HomeMy WebLinkAbout8C - Ring Road Alignment
DATE:
AGENDA #:
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
AGENDA ITEM:
DISCUSSION:
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MARCH 6, 2000
8C
BUD OSMUNDSON, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS I CITY ENGINEER
FRANK BOYLES, CITY MANAGER
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF REPORT REGARDING THE ALIGNMENT
OF THE RING ROAD
HISTORY.
The discussion on the ring road has an extensive history with the City
dating back to 1984. There have been numerous discussions regarding
various segments of the ring road including the CSAH 23ITrunk Highway 13
intersection realignment and the extension of the roadway on the Park
Nicollet property between Toronto and Franklin Trail.
CURRENT CIRCUMSTANCES
The following discussion reviews alternate layouts including the CSAH
23ITH 13 intersection and a proposed "ring road" northeasterly to Franklin
Trail. The intent of this analysis is to assist the Council in its visioning
process for this commercial area. How do you want it to look in twenty to
fifty years? This discussion should assist in this decision making process.
The proposed ring road will help to eliminate the existing frontage road
issue between Duluth and Franklin Trail, especially in front of the Priordale
Mall and the EZ Stop gas station. The main purpose of any proposed
frontage or backage road to TH 13 is to take local commercial business
traffic off of TH 13. To work effectively the road should promote continuous
traffic flow through this commercial/business area.
Shown below are other objectives the ring road is expected to achieve
regardless of layout.
1. Eliminate Toronto Avenue as a city street north ofthe ring road, and the
Toronto Avenue connection to TH 13.
2. Include storm drain improvements to Toronto/Tower intersection.
3. Close Franklin and TH 13 access to EZ Stop.
4. Provide access to EZ Stop and Velishek properties off the ring road.
5. Improve the gravel road segment of Tower Street.
6. Utilize the same CSAH 23ITH 13 area realignment.
7. Discourage southbound traffic on Mushtown Road.
The circumstances which are bringing this issue forward at the present time
include land use issues and priority of funding. The U.S. Postal Service is
proposing to construct a new post office on the Enivid 1 st Addition two lots
16200 Eagle Creek Ave. S.E.,irpH6~r~~~'t1rJJe~g~qg3~~2!i79.~el~WrJflJ<!rf!m8' f~Xx~~~2p,rff542~5
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
-
.-----r------. .
proposed layout of the streets have a major impact on this site. Secondly,
the Napa site located just west of the existing CSAH 23 and Tower Street
intersection will be affected greatly by the redesign of the CSAH 23 and TH
13 intersection and the connecting roadways. In addition, the city has had
proposals to develop the vacant land on Tower and Toronto. Lastly, the
city staff is currently putting together the new five year Capital Improvement
Plan which will prioritize not only projects in this area but other projects
within the city which are affected by the use of Municipal State Aid Funding
and other city funds which could be used for the "ring road" system.
To facilitate the study of the ring road, staff has divided the roadway into
three segments: A = CSAH 23/TH 13 Intersection to Duluth; B = Duluth to
Toronto; C = The Park Nicollet Segment from Toronto to Franklin Trail.
Four alternative layouts have been prepared, each containing an identical
Segment A, the CSAH 23/TH 13 intersection to Duluth since this segment
has previously been investigated more thoroughly. Below is a narrative for
each ring road segment and alternative layouts within each segment. As
you read the narrative please refer to the attached graphics and tables
supplied for each layout.
SEGMENT A: THE CSAH23/TH 13 INTERSECTION
This intersection had a Feasibility Study completed in 1992 which.
investigated various options for this intersection and the surrounding
roadways. At least four alternatives were investigated with the attached
layout being the chosen alternative. Of the alternatives investigated, this
layout achieved the traffic criteria demanded by the county, MnDOT and the
city. This proposal would include a new traffic signal at the new intersection
and include the closure of the current CSAH 23 intersection with TH 13. It
realigns the Tower Street, Mushtown Road, CSAH 23 intersection into a
more acceptable alignment. MnDOT and the county will participate heavily
in this segment of the project due to the access improvements to CSAH 23
and TH 13. The cost for this segment of the proposed ring road
improvements is estimated at $1,777,000.00.
SEGMENT B: BETWEEN DULUTH AND TORONTO
This segment of the road has the most significantly different alternate
layouts of the entire roadway. The alternatives include four different layouts
as shown in the attached materials. The least expensive alternative is not
do any improvements to Tower or Toronto in this area and is called Layout
No.1. Layout No.2 involves a meandering design following Duluth Avenue
and the north side of the Enivid First Addition area (proposed Post Office
site) and continues easterly behind the Priordale Mall to Toronto Avenue.
Layout No.3 utilizes a segment of Tower Street, then curves to the north
through a large radius curve through the Enivid Addition to match Toronto
Avenue near the Borka property site. Layout No.4 involves a more straight
line design between the Duluth/Tower intersection and the Borka property
proceeding straight through the Enivid First Addition area. The least
expensive alternative for Segment 8, is Layout No. 1 with Layout No. 4
being the most expensive. Layouts No. 2 and No. 3 have similar affects on
property, while NO.4 has the most impact on property. The estimated costs
for each are depicted on the attached information.
RINGROAD.DOC
2
RINGROAD.DOC
.. .'.T-r'l
SEGMENT C: THE PARK NICOLLET SEGMENT
For alternative Layouts No. 1 - 3, the proposed design for this segment is
the same which proceeds with a meandering alignment from Toronto to the
existing Park Nicollet street stub. This design impacts the parking area of
the Borka property which may involve purchasing more land to make the
existing building a viable business. Layout No.4 is a more direct route from
Toronto straight through the Borka building and ending up at the same
terminus of the existing Park Nicollet driveway. The first three (3) layouts
for this segment have the same cost estimates while the fourth costs more
due to the total taking of the Borka property.
FUNDING SOURCESIIMPACTS
Shown below are the assumptions used to estimate the costs for each
alternative layout.
COST ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS
(1) Collector standards for street between CSAH 23 to existing stub street to
Park Nicollet.
(a) Forty-four (44) foot wide - concrete curb and gutter
(b) Five (5) feet concrete sidewalk on one side and eight (8)
foot bituminous trail on other.
(2) New street matches existing thirty-two (32) foot wide Park Nicollet street.
(3) No private utility costs (i.e. electric, gas, telephone).
(4) Street lights will be an additional cost.
(5) Leaving shredded tire section in place.
(6) Storm drain improvements to Toronto/Tower intersection (in cooperation
with Post Office site construction).
(7) Alternates 1, 2, & 3 assume purchasing land from Borka plus replacement
cost of that land.
(8) Does not include any costs for acquisition of access rights.
With these assumptions in mind the table below shows the Cost Estimate
for each layout.
COMPARATIVE COST ESTIMATES
LAYOUT
NO.1 NO.2 NO.3 NO.4
CSAH 23/TH 13
Realignment Segment
ROW $77,000 $77,000 $77 ,000 $77,000
Improvements $1,700,000 $1,700,000 $1,700,000 $1,700,000
TOTAL $1,777,000 $1,777,000 $1,777,000 $1,777,000
Duluth to Toronto
Segment
ROW 0 $348,000 $294,000 $375,000
Improvements $120,000.00 $932,000 $742,000 $933,000
TOTAL $120,000.00 $1,280,000 $1,036,000 $1,308,000
3
---.
"
Park Nicollet Segment
ROW $112,000 $112,000 $112,000 $201,000
Improvements $585,000 $585,000 $585,000 $569,000
TOTAL $697,000 $697,000 $697,000 $770,000
TOTAL ROW $189,000 $537,000 $483,000 $653,000
TOTAL $2,405,000 $3,217,000 $3,027,000 $3,202,000
IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL COST $2,594,000 $3,754,000 $3,510,000 $3,855,000
The proposed funding sources include the Minnesota Department of
Transportation, the County Highway Department, and various city funds.
The state and county have already agreed to fund a portion of the CSAH
23/TH 13 intersection improvements as described in Segment A, although
final amounts have not been agreed to.
The CSAH 23/TH 13 intersection (Segment A) has been programmed in the
County CIP for 2004 and the City CIP will also include Segment A in 2004.
Segment C, the Park Nicollet area, possibly is a stand alone project
dependent on development of the remaining parcel by Park Nicollet.
Segment B, the segment between Duluth Avenue and Toronto Avenue'
requires immediate attention with the proposed post office on the Enivid
First Addition, Lots 1 & 2 of Block 1. Alternatives 2, 3, and 4 all would have
impacts on the post office design.
The Council has to prioritize funding, weighing the benefit of this proposed
project versus intersection improvements on TH 13 such as the
Commerce/Boudin Project, 150th Street, Main StreetlCSAH 44 and others.
All include major utilization of Municipal State Aid Funds to construct.
Currently, the City has approximately $600,000.00 in its MSA account
available for new construction and we will receive approximately
$300,000.00 additionally each year for construction. Therefore, there is
some money available to do this project if that is your priority.
CONCLUSIONI
RECOMMENDATIONS: As stated previously, this item is mainly about visioning for the future. It is
what the Council would like this commercial area to look like in ten to twenty
years.
Staff investigated the four alternatives utilizing a decision analysis stating
the purpose, objectives, and desired results of the proposed project. Using
this analysis alternate Layout Numbers 1, 2, and 3 are clearly preferred,
meaning Layout No.4 is thrown out. Of the preferred alternatives, Layout
NO.2 is my recommendation. The reasoning is that it does provide a good
frontage/backage road to TH 13 and the alignment follows property lines
more closely than other alternatives thereby reducing the number of parcels
that are cut up into small, odd-shaped parcels. Layout No. 1 is obviously
the easiest and least expensive. The problem is that its effectiveness from
a traffic movement perspective is undermined by the ninety degree
intersection at Tower and Toronto and the channelizing of the
commercial/business traffic to that intersection.
RINGROAD.DOC
4
Al TERNA TIVES:
RECOMMENDED
MOTION:
RINGROAD.DOC
"T..,.. I
The alternatives are as follows:
(1) Approve Layout No.2, direct staff to schedule a Public Hearing before the
City Council to receive public input on the proposal and then if appropriate
prepare an official map to reserve the right-of-way and program the
improvements in the CIP which will facilitate completion of the ring road.
(2) Take no action and direct that additional information be provided on one or
a combination of layouts.
A motion and second to approve Layout No 2, direct staff to schedule a
Public Hearing before the City Council to receive public input on the
proposal and then if appropriate prepare an official map to reserve the right-
of-way and program the improveme s in the CIP which will facilitate
completion of the ring road.
REVIEWED BY:
5
-, _ 1', \ \ t...-..-.J I~ I..--.J I~I . I "/
~ ~ t ~~ I ' i-; """ I /7"\ · "'cccc:
~~' l,~."":d,"::~ iJ L ~((,~:::~fl'!; ~j_:&_~n___n-_:::
""-' I ._ ~ ,Jfir...rU !! ~-.f$)
~~~" ill ~ [~ 0 ~ :i c::::J d) 1:~~1~ ./~ .-
"~ t""p.) ~ L IU ~ "b- "'. ..' 'fQ '--~'"
'~ '" '/ ~ cY --.J i:1 -_ ! i.. : ~ J€ " ·
, I/) ~ : ~S<, :,~dl.i ~ : "
t~' ,\+, ~ " U j I g-2 8 ~ ~~\O~) ~
tS /(7~~:" i ,,/,; ,~: ~ m 'Y1:1:irH'1., I <,
~i if \:::;: ~, u, ~J i .. n - /Cjl~j
~ I, '\~ '"L ~:o., "<' :: lo~: i!\
_ . ~ \-",- .... '- I "- ii ;;"'"mnmm .. _, ,~ I n I i _~ · -::"'~"''r
\ ~ :",~, '~'l '\~~~::::::,,\ .. .~~B M__ , :,,::::::- ::::.:::::: i ;~'\ M @~
) ;.I \ ,9 ,,'..\ \.2. ~! : 0.. ~ i (,,-
"j jh ~ ~ ~ .,,:'. Iii : II ' v i
_ D~r----; \ '~, ~ itll - ~ ~::r:;, I i./ - 9<\;
~ ~~~:_"~ ~" 1-~\,::~~,~~~.,\\ ~ l)Y::- ~ _ ~\~~~, ~ ; 'I; ""'~~ li\" '/ '" 00-;']
, 4., ill '<'.' ,~~, ~ \\~ ,- --- .. ' [g
.LOl ~" ..,..." ..,:'<~ r.J: " ,,' '0 ..~.:-.;".---~-~~---, ' .. \"\
. n \,:-J. 1~;:~~~- '. ,~, ,- \\ tl3'" - ,,\\ \\~ '" . ----"-,
O "l.'::r:' : u~ JlI~- ,_____- I .' \) :1V30 --- ~ i~'- ',< .,' 00
) -r;:="~ "f _, __- _ ~ ' I'IS;'Oo: - 1 I _ "- ~=-., ... \eD 11 -
i ~ u " }<'I ""-l 6 . I ,,~, '. tiEl " I ~!0 ,- ',<- "LJ
! ,1=1 "I, '. . I _',~ti, -~.
Z - 'to' 'II. . . ",-,:, o" ~, , ' ^' \1 "<::::::::::::'>
~ ~_ (} . "'~ ~':;,(, " ':~, '. L'" > I u. I : ' , .
'J; '_, ' ,~, ,'~, ' ' ....-:-' I I Ii' ' i'--.... ~ -.
,.' " '" ,'- '/ 00 ~
'.I;.eD) . ",'"
'~ '
~ ~~ ~ (> ".-r
~ ,,,,,,' s' 'i!'Ji " _ '--- '., - ~ ' '" ~a:e
. '" "-:.~~.~; b\" 0 \ \ s ~ J'! 0 ~~1 nC )J.-::
u-:~' ,1 ~~~/~ \, \, $- -'-~\l(- ~,JDj}:'??'''-->-''---
~ ~~ [~ \1l! ~ ~I q c If" \ '~'1i1~}lt,-~".'t\ ,.=: -:'-)(
~ ~ r' I ! I ~ \ ','
-, ------- - ' . '-.:
-,_ ________-;-_:=:':::::::..:;,:;,:,::~v_lim~~~::::"_- ~ ---------=-../ "
() ~ 4i< \1 i-~~ -, ;~, \
\-- ~ ~ ~~ ___ 't( ,~~\ "
\.c.1 ,,, \
tV \ 'H~ N \~~\ "
\~ i" ~ \~~\\
~ \ ~ ," \
, , ,+ \ c.a..
.~, '" '\ ' ~
!~~~.~'\\;\ \
~f~ a,' U
~~:t~:'~~<:S '.<>'.
<l;'-- <-2'~ Q"'<& '
"~'- -N.~ :~;~'l5\:U \~~'
~ ~ &:\"; ,7 hm::: ~ IX\,
1I~~ ~:~~~~~'.<
P.f)(. _ _~~~" ,~~ 0. ~'
. V7"-~.' 01 :: - ~'\v ':,'
. 11"I:t ~~("'"\ \\\
-.
,
I
i~
,~
'. :\
,\,
""'\
, ,
\. :\
,
,
,
"'b 1
o
r-,
Yo
~
...
~
z*oo
~
~~
~~
~lfcjs\
""
~S' '\. T
'.. '1\\\ ~
i ' ::-J\-
) "1. I
-. O::-~. '""\
;:Q'~ ~ 't\
~ '>:~. 1
(
\
LAYOUT NO.1
. Least expensive due to minimum changes to existing street layout.
. Worst from a traffic engineering standpoint.
. Does not discourage commercial area traffic plan from Toronto/Tower
intersection.
. Does encourage use of Toronto as access to Ponds and "Busse Property"
parks.
. Least property impacts (Borka, Post Office, and Priordale Mall).
COST/FUNDING ESTIMATE:
Estimated Cost:
Funding: State Aid
County
MnDOT
Collector Street
Assessments
Water & Sewer
Trunk Water & Sewer
Trunk Storm Drain
Storm Drain Utility
TOTAL
$2,594.000.00
$525,000.00
$400,000.00
$400,000.00
$307,000.00
$260,000.00
$192,000.00
$98,000.00
$260,000.00
$152,000.00
$2.594.000.00
--, , \: L--J I L----J L----J I~I .
~ ;;___~_u::~
:;.;.~~~' :ill
',~~~~-...: 0
~~ ~ "'<0~
,ok ,"'-... \
, ',~~" ~
t~ "~<; ~\
~ ~ ~:', v v
~ l ~ '~~~;> i
_~'~ '\~\l 1
= ~ ~ ',~",~-c_::_:_c_:__c
'\~~~\ ~rs'---
~ I \." , l~
I ,..\
\' '..., ~
) : r 6 \S" ~ ~
;' L11\ ...." "'-
"J 1~~ ~ \~,
N ~D'i~. \'~:' ~
~_~:::--' ' 1- \ ,~:, ~"" -' g
I~~_-:"""~___~ ,.,N ~ ~\ ",:~:' O~:\,,\\ -
p. 1 4k "rn Y': \ \':' ~... ~'\ --
~O~~ ,~~ -__~; ~~~~ \\:~.' '0 ~<r:. -- --_
O. ~LI:' :~r'V/~ ~__:------' " \)-\\ ~3J.N3;---
~ ~~ : ' ,'_- _ ~," . ~SJ(O
l . U ' 0. . 'o'l, " O~f1 :,
! m I ~~'::: '\,' ~ '
Z <,'. . 0 '4,,~-'~- "" !\ ,'-
,Z:) ~' - ", ' . .
, \?~:> ~ ~,-:':::l: " .L.:~...:~>
. __ _ ....1 f'IIf,,:. ~ ,,, "l, '-_ 1>\tl...'t.~L 0
1.\ - N "" -' )...ll
. ~. ~. ' ';:'P." '\ ( )\\C~!3""'"
"" ';1& _ _" ,IV \ ~'\
"\:.-. __ s.~ '-:!' - ) " - . ~
ID~ ><. It 0 '. '. <~ J
<::J ~ \i1",a.. ~~ - ~~~ \ ~
,-- I ~ _ \!l_ \" \ ..
. C l' \\\ ,
cv ",H ('If ,~~, \
\' ~ ~,'~ ~ ':~::>
lIS ~'"~''' ':.
~ ~'... I. \:
g~CD ':.\
It \. , \:~ "
_ ~Q " ~t- 't- ,~,,"
",,,~,~/\ CD"Q ':~, \
~ ,~~ -- ' '
'~ ' \
, ' '
L-?;~Jl:~' -,~~.. \ '~"
r--~~~~: \~ \.V \ "
~,__.l ':9 (\, ~ '
t~ A~n81S3M ~7" :j\(i'*11 \~
"~.-. ~\ ~~RJ" ~ \ "
L-/~~~~4'lJ~~~~~'>'
~~I\ yrotJ" "i '~-- : ~~ \
o;r"" :? - -_ IL,. :: ~~~ 0.. ~'
/'-. ., ~ oq." V " ,
~...'" .... ., . : : "lit ~~ ("\ \:\ \
~
":,
~
~ /',
(...-/1
I ~ 1---;; I / '-;;---J '\ 'J -,-::::::::.---- ---.
I,' C I <:::1)? \~oo,. :: -\~.--~-----.------.;.
U ~ ~9\rlL""u, n In i i ~\ · . N
~ :>:~F'~U ,I '*
~ ~~ ~ 0 ~ :1 c::J oJ i! ~,,~~I ^~. ~
~; , '~, ',~ tr-J ' '
~!Y __] ::.'" i:~: l'~ · ,/
r-,. i'~t! !1~~~1~ '~-
II -. ~ c 1 i 2 ~ ~ m ~~7lYCj.-.) a
r JJ:: ~ . YI.rl/ED--" I ~
, ,,,,' fit:] ,
Ii -"-,J~,, ". I
1\ ~ I L- ~ i ~ ii I - U
~ i l t Nil ~I Lf! I P? rJ:?1 \\ --------.
________ ____u_____ ~------------- -- - - -:~ -- - ...-r---'
------ -----------" --~- ,'--' ~~
Iii' ....L. I t\-,lrY~l:1 , ~ ,'-'
: ' ~. <') r L'::::'l U>l U t:S
i ! 7~ ~' - ,/'.f\.:--:.
: i 'b~,' / "-
: ~ ~ ~GJ=, 'bQ -- j ~ -
t; I II r l-~' tP::;- .. ~Q i
~ \\n~\ _ N ~n, ~ (/ %
\~ 5 u!lr\;J]( \
... .. -<: ~ : \,:1;J:flJ '\-// N J
"~ . c---_
, \\ m --~.-.
_' -< co 1\ <0...,-
Y.o" ,'t, ._ t- "<< CD __ t- \ ~
I \ ~ -----.------
\ 1 '-------------- -'I>
fl Lb ~';--I. ~. fJb.
~ 0$ ~~~~cy~,
1(0 -p ~jj:::--,;
~\:--.l(
--
-----
.....
-.
u
o
.....
<Q,
~
\
\
y.
~
...
~
z.~
~
'<6.
(
~~
. ~\
~~
I-
YJ,01.11l0
~~v 1"TI
'., \~!l "\
i \'~ '\
) - "\
~ ~ . "\
~en~
.. "'l" ~ -<!).J......J
-
-----------r'.--..----
LAYOUT NO.2
. Improved commercial - frontage road traffic circulation
compared to Layout Nos. 1 and 3.
· Second most expensive.
. Minimizes impact on Post Office parcel.
· Emphasizes Duluth access.
· Requires acquisition of ROW on Priordale Mall, Borka, and
Post Office parcels.
. Minimizes creation of odd shaped small parcels.
COST/FUNDING ESTIMATE:
Estimated Cost:
Funding: State Aid
County
MnDOT
Collector Street
Assessments
Water & Sewer
Trunk Water &
Sewer
Trunk Storm Drain
Storm Drain Utility
TOTAL
$1,328,000.00
$400,000.00
$400,000.00
$463,000.00
$260,000.00
$270,000.00
$176,000.00
$240,000.00
$208,000.00
.$3,745,000.00
$3,745,000.00
. r=- ~ \ \ L_--.J --J L----J
~~' \~ ___ '--J I~l . I ' .~
~/r ,~____::'! ____ T r 0 "I /'--;;--1'\ ~
~,~"', i. -'T~ ' c~ I ~<<:, lIllrC;;:::; -,,;,' '..::::.O...m... '..
'~~' ;J. 0 ,.. J ,'~ S''' 1s1=---'~~~ 0 t ~~------~
'~. ,"''0 )~ ~ i~ d I 0 ~ ,1!:~1~ 1 ii i;Q ~
',,', ~ WL~ ~ ::I,:::---,_Ot :'rn ,0~7
._ ,,;"'4 ill '. ~L= '--R i: ~ ~ \ : i:~ " . ~ ' ~~--
....:lI.' .1"'1\" '--1 ".'~ " ~" bj"
", ,," ,""'" " '
ri"':'" ,;i , ' ~. :,00. .,'
1~i i~ ,~::j~ ('i t" ~ I~,! ~2 8 ~I~c,!ls~!' 'f, .
-J~~~~~ '~~~ ~--=...'" " ""0\ i 1 LJi!~s:>..(.J ~; w ...""",ret-,' /f:.
~jill~ \~';!&'~ ~:o ~...~ Wi ,,- ~ 1'1iJ!tJ..~
\ \ ~ ..m. .
I
,
, I
, I
.' 1 ~ ~ '.;.. ~ - ! : %. . / f.. ~ '
~ o'i ':;;, '\ I 1;tIi:' ('"
__,. '" ,0, ' .' ' '
~. __, ' " ,.;, ~ t2 L 1 ) ~ -
. ~ Q , .' __" N _ ~ J . .'
, ,.'__" ' ..." "z 0 . : ~./ <>.
~ ~~ ~ "'" \\ < ..:~, ." "Y2:::::::,~ ~ . ~ U' F\';J 1 ( 'to
,I 0= ' ,--:' ~ ~ ----, \, .. r:- :: \.
j 0 r..::: : --r.\ ' ,_:------ " \)\\ ~3J. " " .. .. : ~.. \
, L' " ..' __ ' . """ " >~" ' \ '" N
. -=""', . ' ,', .. "';;' '- ,,'.. :' .. .. . 'c..., I
," ,~' """""..,.~.... , :., co" ) ~-q:-l~ ~ '" , -'-
"1.',... ~ ~~ ~'" ':" ,...' IN ,,,.. ."
, . _':-' _ ;>'~ _ ~" "'.. U~, ,-" , ' ',', '
, ,'<0 ".. ,,-u - ' "'- "
j. . " '", """~' ',', "', .. l.' .../, " : - (1 ,.",,!__'m~""'G
.~' "-': '" -R<V ",,:\ '-. "",i;<;' --i; , , i,'j-...... ~-----------==:=.,.,
.,o, . ' " . " ",,' /I ' · ~ ..
. """ ..;. ~ ,,;;: .. \,<>'m~o, ' "", ;" · ""-
. 'O. \..'~ ~ (~
o
~"l:~"~~,,,,------I----1 J f1.h '~::',:, .;:.; \,:'fiZ--
'/'l --=....;;;,--~ E - 'o,~~, \"
v . m=" __~m.___: ~~ ~ .."
n______ I ~ )l. "
--' '!i ilL." ~., :. \ \ ~ '
c " 1 ~ ~.)~ ,~~, "
\l~~.' ~ '\;;, ~. '~
~ ~',: . "'::... "l; y~
C V' ' \~ , '\ '"
~\ ~ ~ \:~<S'. ~ '\~\, \ ..
~_______________'-- ~~~,,,:'~--;~:B \~~
rJ~ ,_, '~ ~t ~'-- N '~\ l\"% '~\~'
'i; ",,---,o,~ ---""""' . '----1." \ .. Sf;- ~,\\
\ :~S~ ,~,t;J:\\'c\\. \,..
~:~ ": __ 1 ~ ~llJL 7 r\-;IT:J.J. \~
~ ~~ V~' ~ i is ~2Jj t"'AI~'
, ~\ ' _"'."'" ". tJ=t--I" I~!"'- "
_, 1 ,,~,.'v;) , k
, ~. () ,,'.' '" '
_ i : .; ~~ 0: ~~:'
f"'\ \ '\:" ,
, .---- ."
M
d
z
:i
~
!I
I
III"'T
L\
...
-
o
~
z*oo
~
r-,
. ,
LAYOUT NO.3
. Best "Frontage Road" to T .R. 13 for traffic.
. Major impact to Borka and Post Office parcels.
. Less ROW acquisition of Priordale Mall property than Layout
No.2.
. Abandons the most existing roadway.
· Discourages north/south use of Toronto.
COSTIFUNDING ESTIMATE:
Estimated Cost:
Funding: State Aid
County
MnDOT
Collector Street
Assessments
Water & Sewer
Trunk Water &
Sewer
Trunk Storm Drain
Storm Drain Utility
TOTAL
$1,176,000.00
$400,000.00
$400,000.00
$471,000.00
$260,000.00
$225,000.00
$130,000.00
$240,000.00
$208,000.00
.$3,510,000.00
$3,510,000.00
~
. -, . : \ \ L--.J 1 L.-----,j L-----.-J I ~I .
~"t~
~ : .----:;---==
~~~j,
'~~~ fv-,~,O 9~
"~::"l;, 13
f~ ':~{,', ~ ~
~ ~. ~"" ~ 'v
: I "~,', i
1~ '", , "-
~i:~ '~\~~\t 1
---' i ~ ,~,', ~---::-:~--:- ------
~. \~~~:.. ~ w~- ---- ----
\: ',\',
, ,- ' ,,' j:!!
I I~ '..' ~
) \ ~ b \"."':!'i ~
/ Jvl\ ,'0.,'::'"
~ ~~K~ \:,
::~,~' ~/ 1-Q \";;~, ~ -:. Q
I~;"~~ ~. 'i~\>;;,U\ 'I~ ~,
~: .~&> ;~\... '~:~,})~~---=----~-..-
O. . '1h:: ,Ml t<::j/,,~~'_ '.::____- ~.' -\\ ~3:N3;'< --
~ LF' ~ -. .--..' \\- ~S>tOO\'
~ .'" 0. ' ,'~, '. \) "& " .
I '. , -
Z : -0,.--;- ~ \ ~ . ,,~': '.'l, ' ~ 1\ '
\?u ~~. ''''4'~'''' \:).\ ,<. ,/:'
''it · ,t.;;:'.,;;;, d,~ '\\,:~;\. ,.. ,,;::;;;' ,,,' .
!1 \,..~11~~ ~ [!!/i~- ~:" '\ \," ,i~' ,< .
m"~-" "4; . \) '. '. S ~ J.i
__ -,~.,.~, vl\Il\I .. ~. '. ~ /1
N 'f)r ,.8 . '... Ii! -" ~ :
--:tY J (I.": 3;1 K;,fX \,:r -.- ~
~~ lm~ ~: ~Ii Sr q) C \? \ \ ~-~~~y:-~-- r:
~ ~...:~.q~. ~ .~__.__..__.~__.~__! fI ~\\. · . ·
_-=__=___________J\lU;lM'Dii61~---- - E ---------=\.-' ,
...---: ----- ~ \'
V A _' I ~ h -~~---.:., -, ::~\
r-- I N -- ,I' \
"C 11 \" \
\- ~ ~\\~N \~\
\ 15 ~' '.:. ' ~
~ ~~ '" '::. \ ~
g~' .. '\+~\ ~
a.. r'\ ' , ,~ , ~
- ~\~.t, '\\ \ .
~~~ "
-Jf~"';?: ' -\~ <:S \,,~\,
,4,,__ \:') 0. '
~ N \', (\M ~ ~ ~\ \
(t~ ^~n8.lS3M v:
I~~~ e ~ -~,~~ j ~- . \\
V( ,.<\ Ii: ";o/r.l)-e-]-' --. -!sl~ '
~~ "-/- ~ ::~~~ ~
W' ~~, 01 ::. ""''ll.'\ 8' "ti.,\\
. I I ~ ~~ (""\ \ ~\\ \
~
~
~
~ /\
V' (n~!
I ~ !~ ~ I. /'-;,-J '\ ," '---------
!J c- ~ =~ U)~=--I~. L ~\~::&-~-n-n---:::
; :~r" ~'f( "V
! D ~ ,------' :: - ~ lCl j"
~J 0 0: i c::J d :: ~,,~~? ' .-
L " 'V~tI'-J "
~~h~ l:~' li(/)~:~' ,','
.f'- : ~~ ::~\o\l.rJ I~ ~.
L UJ I B'2 8 ~ ~ ~\,OJt\Ud.--) i/2
< H : ~ ~ 'y;;t~-'" I
, ,.,' /1\01. J t..,
"l. ~ J : :: /C...:.J ,,' ~ J .<-.,J
'II' I' 'd>: I T i ]'
~ : I'< <" :: ~ IJ - -1: ~
~ i \ ~ ,'Ti If-f \-(:l! ' --,-----.
~------------- __ ....._ .- _.-r= ~.
:c:c,:c". : : -- T"ll M ' ~181~
jj 7\ 1-f47:jD: f /"/"-"~""
: 'I-, Oa> 1.l:Y"" I J -
....: 'F=- ~
N \if: N /,,/ % I
'<6
U' PJ. %
~ ! ::1;J~\ // ]
f--=]!~ \ \'\ " N
,,\ ~ '~---.
, ,en "-.
CD :\ co It) -
\ ..
,.\.. '<::~--~--~---~--
\ ..r---------. ~
,:; l~J"' ti~.. ~N ~-.
'3: '
(--- ' ' .,.,--
~~~~~'
b ~)::..-"
~::--1(
Iii:
~,
\\it
z
o
" <
,
\ ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
,
.~
,
\~
o
--
--...-...-
~~
...
,
,
,
"
"
, '\
, ,
\,
-\-:\
\
\
.
-<6. \
o
....
Yo
~
'"
J:il
z.~
~
(
Wi.
. _\
~~
1=
'fj.(Jl.!nO
\\~ 'J' I"T I
" ',\.\\ '!l "'\
i i'~ '\
) ~ \
- p 0 "'\
~fcO~
. 1
~
-
LAYOUT NO.4
. Improved traffic circulation compared to Layout No.1.
. Maj or impact to Post Office parcel.
. Creates most odd shaped small parcels.
.'E:.ii~..!........
_:....:;~;4;r.:, 'r'
. Total taking of Borka property.
· Most expensive.
COST/FUNDING ESTIMATE:
Estimated Cost:
Funding: State Aid
County
MnDOT
Collector Street
Assessments
Water & Sewer
Trunk Water &
Sewer
Trunk Storm Drain
Storm Drain Utility
TOTAL
$1,388,000.00
$400,000.00
$400,000.00
$578,000.00
$260,000.00
$238,000.00
$143,000.00
$240,000.00
$208,000.00
$3,855,000.00
.$3,855~OOO.OO