HomeMy WebLinkAbout8D - Affordable Housing
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA #:
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
AGENDA ITEM:
DISCUSSION:
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
JULY 17, 2000
80
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
DON RYE, PLANNING DIRECTOR
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION OO-XX APPROVING THE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING
FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING SOLUTIONS INC. ON PROPERTY
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST INTERSECTION OF TOWER
STREET AND TORONTO AVENUE
History: On April 17, 2000 the City Council heard a request for a
Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a 43 unit multi-
family dwelling. The Council specifically raised four issues to be
addressed. The issues were (1) storm water run-off alternatives, (2)
installation of a sidewalk along Tower Street, (3) providing fencing at
the top of retaining walls, and (4) reducing left turns in and out by
providing an exit only drive on Toronto Avenue and an entrance/exit
driveway on Tower Street.
On June 5, 2000, the Council reviewed the developer's ideas about
these issues. The developer agreed to provide a sidewalk along
Tower Street and a fence along the top of the retaining wall. The
developer also redesigned the parking area to accommodate a one-
way, entrance-only access from Tower Street and a one-way, exit-only
access onto Toronto Avenue.
The City Council also discussed the options for handling stormwater
runoff from this site. The staff presented two options to address the
storm water management concerns raised by the Council. The two
options are:
Option A: Divert stormwater under the intersection to the proposed
Post Office site. Ponding is a part of the Post Office's
overall site plan. An easement for use of the property for
ponding and drainage would be required to be obtained by
the developer.
Option B: Construct a storm sewer line running west along Tower
Street to the City's pond located south of the street.
f~8~~aOg1W'~Pe~lP)\e~p~r, Prior Lake. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph_ (612) 447-4230 / P~g~ \612) 447-4245
A'i EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
80th of these options create a cost to the City. Option A would cost an
estimated $44,000. The City's share would be $35,200 and the
developer's share would be $8,800. Option 8 would cost an estimated
$100,000 with the City's share being $80,000 and the developers
share $20,000. Decisions regarding resource allocation and priority of
improvement projects is a discretionary decision. The Council may
factor these costs into its decision concerning the proposed
development.
In either case, options for financing are flexible. The developer could
pay the entire costs up front, enter into a developers agreement, and
be reimbursed by the City for improvements affecting other property
owners. Another option would allow the developer and other affected
property owner's to petition for public improvements. The developer
has expressed the first alternative as the most viable for resolving the
situation at this time, as the developer represents that it is likely an
easement can be obtained from the Post Office property owners. If an
easement cannot be obtained, the alternative would be to wait until the
Post Office site is developed or to proceed with the second alternative.
Resolution of the storm water issue would be required prior to the
issuance of any type of permit required to develop the property,
including but not limited to grading permits and building permits.
Current Circumstances: The City Council discussed the two options
relating to storm water management at some length. The Council
determined either option is an acceptable means to manage the storm
water from the development property. However, Option 8 is of more
cost to the City and the City has not presently programmed the
improvement or the expenditures associated with Option 8 in its
capital planning. Therefore, the City Council has determined that the
City share of the costs should be capped at $35,200.00. The Council
also indicated the stormwater improvements should be in place, or at
least under construction, before a building permit is issued for the
building.
The Issues: The remaining issue surrounding this development is the
timing of the improvements. The Council directed staff to prepare a
resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit, and developing a
staging plan for the timing of this project. The staff suggests the
following sequence of events:
1. The Developer records the resolution approving the Conditional
Use Permit with the Scott County Recorder.
2. The Developer prepares plans and specifications addressing all the
Engineering and Planning issues for review and approval by City
sta ft.
3. The City Council reviews the final plans and approves a
Development Contract outlining the required improvements.
1:\OOfiles\OOcup\OO-O 1 O\ccrept.doc
Page 2
4. The developer provides to the City an appropriately executed
easement agreement for storage of stormwater on the Post Office
site.
5. A grading permit is issued and all storm water improvements on
and off-site must be completed prior to issuance of a building
permit. In lieu of completion of this work, the developer may submit
a LOC for 125% of the cost of improvements with the building
permit.
6. A building permit is issued and construction begins.
7. All work is completed and the City issues a Certificate of
Occupancy.
This sequencing allows the developer to move forward with the
preparation of plans and specifications with some commitment that the
project will proceed. It also ensures the necessary improvements are,
at a minimum, under construction before a building permit is issued.
The improvements must be completed before the building is occupied.
Conclusion: The attached resolution outlines the conditions of
approval of the Conditional Use Permit and the sequencing of the
approval process. The staff and the City Attorney have reviewed the
attached resolution. It should be noted the developer has provided
revised plans which already address some of the conditions listed in
the resolution.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Budget Impact: The construction of the building will add tax base to
the City. Under Council direction, the City cost of any alternative for
the construction of storm water improvements will be capped at
$35,200.00. The City's portion of the improvement could come from
the Storm Drain Utility and/or Trunk Funds.
ALTERNATIVES:
The City Council has three alternatives:
1. Adopt Resolution OO-XX approving the Conditional Use Permit
subject to the listed conditions.
2. Direct staff to prepare a resolution denying the Conditional Use
Permit with specific findings of fact.
3. Continue the request and direct staff to provide additional specific
information.
RECOMMENDED
MOTION:
Staff recommends Alternative #1.
A motion and f,econd adopting Resolution #OO-XX approving the
Co ditional se:Permit subject to the listed conditions.
I,;
REVIEWED BY: / i
Frank B~y es; qty Manager
1:\OOfiles\OOcup\OO-O IO\ccrept.doc \....;/
Page 3
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
RESOLUTION OO-XX
APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A MULTI-FAMILY
DWELLING ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
THE INTERSECTION OF TOWER STREET AND TORONTO AVENUE FOR
AFFORDABLE HOUSING SOLUTIONS, INC.
MOTION BY: SECOND BY:
WHEREAS, the Prior Lake Planning Commission conducted public hearings on
February 28, 2000, March 13, 2000, and March 27, 2000, to consider
an application from Affordable Housing Solutions Inc. for a
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow the construction of a multi-
family dwelling; and
WHEREAS, Notice of the public hearing on said application for a CUP has been
duly published in accordance with the applicable Prior Lake Ordinances
and State Statute; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission proceeded to hear all persons interested in
this issue and persons interested were afforded the opportunity to
present their views and objections related to the CUP for Affordable
Housing Solutions Inc.; and
WHEREAS, On April 17, 2000, the City Council reviewed the request and
continued the item to allow the applicant the opportunity to address
four specific issues raised by the City Council pertaining to the
Conditional Use Permit application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and City Council find the CUP for a 43 unit
multi-family dwelling located at the south east intersection of Tower
Street and Toronto Avenue for Affordable Housing Solutions Inc. is in
harmony with existing development in the area surrounding the project;
and
WHEREAS, the four issues raised by the City Council include 1) alternatives for
storm - water run-off, 2) providing a sidewalk along Tower Street, 3)
16200 E~~~fi~f~~<1f~0~~-~1~\r~~g~~~~e. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph, (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612f~d7-4245
A~ EQh\L OPPORTl:NITY EMPLOYER
.-, -._.+-_._-"'_.---"-~T--..'-~--"---_..~'<_.
providing fencing along the top of the retammg walls, and 4)
redesigning the parking area to reduce left turns in and out of the site
onto Toronto Avenue; and
WHEREAS,
on June 5, 2000, the applicant addressed these issues to the satisfaction
of the City Council; and
WHEREAS,
the Planning Commission and City Council find the proposed CUP is
compatible with the stated purposes and intent of the Zoning Ordinance
as they relate to conditionally permitted uses, and further, that the
proposed CUP meets the criteria for approval of CUP as contained in
Section 1108 and Section 1102.703 (1) Multi-family Dwellings (Uses
Permitted with a Conditional Use Permit of the Zoning Ordinance).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA:
1. The recitals setforth above are incorporate herein as if fully setforth.
2. The Conditional Use Permit applies to the following legally described property:
Lot 2, Block 3, Brooksville Center 1st Addition, according to the recorded
plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorded,
Scott County, Minnesota, except the westerly 80.00 feet thereof
3. The City Council hereby adopts the following findings:
a) The use is consistent with and supportive of the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan.
b) The use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community as a whole.
c) The use is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance
and the Use District in which the Conditional Use is located.
d) The use will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities,
services, or improvements which are either existing or proposed.
e) The use subject to conditions as setforth herein, will not have undue
adverse impacts on the use and enjoyment of properties in close proximity
to the conditional use.
j) The use subject to conditions as setforth herein is compatible with the
general welfare, public safety and neighborhood character.
4. The Conditional Use Permit is hereby approved subject to the following
conditions
1:\OOfiles\OOcup\OO-O 1 O\resOOxx2.doc
Page 2
a) The developer agrees to manage the storm water run-off from the site by
either one of the following solutions:
i) Diverting the run-off to a ponding and drainage area on to a site
located at the corner of Toronto and Tower Streets that is the
subject of a Purchase Agreement between Neil Boderman and the
United States Postal Service ("Post Office Property ") the
proposed post office site.
ii) Constructing a storm sewer line west along Tower Street to the
City's NURP pond located south of Tower Street.
b) The developer agrees to pay the cost associated with (i) or (ii) and agrees
that regardless of which option the applicant elects, the City's share of
the improvement is not to exceed $35,200.00.
1 -A
c) The developer must submit all necessary plans for the stormwater
improvements to the City staff for approval.
d) All necessary easement documents related to storage of stormwater
drainage on the Post Office property must be approved by the City
Attorney.
e) The developer must enter into the City's standard development contract
for the installation of the necessary improvements prior to issuance of any
type of permits.
f) A grading permit must be issued and all stormwater improvements on and
off-site must be completed prior to issuance of any building permit. In lieu
of completion of this work, the developer may submit an Irrevocable Letter
of Credit, drawn on a Minnesota bank, a LOC for 125% of the cost of
improvements with the building permit. The Irrevocable Letter of Credit is
subject to the approval of the City Attorney. All work on the storm water
improvement must be completed prior to issuance of Certificate of
Occupancy.
g) Sidewalk must be installed along the property line on Tower Street.
h) A fence must be installed at the top of the retaining walls where height
requirements create a hazard to the use of the adjacent property to the
east.
i) The parking lot must be redesigned to allow an entrance-only driveway
from Tower Street and an exit-only driveway onto Toronto Avenue.
j) Four additional shrubs must be planted in the bufferyard required along
170th Street.
k) An Irrigation Plan must be submitted.
I) The following issues in the engineering memo dated March 1, 2000 must
be addressed.
1:\OOfiles\OOcup\OO-O 1 0\resOOxx2.doc
Page 3
- ,-,- -'-.-'--------or-~-~----.--.----"'-.,"'--,--.___
i) Provide a detailed traffic control plan to be implemented during
utility construction on Tower Street prior to utility construction.
ii) Show the location of the rock construction entrance on the plan.
m) Plans indicating hydrant locations and the 300' foot hydrant radius must
be provided.
n) An Irrevocable Letter of Credit must be submitted for 125% of the
landscaping costs, tree preservation requirements. Estimates or bids must
be submitted for the required landscaping.
0) All tree replacement (89.25 caliper inches) must occur on the site with the
landscaping emphasis on the bufferyard on the east side (170th Street).
The revised landscaping plan must be approved by Planning Department
staff. No Final Certificate of Occupancy will be issued until the
landscaping requirements are met.
p) An Assent Form as shown on Exhibit A, agreeing to the conditions placed
on the approval of the Conditional Use Permit as required by the Zoning
Ordinance, must be signed by the applicant and all property owners.
q) The resolution approving the CUP must be recorded on all affected
properties and proof of such recording presented to the Planning
Department.
5. The development of this site will occur according to the following schedule:
a) The Developer records the resolution approving the Conditional Use
Permit with the Scott County Recorder.
b) The Developer prepares plans and specifications addressing all the
Engineering and Planning issues for review and approval by City staff.
c) The City Council reviews the final plans and approves a Development
Contract outlining the required improvements.
d) The developer provides the City with an easement agreement executed by
the appropriate parties, as required pursuant to the Paragraphs 4(a) and
4(d).
e) A grading permit is issued and all storm water improvements on and off-
site must be completed prior to issuance of a building permit. In lieu of
completion of this work, the developer may submit a LOC. for 125% of the
cost of improvements with the building permit.
f) A building permit is issued and construction begins.
g) All work is completed and the City issues a Certificate of Occupancy.
6. Based upon the Findings and Conditions set forth above, the City Council hereby
grants a Conditional Use Permit for Affordable Housing Solutions Inc. The
1:\OOfiles\OOcup\OO-O 1 0\resOOxx2.doc
Page 4
contents of Planning Case File #00-010 are hereby entered into and made a part of
the public record and the record of the decision for this case.
Passed and adopted this 17th day of July, 2000.
YES
NO
Mader
Ericson
Gundlach
Petersen
Vacant
Mader
Ericson
Gundlach
Petersen
Vacant
{Seal}
City Manager,
City of Prior Lake
1:\OOfiles\OOcup\OO-O 1 0\resOOxx2.doc
Page 5
..,.-.........-,...--.-- ~,.' . ....-.~. --~..~,. .......-.~,.~..'^'..""----_.."+._--'---"...~.....__.,-~---........-..--_._..------,--~_.".-_..,._..,~..._,_.,,,...
ASSENT OF APPLICANT
File #
As Approved by Resolution #
The undersigned hereby assents to the following:
1. I have read the conclusions and conditions of said Resolution, and I am familiar with
their contents and with the content of the exhibits.
2. I fully accept all of the terms and conditions of said Resolution.
3. I understand Section 1108.200 of the Prior Lake Ordinance Code provides as follows:
1108.211 Revocation and Cancellation of a Conditional Use Permit. A
Conditional Use Permit may be revoked and canceled if the Zoning
Administrator determines that the holder of an existing Conditional Use
Permit has violated any of the conditions or requirements imposed as a
condition to approval of the Conditional Use Permit, or has violated any
other applicable laws, ordinances, or enforceable regulation.
1108.212 After One Year, No Construction Required. All Conditional Use
Permits shall be revoked and canceled if 1 year has elapsed from the
date of the adoption of the resolution granting the Conditional Use
Permit and the holder of the Conditional Use Permit has failed to make
substantial use of the premises according to the provisions contained in
the Permit.
1108.213 After One Year. New Construction Required. All Conditional Use
Permits shall be revoked and canceled after 1 year has elapsed from the
date of the adoption of the resolution granting the Conditional Use
Permit if a new structure or alteration or substantial repair of an existing
building is required by the Conditional Use Permit and the holder has
failed to complete the work, unless a valid building permit authorizing
such work has been issued and work is progressing in an orderly way.
1108.416 Upon Occurrence of Certain Events. If the holder of a Conditional
Use Permit fails to make actual use of vacant land, or land and
structures which were existing when the Conditional Use Permit was
issued and no new structure, alteration or substantial repair to existing
buildings was required; or if a new structure was required by the
Conditional Use Permit and no building permit has been obtained, the
Conditional Use Permit shall be deemed revoked and canceled upon the
occurrence of any of the following events:
L:\DEPTWORK\BLANKFRM\ASENTCUP.DOC 1
16200 Eagle Creek Ave, S_E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph_ (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
A'i EQUi\L OPPORTl'NITY EMPLOYEE
(1) A change in the Use District for such lands is made by amendment to
the Zoning Ordinance by the City Council.
(2) Eminent domain proceedings have been initiated to take all or any
part of the premises described in the Conditional Use Permit.
(3) The use described in the Conditional Use Permit becomes an illegal
activity under the laws of the United States of America or the State
of Minnesota.
(4) Title to all or part of land described in such Conditional Use Permit
is forfeited to the State of Minnesota for nonpayment of taxes.
(5) The person to whom the Conditional Use Permit was issued files a
written statement in which that person states that the Conditional Use
Permit has been abandoned. The statement shall describe the land
involved or state the resolution number under which the Conditional
Use Permit was granted.
(6) The premises for which the Conditional Use Permit was issued are
used by the person to whom the Conditional Use Permit was issued
in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of such Conditional Use
Permit.
4. I understand the granting by the City of this Resolution is in reliance on the
representations that I will fully comply with all of the terms and conditions of said
Resolution. I understand and agree upon notice of non-compliance with any term or
condition, I shall immediately cease conducting activities pursuant to the notice or
will take all actions necessary to accomplish full compliance with said notice and
conditions of the Resolution.
DATE
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
SIGNATURE OF OWNER
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY
L:lDEPTWORK\BLANKFRM\ASENTCUP.DOC 2
."..-.,.,.----"......~.__...--.......,.....-.,~,...,-~"'~.~--'-""...._.'M.""_' ..,_..._.,.'.~.,~~,~.~,~._ ., ,', .-...___,.~__._."".."_,..__.. M '''.,_~, ,..
.,.._,..~..._~----.......-~-----~-'-~._._-----_.-