HomeMy WebLinkAbout9C - Shepherd of The Lake
MEETING DATE:
AGENDA #:
PREPARED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
AGENDA ITEM:
DISCUSSION:
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
J~.~~ ~ ~~
~~~~~~ --
\E>S\- ~~l+r )~ ~1l
JULY 17,2000 1 \ - '\
9C '( ~ '\ o..~tvaJ ·
JANE KANSIER, PLANNING COORDINATOR
DON RYE, PLANNING DIRECTOR
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION OO-XX
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2020
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REQUESTED BY SHEPHERD OF
THE LAKE LUTHERAN CHURCH, FOR THE PROPERTY
LOCATED IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 115, RANGE 22 (Case
File #00-040)
His1!l.lJ!.: Shepherd of the Lake Lutheran Church has filed an
application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the property
located on the north side ofCSAH 42 and east and west of McKenna
Road, about li8 mile west of CSAH 21. The proposal is to amend the
2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map from the current C-BO
(Business Office Park) designation to the R-HD (High Density
Residential) designation on approximately 20 acres of land.
This property is presently zoned A (Agricultural) and is designated as
C-BO (Business Office Park) on the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land
Use Map. At this time, the applicant is considering developing this
property in conjunction with the property to the west, which is
designated as R-HD (High Density Residential) on the 2020
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. In order to ensure the
designation and zoning of this property is consistent with the adjacent
property, the applicant is requesting an amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan. If the amendment is approved, the applicant will
file an application for a rezoning on this site.
The Planning Commission considered this proposal at a public hearing
on June 26, 2000. The Planning Commission voted to recommend
approval of the proposed Land Use Plan Amendment. A copy of the
draft minutes of the June 26, 2000 meeting are attached to this report.
f:11rrent Circumstances: The total site consists of approximately 25
acres. The site generally drains to the wetland at the southeast comer
of the site. A portion of the site also drains to the wetland to the west.
162b'8<fAg,'g<e~~JR1I)\'B2~~~?~8~~t)gke. Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph, (612) 447-4230 / Falffltt2) 447-4245
fir-; EQ\ 'AL OPPORTl:\JTY E:VIPl.oYER
This property has been cropland for several years, although there are
some existing trees located in the northeast comer of the site. The site
is subject to the provisions of the State Wetland Conservation Act. A
specific delineation will be required as part of the development
application.
Access to this property is presently from McKenna Road off of CSAH
42. As part of the development of this parcel and the property to the
west, McKenna Road will be relocated to the west and either a private
or public road will be extended to serve this site. The property may
also maintain some access from CSAH 42, depending on Scott County
approval. Sewer and water services must be extended from the
existing services located in CSAH 42 to serve this site. Sewer service
presently stops at McKenna Road. Water service must be extended
from the Pike Lake Trail intersection or from the CSAH 21 and
Carriage Hills Parkway intersection. The extension of this service is
planned as part of the CSAH 42 improvement project. This property is
currently outside of the MUSA boundary. However, this property is
consistent with the criteria for the extension of MUSA as listed in the
2020 Comprehensive Plan (see attached).
To the north and west of this property is agricultural land, currently
zoned A and designated for Low to Medium Density Residential uses.
To the south is the Jeffers property, presently zoned R-l and C-5, and
designated as R-L/MD and C-BO. To the east is a single family
dwelling on 15 acres, zoned A and designated as C-BO.
The Issues: The applicant is proposing to develop this property in
conjunction with the property to the west, for a total development of
approximately 60 acres. According to the attached letter, the proposed
development is a religious/spiritual community, consisting of religious
worship, senior housing, community recreation and social space,
education, daycare and a conference center. The property to the west
is currently designated as R-HD (High Density Residential). This
request is consistent with that designation. .
The proposed R-HD designation is consistent with the stated goals and
objectives of the Comprehensive Plan in that it offers a variety of
housing and it provides for open space and the preservation of the
natural elements of the site, and with the City's Livable Community
Goal to provide affordable and life-cycle housing.
The question here is whether the supply of land planned for future
commercial and office park uses should be reduced. There are several
large tracts of undeveloped land located both north and south of CSAH
42 planned for commercial and office park. The elimination of this
area will not significantly reduce that supply. Furthermore, unless this
I: \OOti les\OOcompam\OO-040\00040cc.doc
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES:
RECOMMENDED
MOTION:
REVIEWED BY:
tract of land is developed in conjunction with the land to the east, the
access to this site is more conducive to the R-HD designation than to
the C-BO designation. Finally, the terrain of this site lends itself better
to a residential or mixed use development.
Conclusion: The Comprehensive Plan amendment to the R-HD
designation is consistent with the stated goals and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan in that it offers a variety of housing types and
provides for open space and the preservation of the natural elements of
the site. The R-HDdesignation is also consistent with the City's
Livable Community goal to provide affordable and life-cycle housing.
The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of this
request.
Budget Impact: There is no direct budget impact involved in this
request. Approval of this request may facilitate the development of
this property, and increase the City tax base.
The City Council has three alternatives:
1. Adopt Resolution OO-XX approving the proposed Comprehensive
Plan Amendment to the R-HD designation as recommended by the
Planning Commission.
2. Direct the staff to prepare a resolution with findings of fact denying
the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the R-HD
designation.
3. Continue the review for specific information or reasons per City
Council discussion.
Alternative #1. A motion and second to adopt Resolution OO-XX
approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to designate this
property as R-HD is required.
I: \OOfiles\OOcompam\OO-040\00040cc.doc
Page 3
......"'..,..._..,-,.._-,..,..._~~'-,.._-_..........
RESOLUTION oo-xx
RESOLUTION APPROVING A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE 2020 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LAND USE MAP FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 22, TOWNSIDP 115, RANGE 22
MOTION BY:
SECOND BY:
WHEREAS,
Shepherd of the Lake Lutheran Church submitted an application to amend the City of Prior
Lake 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map from the C-BO (Business Office Park)
designation to the R-HD (High Density Residential) designation for the property legally
described as follows:
PARCEL 1
The Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and the East one-half of the Southeast'
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 115, Range 22, Scott
County, Minnesota. Excepting from the above property the following: EXCEPTION
NO.1: The North 4.00 rods of the East one-half of the Southeast Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter of said Section 22. EXCEPTION NO.2: The North 4.00 rods of
the West 2.00 rods of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section
22. EXCEPTION NO.3: The East 1200 feet of the South 800 feet of the Southwest
1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 22, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County,
Minnesota.
PARCEL 2
That part ofthe Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter lying West of the East 1/4
of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, Section 22, Township 115, Range
22, Scott County, Minnesota.
Excepting therefrom the following described property:
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 22, Township
115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, lying West of the East one-fourth of the
Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and east of the following described line:
Beginning at a point on the South line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter distant 487.82 feet West of the southeast comer thereof; thence north parallel
with the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter to the intersection
with the north line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and there
terminating, Scott County, Minnesota.
11~2ffiJ\lf?cigreP(!P~~?<9{8~r.S~f:19r~gr Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 l'~~ (612) 447-4245
AN EQl'AL OPPORTl;NITY E\lPLOYER
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
and
legal notice of the public hearing was duly published and mailed III accordance with
Minnesota Statutes and Prior Lake City Code; and
the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on June 26, 2000, for those interested in
this request to present their views; and
on June 26, 2000, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan on the basis the R-HD designation is consistent with
the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan; and
on July 17, 2000, the Prior Lake City Council considered the application to amend the 2020
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to designate the above described property to the R-HD
designation and;
the City Council received the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the
proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment along with the staff reports and the minutes of the
Planning Commission meeting; and
the City Council has carefully considered the testimony, staff reports and other pertinent
information contained in the record of decision of this case.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL YED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA,
that:
1. The above recitations are herein fully incorporated as set forth above.
2. The proposed amendment to the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map to designate the above described
property as R-HD (High Density Residential) is hereby approved.
3. Approval of this amendment is subject to the approval of the Metropolitan Council.
Passed and adopted this 17th day of July, 2000.
YES NO
Mader Mader
Ericson Ericson
Gundlach Gundlach
Petersen Petersen
Schenck Schenck
{Seal} Frank Boyles, City Manager
City of Prior Lake
1:\OOfiles\OOcompam\OO-040\rsOOxxcc.doc Page 2
., ,-_._'
land Use:
Zoning: R 1 SO
Storm Sewer District:
Election Distrlct:!2
School District: 71 9
Park Oed Fee: I
Shepherd of the Lake
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
J
~
N
1000
I
o
1000 Feet
I
. ..... .. ..T..... .. ...........-......,... ...-............-.....
BWBR Architects
i ~. ',' " '-.' . ! ) '"
'\ I \ 1 ;]; l~", I "' -\ ! I) I
() -\ ~ 2.2 ~ ~ -: I 1
~--
I~ ~ rn @ rn 0 \'0' @-'\
NAY 24 am In I
~
May 23, 2000
Jane Kansier, Planning Coordinator
City of Prior Lake
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue, SE
Prior Lake, MN 55396
Re: Shepherd's Path
BWBR Commission Number 1999.030.01
Dear Ms. Kansier:
Shepherd of the Lake Lutheran Church is requesting the comprehensive land use
plan be amended to change the designated land use for the parcel of land described
in the attached legal description and illustrated on the attached site plan. The current
land use designation for this parcel is "urban high density" west of McKenna Road
and "business office park" east of McKenna Road. Shepherd of the Lake Lutheran
Church requests that the parcel of land east of McKenna Road be changed to urban
high density. This change would designate the entire parcel of land described in the
legal description as urban high density.
The proposed use of this land is for the development of a religious/spiritual
community. The components of the development would be religious worship, senior
housing, community recreation and social space, education, daycare (child and
senior), and conferencing.
The proposed reconstruction of County Road 42 will modify the current McKenna
Road intersection to a right-in and right-out for westbound traffic only. The limited
access would make the proposed business office park land use east of McKenna
difficult to access. The remaining business office park land use area east of this
parcel will have frontage on and access to the proposed northerly extension of
Highway 21. The City's intent of business office park land use on three of the four
comers of the County Road 42 and Highway 21 intersection is maintained with our
proposal. The proposed change in land use creates a consistent land use for the
parcel described herein and provides for a transitional zoning between the existing
urban low density and the business office park.
':::11'
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MONDAY, JUNE 26, 2000
1. Call to Order:
The June 26, 2 0, Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chairman
Cramer at 6:34 p. Those present were Commissioners Atwo , Criego and Vonhof,
Planning Director D Rye and Recording Secretary Conni arlson.
The Minutes from t
presented.
V onhof
Criego
Cramer
Atwood
Stamson
2. Roll Call:
3.
. ssion meeting were approved as
onhof read the public hearing statement and opened the first meeting.
4.
Public Hearings:
.v~
Case File #00-040 Consider a proposed Amendment to the City of Prior
Lake Year 2020 Comprehensive Plan for the property located in Section 22,
Township 115, Range 22.
Planning Director Don Rye presented the Planning Report dated June 26, 2000, on file in
the office of the City Planner.
Shepherd of the Lake Lutheran Church has filed an application for a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment for the property located on the north side of CSAH 42 and east and west of
McKenna Road, about 1/8 mile west of CSAH 21. The proposal is to amend the 2020
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map from the current C-BO (Business Office Park)
designation to the R-HD (High Density Residential) designation on approximately 20
acres of land.
This property is presently zoned A (Agricultural) and is designated as C-BO (Business
Office Park) on the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. At this time, the applicant
is considering developing this property in conjunction with the property to the west,
which is designated as R-HD (High Density Residential) on the 2020 Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Map. In order to ensure the designation and zoning of this property is
L:\OOFILES\OOPLCOMM\OOPCMIN\MN062600,DOC 1
"..r-
Planning Commission Minutes
June 26, 2000
consistent with the adjacent property, the applicant is requesting an amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan. If the amendment is approved, the applicant will file an application
for a rezoning on this site.
Staff recommended approval of the amendment. The proposed R-HD designation is
consistent with the stated goals and objectives in that it offers a variety of housing and it
provides open space and the preservation of the natural elements of the site.pw;thermore,
the designation is consistent with the City's Livable Community Goal tpprovide
affordable and life-cycle housing.
Atwood questioned the high density to the east with the business
explained the Comprehensive Plan Map and the subject
park. Rye
Comments from the public:
Shepherd of the Lake Lutheran Church, Senior Pastor Steye Jlqschig,introduced
Shepherd's Path Development Chief Financial Officer KerrnitMahlum and Steve
Erickson with BWBR Architects. Mr. Erickson pointed out theistaffreport was
consistent with all the discussions of the appIic~tand City. The priJ.nary reason for the
request is based on the functions envisioned for the site... lIe felt they were more
consistent with the high density residential uses. Ericksoiiexplained the concept project.
The first phase would be a worship facility. Th~()ther components would be elderly
housing, perhaps a social recreatiopa1 area and retreat center. They intend to use the
DNR wetland as a focu~..for the property where tl1e buildings would surround the wetland
area. The first phase (church facility) would start in approximately one year.
Criego commented on the parking and the elderly housing.
Pastor H~chig explaiped one option 'Yould be to sell the present site and move
everything over to then~w property or maintain the two sites. Those decisions would be
maqeiIl the next six months by the congregation. September of 2002 would be the
moving target date.
Erickson distributed the/concept brochures to the Commissioners.
Paul Oberg, the ~~ecutor of the estate of Robert Jeffers, stated he supported staffs
recommendation and hoped to develop their land in a complementary way to Shepherd of
the Lake.
Bill Rudnicki, Tribal Administrator for the Shakopee Sioux Community, stated they will
oppose the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. One concern is for spot zoning. It was
their understanding County Road 21 will develop to the north. Under the current zoning,
the area has a business office designation. This area is a major intersection and it is
important to retain the present zoning designation. Their other concern is with the
realignment of McKenna Road that currently serves their residential area with 60 homes.
I :\OOfiles\OOp Icomm\OOpcmin \mn062600.doc
2
Planning Commission Minutes
June 26, 2000
Rudnicki said there has been a visible increase of traffic and speed. He also felt he City of
Prior Lake needs more businesses.
Atwood questioned Rudnicki and staff on the traffic on County Roads 42 and 21. Rye
explained the County's plan for rerouting and connecting the roads to County Road 18.
County Road 42 will be upgraded from McKenna Road to the west. Rye also commented
on the rolling topography.
The hearing closed at 7:06 p.m.
Comments from the Commissioners:
Criego:
. Did not oppose the use of the property.
. Understood the issues with County Road 21. Moreconcemed about the noise level
from the road and the proposed housing. ',>
. There is plenty of acreage left to the south of County R()ad'42 for a business park.
. This project will add to the community.
. Agreed with staffs recommendation.
Atwood:
. Agreed with Criego on the asse~~ for the cOmmunity.
. Does not jeopardize future busine~s office considerations.
. Supported amendm~rit.
V onhof:
. Agreed with the Cormiiissioners.
. There a~F e~isti~~ sites that have not developed. There is a far better site to the east
for a\:msiness pal"k.
. County Road 21 Will~e a major intersection when completed.
. It,~~" more appropriatel() amend the ordinance at this time.
. Supp ed amendmen
MOTION;<:::RIEqg, SECOND BY ATWOOD, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL
OF THE CO~l{E;~NSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE R-HD DESIGNATION.
Vote taken indicated ayes by all. MOTION CARRIED.
This matter should go to the City Council on July 17 or August 7, 2000.
B. Case File #00-046 Consider an Amendment to Section 1101.501 of the
Zoning Ordinance relating to the combination of nonconforming lots divided
by a private street but under single ownership.
1 :\OOfiles\OOp1comm\OOpcmin\mn062600,doc
3
,- .