HomeMy WebLinkAbout10A - Eagle Creek Development
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA #:
PREPARED BY:
AGENDA ITEM:
DISCUSSION:
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DECEMBER 16, 2002
lOA
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION DENYING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
REQUESTED BY EAGLE CREEK DEVELOPMENT FOR THE
PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 114,
RANGE 22 (Case File #02-126)
History: Eagle Creek Development has filed an application for a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the property located east ofFish
Point Road, on the east side of the Deerfield Development and south of
Cottonwood Lane and Adelmann Street. The proposal is to amend the
2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map from the current R-L/MD
(Low to Medium Density Residential) designation to the R-HD (High
Density Residential) designation on approximately 4 acres of vacant
land.
This property is presently zoned R-2 (Low to Medium Density
Residential) and is designated as R-L/MD (Low to Medium Density
Residential) on the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The
applicant is proposing to amend the Comprehensive Plan to
accommodate an apartment complex that will be accessed from the
east side of the property off of Adelmann Street, which now stops at
Cottonwood Lane, and does not extend to this site. Access to this site
from the east will require the extension of Adelmann Street through
City property and development of the property to the east. The
property owner has not submitted a preliminary plat for this
development.
In 1999, the applicant, along with D.R. Horton, submitted an
application to amend the Comprehensive Plan to designate the easterly
164 acres of the Deerfield development, including this property, to the
R-HD designation. The City Council ultimately denied this
application on the basis that the density proposed could be
accomplished in the R-2 district. The action was also based on the fact
that the ultimate sewer capacity for the entire Deerfield site was 700
units. The proposal would have allowed well over that number. The 4
J:\02fi1es\02compam\02-126 mesenbrink\02-126 cc rpt.doc Page 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
acre site in question as part of this application was removed from the
Deerfield development.
The Planning Commission considered this proposal at a public hearing
on November 25, 2002. The Planning Commission voted to
recommend denial of the proposed Land Use Plan Amendment on the
basis that the application is premature. A copy of the minutes of the
November 25th meeting is attached to this report.
Current Circumstances: The total site area involved in this request is
approximately 4 acres. The site generally drains towards the wetland
on the west side of the site. The property is primarily vacant pasture.
There are existing trees located on the east and west side of the site.
Any development on the site is subject to the Tree Preservation
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. A specific tree inventory will
be required once a specific development plan, such as a preliminary
plat, is submitted. The site is also subject to the provisions of the State
Wetland Conservation Act. A specific delineation will be required as
part of the development application.
Access to this property is presently from an easement on the private
streets in the Deerfield development on the south side of the site. The
private street leading to this site has not been platted at this time. The
applicant's narrative states access will be via an extension of
Adelmann Street. As noted above, Adelmann Street must be extended
from Cottonwood Lane through City property to this site. Although
this connection will most likely occur at some time, there are no plans
to make this extension at this time. Sewer and water services can also
be extended from the Deerfield development to the south. Again,
these utilities have not been installed.
The Issues: The R-HD designation is consistent with the stated goals
and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan in that it offers a variety of
housing and it provides for open space and the preservation of the
natural elements of the site, and with the City's Livable Community
Goal to provide affordable and life-cycle housing.
The issues pertaining to this request have more to do with access and
the availability of services than whether the proposed designation is
appropriate. Currently, the only access to the 4 acre parcel is via an
easement across the private streets in the Deerfield development to the
south. The streets leading to this site have not been platted at this
time. This will most likely be one of the last phases of the
development. The developer's narrative notes that access to the site is
planned from the east, off of Adelmann Street. As noted above,
Adelmann Street stops at Cottonwood Lane to the north. In order to
provide access to the site, Adelmann would have to be extended
1:\02fi1es\02compam\02-126 mesenbrink\02-126 cc rpt.doc
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDED
MOTION:
REVIEWED BY:
through City property to the north boundary of the property east of this
4 acre site. Although it is likely that Adelmann will be extended
through the City property, there are no current plans to do so at this
time. The developer would then be responsible for developing and
building the road through his land. No preliminary plat has been
submitted for this property at this time.
The availability of services, such as sewer and water, is also an issue.
There are no services adjacent to this site. Services could be extended
from the Deerfield development to the south or from the east.
However, once again, this would require development of the adjacent
property.
Conclusion: The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment to the R-
HD designation is premature at this time. Access through the private
streets in the Deerfield development to reach an additional 120 units is
not appropriate. Although it is likely that Adelmann Street will
eventually extended to the south, there are no plans for this extension
in the near future. The City has not included this extension in the CIP,
nor has the developer submitted a preliminary plat. For these reasons,
the staff and the Planning Commission recommend denial of this
request.
Budl!et Impact: There is no direct budget impact involved in this
request. Approval of this request may facilitate the development of
this property, and increase the City tax base.
The City Council has three alternatives:
I. Adopt a resolution denying the proposed Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to the R-HD designation as recommended by the
Planning Commission.
2. Direct the staff to prepare a resolution with findings of fact
approving the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the R-
HD designation.
3. Continue the review for specific information or reasons per City
Council discussion.
The Planning Commission and staff recommend Alternative #1. This
requires a motion and second to adopt Resolution 02-XX denying the
Comprehensive PI Amendment to designate this property as R-HD.
1:\02fi1es\02compam\02-126 mesenbrink\02-126 cc rpt.doc
Page 3
RESOLUTION 02-XX
RESOLUTION DENYING A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE 2020 COMPR,EHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 114, RANGE 22
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
Eagle Creek Development submitted an application to amend the City of Prior Lake
2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map from the R-UMD (Low to Medium Density
Residential) designation to the R-HD (High Density Residential) designation for the
property legally described as follows:
That part of the Northeast ~ and the Northeast ~ of the Northwest ~, Section 12,
Township 114, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Beginning at the northeast corner of said Northeast ~ of the Northwest ~, thence N
89 49' 16" W, along the north line of said Northeast ~ of the Northwest ~, a distance
of 57.51 feet; thence S 00 54' 33" E a distance of 479.65 feet; thence S 32 43' 18" E
a distance of 182.57 feet; thence N 89 05' 27" E a distance of 23.48 feet; thence N 70
46' 58" E a distance of 347.13 feet; thence N 34 17' 20" W a distance of 77.13 feet;
thence N 00 32' 24" E a distance of 296.71 feet to the north line of said Northeast %;
thence N 89 30' 49" W, along said north line of the Northeast ~, a distance of 356.00
feet to the point of beginning.
and
Legal notice of the public hearing was duly published and mailed in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes and Prior Lake City Code; and
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on November 25, 2002, for
those interested in this request to present their views; and
On November 25, 2002, the Planning Commission recommended denial of the
proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan; and
On December 16, 2002, the Prior Lake City Council considered the application to
amend the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to designate the above
described property to the R-HD designation and;
The City Council received the recommendation of the Planning Commission to deny
the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment along with the staff reports and the
minutes of the Planning Commission meetings; and
WHEREAS, The City Council has carefully considered the testimony, staff reports and other
pertinent information contained in the record of decision of this case.
1:\02fi1es\02compam\02-126 mesenbrink\resolution.doc Pa..ge 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (952) 447-4230 / Fax (952) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA, that
the proposed amendment to the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to designate the above
described property as R-HD (High Density Residential) is hereby denied based upon the following
findings of fact.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein.
2. The burden is on the applicant to demonstrate that the Comprehensive Plan designation is in error
and that a change is justified.
3. The applicants have failed to demonstrate that the current Comprehensive Plan designation of R-
L/MD (Low to Medium Density Residential) is inappropriate and that it should be changed.
4. There has not been a material change in the area or conditions affecting the site since the
Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1999.
5. The Prior Lake Planning Commission recommended denial of the request based on incompatibility
with the existing development.
6. The only access to this property is via an easement across private streets that have not been
developed at this time. Access through these private streets for an additional 120 units is not
appropriate.
7. There are no plans for the extension of Adelmann Street to this property at this time. The City has
not included this extension in the CIP, nor has the developer submitted a preliminary plat.
Passed and adopted this 16th day of December, 2002.
YES
NO
Haugen Haugen
LeMair LeMair
Petersen Petersen
Zieska Zieska
Vacant Vacant
{Seal} Frank Boyles, City Manager
City of Prior Lake
1:\02files\02compam\02-126 mesenbrink\resolution.doc Page 2
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 25,2002
1. Call to Order:
Chairman Stamson called the November 25, 2002, Planning Commission meeting to
order t 6:31 p.m. Those present were Commissioners Atwood, Cq~o, Lemke, Ringstad
and St son, Community Development Director Don Rye, Planni11g Coordinator Jane
Kansier, . anner Cynthia Kirchoff, Assistant City Engineer L~ Poppler and Recording
Secretary , ie Carlson. ,NO ,.'
~;'
2.
,r?'
,I"
~ Atwoodl..P~esent
Criego . Present
Lemke Present
, ,
3. APprovaIOfMinn~:/ :::::
The Minutes from the Octob~];.,2'8, 20(n~ Planning Commission meeting were approved
/ ~
as presented. / \
/ ,\,
Consent: /rI \\.
e,;' "t,\...
/ \
A. Case F9t#02-ll 0 Danes/Colluci V arianc~eSOlution.
MOT~O Y CRlEGO, SECOND BY RINGSTAD, 1'Q A, ,P, PROVE THE CONSENT
AGE 'A. '\,
"'"
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED. \
4.
5. Public Hearings:
Commissioner Stamson read the Public Hearing Statement and opened the meeting.
-t
A. Case #02-126 Eagle Creek Development is requesting an amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation on approximately 4 acres of vacant
land on the east side of the Deerfield Development. The amendment would designate
this property from the Low to Medium Density Residential (R-L/MD) designation to
the High Density Residential (R-HD) designation.
Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier presented the Planning Report dated November 25,
2002, on file in the office of the City Planning Department.
L\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminutes\MNI12502.doc I
Planning Commission Meeting
November 25,2002
Eagle Creek Development has filed an application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment
for the property located east ofFish Point Road, on the east side of the Deerfield
Development and south of Cottonwood Lane and Adelmann Street. The proposal is to
amend the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map from the current R-L/MD (Low to
Medium Density Residential) designation to the R-HD (High Density Residential)
designation on approximately 4 acres of vacant land.
The applicant is proposing to develop approximately 4 acres of land located on the east
side of the Deerfield development and south of Cottonwood Lane and Adelmann Street
with an apartment complex.
The Planning staff recommended denial of the request. The proposal is premature at this
time. Access through the private streets in the Deerfield development for an additional
120 units is not appropriate. Although it is likely Adelmann Street will eventually
extended to the south, there are no plans for this extension in the near future. The City
has not included this extension in the CIP, nor has the developer submitted a preliminary
plat. The availability of services is also an issue. There are no services adj acent to this
site.
Comments from the public:
Harold Jesh, representing the developer, John Mesenbrink, Eagle Creek LLC, stated he
realizes there are some issues of concern for the City, both for the present and in the
future. The housing development of approximately 4 acres would provide 120 unit
market rate apartments meeting the needs of the City. At this time, the developer has 3
clients interested in bringing businesses into the industrial park which includes an
additional 60 jobs. Jesh asked ifthere was anything that could be approved contingent
upon, be it a preliminary plat or access of services or a compromise on this issue.
Kansier responded there was nothing to act on. There is no preliminary plat. The staff felt
this proj ect was premature.
Jesh said they have an interest to develop an apartment building in the area. Mr.
Mesenbrink has an interest in the Prior Lake area and would like to go forward with the
two 60-unit apartment buildings.
Stamson questioned Jesh if this project would be developed at the same time they work
on the industrial park. The staff s concern is access to the property, how are you going to
address that? Jesh said he is asking for a compromise and some contingencies that staff
would recommend so the applicant can continue to work on this project and meet the
City's concerns.
Criego questioned the developer why he would take 4 acres and develop it High Density.
J esh felt there is a need for apartments in the Prior Lake area.
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminutes\MN 112502.doc 2
Planning Commission Meeting
November 25,2002
Criego questioned if Jesh sees other parts ofthe R2 area being zoned to High Density.
J esh responded he could not answer at this time.
Kansier briefly explained the R2 area in the Deerfield Development.
Rye gave a historical background with City Council on the Adelmann access.
Stamson recapped the issues. Understands it is premature to develop. Kansier explained
the Deerfield development and the City's concern is that segment of road is built through
a private street.
Jesh said the 120 units would not be built immediately; it would be built in phases. They
do believe Prior Lake is rapidly growing and this is an opportunity for multiple housing.
Lemke questioned a time line on phasing. Jesh responded there would be a number of
phases, starting with the platting.
Scott Kilau, 5431 Fawn Court, said he bought his residence about a year ago and would
be looking right at the proposed apartments. D.R. Horton promised the trees would not
be removed; in fact the area would be parkland. He's lived in Prior Lake for 6 years and
was looking forward to living in this area. He is against all the problems associated with
high density areas. This is not the right place for apartments in a R2 area. Kilau was not
against townhomes.
Lisa Kasperek, 5441 Fawn Court, said she too was told by D.R. Horton the woods would
remain. She is not against the area being built as townhomes but is against the
apartments with all the traffic. Kasperek agreed with staff in denying the proposal.
The meeting was closed.
Comments from the Commissioners:
Atwood:
. Not in favor of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for a number of reasons.
The main reason is the history of this project.
. Appalled the residents were told by D.R Horton the area would remain parkland.
. It would benefit all to refresh the Commissioners, that piece of land was taken out
in the first phase because the density was challenged. The density (for apartments)
was not supported by the Planning Commission and City Council. Three years
later the owner is asking the City for the same thing.
. Staff gave good reasons to deny. Look at the history the City had with this
project.
. How could this possibly meet the needs of the City? How would the City be
assured the project would bring in 60 new employees? Prior Lake is embracing
High Density housing throughout the City and there is no need for additional
apartments.
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminutes\MNl12502.doc 3
Planning Commission Meeting
November 25. 2002
Ringstad:
. Agreed with Atwood. Cannot support.
. Would like to see some consistency with the current housing in the Deerfield
proj ect. This is not consistent.
. Did not like the only current access would be the private road.
. There are several apartment units and high density townhomes that have been
recently approved by the Planning Commission and City Council.
. Cannot support the Amendment.
Criego:
. The current property is zoned R2, as well as the surrounding area.
. See no reason to take 4 acres out of the area and make it High Density.
. Believes R2 is the correct zoning. No need to change to High Density.
. Does not support.
Lemke:
. Agreed with Criego.
Stamson:
. Agreed with Staffs assessment. This is premature for this piece of property.
. Too much of this area is undeveloped and still up in the air to warrant saying
either way it would work. It is unknown how the rest of the area is going to
develop. It is too early to decide on the zoning.
. Deny the request.
MOTION BY ATWOOD, SECOND BY CRlEGO, RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE R-HD DESIGNATION.
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
This item will before the City Council on December 16, 2002.
B. Case #02-123 I Holm is requesting aAariance from the 25 foot front yard
setback for the construct. of an additi.on ~ single family dwelling located at
3201 Spruce Trail SW. /
"
Planner Cynthia K.irchoffpresented~~la,nning Report dated November 25,2002, on
file in the office of the City Planpng Depafhne~.
~~,
Karl Holm is requesting a v. . ance from the zoning O' . nance for the construction of a
living space addition to existing single family dwellin n property zoned R-I (Low
Density Residential), d SD (Shoreland Overlay District) an ocated at 3201 Spruce
Trail SE. In order to construct the proposed addition the following variance is required:
L:\02FILES\02planning comm\02pcminutes\MNI12502.doc 4
Location I\I1ap
Deerfield Comprehensive Plan Amendment
1\ !\ / /
/ /
\ \.~,-</ /
\ ~.,., ",./
\/::::-~\
-1fI:~~~ ,
~'
\
\
\
/'
/....
/
I
I
-.J'_l
IL
!r!
UI
~j
~:
c~ tn
~()I7' B
Ii'lv~ ~,
. Ii' Ii'() "
'. s~
\\ '\ I
\ \
\ -1\\ "
'ii> \
\;F-
\Q
I~
I~ .
'" !
m I
1
1
I
.,~o. /
", ,?q1t/~' I
/ ''''00/
/ .... ,0('11 .
"":S'~
'.... .
/ '" ,f
/.1.. /
.~ /
~.
.~
'-'
I
I
mrm rrt!i~~\\
~~'\liJ\1
[E]mEl wJu
/
larD/JIW
,---' '-,
~....
\\... (....Area proposed to
\ i be designated as R-HD
---- )
------ (
.-~ ~--:::c~ .---==1'\
.------::-;::::------ ~ ~ ,'\
.. ..-<\;>\\-------~_..-!~ ~) \-
(("" j\.---.::>-- ~ (?
'., . \\.---- ..----/ --~\ ( I 1\ '\
\--;: / ({'"("\\ '\1 i \ \,
\\ \.. , \~j
\\'. \'.(.~/
'\ \\ \"-,
') ;'I.-_c.---
'l
r-- .._.\ .
- 'r ::-~.
:=:'r-,
>---1. ' i ------'t=::,' ,
L---j . ,
, 1\. I
~ L---'
---- \ r---,
----,
'~
, .
: t=::=l'
i~.,
I~\
N
A
400
o
400
800 Feet
Deerfield Property
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Q) Q) C
:> en CO
. en ::::> a..
C-c
Q) C
~~
a..
E
8
~
CO
....J
L-
a
as:::
c...
'0
~
+-'
tJ
OJ
z+~
8>; Ul
.~ of: 'E ~ 6 ~
~ ~ 5.8 2 .~ 5 .~ s-
~ ~ !i ~~ aJ ~ ~ ~ 8
'0 E">- lQ ~8 e!~ lQ~ ._&C C\I
s::: +-0' 0 ~~ W O'C III
ctl III .2 .~ i Cl ~ C ~ tl Ie >. _
....J.6 ~ ~ .~.~ 1Ii ~ l5 i -g 0 cd ~ ~
~ 'fi~~~ e-~C:~l:l ~-I'~ I >.
m H .(~ ! ~ 'Ii <'J!~ n 11 ~J! ~ ~
.~ i). ~~ 1 ~1~~lii I i ~ 101.
~ ~ 001 8 LJ ~ ~
~
~
L-
a
--
L-
a..
'0
~
~
--
()
C)c..
ern
.E~
~
m
:.;:::; 10_
~ 1lI ~ 1lI .~
.- 1lI .- ~ .- i
~ i 't; 0- 't; ~
0:: ~~~ GlCll
6 .- 'iij 0:: .- c: -
om ~ & ~ &! '!!j.~!il .l<: ~
.:;: 0:: CIl >! CD CIl .!; .... CIl
~~~!~f~~~;&~ ~;
='='~al lji-'::::C:>' CIl- co"
B~o~50Bj~~~~ ~5
.t: ~ ~ ~ ~ -6, :6> ~ ~ 'iij Gl S S
~0::.:l..9~:I:~ ot~l!l~ > og
50< ~ ~ C/) a..
..-NM ..-NM 1.0 ~y
<(~d::d::d::;1ooo3o:LC/)o::
IDD~IID IIIIIDD~~
~
z*oc
~
~
-"0
Co
~~
-eO
CON
Q.Q)
~S
0)-'
.~i
c-..
C. CO
COR
a..:J
ATTACHMENT A
Amendment to Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance
The request for the proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan and zoning
ordinance is to accommodate an apartment complex that will be accessed from the
East Side of the property off of Adelman Street.
This housing development will provide housing to persons employed in the
industrial park adjacent to the proposed apartment complex along with meeting the
housing needs for the City of Prior Lake.
The section to be amended is from (1102.500) "R-2", low to medium density
residential use district, to (1102.700) "R-4" high density residential use district
which will provide applicant the ability to construct an apartment complex on the
site described.