� ■ �O u��u��'A� ��■�uO��W�WS�� W�� W�WW M�■■�q��tAA ■ \ �� ■ wi��u�aat� � w�ooa �m�o�� m��u� m�m • • . , � , �� . � / � � � ' � � . .. �. � • ; � ..� � .� . ••� .. �. , : . :. . ... • � � • ..• � . :•- •- • � �� • •� • � 1.•: • • • -. � • • • . . -. . . . - . • � . . . •• • �� o ��■��n�n■�v�� u��■�v��a�� ■ ■��v�O��n/�n��■��AU��n��■� u��O��v��n��■��n�u��■■�� W��vA��O�� v��__��n��v�■��v■�A�nn�U■��v�� p�Wn��AW�nu�■��n��WU�■��W�vW� ■ n��0�v�v�v��/��A■WV��n■�n W �� W9�u�v■��W�v��/��O��WO��WO�WO■� ■ ■ vW�■�■ �� ' �� ■��m�� ■ n��/�v�dO��v�v��v��vW ��O�v��W�■ /��W��n�a�■�0��■O�O��W ��d��0� �■ �n��u��u��w�m��n�u�■m�wm ■ ■u��ov�u��■�■��mW��m��uaw��■� ■ ■ ■■��■��um��t��m■m�m��w�� u�W�uO�n��nvW ■ Ou��m��■W/v��/��■�/�� W�n��A� ■ /��O��WWV�■��OUn� ■ �W�� ■ W ��W�/�v�� ■■ " ��.�� vOO■�■ ��OW ■ ��i��/n�0��q�W ��■��d�/�O��au��■��p��■�.7/�� ■ . ��mm��u�a�m��u��.n��t��m��mm�� a�■m�a�■■u�■�uum��■��au�a�■udnu�u�o� ■ w��au��m��uuo��■u�■��u��w.��u�u ■ �u��u�un��uu��w��u��m�p � ■ m�uuu ��wrn�o�m�d ��►�; W �� d � ■ O�W W� �WY��p ■v��W/�WW■�OO/vW� W��n�■� O'IWO��OW WO ■ • ■ • � � •_ .., I 1 � I . I , •• 1 ' • � • • , • • � �• ,� � � � ' �, � • � • • � � �• �• � _ • _. • .�� • • • . •�• s • � • ' • ' � � • I • • � • 1 • • � � '• / � • 1 � • '• • • '� •. � • � � � • • ' � � �� n��A��V��V��W�� u��■W��W��q��n�nn��tv�■■�� vmW�� v��W�■U��■��On��■��d��■��■nn■■�n ■ �� /�v��/�v��/��■��u��n■�■v��0��■�� ■��nv/�d�/�n��■0��■�� W W ��0��A��■v�� uW ��■d��■�O��v�WV��n�d■��■�/�� W�� o��W�■��W��v�� n■��/ ■ � u� i iuu ��u��i��w��i°i■��a��u�� oa■��i �u��uu�au��m�w��wu� �m�ow �� m�m�o�n� ■ mwn� ■ ��n�um■a��aow�■��mma ■ �u��mnu�ut��u��■�nmm��m�tmuum ■ n��■��w�u��u��uum�� mmwu��wm�a��.-�u��un�m� ■ ��uut�u��w��■��u�u.m��u� ■ u■�y�m ■ v �� ■m►maa �t��m�■oa��a�m��t■m�� uu�m�� ■��O�q�W �GW�W��q��.a�■n�v��/■■■��■� ��p�A��!" n'��■a�qq0� ■ � ��/��/�■��II�■��■��W��W��►`�� oav�� M�n��O��I. W��v��nmv��►��M��W/��uW�� v0 W�■�/��■��v��n�i.W��vW�vWn�� tnom�n��u��u�mo�o ��w�u�o��u�� ■W■ �� u a�i°��ow�o ■ . �u�um� uii�i��io�� '�u n��u ��►v� ■ q d�00�'/� �u■��■Wm/u� � ■ m� . aWOW mm�a ■ . � • • , � -i- rf�iiK� ,�vEN�,t ;��urF;E.:�T� ��o, �ria-�>-�F�a ROCHESTER. .ti11NNFSC)T.A i��+(7-i F;1k S07'� ?88-�O�Fi � (''`� �. i� 6..J ��, LJ YAG GY COLBY July 25, 1994 A S S O C I AT E S E,tiGI\E[I:�S • .�hCHITECTS SUR�"El"ORS • PL.�NNEKS Li�NDSC,�f'E .�RCHITECTS Mr. Steve Nielson 5788 - 150th Street Prior Lake, MN 55372 RE: Excavation Observation for Prior Lake Center Building Located at intersection of Pleasant Street and Walker Avenue Prior Lake, MN Dear Mr. Nielson: We recently observed the excavation observation to remove fill and unsuitable soils from within the proposed building area. The geotechnical report dated March 1, 1994, prepared by Yaggy Colby Associates, indicated unsuitable fill soils ranging in depth from about 7.5-feet to 20-feet within the proposed building area. The fill soils were judged unsuitable for foundation support. The report recommended that the fill soils be excavated, unsuitable soils removed, and the clean fill soils be placed and compacted to support building foundations and floor slabs. The excavation was completed beginning on July 13, 1994 and completed on July 18, 1994. A geotechnical engineer was on site on July 13th, 14th, and 15th to observe the excavation and check the excavation bottom, and judge the suitability of the excavated soils for reuse as compacted fill. Hand auger borings were taken at random in the bottom of the excavation to check that all unsuitable fill soils were removed from below the building area. Also, the excavation was checked to see that adequate oversizing was provided in the bottom of the excavation. The oversizing is required to assure that lateral support is provided for the fill placed below foundations. Excavation depths ranged from about 5-feet at the far northwest corner of the building to about 12-feet in the southeast building corner. The excavated fill soils consisted mostly of a mixture of silty sands, clayey sands, and sandy lean clay. Some buried bituminous and concrete debris were encountered. A couple of tree stumps and some debris were also encountered. The majority of the excavated fill soils were suitable and used for compacted backfill in the building area. 215 IVORTH �\f).��tit� i51 �� Y?�3-i�3-i-1 EQI�''�-�L OPPORTI,'NITY MASON CITY. IObV;> >Oa01 FAX �51>> -3?�i-�351 E.ti1PLOYER July 25, 1994 Mr. Steve Nielson Page 2 A total of 42 compaction tests were completed on fill placed in the building azea. These tests were completed by Huntingdon Engineering and Environmental. Copies of test reports are attached. Test results indicated that the fill was compacted to an excess of the required ninety- five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor Density (ASTM-D698). It is our opinion that all unsuitable soils were removed from within the building area and that the compacted fill placed is suitable for spread footing foundations designed for net foundation bearing pressures of up to 2,500 pounds per square foot (psfl. It has been a pleasure to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Y GGY COLBY ASSO� TES 1 � � Dale R. Allen, P.E., Geotechnical Engineer DRA:bsd YCA #4135 Attachments cc: Mr. Gary Staeber, City of Prior Lake Copeland-Mithun, Inc. �'� ' LS ENGINEERS, INC. ��<< D - ! .; RO �� ENGINEERS 2 0 0 SOUTH MAIN STREET Al)li LE SUEUR, MN 56058 ' U (612) 665-6255 ECIAL INSPECTION REPORT DATE: August 11, 1994 JOB NO. 94-200B TO: Jose Rivas PROJECT: Buildina Shell Desiqn Yaqqy/Colby Assoc. Prior Lake Commercial Development FROM: Jennifer Sydow S&� Prior Lake, MN Summary of Work: On August 11, 1994, I visited the site of the Building Shell Design for Prior Lake Commercial Development in Prior Lake, Minnesota, to provide Special Inspection Service for reinforcing in concrete masonry. The following is a summary of my observations. Field Observation Notes: I. General Status of Work: A. Interior shear walls were installed to full height. B. Exterior west and north walls were installed to full height. C. Exterior bond beam at grade along east wall was installed and reinforcing TS 3x2x%" tubes were in place. II. General Observations: A. Exterior Wall on Grid F: Tubes were grouted in place and appeared to be as shown on the Plans. B. Exterior Wall on Grid 6: Reinforcing in bond beam at grade was continuous and placed as shown on the Plans. C. Interior Shear Walls at Grid 3 and Grid C: Vertical reinforcing was marked on masonry walls by Contractor and locations shown are acceptable. D. Reinforcing Steel: Grade and size of reinforcing steel was checked and was found to be as specified in the Plans (#5, grade 60 steel). cc: Bob Copeland, Copeland-Mithun Gary Staber, Building Official, City of Prior Lake f /� � � -_ .. , � /\(\,"��--�� I I �/ i.�.7 I. i . t � � I� �..�___'. ...._.. .. �;. � QC;T 3 � i LS ENGIlVEERS, INC. , PROFES8I�0� 200 SOUTH MAIN STREET .._ .__.._._-_------- .___.. ___..._.. _.._. LE SUEUR, NIId 5 6 0 5 8 (612) 665-6255 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT � DATE: 10-25-94 JOB NO. 94-200B I TO: Jose Rivas PROJECT: Building Shell Design YaggyfColby Assoc. Prior Lake Commercial Development FROM: Jennifer Sydow �p,S Prior Lake, MN Summary of Work: On October 25, 1994, I visited the site of the Building Shell Design for Prior Lake Commercial Development in Prior Lake, Minnesota, to provide Special Inspection Services for steel connections. The following is a summary of my observations. Field Observation Notes: I. General status of work A. Light gauge framing from the roof to the top of the windows and angles to joists were in place along the south and east walls. II. General Observations: A. Rather than installing the suggested retrofit as per Inspection Report dated Oct. 25, 1994, new braces were added t� th� joist top chord alcr.g th� ea�� :;�ali , These braces are not connected to top chord panel points in all locations. To correct this see Attached Detail 1. B. Bracing along the south wall is not in conformance with the Plans. These braces are connected to the top chord but not at panel points. To correct this, see attached Detail 2. Enclosures 2 cc: Bob Copeland, Copeland-Mithun Gary Staber, Building Official, City of Prior Lake , � � � � � � � � I � � °" / � N � � - �' / ' � 2 � ° �- ��° �� E� � � � ►-- , � �° � � , g o-- , ! i� �J J '% � � � �� ` � r/ / � j , � , � , �/� � , L �/ I � � 1 �m� �� , i � � �� r� o � � 2 �' � i� -J g � i� � � -F J � � >�� / x �t� � ' � , �, � � J � . ` ;� e, � � , , �, °- � Q � / �J ,rl 1. o �. � � � � ' �� , 3 � � � ,� o y � � q � � - � � �' 3 � � � � � � � �� A � � � / � � � � �� ; � � � - �- � � � �� ; � � r � � �� J � � �� / J � � � ? �' . � / Z F � � � o / O �- `� ( t `� � 9 j � � � � / �� I , x � � a � � / � �� s � J �� 3 �� /.� ��°- � , � i � . � -_ � LS ENGINEERS, INC. . PROF$SSIONAL ENGINEERS 200 SOUTH MAIN STREET LE SUEUR, MN 56058 ` (612) 665-6255 SPECIAL INSPECTIO�,' REPORT DATE: 1^-13-94 JOB NO. 94-200b TO: Jose Rivas PROJECT: Building Shell Desiqn Yaagy/Celb�� Assoc. Prior Lake Commercial Development FROM: Jennifer Sydow TE�S Prior Lake, MN Summary of Work: On October 13, 1994, I visited the site of the building shell design for Prior Lake Commercial Development in Prior Lake, Minnesota, to provide Special Inspection Services for steel connections and steel roof decking. The following is a summary of my observations. � Field Observation Notes: I. General status of work A. All beams and columns were in place. B. Light gauge framing from the roof to the top of the windows in the south and east wall were in place and angles to joists were in place along the east wall. C. The roof deck was in place. II. General observations. A. All beam and column connections appeared to be in general conformance with the Plans with the exception of Grid B-5; bolts in the beam to column connection were not observed at the time of this inspection at this location. These should be installed. B. Connections of the light gauge members appeared to be in general conformance of the Plans. The bracing angles as per Detail P/Al2 connecting back to the joists were welded to the bottom chord rather than the top chord of the joists at panel points as specified. To correct this, bracing will be added from the bottom chord at the connection points to the top chord and additional bracing between joists ( see attached Detail). Field Observation Report Page 2-Prior Lake Commercial Development October 13, 1994 C. Welds in the steel roof deck appeared to be properly placed. Screws were in place and appeared to be in general conformance with the Plans. Encl. 1 cc: Bob Copeland, Copeland-Mithun Gary Staber, Building Official, City of Prior Lake � .. _ _.. � i � Z. � � . � � � � - � � � _ / �, �' . � � i � , � � � i � I �� ! � �_---�--�.., � ` ' �� J` � ;. � ' � i � � r :, � o p,� r �� - A �f V'. � �� ' � i "7� �, � ------;-._-�w � �' , � � � a � , . � � . � � `� �` N , � �, n � � ` � � � L � � s � -o � , -- � � � � - � a � � p � � � � � � � . � U. d z � � � � � . � � _- ,, LS ENGINEERS, INC. ( � _ �� PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS 200 SOUTH MAIN STREET ' LE SUEUR, I�IlJ 56058 (612) 665-6255 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT DATE: August 2, 1994 JOB NO. 94-200B - T0: Jose Rivas PROJECT: Buildinq Shell Design Yaqgy/Colby Assoc. Prior Lake Commercial Development FROM: Jennifer Sydow T�'� Prior Lake, MN Summary of Work: On August 2, 1994, I visited the site of the Building Shell Design for Prior Lake Commercial Development in Prior Lake, Minnesota, to provide Special Inspection Services for reinforcing in concrete masonry. The following is a summary of my observations. Field Observation Notes: I. General status of work A. Interior footings were installed. B. Exterior piers at Grid E and Grid 5 were installed. C. Interior piers at Grid B3 and Grid C2 were installed. D. Core filled masonry had been poured in exterior masonry walls to grade. E. Walls were backfilled with the exception of the interior shear wall at Grid C. II. General Observations: A. Shear wall on Grid 3: 1. Column pier and adjacent 8" corefill were poured. Two verticals were present in 8" corefill at end of wall. B. Shear wall on Grid C: l. Concrete was observed at cleanout location at the bottom of the corefill at the north end of this wall. SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT , Page 2- Prior Lake Commercial Development August 2, 1994 � C. 24" corefill for beam bearing at Grid B1: 1. Additional vertical bar and.corefill were observed. D. 24" corefill for beam bearing on Grid D1: l. Additional vertical bar and corefill were observed. E. Column footing at Grid C2: 1. Column pier was formed and poured. Anchor bolts were installed. JBS/mas cc: Bob Copeland, Copeland-Mithun Gary Staber, Building Official, City of Prior Lake LS ENGINEERS, INC. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS 200 SOUTH MAIN STREET LE SUEUR, MN 56058 ' (612) 665-6255 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT DATE: 11-18-94 JOB NO. 94-200B TO: Jose Rivas PROJECT: BuildinQ Shell Desictn Yagqv/Colby Associates Prior Lake Commercial FROM: Eu ene D er P.E. Development, Prior Lake ,� Suawnary of Work: On November 18, 1994, at the request of Bob Copeland, I visited the site of the Prior Lake Commercial Development in Prior Lake, Minnesota, to review field welding and general installation of wall bracing. My primary purpose was to review wall bracing which was revised twice previously. While on site, I met with Jumping Johnny, Project Superintendent for Copeland Mithun, and we walked the site reviewing each joist condition. The following is a summary of my observations. Field Observation Notes: I. General status of work The building is enclosed and installation of interior partitions and mechanical work is in progress. Wall bracing to roof joists had been revised a second time, supposedly in accordance with the sketches issued 10/25/94. II. General Observations A. I r_eviewed the beam to column weld (installed in lieu of A325 bolts due to alignment problems) at grid location 6B. This installation appears satisfactory. B. Wall bracing: � 1. At the time of this visit, Johnny was aware that the � bracing installation did not comply with the sketches ! submitted in our last Inspection Report dated 10/25/94. 2. If possible, we want to work with the existing bracing and add material as required to achieve an acceptable solution. We reviewed each brace and, where required, developed solutions; nearly all braces require some retrofit. Retrofit requirements are summarized on the attached sheet 1 of 2 which was put together while on site. Special Inspection Report . Page 2- Building Shell Design Prior Lake Commercial Development 11-18-94 � 3. The horizontal tubes, along the exterior wall to which the braces are attached, stop approximately 12" either side of the column at grid location 3E. Additional braces are required as indicated on attached sheet 2 of 2. Enclosures 2 cc: Bob Copeland, Copeland-Mithun Gary Staber, Building Official, City of Prior Lake I I '; .� rn � � + .m G�� ' �J - v ' �� - 1' � �' , � � i a0 � � �0 � il - 2 K4 0 '-0' O. , . � � � ' I � I � _ � I � � • � ( I • � � W!�ox31 � Wl�OX31 _ — / + � � ' -� � � 3' - �' - T 7 P. � �,_ .lO.G. �� ' � f . tn � I � , � ,� , d �' � _ „ s _ . . I / I I� 14 K 5 O ► . � // '� � W � � 1 � /6 � A � ' 1 I ( �I ' ' � 1 ' �� ' �i ' � I � 3'-0' -T7P. . � ( � (� ' � ( i ' � l�' 6 X 2 6 W x z� _____ � _ __.___ _ __ �� , , ' �� ' I 2' i'-3 li2' lI j� ( . I i � �- � ��'�O L � i c7 � t � � .�� 4 � , �a I N �5��' D� ;,� � � — y.. fl i, "b � �^'- �� a�� r 2 � 4 2 - � � � MM �� 77'' �� ifl � p Z �� N Z Q � ; � - —_ , — ` � .� w.�t s'� ■ !'� ��, � r, ■�� t " � r � i � i � DF Z. � . ; + f „ j l S�� U��,� � ;� �, ��l,Ao�J 1k�1C�r.c� S�UTr� �r,c�e � ; 2, v�I �� B u��t- �' 6tt-a"tC'-�-- �� .r�5 'tv �-+'� �1� A-�1 c� �-u� � �� -. S aU�-�Y ►�� (, �3��s � l • �o rJ � 1�.� ��-� �uc'tz� c� �b1=�� t � l5 �' t-t � TD�" v� D � f� G+c,3^)�4t, �.� ��a.-c � , � �� LT �,-j A�.�.� � z`�Z x zr � u�� M��, ) � $. � � �-1- 6 r�.�.� �a s �vnE t� �D� �G,,w� s� s�o� — w� � . B M�c�t n� 1� �!a t-� �N � .! � S7 '� r�-'�/ I G l �'t' �('�� 'z— Po►NT ; �.. �-� w�'�-i-- � n �. . � IN ST�-�- - t�1 U �t'r '1'v , �-( t,.l_ � L�dTT�'N� � � TBP Ll'{�N'� - 7 �,1� G�i l. ES c' Sr. d (� � , 3 tt-.4t+3" � , �,,��J� , r �D� r� t � � -�--x4—x ! � � �v��__�> i i , � i ; � ��,��, � :� / DATE TIME CITY OF PRIOR LAKE CALLED-IN INSPECTION NOTlCE � SCHEDULED p PERMIT NO. ��'� —� COMPLETED � � ADDRESS �"� ,�%S�'` OWNER CONTR. � TELEPHONE NO. ly� O FOOTING ❑PLUMBING RI ❑SITE INSPECTION Q C FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL ❑ EXCAV./GRADING/FIILING � NSULATION ❑ WATER HOOKUP ❑ LAKESHOREIWETLANDS 0 C WALL BD. O METER SETlTURN ON ❑ COMPLAINT 2❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOKUP � FOLLOW-UP Q❑ FOUNDATION ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL. ❑ SEPTIC FINAL • 2❑ DEMOL ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. � FIREPLACE J❑ FIRE PREV. ❑ PLUMBING FINAL p = COMMENTS• �_� �G � J 2 . . p - � C�. � a � � Q a � � �-,.� �� 1� � O �` tR � � -? � � O W � Q � 2 W � W � � O W Q W C SATISFACTORY:PROCEED 0 PHOTO TAKEN �' CORRECT WORK AND PROCEED � CORRECT WORK. CALL FOR P,EINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING V � CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. INSPECTOR WILL RETURN. G STOP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR. ❑ INSPECTION REQUIFiED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. Owner/Co . o ite Insp tor � 447-4230 YMbw Capy/Srts Nofice NTRe C.opy/Inapsctor's Fib DATE TIME CITY OF PRIOR LAKE CALLED-IN INSPECTION NOTlCE SCHEDULED I� l -g� l' � 3 PERMIT NO. COMP�ETED ADDRESS `► ` �� `e�%� OWNER CONTR. � TELEPHONE NO. l� ❑ FOOTING ❑PLUMBING RI ❑SITE INSPECTION � � FRAMING � MECHANICAL ❑ EXCAV./GRADING/FILLING � C� INSULATION ❑ WATER HOOKUP O LAKESHOREM/ETLANDS � C WALL BD. ❑ METER SET/TURN ON ❑ COMPLAINT 2 C FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOKUP ❑ FOILOW-UP Q � POUNDATtON ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL. O SEPTIC FINAL = C DEMOL. ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FIRE�LACE n J❑ FIRE PREV. G PLUMBING FINAL � F S �c�XS = COMMENTS: �� J Q Q n //. �rt 1\CV� �.�tG�C 4. l_C7t'Q��LJ`� --- � W Ta��o T�} `�{-�-ro�.- � l -°� � � � �.__. � � � ' s 2s- u � � � �e� �� W � � R Q � 2 W � W � � O W � W WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED C PHOTO TAKEN �; CORRECT WORK AN� PROCEED � CORRECT WORK. CALL FOR P,EINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING V ❑ CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. INSPECTOR WILL RETURN. � STOP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR. � INSPECTION REQUIRED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. Owner/Con . ite Inspector 447-4230 reNOw Copy/Srrs wni�s copynnap.cror'a Fils i � DATE TIME CITY OF PRIOR LAKE CALLED-IN INSPECTION NOTlCE SCHEDULED �? �4� �� PERMIT NO. �`I '3� COMPLETED ADDRESS y�� I�n S� ��r4e L OWNER CONTR. � TELEPHONE NO. W ❑ FOOTING ❑PLUMBING RI ❑SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL ❑ EXCAV./GRADING/FILLING � ❑ INSULATION ❑ WATER HOOKUP ❑ LAKESHORENVETLANDS 0 C WALL BD. ❑ METER SET/TURN ON ❑ COMPLAINT Z� FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOKUP ❑ FOLLOW-UP Q❑ FOUNDATION C SEPTIC INSTALL. ❑ SEPTIC FINAL 2 CJ DEMOL. ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FIREPLACE J❑ FIRE PREV. ❑ PLUM8ING FINAL ❑ = COMMENTS: �'�na i uc�� o -� all �� 4;�,G d � � ,.,,� ��;1� � r� l o�,�,- . o � ; �^ � � � (� W l Dr�' oF V[�C ti� o��e' Wi L� iCGI]�cX ¢ Qs '�ev�a�..� -+ �ni��wS arc coi.weL.al�e..� � � ` � �'�^t Sv�Q+atss SvS�-�-- < <•�, /� �i � C�40f�OK � �Lo� � L� e. L�1ky.� o Mc.� �Ia�VP C�...�a�- o .. W � Q � 2 W � W � � Q W 2 W',� WOFK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED C PHOTO TAKEN � C CORRECT WORK AND PROCEED �� CORRECT WORK. CAIL FOR P.EINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING U � CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. INSPECTOR WILL RETURN. C STOP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR. r INSPECTION REQUIRED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. Owner/C t site Inspecto 447-4230 r�ww cocr� wnas copynnawcro. s Fas DATE TIME CITY OF PRIOR LAKE CALLED-IN INSPECTION NOTtCE SCHEDULED Z'Z-'�1 �� • IS PERMIT NO. "�I�I " 3�8 COMPLETED ADDRESS �I77� �c�..^� t��cQci- S�'� d`^l.-A- OWNER CONTR. � TELEPHONE NO. lL ❑ FOOTING L�PLUMBING RI ❑SITE INSPECTION � C FRAMING G MECHANICAI O EXCAV./GRADING/FILIING � ❑ INSULATION ❑ WATER HOOKUP ❑ LAKESHOREJWETLANDS � C WALL BD. C METER SETITUHN ON ❑ COMPLAINT 2 G FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOKUP ❑ FOLLOW-UP Q❑ FOUNDATION ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL. ❑ SEPTIC FINAL _❑ DEMOL. O SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FIREPLACE J❑ FIRE PREV. � PLUMBING FINAL � = COMMENTS: • J Q 1 Q �arYi4 l�'° � W (n �G.� L) aJ�u.. �� r � 6 L� a ¢ � O ¢ O � W � Q � 2 W � W � � O W � �' WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED C PHOTO TAKEN O � CORRECT WORK AND PROCEED � C CORRECT WORK. CALL FOR PEINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING � CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. INSPECTOR WILL RETURN. G STOP OFiDEFi POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR. G INSPECTION RE�UIRED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. Owner/Con r. n si Inspector 447-4230 r�o»� c.ocr�s�. wn�re cacyn��ror s F;b DATE TIME CITY OF PRIOR LAKE CALLED-IN INSPECTION NOTtCE SCHEDULEO i � PERMIT NO. 1` �' �� COMPLETED ��` ��'� Z� ; ADDRESS �7�� T �� OWNER CONTR. TEIEPHONE NO. � ❑ FOOTING ❑PLUMBING RI ❑SITE INSPECTION � RAMING C MECHANICAL ❑ EXCAV./GRADING/FILLING �❑ INSULATION O WATER HOOKUP � LAKESHORE/WETLANOS � C WALL BD. O METER SETlTURN ON ❑ COMPLAINT 2 C FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOKUP O FOLLOW-UP Q❑ FOUNDATtON ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL. ❑ SEPTIC FINAL _ ❑ DEMOL ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FIREPLACE J❑ FIRE PREV. � PLUMBING FINAL ❑ = COMMENTS: /(�� S J Z O ¢ �U�� W a ¢ � O 2 O � W � Q � 2 W � W 2 � O W � W WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PHOTO TAKEN 0:- CORRECT WORK AND PROCEED 0 � COfiRECT WORK. CALL FOR PEINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING G CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. INSPECTOR WILL RETURN. G STOP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR. ❑ �NSPECTION REQUIRED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. Owner/Contr site inspecto� 447-4230 re�aw capy�r. nwnce wnns Copyn�apecm. J FrN / . i� DATE TIME CITY OF PRIOR LAKE CAILED-IN INSPECTION NOTlCE SCHEDULED 1L_ �o _95� �� PERMIT NO. 'I�' y'�3 COMPLETED ADDRESS L I �R O � \��54^—� ��"� OWNER CONTR. � TELEPHONE NO. t1i � FOOTING ❑PLUMBING RI ❑SITE INSPECTION � J�FRAMING C' MECHANICAI ❑ EXCAV./GRADING/FILLING �� INSULATION C WATER HOOKUP ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS �❑ WALL BD. C METER SET/TURN ON C COMPLAINT 2❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOKUP ❑ FOLLOW-UP Q❑ FOUNDATION C SEPTIC iNSTALL. ❑ SEPTIC FINAL _ ❑ DEMOL. ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FIREPLACE J❑ FIRE PREV. ❑ PLUMBING FINAL � = COMMENTS: J ^ p � C `��, � �� --- � �/ �� ' � � V v � � � (—� _ � � �� -'�� =y;, .__� � > J Q O � W � Q ti 2 W � W R � O � W � -'� W V WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED C PHOTO TAKEN � � CORRECT WORK AND PROCEED � � CORRECT WORK. CALL FOR PEINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING ❑ CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. INSPECTOR WILL RETURN. G STOP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR. C INSPECTION REQUIRED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. Owner/Con F+-stte Inspe � �� --� 447-4230 !% r�a»� cocy�rs nwnos wn� coPyn�aP.cra s F�w DATE TIME CITY OF PRIOR LAKE CALLED-IN INSPECTION NOTlCE SCHEDULED I l — q� (� 3 � PERMIT NO . COMPLETED ADDRESS `� ` �� I`��-�� OWNER CONTR. � TELEPHONE NO. t� ❑ FOOTING ❑PLUMBING RI OSITE INSPECTION � C FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL ❑ EXCAV./GRADING/FILLING � ❑ INSULATION ❑ WATER HOOKUP ❑ LAKESHOREIWETLANOS � C WALL BD. C METER SETlTURN ON ❑ COMPLAINT 2 C FINAL C SEWER HOOKUP ❑ FOLLOW-UP Q C FOUNDATION C SEPTIC INSTALL. ❑ SEPTIC FINAL 2❑ DEMOL. � SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FIRE LACE n �❑ FIRE PREV. ❑ PLUMBING FINAL �� , S��XXS = COMMENTS: �� J 0 1 !�t I`�i�.0 �_.K F-C �a-. l_.C7 �' 4�'h'� lJ�" � W Ta��o T�+ ��-row.- a l/ , �Q � o - �. � � Q � ' s � u' O 6� , �-/�-. W R Q ti 2 W � W Q � O W � W WOfiK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED C PHOTO TAKEN ❑ CORFiECT WORK AND PROCEED U .� CORRECT WORK. CALL FOR PEINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING G CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. INSPECTOR WILL RETURN. � STOP ORDEF POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR. C INSPECTION REQUIRED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. Owner/Con . ite Inspector 447-4230 reNow copy/Sir. wnits cooyMap.cr�. �s Frb DATE TIME CITY OF PRIOR LAKE CALLED-IN INSPECTION SCHEDULED PERMIT q - 4 2 COMPLETED n' I� l �' � ADDRESS Qb7d pu�� `� OWNER �—�� NTR. TELEPHONE NO. Q� �� 2 7 W ❑ FOOTING BING RI ❑SITE INSPECTION � ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL 0 EXCAV./GRADING/FILLING � ❑ INSULATION ❑ WATER HOOKUP ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS �❑ WALL BD. ❑ METER SET/TURN ON � COMPLAINT Z❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOKUP ❑ FOLLOW-UP Q C FOUNDATION ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL. ❑ SEPTIC FINAL 2 � DEMOL. ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FIREPLACE J❑ FIRE PREV. ❑ PLUMBING FINAL � . = CO ENTS: J Z O � � W a ¢ � O ¢ O � W � Q ti 2 W � W � � O W � W WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PHOTO TAKEN p❑ CORRECT WORK AND PROCEED �❑ CORRECT WORK. CALL FOR REINSPECT�ON BEFORE COVERING V ❑ CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. INSPECTOR WILL RETURN. ❑ STOP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR. ❑ INSPECTIO EQUIRED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. call for th ex inspection 24 hours in advance. Owner/ ont . site Inspectbr 447-4230 r�ww coar wo wnxs copynnawccor •s F;b = DATE TIME CITY OF PRIOR LAKE CALLED-IN � INSPECTION NOTt SCHEDULED PERMIT NO. � COMPLETED � z3� 1,� ADDRESS -�770 r ��f s`'j OWNER CONTR. � TELEPHONE NO. tL ❑ FOOTING OPLUMBING RI ❑SITE INSPECTION � C FRAMING C MECHANICAL G EXCAV.lGRADING/FILLING � ❑ INSULATION ❑ WATER HOOKUP ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS � C WALL BD. ❑ METER SET/TURN ON ❑ COMPLAINT 2 C FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOKUP � FOLLOW-UP Q❑ FOUNDATION � SEPTIC INSTALL. ❑ SEPTIC FINAL 2❑ DEMOL. O SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FIREPLACE , J❑ FIRE PREV. ❑ PLUMBING FINAL � Q = COMMENTS: C�-S �� J Q Q � 'T � �`� � Q a � � � 0 Q ._�',�.�, �� s �� ib � o � z k r�S W Q �._ 2 Q � 2 W � W � � O W � W WOiiK SATISFACTORV:PROCEED C PHOTO TAKEN �� COFiFiECT WORK AND PROCEED -0 G COFRECT WOFiK. CALL FOR PEINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING � CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. INSPECTOR WILL RETURN. � STOP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOFi. ❑ INSPECTION REQUIRED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. Owner/Contr si Insp or 447-4230 r�a.. cocyism nance wn� cooyn�aP.crw J F;w CITY OF PRIOR LAKE `. B '°` F ''` z. coia c�► 3. Yellow Applicant PLUMB/NG PERMIT # 9�- �/ � O � P RI�� Applicant: VG?`� �� ;� E �y�F ��ti�, Phone: C �3 �� 1 Address: ��i �' %f �iL I( - r� � Di� , �Y��-E:; `'7''d� .� 5 ��i�� Signature: c' �' �t�''��,� V � Legal Description: Lot �- 3 Block B( Sub: <� %�;✓'� ��% rs� ,.�c/��fz�� Site Address: �i "7 7 C� �%�/ -��. � Building Permit # ` - � PID # �5 �/�i 7 �� °3 - �" M ��'N E S�� NOTE: This perm t will not be process without complete information. � RE UNITS Unit Quantity Type of Fixture Amount Total Bath Tub with or without shower $ 6.00 Dishwasher $ 6.00 Floor Drain $ 6.00 ,� G' D Lavatory (bathroom sink) $ 6.00 : ��- ��,' r Laundry Tray (1 or 2 compartment sink) $ 6.00 �� 0 D Shower Stall $ 6.00 Sinks: $ 6.00 Bar Sink $ 6.00 Water Closet (toilet) $ 6.00 �� u� �' Rough-ins $ 6.00 water Heater $ s.00 j�` �� t,� Water Softner $ 6.00 Stand Pipe (washing machine) $ 6.00 Sewage Ejector $ 6.00 Backflow Assembly (RPZ, Double Check, PVB) $25.00 Backflow Assembly Test $10.00 Lawn Sprinkler $25.00 ( Other $ 6.00 � CC Minimum Fee $25.00 / „ / J/ � � �� SURCHARGE .50 o/ J _ 7 � C � GRAND TOTAL $ J `{�' `�� This permit is granted upon the express condition that said contractor, shall comply in all respects with the ordinances of the State Plumbing Code and the amendme ts thereof. �'�� 5�� RECEIPT NO. �I lS DATE ATTEST J Call for all ins cti ns 24 hours in advance. 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / FAX (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLAYER O � n � � GREEM - FKE � r �j YELLOW - APPLICANT '1 � � GOLD - CITY � � v � CITY OF PRIOR LAKE NO. �� 1�� , � 'NE ��P SEWER AND WATER PERMIT NOTE: Sewer and Water contractors must be registered with the City. APPLICANT: �-�1� ,� ��,,�_� PHONE:_ �Jj�j� ' �l�/� ADDRESS : ��j/'Z �dI l�� / �I f�C�- SS�`°�DATE: f.r � Jc� -- ..._-_ _ , c � � - � �: �� SIGNATURE. /,r�' � BLDG. PERMIT # '/ �� - � �. SITE ADDRESS: ''� % ,��5c.�1 r S PID# �� " � � -� FILL IN THE BLANKS 1. Estimated length of water service /`�_5 � feet. 2. Size of water service inch(es). 3. Location of any couplings from structure feet. 4. Type of sewer pipe. ABS PVC� Cast Iron 5. Estimated length of sewer line �/U feet. 6. Clean out (if required), located at feet from structure. This application becomes your permit when approved. BY , � ,�; � DATE : � f_� � 11 �/�y __===�,r___________________________________________________________ FEES: $ 35.00 Sewer and water line connection permit. $ .50 Surcharge $ 35.50 TOTAL * Fee for either sewer or water individually is $20.00 plus $ .50 surcharge. * Sewer and water permits issued for new construction must be recorded on the building permit card at the time of issuance to insure that no duplicate sewer and water permits are issued. DATE PAI D., .S l-' AMOUNT PAI D �5 ��5� RECEIPT # .�4��c�,� REC'D BY �� 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior L.ake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER