HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet O � PRIp�
F. � v 4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
'LII NNESp� P
PRIOR LAKE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AGENDQ
Monday, August 20, 2012
4:00 p.m.
Reports included with this agenda can be found in the Document Center at www.cityofpriorlake.com
Please follow this file path; City of Prior Lake\Economic Development Authority�20121August 20, 2012
1. CALL TO ORDER/INTRODUCTiON
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
3. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES
A. July 16, 2012
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. No public hearing is scheduled.
5. OLD BUSINESS
A. Consider Approval of a Resolution Amending the 2012 EDA Budget
B. EDA Business Plan — Draft #5
C. Consider Approval of a Resolution Adopting the Proposed 2013 EDA Budget and Tax Levy
D. TIF 1-1 Plan Modification Update
E. Fiber Optic Network Discussion and Recommendation
F. Business Venture Fair Rescheduled - Discussion
G. Downtown Redevelopment Acquisition Opportunity
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. EDAC Report and Subcommittee Reports:
(1) EDAC Report
(2) Broadband Fiber Network Subcommittee Report
(3) Technology Village Subcommittee Report
B. Downtown Area Parking Study Update, Summer 2012
C. Consider Approval of the 2�d Quarter Financial Report for the EDA Special Revenue Fund
7. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Draft September 17, 2012 Agenda
8. ADJOURNMENT: 6:00 p.m.
Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245 / www.cityofpriorlake.com
O .� PRIp�
� �
4646 Dakota Street SE
��vivss��' Prior Lake, MN 55372
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY QGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012
AGENDA #: 5A
PREPARED BY: Jerilyn Erickson, Assistant Treasurer
AGENDA ITEM: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE CITY
COUNCIL AMEND THE 2012 PRIOR LAKE GENERAL FUND AND EDA
BUDGETS
DISCUSSION: Introduction
The purpose of this agenda item is to formally adopt a resolution that
requests the City Council to amend its General Fund and EDA budgets in
support of the Technology Village Incubator start-up costs of $50,000.
Histarv
At the July 16, 2012 EDA meeting, a motion was approved as follows:
MOTION BY MYSER, SECONDED BY CHROMY TO RECOMMEND
SENDING THE BUSINESS PLAN TO THE CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT TO
CHANGES DISCUSSED ABOUT MONETIZING MORE SERVlCES lNTO
THE RENT SUBStDY. FURTHERMORE, THE MOTION REQUESTS
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE A TRANSFER UP TO $50,000
FROM GENERAL FUND RESERVES TO FUND THE STARTUP OF THE
BUSINESS INCUBATOR, AND THAT THE EDA BUDGET BE AMENDED
TO EXPEND THOSE TRANSFER FUNDS FOR STARTUP COSTS tN
2012.
VOTE: Ayes by Hedberg, Morris, Choudek, Chromy and Myser. The
motion carried.
The EDA, however, is supposed to pass a resolution rather than a motion
when proposing an amendment to its budget. Therefore, this agenda item
essentially ratifies its motion made on July 16 to support the proposed
budget amendments.
Current Circumstances
The 2012 Technology Village Business Plan was previously accepted by
the EDA. The next step is to gain the necessary funds to begin the
implementation of Phase One in City Hall. Start-up costs are estimated to
be $50,000. The EDA has expressed its support to start this initiative in
2012, which requires corresponding budget amendments.
Canclusion
The EDA should approve a resolution that must then be forwarded to the
City Council for its review/approval process. The council's review is
scheduled for August 27, 2012.
ISSUES: Article 10.2 of the EDA bylaws requires that the EDA budget by approved
by the City Council.
FINANCIAL The City's General Fund Reserve Account will be reduced by $50,000,
IMPACT: which will added to the EDA's budget.
ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are available to the EDA:
1. Approve a Resolution Requesting the City Council Amend the 2012
Prior Lake General Fund and EDA Budgets, as proposed or as
amended.
2. Deny approval of the Resolution.
3. Table action for further discussion.
RECOMMENDED Alternative 1.
MOTION:
ATTACHMENTS: 1. EDA Resolution
2. Proposed EDA 2413 Budget
RESOLUTION 12-xxEDA
A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE
2012 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUDGET
Motion By: Second By:
WHEREAS, The Economic Development Authority spent a great deal of time, early in its existence,
developing strategic goals to facilitate more robust economic development in our
community; and
WHEREAS, Establishment of a Technology Village Incubator was identified as a key objective of
the EDA and one of the Economic and Community Development goals identified in the
City of Prior Lake 2030 Vision and Strategic Plan; and
WHEREAS, Estimated startup costs for the Technology Village Incubator is $50,000; and
WHEREAS, The EDA will essentially deplete its reserve balance by the end of 2012. Therefore, it is
necessary to request funds from another source such as the General Fund reserves to
fund the startup costs for the Technology Village Incubator.
, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA as follows:
1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein.
2. The EDA requests that the Prior Lake City Council authorize a transfer of an amount not to exceed
$50,000 from the General Fund reserves to the Economic Development Authority.
3. The EDA requests that the Prior Lake City Council adopt the 2012 budget amendment in an
amount not to exceed $50,000.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 20�' DAY OF AUGUST, 2012.
YES NO
Hedber Hedber
Choudek Choudek
Chrom Chrom
Morris Morris
M ser M ser
Frank Boyles, Executive Director
O � PRIp
N � V 4646 Dakota Street SE
Frior I,ake. MN 55372
'�iv�s��'
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012
AGENDA #: 56
PREPARED BY: Dan Rogness, Community & Economic Development Director
AGENDA ITEM: EDA BUSINESS PLAN — DRAFT #5
DISCUSSION: Introduction
Based on EDA discussion at the July 16 meeting, staff has made additional
changes to the fourth draft of the EDA Business Plan, resulting in this fifth draft.
A copy was sent out via email te all EDA Commissioners on July 30 in order to
gain comments before this August meeting.
Historv
The City Council appointed members to the (new) EDA for 2011. Since early
2011, staff changes slowed the progress of the EDA establishing a business
plan to help guide strategic directions. Some initiatives have moved forward,
including a broadband analysis and a business incubator concept. This plan is
necessary in order to establish priorities and to assure continued support for on-
going economic development efforts.
Conclusion
The fifth draft plan incorporated the following changes:
• Page 2: The achievement goals are now based on averages obtained
from the past 10 years of new commercial/industrial construction activity.
Using this historical data greatly reduced the previous figures that were
based on the Maxfield report. All public building data during that time pe-
riod was not included, so adding those projects to the list would bring the
averages up to a much higher level (i.e., city hall, police station, fire sta-
tion, water treatment facility). New property tax estimates were also
added as another table.
• Pages 3-4: The number of implementation actions was reduced from 7
to 5 by consolidation. Each of the metrics now incorporates new busi-
ness and job growth estimates to match the table on Page 2.
• Page 5: "Unique Challenges" was revised from previously using the term
"limitations", and some editing was done to be more positive in this sec-
tion.
• Pages 5-7: The beginning of the Funding Needs/Resources section be-
gins with some premises for EDA budgeting. Following that, resources
are identified, and then more detailed budget information has been coor-
dinated with the Gity of Prior Lake Finance Director.
• Sections that were previously included for SCALE and the Strategic Plan
are eliminated; rather, both of them are listed on Page 9.
ISSUES: This business plan provides strategic direction for the EDA priorities.
FINANCIAL Resources, including those related to time and money will be necessary in order
IMPACT: to implement the proposed business plan.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Adopt the plan as proposed or with amendments and direct that it be submit-
ted to the city council for final approval..
2. Continue discussion to a future meeting.
3. Take no action at this meeting.
RECOMMENDED As determined by the EDA.
MOTION:
�
�.� PRIp
� �
�
v
4646 Dakota Street SE
�'�v�r�s��' Prior Lake, MN 55372
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012
AGENDA #: 5C
PREPARED BY: Jerilyn Erickson, Assistant Treasurer
AGENDA ITEM: CONStDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION QDOPTING THE
PROPOSED 2013 EDA BUDGET AND TAX LEVY
DISCUSSION: Introduction
The purpose of this agenda item is to formally adopt the proposed budget
and tax levy for 2013. During its last meeting on July 16, the EDA
recommended that staff present to the EDA a proposed budget based on
an EDA tax levy of $200,000.
Hi StOry
The 2012 EDA budget reflects 50% af the personnel costs associated with
the Economic Development Director position (formerly budgeted in the
General Fund Economic Development Department) as well as other
operational costs such as professional services, training, memberships,
etc. The 2012 EDA budget was funded primarily by using fund balance
reserves. The EDA board recognized that a sustainable funding source
would need to be implemented when considering the 2013 budget.
Current Circumstances
City staff has begun preparing their department budget requests for 2013.
The original 2012 budget included some basic operational expenses which
totaled about $138k, which was later amended to $168k.
Staff has anticipated that initial ongoing operational and project expenses
will be in the range of $200k-$250k each year. Until there is some solid
history of expenditure activity, this amount may vary.
Staff has also prepared an EDA Business Plan which is intended to
establish a framework for economic development initiatives that will require
one-time or ongoing funding. EDA Business Plan Draft #5 identifies
estimated 2013 EDA funding needs in the amount of $205k will be
necessary to operate the EDA and fund the business incubator and
(re)development assistance. See attached report with budget/activity
details.
The report now addresses cashflow needs for the EDA with a$53k reserve
built into the 2013 budget. Similarly, the Business Plan is showing a$56k
reserve account in 2014.
Conclusion
The EDA should approve a resolution that must then be forwarded to the
City Council for its 2013 budget review/approval process.
ISSUES: Article 10.2 of the EDA bylaws requires that the EDA budget by approved
by the City Council. This budget is based on direction provided to staff at
July's meeting. Upon approval by the EDA, the preliminary budget will be
presented to the City Counci� at the September 10, 2012 meeting.
FINANCIAL Staff had identified a number of funding sources that could be considered
IMPACT: for funding the EDA's operational expenses such as:
• Transfer of General Fund reserves;
• Transfer from General Fund tax levy;
• Economic Development Authority tax levy.
The EDA recommended that it review an EDA property tax levy if $200,000
at this August meeting. Per State Statute 469.107 subd. 1, a city may, at
the request of the EDA, levy a tax in any year for the bene�t of the
authority. The tax must be not more than 0.01813 percent of the taxable
market value. The estimated taxable market value for taxes payable in
2013 is $2,350,346,800; therefore, the maximum tax levy could be
$426,117. If the City were to consider an EDA levy that is greater than
0.01813 percent of taxable market value, the levy would be subject to
reverse referendum provisions as outlined in State statute 469.107 subd. 2.
ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are available to the EDA:
1. Approve a Resolution Adopting the Proposed 2013 EDA Budget
and Tax Levy as proposed.
2. Approve a Resolution Adopting the Proposed 2013 EDA Budget as
amended using an EDA Tax Levy, Transfer of General Fund
Reserves and/or a Transfer from the General Fund Tax Levy.
RECOMMENDED Alternative 1.
MOTION:
ATTACHMENTS: 1. EDA Resolution
2. Proposed EDA 2013 Budget
RESOLUTION 12-xxEDA
A RESOWTION TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED
2013 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TAX LEVY AND BUDGET
Motion By: Second By:
WHEREAS, State Statute 469.107 subd. 1 provides that a city may, at the request of the Economic
Development Authority, levy a tax in any year for the benefit of the authority in an
amount not to exceed 0.01813 percent of taxabie market value; and
WHEREAS, The EDA proposes a 2013 tax levy for economic development purposes in the amount
of $200,000; and
WHEREAS, The EDA proposes a 2013 annual budget in the amount of $151,450.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA as follows:
1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein.
2. The EDA requests that the Prior Lake City Council levy a special tax of $200,000 to be collected in
2013 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.107.
3. The EDA requests that the Prior Lake City Council adopt the 2013 annual budget in the amount of
$151,450.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 20�' DAY OF AUGUST, 2012.
YES NO
Hedber Hedber
Choudek Choudek
Chrom Chrom
Morris Morris
M ser M ser
Frank Boyles, Executive Director
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
PROPOSED 2013 BUDGET
Revenues / Sources:
Intergovernmental revenues
33010 Property Taxes $ 200,000
33610 GrantRevenue -
Charges for Services
xxxxx IncubatorLeases 2,700
xxxxx Revolving Loan Administration 2,000
Total Revenues / Sources $ 204,700
Expenditures / Uses:
101 Personnel $ 72,500
201 Office Supplies 500
304 Legal Fees 7,000
314 Professional5ervices 60,000
331 Training & Certification 3,500
351 Legal Notices 500
433 Dues & Subscriptions 1,000
xxx Business Incubator 6,450
Total Expenditures / Uses $ 151,450
Change in Fund Balance $ 53,250
O: �EDA�Budget�2013 EDA Budget : 2013 Proposed EDA 8/14/2012
O � PRIp�
F�+ � V 4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake. MN 55372
�
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012
AGENDA #: 5D
PREPARED BY: Dan Rogness, Community & Economic Development Director
AGENDA ITEM: TIF 1-1 PLAN MODIFICATION UPDATE
DISCUSSION: Introduction
On October 3, 2011 the City Council referred a matter to the EDA regarding the
use of a nearly $200,000 balance within Tax Increment Financing District 1-1.
This fund balance can be spent on TIF-eligible redevelopment expenditures
once the TIF Plan is modified. At the October 3� meeting, the City Council dis-
cussed all options, including decertifying the district, modifying the district plan,
and amending the spending plan under the special jobs provision. Due to the
greatest flexibility for Prior Lake, the council chose to further evaluate the modi-
fication of the TIF Plan for District 1-1.
On May 14, 2012, the EDA approved the following motion based on discussion
to keep maximum flexibility in the plan modification:
MOTION BY CHROMY, SECONDED BY MORRIS TO RECOMMEND STAFF
PROCEED WITH A MODIFICATION OF THE TIF PLAN FOR DISTRICT 1-1 TO
BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL APPROVAL.
VOTE: Ayes by Hedberg, Morris, Choudek and Chromy (Myser absent).
The motion carried.
Hi StON
The fund balance remains after the original 1985 District redevelopment project
met its obligations in conjunction with the Pearson's Auto Body and Dan's Auto
Repair. The city then began a 45-60 day process to modify the existing plan pri-
or to a 12/31/12 deadline.
Conclusion
A public hearing has been scheduled with the City Council on August 27, 2012
to review and approve/deny the proposed modification of TIF 1-1. Denial will
send the tax increment balance back to all taxing jurisdictions. Approval will al-
low the city to use the remaining funds for eligible redevelopment expenses.
The city retained professional services from Northland Securities to prepare the
"Modifications to TIF District No. 1-1 Within Development District No. 1 and to
TIF Financing Plan for TIF District No. 1-1" (see second Attachment). This mod-
ified plan spells out the potential economic development and redevelopment us-
es the TIF 1-1 funds may be expended.
On May 14, the EDA reviewed a list of potentiat targeted redevelopment sites in
Prior Lake that would be identified in the modified TIF Plan (see Attachment A).
The PIDs are now identified in the TIF Plan on pages 1-2, and a second attach-
ment shows their locations on city maps. These sites are listed specifically for
the purpose of potential public acquisition of real property. If desired, the City
Council could add one or two other parcels without altering the plan's intent.
ISSUES: In order to create maximum flexibility for use of these (limited) TIF funds, a
number of sites have been identified, which must be listed in the TIF Plan if they
are ever acquired by the City using these TIF Funds. Other sites not listed,
however, could be assisted in other ways to facilitate redevelopment (i.e., build-
ing demolition funding).
FINANCIAL The TIF 1-1 balance will provide additional public resources to assist with rede-
IMPACT: velopment costs; however, the small balance will likely need to be used for a few
targeted high priority sites, needs and/or opportunities.
ALTERNATIVES: For information only; no action required by the EDA.
RECOMMENDED Not applicable
MOTION:
Attachment A
PARCEL IDENTIFICATION FOR ELIGIBLE TIF 1-1 MODIFICATION EXPENDITURES
- �' ;` �.. � - 4 ��� r � - � � � v 3 < .� �, � <: s � �.:,
�1D # dd�re¢s �3°��C �`! �0�1 x �> w , .�
250010570 4662 Dakota Street SE One of two houses directly east of City Hall
250010550 4664 Dakota Street SE One of two houses directly east of City Hall
250010380 Erie Ave. SE Mertens property (vacant property)
250010390 Erie Ave. SE Mertens property (vacant house)
250010400 Erie Ave. SE Mertens property (vacant property)
250010650 16176 Main Ave. Vacant downtown gas station site
250010790 16125 Main Ave. Rental house north of Viereck Store
250010800 16125 Main Ave. Lot with rental house north of Viereck Store
250020030 16323 Main Ave. Rental house behind Fong's Restaurant
250011270 4500 Colorado Street SE Part of block between Duluth-Arcadia on CR21
250011260 4516 Colorado Street SE Part of block between Duluth-Arcadia on CR21
250011250 4528 Colorado Street SE Part of block between Duluth-Arcadia on CR21
250011240 4540 Colorado Street SE Part of block between Duluth-Arcadia on CR21
250011230 4556 Colorado Street SE Part of block between Duluth-Arcadia on CR21
259020411 16450 Anna Trail SE Digger's site along TH 13
259020261 16511 Duluth Ave. 20 acres south of downtown with Valley Sign
251740020 5119 Gateway Street SE Gateway Mall building
259360040 NE corner 160th & Jordan Carwash building on CR 44 (160th Street)
254760010 17066 Revere Way Svoboda property at southwest CR21 entrance
254770010 17072 Revere Way Svoboda property at southwest CR21 entrance
254770020 17070 Revere Way Svoboda property at southwest CR21 entrance
254770030 17066 Revere Way Svoboda property at southwest CR21 entrance
254770040 17066 Revere Way Svoboda property at southwest CR21 entrance
254770050 17066 Revere Way Svoboda property at southwest CR21 entrance
�
Scott County, I!�N
��
,:,
�
� r�.
,,.
�
, �
. �
- __ ��,�, 4 �� �
� .
�. . �.
. . �
� I j �Pt � � �
, , �j o
:����"'' `i c
. . �
...:., . .,, -.. .
�
. i .
°�` +,. ' � � � .
; � s � r" �. ,� I .� � �� � .
�
�la y�'�` s +µ�„ II, •+ta�,� �')`'., .
P` ^r.� Y a, � a �, y 'W^;», - �:, ,
.'.��` � � I ; .
z y M e
� 4
°._� # �Y�,�# F '� `" �a
a. .
ffi a
r. a � .. ^4 „ e �. �'•
: a > . .:d . ..: ,. .�
v ,�i"� z��'�� .. � � ��"� � -
> � ,..� .+:.� `: . .
` , �,
� � , , . g � �1� �
��.�-��"-r���� . . � ���
�„ y x � +
� . . �� ,� ,�, � "4 ' 4r � ` �.
, �q'�. '`�-,+M "'° _ /� � K" i�
4 �°� 4 ��lv' ��# � �
t- � �": �" z :�,
� ��
� f,� • 4 � f #�� ..
� ✓ {
e. � ���� , y� ��� "� "�, .- �� � s'
' F a�� � 'r � 7 � '"'�q �" ���:
� ` � � i ��� �� ' ��, � � �
r, �"" ` �x ��Y � `' � � � ' "� `.
E '
� � ��� :�:� � •
,� � �
� "� ��� x � ' �r
> ��� °�� �� ��s 'w., �F � � � � a
` } � � � � �� ,
� �r. - - �a���y��,`� `.; -�. �,' �� � g � � , '� ' ' r� P
� � , � :���. '� .,; �� ; ��:
� � '.`i •*�a�a � a ' � t i
� { �? +°�,� � � TO it
� * ,�� �� � �� �.:
� �
.. e.a . ,. + x i
r +
+ � k ��� � ,��
.� 1 r� �� ��
4 � "� ' F�� t e i
� � ��.
+ t��� a
}
Thig draa:;ng Is ne:thar s legally recorded map nor a sun•ey and Ie nol Map Scale N
intended lo �c used es one. ih+� tl�a.�.ing Is a eompila[ian ot records,
mformation, and data bcated in various cily coun�y, and slaie uKCes, and 1 inch = 261 feet
other sources aHSCGng the area sho^:n, and is lo ba used lor rcterenta W E _�+�
purposes only. Scott Ceuory Is not respons�b'e !or any Inaccaredos heretn . �
nta�ned. Iid'3crepancles aro tound, p!ease contact �he Scott Counry Map Date y �
s���oyoaot��a_ 7/13/2012 `S' '' �.�������,
Scott Coun#y, �N
,,_
:;.
t
� ¢ �...
� t:
,
.
� .
� �� . _
� � . . , � :.
. �r ,
..
.
,�� .
, �, ;� �, �� ,
� '�f� k
K �- I�:�� kt..
. `+
�'
� w r .
��' � ! .
� . .�t $� ` °' r$ �� I ?, !a �,��.
I J ' � 5# r
� I I "� � ..' :i. ! �
� � r � # e%�t{r�� �l. # �v['�
� #r
p* � ��'."' T s% �r�
�� � �:
; � �.
. � fi �
�,
s
� `
,
,. C
. . t,s '� �b — .r
..,
„ t• F - j y
. ,; � _.,-...- . . .Y. F. w _�.:`._F� ��� l�Y�. .
. "�^-
_
_.. a
�. , . .
r �
„.».. ,.„.��. ..�.-= z � � , ., . :�;seS r ' ,
�
��x.;'� �>�,� �� �'� �'.d #' a'� r ++ + ' � � j 4 � �
' �, �_� �, ���� .
r � � �+' �
,.
; .;, .
r � �" '. ,.t
.:
a.
�+°� r
� � �"� ��+ �� 3 � t,f ��.
:�9 ' , �' � .'` w ��,Y- �: <�� � -
� K,
e! `
. a
� , � � �
F. r
; %�•� ,�c .�*P =` , ; '' v^" �
�, �.. ,. r. F
.
�
� � � �f � �� �F�, �
This dra�.cfiQ I; ncther a Itqally recordad maD nor a sun�ey and i; not Map Seale N
mtendcd lo bc usad �s ona Th�s d�a is a compiiation ot records,
mformalien, and daia located In various aly county, and slale offices, and 1 ineh = 230 feet
other sowces nttzc6n9 (ho area sho�.tin, snd is lo ba used tor reference W E .N.+,�
purposes ony. Seen Counry Is not resDonih!e for any lnaccurades heretn Ma �at0
contnined. If discr2pancios am lound, p!ease conlad Ihe Scott County p ',,; ��� f ��� �.
so�•C ot��e. 7/13/2012 S �
Scott County, MN
, �� ��� ��
�
ro
�t� ���
.� X�` �
�
,�:
,$
�,. � ���� e�� . .; �:
� ,�� ' `
� ����
� ��, � � �
� �A� Y �i ��n �yf� � ,�4�k.�T,��ap"�' . v' �i, -
:�'' t���k� l � `��" ¥ ,�^� � » � °aP�*
,�' ��'�. � �� - � t y ' � �, ' -,� ,��' x � „�'� � � � .
;, � r ��� ��? �.,�" �, � ,� �
�3:, ,y 4 :° 'q'° �� `� `i' M e � e .
p,� {�,� hp `� l� i {_ .
� '�':. �" ', `�''i �� �� u� fi�'
� z se=
`:� � ��� � �
�"� � � � �g, y� � �� rg �
� °''' ) �a�" �^` ,s � �' 4 +� t � t r � � �
r , ; ��� �� �� °�� M �� � ���"���� �
a r �r� � �
y F`'�- '. � � �"`� : r a�G� a � � � ° i�
� ��� �� .���� ��i: � ��" �
� + nw
� a
�� r
t �� 7�... ' �P i� �3
i
� ��1h� �a,a� �a I��� }'t�� �
�;
�v `
� .. � � ��� � `�� ; 3i �C�� i �, , � ��
y ;_ �`
��, s ��� � ' i -
f �:;e ;:�`� r� y . .; �
' ` i �' � ' �
F
:�
,: ,; -
. , , � . .. . ���
�, ' �' .. .....«�,�+� f � , �� � = � :3
; i, � ' � ,;: -,�. f,, :: � C"�'rS ' � `� �C ,; * �?
. ���� , � ' �,� � ' .� �� �
r � ..� � � �.��
a � .� �i�� � P,�<
r, �
, {. � �' �; t:. �t
r
� a ,Hfxc �„ :
.���' .�r �
�s .
;��� �^�+ � 2 !
_,�
�.
�
�,
,
� ' ` �;j '' ' I I
� � ��. Y a
, �� �;� .�.
��;#� ��
�1 It .x �.,, F
Y � ��i
s t �, � � t �" � . a � � ' ;�+ _ �
�.' �z� � ' �
This draa:ing ts ne@her a legal�y rccordzd map nor a survey aod is not Ma p Scale N
intendeC lo be used es one. Th�s dra•�.ing is a oompi�at�on of retords,
information, and dala ktated invartous c;ty, caunry, and slate oKtes, tnd 1 ineh = 127 feet
oiner soarces aKttt�ny the nrea shaam, and is to be use0 tor reference W E ...�,ia,
purposea oniy. Scoit Coun[y is nul respn�sSi'e tor any Inaccurades herCfn M a dat8
conta�aed.lid�screpaodcsarefouod,p!easecaNactlhnScottCounty p ' :���
s��z orc�a. 7113/2012 S
Scott County, MN
..
_. ��., ..k.� , :� ' �;�
. .
F `
.�r r -.
1y r �
-a `�. ,
�} �r
� d�,�, �
�`> � lf���i
�
.��,
.�. , , .,,. . ��' r , , ..
. � � r� �' f � �
,. ,,,:
g �' -. � . R�� ? ��,
.
�S`� v+ �, � � �€�� �h� . � � tu, R '`
� � ��'�-�: x�� � �, � ,�,, �
��� �
} �,., u : _.�'
il w �� x� � . � �� E
� � , _ .
,�.�,.�. � _
�..: � Y� cz �
�� . :...Y � �,. .. " �.
;"i7 �� � ifi��3y a �.l� . .. }3i ..F� ',�� ., i, ' ti: ��.
sy ,
R ` F( '°�.: � ° � y 5 .- y ...'
t ..*� �� �� �.�. E• t; ��.
• t .;;��..c'.. �.
� �
�
I
� � �� � x �� � 4 � � ��� � �.
ea k �i <^� , � .
.
, • ,•
� �i �k � a
' Y .
r_C
. +' >'
� '
� ? �: T � • �
y .:" � X :.�,.. � 'w�� ' � �, ~w �.,�...
4 ,) e . . „�y< .,
� �� a�. \ 1. { . ( '� � � .; � {���� ""S�
�� t , � ��� � � �� f �..
,
� F a T � �' � _ ��,,
� 3. �' , . ;� � � �F
��� .� � � � ,,.� � ,
��, `� �*� _ `� �.
���',�; o �t' + .�
� ,_
, � i � *
�,
.
,
.
" �t� ��' � �9 �, ���� � ,�.�1.�3v:., � � � � '
. ,
� z �i ` �+ �' ' � 5 � � � � � '
! � � � .
g = `*a, "! ".' s ` ;t�'s �-` y� ,� S �� �` � �
� • .`�, ,� � *
� C ��� ''�.r ' � , � � � � a'.��,,��U« � ''�` � ��'k� �a " n
a� �� � j � ,+ � ?k .. � 2 4S ��'`5 { ''t. ^� +� ' x
-. ��'� "�'' -, '.c� r � '�" �
� �,, ' ` � �� fi.,K t+. 1 , �� + +�
� ` t � �< y¢ s� ��� � � � 3> � ' * �< 1
� ` � '�, ,. F �. r..,*� �S�s" '' _� r f�`�x �! � 1� �� ' �1
H ¢t
' r,'�45 "saA�
� _' �„`� ��x;�� �'� � t� �.r �,�.,'�' ��#` 3V '���� ' � ,�� t ;'����.r��;. �
� r . .
' � � ' ' , . . .�'xY�. .t�r ,4 .-...�r . �"t'y+ �k:..�"'�� � �1 .
L 3 � . .
F� * . � ' . ' ... .. . .
4
g w� �i;.s'r • /1D�L�IANN 8f SE '
.
,� .�,, ? �.. �^�:��a� r��..,.�,a"""'�YS.
,� `.„�` �• � �� :-,. �,
f '� �
-� � • ; . .� �►.
,�*+�" '
� ,� �� ,
� �` ��
,'� ,• .. '� �i
f ^. � k �. J^ � " a k +z �
� � nf - �� « �� S^�j
j ' t � rr �[,9 ' 1 � R s
+ V . 1t w,�. . A.�J• +�� � � ���'.,a`i�: �a G i�.!!�r�^t � � � � r �� , s
This dm�,:mg Is nether o I�qaih,l recorded map nor a surcey and is not Map Scale N
m�ended to be usetl es one. This dra�ain9 is a compi�afon oi retords,
mformatan, anO Cata kwted in various ciy counfy, and sia4e oH�ces, end 1 ineh = 221 feet
other sources �NecFng the area sfio�sn, and is lo Ge used lor roferente W E ,.�.at,
purposes onty. Scot1 County Is not respons�6'e fw eny inaauraties herein M a Q8t0
coota�ned. If d�suepancks are lound, p!ease contacl the Scall Couory p 1 �..x�� , ��� �
s�n�E on«. 7/13/2012 S �"
f_
CO�Y F��t �UBLK l71£ARIIWG
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE (MINNESOTA)
MODIFICATIONS TO
TAX INCREAAENT �INANCING DYSTRICT NO.1-1 WITHIN
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO.1
AND
TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING (REDEVELOPMEN7') DISTRtCT NO.1-1
(R�SOLUTION NO. 20i2-XXXj
PUBLIL HEARi�16: AU6US'T 27, 21112
MD�IFIGTIQI�! APPROY�D: ,..., 20i2
MOD�FKATIOIN I�LING: � 2012
Northland Securities, Inc.
45 South 7th Street, Suite 2000
' I�C3RT�-iLAND STRATEGiES Minneapolis, t�t�v ss4o2
�,���1�� �������# �i�{�,� �800)851-2920
Member NASD and SIPC
�
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (REDEVELOPMENn DISTRICT NO. 1-1
PURPOSE OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN (PAGE 1 4F THE ORIGINAL PLAI�
Municipal Development District No. 1 was first approved on March 1,1985, and has been
modified subsequently. The area of Municipal Development District No. l is coterminous
with the boundaries of the City. The Development District serves as the °project area" for tax
increment financing districts established within its boundaries. The Development Program
describes the City's objectives for the development of this area and the use of tax increment
financing.
Current modifications to the Development Program include budget revisions to coincide with
the Finance Plan relating to Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District No. l-1 .
This modified Development Program is intended to restate and expand on the original program
and all prior amendments hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. Nothing in
this modificaHon is intended to supersede or alter the activities described in the original
Development Program.
The City of Prior Lake, Minnesota (the "City") originally established Tax Increment Financing
(Redevelopment) District No. l-1(the "TIF District") and approved the Tax Increment Financing
Plan (the "TIF Plan") therefor under pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 4b9.00 through
469.047 and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1799, all inclusive, as amended
��e ��A�")•
The City adopted the TIF District and TIF Plan on March 1,1985 (Resolution No. 85-0� and
modifications to the TTF District on January 12,1987 (Resolution No. 87-03) and on July 15, 2002
(Resolution No. 02-116).
The City proposes to further modify the TIF Plan to correct inconsistencies with the provisions
of the Act and to amend the TIF Plan to provide for land acquisition and disposition activities.
The City has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the modification of
the TIF Plan, including, but not limited to, notification of Sco�t County and Independent School
District No. 719 having taxing jurisdiction over the property included in the TIF District and the
holding of a public hearing upon published and mailed notice as required by law; and
EXISTING CONDITIONS (PAGE 2 OF THE ORIG/NAL PLAN)
Modifications to the Development Program do not expand the current geographic designation
of Development District No. l. T'he City is not acting to modify the boundaries.
TAX INCREMENT DISTRIGT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PAGE 5 OF THE OR/G/NAl. PLAN)
The City has been working to a�tract and retain businesses and new development and further
redevelopment of e�cisting property within the City. The City has identified twenty-four (24)
parcels within the boundaries of Municipal Development Dishict No. l that it proposes to
utilize tax increment funds from TIF District 1-1 for assisting with redevelopment within the
Development District. The subject parcels are listed in Figure 3-1. The proposed redevelopment
project consists of the following: property acyuisition; building demolition; site clean up; andJor
public infrastructure.
FIGURE 3-1
PARCEL IDENTtFICATION FOR TIF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES
250010570 250011250
250010550 250011240
250010380 25W11230
ADOPTED MODIFlCATION (XX/XX/12) 1
e
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (REDEVELOPMENT) DISTRICT NO. 1-1
250010390 259020411
250010400 259020261
250010650 251740020
250010790 259360040
250010800 254760010
250020030 254770010
250011270 254770020
250011260 254770030
250011100 254770040
254770050
[This draft document does not include a map of the parcels listed above. The final document will
include a map of the parcels listed above.]
RELOCATION POLICY PLAN (PAGE 6 OF THE ORIG/NAL PLAN)
Any person or business that is displaced as a result of the Development Program will be
relocated in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.50 to 117.56. The City accepts
its responsibility for providing for relocation assistance pursuant to Section 469.133 of the
Development District Act.
PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND DISPOS1TiON PLAN (PAGE 6 OF THE ORIGINAL PLAN)
The original Development Program anticipated that the City would � acquire property and
reconvey the same to another entity. The City proposes to modify the Development Program
for anticipation of property acquisition and disposition. All parcels in the Development District
are eligible for acquisition, In acquiring land, the City Council will require the execution of a
binding development agreement with respect thereto and evidence that Tax Increments or other
funds will be available to repay the Public Costs associated with the proposed acquisition. It is
the intent of the City to negotiate the acquisition of property whenever possible. Appropriate
restrictions regarding the reuse and redevelopment of property shall be incorporated into any
Development Agreement to which the City is a party. The City shall follow applicable federal,
state, and local laws, statutes and regulations in the acquisition and disposition of property.
FINANCIAL PLAN (BEGINNING ON PAGE 6 OF THE ORIGINAL PLAN)
1. Estimate of Public Cost
The estimated modified sources of revenue, along with the estimated public costs of the
TIF District, are itemized in Figure 3-2. Such costs are eligible for reimbursement hom tax
increments, and other listed sources of revenue from the TIF District. �
A Activifies
Modified activities within the Project area consist of site improvement and preparation rnsts
and land and building acquisition. Total project rnsts, not including administrative rnsts, is
estimated at $292,0�.
8. Pubtic Costs Other Than Activities
Costs other than directly attributed to installation of the Project area improvements �Include
interest expense and administrative costs associated with plan preparation, plan modifications,
ADOPTED MODIFICATION (XX/XX/12) 2
a
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (REDEVELOPMENT) DISTRICT NO. 1-1
and administration of the TIF District.
C. Financing Cost
T'he City does not anticipate incurring bonded indebtedness beyond the amount of bonded
indebtedness incurred to date in the amount of $115,0(�. The proposed modification to the TTF
Plan, as shown in Figure 3-3, is to further modify the TIF Plan to correct inconsistencies with the
provisions of the TIF Act. The TIF Act requires that anticipated bonded indebtedness be shown
in the TIF Plan sources and uses of funds.
FIGURE 3-2
ESTIMATED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS
°rtyi"r� MomRouon Mo�flC.ua�
� �PPreved APPro�ed
�/visas ��0oz em�zou
Esffinated Tax Increnxnt Ravanwa (fiom tax inaemeM y�naNed by tM dk61c�
Tax increment revenues distributed from the county f160,000 12,391,000 SS51,000
Transfer in from other T[F distrids (other financing) SO SO f18,000
Interest and irnestment eamings SO SO 568,000
Sales/lease proceeds SO SO SO
Market value homes[ead credit f0 f0 SO
Total EsUmated Tax LwwnrN Revanuas 5160,000 12.391,000 f637,000
Estlmeted ProjecyFinandng Cosls (to b� paW or finanaed wNh 6sx inn�!)
Project corts f�1 SO SO
la�d/buildi�g acquisition S�1 SO 5331,000
Sfte improvements/preparation eosts f114,953 51.726,953 f253,000
Utilities f0 SO SO
Other qualitying improvements f0 S� SO
tonstrudion of affordable housing 30 f� f0
Small cky authorized costs, if not already induded above SO SO SD
Administrativecosts f13.636 5236,736 f15,000
FsUmabd Tax L�vament ProJect Casts 5128.589 Sl.%3,689 5599,000
Estimated financing costs
Interest expense f31,411 f427,411 f38,000
ToW Esdmated Projec!/Finandng Costs to be Pald fi'an Tax L�awnent f160,000 f2,391,100 f637,000
Estimand Fln�dng
Toul amount of bonds to be issued SO 10 5115,000
5. SOURCES OF REVENUE (PAGE 8 OF THE ORIGINAL PLAN)
C. Limitation of Incremenf
The TIF District will be decertifiied by December 31, 2012. This date is after 25 years from the
date of receipt by the authority of the first increment.
AqOPTED MODIFICATION (XX/XX/12) 3
o� P �O�R
ti � V 4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake. MN 55372
° ' 1 nnv�so'��'
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012
AGENDA #: 5E
PREPARED BY: Dan Rogness, Community & Economic Development Director
AGENDA ITEM: FIBER OPTIC NETWORK DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION
DISCUSSION: Introduction
The Broadband Advisory Committee (BAC) presented its Fiber Optic Network
Feasibility Report during a special meeting of the EDA on June 21, 2012. The
committee presented its findings and recommendations and held a brief ques-
tion and answer period. Due to the complexity of the subject matter, a second
question and answer meeting was held with the EDA on Monday, July 16, 2012.
Historv
The Broadband Advisory Committee was formed by the EDA in September 2011
for the purpose of completing a feasibility study #or a community wide broadband
fiber network. The EDA hired a consultant, Lookout Point Communications, in
January 2012 to work with the BAC to complete the fiber optic network feasibility
report. Eric Lampland with Lookout Point Communications and the BAC have
been meeting nearly every two weeks since January 27, 2012.
Conclusion
A City Council Work Session, which was originally scheduled on July 23, 2012 to
allow the BAC to present its report to the Prior Lake City Council has been re-
scheduled for Monday, September 10, 2012 in order that all council members
who have not received the BAC presentation may do so.
ISSUES: EDA members may want to consider providing a recommendation to the City
Council prior to its September 10 meeting, or the EDA may want to provide di-
rection to the BAC regarding key topics and content to include in the City Coun-
cil Work Session presentation.
One other option is for the EDA to consider having another expert in broadband
review the BAC Report in order to get a second opinion on the recommended
hybrid option (triple play services provided by the city and all other services pro-
vided through open access). Staff believes that such a report would cost be-
tween $4,000 and $6,000.
Recognizing what a high priority this is both for the EDA and BAC, staff is a{so
discussing other potential options with the county and private providers to as-
sure that there are various options to choose from to implement fiber.
FINANCIAL Potential $35+/- million revenue bond issue by the City for full fiber build-out;
IMPACT: Phase 2 requires Outside Plant Design to begin at a cost of nearly $500,000.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Provide a recommendation to the City Council.
2. Provide direction to the BAC for its presentation to the City Council.
3. Provide direction to staff with respect to any additional information desired.
4. Defer further action by the EDA to a future meeting.
RECOMMENDED As directed by the EDA.
MOTION:
�
O � PRIp
�� � V 4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake. MN 55372
'�vx�s��'
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012
AGENDA #: 5F
PREPARED BY: Dan Rogness, Community & Economic Development Director
AGENDA ITEM: BUSINESS VENTURE FAIR RESCHEDULED - DISCUSSION
DISCUSSION: Introduction
The Prior Lake Business Venture Fair event, which was originally scheduled for
Wednesday, May 23 at the Wilds Golf Club, was postponed by the EDA during
their May 14, 2012 meeting due to lack of registered attendees. EDA members
felt that a minimum of twenty potential Angel Investor's would be necessary to
proceed with the event, and as of May 14, the City had only received four regis-
trations.
Hi StOry
The EDA can fund a local business event that includes an opportunity for inves-
tors to meet and discuss angel investing opportunities. The EDA agreed to or-
ganize and host a local "venture fair" that would include session topics such as
entrepreneur seed capital, the investment process, fundraising strategies and
business incubation.
This half-day event was scheduled to begin with a lunch followed by finro tracks
of seminars, the first track was designed for entrepreneurs and new businesses
and the second track was designed for entrepreneurs and Angel Investors. The
Venture Fair was scheduled to conclude with a dinner for prospective Angel In-
vestors. Coordination and speaking services were to be provided by RAIN
Source Capital, Inc. under a$7,500 contract for services (half of that cost was
paid up-front for initial work on the event).
Conclusion
The May 23`� Venture Fair was marketed through a direct mailing to 700 recently
filed business entities within the Prior Lake zip code, the event notice was pub-
lished in the Chamber of Commerce newsletter, Chamber of Commerce email
blast and the EDAC e-newsletter. In addition, the Venture Fair was promoted on
the City of Prior Lake website, and an ad was published in the May 12�' edition
of the Prior Lake American. Event notices were also provided to the local offices
of the SBDC, Workforce Center, and SCORE.
After ail of the marketing efforts by City staff, the Venture Fair received only a
minimal amount of registrations. Should the EDA decide to proceed with a fall
2012 Venture Fair, alternative marketing methods should be discussed.
ISSUES: The EDA should determine whether or not it wishes to proceed with the Prior
Lake Business Venture Fair in the fall of 2012. If so, the EDA should discuss if
they would like to offer a two-track seminar with entrepreneurs and Angel Inves-
tors, or proceed with an Angel Investor dinner only. The EDA should also dis-
cuss alternative marketing options to ensure a sufficient number of potential An-
gel investors will attend the event.
FINANCIAL The City Council has approved an EDA budget amendment that provides
IMPACT: $10,000 for this event in 2012. A portion of the available budget was previously
spent on program costs and marketing associated with the spring Venture Fair.
The EDA has $6,250 remaining from the original $10,000 budget.
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Direct City staff to develop a draft agenda for a fall 2012 Venture Fair event.
2. Cancel the Venture Fair event.
3. Direct City staff to coordinate the Venture Fair in connection with an existing
event, such as the EDAC fall Meet-N-Greet, or work toward a SCALE event
that would incorporate a venture fair.
4. Take no action and continue discussion at a future meeting.
RECOMMENDED As determined by the EDA.
MOTION:
�
0 g ���P
ti
� �'' 4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior I,aice_ MN 55372
�S�
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012
AGENDA #: 5G
PREPARED BY: Dan Rogness, Community & Economic Development Director
AGENDA ITEM: DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT ACQUISITION OPPORTUNITIES
DISCUSSION: Introduction
During the June 11, 2012 meeting, staff asked the EDA if they had any interest
in further evaluating either of two properties available for acquisition with the
goal of enhancing redevelopment opportunities in the downtown area. The EDA
indicated an interest in further evaluating the 16323 Main Avenue property as a
future redevelopment site. The EDA asked staff to provide additional infor-
mation about the status and needs in the downtown area, including a map identi-
fying all parcels owned by the City of Prior Lake in the downtown area.
During the July 16, 2012 meeting, the EDA asked staff to talk with the owner of
the adjacent commercial property north of 16323 Main Avenue, which is the
same owner as the house (Robert & Carol Johnson). The EDA concluded that it
would make more sense to consider purchasing two, rather than one parcel, if
future redevelopment opportunity is the goal. The EDA also asked staff to talk
with the owner of the vacant Mertens house on Erie Ave. SE (across from the
Carlson dental office) in order to assess their level of interest in selling that resi-
dentia! property.
Hi StOry
Prior Lake has been involved in previous downtown property acquisitions, includ-
ing the site for City Hall and public parking lots; it also sold property for an office
buitding. The source of funding for this activity would come from the TIF 1-1
fund balance of nearly $200,000 (pending a future modification approved by the
City Council).
Conclusion
Staff discussed with Carol Johnson the possible city acquisition of the commer-
cial property next to the Main Avenue house. They are not interested in selling
the commercial property at this time.
Staff also discussed the possible acquisition of the Mertens house with Robert
Mertens. He is not interested in selling off the house portion of his downtown
properties. Rather, a sale would need to include all four parcels under his own-
ership; no sale price was discussed at this time.
Staff previously presented to the EDA some basic criteria for downtown property
acquisitions for redevelopment, including:
1. Does acquisition of property meet a public purpose (i.e., land banking
property for future redevelopment opportunities; removing blighted or un-
derutilized structures).
2. Does downtown property acquisition meet a key strategy of the EDA? In
the draft EDA Business Plan, redevelopment is one strategy identified for
economic development.
3. What is the cost and associated risk of downtown property acquisition?
Total cost can include acquisition, demolition, relocation, property
maintenance, and other associated soft costs for legal/appraisal. Staff
estimates the total acquisition cost to be in the range of $150,000-
$160,000 for the Main Ave. house. Risk includes unknown property is-
sues, such as poor soils or underground contamination, as well as hav-
ing vacant property.
ISSUES: Staff assumes that since the adjacent commercial property is not for sale next to
16323 Main Avenue, then the EDA will explore other opportunities in downtown
Prior Lake that may use the ba{ance of TIF 1-1 funds. In addition to property
acquisition, other opportunities include eligible TIF expenses for site improve-
ments, demolition and site cleanup.
FINANCIAL The TIF 1-1 balance will provide public resources to pay eligible redevelopment
IMPACT: costs up to approximately $200,000 (pending City Council approval to modify the
TIF 1-1 Plan).
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Direct staff to evaluate other opportunities in downtown Prior Lake that may
be identified by the EDA, using TIF 1-1 funding.
2. Continue discussion at a future meeting.
3. Take no further action.
RECOMMENDED As directed by the EDA.
MOTION:
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Main Avenue Property Location and City-Owned Parcels Map
�
O� p ���P
ti �
v �' 4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake. MN 55372
�s�'��`
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012
AGENDA #: 6.A (1) (2) (3) '
PREPARED BY: Dan Rogness, Community & Economic Development Director
AGENDA ITEM: EDAC REPORT AND SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
DISCUSSION: EDAC Report
The EDAC met on July 26, 2012 with a quorum present. The meeting agenda
included the following items: (1) Downtown Area Parking Study; (2) Economic
Development Plan for Deerfield and Welcome Avenue Industial Parks; (3) EDA
updates; and (4) SCALE initiative updates. The next regular meeting will be Au-
gust 23
Broadband Fiber Network Subcommittee Report
The Broadband Advisory Committee (BAC) presented its Fiber Optic Network
Feasibility Report during a special meeting of the EDA on June 21, 2012. The
committee presented its findings and recommendations and held a brief ques-
tion and answer period. Due to the complexity of the subject matter a second
question and answer meeting was held with the EDA on Monday, July 16, 2Q12.
The City Council work session to hear the BAC Fiber Network Feasibility Report,
ori�qinally scheduled for July 23` has been rescheduled for Monday, September
10 at 4:30 p.m.
Technoloav Villaae Subcammittee Report
The Technology Village subcommittee made changes to the business plan
based on EDA comments received at the July 16th EDA meeting. The revised
business plan will be presented to the City Council on August 27, 2012 along
with a request for an amendment to the 2012 Prior Lake General Fund and Eco-
nomic Development Authority budgets.
ISSUES: None.
FINANCIAL Potential budget impact from the request for a transfer of $50,000 from the Prior
IMPACT: Lake General Fund to the Economic Development Authority budget for the pur-
pose of implementing the Technology Village program in Prior Lake.
ALTERNATIVES: Discussion Only.
RECOMMENDED Discussion Only.
MOTION:
O � PRip�
H� � v 4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake. MN 55372
'�'�viveso'��
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012
AGENDA #: 66
PREPARED BY: Casey McCabe, Community Development Specialist
AGENDA ITEM: DOWNTOWN AREA PARKING STUDY UPDATE, SUMMER 2012
DISCUSSION: Introduction
In. the spring of 2012, the Economic Development Advisory Committee request-
ed City staff evaluate downtown parking supply and demand through an update
of the 2004 Downtown Area Parking Study. The EDAC request to update the
parking study was in response to comments received from the public at the fall
2011 EDAC Meet-N-Greet event where business owners expressed a concern
over the lack of available parking in the downtown area.
During the week of June 17, 2012, City staff completed a total of 15 parking stall
occupancy surveys throughout the downtown. The results of the parking occu-
pancy surveys were analyzed in the attached report to determine if the City of
Prior Lake and downtown business owners were providing a sufficient supply of
on- and off-street parking stalfs to meet the needs of residents, employees and
customers of downtown area businesses.
City staff also utilized the future land use projections detailed in the Market Pa
tentia/ Ana/ysis of Proposed CR 21 /mprovement Options in Downtown Prior
Lake, completed by Maxfield Research, Inc. in December, 2010 to provide an
estimate of future downtown parking needs.
His tON
In April 2004, Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates completed a downtown
area parking study for the City of Prior Lake. The Bonestroo study was de-
signed to be easily updated as land use development andlor redevelopment oc-
curs in the downtown area. City staff utilized the 2004 study as a template for
the 2012 Downtown Area Parking Study update.
Conclusion
The Downtown Area Parking Study survey results indicate the downtown area
parking demand needs are currently being met; however, based on peak park-
ing occupancy results, the Downtown Area Parking Study does not support addi-
tional commercial development in the downtown core (Blocks 5, 6 and 7) without
providing additional resident, employee and customer parking.
The average parking occupancy (number of occupied spaces divided by the
number of available spaces) for all designated on- and off-street parking stalls
was 38 percent. The average on-street parking occupancy was 44 percent, the
average off-street public parking occupancy was 42 percent, and the average
off-street private parking occupancy was 34 percent.
The peak parking occupancy of total designated parking spaces in the down-
town area occurred on Saturday, June 23` during the Prior Lake Farmer's Mar-
ket event when 52 percent of the total designated spaces were occupied.
Weekday occupancy of total designated parking spaces peaked at 45 percent.
ISSUES: The EDA may wish to focus on various aspects of this study. In the first place,
does the EDA concur with the study results? If not, how should they or could
they be confirmed since there will undoubtedly be those who will continue to
subscribe to the 2004 study results.
A second question is, assuming that the report is considered accurate, what can
or should be done to get the word out? Can and should the EDAC play a role in
getting this information publicized by using their business newsletter'?
And finally, are there measures that should be taken or further discussed to di-
rect those coming to downtown Prior Lake to the public parking areas (i.e., direc-
tionat signage)?
FINANCIAL Costs related to staff time conducting the survey and compiling results.
IMPACT:
ALTERNATlVES: 1. Direct staff to further corroborate the study results.
2. Direct staff to publicize this information.
RECOMMENDED As determined by the EDA..
MOTION:
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Downtown Area Parking Study
2. Exhibit A— Individual Block Information
3. Exhibit B— Parking Occupancy Survey Results
1
4
.
DOWNTO�YN AREA PARKING STUDY
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA
UPDATE — SUMMER 2012
.� PR.�Q�
O
� �
� �
V r.�
�jNNES��'�
SUBMITTED TO:
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
SUBNIITTED BY:
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
4646 DaxorA ST�ET SE
Px�oR La�, NIN 55372
952-447-9815
cmccabe(a�citvofpriorlake.com
www.citvofpriorlake.com
a
r
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Overview .......................................................... Page 3
II. Ezecutive Summary ............................................. Page 3
III. Study Area ........................................................ Page 5
IV. Existing Parking Characteristics ............................. Page b
V. Average Parking 4ccupancy .................................. Page 7
VI. Peak Parking Occupancy ...................................... Page 13
VII. Current Parking Needs ......................................... Page 20
VIII. Future Parking Needs .......................................... Page 22
1 �Page
�
LIST OF FIGURES, TABLES & EXHIBITS
FigureA Study Area .............................................................................. Page 5
FigureB Total Average Parking Occupancy ................................................ Page 8
Figure C Average On-Street Parking Occupancy .......................................... Page 9
Figure D Average Off-Street Public Parking Occupancy ................................. Page 10
Figure E Average Off-Street Private Parking Occupancy ................................ Page 11
Figure F Total Peak Parking Occupancy .................................................... Page 15
Figure G Peak On-Street Parking Occupancy .............................................. Page 16
Figure H Peak Off-Street Public Parking Occupancy ..................................... Page 17
Figure I Peak Off-Street Private Parking Occupancy .................................... Page 18
Table 1 Downtown Area Parking Supply ................................................... Page 6
Table 2 Total Average Parking Occupancy ................................................ Page 7
Table 3 Average On-Street Parking Occupancy .......................................... Page 9
Table 4 Average Off-Street Public Parking Occupancy ................................. Page 10
Table 5 Average Off-Street Private Parking Occupancy ................................ Page 11
Table 6 Average Undesignated On-Street Parking Occupancy ........................ Page 12
Table 7 Average Undesignated Off-Street Parking Occupancy ........................ Page 12
Table 8 Total Peak Parking Occupancy .................................................... Page 14
Table 9 Peak On-Street Parking Occupancy .............................................. Page 16
Table 10 Peak Off-Street Public Parking Occupancy ..................................... Page 17
Table 11 Peak Off-Street Private Parking Occupancy .................................... Page 18
Table 12 Peak On-Street Parking Occupancy During Farmer's Market ............. Page 19
Table 13 Peak Off-Street Public Parking Occupancy During Farmer's Market .... Page 19
Table 14 Peak Off-Street Private Parking Occupancy During Farmer's Market ... Page 20
Table 15 Practical Capacity by Block ......................................................... Page 22
Exhibit A Individual Block Information
Exhibit B Parking Occupancy Survey Results
_ _ _ 2lPage
.
�
I. OVERVIEW
A sufficient supply of convenient parking supports the success of local businesses and enhances
the viability of Prior Lake's downtown. The purpose of this study is to analyze the existing
parking supply in the downtown Prior Lake area to determine if the City of Prior Lake and
private property owners are providing an adequate supply of on- and off-street parking stalls to
meet the needs of local residents, customers and employees of downtown businesses.
Full occupancy of every parking space is not realistic so when evaluating the results of the
parking occupancy survey it is important to understand the concept of "practical capacity".
Practical capacity refers to an estimated operational capacity of a parking lot. A parking lot is
perceived by the public to be at full capacity when occupancy levels reach 90 percent. Because
of this perception, industry standards indicate an effective utilization of a parking system is
achieved when a surplus of parking stalls are available; generally a 10 percent surplus. This
report assumes parking blocks are at full capacity (practical capacity) when they reach 90 percent
occupancy.
This report presents the results of a parking study for the downtown area of the City of Prior
Lake. Included in the document is an analysis of existing parking supply and demand, which
was developed by conducting parking occupancy field surveys in the downtown area. In
addition, City staff utilized the future land use projections detailed in the Market Potential
Analysis of Proposed CR 21 Improvement Options in Downtown Prior Lake, Minnesota,
completed by Maxfield Research, Inc. in December, 2010 to provide an estimate of future
downtown parking needs.
The Downtown Area Parking Study, originally completed by Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik &
Associates in April 2004, was intended to be a document that can be easily updated as land use
development and/or redevelopment occurs in the downtown area. City staff used the original
2004 report as a guideline for the completion of this 2012 Downtown Area Parking Study
update.
This Downtown Area Parking Study is intended to be one of many tools that can be used to assist
in the future development of the Prior Lake downtown area. It is recommended that this report is
updated every three years or as substantial development or redevelopment occurs.
II. Egecutive Summarv
The Executive Summary provides the primary findings and conclusions of the parking study
conducted for the downtown area of the City of Prior Lake.
• There are a total of 783 designated parking spaces within the primary downtown study area
that serve residents, employees and customers of downtown area businesses.
• Of the total 783 designated parking spaces; 174 are on-street parking spaces, 195 are off-
street public parking spaces, and 414 are off-street private parking spaces. The downtown
study area is depicted on Figure A of this report.
_ _ 3lPage
• In addition to the 783 parking spaces included in this study, City staff estimated an additional
170 parking spaces are located in the downtown area; however, the additional parking spaces
primarily serve specific businesses, such as parking or displaying vehicles in automobile
sales lots, short-term parking at fuel stationslconvenience stores, or parking for automobile
repair businesses. The primary purpose of this study is to determine if the Prior Lake
downtown area provides a sufficient parking supply for residents, customers and employees
of downtown businesses. Staff determined the additional parking stalls are not available for
general resident, customer and employee parking; for this reason the additional 170 parking
stalls were not included in the baseline parking occupancy survey information.
• The on-street parking stalls along Arcadia Avenue (five stalls) and the private off-street
parking stalls at the currently vacant commercial building at the intersection of Dakota Street
and Main Avenue (approximately ten stalls) were not included in the parking occupancy
count because they were not available for public parking during the time the occupancy
surveys were completed.
• The previous Downtown Area Parking Study, completed in 2004, included the MnDOT Park
and Ride lot located north of Eagle Creek Avenue and east of Hwy 13. This lot provides
parking for approximately 20 vehicles and was not included in the downtown parking
occupancy survey. City staff felt, due to its location, this lot was not significantly utilized by
employees and customers of downtown area businesses.
• Parking occupancy studies were conducted on a Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday, and
Saturday during the week of June 17, 2012.
• The average parking occupancy (number of occupied spaces divided by the number of
available spaces) for all designated on- and off-street parking stalls was 38 percent. The
average on-street parking occupancy was 44 percent, the average off-street public parking
occupancy was 42 percent, and the average off-street private parking occupancy was 34
percent.
• The parking blocks of 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 contain the most retail, commercial, office and
services type land uses within the downtown study area. The average parking occupancy for
these blocks, considered as a unit, was 40 percent. The average on-street parking occupancy
for these blocks was 54 percent, the average off-street public parking occupancy for these
blocks was 43 percent, and the average off-street private parking occupancy for these blocks
was 34 percent.
• The peak parking occupancy of total designated parking spaces in the downtown area
occurred on Saturday, June 23 when 52 percent of the total designated spaces were
occupied.
• The Monday, June 18�' occupancy of total designated parking spaces peaked at 39 percent;
the Tuesday, June 19 occupancy of total designated paxking spaces peaked at 45 percent;
the Thursday, June 21 occupancy of total designated parking spaces peaked at 45 percent,
and the Friday, June 22" occupancy of total designated parking spaces peaked at 36 percent.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4lPage
• Block 6, which is located west of Main Avenue, South of Dakota Street, east of Erie Avenue
and north of CR 21 experienced the greatest average (60% occupancy) and largest peak (89%
occupancy) parking demand.
• T'here is one parking area that could be considered as special use — the church parking lot in
Block l. T'he church lot, considering its special use for church activities and City Hall staff
parking probably does not contribute much to the everyday needs of the downtown area,
other than providing a parking area for City staff which relieves parking demand at other
downtown locations.
III STUDY AREA
The study area for the parking analysis includes the downtown area that is depicted on Figure A
below.
Figure A — Study Area
,�
�
��
e�oc ss
lock: ]Q
� :' e" Block 1;1
d ii�', I�j���il o�i �
S�Pa;>e
IV. EXISTING PARHING CHARACTERISTICS
The base data that was used for the parking study was determined by conducting an in the field
count of the available parking supply in the downtown area followed by the completion of fifteen
parking occupancy survey counts of actual vehicles parked.
The downtown parking area shown on Figure A above was divided into 11 study sub-areas
called Blocks. Such division allows for analysis of each block as to the supply and demand, thus
providing a better indication as to the sub-areas where parking demand is at its greatest. The
sub-area parking blocks are depicted in Figure A.
The field survey that determined the baseline number of available downtown parking spaces only
included the on-street parking spaces designated with painted lines and the off-street parking
stalls which were clearly identifiable as public, employee, or customer parking. The baseline
parking stall supply count did not include additional undesignated on- and off-street parking
areas where it is permissible to park but the stalls were not clearly identified for parking.
However, if a vehicle was parked in an undesignated parking stall, the parked vehicle was
counted in the parking demand survey.
The number of available on-street and off-street parking spaces, noted by block, are shown in
Table 1 below. The total number of designated downtown parking spaces is as follows:
• Designated On-Street Parking Stalls = 174
• Designated Off-Street Public Parking Stalls = 195
• Designated Off-Street Private Parking Stalls = 414
The available parking supply survey indicates a total of 783 designated parking spaces in the
downtown study area.
Table 1— Downtown Area Parking Supply
Table 1
On-Street Off-Street Off-Street
Area parking Public Parking Private Parking Total
Block 1 5 7 0 12
Block 2 12 0 46 58
Block 3 15 0 25 40
Block 4 0 0 70 70
Block 5 16 63 0 79
Block 6 49 32 24 105
Block 7 22 16 62 100
Block 8 1 0 33 34
Block 9 14 0 63 77
Block 10 10 77 91 178
Block 11 30 0 0 30
Total 174 195 414 783
__ _ _ _ _ __ ___ _ 6 � P a g e
To determine the parking occupancy (number of cars parked) for the downtown area, City staff
conducted field surveys where, by parking block, the number of vehicles parked were counted; a
total of fifteen parking demand surveys were conducted on a Monday, Tuesday, Thursday,
Friday and Saturday during the week of June 17 2012. The parking occupancy survey results
are attached as E�ibit B for reference.
• The Monday, June 18�' surveys were conducted at 9:00 a.m., 11:45 a.m., 3:00 p.m. and
4:15 p.m.
• The Tuesday, June 19�' surveys were conducted at 12:30 p.m., 2:30 p.m. and 5:00 p.m.
• The Thursday, June 21 surveys were conducted at 10:30 a.m., 12:00 p.m., 2:00 p.m.,
4:00 p.m, and 7:00 p.m.
• The Friday, June 22 surveys were conducted at 11:00 a.m. and 12:30 p.m.
• The Saturday, June 23 survey was conducted at 10:30 a.m. during the Prior Lake
Farmer's Market.
V. Average Parkin� Occupancv
The average parking occupancy (number of occupied spaces divided by the number of available
spaces) for all designated on- and off-street parking stalls was 38 percent. The average on-street
parking occupancy was 44 percent, the average off-street public parking occupancy was 42
percent and the average off-street private parking occupancy was 34 percent; all well below the
practical capacity of ninety percent.
Table 2 identifies the total average parking occupancy by Block.
Table 2
Area parking Occupancy % Occupied
Supply (avg.) (avg.)
Block 1 12 533 44%
Block 2 58 26.93 46%
Block 3 40 14.27 36%
Block 4 70 17.67 25%
Block 5 79 31.47 40%
Block 6 105 63.46 60%
Block 7 100 54.13 54%
Block 8 34 13.54 40%
Block 9 77 26.53 34%
Block 10 178 42.46 24%
Block 11 30 3.47 12%
Total 783 299.26 38%
Blocks 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 contain the most retail, commercial, office and services type land
uses within the downtown study area. The average parking occupancy for these blocks,
considered as a unit, was 40 percent. The average on-street parking occupancy for fhese blocks
was 54 percent, the average off-street public parking occupancy for these blocks was 43 percent,
and the average o� street private parking occupancy for these blocks was 34 percent.
_ 7�Page
Figure B— Total Average Parking Occupancy by Block
gIi>c f
� ��„��
` E3fc,ck��� R � 'i' �I
� Y ?� �u�1 ��
4
�1�sak•.4 �
�Blta�k�.5 G
� � a ��
: �:` w�,�
R �� �� �
°�: ��
.. � �,o��•�§� €� r a' `.�,. . .fa�' ^� .
� �' �:: . � 7� ��.
e g ��
t "� y ���� � F '�.[ '.#��P .,i * �'2,
# �, .,
�,
� , �iCrCk,'�$ ..k„ �'�"��' � :. ,: , � ` .
«, �
r � ���'r�$ _. � .� (
r
� � , ��� � x
a ��`` g f�9� " Y k ��1C7C.{4��
�el
<�
' . � ����� �7t>C�. �'� � • .'.� s� ,�,' ` .�. .
* ' { P
��
.' � � i °� � ��
t
{ i
E. � ; y $ � Sk., . Ili
a� F �
�^u� � �` � t S . �. `I
„
cv
. . .i N S .. . � 5 I I .
g
.�. x � � ' . .." . .
P 4.'i�� 3^e � � � :.
� $ �� � ��
' � I �� � � I ,�,
I 1 �" I' � I� � I
II}�
I'
Percent Occupied (avg.)
+81'iri
61•fa-84%
4l%-6�%
-40°1e
��t ,
8�1'age
Table 3 identifies the avera e�parkin�occupancy for designated on-street parking stalls by
Block.
Table 3 Designated On-Street Parking
Area Supply Occupancy % Occupied
(avg.) (avg.)
Block 1 5 1.73 35%
Block 2 12 5.60 47%
Block 3 15 6.27 42%
Block 4 0 n/a n/a
Block 5 16 6.60 41%
Block 6 49 28.53 58%
Block 7 22 12.13 55%
Block 8 1 0.87 87%
Block 9 14 8.53 61%
Block 10 10 3.53 35%
Block 11 30 3.47 12%
Total 174 77.26 44%
Figure C— Average On-Street Parking Occupancy by Block
�
_ 9lPage
Table 4 identifies the avera�e parkin� occupancX for designated off-street public parking stalls
by Block.
Table 4 Designated Off-Street Public Parking
Area Supply Occupancy % Occupied
(avg.) (avg.)
Block 1 7 3.60 51%
Block 2 0 n/a n/a
Block 3 0 n/a n/a
Block 4 0 n/a n/a
Block 5 63 24.87 39%
Block 6 32 19.60 61%
Block 7 16 10.60 66%
Block 8 0 n/a n/a
Block 9 0 n/a n/a
Block 10 77 23.20 30%
Block I1 0 n/a n/a
Total 195 81.87 42%
Figure D— Average Off-Street Public Parking Occupancy by B1ock
�
_ __ _ __ _ lO�Page
Table 5 identifies the average narkin�occu�ancX for designated off-street private parking sta.11s
by Block.
Table 5 Designated Off-Street Private Parking
Area Supply Occupancy % Occupied
(avg.) (avg.)
Block 1 0 n/a n/a
Block 2 46 21.33 46%
Block 3 25 8.00 32%
Block 4 70 17.67 25%
Block 5 0 n/a n/a
Block 6 24 15.33 64%
Block 7 62 31.40 51 %
Block 8 33 12.67 38%
Block 9 63 18.00 29%
Block 10 91 15.73 17%
Block 11 0 n/a n/a
Total 414 140.13 34%
Figure E— Average Off-Street Private Parking Occupancy by Block
�
_ 11�Page
Tables 2 through 5 above identify the average parking occupancy for designated on-and off-
street parking spaces. There are a number of locations where it is permissible to park on- and
off-street in the downtown area within undesignated (not striped) parking stalls. Tables 6 and 7
below represent the additional on- and off street average parking occupancy within undesignated
on- and off-street private parking areas on each block.
Undesignated
Table 6 On-Street Parking
Area SuPp�y Occupancy
(avg.)
Block 1 0 1.60
Block 2 0 0.60
Block 3 0 0.00
Block 4 0 0.00
Block 5 0 0.47
Block 6 0 0.00
Block 7 0 0.53
Block 8 0 0.53
Block 9 0 1.07
Block 10 0 0.20
Block 11 0 0.07
Total 0 5.07
Undesignated
Table 7 Off-Street Private Parking
Area Supply Occupancy
(avg.)
Block 1 0 0.00
Block 2 0 0.00
Block 3 0 0.07
Block 4 0 0.00
Block 5 0 0.00
Block 6 0 0.00
Block 7 0 1.07
Block 8 0 0.00
Block 9 0 1.13
Block 10 0 0.07
Block 11 0 0.00
Total 0 2.34
_ _ __ ___ __ _ _. ___ __ 12 � P a g e
Table 6 indicates an average of 5.07 vehicles parked in undesignated on-street parking stalls
throughout the downtown area during the parking occupancy counts. Table 7 indicates an
average of 2.34 vehicles parked in undesignated off-street parking stalls throughout the
downtown area during the parking occupancy counts.
The survey results indicate the overall parking occupancy, during the fourteen weekday parking
occupancy surveys, for all designated on- and off-street parking stalls in downtown Prior La1ce
ranged between 30 percent and 45 percent; the overall parking occupancy was 52 percent on
Saturday during the Prior Lake Farmer's Market.
Survey results show a build-up of parking occupancy throughout the early morning hours until
the noon hour where the parking occupancy remained generally consistent throughout the
.
afternoon and into the early evening.
During the weekdays, on-street parking supplies exhibited a slightly higher occupancy with an
average occupancy of 44 percent. Off-street public parking stalls had an average occupancy of
42 percent while only 34 percent of private off-street parking stalls were occupied on average.
The Saturday survey results indicate 80 percent of the designated on-street parking stalls were
occupied; although it is noted that the Prior Lake Farmer's Market vendors were occupying 24
on-street parking stalls (17% of the available on-street parking supply) to display their goods
along Main Avenue. During the Farmer's Market, 55 percent of the off-street public parking
spaces and 38 percent of the off-street private parking spaces were occupied. The Saturday
survey results also e7chibited the highest amount of vehicles parked in undesignated parking
stalls, with 21 vehicles parked in undesignated on-street parking stalls and 7 vehicles parked in
undesignated off-street parking stalls.
VI. Peak Parkin� Occuuancv
The peak parking occupancy of total designated parking spaces in the downtown area (number of
occupied spaces divided by the number of available spaces) occurred on Saturday, June 23
during the Prior Lake Farmer's Market when 52 percent of the total designated spaces were
occupied. �
The Monday, June 18�' occupancy of total designated parking spaces peaked at 39 percent; the
Tuesday, June 19�' occupancy of total designated parking spaces peaked at 45 percent; the
Thursday, June 21 St occupancy of total designated parking spaces peaked at 45 percent, and the
Friday, June 22" occupancy of total designated parking spaces peaked at 36 percent.
Table 8 below identifies the total peak parking occupancy by Block and includes all on- and of�
street parking spaces. This table represents the peak parking occupancy observed on each
individual block during one of the fourteen weekday surveys. Table 8 shows that even though a
specific block may have a majority of its on- or off-street parking spaces occupied at a specific
time (as detailed below in tables 9 through 14), at all times during the parking occupancy surveys
there were designated parking stalls available within every block in the downtown area.
_ 13�Page
Table 8
Parking Peak Occupancy Q
Area Supp Excluding /o Occupied
Farmer's Market
Block 1 12 9 75%
Block 2 58 34 59%
Block 3 40 21 53%
Block 4 70 27 39%
Block 5 79 54 68%
Block 6 105 93 89%
Block 7 100 71 71%
Block 8 34 17 50%
Block 9 77 39 51%
Block 10 178 68 38%
Block 11 30 8 27%
Total 783 441 62 %
Block 6; which is located west of Main Avenue, south of Dakota Street, east of Erie Avenue and
north of CR 21, had the largest peak occupancy with 89 percent of all available on- and off-street
parking spaces occupied at peak parking demand; essentially practical capacity. Block 6 had an
average parking occupancy of 60 percent.
T'he parking occupancy surveys indicate an overall peak parking occupancy of 45 percent for all
designated on- and off-street parking stalls during the weekdays, which occurred on Thursday,
June 21S at 10:30 a.m. The overall peak parking occupancy was 52 percent of all on- and off-
street parking stalls on Saturday during the Prior Lake Farmer's Market.
During the weekdays, on-street parking occupancy for the entire downtown area peaked at 60
percent, off-street public parking occupancy peaked at 62 percent, while at peak the off-street
private parking stalls were only 37 percent occupied. These three examples of peak parking
occupancy occurred during separate surveys.
The Saturday survey results indicate 80 percent of the designated on-street parking stalls were
occupied; although it is noted that the Prior Lake Farmer's Market vendors were occupying 24
on-street parking stalls (17% of the available on-street parking supply) to display their goods
along Main Avenue. During the Farmer's Market, 55 percent of the off-street public parking
spaces and 38 percent of the off-street private parking spaces were occupied. The Saturday
survey results also exhibited the highest amount of vehicles parked in undesignated parking
stalls, with 21 vehicles parked in undesignated on-street parking stalls and 7 vehicles parked in
undesignated off-street parking stalls.
__ _ _ . _ __ _ _ _ __ 14�Page
Figure F— Total Peak Parking Occupancy by Block
' Block •2
Biock*3
Biock--
µ 9loeit,5
�;: ,; ,
Biocke7 �: `
�.
, .: :.
x ,
. Et h r€ " - =
,�v, � � _ �.1
�
�°�, .
., y�- � w
� . : � a
� j, " � '* �'i' a
; p y ,.
� � �
� "��' _ , .�
F31xk-1D �' . � �
L�,' ' ��#,
€ � E � �� `
�''
� �.,, . n�.
^'Hlu.w ]t
�- '
�:;�
Perecnt Occupied (peak)
+six
�i% - so•i.
ai•i. - 6o•i.
-�w•i.
; ul�t
Tables 9 through 14 below identify the peak on-street parking occupancy and peak off-street
parking occupancy experienced on each individual block. Tables 9 through 14 are not
representative of the peak parking demand of the downtown area as a whole because the parking
blocks generally did not experience their peak parking occupancy at the same time.
15�Page�
Table 9 identifies the peak parkin�occupancX for designated on-street parking stalls by Block
for all counts, excluding the Farmer's Market event.
Table 9 Designated On-Street Parking
Area Supply peak % Occupied
Occupancy
Block 1 5 3 60%
Block 2 12 10 83%
Block 3 15 13 87%
Block 4 0 n/a n/a
Block 5 16 11 69%
Block 6 49 43 88%
Block 7 22 20 91%
Block 8 1 1 100%
Block 9 14 10 71%
Block 10 10 9 90%
Block 11 30 8 27%
Total 174 128 74%
Figure G— Peak On-Street Parking Occupancy by Block
►...�..
_ __ __ _ __ _ _ _ 16�Page
Table 10 identifies the neak �arking occupancy for designated off-street public parking stalls by
Block for all counts, excluding the Farmer's Market event.
Table 10 Designated Off-Street Public Parking
Area Supply Peak % Occupied
Occupancy
Block 1 7 6 86%
Block 2 0 n/a n/a
Block 3 0 n/a n/a
Block 4 0 n/a n/a
Block 5 63 44 70%
Block 6 32 30 94%
Block 7 16 16 100%
Block 8 0 n/a n/a
Block 9 0 n/a n/a
Block 10 77 48 62%
Block 11 0 n/a n/a
Total 195 144 74%
Figure H— Peak Off-Street Public Parking Occupancy by Block
�:
_ U�Page
Table 11 identifies the peak narking occu�ancX for designated off-street private parking stalls by
Block for all counts, excluding the Farmer's Market event.
Table 11 Designated Off-Street Private Parking
Area Supply Peak % Occupied
Occupancy
Block 1 0 n/a n/a
Block 2 46 34 74%
Block 3 25 15 60%
Block 4 70 27 39%
Block 5 0 n/a n/a
Block 6 24 21 88%
Block 7 62 41 66%
Block 8 33 16 48%
Block 9 63 34 54%
Block 10 91 28 31%
Block 11 0 n/a n/a
Total 414 216 52 %
Figure I— Peak Off-Street Private Parking Occupancy by Block
�
_ _ __ _ _ __ 18IPage
Table 12 identifies the �eak �arkin� o� ccupancy for designated on-street parking stalls by Block
during the Farmer's Market event.
Table 12 Designated On-Street Parking
Area Supply peak % Occupied
Occupancy
Block 1 5 1 20%
Block 2 12 12 100%
Block 3 IS 13 87%
Block 4 0 n/a n/a
Block 5 16 8 50%
Block b 49 46 94%
Block 7 22 19 86%
Block 8 1 1 100%
Block 9 14 11 79%
Block 10 10 9 90%
Block 11 30 20 67%
Total 174 140 80%
Table 13 identifies the peak parkin occupancy for designated off-street public parking stalls by
Block during the Farmer's Market event.
Table 13 Designated Off-Street Public Parking
Area Supply Peak % Occupied
Occupancy
Blockl 7 4 57%
Block 2 0 n/a n(a
Block 3 0 n/a n/a
Block 4 0 n/a n/a
Block 5 63 31 49%
Block 6 32 31 97%
Block 7 16 16 100%
Block 8 0 n/a n/a
Block 9 0 n/a nla
Block 10 77 25 32%
Block 11 0 n/a n/a
Total 195 107 42%
_ _ _ 19IPage
Table 14 identifies the peak parkin occupancX for designated off=street private parking stalls by
Block during the Farmer's Market event.
Table 14 Designated Off-Street Private Parking
Area Supply Peak ', a� Occupied
Occupan�y
Block 1 0 n/a n/a
Block 2 46 20 43%
Block 3 25 8 32%
Block 4 70 0 0%
Block 5 0 n/a n/a
Block 6 24 23 96%
Block 7 62 43 69%
Block $ 33 12 36%
Block 9 63 3D 48%
Block 10 91 23 25%
Block 11 0 n/a n!a
Total 414 159 38%
VII. CURRENT PARKING NEEDS
The two blocks which showed the highest total average weekday parking occupancy were Block
6, which experienced the greatest average occupancy at 60 percent and Block 7, which had the
second highest average occupancy at 54 percent. All other blocks included in the parking
occupancy survey indicated an average occupancy of less than 50 percent of total designated
parking stalls.
The four blocks which showed the highest total peak occupancy during the weekday surveys
were Block 6, with the largest peak occupancy (89%), followed by Block 1(75%), Block 7
(71%) and Block 5(68%). All other blocks included in the parking occupancy survey indicated
a peak parking occupancy of less than 60 percent of total designated parking stalls.
Block 6 provides a total of 105 designated on- and off-street parking stalls; the second highest
parking supply among all blocks surveyed. Even though the City of Prior Lake and private
property owners are providing a large quantity of designated parking stalls, Block 6 experienced
the greatest average parking occupancy (60%) and the greatest peak parking occupancy (89%) in
the downtown area.
Based on the parking occupancy survey results, the total average and total peak parking
occupancy numbers do not necessitate additional downtown area parking to accommodate the
current demand. However, should the City of Prior Lake decide to add additional on- or off-
street parking in the downtown area, the greatest impact on the overall parking demand would be
achieved by providing additional off-street parking in Block 6.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _20�Page
�
The survey results indicate additional parking in Block 6 would be more heavily utilized than
additional parking elsewhere in the downtown area, thus it would be the most effective way to
relieve parking demand. The addition of off-street parking in Block 6 would likely require the
acquisition of all, or a portion of the Monnens Lumber Supply property.
Block 7 showed the second highest total average parking occupancy at 54 percent and a peak
parking occupancy of 71 percent. Additional parking in Block 7 would be utilized by residents,
employees and customers of downtown area businesses but it may be difficult to add parking
because the majority of the block area is developed with commercial buildings. Additional
parking in Block 7 would likely require the purchase and removal of an existing building(s)
which may be cost prohibitive.
VIII. FUTURE PARHING NEEDS
In December, 2010 Ma�cfield Research, Inc. completed a study titled; Market Potential Analysis
of Proposed CR 21 Improvement Options in Downtown Prior Lake, Minnesota. The study
examined the market potential analysis for downtown Prior Lake, including the impact on the
market potential from each of the three proposed CR 21 improvement options; the Base Line
Option, the Main Avenue Bridge Option and the CR 21 Realigmment Option.
Under the Base Line Option, which was ultimately approved by the Prior Lake City Council, the
Main Avenue and CR 21 intersection will be converted from a four-way stop to a right-in/right-
out only in order to maintain traffic flow. To provide alternative entrances to the downtown
area, a traffic signal will be added at the intersection of CR 21 and Arcadia Avenue and Arcadia
Avenue has been extended south of CR 21 to connect with Colorado Street.
According to the Maxfield Research Study; as of 2010, Prior Lake's primary trade area (PTA) is
served by about 540,000 square feet of retail space and 295,000 square feet of office space.
Anticipated strong growth of households and employment in the PTA through 2430 will create
the need for additional retail and office space. For retail, demand was calculated for a total of
760,000 square feet of space in the PTA in 2020 and 1 million square feet in 2030 (up from
540,000 square feet in 2010). As of 2010, Maxfield estimated downtown Prior Lake had about
101,000 square feet of occupied retail space; this equates to 18.8% of the total occupied retail
space in the PTA.
Maxfield projected the PTA will need 470,000 square feet of office space in 2020 and 630,000
square feet in 2030 to accommodate new employees (up from 295,Q00 square feet in 2010). As
of 2010, Maxfield estimated that downtown Prior Lake had about 37,000 square feet of occupied
office space; this equates to 12.6% of the total occupied office space in the PTA.
Maxfield Research determined the proportion of total future PTA retail and office demand that
can be captured in the downtown area partly depends on how CR 21 was improved. Downtown
demand potential was calculated based on the strengths and weaknesses of each of the three
improvement options. Maxfield Research projected the demand for additional downtown area
commercial (retail and office) space under the Base Line Option would be an additional 29,000
square feet from 2010 to 2030.
_ _ 21 �Page
Table 15 below compares the peak parking demand by block survey results to the 90 percent
practical capacity estimate by block. Table 15 is included in this study for reference and it is
noted that it is not conceivable to assume all parking facilities will operate at optimum capacity,
especially when considering many of the underutilized parking stalls are located in off-street
private parking lots and may not be available to general downtown resident, customer and
employee parking. The purpose of including Table 15 in this report is to show the parking
capacity of the aowntown area when all parking spaces are occupied at practical capacity.
Table 15 Current Peak Occupancy by Block Practical Capacity by Block
Peak Occupancy o
Parking o 90 /o Practical Additional
Area Su 1 Excluding /o Occupied Capacity Capacity
p y Farmer's Market
Block 1 12 9 75% 10.8 1.8
Block 2 58 34 59% 52.2 18.2
Block 3 40 21 53% 36 1S
Block 4 70 27 39% 63 36
Block 5 79 54 68% 71.1 17.1
Block 6 105 93 89% 94.5 1.5
Block 7 100 71 71% 90 19
Block 8 34 17 50% 30.6 13.6
Block 9 77 39 51% 69.3 30.3
Block 10 178 68 38% 160.2 92.2
Block 11 30 8 27% 27 19
Total 783 441 62% 704.7 263.7
Using the peak parking demand by block and an estimate of one parking space required for each
300 square feet of commercial (retail or office) development, at practical capacity the downtown
area could theoretically support an additional 80,000 square feet of commercial development.
Although, as stated above, it is not realistic to assume all parking facilities will operate at
practical capacity. �
Based on the parking occupancy survey data and dependent on the tocation of new commercial
development adjacent to an underutilized parking supply, the downtown area should be able to
absorb 5,000 to 7,000 square feet of new commercial development around the perimeter of the
downtown study area without the need to construct additional parking facilities.
The survey results indicate the downtown area parking demand needs are currently being met;
however, based on peak parking occupancy results the Downtown Area Parking Study does not
support additional commercial development in the downtown core (Blocks 5, 6 and 7) without
providing additional resident, employee and customer parking.
_ _ _ _ _ _ 22�Page
4
E�iBiT A
INDIVIDUAL BLOCK INFORMATION
J
Block 1
�
B� �
� ��
,�
��
�« : �.►.�
.,
w ..
>;, ,
��
Block 1
�-
6
5 -
4 ■ Designated On-Street
Parking
3
2 ■ Designated Off-Street
Public Parking
1
� ■ Designated Off-Street
Parking Average Peak Peak Private Parking
Supply (Excluding (During
Farmer's Farmer's
Market) Market)
Block 1
Parking Average Peak Occupancy Peak Occupancy
Supply Occupancy Excluding During
Farmer s Market Farmer s Market
Designated On-Street Parking 5 1.73 3 1
Designated Off-Street Public Parking 7 3.60 6 4
Designated Off-Street Private Parking 0 n/a n/a n/a
Total 12 5.33 9 S
Block 2
� ���
. �. � �
,
�� �� � �, u �
°o �,�� .
� � . e ;� .�
. ��
� ,�
�
�.. �rw� � �-��.,
. �� —
BIOCk 2
50 --- ---
45
40 -
35
30 ■ Designated On-Street
25 Parking
20
15 ■ Designated Off-Street
10 Public Parking
5 ■ Designated Off-Street
0
Parking Average Peak Peak Private Parking
Supply (Excluding (During
Farmer's Farmer's
Market) Marketj
Block 2
Parking Average Peak Occupancy Peak Occupancy
Supply Occupancy Excluding During
Farmer s Market Farmer s Market
Designated On-Street Parking 12 5.60 10 12
Designated Off-Street Public Parking 0 n/a n/a n/a
Designated Off-Street Private Parking 46 21.33 34 20
Total 58 26.93 44 32
Block 3
Block 3
zs
zo
15 ■ Designated On-Street
Parking ,
10
■ Designated Off-Street
5 Public Parking
p ■ Designated Off-Street
Parking Average Peak Peak Private Parking
Supply (Excluding (During
Farmer's Farmer's
Market) Market)
Block 3
Parking Average Peak Occupancy Peak Occupancy
Supply Occupancy Excluding During
Farmer s Market Farmer s Market
Designated On-Street Parking 15 6.27 13 13
Designated Off-Street Public Parking 0 n/a n/a n/a
Designated Off-Street Private Parking 25 8.00 15 8
Total 40 14.27 28 21
Block 4
�,��„
w
��
Block 4
�o
60
50
40 ■ Designated On-Street
Parking
30
20 ■ Designated Off-Street
10 Public Parkin�
� ■ Designated Off-Street
Parking Average Peak Peak Private Parking
Supply (Excluding (During
Farmer's Farmer's
Market) Market)
Block 4
Parking Average Peak Occupancy Peak Occupancy
Supply Occupancy Excluding During
Farmer s Market Farmer s Market
Designated On-Street Parking 0 n/a nfa n/a
Designated Off-Street Public Parking 0 n/a n!a nla
Designated Off-Street Private Parking 70 17.67 27 0
Total 70 17.b7 27 0
Block 5
-{
c - �
�a
. �,�.
� �-_
��
;,.
:�
� �,r�;�
�
�� ..
Block 5
�o
60
50
40 ■ Designated On-Street
Parking
30
Z � ■ Designated Off-Street
Public Parking
10
� ■ Designated Off-Street
Parking Average Peak Peak Private Parking
Supply (Excluding (During
Farmer's Farmer's
Market) Market)
Block 5
Parking Average p�ak Occupancy Peak Occupancy
Supply Occupancy Excluding During
Farmer's Market Farmer's Market
Designated On-Street Parking 16 6.60 11 8
Designated Of� Street Public Parking 63 24.87 44 31
Designated Off-Street Private Parking 0 n/a n/a n/a
Total 79 31.47 55 39
Block 6
��
Btock 6
50
45
40
35
3p ■ Designated On-Street
25 Parking
20
15 ■ Designated Off-Street
10 Public Parking
5 ■ Designated Off-Street
0
Parking Average Peak Peak Private Parking
Supply (Excluding (During
Farmer's Farmer's
Market) Market)
Block 6
Parking Average Peak Occupancy Peak Occupancy
Supply Occupancy Excluding During
Farmer s Market Farmer s Market
Designated On-Street Parking 49 28.53 43 46
Designated Off-Street Public Parking 32 19.60 30 31
Designated Off-Street Private Parking 24 15.33 21 23
Total 105 63.46 94 100
Block 7
�. �
�, �
Block 7
�o
60
50
� i Designated On-Street
Parking
30
20 ■ Desi�nated Off-Street
Public Parking
10
Q ■ Designated Off-Street
Parking Average Peak Peak Private Parking
Supply (Excluding (During
Farmer's Farmer's
Market) Market)
Block 7
Parking Average Peak Occupancy Peak Occupancy
Supply Occupancy Excluding During
Farmer's Market Farmer's Market
Designated On-Street Parking 22 12.13 20 19
Designated Off-Street Public Parking 16 10.60 16 16
Designated Off-Street Private Parking 62 31.40 41 43
Total 100 54.13 77 78
Block 8
�
�,
y .,� a .,
�,-
,
Block 8
35
�
30 --
25 -
20 ■ Designated On-Street
Parking
15
10 ■ Designated Off-Street
Public Parking
5
Q Designated Off-Street
Parking Average Peak Peak Private Parking
Suppiy (Excluding (During
Farmer's Farmer's
Market) Market)
Block 8
Parking Average Peak Occupancy Peak Occupancy
Supply Occupancy Excluding During
Farmer s Market Farmer s Market
Designated On-Street Parking 1 0.87 1 1
Designated Off-Street Public Parking 0 n/a n/a n/a
Designated Off-Street Private Parking 33 12.67 16 12
Total 34 13.54 17 13
Block 9
:;
;� �.
.�
�
4„
��ti .n` r....
�v'
Block 9
�o -
60
50 —�— —
40 ■ Designated On-Street
Parking
30
20 ■ Designated Off-Street
Public Parking
10
� ■ Designated Off-Street
Parking Average Peak Peak Private Parking
Supply (Excluding (During
Farmer's Farmer's
Market) Marketj
Block 9
Parking Average Peak Occupancy Peak Occupancy
Supply Occupancy Excluding During
Farmer s Market Farmer s Market
Designated On-Street Parking 14 8.53 10 11
Designated Off-Street Public Parking 0 n/a n/a n/a
Designated Off-Street Private Parking 63 18.00 34 30
Total 77 26.53 44 41
.
.
Block 10
8�oolr. o , ++'
� e ��
�
a,.
. , � €�
.,.�M .:
�`.:,�
�..t.
Block 10
ioo -------
90 — --
80 —
70 ....__ ____
60 --- Designated On-Street
50 ';; .._.._..__...._.- Parking
40
30 ■ Designated Off-Street
20 Public Parking
10 Designated Off-Street
d � `
Parking Average Peak Peak Private Parking
Supply (Excluding (During
Farmer's Farmer's
Market) Market)
Block 10
Parking Average Peak Occupancy Peak Occupancy
Supply Occupancy Excluding During
Farmer s Market Farmer s Market
Designated On-Street Parking 10 3.53 9 9
Designated Off-Street Public Parking ?7 23.20 48 25
Designated Off-Street Private Parking 91 15.73 28 23
Total 178 42.46 85 57
,
.
Block 11
�
�
��
. .�. M
Block 11
3Q
25
2Q
■ Designated On-Street
15 Parking
10 ■ Designated Off-Street
5 Public Parking
� ■ Designated Off-Street
Parking Average Peak Peak Private Parking
Supply (Excluding (During
Farmer's Farmer's
Market) Market)
Block 11
Parking Average Peak Occupancy Peak Occupancy
Suppiy Occupancy Excluding During
Farmer's Market Farmer's Market
Designated On-Street Parking 30 3.47 8 20
Designated Off-Street Public Parking 0 n/a n/a n/a
Designated Off-Street Private Parking 0 n/a n/a n/a
Total 30 3.47 8 20
r
� �
EX�IIBIT B
PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY RESULTS
,
Downtown Customer Parking Counts by Single Block Area
Date: 6/18/12 Time: 9:00 a.m. . ,
Block Area Descri tion On-Street Off-Street Off-Street
Additional Additional
p Parking Public Parking Private Parking On-Street Off-Street Total
un-desi nated un-designated
City Hall Property 5 � 0 0 0 12
1 North of Dakota St.
Park(ng Stalls Occupfed 2 4 0 0 p 6
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 40% 57% n n n 50%
Apartment Building 12 0 46 0 0 58
2 North of Dakota St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 7 0 22 0 0 29
Percent of Stalis Occu fed 58% n 48% n n 50%
North of Dakota St., West of Hwy 13, 15 0 25 0 0 40
3 East of Main Ave.
Parkin Stalls Occu ied 2 1 15 0 1 19
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 13% 100% 60% n 10096 4896
Church Property - North of CR 21, West of 0 0 70 0 0 70
4 Arcadia Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occupied 0 0 23 0 0 23
Percent of Stalis Occupfed n n 33% n n 33%
Pollce StaUon / Library
North of CR 21, West of Erie Ave., 16 63 0 0 0 79
5 East of Arcadia, South of Dakota
Parking Stalls Occu ied 7 15 0 1 0 23
Percent of Stalls Occu led 4496 24% n 100% n 29%
West of Main Ave., 5outh of Dakota St., !
49 32 24 0 0 105 �
6 East of Erie Ave., North of CR 21 �
Parking Stalls Occu led 18 8 17 0 0 43
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 3796 25% 71% n n 41%
North of CR 21, West of Hwy 13, 22 16 62 0 0 100
� East of Main Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occupied 6 7 16 0 1 30
Percent of Stalls Occupied 27% 44% 269� n 300% 30%
South of CR 21, West of Arcadia Ave., 1 0 33 0 0 34 +
$ North of Colorado St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occupied 1 0 16 0 0 17
Percent of Stalls Occupied 100% n 48% n n 50%
South of CR 21, West of Hwy 13., North of 14 0 63 0 0 77
9 Pleasant St., East of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occupied 8 0 6 2 2 18
Percent of Stalis Occu ied 57% n SO% 200% 200Yo 235�
South of Colorado St., West of Main Ave., North 10 77 91 0 0 178
10 of Pleasant St.
Parking Stalls Occupied 2 24 10 1 0 37
Percent of Stalls Occupied 20% 31% 11% 10095 n 21%
South of Pieasant St. West of H 13 30 0 0 0 0 30
11 Parkin Stalls Occu led 0 0 0 1 0 1
Percent of Stalls �ccupied � 0% n n 100% n 3%
Total Parking Stalls Available 174 195 414 0 0 783
Total Parking Stalls Occupied 53 59 125 5 4 246
Percent of Stalis Occupied 3095 30% 30% 50055 400% 31% ,
�
,
Downtown Customer Parking Counts by Singie Block Area
� _ Date: 6/18/12 Time:11:45 a.m.
On-Street Off-Street Off-Street Additional Additional
Block Area Description On-Street Off-Street Total
Parking Public Parking Private Parking un-designated (un-designated
City Hall Praperty
1
North of Dakota St. 5 7 0 0 0 12
Parkin 5talls Occupied 2 3 0 0 0 5
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 40% 53% n n n 42%
Apartment Building 12 0 46 0 0 58
Z North of Dakota St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occupied 1 0 27. 1 0 23
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 8% n 4646 100% n 4096
North of Dakota St,, West of Hwy 13, 15 0 25 0 0 40
3 East of Main Ave.
Parkin Stalts Occupied 5 0 5 0 0 10
Percent of Stal(s Occu ied 33% n 20% n n 2595
Church Property - North of CR 21, West of 0 0 70 0 0 70
4 Arcadia Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parkin Stalfs Occu led 0 0 21 0 0 21
Percent of Stalls Occupied n n 30% n n 30% i
Police Station / Library (
North of CR 21, West of Erie Ave., i6 63 0 0 0 79
5 East of Arcadia, South of Dakota
Parking Stalls Occupied 4 22 0 1 0 27
Percent of Stalls Occupfed 25% 35% n 100� n 34%
West of Main Ave., South of Dakota St., 49 32 24 0 0 105
6 East of Erie Ave., North of CR 21
Parking Stalls Occu ied 9 25 18 0 0 52
Percent of Stalls Occu ied i8% 789'0 75% n n SO%
North of CR 21, West of Hwy 13, ZZ 16 62 0 0 100
� East of Main Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occu led 8 13 20 0 1 42
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 36% 81% 32�o n 100% 42%
South of CR 21, West of Arcadia Ave., 1 0 33 0 0 34 I
$ North of Colorado St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 1 0 12 0 0 13
Percent of Stalls Occupied 1009�o n 36`� n n 38%
South of CR 21, West of Hwy 13., North of 14 0 63 0 0 77
9 Pleasant St., East of Main Ave.
Parkin Stalls Occu ied 5 0 34 0 U 39
Percent of Stalls Occupied 36�o n 549'o n n 51%
South of Colorado St., West of Main Ave., North Z � �� 91 0 0 178
10 of Pleasant St.
Parkin Stalls Occupied 2 13 6 0 0 21
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 20% 17% 7% n n 1246
Sauth of Pleasant St. West of Hw 13 30 0 0 0 0 30
11 Park)ng Stalls Occupied 1 0 0 0 0 1
Percent of Stalis Occu ied 3% n n n n 3%
7otal Parking Stails Available 174 195 414 0 0 783
7otal Parking Stalls Occupled 38 76 137 2 1 254 �
Percent of Stalls Occupied 22% 39% 3396 200% 100% 32% �
i
f
�
Downtown Customer Parking Counts by Single Block Area
Date: 6/18/12 Time: 3:00 p.m. - �
Block Area Descri tion On-Street Off-Street Off-Street
Additional Additional
P Parking Public Parking Private Parking On-Street Off-Street Total
un-designated un-desi nated)
City Hall Property 5 � 0 0 0 12
1 North of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occupied 1 5 0 2 0 8
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 20% 71% n 200% n 67%
Apartment Building 12 0 46 0 0 58
Z North of Dakota St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 5 0 26 1 0 32
Percent of Stalis Occu ied 42% n 5796 100% n 559�
North of Dakota St., West of Hwy 13, 15 0 25 0 0 40
3 East of Main Ave.
Parking Sta{Is Occupied 7 0 7 0 0 14
Percent of Stalls Occupied 47% n 28% n n 359G
Church Property - North of CR 21, West of
Arcadia Ave., South of Dakota St. 0 0 70 0 0 70
4 Parking Staifs Occu ied 0 0 21 0 0 21
Percent of Stails Occu ied n n 3096 n n 30%
Police Statfon / Library
North of CR 21, West of Erie Ave., 16 63 0 0 0 79
5 East of Arcadia, South of Dakota
Parkin Stalls Occu led 7 33 0 0 0 40
Percent ot Stalls Occu ied 4496 52% n n n 519b
West of Main Ave., South of Dakota St., 49 32 24 0 0 105
6 East of Erie Ave., North of CR 21
Parkin Stalls Occu ied 27 21 21 0 0 69
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 55% 66% 88% n n 66%
North of CR 21, West of Hwy 13, 2Z 16 62 0 0 100
� East of Main Ave., South of Dakota St.
ParkingStallsOccu led 4 9 21 0 2 36
Percent of Stalls Occupied 18% 56% 34% n 2009'0 36�'0
South of CR 21, West of Arcadia Ave., 1 0 33 0 0 34
$ North of Colorado St., West of Main Ave.
Parkin Stalls Occu ied 1 0 15 0 0 16
Percent of Stalls Occupied 100% n 45% n n. 47%
South of CR 21, West of Hwy 13,, North of 14 0 63 0 0 77
9 Pleasant St., East of Main Ave.
Parkfng Stalls Occupied 8 U 14 2 1 25
Percent of Stalls Occu fed 57% n 22% 200% 100% 32%
South of Coloredo St., West of Mafn Ave., North 10 77 91 0 0 178
10 of Pleasant St.
Parkin Stalls Occupied 3 38 14 0 0 55
Percent of Stalls Occu led 30� 49% 15% n n 2696
South of Pleasant St. West of Hw 13 3U 0 0 0 0 30
11 Parkin Stalis Occu ied 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 0% n n n n 096
Total Parking Stalls Available 174 195 414 0 0 783
Tota) Parking Stalls Occupied 63 106 139 5 3 316
Percent of Stalls Occupied 36% 54% 34% 500% 300% 409b
Downtown Customer Parking Counts by Single Block Area
� - Date: 6/18/12 Time: 4:15 p.m.
On-Street Off-Street Off-Street Additional Additional
Block Area Description On-Street Off-Street Total
Parking Public Parking Private Parking
(un-designated) (un-designated)
City Hall Property 5 7 0 0 0 12
1 North of Dakota St.
Parking Stalis Occupied 2 5 0 2 0 9
Percent of Stalls Occupied 40°� 71% n 2009� n 75�
Apartment Building 12 0 46 0 0 58
Z North ofi Dakota St., West of Main Ave.
Parktng Stalls Occupied 7 0 25 1 0 33
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 58% n 5496 10U9�o n 57%
North of Dakota St., West of Hwy 13, 15 0 25 0 0 40
3 East of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 7 0 6 0 0 13
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 47% n 24% n n 3396
Church Properry - North of CR 21, West of
4
Arcadia Ave., South of Dakota St. 0 0 70 0 0 70
Parkin Stalls Occu ied 0 0 18 0 0 18
Percent of Stalls Occupied n n 2696 n n 26%
Police Station / Library
North of CR 21, West of Erie Ave., 16 63 0 0 0 79
5 East of Arcadia, South of Dakota
Parking Stalis Occu led 5 20 0 0 0 25
Percent of Stalls Occu ted 31� 32� n n n 3296
West of Mafn Ave., South of Dakota St., 49 32 24 0 0 305
6 East of Erie Ave., North of CR 21
Parkin Stalls Occu ied 25 20 13 0 0 58
Percent of Stalis Occupied 51% 63% 54% n n 55%
North of CR 21, West of Hwy 13, 22 q6 62 0 0 100
� East of Main Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 6 9 27 0 2 44
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 27�0 569� 44% n 20U% 44�
South of CR 21, West of Arcadia Ave., 1 0 33 0 0 34
$ North of Colorado St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occupled 1 D 12 1 0 14 ,
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 100% n 369'0 100% n 41%
South of CR 21, West of Hwy 13., North of 14 0 63 0 0 77
9 Pteasant St., East of Main Ave.
Parking Stalis Occu ied 9 0 21 2 1 33
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 64% n 339� 200% 10�Y 43%
South of Colorado St., West of Main Ave., North 10 77 91 0 0 178
10 of Pieasant St.
Parking Stalis Occu ied 2 16 17 0 0 35
Percent of Stalls Occu led 20% 21% 19% n n 20%
South of Pleasant St. West of Hwy 13 30 0 0 0 0 30
11 Parkin Stalls Occu ied 2 0 0 0 0 2
Percent of Stalls Occupfed 7� n n n n 746
Total Parking Stails Available 174 195 414 0 0 783
Total Parking Stalls Occupied 66 70 139 6 3 284
Percent of Stalls Occupied 38� 36°� 34°� 6U0% 306% 36°lb
Downtown Customer Parking Counts by Single Block Area
Date: 6/19/12 Time: 1230 p.m. ' `
Additional Additional
On-Street Off-Street Off-Street
Block Area Description On-Street Off-Street Total
Parking Public Parking Private Parking
(un-desi nated un-desi nated
City Hall Property
1
North of Dakota St. 5 7 0 0 0 12
Park(n Stalls Occu ied 1 3 0 3 0 7
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 20% 53% n 300% n 58%
Apartment Building 12 0 46 0 0 58
Z North of Dakota St., West of Main Ave.
Parkin Stalls Occu ied 7 0 20 1 0 28
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 58% n 43% 100% n 48%
North of Dakota St., West of Hwy 13, 15 0 25 0 0 40
3 East of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 7 0 6 0 0 13
Percent of Stalls Occupied 47% n 2496 n n 33%
Church Property - NoKh of CR 21, West of 0 0 70 0 0 70
4 Arcadia Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parkin Stalls Occupied 0 0 26 0 0 26
Percent of Stalls Occu ied n n 37% n n 37%
PoUce Station / Library
North of CR 21, West of Erie Ave,, 16 63 0 0 0 79
5 East of Arcadla, South of Dakota
Parkin Stalls Occu ied 4 30 0 0 0 34
Percent of Stalls Occupied 36% 48% n n n 43%
West of Main Ave., South of Dakota St., 49 32 24 0 0 105
6 East of Erie Ave., North of CR 21
Parkin Stalls Occu led 38 26 20 0 0 84
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 7S% 81% 83% n n 80%
North of CR 21, West of Hwy 13, 22 16 62 0 0 100
� East of Main Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occupfed 16 14 37 0 1 68
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 7396 88% 60% n 100� 68%
South of CR 21, West of Arcadia Ave., 1 0 33 0 0 34 "
$ North of Colorado St., West of Main Ave. �
Parking Stalls Occu ied 1 0 10 0 0 11
Percent of Staf(s Occupied YOU% n 30% n n 32%
South of CR 21, West of Hwy 13., North of 14 0 63 0 0 77
9 Pleasant St., East of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occupied 9 0 19 3 0 3i
Percent of Stalls Occu fed 64% n 30% 30096 n 40%
South of Colorado St., West of Main Ave., North 10 77 91 0 0 178
10 of Pleasant St.
Parking Stalls Occu Ied 1 48 9 0 0 58
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 109�0 624�0 10% n n 33%
South of Pleasant St. West of Hwy 13 30 0 0 0 0 30
11 Parking Stalls Occu ied 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 0% n n n n 09�
Total Parking Stalis Available 174 195 414 0 0 783
Total Parking Stalls Occupied 84 121 147 7 1 360
Percent of Statis Occupied 48% 6296 36% 70096 100% 46%
Downtow� Customer Parking Counts by Sing�e Block Area
� - Date: 6/19/12 Time: 2:30 p.m.
Additional Additional
Block Area Description On-Street Off-Street Off-Street On-Street Off-Street Total
Parking Public Parking Private Parking
un-designated un-designated
City Hall Property � � 0 0 0 12
1 North of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occupfed 3 2 0 0 0 5
Percent of Stails Occu led 609�0 29% n n n 42%
Apartment Building 12 0 46 0 0 58
2 North of Dakota St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occupied 2 0 20 0 0 22
Percent of Stalls Occupied 17% n 43% n n 38%
North of Dakota St., West of Hwy 13, 15 Q 25 0 0 40
3 East of Maln Ave.
Parking Stalts Occu fed 7 0 13 0 0 20
Percent of Stalls Occu fed 47% n 52% n n 50%
Church Property - North of CR 21, West of
Arcadia Ave., South of Dakota St. 0 0 70 0 0 70
4 Parking Stalls Occupied 0 0 23 0 0 23
Percent of Stalls Occu ied n n 33% n n 33%
Police Station / Library
North of CR 21, West of Erie Ave., 16 63 0 0 0 79
5 East of Arcadia, South of Dakota
Parking Stalls Occu ied 2 30 0 0 0 32
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 13� 489� n n n 41%
West of Main Ave., South of Dakota St., �9 32 24 0 0 105
6 East of Erie Ave., North of CR 21
Parking Stalls Occupied 27 24 20 0 0 71
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 55°� 759'0 83�o n n 68%
North of CR 21, West of Hwy 13, 22 16 62 0 0 100
� East of Main Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parking Sta11s Occupied 14 16 41 0 0 71
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 64% 100% 66% n n 71%
South of CR 21, West of Arcadia Ave., 1 0 33 0 0 34
$ North of Colorado St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu fed 1 0 12 0 0 13
Percent of Stalls Occupied 100% n 3696 n n 38%
South of CR 21, West of Hwy 13., North of 14 0 63 0 0 77
9 Pleasant St., East of Ma1n Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 8 0 10 0 0 18
Percent of Stalls Occupied 579� n 16% n n 23%
South of Colorado St., West of Mafn Ave., North 10 77 91 0 0 178
1a af Pleasant St.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 5 33 8 0 0 46
Percent of Stalls Occupied 509� 43% 9� n n 26%
South of Pleasant St. West of H 13 30 0 0 0 0 30
11 Parking Stalls Occupied 2 0 0 0 0 2
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 7% n n n n 79�
Total Parking Stalls Available 1T4 195 414 0 0 783
Total Parking Stalls Occupied 71 105 147 � 0 323
Percent of Stalls Occupied 41% 54% 36% 0% 0% 41%
Downtown Customer Parking Counts by Single Block Area
Date: 6/19/12 Time: 5:00 p.m. - �
On-Street Off-Street Off-Street Additional Additional
Block Area Descrlption On-Street Off-Street Total
Parking Public Parking Private Parking
un-designated) un-desi nated
City Hall Property 5 � 0 0
1
North of Dakota St. 0 12
ParkingStallsOccupied 1 4 0 3 p g
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 20% 57% n 300% n 67%
Apartment Building 1z 0 46 0 0 58
Z North of Dakota St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalis Occu !ed 4 0 22 1 0 27
Percent of Stalls Occupied 33% n 48% 100% n 47%
North of Dakota St., West of Hwy 13, 15 0 25 0 0 40
3 East of Main Ave.
Parking StaAs Occu fed 5 0 9 0 0 14
Percent of Stalls Occupied 33% n 36% n n 35%
Church Property - North of CR 21, West of 0 0 70 0 0 70
4 Arcadia Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parkin Stalls Occu led 0 0 15 0 0 15
Percent of Stalls Occu ied n n 21% n n 2196
Police Station / L(brary
North of CR 21, West of Erle Ave., 16 63 0 0 p 79
5 East of Arcadia, South of Dakota
Parking Stalls Occu ied 9 23 0 1 0 33
Percent of Stalls Occu led 56% 37% n 100% n 42%
West of Main Ave., South of Dakota St, 49 32 24 0 0 105
6 East of Erie Ave., North of CR 21
Parking Stalls Occu ied 29 14 8 0 0 51
Percenf of Stafls Occupied 5996 44% 33% n n 49%
North of CR 21, West of Hwy 13, 22 16 62 0 0 100
� East of Main Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occupied 10 6 40 0 1 57
Percent of Stails Occu ied 45% 38% 65% n 100% 5795
South of CR 21, West of Arcadia Ave., 1 0 33 0 0 34
$ North of Colorado St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 1 0 13 0 0 14
Percent of Stalls Occupled 100% n 39% n n 41%
South of CR 21, West of Hwy 13., North of 14 0 63 0 0 77
9 Pleasant St., East of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occupied 8 0 16 Z 1 27
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 57% n 25% 200% 100% 35%
South of Colorado St., West of Maln Ave., North 10 77 91 0 0 178
10 of Pleasant St.
Parkin Stalls Occu led 7 24 28 Q 0 59
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 70% 31% 31% n n 33%
5outh of Pleasant St. West of Hwy 13 30 0 0 0 0 30
11 Parkin Stalis Occu ied 2 0 0 0 p Z
Percent of SYalls Occu ied 7% n n n n 796
Total Parking Stalls Available 174 195 414 0 0 783
Total Parking Stalls Occupied 76 71 151 7 2 gp�
Percent of Stalis Oceupied 44% 36% 36% 700% 200% 3996
Downtown Customer Parking Counts by Single Block Area
. Date: 6/21/12 TIme:1030 a.m.
Block Area Descri tion �n-Street Off-Street Off-Street
Additional Additional
P On-Street Off-Street Total
Parking Public Parking Private Parking (un-designated) (un-desi nated
City Hall Property
1
North of Dakota St. 5 7 0 0 0 12
Parking Stalls Occu ied 0 2 0 2 0 4
Percent of Stalls Occupied 0% 29% n 200% n 33%
Apartment Buflding 12 0 46 0 0 58
2 North of Dakota St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 6 0 18 0 0 24
Percent of Stalls Occupied 50% n 39% n n 41%
North of Dakota St., West of Hwy 13, 15 0 25 0 0 40
3 East of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 13 0 8 0 0 21
Percent of Stalls Occupied 87% n 329� n n 53%
Church Property - North of CR 21, West of 0 0 70 0 0 70
4 Arcadia Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 0 0 20 0 0 20
Percent of Stalls Occu ied n n 29% n n 29%
Police Station / Library
North of CR 21, West of Erie Ave., 16 63 0 0 0 79
5 East of Arcadia, South of Dakota
Parking Stalls Occu ied 10 44 0 1 0 55
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 63% 70% n 10096 n 70%
West of Main Ave., South of Dakota St., 49 32 24 0 0 105
6 East of Erie Ave., North of CR 21
Parking Stalls Occu ied 43 30 20 0 0 93
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 88% 949� 83% n n 89%
North of CR 21, West of Hwy 13, 22 16 62 0 0 100
� East of Mafn Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 20 13 36 0 0 69
Percent of Stails Occu ied 91% 81'Y 58% n n 69%
South of CR 21, West of Arcadia Ave., 1 0 33 0 0 34
8 North of Colorado St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu fed 1 0 16 0 0 17
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 1009'o n 48� n n 50%
South of CR 21, West of Hwy 13., Narth of 14 0 63 0 0 77
9 Pleasant St., East of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occupied 7 0 7 0 2 16
Percent of Stalls Occupied 50� n 11�o n 20096 21%
South of Colorado St., West of Mafn Ave., North 10 77 91 0 0 178
10 of Pleasant St.
Parking Stails Occu fed 2 15 20 1 0 38
Percent of Stalis Occu led 20% 19% 22% 100% n 2196
South of Pleasant St. West of H 13 30 0 0 0 0 30
11 Parking Stai{s Occu ted 2 0 0 0 0 2
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 7% n n n n 7%
Total Parking Stalls Available 174 195 414 0 0 783
Total Parking Stalls Occupied 104 104 145 4 2 359
Percent of Stalls Occupied 60% 53% 35% 400% 200% 46%
Downtown Customer Parking Counts by Single Block Area
Date: 6/21/12 Time: 12:00 p.m. '
On-Street Off-Street Off-Street Additional Additional
Block Area Description On-Street Off-Street Total
Parking Public Parking Private Parking
un-designated) (un-desi nated
City Hall Property 5 7 0 0 0 12
1 North of Dakota St.
Parkin Stalls Occupied 3 2 0 2 0 7
Percent of Stalls Occupied 609� 29% n 200% n 589�
Apartment Building 12 0 46 0 0 58
2 Narth of Dakota St., West of Mafn Ave.
Parkin Stalls Occu led 10 0 18 1 0 29
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 83% n 39% 100% n SO% i
i
�
North of Dakota St., West of Hwy 13, 15 0 25 0 0 40 �
3 East of Main Ave.
Parkin Stalis Occu ied 3 0 3 0 0 6
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 20% n 12% n n 15%
Church Property - North of CR 21, West of 0 0 70 0 0 70
4 Arcadia Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parkin Stalls Occu ied 0 0 19 0 0 19
Percent of Stalls Occupied n n 27% n n 27%
Police Station / Library
North of CR 21, West of Erfe Ave., 16 63 0 0 0 79
5 East of Arcadia, South of Dakota
Parkin Stalls Occupied 7 14 0 0 0 21
Percent of Stalls Occu ted 44% 22% n n n 27%
West of Main Ave., South of Dakota St., 49 32 24 0 0 105
6 East of Erie Ave., North of CR 21
Parkin Stalis Occu ied 39 26 14 0 0 79
Percent of Stalls Occupied 80% 81°% 5896 n n 75%
North of CR 21, West of Hwy 13, 22 16 62 0 0 100
� East of Main Ave. South of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occupied 16 10 33 0 2 61
Percent of Stalls Occu fed 73% 63% 5396 n 200% 61�
South of CR 21, West of Arcadia Ave., 1 0 33 0 0 34
8 North of Colorado St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 1 0 13 0 0 14
Percent of Stalis Occu ied 100% n 39% n n 41%
South of CR 21, West of Hwy 13., North of 14 0 63 0 0 77
9 Pleasant St., East of Main Ave.
Parkin Stalls Occupied 8 0 16 1 2 27
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 57% n 25% 100% 200% 35%
South of Colorado St., West of Main Ave., North 10 77 91 0 0 178
10 of Pleasant St.
Parking Stalis Occu ied 2 18 13 1 0 34
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 20% 2396 14% 100% n 1996
South of Pleasant St. West of H 13 30 0 0 0 0 30
11 Parking Stalls Occu led 2 0 0 0 0 2
Percent of Stalls Occupied 7% n n n n 7%
Total Parking Stalls Available 174 195 414 0 0 783 j
Totai Parking Stalls Occupied 52 70 129 5 4 260 �
I
Percent of Stalls Occupied 30% 36% 31% 500% 400% 33% �
I
�
Downtown Customer Parking Counts by Single Block Area
` Date: 6/21/12 Time: 2:00 p.m.
On-Street Off-Street Off-Street Additional Additional
elock Area Description On-Street Off-Street Total
Parking Public Parking Private Parking
(un-desi nated (un-desi nated
City Hall Property 5 � 0 0 0 12
1 North of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occupied 1 3 0 0 0 4
Percent of Stalls Occupied 209� 43% n n n 33%
Apartment Building 12 0 46 0 0 58
Z North of Dakota St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occupied 5 0 21 1 0 27
Percent of Stalls Occu fed 42% n 464� 100% n 47%
North of Dakota St., West of Hwy 13, 15 0 25 0 0 40
3 East of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu led 5 0 10 0 0 15
Percent of Stalls Occupted 33% n 40`Yo n n 38%
Church Property - North of CR 21, West of 0 0 70 0 0 70
4 Arcadia Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parkin Stalis Occu led 0 0 15 0 0 15
Percent of Stalls Occu led n n 21� n n 21%
Police Station / Library
North of CR 21, West of Erie Ave., 16 63 0 0 0 79
5 East of Arcadia, South of Dakota
Parking Stalls Occu led 11 37 0 0 0 48
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 69% 59% n n n 36%
West of Main Ave., South of Dakota St., 49 32 24 0 0 105
6 East of Erie Ave., North of CR 21
Parking Stalis Occupied 37 23 12 0 0 72
Percent of Stalls Occu led 76% 729�0 504�o n n 69%
North of CR 21, West of Hwy 13, Z2 16 62 0 0 100
� East of Maln Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parkin Stalls Occu ied 12 10 30 0 2 54
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 55% 63�0 48% n 20096 54%
South of CR 21, West of Arcadia Ave., 1 0 33 0 0 34
8 North of Colorado 5t., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occupied 1 0 12 0 0 13
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 1009� n 36% n n 38%
South of CR 21, West of Hwy 13., North of 14 0 63 0 0 77
9 Pleasant St., East of Main Ave.
Parkin Stalls Occu ied 10 0 13 2 2 27
Percent of Stalls Occupied 71� n 2196 200% 200°Y 35�
South of Colorado St., West of Mafn Ave., North 10 77 91 0 0 178
10 of Pleasant St.
Parkin Stalls Occu led 3 18 13 0 0 34
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 30% 23% 14% n n 19%
South of Pleasant St. West of Hwy 13 30 0 0 0 0 30
11 Pa'rkin Stalls Occu ied 2 0 0 0 0 2
Percent of Stalis Occu led 74�o n n n n 7%
Total Parking Stalls Available 174 195 414 0 0 783
Total Parking Stalls Occupied 87 91 126 3 4 311
Percent of Stalls Occupied 50% 47% 30qb 300% 40096 4045
Downtown Customer Parking Counts by Single Block Area 'I
Date: 6/21/12 Time: 4:00 p.m. y
Additional Additional
Block Area Description On-Street Off-Street Off-Street On-Street Off-Street Total
Parking Public Parking Private Parking
(un-desi nated un-desi nated
City Hall Property
5 7 0 0 0 12
1 North of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occupied 2 3 0 3 0 8
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 4096 53% n 300% n 67%
Apartment Building 12 0 46 0 0 58
2 North of Dakota St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 3 0 23 1 0 27
Percent of Stalis Occu fed 25R6 n 50% 100% n 47%
North of Dakota St., West of Hwy 13, 15 0 25 0 0 40
3 East of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 3 0 6 0 0 9
Percent of Stalis Occu led 20% n 2496 n n 23%
Church Property - North of CR 21, West of 0 0 70 0 0 70
4 Arcadia Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parkin Stalls Occu ied 0 0 27 0 0 27
Percent of Stalls Occu ied n n 39% n n 39%
Police Station / Library
North of CR 21, West of Erte Ave., 16 63 0 0 0 79
5 East of Arcadia, South of Dakota
Parking Stalls Occupied 8 33 0 0 0 41
Percent of Stalls Occupied 50% 52% n n n 52%
West of Main Ave., South of Dakota St., 49 32 24 0 0 105
6 East of Erie Ave., North of CR 21
Parkin Stalls Occu ied 24 23 15 0 0 62
Percent of Stalls Occupied 49% 72% 6396 n n 5996
North of CR 21, West of Hwy 13, Z2 16 62 0 0 100
� East of Main Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occupied 14 6 31 0 1 52
Percent of Stalls Occupied 64% 38% 50% n 100% 52%
South of CR 21, West of Arcadia Ave., 1 0 33 0 0 34
8 North of Colorado St., West of Main Ave.
ParkingStallsOccupied 0 0 16 0 0 16
Percent of Stalis Occupied 0� n 48% n n 4796
South of CR 21, West of Hwy 13., North of 14 0 63 0 0 77
9 Pleasant St., East of Main Ave.
Parkin Stalls Occu led 10 0 17 0 2 29
Percent of Stalls Occupied 71% n 27% n 200% 38%
South of Colorado St., West of Mafn Ave., North 10 77 91 0 0 178
10 of Pleasant St.
Parking Stalls Occu fed 5 17 17 0 0 39
Percent of Stalls Occu led 50% 229�0 19% n n 22%
South of Pleasant St. West of Hwy 13 30 0 0 0 0 30
11 Parking Stalls Occu ied 4 0 0 0 0 4
Percent of Stalls Occu led 13% n n n n 13%
Tota) Parking Stalis Available 174 195 414 0 0 783
Total Parking Stalls Occupied 73 82 152 4 3 314
Percent of Stalls Occupied 42% 424� 37% 400% 30096 40%
, Downtown Customer Parking Counts by Single Block Area
� Date: 6/21/12 Time: 7:00 p.m.
On-Street Off-Street Off-Street Additional Additional
Block Area Description On-Street Off-Street Total
Parking Public Parking Private Parking
(un-designated (un-designated
City Hall Property
1 North of Dakota St.
5 7 0 0 0 12
Parking Stalls Occupied 3 6 0 0 0 9
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 60% 86Y n n n 75%
Apartment Building 12 0 46 0 0 58
2 North of Dakota S#., West of Maln Ave.
Parking Stalls Occupied 0 0 34 0 0 34
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 09� n 744� n n 59%
North of Dakota St., West of Hwy 13, �5 0 25 0 0 40
3 East of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occupied 7 0 5 0 0 12
Percent of Stalls Occu led 47% n 20% n n 30%
Church Property - North of CR 21, West of 0 0 70 0 0 70
4 Arcadia Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occupied 0 0 4 0 0 4
Percent of Stalis Occu ied n n 6% n n 6%
Police Station / library
North of CR 21, West of Erie Ave., 16 63 0 0 0 79
5 East of Arcadia, South of Dakota
Parking Stalls Occu fed 9 22 0 2 0 33
Percent of Stalls Occupied 569�0 35% n 200% n 42%
West of Main Ave., South of Dakota St., 49 32 24 0 0 105
6 East of Erie Ave., North of CR 21
Parkin Stalls Occu fed 9 8 1 0 0 18
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 18% 25% 4% n n 17%
North of CR 21, West of Hwy 13, ZZ 16 62 0 0 100
� East of Maln Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occupied 8 8 28 0 1 45
Percent of Stalls Occupied 369� 50% 45% n 100% 4596
South of CR 21, West of Arcadia Ave., 1 0 33 0 0 34
$ North of Colorado St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 0 0 5 1 0 6
Percent of Stalls Occupied 0% n 15% 100% n 18%
South of CR 21, West of Hwy 13., North of 14 0 63 0 0 77
9 Pleasant St., East of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occupied 9 0 30 0 1 40
Percent of Stalls Occupied 64% n 48% n 10096 52%
South of Colorado St., West of Main Ave., North 10 77 91 0 0 178
10 of Pleasant St.
Parkin Stalls Occu ied 9 37 22 0 1 69
Percent of Stalls Occupied 909� 489� 24% n 100% 39%
South of Pleasant St. West of Hw 13 30 0 0 0 0 30
11 Parking Stalls Occupied 8 0 0 0 0 8
Percent of Stalls Occu led 27% n n n n 27%
Total Parking Stalls Available 174 195 414 0 0 783
Total Parking Stalls Occupied 62 81 129 3 3 278
Percent of Stalls Occupied 36% 4296 31% 300% 300% 36%
.
Downtown Customer Parking Counts by Single Block Area
Date: 6/22/12 Time: 11:00 a.m. �
On-Street Off-Street Off-Street Additional Additional
Block Area Description On-Street Off-Street Total
Parking Public Parking Private Parking tun-desi nated un-designated
City Hall Property 5 � 0 0 0 12
1 North of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 2 6 0 0 0 8
Percent of Stalls Occupfed 409� 86% n n n 67%
Apartment Building 1Z � 46 0 0 58
Z North of Dakota St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu led 8 0 18 0 0 26
Percent of Stalls Occupied 67% n 39% n n 45%
North of Dakota St., West of Hwy 13, 15 0 25 0 0 40
3 East of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu led 5 0 9 0 0 14
Percent of Stalls Occupied 33% n 36% n n 35%
Church Property - North of CR 21, West of 0 0 70 0 0 70
4 Arcadia Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parkin Stalls Occupied 0 0 17 0 0 17
Percent of Stalls Occu ied n n 24% n n 24%
Police Station / Library
North of CR 21, West of Erie Ave., !6 63 0 0 0 79
5 East of Arcadia, South of Dakota
Parking Stalls Occupied 5 10 0 0 0 15
Percent of Stalls Occupied 31% 16% n n n 19%
West of Main Ave., South of Dakota St., 49 32 24 0 0 105
6 East of Erfe Ave., North of CR 21
Parking Stalls Occupied 37 7 17 0 0 61
Percent of Stalis Occu ied 7696 22% 71% n n 58%
North of CR 21, West of Hwy 13, 22 16 62 0 0 100
� East of Mafn Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occu ted 15 12 38 0 0 65
Percent of Stalls Occupied 68% 7596 6146 n n 65%
South of CR 21, West of Arcadia Ave., 1 0 33 0 0 34 I
8 North of Colorado St., West of Main Ave.
Parkin Stalls Occupied 1 0 14 0 0 15 j
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 100% n 42% n n 4496 !
South of CR 21, West of Hwy 13., North of 14 0 63 0 0 77
9 Pleasant St., East of Main Ave.
Parking Sta!!s Occu }ed S 0 20 0 0 28
Percent of Stalls Occupied 57% n 32% n n 3696
South of Colarado St., West of Main Ave., North 10 77 91 0 0 178
10 of Pleasant St.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 0 12 14 0 0 26
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 0% 16°k 15% n n 15%
i
South of Pleasant St. West of Hwy 13 30 0 0 0 0 30 �
11 ' Parking Stalls Occu ied 4 0 0 0 0 4 �
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 13% n n n
n 13% i
i
Total Parking Stalls Available 174 195 414 0 0 783 �
Total Parking Stalis Occupied 85 47 147 0 p 27g I
Percent of Stalls Occupied 4996 249�6 3696 0% 095 3646 i
I
Downtown Customer Parking Counts by Single Block Area
• Date; 6/22/12 Time: 12:30 p.m.
On-Street Off-Street Off-Street Additional Additional
Block Area Description On-Street Off-Street Total
Parking Public Parking Private Parking un-designated (un-designated
City Hall Property
5 7 0 0 0 12
1 North of Dakota St.
Parking Stails Occupied 2 2 0 2 0 6
Percent of Stalls Occupied 40°6 29�o n 2009� n 50%
Apartment Building 12 0 46 0 0 58
Z North of Dakota St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occupied 7 0 12 1 0 20
Percent of Stalls Occu led 58% n 26% 100% n 34%
North of Dakota St., West of Hwy 13, 15 0 25 0 0 40
3 East of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occupied 5 0 10 0 0 15
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 33% n 40% n n 38%
Church Property - North of CR 21, West of ,
4
Arcadia Ave., South of Dakota St. 0 0 70 0 0 70
Parking Stalls Occu led 0 0 16 0 0 16
Percent of Stalls Occu ied n n 23% n n 23%
Police Station / Library
North of CR 21, West of Erie Ave., 16 63 0 0 0 79
5 East of Arcadia, South of Dakota
Parking Stalls Occu ied 3 9 0 0 0 12
Percent of Stalls Occu led 19% 14% n n n 15%
West of Main Ave., South of Dakota St., � 49 32 24 0 0 105
6 East of Erie Ave., North of CR 21
ParkingStallsOccu led 20 8 11 0 0 39
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 41% 25� 46°� n n 37%
North of CR 21, West of Hwy 13, 22 16 62 0 0 100
� East of Main Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occupied 14 10 30 0 1 55
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 64% 63% 48% n 100% 5596
South of CR 21, West of Arcadia Ave., 1 0 33 0 0 34
8 North of Colorado St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 1 0 12 0 0 13
Percent of Stalls Occupied 100'Y n 36% n n 3896
South of CR 21, West of Hwy 13., North of 14 0 63 0 0 77
9 Pleasant St., East of Main Ave.
Parking Stalis Occupled 9 0 17 1 3 30
Percent of Stalis Occupied 64% n 27% 100°k 30096 39%
South of Colorado St., West of Main Ave., North 10 �� 91 0 0 178
10 of Pleasant St.
Parking Stalls Occupied 1 10 22 D 0 33
Percent of Stalls Occu led 10% 13% 24% n n 19%
;
South of Pleasant St. West of H 13 30 0 0 0 0 30
11 Parkin Stalls Occupied 3 0 0 0 0 3
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 10% n n n n 304�
Total Parking Stalis Available 174 195 414 0 0 783 i
Total Parking Stalls Occupied 65 39 130 4 4 242
Percent of Stalls Occupied 3740 20% 31% 400% 400% 3195
�
Downtown Customer Parking Counts by Single Block Area
Date: 6/23/12 Time: 10:30 a.m. �
Addittonal Additional
Block Area Description On-Street Off-Street Off-Street On-Street Off-Street Total
Parking Public Parking Private Parking
un-designated un-desi nated
City Hall Property 5 � 0 0 0 12
1 North of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occupled 1 4 0 5 0 10
Percent of Stalls Occupied 20% 57% n 500% n 83%
Apartment Building 12 0 46 0 0 58
2 North of Dakota St., West of Main Ave.
Parkin Stalis Occu ied 12 0 20 0 0 32
Percent of Stalls Occupied 1009� n 43% n n 559b
North of Dakota St., West of Hwy 13, 15 0 25 0 0 40
3 East of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 13 0 8 0 0 21
Percent of Stalls Occu led 87% n 32% n n 5396
Church Property - North of CR 21, West of 0 0 70 0 0 70
4 Arcadia Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parking Stalls Occupied 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percent of Stalls Occupied n n 0% n n 0%
Police Station / library
North of CR 21, West of Erie Ave., 16 63 0 0 0 79
5 East of Arcadia, South of Dakota
Parking Stalis Occupied 8 31 0 1 0 40
Percent of Stalls Occupied 50% 49% n 100% n 5196
West of Main Ave., South of Dakota St., 49 32 24 0 0 105
6 East of Erie Ave., North of CR 21
Parking Stalls Occupied 46 31 23 0 0 100
Percent of Stalls Occu led 949�0 97% 96% n n 95%
North of CR 21, West of Hwy 13, 22 16 62 0 0 100
� East of Main Ave., South of Dakota St.
Parking Stalis Occupied 19 16 43 8 1 87
Percent of Stalls Occu led 86% 100% 69% 800% 100% 5796
South of CR 21, West of Arcadia Ave., 1 0 33 0 0 34
$ North of Colorado St., West of Main Ave.
Parking Stalls Occupied 1 0 12 6 0 19
Percent of Stalls Occu led 10096 n 36% 600% n 56%
South of CR 21, West of Hwy 13., North of 14 0 63 0 0 77
9 Pleasant St., East of Maln Ave.
Parking Stalls Occu ied 11 0 30 1 6 48
Percent of Stalls Occupied 79% n 48�0 100% 60096 62%
South of Colorado St., West of Main Ave., North 10 77 91 0 0 178
10 of Pleasant St.
Parkin Stalls Occu ied 9 25 23 0 0 57
Percent of Stalls Occu led 90�'0 32% 25% n n 3296
South of Pleasant St. West of Hwy 13 30 0 0 0 0 30
11 Parking Stalls Occu ied 20 0 0 0 0 20
Percent of Stalls Occu ied 67� n n n n 67%
Total Parking Stalis Available 174 195 414 0 0 783
Total Parking Stalls Occupied 140 107 159 21 7 434
Percent of Stalls Occupied 80% 5596 38% 210095 7009b 5546
O� p ��1P
� �
�
U
4646 Dakota Street SE
'Mnvnreso'��' Prior Lake, MN 55372
, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 20, 2012 '
AGENDA #: 6C
PREPARED BY: Jerilyn Erickson, Assistant Treasurer
AGENDA ITEM: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE 2ND QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT
FOR THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SPECIAL
REVENUE FUND
DISCUSSION: Introduction
, Staff has prepared a preliminary summary financial report as of June 30,
2012 for the Economic Development Authority Special Revenue Fund. The
report reflects revenue and expenditure activity for the first half of 2012.
The reports are preliminary, unaudited and may change. The attached
memorandum provides a summary of the significant issues.
If commissioners have questions please feel free to contact me at 952-447-
9841 for more information.
ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are available to the EDA:
1. A motion to accept the June 30, 2012 Financial Report as submitted.
2. Take no action and provide the staff with specific direction.
RECOMMENDED Alternative 1.
MOTION:
oF rxr MEMORANDUM
� � TO: Prior Lake Economic Development Authority
FROM: Jerilyn Erickson, Assistant Treasurer
'"'"��` RE: Financial Report dated 06/30/2012
The �nancial report presented as part of this agenda item reflects activity for the first half of
2012. The significant issues identified at this time are summarized below.
The EDA budget was amended on February 21, 2012 to provide additional resources for
professional services, training and memberships.
Revenues
Revenues reflect a grant received from Scott County CDA for the fiber nefinrork study as well as
a transfer of funds from the City's General Fund and interest earnings.
Expenditures
Personnel, commissioner per diems, professional services (for broadband consulting) and
training expenditures comprise the total expenditures.
o� P �' O � City of Prior Lake
� � Economic Development Authority Special Revenue Fund
As of 06/30/2012
'"��'' (Unaudited) Variance with
2012 Amended 2012 Budget - Actual
Budget Budget Actual Positive (Negative) Percent
Revenues
Intergovernmental revenues
33610 County/city aids & grants - 15,000 15,000 - 100°k
Miscellaneous revenues
36210 Interest earnings 6,000 4,800 991 3,809 21°r6
39203 Transfers from other funds - 16,000 16,000 - 100%
Total revenues 6,000 35,800 31,991 3,809 89°�
Expenditures
Economic development
46500 Economic development 137,923 167,723 116,789 50,934 70%
Total economic development 137,923 167,723 116,789 50,934 70%
Total expenditures 137,923 167,723 716,789 50,934 85°�
Net change (131,923) (131,923) (84,798)
Page 1 of 1
o� P � O �P
� � V 4646 Dakota Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
�S��
PRIOR LAKE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
DRAFT AGENDA
Monday, September 17, 2012
4:00 p.m.
Reports included with this agenda can be found in the Document Center at www.cityofpriorlake.com
Please follow this file path: City of Prior LakelEconomic Development Authority120121Sept.17, 2012
1. CALL TO ORDERIINTRODUCTION
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
3. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES
A. August 20, 2012
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. No public hearing is scheduled.
5. OLD BUSINESS
A. Fiber Optic Network Discussion and Recommendation
B. Business Venture Fair Rescheduled - Discussion
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. EDAC Report and Subcommittee Reports:
(1) EDAC Report
(2) Broadband Fiber Network Subcommittee Report
(3) Technology Village Subcommittee Report
B. Business Friendly Zoning Code Changes
7. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Draft October 15, 2012 Agenda
8. ADJOURNMENT: 6:00 p.m.
Phone 952.447.9800 / Fax 952.447.4245/ www.cityofpriorlake.com