HomeMy WebLinkAboutDraft 08/15/11 Minutes/ O~ PRto
N
U �
4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake. MN 55372
'�r
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 15, 2011
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Mayor Myser, Council members Erickson, Hed-
berg, Keeney and Soukup, City Manager Boyles, City Attorney Pace, Finance Director Erickson, City Engi-
neer /Inspections Director Poppler, Public Works /Natural Resources Director Gehler, Police Chief O'Rourke,
Fire Chief Hartman, Natural Resources /Facilities /Fleet Manager Friedges, Assistant City Manager Kansier,
Assistant City Manager Meyer and Administrative Assistant Green.
PUBLIC FORUM
The Public Forum is intended to afford the public an opportunity to address concerns to the City Council.
The Public Forum will be no longer than 30 minutes in length and each presenter will have no more than
ten (10) minutes to speak. Topics of discussion are restricted to City governmental topics rather than pri-
vate or political agendas. Topics may be addressed at the Public Forum that are on the agenda except
those topics that have been or are the subject of a scheduled public hearing or public information hearing
before the City Council, the Economic Development Authority (EDA), Planning Commission, or any other
City Advisory Committee. The City Council may discuss but will not take formal action on Public Forum
presentations. Matters that are the subject of pending litigation are not appropriate for the Forum.
Comments:
No person stepped forward to speak.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
City Manager Boyles requested that Old Business items 9A and 9B be reversed in order to allow Mr.
Mattson of Northland Securities an opportunity to address the Council earlier in the evening.
MOTION BY HEDBERG, SECOND BY KEENEY TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS MODIFIED.
VOTE: Ayes by Myser, Erickson, Hedberg, Keeney and Soukup. The motion carried.
APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES
MOTION BY SOUKUP, SECOND BY KEENEY TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 1, 2011
MEETING AS PRESENTED.
VOTE: Ayes by Myser, Erickson, Hedberg, Keeney and Soukup. The motion carried.
CONSENT AGENDA
City Manager Boyles reviewed the items on the consent agenda.
A. Consider Approval of Invoices to be Paid.
B Consider Approval of Building Permit Summary Report.
C Consider Approval of Animal Control Services Report.
D. Consider Approval of Fire Department Report.
E. Consider Approval of Resolution 11.094 Approving a Joint Powers Agreement for Assessment Services Be-
tween Scott County and the City of Prior Lake.
F. Consider Approval of Resolution 11 -095 Approving a Special Hunt on the Vierling Property.
G. Consider Approval of Resolution 11.096 Approving a Special Hunt on the O'Loughlin Property.
Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 / www.cityofpriorlake.com
H. Consider Approval of Resolution 11 -097 Approving the Combined Preliminary and Final Plat to be known as
Eastwood 3rd Addition.
Councilmember Erickson requested that items 5F and 5G be removed from the Consent Agenda for dis-
cussion.
MOTION BY ERICKSON, SECOND BY HEDBERG TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS MOD-
IFIED.
VOTE: Ayes by Myser, Erickson, Hedberg, Keeney and Soukup. The motion carried.
Comments:
Erickson: Asked if the hours requested for the special hunts are consistent with the noise guidelines set
out in ordinance.
O'Rourke: Replied that the start time is consistent with the ordinance for 7 a.m. on week days and 8 a.m.
on weekends.
Boyles: Added that the ordinance addresses construction noises and 10 p.m. is when neighborhood nois-
es are supposed to cease, whereas the hunts are scheduled to finish earlier.
O'Rourke: Noted that the language on this proposed resolution is the same as approved by the Council
last year.
Myser: Asked how many years there has been a special hunt on the Vierling property.
O'Rourke: Four or five.
Myser: Asked if there are changes in hours from the first hunt.
O'Rourke: Stated that previously the hunt did not begin until 9 a.m.; and comments were made expressing
concern about pedestrian traffic going to Jeffers Elementary. Noted that, generally, people are aware that
firearms discharge is not allowed in the City so they call to ask about it. Stated there were no issues last
year with the noise and the timeframe.
Boyles: Stated the Council may want to consider the degree of urbanization in the areas. CR 21 to the
north will be opening soon which will bring more traffic to the area. Ordinance does provide for special
hunts, but with more urbanization in the area, review may be desired.
O'Rourke: Commented that the language about the time of the hunts in the resolution is consistent with
water fowl hunting laws in the State rather than with language for construction equipment noise. The City's
firearms ordinance allows hunts that are consistent with State laws, but the Council can set whatever hours
it wishes.
Erickson: Stated he would like an ending time of 7 p.m. or half hour after sunset, whatever comes first.
Keeney: Stated his understanding that this activity occurs only three or four days out of the year.
O'Rourke: Concurred adding that O'Loughlin intends to only hunt in the morning.
Keeney: Putting a 7 p.m. restriction on the hunt shouldn't be a problem.
Soukup: Believes the Minnesota hunting laws are from sun -up to sun -down and suggested that perhaps
the issue is the noise. Suggested that the resolution should follow the Minnesota hunting laws.
Hedberg: Asked if there have been complaints from nearby residents for past hunts.
O'Rourke: Replied that the only calls received have been questions, not complaints.
Hedberg: Assumes these are the same terms as in the past and there have been no problems so there is
no reason to change the Vierling hunt request. Stated the O'Loughlin property is less urban so the State
hunting laws should be applied.
Myser: Concurred there is no reason to change this year. Would like to see future hunt requests reviewed
for safety concerns since the volume of traffic will be increased near the O'Loughlin property.
2
DRAFT 08 1511 City Council meeting minutes
A motion was made by Erickson to amend the resolution to end the hunts at either 7 p.m. or a half hour af-
ter sunset, whichever comes first.
The motion failed for lack of a second.
MOTION BY HEDBERG, SECOND BY SOUKUP TO APPROVE ITEM 5F, RESOLUTION 11.095 AP-
PROVING A SPECIAL HUNT ON THE VIERLING PROPERTY AND ITEM 5G, RESOLUTION 11.096 AP-
PROVING A SPECIAL HUNT ON THE O'LOUGHLIN PROPERTY.
VOTE: Ayes by Myser, Erickson, Hedberg, Keeney and Soukup. The motion carried.
PRESENTATION
Consider Approval of a Report Regarding Advisory Committee Vacancies.
City Manager Boyles reported on the upcoming term completion of advisory committee members. De-
scribed the kinds of advisory committees that have been established and the process for eligible members
to apply for another term, as well as recruitment of new members. Encouraged viewers to consider volun-
teering for service on an advisory committee.
Comments:
Soukup: Stated that service on an advisory committee is a great way for people to become involved in the
community. Encouraged everyone to look into it and see if there are areas of interest for them.
Hedberg: Concurred with Soukup's comments. Stated that the City moves forward with active involve-
ment of volunteers from the community and many knowledgeable people serve on the committees.
Keeney: Asked how many members have reached term limits.
Boyles: Responded that three members have reached term limits.
Keeney: Clarified that the Planning Commission has official action to enact and without a quorum it cannot
serve its function.
Boyles: Affirmed that it is a statutory body that has final authority on certain matters subject to appeal to
the City Council.
Keeney: Suggested that there should be a priority on recruiting for the Planning Commission. Concurred
that serving on an advisory committee is a good way to provide input to the process and learn more about
what is going in the particular area of interest as well as providing a chance to have a say in advising on
policy in certain areas.
Erickson: Thanked all of the people who have and are serving. Commented on some of the responsibili-
ties and activities of various committees.
Myser: Encouraged citizens to become involved and commented that serving on an advisory committee is
an opportunity to get to know the City and community.
PUBLIC HEARING
None scheduled.
OLD BUSINESS
Consider Approval of a Resolution Providing for the Issuance and Sale of $3,295,000 General Obli-
gation Bonds, Series 2011A.
Finance Director Erickson reviewed the projects that are being bonded. Introduced Steve Mattson of
Northland Securities. Mattson advised the Council that Moody's upheld the City's rating of Aa2, which is a
high - quality rating. Commented that the Federal government's rating was reduced by Standard & Poor's
and the fallout of that is good for the City as it tends to make high quality municipal bonds in demand.
Stated he was able to sell the bonds for 2.02% interest for a total package of $3,240,000 total package.
Reviewed the interest yields and debt service comparisons.
3
DRAFT 08 15 11 City Council meeting minutes
Comments:
Keeney: Thanked Mattson for negotiations on our behalf and expressed excitement about the timing of the
opportunity to take advantage of the market. Asked staff for its recommendation on the accuracy of docu-
mentation.
Pace: Replied that City's bond counsel is responsible for reviewing the documents.
Erickson: Commented that with these rates, other opportunities for the City might be found.
Soukup: Commented that the city hall and police station debt could be refinanced but would incur negative
arbitrage.
Hedberg: Queried about the other four cities whose bonds were sold the same day.
Mattson: Commented on interest rates other cities received.
Hedberg: Remarked on the favorable interest rates. Will support
Myser: Asked about the Moody comment that the City's tax capacity is going down and whether or not
Prior Lake's tax capacity is going down faster than others.
Mattson: Believes Moody's was looking for a reason not to increase the City's rating. Stated he does not
believe the City's valuation is going down any more than anywhere else.
MOTION BY HEDBERG, SECOND BY KEENEY TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 11.101 PROVIDING FOR
THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $3,240,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2011a, PLEDG-
ING FOR THE SECURITY THEREOF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND TAX INCREMENTS AND LEVY-
ING A TAX FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF.
VOTE: Ayes by Myser, Erickson, Hedberg, Keeney and Soukup. The motion carried.
Mattson reviewed the City's three larger bond issues that will be good refinancing candidates, but noted
that they will not reach their early redemption period for up to three years. Believes there is potential to sell
those bond issues and invest the monies in government securities. The government securities will pay the
interest on the new 2011 bonds until 2013 and then to call all the old bonds. Believes that approximately
$1 million dollars can be saved for refinance with a net of approximately half a million after the negative ar-
bitrage. Stated the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee plans to keep interest rates low for two years
which is when the bonds are ready for redemption. Described potential for saving costs and the challenges
of needing to stay below $10 million to receive bank qualified status. Would have to sell reconstruction
bonds for 2012 in November or December to meet the bank qualification and maximize interest savings.
Comments:
Erickson: Believes the amount for bank qualification was raised from $10 million.
Mattson: Responded that it was increased to $20 million and then returned back to $10 million.
Erickson: Asked if there is any likelihood of that going back up to $20 million.
Mattson: Believes that would be unlikely and we should assume that it will remain $10 million. Proposed
that the City could refinance $9.9 million of city hall bonds in 2012 and try to sell the 2012 reconstruction
project bonds in 2011.
Erickson: Asked the Finance Director if she perceives any issues with that strategy.
J. Erickson: Replied that Mattson is the expert on bond issuance and bond counsel Briggs and Morgan
can verify it. It is consistent with the issue of $2 -3 million range for bonds.
Erickson: Asked how it will affect the budget regarding Truth in Taxation meetings.
J. Erickson: Replied that is related to the tax levy we would issue. We would need to keep the structure
of the debt in mind regarding when it will be paid and having the tax levy to pay it.
Mattson: Added that the 2012 issue for streets would be structured for late in 2011 and plans would be
made to set aside enough money for capitalized interest in the bond structure assuming that everything
would happen as normal from a construction standpoint in 2012. Should be able to accommodate it by cal-
DRAFT 08 15 11 City Council meeting minutes
culating the interest on the bonds for the additional six to seven months. Tax levies would not come any
earlier than normal and assessments would still be scheduled for first year collection 2013.
Keeney: Clarified Mattson's comments that it might be possible to wait two years to do this and continue
the benefit of the call feature without negative arbitrage. Asked what the downside might be to take this ac-
tion now.
Mattson: Replied that the downside is that if done now, the City would save half million and lose half mil-
lion in negative arbitrage. If interests are kept low, it would be worthwhile to plan to do this in 2012. Rec-
ommended watching the market and suggested that he communicate with the Council regularly on the sta-
tus of the market.
Keeney: Asked if refinancing could be done in increments if the street bonds were not accelerated, but we
want to stay under the $10 million limit.
Mattson: Replied that it makes sense to keep it together in one bond issue and believes the most effective
way to do it would be to sell all $9.9 million in 2012 using bank qualification and try to sell the 2012 street
reconstruction bonds late in 2011.
Hedberg: Believes we will want to watch this carefully as we are in turbulent times. Concurred that it is
sensible to wait for seven to eight months and early next year watch the financial condition on a month -to-
month basis. Acknowledged the Committee's statements to hold interest rates low for two years, but be-
lieves that world events could overtake the desire to keep rates down. Would favor considering selling
2012 reconstruction bonds late this year.
Soukup: Concurs with previous comments. Would like monthly or bimonthly reports on status of the mar-
ket watch.
Myser: Suggested directing staff to work with bond counsel to come up with a plan and strategy. The plan
and strategy could include some of the risks that are involved with the changing marketplace, how it might
work and the best strategy for moving forward. The plan could be brought back to the Council at a work
session. Asked when a reasonable timeline would be for bringing such a report back to the Council.
J. Erickson: Believes a plan would need to be put together within 30 -45 days in order to be ready by this
fall. Plans have not been developed and contracts are not awarded, so all of those amounts would be es-
timations in the plan.
MOTION MADE BY HEDBERG, SECOND BY SECOND TO DIRECT STAFF TO WORK WITH BOND
COUNSEL TO DEVELOP A PLAN AND STRATEGY FOR DETERMINING WHETHER AND WHEN TO
TAKE THE 2012 STREET CONSTRUCTION BONDS TO MARKET IN LATE 2011 AND SELL $9.9 MIL-
LION OF CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION BONDS IN 2012.
VOTE: Ayes by Myser, Erickson, Hedberg, Keeney and Soukup. The motion carried.
Consider Approval of Three Resolutions Relating to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP): 1)
Approving the 2012 -2016 CIP; 2) Approving the Street Reconstruction Plan; and 3) Approving the
Establishment of the Facilities Management Fund and Closing the Building Fund.
City Engineer Poppler reviewed the CIP which includes the equipment replacement, park equipment re-
placement, and technology and facilities management plan. Stated that water, sewer and water quality
plans will be reviewed with the budget.
Comments:
Hedberg: Commented that there are several important features in the CIP including an accelerated street
reconstruction effort to get to a sustainable long -term plan for streets, as well as establishment of the facili-
ties and technology refurbishing and replacement plans. Highlighted that there are no funds planned in the
CIP to deal with alignment of CR 21 beyond the scheduled intersection project on Arcadia. Asked if this
proposed CIP plan includes a future southern entrance into downtown on Pleasant.
Poppler: Replied that is scheduled for 2016.
5
DRAFT 08 15 11 City Council meeting minutes
Hedberg: The Council will be making a decision on the CR 21 alignment through downtown. Believes fu-
ture CIP plans will potentially include funds for either dealing with CR 21 realignments or completion of Ar-
cadia to the south to Pleasant. Another major item will be the development of Spring Lake Park play fields.
Various youth groups are talking about the usage of those parks at a higher demand than current parks will
support. Such planning might entail a referendum so voters can help determine that planning. Spoke of
the need of capital to support the City in the way it has been run in the past. Will support the CIP.
Soukup: Will support the CIP. Commented that the sale of bonds was approved for reconstruction of the
Boudin's area; park sustainability and park equipment replacement plans are reviewed annually; and water
rates will be proposed for systematic increases.
J. Erickson: Added that the water /sewer rates were last adjusted in 2005 and the stormwater rate was in-
creased in 2009. All rates are projected to be adjusted in 2012.
Erickson: Noted that even though a small annual increase is planned for water rates, Prior Lake has the
lowest water rates in the area. Questioned whether the Sunset Avenue reconstruction project is projected
to be moved up to 2013.
Poppler: Responded that the County has verbally agreed to complete that project in 2013 if the City and
Township support that time frame.
Erickson: Clarified whether the project will also bring sewer to those areas.
Poppler: Affirmed and stated the project will serve a number of the homes around the lake on CR 12 as
well as Sunset Avenue. Stated that the Annexation Task Force met last week to discuss this topic and
supports moving the project to 2013.
Keeney: Commented that the report refers to a 500,000 gallon water storage project for 2013.
J. Erickson: Affirmed stating that was in last year's CIP as well.
Keeney: Commented on the projected debt balances increasing in 2013 and then lessening even while
there are increases in the debt levy and asked if that is due to the transition from longer term bonds to short
term bonds.
J. Erickson: Replied that typically street bonds are ten years and building bonds are 20 years. Have
structured bonds for incrementally increased payments for principal redemption each year. The interest
rate is going down.
Keeney: Reiterated that the City is paying off the debt faster than with a preponderance of 20 -year bonds
and more of the new debt is weighted toward ten -year bonds.
J. Erickson: Bonds are structured based on demand for a given term, interest rates and what investors
are looking for and the assessment stream. Between two to three million dollars of principal debt are being
paid off each year.
Keeney: Recapped the plan to move up the reconstruction project on Sunset and CR 21 to deal with sew-
er problem; some alternatives such as signaling, etc. are still being considered for the Arcadia intersection
based on future decision of alignment.
Poppler: Affirmed that most of the alternatives on hold are for streetscaping and indicated that approx-
imately $250,000 of $300,000 might not be spent depending upon the decision made.
Keeney: Asked how many vehicles the City currently has.
Friedges: Replied there are 140 pieces of equipment including fire, police, streets, parks, staff and utilities.
Keeney: Asked what change in the number of vehicles is projected to change.
Friedges: Replied that two additional pieces are planned over the next 12 years: a vehicle lift and an anti -
icing piece. In the past ten years, the City has purchased 19 additional pieces of which 13 are specialized
or safety equipment at an average cost of $15,000 each.
Keeney: Understands that additional police vehicles were purchased.
Friedges: Confirmed that five were purchased in 2011 with two placed in storage until 2012. One more
vehicle is planned for 2012 in the revolving equipment plan.
DRAFT 08 1511 City Council meeting minutes
0
Keeney: Stated he likes having a plan that is projected into the future believing that is needed for a well -
managed operation. Managing by reaction would not generate the kind of savings we experienced tonight
with the bond sale. This planning will be a benefit to the City for years to come.
Myser: Asked about item CIP 9 and whether it is for operational expenses.
J. Erickson: Replied that it is for capital improvements, but is included in the Parks operating budget.
Myser: Clarified that the funds will be used for equipment replacement, not operating expenses.
Friedges: Affirmed.
Myser: Commented that the technology plan appears to be an operating plan rather than capital improve-
ment.
J. Erickson: Replied that the fund covers the hardware and software associated with technology up-
grades, but does not cover associated licensing fees, etc. Added that there is a supporting detailed matrix
for this plan.
Myser: Asked if these items are shorter term investments.
J. Erickson: Replied that computers are on a four -year cycle.
Myser: Asked if there are specifications about life cycle before it is put on the CIP and when does it be-
come capital rather than operating.
J. Erickson: Replied that the threshold is dependent on the value of the item purchased. Capital pur-
chases for hardware and software are included in the capital account as capital outlay, but technically they
don't meet the threshold for capitalization so they are not capitalized in fixed assets.
Myser: Asked if a financial software package could be charged to enterprise funds.
J. Erickson: Replied that a portion of it would be funded by the enterprise and general funds.
Myser: Queried whether the $1.5 million designated for water storage could be considered a placeholder.
Poppler: Agreed stating that the water storage study is being done and a recommendation will be made.
More definite information about cost will be learned before purchasing decisions are made.
Myser: Asked if there are ways to look at rate structure or growth pattern changes to see if water storage
will be needed by 2013.
Poppler: Replied that the water operating plan will be reviewed again and again and when the water sys-
tems supply study is completed and if it is learned that there will be savings, it can be applied towards rate
increases in future years.
Myser: Expressed his understanding that the fiber optic network connection would improve the service
connection to the water treatment facility and maintenance center and asked if there might be less expen-
sive ways to accomplish it such as new development.
Poppler: Replied that most of the conduit is in place, so some of the links can be made easily. Believes
this will be the most reliable option for connectivity.
Meyer: Stated there were radio read towers that connected Fire Station No 1 which no longer work. A
point -to -point T1 line is being used for the maintenance center and water treatment facility which is expen-
sive. The fiber optic system will be the backbone of collaboration with County and a report will be forth-
coming about that partnership and how it sets us up for the future.
Myser: Asked how the current value relates to the future replacement value in the equipment inventory.
Friedges: Replied that the current value reflects the cost of a new vehicle today and inflationary factors
are built in for future year replacement.
MOTION BY HEDBERG, SECOND BY SOUKUP TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 11.098 APPROVING THE
2012 -2016 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.
VOTE: Ayes by Myser, Erickson, Hedberg, Keeney and Soukup. The motion carried.
MOTION BY HEDBERG, SECOND BY KEENEY TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 11.099 ADOPTING THE
STREET RECONSTRUCITON PLAN AND THE INTENT TO ISSUE GENERAL OBLIGATION STREET
RECONSTRUCTION BONDS.
7
DRAFT 08 15 11 City Council meeting minutes
VOTE: Ayes by Myser, Erickson, Hedberg, Keeney and Soukup. The motion carried.
MOTION BY HEDBERG, SECOND BY SOUKUP TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 11.100 APPROVING THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FUND AND THE CLOSURE OF THE BUILDING
FUND.
VOTE: Ayes by Myser, Erickson, Hedberg, Keeney and Soukup. The motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
Consider Approval of a Resolution Authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to Execute an Ease-
ment Agreement with Burt and Georgiann Olson, Eugene and Sandra Tofanelli and the Tofanelli
Trust.
City Engineer Poppler stated that the City was approached by Olson's requesting an easement in Lake-
front Park to allow driveway access to their home and other lots. Described the area. Described topo-
graphical challenges. Described proposed easement. Stated that Tofanelli's have expressed agreement to
paying for an easement as well as the cost of staff and attorney time.
Comments:
Hedberg: Stated the Planning Commission held a public hearing and supports the easement request with
comments that the steepness of grade in the area makes this only practical solution; the easement will pro-
vide better public safety access; and the easement serves the Olson property as well as access to two ad-
ditional platted lots. Stated there is no meaningful loss of the use of parkland as it is very remote.
Soukup: Sees no issues with easement.
Erickson: Commented that this seems to be serving three lots and asked if it is a driveway or a private
street.
Poppler: Responded that the easement will serve four lots with two property owners and the area is plat-
ted as a 20 -foot driveway.
Erickson: Asked if there should be a street sign.
Pace: Reiterated that it is platted as a driveway, not a street. The driveway was dedicated to the owners
of all the lots. Since it cannot meet the criteria for a street, the classification should not be changed.
Keeney: Commented that many properties border parks and he does not want to set precedence that we
would sell pieces of parks to adjoining properties. Wants to acknowledge that this is necessity and not just
a convenience. Asked why the City does not just sell the property to them rather than having an easement.
Pace: Responded that in order to sell property there would have to be a finding. The Planning Commis-
sion made a finding that the proposed action was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, but sale of park
land would not be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Also, in order to sell public property, the City
would have to advertise it and it could then potentially be sold to someone else. Third, there are several
other lots that benefit from how this driveway is constructed and having an easement agreement requires
Olson's to share the construction method, etc. so there can be no argument about having access impaired.
Finally, this original driveway was dedicated to the public and by selling it to a private party, it would take
away something that is dedicated to the benefit of all people.
Keeney: Asked if all owners of properties benefitted by this easement are benefitted by the agreement.
Pace: Affirmed.
Keeney: Regarding the question of whether this should be a private drive vs. private road, asked if clarifi-
cation would be needed regarding future taxation and whether it has been specified that this is a shared
driveway and there would be shared responsibility for any future improvements. Questioned whether this
could introduce additional complexities to any future special assessments. Suggested there be specific
language in the easement agreement to avoid it.
Boyles: Commented that this easement has been negotiated and executed and the easement document
may not be the appropriate document for clarifying policy on shared driveways.
DRAFT 08 15 11 City Council meeting minutes
Erickson: Believes the City has already established the process for such a scenario with the CR 12
project where an area was defined as a driveway and all property owners had to pay special assessments
for the project. If there is special assessment on West Avenue, this area is defined as a driveway and all
homes using this driveway to access West Avenue would be assessed as part of the project.
Myser: Asked if there have been situations where people who shared a private drive sought to have it de-
clared a private road and subsequently a public road which the City then becomes responsible for it.
Pace: Stated this easement agreement makes it clear what it is, as does the dedication of the plat.
Poppler: Added that it does not meet requirements for a public drive which requires specific amounts of
right of way, street width, etc.
Pace: Commented that concerns about precedence were shared and that is part of the reason why a sale
was not considered. The agreement specifies the uniqueness of the situation and will distinguish it from
any other situation so it should not set a precedent.
MOTION BY SOUKUP, SECOND BY HEDBERG TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 11.102 AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH BURT AND
GEORGIANN OLSON, EUGENE AND SANDRA TOFANELLI AND THE TOFANELLI TRUST.
VOTE: Ayes by Myser, Erickson, Hedberg, Keeney and Soukup. The motion carried.
Consider Approval of a Resolution Calling for a Public Hearing on the Proposed Modification of the
Development Program for Municipal Development District No. 1; The Proposed Establishment of
Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-4; The Propose Adoption of the Tax Increment Financing
Plan Therefore and on the Proposed Awarding of a Business Subsidy.
Assistant City Manager Kansier stated that River Valley Veterinary Service desires to expand and is ask-
ing for tax increment financing of approximately $57,000 over a nine year period. Described the process
for establishing a TIF noting that a public hearing must be held. Ehlers has determined this request meets
statutory criteria. Described costs associated with administering a TIF.
Comments:
Keeney: Stated he is not excited about the use of TIF as a mechanism to encourage business develop-
ment believing the benefit is often overestimated and it is too generous of a program when used to maxi-
mum benefit. Believes it tends to be somewhat of an overestimation to say the development would not
happen but for the tax deferral. Concerned that they are asking for the maximum available TIF.
Boyles: Responded it would be approximately $6,400 annually.
Keeney: Sought clarification of the statement that the improvement would have a 15 -year life.
Kansier: Responded that the owners feel it would meet their needs for the next 15 years after which they
might sell the business or move on.
Keeney: Asked how long the building would be on the tax roll.
Kansier: Replied that it would be on the tax roll for its life; likely more than 50 years.
Keeney: Stated he would be more agreeable to a lesser amount.
Erickson: Commented this might meet the "but for" test in that the owners would probably look at alterna-
tives other than expanding their business if the TIF is declined. Believes advantages to the City include the
continued collection of taxes as in the past even though the increased value of the property would not be
taxed for nine years; as well as the increased taxes received afterwards for an additional 20 or more years.
Soukup: Believes TIF could be a tool to offer people to redevelop and stay in Prior Lake rather than move.
Would like to hear what the EDA and EDAC have to say about this issue. Favors a public hearing.
Hedberg: Stated he serves on the EDA and they have carefully considered incentives to attract and retain
businesses and would consider each situation on its merits. Believes the City needs to be more aggressive
in use of tools to promote economic development. After a public hearing, the Council will determine wheth-
er to approve this TIF. Expressed his opinion that the incentive could encourage them to stay in Prior Lake,
9
DRAFT 08 15 11 City Council meeting minutes
add jobs and grow the tax base. This particular business has a large number of local clientele who appre-
ciate the service offered. Noted that the proposed $57,000 is not money that the City is paying out; but is
money the business owner will be paying. The public entities will collect what they have always received;
and the remainder will be recycled back to the owner. Supports holding a public hearing.
Myser: Stated he is a strong proponent of economic development because it provides jobs, services and a
more stable and broader tax base. Believes that TIF is a viable economic tool; but it should be balanced
with the idea of using the funds judiciously spurring economic development rather than providing tax base.
Supports moving this to a public hearing. Would like to see the EDA move toward formalizing what the
process should be and perhaps develop a policy on the use of TIF.
Keeney: Clarified that this would be TIF issued by the City not the EDA and the public hearing would be
with the Council, not the EDA.
Kansier: Noted there is a 30 -day notice period for the public hearing so there is time to take it to the EDA
for its opinion. Confirmed that the public hearing would be before the Council.
MOTION BY HEDBERG, SECOND BY SOUKUP TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 11 -103 CALLING FOR A
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR
MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1: THE PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCRE-
MENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 -4; THE PROPOSED ADOPTION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FI-
NANCING PLAN THEREFORE AND ON THE PROPOSED AWARDING OF A BUSINESS SUBSIDY.
VOTE: Ayes by Myser, Erickson, Hedberg, Keeney and Soukup. The motion carried.
OTHER BUSINESS
Community Events
Erickson: Stated the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community is hosting its Wacipi this weekend.
Keeney: Sought clarification about whether the Economic Development Authority (EDA) took action on the
CR 21 decision.
Hedberg: Replied that the most recent meeting was a joint meeting of EDA and Economic Development
Advisory Committee (EDAC) and the EDAC gave its position. The EDA did not take a position because
there is more information coming in.
Myser: Added that the EDA as a group will not take a position as two of its members are on the City
Council, although individual members of the EDA may express a position. Stated that taking a position on
the CR 21 decision was not an agenda item.
ADJOURNMENT
With no further comments from Council members, a motion to adjourn was made by Keeney and seconded
by Soukup. With all in favor, the meeting adjourned at 9:34 p.m.
Frank Boyles, City Manager Charlotte Green, Administrative Asst.
DRAFT 08 15 11 City Council meeting minutes
im