Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989 March Planning Commission Agenda PacketsMA9L CITY OF PRIOR LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MARCH 2, 1989 7 :30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER 7:35 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING AMEND ZONING CODE SECTION 4.11 "SETBACK RBZUIREMENT5 FOR COUNTY ROADS" 8:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENCMENT 8:01 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING REZONING NOTE: PLEASE BRING CODE AND REFERENCE BOOKS 1O THIS MEETING TO BE UPDATED. STAFF %mum ISREALBCN WHEN 7SREALSON (612) 447.4230 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E. PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 56372 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 19, 1989 The January 19, 1989, Prior Lake Planning Commission was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairman Wells. Present were Commissioners Loftus, Roseth, Wells, Kedrowski, Assistant City Planner Deb Garross, and City Intern Gar; Schmitz. Commissioner Arnold arrived at 7:32 P.M. ITEM I - REVIEW MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECOND BY LOFTUS, TO APPROVE THE JANUARY 5, 1989 MINUTES AS PRESENTED. Vote taken signified ayes. Motion carried unanimously. ITEM II - LAKESHORE AND SIDEYARD SETBACK VARIANCE - JOHN MEYER Mr. John Meyer, 8300 Ewing Road, Bloomington, MN stated that his intent is to build a seasonal cabin on Twin Isles and is requesting a 37.5 ft. lakeshore and 21 ft. rear lot variance. Deb Garross, Assistant City Planner, stated that Mr. Meyer has met the stipulations of Resolution 78 -22 that governs construction on Twin Isles. Staff has requested the following restrictions to be included on the application. 1. Tree removal be restricted to the area needed to construct the cabin. 2. Gray water disposal system be located on Lot 43, which will require a 75 ft. setback. 3. Restore natural vegetation as specified under shoreline regulations. 4. Identify method used for lake access with the least amount of soil erosion potential. 5. Provide staff with information on method which vegetation cover can be restored on southerly face. Mr. Meyer stated there would be no problem with these conditions. Discussion by the Commissioners concerned soil erosion potential of south face slope area, location and type of construction of stairs proposed for lake access, well location and gray water disposal system proposed. (612) 447.4230 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E. PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372 Prior Lake Planning Commission Minutes January 19, 1989 Page 2 MOTION BY ARNOLD, SECOND BY KEDROWSKI TO APPROVE THE 37.5 FT. LAKESHORE AND 21 FT. REAR YARD VARIANCE FOR LOTS 43, 44, AND 45, TWIN ISLES, CONTINGENT UPON THE MEETING OF THE REQUESTS AS SET DOWN AND RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. 1. TREE REMOVAL BE RESTRICTED TO THE AREA NEEDED TO CONSTRUCT THE CABIN. 2. GRAY WATER DISPOSAL SYSTEMS BE LOCATED ON LOT 43 AT LEAST 75 FT. AWAY FROM THE 904 CONTOUR. 3. NATURAL VEGETATION BE RESTORED AS SPECIFIED UNDER SHORELAND REGULATIONS. 4. APPLICANT IDENTIFY TO THE SATISFACTION OF STAFF THE METHOD BY WHICH HE INTENDS TO ACCESS THE LAKE SPECIFICALLY PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STAIRS SO THAT THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF GROUND COVER BE DISTURBED. 5. THE APPLICANT PROVIDE STAFF WITH PLANS BY WHICH THE SOIL AND VEGETATION CAN BE RESTORED ON THE SOUTH FACE OF THE SUBJECT SITE. Vote taken signified ayes unanimously. Motion carried. ITEM III - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REZONING PUBLIC HEARING Assistant City PLanner Garross summarized the location and procedure for this item, as the public did not receive adequate notice, it would have to be tabled until notice can be given. MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECOND BY ARNOLD, TO TABLE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR COMPREHENSIVE AMENDMENT AND REZONING. Vote taken signified ayes unanimously. Motion carried. MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY KEDROWSKI, TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. Ayes carried motion unanimously. Gary Schmitz was introduced to the Planning Commission and gave a short summary on his background and duties while interning at Prior Lake City Hall. Discussion on retreat. Horst Graser will send further information to the Commissioners. MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY ROSETH, TO ADJOURN MEETING. Vote taken signified ayes. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 8:15 P.M. *Tape of meeting available at City Hall. Deb Garross Rita M. Schewe Assistant City Planner Recording Secretary CITY OF PRIOR LAKE PLANNING REPORT AGENDA ITEM 2 MEETING DATE MARCH 2, 1989 APPLICANT WARREN J. ISRAELSON APPLICATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT & REZONING SUBJECT To consider an application by Warren Israelson to amend the Land Use Plan of the Prior Lake Comprehensive Plan. The request is to change the designation of Industrial, Public and Natural Open Space land to Low Density Residential. The applicant also requests consideration of a proposal to rezone property from I -1 Industrial and C -1 Conservation to R -1 Urban Residential. Several maps are attached to this report for reference to the subject site. The legal description of the property is found on the attached public hearing notices. In addition to this information, staff will present slides of the subject site at the public hearing. SITE ANALYSIS The subject site consists of approximately 97 acres of land located 1/4 mile southeasterly of the intersection of County Road 21 and County Road 42 and lying northerly of the subdivision of Raspberry Ridge. The attached "Existing Conditions Map" indicates the location of four ponding areas, tree cover, abandoned rail right of way and two pole sheds. Ponds 2 and 3, circled on the map, are designated ponds needed for Storm Water Management purposes. In addition, there are two marsh areas, one located adjacent to County Road 21 and the other located near the easterly boundary of the subject site. Approximately one third of the area is covered with a variety of trees ranging from brush to mature oaks. There is a dirt road which bisects the property and is used to access two pole buildings located on the south central part of the property. The majority of the site consists of gently rolling land which has been used for farming purposes. ZONI AND LAND USE DESIGNATION The predominant zoning and land use designation for the site is Industrial. The Comprehensive Plan states that the I -1 Special Industrial District is recommended to encourage a high amenity land reserve for testing and research laboratories, offices and light manufacturing. The Zoning ordinance further defines this district by stating that it is intended to provide areas of the City which encourage initial industrial development which is (812) 447.4230 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E. PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372 landscaped and would otherwise be compatible with adjoining residential districts. Permitted uses in the district include: Research and Testing Laboratories, Offices and Public Buildings. Conditional Uses include: Light Manufacturing, Public Utility Buildings and Wholesale Business. The subject site contains C -1 Conservation District and Open Space Land Designations. The Comprehensive Plan states that the conservation district was developed to protect, preserve and enhance the air, water, plant and land resources as a component of the human environment. Housing and other intensive development may not be accommodated. The Public Open Space Designation is intended to reflect abandoned rail road right of wax. The Comprehensive Plan (Pg 29 -30) discusses an objective of linking Prior Lake with other communities along this corridor with a trail system connecting Farmington with Shakopee. As land develops, park space adjoining this right of wax would be acquired. The Zoning Ordinance further defines this district by stating that it is intended to recognize vital environmental resources of the community as steep slopes, wetland and unstable soil conditions and allow development only after careful analysis. POLICIES: The Comprehensive Plan contains policy statements which specifically address the subject site. POLICY 9: To preserve employment opportunities for future development, approximately 280 acres has been reserved for a high amenity industrial office park at the intersection of County Roads 21 and 42. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that this site will not likely be available for development until after the year 1990. Situated at the intersection of County 21 and 42, the site is comprised of rolling agricultural land. This site is viewed by the City as an industrial land reserve which may offer employment opportunities to future residents. It will become a special area designed to accommodate research and testing laboratories, offices, light manufacturing and wholesaling. In addition, Policy 10 indicates that the City Council and Chamber of Commerce will work together on a program focused upon the industrial potential of Prior Lake. PRIOR LAKE 2000 SURVEY (INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT) Attached to this report find the 1987 survey results from the Prior Lake 2000 Report which pertain to Industrial Development. A majority of survey respondents indicated overwhelming support for the promotion of industrial development within Prior Lake. CITY OF PRIOR LAKE NOTICE OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Prior Lake Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the City Council Chambers at 4629 Dakota Street S.E. on Thursday March 2, 1989 at 8:00 p.m. The purpose of the hearing is to consider an amendment to the Land Use Plan of the Prior Lake Comprehensive Plan. The City of Prior Lake has received an application from Warren J. Israelson to change the designation of Industrial, Public and Natural Open Space land to Low Density Residential. The subject site consists of approximately 97 acres of land located 1/4 mile southeasterly of the intersection of County Road 21 and County Road 42. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: INDUSTRIAL LAND DESCRIPTIDN That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, and that part of the now abandoned Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul railroad right -of -ray described as followas Commencing at the most northerly corner of Lot 9, SOPP'S BAY ADDITION, Scott County, Minnesota; thence southwesterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot 9, a distance of 50.00 feet to the angle point on said Lot 9; thence on an assumed bearing of the North 60 degrees 21 minutes 18 seconds Nest a distance of 50.6 feet more or less to the northwesterly right -of -way line of Lila Lane ae platted; thence continuing Worth 60 degrees 21 minutes 18 seconds Nest a distance of 256.68 feet; thence North 22 degrees 53 minutes 50 seconds East a distance of 570.00 feet; thence North 48 degrees 18 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 615.93 feels thence North 66 degrees 43 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 195.04 feet; thence North 67 degrees 19 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 731.50 feet to the point of beginning If the land to be described; thence continuing North 67 degrees 19 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 250.04 feet more or less to the east line of said Southwest Quarter; thence northerly along said east line of the Southwest Quarter to the northeast corners thence westerly along the north line of said Southwest Quarter a distance of 2287.00 foots thence South 7 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds Nest a distance of 610.00 feet; thence southerly to a point on the north line of RASPBERRY RIDGE, Scott County, Minnesota, distant 560.00 feet easterly of the northwest corner of said RASPBERRY RIDGE; thence easterly along the north line of said plat of RASPBERRY RIDGE a distance of 690.00 feet; thence northerly perpendicular to the north line of said RASPBERRY RIDGE a distance of 140.00 feet; thence easterly to the point of beginning. (612) 447.4230 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E. PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PUBLIC AND NATURAL OPEN SPACE LAND That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the most northerly corner of Lot 9 ROPP -S BAY ADDITION, Scott County, Minnesota; thence southwesterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot 9, a distance of 50.00 feet to the angle point on said Lot 9; thence on an assumed bearing of the North 60 degrees 21 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of 50.6 feet more or less to the northwesterly right -of -ray line of Lila Lane as platted; thence continuing North 60 degrees 21 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of 256.68 feet, thence North 22 degrees 53 minutes 50 seconds East a distance of 570.00 feet; thence North 48 degrees 18 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 615.93 feet; thence North 66 degrees 43 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 195.04 feet; thence North 67 degrees 19 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 731.50 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 67 degrees 19 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of 731.50 feet to the easterly line of RASPBERRY RIDGE, Scott County, Minnesota; thence North 01 degree 42 minutes 59 seconds West along said east line to the north line of said RASPBERRY RIDGE; thence westerly along the north line of said RASPBERRY RIDGE a distance of 488.41 feet; thence northerly perpendicular to the northerly line of said RASPBERRY RIDGE a distance of 140.00 feet; thence easterly to the point of beginning. Together with that part of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 26, and that part of the now abandoned Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul railroad right -of -ray lying northerly of RASPBERRY RIDGE, Scott County, Minnesota, and westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the northeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 26; thence North 88 degrees 18 minutes 14 seconds West along the north line of said Southwest Quarter a distance of 2287.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described, thence South 07 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 610.00 feat, thence southerly to a point on the north line of sold RASPBERRY RIDGE distant 560.00 feet easterly of the northwest corner of said RASPBERRY RIDGE and there terminating. If you desire to be heard in reference to this Comprehensive Plan Amendment, you should attend this public hearing. Written and /or oral comments will be considered by the Planning Commission. H 44raser Director of P anning City of Prior Lake To be published in the Prior Lake American February 20 and 27, 1989. CITY OF PRIOR LAKE NOTICE OF REZONING PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Prior Lake Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the City Council Chambers at 4629 Dakota Street S.E. on Thursday March 2, 1989 at 8:01 p.m. The purpose of the hearing is to consider an application by Warren J. Israelson to rezone the following legally described property from I -1 Special Industrial and C -1 Conservation to R -1 Urban Residential. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OP LAND CURRENTLY TONED INDUSTRIAL: That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 115,• Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, and that part of the now abandoned Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul railroad right -of -ray described as followas Commencing at the most northerly corner of Lot 9, ROPP'S BAY ADDITION, Scott County, Minnesota; thence southwesterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot 9, a distance of 50.00 feet to the angle point on said Lot 9; thence on an assumed bearing of the North 60 degrees 21 minutes 16 seconds Nest a distance of 50.6 feet more or less to the northwesterly right- of-way line of Lila Lane as platted; thence continuing North 60 degrees 21 minutes 18 seconds Nest a distance of 256.66 feet; thence North 22 degrees 53 minutes 50 seconds East a distance of 570.00 feet; thence North 48 degrees 18 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 615.93 feet, thence North 66 degrees 43 minutes 00 seconds Nest a distance of 195.04 feet; thence North 67 degrees 19 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 731.50 feet to the point of beginning If the land to be described; thence continuing North 67 degrees 19 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 250.04 feet more or less to the east line of said Southwest Quarter; thence northerly along said east line of the Southwest Quarter to the northeast corner; thence westerly along the north line of said Southwest Quarter a distance of 2287.00 feet; thence South 7 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds Nest a distance of 610.00 feet; thence southerly to a point on the north lint of RASPBERRY RIDGE, Scott County, Minnesota, distant 560.00 feet easterly of the northwest corner of said RASPBERRY RIDGE; thence easterly along the north line of said plat of RASPBERRY RIDGE a distance of 690.00 feet; thence northerly perpendicular to the north line of said RASPBERRY RIDGE a distance of 140.00 feet; thence easterly to the point of beginning. (612) 447.4230 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E. PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 65372 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LAND CURRENTLY ZONED CONSERVATION: That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 115, Range 22, Scott County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the most northerly corner of Lot 9, KOPP'S BAY ADDITION, Scott County, Minnesota; thence southwesterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot 9, a distance of 50.00 feet to the angle point on said Lot 9; thence on an assumed bearing of the North 60 degrees 21 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of 50.6 feet more or less to the northwesterly rigbt-ofway line of Lila Lane as platted; thence continuing North 60 degrees 21 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of 256.6d feet, thence North 22 degrees 53 minutes 50 seconds East a distance of 570.00 feet; thence North 48 degrees 18 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 615.93 feet; thence North 66 degrees 43 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 195.04 feet; thence North 67 degrees 19 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 731.50 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 67 degrees 19 minutes 18 seconds Nest a distance of 731.50 feet to the easterly line of RASPBERRY RIDGE, Scott County, Minnesota; thence North 01 degree 42 minutes 59 seconds Nest along said east line to the north line of said RASPBERRY RIDGE; thence westerly along the north line of said RASPBERRY RIDGE a distance of 488.41 feet; thence northerly perpendicular to the northerly line of said RASPBERRY RIDGE a distance of 140.00 feet; thence easterly to the point of beginning. Together with that part of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 26, and that part of the now abandoned Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul railroad right -of -way lying northerly of RASPBERRY RIDGE. Scott County, Minnesota, and westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the northeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 26; thence North Be degrees 18 minutes 14 seconds West along the north line of said Southwest Quarter a distance of 2287.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 07 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 610.00 feet, thence southerly to a point on the north line of said RASPBERRY RIDGE distant 560.00 feet easterly of the northwest corner of said RASPBERRY RIDGE and there terminating. or more commonly described as approximately 97 acres of land located 1/4 mile southeasterly of the intersection of County Road 21 and County Road 42. If you desire to be heard in reference to this rezoning, you should attend this public hearing. Written and /or oral comments Wil� c nsidered by the Planning Commission. Ho s W. Gra er Director of Tanning City of Prior Lake To be published in the Prior Lake American February 20 and 27, 1989. I 1 1 1 i l !f J i i -I� S-0 �`'1,l •1 l ''c_ S Cl 2 I Flo { • —r ` I w hr�,� �� M~ R- 2 1161N 1E!®IIML R-9 tumE FfiauenmL cl Ri io® oaae trmanlK �. '�`O : •. ( t 8-2 ommw ■mew b8 anew ■odw 1-2 Lou omL%Tmx - A-1 ANWJLRNM } EIfYON • y - .,. M . t Cr1 oaaanAnw P Wnuaan LW oaaaneW a OFMAM tntwcr y 1 t � I "1'�4 F4 MU OIY L �MM T 4 � n VRIOR IYNE LAND USE PLAN h CITY OF PRIOR LAKE I N TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Planning Commission and Horst Graser, Director of Planning Kay Schmudlach, Assistant City Manager Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning, Planning Commission Agenda Item #2 February 28, 1989 The Prior Lake Economic Development Committee (EDC) has discussed in detail the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning proposed by the applicant, Warren J. Isrealson. The Economic Development Committee spent a great deal of time analyzing the merits of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning because it significantly impacts the industrial land reserve. The Economic Development Committee unanimously agreed to recommend that the application be tabled or continued for that amount of time in which a T can be completed to determine the appropriate location of an industrial reserve of land. Furthermore, the Economic Development Committee proposes that the study be comprehensive in nature to include the proposed best use of the land in the north and northwest area of the City, especially in reference to the anticipated transportation improvements. The Economic Development Committee believes the study should be conducted expediently with either City Staff, Consultants, or a combination of both. Representatives of the Economic Development Committee would like to request time to address the Planning Commission on this topic at the March 2 meeting. (512) 447.4230 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E. PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372 November 14, 1988 Mr. Horst Graser, City Planner City of Prior Lake 4629 Dakota St. Prior Lake, MN 55372 DEC 8 1988 CITY Of PRIOR IAK6 Dear Horst, Enclosed is the application for on County Road 21. In addition comprehensive plan amendment residential. rezoning of the property we own to rezoning, we are requesting a from industrial to low density Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely 1La-� Warren J. Israelson, P.E. WJI /clg Property Identification Number: 25 9260280 integ 0 Development Inc. EM CIT1t OF PRIOR LAKE APPLICATION FOR REZONING Reasons for Request: We desire to develop the prnpprty into 0nglp tamilY intq w h1rh iq nnt lJo Wahip Deed Restrictions- -- IL — No Yes If so, please attach. Has the Applicant previously sought to plat, rezone, obtain a variance or conditional use permit on the subject site or any part of it: Yes What was requested: When: SUBMISSION REDUIBREM (A)CO:plete application form. (B)COmplete legal description 6 Property Identification Number (PID). (C) Filing fee. (D)Deed restrictions, if necessary. (E)Fifteen copies of a site plan dram to scale showing existing and proposed structures, lot boundaries, foliage and topography on site and within three hundred (300) feet of the property. (F)Soil tests, if pertinent. (G)Certified from abstract firm the names and addresses of property owners within 300 feet of the exterior of the property lines of the subject property. ONLY COMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING OOM9ISSION. To the best of my knowledge the information presented on this form is correct. In addition, I have read Section 7.9 of the Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance which specifies requirements for rezoning procedures. I agree to provide information and follow the procedures s tlin in the Ordinance. 1 -16-Rn .; : s , .• :.: .�, �, ,_ :. � .. ;...� �,. .; _ .- �''��_', urn,' " TN•lI6R /7Y �VK! 1 -76 -BO Fee Owne Signature Date _ THIS SECTION TO BE FILLED IN BY THE PLANNING DIRBCVM I ..'1 . • i. .T J, •. I YY I DATB OF ME OF ny"z �RTn�(iF.�YtP'Yl. Signature of the Planning Direc�or Da „ s Location of proposed rezoning: County Road 21, 1/4 mile South County Road 42 Present Zoning: Industrial, Conservation Proposed Zoning: R -1 Property Acreage Existing use to be rezoned: 96 of Property: Agricultural Intended use(s) of property: Single Family Slihdivicion 4 1 c ISFAEi50N f SITE Jam: CO�IVE LANE) Lg PLAN MP � Y Jt law vaioa LAKE LAND USE PLAN _ weeatie� nut �+ O moor i t 1. _ -••�`' 1 _ "s ' ' ` ZONIM I V :�_.. l ►t ' � •. � ,lPyp tom /�.wz , _ / f 4 I AEL$ON SITE r.••'y .'. 7,1. rt ov R uauN msoenu� 1. -- :i J y' • ' . R-2 rercoNU,� _ R-3 �un� rEane(rv� FYI R �o® acce ,emenN� 8-1 un® nsE" B-2 cmaum omen B-3 coert4L PAwn M obaft raomK 1 - 2 uuv rwlw miL A -1 Aonmr-PAL C-1 CMWWAM N q r 4-D r„oABAIO owmoi "�. _ _ r �..,., R3 3 ,�. � •l a -'`.. '�� romm ; "� M crt. a ••• '••• ..i C� }' p PmoR LAKE y't 1 Zp11G MAP .w 0 ISRAELSON COMP PLAN AND REZONING AMENDMENT REQUEST ( EXISTING TREE LINE STORM WATER MONT. POND k� \� \ ] MARSH (CAT TAIL) ( POLE SHED 6 BARN EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP SUBJECT SITE a � q v Boa �.. i ' .G;9 =1 1 Ink y��o�A Ingo oe d o0D m ._ 0 PRIOR LAKE 2000 SU9VEY CORRELATIONS REPORT B11LBA2 -_ All age categories indicated strongly agree /agree to promote industrial development. Over 604 of the respondents that h ae lived in prior take less than 50 years responded favorably to promote industrial development. 904 of the respondents who have lived in the community less than 3 years agree to promoting industrial development. RI1Rd2 Block group r elated to whether the Qty s�Md ptomotp induaLrIal deoel QMV=. An overall favorable response (56 -849) strongly agree /agree to the statement. 1001 of the respondents in block 7 (16 out of 16) indicated agreement to broaden the tax base by promoting industrial development. 28Z= _lakesh4re/ a+k sho trompYe industrial develo nt . 80 -859 of the respondents indicated strongly agree /agree to broaden the industrial base. There appears to be no difference in opinion with respect to whether or not the respondent owns lakeshore property. It makes no difference what respondents feelings were regarding employment opportunities. All respondents indicate a need to promote industrial development. EZ&V5A_ -Block_Groupe_ to rvl+arrt 1 1]evelenment Prieritg Block Groups 2, 4, 5, 6 and 10 had at least 50% of the respondents rank Industrial Development as a Number 1 or 2 priority. Block Group 3 was the most even group considering a ranking of 1 -6, while Block Group 2 was the strongest supporter of Industrial Development with a 719 support for a Number 1 or 2 ranking. Block Group 6 had the highest number of number 1 respondents with 9. The lowest 1 and 2 ranking was turned in by Block Group 7 with 319. 17/R25n ltlrsk G pa Related to O fi War }n .ne >ley leoeent Block Group 1 was the only Group with at least 501 of the respondents ranking Office/Warehouse development as a Number 1 or 2 priority. The lowest Block Group support for Office/Warehouse Development was Block Group 8 with 201 of respondents ranking this area 1 or 2. In all Block Groups except 2, 8 and 9, the Office/Warehouse Development priority was in the middle 3 and 4 ranking as compared to 1 and 2 or 5 and 6. The ranking of 3 and 4 averaged across Block Groups 414, while a ranking of 5 and 6 averaged across Block Groups 294. 21 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE PLANNING CIDMMISSION AGENDA MARCH 16, 1989 7:38 P.M. 7:30 P.M. 7:35 P.M. 7:45 P.M. .: a REVIEW MINUTES MINUTES GP PREVIOUS MEETING HEARING LAKESHORE VARIANCE JOHN MEYER (612) 447.4230 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E. PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 2, 1989 The March 2, 1989, Prior Lake Planning Commission was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairman Wells. Present were Commissioners Arnold, Kedrowski, Roseth and Wells, Director of Planning Horst Graser, Assistant City Planner Deb Garross and City Intern Gary Schmitz. Commissioner Loftus arrived at 8:27 P.M. ITEM I - REVIEW THE MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECOND BY ROSETH, TO APPROVE THE JANUARY 19, 1989, MINUTES AS PRESENTED. Vote taken signified ayes. MOTION CARRIED. Commissioner Roseth commended the Staff on providing an excellent retreat for the Commissioners. ITEM II PUBLIC HEARING AMEND ZONING CODE SECTION 4.1L "SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR COUNTY ROADS Mr. Graser gave a demonstration and illustrations on the language of the Amendment. Scott County Highway Department has requested the change. Questions raised by the Commissioners were on the present homeowners affected by the amended changes and if non - conforming houses would result if roads are widened. MOTION BY ARNOLD, SECONDED BY KEDROWSKI, TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT AS WRITTEN. That the proposed amendment is better suited for planning and construction, that it will reduce possibilities of non - conforming structures and it will delineate adequate setback requirements. Vote taken signified ayes, MOTION CARRIED. (612) 447.4230 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E. PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372 MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECOND BY ARNOLD, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. Vote taken signified ayes. MOTION CARRIED. Short recess called at 7:54 p.m. Meeting called to order at 8:00 p.m. ITEM II PUBLIC HEARING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ITEM III FOR REZONING. Warren Israelson, representing Integrity Development, stated that his client felt the area is more suited for residential than industrial. Topography of the land would lend itself to very desirable residential lots whereas it would be undesirable for industrial. The land in question is located at County Roads 42 and 21. Deb Garross, Assistant City Planner, showed slides of the area in question which illustrated the trees, gullies, pond and conservation areas. Comprehensive Land Use Plan map showed areas intended for industrial use through the year 2000 and beyond. Zoning is I -1, the type of industry permitted would include testing and research laboratories, offices, and public buildings. conditional uses would include light manufacturing, public utility buildings and wholesale businesses. Horst Graser, Director of Planning, stated that when the plans were made to designate an area for industry, this seemed the most logical site. Prior Lake has tried to encourage developers to come to the City. If this area is changed to residential, then it must be replaced with another industrial area. A poll taken in 1987 indicated that the public wanted industry in Prior Lake. Mr. Graser stated that it is Staff's recommendation that the 280 acres be kept as industrial until another site is established. Request that the application be denied. Bob Barsness, of the Economic Development Committee, stated that they did not want to discourage any developer coming into the community, but felt this issue should be continued until a study can be done. Leo Virling, 4730 - 140th St. N.E., stated that he is a property owner adjacent to the area in question. He felt that if the 97 acres is taken out of industrial, his should also be rezozned. Also, Mr. Virling felt conservation was needed and he did not feel industry is suited for the land. Dorothy Brandt, 16503 Franklin Trail, owner of 40 acres on Pike Lake Trail, was unaware that her land was zoned industrial she felt this was a hardship for her to have this zoned industrial. Bob Cavill, 14909 Manitou Road, felt this area should be looked at very carefully and that conservation areas need protection. Don Abrams, 14877 Manitou Road, felt it should be kept industrial and that the conservation area must be protected. Comments from the Commissioners were: If this area is changed from industry to residential then another area needs to be designated. The area should be looked at with respect to all property owners and the entire parcel should be considered in any rezoning application. Applicant did not show substantial reasons for change to be made. Study is needed on the land use and the possibility of designating industrial land in some other area of the community. MOTION BY WELLS, SECOND BY LOFTUS, RECOMMENDATION THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THIS ISSUE BE BROUGHT FORTH TO THE CITY COUNCIL, TABLED AT THIS TIME UNTIL A STUDY CAN BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY STAFF IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE, PLANNING COMMISSION IF NECESSARY, AND OTHER APPROPRIATE AGENCIES AND PEOPLE THAT WOULD EXAMINE THE NEEDS OF INDUSTRIAL ZONES, THE CHANGES IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, OTHER RELATED ISSUES, AND THAT THE RECOMMENDATION BE FORWARDED WITH THE COMMENTS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION, THAT THERE IS CONCERN REGARDING TAKING INDUSTRIAL LAND OUT OF THE CITY WITHOUT A REPLACEMENT AND AT THE SAME TIME RECOGNIZING THE NEEDS OF THE OWNERS OF THIS PROPERTY AND THE TOPOGRAPHICAL CONDITION OF THE LAND. Discussion followed indicated concern on what would replace the area if this land was taken out of industrial. MOTION WITHDRAWN BY WELLS. MOTION BY LOFTUS,SECOND BY ROSETH, TO DENY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS; THERE IS INCOMPLETE INFORMATION; FURTHER STUDY IS NEEDED TO DETERMINE WHAT OPTIONS EXIST FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IF THIS SITE IS REZONED; IT IS INAPPROPRIATE TO REZONE WITHOUT LOOKING AT THE ADJOINING PARCELS THAT MAKE THE ENTIRE 280 ACRE INDUSTRIAL PARK. Vote taken signified ayes, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY ROSETH, TO DENY THE REZONING APPLICATION. Vote taken signified ayes, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECOND BY ARNOLD, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING RELATED TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT. Vote taken signified ayes. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION BY ARNOLD, SECOND BY KEDROWSKI, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE REZONING. Vote taken signified ayes, MOTION CARRIED. MOTION BY ROSETH, SECOND BY ARNOLD, RECOMMENDING FURTHER STUDY BY CITY STAFF OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO STUDY THE NEED AND APPROPRIATE LOCATION FOR INDUSTRIAL SITES. Vote taken signified ayes, MOTION CARRIED. Comment was made that the Comprehensive Plan should be reviewed sometime in the future. MOTION BY KEDROWSKI, SECOND BY ARNOLD, TO ADJOURN. Vote taken signified ayes, MOTION CARRIED. Meeting adjourned at 9:40 P.M. *Tapes of meeting available at City Hall. Horst Graser Rita M. Schewe Director of Planning Recording Secretary r CITY OF PRIOR LAKE "VA02PC" PLANNING REPORT MARCH 16, 1989 SUBJECT VARIANCE APPLICATION APPLICANT JOHN MEYER SUBJECT SITE LOTS 43, 44 AND 45, TWIN ISLES REQUEST 54' LAKESHORE VARIANCE BACKGROUND: T eT apsjicant has submitted an application to the Planning Commission whereby he requests a 54' foot lakeshore variance in order to build a 16' x 38' foot deck addition. The proposed deck location is on the southerly side of a newly constructed cabin. The applicant received a 37' foot lakeshore and 21' rear yard variance on January 19, 1989 for a cabin. At that time it was not known that the applicant wished to build a deck addition which will encroach an additional sixteen feet into the 100' foot lakeshore requirement. (See attached materials for additional reference to this item). STAFF EVALUATION: Twin Is es was platted in 1925 into lots which no longer meet existing zoning requirements. The applicant owns three lots which are combined under one tax I.D. number and consist of approximately 15,300 square feet. There are no other locations on the site where a deck could be built and comply with setback requirements. The proposed deck location is the only logical location available on the site. The hardship in this case is not caused by the applicant or previous owners. RECOMMENDATION: The Panning Commission has allowed setback variances for lakeshore lots where hardship has been identified, in order that riparian owners may have decks. The hardship is not caused by the applicant or previous owners. A lakeshore variance in this case, would not be detrimental to the health and welfare of the general public. The recommendation from staff is to allow a maximum variance of 50' feet. This would allow the applicant the opportunity to have a 12 foot deck in the location desired yet not exceed the fifty foot precedent which has been used in the past for lakeshore lots. (612) 447.4230 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E. PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372 P Way • ► • e �• • • of use M Phone; Phone: 2 2 Phone: -1 Ph one; -0 0 Fee Contract X Purchase Agreement rt Fno ne: of property: Seasonal Ca legal Description Lots 43, 44 of Variance Site: PID1 25� 100034 -0 Zoning: RISD Variance Requested: 54' foot lakeshore variance for a deck addition. Has the applicant previously sought to plat, rezone, obtain a variance or conditional use permit on the subject site or any part of it? -A —Yes _No What was requested: 37.5' Lakeshore Variance and 2 1' Rear Yard Vara for Cab Describe the type of improvements proposed: _ 16' x 38' deck to the Seasonal Cabin on the - Island. SUBMISSION s (A)Completed application form. (B)Filing fee (C)Certified from abstract firm, name:: and addresses of property owners within 100 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. (D)Complete legal description 6 Property Identification Number (PID). (E)Deed restrictions, if applicable. LF)An area map at 1' =200' available from the City Engineering Section showing: existing topography, utilities, lot boundaries, building easements and soil test data if pertinent within 300 feet. (G)A parcel map at 1 20' -50' showing: The site develolnent plan, buildings: parking, loading, access, surface drainage, landscaping and utility service. ONLY OOMPLETE APPLICATIONS SHALL BE REVIEWED BY WE PL.ALINING ColoaSSION. To the beat of my knowledge the information presented on this form is correct. In addition, I have read Section 7.6 of the Prior Lake Zoning Ordinance which specifies requirements for variance procedures. I agree to provide ' nformation and follow the prooedures as outlined in the Ordinance. Submitted this 722 da of e6 Appli s Signature Y F 1 9$ Fee Owners Signature THIS 'PACE IS TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE P,JVTIING DIRECTOR PLANNING COMMISSION , APPROVED _ DENIED CITY CODNCM APPEAL __ APPROVED DENIED DATE OF HEARING DATE OF HEARI:ri CPDDITIONS: Signature of the Planning Director Date CITY OF PRIOR LAKE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR LAKESHORE VARIANCE You are hereby notified that a public hearing will be held by the Planning Commission in the Prior Lake Council Chambers at 4629 Dakota Street S.E. on: THURSDAY, MARCH 16, 1989 at 7:35 P.M. PURPOSE OF HEARING To consider a variance application for John Meyer. SUBJECT SITE LOCATION Lots 43, 44 & 45 Twin Isles REQUESTED ACTION The applicant wishes to build a 16 X 38 foot deck addition on the southerly side of a cabin. The required lakeshore setback is 100 feet. Mr. Meyer wishes to locate the deck 46 feet from the lake which would require a 54 foot lakeshore variance. If you desire to be heard in reference to this matter, you should attend this meeting. Oral and written comments will be accepted by the Planning commission. For more information, contact the Prior Lake Planning Department at 447 -4230. Prior Lake Planning Commission March 6, 1989 (612) 447.4230 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E. PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372 J JOHN M. MEYER RSOO EWINO NORD OLOONIWTON, Wl. 55431 Volley Engineering Co., Inc. Wn M.C. FRRNpf1 T Offla QDNOOWW 6470 FRINRLM TRAIL LE. PRIOR LANE, WNNESDTI WST3 TELEF E IRRI4RT nM IRRJMT -84 11.1 IRR. 0 RWN 1 FAR, •RNIW YW �,n11 \IN CITY OF PRIOR LAKE "VA03PCII PLANNING REPORT MARCH 16, 1989 SUBJECT VARIANCE APPLICATION APPLICANT RICHARD MUELLER SUBJECT SITE LOT 2, SUNSET SHORE REQUEST: 4' NORTH SIDE; 6.4' SOUTH SIDE AND 26' REAR YARD SETBACK VARIANCES BACKGROUND: The — applicant has submitted an application to the Planning Commission to consider several variances in order to build a deck and addition to an existing cabin. The legal description of the site is Lot 2, Sunset Shore. Sunset Shore subdivision was platted in 1931. Records from the County Assessor's Office indicate that the cabin existing on the site was built in 1930. (See attached maps and materials for reference to this item). SITE ANALYSIS: The subject site consists of approximately 9,800 square feet and is zoned R -1 Urban Residential and S -D Shorelanu District. The existing cabin is at variance with side and rear yard setback requirements. An existing deck and shed encroach over the north property line of Lot 2. The lot is located in a low lying area and is divided by an existing sewer easement. STAFF EVALUATION: The applicant has proposed to remove the deck and shed which encroach over the north property line of the subject site. It is the intent of the applicant to build an addition to the easterly side of the cabin and a deck on the westerly side. The required setbacks in this district are ten foot side yard and an eighty three foot setback measured from the centerline of County Road 81. The applicant has attempted to diminish the amount of variance needed and has designed the additions so that no variance is needed from the 911 contour at Spring Lake. (612) 447.4230 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E. PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 65372 It is unfortunate that the existing cabin was not built parallel to the east /west property lines, which would have diminished the amount of variance needed. The proposal is to keep the addition in alignment with the existing walls of the cabin. The applicant has attempted to minimize variances needed and will remove two structures which currently cross over the north property line. The coverage ratio of the proposed additions will be approximately 16 percent and will not require variance. Staff is concerned with the ability of the applicant to meet flood plain management requirements under the existing proposal. All new additions must have a floor elevation of at least 914. There were no elevation markings presented with the survey however, any building permit issued for this site will have to comply with flood plain management requirements. RECOMMENDATION: T e recommen ation from staff is to approve the variances as requested. The applicant has attempted to minimize the amount of variance needed to improve his lot. The hardship was not caused detrimental the l general 's health opinion, variances would welfare ofthe public• 1 011W its 1AMM I- i ,/ , ,. F ONYW IM of Ownership: Fee Coqtract .. Purchase Existing Use of Property: P resent Zonings Use of Property: �(J11_ Oki r 9 J0_ n V14 Cpa Legal Description of Variance Site: Z-o'T 9 SyA.�Cj2�"- 6ao�� S4&L' l ,Ik 1- Variance Requested: < C•a d2-U 4.p 4' A) Sop . (.. 4 ' S. S!Qa 1 2l0 �� gr waif- Has the applicant previously sought to plat, rezone, obtain a variance or conditional use permit on the subject site or any part of it? Yea -'X- }b What was requested: When: D ispoaition: Describe the type of improvements proposed: akAA9Q,a in /a�QtGn Ih YVIr SUBMISSION 3 (A)Canpleted application form. (B)Filing fee (C)Certified from abstract firm, names and addresses of property owners within 100 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. (D)Complete legal description 6 Property Identification Number (PID). (E)Deed restrictions, if applicable. (B)An area map at 1"-200' available from the City Engineering Section showing: existing topography, utilities, lot boundaries, building easements and soil test data if pertinent within 300 feet. (G)A parcel map at 1 20 -50' showing: The site development plan, buildings: parking, loading, access, surface drainage, landscaping and utility service. :XMY COMPLETE APPLICATIONS SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. To the best of my knowledge the information presented on this form is correct. In addition, I have read Section 7.6 of the Prior take Zoning Ordinance which specifies requirements for variance procedures. I agree i rTnn d fold the procedures as outlined in the Ordinance. / /f Tee owners Sainalsrd ' r THIS SPACE IS TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR 0OWITIONS: Signature of the Planning Director : Date NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR SIDEYARD AND COUNTY ROAD SETBACK VARIANCES You are hereby notified that a public hearing will be held by the Planning Commission in the Prior Lake Council Chambers at 4629 Dakota Street S.E. on: THURSDAY, MARCH 16, 1989 at 7:45 P.M. PURPOSE OF HEARING To consider a variance application for Richard Mueller. SUBJECT SITE LOCATION Lot 2, Sunset Shore 17244 Sunset Trail REQUESTED ACTION The applicant wishes to build an addition to an existing cabin. The proposed addition will encroach within the required 10 foot sideyard and 83 foot county road setbacks. The proposal is to locate a deck 6 feet from the northerly property line and locate the addition 3.6 feet from the southerly property line and 57 feet from the centerline of County Road 81. If you desire to be heard in reference to this matter, you should attend this meeting. Oral and written comments will be accepted by the Planning Commission. For more information, contact the Prior Lake Planning Department at 447 -4230. Prior Lake Planning Commission March 6, 1989 (512) 447.4230 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E. PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372 ?«— y,.e� \ »[: � \� ƒ \« �� \ 2� �� ?•� �� � f � y � y - w . ... dy Al /W, 10 lfr,l fwxed 0 GM ,e Aft wwr � � w' �� i ��_ n n�i � j aosf� , ; 1 s.� ��atst lces6r � r. - -- I 7I � a'' "' + , - (K /wrz ficF ' II � I 4c' —�, � �.~ O it - � �11p� u __... ! �'- ..�fOV6it �tL61 S..ceE G /lwcE � �. �� - I CteLf I � � 2' •. $ /ti(a(f 6PR /6E �. c � .� p�' . ._ �s� I _... � A i ._ — __. —_ �- �,) � � t �- - � - - i; 7 � !i i � /�__ f �`_. __r � 1 i I ... .. -� City Property Information System City of Prior Lake, MN Parcel Status Run at 11:46 AM on 03/06/89 Property Identification Number: 25134002C Previous PIN: 251340020 Street Address: City, State Zip: Fire Code: Occupant: Code: Area: Number of Units: Assessed Value: Market Value: Year Built: 17244 SUNSET PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372 000000 N 8,000 1 $13,048 $46,600 1930 Land Use: 204 Zoning: R1SD Storm Sewer District: 0000 Election District: 2 School District: 719 Park Dedication Fee: $0 TRL PAGE 1 Actual Use: SF Census: 809.01 -05 Flood District: TIF District: Park Dedication Sq Ft: 0 SB EM SM: Lot 2, Siset �Y'PLICAW-. Riche d N 1188 FEQLEST: 4- Pbrth Side Yard Veria 6.4• South Side Yard Va is 26• CourMy Fb W Setbmk Veris i Frpor Additi. Structure to h Flw ed P16. S PRO IG JP YM m