HomeMy WebLinkAbout05 02 11 city council work session - SCALE trainingUnified Plan for Economic Unified Plan for Economic
Development Workshop Development Workshop
City of Prior Lake City of Prior Lake
May 2, 2011 May 2, 2011
1
“LEGO’S” 101 –
Transportation Corridor
Basics
“Lego’s” 201 - Land Use
and Transportation
“Lego’s” 301 - Support for
Economic Development
Bryan Tucker, Planning Manager, City of
Savage
Lisa Freese, Transportation Manager, Scott
County
Michael Leek, Community Development
Director, City of Shakopee
Michael Sobota, Community Development,
Scott County
Formed in the spring of
2003
Model of
intergovernmental
cooperation
Meets monthly
Membership composition
4
Service Delivery Service Delivery
Establish coordinated policies Consolidation of services
and programs that improve and/or sharing of resources to
the quality of life within our provide superior services at the
communities lowest cost, total cost, to our
taxpayers.
Transportation Transportation
Economic Development Economic Development
Improve transit and
Create a supportive business
transportation infrastructure and
environment that attracts and
services that enhance access and
retains business across all of Scott
mobility, encourage business
County
development and manage costs.
5
signed to build upon principles we have signed to build upon principles we have
De De
supported through our SCALE initiatives: supported through our SCALE initiatives:
Prior Lake City Council adopted
Unified Plan “Charter”
September 21, 2009
City Staff involved in SCALE work
activities
7
.
The “Economic Pause” allows us time
to collectively prepare for business
growth spurred by the pending
economic recovery
Results of Phase I of our Work Plan
identified specific challenges and
opportunities
8
Create a safer, healthier county with
a higher quality of life;
Protect transportation corridors;
Link infrastructure investments to
the Unified Plan;
Optimize existing and future
infrastructure for increased
accessibility, as well as business
development;
Market ourselves
to the region
while supporting the unique role
each community plays in the county.
9
The Functional Class Concept
.
10
Functional Class
Collectors Collectors
Volumes 1,000 Volumes 1,000 - - 8,000 ADT 8,000 ADT
Speeds 30 Speeds 30 - - 35 mph 35 mph
Trips 1 Trips 1 - - 2 miles 2 miles
1/8 mile intersection spacing 1/8 mile intersection spacing
Principal Arterials Principal Arterials
Minor Arterials Minor Arterials
Volumes greater than 20,000 ADT Volumes greater than 20,000 ADT
Volumes 5,000 Volumes 5,000 - - 40,000 ADT 40,000 ADT
Higher speeds Higher speeds
Speeds 35 Speeds 35 - - 45 mph 45 mph
Longer trips Longer trips
Medium length trips Medium length trips
Strict access control Strict access control
Limited access Limited access
Intersection spacing ½ mile Intersection spacing ½ mile
Freeway interchange spacing 1 mile Freeway interchange spacing 1 mile
11
Roadway functional
classification influences land
use & development outcomes.
Consistently applying
functional class standards for
access & mobility positively
impacts development quality.
Consistent standards will
benefit the regional
transportation and land use
systems, promoting SCALE’s
goals.
12
Balance road safety, capacity
and predictability
Adopt and use standards to;
•
Ensure street connectivity
•
& adequate supporting
road network;
Manage connections to
higher order roads;
Use intersection &
interchange influence area
design
13
14
Corridor Management for Economic
Development
ROW preservation
Reduces future impacts to businesses
Access management
Consistent approach to prevent congestion
Reduces “retrofit” costs
15
Access management
Best Approach:
Include access management in your subdivision
standards
Standards give you a better leg to stand on
Why?
Safety
Capacity
Predictability
16
17
Your Role in Implementing
Functional Class
Intersections &
Interchange influence area design
Must be coordinated with
Land Use Plan
18
19
Aligning Land Uses
No access off arterials
Adequate Depth of land
uses to turn lanes
Good internal
circulation
Cross access easements
20
Interchange Influence Areas
Weakest link is the capacity of the intersecting road
Increased crashes
More serious crashes
Congestion
Can back up onto main line
Retrofits are costly
Intensely developed
Access closures controversial
Purchasing R/W is expensive
Driver transition
21
22
23
24
25
Break for Review of
Alternative Scenarios
Discussion
• CR17/TH169
Interchange
Example
26
SCALE Unified Plan Work
Update
Regional Economic
Development Initiatives
Economic Development
Strategy
Marketing Plan timeline
Small Group Exercise
Phase I – Data Gathering
(2009 - 2010)
Phase II – Truth Testing
(2010 - 2011)
Phase III – Economic Development
Strategy and Marketing Plan
Development (2011)
2030 County Jobs Forecast = 56,000 jobs
2030 Jobs Target 78,000 jobs.
additional 37,000
The County needs to grow an
jobs
between 2011 and 2030
Phase 1 Phase 1 – – Data Gathering Data Gathering
Current numbers of Jobs Current numbers of Jobs
CITY Private sector Public sector Total # jobs @ city
Belle Plaine 1677 152 1829
Elko New Market 325 13 339
Jordan 1116 321 1437
New Prague 2347 439 2786
Prior Lake 2878 708 *7447
Savage 5784 766 6549
Shakopee 16909 2300 19209
Scott County 31036 4699 *39596
totals
*includes 3861 employees in leisure & hospitality category
rd
Source: www.postivelyminnesota.com (Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages / 3 qtr 2010)
Development Site Readiness Countywide?
Class I
–
“Pad Ready” and only requires building permit or site plan approvals
490 acres county wide
159 parcels county wide (130 parcels 5 acres or less)
27 parcels 5 - 20 acres
Only 1 parcel 50+ acres!
Class II
–
Property is guided and zoned for commercial or industrial use with public
infrastructure readily accessible
1746 acres county wide
Class III
–
Property is guided for commercial or industrial use on locally adopted
land use map
3336 acres county wide
City Class I Class II Class III
Prior Lake 7% 22% 71%
60 acres of Class I acreage guided and zoned for Com/ Ind use
194 acres of Class II acreage guided for Comm./Industrial uses
617 acres of Class III acreage guided for Comm./Ind. uses
Belle Plaine 2% 30% 68%
Elko New Market 5% 13% 83%
New Prague 6% 42% 51%
Jordan 6% 25% 70%
Savage 13% 84% 3%
Shakopee 27% 68% 5%
SMSC 10% 26% 64%
32
Jobs - to - Acres density Bldg sq footage
Class I 550 – 750 jobs 850 jobs
Class I - II 2,300 – 3,300 jobs 4,000 jobs
Class I - III 7,800 – 11,000 jobs 12,000 jobs
There is only enough Class I acreage in the city to generate
-
several hundred new jobs.
There is enough Class I – III acreage to generate 7,800 to 12,000
-
new jobs by the year 2030.
Transportation Infrastructure Analysis Transportation Infrastructure Analysis
Countywide gross C/I map with roads here
Countywide gross C/I map with broadband fiber here
Transportation Infrastructure analysis (SCALE member staff)
Market Competitiveness analysis (SCALE member staff and outside
assistance)
Broadband/Intelligent Community analysis (Task Force and outside
assistance)
Developable Acreage analysis (Consultant and Brokers)
Economic Development tools analysis (SCALE Work Team and
Outside Assistance)
Phase II Phase II – – Truth Testing Truth Testing
(2010 (2010 - - 2011) 2011)
How do we position SCALE to influence the Itasca
Project Regional Economic Development Vision?
SCALE Membership/Influence
How do we develop strategies to capture National and
International opportunities for Business development?
How do we develop strategies to better market our
collective land base and economic development assets
to the Region?
How do we capture all Business Expansion opportunities
MetroMSP website for marketing
Council of Mayors Competitiveness Project
Entrepreneurship Acceleration
Customer Service at every step of
the process:
Clear Role in Economic Development
Clear and consistent Regulatory standards with
timelines defined
Direct/honest responses to businesses
Predictable decision - making processes
Defined business incentives policies
Call to Action Call to Action
Difference between Twin Cities
employment growth and U.S.
employment growth
1
1.0
Job growth has
0.8
significantly
declined
0.6
relative to
0.4
the U.S.
0.2
0
1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
40
1 3 - year moving average difference between Twin Cities and the U.S. using the given year and the previous two years
Twin Cities Assessment
MSP above peers and
national average
MSP around average
MSP below average
Today’s Focus
Assessment
Supporting Facts
Minnesota’s corporate tax is third highest in the nation at
Cost of Doing
9.8%
Business
MN ranks 41 st in overall tax climate
Environmental Levers
Minnesota’s unionization rate is at 15.9 percent relative to
12.5 nationally
Ranked #1 on Sperling’s best places, #2 on Forbes Best
Quality of Life
U.S. Cities to earn a living, and #2 in Next Cities: Hotspots
for young, talented workers
36.8% of Twin Cities residents have a bachelor’s degree
Human
relative to 27.5% nationally
Capital
MSP average commute time of 24 minutes is at the US
average and average commute time via public
Infrastructure
transportation is better than US average
Broadband penetration of 56% is middle of the road
relative to peers
Innovation
Ranks 22 nd in number of entrepreneurs per thousand
and Start -
residents
At 26 deals venture deals in 2007, MSP lags top
up
innovation hubs
41
Twin Cities Assessment
MSP above peers and
national average
MSP around average
MSP below average
Today’s Focus
Assessment
Supporting Facts
Currently various economic development entities
Unified Regional
operate with varying visions
Vision
ED pursued at a sub - regional level
Process Levers
Currently, ED entities operate largely
Central ED
autonomously
Governance
Sub - regions within MSP often compete for
business rather than coordinating efforts
Limited outreach efforts on regional basis, with
Marketing
most outreach coming from city entities such as
Campaign
Capital City Partnership
More to Life Positively Minnesota
and efforts
Historically limited coordinated cluster efforts but
Sector focus
some current activities underway (e.g., RCM,
Humphrey Institute)
42
Participation in Itasca
Participation in SCALE Unified
Planning
Project
Setting Countywide Agenda to
– Setting Regional Agenda to Capture
Capture Regional and Sub - regional
National and International ED
ED Opportunities
Opportunities
Focus on economic development
– Focus on Restoring Job Growth in
throughout the County, such as:
the Twin Cities, through:
Sites and Building Inventories
• Setting a Regional Vision
Economic Development Tools
• Branding and Marketing the Region
Business Retention programs
• Regional Business Retention
Labor Force Development and Training
• Attracting New Businesses to the Region
Entrepreneur/Business Start - up
Assistance
Marketing
Current Activities Future Activities
through SCALE through SCALE & Itasca
Data Gathering
Land Inventories
Broker Interviews Strategy Development
Mapping Marketing
Retention Surveys Websites
Planning Regional Visioning
Research
“Marketing our assets”
“Understanding our assets”
Break For Small Group Exercises:
CONSIDER:
BUSINESS NEEDS
Available Sites
Protecting Corridors
Access/Mobility Needs
Long Term/Short Term
Economic Development
Tools
45
Instructions: Small Group: Instructions: Small Group:
Review Business needs
(handouts)
Review site
requirements
Use Large Phase I Map
Identify proposed
site(s) for the
prospective Businesses
Propose how you
would respond to this
business prospect to
bring jobs to Scott
County
Twenty minutes to work
•
Report to large group
•
46
Economic Development is competitive and
takes a long term commitment
Short - term cost vs Long - term gain
Know/Create your assets
Businesses have specific needs
Time = $$$$$
Customer Service throughout the process
47
Questions Questions
48
Good Transportation Utilities and
System Access communications
Regional System close
No “Hassles” - Good
proximity
Customer Service
Local System(s) available
Available Financing
Site/building space
that meets their
requirements
Cost Efficient
operations
49
Location related to Owner/Manager
Markets/Customers / Residence proximity
Suppliers
Entrepreneurship -
Well trained/available Start - up assistance
Workforce
Business Incentives
Quality of Life for
employees
“Cluster”
opportunities and
business support
50
Interchange Influence Areas
51