Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10B City Budgets and Property Tax LevyAV U 4646 Dakota Street SE \ Prior Lake, NiN 55372 y s N O - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 2011 AGENDA #: 10B PREPARED BY: JERILYN ERICKSON, FINANCE DIRECTOR PRESENTED BY: JERILYN ERICKSON AGENDA ITEM: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING PROPOSED 2012 CITY BUDGETS AND CERTIFYING PRELIMINARY 2012 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE PROPERTY TAX LEVY TO SCOTT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION DISCUSSION: Introduction State Statute 275.065 requires that each "taxing authority" adopt a proposed budget and certify a preliminary tax levy for payable 2012 property taxes to the County Department of Taxation on or before September 15, 2011. The attached resolution fulfills this statutory requirement. The 2009 Legislature made some significant changes to the Truth in Taxation process for 2010 and beyond. At the meeting at which the City Council adopts a proposed budget and tax levy (September 6), the Council must announce the time and place of the council meeting at which the 2012 budget and levy will be discussed and which allows for citizen input (December 5 here in the Prior Lake City Council Chambers). This information must also be included in the meeting minutes. History The Council held a workshop on August 15 to discuss and provide direction on the preliminary 2012 budget and tax levy. Council directed Staff to remove the personnel costs associated with the Economic Development Director position from the General Fund Economic Development department (50% of position was allocated to this budget) and reflect those costs in the EDA Special Revenue Fund. This change would result in reducing the General Fund levy to zero and the EDA Special Revenue Fund would reflect a higher use of fund balance reserves. This change would also reflect the need of additional funding sources for the EDA Special Revenue Fund such as the transfer of funds from other economic development - related funds. A consent agenda item on the 09/06/2011 addresses this transfer of funds. The Council requested clarification of the additional funding being requested to upgrade the emergency sirens. The FCC has mandated that all non - Federal public safety licensees using 25 kHz radio systems migrate to narrowband 12.5 kHz channels by January 1, 2013. Agencies that do not meet the deadline face the loss of communication capabilities. Our current public safety radio system operates at 25 kHz. This mandated change will directly affect the cities' outdoor Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 / www.cityofpriorlake.com warning sirens and will render them inoperable without the needed programming upgrades. It will not affect any other radio service. Prior Lake currently has sixteen outdoor warning sirens in our system. Fifteen need to be upgraded to make them compatible with the narrowband system. The oldest siren was installed in 1975 and because of its location was never replaced and will be phased out. The other sirens range in age from 1990 to 2007 and because of that requires different levels of upgrades to make them narrowband compatible. The older sirens cost more to update. The General Fund Emergency Management preliminary 2012 budget includes $28,400 for siren upgrades. General Fund Intergovernmental revenues include $12,700 in estimated grant revenues for these upgrades. Current Circumstances Preliminary 2012 Budget The preliminary budgets prepared reflect the direction given to Staff during the August 15, 2011 council workshop. In addition, the following changes were made: 1) The Sewer Fund reflects an increase in the Municipal Wastewater Charge per notification received on August 25, 2011; 2) The Sewer Fund and the Water Fund both reflect a decrease in professional services to correspond with the Cartegraph position (more information below); 3) The Transit Fund State Aid revenues were increased to reflect recent updates regarding the interpretation of new legislation; and 4) The General Fund reflects a decrease in Intergovernmental Revenues due to a reduction in grant revenues. Council members had requested a reconciliation of the impacts of the Reorganization. The following chart reflects all of the personnel changes (reorganization and new positions) that are included in the preliminary 2012 budget: Reorganization: (1.00) Community Development/Natural Resources Director Al (1.00) Building7Transit Service Director 81 (1.00) Director of Public Works/City Engineer C1 (1.00) Parks, Fleet & Facilities Maintenance Supervisor D1 (1.00) Assistant City Engineer El (1.00) Economic Development Director F1 (1.00) Streets/Utllities:Maintenance Supervisor G1 1.00 Assistant City Manager 82 1.00 Planning Coordinator F2 1.00 Community D+evelopment/f onomic Development 0inector A2 1.00 Natural Resource- Facillt1wFleet Manager D2 1.00 City Engineer /inspections Director E2 1.00 Maintenance Superintendent G2 1.00 Public Works /Natural Resources Director C2 1.00 Cartearaoh H 1.00 Total changes from Reorganization New Positions: 1.00 Accourrtant 1.00 Police Supervisor J 0.20 Utility Billing Clerk - increased 8 hours per week K ;0,03 Part Time secretaries � Increased total of 1 hour per week L 2.23 Total New Positions 3.23 Total Change in Personnel The 2011 Staff Reorganization has the impact of increasing the employee count by one (1) full- time - equivalent (FTE). I have added codes on the right side to correlate the change in titles with the change in responsibilities from the Reorganization. For example, the Community Development/Natural Resources Director position (A1) was changed to Community Development/Economic Development Director (A2). Codes F1 /F2 and H require some additional clarification. The Economic Development Director position (F1) as it was budgeted in 2011 was a full -time position that would commence on or about July 1, 2011 (half year funding). As part of the Reorganization, the funding for this position was allocated to funding the Planning Coordinator position (F2). The Cartegraph position (H) existed as a full -time position in 2010. The individual that was in this position resigned in 2010 and Staff sought to use professional consultants to fill some of the responsibilities during 2011. As part of the 2011 Reorganization, Staff evaluated the technology needs and determined that it was more cost effective to reinstate the position in the 2012 preliminary budget and reduce the corresponding professional service budgets. The difference between the amounts budgeted in professional services and the anticipated personnel costs is an additional $20k. The following chart shows the changes "by Fund" from the Reorganization and new positions added: CHANGES TO THE FUNDS BY THE REORGANIZATION General Fund (1.00) Community Development/Natural Resources Director Al (0.25) Building/Transit Service Director B1 (0.50) Director of Public Works /City Engineer C1 (1.00) Parks, Fleet & Facilities Maintenance Supervisor D1' (1.00) Assistant City Engineer E1 (1.00) Economic Development Director F1 0.25 Assistant City Manager B2' , , 1.00 Planning Coordinator F2 0.50 Community Development/Economic Development Director A2 1.00 Natural Resource- Facilities -Fleet Manager 02 1.00 City Engineer /Inspections Director E2 0.50 Maintenance Superintendent 02 0.25 Public Works /Natural Resources Director C2 0.25 Cartegraph H - Total change for General Fund EDA Special Revenue Fund 0.50 Community Development/Economic Development Director A2 0.50 Total change for EDA Special Revenue Fund Water Fund (0.25) Director of Public Works /City Engineer C1 0.25 Maintenance Superintendent G2, (1.00) Streets /Utilities Maintenance Supervisor G1 0.25 Public Works /Natural Resources Director 02 0.35 Cartegraph H (0.40) Total change for Water Fund Water Quality Fund 0.25 Public Works /Natural Resources Director C2 0.05 Cartegraph H 0.30 Total change for Water Quality Fund Transit Fund (0.75) Building/Transit Service Director B1 0.75 Assistant City Manager 62= - Total change for Transit Fund Sewer Fund (0.25) Director of Public Works /City Engineer C1 0.25 Maintenance Superintendent G2' 0.25 Public Works/Natural Resources Director C2 0.35 Cartegraph H 0.60 Total change for Sewer Fund 1.00 Recap of Total Changes among Funds - Reorganization CHANGES TO THE FUNDS BY THE NEW POSITIONS & ADDITIONAL HOURS General Fund 1.00 Accountant 1 1.00 Police Supervisor J 0.03 Part Time Secretaries - increased total of 1 hour per week L 2.03 Total Increase for General Fund Water Fund 0.10 Utility Billing Clerk -increased 4 hours per week K 0.10 Total Increase for Water Fund Sewer Fund 0.10 Utility Billing Clerk -increased 4 hours per week K 0.10 Total Increase for Sewer Fund 2.23 Recap of Total Increases among Funds - New Positions & Addl Hours 3.23 Total Change in Personnel As you can see, there is some movement of FTEs between Funds due to the Reorganization, resulting in no change to the General Fund and Transit Fund, increases to the EDA Special Revenue Fund, Water Quality Fund and Sewer Fund, and a decrease in the Water Fund. This is primarily due to realigning positions and corresponding responsibilities to the appropriate funding sources. Specifically, fifty (50) percent of the Community Development/Economic Development Director is being charged to the EDA Special Revenue Fund, the Public Works /Natural Resources Director and the Maintenance Superintendent personnel costs are being allocated to the funds /departments for which they have oversight and the Cartegraph position is being reinstated for which professional service budgets were reduced. The new positions (including some minor increases in hours for two part-time secretarial positions and one utility billing position) result in increases to the General Fund, Water Fund and Sewer Fund. The preliminary budget includes the Accountant position for a full -year and the Police Supervisor position for seven (7) months. Budget Overview The Budget Overview reflects preliminary figures for the 2012 budget for the following funds: • General Fund • Debt Service Funds (includes all debt) • Revolving Equipment Fund • EDA Special Revenue Fund • Water Fund • Sewer Fund • Water Quality Fund • Transit Fund The second page of the Budget Overview shows tax levy and budgetary comparisons from the 2011 adopted budget to the preliminary 2012 figures. Summary Revenue and Expenditure Reports Summary reports are provided for each of the funds noted above. Significant changes are as follows: General Fund Revenues • Eliminated reduction of negative MVHC Aid revenue per tax changes adopted in the 2011 special legislative session. • Increased property tax revenues by $74,855 of which $37k is for operating expenditures and $47k is for market value referendum debt and the EDA lease revenue bond. NOTE. This increase is offset by a decrease in the debt service levies resulting in a zero change in the overall tax levy. • Increased State road and bridge aid (based on 2011 amount received), grant revenue for sirens, franchise fees and interest earnings; • Reduced Township fire agreement revenues and Tower/ Communication Site lease revenues (Clear Wire terminated the Crest Avenue agreement); • Use of Fund Balance reserves for funding the $150k transfer to the Facilities Management Fund. General Fund Expenditures • Addition of full -time Accountant and Police Supervisor; • Addition of .5 hour /week for two part-time secretaries; • Other personnel costs moved to reflect the impact of the 2011 Staff Reorganization; • Established "Natural Resources" department by moving costs previously accounted for in the Parks Department budget; Agreements for all three bargaining units expire on 12/31/11. Personnel costs reflect an estimated COLA and steps for represented and non - represented groups, anticipated changes for insurances, etc. The Council had also requested a reconciliation of the movement of expenditures to establish the Natural Resources Department in the General Fund. The following chart shows this movement: 2011 Budget $1,326,359 2011 Budget $ 0 Personnel: Reduce by Park (82,206) Personnel: Add 50% of Parks, 86,705 Supervisor (1 FTE); add 25% Fleet & Facilities Maintenance of Maintenance Supervisor and 25% PW /NR Superintendent Director Other Personnel Adjustments 8,614 Other Personnel Adjustments 1,249 — salary & benefits* — salary & benefits* Current Expenditures — Move ( 28,570) Current Expenditures — Moved 28,570 from Parks to Natural from Parks to Natural Resources Resources Other Current Expenditure Adjustments: Add maintenance of trails & 10,000 Add professional services for 4,650 sidewalks Pike Lake Park & Comp Plan update Less miscellaneous (1,333) adjustments Add capital expenditures per 40,000 2012 -2016 CIP Preliminary 2012 Budget $ 1,272,864 Preliminary 2012 Budget $ 121,174 *Benefits include employer payroll taxes (FICA & medicare), workers compensation insurance, etc. Debt Service Funds • A high rate of special assessment prepayments and sufficient fund balance reserves allow a reduction of $84,855 in the 2012 debt service tax levies. • Reflects payments for all types of debt including special assessment bonds, tax increment bonds, revenue bonds and market referendum bonds; Revolving Equipment Fund • $10,000 increase in tax levy per 2012 -2016 CIP; NOTE: This increase is also offset by a decrease in the debt service levies resulting in a zero change in the overall tax levy. • Reflects equipment replacements and refurbishments identified in the 2012 -2016 CIP. Water Fund, Sewer Fund. & Water Quality Fund • Operating revenues reflect anticipated rate changes per Council adoption of the 2012 -2016 CIP; • The 2011 Water Fund revenue budget included 100% of CFAC and penalty revenues budgeted (Staff will request that Council adopt a budget amendment at a future council meeting so financial reports accurately reflect these anticipated revenues); 2012 budget reflects these two revenues split 50/50 between Water Fund and Sewer Fund. • WQ Fund includes grant revenue for water quality initiatives; • Personnel costs reflect adjustments as noted above including changes due to the 2011 Staff Reorganization; Transit Fund • Increased revenues from bus fares; • Reduction in transit aid based on the Met Council's most recent interpretation of the 2011 special session legislation; • Personnel costs reflect adjustments as noted above. • Increased operating costs; • No capital projects planned. Property tax levy The table below provides some explanation regarding the estimated change in the property tax levy: Description $$ Impact on Levy ( Change from 2011 Personnel $ 240,727 Current Ex 44,796 Capital 43,024 Debt Service 54,805 Transfers 150,000 Total Expenditure Change $ 443,760 Increased Non -Tax Revenues 26,364 Increased Use of GF Reserves' 84,017 Eliminate Negative Revenue for MVHC (258,524) Increase In GF Lev $ 74 Other Tax Supported Funds: Revolving Equipment Fund Levy 10,000 Debt Service Funds 84,855 Net Increase in Levy $ 0 2011 Use of Reserves ($150,000) — 2011 Use ($65,983) _ $84,017 Use of Fund Balance Reserves The preliminary budget reflects a planned use of fund balance reserves in most of the funds for purposes of funding debt service payments, capital replacement, and capital improvements. The General Fund includes a $150,000 use of reserves for funding a transfer to the Facilities Management Fund. The Council approved the establishment of the Facilities Management Fund based on the Facilities Management Plan in the 2012 -2016 CIP on August 15, 2011. Impact of Tax Levy on Tax Rates The Market Value Homestead Credit program was eliminated per tax changes adopted in the 2011 special legislative session. In place of the MVHC, homeowners will receive an exclusion of a portion of the market value of their house from property taxes. For homes valued at less than $76,000, the exclusion is equal to 40% of the home's market value. For homes valued between $76,000 and $413,800, the exclusion is $30,400 minus 9% of the value over $76,000. The following table reflects the impact of four scenarios on the tax rates using the preliminary 2012 market values and tax capacities (per the new tax changes): • Zero change in total tax levy • Maintain same tax rates for tax capacity -based levies and market value - based levies • Levy increased by the amount of tax generated by new construction • Zero change in Total Tax Levy IMPACT OF 2012 PROPERTY TAX LEVIES based on preliminary estimated tax capacities and market values for 2012 based on updated fiscal disparities information Preliminary Final Zero Change Maintain Same New Construction* Budget 2011 In Levy Tax Rates $ 32,613,900 09/06/11 TC Levy $ 8,220,809 $ 8,277,468 $ 7,805,099 $ 8,320,966 $ 8,254,308 Fiscal Disparities $ 787,953 $ 731,294 $ 731,294 $ 731,294 $ 731,294 TC Levy $ 9,008,762 $ 9,008,762 $ 8,536,393 $ 9,052,260 $ 8,985,602 TC Value $ 26,768,943 $ 25,415,292 $ 25,415,292 $ 25,415,292 $ 25,415,292 TC Rate 30.7102 % 32.5688% 30.7102% 32.7400% 32.4777% MV Levy $ 1,105,362 $ 1,105,362 $ 1,089,391 $ 1,119,226 $ 1,128,522 MV Value $ 2,600,331,100 $ 2,562,758,800 $ 2,562,758,800 $ 2,562,758,800 $ 2,562,758,800 MV Rate 0.04251% 0.04313% 0.04251% 0.04367% 0.04404% Changes: TC Levy $ - $ (472,369) $ 100,157 $ (23,160) MV Levy $ - $ (15,971) $ 13,864 $ 23,160 Total $ - $ (488,340) $ 114,021 $ *Calculation of additional levy from new construction growth: $32,613,900 x I% x 30.710% (2011 TC Rate) _ $ 100,157 $32,613,900 x .04251% (2011 MV Rate) = $ 13,864 As previously mentioned, the Council directed staff to prepare a preliminary budget which included a zero tax increase for the 2012 property tax levy. The impact of the new market value exclusion is evident in column 3 "zero change in levy" in which the levy remains the same but the tax base is reduced and, as a result, the tax rate rises Although the homestead exclusion is computed in a mathematically similar manner to the repealed MVHC, the new system will shift taxes among properties within the community. Preliminary 2012 Tax Levy Options The preliminary 2012 budget includes a preliminary tax levy of $10,114,124. This is a zero increase from the 2011 tax levy. Truth -in- Taxation Hearing Process As mentioned above, new legislation requires that the City Council announce the time and place of the council meeting at which the 2011 budget and levy will be discussed and which allows for citizen input. This information must be included in the meeting minutes. The public hearing on the proposed 2012 budget and tax levy will be held on Monday, December 5, 2011, at 7 p.m. with a continuation hearing to be scheduled for Monday, December 19, 2011, if needed. ISSUES: The attached resolution reflects a proposed 2012 General Fund Budget of $12,632,073 representing a 3.64% increase from the current year budget of $12,188,313. The preliminary total budget is $25,726,628 representing a 1.65% increase from the current year budget of $25,307,973. Overall, the proposed tax levy of $10,114,124 is comprised of the following elements: ........ .. . .............. ............................... i Pu rpo se ....................................................................................................................... ........._..................... .................................................. ..........:. ............ Amount ....... Change ..... ............................... _ ............ ....... .... ........ _ ...................... ............................................... General purposes ................ .............. .... .... _................. $ 6 , 998 5 1 4 ..._.................... ........... .... .... ........ ........ ........... .... ............... ................ .................................................... ............................... Revolving equipment fund ....... ............................... 1..... ..... ..................... ...... ........... ............................... 280, 000 ............._................ ........................._..... .........$......... .............................. 10,000 ................ Referendum debt levies a............................................_.............................................................................................. 1,128,522 23,160 ......................................................................................................................................................................... EDA...buildin.g....bond levy ....................... ................... ............... .. .................. ....... ............_ 634, 748 ..._ ............. .... ... ....................... . ........... ................_... CIP special debt levies 1,072,340 ($ 84,855) ................... Total Property Tax Lev....... .............._$..._1._0,1..14, . Y.. 124............................ _$ ...... The proposed tax levy of $10,114,124 represents a 0.00% increase from the current year tax levy. Historically, a portion of the City tax levy that was known as the Market Value Homestead Credit Aid was supposed to be paid by the State of Minnesota. This was a credit that appeared on the property tax statement to reduce the taxes paid by the property owner. Even though the property owner received this credit, the City did not actually receive the payment from the State of MN for 2011, 2010, 2009. The City only received 50% of the amount due in 2008. For years 2009- 2011, the City budgeted a negative or contra revenue in anticipation of NOT receiving this State aid. The contra revenue has been eliminated in the preliminary 2012 budget. This change, along with other impacts from changes in non -tax revenues and expenditures, results in an increase in the tax rates for both the tax capacity - based levy and the market -value based levy even though the overall tax levy remains the same as 2011. The initial property tax levy certification for 2012 as approved this evening may be maintained at this level or only adjusted downward when the final budget and property tax levy is considered in December. FINANCIAL There are multiple factors that have an impact on the property tax that is levied IMPACT: against an individual property. They include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) Valuation of individual property 2) Total valuation of all properties in the community 3) Classification rates 4) Property tax levy When any one of these factors change, the amount of property tax levied against a particular property will be impacted. During this past year, Prior Lake property owners experienced valuation adjustments ranging from a 15% increase to a 15 %+ decrease. The following chart shows the percentage of residential properties that received the particular change in market value: Increase 3% No Change 29% Decrease 68% Total 100% The total tax capacity valuation for the City of Prior Lake decreased approximately 1.7 %. Combined with the implementation of the Market Value Exclusion (which reduced total tax capacity by approximately 946,000) and smaller changes in tax increment and fiscal disparities, the total tax capacity valuation for the City decreased about 5.1 %. There were no changes in the classification rates. The State implemented the Market Value Exclusion which impacts homes valued at $413,800 or less. Based on a zero tax levy change, about 90% of residential properties will still experience an increase in their City property taxes. Historically, we have used the average valued home as a basis for communicating the impact of any tax levy decision. Based on current tax valuations provided by Scott County, the average valued home of $284,800 in 2011 decreased approximately 2.4% to $278,100 for taxes payable 2012. The impact of a zero total change in property tax levy would be an approximate $26.00 increase in taxes imposed by the City of Prior Lake. This does not include the impact of taxes imposed by the county, school district, etc. The attached resolution identifies the funds for which the City approves formal budgets and the proposed 2012 property tax levy. The resolution also states that the City will hold a formal Truth in Taxation public hearing to receive citizen input on the proposed 2012 budget and property tax levy on Monday December 5, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. Final budget adoption and property tax levy approval will occur during the following council meeting on December 19, 2011. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are available to the City Council: 1. Approve Resolution Adopting Proposed 2012 City Budgets and Certifying Preliminary 2012 City of Prior Lake Property Tax Levy to Scott County Department of Taxation as submitted. 2. Amend resolution to an amount determined by the City Council. RECOMMENDED Staff recommends Alternative #1. The Council may make alternative adjustments MOTION: between now and the final levy determination that must be certified in late December. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution Adopting Proposed 2012 City Budgets and Certifying Preliminary 2012 City of Prior Lake Property Tax Levy to Scott County Department of Taxation 2. 2012 Preliminary Budget Overview (2 pages) 3. 2012 Summary Revenue Report by Fund 4. 2012 Summary Expenditure Report by Fund U try 4646 Dakota Street SE r INxsso� P Prior Lake, MN 55372 RESOLUTION 11 -xxx A RESOLUTION ADOPTING PROPOSED 2012 CITY BUDGETS AND CERTIFYING PRELIMINARY 2012 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE PROPERTY TAX LEVY TO SCOTT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION Motion By: Second By: WHEREAS, Truth in Taxation provisions as specified by state statute requires the Prior Lake City Council to certify a proposed property tax levy to the Scott County Department of Taxation; and WHEREAS, Preliminary budget amounts for the City of Prior Lake for calendar year 2012 are estimated as follows; and General Fund $ 12,632,073 Debt Service Funds 4,468,890 Revolving Equipment Fund 439,564 EDA Special Revenue Fund 137,923 Water Fund 3,438,992 Sewer Fund 3,071,960 Water Quality Fund 690,022 Transit Fund 847,204 Total $ 25,726,628 WHEREAS, The proposed property tax levy for the City of Prior Lake for payable year 2012 is as follows; and General Purposes $ 6,998,514 Revolving Equipment Fund 280,000 Debt Service 2,835,610 Total $ 10,114,124 WHEREAS, The proposed property tax levy by tax base for the City of Prior Lake for payable year 2012 is as follows; and Tax Capacity Based Levy $ 8,985,602 Market Value Based Referenda Levy 1,128,522 Total $ 10,114,124 WHEREAS, The proposed City of Prior Lake property tax levy for the year payable 2012 represents a zero change in total tax levy; and WHEREAS, The City Council will consider the 2012 General Fund, Debt Service, Revolving Equipment Fund, EDA Special Revenue Fund and Enterprise Fund Budgets and the Final 2012 Property Tax Levy during its regularly scheduled council meeting at 7:00 p.m. on Monday December 5, 2011 at 4646 Dakota Street SE, Prior Lake with a continuation (if necessary) at 7:00 p.m. on December 19, 2011. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA as follows: 1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein. 2. That the proposed tax levy be distributed upon the taxable property in said City for the following purposes in payable 2012: Purpose General City Purposes Revolving Equipment Fund Debt Service: G.O. Improvement Bonds'05 (Fish Point) CSAH 82 Improvement Appropriation '06 G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds '07 G.O. Improvement Bonds '08 (Brooksville Hills 1) G.O. Improvement Bonds'09 (Brooksville Hills II) G.O. Imp Refunding Bonds 2009B G.O. Improvement Bonds'10 (CR12) G.O. Improvement Bonds'11 (Boudins I & Arcadia ROW) G.O. Improvement Bonds ('04) '11 Refunding G.O. Building Bonds'05 (EDA) ** Park Refunding Bonds'05 ** Fire Station #2 Referendum Bonds'06 ** Fire Station #1 Refunding Bonds'08 Total Debt Service Total Amount $ 0 148,340 162,000 91,000 115,000 118,000 109,000 172,000 157,000 634,748 727,244 216,280 184,998 Amount $ 6,998,514 280,000 2,835,610 $10,114,124 Note: Single starred funds shall be spread over the entire consolidated City of Prior Lake. Note: Double starred funds represent market value -based referendum taxes and shall be spread over the entire consolidated City of Prior Lake. Note: All other bond issues have sufficient fund balances to cover debt requirements. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 6th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2011. YES im M ser M ser Erickson Erickson Hedberg Hedber Keeney Keene Soukup Souku Frank Boyles, City Manager 04 Council Meeting 09.06.2011 Cit y of Prior Lake 2012 Preliminary Budget Budgeted Funds Page 1 of 2 Debt Revolving Total Total General Service Equipment EDA Governmental Water Sewer Water Quality Transit Enterprise Budgeted Fund Funds Fund Funds Fund Fund Fund Fund Funds Funds Revenues / Sources Property Taxes Levy - Tax Capacity $ 7,633,262 $ 1,072,340 $ 280,000 $ - $ 8,985,602 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,985,602 Levy - Market Value 1,128,522 - - - 1,128,522 - - - 1,128,522 MVHC Aid - - - - - - - - - - Special Assessments - 312,000 - - 312,000 - - - 312,000 Licenses & Permits 292,165 - - - 292,165 - - - - - 292,165 Fines & Forfeits 130,000 - - 130,000 - - - - - 130,000 Intergovernmental 1,316,469 - - 1,316,469 - - 140,000 485,000 625,000 1,941,469 Charges for Services 1,488,263 - - 1,488,263 2,732,437 2,587,735 540,000 200,000 6,060,172 7,548,435 Other Revenues 158,392 30,000 21,917 2,000 212,309 50,000 50,000 13,000 33,000 146,000 358,309 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - Transfers From Other Funds General Fund - 1,768,370 - - 1,768,370 - - - 1,768,370 Water Fund 167,500 575,720 50,000 - 793,220 - - - - 793,220 Sewer Fund 167,500 96,931 50,000 - 314,431 - - - - 314,431 Total Revenues Sources $12,482,073 $ 3,855,361 $ 401,917 $ 2,000 $ 16,741,351 $ 2,782,437 $2,637,735 $ 693,000 $ 718,000 $ 6,831,172 $23,572,523 Expenditures / Uses Employee Services $ 7,147,452 $ - $ - $ 69,923 $ 7,217,375 $ 527,812 $ 675,595 $ 282,072 $ 94,174 $ 1,579,653 $ 8,797,028 Current Expenditures 3,246,932 - 68,000 3,314,932 1,068,210 1,613,183 162,950 753,030 3,597,373 6,912,305 Capital Outlay 269,319 439,564 - 708,883 4,750 8,750 - - 13,500 722,383 Capital Improvements - - - - 1,020,000 450,000 245,000 - 1,715,000 1,715,000 Subtotal $ 10,663,703 $ $ 439,564 $ 137,923 $ 11,241,190 $ 2,620,772 $2,747,528 $ 690,022 $ 847,204 $ 6,905,526 $ 18,146,716 Transfers to other funds General Fund $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ 167,500 $ 167,500 $ - $ - $ 335,000 $ 335,000 Maintenance Building (Debt) - - - 96,931 96,932 - - 193,863 193,863 Treatment Plant (Debt) - - - 478,789 - - - 478,789 478,789 Equipment Fund - - - 50,000 50,000 - - 100,000 100,000 Park Equipment Fund 50,000 - - - 50,000 - - - - - 50,000 Debt Service Funds 1,768,370 - - - 1,768,370 - - - - - 1,768,370 Facilities Management Fund 150,000 - - - 150,000 25,000 10,000 - - 35,000 185,000 Contingency - - - - - - - - - - Debt Service - 4,468,890 - - 4,468,890 - - - - 4,468,890 Subtotal $ 1,968,370 $ 4,468,890 $ - $ - $ 6,437,260 $ 818,220 $ 324,432 $ - $ - $ 1,142,652 $ 7,579,912 Total Expenditures / Uses $ 12,632,073 $ 4,468,890 $ 439,564 $ 137,923 $ 17,678,450 $ 3,438,992 $3,071,960 $ 690,022 $ 847,204 $ 8,048,178 $ 25,726,628 Change in Fund Balance $ (150,000) $ (613,529) $ (37,647) $ (135,923) $ (937,099) $ (656,555) $ (434,225) $ 2,978 $ (129,204) $ (1,217,006) $ (2,154,105) Page 1 of 2 2012 Preliminary Property Tax Levy 2012 Preliminary Budget Comparisons Change 11 -12 Property Taxes 2011 2012 Amount Percent Levy - Tax Capacity Total General General Fund - Operating $ 6,961,567 $ 6,998,514 $ 36,947 0.53% General Fund - Debt 620,000 634,748 14,748 2.38% Debt Service Funds 1,157,195 1,072,340 (84,855) - 7.33% Revolving Equipment Fund 270,000 280,000 10,000 3.70% Funds $ 9,008,762 $ 8,985,602 $ (23,160) -0.26% Le - Market Value - General Fund 1,105,362 1,128,522 23,160 2.10% Total Le $ 10,114,124 $ 10,114,124 $ - 0.00% 2012 Preliminary Budget Comparisons *2011 EDA Budget was adopted on 0412512011 Page 2 of 2 Revolving Total Total General Debt Service Equipment EDA* Governmental Water Sewer Water Quality Transit Enterprise Budgeted Fund Funds Fund Funds Fund Fund Fund Fund Funds Funds 2012 Total Expenditures / Uses 12,632,073 4,468,890 439,564 137,923 17,678,450 3,438,992 3,071,960 690,022 847,204 8,048,178 25,726,628 2011 Total Expenditures / Uses 12,188,313 4,278,001 693,756 55,000 17,215,070 3,570,445 2,837,596 908,404 776,458 8,092,903 25,307,973 Change 2011 to 2012 ($) 443,760 190,889 (254,192) 82,923 463,380 (131,453) 234,364 (218,382) 70,746 (44,725) 418,655 Change 2011 to 2012 % 3.64% 4.46% - 36.64% 150.77%1 2.69% -3.68% 8.26% - 24.04% 9.11%1 -0.55% 1.65% *2011 EDA Budget was adopted on 0412512011 Page 2 of 2 0 p � O R City of Prior Lake Council Meeting 09.06.2011 2012 Requested Budget 0 Revenue Summary 2011 2012 2011 2012 $ Change % Change % of % of General Fund Adopted Requested 11-12 11-12 Total Total Taxes 8,428,405 8,761,784 333,379 3.96% 69.53% 70.19% Licenses and permits 292,815 292,165 (650) -0.22% 2.42% 2.34% Intergovernmental 1,310,678 1,316,469 5,791 0.44% 10.81% 10.55% Charges for services 1,480,432 1,488,263 7,831 0.53% 12.21% 11.92% Fines and forfeitures 130,000 130,000 0 0.00% 1.07% 1.04% Interest on investments 90,000 100,000 10,000 11.11% 0.74% 0.80% Other 55,000 58,392 3,392 6.17% 0.45% 0.47% Transfers from other funds 335,000 335,000 0 0.00% 2.76% 2.68% Total General Fund 12,122,330 12,482,073 359,743 2.97% 100.00% 100.00% Debt Service Funds 396,348 401,917 5,569 1.41% 100.00% 100.00% Taxes 1,157,195 1,072,340 (84,855) - 7.33% 29.44% 27.81% Special assessments 374,184 312,000 (62,184) - 16.62% 9.52% 8.09% Interest on investments 31,945 30,000 (1,945) -6.09% 0.81% 0.78% Transfers from other funds 2,367,398 2,441,022 73,624 3.11% 60.23% 63.31% Total Debt Service Funds 3,930,722 3,855,362 (75,361) -1.92% 100.00% 100.00% Revolving Equipment Fund Taxes Interest on investments Transfers from other funds 270,000 26,348 100,000 280,000 21,917 100,000 10,000 (4,431) 0 3.70% - 16.82% 0.00% 68.12% 6.65% 25.23% 69.67% 5.45% 24.88% Total Revolving Equipment Fund 396,348 401,917 5,569 1.41% 100.00% 100.00% EDA Special Revenue Fund 10,000 33,000 23,000 230.00% 1.49% 4.60% Intergovernmental revenues Interest on investments 15,000 2,000 - 2,000 (15,000) 0 - 100.00% 0.00% 88.24% 11.76% 0.00% 100.00% Total EDA Fund 17,000 2,000 (15,000) - 88.24% 100.00% 100.00% Water Fund Charges for services - water Interest on investments 2,702,938 50,000 2,732,437 50,000 29,499 0 1.09% 0.00% 98.18% 1.82% 98.20% 1.80% Total Water Fund 2,752,938 2,782,437 29,499 1.07% 100.00% 100.00% Sewer Fund Charges for services - sewer Interest on investments 1,916,250 50,000 2,587,735 50,000 671,485 0 35.04% 0.00% 97.46% 2.54% 98.10% 1.90% Total Sewer Fund 1,966,250 2,637,735 671,485 34.15% 100.00% 100.00% Water Quality Fund Charges for services - storm water Intergovernmental revenues Interest on investments 425,000 87,000 10,000 540,000 140,000 13,000 115,000 53,000 3,000 27.06% 60.92% 30.00% 81.42% 16.67% 1.92% 77.92% 20.20% 1.88% T otal Water Quality Fund 522,000 693.000 171.000 32.76% 100.00% 100.00% Transit Fund Charges for services - transit revenue 100,000 200,000 100,000 100.00% 14.91% 27.86% Intergovernmental revenues 560,886 485,000 (75,886) - 13.53% 83.60% 67.55% Interest on investments 10,000 33,000 23,000 230.00% 1.49% 4.60% Total Transit Fund 670,886 718,000 47,114 7.02% 100.00% 100.00% GRAND TOTAL 22,3 78,474 23,572,523 1,194,049 5.34% Page 1 of 1 0 p'LO City of Prior Lake h 2012 Requested Budget Fund /Department Expense Summary M� Council Meeting 09.06.2011 2011 2012 2011 2012 $ Change % Change % of % of General Fund Adopted Requested 11-12 11-12 Subtotal Subtotal 41110 Mayor & Council 67,365 70,067 2,702 4.01% 0.55% 0.55% 41130 Ordinance 7,000 7,000 0 0.00% 0.06% 0.06% 41320 Administration 371,884 394,528 22,644 6.09% 3.05% 3.12% 41330 Boards & Commissions 13,575 10,189 (3,386) - 24.94% 0.11% 0.08% 41410 Elections - 17,349 17,349 n/a 0.00% 0.14% 41520 Finance 312,967 403,626 90,659 28.97% 2.57% 3.20% 41540 Internal Auditing 28,200 28,200 0 0.00% 0.23% 0.22% 41500 Assessing 118,800 118,300 (500) - 0.42% 0.97% 0.94% 41610 Legal 309,000 291,000 (18,000) -5.83% 2.54% 2.30% 41820 Personnel 140,248 141,331 1,083 0.77% 1.15% 1.12% 41830 Communications 113,956 113,682 (274) -0.24% 0.93% 0.90% 41910 Community Dev /Natural Resources 276,354 325,733 49,379 17.87% 2.27% 2.58% 41920 Technology 135,340 183,975 48,635 35.94% 1.11% 1.46% 41940 Buildings & Plant 410,206 430,539 20,333 4.96% 3.37% 3.41% 42100 Police 3,122,509 3,186,512 64,003 2.05% 25.62% 25.23% 42200 Fire 851,139 798,559 (52,580) - 6.18% 6.98% 6.32% 42400 Building Inspection 398,004 435,572 37,568 9.44% 3.27% 3.45% 42500 Emergency Management 7,500 33,900 26,400 352.00% 0.06% 0.27% 42700 Animal Control 25,650 25,650 0 0.00% 0.21% 0.20% 43050 Engineering 416,046 298,444 (117,602) - 28.27% 3.41% 2.36% 43100 Street 1,054,352 1,079,829 25,477 2.42% 8.65% 8.55% 43400 Central Garage 346,903 367,883 20,980 6.05% 2.85% 2.91% 45100 Recreation 390,860 387,152 (3,708) - 0.95% 3.21% 3.06% 45200 Parks 1,326,359 1,272,864 (53,495) -4.03% 10.88% 10.08% 45500 Libraries 85,067 80,642 (4,425) - 5.20% 0.70% 0.64% 46100 Natural Resources (NEW) - 121,174 121,174 n/a 0.00% 0.96% 46500 Economic Development 95,464 40,004 (55,460) - 58.10% 0.78% 0.32% 47000 Debt Service 1,713,565 1,768,370 54,805 3.20% 14.06% 14.00% 49999 Contingency - - 0 n/a 0.00% 0.00% 49303 Transfers 50,000 200,000 150,000 300.00% 0.41% 1.58% Total General Fund 12,188,313 12,632,073 443,760 3.64% 100.00% 100.00% Debt Service Funds 47000 Debt 4,278,001 4,468,890 190,889 4.46% 100.00% 100.00% Total Debt Service Funds 4,278,001 4,468,890 190,889 4.46% 100.00% 100.00% tevolvina Eauipment Fund Fire 90,000 - (90,000) - 100.00% 12.97% 0.00 Police 73,500 28,840 (44,660) - 60.76% 10.59% 6.56 Public Works 530,256 410,724 (119 - 22.54% 76.43% 93.44°/ Total Revolving Equipment Fund 693,756 439,564 (254,192) - 36.64% 100.00% 100.00 ° / EDA Water Fund 41520 Finance 65,690 82,418 16,728 25.47% 1.84% 2.40 49400 Water 2,726,244 2,538,354 (187,890) - 6.89% 76.36% 73.81 ° / 49303 Transfers 778,511 818,220 39,709 5.10% 21.80% 23.79 Total Water Fund 3,570,445 3,438,992 (131,453) - 3.68% 100.00% 100.00 S ewer Fund 41520 Finance 65,690 81,591 15,901 24.21% 2.31% 2.66 ° / 49005 CIPP Pipe Slip Lining - - 0 n/a 0.00% 0.00°/ 49450 Sewer 2,461,584 2,665,937 204,353 8.30% 86.75% 86.78 49303 Transfers 310,322 324,432 14,110 4.55% 10.94% 10.56 Total Sewer Fund 2,837,596 3,071,960 234,364 8.26% 100.00% 100.00 Transit Fund 49804 Transit Services 776,458 847,204 70,746 9.11% 100.00% 100.00% Total Transit Fund 776,458 847,204 70,746 9.11% 100.00% 100.00% GRAND TOTAL 25,307,973 25,726,628 418,655 1.65% Page 1 of 1