Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9A - Deerfield Preliminary Plan MEETING DATE: AGENDA #: PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT JANUARY 18, 2000 9A JANE KANSIER--1. PLANNING COORDINATOR DO~RYE, PLANNING DIRECTOR AGE~D-A IT~M: "G ~}./ ::; .~ \rp/: ", -\, .' l \>\ ~,,~t ~. ~vr / J I. rV' ,..,e" \ P,V \_' v Ii 'I ~ v",;t! ~, Q" Jj .' 'r. '\1' r X .Jv.... ((") 'r I~I ,. \/0 'i\ J)'f.\ (\# (y) 0' 'J \tv F; .' DISCUSSION: . History: D.R. Horton has applied for approval of a Planned Unit 4~V Development (PUD) preliminary plan and a preliminary plat for the \'7\ ~ ~.', property located south and west of CSAH 21, south of F. ish Point Road \ ,<\v, ~. & e and Wilderness Trail and east of the Ponds Athletic Facility. The \ ,'~ ~ I application includes a request for a PUD Preliminary Plan to allow a . _ ~ ~ \ ~ 'r " f mixed use development consisting of single family dwellings, two-unit C\. ' ~ . ~,. townhouse buildings, two-, three- and four-unit coach homes, and A ~ \ '-, lL-v four-, six-, eight- and ten-unit villa homes. The development also \ ~ bJ\,' ~ includes public parkland and private open space. \/ l r \ S v'", lyd'" "'\.'0) / This property was annexed to the City in July, 1997. Late in 1997, the r'\JtY,.~~' aJ~yJ. -7\" . JIiJ~ Conncil approved an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan that v - \)~ . _ V included this area within the MUSA and designated it for Low to \.p,'b '^',,~ Medium Density Residential uses. In July, 1999, the City Council ~/\{V approved a rezoning of this property to the R-1 (Low Density Residential) and R-2 (Low to Medium Density Residential) districts. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION OO-XX APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN, APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION OO-XX APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS DEERFIELD, AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION OO-XX APPROVING THE WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN FOR DEERFIELD On November 8, 1999, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider this proposal. There were a number of outstanding issues with the proposal at that time. The Planning Commission therefore continued the public hearing to December 13, 1999, to allow the developer the time to address those issues. The minutes of the November 8, 1999, and December 13, 1999, Planning Commission meetings are attached to this report. l:\92file~\9~ubdjv\99prelirmdeerfld\d~er~c.dqc. PilE!; 1 162UUEagle Creel< A\fe. ~.t:., Prior Lal<e, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax \(12) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER . I T ' The size of this development triggered the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W), which was completed in November. The comment period expired on December 1, 1999. The City Council considered the EA Won December 20, 1999, and determined there is no need for further environmental review. Current Circumstances: Prior to December 13, 1999, the developer submitted revised plans for this development. The original proposal consisted of a total of 631 dwelling units on 133 net acres, for a total density of 4.7 units per acre. It included 77 single family dwellings, 46 dwelling units in two-unit buildings, 220 dwellings in three- and four-unit buildings, and 288 dwellings in eight- and ten-unit buildings. The new proposal has reduced the total number of dwelling units to 540 units, for an overall density of 4.1 units per acre. A summary of this proposal, and the way in which it addresses the outstanding ordinance issues is included in this report. Density: The plan proposes 540 units on a total of 165.03 acres. Density is based on the buildable acres of the site, or in this case on 133 net acres. The overall density proposed in this plan is 4.1 units per acre. The proposed density in the R-1 district is 2.7 units per acre, and the proposed density in the R-2 district is 6.1 units per acre. The Zoning Ordinance permits a density of3.6 units per acre in the R-l district and 7.2 units per acre in the R-2 district. The proposed densities are within the density allowed by the Ordinance. Lots: The preliminary plat consists of78 single family lots and 462 lots for the townhouse units. There are also two lots for the common open space, and 4 outlots for the private roads. The plan also includes a 27 acre park located on the north end ofthe site. The single family lots meet or exceed the minimum lot area and lot width requirements ofthe underlying R-l district. Building Styles: The proposed plan calls for a townhouse style development consisting of2-, 3-, 4-,8- and 10-unit buildings. Sample floor plans ofthese buildings are included within the developer's narrative attached to this report. The plan includes 23 2-unit buildings, which are one-story homes with an attached double car garages. The plan also includes one 2-1J.nit building, sixteen 3-unit buildings and 43 4-unit buildings, called coach homes. The coach homes are also one story with attached double garages. Finally, the plan calls for eleven 4-unit buildings, eight 6-unit buildings, nine 8-unit buildings and three 10-unit buildings, identified as villa homes. The villas are designed as back-to-back units in two story buildings, all with double car garages. The exteriors ofthese buildings have been redesigned using stucco in order to meet the Architectural requirements ofthe Zoning Ordinance. 1:\99files\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\deercc,doc Page 2 . . The primary change in the revised plan is in the number of the villa units. This number has been reduced 94 units from the original proposal. The layout of these buildings has also been significantly revised to address the Planning Commission's concerns. The developer has also provided a variety of styles of single family homes similar in design and size to other single family homes in Prior Lake. The developer anticipates the units will sell from $105,000 to $300,000. Setbacks: The plan proposes a 25' setback from the front property line, and the side street lot line, a minimum 25' rear yard setback, and a minimum 10' side yard setback, and a 25' side yard setback for the villas. The Subdivision Ordinance also requires that all building pads be located at least 30' from the 100 year flood elevation of any wetland or NURP pond. The plans are not clear as to whether this is the case, although there appears to be a 30' setback line. Lot Coverage: Both the R-1 and the R-2 district allow a maximum ground floor area of 0.30. The ground floor area proposed in this plan is 0.137, including the single family homes. Useable Open Space: The R-1 and R-2 districts also require 600 square feet of use able open space per unit for cluster developments. The proposed common area provides open space for this development; the developer has provided calculations indicating 8,807 square feet of open space per unit for the twin homes, 1,764 square feet per unit for the coach homes, and 3,920 square feet per unit for the villas. This meets the minimum criteria. The plans should also depict this open space graphically in order to ensure that the minimum dimensions are met. Parking: The proposal provides at least 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit, which is consistent with the minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. All ofthe have units two car garages, which provides parking for both occupants and tandem spaces for guests. The developer has also provided 24 guest spaces located primarily within the villa area. The proposed private streets will not provide any on- street parking. Landscaping: Section 1107.1900 lists the landscaping requirements for this development. There are two different types of landscaping required for this development. First of all, perimeter landscaping is required for the townhouse portion of the development with buildings consisting of 3 or more units at a rate of 1 tree per unit. In addition, 2 front yard trees are required for each single family lot, and for each of 1:\99files\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\deercc.doc Page 3 I I -r" .." the attached single family dwellings. A total of 664 trees must be provided for the entire development. The developer has submitted a landscaping plan that identifies landscaping for the townhouse portion ofthe development and for the single family lots. The plan has paid special attention to providing screening along Fish Point Road. The plan also provides screening along the north property boundary where the property is adjacent to the business park in the form of deciduous trees, evergreen trees and shrubs. The adjacent property owner has expressed his feeling that a 4' berm or a solid fence would also be appropriate at this location for security purposes; however, the Planing Commission did not include this requirement in their recommendation. The landscaping plan provides the proper number oftrees for the both the single family and higher density units. It also is consistent with ordinance requirements for size and species ofthe plantings, and provides the proper mix of size and species required by the ordinance. Finally, the plan notes an irrigation system will be provided. Tree Replacement: As noted above, the applicant has submitted an inventory identifying 9,797.5 caliper inches of significant trees on the site. Based on the developer's calculations, the proposal removes 16.76 % for road and utility purposes. This is within the allowable 25% removal. The plan also notes 30.1 % ofthe caliper inches will be removed for building pads and driveways. This exceeds the allowable 25% by 505.5 caliper inches. Since replacement is required at a rate of 1/2 caliper inch to 1 caliper inch removed, a total of 253 caliper inches must be replaced. This is equal to 101 trees at 2 1/2 caliper inches per tree. The replacement trees are included in the number of trees shown on the landscaping plan. Signs: This proposal includes 2 project monument signs located at the north entrance along Fish Point Road. The Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum of two signs, not larger than 50 square feet, at each ofthe major entries to the development. These signs appear to meet that criteria, although greater detail on the size ofthe sign is required. The plan also includes neighborhood monuments at each ofthe street entrances. These are essentially fences with brick posts. These monuments are permitted as long as they are not located within the clear view triangle at each intersection. Greater detail on the location is required. Lighting: Street lights will be provided on the public streets. The developer has also indicated street lights will be provided on the private streets by the public utility company. The cost and maintenance ofthe street lights on the private streets will be borne by 1:\99files\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\deercc.doc Page 4 the homeowner's association. The homeowner's' association documents must reflect this responsibility Streets: This plan proposes a combination of public and private streets. The public streets include Fish Point Road and those streets serving the single family portion of the development. The private streets serve the townhomes, and will be maintained by a homeowner's association. These streets are described below. Public Streets: There are six new public streets proposed in this development. The major street is the extension ofFish Point Road about 3,400 feet from its current location to the southwest corner of this site. The second street is Wilderness Trail, which is an extension of the existing Wilderness Trail from its current location about 2,300' south and east to an intersection with Fish Point Road. Wilderness Trail provides access to approximately 35 single family lots. Wilderness Court is a 220' long cul-de-sac located on the north side of Wilderness Trail and providing access to six of the single family lots. Parklawn Lane is a local street located between Wilderness Trail and Fish Point Road on the west side of the development. It provides access to about 25 ofthe single family lots and is 1,350 feet long. Basswood Lane and Deerfield Lane are short streets connecting Wilderness Trail to Fish Point Road. Both are approximately 400' long and provide access to 5 or 6 lots. Private Streets: The six private streets are designed to serve the townhouse portion of the development. Maple Curve, located on the east side ofFish Point Road on the north end ofthe plat, has been redesigned with a 32' wide surface. This street provides direct access to 32 villa units, and indirect access via 24' wide private drives to another 32 units. Wilderness Trail is the next private street. This is essentially an extension of the public portion ofthe street, and provides access to individual units and the private drives for the remaining 130 villa units. This street is designed with a 32' wide surface and the access drives are 24' wide. Marshfield Lane is located to the south of Wilderness Trail, and provides access to 35 of the 3- and 4-unit coach homes. This street is also designed with a 32' wide surface. Deerfield Drive extends the public section of this street on the east side ofFish Point Road 3,500 feet to the east and north. This street is 32' wide and provides access to 150 of the coach homes. There is also a 24' wide access drive providing access to 13 coach homes. Deerfield Drive is also shown as a cul-de-sac. The original plan identified a 1:\99fi1es\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\deercc.doc Page 5 "I I Y' i future extension to the 4 acre parcel of land located in the northeast comer of this site. That access has not been included in this plan. To assure the 4 acre parcel is not landlocked, the approving resolution requires the access issue must be addressed prior to final approval. If the access is to be provided via a private street, how this will be accomplished must also be addressed. Deerfield Circle is a 32' wide loop street located on the north side of Deerfield Drive providing access to 24 of the coach homes. Oak Point Drive is located both east and west ofFish Point Road, and provides access to the attached units. Oak Point Drive West is a 400' long cul-de-sac and Oak Point Drive East is a 1,100' long cul-de-sac. Both streets have a 32' wide surface and a 49' radius on the cul-de-sac. Section lO06.206lists the design criteria for private streets as follows: Private streets shall not be approved, except that private streets may be permitted in planned unit developments that have homeowner associations approved by the City. Those private streets shall be platted as outlots, and shall be designed and constructed in accordance with this Section; provided, the street pavement may be contained within the outlot and the balance of the street right-of-way may be contained within adjacent easements, provided that the combined width of outlots and easements shall not be less than the right-of-way, pavement width and easement requirements for public streets. This requirement may be modified as part of the approval of a planned unit development if, in the sole opinion of the City, such modifications preserve the intent of the ordinance. Although the design of the private streets has been modified, the preliminary plat does not identify easements, so we cannot determine whether the private streets meet this requirement. The Engineering Department has noted that several of the access drives are only 24' wide. These should also meet the minimum design standard of a 32' wide surface. The Engineering Department has also noted there are a number of dead-end streets or private turn-arounds that can possibly be connected or combined to provide a more continuous traffic pattern. SidewalkslTrails: The plan proposes a sidewalk and a trail on both sides ofFish Point Road. Sidewalk is also provided on the south side of Wilderness Trail (the public portion) and on the east side of Parklawn Lane. Public trail is provided around the pond in the proposed park, and there are two trail accesses to the Ponds Athletic Facility. A private trail system, built by the developer, is provided on the common area in the townhouse development. 1:\99files\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\deercc.doc Page 6 Parks: There is one 27 acre park located on the north side ofthis development. Only 10 acres of this land will qualify for parkland dedication. The Parks and Recreation Director has recommended the City accept a combination of cash and land dedication for this development, given the adjacency to the Ponds Athletic Complex and the proposed park and trail system included in this development plan. Sanitary Sewer and Water Main: Sanitary sewer and water main will be extended from the existing utilities located in Fish Point Road and Wilderness Trail. The developer has been working with the City Engineer to ensure the design is consistent with City standards. Revised plans were recently submitted; however, the staff has not had adequate time to review the specifics. The attached letter from WSB, consulting engineers to the City, indicates the sewer capacity is available to serve this site, with the proper design of the system. Storm Sewer: The plan proposes a series ofNURP ponds and storm sewers to handle the storm water runoff on this site. The developer has worked with both the City and the DNR to ensure that this site will not drain to Markley Lake. The project is designed so runoff from the 54 acres ofthis site that previously drained to Markley Lake is diverted to DNR Wetland #70-188W at the southern boundary of the Deerfield development. The stormwater analysis for this development prepared by BDM, consulting engineers for the project, concludes the net effect of the runoff from this project to the DNR wetland has a negligible effect on Credit River. The diversion of this runoffmust be approved by the DNR through the permitting process. This process provides for the participation of the affected govemmentaljurisdictions. The DNR permit will also address the control ofthe diversion structures. Traffic Impact Report: The City hired a consultant to prepare a Traffic Impact Report (TIR) for this project. This report was revised to reflect the Planning Commissioner's comments and a copy of the revised TIR is attached to this report. It should be noted the revision was completed before the developer submitted the revised plans. The traffic generated by this development will therefore be less than shown in this report. However, the conclusions remain essentially the same. The development will have a negligible impact on the existing Blind Lake Trail and Wilderness Trail. An eastbound right turn lane at CSAH 21 and Fish Point Road will be necessary by 2020, whether or not this development occurs. The consultant will be available to discuss the details of this report at the meeting. Phasing: This project is proposed to be completed in five phases beginning in 2000 and ending in 2004. The phasing has not changed significantly. 1:\99files\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\deercc.doc Page 7 , I ----'--~'-' - I THE ISSUES: There are two separate applications included in this proposal. PUD PRELIMINARY PLAN: The PUD must be reviewed based on the criteria found in Section 1106.100 and 1106.300 ofthe Zoning Ordinance. Section 1106.100 discusses the purpose of a PUD. These criteria are discussed below. (1) Greater utilization of new technologies in building design, materials, construction and land development. According to the narrative, the developer utilizes the most recent building technologies. The plan has also been revised to utilize the use of Class I materials (stucco, brick, wood and the like) on the buildings with greater than 4 units. The general design of the PUD does allow the clustering ofthe units, which helps to preserve the wetlands and some ofthe wooded areas. (2) Higher standards of site and building design. The use of curvilinear streets will slow traffic through the neighborhood. In addition, the creation of a private trail system through the common area, connecting to the public system, creates an integrated system. The layout and design of the villa units has been revised to meet this criteria. The pattern provides less density, more curvilinear streets and also preserves the natural site features. (3) More efficient and effective use of streets, utilities, and public facilities to support high quality land use development at a lesser cost. Maintenance of private streets, including plowing and future repairs, is done by the homeowners association. This reduces City costs in providing services to these homes. The private open space also functions as parkland, without the City cost of maintenance. (4) Enhanced incorporation of recreational, public and open space components in the development which may be made more useable and be more suitably located than would otherwise be provided under conventional development procedures. The dedication of the park and the creation of the public trail system around the pond provides an amenity which can be utilized by both the future and the existing neighborhood. The creation ofthe private trail system allows some flexibility in the 1:\99files\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\deercc.doc Page 8 location of the trails, to preserve trees and wetlands, and provides a link to the public park system. (5) Provides a flexible approach to development which allows modifications to the strict application of regulations within the various Use Districts that are in harmony with the purpose and intent of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The use of the PUD allows the higher density to be clustered on the east side ofFish Point Road, and to utilize the property on the west side ofFish Point Road for single family homes. The density and variety of housing units is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals to provide a variety of housing styles. In order to provide a comparison, the staff calculated the number of single family homes that could be developed on this site. To do this calculation, we assumed a minimum lot area of 12,000 square feet in the R-1 area and 6,000 square feet in the R-2 area. We also assumed road development utilized 20% of the net site area. We have determined approximately 230 lots could be developed in the R-1 district, and 308 lots could be developed in the R-2 district, a total of 538 lots. The proposed PUD includes 540 units, and also utilizes a cluster pattern, which the single . family development would not. (6) Encourages a more creative and efficient use of land. As noted above, the PUD allows the higher density areas to be clustered, and preserves open space. The density is also consistent with a single family density, and preserves more ofthe natural area. (7) Preserves and enhances desirable site characteristics including flora and fauna, scenic views, screening and buffering, and access. Clustering the units allows the preservation of some ofthe wooded areas on the site. The units also are sited to offer views of the adjacent wetlands. (8) Allows the development to operate in concert with a Redevelopment Plan in certain areas of the City and to insure the redevelopment goals and objectives within the Redevelopment District will be achieved. This criteria is not applicable. 1:\99files\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\deercc.doc Page 9 , I m - -r ~ I (9) Provides for flexibility in design and construction of the development in cases where large tracts of land are under single ownership or control and where the use(s) has the potential to significantly affect adjacent or nearby properties. The use ofthe PUD allows the clustering ofthe homes and the use of private streets. (10) Encourages the developer to convey property to the public, over and above required dedications, by allowing a portion of the density to be transferred to other parts of the site. Although the plan proposes a private trail system, the developer has not provided any dedication over and above the requirements. The private open space and trails, however, function as parkland, without the cost to the City for maintenance and development. Section 1106.300 states the quality of building and site design proposed by the PUD will enhance the aesthetics of the site and implement relevant goals and policies ofthe Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the following criteria shall be satisfied: (1) The design shall consider the whole of the project and shall create a unified environment within the boundaries of the project by insuring architectural compatibility of all structures, efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation, aesthetically pleasing landscape and site features, and efficient use and design of utilities. The design does create a unified environment. The extension of the existing streets and provision of trails and sidewalks allows for efficient movement oftraffic. As noted earlier, the design of the villa homes has been modified to create a more pleasing pattern. The landscaping plan has also been revised to meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and will also enhance this area. Additional landscaping along Fish Point Road will provide screening. Enhancement of the landscaping along the north property boundary will also protect the adj acent residents from the noise and other impacts of the adjacent business park. (2) The design of a PUD shall optimize compatibility between the project and surrounding land uses, both existing and proposed and shall minimize the potential adverse impacts of the PUD on surrounding land uses and the potential adverse effects of the surrounding land uses on the PUD. 1:\99files\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\deercc.doc Page 10 The use of the PUD will allow the extension of the single family homes adjacent to the existing residences, and the clustering of the townhouse units. Additional landscaping along Fish Point Road and along the north boundary will minimize the visual impact of this development. (3) If a project for which PUD treatment has been requested involves construction over a period of time in two or more phases, the applicant shall demonstrate that each phase is capable of addressing and meeting each of the criteria independent of the other phases. Each ofthe individual phases includes landscaping and road extensions. (4) Approval of a PUD may permit the placement of more than one building on a lot. This is not applicable. (5) A PUD in a Residential Use District shall conform to the requirements of that Use District unless modified by the following or other provisions of this Ordinance. · The tract of land for which a project is proposed shall have not less than 200 feet offrontage on a public right-of-way. . No building shall be nearer than its building height to any property line when the property abutting the subject property is in an "R-l" or "R-2" Use District. · No building within the project shall be nearer to another building than ~ the sum of the building heights of the two buildings, except for parking ramps which may be directly connected to another building. · Private roadways within the project site may not be used in calculating required off-street parking spaces. The modifications requested by the developer include the following: . The use of private streets · Allowing up to 10 units per building rather than 4 units per building All of these modifications are permitted under the PUD provisions at the discretion of the Council. 1:\99files\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\deercc.doc Page 11 ,.'......n.."T 1r T PRELIMINARY PLAT: The primary issue relating to the preliminary plat is the need to provide a future access to the 4 acre parcel at the northeast corner ofthis site. This issue has not been addressed. The plan must provide a public access to this property. Access via a private street may be possible with proper documentation approved by the City Attorney. A second issue is the width ofFish Point Road. The plan has been revised to meet the collector street design. The Planning Commission considered but did not make a recommendation to the Council on the expansion ofthe existing portion ofFish Point Road to collector street standards. Any improvements to the existing road cannot be required of this developer. Such improvements would have to be done as a City proj eet. A third issue concerns the design of the private streets. The Subdivision Ordinance requires private streets be designed with a 32' wide surface. The staffhas agreed the secondary access roads, or those private roads providing access to the back half of buildings, can be 28' wide as long as they are posted no parking. Finally, the design ofthe public utilities must be consistent with the City Public Works Design Manual. The City staffwill continue to work with the developer to meet these requirements. WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN: The developer has also requested approval of a wetland replacement plan for this project. The Technical Evaluation Pane (TEP) met with the developer on June 30, 1999, to review preliminary development plans. The TEP made design recommendations to avoid the unnecessary filling of wetlands. The final design calls for the filling of 43,714 square feet of existing wetland to be filled. This will be mitigated at a rate of2:1, with the creation of 43,714 square feet of new wetland and 86,000 square feet of on-site ponding eligible for mitigation credit. The proposal meets the mitigation and sequencing criteria. No comments were received during the comment period. CONCLUSION: The Planning Commission concluded the project can proceed with a number of changes to both the PUD preliminary plan and the preliminary plat. The developer has submitted revised plans attempting to address these changes. The requirement, and the developer's response, are shown below. 1. Address the issue of providing access to the parcel in the northeast corner of this site. If access is provided via a private street, address how that will be accomplished. This issue has not been addressed at this time. 1:\99files\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\deercc.doc Page 12 . 2. Revise the grading plan to identify the required 30' setback from the 100 year flood elevation for all wetlands and NURP ponds. This required setback must also be included on the pun site plan. The developer has revised the grading plan to adjust the setbacks and the lowest floor elevations. The 50-scale plans provided at the final plan and final plat stage will provide better detail of the required setback. 3. Revise the grading plan and tree preservation plan to include the lots currently shown as "custom graded". If necessary, the landscaping plan must be revised to include any required replacement trees. This plan has been revised. The tree inventory and preservation plan has always included this area, so no changes are necessary. 4. All private streets must meet the requirements of Section 1006.206 of the Subdivision Ordinance. This requires all private streets must be at least 32' wide, and all easements must be identified. In addition, eliminate as many of the dead- ends and private turn-arounds as possible by connecting some of these streets. As noted above, the staff has worked with the developer to identify the street width requirements for the private streets. The plans have been changed to include the proper widths. However, the preliminary plat did not include the 28' wide streets as outlots, as required. 5. Identify all drainage and utility easements on the preliminary plat. The plans have been revised to include the easements. 6. All public utilities must be designed in accordance with the Public Works Design Manual. The proper plans must be provided to allow staff to review this design. The Engineering staff is continuing to review the revised plans; however, the staff is confident the outstanding issues pertaining to utilities have been resolved. The specific design issues will be addressed at the final plat stage. 7. Loop the watermain through Wilderness Trail in Phase I ofthe development. The developer has agreed to this condition. 8. Identify the useable open space graphically on the PUD plan to ensure the minimum dimensions are met. The developer has provided this information. 1:\99files\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\deercc.doc Page 13 , , -'---1 ~ ~ I FISCAL IMPACT: AL TERNATIVES: RECOMMENDED MOTION: REVIEWED BY: 9. Provide greater detail on the size and location of the proposed signs. The developer has provided some ofthis information. The 50- scale plans at the final plan stage will provide better detail to ensure the proper setbacks. Most ofthe issues may be handled at the final plan stage of this development. The TEP also recommends approval of the Wetland Replacement Plan for this project. At this time, the major issue is the access to the adjacent 4 acre parcel. Due to the potential impact ofthis issue, the City Attorney has recommended this item not proceed until the access issue has been resolved. The stafftherefore recommends this item be continued. Budget Impact: There is no budget impact as a result ofthis action. Approval of the project will facilitate the development of the area and increase the City tax base. The City Council has three alternatives: I. Adopt Resolution DO-XX approving the PUD Preliminary Plan subject to the listed conditions, adopt Resolution DO-XX approving the Preliminary Plat for this development subject to the listed conditions, with the finding that the preliminary plat is consistent with the intent and purpose ofthe Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, and adopt Resolution DO-XX approving the Wetland Replacement Plan. 2. Deny the PUD Preliminary Plan, the Preliminary Plat and the Wetland Replacement Plan on the basis they are inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and/or the Comprehensive Plan. In this case, the Council should direct the staff to prepare a resolution with findings of fact based in the record for the denial of these requests. 3. Defer consideration ofthis item until the access issue has been resolved. The 1:\99fi1es\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\deercc.doc Page 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN RESOLUTION OO-XX MOTION BY: SECOND BY: RESOLUTION APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELlMI KNOWN AS DEERFIELD WHEREAS: D.R. Horton has submitted an application for a Plann Plan to be known as Deerfield; and WHEREAS: The Prior Lake Planning Commission considered , hearing on November 8, 1999 and on December WHEREAS: has been duly published in WHEREAS, WHEREAS: The Prior Lake City Council con dered the pr posed PUD Preliminary Plan for on January 18, 2000; and WHEREAS: the City Council finds the PUD reliminary Pia consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance; a NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HERE MINNESOTA: , , UD Preliminary Rian is compatible with the stated purposes 06 Planned Unit ~evelopments of the Zoning Ordinance. .' WHEREAS: the City Council finds the and intent of the Section RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, 1. it hereby adopts the followin findings: a) Greater utilization 0 new technologies in building design, materials, construction and land development. According to the narrative, the developer utilizes the most recent building technologies. The plan has also been revised to utilize the use of Class I materials on the buildings with greater than 4 units. The general design of the PUD does allow the clustering of the units, which helps to preserve the wetlands and some of the wooded areas. b) Higher standards of site and building design. The use of curvilinear streets will slow traffic through the neighborhood. In addition, the creation of a private trail system through the common area, eventually connecting to the public system, creates an integrated system. The layout and design of the villa units has 1:J.9~~~g~1~tt9fJ~~~"~~\~~,np~& Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph, (612) 447-4230 Pf~~ (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER -r- been revised to meet this criteria. The pattern provides less density, more curvilinear streets and also preserves the natural site features. c) More efficient and effective use of streets, utilities, and public facilities to support high quality land use development at a lesser cost. Maintenance of private streets, including plowing and future repairs, is done by the homeowners association. This reduces City costs in providing services to these homes. The private open space also functions as parkland, without the City cost of maintenance. d) Enhanced incorporation of recreational, public and open space components in the development which may be made more useable and be more suitably located than would otherwise be provided under conventional development procedures. The dedication of the park and the creation of the public trail system around the pond provides an amenity which can be utilized by both the future and the existing neighborhood. The creation of the private trail system allows some flexibility in the location of the trails, to preserve trees and wetlands, and provides a link to the public park system. e) Provides a flexible approach to development which allows modifications to the strict application of regulations within the various Use Districts that are in harmony with the purpose and intent of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The use of the PUD allows the higher density to be clustered on the east side of Fish Point Road, and to utilize the property on the west side of Fish Point Road for single family homes. The density and variety of housing units is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals to provide a variety of housing styles. In addition, approximately 230 lots could be developed in the R-1 district, and 308 lots could be developed in the R-2 district, a total of 538 lots. The proposed PUD includes 540 units, and also utilizes a cluster pattern, which the single family development would not. f) Encourages a more creative and efficient use of land. As noted above, the PUD allows the higher density areas to be clustered, and preserves open space. The density is also consistent with a single family density, and preserves more of the natural area. g) Preserves and enhances desirable site characteristics including flora and fauna, scenic views, screening and buffering, and access. Clustering the units allows the preservation of some of the wooded areas on the site. The units also are sited to offer views of the adjacent wetlands. h) Allows the development to operate in concert with a Redevelopment Plan in certain areas of the City and to insure the redevelopment goals and objectives within the Redevelopment District will be achieved. This criteria is not applicable. i) Provides for flexibility in design and construction of the development in cases where large tracts of land are under single ownership or control and where the users) has the potential to significantly affect adjacent or nearby properties. The use of the PUD allows the clustering of the homes and the use of private streets. j) Encourages the developer to convey property to the public, over and above required dedications, by allowing a portion of the density to be transferred to other parts of the site. I :\99files\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\pudres.doc PAGE 2 Although the plan proposes a private trail system, the developer has not provided any dedication over and above the requirements. The private open space and trails, however, function as parkland, without the cost to the City for maintenance and development. k) The design shall consider the whole of the project and shall create a unified environment within the boundaries of the project by insuring architectural compatibility of all structures, efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation, aesthetically pleasing landscape and site features, and efficient use and design of utilities. The design does create a unified environment. The extension of the existing streets and provision of trails and sidewalks allows for efficient movement of traffic. As noted earlier, , the design of the villa homes has been modified to create a more pleasing pattern. The landscaping plan has also been revised to meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and will also enhance this area. Additional landscaping along Fish Point Road will provide screening. Enhancement of the landscaping along the north property boundary will also protect the adjacent residents from the noise and other impacts of the adjacent business park. I) The design of a PUD shall optimize compatibility between the project and surrounding land uses, both existing and proposed and shall minimize the potential adverse impacts of the PUD on surrounding land uses and the potential adverse effects of the surrounding land uses on the PUD. The use of the PUD will allow the extension of the single family homes adjacent to the existing residences, and the clustering of the townhouse units. Additional landscaping along Fish Point Road and along the north boundary will minimize the visual impact of this development. m) If a project for which PUD treatment has been requested involves construction over a period of time in two or more phases, the applicant shall demonstrate that each phase is capable of addressing and meeting each of the criteria independent of the other phases. Each of the individual phases includes landscaping and road extensions. n) A PUD in a Residential Use District shall conform to the requirements of that Use District unless modified by the following or other provisions of this Ordinance. 1) The tract of land for which a project is proposed shall have not less than 200 feet of frontage on a public right-of-way; 2) No building shall be nearer than its building height to any property line when the property abutting the subject property is in an "R-1" or "R-2" Use District; 3) No building within the project shall be nearer to another building than ~ the sum of the building heights of the two buildings, except for parking ramps which may be directly connected to another building; and 4) Private roadways within the project site may not be used in calculating required off-street parking spaces. The proposal meets the above requirements with the exception of the modifications requested by the developer, which include the following: 1) The use of private streets; and 2) Allowing up to 10 units per building rather than 4 units per building All of these modifications are permitted under the PUD provisions at the discretion of the Council. 2. The Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan is hereby approved subject to the following conditions a) Address the issue of providing access to the parcel in the northeast corner of this site. If access is provided via a private street, address how that will be accomplished. I :\99files\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\pudres .doc PAGE 3 I I b) Revise the grading plan to identify the required 30' setback from the 100 year flood elevation for all wetlands and NURP ponds. This required setback must also be included on the PUD site plan. c) Identify the 28' wide streets on the preliminary plat. In addition, these streets should be named using a name unique to the Prior lake area. d) All public utilities must be designed in accordance with the Public Works Design Manual. The proper plans must be provided to allow staff to review this design. e) Loop the watermain through Wilderness Trail in Phase I of the development. f) Provide greater detail on the size and location of the proposed signs. 3. Application for approval of a PUD Final Plan must be submitted within 90 days of the date of approval of this resolution, or by April 18, 2000, unless written request for an extension of time is approved by the City Council. ' 4. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein. Passed and adopted this 18th day of January, 2000. YES NO Mader Mader Ericson Ericson Gundlach Gundlach Petersen Petersen Schenck Schenck {Seal} Frank Boyles, City Manager 1:\99files\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\pudres.doc PAGE 4 PRELIMINARY PLAT RESOLUTION OO-XX RESOLUTION OF THE PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "DEERFIELD" SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OUTLINED HEREIN. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: WHEREAS: the Prior Lake Planning Commission conducted a public hearin 0 November 8, 1999 and on December 13, 1999, to consider an application 0 D.R. Horton for the preliminary plat of Deerfield; and WHEREAS: all persons interested in this issue were afford and objections related to the preliminary plat Commission hearing; and en duly published and posted d Prior Lake Ordinances; and WHEREAS: notice of the public hearing on said preliminary plat h in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statut e opportunity to present their views eerfield for the record at the Planning WHEREAS: the Planning Commission and City Coun' ve reviewed the preliminary plat according to the applicable provisions of the Prio ke Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and found said preliminary plat to be consi e t with the provisions of said ordinances; and WHEREAS the Prior Lake City Council consid r an application for preliminary plat approval of Deerfield on January 18, 2000; an NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA, that it her following conditions: the City Council finds the preli infry plat of Deerfield to be consistent with the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. ; / I SdLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Y 9Pproves the preliminary plat of Deerfield subject to the I i i WHEREAS: 1. Address the issue of providing acpess to the parcel in the northeast corner of this site. If access is provided via a private street, ajJdress how that will be accomplished. / 2. Revise the grading plan to identify the required 3D' setback from the 100 year flood elevation for all wetlands and NURP ponds. This required setback must also be included on the PUD site plan. 3. Identify the 28' wide streets on the preliminary plat. In addition, these streets should be named using a name unique to the Prior lake area. 116~~5(l~~PJ>~r~~~r~{Pd~~~~~ir~~-tk\e, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 ff%~ ?612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 11 I ---,r-- 4. All public utilities must be designed in accordance with the Public Works Design Manual. The proper plans must be provided to allow staff to review this design. 5. Loop the watermain through Wilderness Trail in Phase I of the development. 6. Provide greater detail on the size and location of the proposed signs. Passed and adopted this 18th day of January, 2000. YES NO Mader Mader Ericson Ericson Gundlach Gundlach Petersen Petersen Schenck Schenck {Seal} City Manager City of Prior Lake 1:\99files\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\platres.doc Page 2 G\ Pro f C~ \ /C{C/q \'3 3 tJeer\ ) RESOLUTION 00- o~ )-"'0 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE WETLAND RRPT ,ACEMENT PLAN FOR DEERFIELD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 99-33 MOTION BY: ?'5 SECOND BY: JP WHEREAS, the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) met with the developer and reviewed the preliminary development plans on June 30th, 1999, and made design recommendations to avoid unnecessary wetland filling on the project; and WHEREAS, sequencing criteria has been met; and WHEREAS, 27,957 square feet (0.642 acre) of type 2 wetland and 15,757 square feet (0.362 acre) of type 3 wetland for a total of 43,714 square feet (1.00 acre) of wetland to be filled and replaced at a 2 to I ratio: 43,714 square feet (1.01 acre) of new wetland and 86,000 square feet of on-site ponding, of which 75% is eligible for mitigation credit, the remaining area is to meet City requirements for on-site water quality ponding; and WHEREAS, no comments were received during the comment deadline period regarding the proposed wetland alteration permit application. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, that the Wetland Replacement Plan for Deerfield Development be approved. Passed and adopted this 18th day of January, 2000. YES NO Mader Ericson Gundlach Petersen Schenck Mader Ericson Gundlach Petersen Schenck {Seal} City Manager City of Prior Lake WETRES,DOC 16200 Eagle Creek Ave, S.E" Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph, (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MONDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 1999 1. Call to Order: The November 8, 1999, Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chairman Stamson at 6:31 p.m. Those present were Commissioners Cramer, Stamson and Vonhof, Planning Director Don Rye, Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier, Planner Jenni Tovar, Assistant City Engineer Sue McDermott and Recording Secretary Connie Carlson. 2. Roll Call: V onhof Kuykendall Criego Cramer Stamson Present Absent Absent Present Present 3. Approval of Minutes: The Minutes from the October 25, 1999 Planning Commission meeting were approved as presented. Commissioner Stamson read the Public Hearing statement and opened the first meeting. 4. Public Hearings: ~ A. Case Files 99-056 and 99-057 D.R. Horton, Inc. is requesting a Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plan to allow a mixed use development consisting of a total of 632 dwelling units on 133 net acres, for a total density of 4.75 units per acre and a Preliminary Plat consisting of a total of 165.03 acres to be subdivided into 632 lots for the dwelling units and the parks and common open space for the Project to be known as "Deerfield". Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier presented the Planning Report dated November 8, 1999, on file in the office ofthe City Planner. D.R. Horton has applied for approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan and a Preliminary Plat for the property located south and west of CSAH 21, south of Fish Point Road and Wilderness Trail and east of the Ponds Athletic Facility. The application includes a request for a PUD Preliminary Plan to allow a mixed use development consisting of a total of 631 dwelling units on 133 net acres, for a total density of 4.7 units per acre. The proposed development includes 77 single family dwellings, 46 dwelling units in two-unit buildings, 220 dwellings in three and four-unit buildings, and 288 dwellings in eight and ten-unit buildings. The development also includes public parkland and private open space. L:\99FILES\99PLCOMM\PCMIN\MNII0899.DOC 1 [I" I I[ '----i----'.-----------'--'----'----r--------- ---,_..", Planning Commission Minutes November 8. 1999 Staff felt with the number of outstanding issues (11) with both the PUD plan and the preliminary plat, it seemed reasonable to continue this item and allow the developer time to address these issues. In light of the fact the Council cannot take any action on this application until after the EA W comment period expires, continuing the item would not cause undue delays. Kansier addressed Cramer's concern for traffic control and park dedication. Acting City Engineer Sue McDermott addressed Cramer's question on water flow and redirection ofthe sewer. Don Patton, representing D.R. Horton, introduced Dick Krier, from Midwest Planning and Design and Bob Wiegert from Paramount Engineering and Design. Krier distributed a letter to the Commissioners requesting the Commission to take action at this meeting and forward the recommendation to City Council with conditions. He felt the issues could be resolved and did not want to delay the project. Krier gave an overview of the process and addressed some of staffs conditions and concerns. Comments from the public: Jerry Michels, 6166 Birch Road, Credit River Township, said his biggest concern is the runoff on Markley Lake. It is no longer a holding pond. He feels there is no reduction in the wetland area. Michels said he heard the wetlands will drain north to Cleary Lake. Michel questioned the impact on Markley Lake. Bob Wiegert, of Paramount Engineering and Design, the site civil engineer, said the project was designed so runoffto Markley Lake would not increased. The runoff currently drains to the north and is controlled through a storm system. The development will not increase runoff to the north but allow low storage areas to replenish the wetlands. Stamson questioned what would happen during high water periods. Wiegert responded there is an outlet control on Fish Point Road directing water to the DNR wetland to the south. A formal application has been made to the DNR for that purpose. Margi Atwood, 16992 Crimson Court, stated she and her neighbors are happy to have the beautiful land behind them developed, however they are not happy with the housing numbers. One of her concerns is for the traffic on Fish Point Road. She said she has not seen the traffic study but felt this was a major implication and should be looked at. Another concern is for the overburdened school district and quality of education. She felt the landowners and developers are holding out with the adjoining land and would like to know their intentions. Atwood feels the housing numbers presented are bogus. The quality of life she and her neighbors are enjoying will diminish with this development. Their concern for the development is not how it looks or the quality ofthe product. It is density. It is too high. How will this density benefit the citizens of Prior Lake? 1:\99fi1es\99plcomm\pcmin\mn 11 0899.doc 2 Planning Commission Minutes November 8, 1999 Tom Stanley, 6221 Sue Ann Lane, a resident on Markley Lake, said he was suspicious of this subdivision and the direction water will runoff. One of his concerns was the increased volume of water to Markley Lake. He felt there will be additional development on Deerfield. The water level in Markley Lake has gone up 9 feet in the last 10 years. The pumping of Markley Lake is going to Credit River which is not a permanent solution. Savage will not want any more water. The DNR has said no more pumping until a permanent solution is resolved. The decisions the Commissioners make will effect his property in Credit River. The public hearing closed at 8:01 p.m. Comments from the Commissioners: V onhof: . Appreciate all comments. However there are a number of concerns from the staff. . Questioned the upgrade and right-of-way from Fish Point Road - McDermott said the City has 66 feet of right-of-way and at this time the City has no cost estimates for upgrading. . Chuck Rickart, WSB Associates, explained the traffic study. There would be 4,000 trips per day generated from this development. They looked at the worst case conditions if the project is built-out and the resulting traffic flow. Rickart said the roadways and intersections will work satisfactory with those numbers. Depending if the road to the south connects and what percentage of traffic heads south, by the year 2020, a right turn lane would be needed at the intersection ofFish Point Road and County Road 21. A normal single family residence generates about 10 trips per day. Rickart explained a collector roadway (Fish Point Road) with 4,000 trips per day can easily be handled by a two lane facility with shoulders. Page 7 ofthe Traffic Report shows the trip generation. . Questioned the runoff. Wiegert explained how the engineers determined runoff and redirection. . At least six ofthe criteria for a PUD fails. The greatest problem is the grid system and the concentration on the villa units. Cramer: . Vonhofaddressed most of his concerns. . Questioned adjoining acreage to the northeast - Patton responded it was about 4 acres. . Questioned if anyone is aware ofthe adjoining project outside the city limits. Rye responded there were a few houses along the county road to the east and Cleary Lake, quite a distance from the wetland. There are some properties along the south, but did not have exact numbers or information in the township. . Believes the R1 zone is acceptable. Has concern for the R2 density. The developer is pushing the envelope taking the PUD process trying to get as many units on the parcel as possible. A developer's desire to maximize their investment should not be done at the expense of the surrounding neighborhood and the community as a whole. He is disappointed in the proposal. . Fish Point Road was never designed to handle this type of density. I :\99files\99plcomm\pcmin\mn 11 0899 .doc 3 I I I - Planning Commission Minutes November 8. 1999 . There is a neighborhood park at the end of Wilderness Ponds. The amount of traffic will put children at a safety risk. . The City's only fire station is at the end ofFish Point Road. Emergency vehicles need to get out quickly. . The density is too high for the sewer capacity. . It is unknown how many units will go in the undeveloped north end parcel. . Disappointed there is only 10 acres for parkland. A full park dedication should be made. This is important. The burden for high density will fall on Wilderness Ponds park. The developer owes it to the City to provide a park. . The R2 district in the Zoning Code indicates 4 units per building. I expected to see this when I supported the R2 zone. . Shared staff's concern with parking. The parking in the villa area is inadequate and unacceptable. There must be greater parking - two car garage for each unit. . The PUD does not meet the criteria in the Zoning Ordinance. . The Commissioners have always been concerned with runoff and impervious surface. The EA W indicates a significant amount of runoff. The best way to reduce impervious surface is to reduce density. . Spoke to the same school board member as Margi Atwood. It is a fact, this development affects the school district. This is not advisable for the City. . Would like to see the developer go back to the drawing board and come up with something that meets the R2 district. It is detrimental to the neighborhood and community. . The entire request should be denied. Stamson: . The biggest concerns are density effecting traffic, schools and runoff. . The developer states it will create 4,000 trips per day. If platted under single family, this development would have 5,000 trips per day. This proposal creates 1,000 less trips per day, than a typical detached single family subdivision on the same site. . Regarding schools - Using the standard criteria and past experience this development expects to have roughly 174 students. One hundred forty come from the single family district. Ifthis development had 500 single family (allowable under Rl district), it could create 750 students. The proposed development would have 600 less students than the single family homes. . Runoff - The allowable impervious surface coverage is 30%. The proposal is half at 15%. . This is a lot of misconception with this development. The numbers are favorable. The Metropolitan Council stated in the Sunday Star Tribune they were in favor of this type of development. The project is a more efficient use of land than the traditional large lot development. It is a very positive development to the community providing a variety of housing styles which the City is lacking. The developer has gone to great lengths to preserve and utilize the natural features. . Supported the R2 district. It has more density on the east, allowing larger lots on the west where there is more natural features to be avoided. This proposal allows more green space than single family homes. 1:\99files\99plcomm\pcmin\mnII0899.doc 4 Planning Commission Minutes November 8. 1999 . This type of density has more tax advantages to the City than single family. It provides more tax dollars per acre than other types of residential developments. City services are in a joint area. It also produces fewer children in the school district than single family homes. That is positive. . The impact on adjacent development should be more positive than negative. Over 50% of the homes anticipated sale price is equal to or greater than the homes in Wilderness Ponds. The housing immediately adjacent to Wilderness Ponds are planned to be of higher value. This cart only positively effect property values in the neighborhood. . The neighborhood amenities are improved with parks and trails. . The street layout has been designed to minimize traffic on existing streets. . This development is very positive to the community. Although there are a number of concerns from the staff, they can be addressed without major redrawing of the plan. . Agreed with V onhof and Cramer the villas need some work. The density in the grid is too dense. Would like to see those redesigned. . Fish Point Road should be upgraded, probably plan for a signal. . There should be a sidewalk behind Wilderness Trail through the cluster homes. . The other concern is for usable space. The R2 district seems to be dense without much useable open space. Would like to meet R2 open space requirements within the area. Do not expand outside the R2 zone. . This is a high quality development and all parties should find a way to make it work. Open discussion: V onhof: . Stamson brought up very good points and comments. . Pointed out the 24.8 % impervious surface area. . Before considering this development. Staff s concerns have to be addressed. . Need more information on the impact on Outlot A. Stamson: The proper step would be to continue the matter and address the issues. MOTION BY VONHOF, SECOND BY CRAMER, TO CONTINUE TO THE DECEMBER 13, 1999 MEETING TO ADDRESS THE 11 CONCERNS IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF REPORT. ADD THE COST OF UPGRADING FISH POINT ROAD AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF AND THE COST OF A SEMAPHORE ON COUNTY ROAD 21 AND FISH POINT ROAD. ALSO ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF PRIVATE TRAILS AND ROADWAYS IN THE DEVELOPMENTS AS INDICATED IN THE STAFF REPORT. INCLUDE AN EXPLANATION OF OUTLOT A - THE OWNERSHIP AND USE OF THE LOT. ADDRESS THE DESIGN OF MAPLE CURVE - RECOMMEND INCREASING THE 24 FOOT WIDTH TO 32 FEET. ALL PRIVATE STREETS IN THE DEVELOPMENT SHOULD BE BUILT TO PUBLIC STREET STANDARDS. 1:\99files\99plcomm\pcmin\mn II 0899.doc 5 II I -,-----..,--.--..-------..' T Planning Commission Minutes November 8, 1999 CRAMER AMENDED THE MOTION TO UPDATE THE TRAFFIC STUDY TO THE NORTH INCLUDING THE EXTENSION. SECOND BY STAMSON. Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED. A recess was called at 8:40 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:50 p.m. B. Case File 99-075 Ryan Contracting is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for grad. ,g, filling, land reclamation and excavation. The applicant is intending to operate a nd and gravel mining operation. Planner J enni var presented the Planning Report dated November ,&' 1999, on file in the office of the , ity Planner. / On September 29,'1 99, a completed application was receive4:~ the excavation of sand and gravel from prop y located in the SE y.., Section 22, T<,:>' ship 115, Range 22. This property is owned by .' chard McKenna and Joseph and ~aI yn Kinney. Due to an error in the legal description;"" on recommendation staff, the P 'ng Commission opened the public hearing on Oct. ber 25, 1999 and continued Jt November 8, 1999. Ryan Contracting is proposi to operate a sand and avel mining operation. The operation will consist of mini and processing in' uding descreening, stockpiling, and sale of product. Aggregate wa ing or operatio f an asphalt plant is not a part of this operation. Ryan intends to oper "e at the site :fl approximately 10 years and remove 500,000 cubic yards of materials. , he mate,' s mined will be used for road construction and general fill. The operation will n fro' 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday through Friday and 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturdays. Staff received necessary information 0, ednesday but were unable to review before the packets went out. The staffhas sinc rev~ wed the information and felt the outstanding conditions and concerns were met. taff ie, mmended approval with the 5 conditions listed in the Planning Report. : \ , Tom Ryan, President ofRy ontracting, expl 'ned the Conditional Use Permit request was to use the natural aggre ate resources in the operty and through the process address all environmental issues (l concerns by staff. Craig Ahlman, 137. 9 McKenna Road, said he did not~ t this project next to his property. His ot ,r concerns are the truck traffic and tirp s of operation. It is a long and big operation:fl the area. " Rick Palla, ,3755 McKenna Road, said he and his neighb~r:s I~ught a gravel pit 10 years ago whe he same family was trying put in an adjoining pit:,,:Many residents fought the proposa >"futd won. In the end, the Dakota Community boughhhe land. Palla felt his 1:\99files\99plcomm\pcmin\mn 11 0899,doc 6 Planning Commission Meeting December 13,1999 ~ .':::'. .:)WW~::' ~e MO:::Y:OD:::er 13, 1999, Planning Commission meeting,~i~'~IO order hy Chairman Stamson at 6:30 p.m. Those present were Commis~ioriets Criego;!!K~ykendall, Stamson and Vonhof, Planning Director Don Rye, Planningiq~ordinator Jane:K,~~jer, Zoning Administrator Steve Horsman, Assistant City E~gm~~r Sue McDermott ari~:i::< Recording Secretary Connie Carlson. ,::~/i!:(" :\i!HP=- .:::::=:::' .::nm~:. ::' Roll C::nhOf AbS~:m:il'i;':":;",'i!!.m:m,r" :::::'. ..... Ef:a11 ;'i,ii'ii;,;;~!i'li'i,mm'ii'i;:;;:::;:':;I:"'ii:" 3. Approval of ~~~~ij'"mm",iili" . . '. The Minutes from,\!i~iN~vemher,~~"I999 P:!:COmmiSSion meeting were approved as presented. "::\111IiiI11:\:~::" ::ii!!iilill1m:j:!\m!!!:!mmmim@~~ii~!:::~:: Commissionef:,Stamson:@~&the Public Hearing Statement. 4.;;":,m';"~~~;~'~~~_lr,,:";"miii'I'i,,,,::,; A/!!:!:!\,Case Files 99-05~i~#.d 99-057 (Continued) D.R. Horton, Inc. is requesting a Preii~~~!y Planned Un~(pevelopment Plan to allow a mixed use development consisting of a tol~t~t()32 dwelling)~~its on 133 net acres, for a total density of 4.75 units per acre and a Prell~A~ry PI,~t~~hsisting of a total of 165.03 acres to be subdivided into 632 lots for the dwellin{ti.~~~:~!~:!the parks and common open space for the Project to be known as "Deerfield". ::\iW?' PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MONDAY, DECEMBER 13,1999 2. Planning Coordinator Jane Kansier presented the Planning Report dated December 13, 1999, on file in the office of the Planning Department. D.R. Horton has applied for approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan and a Preliminary Plat for the property located south and west of CSAH 21, south of Fish Point Road and Wilderness Trail and east ofthe Ponds Athletic Facility. The application includes a request for a PUD Preliminary Plan to allow a mixed use development consisting of single family dwellings, two-unit townhouse buildings, two-, three- and four-unit coach homes, and four-, six-, eight- and ten-unit villa homes totaling 540 units. The development also includes public parkland and private open space. L:\99FILES\99PLCOMM\PCMIN\MN l21399.DOC 1 II Planning Commission Meeting December 13, 1999 Kansier concluded stating most of the outstanding issues have been addressed. The redesign is consistent with the PUD criteria. ..::nnn::" Ifthe project is to proceed, the following changes or revisions must be ~l1t; to both the preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan: ::/:iiWiW::: 1. Address the issue of providing access to the parcel in the ,~d~ID~~:t'~~~~f:qf this site. If access is provided via a private street, address how t~~:~i1l be accompH~~#4:~:, 2. Revise the grading plan to identify the required 3Of(~ib~ck from the 1 00 ;~~mh.~od elevation for all wetlands and NURP ponds. ,Jj~~t~equire(L~~tback must ai~Bi::be included on the PUD site plan. <iillll/iib:, ,,)[illll>:::- 3. Revise the grading plan and tree preservation plan::t~:i~~8t~~~"the lots currently shown as "custom graded". Ifnecessary, the ~andscaping phlriim'4.~t be revised to include any required replacement trees. ,/U!\"::::,, '<iHii\" 4. All private streets must meet the re~J~t,~~WI:~~~~~~~n 1 ridd~~P6 of the Subdivision Ordinance. This requires all privat~:i:~treets ,m~~(m?'~U~t.least 32' wide, and all easements must be identified. In addit~9~, l:(),~wHlate 'a~::fuany of the dead-ends and private turn-arounds as.:w~~~J~!:.by connep.~i#g~~ome ofthese streets. 5. Identify all drainage:~~'~~iii~ll~sements::mhlthe preliminary plat. 6. All public uti~i#~::~ust be ,4.~~~ked in a~m~~9ance with the Public Works Design Manual. The pt~p~r:plans}Jl.*-~f~~:p.ffiYi4~~tib' allow staff to review this design. .':':':':': .:.:.:.;.:" . "..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:." 7. Loop th~,:'Y:~,t~rm~i~:~~e~~h'Wildern~~~::;ff~il in Phase I of the development. 8. Ident~f#:%h~!~~~~p.le op'ciiji$pi=:lce graphically on the PUD plan to ensure the minimum ::%f~~hsions are:rtj,~~[[:\ ':\i!illli:t> 9~[::i~fovide greater det~i~:~n the size and location of the proposed signs. '::n~wn~:. , :nn~\ Comfu~nts from the Publl.c: Don ~~~~~~~iD;R. HOrlBW,!:~d his staff presented the revised proposed development. Project M~ig~~:PiW,]tkrier explained the PUD changes and addressed staffs concerns, specifically: Priv:@e streets will be changed to a 32 foot width; Signs will not exceed 50 square feet and street lights will be on both private and public streets. Krier stated all experts claim there will be no storm-water runoff problems to Markley Lake. He also stated the development will provide an access to the 4 acre parcel to the north. All usable open space, setbacks and elevations from the wetlands have been identified. Krier felt with the revised lower density and changes, the development meets all criteria for a Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat. Tom Stanley, 6221 Sue Ann Lane, Credit River Township, said all he heard in regard to the water problems with Markley Lake is encouraging but everything he has read addresses the 100 year flood. Water events are of as much concern or greater to the residents of Markley Lake. Volume is rate times duration. He would like have the hydrologist address some of his issues. Stanley read statements from DNR Supervisor Thomas Balcom, dated November 29, 1999 to the City of Prior Lake. He also read a L:\99FILES\99PLCOMM\PCMIN\MNI2l399.DOC 2 Planning Commission Meeting December 13, 1999 letter from Savage Public Works Director, David E. Hutton. Stanley felt there were no figures in the EA W to make a correct decision. Stanley is not giving the dey~,~oper permission to put water on his property. Stanley asked the Commissioner~:J~:h)ay attention to the EA W. The developers should not rush this project andJqije Commissioners to make quick decisions. Make sure Savage and C~~4~~!~xer Township agree to the water runoff and have some kind of plan to address ~~probl~~:,: Hydrologist Brian Miller, from BDM Consulting Engineer~~i~,:;~P~ovell ~~~~IJI~H2, Lexington, Minnesota, explained the process of redirect~p~1the water from Markfeyt~~~e. A diversion structure which has been used in drainag~J~#ilities in hydrology for mahY): years will be constructed. It is a simple stop-log st~~4.ih: with th~j#.~ent of taking water from the Deerfield development and completely divett~~iH~~ay:~4ffi'Markley Lake. This water body is under the DNR'sjurisdiction. One oftheifi~q~ihs with Markley Lake is that it is a water body and it can't be starv:~,d. Ifthere is ati~:y~ar it will drop considerably. The water must be supplcml.ijt~~4J~nd maintain~a::ata reasonable level. There will be diversion structures on the~~prtfrt!~~H~t~~ one"d~l~h~ proposed diverted outlet. A permit application has been subrp~tted to"th~J~NRAp',aIl6w for this diversion. The developer will negotiate a managemen~j?,~~ 'Yf1~nt'liet)~tor the diversion structures. In the opinion of.the.:DNR, the operati&j{ofthe facilities will stay with the City of Prior Lake because~Mt:k~~tures ard!ihiihe city limits. The DNR does not want to add any additional;w#,t1Fioad t~:~m~mselves\~f[~s not for the DNR's benefit, it is for the City's benefit t4~:~fuctures aI:lf~dng consid~:r~4. Once the permit is in place along with the managem~~~ip.:l;m, the:~t.~~p.f:tw~JlprM~en care of. Up to the 100 year storm, this will divert all 0{tli,~1~w~~~1tfuh1"a:54::~tf~:ifr~'a from Markley Lake. The overall drainage i~Pf!pq9 othed*#1~(are at a rate of discharge to DNR Wetland 188 is also reduce4;)Wlth1tlj#::~~t:yelop~~#;;,increased volumes will go to that wetland and discharge to Cl~~'iake. Theim~imuillim~r.ease would be approximately 2 inches (with no di.~dfufrge). The dow~:i:$.if{:,am irrip~tts to the wetland is insignificant. Miller stated the d~v~t~pment will reduc~1~~~ amou~t of water to Markley Lake. Ku~~~~~~itparaphras~~f~iller' s comments confirming the development would not have a significJ1dhlpact ,withe area to the south, Savage or Markley Lake. JeffElasky,':~~~\~\~II~~~derness Trail, wanted to keep Wilderness Trail a cul-de-sac. In his meeting with the Planning Staff, the City felt the road should go through. Elasky felt he did not receive a valid reason. Mr. Patton, the developer, told him it wouldn't be a problem, but city staff recommended a through-street. Elasky questioned the benefit to opening the cul-de-sac. McDermott responded ifthe City allowed a the cul-de-sac, there would only be one way to enter and exist the development. There should be two points of entry. It is a safety issue. Kansier said not only is a public safety issue, other concerns are for maintenance, snow plowing, costs to the City, school buses, garbage hauling, mail delivery and all kinds of L:\99FILES\99PLCOMM\PCM1N\MNI21399.DOC 3 ~._------,_._--------_.~~~."~--~-- ~ . Planning Commission Meeting December 13, 1999 vehicles that go through neighborhoods every day. It is a more logical and efficient use ofthe public right-of-way. Margi Atwood, Crimson Court, the spokesperson from Wilderness pond~jji~~i:~ they consider the new proposal a great gesture. Atwood said on behalf qft4~ib.~ighborhood, they consider it adequate. <11111W:/: "\::lllllill~iH\ The public hearing was closed. ::)mlllii::::::' "::<iiiliillll~\~~\ Comments from the Commissioners: ,,/:::::r: '\?: " :, ,,:, ~, ;,', j, ;,', ~,' ;,', :.: ::':, . . : :: : ::: : : . ,.;:;::::::: Kuykendall: ':\:ii!:[h,. ,,/::W?:" · Commend the developer, neighbors and City staff t&:~~~:t~~rough comprehensive report. ':::" ,:\::~:!\: · The development is a great addition:iQ!~~~~~Qpununity. '\~:m1i\:, . There is a couple of issues left to be~d'&~~~~db}(the, develo~LSpecifically, drainage and utility easements. Stafd~4.1~ated:i:d#f.4~\~Qt~:pr~blem. . The other concern was Item 6, regardin:gl~~bUp::~thiti~~:ffi~Hng the Public Works Design Manual. The develQper;;:Don Pattoh:f~p(mded they will address all issues. · The hydrologist ha~:~~f~:~~ia~~~: issues t8!f~*-tisfaction. · A permit applicatidifi'S in for pi88ess with th~:1DNR. McDermott did not feel it was a problem waiti~:~W.:'hear fron11h~~PNR in reg~d to the application as this is a preliminary p laf!~::::i::::~::, ,::~~::::i:w::nn:::m:mm:w::::::::n~~::::" · Requested Tom St~~fu:i~:8ome forwM<f'iliid address Hydrologist Miller's comments. Stanly.w~~t'<nl.e.::f.~elt th<:9{tygrologist addressed his concerns for keeping the water out o(M~ki~}/tillk~g:)jis co~~, remains as far as the development actually being able Jp;PblI it offwid{~~*!;lge. '::<i%> .::milA~~ of his concerns:~yp been addressed. · ':~~q'9:~sted Developer.ipon Patton to explain his comment stating "considerable arm tWi~~~Kby staff'. ~~tion responded 4.1 is the density for R1. He felt they are redudtig:t.4e den$j~)(Which was an issue from the beginning. Patton said they are yielding:i~:~~:hwliWhat it has to be. They still think the original proposal they had was appropriate:\#j~1h:the subjectiveness of the grid system. They answered that with staff, but have to accept it for approval. · Did not like Mr. Patton's negative comment about staff and was not impressed. The staff does a remarkable job and should be commended and in response to the community. The proposal is 99% solid with the exception ofthe negative comments. Criego: . Requested to see the sidewalk and trail systems. Kansier identified the paths. . Patton explained the custom six, eight and ten unit buildings. · Questioned why the developer wouldn't construct four and six unit buildings. Krier responded the strategy in reducing the density is price reduction and design. They dropped 94 units and to do that they need some flexibility. The development provides a limited number oflarge buildings, yet maintain the look from the outside of being a lot less. It was a trade off. L:\99FILES\99PLCOMM\PCMIN\MNI21399.DOC 4 Planning Commission Meeting December 13, 1999 . Has a hard time with large buildings - 8 and 10 units. Concern for parking, etc. It does not seem professional. Krier said all units have 2-car garages. :ta:::~VeIOPer has done a wonderful job in laying ont the projec:'(:::ll!:!!.::!:lm> . Overall the developer has done an excellent job in addressin,~:~~~FC~~~~~on' s, City's and neighbor's concerns. The redesign of the villa,:4.eve1opment is.~~~&r,eat improvem~nt. . ::)\\lll~/' ':\~~llllm~\, . The PUD IS appropnate. /H/ "::W~H:: . Most ofthe other concerns, water, traffic and de~i.@ih~ve been:~Qdressed. '\~(? . It is an important development for the City with~m~y housm~j~hoices. . Most ofthe people mentioned in their EA W comci~ht$,tba{~hformation was not available. As part ofthe recommendation, the deveidp~tt!~~6uld provide information to support what he stated in the recoI;~tp.:~fore it goes the:(i~~y:,Council. · Supported the development. :::I~',ii;;::~mmm~~m:!!iW~H\~>:" '::+illllllll> MOTION BY KUYKENDALL, SECOND~~r ST~SOf.f~~~qRECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PUD ANP PRELIM~M~jP'LAT StraJECT TO STAFF'S CONDITIONS LISTED INHTHEHpLANNINGtffiJiORT AND THAT THE HYDROLOGIST'S REEoifBE:lAXTACHEt)ii[O THE RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL.<::ll~I'!mj?',)mll:!!:::::::::::::,:", :~:II,I.II:; Criego suggested h~V:~~:~e,e,:~~my~18p~FH~d~#~1~ll~'eight and ten unit buildings. StamsonJe,~f~~~~!y,;ger Jli~l~~:uld be minimized. He explained the increased setbacks with th..<<j~ilillIief"Uh~~HwhicIi:Wg~~Q eliminate green space. It is a trade off. Take the ten ~~1~9ildingS in exch~~~i: :\j:iilm:: Cri~~6.:did not disagree, :hi~ concern was the number of people in a small area. Proposed to redrt~~11p:e number o(~its in the each of the 8 and 10 unit buildings. KUYken~~i:lll~~~~th~j~~~ii~ rather see adding the 6 units somewhere else. This development iri~~~:~i1 the criteria with all the design standards. The process has been long but it is an excellent product. It meets staffs concerns. All the issues have been addressed. There is no other alternative. Accept as proposed. Stamson pointed out the previous proposal actually had four eight-unit buildings. The design was rejected and traded off. The Commissioners said come back with something better and a new proposal was submitted. Vote taken indicated ayes by Kuykendall and Stamson, nay by Criego. MOTION CARRIED. This item will go before the City Council on January 18,2000. A recess was called at 8:16 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:25 p.m. L:\99FILES\99PLCOMM\PCMIN\MNI2 1 399,DOC 5 11 I 5\..0 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ~ELlMINARY PLAN RESOLUTION ...~ 0 +- RESOLUTION APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN TO BE ~vvN AS UEERFIELU _ ~ 0. ~ ~ Ii fw-\\J.')> CA~( ~vJh\Vvv -t ((pI>') 4-\~;.JI*f,L~ MOTION BY: \, , SECOND BY: --J WHEREAS: D.R. Horton has submitted an application for a Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan to be known as Deerfield; and WHEREAS: The Prior Lake Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment at a public hearing on November 8, 1999 and on December 13, 1999; and WHEREAS: notice of the public hearing on said PUD Preliminary Plan has been duly published in accordance with the applicable Prior Lake Ordinances; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission proceeded to hear all persons interested in this issue and persons interested were afforded the opportunity to present their views and objections related to the Deerfield PUD Preliminary Plan; and WHEREAS: The Prior Lake City Council considered the proposed PUD Preliminary Plan for on January 18, 2000; and WHEREAS: the City Council finds the PUD Preliminary Plan consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS: the City Council finds the PUD Preliminary Plan is compatible with the stated purposes and intent of the Section 1106 Planned Unit Developments of the Zoning Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA: 1. it hereby adopts the following findings: a) Greater utilization of new technologies in building design, materials, construction and land development. According to the narrative, the developer utilizes the most recent building technologies. The plan has also been revised to utilize the use of Class I materials on the buildings with greater than 4 units. The general design of the PUD does allow the clustering of the units, which helps to preserve the wetlands and some of the wooded areas. b) Higher standards of site and building design. The use of curvilinear streets will slow traffic through the neighborhood. In addition, the creation of a private trail system through the common area, eventually connecting to the public system, creates an integrated system. The layout and design of the villa units has l196~\)~~~~1bv&J~~")1?S~~:~~,rCP-~~r Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 Ij'\Y:~1 (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER II been revised to meet this criteria. The pattern provides less density, more curvilinear streets and also preserves the natural site features. c) More efficient and effective use of streets, utilities, and public facilities to support high quality land use development at a lesser cost. Maintenance of private streets, including plowing and future repairs, is done by the homeowners association. This reduces City costs in providing services to these homes. The private open space also functions as parkland, without the City cost of maintenance. d) Enhanced incorporation of recreational, public and open space components in the development which may be made more useable and be more suitably located than would , otherwise be provided under conventional development procedures. The dedication of the park and the creation of the public trail system around the pond provides an amenity which can be utilized by both the future and the existing neighborhood. The creation of the private trail system allows some flexibility in the location of the trails, to preserve trees and wetlands, and provides a link to the public park system. e) Provides a flexible approach to development which allows modifications to the strict application of regulations within the various Use Districts that are in harmony with the purpose and intent of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The use of the PUD allows the higher density to be clustered on the east side of Fish Point Road, and to utilize the property on the west side of Fish Point Road for single family homes. The density and variety of housing units is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals to provide a variety of housing styles. In addition, approximately 230 lots could be developed in the R-1 district, and 308 lots could be developed in the R-2 district, a total of 538 lots. The proposed PUD includes 540 units, and also utilizes a cluster pattern, which the single family development would not. t) Encourages a more creative and efficient use of land. As noted above, the PUD allows the higher density areas to be clustered, and preserves open space. The density is also consistent with a single family density, and preserves more of the natural area. g) Preserves and enhances desirable site characteristics including flora and fauna, scenic views, screening and buffering, and access. Clustering the units allows the preservation of some of the wooded areas on the site. The units also are sited to offer views of the adjacent wetlands. h) Allows the development to operate in concert with a Redevelopment Plan in certain areas of the City and to insure the redevelopment goals and objectives within the Redevelopment District will be achieved. This criteria is not applicable. i) Provides for flexibility in design and construction of the development in cases where large tracts of land are under single ownership or control and where the users) has the potential to significantly affect adjacent or nearby properties. The use of the PUD allows the clustering of the homes and the use of private streets. j) Encourages the developer to convey property to the public, over and above required dedications, by allowing a portion of the density to be transferred to other parts of the site. I :\99files\99subd iv\99pre lim\deerfld\pudres.doc PAGE 2 n m --r-------------..... Although the plan proposes a private trail system, the developer has not provided any dedication over and above the requirements. The private open space and trails, however, function as parkland, without the cost to the City for maintenance and development. k) The design shall consider the whole of the project and shall create a unified environment within the boundaries of the project by insuring architectural compatibility of all structures, efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation, aesthetically pleasing landscape and site features, and efficient use and design of utilities. The design does create a unified environment. The extension of the existing streets and provision of trails and sidewalks allows for efficient movement of traffic. As noted earlier, the design of the villa homes has been modified to create a more pleasing pattern. The landscaping plan has also been revised to meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and will also enhance this area. Additional landscaping along Fish Point Road will provide screening. Enhancement of the landscaping along the north property boundary will also protect the adjacent residents from the noise and other impacts of the adjacent business park. I) The design of a PUD shall optimize compatibility between the project and surrounding land uses, both existing and proposed and shall minimize the potential adverse impacts of the PUD on surrounding land uses and the potential adverse effects of the surrounding land uses on the PUD. The use of the PUD will allow the extension of the single family homes adjacent to the existing residences, and the clustering of the townhouse units. Additional landscaping along Fish Point Road and along the north boundary will minimize the visual impact of this development. m) If a project for which PUD treatment has been requested involves construction over a period of time in two or more phases, the applicant shall demonstrate that each phase is capable of addressing and meeting each of the criteria independent of the other phases. Each of the individual phases includes landscaping and road extensions. n) A PUD in a Residential Use District shall conform to the requirements of that Use District unless modified by the following or other provisions of this Ordinance. 1) The tract of land for which a project is proposed shall have not less than 200 feet of frontage on a public right-of-way; 2) No building shall be, nearer than its building height to any properly line when the properly abutting the subject properly is in an "R-1" or "R-2" Use District; 3) No building within the project shall be nearer to another building than ~ the sum of the building heights of the two buildings, except for parking ramps which may be directly connected to another building; and 4) Private roadways within the project site may not be used in calculating required off-street parking spaces. The proposal meets the above requirements with the exception of the modifications requested by the developer, which include the following: 1) The use of private streets; and 2) Allowing up to 10 units per building rather than 4 units per building All of these modifications are permitted under the PUD provisions at the discretion of the Council. 2. The Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan is hereby approved subject to the following conditions a) The access easement and indemnification agreements must be signed prior to final plat approval. 1: \99fi les\99subdiv\99pre 1 im\deerfld\pudres.doc PAGE 3 rn b) Revise the grading plan to identify the required 30' setback from the 100 year flood elevation for all wetlands and NURP ponds. This required setback must also be included on the PUD site plan. c) Identify the 28' wide streets on the preliminary plat. In addition, these streets should be named using a name unique to the Prior lake area. d) All public utilities must be designed in accordance with the Public Works Design Manual. The proper plans must be provided to allow staff to review this design. e) Loop the watermain through Wilderness Trail in Phase I of the development. f) Provide greater detail on the size and location of the proposed signs. 3. Application for approval of a PUD Final Plan must be submitted within 90 days of the date of approval of this resolution, or by April 18, 2000, unless written request for an extension of time is approved by the City Council. 4. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein. Passed and adopted this 18th day of January, 2000. YES NO Mader Mader Ericson Ericson Gundlach Gundlach Petersen Petersen Schenck Schenck {Seal} Frank Boyles, City Manager 1:\99files\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\pudres,doc PAGE 4 II I "1'------- 5....0 PRELIMINARY PLAT RESOLUTION OO~Or RESOLUTION OF THE PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE1PRELlMI~RY PLAT_OF "DEERFIELD" SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OUTLINED HEREIN. MOTION BY: pS 0 ('t(~~~gND<BY: ( }j7 WHEREAS: the Prior Lake Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on November 8, 1999 and on December 13, 1999, to consider an application from D.R. Horton for the preliminary plat of Deerfield; and WHEREAS: notice of the public hearing on said preliminary plat has been duly published and posted in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes and Prior Lake Ordinances; and WHEREAS: all persons interested in this issue were afforded the opportunity to present their views and objections related to the preliminary plat of Deerfield for the record at the Planning Commission hearing; and WHEREAS: the Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed the preliminary plat according to the applicable provisions of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and found said preliminary plat to be consistent with the provisions of said ordinances; and WHEREAS the Prior Lake City Council considered an application for preliminary plat approval of Deerfield on January 18, 2000; and WHEREAS: the City Council finds the preliminary plat of Deerfield to be consistent with the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA, that it hereby approves the preliminary plat of DeerfieJd subject to the following conditions: 1. The access easement and indemnification agreements must be signed by all parties prior to final plat approval. 2. Revise the grading plan to identify the required 30' setback from the 100 year flood elevation for all wetlands and NURP ponds. This required setback must also be included on the PUD site plan. 3. Identify the 28' wide streets on the preliminary plat. In addition, these streets should be named using a name unique to the Prior lake area. l:i99fjI~sl99SlJbdLv\99preJim\d~rfld\platres.doc Page 1 Ib~UU cagle Creek Ave. ~.c., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph, (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER I I 4. All public utilities must be designed in accordance with the Public Works Design Manual. The proper plans must be provided to allow staff to review this design. 5. Loop the water main through Wilderness Trail in Phase I of the development. 6. Provide greater detail on the size and location of the proposed signs. Passed and adopted this 18th day of January, 2000. YES NO Mader Mader Ericson Ericson Gundlach Gundlach Petersen Petersen Schenck Schenck {Seal} City Manager City of Prior Lake 1:\99files\99subdiv\99prellm\deerfld\platres.doc Page 2 ,\ , w ------'-'--,-'--'---- --,- PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN RESOLUTION OO-XX RESOLUTION APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN TO BE KNOWN AS DEERFIELD MOTION BY: SECOND BY: WHEREAS: D.R. Horton has submitted an application for a Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan to be known as Deerfield; and WHEREAS: The Prior Lake Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment at a public hearing on November 8, 1999 and on December 13, 1999; and WHEREAS: notice of the public hearing on said PUD Preliminary Plan has been duly published in accordance with the applicable Prior lake Ordinances; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission proceeded to hear all persons interested in this issue and persons interested were afforded the opportunity to present their views and objections related to the Deerfield PUD Preliminary Plan; and WHEREAS: The Prior Lake City Council considered the proposed PUD Preliminary Plan for on January 18, 2000; and WHEREAS: the City Council finds the PUD Preliminary Plan consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS: the City Council finds the PUD Preliminary Plan is compatible with the stated purposes and intent of the Section 1106 Planned Unit Developments of the Zoning Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA: 1. it hereby adopts the following findings: a) Greater utilization of new technologies in building design, materials, construction and land development. According to the narrative, the developer utilizes the most recent building technologies. The plan has also been revised to utilize the use of Class I materials on the buildings with greater than 4 units. The general, design of the PUD does allow the clustering of the units, which helps to preserve the wetlands and some of the wooded areas. b) Higher standards of site and building design. The use of curvilinear streets will slow traffic through the neighborhood. In addition, the creation of a private trail system through the common area, eventually connecting to the public system, creates an integrated system. The layout and design of the villa units has lf6~~~~~t~v&d'~~~S~~:~~,r~'~~r Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 FJ'<t~i (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER I I c) been revised to meet this criteria. The pattern provides less density, more curvilinear streets and also preserves the natural site features. More efficient and effective use of streets, utilities, and public facilities to support high quality land use development at a lesser cost. Maintenance of private streets, including plowing and future repairs, is done by the homeowners association. This reduces City costs in providing services to these homes. The private open space also functions as parkland, without the City cost of maintenance. Enhanced incorporation of recre'ational, public and open space components in the development which may be made more useable and be more suitably located than would , otherwise be provided under conventional development procedures. The dedication of the park and the creation of the public trail system around the pond provides an amenity which can be utilized by both the future and the existing neighborhood. The creation of the private trail system allows some flexibility in the location of the trails, to preserve trees and wetlands, and provides a link to the public park system. Provides a flexible approach to development which allows modifications to the strict application of regulations within the various Use Districts that are in harmony with the purpose and intent of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The use of the PUD allows the higher density to be clustered on the east side of Fish Point Road, and to utilize the property on the west side of Fish Point Road for single family homes. The density and variety of housing units is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goals to provide a variety of housing styles. In addition, approximately 230 lots could be developed in the R-1 district, and 308 lots could be developed in the R-2 district, a total of 538 lots. The proposed PUD includes 540 units, and also utilizes a cluster pattern, which the single family development would not. Encourages a more creative and efficient use of land. As noted above, the PUD allows the higher density areas to be clustered, and preserves open space. The density is also consistent with a single family density, and preserves more of the natural area. Preserves and enhances desirable site characteristics including flora and fauna, scenic views, screening and buffering, and access. Clustering the units allows the preservation of some of the wooded areas on the site. The units also are sited to offer views of the adjacent wetlands. Allows the development to operate in concert with a Redevelopment Plan in certain areas of the City and to insure the redevelopment goals and objectives within the Redevelopment District will be achieved. This criteria is not applicable. Provides for flexibility in design and construction of the development in cases where large tracts of land are under single ownership or control and where the users) has the potential to significantly affect adjacent or nearby properties. The use of the PUD allows the clustering of the homes and the use of private streets. Encourages the developer to convey property to the public, over and above required dedications, by allowing a portion of the density to be transferred to other parts of the site. d) e) f) g) h) i) j) I :\99files\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\pudres.doc PAGE 2 I I T Although the plan proposes a private trail system, the developer has not provided any dedication over and above the requirements. The private open space and trails, however, function as parkland, without the cost to the City for maintenance and development. k) The design shall consider the whole of the project and shall create a unified environment within the boundaries of the project by insuring architectural compatibility of all structures, efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation, aesthetically pleasing landscape and site features, and efficient use and design of utilities. The design does create a unified environment. The extension of the existing streets and provision of trails and sidewalks allows for efficient movement of traffic. As noted earlier, the design of the villa homes has been modified to create a more pleasing pattern. The landscaping plan has also been revised to meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and will also enhance this area. Additional landscaping along Fish Point Road will provide screening. Enhancement of the landscaping along the north property boundary will also protect the adjacent residents from the noise and other impacts of the adjacent business park. I) The design of a PUD shall optimize compatibility between the project and surrounding land uses, both existing and proposed and shall minimize the potential adverse impacts of the PUD on surrounding land uses and the potential adverse effects of the surrounding land uses on the PUD. The use of the PUD will allow the extension of the single family homes adjacent to the existing residences, and the clustering of the townhouse units. Additional landscaping along Fish Point Road and along the north boundary will minimize the visual impact of this development. m) If a project for which PUD treatment has been requested involves construction over a period of time in two or more phases, the applicant shall demonstrate that each phase is capable of addressing and meeting each of the criteria independent of the other phases. Each of the individual phases includes landscaping and road extensions. n) A PUD in a Residential Use District shall conform to the requirements of that Use District unless modified by the following or other provisions of this Ordinance. 1) The tract of land for which a project is proposed shall have not less than 200 feet of frontage on a public right-of-way; 2) No building shall be nearer than its building height to any property line when the property abutting the subject property is in an "R-1" or "R-2" Use District; 3) No building within the project shall be nearer to another building than ~ the sum of the building heights of the two buildings, except for parking ramps which may be directly connected to another building; and 4) Private roadways within the project site may not be used in calculating required off-street parking spaces. The proposal meets the above requirements with the exception of the modifications requested by the developer, which include the following: 1) The use of private streets; and 2) Allowing up to 10 units per building rather than 4 units per building All of these modifications are permitted under the PUD provisions at the discretion of the Council. 2. The Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan is hereby approved subject to the following conditions a) The access easement and indemnification agreements must be signed prior to final plat approval. I :\99files\99subdiv\99prel im\deerfld\pudres,doc PAGE 3 i I b) Revise the grading plan to identify the required 30' setback from the 100 year flood elevation for all wetlands and NURP ponds. This required setback must also be included on the PUD site plan. c) Identify the 28' wide streets on the preliminary plat. In addition, these streets should be named using a name unique to the Prior lake area. d) All public utilities must be designed in accordance with the Public Works Design Manual. The proper plans must be provided to allow staff to review this design. e) Loop the watermain through Wilderness Trail in Phase I of the development. f) Provide greater detail on the size and location of the proposed signs. 3. Application for approval of a PUD Final Plan must be submitted within 90 days of the date of approval of this resolution, or by April 18, 2000, unless written request for an extension of time is approved by the City Council. 4. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein. Passed and adopted this 18th day of January, 2000. YES NO Mader Mader Ericson Ericson Gundlach Gundlach Petersen Petersen Schenck Schenck {Seal} Frank Boyles, City Manager 1:\99files\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\pudres,doc PAGE 4 -------n--r- ' r----- PRELIMINARY PLAT RESOLUTION OO-XX RESOLUTION OF THE PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "DEERFIELD" SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OUTLINED HEREIN. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: WHEREAS: the Prior Lake Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on November 8, 1999 and on December 13, 1999, to consider an application from D.R. Horton for the preliminary plat of Deerfield; and WHEREAS: notice of the public hearing on said preliminary plat has been duly published and posted in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes and Prior Lake Ordinances; and WHEREAS: all persons interested in this issue were afforded the opportunity to present their views and objections related to the preliminary plat of Deerfield for the record at the Planning Commission hearing; and WHEREAS: the Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed the preliminary plat according to the applicable provisions of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and found said preliminary plat to be consistent with the provisions of said ordinances; and WHEREAS the Prior Lake City Council considered an application for preliminary plat approval of Deerfield on January 18, 2000; and WHEREAS: the City Council finds the preliminary plat of Deerfield to be consistent with the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA, that it hereby approves the preliminary plat of Deerfield subject to the following conditions: 1. The access easement and indemnification agreements must be signed by all parties prior to final plat approval. 2. Revise the grading plan to identify the required 30' setback from the 100 year flood elevation for all wetlands and NURP ponds. This required setback must also be included on the PUD site plan. 3. Identify the 28' wide streets on the preliminary plat. In addition, these streets should be named using a name unique to the Prior lake area. l:i99fiI~si99s~bdLv\99preJim\d~r1I.d\pJatres.doc Pc;rne 1 Ib~UU cagle Creel< Ave, :"c" Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph, (612) 447-4230 / J-ax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER I I 4. All public utilities must be designed in accordance with the Public Works Design Manual. The proper plans must be provided to allow staff to review this design. 5. Loop the water main through Wilderness Trail in Phase I of the development. 6. Provide greater detail on the size and location of the proposed signs. Passed and adopted this 18th day of January, 2000. YES NO Mader Mader Ericson Ericson Gundlach Gundlach Petersen Petersen Schenck Schenck {Seal} City Manager City of Prior Lake I :\99files\99subdiv\99prelim\deerfld\platres.doc Page 2 ,I I ~"--~""'--'-'--'---' I ---..---- ---..,..- DEER FIELD - A GREENWAY COMMUNITY - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT January 2000 BY -- D-R-HORlON@ CUSTOM HOMES 111 r DEERFIELD A Greenway Community PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT City Council January, 2000 Planner Consultant: Midwest Planning & Design, LLC 1491 Shoreline Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 (612) 476-1762 Applicant/Developer D.R. Horton, Inc.- Minnesota 3459 Washington Drive Suite 204 Eagan, Minnesota 55122 (651) 256-7140 ;1 I m ,.."....--..---1-""-'_..- ,....-,....,'-----'--'-,.."..-..,..,..,...-..--'----r----------- Consultant DesignerlEngineer Paramount Engineering & Design 1440 Arcade Street, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55106 (651) 771-0544 T ABLE OF CONTENTS Previous City Approvals and Requested City Action, pun Findings and Purpose ..................................................................... ~ Proposal General Description............................................................................................5 Building Profile... .... ..................... '" ..... .................... .,. ..................................... ..6 Street System.............. .......................... ........................................................... .11 Signage............................................................................................................ .12 Lighting............................................................................................................ 13 The Site Surrounding Land Use.......... ........................... ................................ ................ .13 Zoning........ ...... ........................ .......................... ....................................... ...... .15 Comprehensive Land Use Plan ..................... ....... .................. ...........................16 Tree Preservation. ....................... ............................. .............................. ...... .....16 Buffer Yards... ......... . .. .., ............. .. . .. . .... . .. .. ........ .., . .. . . . ..... .... ...... ... Existing Site Conditions............... ... ............................................................ ..... .15 Soils............................................................................................................... ..17 Wetlands.... .... .......................... ..... .................. . .. ..................... ... ....................... I 7 Public Utilities ................................................................................................. .17 EA W ................................................................................................................18 Site Development Data.. ..... ......................................................................................... 19 Legal Instruments............................................................................................ .18 EXIllBITS Building Type.................................................................... .Exhibit A DR Horton. . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . .. . " . . . .. . " . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . .Exhibit B Title Sheet................. ............................................................................... Sheet 1 Boundary Survey............................................. ......................................... Sheet 2 Existing Condition ................................................................................... Sheet 3 Preliminary Site Plan......... ................ .................. ..................................... Sheet 4 Preliminary Plat.............................. .......................................................... Sheet 5 Preliminary Grading Plan ......................................................................... Sheet 6 Erosion Control Plan and Notes ................................................................ Sheet 7 Preliminary Utility Plan....... .............. ................. .............................. ........ Sheet 8 Tree Preservation Plan .............................................................................. Sheet 9 Preliminary Landscape Plan.................................................................... Sheet 10 Preliminary Wetland Replacement Plan .................................................. Sheet 11 Phasing Plan ......... ............... ................. ............................... ................... Sheet 12 Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 2 Previous City Approvals This site which was recently annexed to the City has been planned for development since the Orderly Annexation Agreement of 1972 between the City and Spring Lake Township. In 1999. the City Council adopted a Comprehensive Plan, which guides this site for low to medium density. This means that the site is planned for up to 10 homes per acre. Based on the Comprehensive Plan density, about 1330 homes would be allowed on this site. We are proposing 540 homes which is 4.06 homes per acre. It was noted by the staff that should this property be developed all as single family homes 538 homes could be built on the R-1 and R-2 zoned property. On July 6, 1999 the City Council upon recommendation of the Planning Commission zoned the site to R-1 and R-2. By zoning the property the City vested the property for particular land uses and particular housing densities. This vestment would be as follows: . R -I Zoning District Approximately 109.93 acres (79.95 net acres) of the site is zoned R-110w density residential. The R-1 zoning allows residential development of single family and cluster housing. Densities in the R-1 zoning district would be 3.6 homes per acre and 3.96 homes per acre in a PUD. With this R-1 zoned property, 317 homes would be allowed. We are proposing a net density (gross land area less the area of the wetlands) of2.72 homes per acre (216 homes), which is substantially less than what's allowed by the Zoning Ordinance in this R-1 Zoning District. . R-2 Zoning District Approximately 55.1 acres (53.05 net acres) are zoned R-2 medium density residential. Allowed densities in the R-2 Zoning District would normally be 7.2 homes per acre and with a PUD 7.9 homes per acre. . Our proposed density for the R-2 zoning district is 6.11 homes per acre (324 homes). The R-2 zoning District allows us to build 419 homes. Again, we are proposing to build fewer homes than allowed in this zoning district. The allowed land uses in the R-2 zoning district are single family dwellings and cluster homes. Over all within the existing zoning we are allowed to build 736 homes (5.53 homes per acre). We are proposing to build 540 homes (4.06 homes per net acre) or 196 homes less than allowed on the site in both zoning districts. This development is not dense compared to what is allowed on the site and the previous proposals for development of this site. At its December meeting, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council approval of both the Preliminary PUD and the Preliminary Plat. The Planning Commission made their recommendation based on a positive recommendation of the City Staff. Both the Staff and Planning Commission recommendation included a number of conditions which have been satisfied in the submission ofthe this document and the revised plans and exhibits. The Conditions and our response are as follows: Request for PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 3 I I .. ..,... '.......1Jr.. .'..---..........1'..........'....-.......'..-'..'..'..'....... , . Provide access to the northeast corner of the site. The revised plans show this access. In addition, we are providing a easement to that property. . Revise the grading plan to show the 30 foot setback from the 100 year flood elevation. The setbacks are from 30 feet to 120 feet from the 100 year flood elevation. . Revise grading plan and tree preservation plan to show lots in the "custom graded area". The grading plan and landscape plan have been revised. . All private streets to meet Section 1006.206 of the Subdivision Ordinance. All Streets are 32 feet. The drives as agreed to by staff are 28 feet and 24 feet. All private streets are in out lots and have 9 foot drainage and utility easements on both sides. . Identify the drainage and utility easements on the Preliminary Plat. This has been done. A blanket easement has been provide for all areas out side ofthe home lots in the multi family areas and on the lots in the single family areas. . Provide utility plans that conform to the Public Works Design Manual. This has been completed. . Loop the water main through Wilderness Trail in Phase 1. This is shown on the revised preliminary utility plans. . Identify useable open space graphically to ensure minimum dimensions. This is on the submitted plans. . Provide greater detail on the size and location of the proposed signs. There will be four entrance signs which are on the preliminary plat and grading plan. These signs are shown in this manual and on the plan set. Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 4 ,.., ....'......'--..---y-.....-....----i-..--------..'-'-'..'.......'--..'...'__,..~_--'_-..,_--'-'--m-..'..' Environmental Assessment Worksheet The City staff caused an EA W to be prepared by the City's consulting engineer, WSB. WSB recommended that the City Council Acting as the Responsible Govermnental Agency (RGU) make findings and a determination that an Environmental Impact Statement was not necessary. At the December 20th City Council meeting, the Council took action on a Negative Declaration Resolution which provides that an EIS is not necessary. Requested City Action D.R. Horton, Inc. - Minnesota is now requesting a Preliminary Planned Unit Development and a Preliminary Plat approval for this 165.03 acre site. By its action in July, the City Council established the zoning districts and the housing density for these zoning districts. The current application is not to revisit the density or land use issues. The City Council has clearly established both the use of the property and the density. The current application is to use the Planned Unit Development (PUD) to establish a unique planned community design. This planned unit development design creates standards that are more restrictive then those allowed in the R-l and R-2 Zoning Districts and we request some modifications to create a community of neighborhoods using several high quality housing types without exceeding the allowed density bestowed on this property by the City Council. Planned Unit Development Findings and Purposes (Zoning Ordinance Section 1106.100) and how the Deerfield PUD meets these Findings and Purposes Deerfield Planned Unit Development meets the following PUD Findings and Purposes, which are detailed throughout the text of this Development Manual and in the attached plans and exhibits. These are summarized below: Deerjield has greater utilization of new technologies in building design, materials, construction, and land development. New building technologies include: . A new heating and ventilating systems, low 'E' argon filled windows to reduce harmful sun radiation, and a monolithic pored wall foundation with foil face ridged insulation which lasts longer and reduces moisture . Engineered trusses which are typical but these trusses have raised energy heels which allow more effective insulation . Cluster home separation walls, which use the standard techniques and add 'RC' channel as innovation in residential sound attenuation. Land Development technologies include: . Use of greenway system as a central focus . Vehicle approaches, which reflect the tree and wetland environment. Vehicle access is through tree lined street design to meander between the wetland areas. . Preservation of natural areas by easements, additional set backs, common ownership and use of private streets. Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 5 11 . Pedestrian trail system . A curverlineal design which reduces development scale by focusing lower density smaller building at the edge of the neighborhood and the larger buildings to the center of the neighborhood. . Clustering homes to preserve the wetlands and wooded areas. Higher standards of site and building design are used in this PUD. High standards of site design are: . Additional setbacks to wetlands and to buildings . Preservation of environmentally sensitive areas . Location of buildings with open space vistas . Curvilinear private street system designed to dampen traffic and discourage through traffic in the neighborhoods . Creation of an intergenerational community with distinct neighborhood identity . Creation of a greenway system . A private street system with 32 foot wide streets and utility easements on both sides . The revised plans provide pattern of development which is less dense, has more curvilinear streets and also preserves the natural features. High building design standards are: . A variety of buildings designed to attract intergenerational buyers . New technologies to create better buildings and maintain value . High quality products and construction in both exterior and interior finishes to provide maintenance free living. Deerfield is planned for more efficient and effective use of streets, utilities and public facilities to support high quality land use development at a lesser cost . With the exception of the single family home, using the cluster home concept for the villas, coach home and twin homes reduces the amount of street and utilities required to service each neighborhood. . Reduced lineal feet of streets and utilities produces high quality land use at lesser costs . The dedication of public park and inter-relating the public park to the greenway more then doubles the usable open space available to the community. . Changing the storm water flow to Cleary Lake rather than Markly Lake helps an existing storm water flooding issue. . Private Streets which are maintained by the Home Owners Association reduce City costs for street maintenance and snow plowing. . Private Open Space owned and maintained by the Home Owners Association provide recreation and passive activities with less cost to the City. The Greenway plan enhances the incorporation of recreational, public, and open space components. Request/or PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 6 . The new public park will provide natural open spaces for this development as well as for the existing neighborhood and Prior Lake Community. . The greenway expands the activities ofthis natural public area and inter connects it to the PUD and the Pond Athletic Field. . Wetlands are not only preserved but are incorporated into the human environment to expand them as a passive recreational resource. . The wildlife corridors created by the greenway system provide public enhancement to the PUD and to the larger community . The private parks incorporated into the greenway system provide recreational opportunities for new residents . Clustering the homes and the use of private streets produces additional open space and preserves more significant trees The PUD is in harmony with the City's Comprehensive Plan. . Deerfield is less dense than and conforms to the land uses as provided for in the Comprehensive Plan . The Deerfield PUD recognizes the unique natural features and protects them. The site design also incorporates several elements to enhance these natural features. . The PUD creates neighborhoods which are interactive and intergenerational . The PUD provides owner occupied affordable housing which is a goal of the Comprehensive Plan and also the City's Livable Communities agreement . Deerfield is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plans sewer and water elements . The PUD is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plans Transportation element. . The PUD is in harmony with the Comprehensive Plans Park and Recreation element Request/or PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 7 :r T The PUD has allowed more creative and efficient use the land. . There are 133 net acres of land in the PUD by using cluster housing we have achieved an over all density of 4.06 homes per acre. Clustering preserves more significant trees and provides more usable open space. . There is less land, which is built on and less impervious surface. For example the equivalent number of single family detached homes would cover 1,080,000 SF of ground compared to the Deerfield PUD ground coverage of985,341 SF. Deerfield has 9.7% less ground coverage and 9.7 % less impervious surface than the equivalent number of single family homes. Decreases in impervious surface means less storm water run off and less danger to the wetlands. . The Deerfield PUD will generate less than 300 vehicle trips during the peak hour. The equivalent number of single family detached homes generates 540 vehicle trips during the peak hour. This means that the efficient use ofland generates less vehicle trips Deerfield is designed around a greenway system, which preserves and enhances desirable site characteristics such as wetlands, significant woodlands, and views. . We are conveying property to the public for public parks . There is a significant open space system which not only preserves but enhances the natural features of the property . Private streets increase the amount of usable open space . Clustering decreases ground coverage and helps to protect natural features. . The design creates views for most homes Provides flexibility in construction and design where large tracts of land are under one ownership . DR Horton will own the entire tract ofland consisting of 133 upland acres and 32.03 wetland acres . The PUD has allowed us to set higher standards of design, to create a community of open spaces, which is pedestrian friendly and to preserve more significant natural features. Zoning Ordinance Section 1106.300 requires the City Council to find that the proposed pun demonstrate how the quality of the building and site design enhances the aesthetics of the site and implements Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies. As part of this requirement we will demonstrate how the following zoning ordinance criteria have been satisfied: Deerfield creates a unified environment with architectural compatibility of all structures, efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation, aesthetically pleasing landscape and site features, and efficient use and design of utilities. . The buildings have a common structure in terms of quality and types of fa~ade Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 8 ~ ~'-r'~"---'---"--'~-'-I . The greenway is designed to access all of the PUD and connect it with the Community . There is one master home owners association which requires maintenance of common areas including open parks, private streets and the greenway . Each neighborhood is identified by monuments to create a neighborhood awareness and feeling. . The pedestrian system and the streets are designed to create neighborhood and community identity. . The greenway trails connect the neighborhoods and the public sidewalk system . The natural landscape is preserved and the new homes are landscaped with foundation plantings and trees in the yards. A significant number of new trees are added to the landscaped yards. The pictures in this manual demonstrate the type of landscaping that is being planned for this PUD. Deerfield is designed to optimize compatibility between land uses both with in the PUD and to the surrounding existing and proposed land uses. . Thirty foot landscaped buffer yards are provided between Deerfield PUD and the existing and planned industrial parks . The land use adjacent to the existing single family neighborhood is high quality single family . A 27 acre park and a collector street as well as a buffer yard separate the existing single family homes from the proposed higher density Villa Homes . Most of the traffic is routed to Fish Point Road, a collector street. The street system is generally designed to limit through traffic in the residential areas . Large open spaces exist between the higher density and lower density neighborhoods. . High quality construction and design allow us to be assured that the new homes even where they are relatively close are compatible and will maintain there value. . The designed community creates intergenerational neighborhoods for life style housing. The site plan and homes are designed to attract young adults just entering the home market and looking to stay in Prior Lake to families with children to empty nesters and retired couples who want to stay in the Community. Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 9 IT Deerjield PUD conforms to the requirements of the respective R-l and R-2 Zoning Districts, except for the following modification R-l Zonin District Re uirements Public Streets with 180 foot radiuses Side yards set back 10 ft min R-2 Zonin District Re uirements Cluster homes 4 units per building Public Streets with 180 foot radius All private roads 32 feet width Densi 7.2 with PUD 7.9 Wetland set backs 30 feet No requirement for wetland preservation throu h ownershi Park dedication 600 Sq. Ft. useable open space per home Modifications Private streets in the Twin Home and Coach Home area are 150-foot radius rather than 180- foot radiuses to dampen traffic. Speed limits on the private streets are 25 MPH rather then 30 MPH 2.7 units er acre Avera e lot size is 14,840SF Wetland set backs 30 ft to 120 ft Ownership of wetlands by home owners association for rotection Park land dedication plus neighborhood common open space with trails and community greens. Useable open space as follows: Cluster Twin Homes 7082 Sq Ft per home, Cluster Coach Homes 2556 Sq. Ft per home Side yard lOft mini actual building if greater then 10ft min Modifications 6, 8 and 10 unit cluster home buildings to reserve existin trees and 0 en s ace Private Streets in the Twin Home and Coach Home areas arel50 foot radius rather then 180- foot radius. Speed limits on the private streets are 25 MPH rather then 30 MPH Private Roads are 32 feet, Driveways to Villa Home Clusters are 28 foot and 24 foot width 6.11 Dwellin units er acre Wetland set back 30 to 120 foot Ownership of wetlands by home owners association for rotection Park land dedication plus neighborhood common open space with trails and community greens. Usable open space as follows: Cluster Coach Home 2556 Sq. Ft. per home Cluster Villa Homes 2023 Sq. Ft per home Less than 25% im ervious surface Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 10 T I ... ",... .. ".., ..............y-' ,...-., '-.-...... ,'.. r ' '....... ",.. ".. '" ,,' ....--...,-, '....'-...-.....---...-'---.."..-..'.......T PROPOSAL General Description and Desien Theme Greenway This is an environmentally designed PUD based on the concept of a Greenway system of lineal parks, private open spaces and pedestrian trails. The PUD is designed to offer the opportunity for a variety of inter-generational residential environments with an interconnected network of protected lands. The fabric of open space flows among a number of housing elements all designed to attract an inter-generational mix of homeowners. The greenway system, which could not be accomplish without a PUD, is used to enhance public and private open space components in the development making them more usable and more suitably located. The greenway system also preserves and enhances desirable site characteristics and sets a higher standard of site and building design. Greenway planning is a relatively new concept in land development. This greenway planning ptinciple is that the environment, common open space and lineal parks become the central theme of a development rather then the typical automobile theme of suburban residential development. In Deerfield, the focus of the greenway network is wetland basin number 4 and the new park adjacent to the basin. This natural wetland open space associated with basin 4 is 16.4 acres. This wetland area will be expanded and enhanced from 16.6 acres to 26.9 acres by ponds, and a new 10.3-acre public "upland" park. This 27-acre park forms the central "Green Node" of the Deerfield greenway system. It is connected by a lineal trail park to the Pond Athletic Complex and it is connected easterly by the Greenway network to a protected wood land area and then in a semi circle back to the primary north south greenway network. From here the greenway goes southwesterly to second large Green wetland node which focuses on wetland basins 1 and 8. A private home association park is planned as part of the north south greenway. Two community areas with gazebos are also planned in this area. Example ofGreenw~ ,.... Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 11 I I The lineal greenway network allows us to create exceptional residential environments with the following characteristics: . Open space and wood land vistas for a large number of homes, . Lineal wild life habitat is preserved and enhanced for wild life to dwell in and to travel along, . Buffered wetlands with natural buffers 30ft. to 120 ft. wide, . Over 18,200 lineal feet of parks and private open space, . Preservation of natural vegetation to filter storm water, . Creation of a new north to south waterway that will meander within the north south greenway, . The Greenway system encourages social interaction and presents opportunities for neighbors to meet casually and to get to know each other a little better, . The wildlife and foliage offer opportunity for more outdoor strolls and places to interact socially and to interact and enjoy nature with nature, . Multi- dimensional out door life activities from walks to wildlife observations, to places close to home for exercise. . An opportunity for people to enjoy the out doors and the park system in a safe vehicle free greenway environment. . Vehicle approaches, which reflect the tree and wetland environment. Vehicle access is through tree lined street design to meander between the wetland areas. Homes Nestled into the greenway environment, we have planned a variety of housing types each designed to create an inter-generational heterogeneous community. These higher standards, attractively designed new technology homes include: . There will be 78 single family detached homes in a single-family detached neighborhood. This new single family neighborhood is an extension of the existing single family detached neighborhood. A sidewalk system connects the neighborhood to the greenway trails. The primary difference between the new Deerfield part of this neighborhood and the existing neighborhood is that our new homes will have a value of from $200,000 to $300,000 compared to the existing neighborhood homes valued of from $150,000 to $190,000. Another difference is that our homes are built to a higher standard category one construction. . Most ofthe homes have scenic views of wetlands; open space or woodlands and are serviced by an efficient street system designed to limit through traffic. The homes are designed to capture the upper income market. In Deerfield, this is accomplished by extra features and also by the use of new building and construction technologies. These new technologies include: . Heating and ventilating systems, which use temperate air, saves energy and improves, air quality. . Low 'E' argon filled windows which are highly energy efficient and reduce harmful sun radiation. . A monolithic pored wall foundation, which reduces moisture penetration and typical foundation imperfections. Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 12 I I .... ,.....----1"-' ,..-,-,..---....,.. 'T-..------- ..--,,--- ...."-.-.., . A foundation system with foil face ridged insulation which lasts longer . Extra thick vinyl siding . Engineered trusses which are typical but these trusses have raised energy heels which allow more effective insulation . Cluster home separation walls, which use the standard technics and add 'RC' channel as innovation in residential sound attenuation. . Maintenance free fencing The following represents the D.R. Horton home. This upper bracket home which comes in numerous variations will dominate the single family detached neighborhood. Exam les of the typical D.R. Horton Homes Minnesota ...... Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 13 1111 We are proposing 46 twin cluster homes. These one-story homes which sell for $190,000 to $250,000 are designed to be attractive to upper middle income retired families and empty nester families. The neighborhood of twin cluster homes is nestled into a peninsula between wetlands, yet offering natural buffers to the wetlands. The neighborhood is designed to be on very quiet on cul-de-sac streets. The individual homes are sited to respect individual privacy. The private street in this neighborhood provides a more creative and efficient use of the land. The design also moves the dominance from the automobile to the greenway focus preserving more ofthe sites natural characteristic. These larger homes feature a vaulted owner's suite. The second bedroom with attached bath can double as a den. The vaulted living room with fireplace opens to an optional 4- season porch. The dining room is located adjacent to the modem kitchen. The open design architecture creates a feeling of larger space. The lower level is reserved for grand children or for family gatherings. This level features a family room and two additional guest bedroom, which can double as a sewing room or hobby room and a bath. Another design innovation is the entryways, which enhance privacy. The Home Owners' Association maintains each lot and building exterior as well as the common area. All the PUD common areas and the individual lots are mechanically irrigated. Exam Ie of D.R. Horton Minnesota Twin Cluster Home Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 14 11 ,I ,-- ,..... . There are 222 three and four unit cluster coach homes in this greenway community. Like the twin home, these single story homes are popular among empty nester and retired families. The homes will be priced in the $140,000 to $190,000 range. The cluster coach home neighborhood is creatively laid out on curvilinear streets with open space scenic views for most of the homes. Again, the homes are designed and sited to maximize privacy and yet provide a sense of neighborhood. In addition to the new technologies used in all n.R. Horton homes, these homes feature an owner's suite and a second bedroom and bath. The attractive living room opens onto an optional four season porch. The dinning room is arrange for entertaining and is convenient to the modern kitchen. All homes have 2 car garages with extra storage. The exteriors are easy maintenance siding, attractive large windows and entry porch. Each lot is attractively landscaped and the homeowners association maintains exterior and common areas. .- Exam Ie of a D.R. Horton Minnesota Cluster Coach Home Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page J 5 '" . Immediately east of the upper bracket single family detached neighborhood, there are 194 Villa Cluster homes consisting of 4, 6, 8 and 10 dwelling unit buildings. The Villa Cluster Home is one of DR Horton's most popular homes. These homes sell for $105,000 to about $130,000. The homes are two stories with double and single car garages. This home is an example of using new construction technology to provide maintenance free living to a large upwardly mobile population. The Villa Cluster home owner profile consist of a professional married couple or professional single people who enjoy the outdoors and are attracted to the small town atmosphere for which Prior Lake is known. These are generally people who are coming from rural Minnesota and Iowa and from the area near Prior Lake. They are familiar and seek out the quality of small town living. They are financially independent people who work within an easy commute of their home. This neighborhood of Villa Cluster Homes is innovatively designed to preserve the natural character of the neighborhood. For example the smaller 4 and 6 unit buildings are adjacent to Fish Point Road and the larger 8 and 10 unit buildings are in the southeast part ofthe site. This arrangement reduces the scale of the neighborhood. Like all of the neighborhoods this one is part of the natural greenway and is attractively landscaped to extend the greenway concept to the private yard. The clustering ofthese homes and the use of the PUD private streets preserves more significant woodland and creates more open space than would be possible in a typical subdivision. These homes feature a modern kitchen, 2 bedrooms, 11/2 baths and a den off the owner's suite. The vaulted living room has an optional fIreplace and dinning room opens to a patio. Like all of the cluster homes the exteriors and grounds are maintained by the homeowners association. Example of D.R. Horton Minnesota Villa Cluster Home \-- The PUD community is designed so attractive homes of various densities in a unified environment are clustered close to each other. This close relationship is possible for the following reasons: . Each area is in a separate neighborhood with its own neighborhood identity, Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page J 6 ~. .... . Each home is attractively designed and has a similar market value, · Open space or Fish Point Road separates each neighborhood, which is a natural division between neighborhoods. . Each neighborhood is linked through the greenway system. The creation ofa community with a variety of home styles actually improves the attractiveness ofthe entire area and the value of all the homes in the area. This improved value will also benefit the surrounding neighborhood. Street System To service the homes, we are proposing a system of curvilinear streets winding through the neighborhoods. Because of the greenway theme, we have decided to reduce the density of this PUD and limit the number of driveways and streets to service the homes. To create more open space, we are proposing a series of private streets with only a few public streets. Like the public streets, the private streets will be designed to City Standards. The public streets will have sidewalks on one side and the public Fish Point Road will have a side - walk on one side and a trail on the other side. The streets are designed in a curvilinear fashion to reduce the building scale and make the neighborhoods more attractive. This improved design style also creates more attractive individual homes from the curb. Better curb appeal will enable us to price the homes higher and will help maintain long term homeowner value. To create quieter residential private streets, we have reduced the speed limits to 25 MPH and designed the private streets appropriately. The private easement will provide access to the property northeast of the PUD. This property will be able to a limited amount of the private street system to gain access to Fish Point Road. Fish Point Road, the north south collector street is designed to create a feeling of moving along a rural road. This is accomplished by maintaining and creating passive open spaces and ponds adjacent to Fish Point Road. The road also meanders through the PUD, is tree lined, and has limited access, all to improve the open space rural feeling. This limited access road is complementary to the greenway system and complementing the open space feeling. Fish Point Road is proposed to have a 80-foot R-O-W The system of local and private streets lead to Fish Point Road, which is a collector street. This Collector Street runs north to County Road 23 and will eventually run south to Mushtown Road. County Road 23 is a Minor Arterial. By using this system of local to collector to arterial streets, we minimize the traffic in residential neighborhoods. Also, at the request of the City we have made a local street connection to Wilderness Trail. We are proposing to locate the lowest density part of the PUD on this extension to Wilderness Trail. This will blend with the existing neighborhood and minimize the affect of this connection to Wilderness Trail on the existing neighborhood. We estimate that 17 to 20 of the single family detached home owners will use this Wilderness Trail connection rather than proceed directly to the collector street, Fish point Road. Based on the information from the traffic engineer this means that 20 additional vehicle trips will use this connection during the peck traffic period. Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 17 'T I m .-.,--1"-.----'--' --......--......--,.. ......-,...-,--..---.--, r Building Profile Attached are a series of pamphlets describing the homes that will be built in this PUD Signage Monument entrance structures will be constructed where Fish Point Road enters the PUD from the north and from the south. These (2 by 6 by 4 foot high) monuments are appropriately setback from the right-of-ways (50 foot triangle). The monuments are made of stone and brick construction with landscaping around the base. In addition to the PUD community entrance monuments, a pillar and fence type monument sign will designate each neighborhood. Again these entrance signs will be set back from the R-O-W with a 50 foot triangle. These neighborhood entrance features are 4 feet high and have at most 25% opacity. City street signs will be placed as required by city standard on both public and private streets. Typical Community entrance monument Typical neighborhood entrance feature Request for PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 18 . . ,..... Lighting Public streetlights will be provided in conjunction with the private and public street locations. The on-site lighting will consist of high quality "carriage" type lighting. The lighting will be designed to city standards to create a safe yet residentially tranquil environment. Lighting on the homes will be "can" type lighting directing the light to the deck and ensuring that glare does not spill onto the adjoining residences or the greenway. The followin is an exam Ie of the ro sed ublic and private street lighting. ,..... THE SITE Surroundine: Land Use The PUD is bordered to the north by Waterfront Passage Industrial Park. This industrial park along with the proposed park to the east offers special design consideration. To over~ come these problems the new homes will be screened from the industrial parks with heavy tree cover (buffer yard). Waterfront Passage Industrial Park is zoned I-I Northwest of the PUD is a single-family R-1 zoned neighborhood. The single family detached part of the Deerfield PUD extends to this existing neighborhood. Else where along the northern fringe there are 27 acres of wetlands and new park land between the existing single family neighborhood and the PUD. Because we are sensitive of not only retaining open space vista from our homes but also from our neighbors homes, we have designed the various PUD neighborhoods so that vistas are maintained and privacy is respected for all homes, our neighbors and ours. The following pictures illustrate the view, which would be seen from the existing neighborhood after development of the PUD: Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 19 11 I ,-. ~xisting View from back yard of Crimson Court ,..... Existing View from Wilderness Trail Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 20 11 :1 ,.- View after development from Wilderness Trail Ponds Athletic Fields border the PUD to the west. This City Athletic field is well screened by mature trees. The area south of the Deerfield PUD is in Spring Lake Township and out side of the existing MUSA. The proposed PUD is close to Mushtown Road. Fish Point Road is proposed to be extended through the PUD to its southern edge and eventually south to Mushtown Road once this southern area becomes part of the City ,.-- Zoning The property is currently zoned R-1 single family low-density residential and R-2 medium- density residential. This proposed development complies with the regulations set forth in those zoning districts. The R-1 zoning allows residential development of single family and cluster housing. Densities in the R-l zoning district would normally be 3.6 dwelling units per acre and 3.96 dwelling units per acre in a PUD. We are proposing a density of2.7 homes per acre in this zone, which is substantially less than, what is allowed in this R-1 zoning district. Allowed densities in the R-2 zoning district would normally be 7.2 dwelling units per acre and with a PUD 7.92 dwelling units per acre. The allowed land uses in the R-2 zoning district are single family dwellings and cluster homes. The proposed density for the R-2 district is 6.1 dwelling units per acre. Comprehensive Land Use Plan The property is guided for low to medium density residential. The density allowed in the Comprehensive Plan is up to 10 units per acre. The proposed PUD density of 4.1 units per acre, which is less than, that guided in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The area north of the proposed PUD is guided industrial, low density residential and commercial. The area east of the site is guided industrial. The area south in Spring Lake Township is guided residential and west of the site is guided park. The PUD satisfies a number of Comprehensive Plan Goals and Objectives. These are: . Maintain a choice of and encourage development of quality residential environments. Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 21 11 r T . Maintain a variety of residential densities. · Provide traffic and pedestrian circulation with and between developments. Existing Site Conditions Topographically this site is rather flat and open. An exception is the tree-covered knoll in the northeast part of the site, which raises to an elevation 968 feet above sea level. The site varies in elevation from 940 feet in the south east to 960 feet in the central and northwest area to the tree knoll at 968 feet. Clearly most of the site is open cropland. The site is d' 'd d . h ti 11 IVl e mto t e o owmg; ve~ etatIon areas: Type Area Percentage Wetlands 32.03 Acres 19.40% Crop Lands 83.5 Acres 50.60% Significant Trees 15.40 Acres 9.34% Pasturelbrush 34.10 Acres 20.66% Total 165.03 Acres 100% Tree Preservation and Replacement Kunde Co. Inc. inventoried the trees in August 1998. The following chart identifies . be d and replacement trees. varIOUS eXlstmg trees to remove Existing Tree Type Number of Existing Significant Trees Ash, green 284 Basswood 185 Eastern redceda 8 Hackberry 9 Hawthorn 1 Hickory, bitternut 131 Ironwood 99 Maple, sugar 187 Oak, bur 7 Oak, red 18 Pine, red 26 Spruce, white 3 Total 958 Request for PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 22 .. I -,-,,-- ---, '-------r---------.,....'..'l""'" .,---. .,--,.,.-..,-..,...".'" ,-.. T p f R I t dL d ree reserva Ion, eplacemen an an scapm,r Tree Preservation & Trees in Caliper Percentage Trees Replacement Inches Existin~ Trees 9787..5 100% Removal for Road and 1643.0 16.8% Utilities Removal for 2939.0 30.0% Driveways Pads etc. Replacement 505.0 101 Required Plantin~s Single Family 2 per du + 16 side 188 street Twin Home 2 per du 92 Multi Family 417 Total 798 Buffer Yards The city ordinance requires a buffer yard between the residential development and the industrial land uses. This buffer yard which is required to be 30 feet wide must be extensively landscaped. There are three proposed buffer yards. Two required by the City and one provided to buffer the villa cluster homes from Fish Point Road. Of the two required by the City, one is on the northeast part of the site and the other on the east part of the site. The following table describes that buffer yard. Buffer Yards Calculation Trees and Shrubs . North east 930 Lineal Feet . Canopy Trees 1.8 x 9.3 17 . Under Story Trees 3.6 x9.3 33 . Shrubs 5.4 x 9.3 50 . East 1,775 Lineal Feet . Canopy Trees 1.8 x 17.75 32 . Under Story Trees 3.6 x 17.75 64 . Shrubs 5.4 x 17.75 96 . Fish Point Road . Canopy Trees 13 . Under Story Trees . Shrubs 4 In addition to the vegetation along the Fish Point Road Buffer Yard berms are being used to create a buffer. This buffer also has been done to mitigate a neighborhood concern. I See landscape plan Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 23 lf T .---.---T......---..----'..'. 'T , --,.."..-.--,--.- -'1-----'-.----'-.--- Soils American Engineering Testing, Inc. completed soil borings in 1994. These soil borings indicate that; "A surficial layer of organic soil was encountered in the borings. Very soft to soft inorganic soils were encountered below the organic soils in many ofthe borings. These soils are underlain by firmer denser alluvial and till soils". The soils are suitable for building. Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 24 Wetlands There are 32.03 wetland acres identified within the PUD. Patricia Arling delineated these wet lands in October1997. Ms. ArOOg is a civil engineer trained to complete wetland delineations. The wetland delineation has been approved by the City. These 9 wetlands are shown on sheet 8 and consist ofthe followin~: . Wetland # I is a large basin, which is mostly shown on the DNR map as protected water # 188w. This is a type 3 wetland. The water in this wetland has an elevation of 950.8 feet. . Wetland # 2 is a basin located at the south edge ofthe property. Trees surround the wetland. This is a type 7 wetland. . Wetland #3 is small basin located at the southwest corner of the property. This is a type 3 wetland . Wetland #4 is a protected water (1 87w). There are two large open areas of water in this basin. This is a type 4 wetland. . Wetland #5 is a type 2 wetland not designated on the National Wetland Inventory map. Field investigations confirmed the presents of this wetland in the northwest portion of the parcel. . Wetland # 6, a type 3 wetland is located in the southwestern portion ofthe property. . Wetland # 7 is a type 6 wetland located on the eastern edge of the site. . Wetland #8 is a larger figure 8 shaped wetland adjacent to wetland # 1. This type 3 basin is located in the south part of the property. . Wetland #9 is attached to wetland #8. This type 3 wetland is located in the southern part of the property. The proposed development impacts 1.01 wetland acres. We plan to provide 1.01 acres of newly created wetlands for mitigation and we are requesting a wetland mitigation credit (75%) for another 1.01 acres of water sedimentation ponds. This would provide a 2:1 replacement of the impacted wetland as required by the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). U sing stricter site design standards than are required by the City Ordinance, we will help maintain healthier wetlands. The stricter site design standards include: . natural buffers adjacent to wetlands, . additional set backs - up to 120 feet rather then the required 30 foot set back . using board walks to cross small portions wetlands rather than fill the wet land for trails . maintaining water levels in the north wetlands . retaining the wetlands in common ownership of all the homeowners so that their beauty and benefit can be enjoyed by the community rather then a few property owners as would be the case in a typical subdivision. This will also protect the wetlands from future filling by individual homeowners. . dedicating most of wet land basin number one to the City to be part ofa new nature park with park facilities on the up land area and a nature trail around the wetland. Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 25 IT I ,-,-.-- ,-- --'---r------.--.. ',.--' "..-.. Shoreland The northwest portion of the PUD lies within the Blind Lake Shoreland Overlay Zoning District. This Overlay district extends 1000 feet from the shore of Blind Lake. Not any of the proposed lots are riparian (adjacent to the lake). Impervious surfaces oflots within the Shore land District can not exceed 30%. Using the PUD, we have instituted a stricter standard then that required by the City. The lots within the Shore land district will not exceed 24% impervious surface Public Utilities Sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer will service the proposed PUD. All new infrastructure has been designed to City Standards. The watermain is looped to provide uninterrupted fire protection and service. Both sanitary sewer service and water is oversized to provide service to the area south of the proposed PUD should it be needed in the future. A lift station is proposed in the south central area of the PUD. The storm water design is arranged in such a way as to provide a southeast outlet out of the major wetland basin # 4. This arrangement which has tentative approval from the Watershed and DNR helps solve the storm water problem associated with Markely Lake. This means that the primary flow of storm water will go southeast from the site to the Credit River. There are several NURP (National Urban Run Off Program) ponds proposed for the site and a number of holding ponds. The NURP ponds will clean the water before this storm water enters the retention basins or wetland. Because of the sensitive nature of this site and the need to protect the natural amenities we are proposing a number of means to control storm water run off during and after construction. These include such measures as: 1. Temporary sedimentation ponds, 2. Silt fencing and silt blankets, 3. Rock constriction entrances, 4. Use ofMPCA "Best Management practices" 5. Use ofNPDES standards Legal Instruments Home Owners Association The legal documents to be created for this development consist of: 1. Restrictive covenants in accord with state law and city ordinances including: A. Land Use B. Drainage C. Wetland preservation, wetland setback and natural buffer areas D. Landscaping and bufferyards E. Tree Preservation F. Flood Plain uses G. Parking and Storage of Vehicles H. Maintenance and repair including a capital replacement fund I. Garbage storage and pickup 1. Lawn irrigation and lawn maintenance. Request for PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 26 '-'------r'--.''-..-'-------r"'.----"--',.,'-.----'--'-' ,....."~'------T 2. Easements to the City and public utility companies for utilities and in case of the city drainage, such easements will allow the city to have access to the drainage area for maintenance. 3. Public street dedication allowing construction. reconstruction, maintenance ofthe stormwater system, sanitary sewer system, and water system. 4. Land dedicated for trail and park purposes 5. Easements for monument signs and fences requiring maintenance by all homeowners. 6. Other documents as may be required by the City. The single family attached homes; twin homes, coach homes and villas will belong to a homeowners association. Articles will govern the homeowners Association, By laws, Rules and Regulations. This association will be responsible for maintenance and repair. The Association also acts as a way to bring the homeowners closer together. The private greenway, the private streets, the exteriors of the homes yards and irrigation system will all be the responsibility of the homeowners association. The association will also be responsible to lawn care, the lawn sprinkling system and a number of other maintenance items. Environmental Assessment A Phase I Assessment has been completed. The City of Prior Lake has completed an independent Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W). The City contracted with WSB & Associates, Inc to complete the EA W. The EA W fmdings are as follows: 1. It is anticipated that 1.01 acres of wetlands will be filled. However, these impacts will be mitigated through wetland creation and buffer establishment on site. 2. Impacts to storm water quality will be mitigated through pretreatment prior to discharge into downstream water bodies. Storm water quantity is anticipated to be impacted by this development. Storm water diversion over part of the development area will reduce further impacts to the area currently experiencing flooding problems. Also, the discharge rate will not exceed the existing discharge rate. Therefore, impacts associated with storm water will be adequately mitigated. 3. This development is anticipated to increase domestic water use and wastewater discharge for the area. The public water supply system and wastewater treatment facility have been designed to accommodate the added demand. 4. Traffic is anticipated to increase but not to significantly impact the level of service of the surrounding roadways. However, by the year 2020 a right turns lane should be added to County Road 21 at Fish Point Road. Request for PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfie/d Page 27 11 I ----'------r-.---" '---,.,-.--'-'--'T- ".--". -,'""...... ,. ,-.."..... ,- ....----....-,---,-- 1 Site Development Data pun AREA Total Area Net Area* Wetlands Public Parks and Trails Total Homes PUD Density: Gross density Net density* * PUD area Zoned R-l Total Area Net Area Wet Land Total Homes R-l Density: Gross density Net density** PUD area Zoned R-2 Total Area Net Area Wet Land Total Homes R-2 Density: Gross density Net density** 165.03 Acres 13 3 Acres 32.03 Acres 10.3 Acres 540 Homes 3.3 Homes per Acre 4.1 Homes per Acre 109.93 Acres 79.54 Acres 29.98 Acres 216 Homes 1.96 Homes per Acre 2.72 Homes per Acre 55.10 Acres 53.05 Acres 2.05 Acres 324 Homes 5.88 Homes per Acre 6.11 Homes per Acre Housing Mix Single Family Detached Twin and Coach Cluster Attached Villa Clusters Total Building Heights Single Family Detached Twin and Coach Attached Clusters Villa Clusters 78 Homes 268 Homes 194 Homes 540 Homes 25 feet 18 feet 24 feet Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 28 --".-."...----y--------'....'. ') Useable Open Space Cluster Twin Homes Cluster Coach Homes Villa Clusters Lot Sizes and Dimensions Single Family Detached Average Lot Area Minimum Interior Lot Area Minimum Corner Lot Area Average Corner Lot Area Minimum lot frontage single family detached 7,082 SF per home 2,556 SF per home 2,023 SF per home 14,840 SF 12,000 SF 14,000 SF 18,000 SF 86 ft. Set backs and yards: Detached single family is measured from R-O- Wand lot line Attached single family from private road and building line Minimum front and rear yards 25 ft. Minimum side yard lOft. or greater Minimum sides yard Villa Cluster Homes ~ the sum of the height of the adjoining buildings 30 ft. to 120 ft. 25 ft Minimum to wetland range Minimum rear yard Building sizes: Villa Cluster Home: 4 unit 6 unit 8 unit 10 unit Coach Cluster Home: 3 unit 4 unit Twin Cluster Home Single Family Detached 4352 SF 6749 SF 9040 SF 11315 SF 6530 SF 8870 SF 4752 SF 2000 SF Request for PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 29 ,-,,-,-,,--- _._-y----'-----', " " Ground Area, Floor Area and Ratios Style Home Lot Area Building Ground Floor Area Floor Ground Area Area Area Ratio Ratio Single 156,000 SF 234,000 SF Family detached Cluster Twin 110,290 SF 110,290 SF Cluster 501,882 SF 501.882 SF Coach Villa Cluster 217,169 SF 357,012 SF Total PUD 7,188,707 SF 985,341 SF 13.7% 1,203,184 SF 16.7% Impervious surface Total Ground Area Buildings Total Ground Area drives sidewalks and patios Total Impervious Surface 985,341 SF 700,000 SF 1,685,341 SF 23.4 % Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfie/d Page 30 iT I Parking Although the homes in the PUD far exceed the requirements for off street parking, the Code does not recognize tandem parking spaces. These tandem spaces (one parking space behind another parking space) are usable parking spaces. The following information shows only those recognized by the City Code. Parkin Single Family 156 Spaces 388 Spaces Ratio 2 spaces er home Ratio 2 spaces r home Ratio 2 spaces er home Cluster Coach Homes Villa Cluster Homes 444 Spaces Streets Street Names Fish Point Road Wilderness Trail Maple Curve Deerfield Drive Marsh Field Lane Red Oak Lane Parklawn Lane Oak Point Lane Street A Street B Street C Cul-de-sac Street Width 44 feet 32 feet 32 feet 32 feet 32 feet 32 feet 32 feet 32 feet 28 feet 28 feet 28 feet 46 foot Radius ROW Width 80 feet 60 feet Private Private Private 60 feet 60 feet Private Private Private Private 60 foot Radius. All private streets are in out lots and have 9 foot drainage and utility easements on both sides Phasing See phasing plan attached Requestfor PUD and Preliminary Plat January 2000 Deerfield Page 31 iT I '---..'....----y--------..- -......-1-'..'..-----..- H_'_____,_,_______ D.R.HORIDN@ The Companies that comprise the D. R. Horton family of Builders are dedicated to building quality crafted, distinctive homes across the United States, This family of Builders has developed a reputation for high quality homes with features and amenities other Builders often consider options or upgrades, The flexible home designs, attention to detail and affordable pricing are what makes D. R. Horton Homes a National leader in the residential home building industry, D. R, Horton's detached, single - family homes are priced from $80,000 to over $750,000, The Company has differentiated itself in the industry through its pursuit of quality and its unique ability to offer to its customers the features and amenities they look for in a new home. Home designs are created by award winning architects to appeal to the tastes and desires of the local community, By taking advantage of its National purchasing power by building thousands of homes each year, the Companies of D. R. Horton often are able to offer exclusive features to each homebuyer at an affordable price. Courteous customer service is another characteristic which makes buying a new home from D. R. Horton a smart decision, D, R. Horton and its staff of professionals are dedicated to prompt, polite response to homebuyers' requirements and needs. This philosophy has resulted in a reputation that leads to significant repeat and referral business, A Familv Business D, R. Horton was founded as a family business, and it is this spirit that prevails among all the dedicated professionals as they come together to ensure the success and the stability of your investment. The cooperation of sales, construction, warranty, development and office staff is proof that the family spirit is alive and growing at D, R. Horton Homes. The Builders that comprise the D, R. Horton family are: Arappco Homes, Continental Homes, Dobson Builders, Inc" Joe Miller Homes, Mareli Construction, Milburn Homes, Regency Homes, RMP Properties, SGS Communities, Torrey Homes and Trimark Homes, Diversifying Into Top Markets Donald R, Horton began his own construction business in 1978 in the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex. In 1987 D. R. Horton began expanding the operations by seeking out the Nation's most active homebuilding markets, It is with this desire to diversify that the Company now has over 50 Divisions operating over 400 communities, located in 23 states across the United States, Additionally, D, R, Horton Homes provides mortgage and title insurance services in many of its markets. Financial Stability Traded on the New York Stock Exchange (DHl), D, R. Horton's financial performance has been outstanding thereby placing the Company as one of the industry leaders in revenue and earnings growth, By offering a piece of the "American Dream", D. R. Horton Homes has grown to over 2,000 stockholders and $500 million in stockholders' equity which emphasizes the financial commitment and stability D, R. Horton Homes provides its homebuyers. 6/98 OCopyright 1998 ~ 190 I Ascension Blvd" Suite 100, Arlington, Texas 76006 . Phone: (817) 856-8200 Fax: (817) 856-8249 . www,drhorton,com 0601-9tt (t19) :tINOHJ 7tIUOW S'3WOH WO.J.Sll:) .NOIHOH.U.O ""- ~ ,,),:' ,>';.,,: .. . .......,j;......",', >". \ lJ"Ud lJa'Mpeq~ }O sawoLjuMOl aLjl @ SJW 8J PJJIUIJ.wn:I5 IOU mq JtqV!lJ.l pJUJJJp UO!IDUJ.lOjuI LS9S000(Yl# ~SIWn SJ:lprrna Ie^otu~~ ~lse.M . s~lI!pnna pue SlU~WaAOJdUIJ 1!llU~w~:)eld~'}I JOJ S~AJ~S~~ . st?~.lV UOWUlO;) UO ~oueJnsU[ . J~M~S 1!l J~lB.M B~JY UOWWO;) . rB^Otu~'}I MOUS . ~Ul?U~llI!BW spunO.ID . l~r}{U!Jds tLWB'I . ~Otmu~llJ!t?W ,(BM~^~.I(J 1!l pBO'}I . ~:)Ul?U~llI!BW ~dB:)SPtrn'J pUB ~.rn;) lIM.B'J . ~lI!Plfl1a JO ~:)UBU~lUp:'1W lO!-I~lxa . o!-Ip~r3 B~IY UOUlWO,:) . Suo!Jaunj .aueu.,ufuW uO!JU!aossV a.UM.OOlUoH S.....O.._O... 'l(oIud 'l("r-P....:l S3WOH V'tIO.LSro .NOIHOH.U.O .IIIA..... .11... '0"" }fJed a' }f:J!MpeLfJ fi )> .i ~ ~ .'.AIIS {J, c;; , 8fIIAS.'.1 ~ 91 'PH '0:> ~ ~ .....,. -l-" uOlh'''OOII ~ ~ \IIdJ!v I.llIIJIIIi.~ plIO IIlI*IIr J'''' If ~ (ii )'6' I!l!DlolIlllPJ Of -l- 691'~ THE BAYPORT THE GLENDALE OPTIONAL 4-SEASON PORCH 12 x 12 OPTIONAL 4-SEASON PORCH 12 X 12 Rendering and floor plans are artist's concept and may depict options not Included In the base price and may vary In detail from the actual plans and specifications. In order to Improve value to our customers, D. R. Horton Homes reserves the right to modify product, specifications and prices without prior notice. Floor plan dimensions are approximate. Interior Highlights White Six Panel Interior Doors Princeton Oak Trim and Base Decorator Lighting Package Ceiling Lights in Bedrooms Wired for Phone and Cable TV (2 outlets each) White Wire Closet Shelving Spacious Walk-in Closet (per plan) White Switches, Outlets and Cover Plates Exterior Highlights Architecturally Designed Exteriors Two Car Garage Premium Grade Maintenance Free Vinyl Siding Maintenance Free Vinyl Windows Maintenance Free Soffits & Facia Raised Panel Steel Garage Door Decorative Insulated Front Door Dead Bolts on all Exterior Swing Doors Designer Landscape Package with Sodded Yard Underground Lawn Sprinklers Concrete Stoop & Sidewalk Asphalt Driveway Sheetrocked Garage Exterior Electrical Outlet Exterior Water Faucet in the Garage Premium Grade 25 Year Roofmg - - Exclusive Features Gourmet Kitchen Appliance Package: Electric Range, Range Hood, Dishwasher, and Disposal Oak Cabinetry Easy to Clean Cabinet Interior and Shelves Stainless Steel Sink Single-Level Faucet with Sprayer Custom Laminate Countertops Vinyl Flooring Ice Maker Water Line (rough-in) Energy Features Central Air Rough-In 80% High Efficiency Gas Furnace , Energy Efficient 40 Gallon Water Heater Decorative Insulated Front Door R-44 Value Ceiling Areas (R-38 Vaulted Area) 2 x 6 Exterior Walls Raised Heel Energy Roof Trusses Water Saving Toilets Mechanical/Eleetrical Underground Utilities Anti-Scald Shower Faucet 100 Amp Electrical Service Garage Door Opener Outlet GFI Outlet in Garage Smoke Detectors 10 Year R.W.C. Home Owners' Warranty n.R.HORmNe - - ~9L9-~OL (t99) aUOL/d lapow - S3VVOH VVOLSfO .NOIHOH.U.U , ~ aJJp!lI A....enb )0 sawoLjuMo 1 aLji UD.JL U 1m, " !lo.J I Ip UC, .oJUJ (!) nw fI] N'lI.l\I)(,\W';lf\ii.tnna '~'" 'i. . "'.~ , p" I~AOlli~lI ~lS~ M. SlU~lli~AOldUIJ 7fllU~lli~~~Id~lI lOJ S~Al~S~lI l~M~S 7fll~l~ M. ~~lV UOlillUO;) ~~U~U~lU!~W spunOlQ ~~trnU~lU!~W A~M~A!la tfl p~OlI '3ll!PI!ns: JO ~~trnU~lU!~W lO!l~lX3: . ~~trnmsUJ Pl~Z~H S~~lV UOlillUO;) uo ~~trnmsUJ I~AOlli~lI MOUS l~I){u!ldS UM~l ~~U~U~lll!~W ~d~~spu~l pu~ ~l~;) UM~l ~!lP~I3: ~~lV UOlillUO;) . . . . . LS9S0000Z # :lSU;r.)!1 S,J:lpll"g . . S3VVOH VVOJ.SfD . . .NOIHOH.U.U . . suoH;>un.... ~;>ullu~lu!l~W uOHlIpossV .1~UMO~lliOH samoquMO ~ ajplU A:....enb ~ 3: ~ ~ Z 1.1.I ~ CIlI: 1.1.I I- ~ THE NOKOMIS PATIO DINING T he spacious "Nokomis" features 2 bedrooms, 1 1/2 baths, sitting room off owners suite, vaulted liv- ing room. Attached two car garage, full sized patio and owners walk in closet. All appliances including central air, washer & dryer too. Come and enjoy the maintenance free living in Woodburys most conven- ient location. r -, I r-' I VAULTED I I I UV1NG ROOM I -- I I '- ..J OPT. GAS FIDEPLACE 2-CAR GARAGE LOFT BEDROOM BEDROOM OWNER'S BEDROOM OWNER'S SITTING AREA BEDROOM STANDARD 2ND FLOOR OPTIONAL 2ND FLOOR - THE MINNETONKA The "Minnetonka" features two bedrooms and 1 1/2 large baths. Great sized kitchen with and "L" shaped snack bar. It also features oversized windows through out. Each bedroom has a walk-in closet. All ap- pliacnes including washer & dryer. One car garage. OPTIONAL GAS FIREPLACe UVlNG ROOM GARAGE PATIO MYAC'Y FENCE BEDROOM BEDROOM OWNERS' BEDROOM OWNERS' BEDROOM STANDARD 2ND FLOOR OPTIONAL 2ND FLOOR Rendering and floor plans are artist's concept and may depict options not included in the base price and mar vary in detail from the actual plans and specifications. In order to improve value to our customers, Joe Miller Homes reserves the right to modify product, specifications and prices without prior notice. Floor plan dimensions are approximate. Exclusive Features Interior Highlights White Six Panel Interior Doors Princeton Oak Trim and Base First Floor Powder Room Stain Release Carpet Decorator Lighting Package Ceiling Lights in Bedrooms Wired for Phone and Cable TV (2 outlets each) White Wire Closet Shelving Spacious Walk-in Closet (per plan) Washer and Dryer White Switches, Outlets and Cover Plates Exterior Highlights Architecturally Designed Exteriors with Brick Front (as shown) One and Two Car Garage Premium Grade Maintenance Free Vinyl Siding Maintenance Free Vinyl Windows with Inner Grids Maintenance Free Soffits & Facia Raised Panel Steel Garage Door Decorative Insulated Front Door with Gridded Light Dead Bolts on all Exterior Swing Doors Designer Landscape Package with Sodded Yard Underground Lawn Sprinklers (Through H.O.A.) Concrete Stoop & Sidewalk Asphalt Driveway Sheetrocked Garage Concrete Patio (Size Per Plan) Exterior Electrical Outlet Exterior Water Faucet in the Garage Premium Grade 25 Year Roofmg Meehanieal/Eleetrieal Underground Utilities Anti-Scald Shower Faucet 100 Amp Electrical Service Garage Door Opener Outlet GFI Outlet in Garage Smoke Detectors 10 Year R.W.C. Home Owners' Warranty Gourmet Kitehen Appliance Package: Electric Range, Range Hood, Refrigerator, Dishwasher and Disposal Oak Panel Cabinetry Easy to Clean Cabinet Interior and Shelves Stainless Steel Sink Single-Level Faucet with Sprayer Custom Laminate Countertops Vinyl Flooring Ice Maker Water Line (rough-in) Energy Features Energy Efficient Central Air 80% High Efficiency Gas Furnace Energy Efficient 40 Gallon Water Heater Decorative Insulated Front Door R-44 Value Ceiling Areas R-IO Foundation Insulation (Per Plan) 2 x 6 Exterior Walls Raised Heel Energy Roof Trusses Water Saving Toilets n.R.HORIONe CUSTOM HOMES - ~ z @) '0 ID <l> i 'C >- Q.. ~ 8 -g '" ] :t * = .~ ~ !! '" = ~ -a ~ ~ ) == Q :E ~ 0 oj .~ oS ... rI . ~ ~ = > ~ Q) '" - Q ~ ~ 1- 1 ~ @II - . Q.;J ~ ~ ,S I Q.;J '" co ,S ~ 11 ~ e = 1 co I ,~ ~ 'i! i ~ I 'ji I ~ :; 1:: ~I t '" :; I .. ~, g:~ ,- 0 II ~1 ~~ ;;.. l~ jf ~ ~';! Z ~j ~t co,_ U "',l ID ~l! i'8 'O:i fie ~ e'" t] :a . ~ ~ :t -s~ = ~j ~ '0 "'co tIS .S = eJ ~co ~ < 'C,S '~'3 == "',c Q :; 0 ~s 0 .. ~ -'~ .~ ~,c ... Sg . ~ 1~ = > ~I! Q) i~ - ~ d , ~ rn I = :;j .NQ) .9 N ...... 0.. U "..= 0 ~ ..= eJ) 0.. ...... ..... Q) rn ~ I-< :C ..o..o~ ~ ~ rn N ..:: ;::;- -5 ........ I ....... Q) N ~ > "Q) ~ S S 000 08..= ~ ] >. ~ ..0 s" ~ ~ ~ [ u ~ tB > ~ 0 .C 0.. ~ 0.. rn ~ " ..... E -= ~ 8 .... Q) Q.. I-< ~ ErneJ) ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) t::.""'"l 0.. ~ eJ) I;'a o Q).S I=l >> :t:: = t:: 5 S.~ <B ~ ~ :.0 ~ : 4 Q)>:''Q ~ ..= :-::: Q) E · .BSI-<~ ~~c2tB .,; c ,9 15. <l> " c 8 ~ - . Q.;J ~ r Q.;J ~ = ~ ~I '" 'ill 'E '" !! '" ~ l '0 C oS -g '" '" <l> e o .c <l> ~ .... o '" c .g ~ 'ill 2 ~ c ia 6= S J" ~ ~ ~ [ '0 ~ ~ ~, Ii ;; Co ~ Co ~ ~ [ ~ 'f n' ~~ ~:' c., , " ",Co '"" 6=8 s.; ;;~ Iii ., a;; 3 ., :c a, o ~ 3 -. &l ~ ;; g /Ill :!'la ~ ~ ;;'Co " 3 :>,., '!g.'< _Co a.g 3 li' 8.0 -,'0 ~g. '0 " 8.~ c sa P. 6' 1.~ ",Co g 5' U' ~'O ~~. ~' ~ ~ 3 -, ., g~ c ., .;-< g. Ei" _ Co " " s g. ~' ~ :!J3 0' '2.~ ~ ., Q. - ei"'E. n <:5" ~ Iii it ~'& ., " :gSi a g ~ =. 3' g ~ !II , 5' tIlo ~~ :~ a- t:: if 1l"5l Po 0 5 ~ ~.. ~ Ii a ~~ @ L.\I I !!lie ~~~ _;IIc c~z z"') ),,'" i ~ 0 )C rn .... Z w ." ~ ~ .... ;:~ ....~ NZ ICl 0) ._--,- o "0 .... _. Q = rI.l ~ 0 )C rn .... Z w 1ft - ",::a ,..!I i;D ill4C -c C::a z" )) z ~ ",m'" ,.."'~ ~C1C .....ZlZ ~c= _CIft ClI,.. z"c ))i z ....lD Nrn )C 0 ....:0 00 10 O)S: lD ~ :J: @ ." ....:1> CDS: )C ~ .... ". :0 \0 0)0 s: ~r- -.., ~I ~I ; ;2 I .J I ~L I" .J cs -< rn :0 52 Z )C rn -I 5-1 rn .... .... )( 2 .. ~ NZ ICl 0) '" ::j (') :J: rn Z Cl :I> :0 ~ rn r :I> C Z o :0 -< lD ....rn ....0 )C :0 ....0 NO .S: s: :I> (J) o -I .... "tl rn .... -I :0 )c' lD .... ~ rn UI c !il Cj 0 o s: lD ....,rn ....0 )C :0 ....0 ....0 s: = ~=.= s:= x= ~~ Z . Ig ~ ~ ~ =- ~ ~ =- ~ ~ ~ '- I - \. , ..,. = c:::> ~I~ ~ - 6 ~] ~ ~CIl o.s SEc"O ~ =0 ~ - ~ ..... 0 C':l..... 0 :::;..... . CIl ~ ~ ~ e ~; ..e- S~ ~ ~ Q) : - >>.... ~ ;> .!:: CIl~""=-"OQ)..."O..= 8 = U = Q) Q) = = = Q) ~ .... Q)CIl'!:: ::: S ~ Vi c.. ~ N "0 ~ w S CIl..... .... Q)"= Vi Q) ~~ 0 0 Q) ~ Q) -9'EQ)--=Q)ou~~E S?:-E = ~ so"? Q)~ ~ 0 8 O=CIl ~ =U~-~"O ': ~ .~ ~ s:: 'C;; lEo"= ~ 5 ;>--c.. C':lS CIlOw '':::>>~S OCll u....u.... ~.... 8onQ)Q)0 Q) ;> 0 C':l.... = ~ ~ 0 = ~ o Vi .... 0 >>..... t-< .... t;::<..... 0 = ,"0 -= q,) J::.... = 0 "0 0 .S.... Q) rIi c.."O - CiJ ..... ~ = - ;> - ~ = ~ =.GC':l--..sQ)CIlCllO~Q) ~..="" -Q)~Q)~ ~ CIl - Q) _ E..... on ~ CIl 2:>" .... ..... ~>> _ = w ...., ~ -..oo~Q)C"onSQ)~c.. = ~ ~ ..... .5 .... = CIl ~ - Q) o _ >>__ "0 0 ..... .... ~ ..= CIl a~.... _~=o _ ~ ~..= 0 = -'C;; 0 ...... ~ ~ ~Vi = Q) ut::"O S ~ = o ' 0' Q) -8 .B Q) >. 0 Q) ..... "0 c.. _ .... - 1-.' 0 _ CIl Q) = ~ ..... Q) = E .....3 - ..= ~.G O..!od c..Q) Q) U CIl~.o ~ ..=.(;1 .....g = 4 U = Q) - =SVi..=~ ~ .... ~ .~ Q) i:1.OS~"O <Ii c: o 'a. !l c: 8 ~ '€ .. ~ ~ .~ ~ 't:l c: .!l! 't:l '" .. '" " g .c: " .; .... o '" '" .g ~ ';! :3 --- - , = = ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ t ~ -" ~'" ~~ <iN >.. ~ ~ ~ c a~ e;::; .~ ~1Il i~ - ~ 0<0 .5 Qj 8 .~ 'B E 'E~ 8.e ~ ~ i g ~ .~ -a,s ~i tl- ~ Q. ,H eO: ~.~ .~ g '" - ,51 1:'- .. ~ > 0 ..,-s i3'i -g n ~ 'c ~Q. 'c 11 Q.~ p' .0 .S! ,51i is ~l ,~ ~ :1 ,g ..i:' g.'g tl e Og. .9 ;~ e " "'-S c ~ ae 8 ~ 8 e Y :J ~ 8 '€ ::c ~ e q ]~ Q.O 8~ '" , '!2'" ;0 ifl!f j ~ ,d ~It: ~ :E ( OC\l 0.... ~ )( :c :E w.... ~ .0 al.... o$! al ~ M wC\l al.... :E 0.... 0.... a: M 0 w.... al.... :E !#lii 0 0 ::'::C1l oa: ..JO WOCO) ~d ~w .... ;:) al M ~ ffi II) I- .... C1l < :E 00 I I w (,) :coD .,< <~ elf:; '" ~~ (g W ii: (,) iE~ ~)( :E w~ 0 0 0 'Of' a: .... ~ a: w w a: > C) 0 'II.. w ~ $! ~ )( is sa ~:i;: _ 0 )( zo iSa:~ ~ o o ~ ~ Z ~ .9 ,g i ~ g 'i?j ,~ '" ~ ~ 8 Z 8~ =~ = =~ =~ . = w C) < a: < C) a: < (,) ..; U I DBB.PIBLD D LOPMENT City of PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA Submitted to: City of Prior lake 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 Revised December 1, 1999 TT7("1'n n . ~ -.T 1 lFl~ /\/\ ---,....-....,'-,...-----r..,--'-.-'-..i--'-----..".. -----,...----"------,-------.. ..-..--.. '..-..--,.. ~..~. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR DEERFIELD DEVELOPMENT AT FISH POINT ROAD SOUTH OF COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 21 PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA Submitted to: City of Prior Lake 16200 Eagle Creek Avenue Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 Prepared by: WSB & Associates, Inc. October 15, 1999 Revised December 1,1999 Deerfield Development Site Traffic Study City of Prior lake WSB Project No.1 195,00 R I r ....--....-'--r'.--....' ...---......,...., "'1" .. .., ..,~,...,...._----_...~'--,.._---_...,"-r-----_..--_ CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered professional engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Charles T. Rickart, P.E. Date: Revised December I, 1999 Reg. No. 26082 ......'$-. Deerfield Development Site Traffic Study City of Prior lake WSB Project No, 1195.00 i I --"---------r-------'--..'..'1-..--'----..-----------..-..--'-----,-- 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction 1 II. Existing Conditions 4 III. Site Traffic Characteristics 7 IV. Traffic Analysis 16 V. Conclusions and Recommendations 20 Appendix 22 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Location Map 2 Figure 2. Deerfield Development Preliminary Plat 3 Figure 3. 1995-1996 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 6 Figure 4. Site Traffic Distribution 9 Figure 5. 1999 & 2005 Site Traffic 10 Figure 6. 2020 Site Traffic 11 Figure 7. 1999,2005,2020 AM Peak Hour Volumes without Site Traffic 12 Figure 8. 1999,2005,2020 AM Peak Hour Volumes with Site Traffic 13 Figure 9. 1999,2005,2020 PM Peak Hour Volumes without Site Traffic 14 ~' -, 1999,2005,2020 PM Peak Hour Volumes with Site Traffic Figure 10. 15 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Deerfield Development Traffic Generation 7 Table 2. Level of Service Descriptions 17 Table 3. Level of Service Analysis Results 19 Deerfield Development Site Traffic Study City of Prior lake WSB Project No. 1195,00 n I '----'r'- I. INTRODUCTION The Deerfield development is proposed to be located on Fish Point Road, south of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 21 and east of Trunk Highway 13 in Prior Lake, Minnesota (Figure 1). Fish Point Road currently extends south from CSAH 21 and dead- ends at the proposed Deerfield development site. Fish Point Road will be extended through the development to its southern edge as part of the project. Access to the development will be via CSAH 21 at Fish Point Road to the north and Wilderness- Trail on the west edge of the site. Access to the Deerfield development from Mushtown Road to the south via an extension of Fish Point Road will exist in the future. The proposed development will be located on 165.03 acres and will consist of 78 single family detached units, 46 twin homes (located in 2-unit buildings), 220 Coach Homes (located in 3 or 4-unit buildings), and 288 Villas (located in 6,8, or 10-unit buildings). It is anticipated that the proposed development will occur over a period of 4 years based on the local demand for housing. The development preliminary plat is shown in Figure 2. WSB & Associates, Inc. was retained by the City of Prior Lake to prepare a traffic impact study in order to estimate the traffic generated by the proposed Deerfield development and the impact this traffic will have on traffic operations in the vicinity of the proposed development. ","' -- Deerfield Development Site Traffic Study City of Prior lake WSB Project No.1 195.00 I U I ~ ::ASANT g I 151 w > "<t ~~ 8 ~<<; I - ~NAL ~\{J ~'\) ,--1 0"1' :Ii I u... ~ ~ --l ~ v: ST. I PONDVIEW ~ TR. .) I/~ I I I TI14N R22W I \0\ ~ 6e~ 1'1'2 epj ~\e\~'" ~e~ ee( /" Ne\O\J o I 06 I I I I I " ,.. a BIRCH RD. W I w > ~ > "<t <t sIDE 0 0 l- I 0 Vl ii:: w w ii:: a l- x ii:: T114N/ ~ 1701 "6 R22WTR21W 12 1 ~ I I Project Location >- <t ii:: Proposed Future Development . WSB 350 Westwood Leke 0IIice 8<<1 Wayzata Boulevard MIMupoh. MN 55428 Traffic Impact Study Deerfield Residential Development City of Prior Lake, Minnesota WSB Project No, 1195,00 Date: December 2,1999 812-6011.??8OO & A.uocIatu.lnc, FAX 541.1100 INFRASTRUCTURE . ENGINEERS .. PlANNERS Project Location Map Figure 1 . . ..... ..... _.......\':...nl...tIt'I i I ..------.---~._,-~ ""-_"._'''~_'M """"-r' "__'u___'_...........,_~____.._..,___ ----,--..--....'--,........-."..-.."...., , lU ~ 0 -J ~ ~ I I ~ I L1J1 w 0 B I ....... WClUIIe II<1aACX ~TION .......- --..., --.. .............-......- ........... M'&.T~_....,. ....-- .-.. -.............. ......--.,........... _..... ...,.....--.:'1".......- ................... ..... ..............-..ac.....___--..M"&U .....................---.&.....--- ___..,...-c. .a~ ......___~_..._ ..._~.-..._...-c. __!>AT.... --.---....---..-................-.... ............. ........-..-&-............-- -- ........___AI4~.......__...._.-c ......-.___41.&. ...-.c...........,.... .-:t__..... .........-.,..-.........-...... ...,.......... . .......___...........-~....,.... w-.-;. -.-................... 2. .r-~~~~'l ~ \~. 'j' \/' ~! l~r------~ ~. / I Ill\ b I '" 1 : ' 1': V r---::IlII---7A 1/.1; '.,Jo. _ I L__, ~ I 21, I ~-/ - ..--,,-- l _.. , '. "All: --r' -.s.. tW.. , , ..._" ) V' ~ - ~-Jg,~'(-'V:. / \ 1 /1 -,~ - - fI T I ~,: ,.2lI"i"'~rJ~ (~_ ) ~ __~~{~ 1 1 J /' _ I ..i ~ ~ I ' ,'__, /I ',' J ", ' 1 / --3 .. -..; I I 1._ " ", -oJ j ,/ \ ,/ I --_/ '-- ..,1:; J'"~~T -II ~ ~~J , , ,/ ..... ,/ / \ 'in' 1M''' I 'f .~~ ' 24 ',"" ~ /' '1/...\ A ~~ II .J!..., L -.. I r /" ,/.....- !J - \ --=- - T - L___J (I!f:.c,~-:~ ./ '- _ _ /. ~_ '\ l ~W ('-... l !l I .....' .... \ ~ _.. '\ J' 'I: -.1 ~ rJ 't" f I I ~L._---"-' / I m ~I \ : ,',._----, --' 1 ' ./ to- - - - 1 ' ZZ \ ~ - w I ' \~ .. ~4;'~~ " ,'/ ^ ,,~. ~ ;L t. IJ -"I. .I;.,p1fr-l ' ~,._ 21 \ ,\:N ~!."'J' .. / _ ./ ,\;, _w, ~ 1 ~ m ' l ('18\~\~'~\,,':;;/\~ A 'J r.''''' ~I'~~---r;;::-'~~~ ~ , '. _'" >~''" <':11 '> ./ ~ - -- L' 11L.c""-.JILi I ' ...,'" "~~ ,_..,/" ~ 1 ( ~' ...,r.....'......!.l'"1! v(' v '\ . \/~' '\ / ,AItI( I - , :!II; I'lI-.V ~ ~ "1!::lD - , _'" > I;: <' 19 :~ ' ~ II~ .r.-H~ ~I " \ /,^, ~.\_~~" " /" I ,__ ~-_ "I ~ .." ~ ...... w! ~ <;;k I v 16' !\... ../;r . ~ 0.... ,,, , .-~. , ~ I I -..>, \.\(< 18 , /. ~--= ~ {' , ,;:.u:\~fs;.~- :\~ 4, \-:s..-7 r,,~ _____ .r"-, ~ - -" - rl ~ _J ~ ij, \5 I / ,/......~. 1.'-, /'''', ~ V'/_.. \ ,--..1 '..!.. '. :::::....... ~ ~1 ~ \?C? r, I .'. ,~"~v::;~;::;;~~ ",,~ .~ roc f-!o__,> <., ,,~;~"1r--_ __ .~, A: 6:A ~~ ,~J':::1 -.~ ~r I <. _.. > ~ ~ <. -.. /-~~~ I ,.~-' '\ v~ \ \ 1 r ~~ "h" ~ , :f' \ - ""'..... rf;jr I, 'lr......,/. ~~/'\~~',A~15)~ '.~' 11-1 ~(" 7 \\\..i..,:.J..:t~~'r--, .~ ~\"\':j!o ~~~~i.l~~E 3t.~ \:~~~E:~I t I. / .!....)~Vi;F <;. ~_ \ ~"..:'..(<.,,-"'/1-',...~ l--" ~ ~: -.. \ \ __J L__J ,.,!..../ l ".. E :l - ~' ~ 1 l.._ / ~ ,1/'\ '\ /,,^, ~.......~~..../1'J1../L' ...... \.---~"" I. l ---;:.~.t- L...../lc:.:.:-J l.~.", "')r I G'.\\.:::,.....fF~ .......-.. ~ \ ~~ ,.. _,../' ';', """,... ~(""" 'If fJ \ -, '\ ...... ~~..- ":!I/;" 2 '," , ..~(" ~\ ~',~ ~ r i: 12 ';- r,'.JJ.. '\ \ .!"/"" ~~.,j L -.', r ..Ew. \ '-i:"~ --- l.~w/ 1 7 """ ~ 40'. I L' _..: ,I/-;L-___j '.'/:14") ............ ~_J.i L.__"'-~~';' v ~~ '\ ~ r __, ;;;:::-.:::::.... "<:-.;/);/ '1/1 \I .....fi" 1 ~ \J ~' ~~ ~ · ___oJ ~r-~~ (_w" r... "'--.........~, ~-..-_' ....1' "\ 2 r-_ ............ '/11 ~ ,~' ,('" ,. r~-., 1111 -, ... "15....) - - ~~ (-"'4 \ _..." 3'" ~~,' d'.-";...r- -c-, C' .. 1 I \ J1.,\ t ~~l-.:---Jj ~,>ji.... o:w/ r~,) r- ~-I' \ _w, \ f \, \ :~ -"(ii, .....~~- vg" j' 'c:::~:::._/"' - ,( --.- \" ~ "" ",. '-"'" ~ I '_.J \.- ~ ' ...., -.., T1-~ ~ ~ ir" 3 I '-_--..J :.....;....5" 4 ... \/~ ~\:G- \L. r.~ .~{. "\~, Iii. -' ..J ~. \ r- I ..." r--, S. ' Go'- ~, ',_'" > . \ ~ L ~t: : -r~ _ ""\ ' \ \' 1 .. , -"'I' 'II \ ~ I -.. r " ( /' I. ~ 1 ~ 1 \~ -- ~ .- i ~' ~~ \" C~ - ,,lJ 1.._ : -.. ~~ L___ '.! I ...!w, i--...~... '. '~A~ ,,,- ~ ~ r'\ \\\ I- "C: · ~......,.~ ~ ~ €! :lJ~~' ~ ,~ ...__- ~L,;__ ~ /_;::.... L..____ :1 r~- ~ '-____ r 11 v" -..;: . -~.~.., .... ~ .- 1::1'\"" - .- 1 ., f.. ,...__ -_ WI 1_.' '" / '7/ ~"............. ::1 ~.., .. -. ? ~, r", \\\_.. r -- r.oJ... r~ '1 \ .,,_-., A '/ . ~ t:; t: · ,Ji,\..:s:;: ~ ~::j \ L-';.~ If ~..: .J!w. jL--':'~ \ ~..\ \ ,\.-:;~~ ~' ~ ~ \~ ' ~~~ "\1:~' __I i! r , \'i l.__-- ~.I' -'"\' .) &'\ \ , '\::.-\ ,. r~. \..ll..z....~ I \ t r-'"lI'<'-.,s. \ 1 1 \l"v......~ ~~~....."\6 ~~,. PAItI(~"\ I~,\l ":111 ~ ~_.. l.t ...__- \\ 1 :II' Q _ ~I_" '\ .-- - ~ ,...r~ \ '( \"r~'" ~ - L__-;,.c""\ I \ -i\ '.\ \ ....> ~,..:-.y ~ ,.-...~''f' \l.I --~.- ... ""_' \ ,I __ ,\ 1 ,... . ~'JI..l. " ~ ...... - --~ r 1 1_..) I" ~-- _..... v.~. ~~ I : ,\..r~ '\\-:;--'\ 1 II. {..lI~\~~;2 ("~:n~ \9~~ ~ Q~ et'l:1 FI"J31 _ =',~ '_,"ii" \ J ~ ,_ _ ,.".. '" 1 · \' ~ . '1mIIJ :<. /_;~ llliUi I \ ~;\~,~~-;/r......> ~"JJ("'" ',r-'I:!i3"~' ,\' .J"!2 ;;.rlol ~~~ 9JJ: '.; ..l~\ ~ v{..!_.' ~', ~ ///. J \ L.J~ g;;'- ';->--' ' .r.l 01cJ;.-.--.-, ^'" .;t.<.l.... ~ / - -- t """ , ./ 1 ) ~W I J \,!..:~ ~'- n- ~ .'~~, L~ ~ I roo " 3" ~ (...-:~' V roo.... / - ::r:; t- :x:: -n. &1\ ~ ' y ....... '<.: 'V' - I _-, ;r?,/:'>".,... ,~." rl. _'.,...~/ ,---- ..!-:ct ~ ~~ ''--" I"P ~~ft - A I ~" , <. /' ~ / 4 ~ \ ~a: --- - =--1-\I .. \ ..... ......,J ..? I \ ~ W' o.!.. .-.tf).1 _0:' ,. ~"'_~"UI~H cr-\ ~ A \ ....., <... ; 1 '~- ~:h...\ ~ //~aLB ~ ./ I. " \ ~ /" ~~ \-::""'~ ~,,~ --...-/ I · f '\ ',-__~ A ~ I \ < ~ ~~ A'-<~'" -rT~W\ p~,,_/---~ , ~ i h..~ ~ c::'A.." '~E1... J~~~HjH ~\-\1t) ~ /" ~..,r J::P II:!!! ) ~ I ; _--...-"'-..... '" \\a\ r.\"\ ~1 ~y- / I II-r-.'.'" //!J ~ / '/ \ ~ / I 1,/ ,-....------...-' 1 ' I I 1/ /_J 1'/ I I \ I I ~ /-,,,...../ I \ ~ '" / I .... I Ii ,; I ," I --, /. ,,/ . I JI. - I ,,/ I ,.. ./'0, I / I / '"..... · I " I /. 1/ L_~---~~ .. ~ -_. . . ., .. ....... .-.--........,.-. .. ... ......-.--. . .. ... ....- ................ . ....... ....M'Lt'.-...:MD~___. .._ .......Tw.J.M, .__ .......T--=w__ .___ -- -- -- -- . ._- -- -- ,-- -- -- , -- -- -- ~ ~r._ - , , . QAMC sc:AIf ~ "" ~ ~ --, --, -~. . -.&.... . . -- -_. la ....,.. , --, --, 1Cf...... . --, -- -- I"l.MED \NIT OEVELClI'r"I:HT I.aiAL PE5CRIPl'ION --....... 'hi.....,............ "fIf"'-"-' "...____" _........ \'''' =: !!..~-: =--- ".,............... --.....""..... c.-....-----.....-~............ --~.......... ===;=-":''=-'''-.:::r..::...,~ ..... ..........~.,IUI..... __~ .-..-fIIl1IA......__. ~. __rut.... .............. ~-....:n......... -..............,............ ..,..... .......,................ ~. ----.......... -- --.. .....,............ ----. -...-.. ....................... ~........... .... ::.'::~::=-~.:=:.-=:==..~..=:- .... ----.--..... ...............--." -..--. ,--- ~.... ~- ....,..~ ....,.............. ....11I.... .........................- "" ---------....-.. ............. .-..-111...., ..... ......_....... I . ~; - II. EXISTING CONDITIONS Land Use The proposed Deerfield development site includes recently cropped and/or grazed land and forested areas. Existing and proposed surrounding land uses include an industrial park, fire station, and City athletic park to the north. Single family homes exist to the northwest and west. Cropped and/or grazed lands, wetlands, and forested areas exist to the south. The area north of the proposed development is primarily developed as p'art of the City of Prior Lake. The area south of the proposed development is primarily undeveloped. Street and Highway Characteristics Fish Point Road will provide the primary access to the proposed development initially. It is located north of the development and intersects County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 21 at aT-intersection. A minor access will be provided via Wilderness Trail (See Figure 1). The development traffic will enter/exit the development from/to the east or west along CSAH 21. The northbound Fish Point Road traffic is controlled by a stop sign at the intersection of CSAH 21. The majority of traffic will come and go from the west via north/south Trunk Highway (TH) 13 and CSAH 39. Both are west of the proposed Deerfield development and intersect CSAH 21 at signalized intersections (Figure 1). Fish Point Road is a two-lane divided east/west roadway with a 30-mph posted speed limit and a grass/concrete median from CSAH 21 south approximately 100 feet. From that point south, Fish Point Road becomes a two-lane undivided roadway that currently dead-ends at the north end of the proposed development. Curb and gutter runs along the entire length of Fish Point Road as well as a bituminous pathway along the west side of Fish Point Road to Cottonwood Lane and a concrete sidewalk along the east side of Fish Point Road south to where the road dead-ends. No parking is posted along both sides of Fish Point Road. South of CSAH 21, Cottonwood LaneIBlind Lake Trail intersects Fish Point Road. .cottonwood Lane extends to the east and ends at Adelmann Street. Adelmann Street is a short street that extends north/south between Cottonwood Lane and CSAH 21. Blind Lake Trail extends to the west around the west side of Blind Lake, with Wilderness Trail intersecting Blind Lake trail and extending south along the east side of Blind Lake: Wilderness Trail will extend south into the proposed development. CSAH 21 is a four-lane undivided east/west "A" Minor Arterial, Expander with curb and gutter and a 50-mph posted speed limit. A bituminous pathway exists along the south side of CSAH 21. No parking is posted along both sides of CSAH 21. CSAH 39 is a north/south "B" Minor Arterial two-lane roadway at the intersection of CSAH 21 with posted no parking and a 30-mph speed limit. CSAH 39 intersects TH 13 DeerjieJd Development Site Traffic Study City of Prior Jake WSB Project No.1 195,00 4 I I -,--.- T..'.... .. '--~ .. .,-----.. .. both north and south of CSAH 21 and intersects CSAH 21 east of TH 13 and west of the proposed Deerfield development. TH 13 is a north/south "A" Minor Arterial Expander north of CSAH 21 and an "A" Minor Arterial, Connector south of CSAH 21. It is a two-lane divided roadway with right and protected left-turn lanes at the signalized intersection ofCSAH 21. Wilderness Trail is a local city street that provides access to single family residences south of CSAH 21, east of Fish Point Road and west of CSAH 39. It is a two-lane roadway with parking allowed on both sides. Existing Traffic Volumes The 1995-1996 MnlDOT Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes provided the majority of the most recent traffic data for the area surrounding the proposed Deerfield development. However, 1999 ADT volumes along CSAH 21 east of TH 13 were available from the Scott County Highway Department. The 1995-1996 ADT along TH 13 and Fish Point Road were projected to 1999 using the Scott County Highway Department recommended 3.5% per year growth rate for this area. The 1995-1996 CSAH 39 ADT was projected to 1999 using the average growth rate of 11.8% per year based on the 1995-1996 to 1999 increases along the adjacent CSAH 21. The 1999 Fish Point Road ADT south of CSAH 21 was estimated based on the land use adjacent to Fish Point Road. Figure 3 shows the ADT volumes. The AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes were estimated as 4% and 8% of the ADT, respectively. The intersections ofFish Point Road at CSAH 21, CSAH 21 at CSAH 39, and CSAH 21 at TH 13 were analyzed as part of this traffic study to determine what effect the traffic generated by the proposed Deerfield development would have on traffic conditions. The existing and projected (1999) ADT volumes were used to estimate intersection movement volumes along CSAH 21 at the intersections of Fish Point Road, CSAH 39 and TH 13. First a 50/50 directional distribution was applied to all of the 1999 ADT volumes. The intersection movement volumes were then estimated by distributing each approach volume according to the approach volumes on the other adjacent legs. ..........- . -$-" Deerfield Development Site Traffic Study City of Prior lake WSB Project No, 1195.00 5 ~ I ~ ---------.-r-.--'-.----,.- fi ..10,000 1,225* (J3A [2 ,"tOO) 0,880) ~~~ * \. bI. ",~~ "'~. *~ b~ ~q ~ ",');~'\ <J~' ~ .$-~ Cl c: f-- Z o n. :J:: Vl ..... CD ,,-.,..-. -.:tt'-- 00 -.:t ON cici e * 00 00 NO ~V)~ * "-.,,.-, 00 t'-- 0 O\M .,.;'~ '-/ ..... 3,600 *5,624* .I ;' ",'" ;'.................. ;' .I .I / (6,720) t10,4601 Legend xxx Existing 1995-1996 .XXX. Existing or Projected 1999 (XXX) Projected 2005 [XXX] Projected 2020 Proposed Future Development ~ WSB .... . - . -. - . - . -. -.8 o ~I .;11 ....1 ~J J I / / ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' ;' . 1'__----1 . \ \ Deerffeld ResIdentIal Development 350 WestwOoclIAke Office 8441 Wayzata Boulevard Minnupolla, MN 55426 Traffic Impact Study Deerfield Residential Development City of Prior Lake, Minnesota WSB Project No, 1195,00 Date: December 2, 1999 812-641-4800 & AuocIGlu. Inc, FAX 541.1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS . PLANNERS Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Figure 3 I I .. '----r -- -.--. - -- 'T'" .. ....----....--,..-,..,- ....... '-j-- -'- III. SITE TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS Traffic conditions both with and without the site-generated traffic in 1999, 2005, and 2020 were evaluated to determine the impact of the site-generated traffic on operations. In doing so, it was assumed that the site is fully developed by 1999, although development is anticipated to occur over four years. To evaluate the impact of the site traffic on existing traffic conditions, the number of trips generated by the site had to be estimated. Trip Generation The Fifth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers CITE) Trip Generation Manual, including the February 1995 update, was used to calculate daily AM and PM peak hour entry/exit volumes for the proposed 165.03 acre Deerfield development. The proposed development will consist of 78 single family detached units, 46 twin homes (located in 2-unit buildings), 220 Coach Homes (located in 3 or 4-unit buildings), and 288 Villas (located in 6, 8, or 10-unit buildings). It is anticipated that the proposed development will occur over a period of four years based on the local demand for housing. The site generated AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes are presented in Table 1. Table 1. Deerfield Development Traffic Generation Type of Dwelling Total No. of AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ADT Trips Trips Unit Dwelling Units In Out In Out Single Family 78 747 15 44 50 28 Detached Homes Single Family Attached (Twin) 46 270 3 17 17 8 Homes Single Family Villas 288 1,688 22 129 104 51 'Single Family 220 1,289 _17 80 80 39 Coach Homes Total 632 3,994 57 270 251 126 Site Traffic Distribution The main access to the proposed Deerfield development will be Fish Point Road. Some traffic will enter and exit via Wilderness Trail. Based on the Deerfield layout, it was assumed that the traffic generated by sixteen of the single family homes would enter and exit via Wilderness Trail. This results in 4% of the total traffic generated by the site entering and exiting via Wilderness Trail, and 96% of the site-generated traffic entering Deerfield Development Site Traffic Study City of Prior lake WSB Project No, 1195.00 7 i I -'-----.-'---,~__...___ --'._-'-'---T--"-._'-- 1 .'--....---..-.-... ....----. and exiting the development via Fish Point Road and CSAH 21 in 1999 and 2005. Wilderness Trail will see an approximate increase in its ADT of 153 vehicles per day. This is an approximate increase of 12 vehicles during the AM peak hour and 16 vehicles during the PM peak hour. Based on the existing ADT volumes along CSAH 21 east and west of Fish Point Road, 42% and 54% of the site traffic was assumed to approach/depart from and to the east and west along CSAH 21, respectively. The site traffic was then distributed at the intersections of CSAH 21 at CSAH 39 and CSAH 21 at TH 13 according to the' same procedure used for the existing traffic, which was to distribute the approach volumes proportionally according to the approach volumes on the other adjacent legs. Figure 4 shows the site traffic distribution used. Figures 5 and 6 show the distributed site traffic. In 2020, it was assumed that Fish Point Road would extend south to Mushtown Road and north to CSAH 44 providing another access to the site. It was assumed that in 2020, 20% of the site traffic would enter/exit from the Mushtown Road access and 80% would enter/exit from CSAH 21 and Fish Point Road north of CSAH 21. The projected 2020 traffic was distributed at the intersection of CSAH 21 at Fish Point Road (with the extension to the north) proportionately according to the approach volumes. The site- generated traffic for 2020 was distributed assuming that the extension to the north would provide an alternate route to traffic that would otherwise travel north via CSAH 39 or TH 13. Projected Traffic Volumes The Deerfield development is anticipated to be fully developed in four years. In order to analyze a worst case scenario, it was assumed that the development would be fully developed immediately (1999). The 2005 and 2020 background traffic (without site) 'volumes were estimated assuming the Scott County Highway Department recommended growth rate of 3.5% per year. The total traffic was then determined by adding the site- generated traffic to the estimated background traffic. Figures 7, 8, 9, and 10 show the AM and PM peak hour volumes both with and without the site-generated traffic for the years 1999, 2005, and 2020. ,,"' -- Deerfield Development Site Traffic Study City of Prior lake WSB Project No. 1195,00 8 ~ I ,...."..-'1'------""'---.,"'--..--- I = a: I- :z C) a. :r: Vl CD l..L. fa xx 1999 Site Distribution (XX) 2020 Site Traffic Distribution (Assuming Fish Point Road Extension South to Mushtown Road & North to CSAH 44) Proposed Future Development \ \ Deerfleld ResIdential Development -] _ 0 ~~ -----------*.9 t----, o 0 .. I ~ 10 . .. ..s::=1 ~ 1 .~ I ;: . ~I ;: 1 I - . I 1 I . ",," 1._.-.-.1 ,," . " " " ~--~. Legend ... WSB 350 \IIIe8twOOd I.8ke 0IIice 8<<1 Wayzata BouIevlrd Mlmeapolll, MN 55428 Traffic Impact Study Deerfield Residential Development City of Prior Lake, Minnesota WSB Project No, 1195,00 Dale: December 2,1999 812-641-4800 d: .4....,/aI.., I"", FAX 541-1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS . PLANNERS Site Traffic Distribution Figure 4 t:\ 119~.OO'\.lud)'''~-04.dgn i I -.-,.'.-..--T'-"--'--'----....'-'-T'. " ,..,"'--....,-'-,..-r---....,--. ..-,.. .I CD Cl a:: I- :z o c... :J:: Vl w... " / / ...... ... ... ... ... / / / / I ~ -- Legend xxx AM Traffic Volumes I xxx I PM Traffic Volumes Proposed Future Development \ \ Deerfleld ResIdentIal Development 1 o 1 o 1 o 10_0_0_01 o 1 .. WSB 350 Westwood Lake 0IIIce s.u 1 Wayzata Boulevard MInneapoII. MN 55428 Traffic Impact Study Deerfield Residential Development City of Prior Lake, Minnesota INSB Project No. 1195.00 Date: December 2,1999 812-641-4800 d: .4"oclatu. Inc. FAX 541-1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PlANNERS 1999 & 2005 Site Traffic Figure 5 I; \ 1185.00\.ludy\fill-05.dljJn I I ~ .---.-.... --. '-T' m.... ..-T---- .I e e Cl a:: I- :z o c... :J:: Vl w... / / ...... ... ~.... ,,' ... ....'- / / 1/ I . ~ >-. -- ~_._., I - 0 I '::.: 1 \ .. , - 0 Deerfield ResIdential / ! Development olfJo~ / ! ~~ / 10_0_0_01 ~o~/ 0 .~ / 1 ~\."'/.. Legend xxx AM Traffic Volumes (XXX) PM Traffic Volumes Proposed Future Development .. WSB Traffic Impact Study Deerfield Residential Development City of Prior Lake, Minnesota 350 Westwood Lake 0IIIce s.u 1 Wayzata Boulevard Mlnneapan.. MN 55428 812-641-4800 d: .4uoc1atu.lnc. FAX 541-1700 INFRASTRUCTURE . ENGINEERS - PlANNERS 11\ 1115.0D\ltudy\rill-oe.d9R i I -.----..-----------r----.. . ... -....-.1 INSB Project No. 1195.00 Date: December 2.1999 2020 Site Traffic Figure 6 .I Cl a:: I- :z Cl c... :J:: Vl w... CD ..,<,'\. .... r:;\'\.- ~'\. ......;' <:;,\. <:;,'0 ...... <:;,\. r:;,,'" CD Legend xxx 1999 Existing Volumes I xxx I 2005 Projected Volumes [xxxi 2020 Projected Volumes Proposed Future Development \ \ Deerfleld ResIdential Development .... . - . - . -. - . -. -.8 o ~I ~' .... , ~I I I I I .... ;' .... ;' ;' ;' .... o 10_0_0_01 o .. WSB 350 Westwood Lake 0IIIce 84~ 1 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapola. MN 55428 Traffic Impact Study Deerfield Residential Development City of Prior Lake, Minnesota INSB Project No. 1195.00 Date: December 2.1999 812-641-4800 d:.4,.".latu.1nc. FAX 541-1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PlANNERS AM Peak Volumes Without Site Figure 7 11\ 1185.00,.tucly\'iV"07 .dO" l I "l '-T-- .I CD Cl a:: I- :z Cl c... :J:: Vl w... ..,<'\. / <:::.'''' ~~ '" \. <:::.'2\ 'j. ...... <:::. \. t;)\ ...... _ t;) \. ,,'" ~ t;) '" Ir -' ;," / \ "" 7 0, ~ ;;" O~ S1, ~6) ;1 6;]) ;;, '9 CD .,.".,~ ,~. GJ xxx 1999 Existing Volumes 2005 Projected Volumes 2020 Projected Volumes Proposed Future Development \ \ Deerfleld ResIdential Development .... . -. -. - . - . - . -.5 o ~I ~I .... , ~I I I I / / '" '" " '" " '" ____a, . Legend (XXX) Ixxxl . 1______- 1 . .. WSB 350 WeItwood Lake Oflloe s.u 1 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55428 Traffic Impact Study Deerfield Residential Development City of Prior Lake, Minnesota INSB Project No. 1195.00 Date: December 2,1999 812-641-4800 d: .4....latu, Inc. FAX 541-1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PlANNERS AM Peak Volumes With Site Figure 8 t1\ l1'~.OO\.ludy\fig.08.dgn ] I . --------~--- . - '--T'-'----"-" .I CD Cl a:: I- :z Cl c... :J:: Vl w... -- ....--~. ~] ~ .... en aHJ'~ II Legend -----, o xxx (XXX) [xxx I 1999 Existing Volumes 2005 Projected Volumes 2020 Projected Volumes Proposed Future Development \ \ Deerfleld ResIdential Development 1 o 1 o I o 10 _ 0 _ 0 _ 01 o 1 .. WSB 350 Westwood Lake Office 8441 Wayzala Boulevard Minneapolis. MN 55428 Traffic Impact Study Deerfield Residential Development City of Prior Lake, Minnesota INSB Projed No. 1195.00 Date: December 2.1999 812-641-'1800 d: AMo.lat...I.... FAX 541-1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PlANNERS PM Peak Volumes Without Site Figure 9 1:\ '195.00\study\fig-09.dgn i I m . ..--..-----.....-...,.. .....--...-.--.......---.-..--...--- T -.-------..---.--.-- .I Cl a:: I- :z o c... :J:: Vl w... CD "\<:::.\. / t;)'\''j.:~ ..." \. r:;'~ <) ... o \. t;)~ ...... _ t;) \. ",'" " t;) ..... Ir -' ,," / \ '.J. 0, ~ 1 00,.1 ~)/.. '8,,;~~/~S;S/ I' Se; " -- Legend xxx 1999 Existing Volumes (XXX) 2005 Projected Volumes Ixxx] 2020 Projected Volumes Proposed Future Development \ \ Deerfleld ResIdential Development . 1______-1 .. WSB 350 Westwood Lake 0IIIce s.u 1 Wayzata Boulevard MlnneapoAa, MN 55426 Traffic Impact Study Deerfield Residential Development City of Prior Lake, Minnesota INSB Project No. 1195.00 Date: December 2, 1999 812-641-4800 d: .4_latu, Inc. FAX 541-1700 INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PlANNERS PM Peak Volumes With Site Figure 10 11\ 1'l8',OO,.ludy\fig-10.dgn 1 I ~"-'--"-'1 ...._..... ---"-r-"- ......_. IV. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Using the 1999, 2005, and 2020 projected AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes with and without the development, an analysis of the level of service (LOS) was conducted for the following intersections to determine the impact the development-generated traffic will have on traffic operations: · Fish Point Road at CSAH 21 · CSAH 39 at CSAH 21 · CSAH 21 at TH 13 · Adjacent City Streets The analysis was performed using the FHW A Highway Capacity Software (HCS), which simulates capacity analysis techniques as described in the 1995 Highway Capacity Manual. The capacity analysis worksheets are included in the appendix of this report. The LOS for the above-mentioned intersections were using the AM and PM peak hour volumes shown in Figure 7, 8, 9, and 10. The ability of a roadway system to accommodate traffic volumes is expressed in terms of levels of service (LOS). The LOS of an intersection is based on approach delay and the amount of time a driver must wait at an intersection before proceeding. Intersections are graded as A-F with A representing the least delay and F representing the greatest delay. In urbanized areas such as Prior Lake, a LOS DIE is typically acceptable during the AM and PM peak hours. A brief description of LOS is provided in Table 2. The LOS measures are standards set forth by the Transportation Research Board (TRB) in the 1995 Highway Capacity Manual. .,.".~~' Deerfield Development Site Traffic Study City of Prior lake WSB Project No. 1195.00 16 1 I -.--........-.-y--.--..---...l..... _d I Table 2. Level of Service Descriptions Level of Service Description FREE FLOW: A Speed controlled by driver's desires, speed limits, or physical roadway conditions. STABLE FLOW: B Operating speeds beginning to be restricted, little or no restriction on maneuverability from other vehicles. C STABLE FLOW: Speeds and maneuverability more restricted. APPROACHING UNSTABLE FLOW: D Tolerable speeds can be maintained but temporary restrictions to flow cause substantial drops in speed, little freedom to maneuver, comfort and convenience are low. UNSTABLE FLOW: E Volumes near capacity, speed typically in neighborhood of 30 mph, stoppages of momentary duration, ability to maneuver severely limited. F FORCED FLOW: Low operating speeds, volume below capacity, queues formed. By analyzing the LOS of the intersections of CSAH 21 at Fish Point Road, CSAH 21 at CSAH 39, and CSAH 21 at TH 13 without and with the Deerfield site-generated traffic, the effects of the site-generated traffic on the intersection traffic operations could be determined. Fish Point Road at CSAH 21 The results of the intersection LOS analysis indicated that in 1999, the unsignalized intersection ofFish Point Road at CSAH 21 will operate at a LOS B during the AM peak ]wur. both with and without the proposed site traffic. D.uring the PM peak hour without the development traffic the intersection would operate at a LOS B. However, with the development traffic the LOS would drop to a LOS D. Similarly, in 2005 the intersection would still operate at a LOS B during the AM peak hour and a LOS C during the PM peak hour without the site traffic. With the site traffic, the intersection will operate at a LOS C during the AM peak hour and at a LOS E during the PM peak hour. Fish Point Road was assumed to extend north to CSAH 44 and south to Mushtown Road by 2020. The intersection geometrics for Fish Point Road at CSAH 21 were assumed to be a left-turn and a through/right-turn lane in both the north and southbound directions. Deerfield Development Site Traffic Study City of Prior lake WSB Project No. 1195.00 17 I I --....,--- 1..-.................---..---.....-. ....._... ._.... ... .r--........ In 2020 without the site traffic, CSAH 21 at Fish Point Road will operate at a LOS C and F during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. With the site traffic, the intersection will operate at a LOS D and F during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. By mitigating the intersection and providing two through lanes and a right-turn lane eastbound and westbound and a left-turn and a through/right-turn lane northbound and southbound, the intersection of CSAH 21 at Fish Point Road would operate at a LOS D and E during the AM and PM peak hours respectively, with the site traffic. By mitigating this intersection and providing a traffic signal system, the intersection would operate at a LOS B in 2020 during both the AM and PM peak hours, CSAH 39 at CSAH 21 By analyzing the level of service at the intersection of CSAH 21 at CSAH 39, it was determined that the intersection will operate at a LOS B during the AM peak hour in 1999 and 2005 both with and without the proposed site traffic. The intersection will operate at a LOS B and C during the PM peak hour in 2005 without and with the proposed site traffic, respectively. In 2020, the intersection will operate both with and without the site traffic at a LOS B and DIE during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively, with and without the development traffic. CSAH 21 at TH 13 The intersection of CSAH 21 and TH 13 will operate during both the AM and PM peak hours at a LOS C in 1999 and 2005 both with and without the site traffic. The intersection will operate at a LOS F during the PM peak hours both with and without the site traffic in 2020. The intersection will operate at a LOS C during the AM peak hours. By mitigating the intersection, assuming the traffic signal would have split phasing, and providing a through-left, through, and right-turn lane for eastbound and westbound CSAH 21, and a left-turn, through-left, through, and right-turn lane for northbound and southbound TH 13, the intersection would operate at a LOS C and E during the AM and PM peak hours respectively, with the site traffic. ..Ifhtfresults of the LOS analysis are summarized in Table4. Deerjield Development Site Traffic Study City of Prior lake WSB Project No. 1195.00 18 i I I ----.----......--1"-.....-.----. ,. -'1 ,.....------ -.. -.--.-..'..-..-..---..----..-...,-----.......--.....-...----.---.. Table 3. Level of Service Analysis Results 1999 2005 2020 Without With Without With Without With Miligated With Development Development Development Development Development Development Development AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM CSAH 21 at TH 13 c c c c c c c c C F C F C . E CSAH 21 at CSAH 39 B B B B B B B C B D B D NA NA CSAH 21 at B B 0 B C C E C F 0 F D Fish Point Road B (B) (B) (B) (8) E o Assuming signalized intersection. Adjacent Intersections The traffic generated by the Deerfield development will have a negligible impact on the traffic conditions that exist along Wilderness Trail. The Wilderness Trail ADT will increas~ by approximately 153 vehicles per day. This is an approximate increase during the AM and PM peak hour volumes of 12 and 16 vehicles, respectively. Warrant Analysis The intersection of CSAH 21 at Fish Point Road was analyzed to determine whether a traffic signal system was warranted at this location. Assuming full development, it appears that with the existing 1999 traffic, a traffic signal system 7at the intersection of Fish Point Road and CSAH 21 may be warranted. ~,-.$-- Deerfle/d Development Site Traffic Study City of Prior lake WSB Project No.1 195.00 19 i I --'~-'---r-'--"-'--"""-'-'-_.'I v. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions . 1. The unsignalized intersection of Fish Point Road at CSAH 21 currently (1999) operates at a LOS B during both the AM and PM peak. hours without the site traffic. In 2005, the intersection will operate at a LOS B and C during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively without the development traffic. 2. The CSAH 21 at Fish Point Road intersection will operate at a LOS B and LOS D in 1999 during the AM and PM peak. hours, respectively with the site traffic. In 2005, the intersection will operate at a LOS C and E during the AM and PM peak. hours, respectively with the site traffic. 3. In the projected year 2020, the intersection of Fish Point Road at CSAH 21 will operate at a LOS C and LOS F during the AM and PM peak. hours, respectively, without the site traffic. 4. With the site traffic, the intersection ofFish Point Road and CSAH 21 will operate at a LOS D and LOS F in 2020 during the AM and PM peak. hours, respectively. 5. With mitigation by providing east and westbound right-turn lanes, the intersection of CSAH 21 at Fish Point Road will operate at a LOS D and E with the site traffic during the AM and PM peak. hours, respectively. By signalizing this intersection, the intersection would operate at a LOS B in 2020 during both the AM and PM Peak. hours with and without the site traffic. 6. It appears that, assuming full development (with existing 1999 traffic), a traffic signal system at the intersection of Fish Point Road and CSAH 21 may be warranted. 7. The signalized intersection of CSAH 21 at CSAH 39 currently operates at a LOS B during the AM and PM peak. hours and will continue to operate at a LOS B/C with the proposed site traffic both today and in 2005. ~ In 2020, the intersection of CSAH 21 at CSAH 39 will operate at a LOS B and LOS D during the AM and PM peak. hours, respectively, both with and without the site traffic. 9. The signalized intersection of CSAH 21 at TH 13 currently operates at a LOS C during the AM and PM peak. hours with and without the site traffic and will continue to operate at this LOS in 2005. 10. In 2020, the intersection of CSAH 21 at TH 13 will operate at a LOS C and LOS F during the AM and PM peak. hours, respectively, both with and without the site traffic. Deerfield Development Site Traffic Study City of Prior lake WSB Project No. 1195.00 20 i I ---.-...,..-------...--1......----.. -,--..--.....-. 11. With mitigation, the intersection of CSAH 21 at TH 13 will operate at a LOS C and E with the site traffic during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. 12. The Wilderness Trail ADT will increase by approximately 153 vehicles per day. This is an approximate increase during the AM and PM peak hour volumes of 12 and 16 vehicles, respectively. Recommendations 1. Provide an eastbound right-turn lane at the intersection of CSAH 21 at Fish Point Road by 2020 or as development dictates. 2. Extend Fish Point Road to Mushtown Road to provide additional access to the site by 2020 or as development dictates. 3. Work with MnlDOT and Scott County to monitor the operation of TH 13 at CSAH 21. 4. Upon the full development, the County should be requested to do an analysis at the intersection of CSAH 21 at Fish Point Road to determine if a traffic signal system is warranted. .,.:-. . 3/-' Deerfleld Development Site Traffic Study City of Prior lake WSB Project No. 1195.00 21 i I .-......--,......-----.. .......... . -$-" APPENDIX Deerfield Development Site Traffic Study City of Prior lake WSB Project No. 1195.00 a I 22 -----...1 .....~.-.._.. .....-----...--...--..---...--.---.-,----.....- - HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: JBB Intersection: CSAH 21 at Fishpointe Road Count Date: EXISTING 1999 wlo SITE Time Period: PM PEAK Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 2 3 4 5 7 9 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: HFR: PHF: PHV: 389 409 0.95 0.03 11 12 0.95 0.03 8 8 0.95 0.03 300 316 0.95 0.03 42 44 0.95 0.01 33 35 0.95 0.01 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: !fs Blockage: Median Type: # of vehicles: None o - Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N Y N N Y Y N N N - Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 - Lane usage fop- movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y Y N N Y N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y N N N N Y N N N -Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 ........--y----...-........-.......,... ..-.....-.. ........-----.........---....-.........--.. --.....,---.-......-.-.. Lane usage for movements 10,11 & 12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 N Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Eastbound _ Shared In volume. major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate. major rt vehicles: _ Number of major street through lanes: o o 1700 1700 2 Length of study period. hrs: 1.00 Westbound 150 o 1700 1700 2 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 _ t c,base t c,hv P hv t c,g G t 3,It t c,T: 1 stage 4.1 7.5 6.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.2 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 tc 1 stage 4.2 6.8 6.9 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 t f,base t f.HV -Phv tf 2.2 3.5 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.03 0.01 0.01 2.2 3.5 3.3 -Worksheet 6Impeaa;~ and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor 51. 9 12 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 211 798 1.00 798 0.96 _ Step 2: L T from Major 51. 4 Conflicting Flows 421 Potential Capacity 1127 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 -Movement Capacity 1127 Probability of Queue free 51. 0.99 Maj. L Shared In. Prob. Queue Free St. 0.99 L N .-----r---. --....--..----...... 'r Lane 3 T R N N Step 4: L T from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 590 - Potential Capacity 441 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 - Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 Movement Capacity 438 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) C m(vph) vie _ 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay _ Approach LOS I- I I 8 44 1127 438 0.01 0.10 I I I II -II II 35 798 0.04 8.2 14.1 9.7 A 8 A 12.2 8 Worksheet 11 Shared Major L T Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 Poj Vi1 Vi2 -Si1 Si2 P*Oj D maj left - N number major st lanes . Delay. rank 1 mvmts 1.00 0.99 o 150 o 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 1.00 0.99 0.0 8.2 2 2 -1.$ 0.0 ..,...- .~- i I iIr -.--I.---..--....-..---------.....----.-.J----..-.----......... HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: JBB Intersection: CSAH 21 at Fishpointe Road Count Date: EXISTING 1999 W/O SITE Time Period: AM PEAK Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 2 3 4 5 7 9 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: HFR: PHF: PHV: 159 167 0.95 0.03 41 43 0.95 0.03 32 34 0.95 0.03 122 128 0.95 0.03 9 9 0.95 0.01 7 7 0.95 0.01 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: _ % Blockage: Median Type: # of vehicles: None o Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 T R N Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 - Lane for-movements 4,5&6 approach: usage Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R y y N N Y N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R y N N N N y N N N Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 l' .--,--------.---1'--.....----.--.----....-......---.--------- Lane usage for movements 10,11 & 12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 N N Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Eastbound - Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: - Number of major street through lanes: o o 1700 1700 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 Worksheet 4 CritiCal Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 2 Westbound 61 o 1700 1700 2 - t c,base t c,hv P hv t c,g -G t 3,It t c,T: 1 stage 4.1 7.5 6.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.2 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 tc 1 stage 4.2 6.8 6.9 _ Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 t f,base _ t f,HV Phv tf 2.2 3.5 3.3 1.0 1,0 1.0 0.03 0.01 0.01 2.2 3.5 3.3 - Worksheet 6 Impeaah~e and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor S1. 9 12 I Conflicting Flows : Potential Capacity : Pedestrian Impedance Factor _ Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free S1. 105 932 1.00 932 0.99 _ Step 2: L T from Major S1. 4 Conflicting Flows 211 Potential Capacity 1350 _Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 1350 Probability of Queue free S1. 0.98 Maj. L Shared In. Prob. Queue Free S1. 0.97 I I i~ - L Lane 3 T R N N N .~_..- --.......T-----.--.....----..--.----.' Step 4: L T from Minor S1. 7 10 _ Conflicting Flows 321 Potential Capacity 651 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.97 - Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.98 Cap. Adj, factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 Movement Capacity 638 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length. and LOS - Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 --- I-- II I I -II I I II I v(vph) 34 9 7 C m(vph) 1350 638 932 vie 0.02 0.01 0.01 - 95% queue length Control Delay 7.7 10.7 8.9 LOS A B A Approach Delay 9.9 - Approach LOS A Worksheet 11 Shared Major L T Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations - Movement 2 5 I P oj Vi1 -Vi2 S i1 Si2 P* OJ - D maj left , N number major st lanes Delay, rank 1 mvmts 1.00 0.98 o 61 o 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 1.00 0.97 0.0 7.7 2 2 -1.$ 0.1 ~-~ ~. n I ~ ., ..__...__._ __.__.____.....__............___....,_.._..._.... .......... .m.. HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: JBB Intersection: CSAH 21 at Fishpointe Road Count Date: 2005 w/o SITE Time Period: PM PEAK Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 2 3 4 5 7 9 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: HFR: PHF: PHV: 465 489 0.95 0.03 13 14 0.95 0.03 10 11 0.95 0.03 358 377 0.95 0.03 50 53 0.95 0.01 39 41 0.95 0.01 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- __ Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: __ !Is Blockage: Median Type: # of vehicles: None o Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 T R N Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage fcrr-'mC;~ements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R y y N N Y N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R y N N N N y N N N Channeli zed: Grade: N 0.00 T .--y--........-....--...r ...--_._--- 'j Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 L T R L N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane 2 T R N N Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Eastbound _ Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: _ Number of major street through lanes: o o 1700 1700 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 2 Westbound 179 o 1700 1700 2 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 _ t c,base t c,hv P hv t c,g _G t 3,lt t c,T: 1 stage 4,1 7.5 6.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.2 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 tc 1 stage 4.2 6.8 6.9 _ Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 t f,base _ t f,HV P hv tf 2.2 3.5 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.03 0.01 0.01 2.2 3.5 3.3 - Worksheet 6 Impeaarr~ and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor _ Movement Capacity ! Probability of Queue free St. 252 751 1.00 751 0.95 _ Step 2: L T from Major St. 4 Conflicting Flows 503 Potential Capacity 1051 _Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 1051 Probability of Queue free St. 0.99 Maj. L Shared In. Prob. Queue Free St. 0.99 L Lane 3 T R N ---y-------~~-..,~_....._----~.__._...__...._._.. .__.._---------- N N Step 4: L T from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 706 Potential Capacity 373 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 Movement Capacity 369 Worksheet 10 delay, queue length, and LOS - Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 I- II I I -II I I II I v(vph} 11 53 41 C m(vph) 1051 369 751 vie 0.01 0.14 0.05 - 95% queue length Control Delay 8.5 16.4 10.1 LOS A C B Approach Delay 13.6 - Approach LOS B Worksheet 11 Shared Major L T Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations - Movement 2 5 P oj Vii _Vi2 S 11 Si2 P* OJ _ D maj left N number major st lanes Delay, rank 1 mvmts 1.00 0.99 o 179 o 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 1.00 0.99 0,0 8.5 2 2 -1.$ 0.0 ....~-:$-. I I . 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: JBB Intersection: CSAH 21 at Fishpointe Road Count Date: 2005 wlo SITE Time period: AM PEAK Intersection orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 2 3 4 5 7 9 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: HFR: PHF: PHV: 190 200 0.95 0.03 49 52 0.95 0.03 38 40 0.95 0.03 146 154 0.95 0.03 11 12 0.95 0.01 8 8 0.95 0.01 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: # of vehicles: None o Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 T R N Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage fd!"-movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R y y N N Y N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R y N N N N y N N N Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 -----I.--......-...---.-~---.---...-.---~-..---.... 1 Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 L T R L N N N N _ Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane 2 T N Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: R N Eastbound - Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: - Number of major street through lanes: o o 1700 1700 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 2 Westbound 73 o 1700 1700 2 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 - t c,base t c,hv P hv t c,g -G t 3,It t c,T: 1 stage 4.1 7.5 6.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.2 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 tc 1 stage 4.2 6.8 6.9 _ Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 t f,base _ t f,HV P hv tf 2.2 3.5 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.03 0.01 0.01 2.2 3.5 3.3 Worksheet 6 Impeaa~e and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor _ Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 126 904 1.00 904 0,99 _Step 2: L T from Major St. 4 Conflicting Flows 252 Potential Capacity 1304 _Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 1304 Probability of Queue free St. 0.97 Maj. L Shared In. Prob. Queue Free St. 0.97 12 1 !f I L Lane 3 T N N R N 'T" .....-...-..-.....--.-----..- --"'--'... T Step 4: L T from Minor St. 7 10 _ Conflicting Flows 383 Potential Capacity 595 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.97 _ Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 Movement Capacity 581 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS _ Movement 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 I- II I I -II I I II I v(vph) 40 12 8 C m(vph) 1304 581 904 vie 0.03 0.02 0.01 _ 95% queue length Control Delay 7.8 11.3 9.0 LOS A B A Approach Delay 10.4 _ Approach LOS B Worksheet 11 Shared Major L T Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations _ Movement 2 5 poj Vi1 _Vi2 5 i1 Si2 P* OJ _D maj left N number major st lanes Delay, rank 1 mvmts 1.00 0.97 o 73 o 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 1.00 0.97 0.0 7.8 2 2 -1.$ 0.1 .,a,.-,~' -,----.--.-.-.1--.--.---..-.,.-...-----......-.-....--..--_... HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: JBB Intersection: CSAH 21 at Fishpointe Road Count Date: 2020 wlo SITE Time period: PM PEAK Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: 70 723 20 15 558 55 78 5 61 55 5 70 HFR: 74 761 21 16 587 58 82 5 64 58 5 74 PHF: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHV: 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type; None # of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 T R N Y N N y y N N N Channelized: N - Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: -Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane --3 L T R L T R L T R y y N N Y N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R y N N N Y y N N N Channelized: -Grade: N 0.00 --y--..-...-----.-.--..,..... ...---.--..---....---..-.....---..---...-r----... .-..-. .--..----... lane usage for movements 10,11 & 12 approach: lane 1 lane 2 L T R L T R y N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 N N L lane 3 T R y y N N N _ Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Eastbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: _ Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Length of study period, hrs: o o 1700 1700 2 Westbound 279 o 1700 1700 2 1.00 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. _ Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c,base _ t c,hv P hv t c,g G _t 3,It t c,T: 1 stage tc 1 stage 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.2 4.2 7.6 6.6 7.0 7.6 6.6 7.0 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t f,base t f,HV P hv t f 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 _ Worksheet 6 Imp~arw-e and capacity equations I Step 1: RT from Minor St. _ Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity _ Probability of Queue free St. Step 2: l T from Major St. 9 391 605 1.00 605 0.89 4 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor _ Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Maj. L Shared In. Prob. Queue Free St. I I 782 825 1.00 825 0.98 0.98 12 323 670 1.00 670 0.89 645 929 1.00 929 0.92 0.92 -----.-..---y----..-~---.-......T-- .....--..-.....-.-.---..---........-.....--.----.T----.---- ---...... ..._w.. Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows 1596 1577 _. Potential Capacity 105 107 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.90 0.90 Movement Capacity 94 97 _ Probability of Queue free St. 0.94 0.95 Step 4: L T from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 1247 Potential Capacity 129 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 _ Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.85 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.89 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity 102 1178 145 0.79 1.00 0.85 0.88 0.79 114 Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) _ Movement Capacity Shared Lane Capacity 1------ 11------ I I ----------11 --------1 1 II I 82 5 64 58 5 74 102 94 605 114 97 670 429 480 _Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 1-- 11------ 1 ---------11 ------------1 II I v(vph) 74 16 82 69 58 79 _. C m(vph) 929 825 102 429 114 480 v/c 0.08 0.02 0.81 0.16 0.51 0.16 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 9.2 9.4 153.2 15.0 A A F C 89.9 F F 67.5 14.0 B 36.6 E ~-~. Worksheet 11 Shared Major L T Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 _Poj Vi1 Vi2 S i1 _Si2 P* OJ D maj left N number major st lanes _Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.92 0.98 o 279 o 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 0.92 0.98 9.2 9.4 2 2 -1.$ 0.1 [ I I --"T~-'-'" --.---..--...-----,----........-.. '.. ...._. RCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: JBB Intersection: CSAH 21 at Fishpointe Road Count Date: 2020 W/O SITE Time period: AM PEAK Intersection orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: 35 296 76 60 227 27 17 3 13 27 3 35 HFR: 37 312 80 63 239 28 18 3 14 28 3 37 PRF: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHV: 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: # of vehicles: None o __Flared approach Movekents: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 T R N Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: --Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane-3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y N N N N Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 T R Y N N N y y N N N __Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 ..---y--.-.-..-"-.----r---- Lane usage for movements 10,11 & 12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R y N N Channelized: N - Grade: 0.00 N y y - Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Eastbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: - Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Length of study period, hrs: o o 1700 1700 2 Westbound 113 o 1700 1700 2 1.00 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. - Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c,base -t c,hv P hv t c,g G -t 3,It t c,T: 1 stage 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -tc 1 stage 4.2 4.2 7.6 6.6 7.0 7.6 6.6 7.0 Follow Up Time Calculations: -Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t f,base t f,HV _Phv t f 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Step 1: RT from Minor St. -Worksheet 6 Imp~ance and capacity equations 9 -Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity -Probability of Queue free St. Step 2: L T from Major St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor -Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 'Maj. L Shared In. Prob. Queue Free St. I I 196 809 1.00 809 0.98 4 392 1156 1.00 1156 0.95 0.94 12 134 888 1.00 888 0.96 267 1286 1.00 1286 0.97 0.97 L Lane 3 T R N N N ,...----.....-....--...---... Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows 819 845 _ Potential Capacity 307 296 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.91 0.91 Movement Capacity 281 271 _ Probability of Queue free St. 0.99 0.99 Step 4: L T from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 673 Potential Capacity 339 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 - Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.90 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.93 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity 301 611 376 1.00 0.90 0.93 0.91 0.89 343 Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) - Movement Capacity Shared Lane Capacity 1------ 11----- I I -----------11 ------------1 I II I 18 3 14 28 3 37 301 281 809 343 271 888 598 752 - Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 1---- 11--- I -------11 I II v(vph) 37 63 18 17 _Cm(vph) 1286 1156 301 598 vIe 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.03 95% queue length Control Delay _LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS I ------1 I .28 40 343 752 0.08 0.05 7.9 8.3 17.7 11.2 A A C B 14.5 B C 16.5 10.1 B 12.7 B ~. -- Worksheet 11 Shared Major L T Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations I Movement 2 5 -poj Vi1 Vi2 S i1 -Si2 p. OJ D maj left N number major st lanes -Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.97 0.95 o 113 o 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 0.97 0.94 7.9 8.3 2 2 -1.$ 0.2 i I J" .---.---..........1....-.......---..--.-.-..--..----..... HCS: unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: JBB Intersection: CSAH 21 at Fishpointe Road Count Date: 1999 W SITE -- Time Period: PM PEAK Intersection orientation: East-West Major St. -- Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 2 3 4 5 7 9 -- Volume: 389 152 118 300 113 88 HFR: 409 160 124 316 119 93 PHF: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHV: 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: -- Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: t Blockage: Median Type: None # of vehicles: 0 ,-- Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 T R N Y N N Y Y N N N -- Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 --Lane usage f~m~vements 4,5&:6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R y y N N Y N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&:9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R -------------------~--------------------------------------------------------------------------- y N N N N y N N N --Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 ---...--...........y-....-.. 1 . 'T---"''''- ....-.. .... ... Lane usage for movements 10,11 & 12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R N N N N N Channelized: N - Grade: 0.00 N - Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Eastbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: _ Number of major street through lanes: o o 1700 1700 2 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 Westbound 150 o 1700 1700 2 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 t c, base t c,hv P hv t c,g G t 3,It t c,T: 1 stage -tc 1 stage 4.1 7.5 6.9 2.0 2,0 2,0 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.2 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.2 6.8 6.9 Follow Up Time Calculations: -Movement 4 7 9 t f,base t f,HV -Phv tf 2.2 3.5 3.3 1.0 1.0 1,0 0.03 0.01 0.01 2.2 3.5 3.3 -Worksheet 6 ImpEmance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 -Conflicting Flows 285 Potential Capacity 715 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 715 -Probability of Queue free St. 0.87 _Step 2: L T from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 569 Potential Capacity 992 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 -Movement Capacity 992 Probability of Queue free St. 0.87 Maj. L Share~ In. Prob. Queue Free St. 0.86 I I L N Lane 3 T R N N -~'-~"-"''''''.'~'T . .................. ....--..-......----.-'..--....--.---.T.--'.-......--. ---,-....... Step 4: L T from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 896 Potential Capacity 282 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.86 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.89 Cap, Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.89 Movement Capacity 252 Worksheet 10 delay, queue length, and LOS Movement 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 I- II I I -II I - I II I v(vph) 124 119 93 C m(vph) 992 252 715 vlc 0.13 0.47 0.13 95% queue length - Control Delay 9.1 31.9 10.8 LOS A D B Approach Delay 22.6 Approach LOS C - Worksheet 11 Shared Major L T Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 poj Vii Vi2 - Si1 Si2 p.Oj D maj left - N number major st lanes Delay. rank 1 mvmts 1.00 0.87 o 150 o 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 1.00 0.86 0.0 9.1 2 2 -1.$ 0.6 ~._;... i I ""--r--'--' HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1~ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: JBB Intersection: CSAH 21 at Fishpointe Road Count Date: 1999 W SITE - Time Period: AM PEAK Intersection orientation: East-West Major St. - Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 2 3 4 5 7 9 Volume: HFR: PHF: PHV: 159 167 0.95 0.03 73 77 0.95 0.03 57 60 0.95 0.03 122 128 0.95 0.03 160 168 0.95 0.01 126 133 0.95 0.01 pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: \ Blockage: Median Type: # of vehicles: None o ,- Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 T R N Y N N Y y N N N -Channelized: N Gra,de : 0.00 -Lane usage fot"'"movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R --------------------------------------------------------~-------------------------------------- y y N N Y N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- y N N N N y N N N -2hannelized: 3rade: N 0.00 '---'T'-'---"'" Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R N N N N Channelized: N - Grade: 0.00 N N - Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Eastbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: - Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: _ Number of major street through lanes: o o 1700 1700 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 2 Westbound 61 o 1700 1700 2 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 t c,base t c,hv P hv t c,g G -t 3,It t c,T: 1 stage -tc 1 stage 4.1 7.5 6.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.2 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.2 6.8 6.9 Follow Up Time Calculations: - Movement 4 7 9 t f, base t f,HV -Phv tf 2.2 3.5 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.03 0.01 0.01 2.2 3.5 3.3 ,-Worksheet 6 Impd'Banee and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 -Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity -Probability of Queue free St. 122 909 1.00 909 0.85 Step 2: L T from Major St. 4 Conflicting Flows 244 Potential Capacity 1312 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 -nnovement Capacity 1312 Probability of Queue free St. 0.95 Maj. L Shared In. Prob. Queue Free St. 0.95 L N Lane 3 T R N N -'-..-T . . ..----.------..-----...--. I Step 4: L T from Minor St 7 10 Conflicting Flows 390 - Potential Capacity 589 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.95 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.96 - Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 Movement Capacity 568 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 I- II I I -II I I II I - v(vph) 60 168 133 C m(vph) 1312 568 909 vIe 0.05 0.30 0.15 95% queue length - Control Delay 7.9 14.0 9.6 LOS A B A Approach Delay 12.1 Approach LOS B - Worksheet 11 Shared Major L T Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 P oj Vii Vi2 -Si1 Si2 P* OJ D maj left - N number major st lanes . Delay, rank 1 mvmts 1.00 0.95 o 61 o 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 1.00 0.95 0.0 7.9 2 2 -1.$ 0.2 ....-.' ._~- I I '-'''-''-r ...---...-----....--.... ..-._.__....-_.-....~_._... ....- ........- HCS: unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: JBB Intersection: CSAH 21 at Fishpointe Road Count Date: 2005 W SITE Time period: PM PEAK Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 2 3 4 5 7 9 -------.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: HFR: PHF: PHV: 465 489 0.95 0.03 154 162 0.95 0.03 120 126 0.95 0.03 358 377 0_95 0.03 121 127 0.95 0.01 94 99 0.95 0.01 pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: - Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: # of vehicles: None o - Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 T R N y N N y y N N N - Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 - Lane usage fo.- mOvements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R y y N N Y N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R y N N N N y N N N -Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 II .----r--....................... I ... ...-.-.. __0.......... .......-..-..--.... T---..-......-.. ....,_.. Lane usage for movements 10,11 & 12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 N N Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Eastbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: - Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: _ Number of major street through lanes: o o 1700 1700 2 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 Westbound 179 o 1700 1700 2 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 t c,base t c,hv P hv t c,g G t 3,It t c,T: 1 stage tc 1 stage 4.1 7.5 6.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.2 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.2 6.8 6.9 Follow Up Time Calculations: - Movement 4 7 9 t f,base t f,HV P hv tf 2.2 3.5 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.03 0.01 0.01 2.2 3.5 3.3 - Worksheet 6 Impidarlee and capacity equations Conflicting Flows 652 Potential Capacity 924 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 -Movement Capacity 924 Probability of Queue free St. 0.86 Maj. L Shared In. Prob. Queue Free St. 0.85 i I L Lane 3 T R N N. N --..-.---r---.......-----.--..T.. Step 4: L T from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 1012 - Potential Capacity 237 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.85 _ Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.88 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0,88 Movement Capacity 210 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 I- II I I -II I I II I v(vph) 126 127 99 C m(vph) 924 210 673 vie 0.14 0.61 0.15 _ 95% queue length Control Delay 9.5 47.9 11.3 LOS A E 8 Approach Delay 31.9 _ Approach LOS D Worksheet 11 Shared Major L T Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 P oj Vi1 Vi2 S i1 Si2 P"Oj o maj left - N number major st lanes Delay. rank 1 mvmts 1.00 0.86 o 179 o 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 1.00 0.85 0.0 9.5 2 2 -1.$ 0.7 ~ -~. i I ....-~-I-.... ... 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: JBB Intersection: CSAH 21 at Fishpointe Road Count Date: 2005 W SITE - Time period: AM PEAK Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. - Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 2 3 4 5 7 9 - Volume: HFR: PHF: PHV: 190 200 0.95 0.03 B1. 85 0.95 0.03 63 66 0.95 0.03 146 1.54 0.95 0.03 1.62 171 0.95 0.01 1.27 134 0.95 0.01 pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: - Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: !!r Blockage: Median Type: # of vehicles: None o -Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1. Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 T R N y N N y y N N N -Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 -Lane usage fOif'-- mOVements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R y y N N y N N N N Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 T R Y N N N N y N N N -Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 -r.-.-------.---r-..--.---.-..------. Lane usage for movements 10,11 & 12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0,00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Eastbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: - Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Westbound 73 o 1700 1700 2 o o 1700 1700 2 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. - Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 4 7 9 t c,base - t c,hv P hv t c,g G - t 3,It t c,T: 1 stage 4.1 7.5 6.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.2 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 -tc 1 stage 4.2 6.8 6.9 Follow Up Time Calculations: - Movement 4 7 9 t f,base t f,HV -Phv tf 2.2 3.5 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.03 0.01 0.01 2.2 3.5 3.3 - Worksheet 6 Impedcirfee and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor 81. 9 12 - Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity - Probability of Queue free 81. 143 882 1.00 882 0.85 Step 2: L T from Major S1. 4 Conflicting Flows 285 Potential Capacity 1267 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 - Movement Capacity 1267 Probability of Queue free S1. 0.95 Maj. L Shared In. Prob. Queue Free St. 0.95 L N ---------r-- Lane 3 T R N N ...--------. 1 Step 4: L T from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 452 - Potential Capacity 539 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.95 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.96 - Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 Movement Capacity 516 Worksheet 10 delay, queue length, and LOS Movement 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 I- II I I -/I I I /I I 1- v(vph) 66 171 134 I C m(vph) 1267 516 882 vlc 0.05 0.33 0.15 95% queue length - Control Delay 8.0 15.4 9.8 LOS A C A Approach Delay 12.9 Approach LOS B -Worksheet 11 Shared Major L T Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 : Poj Vi1 Vi2 -Si1 Si2 P* OJ o maj left -N number major st lanes Delay, rank 1 mvmts 1.00 0.95 o 73 o 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 1.00 0.95 0.0 8.0 2 2 -1.$ 0.2 ,,*,,--~- B I .-"-.-..--....---.........--y---.---....... ......, -..........-.--...-----....- HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: JBB Intersection: CSAH 21 at Fishpointe Road Count Date: 2020 W SITE Time period: PM PEAK Intersection orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: 70 723 110 98 558 55 124 14 103 55 23 70 HFR: 74 761 116 103 587 58 131 15 108 58 24 74 PHF: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHV: 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: # of vehicles: None o Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 T R N Y N N Y Y N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: ,s.' --Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane-3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N Y N N N N Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 T R Y N N N Y Y N N N Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 .....T.. ._-_._........- Lane usage for movements 10,11&12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R y N y y N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 _ Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Eastbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: _ Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: o o 1700 1700 Westbound 279 o 1700 1700 2 2 Length of study period, hrs: 1.00 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. _ Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c,base _ t c,hv P hv t c,g G t 3,It t c,T: 1 stage 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 tc 1 stage 4.2 4.2 7.6 6.6 7.0 7.6 6.6 7.0 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t f,base t f,HV P hv t f 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Worksheet 6 Impedal].Ce and capacity equations - -- Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 438 .563 323 670 1.00 563 0.81 1.00 670 0.89 Step 2: L T from Major St. 4 877 760 645 929 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity - Probability of Queue free St. Maj. L Shared In. Prob. Queue Free St. 1.00 760 0.86 0.84 1.00 929 0.92 0.92 ------r--- L Lane 3 T R N N N "--T" Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows 1818 1847 _ Potential Capacity 76 73 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.77 0.77 Movement Capacity 59 56 _ Probability of Queue free St. 0.75 0.57 Step 4: L T from Minor St. 7 Conflicting Flows 1478 Potential Capacity 87 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 _ Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.44 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.56 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity 43 Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculatfons Movement v(vph) _ Movement Capacity Shared Lane Capacity 10 1358 107 0.49 1.00 0.58 0.67 0.54 58 7 8 9 10 11 12 1----- 11-- I --------11 --------1 II 1 131 15 108 58 43 59 563 278 Movement _ Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 24 74 58 56 670 181 1----- 11----- 1 ------11 --------1 1 II 1 v(vph) 74 103 131 123 58 98 _ C m(vph) 929 760 43 278 58 181 vlc 0.08 0.14 3.05 0.44 1.00 0.54 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 9.2 10.53893.4 28.2 A 8 F D F 2016.9 F ......... '-~- 407.1 47.5 E 181.1 F Worksheet 11 Shared Major L T Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 _Poj Vi1 Vi2 S i1 Si2 P* OJ D maj left N number major st lanes _ Delay, rank 1 mvmts I I 0.92 0.86 o 279 o 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 0.92 0.84 9.2 10.5 2 2 -1.$ 0.9 . '.'l'" ....-.----.........~--.-..-.-.-.-.....--....-___r__--.-..--.--.. ..... HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: JBB Intersection: CSAH 21 at Fishpointe Road Count Date: 2020 W SITE Time period: AM PEAK Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _ Volume: 35 296 97 79 227 27 114 22 102 27 7 35 HFR: 37 312 102 83 239 28 120 23 107 28 7 37 PHF: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHV: 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: # of vehicles: None o _Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 T R N y N N y y N ~ N Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: --it~e 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane -3 T R y y N N y N N N N Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 T R y N N N y y N N N _Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 y-----.-----r-----------...-- lane usage for movements 10,11 & 12 approach: lane 1 lane 2 l T R l T R y N N Channelized: N _ Grade: 0.00 N y y - Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Eastbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: _ Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: length of study period, hrs: o o 1700 1700 1.00 2 Westbound 113 o 1700 1700 2 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. - Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c, base - t c, hv P hv < t c,g G _t 3,It t c,T: 1 stage 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _tc 1 stage 4.2 4.2 7.6 6.6 7.0 7.6 6.6 7.0 Follow Up Time Calculations: _Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t f,base t f,HV _Phv t f 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Step 1: RT from Minor St. _Worksheet 6 Imp~ance and capacity equations 9 _ Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor < Movement Clipacity _Probability of Queue free St. < Step 2: L T from Major St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor _Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Maj. l Shared In. Prob. Queue Free St. [ I 207 796 1.00 796 0.87 4 414 1135 1.00 1135 0.93 0.92 12 134 888 1.00 888 0.96 267 1286 1.00 1286 0.97 0.97 :II l lane 3 T R N N N .--.-.,---...-....-.---...-. Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows 870 907 _ Potential Capacity 286 272 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.90 0.90 Movement Capacity 256 244 _ Probability of Queue free 51. 0.91 0.97 Step 4: L T from Minor St. 7 10 - --------..--------------------------------------- I Conflicting Flows 726 Potential Capacity 310 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 _ Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.87 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.90 I Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity 267 661 346 1.00 0.81 0.86 0.74 0.86 257 Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) - Movement Capacity Shared Lane Capacity 1----- II-- I ---------11 I II 120 23 107 267 256 580 I --------1 1 28 796 7 37 257 244 888 616 _Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 1----- 11---- 1 ----------11 --------1 I II 1 v(vph) 37 83 120 131 28 44 _ C m(vph) 1286 1135 267 580 257 616 , vlc 0.03 0.07 0.45 0.23 0.11 0.07 I 95% queue length Control Delay _LOS Approach Delay i Approach LOS 7.9 8.4 29.3 13.0 A A D B 20.8 C C 20.8 11.3 B 15.0 C ...--. '.~. Worksheet 11 Shared Major L T Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 _poj I Vi1 Vi2 I S i1 _Si2 P* OJ D maj left N number major st lanes _Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.97 0.93 o 113 o 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 0.97 0.92 7.9 8.4 2 2 -1.$ 0.3 ~ I --"--'-'--'T" HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: JBB Intersection: CSAH 21 at Fishpointe Road Count Date: 2020 W SITE-MITIGATED Time Period: PM PEAK Intersection orientation: East-West Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume: 70 723 110 98 558 55 124 14 103 55 23 70 HFR: 74 761 116 103 587 58 131 15 108 58 24 74 PHF: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHV: 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: % Blockage: Median Type: # of vehicles: Raised Curb 9 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 T R Y Y N N Y N N N Y Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: --Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane-3 T R ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y Y N N Y N N N Y Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 T R Y N N N Y Y N N N Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 ,. -----.--y----------.-...i ..-----'-.-----.-----------..---,---..-...-. ..----.-...-....-...' lane usage for movements 10,11 & 12 approach: lane 1 lane 2 l T R l T R y N N N Channelized: N _ Grade: 0.00 y y _ Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Eastbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: _ Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: 361 o 1700 1700 length of study period, hrs: 1.00 2 Westbound 279 o 1700 1700 2 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. _ Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c, base _ t c,hv P hv t c,g G _t 3,lt t c,T: 1 stage 2 stage _tc 1 stage 2 stage 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 no no no no no no no 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 4.2 4.2 7.6 6.6 7.0 7.6 6.6 7.0 4.2 4.2 6.6 5.6 7.0 6.6 5.6 7.0 _ Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t f,base _ t f,HV P hv t f 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 ,... Worksheet 6 Imp;(fance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor _ Movement Ca'pacity Probability of Queue free St. 381 615 1.00 615 0.82 _ Step 2: l T from Major St. 4 Conflicting Flows 877 Potential Capacity 760 _ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 760 Probability of Queue free St. 0.86 Maj. l Shared In. Prob. Queue Free St. 0.84 I I 12 294 700 1.00 700 0.89 645 929 1.00 929 0.92 0.90 l lane 3 T R N N N .--T.... ----------..-.--.....-.--....-- 1 Worksheet 7a - Computation of the effect of Two-stage gap acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. Part 1- First Stage 8 11 _ Conflicting Flows 908 794 Potential Capacity 350 396 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.90 0.84 _ Movement Capacity 315 331 Probability of Queue free St. 0.95 0.93 _ Part 2- Second Stage Conflicting Flows 852 1024 Potential Capacity 372 309 _ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.84 0.90 Movement Capacity 312 278 Part 3- Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1760 1818 _ Potential Capacity 83 76 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.75 0.75 Movement Capacity 62 57 Result for 2 stage process: _a y Ct Probability of Queue free St. 0.99 1.44 234 0.99 2.34 173 0.94 0.86 Worksheet 7b - Computation of the effect of Two-stage gap acceptance Step 4: L T from Minor St. , Part 1- First Stage 7 10 _ Conflicting Flows 908 794 Potential Capacity 294 346 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.90 0.84 _ Movement Capasi!Y>-. 265 289 Part 2- Second Stage Conflicting Flows 512 535 Potential Capacity 510 494 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 _ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.69 0.71 Movement Capacity 354 349 _ Part 3- Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1421 Potential Capacity 96 _ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.65 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.73 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt _ Movement Capacity 62 1329 112 0.65 1.00 0.71 0.77 0.64 71 r---..---- -...1..-----.---.---..---..------ Result for 2 stage process: a y Ct 0.99 0.93 249 0.99 1.25 239 Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement v(vph) - Movement Capacity Shared Lane Capacity 7 8 9 10 11 12 1--- 11----- I -----11 ---------1 II I 131 15 108 58 24 74 249 234 615 239 173 515 399 Movement - Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 1--- 11------ 1 I -----11 -------------1 I II I v(vph) 74 103 131 123 58 98 - C m(vph) 929 760 249 515 239 399 vlc 0.08 0.14 0.52 0.24 0.24 0.25 95% queue length Control Delay -LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 9.2 10.5 35.1 14.2 A B E B 24.9 C C 24.9 16.9 C 19.9 C Worksheet 11 Shared Major L T Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 _Poj V i1 Vi2 S i1 _Si2 p. OJ D maj left N number major st lanes _ Delay, rank 1 mvmts ...,.. s.- II' , 0.92 0.86 361 279 o 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 0.90 0.84 9.2 10.5 2 2 0.5 0.9 700 --T....-----------.---. T HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: JBB Intersection: CSAH 21 at Fishpointe Road Count Date: 2020 W SITE-MITIGATED _ Time period: AM PEAK Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St. _ Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _ Volume: 35 296 97 79 227 27 114 22 102 27 7 35 HFR: 37 312 102 83 239 28 120 23 107 28 7 37 PHF: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHV: 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: _ Flow: Lane width: Walk speed: 'l; Blockage: Median Type: # of vehicles: Raised Curb o _ Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Northbound 0 # of vehicles: Southbound 0 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R L Lane 3 T R Y Y N N Y N N N Y Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage fOLm~?yement s 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane-3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y N N y N N N Y Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y N N N Y Y N N N _ Channelized: Grade: N 0.00 --..--------y-..---.--.-T'........--.--.. Lane usage for movements 10,11 & 12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 L T R L T R y N N Channelized: N _ Grade: 0.00 N y y _ Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Eastbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: _ Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: , Length of study period, hrs: 148 o 1700 1700 1.00 2 Westbound 113 o 1700 1700 2 Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. - Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c,base _ t c,hv P hv t c,g G _t 3,lt t c,T: 1 stage 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _tc 1 stage 4.2 4.2 7.6 6.6 7.0 7.6 6.6 7.0 Follow Up Time Calculations: _Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t f,base t f,HV P hv tf 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Step 1: RT from Minor St. __ Worksheet 6 Imp~arwe and capacity equations 9 _ Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity _ Probability of Queue free St. Step 2: L T from Major St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor _Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Maj. L Shared In. Prob. Queue Free St. I I 156 859 1.00 859 0.88 4 414 1135 1.00 1135 0.93 0.92 12 119 906 1.00 906 0.96 267 1286 1.00 1286 0.97 0,97 L Lane 3 T R N N N ..---.-.....T.......--......----.. Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows 819 893 _ Potential Capacity 307 278 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.89 0.89 Movement Capacity 274 248 _ Probability of Queue free St. 0.92 0.97 Step 4: L T from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 675 Potential Capacity 338 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 _ Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.87 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.90 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity 291 646 354 1.00 0.82 0.86 0.75 0.86 266 Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 v(vph) _ Movement Capacity Shared Lane Capacity 1-- 11---- 1 1 -----------11 -------1 1 II 1 120 23 107 28 7 37 291 274 859 266 248 623 628 906 _ Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 1--- 11----- I -----11 --------1 1 II I v(vph) 37 83 120 131 28 44 _ C m(vph) 1286 1135 291 623 266 628 vlc 0.03 0.07 0.41 0.21 0.11 0.07 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 7.9 8.4 26.0 12.3 A A D B 18.9 C c 20.1 11.2 B 14.7 B .".-->-- Worksheet 11 Shared Major L T Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 _poj Vi1 Vi2 S i1 _Si2 p.Oj D maj left N number major st lanes _ Delay, rank 1 mvmts 0.97 0.93 148 113 o 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 0.97 0.92 7.9 8.4 2 2 0.1 0.3 I I ---.T----."-..--.---.-r....---"...-----.---.-----.-j-".-."-" '-'-"---'"' HCS-Signals 3.1a File:1999 PM EXISTING WO SITE HCS: Signals Release 3.1a Inter: CSAH 21 AT CSAH 39 _Analyst: JBB: 1999 PM EXISTING WO SITE Date: 9/29/99 E/W St: CSAH 21 City/St: proj #: Period: N/S St: PRIOR LAKE, 1195.00 PM PEAK CSAH 39 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R Southbound L T R No. Lanes 0 2 0 LGConfig LTR _Volume 132 168 84 i Lane Width 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 020 LTR 120 180 100 12.0 o 1 0 LTR 79 45 101 12.0 Page 1 MN 010 LTR 80 50 70 12.0 ,-ouration , 1. 00 o Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 3 4 Phase Combination 1 -EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds N'B Left Thru Right Peds rn Right SB Right -Green 'lellow .~ll Red _CYCle Length: A A A 40.0 3.5 1.5 90.0 o 2 NB EB WE o SB Left Thru Right Ped Left Thru Right ped Right Right 5 A A A A A A 40.0 3.5 1.5 \ppr / Lane -Srp I Lane Group Capcity sees Intersection Performance Adj Sat Ratios Flow Rate (s) Summary Lane Group Approach v/c g/C 6 7 8 Delay LOS Delay LOS ....... Eastbound :"TR 1020 2294 Westbound :"TR 1058 2381 .....hJorthbound , ~TR 568 1277 3outhbound LTR 558 1255 0.40 0.444 17.1 B 17.1 0.40 0.444 17.1 B 17.1 0.42 0.444 17.5 B 17.5 0.38 0.444 17.1 17.1 B Intersection Delay = 17.2 (sec/veh) B B B B Intersection LOS = B ! J ---,,- ----..T---.-.--......-. HCS-Signals 3.1a File:1999 AM EXISTING WO SITE Page 1 HCS: Signals Release 3.1a Inter: CSAH 21 AT CSAH 39 ~alyst: JBB: 1999 AM EXISTING WO SITE )ate: 9/29/99 E/W St: CSAH 21 City/St: proj #: period: N/S St: PRIOR LAKE, 1195.00 AM PEAK CSAH 39 MN SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ~o. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ! .LGConfig LTR LTR LTR LTR ~olume 42 84 42 60 90 50 39 23 51 40 25 35 :"ane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 _~TOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Juration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ~B Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Ped 'lB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Ped ill Right EB Right SB Right WB Right ~reen 40.0 40.0 [ellow 3.5 3.5 _\.11 Red 1;5 1.5 -Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary . \ppr / Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate jrp Capcity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS '.J:astbound .....- .~. JTR 1269 2856 0.14 0.444 14.9 B 14.9 B ..1lestbound JTR 1235 2779 0.17 0.444 15.1 B 15.1 B ,lorthbound i '...JTR 612 1376 0.19 0.444 15.4 B 15.4 B ;outhbound -bTR 608 1367 0.17 0.444 15.2 B 15.2 B Intersection Delay = 15.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B I I ..-M-----r--...-.-..-------.-r...---- RCS-Signals 3.1a File:2005 PM EXISTING WO SITE RCS: Signals Release 3.1a Page 1 Inter: CSAH 21 AT CSAH 39 -Analyst: JBB: 2005 PM EXISTING WO SITE )ate: 9/29/99 ~/w St: CSAH 21 City/St: proj #: Period: N/s St: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 '1 0 0 1 0 DefL TR LTR LTR LTR 158 201 100 143 215 119 94 54 121 96 60 84 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 0 0 0 ~o. Lanes 'wGConfig -JJolume :"ane Width {TOR Vol PRIOR LAKE, 1195.00 PM PEAK CSAH 39 MN Juration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 3 4 Phase Combination 1 ~B Left A Thru A Right A Peds VB Left Thru Right Peds ffi Right ,sB Right -'3reen fellow .~ll Red .-Cycle Length: 2 A A A 40.0 3.5 1.5 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Adj Sat Ratios Flow Rate (s) ~ppr I Lane """1 rp Lane Group Capcity v/c g/C NB Left Thru Right Ped Left Thru Right Ped Right Right 5 A A A 6 7 8 SB EB WB A A A 40.0 3.5 1.5 Summary Lane Group Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS ..!:astbound ...t)efL 3~9,,"' ~R 779 Westbound .lTR 1120 Jorthbound ....JTR 560 louthbound LTR 544 785 1753 0.48 0.41 0.444 0.444 18.6_ B 17.3 B 17.6 18.7 18.1 Intersection Delay = 17.9 (sec/veh) 2520 0.45 0.444 17.8 B 1261 0.51 0.444 B 17.6 B 1223 0.46 0.444 B 18.7 B B 18.1 B Intersection LOS = B [ I -y-.-.---.--,.-..-------..- . RCS-Signals 3.1a File:2005 AM EXISTING WO SITE HCS: Signals Release 3.1a Page 1 Inter: CSAH 21 AT CSAH 39 -Analyst: JBB: 2005 AM EXISTING WO SITE Date: 9/29/99 E/W St: CSAH 21 City/St: proj #: Period: N/S St: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 LTR LTR LTR LTR 50 100 50 72 107 60 47 28 61 48 30 42 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes LGConfig _Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol PRIOR LAKE, 1195.00 AM PEAK CSAH 39 MN -')uration 1. 00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 3 4 Phase Combination 1 -EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds o'1B Le f t Thru Right Peds :ffi Right 3B Right -Green (e llow ~ll Red _Cycle Length: 2 A A A 40.0 3.5 1.5 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Adj Sat Ratios Flow Rate (s) \ppr / Lane --'3rp Lane Group Capcity v/c g/C NB Left Thru Right Ped Left Thru Right Ped Right Right 5 A A A 6 7 8 SB EB WB A A A 40.0 3.5 1.5 Summary Lane Group Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS ..!:astbound :"TR ....... $0-' 1241 Westbound :"TR 1205 ~orthbound --,TR 603 ~outhbound LTR 597 2793 0.17 0.444 15.1 B 15.4 15.7 15.5 Intersection Delay = 15.4 (sec/veh) 2712 0.21 0.444 15.1 B 1356 0.24 0.444 B 15.4 B 1343 0.21 0.444 B 15.7 B B 15.5 B Intersection LOS = B H I t' ..-r...--.--------.- HCS-Signals 3.1a File:2020 PM EXISTING WO SITE-FPR HCS: Signals Release 3.la Page 1 :nter: CSAH 21 AT FISH POINT ROAD Analyst: JBB: 2020 PM EXISTING WO SITE ~ate: 9/29/99 ~/W St: CSAH 21 City/St: proj #: Period: N/s St: PRIOR LAKE, MN 1195.00 PM PEAK FISH POINT ROAD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R Southbound L T R 110 L TR 55 5 70 12.0 12.0 Jo. Lanes 0 2 1 0 2 1 1 1 0 JGConf ig LT R LT R L TR Volume 70 723 20 15 558 55 78 5 61 -""Jane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 (TOR Vol 0 0 0 o -Duration 1. 00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations >hase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds ped -.:r.vB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Ped IE Right EB Right m Right WB Right Green 38.0 42.0 -(ellow 3.5 3.5 ~ll Red 1.5 1.5 ~yele Length: 90.0 sees Intersection Performance Summary ~ppr / Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Jane Group Flow Rate _Grp Capeity (s) vlc g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ~astbound -'" J T 1606-" 2856 0.69 0.422 23.0- C 22.8 C ~ 662 1568 0.03 0.422 15.2 B , .1estbound JT 1367 3238 0.44 0.422 18.7 B 18.4 B 662 1568 0.09 0.422 15.7 B Northbound 608 1302 0.13 0.467 13.8 B ~R 741 1588 0.09 0.467 13.4 B 13.6 B 40uthbound 613 1314 0.09 0.467 13.5 B _'R 740 1585 0.11 0.467 13.5 B 13.5 B Intersection Delay = 19.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B n I _._.. -- "-r" . HCS-Signals 3.1a File:2020 AM EXISTING WO SITE-FPR HCS: Signals Release 3.1a Page 1 :nter: CSAH 21 AT FISH POINT ROAD Analyst: JBB: 2020 AM EXISTING WO SITE -Date: 9/29/99 ~/w St: CSAH 21 City/St: proj #: Period: N/s St: PRIOR LAKE, MN 1195.00 AM PEAK FISH POINT ROAD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R - 'Jo. Lanes 0 2 1 0 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 JGConf ig LT R LT R L TR L TR Volume 35 296 76 60 227 27 17 3 13 27 3 35 -"Jane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 (TOR Vol 0 0 0 0 -Duration 1. 00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations )hase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Ped -ltilB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds ped JB Right EB Right 3B Right WB Right Green 38.0 42.0 -'Yellow 3.5 3.5 ~ll Red 1.5 1.5 ~ycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ~ppr / Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Jane Group Flow Rate Grp Capcity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ~astbound ...r.J T 1.1.9-' 3125 0.26 0.422 17.0- B 16.8 B ( 662 1568 0.12 0.422 15.9 B lestbound JT 1202 2847 0.25 0.422 16.9 B 16.8 B 662 1568 0.04 0.422 15.3 B Northbound 629 1348 0.03 0.467 13.0 B ~R 755 1617 0.02 0.467 12.9 B 13.0 B ....c:;outhbound 643 1377 0.04 0.467 13.1 B _'R 742 1589 0.05 0.467 13.2 B 13.1 B Intersection Delay = 16.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B Tr , --,-- .-.----..---.---.-.. HCS-Signals 3.1a File:2020 PM EXISTING W SITE-FPR Page 1 HCS: Signals Release 3.la rnter: CSAH 21 AT FISH POINT ROAD Analyst: JBB: 2020 PM EXISTING W SITE -Date: 9/29/99 ~/W St: CSAH 21' City/St: PRIOR LAKE, MN proj #: 1195.00 period: PM PEAK N/S St: FISH POINT ROAD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ~o. Lanes 0 2 1 0 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 ~GConfig LT R LT R L TR L TR Volume 70 723 110 98 558 55 124 14 103 55 23 70 -t..ane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ;(TOR Vol 0 0 0 0 J)uration 1. 00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Ped JNB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds ped ~B Right EB Right 3B Right WB Right Green 42.0 38.0 -Yellow 3.5 3.5 till Red 1.5 1.5 2ycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary !\.ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach i wane Group Flow Rate Grp Capcity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ~astbound .J.JT 1.13' 2813 0.64 0.467 19.2- B 18.6 B ~ 732 1568 0.16 0.467 13.9 B N'estbound :"T 1063 2278 0.65 0.467 19.8 B 19.3 B .~ 732 1568 0.08 0.467 13.3 B Northbound - 540 1279 0.24 0.422 17.0 B .J rR 676 1602 0.18 0.422 16.4 B 16.7 B ~outhbound .J 528 1251 0.11 0.422 15.8 B ER 691 1636 0.14 0.422 16.1 B 16.0 B Intersection Delay = 18.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS B rr I -....-.-r------.-i.........---.----.----..--.-...-.--. 1 HCS-Signals 3.1a File:2020 AM EXISTING W SITE-FPR Page 1 HCS: Signals Release 3.1a [nter: CSAH 21 AT FISH POINT ROAD Analyst: JBB: 2020 AM EXISTING W SITE -Date: 9/29/99 ?/W St: CSAH 21 City/St: PRIOR LAKE, MN proj #: 1195.00 Period: AM PEAK N/S St: FISH POINT ROAD SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R \Io. Lanes 0 2 1 0 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 ~GConfig LT R LT R L TR L TR Volume 35 296 97 79 227 27 114 22 102 27 7 35 -T....ane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ~TOR Vol 0 0 0 0 JJuration 1. 00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ?hase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Ped -WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds ped ~B Right EB Right 3B Right WB Right Green 42.0 38.0 -Yellow 3.5 3.5 \11 Red 1.5 1.5 ':::ycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ~ppr I Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach ~ane Group Flow Rate Grp Capcity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 1:astbound -I.JT 1450- 3120 0.24 0.467 14.5- B 14.3 B I 1568 0.14 13.8 ~ 732 0.467 B :ilestbound ~T 1271 2723 0.25 0.467 14.6 B 14.5 B ~ 732 1568 0.04 0.467 13.1 B Northbound I .J 567 1344 0.21 0.422 16.7 B :m 683 1617 0.19 0.422 16.5 B 16.6 B I ~outhbound .J 525 1243 0.05 0.422 15.4 B i'R 681 1612 0.06 0.422 15.5 B 15.5 B Intersection Delay = 15.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B ~ , y '''-~'~T-~" ~"-_..- HCS-Signals 3.1a File:2020 PM EXISTING WO SITE Page 1 HCS: Signals Release 3.1a [nter: CSAH 21 AT CSAH 39 Analyst: JBB: 2020 PM EXISTING WO SITE -4)ate: 9/29/99 ~/W St: CSAH 21 City/St: proj #: Period: N/S St: PRIOR LAKE, 1195.00 PM PEAK CSAH 39 MN SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R Southbound L T R 'qo. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ~GConfig DefL TR DefL TR LTR LTR Volume 246 347 156 243 361 204 147 84 208 165 93 130 -f...ane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ~TOR Vol 0 0 0 0 -Duration 1. 00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ?hase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds ped .....IN"B Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds ped 'TB Right EB Right 3B Right WB Right Green 37.5 42.5 -{ellow 3.5 3.5 HI Red 1.5 1.5 2ycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary -\ppr I Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach ~ane Group Flow Rate _Grp Capcity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ~astbound , DefL 290 695 0.89 0.417 60.7 E -'1'R 7~3""' 1759 0.72 0.417 25.5--' C 37.1 D .'1estbound ....De fL 320 769 0.80 0.417 37.8 D [,R 727 1745 0.82 0.417 31. 0 C 33.1 C Northbound ~TR 533 1129 0.87 0.472 37.5 D 37.5 D 4outhbound ":"'TR 476 1008 0.86 0.472 38.0 D 38.0 D Intersection Delay = 36.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D IF J -.--.- 1Ii -..--...,---.---.--... HCS-Signals 3.la File:2020 AM EXISTING WO SITE HCS: Signals Release 3.la Page 1 [nter: CSAH 21 AT CSAH 39 Analyst: JBB: 2020 AM EXISTING WO SITE ~ate: 9/29/99 ~/W St: CSAH 21 City/St: proj #: period: N/S St: PRIOR LAKE, 1195.00 AM PEAK CSAH 39 MN SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R 'oJo. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ~GConfig LTR LTR LTR LTR Volume 78 173 78 123 183 102 73 43 105 82 47 65 l.Jane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ~TOR Vol 0 0 0 0 -Duration 1. 00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ?hase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Ped ~B Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds ped ilB Right EB Right 3B Right WB Right Green 38.0 42.0 -(ellow 3.5 3.5 1,.11 Red 1.5 1.5 2ycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary I,.ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach .Jane Group Flow Rate _Grp Capcity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ~astbound -.JTR 1-ttB~r 2580 0.32 0.422 17.5- B 17.5 B .~estbound .JTR 1033 2446 0.42 0.422 18.5 B 18.5 B Northbound ~TR 605 1296 0.39 0.467 16.0 B 16.0 B 4outhbound -lTR 580 1243 0.35 0.467 15.7 B 15.7 B Intersection Delay = 17.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B If , -,--.-.------..-.----- HCS-Signals 3.1a File:2020 PM W SITE HCS: Signals Release 3.1a Page 1 [nter: CSAH 21 AT CSAH 39 Analyst: JBB: 2020 PM W SITE -ryate: 9/29/99 ?/W St: CSAH 21 City/St: PRIOR LAKE, MN proj #: 1195.00 period: PM PEAK N/s St: CSAH 39 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R Southbound L T R "'~o. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 :"GConf ig DefL TR DefL TR LTR LTR Volume 246 383 156 257 388 215 147 84 235 192 93 130 4.Jane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ~TOR Vol 0 0 0 0 J)uration 1. 00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ?hase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Ped .....:rflB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds ped \IB Right EB Right 3B Right WB Right Green 37.0 43.0 -(ellow 3.5 3.5 \11 Red 1.5 1.5 ~ycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary \.ppr / Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach :"ane Group Flow Rate _Grp Capcity (s) vlc g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ~astbound DefL 267 649 0.97 0.411 108.3 F -,,[,R 7~-6'" 1765 0.78 0.411 28.7- C 53.7 D . .vestbound -DefL 297 722 0.91 0.411 67.9 E rR 718 1746 0.88 0.411 39.0 D 47.6 D Northbound :"TR 543 1136 0.90 0.478 44.5 D 44.5 D -'Southbound ':"TR 458 958 0.95 0.478 70.6 E 70.6 E Intersection Delay = 52.7 ( sec/veh) Intersection LOS D 11'1 ---.-..,--.---....-.....-----.-.-..-..........-.... ........_--_.---._._.~._----_.__.......__.__.. RCS-Signals 3.1a File:2020 AM W SITE HCS: Signals Release 3.1a Page 1 [nter: CSAH 21 AT CSAH 39 Analyst: JBB: 2020 AM W SITE I)ate: 9/29/99 ?/w St: CSAH 21 City/St: PRIOR LAKE, MN proj #: 1195.00 period: AM PEAK Nls St: CSAH 39 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R oJo. Lanes ~GConf ig Volume l.Jane Width ~TOR Vol o 2 0 LTR 78 182 78 12.0 020 LTR 152 227 126 12.0 o o 010 LTR 73 43 111 12.0 Southbound L T R 010 LTR 88 47 65 12.0 o o -Duration 1. 00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 3 4 ?hase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds -".vB Le f t Thru Right Peds .;JB Right 3B Right Green -(ellow HI Red ~yele Length: 2 A A A 38.0 3.5 1.5 90.0 sees Intersection Performance Adj Sat Ratios Flow Rate (s) \ppr I ~ane _Grp Lane Group Capeity vie g/C NB Left Thru Right Ped Left Thru Right Ped Right Right 5 A A A 6 7 8 SB EB WB A A A 42.0 3.5 1.5 Summary Lane Group Approach Delay LOS Delay LOS !:astbound -.JTR 1-6-4 a' .'lestbound ~TR 1026 Northbound ..ITR 604 4outhbound ":"TR 572 2481 0.34 0.422 17.7- B 19.7 16.1 15.8 Intersection Delay = 17.9 (see/veh) 2430 0.52 0.422 17.7 B 1294 0.40 0.467 B 19.7 B 1226 0.37 0.467 B 16.1 B B 15.8 B Intersection LOS = B 11' T -.--;r--..---.--...--,--.--....-......'.......--........-.-..-.--....---.---T--..-....-.- .-...-....-...,.-. HCS-Signals 3.1a File:1999 PM EXISTING WO SITE-TH 13 HCS: Signals Release 3.1a Page 1 Inter: CSAH 21 AT TH 13 ~alyst: JBB: 1999 PM EXISTING WO SITE Date: 9/29/99 8/w St: CSAH 21 City/St: proj #: period: N/s St: PRIOR LAKE, 1195.00 PM PEAK TH 13 MN SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R N"o. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 LGConfig DefL TR LTR L T R L T _Volume 225 90 135 101 84 151 136 227 95 214 249 249 Lane Width i2.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 60 60 I)uration 1. 00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ~B Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds ped flB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds ped rn Right A EB Right A 3B Right A WB Right A -Green 31.0 19.0 27.0 fellow 3.0 3.0 3.5 \11 Red 1.0 1.0 1.5 _Cycle Length: 90.0 sees Intersection Performance Summary \ppr I Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach i.ane Group Flow Rate ---Srp Capcity (s) vie g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ~astbound ....DefL 31_2",. 907 0.76 0.344 37.3 D rR 578 1679 0.41 0.344 23.0 C 30.1 C Westbound ~ '..TR 884 2566 0.40 0.344 22.7 C 22.7 C ....hTorthbound .. 370 1752 0.39 0.211 31.2 C - e 554 1845 0.43 0.300 25.9 C 25.8 C R 1098 1568 0.03 0.700 4.2 A ;outhbound .. 370 1752 0.61 0.211 35.1 D 'f 554 1845 0.47 0.300 26.3 C 22.9 C t 1098 1568 0.18 0.700 4.7 A Intersection Delay = 27.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C WI r ..---..i.......--.---...---------.-----..--T HCS-Signals 3.1a File:1999 AM EXISTING WO SITE-TH 13 Page 1 HCS: Signals Release 3.1a , Inter: CSAH 21 AT TH 13 -Analyst: JBB: 1999 AM EXISTING WO SITE )ate: 9/29/99 Vw St: CSAH 21 City/St: proj #: Period: N/S St: PRIOR LAKE, 1195.00 AM PEAK TH 13 MN SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ~o. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 , ~GConfig DefL TR LTR L T R L T -Volume 113 45 68 50 42 76 68 113 45 107 125 125 Jane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ~TOR Vol 0 0 45 45 Juration 1. 00 Area Type: All other areas Signal 0 erations ~hase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4B Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Ped m Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds ped ffi Right EB Right A JB Right WB Right A -Sreen 28.0 20.0 30.0 ~ e llow 3.0 3.0 3.0 ~ll Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 ....9ycle Length: 90.0 sees Intersection Performance Summary ~ppr / Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach !.Jane Group Flow Rate jrp Capcity {s} v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS _~astbound ...DefL 3 ~7>-. 1181 0.32 0.311 24.3_ C 'R 522 1677 0.23 0.311 23.2 C 23.7 C Westbound ,TR 862 2771 0.21 0.311 22.9 C 22.9 C 4orthbound 389 1752 0.19 0.222 28.6 C 615 1845 0.19 0.333 21. 5 C 24.2 C ...:e. 523 1568 0.00 0.333 20.0 B :ou thbound 389 1752 0.29 0.222 29.5 C T 615 1845 0.21 0.333 21.7 C 24.3 C 523 1568 0.16 0.333 21. 3 C Intersection Delay = 24.1 {sec/veh} Intersection LOS = C n I -1'-' .----..- ,.- HCS-Signals 3.1a File:2005 PM EXISTING WO SITE-TH 13 Page 1 HCS: Signals Release 3.1a SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 DefL TR LTR L T R L T 269 107 161 121 100 180 162 271 113 255 297 297 12.0 12.0 12:0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 0 60 60 Inter: CSAH 21 AT TH 13 -Analyst: JBB: 2005 PM EXISTING WO SITE Date: 9/29/99 E/W St: CSAH 21 No. Lanes LGConfig _Volume :"ane Width ! i{TOR Vol City/St: proj #: Period: N/S St: PRIOR LAKE, J.J.95.00 PM PEAK TH 13 MN Juration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 -SB Left A NB Left Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Ped ~ Left A SB Left Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Ped ill Right A EB Right 3B Right A WB Right ~reen 36.0 lellow 3.0 : HI Red 1. 0 _Cycle Length: 90.0 sees Intersection Performance Summary I ~ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate ~rp Capcity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS I 5 6 7 8 A A A A A A A A 19.0 23.0 3;0 3.0 1.0 1.0 3astbound -DefL 3].6 ,... ! ~R 672 I 841 1679 0.84 0.42 Westbound JTR 1000 2499 0.42 ..1Torthbound I J 370 I ~ 472 -R 1098 louthbound i ~ 370 1752 T 472 1845 1098 1568 Intersection Delay 1752 1845 1568 0.46 0.60 0.05 0.72 0.66 0.23 = 30.1 0.400 0.400 44 . 6_ D 19.9 B 32.3 C 0.400 19.8 B 19.8 B 0.211 32.0 0.256 31.7 0.700 4.2 0.211 40.2 0.256 33.6 0.700 4.9 ( sec/veh) c C 28.8 A C D C 27.1 A Intersection C LOS = C w, - ------y---..-.--..-i-...---.-- HCS-Signals 3.1a File:2005 AM EXISTING WO SITE-TH 13 Page 1 HCS: Signals Release 3.1a Inter: CSAH 21 AT TH 13 ~alyst: JBB: 2005 AM EXISTING WO SITE )ate: 9/29/99 .l,/W St: CSAH 21 City/St: Proj #: period: N/S St: PRIOR LAKE, 1195.00 AM PEAK TH 13 MN SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R 10. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 l.JGConfig DefL TR LTR L T R L T ...1Tolume 135 54 81 60 50 91 81 135 54 128 149 149 Jane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 tTOR Vol 0 0 54 54 }uration 1. 00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "4B Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds ped rB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Ped fB Right EB Right A ~B Right WB Right A -C;reen 28.0 20.0 30.0 'ellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 ,_...11 Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 J;ycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ,ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate --:rp Capcity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS '~astbound .DefL 3 5.4>- 1138 0.40 0.311 25.1_ C 'R 522 1679 0.27 0.311 23.6 C 24.4 C Westbound ,TR 849 2730 0.25 0.311 23.3 C 23.3 C ..:t.:rorthbound 389 1752 0.22 0.222 28.9 C 615 1845 0.23 0.333 21.9 C 24.5 C .R 523 1568 0.00 0.333 20.0 B outhbound 389 1752 0.35 0.222 30.0 C T 615 1845 0.26 0.333 22.1 C 24.7 C 523 1568 0.19 0.333 21.5 C Intersection Delay = 24.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C I I ..,.-.---. HCS-Signals 3.1a File:2020 PM EXISTING WO SITE-TH 13 HCS: Signals Release 3.1a Page 1 :nter: CSAH 21 AT TH 13- Analyst: JBB: 2020 PM EXISTING WO SITE ---T)ate: 9/29/99 ~/w St: CSAH 21 City/St: proj #: period: Nls St: PRIOR LAKE, 1195.00 PM PEAK TH 13 MN SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R Southbound L T R Jo. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 .JGConf ig DefL TR DefL TR L T R L T Volume 419 175 251 197 164 295 253 422 185 416 463 463 ---".Jane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 tTOR Vol 0 0 60 60 -Duration 1. 00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 'hase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds ped --I.o:lB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Ped ifB Right A EB Right A 3B Right A WB Right A Green 33.0 18.0 24.0 ~ellow 3.5 3.5 3.5 ~ll Red 1.5 1.5 1.5 L:ycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ~ppr / Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach .Jane Group Flow Rate Grp Capcity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ~astbound DefL 291 794 1. 52 0.367 974.2 F -'1:'R 64:-7>-' 1682 0.73 0.367 29.0- C 497.9 F . ,~estbound J)efL 309 842 0.67 0.367 29.6 C rR 611 1667 0.79 0.367 32.9 C 31. 9 C Northbound ~ 350 1752 0.76 0.200 43.9 D .J f1 492 1845 0.90 0.267 57.0 E 44.7 D . ~ 1080 1568 0.12 0.689 4.8 A -Southbound .J 350 1752 1.25 0.200 512.9 F .r 492 1845 0.99 0.267 104.3 F 206.1 F ...R 1080 1568 0.39 0.689 6.2 A Intersection Delay = 232.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F BIT .-r.---.---...----------.....-.- HCS-Signals 3.1a File:2020 AM EXISTING WO SITE-TH 13 Page 1 HCS: Signals Release 3.1a Inter: CSAH 21 AT TH 13 Analyst: JBB: 2020 AM EXISTING WO SITE ---J)ate: 9/29/99 ?/W St: CSAH 21 City/St: proj #: period: N/s St: PRIOR LAKE, 1195.00 AM. PEAK TH'13 MN SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R Southbound L T R ~o. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 LGConfig DefL TR LTR L T R L T Volume 210 88 127 98 82 148 127 210 88 208 233 233 l:...ane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 :{TOR Vol 0 0 60 60 -Duration 1. 00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds ped -WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds ped ~B Right EB Right A 3B Right WB Right A Green 28.0 20.0 30.0 -Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 1:\.11 Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 sees Intersection Performance Summary I:\.pprl Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate _Grp Capcity (s) vie g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 3astbound DefL 280 899 0.79 0.311 43.8 D --"I'R ~3". 1681 0.43 0.311 25.3- C 34.4 C tlestbound LTR 802 2577 0.43 0.311 25.0 C 25.0 C Northbound L 389 1752 0.34 0.222 30.0 C r 615 1845 0.36 0.333 23.1 C 25.3 C R 523 1568 0.06 0.333 20.4 C -Southbound L 389 1752 0.56 0.222 33.0 C r 615 1845 0.40 0.333 23.5 C 26.6 C ....R 523 1568 0.35 0.333 23.0 C Intersection Delay = 28.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C n T r 1--'---'" -----.--...-..---r----.--.-..- HCS-Signals 3.1a File:1999 PM W SITE-TH 13 HCS: Signals Release 3.1a Inter: CSAH 21 AT TH 13 _Analyst: JBB: 1999 PM W SITE Date: 9/29/99 E/W St: CSAH 21 City/St: PRIOR LAKE, MN proj #: 1195.00 period: PM PEAK N/S St: TH 13 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R Southbound L T R No. Lanes LGConfig _Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol o 2 DefL 225 104 12.0 12.0 o TR 135 o 1 L 249 12.0 Page 1 1 T 249 12.0 60 -ouration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 -EB Left A NB Left Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds ped NB Left A SB Left Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Ped ~ Right A EB Right SB Right A WB Right -Green 31.0 iellow 3.5 All Red 1.5 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ~ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate -9rp Capcity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS o 2 0.79 0.43 0.344 0.344 41.6 D 23.2 C 32.1 C o LTR 164 1 1 L 227 12.0 o 1 T 115 12.0 60 0.46 0.344 23.4 C 23.4 C 0.37 0.222 30.2 C 0.49 0.267 28.6 C 26.0 C 0.06 0.667 5.2 A 0.64 0.222 35.3 D 0.53 0.267 29.3 C 24.8 C 0.19 0.667 5.8 A = 28.8 ( sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C ...----.-.T......---... 1 R 237 12.0 122 92 12.0 Bastbound -PefL 2~9.. [,R 581 869 1688 Westbound ~TR 862 2502 ~orthbound , .I 389 : .r 492 R 1045 3outhbound -' 389 1752 T 492 1845 t 1045 1568 Intersection Delay 1752 1845 1568 136 12.0 i I 5 6 7 8 A A A A A A A A 20.0 24.0 3.5 3.5 1.5 1.5 HCS-Signals 3.1a File:1999 AM W SITE-TH 13 HCS: Signals Release 3.1a Page 1 Inter: CSAH 21 AT TH 13 _Analyst: JBB: 1999 AM W SITE Date: 9/29/99 ~/W St: CSAH 21 City/St: PRIOR LAKE, MN proj #: 1195.00 period: AM PEAK N/S St: TH 13 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ~o. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 ":"GConfig DefL TR LTR L T R L T _Volume 113 48 68 70 59 103 68 113 49 112 125 125 ~ane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ~TOR Vol 0 0 49 49 Juration 1. 00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ~B Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Ped om Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds ped m Right EB Right A .3B Right WB Right A ..Green 28.0 20.0 30.0 ~ellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 !..ll Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary !..ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate .-C;rp Capcity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ~astbound j?efL 31.5>-- 1077 0.36 0.311 24.7 C ~R 524 1683 0.23 0.311 23.3- C 24.0 C Westbound JTR 848 2725 0.29 0.311 23.6 C 23.6 C ...hTorthbound 389 1752 0.19 0.222 28.6 C 615 1845 0.19 0.333 21. 5 C 24.2 C R 523 1568 0.00 0.333 20.0 B louthbound 389 1752 0.30 0.222 29.6 C T 615 1845 0.21 0.333 21. 7 C 24.4 C ...... 523 1568 0.15 0.333 21. 2 C Intersection Delay = 24.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C 11 ------r-.---.-i.......--- HCS-Signals 3.1a File:2005 PM W SITE-TH 13 HCS: Signals Release 3.1a Inter: CSAH 21 AT TH 13 _Analyst: JBB: 2005 PM W SITE Date: 9/29/99 E/w St: CSAH 21 City/St: PRIOR LAKE, MN proj #: 1195.00 period: PM PEAK N/s .St: TH 13 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R Page 1 Southbound L T R No. Lanes LGConfig -Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol 1 T 133 12.0 60 020 DefL TR 132 108 193 12.0 12.0 o 2 DefL 269 121 12.0 12.0 o TR 161 1 1 L 271 12.0 1 R 278 12.0 1 L 297 12.0 162 12.0 o o Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 -EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Ped NB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Ped ~B Right A EB Right A SB Right A WE Right A -Green 31. 0 21.0 26.0 iellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 1-\.11 Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 _Cycle Length: 90.0 sees Intersection Performance Summary \ppr / Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate -'3rp Capcity (s) vie g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS .3astbound ...DefL 3..4.1>-. 991 0.83 0.344 45.0_ D rR 581 1687 0.51 0.344 24.2 C 34.4 C Westbound -)e fL 353 1024 0.39 0.344 23.1 C rR 574 1667 0.55 0.344 25.0 C 24.5 C 1 T 297 12.0 60 ~orthbound .J 409 1752 0.42 0.233 30.0 C r 533 1845 0.53 0.289 28.0 C 25.3 C ..R 1063 1568 0.07 0.678 4.9 A 3outhbound .J 409 1752 0.72 0.233 37.9 D T 533 1845 0.59 0.289 29.1 C 25.3 C - ~ 1063 1568 0.23 0.678 5.7 A Intersection Delay = 29.8 ( sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C I I ~ '-'-'~-----'T'-'------------- HCS-Signals 3.1a File:2005 AM W SITE-TH 13 HCS: Signals Release 3.1a Inter: CSAH 21 AT TH 13 -Analyst: JBB: 2005 AM W SITE Date: 9/29/99 E/W St: CSAH 21 City/St: PRIOR LAKE, MN Proj #: 1195.00 Period: AM PEAK N/S St: TH 13 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R Southbound L T R ~o. Lanes LGConfig -Volume Lane Width ~TOR Vol o LTR 118 o 2 DefL 135 57 12.0 12.0 o TR 81 o 2 67 12.0 80 81 12.0 o o ~uration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 ~B Left A NB Left Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Ped ~ Left A SB Left Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Ped is Right EB Right 3B Right WB Right ~reen 28.0 {ellow 3.0 H 1 Red 1. 0 _Cycle Length: 90.0 sees Intersection Performance Summary \pprl Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach i Lane Group Flow Rate ~rp Capcity (s) vie g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 1 L 149 12.0 Page 1 1 T 149 12.0 58 1 L 135 12.0 1 T 58 12.0 58 1 R 133 12.0 5 6 7 8 A A A A A A A A 20.0 30.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 I .!:astbound .J)efL 3~5,... ~R 523 0.45 0.28 0.311 0.311 25.9_ C 23.7 C 1013 1682 Westbound JTR 836 2688 0.33 24.1 0.311 ~Torthbound 389 , 615 ..R 523 ;outhbound J 389 1752 T 615 1845 , 523 1568 Intersection Delay 1752 1845 1568 0.22 0.23 0.00 0.222 28.9 o .333 21. 9 0.333 20.0 0.36 0.26 0.18 = 24.8 0.222 30.2 0.333 22.1 0.333 21.5 ( sec/veh) 24.8 C U I - ~ "T""""-- C C 24.1 C C 24.5 B C C C 24.8 C Intersection C LOS = C HCS-Signals 3.1a File:2020 PM W SITE-TH 13 HCS: Signals Release 3.1a Page 1 [nter: CSAH 21 AT TH 13 Analyst: JBB: 2020 PM W SITE -ryate: 9/29/99 ~/w St: CSAH 21 City/St: PRIOR LAKE, MN proj #: 1195.00 Period: PM PEAK N/s St: TH 13 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R Southbound L T R .'10. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 :"GConfig DefL TR DefL TR L T R L T Volume 419 184 251 203 170 304 253 422 198 430 463 463 --'f.Jane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ~TOR Vol 0 0 60 60 -Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ?hase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left A NB Left Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds Ped -wE Left A SB Left Thru A Thru Right A Right Peds ped IJ"B Right A EB Right I 3B Right A WB Right Green 33.0 -Yellow 3.0 \11 Red 1.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary \ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach :"ane Group Flow Rate _Grp Capcity (s) vlc g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ~astbound . DefL 274 -t['R 6~~' 5 6 7 8 A A A A A A A A 20.0 25.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 748 1685 1. 61 0.74 0.367 0.367 29 . 7- C .ilestbound -DefL 294 rR 611 801 1667 0.73 0.82 0.367 0.367 33.9 34.9 C C 34.6 C Northbound .J 389 1752 0.68 0.222 37.1 D r 513 1845 0.87 0.278 47.6 D 37.0 D R 1080 1568 0.14 0.689 4.9 A -Southbound .J 389 1752 1.17 0.222 373.8 F r 513 1845 0.95 0.278 73.5 E 152.8 F -R 1080 1568 0.39 0.689 6.2 A Intersection Delay = (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = I I ---.,----.---..-.---.----. HCS-Signals 3.1a File:2020 AM W SITE-TH 13 HCS: Signals Release 3.1a Page 1 [nter: CSAH 21 AT TH 13 Analyst: JBB: 2020 AM W SITE ~ate: 9/29/99 ~/W St: CSAH 21 City/St: PRIOR LAKE, MN proj #: 1195.00 Period: AM PEAK N/S St: TH 13 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R -'qo. Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~GConfig DefL TR LTR L T R L T Volume 210 91 127 113 93 166 127 210 91 211 233 233 -T...Jane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ~TOR Vol 0 0 60 60 -Duration 1. 00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ?hase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Ped -fN"B Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Ped qB Right EB Right A 3B Right WB Right A Green 28.0 20.0 30.0 -Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 ~ll Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 90.0 sees Intersection Performance Summary ~ppr / Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach :Jane Group Flow Rate _Grp Capcity (s) vie g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ~astbound DefL 256 822 0.86 0.311 60.2 E ---q'R ~4"" 1683 0.44 0.311 25.3- C 42.4 D flestbound ~TR 791 2542 0.50 0.311 25.7 C 25.7 C Northbound ~ 389 1752 0.34 0.222 30.0 C ...J [' 615 1845 0.36 0.333 23.1 C 25.3 C R 523 1568 0.06 0.333 20.5 C -Southbound ..J 389 1752 0.58 0.222 33.3 C r 615 1845 0.40 0.333 23.5 C 26.7 C ...R 523 1568 0.35 0.333 23.0 C Intersection Delay = 30.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C H I -.-...----r-....--..-.......-.-..-.-T....---...--.......----..-'-'---,---'---'-"-' HCS-Signals 3.1a File:2020 PM W SITE-TH 13 MITIGATED Page 1 HCS: Signals Release 3.la [nter: CSAH 21 AT TH 13 Analyst: JBB: 2020 PM W SITE-MITIGATED -Date: 9/29/99 ~/W St: CSAH 21 City/St: proj #: period: N/S St: PRIOR LAKE, 1195.00 PM PEAK TH 13 MN SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R Southbound L T R """\Io. Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 ~GConf ig L TR L TR L LT R L LT R Volume 419 184 251 203 170 304 253 422 198 430 463 463 -"Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ~TOR Vol 0 0 60 60 -Puration 1. 00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ?hase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Ped -WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds ped - Right Right ~B A EB 3B Right A WB Right Green 23.0 14.5 23.0 13.5 -Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ~ll Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2ycle Length: 90.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ~ppr / Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach :"ane Group Flow Rate Grp Capcity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ~astbound 'L 448 1752 0.98 0.256 103.8 F -TR ~6"'"' 3202 0.89 0.161 57.6.- E 80.2 F ~estbound _L 448 1752 0.48 0.256 29.2 C rR 510 3168 0.98 0.161 98.1 F 77.4 E Northbound --r 263 1752 1. 01 0.150 160.6 F .J ~T 526 3505 0.84 0.150 50.6 D 78.7 E 'R 706 1568 0.21 0.450 15.2 B -Southbound .J 448 1752 1. 02 0.256 136.9 F ":"T 896 3505 0.54 0.256 29.6 C 61. 0 E R 801 1568 0.53 0.511 15.4 B Intersection Delay = 79.6 ( sec/veh) Intersection LOS E U I T --Y--~--'--'.'--'''''T .....--..---.-..--.---....---.-..- --............ '1-...-..--.-.------- HCS-Signals 3.1a File:2020 AM W SITE-TH 13 MITIGATED Page 1 HCS: Signals Release 3.1a Inter: CSAH 21 AT TH 13 . Analyst: JBB: 2020 AM W SITE-MITIGATED lJate: 9/29/99 ~/W St: CSAH 21 City/St: proj #: period: N/S St: PRIOR LAKE, 1195.00 AM PEAK TH 13 MN SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R Southbound L T R :Jo. Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 !:...GConfig L TR L TR L LT R L LT R Volume 210 91 127 113 93 166 127 210 91 211 233 233 -Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ::(TOR Vol 0 0 60 60 -Duration 1.00 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds ped -WB Left A SB Left A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Ped ~B Right A EB Right , 3B Right A WB Right Green 23.0 14.0 23.0 14.0 -Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ?\.ll Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ~ycle Length: 90.0 sees Intersection Performance Summary ?\.ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach !:...ane Group Flow Rate _Grp Capcity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS E:astbound iL 448 1752 0.49 0.256 29.4 C -rR 4~8 >-' 3199 0.46 0.156 35.3"' D 32.4 C iVestbound -L 448 1752 0.27 0.256 27.1 C rR 493 3168 0.55 0.156 36.5 D 33.6 C _Northbound !:... 273 1752 0.49 0.156 36.1 D l.T 545 3505 0.41 0.156 34.7 C 33.4 C R 714 1568 0.05 0.456 13.7 B -Southbound !:... 448 1752 0.50 0.256 29.5 C LT 896 3505 0.27 0.256 27.0 C 23.7 C -R 801 1568 0.23 0.511 12.3 B Intersection Delay = 31.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C I I --1"""'---