HomeMy WebLinkAbout90-02-C.U.PC 2
IST
CHRISTENSON RUILDiNC CORP.
RETAIL DEVEWP,,U
S ate
AW
No. 2 -150CY
snxm. x
s.ox¢woo... ox
M O - I... cxovc. cw
v s.w.
LANGHOI
LANGHORST COND USE
S#ad
N. 3A50CY
•STIN49. NN
9.CHICIGO- L04.�N.ON
rote. x[GOF. TY.LOC V ST GNOVE.4A
ogu,t H, /s
C'�m�mz�o ✓ cehncl TIL16 P C'
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERM PT )V7 -oo -1
Phone: 929 -7128 ®�
Phone: 338 -7173
Phone: 447 -6623
Proposed Conditional Use Address:=
legal Lescription: PID (two avant 25 25- 1470003 -1
Existing Use of Property:
Property Acreage: .87 acre Present Zoning: B-2
Conditional Use Being Requested' Car wash
Deed restrictions: -- K — Ho _Yes If so, please attach.
Hes the Applicant previously sought to plat, rezone, obtain a variance or conditional use
permit on the subject site or any part of it: —1-- Yes Bequest:
when:
SMSSMN .(Mospleted application form. (B)Crnplete legal description and
parcel identification nurber (PID). (C)Piling fee. (D)Deed restrictions, if necessary.
(E)Pifteen copies of site plan drawn to scale showing existing /proposed structures.
(P)Additioml infommtion as requested by the Planning. Director including but not limited
to- existing grades and buildings within 100 feet, drainage plan with finished grade and
relationship to existing water bodies, if any, proposed floor plan with use indicated plus
buildingelevatiom;, landscape plan with schedule of plantings.. and screening, curb cuts,
driveways, .parking areas, walks and curbing. (G)Certified from abstract fine the names and
address of property owners within 500 feet of the existing property lines of the subject
property. (H)Application and supportive data are due 20 days prior to arty scheduled
CM3 0014PLETB APPLICATIONS SHALL BE RWIDM BY THE PLANNING COMIISSION.
Tb. the best of N knowledge the information presented on this form is correct. In
addition, I have read Section 7.5 of the Zoning Ordinance which specifies the
reps to for i es. I agree to ; provide information and follow the
p[ res rdinance. -
ta. ne
Sigts � � Date
Date O
Fed Corers Signature Dste
THIS SHMON TO BE PILLED OUT BY THE PLANKI G u1NNUWK
1N5110 17nax4i�
PLANNU G COMD:SSH)N APPlCNED _DENTED DAZE OP HEAPING
CITY COUNCIL _A PPROVED _ 1111E OF MAKING
__"
/7 1Al)0;n a -/ 1,V 4 'IIn4OdWil /A A 1.1-A /l, /T "qD
Date
L 1891 91
64 HERITAGE Zc`�W 4"
1991 -909/ y
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
DECEMBER 6, 1990
The December 6 1990, Planning Commission Meeting was called to
order by Chairman Arnold at 7:30 P.M. Those present were
Commissioners Loftus, Arnold, Kedrowski, Wells, Roseth, Director
of Planning Horst Graser, Associate Planner Steve Hess, and
Secretary Rita Schewe.
ITEM I - REVIEW MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
Commissioner Kedrowski made a correction to the minutes, page 5,
paragraph 2, line 2, delete the name Kedrowski on voting as he
had abstained. Chairman Arnold stated on page 4, paragraph 9,
line 2, the name Culton is misspelled, should be Kelton.
MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY KEDROWSKI, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS
AMENDED.
Vote taken signified ayes by Kedrowski, Loftus, Arnold, Wells,
and Roseth. MOTION CARRIED.
" ITEM II - PUBLIC HEARING - CHRISTENSON BLD. CORP.- CONTINUED
Public Hearing was reconvened at 7:35 P.M. by Chairman Arnold.
As per memo of December 6, 1990, stating that the a plicant is
still in the process of revising plans for the pro�ect. Mr.
Graser gave a brief status report on the application and the
Public Hearing should be continued.
MOTION BY REDROWSKI, SECOND BY WELLS, TO RESCHEDULE THE PUBLIC
HEARING FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES FOR
CHRISTENSON BUILDING CORPORATION TO DECEMBER 20, 1990, 8:00 P.M.
Vote taken signified ayes by Redrowski, Wells, Loftus, Arnold,
and Roseth. MOTION CARRIED.
ITEM III - SUPER VALUE UPDATE - STAFF
Horst Graser presented information on the status of the Super
Valu Store construction. The contract between Enivid Corporation
4629 Dakota St. S.E. Pnw lake Minnewta 55372 / Ph. (61214474230 / Fu(612)4474245
of . p R lo k HERITAGE COMMUNITY 9J.S�ti'
1891 1991 209
\M�NNF.S Oda
"CUO2P2"
PLANNING REPORT
APPLICANT: CHRISTENSEN BUILDING CORPORATION
ITEM: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE
APPLICATIONS
PRESENTER: HORST GRASER
PUBLIC HEARING: X YES NO
DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1990
The Planning Commission held a hearing on November 15, 1990 to
consider a retail development submittal from Christensen Building
Corporation for a development proposed adjacent to Pleasant
Street and S.T.H. 13. The applicant was directed to incorporate
findings of the Planning Commission and to resubmit the site plan
for consideration on December 6, 1990 at 7:35 p.m.
Please be advised that the applicant is in the process of
revising plans however, the information could not be compiled in
order to meet the submittal deadline for this evening's meeting.
Staff would recommend that the public hearing for conditional use
and variance be continued for two weeks to December 20, 1990 at
7:35 p.m.
4629 Dakota St. S.E, Prior lake Minnesota 55372 1 Ph. (612) 4474230 1 Fax (612) 4474245
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 15, 1990 PAGE 5
MOTION BY ROSETH, SECOND BY WELLS, TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT APPLICATION FOR MCWILLIES ON THE LAKE RESTAURANT TO ALLOW
THE ERECTION OF SIGNS WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. THAT THE SIGNS BE MAINTAINED IN SAFE, AESTHETICALLY PLEASING
AND GOOD STRUCTURAL CONDITION AT ALL TIMES.
2. THE MAXIMUM SIZE OF THE SIGN TO BE LOCATED AT THE
INTERSECTION OF WEST AVENUE AND PLEASANT STREET NOT EXCEED
24" X 12 ". THE SIGN SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED OF CEDAR OR
REDWOOD WITH ROUTED LETTERS. SIGN COLORS SHOULD BE SIMILAR
TO THE COLOR SCHEME USED BY MCWILLIES. THE SIGN DESIGN,
LOCATION, AND COLOR SCHEME, IS SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL.
3. THE SIGNS NOT BE ILLUMINATED.
Vote taken signified ayes by Roseth, Wells, Loftus, Arnold, and
Kedrowski. MOTION CARRIED. This item will go before the City
Council.
ITEM VII PUBLIC HEARING CHRISTENSEN BUILDING CORP. -
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE APPLICATION
Public Hearing called to order at 9:45 P.M. by Chairman Arnold.
Public was in attendance.
Ted Schweich representing Christensen Building Corp., 2910
Multifoods Tower, 33 South 6th St. Minneapolis, MN, stated they
are requesting a conditional use permit and variance to construct
a proposed retail center, detached car wash and a three pump
island gas dispensary for the vacant .87 acres located on the
northwest corner of the intersection of S.T.H. 13 and Pleasant
Street. A conditional use permit is needed for the car wash and
an 18 foot variance for the pump island canopy and an 8 foot
variance for a 32 foot driveway. Mr. Schweich explained the
various businesses, traffic flow and parking plan proposed by
applicant.
Horst Graser presented the information as per memo of November
15, 1990 and gave a brief summary on the history of the subject
site. Perhaps some of the reasons this site has not the is
access, traffic flow, soil conditions, market factors and
negative influences by other uses. This site is very visible and
should be developed to its highest potential to enhance the
appearance and image of this downtown block to give a positive
identity to the community. The charge to the Planning Commission
is to determine if this proposal should be approved or if changes
should be made, deleted, and /or redesigned. The proposal shows
that virtually the entire lot is asphalt, parking is proposed on
public right -of -way which will need County, City and perhaps
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 15, 1990 PAGE 6
MNDOT input, the sidewalk is proposed on public right -of -way
which would not be allowed without a permit, area traffic cannot
properly flow through the development as proposed and landscaping
is not adequate for the area. The demands of the proposal exceed
the capabilities of the site. In view of the evidence of this
application it should be denied. An alternative would be to
continue this proposal to give the applicant time to resubmit a
revised site plan.
Steve Neilson, partner in the proposal, explained the concept
that fast food, gas and car wash would be a one -stop shop. Mr.
Neilson is the owner of Main Avenue Video, and Express Gas and
Grocery in Prior Lake.
Jim Rabuse, Delwood, Prior Lake Amoco co- owner, explained that he
felt that the issue is to maintain the integrity of the downtown
development. He questioned the location of gas tanks, access for
tankers to unload, stacking of cars to carwash, how many parking
spaces were proposed.
Sarnia Carlson, Carlson Hardware, supports development but is
concerned on traffic flow and impact of the proposed development
on his business.
Dick Casey, Viking Liquor owner, stated that development is
needed but plan needs to be modified to reflect better traffic
flow for the site and block.
Ted Schweich explained various aspects of the proposal in answer
to questions raised.
Concerns from the Commissioners were on traffic flow, the mixture
and number of uses proposed seemed to be too much for the site
and d' perhaps the applicant should consider possible purchase of
land adjacent to Main Avenue to - .increase the site size. The
nrnnesed lanascanino is not adequate, '. the parking plan does . not
fr6m : the :retail. building. The
safety bf: nadestrians and i
to
information from Scott County and MNDOT that the necessary
permits.:: and approvals have been received in order to implement
the proposal. Comment was made that future proposals should . be
complete and submitted by established 'deadline dates to insure
that Staff and the Planning Commissioners have ample review time
to prepare for hearings on this proposal.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 15, 1990 PAGE 7
It was the consensus of the Commission that the applicant revise
the site plan to incorporate the following:
1. Certified Lot Survey indicating property lines, easements,
right of way location and proposed buildings relative to the
subject site.
2. A functional, safe, easily accessible frontage road system
that will accommodate the site and other businesses in the
block.
3. A landscaping plan that at minimum, continues the planting
efforts of adjacent business and improvements adjacent to
County Road 21. The plan should indicate the methods of
screening proposed to buffer refuse containers, loading
areas, mechanical equipment and planting materials should be
increased for the site.
4. The site traffic circulation and parking plan must indicate
that adequate. turning radii, stacking, loadinq /unloading, and
internal circulation systems exist that will accommodate
trucks and .cars. The parking scheme would be designed to
encourage safety, organized traffic movements and
employee /customer parking areas should be designated.
S. The site plan should reflect a pedestrian orientation where
People will be able to walk to the buildings proposed on the
site and to other businesses in and adjacent to the block.
The sidewalk system should connect to existing sidewalks and
bike paths.
6. The applicant should provide examples of the types and color
of exterior materials proposed for all of the buildings. The
exterior materials should be of brick, wood, stucco or other
materials which complement the adjacent Viking Liquor
expansion.
7. The location of underground tanks should be identified.
S. The applicant should develop ::a plan that indicates proposed
future expansion options and .:how this . site . will be integrated
and any
government
use permit
CONSENSUS :FROM. THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS TO CONTINUE THE HEARING
FOR CHRISTENSEN BUILDING CORPORATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND
VARIANCE APPLICATIONS TO DECEMBER 6, 1990 AT 7:35 P.M.
ITEM VIII —STAFF - 1991 RETREAT DISCUSSION
Possible locations and dates for the Planning Commission annual
retreat were discussed by the Commissioners. Dates of January
18 -19, February 1 -2, and February 15 -16, and locations of
Rochester, Riverwood, Northwood, and Stillwater will be checked
into by Staff.
\\ HERITAGE
1891
COMMUNt Y
1991
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS
FROM: DEB GARROSS, ASSISTANT CITY PLANNER
RE: CONDITIONAL USE AND VARIANCE FOR TED SCHWEICH
DATE: NOVEMBER 9, 1990
Please be advised the the agenda report for the Conditional Use
and Variance for Ted Schweich will be mailed to you under
separate cover. The information needed to complete the report
was not available prior to the deadline for submission of agenda
materials to the Planning Commission. Staff will provide the
information relevant to the Conditional User Permit and Variance
application as soon as it has been received and reviewed by
staff.
4629 Dakota St. S.E, Pd Lake, Minnesota 55372 1 Ph. (612) 4474230 1 Fax (612) 4474245
j - k HFR7TArF COMMUNITY
PLANNING REPORT
APPLICANT: CHRISTENSEN BUILDING CORPORATION
ITEM: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE
APPLICATIONS
PRESENTER: HORST GRASER
PUBLIC HEARING: X YES NO
DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 1990
SITE ANALYSIS
HISTORY /BACKGROUND
01, f.'SYZ t
The Planning Department has received an application for
conditional use permit and a variance in conjunction with a
retail development northwest of the intersection of Pleasant
Street and STH 13. The development: proposal consists of a 7,936
square foot retail center with a detached car wash and a three
pump island gas dispensary.
The car wash is a conditional use permit in the B -2 District.
The two variances are an 18 foot setback variance from STH 13
R.O.W. for the pump island canopy and an 8 foot variance to allow
a 32 foot driveway width rather than the required 24 feet (Zoning
Ordinance Section 6.5D).
PREVIOUS PROPOSALS
The site is vacant and to Staff's knowledge has never been
developed. The current owner, Mr. Harry Topy, has on several
occasions presented conceptual plans for a variety of uses.
Staff did conduct informal reviews, however, none came to
fruition. On October 10, 1990, Staff drafted a memo to City
Manager Dave Unmacht, the subject of which was a concept review
for a development plan submitted on October 2, 1990, for the
subject site.
PHYSIOGRAPHY
The subject site is .85 acres in size and bordered by Pleasant
Street on the south and a publicly owned access road on the east.
The grade of the site is virt -ally flat with no overstory. There
is a potential of soil problems on the southern one half of the
site. Grade is not a development constraint.
ADJACENT USES
The subject site is the largest parcel in the central business
district block bordered by Main Avenue, Pleasant Street, STH 13,
4629 Dakota St. SE.. Pnor lake Mimiesota 55372 1 Ph. (612) 4474230 1 Fax (612) 4474245
and County Road 21. There are six other parcels in this block
all of which are developed. The most recent is the Viking Liquor
expansion which is in the final stages of completion. This
improvement will greatly help the appearance and image of this
block as viewed from STH 13. On the other hand, the appearance
of this block from Main Avenue tends to erode the strides made by
Viking Liquor. The three uses which face Main Avenue, including
Extra Inning Saloon, A -1 Radiator, the single family home, and
the rear of the hardware store which are not being maintained and
compromise the environmental and business quality of tie block
and certainly project a negative image to consni.a rr and
investors. The image of the block could be improved greatly by
cleaning up the rear of the buildings and some minor investments
in the exterior of the structures. The uses along Main Avenue
will undoubtedly lose visibility and most importantly,
redevelopment options after this proposal is built.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Architecturally the above referenced block has little continuity.
Perhaps the only common element is heights and traffic
circulation. It is a common goal by both the private and public
sector to improve the business vitality of this block.
Unfortunately the private sector which includes five owners have
done little along this goal.
Perhaps some of the reasons why the subject site has failed to
develop are difficult access, soil conditions, market factors,
and negative influences by other uses. Perhaps the overriding
issue in this case was access. This year, Pleasant Street,
County Road 21, and the frontage road between Pleasant Street and
County Road 21 were completed. These improvements established
permanent access points and eliminated much non - business through
traffic. The frontage road is currently owned by Scott County
but will eventually be turned back to Prior Lake. Its
construction was required after the direct land access was closed
in favor of the Pleasant Street access. The proposal indicates
a parking lot for this public road. The County must acknowledge
this plan before any final approvals can be given.
Outlet B which is located between the proposed building and
Viking Liquor was originally intended to provide legal access to
the two Viking Liquor lots, cannot be developed with a structure.
Both Viking Liquor and ON Hardware have access easements across
it.
Utilities are of size and capacity to accommodate the proposed
car wash and retail center.
NEIGHBORHOOD ISSUES /IMPACT /CONCERNS:
It is self evident that the subject block has evolved with no
overriding concept. In order for the business in this block to
be stronger economically they must be linked properly. This
includes architecturally, pedestrian, and from a traffic
circulation perspective. The development of this block should be
along the parameters of a shopping complex rather than six
independent business sites.
The single most important factor when considering the viability
of the subject block is the frontage road system now in place.
Nothing should compromise its function. Architecturally the
proposed building should be of brick or perhaps stucco to match
Viking Liquor. It was a contingency item for the Amoco
conditional use that the building be faced with brick. The City
Council has established the following goal: To insure that
future residential, commercial, and industrial development and
redevelopment of the City is well planned, of high quality, and
guided by the City's values as reflected in its mission
statement.
This lofty goal means that this most visible site should be
developed to its highest potential in accordance with a well
designed plan that gives a positive experience to the consumer
and positive identity to the community.
There is a question as to the need for another convenience
store /gas outlet along the STH 13 business strip. Such
facilities currently dominate about half the frontage on STH 13.
Although this is a permitted use in B -2 Districts, the City does
have the flexibility of not issuing the Conditional Use and
variances which would kill this proposal.
The impact on the uses facing Main Avenue will be dramatic.
Currently, the western portion of the subject site is being
utilized for storage, access, repair of vehicles and parking.
The development of the subject site will make it extremely
difficult to redevelop the three independent sites facing Main
Avenue without government involvement. The developer of this
subject site should be encouraged to acquire the businesses
facing Main Avenue and incorporate the land into this proposal.
The subject site affords a premium location from east -west
traffic on County Road 21 and north -south traffic on STH 13. The
prospects for a successful business endeavor are good. From an
area -wide and City perspective, this development will have a
positive impact throughout the downtown strip.
It is unfortunate that Prior Lake does not have a detailed
redevelopment plan in place. The STH 13 strip study adopted
previously by the Council merely outlines the deficiencies in the
transportation system and recommends improvements. The Planning
Commission /Council must decide how best to interpret informal and
vague goals and objectives discussed at previous meetings. The
critical elements in such a plan include exterior finish
materials, traffic circulation, landscaping and site planning.
DEVEL OPMENT SUMMARY
The subject site is .85 acres in size and zoned B -2 community
business. The setback from STH 13 is 50 feet from the R.O.W. and
the rear yard setback is 15 feet (measured from the Viking Liquor
property). The front and side yard setbacks are 0 feet. There
is no building coverage in the B -2 District. Currently there is
no landscaping requirements, however, the conditional use process
allows the inclusion of landscaping as a condition of the permit.
Parking requirement for retail is one space for 200 square feet
of floor space. One space for 75 square feet is required for
personal service and eating and drinking establishments. Fast
food is one space for every 15 square feet of floor space. The
setback for freestanding signs in B -2 Districts is 0 feet. The
zoning code does not require a survey of the site, however, the
City should not grant final approval of the proposal until the
site plan has been transferred onto a survey.
The proposal entails a 7,936 square foot retail building that
includes video rental, tanning, a Superette Subway Sandwich,
Cajun Joe Restaurant with a pickup window and restaurant seating.
The superette will also feature a three pump island gas station
and detached car wash.
It is very desirable from the public sector perspective to have a
building proposal for this highly visible lot. A well designed
and integrated development will make the entire block stronger
economically. However, the proposal indicates an overbuilt
condition. The points are as follows:
Virtually the entire lot is consumed by asphalt or
buildings. A town center development should have more
landscaping than is indicated. The planter island is
too narrow for plant material to survive. The three
trees in the northwest corner are a token planting that
is hidden and provides little benefit to the public.
The frontage road is used for parking without County
CODE REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSAL
Lot size
5000 sq. ft.
37,000 sq. ft.
Zoning
B -2
Setback building
0 front; 15' rear,
32' STH 13
50' STH 13
Requires variance
Setback sign
0
None shown
Coverage
No limit
None given
Percent landscaped
None required
Percent not given
Driveway access
24'
32' requires
variance
Parking
As delineated above
38
The proposal entails a 7,936 square foot retail building that
includes video rental, tanning, a Superette Subway Sandwich,
Cajun Joe Restaurant with a pickup window and restaurant seating.
The superette will also feature a three pump island gas station
and detached car wash.
It is very desirable from the public sector perspective to have a
building proposal for this highly visible lot. A well designed
and integrated development will make the entire block stronger
economically. However, the proposal indicates an overbuilt
condition. The points are as follows:
Virtually the entire lot is consumed by asphalt or
buildings. A town center development should have more
landscaping than is indicated. The planter island is
too narrow for plant material to survive. The three
trees in the northwest corner are a token planting that
is hidden and provides little benefit to the public.
The frontage road is used for parking without County
approval. This may be an acceptable plan but not
without County participation.
3. The sidewalk is on State R.O.W. and must receive a
permit from MDOT.
4. The driveway opening to Pleasant Street cannot exceed 32
feet. Reducing the opening will cause frontage road
traffic to filter through the area between the building
and the stalls along the STH 13. The frontage road
traffic should be confined to a easily recognizable
through road. The opening should be as close to the
building as possible to allow for stacking on Pleasant.
The turning radi for the opening must be 15 feet.
5. Some of the parking stalls along SIR 13 are on
city /state /county right of way. A survey is essential
to make that determination. If this plan is approved
the frontage road should be vacated and a new easement
in favor of Viking Liquor and OK Hardware store granted.
6. A vehicle facing north and parked at one of the pump
islands will have to execute a difficult maneuver to
exit back to Pleasant Street. A van or pickup truck
will have to exit through the confining oneway system
at the west end of the building.
7. The car wash and driveway are virtually on the west
property line. It does not allow the opportunity for
landscaping. Since this site is overcrowded it leads to
the question of whether there should be an additional
car wash in the town center. The Amoco Station
currently operates a car wash similar to the one planned
here. Elimination of the car wash will greatly help
reduce the use intensity of the site.
8. The exterior finish materials of the two buildings are
decorative concrete block with tile accent panels. The
Amoco conditional use permit was conditioned on uniform
face brick. This proposal should at least equal that
standard.
At this point the demands of the proposal exceed the capabilities
of the site. The difficult turning movements in addition to this
lack quality and quantity in the form of landscaping and building
material are evidence that this application should be denied at
this time. An alternative would be to continue this proposal in
order for the applicant to resubmit a revised site plan. A
recommendation is to reduce the size of the building by 20 to 30
percent and be more sensitive to through (frontage road)
traffic.
M A I N A V E N U E
RETAIL BAR
e-MrN 1
�t ( ONE WAY MIVEVAY RM
E%6TM
m CIAI
anop � cenror urcp � �
I 6 I
13 spaces
1 3 0_^ islands s/ 6 w
70x22 c mP ob-v- L
1 I
e _
S T A T E H I G H W A Y 1 3
T E P, N
1
PROPOSED
BUILDING t
7236 W.
it
n. nes or.w
iI
4 1
anop � cenror urcp � �
I 6 I
13 spaces
1 3 0_^ islands s/ 6 w
70x22 c mP ob-v- L
1 I
e _
S T A T E H I G H W A Y 1 3
T E P, N
I
3
0
x
r
Z
O I
U
M A I N
A 4 E N U E
I
a
'
�
PROPOSED COND yTION
.�,
�'G� •� W
USE: CAR WAS, IN n
mom°
BUSINESS DISTP.PGT
1
m
' "-
A
I
"
PROPOSED°
I w
III
BUILDING
g
1
w
li.
I
I
•Iwo °�
� N
PROPOSED 8' VARIANCE TO
ALLOW 32' DRIVEW4V up
RATHER THAN REQUI
.
24' DRIVEWAY WIDTH
Z
j
3
VI
I I
Q
PROPOSED 18' VARIAN
E w
32' r
- - - - I
w...a
li
TO LOCATE PUMP 1S
I
"'`'n
. •
-'i
32' FROM S.T.R. I _
�W
__ i�
r
S T A T E H I G H W A Y 1
3
S I T E
P L A N
I
3
0
x
r
Z
O I
U
GALVANIZED METAL FASCIA
DECORATIVE CONCRETE BLOCK
WHITE TILE ACCENT PANEL
BACKLIT VINYL CANOPY
INSUL. GLASS IN ALUM. FRAME ®®
EAST BUILDING ELEVATION
NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION
PLEASANT STREET AT STATE HK3HWAY 13 PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA
:I
del
BUILDING FLOOR PLAN
9�
c
NORTH BUILDING ELEVATI
PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING
PLEASANT 3TAEET AT STATE HIQFWAY 13 PPoOR LNCE MMESOTA
EAST
BUILDING
ELEVATION
c
NORTH BUILDING ELEVATI
PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING
PLEASANT 3TAEET AT STATE HIQFWAY 13 PPoOR LNCE MMESOTA
1001 61
RFLSGM SfR£f
1
DETAIL H
Wn 21
aw I I e I
\
EID 061MCIYIN
/
09ElE Cf4 r r
lip
00
r
DETAIL r6
TYPICAL SECTION PLEASANT STREET
m6i1WILT1G11
sr m.
LAD
M Z S is
e
HERITAGE COMMUNITY _x1.1;01
I891 1991 YO91
I N T E R O F F I C E _ M E M O R A N D U M
TO: HORST GRASER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING t
FROM: LARRY J. ANDERSON, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS J
SUBJECT: PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON PLEASANT STREET &
T.H. 13
DATE: OCTOBER 3, 1990
I have the following comments on the proposed commercial
development adjacent to Pleasant Street and T.H. 13:
Item #1
The street names of Pleasant Street and Main Avenue
are incorrectly shown on the plan.
Item #2
The plan does not show any existing or proposed
elevations and those must be addressed.
Item #3
The existing topography such as utilities, fences,
doors, docks, and sidewalks are not shown and must
be indicated. This must include not only the
topography on site but also the topography on the
adjacent lots and streets that surround the
parcel.
Item #4
On October 3, 1990, the proposed driveway on the
northerly boundary of the property was blocked by
two semi - trucks unloading at the Viking 1,iquor
:store. The dock to the existing hardware store was
also being used this morning. It appears that this
is going to provide a major conflict in traffic
circulation to the mite.
Item #5
It should be clearly established who actually owns
the property on the outlot adjacent to the
buildings to the north of the drive -way on the
north side of the property, as this property is
currently being used for uses other than what is
shown.
Item #6
The proposed car wash provides conflicts in two
areas:
a. The stacking area of storage vehicles waiting
4629 Dakota St S.E. Pd., lake Minnesota 55372 I Ph. (612) 4474230 1 Fax (612( 4474245
to yet into the car wash is limited to two
vehicles. More than one or two vehicles of
traffic probably will cause a problem with
traffic circulation on site; and based on the
use of the car wash at Amoco, it is not
unreasonable to expect more than two cars to
be stacked up waiting.
b. Exit of the car wash is in conflict with site
distance from the trash container and also the
people going out of the driveway from the
north side of the driveway will have a
collision with people not seeing each other.
Item #7 Traffic waiting to get up to the pick -up window
will block the entrance on the southeasterly corner
of the site to Pleasant Street, thus backing up
traffic of people trying to leave from the car
wash and from the Highway 13 traffic stalls on the
westerly side of the site.
Item $S
The parking stall adjacent to the pylon sign is too
small and the traffic will block the drive through
adjacent to the pylon sign.
Item $s
If a car stops at the first gas pump with a trailer
type vehicle such as a boat, will block the traffic
waiting to get to the gas pump:: and canopy area He
will also block the parking stalls of the five
stalls next to the pylon sign.
Item 010
The traffic exiting from the gas pump area trying
to go back out to Pleasant Street via the existing
driveway cannot physically make the turn movement
and will have to exit through the driveway to the
west back behind the building to get out.
Item #11
The existing sidewalk
on Pleasant Street has not
been shown and consideration
should be given to
connecting up the sidewalk
from Pleasant Street to
CSAH 21.
Item #12 The existing watermain and sanitary sewers should
be shown on site and the property adjacent to it
for streets and properties. There may be an
easement required for the sanitary sewer on the
westerly side of the parcel depending on the actual
location of that sanitary sewer. In addition, the
sanitary sewer service for the Viking Liquor Store
should be shown as to its actual location.
Item #13 The building elevations for the north, west, and
south sides of the building should be shown.
Item #14 It appears to have numerous potential conflicts
that need to be resolved from this proposed
building's use and the Viking Liquor Store,
hardware store, and t'.e use of the common driveway.
These items should be discussed thoroughly with the
property owners to insure that those conflicts can
be eliminated which probably will require changing
of this plan.
MEMORANDUM
TO: DAVE UNMACHT, CITY MANAGER
FROM: HORST GRASER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
RE: COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR TED
SCHWEICH
DATE: OCTOBER 10, 1990
I have reviewed the site plan submitted to the Planning
Department on October 2, 1990, and have the following comments.
1. Both Pleasant and Main are mislabeled and should read
Pleasant Street and Main Avenue.
2. The proposed parking spaces along Pleasant and the
western boundary of the site must be pulled back five
feet from the boundary line in order to accommodate
planting and overhang of cars.
3. The parking space adjacent to the pylon sign is
inadequate and will not be counted as a parking stall
because of the deficient dimensions.
9. The carwash requires a conditional use permit.
5. The canopy above the three pump island has a setback of
forty feet from the right -of -way of Highway 13. The
minimum setback is fifty feet and will require a ten
foot variance from Highway 13. The site plan indicates
a driveway on the north end of the site. Currently OR
Hardware has a structure which prevents through
vehicular movement, this must be resolved prior to
obtaining a building permit.
6. I understand there will be a fast food /drive -up type of
restaurant located in the building. The menu board is to
be located adjacent to the northerly drive and the
drive -up window on the south side of the building. Both
of these features must be shown on the site plan. The
vehicular movement around the southwest corner lacks
stacking distance and is extremely poor and is in need
of improvement. The stacking distance for the carwash
is only two, perhaps three cars deep and should be
considered for additional stacking.
7. The traffic movement through the driveway area on the
north side of the building is going to be extremely
precarious. Viking Liquor has their delivery doors
opening into the driveway area which we have required to
be protected by elevated driveways. Since delivery
trucks will be blocking the driveway periodically for
both OK Hardware and Viking Liquor, it is suggested that
two lane traffic be designed for the proposed
structure to serve primarily the menu board.
e. The northern access to the site is not designed well.
Confusion will result because of the unusual small
median or curb, and the difficulty of vehicular
movements coning out of the parking area. The applicant
should consult the contractor for Viking Liquor and come
up with a joint plan or resolution that would provide
better vehicular access.
5. Perhaps one of the most critical issues is elevation and
drainage plans which are missing. It is of the utmost
importance that drainage and elevations be coordinated
with Viking Liquor and the existing buildings to the
north, that being A -1 Radiator and Extra Innings Bar.
10. Although a landscape plan is not required, one should
be submitted and will be a contingency item for any
condttional use or variance being considered for the
site. An observation is, that very little of the site
can accommodate landscaping. Another item is the trash
container is in an extremely poor location and should be
considered for a different area. The trash container in
its current location would impair traffic movement out
of the carwash.
11. The site plan indicates thirty designated spaces. If
you include the six pump island spaces it would come to
a total of thirty -six. The code requires thirty -seven
spaces. However, thirteen of the spaces are in back of
the building and have poor exposure and access to the
front of the building. It does not appear there are rear
entrances to the building.
12. In general, it is my recommendation that the developer
hold a meeting with the owners of OK Hardware and Viking
Liquor and discuss the integration of the proposed
building into the overall scheme of things in this area.
I would not be opposed to the elimination of the
driveway easement which seems to conflict and pose a lot
of development constraints. I'm sure there are other
alternatives to provide access to the rear of Viking
Liquor and OK Hardware. In general, the current site
plan as prepared, although it does have tremendous
potential, it needs some work in the areas mentioned
above. To develop this site without integration or
consideration for the other two main structures in this
block is a negative way of dealing with the issues.
furthermore, I suggest also that when possible the
exteriors of the building and all architecture be
integrated for continuity purposes. This includes, but
should not be limited to exterior finishes, roof
pitches, colors, canopies, and sign display or reader
boards. It is important that this most highly visible
corner of the community looks as though it is a planned
center and planned development rather than a fragmented
collection of buildings.
�,tNlEsmr4 Minnesota Department of Transportation
Metropolitan District
Transportation Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
or
Iar' Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128
Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422
Reply to
Telephone No.
if -, 1990
Deh Garross
Assistant City Planner
City of Prior Lake
4629 Dakota St. SF.
Prior Lake, Minnesota 55312
Re: Conditional Use Permit at TH 13 and County Road 21
Dear MS.Garross,
In receipt of your letter of November 6, 1990 for conditional Use
Permit and variance for retail building at TH 13 and Pleasant
Street.
MN /DOT has reviewed the proposal and would not be in agreement
with any type of use of MN /DOT's Right of Way for parking by the
proposed business.
MN /D0T fc,,ls this right of way may be required in the future for
expansion of TH 13 and private parking would interfere with any
proposal.
If you have. any further questions regarding this matter please
contact me at telephone number 593 -8449.
Sincerely,
William G. Warden
Roadway Regulation Supervisor
jemsricsvul
use
M Equal Opportunity Employer
SCOTT COUNTY
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
Nd 606 COUNTRY TRAIL EAST
JORDAN, MN 55352 -9339 (612) 496 -6346
FAX (612) 496 -8365
BRADLEY J. LARSON
Highway Englrwar
DANIEL M. JOSE
Asst Highway Engineer - Design
DON D. PAULSON November 21, 1990
AasL Highway Engineer - Contra fibn
Mr. Horst Graser
Planning Director
City of Prior Lake
4629 Dakota street BE
P.O. Box 359
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Re: Proposed Commercial
Development on
Pleasant street at
TH 13
Dear Mr. Graser:
This letter is in response to the proposed conditional use
permit and variance for the above referenced development.
Scott County purchased a Road Basement (see enclosed) and
has constructed a service road to provide access to Lots 1,
2, and 3 of Langhorst 1st Addition. The site plan for the
proposed development fails to show the inplace service road
and makes no reference to the County right -o£ -way. Scott
County has not made a decision as to the disposition of the
right -of -way.
The County will not permit any permanent construction for
this development on the right -of -way.
If you have any questions or would like any further
information, please contact this office.
ere�.y,
Bradley '', \, J. Larson, P.E.
County Highway Engineer
HJL /kmg
Enc.
As Efaai OPp°wmNYyA/firmaaos A ias Emp(yer
R C A D E A S E M E N T
SP 7001 -61
Harold G. Tupy and Reg:._ C. Tupy, husband and wife,
3rsntor(s), of Scott County, Minnesota, for and in consideration
:.f seven — Thousand FiVe Hundred Nine and 19 /100-- - - - - -- Dollars
hereby convey(s) and warrant(s) to the County of Scott, grantee, for road
purposes, an easement for inTiess and egress for Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1,
Langhcrst 1st Addition, Scott County, Minnesota:
All that part of Lot 3, Block 1, Langhorst 1st Addition, Scott County
Minnesota, lying easterly cf the following described line:
Commencing at the Northwest Corner of said Lot 3; thence easterly
along the north lire of said Lot 3 a distance of 221.46 feet to the
point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southerly and
parallel with the westerly right -of -way line of T.H. 13 to the
southeasterly line of said Lot 3 and there terminating.
Together with *_he most easterly 20.00 feet of Outlot B, of said Langhorst 1st
addition.
This easement can he relocated to a location mutually agreeable to the County
of Scctt, City of Prior Lake and the owners of Lots 1, 2 and 3.
Dated this 21st day of December 19 89
THIS INSTRU'MENi DRA =ED BY:
0 y Bradley j. Larson
l
Scctt County Highway Engineer
SIGNED:
Harol G. T
7
g' uPY /
Jordan, MN 55352
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)as.
County of Scott )
On this 21st day of Dece mber, 1989 before me personally appeared
Harold G. Tupy and Regina C. Tupy, husband and wife,
to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the
foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed the
same as their free act and deed.
CAMEL M, XSE
- ?' ; I.'=V Nuauc L'INNESOTA
uon ccutiry
� !. °'7 C.=i� w Erc:ns M1m. 1. !S90
... `.uvrWWYWYV W W \WUNYVW�YNN /f
AinaaO
u roi!p ■tl A7ana;J
--� ju Asp
• �d 6L' �0
pu» Aa)Na■+l
W
E
F
u
u
N
Y
X
u
u
p
X
N
N
p
■
N
u
n
E p
0 n
� 11
O X
p
N M
m X
I approve said easement as to form.
■
&V a a w •,
.4 V ow .44
N
L
■ w
w
WAND "T
O V
a m
y y OX'
q0
■ 64
N
■ m
■G
♦N L L
7y.
uC L
■ H
Y
V 6 N
Z
1
'h 4�
■
: o
9
v
.
H
o
:'eqM
C
■
G ~ V
4
E
O
O
R L
V
N
M ,C 4
C
+
NY?
■
0
0
O
W
Y 4 V O r V\
OS 40
X
u
0
3wL o
W
E
F
u
u
N
Y
X
u
u
p
X
N
N
p
■
N
u
n
E p
0 n
� 11
O X
p
N M
m X
I approve said easement as to form.
0 II •
DEPAR - MENT OF HIGHWAYS
( ROAD EASEMENT)
Tu
Ti kr%J TPn , Wel C .
STATE OF MINNESOTA. }
}Ss.
County of
Office }
O£fice of County Recorder,
I hereby certify that the
within instrument was filed
for record ip this office on
the 3 day of
19 at
o'cl ck /1 and that the
same was dul]y €ecorded as
Document No. �GFi..:.
c
TITLES
BY
DEPUTY
Y ^ e
t
� IS
T
T
'O
h MY.^nM.
N � 2
W SRC� f'a
m }
m
m
@ uWWNMN�•
7
M
m
m
0
0
0
mMM
n
moo
0
3 n
c
o m
W
N ;
o
o
o x
S
M M
O
W
N•!
0
m'
S rt
H
r
K z.
N 3 O
v
R
H
y
17
k 0
H
p
0
b
K
�
M
N
N
M
W
O
ti O
7
A
nxm
n
O M
H
ry
0 SIN
a,Q
y
m
M m, o
c
dmµ
A
?P
G
M
M o.
^
w
W
�
3
Ic
K
M
A
M
m
o
N
0
W m
Y
`°
0 n
mm
ro
m
nrt
n
m
m
m,
� 3i l5s�
� V'a
A4f 13 eiet a., -E%
- ry
/'N (j,L q�/ .'/ QU. �Mln60tYlO ltmA
CLO rllua �Cc�� 7�r l�.n/v vJ.Qa�n,C' � -� y
Y�i r Ni a.. rig � y / �c � � cats* - � - � unto / ry'4c �✓o
�+.i.Q�✓�.�:q � yMnt��o 1���. r�- �.u !�o ih2ne /J/�act �i
�'�C uR at c%.,k •.c 4" a alto« un
46 y de¢ 4
2 / 4rtiu�iu�/tilro¢�ura /u
iyy/Unww� r/Pall.. fin. c
l� �wa.2 c5f.�e unto �ot f cou i"�G r /� `✓�y
�t t •�„ c�rurt l�ii / �tY //
#IL
ry Q. -(A j,Q Qlt ow. Ate ?" , ,Q �� G4,4, /01ww.tcK �/
V14 A
OV
w ild" V (�,,,,� r i2 /J [ � 42 ✓a �`" Q.. �2rRq tlY [✓(� @!a �au ✓� r� .
2/ ) 9M �r.: y /;�/A C" OL W, +y u ,3 wrl11he ?Z
�,p� "'�G,r ilt� u,�w,w'� df �= Cut/XrtatuN c,r ltu It wr�la�•c L`
r/
e
l .di Oe /��u
l'
NEW ABET "CIA h � NEaISTENEO PROPERTV.ORTR.CTs
We TINUATIONS TIT LEIN£URANCE
CLOSINO SERVICE RECOROIN0 SERVICE
SCOTT COUNTY ABSTRACT AND TITLE, INC.
223 HOLMES STREET, P. O. BOX 300 SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA 55379
DIP"d Noonan and Dale Kuner
Ran, Meagher, cen„e coNPIN
IELEPNONE III U1.1.2.
IA. . MIZII E.
October 26, 1990
Christian Building Corporation
"]• 2910 Multifoods Tower
33 South 6th Street
1 641 SJi'IC i.
Minneapolis, MN 55402 ��'� L /� C / / >I I ( L(-( Cl-- )'
To Whom it may concern:
According to the 1990 Tax Records in the Scott County Treasurer's Office,
the following persons are listed as the owners of the property which lies
within 500 feet of the following described property:
Lot 3, Block 1 and Outlot B, Langhorst let Addition, according to
the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of
the County Recorder in and for Scott County, Minnesota.
Christine I. Traxler
4900 Credit River Road
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake State Bank
CFD - City of Prior Lake
4629 Dakota Street SE
P.O. Box 359
Prior Lake, MN 55372
T. J. Simpkins
3904 Green Heights Trail SW
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Wallace W. S Delores Langhorst
16280 St. Paul Avenue South
Prior Lake, HN 55372
Prior Lake Apartments
4945 Halifax Avenue South N7
Minneapolis, MN 55424
Loren Gross
8609 Lyndale Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55420
County of Scott
Scott County Courthouse
Holmes Street
Shakopee, MN 55379
Robert L. 6 Elizabeth Haugh
CFD - PF, Inc.
1424 Yankee Doodle Road
Eagan, MN 55121
Prior Lake State Bank John R. S Diane M. Casey
CFD - B 6 D Bar 6 Restaurant 3497 Willow Beach Trail SW
16211 Main Avenue SE Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Bernard J. 6 Ethel J. Carlson
791 Keller Parkway
St. Paul, MN 55117
PAGE 1 OF 3
MEMBER MINNESOTA LAND TITLEASSOCIATION
AGENT FOR CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Extra Innings, Inc.
Lillian Groth
P.O. Box 411
16281 Evanston Avenue SE, Box 99
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Robert W. 6 Carole Johnson
Lawrence W. Ryan d wife
5018 43rd Avenue South
4841 Dakota Street SE
Minneapolis, MN 55417
Prior Lake, MN 55372
D. James Space
Stephen D. Nelson S wife
16094 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
15661 Mitchell Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Veterans of Foreign Wars
Robert L. Fenner
VFW Post #6208
4850 Credit River Road
P.O. Box 116
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake, MN 55372
James C. d Karen A. Kunan
Earl T. Pepper S wife
14934 Estate Avenue
CFD - Joe Scandinard
Prior Lake, MN 55372
16318 Main Avenue BE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Frank 3 Eileen Muelken
Gateway Center
Daniel L. 4 Joleen R. Wiemaun
15878 Franklin Trail
4656 Pleasant Avenue BE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Olson - Koroulis Co.
Patrick J. b Jill Heaney
CFD - B 8 D Bar 6 Restaurant
4642 Pleasant Street BE
16211 Main Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Thomas A. Bluth
Thomas 6 Jean Borger
CFD - Scott E. 4 Diane M. Barriball
3106 Fairview Road SW
5533 Fairlawn Shores Trail SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Earl H. Raferman
Kathleen M. Jorgenson
CFD - B 6 D Bar 6 Restaurant
CED - Jack 6 Rose Frazer
16211 Main Avenue BE
4693 Pleasant Street BE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Harold G. L Regina C. Tupy
Mary C. Janousky
18076 Luedke Lane
4679 Pleasant Street
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Hans Widerstrom 6 Frank Wicker
Kenneth A. 6 Susan E. Bertoson
4769 Dakota Street
4667 Pleasant Street BE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Thieling Properties
Terry Alan 6 Lidy Ann Flom
CFD - Lawrence G. Mennen
4655 Pleasant Street SE
P.O. Box 178
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake, HN 55372
Mary Lyons
Robert D. 6 Carole A. Mertens
4641 Pleasant Avenue SE
3534 Basswood Circle, Box 488
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake, MN 55372
PAGE 2 OF 3
Harriet N. Thieling
CFD - Jill C. Thaler
632 Thoreau Drive
Burnsville, MN 55337
City of Prior Lake
4629 Dakota Street BE
P.O. Box 359
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Minnegasco, Inc.
201 South 7th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Scott Rice Telephone Co.
4690 Colorado Street
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Rose M. Tousley
RR 02, Box 2
Henderson, MN 56044
Bernard J. 4 Ethel J. Carlson
791 Keller Parkway
St. Paul, MN 55117
Inter -City Oil of America. Inc.
1927 South Street, Boa 3048
Duluth, MN 55803
Merlin E. 6 Dwane F. Arndt
15822 Candy Cove Trail BE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Adeline Lyons
CFD - Wallace W. 6 Delores Langhorst
16280 St. Paul Avenue South
Prior Lake, MN 55372
If
L
David Noonan
SCOTT COUNTY ABSTRACT AND TITLE, INC.
Soon W-- -NA951sACf t
! m`d 1
r r r....
PAGE 3 OF 3
x P "' +
k
r
(.
HERITAGE
1891
COMMUNITY
1991
** *PLEASE NOTE: THIS IS A REVISED NOTICE * **
NOTICE OF HEARING
FOR
VARIANCE
You are hereby notified that a hearing will be held by the
Planning Commission in the Prior Lake Council Chambers at 4629
Dakota Street S.E. on:
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 15,
1990 at 8:45 P.M.
PURPOSE OF HEARING:
To consider a variance application
for Ronald Christenson of
Christenson Building Corporation,
2910 Multifoods Tower, 33 S. 6th St.
Mpls, MN 55402.
SUBJECT SITE LOCATION:
Lot 3, Block 1, Langhorst 1st
Addition and outlot B, Langhorst 1st
Addition.
Or more commonly described as the
.87 acres located on the northwest
corner of the intersection of S.T.H.
13 and Pleasant Street in Prior
Lake.
REQUESTED ACTION:
The applicant wishes to build a
commercial building and car wash as
proposed on the attached plan. In
order to build the canopy over the
proposed gas pumps, it will be
necessary for the applicant to
receive approval of an eighteen foot
east front yard variance from the
fifty foot setback requirement from
S.T.H. 13 right -of -way.
In addition, the applicant proposes
to construct a 32• foot side
driveway entrance from Pleasant
Street to the retail site. The City
of Prior Lake driveway width
standard is 24' feet. The applicant
will require an 8' foot driveway
width variance in order to develop
the site as proposed on the attached
maps.
If you desire to be heard in reference to this matter, you should
attend this meeting. Oral and written comments will be accepted
by the Planning Commission. For more information, contact the
Prior Lake Planning Department at 447 -4230.
Prior Lake Planning Commission
November 9, 1990
4629 Dakota St. SE, Prior fake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447 -0230 / Fax (6121 4474245
eRI
O O �P HERIT.9GE COMMUNITY 9,
jI \ y 1891 1991 2O9v
\� x
NOTICE OF HEARING
FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
You are hereby notified that a hearing will be held by the
Planning Commission in the Prior Lake Council Chambers at 4629
Dakota Street S.E. on:
THURSDAY. NOVEMBER 15. 1990 at 8:45 P.M.
PURPOSE OF HEARING: To consider a conditional use permit
application for Ronald Christenson
of Christenson Building Corporation,
2910 Multifoods Tower, 33 S. 6th St.
Mpls, MN 55402.
SUBJECT SITE LOCATION: Lot 3, Block 1, Langhorst 1st
Addition and Outlot B, Langhorst 1st
Addition.
Or more commonly described as the
.87 acres located on the northwest
corner of the intersection of S.T.H.
13 and Pleasant Street in Prior
Lake.
REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant wishes to build a
commercial building and car wash as
proposed on the attached plan. In
order to build a car wash, the
applicant must receive approval of a
conditional use permit from the
Prior Lake Planning Commission and
City council.
If you desire to be heard in reference to this matter, you should
attend this meeting. Oral and written comments will be accepted
by the Planning Commission. For more information, contact the
Prior Lake Planning Department at 447 -4230.
Prior Lake Planning Commission
November 8, 1990
4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 I Ph. (612) 4474230 I Fax (612) 4474245
PUBLIC HEARING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE APPLICATIONS
CIRISTENSEN BUILDING CORPORATION
8:45 P.M.
AT18'LA= -- FUME FRINf
/cj �/�w fie. 1 Ti. Sw 1 yVJ -�/27
PUBLIC HEARING
DECEMBER 21, I990
8:00 P.M.
CONTINUED BEARING FOR
CHRISTENSON BUILDERS
CONDITIONAL USE AND VARIANCE
MINOR 1I8 - ME= MUM
i
���!//� 4+ Lb� Y° .ceyt.J 4
V � �luaC.E
(o- 3— Qv 6 a , +�� A+IM �ccv.eM1 n Q o�.+u w,r�u�
cva `/ iwceo� 4 U ,rum, a..• �^ 5i tf �3.
10' l0- 40 / a.�.o �� / t 54�
H lw , l Shat r L� auJ ({WC'a . V s..41 /a
r
., Q me t �au a�d rs� Avm.l U LT q S Go nH:n..<✓��S. ih
. '�V �.I +�N� � Y`•� �'^'�'�^'�VS W / t�SO Ce�M.a{' y 4LQ wf4�
u,.//c11�II 11 ao � } t ( �N•.L , ,/ � d�,.e�y'�(ls7 4�b �n nc ce.� r .a -r � g n r
WuM'+`�eN cowppa'Fo�i�r li/7 �" ore
\$ UI�I \.N Iv �D�� -Q GWw N✓.21/I ANA
P.�2.. oKTGt.�.aW i...! .d i�G cPAa�nS•
t
u . 0 -44j" lled.J . �.�..,
eo, &.to/ o.t� t w� : t tJ , l". - lccH
ly
v,aJ e„.,,
to -Z - 9J o u , oL% / � . SO
Q �K. y r � 4 Ass
aC6Ler(' LmZ, ff) �
�µo d ✓ y/ ) J .t«i ��/ / Le ��
dw
,Y rf. " W15o ?4" 944�&
... (/�I(• K/C — "H W�•4�Y P^ / / Ord IN O.0
,Y1tE,P"- � I ':,- ' ,�iq ,`�•fl� Gs.v�.w,.. .
� v
LAURIE A. SCHWEICH 7143
LIC, S200d 067x89 ,�-
20.18 CONROY ST. N.E. PH. ai5 -15e6 Iv J&
PRIOR LRKE. MN W72 .9
PnY TO TH 'S I tG
ORDER OF B / LA
a j� „lid l y � 6 C� DOLRS
A � no*
�La D s (/
MEMO � S.., ..nix /lief
L :0949082051: 020 504 9 7443
PRtp�
HERITAGE COMMUNffY TINIX-971Y
1891 1991 20y>
ra
.1� P
\ E5
November 5, 1990
MNDOT District Engineer
Bill Warden
2055 Lilac drive North
Golden Valley, MN 55422
Dear Mr. Warden,
Attached find a proposal for conditional use Permit and variance
to build a retail building at the intersection of S.T.H. 13 and
Pleasant Street in Prior Lake, Minnesota. The property is
located approximately 100 feet south of the intersection of
County Road 21 and S.T.H. 13.
The proposal is to build a 7,936 square foot retail building and
car wash on the site. The plan indicates that 21 parking stalls
and a five foot concrete sidewalk are proposed within S.T.H. 13
R -O -W. In addition, a gas pump island and canopy are proposed 42
feet from the R -O -W line which would require an 8 foot variance
from the City of Prior Lake.
The hearing to consider the conditional use and variance
applications is tentatively scheduled for Thursday, November 15,
1990 at 8:45 p.m. It is my understanding that such a proposal
would require a permit from the State of Minnesota Department of
Transportation and that no permit has to date, been issued. If
you could review the attached plan and submit comments to our
department prior to the November 15th meeting, it would be
greatly appreciated. I would be interested to know the submittal
requirements and permit procedures that your office requires and
if possible, an opinion as to whether such a plan would be
approved.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Deb Garross
Assistant City Planner
Enclosure
4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 4474230 / Fax (612) 447 -4245
i
/ —Z9 -9/
sV
L L� � � /� • � r�+el� / ,.�.scr�w.�
i
f(7 19y�'t00
�c:re�v�y syS�,�eo-u�ex�'
w3 I AE1R
MEMORANDUM
TO: DAVE UNMACHT, CITY MANAGER
FROM: HORST GRASER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
RE: COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR TED
SCHWEICH
DATE: OCTOBER 10, 1990
I have reviewed the site plan submitted to the Planning
Department on October 2, 1990, and have the following comments.
1. Both Pleasant and Main are mislabeled and should read
Pleasant Street and Main Avenue.
2. The proposed parking spaces along Pleasant and the
western boundary of the site must be pulled back five
feet from the boundary line in order to accommodate
planting and overhang of cars.
3. The parking space adjacent to the pylon sign is
inadequate and will not be counted as a parking stall
because of the deficient dimensions.
4. The carwash requires a conditional use permit.
5. The canopy above the three pump island has a setback of
forty feet from the right -of -way of Highway 13. The
minimum setback is fifty feet and will require a ten
foot variance from Highway 13. The site plan indicates
a driveway on the north end of the site. Currently OK
Hardware has a structure which prevents through
vehicular movement, this must be resolved prior to
obtaining a building permit.
6. I understand there will be a fast food /drive -up type of
restaurant located in the building. The menu board is to
be located adjacent to the northerly drive and the
drive -up window on the south side of the building. Both
of these features must be shown on the site plan. The
vehicular movement around the southwest corner lacks
stacking distance and is extremely poor and is in need
of improvement. The stacking distance for the carwash
is only two, perhaps three cars deep and should be
considered for additional stacking.
7. The traffic movement through the driveway area on the
north side of the building is going to be extremely
precarious. Viking Liquor has their delivery doors
opening into the driveway area which we have required to
be protected by elevated driveways. Since delivery
trucks will be blocking the driveway periodically for
both OK Hardware and Viking Liquor, it is suggested that
two lane traffic be designed for the proposed
structure to serve primarily the menu board.
e. The northern access to the site is not designed well.
Confusion will result because of the unusual small
median or curb, and the difficulty of vehicular
movements coming out of the parking area. The applicant
should consult the contractor for Viking Liquor and come
up with a joint plan or resolution that would provide
better vehicular access.
9. Perhaps one of the most critical issues is elevation and
drainage plans which are missing. It is of the utmost
importance that drainage and elevations be coordinated
with Viking Liquor and the existing buildings to the
north, that being A -1 Radiator and Extra Innings Bar.
10. Although a landscape plan :s not required, one should
be submitted and will be a contingency item for any
conditional use or variance being considered for the
site. An observation is, thet very little of the site
can accommodate landscaping. Another item is the trash
container is in an extremely poor location and should be
considered for a different area. The trash container *i,
its current location would impair traffic movement out
of the carwash.
11. The site plan indicates thirty designated spaces. If
you include the six pump island spaces it would come to
a total of thirty -six. The code requires thirty -seven
spaces. However, thirteen of the spaces are in back of
the building and have poor exposure and access to the
front of the building. It does not appear there are rear
entrances to the building.
12. In general, it is my recommendation that the developer
hold a meeting with the owners of OK Hardware and Viking
Liquor and discuss the integration of the proposed
building into the overall scheme of things in this area.
I would not be opposed to the elimination of the
driveway easement which seems to conflict and pose a lot
of development constraints. I'm sure there are other
alternatives to provide access to the rear of Viking
Liquor and OK Hardware. In general, the current site
plan as prepared, although it does have tremendous
potential, it needs some work in the areas mentioned
above. To develop this site without integration or
consideration for the other two main structures in this
block is a negative way of dealing with the issues.
Furthermore, I suggest also that when possible the
exteriors of the building and all architecture be
integrated for continuity purposes. This includes, but
should not be limited to exterior finishes, roof
pitches, colors, canopies, and sign display or reader
boards. It is important that this most highly visible
corner of the community looks as though it is a planned
center and planned development rather than a fragmented
collection of buildings.
f
zD
t
59
h
I
, 4 / f I / ti
j " , C��
cl
C;
L7
ti
J
17
////- 7 6
LL
N
a
y7 &S F7
r e8� Ffz
i
a�
O
�6
F,
Imo-
4-
I t
U f I
? . -II
Z6 S(A,-f -11
ev
39 V' .' r
e �;F
fir -
,/
N I
61
y - FI �r /o Q
ZG S/lp Gf
4' G` 0�4
i
DETAIL N0. 8
FRONTAGE RO
MATCH EXIST. C. B G.
I
1
I
i
828
W \
7
W
3
Q e N
a
"r
f N
z e
Q n
r
az
J
a
SEE DETAIL
NO. 10
CURVE NO.1
EXTEND SIDEWALK CURVE
; CURVE N0. 2 NO. 3
TH 13 N 15
E
I I $T
CURVE NO. I
CURVE NO. 2
CURVE N0. 3
A = 49e 09' 05
A - 40e 00' 00"
A = 90e 00' 00"
T s 9.15'
T e 7.26'
T= 5.0'
L "17.16'
L =13.96'
L =7.85
C= 16.73'
C =13.68'
C =7.07
R • 20'
R = 20'
R = 5'
NOTE: AL
CURV DATA IS TO BACK
OF CURB
DETAIL NO. 8
FRONTAGE ROAD
C. a G.
CURVE N0.2 CURVE N0.3
A = 40 DO 00" A = go- 00 Do'
T =7.28' T = 5.0'
L = 13.96' L = 7.85
C= 13.68' C =7.07
R =20' R =5'
ALL CURVE DATA IS TO BACK OF CURB
I
In
LAI t.,
CURVE NO. I
" EXTEND
SIDEWALK
U CURVE
FIVE N
.CURVE NO. 2 CO.
END 8618
C. a G.
FRONTAGE ROAD
x
N 15* 2V nt-
w
-j
END 8618 C. B G.
STA. 851 ♦ 25
SEE DETAIL
NO. 10
TH 15 N15023'13" E
CURVE N0.2 CURVE N0.3
A = 40 DO 00" A = go- 00 Do'
T =7.28' T = 5.0'
L = 13.96' L = 7.85
C= 13.68' C =7.07
R =20' R =5'
ALL CURVE DATA IS TO BACK OF CURB
I
In
In
x
DE .W L N0. 9
TYPICAL SECTIUN FRONTAGE ROAD
8 -618 CONCRETI
CURB B GUTTER
PLACE 5" —J
TOPSOIL 8 $OD
14.17'
12
�1
-0.02Y FT.
T 'F"
14.17'
1z'
-0.02 icr
15.67' - -.,
INSET " F"
1 -1/2" BIT. WEARING COURSE MOD. - 2341
I - I/2" BIT. BINDER COURSE MOD. -2341
I -V2" DR. BASE COURSE MDD -2331
6" AGGREGATE BASE. CLASS 5
TACK COAT IS REQUIRED BETWEEN ALL BITUMINOUS COURSES
- - -1
DE -W L
IAL SECTION
N0. 9
FRONTAGE ROAD
89.63'
- 14.17' 14.17'
12' 12
VARIABLE
.0.02Y FT. - 0.02 %FT.
INSET '{'"
15.67' 15.67` ----rl PLACE 5" TOPSOIL 9 SOD
INSET "F"
1 -1/2" BIT. WEARING COURSE MOD. -2341
1 -1/2" BIT. BINDER COURSE MOD. -2341
1 -1/2" DFF. BASE COURSE MOD. -2331
6" AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5
TACK C04T IS REQUIRED BETWEEN ALL BITUMINOUS COURSES
M A I N
- -- -- --
1
' '(%
i
i
Z
� a
i N
i
/ 8� s� i a Ld
i a
i
EXISTING
HOUSE
1
�r
EXISTING
RETAIL
PROPOSED
BUILDING
6736 SO. FT.
U I V i3 I L � iI
�Il spnces ° .'�
e
3 puny Islnnd5 w/
70x28 c.py nbove
S
` o 5
0 Q U O
1 1 _•
I`' I PROPOSED
BUILDING
I I ,
a• 8736 50. FT.
� • — 124-0'
I I ~ I anopy canopy I canopy canopy
Z i
1 13 spaces
p
3 pump Islands w/
70x28 canopy above
S s I
° B PS O C
I pylon sign 5
-- -- — 42.00'
S T A T E H I G
S I T E P L A
S C A L E 1" = 3 0 '- 0"
N S T' "R' 'f
I
It
RAJ
e
i
7
'A
D« �
EXISTING
COMMERCIAL
re I(-
I
I
I
I
I �
N
I
I
I �
I Q
I
i 3
i
I c�
I _
I
I =
I
I
I
I
o
0
4
p 7
-ro IN
BUILD
SCALE 1116' . P -0'
°• ,.� 16
c a p
L1J� CafIOpY c" .
P
oOove
• i la � /
~ 51. 0' /
H I G
W A Y 1 3
Q
Z
0
U
BUI
EAST,
SOME 1/16' l'
PROPOS
PLEASANT AVENUI
IL A
s�2%
�Po
z.
GO
G'8
i
3G.}
1.
I
II 111 11 11 11 �� ,I�
11 11 11 11 11 11 I � �I �I
-0
BUILDING', FLOOR PLAN
SAL 1/16' ^ 1'A'
EAST:
GALVANIZED METAL F
DECORATIVE CONCRET
WHITE TILE ACCENT
BACKLIT VINYL CANO
GARAGE DOOR
lJ
BUILDI FLOOR PLAN
SCALE :116' - 1' - 6'
PROPOSED
PLEASANT AVENUE AT
IIZED ME
TIVE C
TILE AC
f VINYL
DOOR
MMERCIAL BUILDI
HKIHWAY 13
EAST, - BUILDING ELEVATION
WO E 1 /I6' - I -0'
"o
Ti
Go
G®
2 z 3
Y
�vj
_OOR PLAN
.GALVANIZED METAL FASCIA
DECORATIVE CONCRETE BLOCK
'. WOTE TILE ACCENT PANEL
IIETT 1, B KLIT VINYL CANOPY
G x AGE BpOR
�LO 0 R PLAN
VANIZED METAL FASCIA
TIVE CONCRETE BLOCK
WHITE TILE ACCENT PANEL
VINYL CANOPY
DOOR
ELEVATION
WMERCIAL BUILDING
Y 13 PRIOR LAKE,LMNNEBOTA
d
z
o °amt_
u O O
� 1
i
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
M A I N
EXISTING
HOUSE
EXISTING
RETAIL
175.3
13 SPac
r
W a PROPOSED.
BUILDING
Q I - 8736 SO. FT. m
' -4' 124' -0'
I—
Z
13 spaces
�!t 3 pump Islands w/
70x28 cano nbove
I S
a in
i
1 •
I.tJ
V, >
I � Q
I
I
I �
I Z
I � a
sn
I
I Q
I
Ld
I J
I
I 0_
I
I
I
I
•��• � � � � �ppCe
1 13
A
A ' trp
PROPOSED
BUILDING
8736 SO. FT.
124' -G'
13 spaces
M.
a
3 islands
70x28 x28 mnapy above 'i
9 S.
S I T E P L A
SCALE 1 ' c 3 0 -0'
F T E E T
EXISTING
BAR
EXISTING
COMMERCIAL
16'
,..� v
e
I I
I �
� I
I I
I I
� I
I I
1 I
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I I
I I
I
1. I
I
i I
I
I
I
I
i
i
i
i
i
N
}
Q
3
x
c�
x
}
t—
Z
O
U
L
BUILDI
x V%, -%,v
cro
J
a�
3 I.
w
a m
it
I
Q I I j
I�
I i
H I G H
A Y 1 3
Q
3
we
Z
M
0
U
BOIL[
S E 1 /l6' - I'-0'
PROPOSE
PLEASANT AVENUE
A N
it I
I
i
I
i
7 �z
i
i
i
BUILDING FLOOR PLAN
GALVANIZED METAL FASCIA
DECORATIVE CONCRETE BLOCK
WHITE TILE ACCENT PANEL
BACKLIT VINYL CANOPY
GARAGE DOOR
3
c�
Z
U
BUILDING
.0 ""' . 1' -.'
®®
®®
am
FLOOR PLAN
EAST 'BUILDING
WALE 1/16' = 1'-0'
ELEVATION
MMERCIAL
HKIHWAY 13
PROPOSED
PLEASANT AVENUE AT ST,
A
MS nnuTY
iAV
CM V/SN EWR.
!Q1
C ®DER
VflFw
I TN
TM TM Tm
aw Ww
T
Y
�I
t
U
OR PL
- GALVANIZED METAL FASCIA
DECORATIVE CONCRETE BLOCK
� WHITE TILE ACCENT PANEL
HACKLIT VINYL CANOPY
(FLOOR PLAN
IG ELEVATION
x'%
GALVANIZED METAL FASCIA
DECORATIVE CONCRETE BLOCK
WHITE TILE ACCENT PANEL
BACKLIT VINYL CANOPY
GARAGE DOOR
MMERCIAL BUILDING
Y 13 PRIOR LAKE,WO EBOTA I;
z z n
azz_�
00 O J O�
F
r
i
(FLOOR PLAN
IG ELEVATION
x'%
GALVANIZED METAL FASCIA
DECORATIVE CONCRETE BLOCK
WHITE TILE ACCENT PANEL
BACKLIT VINYL CANOPY
GARAGE DOOR
MMERCIAL BUILDING
Y 13 PRIOR LAKE,WO EBOTA I;
z z n
azz_�
00 O J O�
F
r
90]
�Y
DRAWN W
o�
D. I
Ye
is /: /9v
�D
m
r
m
D
O
Z
®®®,
®®a,!
n
A Cl
� y
O <
A Z
r
n
a
Z
m
ti
m
n
z
z
D
m
A
D
ti
0
Z
n
A
0
n
F
<
w
N
d
H
n
a
0
D
z
RRU
o
m
(n
°�
M
C)
_
O
�a
m
I
D
r
co
�c
r
Z
�D
m
r
m
D
O
Z
®®®,
®®a,!
n
A Cl
� y
O <
A Z
r
n
a
Z
m
ti
m
n
z
z
D
m
A
D
ti
0
Z
n
A
0
n
F
<
w
N
d
H
n
a
g D
_ (n
CO
0
z
0
m
r
m
D
0
z
MIME
MIME
m E
4
a m a
L r m A
m D D
o i m m d
A 'C a l7 3
n z y
n m n a
i ? m r
O y �
N
m m n
r o a
x
8
_ r
z
c�
li
An,
n._�.
A E
\
\
�\
1
l
Y VASH
NEW 6 SNH. SEWER
LpJE
19 NA.DLE
| T E
SCALE 1 ° = 3 ' —a'
�
y�
<
:f ..
.,
-
\
\
| T E
SCALE 1 ° = 3 ' —a'
�.r-
i
4 1
P L A N
,t ACCE
BA' K. I- P INY
:jL A-:S IN AL
im
1
i
R �
o.
i
y-
al
f
1
P
I
P L A N
,t ACCE
BA' K. I- P INY
:jL A-:S IN AL
im
I li
Ton raa sruRPlx um 1.1
., les �
rwv n. REN y e _ l
0 8 l
I
M -,N
VPLK -IN ppL', RCEJA
V6KN 7 P
H
�V���
7 I ��h (1 j L.J LJ ( SLBVPY PICK JP WIN A£
' II PICK -IP
r SLWEREriF Sp.Ei PREA
J L� R LOWiE I
�I
iT ?lJ
4
BUILDING FLOOR PLAN
a
GALVANIZED METAL FASCIA
DECORATIVE CONCRETE BLOCK
WHITE TILE ACCENT PANEL
BACKLIT VINYL CANOPY
INSIJL GLASS TM Al IIM 1D...
EAST BUILQING_ FLFVATION
B U I L ID I NG
bACK- 1 V 1,
�A ASS lN A UM FRAME
EAST
FLOOR --,-- PLAN
SE E 1118 = l' -0•
ELEVATION
- M - �
.EASANT STREET AT STATE HXal-WAY 13 PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOT
vux -a
fISFIEF
N
j �
L �
918tlPY PILI( -W WW '� III
PIIX -1➢
m
FLOOR PLAN
<z r"
t �
vl ,
V'
�;ING FLOOR
LT BUIL
•
TH BUILDING
ELEVATION
f -1V
PRI MINNES
I 2
S
l� 2
Wti v
0 �
Z _m
f o ;zw�
f oa
a�—a e
u o"au
z
w
x °
m
f
f
1
a
.l hiEET� COMM. NO.� AEVISfONS�
ORAWN BY �Ey Ida
l C V u
DATE:
ilF LNE ocl 1 ) ,
S
r
r
Z
�
Z
G7
i
�
m
r�
r
r
m
r�
D
�
O
O
z
z
co
G
Z
m
r
0
w
G
r
m
r
m
0
r
Z °
n4+
M
/-�
Pi-E a _ <ANT s TV, E ET F �TA TE 16 13
i I O P L A K E /`" 1 Ki N E S O T A
11
i
7
�e
/-�
Pi-E a _ <ANT s TV, E ET F �TA TE 16 13
i I O P L A K E /`" 1 Ki N E S O T A
11
M A I N
;
,
1
�
I
i
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
EXISTMC[,
j HOUSE
EX STING
RETAIL
P PSN scx m 175.34,
Wax eimnn { CpR 6
:o .� ,O M�. o vrI-0, Y1 p5N
v,nn
AL
- E.. ' 3N E W Y- ZR;VEWgY" L -
� I
w
W
V)
PROPOSED
BUILDING
7936 SO. FT.
NF.
F RD ELE,, I="
13 spaces
Y L
3 pump Islands
70x28 canopy a
Q i
W
D, IE AY D4Riljf WAI _.
,E z r.nu
2 8 noGy abr e
'Q
� 0 I
Q ♦♦
uj !.
n
------ - _- l-
ii
SIM
S T A T E H I'
S 1 7 E
S C A L E 1 " = 3 0'- 0"
PROPOSED
BUILDING
938 Sr F7.
Li
2 8 noGy abr e
'Q
� 0 I
Q ♦♦
uj !.
n
------ - _- l-
ii
SIM
S T A T E H I'
S 1 7 E
S C A L E 1 " = 3 0'- 0"
A V E N U E
EXISTING
BAR
EXISTING
COMMERCIAL
f
i!
I
I
I
I I
I I
II I I
II I
I
I
I
i
I
I I
I
I
1
i'
I
I i
I
I
I
N
hip
l �
I
A z
y
V
a I
a E
o
a z a
o i
a
I
a
rG j
m
Ie
i 111
I
2
L
O
U
BUI
E H : —
r."M F RAN: --
A
NOI
lG H W A Y 1 3
L A N
a
a a.
T. 1A1 w
. C
�6NLn
SVPE rC - F. +LES
n CK LIL
I I
11
BUILDIN FLOOR
SCALE 1 /16' = 1' -0•
I,
I
v
��v
ANDL
NGPY ® so
AME
r
I ,
T
1
E•.:F
I
t
pJ
2
r
rr
�
S.'B Cn .IGE
G�CK P II
1
X11 + ff .
Y 1
I
i
I,
I
v
��v
ANDL
NGPY ® so
AME
r
I ,
T
--
I
I,
I
v
��v
ANDL
NGPY ® so
AME
BUILDING r PLAN!
J
t � _
,
WA11L
EA B UILDING
SCA:E 116' !J'
ELEVATION
NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION
1111 11 • �
AT STATE HIGHWAY 13 PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA
¢a -a
E
of
PEE¢
S4 C
E � BEV @u
I� �CCIHii
�PIQ
FLOOR PLAN
1 .
®®
LIKING
Im , _
I EAST
P LAN 1
I $CALF 1116' = I' -,'
IT STATE HIGHWAY 13 PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA
t,
2
.1
S
X 1 4 '1
W ry
Q
QA 2 -N
„
f 3 = w L.
W
N
iEET: COMM. NO.:
e
DRAWN BV:
C C N
L GATE:
CF tJ_
•
REVISIONS
IW =3 D�TnU UR n1e5q�
VI`,E Ct 1'c`
a
W
r
Z
C
m
r
m
D
O
Z
R
V/
C
r
y 1
m
r
m
D
—i
O
Z
H tllH
T
x
Is
M
r
M
0
z
k
d
C � D
3 Z
r1
D I Z C]
3 U A :]
I1
W
C
r
r- ®®®
r
r r l
® ®®
0
z
W
r C
i
z
c
O
O
M
z
Rl
6v_o•
II 1 1
I
1...1
r
MEMN
Y rA� K
6Y -0'
T I
g
5
M ■II_ - ' 1 PON
COMMEMAL bLV,,� c4i� V145
PLEASANT 5TREET STATE 146P 13
P R I b R L A K E M IKI NE5oTA
R O A D E A S I M E N T
SP 7001 -61
Harold G. ur; and Regina =. Tupy, husband and wife
Grantor(s), of Scott County, Minnesota, for and in consideration
Of Szve!ihhousan Five gun re f71ne and 1S/ 100 -------- Dollars
_(57_,305.15-
ha : s an warrant( =` to the County of Scott, grantee, fen roa
purposes, an easement for incrzss and egress for Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1
Langhorst 1st Addition, Scott County, Minnesota: .
All that part of Lot 3, Block 1, Langhorst let .Addition, Scott County
Minnesota. lying easterly of the following described line:
Comm =_ncing at the Northwest Corner of said Lot 3; thence easteri,
along the north line of said Lot 3 a distance of 1 2 1 1.46 feet to L.
point of beginning of the line tc be described; thence southerly and
parallel with the westerly right -of -way line of T.Y. 13 to the
southeasterly lire of said Lot 3 and there terminating.
TOgether wito. tae acst easterly 20.00 f___ of Cutlot E, of said Lan#crst le_
addition.
This easement can be relocated to a location mutually agreeable to the County
Of Scott, City Of Prior Lake and the cwrera of Lots 1, 2 and 3.
Dated thlz 21st day of
December
7 INSTRUMENT DRAFTED By:
0 5 , 2radley J. Larson
1
SCCt ^. County Highway Engineer
MN " "52
l? 89
SIGNED:
C
Haro G. T
J
g'n C. Tupy
R_ A D E M E N T
SR 7001 -51
Harold G. py and Regina C. Tiny, husband and wife
Grantor(s), of Scott County, Minnesota, for and in ccnsideratic
cf sever Thousan eive Run -ad Nine and IS/100 -- - - - - -DC 11 ais
h =_reby convey an warrant s! to the County of Sccct, Siantea, i roa
mapoees, an easemert fcr ingress and egress for Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1,
Langh.orst 1st :Addition, Scot: County, Minnesota:
l that part of Lot 3, Block 1, Langhorst 1st .Addition, Scott County
- nnesota, lying easterly of the '_oliowing described line:
°oTm'anC II :S at the Northwest Corner of said Lot 3; the noe easterly
along the north line of said Lot 3 a distance of 221.46 feet to the
point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southerly and
parallel with the westerly right -of -way line of T.A. 11 to c.._
southeasterly lire of said Lot 3 and there terminating.
.C_tiler wita tae ncst easterly 20.00 f___ of Cutlot B, of said Langhcrst lc:
ditiOR.
Tills easement can be relocated to a location mutually agreeable to the - ov. ;
of Scott, City of Prior Lake and the owners of Lots 1 - and 3.
Dated this 21st day of December , 1989
— INSTRJMENi DRASTED By:
U YE :ad. =_•l J. Larson
Sr t' County Highway Enginear
I _.
an, — .�.. -_
SIGNED:
c
Aaron
G TW7
S:n
U. 7upy /
R A D I A S E M E N T
SP 7001 -tit
Harold G. Tup and Regina C. Tupy, husband and wife,
Grantor(s), of Scott County, Minnesota, for and in consideration
of Seven Thousan Eive� Nur.G�ne and 19/100-- - - - - -- Dollars (57 ,509.19 - -;,
:iara_y convey (s) and warrant(s) to the County of Scott, grantee, cr roa
m :.poses, an easement fcr inTress and egress for Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1,
Langhorst 1st addition, Scott County, Minnesota:
1 that part of Lot 3. Block 1, Langhorst 1st .Addition, Scott County
Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described line:
Ccmme, ^. ir.5 at the Northwest Corner of said Lot 2; thence saster'_y
alcnc the north line of said Lot 3 a distance of 2 1.4E feet to the
pc int of beginning of the line tc be described; thence southerly and
parallel with the westerly right -of -way line of T.H. 1I to the
southeasterly line of said Lot 3 and there terminatc-c.
Together with the most easterly 20.00 feet cf Cut B, of sz d Langhorst Is
Addition.
::is easement can to relocated to a location m=I.all7 agreeable ._ the
of S -ct-, City of Prior Lake and the cwnars cf Lots - and 3.
Dated this 21st day of December , 1989 .
SIGNED:
c,
Harp G. T uIrf
-HIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED By: ✓/
0 YEradley J. Larscn 9 upy /
Sc_.._ Ccu ty Highway Engineer
Jordan, MN 5-352
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
i
i
i
I
I
I
I
EXISTING
HOUSE
6' $ y wW
TO MpIgpLE ' �•
M A I N
EXISTING
RETAIL
175.3
IV& WATU
1c m cnw¢ m ONE WAY DRIVEWAY
F PROPOSED
LL BUILDING
W SO. Ef.
124
k 7936
E EV. M-O'
L canopy
N
'
aO e p4 i �
O le
a spaces
Z
1
3 pump islands w/
70x28 canopy abo%
Q
��
N
e
Q
•� Rw
\\ � I LC VNTER
me
1
� l
I w I
i
W I
I �
I
V'
I
I �
Z
Q
I
N
I Q
W
I J
�- - -a- --
< ENE WAY DRIVEWAY
PROPOSED
BUILDING
7936 SO. F7.
FM FL®R f EV. IN -C•
e
13 spaces
�/� 3 pump islands w/
� 7oxza canopy above
I 21 i spaces
S T A T E H
S
!
T
E
P
S C
A
L
E 1'
=
3
0—
0'
SEE
A V E N U E
EXISTING
BAR
1 6
e
NI
m+ g E 1 20.00'
ELEV,
EXISTING
COMMERCIAL
FM M" E V. I0l '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
Q
s Z
V
0,
f—
Z
O
U
GAL.VANIZ U MI TAI.
DECORATIVE CIJNCPI It:
WHITE TILL AGMFII
BACKLIT ViNYI.
U ASS 1h M UM
100' -3
�I
T I
6
3 1
W i
o.
r
31
I
W
C
as
1111��
m
f
i
I �
1
I
I
1
I
i
EXISTING
COMMERCIAL
FM M" E V. I0l '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
Q
s Z
V
0,
f—
Z
O
U
GAL.VANIZ U MI TAI.
DECORATIVE CIJNCPI It:
WHITE TILL AGMFII
BACKLIT ViNYI.
U ASS 1h M UM
i
ORBIq • ZO.00� f 1
E.EV,
00' -3 T
Q
3 I
w
Z
o _
u
�dd � I
d A
�Q GIN. FLOOR ELEV. !01'E' I
I A l" \i
m / Q
'm
J
I l
s 51.50' '
II G H W A Y
L A N
1 3
sue!/
GALVANIZED METAL FASCIA
DECORATIVE CON PETE BLOCK
WHITE TILE. ACCENT PANEL
BACKLIT VINYL. CANOPY
INSUL GLASS IN Al IIM FRAMC
PROPO
PLEASANT STREET AT
TMI • ' • TA11
T� Tlul IEN
e
STWAfi Axv unurT i- _u.u_� ��
VNX -M C�.Eft„ iI1EEliR
n
BUILD
FLOOR PLAN
SCALE 1 /16 _ ]' -V
GALVANIZED METAL FASCIA — DECORATIVE CONCRETE BLOCK
WHITE TILE ACCENT PANEL
BACKLIT VINYL CANOPY
Ems!
BUILDING
SCALE 1 = l' -D'
GALVANIZED.,ETAL FASCIA
DECORATIVE CONCRETE BLOCK
WHITE TILE ACCENT PANEL
BACKLIT VINYL CANOPY
IIJSUL. GLASS IN ALUM, FRAME
EAST
FLOOR
BUILDING
PLAN
ELEVATION
S E 1/16' a 1-0'
::::::::::1:::::"
NORTH BUILDING ELEVATIO
=-I ]A6• - 1'-0•
POSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING
STREET AT STATE HK*iWAY 13 PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA
3\DZ
T
_
4L w r
TM
TM I Q
VNl( -M CORER° FXEEZFR
vorn L a
u �
S _
SUYYAT PIIXiV
Q
1 U S/iLES pRFA
m
ING FLOOR PLAN
®®
®®
®®
NG FLOOR
BUILDING
we
®®
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
OMMERCIAL BUILDING
HIGHWAY 13 PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA
<� Z
z <= a
?��
W� N
dA
F o3�w�
f oa o
u a oo
w
z
F
W