HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-01-C.U.P.C CU91 -01 PATRIC
1/2 AC. NW CORNER WEST 6 21
S�
m O
No. 2.150CY
•anMC�. Hw
EL USTG R O M OM
MtGFEG OP.TX�L A. OXOV[.01
Y A.
O'KEEFE
OWEEFE CONDITIONAL USE
S#Md
No. 2 -150CY
n S- ZS O-
LE9-GPICA4D-LO .OM
GROVE. PccnE40P. T %.LOG 4PDYE. GR
Y f.�.
Aloh[k i4 - A. ,d i v9- /o
J
c
?Va Qin9 �eltnirf 9,t - Ila l
tv" /s 5U'Ql) fp" SIN6LE Fi1,nr�r �2£srta�v.
yy�rafzre -�• C�•huwr/ vsc.P��nif to
na/( 7 �v Pet" 1 a4 -77
/Zouv plus �P
s s by ^O /r ccB
�1 r kaGc�UCisS. 71� AStn ldl"9 jrry�cL Gvas
.
i
1
w
�
�
� / w
(w +1~ p
V
\
i w� 19,
1 O5'
i
.M-� F
did �r C " ✓' °`
APPLICATION FOR NEIDITIONAL USE PERMIT
_ )
PIDR 29 I2o-o
Phone: 447 —o44c
Phone: Ida -539!1
Property
Address:
Address:
Proposed Conditional
Legal Description:_
Existing Use of Prop
Property Acreage: V2A (7-1'7EO � Present Zoning:
Conditional Use Being Requested: 6on4ruck 4 4�* '14 y�e
Deed Restrictions _NO —! _ Yes If so, please attach. a, ,,.Ding s bo F -
'.' l � orial e
Has the Applicant previously sought to plat, rezone, obtain a variance or co it use
permit on the subject site or any part of it: >< No _Yes Request:
When:
axveISSION REQUIRFMET7TS :(A)COmpleted application form. (B)Complete legal description and
parcel identification number (PID). (Wiling fee. (D)Deed restriction, if necessary.
(E)Fifteen copies of site plan drawn to scale showing existing /proposed structures.
(F)Additional information as requested by the Planning Director including but not limited
to: existing grades and buildings within 100 feet, drainage plan with finished grade and
relationship to existing water bodies, if any, proposed floor plan with use indicated plus
building elevation, landscape plan with schedule of plantings and screening, curb cuts,
driveways, parking areas, walks and curbing. (G)Certified from abstract firm the names and
address of property owners within 500 feet of the existing property lines of the subject
property. (!)Application and supportive data are due 20 days prior to any scheduled
hearing.
ONLY COMPLETE APPLICATIONS SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING OOEAIISSION.
Tb the best of my knowledge the information presented on this form is correct. In
- addition, I have read Section 7.5 of the Zoning Ordinance which specifies the
r '[ co itional uses. I agree to provide information and follow the
Pr t in the Ordinance.
L3 (xr e I
Ap nts Sig urel Date
Fee Owners Signature Date
THIS SECTION TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE PANNING DIRWIOR
PANNING MISSION — X _APP%NED _DEEMED
CITY COUNCIL 4 K,J: PPRNM _R1 aED
i
of
RATE OF HEARING
DATE OF HEARING
/ R -w-"/
Date
PD Q 9- 2i -o
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PEWIT
Phone: 44 - 7 -so44�
Phone: 4da -9az-m
Phone:
Phone:
Property Acreage: "(wle:04 Present Zoning:
Conditional Use Being Requested: 60rft
Deed Restrictions: No Yes If so, please attach. ( '� O ��� s - �
_ �
N� p U
Has the Applicant previously sought to plat, rezone, obtain a variance or ciditiorul use
permit on the subject site or any part of it: X No Yes Request:
When•
SUBMISSION RBOUIRIILffiPfS application form. (B)Omplete legal description and
parcel identification number (PID). (Wiling fee. (D)Deed restrictions, if necessary.
(E)Fifteen copies of site plan drawn to scale showing existing /proposed structures.
(F)Additional information as requested by the Planning Director including but not limited
to: existing grades and buildings within 100 feet, drainage plan with finished grade and
relationship to existing water bodies, if any, proposed floor plan with use indicated plus
building elevations, landscape plan with schedule of plantings and screening, curb cuts,
driveways, parking areas, walks and curbing. (G)Certified from abstract firm the names and
address of property owners within 500 feet of the existing property lines of the subject
property. (!)Application and supportive data are due 20 days prior to any scheduled
hearing.
ONLY COMPLETE APPLICATIONS SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE FLA)d M COMMISSION.
Tb the best of my knowledge the information presented on this form is correct. In
addition, I have read Section 7.5 of the Zoning Ordinance which specifies the
r cements or con
itional uses. I
agree to provide
information and follow the
pr
ores ut
. the Ordinance.
23
Ckr s I
Appl nts Si urel
Date
Fee Owners Signature
IJ
Date
THIS SECTION TO BE FILL® OUT BY THE PLANNIMG DIRECTOR
PANNING COMMISSION
-XC_APPRWED _DECII®
DATE OF HEARING
CITY COONCIL
_X APPAOVSD _DENIED
DATE OF HEARING
1- W-9 / -�/ 9/
Date
Proposed Conditional Use Address: I/OO)CX Wf �T A -4u
Legal Description: 5f�. e� -IF o
Existing Use of Property:
Regarding: Patrick O'Keefe
Application for Conditional Use Permit
Construction of a two - family house within
an R -1 Zone.
The parcel in question is located on the northwest corner of
County Road 21 and West Avenue and is currently zoned R -1.
But, it is on the fringe of that R -1 zone. The four acre parcel
across the street is zoned for up to 144 units and there are
several other two- and four - family residences in the vicinity.
I am not asking for this variation from the current zoning
simply because others have been given permission. I truly
believe that the proposed house will be an asset to the
neighborhood.
The house will be occupied by my family in the upper two
floors and by my parents in the walk -out level. As you can
see on the accompanying preliminary drawings, the house bears
little resemblance to what normally comes to mind when the
word "duplex" is mentioned.
I recognize the sentimental value of the "Stonetables" prop-
erty to many long time residents, and hope that this home will
satisfy their desires for an architecturally significant
building on that property.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
That part of Government Lot 1, Section 2, Townshipll4, Range 22,
Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at a point on the North line of said Section 2,
distant 57 rods and four links West of the Northeast corner
of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 2; thence South a
distance of 270.00 feet to the point of beginning of the tract
of land to be described,thence West parallel with said North
line a distance of 42.00 feet; thence deflecting to the left
at an angle of 15 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds a distance of
137.45 feet to the Easterly right of way line of the Chicago,
Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad: thence Southerly along said
right of way to its intersection with a line drawn South from
the point of beginning; thence North a distance of 249.6 feet
more ore less to the point of beginning.
Minutes of the Prior Lake City Council December 2, 1991
The next order of business was: Conduct Hearing on B S D Bar
Liquor License Application. City Manager Unmacht announced that
applicant, Joe Feldman, had requested this item be withdrawn from
the agenda. Council concurred with his request.
The next order of business was: Consider Conditional Use Permit
Application For Pat O'Keefe. Associate Planner Lucast presented
an overhead of the site. Mr. Lucast summarized details of the
request and discussed the five contingencies recommended by the
Planning Commission. Mr. O'Keefe then addressed the Council with
regard to his plans for the property. Mayor Andren stated that
Don Busse, Jr. had contacted her regarding his concern that the
proposed duplex remain owner occupied and be constructed per the
drawings submitted in this application. Discussion occurred on
the plans as submitted by Mr. O'Keefe and on the definition of
the phrase "substantially compliant ". Rick Rybak, 16000 Sunfish
Trail, spoke against the Conditional Use Permit being granted for
a duplex and expressed concern that the property would become
rental property and not owner occupied. Mr. Rybak submitted a
letter containing signatures from neighboring property owners
expressing the same concern. Mayor Andren read the letter and
entered it into the record. Wade Allison, 4330 Dakota Street,
also expressed concern over the proposed property eventually
becoming a rental unit. Council discussed adding a further
contingency requiring that the proposed dwelling be homesteaded
as as well as remaining an owner occupied unit.
MOTION MADE BY WHITE, SECONDED BY SCOTT, TO APPROVE THE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT INCLUDING THE FIVE CONTINGENCIES• SET
FORTH BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND ADDING THE CONTINGENCY THAT
THE PROPERTY BE HOMESTEAD CLASSIFICATION.
*Note: The Planning Commission had recommended five
contingencies, however, Council concurred that since they are
requiring the owner to homestead the property and that the owner
must build substantially the same plan as the one he submitted,
then item N3, which referred to the value of the home, would be
redundant. Due to the timing of the house construction, Mr.
O'Keefe will, for the first year, file an affidavit of his
intentions to homestead the property.
Upon a vote taken, ayes by Andren, Scott and White, the motion
passed unanimously.
A short recess was called.
Mayor Andren reconvened the meeting at 8:35 p.m.
The next order of business was: Discuss Preliminary Ideas for
Council workshop. City Manager Unmacht requested that this item
be tabled and that he would discuss it individually with each
Councilmember.
The next order of business was: Staff Update on Metropolitan
Council /City of Prior Lake Business. City Manager Unmacht
in
reported daythregarding which
Woodridge officials Estates haandttethed earlier
y's
Minutes of the Prior Lake City Council December 2, 1991
Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Mr. Unmacht stated that
Metropolitan community Development Committee voted to support the
expansion of the MUSA for Woodridge Estates property, and their
recommendation will be presented to the full Metropolitan Council
on December 19, 1991 for final action. Discussion occurred on
details of the meeting.
City Manager Unmacht reminded Council that there would be an
open house for Doug Larson on Monday, December 16 beginning at
6:00 p.m. with a short program beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers.
The next Council meeting will be Monday, December 16, 1991 at
7:30 p.m.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8 :45
p.m. by general consent of the Council.
I 'n
DA vid J. Unmac
City //Managg
e�irc
Recording Secretary
3
PRI
1j k HERITAGE COMMUNITY 7:'/f.
/ \ y 1891 1991 2491
AGENDA NUMBER: 5
PREPARED BY: Sam Lucast - Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Consider Conditional Use Permit Application of
Patrick O'Keefe
DATE: December 2, 1991
INTRODUCTION: The Planning Department received, and the
Planning Commission approved, a Conditional
Use Permit application from Patrick O'Keefe.
Mr. O'Keefe requests permission to construct
a duplex in an R -1 District where it is a
Conditional Use. The use must be accepted or
denied based on the criteria in Section 7.5 C
and D of the zoning Ordinance. The
Performance Standards in D are applicable in
Commercial or Industrial designations, not
residential. Therefore the standards in
Section C are applicable in this instance.
See attached staff memo to the Planning
Commission dated November 7, 1991 for a
detailed analysis of the proposed use and
subject site.
BACKGROUND: The subject site meets all applicable zoning
criteria and is an excellent use of the odd
shaped parcel. The Planning Commission placed
the following conditions on the site and
recommends that these conditions remain
attached to the Conditional Use Permit.
1) The unit must be owner occupied.
2) A parking plan be submitted to staff to
include a turnaround for both driveways,
90 degree angle exits, and staff review
driveway relative to Dakota Street.
3) The building must exceed the average
value of houses in the area.
a) Landscaping plan be submitted with
building permit and reviewed by staff.
5) The plat plan and building elevations
sha11 be an exhibit and building plans
shall be substantially compliant with the
application submittal.
4629 Dakota St. S.E.. Prio, lake Minnesota 55372 I Ph. (612) 4474230 1 Fax (612) 4474245
DISCUSSION: Neighborhood residents are concerned that an
absentee landlord situation would arise and be
detrimental to the quality of the
neighborhood. The attached conditions assure
the neighbors that the use will be a
beneficial and positive addition to the area.
The lot is ideally suited to the use because
of the size, shape, and location. Development
into two single family lots is unlikely
because of the proximity to C.R. 21 requiring
a centerline setback of 85 and also due to
the high traffic volume which is estimated to
reach 10,000 Average Daily Trips (ADT's) in
five years. The placement of a duplex in the
approximate center of the lot allows a buffer
of distance and existing vegetation to make
the site more desirable for this conditional
use.
The condition of owner occupancy ensures a use
more in keeping with the single family
neighborhood. Even if the unit is sold, that
condition remains in effect.
COMPREHENSIVE The requested Conditional Use is consistent
PLAN IMPACT: with the Comprehensive Plan. The intensity of
development equates to a low density
residential equivalent due to the large lot
size involved.
ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives are as follow:
1) Accept the Planning Commission
recommendation and allow the Conditional
Use Permit as submitted.
2) Deny the Conditional Use Permit.
3) Table the item for further review.
Staff concurs with the Planning Commission and
recommends approving the permit as submitted
with the conditions as specified in the Agenda
Report.
ACTION REQUIRED: Motion to adopt the information contained in
alternative one would be in order.
land; the proposed size, bulk, use and location of
buildings; the location and proposed junction of
yards, open space, parking area, driveways, storage
areas and accessory structures; the location of all
utilities and timing of proposed construction
as the Zoning Officer may require.
The Zoning Officer at his discretion may require
a topographic map to the site and reduced copies of
all material suitable for mailing.
The names and addresses of all property owners within
five hundred feet (500') shall be provided by . a
certification of an abstract company so that the Zoning
officer may provide notification of the conditional use
permit application. (Ord. 90 -07)
B. Review: The Zoning Officer shall forward copies of the
application to the City Council, the Board of Adjustment
and, if necessary to the Consultant Planner for review.
1. The Board of Adjustment shall forward its
recommendations within forty -five (45) days unless
the petitioner agrees in writing to a time
extension. Failure to act within the
allotted time shall be deemed to be a
favorable recommendation.
2. The City Council may attach such conditions to the
approval of any conditional use as may be
necessary. The approved site plan and all
attached conditions shall be filed by the
petitioner with the Zoning Officer within thirty
(30) days of final approval. Any development
contrary to the approved plan shall constitute a
violation of this Ordinance.
7 S C. Criteria for Approval: A conditional use shall be approved
if it is found to meet the following criteria:
1. The proposed use conforms to the district
permitted and conditional use provisions and all
general regulations of this Ordinance.
The proposed use shall not involve any element or
cause any conditions that may be dangerous,
injurious, or noxious to any other property or
persons, and shall comply with the performance
standards listed below.
3. The proposed use shall be sited, oriented and
landscaped to produce a harmonious relationship
L of buildings and grounds to adjacent buildings and
properties.
51
4. The proposed use shall produce a total visual
impression and environment which is consistent
with the environment of the neighborhood.
5. The proposed use shall organize vehicular access
and parking to minimize traffic congestion in the
neighborhood.
/6. The proposed use shall preserve the objectives of
J this Ordinance and shall be consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
7. Additional requirements with respect to conditional
use in the Consery ation District include the
following:
a) Filling a wetland shall not exceed the flood
storage capacity requirements for the
wetland.
b) The proposed development shall not result
in unusual maintenance cost for road and
parking areas or the breaking and leaking
of utility lines.
C) Development shall be permitted in such a
manner that the maximum number of trees shall
be preserved. The remaining trees shall
contain at least fifty (50) percent of the
canopy coverage.
d) Development shall be accomplished only in such
a manner that on -site soil erosion shall be
minimized both during construction and
when construction activity is completed.
e) Wetlands and other water bodies shall not be
used as primary sediment traps during
development.
f) The quality of water run -off and water
infiltration to the water table or aquifer
shall remain undisturbed by the development of
the site.
g) The types and density of land use proposed for
the site shall be suited to the site. Bedrock
conditions shall not present a threat to the
maintenance of ground water quality and
shall not Lail to adequately correct
problems due to soil limitations including
bearing strength, shrinkswell potential and
slope stability.
52
D. Performance Standards: All conditional uses shall comply
with the requirements of this section. In order to
determine whether a proposed use will conform to the
requirements of this Ordinance, the City Council may obtain
a qualified consultant to testify. Said consultant service
fees shall be borne by the applicant.
1. Fire Protection - Fire prevention and fighting and
equipment acceptable to the Board of Fire Underwriters
shall be readily available when any activity involving
the handling or storage of flammable or explosive
material is carried on.
2. Electrical Disturbance - No activity shall cause
electrical disturbance adversely affecting radio or
other equipment in the vicinity.
3. Noise - Noise which is determined to be objectionable
because of volume, frequency, or beat shall be muffled
or otherwise controlled, except fire sirens and related
apparatus used solely for public purpose shall be exempt
from this requirement.
<. vibrations - Vibrations detectable without instruments
on neighboring property in any district shall be
prohibited.
5. Odors - No malodorous gas or matter shall be permitted
which is discernible on any adjoining it or property.
6. Air Pollution - No pollution of air by fly -ash, dust,
smoke, vapors, or other substance shall be permitted
which is harmful to health, animals, vegetation or other
property.
7. Glare - Lighting devices which produce objectionable
direct or reflect glare on adjoining properties or
thoroughfares shall not be permitted.
S. Erosion - no erosion by wind or water shall be permitted
which will carry objectionable substances onto
neighboring properties.
9. Water Pollution - Water pollution shall be subject to
the standards established by the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency..
7.6 VARIANCES: The Board of Adjustment shall have the power
to vary from the requirements of this Ordinance, and to
attach such conditions to the variances as it deems necessary
to assure compliance with the purpose of the Ordinance.
53
er r
s[
4 1
\ 1t \
\ 1 /
co
h
a � '` 9 .
P
DISC MIN:
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372
TELEPHONE 16121447.2570 „
?I
r rt + -tt _1200
yf i
MA
` F A
5.
3y1;.
� I
t.
I�
� w.
• '
final pact U foatasnt IM 1, Section 2, TOansnlp 114, Range 4, awtl fount',
alnft.ola eatc[ISe 4 f.11oee:
Cw[mie{ at [ plat Ot W mLN HIM of said Seclico 2. 11LWt 59 roes aft 4
liNa at Of W lRtoeat ..at Of W M t ft..t caiaLNC of x10 is U. 2,
LIaOLa eWt11 a elL[M[.e Of no.OL feet 0 lift'Int, of aw.Lllf Of Y t[t[t of
laud W be e414141441t Mavet veal Mnallal .1M MW noftn IS. • 0lalancn Of
42.Op reveal eftert paftenUm la 0 left at a Wells of 15 degree. 70 minuet.
W aacaWa a Oi Of 11'f iii feet b tM WbteL1L [iVS,f.uY live of See
Cnteepa au
. ftleeve W W
St. Paul ROIIroI to nee eeueft[IY alpal a.14
[lyiWf�y line to Its MNfaactlan vim a lift d"On WOUN from Sea, point K
WgiOnWi lintel aaYM a 03atu1pe Of 249.0 feet meta ft lama to th point of
W,S.L,.
bteal
leave tlaratlm 950.35 Top Out of hand. at hto4 Steve% s Meat
Aan«1a.
\ „ r an.
.S
L:
N
i
� - - -�
�'� e
�` � � �
��
�a
�. r'
Y
r
{-�
h
PRI
�S HER ITAGE COMMUNITY xv 1
1891 1991 Peg/
v / r
tr r \\! 0
"CUOIPC" PLANNING REPORT
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: PATRICK O'KEEFE
SITE ADDRESS: 1/2 ACRE LOT NW OF C.R. 21 6 WEST AVE
PRESENTER: SAM LUCAST
PUBLIC HEARING: YES X NO
DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 1991
SITE ANALYSIS
HT_STO BACKGROUND
The subject site is a triangular shaped parcel approximately 1/2
acre in size adjacent to and northwest of the intersection of
County Road 21 and West Avenue. The lot is bisected east to west
by a Zoning District Boundary. The northern portion of the lot
is zoned R -1 Urban Residential and the southern portion is zoned
C -1 Conservation. In cases where a parcel is divided into two or
more Zoning Districts, Section 2.3 of the Zoning ordinance allows
any portion of the lot within fifty (50) feet of the division to
be used for any use of either district. Therefore, the applicant
has submitted a conditional use permit to construct a duplex on
the parcel. Duplexes are allowed as Conditional Uses in the R -1
Zoninq District.
PREVIOUS PROPOSALS
No previous proposals for this parcel are on file at City Hall.
PHYSIOGRAPHY•
The site is approximately 1/2 acre in size. It slopes from the
north to the south. The middle of the lot is basically open
space. The periphery of the site contains medium and large
trees. There is a mixture of both deciduous and coniferous trees
in this area. It appears from the information submitted, that
the structure will be located in the open space. See attached
site plan. Section 7.5, paragraph C, subsection 7c of the
Zoning Ordinance requires Conditional Use development to be
located so that the maximum number of trees are preserved. The
existing tree cover provides a natural buffer to separate the
home from adjacent development and traffic associated with County
Road 21.
ADJACENT USES:
The The subjlct site is almost completely surrounded by R -1 Urban
Residential zoning and is located within the shoreland district.
Roadways border two of the three sides of the parcel. An R -3
zoning district is located diagonally across the County Road 21
4629 Dakota St. S.E. Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 4474230 1 Fax (612) 4474245
and West Avenue intersection from the site. The entire abandoned
railroad right of way is zoned C -1 Conservation District. Prior
to development of C.R. 21, the railroad right of way was
anticipated to be used for public trails. However, the right of
way was abandoned and sold to private individuals. Therefore no
trail will be built in its for^er location and the C -1
designation of the property is questionable.
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
T e site is currently vacant. South and west of the site, and
defining the southwestern border, is County Road 21, a paved four
lane arterial roadway. North and east of the subject site is
single family residential housing. North of the site in the
Sunfish Bay subdivision are two duplex units that were given
conditional lots e (Please o see t map 2 family units on
for location of
other conditional uses.)
NEIGHBORHOOD ISSUES /IMPACT /CONCERNS
This proposed duplex is located in an area which would be
difficult to develop for single family homes due to the large lot
size, triangular shape and setback requirements from C.R. 21. A
duplex requires 15,000 square feet for minimum lot size while a
single family dwelling requires 10,000 square feet. Deed
restrictions require that no building be placed closer than
thirty (70) feet to the northern property line. It would be
nearly impossible to obtain the required minimum lot sizes for
two single family dwellings without variances or significant
overstory loss. The half acre lot is not desirable for
construction due to its proximity to an arterial roadway which is
intended to carry 10,000 ADT's (Average Daily Trips) within five
{5) years and the uncommonly large lot size. The pollution
and noise emitted from C.R. 21 will likely be a negative
influence for single family construction.
The applicant intends to construct a home that exceeds the
valuation of single family homes in the neighborhood. The unit
will be owner occupied and therefore be more representative of a
single family residential environment. The owner will occupy the
upper portion of the structure and his parents the ground level.
The submitted plans indicate a design sensitive to the specific
conditions on this property. The proposed structure is
architecturally pleasing and should be a positive feature on the
corner. The site is located on the periphery of the neighborhood
and relates more to the C.R. 21 corridor than to the Prior Acres
neighborhood. Therefore a conditional use permit for a duplex on
this site will not be a negative influence to the remainder of
the single family neighborhood.
PROBL /OPPORTUNITIES
Staff ,7oes not feel that this application will set a negative
precedent for the neighborhood. The two existing Conditional
Use duplexes had conditions placed on their permits to deal with
perceived problems associated with an out of the ordinary land
use. Possible conditions for this application include limits on
parking and the need for a detailed parking plan, requiring owner
occupation, having the proposed structure valued higher than the
adjacent structures, and the structure located to preserve the
most trees. These conditions or other similar ones may be placed
on the use to alleviate any neighborhood impact.
The neighborhood is fully developed with single family homes.
The site consists of approximately 1/2 acre and is a conducive
setting for a duplex due to its isolation from the rest of the
neighborhood, location adjacent to a major arterial street and
proximity to an R -3 zoning District. It is located in the
Shoreland District and the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources has no problem with the Conditional Use request.
The opportunity exists to obtain the highest use permitted from
the vacant parcel without compromising the integrity of the
single family neighborhood. The submitted plans reveal a
sensitive site plan with a design specifically for this site, not
a standard design which is intended for a flat rectangular lot.
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY:
Site area and statistics: Approximately 1/2 acre (21,780 sf.)
Zoning /setback requirement: 85' setback from centerline of
County Road 21
30 from north property line (as per deed restriction)
Parking requirement: Two (2) spots per dwelling unit
Front and rear yard setbacks: 25 feet each
Side yard setbacks: 10 feet
Maximum Height: 35 feet above average ground level
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPACT:
The requested Conditional Use is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan. The intensity of development equates to a
low density residential equivalent due to the large lot size
involved.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Staff recommends approval of the requested
Conditional Use for a duplex subject to the following
conditions:
1) The upper unit must be owner occupied
2) The building must provide four required off street parking
spaces
3) The building must exceed the value of the houses in the area
4) The site plan must include a parking plan acceptable
to City Staff
5) The unit must be located to remove as few trees as possible
The approval of this Conditional Use Permit does not adversely
affect the health, safety, or welfare of the general public.
Rationale for approval of the conditional use are that the
subject site exceeds the 15,000 square foot minimum lot size
requirement; the site is located adjacent to a R -7, High Density
Residential Zone and an R -1 Zone and as such, provides a
transition between them; the site is wooded on all sides to
provide a buffer from adjacent homes and C.R. 21; the negative
pollution and noise problems associated with C.R. 21 traffic
combined with the irregular triangular shape of the lot are not
conducive to single family development; the plan demonstrates a
sensitivity to the neighborhood by the incorporation of superior
architectural design and the provision that the unit will be
owner occupied.
Q) 'll l I
PIO1 2S -9o2- rzo-
APPLICATION FOR CDNDIT1ONAL USE PERIIT
Applicant: o ,�
Address: IS 91 Fs,
Property Owner:
Address:
Co,-_1Lant:
Address: --
Proposed Conditional Use
Legal Description
Existing Use of Property
Phone: 447 aod(o
Phone: 4d9 -9S9-S
Phone:
Ptrrne•
Property Acreage: Y7A (7- I. Present Zoning:
Conditional Use Being Requested: 4 4L=
!)e eu,l.o:�lq SA&LL. eL
Deed Restrictions: No Yes If so, please attach. ,1 .p r: TA
Has the Applicant previously sought to plat, rezone, obtain a variance of conditional use
permit on the subject site or any part of it: 'X No _Yes Request:
When:
SUBMISSION RBDUIRDENTS :(A)Corpleted application form. (B)Complete legal description and
parcel identification number (PID). (C)Filing fee. (D)Deed restrictions, if necessary.
(E)Fifteen copies of site plan drawn to scale showing existing /proposed structures.
(F)Additional information as requested by the Planning Director including but not limited
to: existing grades and buildings within 100 feet, drainage plan with finished grade and
relationship to existing water bodies, if any, proposed floor plan with use indicated plus
building elevations, landscape plan with schedule of plantings and screening, curb cuts,
driveways, parking areas, walks and curbing. (G)Certified from abstract firm the names and
address of property owners within 500 feet of the existing property lines of the subject
property. (H)Application and supportive data are due 20 days prior to any scheduled
hearing.
OELY COMPLETE APPLICATIONS SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING OOEA)ISSION.
Tb the best of my knowledge the information presented on this form is correct. In
addition, I have read Section 7.5 of the Zoning Ordinance which specifies the
r 'rements r itional uses. I agree to provide information and follow the
pr ores a t n the Ordinance. Trip 23 Glc.—r 91
App13 nts Sig Date
Fee Owners Signature Date
THIS SECTION TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE PLANNING DIREI.TOR
PLANNING CONMISSION _APPROV(D _DENIED DATE OF HEARING
CITY COUNCIL APPRVJm _DENIED DATE OF HEARING
GUNDITIONS-
Signature of the Planning Director Date
Regarding: Patrick O'Keefe
Application for Conditional Use Permit
Construction of a two- family house within
an R -1 Zone.
The parcel in question is located on the northwest corner of
County Road 21 and Nest Avenue and is currently zoned R -1.
But, it is on the fringe of that R -1 zone. The four acre parcel
across the street is zoned for up to 144 units and there are
several other two- and four - family residences in the vicinity.
I am not asking for this variation from the current zoning
simply because others have been given permission. I truly
believe that th proposed house will be an asset to the
neighborhood.
The house will be occupied by my family in the upper two
floors and by my parents in the walk -out level. As you can
see on the accompanying preliminary dravir.ys, the house bears
little resemblance to what normally comes to mind when the
word "duplex" is mentioned.
i recognize the sentimental value of the "Stonetables" prop-
erty to many long time residents, and hope that this home will
satisfy their desires for an architecturally significant
building on that property.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
That part of Government Lot 1, Section 2, Townshipl14, Range 22,
Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at a point on the North line of said Section 2,
distant 57 rods and four links West of the Northeast corner
of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 2; thence South a
distance of 270.00 feet to the point of beginning of the tract
of land to be described, thence West parallel with said North
line a distance of 42.00 feet; thence deflecting to the left
at an angle of 15 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds a distance of
137.45 feet to the Easterly right of way line of the Chicago,
Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad: thence Southerly along said
right of way to its intersection with a line drawn South from
the point of beginning; thence North a distance of 249.6 feet
more ore less to the point of beginning.
Of5GgY00a: - ` ;
fTOt pfR 0[
Gm nt bt 1, Sectl On 2. % .,D 114. Ruµe
KlOm.6 tr.Y[1MG as f.11.m;
Loan "& at O POUrt s tnf rortn 1IM Of Mid J ti.. 2, di.t l 5'I .aa. uld 4
IIOM mm a %m m[{afa.t Ce[nf[ Of tM u',MOat 4w[lf[ Of "to iOOtion 2;
tlwcf Belk a OlaYrcf Of 274.x f «t tO W wi.t Of !µNHµ Of tM !nee Of
lwtl m a descrl4d: tMM. v..t W-11 -1 .lu uld Mrtn Lim • dutmt. of
Q-W h.t; tk.kO. Mtlactlrµ s l uft at m max. Of 15 afar.!+ JO smut++
W mm"O a Otatwm v< ly"" f..t m tM futerl/ rlplsP -../ ItM Of tM
GTIMSI. ftlmmw and Jt. faux Rallr ; tmm. .wsM[i/ .1wµ Nid
[tdM -etya xis b 14 ugraf[ltm ,IIN a Lim dnm mI,U f,m tM point M
m93mtaa; VmOm ne[tl, •distance Of 24O.d fmt tM polo! of
wstMis.
iql
Rsilsrk . 950.55 TOP st Of O/s, at OOketa St[." , Oat
S.m O.
PRIOR LANE, MINNESOTA SS3f2
TELEPHONE (612)447.2570
r r
J
sn
S -
-- T � r
r•
nM
1 !
f :aw
W
CC'? ,
y \
\
% 3
3
+ �
� r
t
Gm nt bt 1, Sectl On 2. % .,D 114. Ruµe
KlOm.6 tr.Y[1MG as f.11.m;
Loan "& at O POUrt s tnf rortn 1IM Of Mid J ti.. 2, di.t l 5'I .aa. uld 4
IIOM mm a %m m[{afa.t Ce[nf[ Of tM u',MOat 4w[lf[ Of "to iOOtion 2;
tlwcf Belk a OlaYrcf Of 274.x f «t tO W wi.t Of !µNHµ Of tM !nee Of
lwtl m a descrl4d: tMM. v..t W-11 -1 .lu uld Mrtn Lim • dutmt. of
Q-W h.t; tk.kO. Mtlactlrµ s l uft at m max. Of 15 afar.!+ JO smut++
W mm"O a Otatwm v< ly"" f..t m tM futerl/ rlplsP -../ ItM Of tM
GTIMSI. ftlmmw and Jt. faux Rallr ; tmm. .wsM[i/ .1wµ Nid
[tdM -etya xis b 14 ugraf[ltm ,IIN a Lim dnm mI,U f,m tM point M
m93mtaa; VmOm ne[tl, •distance Of 24O.d fmt tM polo! of
wstMis.
iql
Rsilsrk . 950.55 TOP st Of O/s, at OOketa St[." , Oat
S.m O.
MAP 1 PROPOSED O'KEEFE
CONDITIONAL USE
Wl
i
PROPOSED
COND. USE
n
R L
u
Tuo
o .
, Oi`
,. .,. T. 114 R. 2
EXISTING COND. USES
•� s
t . A
• r R.�.s. st
a— • r
C
Mr..
L. 1 M
m.0
LLT
2 W
.• COURT F
W.W.
Y
1 �.
-
..,
.IC
•
Y
] _
• Y
1
1
Y .'
Y•F
C
Mr..
L. 1 M
m.0
LLT
2 W
.• COURT F
W.W.
Y
1 �.
i
SUBJECT
SITE
u
L S
118
MAPS
ADJACENT ZONING
�x e °
4
f J'
br/ o T H4 R L ^
s T
r _
!J J �•
•-., • t ., II. L. S. 36
0 • iy
• I i i I '
OR"
! T
MY
r.
I
i
a
rYe
sloe
...
• 1
w.,Y
ua
`
•
i
Y ..- Y....w
mr
uru
n
!.
•
!u!u
ww
uT
2
M,r
• • •
COURT
. s.
MY
� PkIU
HFRITAGE COMMUNITY
_F 1891 1991 : r >qi
"CUOIPN"
NOTICE OF HEARING
FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
You are hereby notified that a hearing will be held by the
Planning Commission in the Prior Lake Council Chambers at 4629
Dakota Street S.E. on:
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1991 at
P.M.
PURPOSE OF HEARING: To consider a conditional use permit
application for Patrick O'Keefe.
SUBJECT SITE LOCATION: 1/2 Acre lot located adjacent to and
northwest of the intersection of
West Avenue and C.R. 21 (Eagle Creek
Avenue).
REQUESTED ACTION: The property is zoned R -1 Urban
Residential which permits single
family homes to be built. The
applicant is requesting the Planning
Commission to grant a conditional
use p ermit to construct a duplex on
the lot as proposed on the attached
sheets.
If you desire to be heard in reference to this matter, should
attend this meeting. oral and written comments will be .ccepted
by the Planning Commission. For more information, contact the
Prior Lake Planning Department at 447 -4230.
Prior Lake Planning Commission
October 30, 1991
4629 Dakota St. S.E, Prior lake Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 4474230 / Fax (612) 4474245
s
\ ' `
HER ITAGE. COMMUNITY `fk /I. f'7_ t
1891 1991 2Qy!
"CUOIPN"
NOTICE OF HEARING
FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
You are hereby notified that a hearing will be held by the City
Council in the Prior Lake Council Chambers at 4629 Dakota Street
S.E. on:
MONDAY. DECEMBER 2, 1991 at 8:00 P.M.
PURPOSE OF HEARING: To consider a conditional use permit
application for Patrick O'Keefe.
SUBJECT SITE LOCATION: 1/2 Acre lot lozated adjacent to and
northwest of the intersection of
West Avenue and C.R. 21 (Eagle Creek
Avenue).
REQUESTED ACTION: The pro arty is zoned R -1 Urban
Residential which permits single
family homes to be built. The
applicant is requesting the City
Council to grant a conditional use
permit to construct a duplex on the
lot as proposed on the attached
sheets.
At a public hearing held on November 7, 1991 thn Planning
Commission approved the permit with the following conditions,
however the City Council makes the final decision.
1) The unit must be owner occupied
2) A parking plan be submitted to staff to include a turnaround
for both driveways, 90 degree angle exits, and staff review
driveway relative to Dakota Street.
3) The building mu:;t exceed the average value of houses in the
area
4) Landscaping plan be submitted with building permit and
reviewed by staff
5) The plat plan and building elevations shall be an exhibit and
building plans shall be substantially compliant with the
application submittal
If you desire to be heard in reference to this matter, you should
attend this meeting. Oral and written comments will be accepted
by the City Council. For more information, contact the Prior
Lake Planning Department at 447 -4230.
Prior Lake Planning Department
November 22, 1991
4629 Dakota St. S.E. Prior Lake, Minnewta 55372 / Ph. (612) 447 -4230 / Fax (612) 447 -4245
2
4
�t
PRIOR LA:<E, MINNESOTA 55372
TELEPW,tNE (612447 -2570
P
n.umn.W m e of Va e r rn
HMV. eIt aSt- _ 0200
,.1ST m5- . m•
"
'4$ w
.t
DE L nlw;
r
Ew
1
e
� i
Y •:
'-4
t)
Teat pact a Cortrmmt wt 1. Section 2, Tm.hlp 114 Range ll, S .tt Couotf,
ffltneaata E<serime as [olloue:
COwmLy at a paint m Me ro[N line of mid Section 2, diaLnt 57 [Ode and 4
limn neat o[ Me ro[tMaet c e feet to Me of MO Ro[NUaat Owrte[ of Wald iacttm 21
Yana eouth a disWm Of 02U.W {Dint of Mgiming of toe tract Of
leod W of described; theme stet le"1101 With acid mrth lie a distance of
42.00 feet; Umee, deflectlN, to the left at an esgl. of 15 d.gr... N mim4a
W e4cmdO a distance u[ 1Pf.45 feet W Me OmUrlf fight- O[ -.ay Jim Of Me
C41mge, Rllemk a aM 5t. Paul Railroad; tMme aoOMOcij atom mid
rlgatOf llo t0 lb Intersection with a Jim dneo eouth from MO point of
btmiminml teem. meth • distant. of 249.0 feat oafs or lass to tee point of
maimlug.
lofts;
serbesre tl.eatlo 950.35 Top oat of bfd. at Oskote Sttamt m Wet
Ieeua.
1
n
n
U
i
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 7, 1991 PAGE 2
Comments from the Commissioners were on: lighting, grading, close
proximity to the Bingo Hall possibility of parking lot becoming
permanent, and annexation of subject property into Sioux
Community.
MOTION BY ARNOLD, SECOND BY KEDROWSKI, TO GRANT APPROVAL OF THE
PARKING LOT TO THE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY TO CONSTRUCT A 304
CAR TEMPORARY PARKING LOT ON NW1 /4 OF SW1 /4 OF SECTION 23,
TOWNSHIP 115N, RANGE 22 W. RATIONALE BEING THE CONSTRUCTION WOULD
IMPROVE AN UNSAFE CONDITION, REASONABLE DEVIATION OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCE. THE LAND WILL BECOME TRUST LAND WITHIN 4 -8 MONTHS AND
AS SUCH WILL NO LONGER BE SUBJECT TO PRIOR LAKE ORDINANCES, AND
WOULD NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH AND WELFARE OF THE
COMMUNITY.
Vote taken signified ayes by Arnold, Kedrowski, Roseth, and
Loftus. MOTION CARRIED.
ITEM III PAT O'KEEFE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Pat O'Keefe, 15191 Fairlawn Shores Trail SE, stated he is
requesting a conditional use permit to construct a two family
dwelling. The design of the house is unique as it does not
resemble the typical duplex style. The applicant will be living
in the upper level and his parents would live in the lower
walk -out level.
Sam Lucast presented the information as per planning report of
November 7, 1991. The subject site is located in two different
zones. The southern portion is C -1 Conservation and the northern
portion is R -1 Urban Residential. When a parcel is divided by
two zones, the Ordinance allows it to be used for any use within
50 feet of the division. Duplexes are allowed as Conditional
Uses in the R -1 Zoninq District. The applicant has designed the
house plans to compliment the site and is not the normal
appearance of a duplex. The unit will be owner occupied. Staff
recommends approval of the application with conditions.
Robert Preussler, 16350 Park Ave. asked for clarification of the
location of the proposed duplex.
Margaret Busse, 4350 Dakota St. questioned the duplex and stated
that she would like to see one home built on the lot.
Corinne Gormley, 16048 West Ave. had questions on the building
envelope in reference to the 30 foot setback.
Rich Rybeck, 160nn Sunfish Trail, asked for clarification on the
location of the conservation district boundary and owner
occupied status for future owners.
Patrick O'Keefe, 15191 Fairlawn Shores Trail, stated he is
co -owner with his parents, and that the plan is designed so that
the duplex can be converted to a single family unit, he also
questioned recommended staff restriction on house value.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 7, 1991 PAGE 3
Comments from the Commissioners were on: driveway location and
turn around on driveways, owner living quarters, house
valuation, landscape plan, impressive plans, lighting plans,
and off - street parking for four vehicles.
MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECOND BY ROSETH, TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR 1/2 ACRE LOT NW OF COUNTY ROAD 21 AND WEST AVENUE,
AS IT EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM SIZE LOT REQUIREMENT OF 15,000 SQUARE
FEET, IS LOCATED BETWEEN R -1 AND R -3 ZONES THUS ALLOWING A
TRANSITION AREA ON THIS PARCEL, THE SITE IS WOODED ON ALL SIDES
AND SERVES AS A BUFFER TO ROADS AND ADJACENT HOMES, THE DUPLEX AS
PROPOSED IS NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH AND WELFARE OF THE
NEIGHBORHOOD. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE RECOMMENDED:
1. THE DUPLEX MUST BE OWNER OCCUPIED.
2. A PARKING PLAN BE SUBMITTED TO STAFF TO INCLUDE A TURNAROUND
FOR BOTH DRIVEWAYS, 90 DEGREE ANGLE EXITS, AND STAFF REVIEW
DRIVEWAY RELATIVE TO DAKOTA STREET.
3. BUILDING VALUE SHOULD BE ABOVE THE AVERAGE VALUE OF HOMES IN
THE AREA.
A. LANDSCAPING PLAN BE SUBMITTED WITH THE BUILDING PERMIT TO BE
REVIEWED BY STAFF.
5. THE PLAT PLAN AND BUILDING ELEVATIONS SHALL BE AN EXHIBIT AND
BUILDING PLANS SHALL BE SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLIANT WITH THE
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL.
Vote taken signified ayes, by Kedrowski, Roseth, Arnold, and
Loftus. MOTION CARRIED.
Recess called at 9:20 P.M. Meeting reconvened at 9:25 P.M.
Discussion followed on the DeVos site line study made by Bruce
Loney, Assistant City Engineer, stating that the sight distance
problem is caused by the slope of Mr. Caruso's driveway, the
vertical curve of Lakeside Avenue, and a utility box adjacent to
the north of the Caruso driveway, and not the location of the
DeVoss home. The Commissioners accepted the letter. Russell
DeVoss, Roy Clay and Jay Caruso were notified of this decision.
Comprehensive Plan Workshop is scheduled for January 25, 1992.
Additional information will be sent later.
MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECOND BY LOFTUS, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING.
Vote taken signified ayes by Kedrowski, Loftus, Arnold, and
Roseth. MOTION CARRIED.
Meeting adjourned at 9:30 P.M. Tape of meeting on file at City
Hall.
Deb Garross Sam Lucast
Assistant City Planner Acting Recording Secretary
DPRI
HERITAGE COMMUNITY
1891 1Q91
"CUOIPC" PLANNING REPORT
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: PATRICK O'KEEFE
SITE ADDRESS: 1/2 ACRE LOT NW OF C.R. 21 & WEST AVE
PRESENTER: SAM LUCAST
PUBLIC HEARING: YES X NO
DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 1991
SITE ANALYSIS
�t:r /I,iY7. t
HISTORY /BACKGROUND
The subject site is a triangular shaped parcel approximately 1/2
acre in size adjacent to and northwest of the intersection of
County Road 21 and West Avenue. The lot is bisected east to west
by a Zoning District Boundary. The northern portion of the lot
is zoned R -1 Urban Residential and the southern portion is zoned
C -1 Conservation. In cases where a parcel is divided into two or
more Zoning Districts, Section 2.3 of the Zoning Ordinance allows
any portion of the lot within fifty (50) feet of the division to
be used for any use of either district. Therefore, the applicant
has submitted a conditional use permit to construct a duplex on
the parcel. Duplexes are allowed as Conditional UseE in the R -1
Zoning District.
PREVIOUS PROPOSALS:
No previous proposals for this parcel are on file at City Hall.
PHYSIOGRAPHY•
The site is approximately 1/2 acre in size. It slopes from the
north to the south. The middle of the lot is basically open
space. The periphery of the site contains medium and large
trees. There is a mixture of both deciduous and coniferous trees
in this area. It appears from the information submitted, that
the structure will be located in the open space. See attached
site plan. Section 7.5, paragraph C, subsection 7c of the
Zoning Ordinance requires Conditional Use development to be
located so that the maximum number of trees are preserved. The
existing tree cover provides a natural buffer to separate the
home from adjacent development and traffic associated with County
Road 21.
ADJACENT USES:
TheThe sutilect ssite is almost completely surrounded by R -1 Urban
Residential zoning and is located within the shoreland district.
Roadways border two of the three sides of the parcel. An R -3
zoning district is located diagonally across the County Road 21
4629 Dakota St. S.E.. Prior take, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 447 -4230 / Fax (612) 447 -4245
and West Avenue intersection from the site. The entire abandoned
railroad right of way is zoned C -1 Conservation District. Prior
to development of C.R. 21, the railroad right of way was
anticipated to be used for public trails. However, the right of
way was abandoned and sold to private individuals. Therefore no
trail will be built in its former location and the C -1
designation of the property is questionable.
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is currently vacant. South and west of the site, and
defining the southwestern border, is County Road 21, a paved four
lane arterial roadway. North and east of the subject site is
single family residential housing. North of the site in the
Sunfish Bay subdivision are two duplex units that were given
conditional use approval. They are both two family units on
two combined substandard lots (Please see map 2 for location of
other conditional uses.)
NEIGHBORHOOD ISSUES /IMPACT /CONCERNS
This proposed duplex is located in an area which would be
difficult to develop for single family homes due to the large lot
size, triangular shape and setback requirements from C.R. 21. A
duplex requires 15,000 square feet for minimum lot size while a
single family dwelling requires 10,000 square feet. Deed
restrictions require that no building be placed closer than
thirty (30) feet to the northern property line. It would be
nearly impossible to obtain the required minimum lot sizes for
two single family dwellings without variances or significant
overstory loss. The half acre lot is not desirable for
construction due to its proximity to an arterial roadway which is
intended to carry 7.0,000 ADT's (Average Daily Trips) within five
(5) years and the uncommonly large lot size. The pollution
and noise emi•_ced from C.R. 21 will likely be a negative
influence for single family construction.
The applicant intends to construct a home that exceeds the
valuation of single family homes in the neighborhood. The unit
will be owner occupied and therefore be more representative of a
single family residential environment. The owner will occupy the
upper portion of the structure and his parents the ground level.
The submitted plans indicate a design sensitive to the specific
conditions on this property. The proposed structure is
architecturally pleasing and should be a positive feature on the
corner. The site is located on the periphery of the neighborhood
and relates more to the C.R. 21 corridor than to the Prior Acrs
neighborhood. Therefore a conditional use permit for a duplex on
this site will not be a negative influence to the remainder of
the single family neighborhood.
PROBLEMS /OPPORTUNITIES
Staff does not feel that this application will set a negative
precedent for the neighborhood. The two existing Conditional
Use duplexes had conditions placed on their permits to deal with
perceived problems associated with an out of the ordinary land
use. Possible conditions for this application include limits on
parking and the need for a detailed parking plan, requiring owner
occupation, having the proposed structure valued higher than the
adjacent structures, and the structure located to preserve the
most trees. These conditions or other similar ones may be placed
on the use to alleviate any neighborhood impact.
The neighborhood is fully developed with single family homes.
The site consists of approximately 1/2 acre and is a conducive
setting for a duplex due to its isolation from the rest of the
neighborhood, location adjacent to a major arterial street and
proximity to an R -3 Zoning District. It is located in the
Shoreland District and the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources has no problem with the Conditional Use request.
The opportunity exists to obtain the highest use permitted from
the vacant parcel without compromising the integrity of the
single family neighborhood. The submitted plans reveal a
sensitive site plan with a design specifically for this site, not
a standard design which is intended for a flat rectangular lot.
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY:
Site area and statistics: Approximately 1/2 acre (21,780 sf.)
Zoning /setback requirement: 85' setback from centerline of
County Road 21
30 from north property line (as per deed restriction)
Parking requirement: Two (2) spots per dwelling unit
Front and rear yard setbacks: 25 feet each
Side yard setbacks: 10 feet
Maximum Height: 35 feet above average ground level
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPACT:
The requested Conditional Use is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan. The intensity of development equates to a
low density residential equivalent due to the large lot size
involved.
RECOMMENDATION•
The P anning Staff recommends approval of the requested
Conditional Use for a duplex subject to the following
conditions:
1) The upper unit must be owner occupied
2) The building must provide four required off street parking
spaces
3) The building must exceed the value of the houses in the area
4) The site plan must include a parking plan acceptable
to City Staff
5) The unit must be located to remove as few trees as possible
The approval of this Conditional Use Permit does not adversely
affect the health, safety, or welfare of the general public.
Rationale for approval of the conditional use are that the
subject site exceeds the 15,000 square foot minimum lot size
requirement; the site is located adjacent to a R -3, High Density
Residential Zone and an R -1 Zone and as such, provides a
transition between them; the site is wooded on all sides to
provide a buffer from adjacent homes and C.R. 21; the negative
pollution and noise problems associated with C.R. 21 traffic
combined with the irregular triangular shape of the lot are not
conducive to single family development; the plan demonstrates a
sensitivity to the neighborhood by the incorporation of superior
architectural design and the provision that the unit will be
owner occupied.
I
F � I F
FF- F- F-
OEM m
t
n I m mom Il �1i�l n
V 4'_ _o.
L3D
t
Lautlof.T / Hu,t
b np& z�
E T
I
1 1
II�
Love -"D
= — — _mot
1 `.D f ,.
L. f+ / htc,N
bnj "�
it
Livikj(g
r-
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I �
Vi2-ILL-
IT
E,J=
w1
F
lid
7& 1�
2" nILILVA
i
E�,nY
�..�ICrn� I lal
F I III
i
wnl y � I I
it
2g�1,
Dj1
�Y�cLt�lc �
1b'xyL° Iel+•1��
\.I
Q S-(
�..�ICrn� I lal
F I III
i
a
F-7 �� q 1, ti
'LV D
2
w
HEEL
16670 FRANKLIN TRAIL S.E.
PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372
TELEPHONE (612)447 -2570 er nop: a. unfE wcn
i
pprollel mm Ine NwMWIe of rpe NE I/4 0:ne
NwV4 of? 14.21— - \_ _ 42. OO –
i j3 �,45
nits
'O
V t r
F
'J
\ F
M
el
4 �
60
I '
1
DPSCRIPIION:
That part of Goverment Lot 1, Section 2, Township 914, Range 22, Scott County,
Minnesota described as follows:
Commencing at a point on the north line of said Section 2, distant 57 rods and 4
va
�r
\ \i
\ Oafall¢I nM rc¢Np111.4/I¢Ol 1p¢NEI /9 el lip
NWI14 of 2 , 14 22—
- 42. 00 - 9s
\ 13T 45-..
9si i
C
z �\
a
sw N
llclL
f¢A: ,
1 .
e •
h
/
1 eo
l
OFSCRIPSfON: I � `......
That part of Goverment Lot 1, Section 2, Township 114, Range 22, Suott County,
Minnesota described as follows:
Commencing at a point on the north line of said Section 2, distant 57 rods and 4
links west of the northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 2:
thence south a distance of 27U.00 feet to the point of beginning of the tract of
land to be described; thence west parallel with said north line a distance of
42.00 feet; thence deflecting to the left at an angle of 15 degrees 30 minutes
QQ seconds a distance of 137.45 feet to the easterly right -of -way line of the
Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad; thence southerly along said
tight -of -way line to its intersection with a line drawn south from the point of
beginning; thence north a distance of 249.1 feet more or less to the point of
beginning.
Notes!
Benchmark elevation 950.35 rap nut of hid. at Dakota Street s West
Avenue.
� � k HERITAGE COMMUNITY 9J'7J:`fi�_i'
u / \ 7897 1991 -9,291 t m
"CUOIPN"
NOTICE OF HEARING
FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
You are hereby notified that a hearing will be held by the
Planning Commission in the Prior Lake Council Chambers at 4629
Dakota Street S.E. on:
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1991 at 8:00 P.M.
PURPOSE OF HEARING: To consider a conditional use permit
application for Patrick O'Keefe.
SUBJECT SITE LOCATION: 1/2 Acre lot located adjacent to and
northwest of the intersection of
West Avenue and C.R. 21 (Eagle Creek
Avenue).
REQUESTED ACTION: The property is zoned R -1 Urban
Residential which permits single
family homes to be built. The
applicant is requesting the Planning
Commission to grant a conditional
use permit to construct a duplex on
the lot as proposed on the attached
sheets.
If you desire to be heard in reference to this matter, you should
attend this meeting. Oral and written comments will be accepted
by the Planning Commission. For more information, contact the
Prior Lake Planning Department at 447 -4230.
Prior lake Planning Commission
October 30, 1991
4629 Dakota St S.E.. Prior Lake Minnesota 55372 / Pn. (612) 4474230 / Fax (612) 4474245
C UOlmc
w - SE,oxs nEaaa a�,r.a
e „.aa
ble5,ae 5EaviGf ,aa�wacs
nE TRIE No neaa,aa eaaViCE
SCOTT COUNTY ABSTRACT AND TITLE, INC.
223 HOLMES STREET, P.O. BOX 3B0 SHAKOPEE. MINNESOTA 55379
DEEM Mennen and Dale Kuller
Kan, Mea91er. s.nann coon.,
TEIER. SEIL111.
I. nrn..wm
October 24, 1991
Mr. Pat O'Keefe
15191 Farilawn Shores
Prior Lake, MN 55372
To Whom it may concern:
According to the 1991 Tax Records in the Scott County Treasurer's Office,
the following persons are listed as the owners of the property which lies
within 500 feet of the following described property:
That part of Government Lot 1, Section 2, Township 114, Range 22, Scott
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Communing at a point on the North line of said Section 2, distant 57 rods
and 4 links West of the Northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of said
Section 2: thence South a distance of 270.00 feet to the point of beginning
of the tract of land to be described: thence West parallel with said North
line a distance of 42.00 feet: thence deflecting to the left at an angle of
15 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 137.45 feet to the Easterly
right of way line of the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad: thence
Southerly along said right of way line to its intersection with a line
drawn South from the point of beginning: thence North a distance of 249.6
feet more or less to the point of beginning.
Richard A. 4 Debra K. Rybak
16000 Sunfish Trail HE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Roy J. Clay 4 Jenny
16129 Lakeside Avenue
Prior Lake, MN 55372
William G. Slipher A wife
16020 West Avenue
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Raymond J. 6 Corinne Gormley
16048 West Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Eldon E. S Ampere C. Zupke
16130 West Avenue BE
Prior Lake, HE 55372
Arlo 6 Renee Rhoads
P.O. Box 88
Rosemount, MN 55068
County of Scott Albert M. 6 Jackie L. Dunker
R Highway Engineer 16133 Lakeside Avenue
600 Country Trail East Prior Lake, MN 55372
Jordan, MN 55352
PAGE 1 OF 3
MEMBERMINNESOTALANDTRLEASS KWUlKYN
AOFNT POR CMICAOO TITLE IMSUMNCE COMPANY
City of Prior Lake
Clyde E. Reetz 6 wife
4629 Dakota Street BE
4323 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Bette A. Humphrey
Robert J. d Judy A. Dardis
16000 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
4345 Dakota Street SE
Box 284
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Paul W. Onkka, Jr. S
Alan S Suzanne Winterberger
Mary Beth Clayton
15956 Sunfish Trail
4363 Dakota Street
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake, MN 55372
John B. Ramsey 6 wife
Elizabeth A. Peterson
5609 12th Avenue South
4373 Dakota Street SE
Minneapolis, MN 55417
Prior Lake, MN 55372
John K. Siskoff
Arthur L. 6 Angeline Schesso
15991 Sunfish Trail
4381 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
P.O. Box 2
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Craig R. 6 Melissa Chisholm
15981 West Avenue SE
Larry P. S Laurie A. Arth
Prior Lake, MN 55372
4391 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Richard J. Ames
20335 Sawmill Road
Mary Ellen Wolf
Jordan, MN 55352
16010 Cambridge Circle
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Mark S. Coffman
15901 Sunfish Trail SE
Robert G. S Cheryl L. Drummer
Prior Lake, MN 55372
16006 Cambridge Circle BE
Prior Lake, HE 55372
Wade R. S Nancy J. Allison
4330 Dakota Street BE
Dwight D. S Susan E. Borland
Prior Lake, MN 55372
16011 Cambridge Circle SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Donald F. S Margaret Busse
4350 Dakota Street SE
Kenneth Andersen
Prior Lake, MN 55372
22548 East Martin Lake Drive HE
Stacy, MN 55079
Larry L. Henschke d wife
4370 Dakota Street SE
Carol A. Jacobson 6
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Elliott J. Rivera
16078 Cambridge Circle
Helen A. Nelson
Prior Lake, NN 55372
4386 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Cynthia Pauly
16704 Cambridge Circle
Charles A. Meyer
Prior Lake, MN 55372
4394 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
PAGE 2 OF 3
Raymond L. Sheehan
Gilbert L. Anderson 6 wife
16017 Cambridge Circle
161L2 Lakeside Avenue SE
Prior Lake, Ml 55372
Prior Lake, ME 55372
Thomas W. 4 Stacey L. Foust
Mathew Colucci 6 wife
16051 West Avenue BE
16110 Lakeside Avenue BE
Prior Lake, M4 55372
Prior Lake, M1 55372
Edgar M. Bennett 6 wife
Robert C. Chandler d wife
16031 West Avenue BE
9202 Bay Hill Blvd.
Prior Lake, ME 55372
Orlando, FL 32819
Carolyn I. Schoeller
D. James Space 6 Katherine
16011 West Avenue BE
16094 Eagle Creek
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Les C. 6 Kristine Z. Thompson
Joel T. b Kathryn J. Pietig
16001 West Avenue BE
14534 Glendale Avenue BE
Prior Lake MN 55372
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Paul J. 6 SandrL C. Joachim
Charles R. Brazier 6 wife
16018 Cambridge Circle BE
16072 Eagle Creek Avenue South
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake, PM 55372
Jeffrey M. Gagen
Alan W. 6 Sharon K. Roberts
16014 Cambridge Circle BE
16058 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake, MN 55372
John M. Cates 6 Arlene C.
Wayne R. Anderson
16200 West Street BE
1512 East 122nd Street
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Burnsville, MN 55337
Earl J. Cates 6 wife
Kevin J. Bergstrom
16220 West Street SE
16030 Eagle Creek Avenue
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Patrick b Patricia McFadden
Gaylon C. 6 Kris M. Anderson
16111 Lakeside Avenue BE
16020 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, M 55372
Prior Lake, MI 55372
Jon I. Humphrey
Donald Draayer 6 wife
16000 Eagle Avenue BE
Uncut. CFD - Beth T. Stoller
P.O. Box 284
16010 Eagle Creek Avenue SE
Prior Lake, Mi 55372
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Gregory S. 6 Lois K. Benson
16140 Lakeside Avenue SE
Prior Lake, !IIi 55372
^
Robert F. d Mary Preussler
(� L
16350 Park Avenue BE
David E. Human
Prior Lake, MN 55372
SCOTT COUNTY ABSTRACT AND TITLE, INC.
DEM:nlg --
fmlR Cr'TY R::iOd:r
PAGE 3 OF 3
?] G