Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993 August Planning Commission MinutesUS f /F PR1 - \'NN ES REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Thursday, August 5, 1993 6:30 p.m 1. Call meeting to order. a) Review minutes of previous meeting. 6:30 p.m. 2. NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING DLSTRICf MEETING North Shore, Pike Lake, and Jeffers 9:00 P.M. 3. PUBLIC HEARING - To consider Schematic EU.D. Preliminary P.U.D. Preliminary Plat West Edge Estates First Addition Odra Business a) Crown CoCo Settlement Information - Deb b) Tree Protection Article - Tom Loftus All times stated on the Planning Commission Agenda, with the esceptlm of Public Hearings, are approximate and may start a few minutes earlier or later than the scheduled time. 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Pri lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph. (612) 4474230 / Fax (612) 4474245 AN EQUAL OPPORNFBR' BOUNM PLANNING COMMIS MINUTES AUGUST 5,1993 The August 5, 1993, Planning Comtrussion Meeting for neighborhood districts of North Shore, Pike Lake, and Jeffers was opened by Vice- Chaitperson Arnold. As a quorum was not present the meeting could not be officially called to order, therefore the review of the minutes from the previous meeting will be considered at a later time in the meeting. Those present were Commissioners Arnold, Greenfield, Director of Planning Horst Graser, Assistant City Planner Deb Garross, Associate Planner James Hayes, and Secretary Rita Schewe. Commissioner Roseth arrived at 9:00 P.M. ITEM 11 - NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING DIS TRICT MEE3 NG NORTH SHORE. PIKE LAKE. AND JEFFERS Director of Planning Horst Graser, gave a brief summary on the objectives of the neighborhood meetings and the ultimate plan and outcome. What is decided today will make a difference in five, ten, or twenty years. Duane Melling -4833 Beach Street NE, wanted to know what the plans are on the Grassini -Grothe development next to his property. Mr. Graser responded that the development is called Knob Hill. The oudot is to be used for day use, picnics, swimming, but would not be a marina. Evan Shadduck -4841 Beach Street NE, concerted on noise, refuse, boat docking, clear cutting, small lots like Sand Pointe, and ingress and egress associated with the new development. Luella Newstrom -4949 Beach Street NE, asked if a hearing will be conducted on the new development and that a left turn onto County Road 42 is very dangerous and would like the City to use their influence on the County to upgrade County Road 42. Lloyd Berggren -4853 Beach Street NE, would like the oudot shifted to the western part of the Knob Hill development. Denise Shadduck -4841 Beach Street NE, concerned on the traffic on County Road 42 and the fatalities that have occurred. Would like to we Prior Lake rural and as much open space as possible. Randy Doud -4965 Beach Street NE (P.O. Box 987, Sanibel, PL), stated having a higher density to lower taxes is bunk. Evan Shadduck -4841 Beach Street NE, felt that people who can afford larger lots would be smart enough to vote for referendums. He likes the layout of Raspberry Ridge lots, more trees, bike paths, and cul -de -sacs. Lee Andren -4880 Chatonka Beach Trail, gave an update on the subdivision of the Echos. She reported that at the last Council meeting, a petition was presented by tbe neighborhood that stated they did not want a road to go through. Roy Stromme -4913 Beach Street NE, opposed the lakeshore road and would prefer bike and pedistrian paths. Carriage Hills Road should not become a main toad as it would become a PLANNING COMMISSION Augur 5,1993 Page I shortcut to County Road 42. Housing density should be lower on the north side as it would be easier to service and developers should pay for service and not tax the residents. To have a commercial development would just be a hangout and it would be better some place else. John O'Loughlin -2988 Valley View Road, Shakopee, asked about the :Yilds MUSA status. The deadline of the Metropolitan Council was discussed, and what his property would be zoned. Randy Doud -4965 Beach Street NE, asked where commercial site was being planned for Carriage Hills Road and Pike Lake Trail. (Mr. Graser informed him this was not in the plans.) Mr. Doud felt the private facilities in the neighborhoods should be public and that the developers should pay for the park and playground systems. There should be more baseball fields in the City. Evan Shadduck -4841 Beach Street, disagreed with Mr. Doud very strongly on various points of his statements. Luella Newstrom4949 Beach Street, would forego the bike paths in order to keep the area rural and asked if the school district would consider building a school in this area. Sally Melling -4833 Beach Street, lots should be larger on lakeshore property, bath house facilities should not be built on outlot, and was concerned on the installation of the sewer and water line destroying the trees. Leo Vierling -14091 Eagle Creek Ave., wanted to know if he is getting any help from the City for field access on County Road 42. He asked the status on his lakefront property, can he build a house, and what is his property on County Road 18 zoned. Richard Klimmek- 3020 -154th Street NW, stated he has 70 acres and has been approached by developers and would like to know the status of the MUSA line for his property. Roy Stromme -4913 Beach Street, felt that Shakopee will be developed with more commercial than residential and Metropolitan Council is exercising control. Harold Bohlen -13380 Hickory Avenue, wanted to know what his property is zoned. Duane Melling -4833 Beach Street, commmended the Commissioners and the Planners for holding these meetings and listening to the voices of the community. A recess was held at 8:55 p.m. Chairman Roseth called the August 5, 1993, Planning Commission meeting to order at 9:00 p.m. ITEM I - REVIEW MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING MOTION BY LOPTUS, SECOND BY ARNOLD, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS SUBMITTED. Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Arnold, Greenfield, and Roseth. MOTION CARRIED. ITEM II PUFI1-1r HEARIN - WEST E DC . ECTATFC FIR.CT ADDITION SCHEMATIC P I1.D_. PRELIMINARY RUM_ AND PRELUMNARY PLAT The public hearing was called to order at 9:00 pm. by Chairman Roseth. The public was in attendance and a sign -up sheet was circulated. PLANNING COMMISSION AuVw 5. 1993 Pop 2 Ron Swanson of Valley Surveying Co. represented the applicant Louis Stassen. Phase two of West Edge Estates is now being proposed and would be for six, four unit townhouses. Deb Garross presented the information as per planning report of August 5, 1993. This is the second time the application has been brought to the Commissioners. The issues that were a concern have been addressed. The subject site is a remnant Parcel consisting of 4.8 acres zoned R -3 Multiple Residential. There are a number of constraints connected to the property. Two issues which must be decided by the Planning Commission relative to the proposed PUD are (1) Should there be a public or private road connection thrugh the site to connect 170th Street to the future Simpkins Circle. (2) Should the sprinkler requirement of the Landscape Ordinance be waived. Section 6 -6 -2 (1) states that private streets shall not be approved nor shall any public improvements be installed for any private street unless approved by the Council. Private streets may be permitted in PUD's. The existing West Edge Estates plat contains a private drive which connects to 170th Street This plat was approved prior to adoption of the current Subdivision Ordinance. The applicant did explore public road alternatives but due to the limited width of the parcel and location of the future Simpkins Circle, public street installation would severely limit development potential for the site. The DRC recommended the applicant file a PUD application rather that request a variance from the Subdivision Ordinance as per the City Attorney. The Landscape Ordinance is recommended to be followed for the PUD. Recommendation from the DRC is to approve Resolution 93 -IOPC as stated and Resolution 93 -IIPC with the nine conditions as listed. After discussion with the applicant, changes were made to condition #2, with the words deleted as follows; "Prior to approval of the second phase of the PUD for blocks 4, 5, and 6 ". Margarite Jorgenson -16989 Dewitt Avenue, stated she was very pleased that a stroet was being named Simpkins as this was her family name and the land had been in her family for many years. Commissioner Greenfield asked when the first phase was completed, street width, what Subdivision Ordinance governed a private road in the first phase, definition of streets, access, and traffic. At this point Commissioner Greenfield read the definition of a PUD and voiced his opposition to the subject site classified as a PUD. Commissioner Arnold requested Ms. Garross to review the information from legal counsel on the PUD. Ms. Garross also stated the site has no natural features, has many constraints connected with it and that a PUD is a contract between the City and the developer and is meant to be a flexible tool. Commissioner Loftus commented on the traffic flow, landscape, irrigation, and the PUD should not be used to opt out but the details worked out Mr. Swanson stated the units would house mainly retirement age couples and individuals so traffic would not be a problem. The applicant would not have a problem installing the sprinkler system. Commissioner Roseth acknowledged the naming of Simpkins Circle in bon" of the family. He did not have a problem with the traffic, or the streets and the landscape plan with the sprinkler systems should be enforced Discussion followed on the interpretation of a PUD PLANMW COMMISSION Ausud 5. 1993 PW3 MOTION BY LOFPUS, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 93 -IOPC TO APPROVE THE SCHEMATIC AND PRELIMINARY PUB OF THE FIRST ADDITION TO WEST EDGE ESTATES. In the absence of a second the motion was retracted. MOTION BY GREENFIELD, SECOND BY ARNOLD, TO DENY RESOLUTION 93 -10PC. JUSTIFICATION FOR DISAPPROVAL OF THE PUD IS BASED ON THE LANGUAGE IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE WHICH STATES IN PARAGRAPH 12 THAT THE PRIMARY FUNCTION OF THE PUD PROVISION IS TO ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT WHICH WILL PRESERVE AND ENHANCE THE WORTHWHILE NATURAL TERRAIN CHARACTERISTICS, AND THE DESCRIPTION STATING THAT A PUD IS BEING USED IS IN LIEU OF A VARIANCE THEREBY FURTHER CLARIFICATION IS BEING REQUESTED FROM COUNCIL. Vote taken signified ayes by Greenfield, Arnold, and Loftus. Nay by Roseth. MOTION CARRIED. Commissioner Roseth agreed the PUD definition does need clarification but felt this was the wrong way to do it MOTION BY ARNOLD, SECOND BY GREENFIELD, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR RESOLUTION 93 -I0PC. Vote taken signified ayes by Arnold, Greenfield, Loftus, and Roseth. MOTION CARRIED. Public Hearing closed at 10:27 P.M. MOTION BY LOFTUS. SECOND BY GREENFIELD, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 93 -IIPC FOR THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE FIRST ADDITION TO WEST EDGE ESTATES WITH THE NINE (9) CONDITIONS AS LISTED IN THE RESOLUTION AND THE CHANGES MADE TO N2 AS ENTERED INTO THE RECORD BY STAFF. Vote taken to signified ayes by Loftus, Greenfield, Roseth, and Arnold. MOTION CARRIED MOTION BY ARNOLD, SECOND BY ROSETH, TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING FOR RESOLUTION 93 -11PC. Vote taken signified ayes by Arnold, Roseth, Loftus, and Greenfield. MOTION CARRIED. Public hearing closed at 10:33 P.M. OTHER BUSINESS Item b: Commissioner Loftus presented an article on tree preservation guidelines from Eagan. Ms. Garross informed the Commissioners that the City Council felt this would be a good idea and a workshop will be planned in the future. Staff will request a copy of the guidelines from Eagan. Item a: Deb Garross updated the Commission on the Crown CoCo status and the settlement agreement. Item c: Chairman Roseth read a memo from Frank Boyles, City Manager, advising the Planning Commission a Council member will be assigned as a liaison to the Planning Commission. The date of September 16, 1993, was set for the final Neighborhood Districts Meeting which will encompass the entire community. PLANNM 00MIC SSIM �P�4� MO°I71ON BY GREENFIELD, SECOND BY ARNOLD, TO ADJOURN 771E MEETING. Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Arnold. Woellner, Roseth, and Greenfield. MO7ION CARRIED. The meeting adjourned at 11:00 n m. Tapes of the eating are on file as ury Hal Horst W Gmser Director of Planning Rita 11N. Schewe Recordin Secretary PLANNn��IG o�6SSM r 5� 0 FRd ®" U • A 0 REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Thursday, August 19, 1993 6:30 p.m. 1. Call meeting to order. a) Review minutes of previous mating. 6:30 p.m. 2. NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING DISTRICT MEETING Boudin/Onkland, Frost/Eastwood, Sand Pointe, and Lakefront 8:30 p.m. 3. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 8:45 p.m. 4. SIGN ORDINANCE WORKSHOP 9:30 p.m. 5. VARIANCE. WILLIAM KALAL Other Business a. Reorganization of Planning Commission All times stated on the Planning Commission Agenda, with the exception of public Hearings, are approximate and may start a few minutes earlier or hoer than the acbeduled time. 4629 Dakota St. SE., Prior lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph (612) 4474230 / Fax (612) 4474245 AN EQUAL oPPOfmINrrY EM01YER PLANNING COMML MINUTES August 19,1°03 The August 19, 1993, Planning Commission Meeting was called to order by Vice-Chairman Arnold at 6:35 P.M. Those present were Commissioners Arnold, Greenfield, Loftus, Director of Planning Horst Graser, Associate Planner James Hayes, Gina Mitchell, and Secretary Rita Schewe. Commissioner Roseth arrived at 6:40 P.M. MOTION BY LOFfUS, SECOND BY GREENFIELD, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS WRITTEN. Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Greenfield, and Arnold. MOT10N CARRIED. ITEM IT _ ROUDINlOAKLAND, FROCTIF SM00D. CAIND PO i AND LAKEFRONT Director of Planning Horst Graser, summarized the primary purpose of the neighborhood meetings. We need to strive for a sense of community and to market Prior Lake. Many of die City's natural features are visible from County Road 21 and this is the "Heart of the (Sty". Suzanne Kruse-6096 150th St. SE, asked what the plans are for Highway 13, V anything could be done on the Savage side of Highway 13 to improve the landscape, and the status of the Business Park. Ms. Kmse felt something should be done with Priordale Mail and could possibly be used for a senior and youth center facility. Prior Lake has to make some moves and has to do it fast or we will be lost to expanding businesses around the City. Ms. Kruse asked the question of why a new building had to be built when there are several empty buildings available. Mr. Graser stated that Highway 13 will be upgraded to a 2 -lane expressway. Mary K. Whiting -14897 Manitou Road, spoke on a "bonding agent" for the City, and a community center should be put in the comprehensive plan. Mr. Loftus commented that possibly several communities could share a facility because of cost or maybe the school's facilities could be used. Dorothy Watzl -15608 Red Oaks Road, asked about the recreational center dun had been planned for Lakefront Park, the condition of the trails and beaches are terrible and would a no parking sign be placed by the mailboxes as they do not receive mail when vehicles are perked in front Dave Watzl -15608 Red Oaks Road, complained on the quality of the drinking water as it is very bad and needs to be clgatted up. There has been too much construction, roofing, and paving causing drainage problems, the outlet is not used properly, and the 904 high water mark should be lowered. PLANNING COMMISSION Anprt 19.1993 Par I Tom Watkins -5242 Frost Point Circle, spoke on planning issues, people do not become involved with issues until they are threatened and the comprehensive plan is a very important document. Business development needs to be done with private money not the City. Joan Gustafson -5795 Shannon Trail, voiced her concern on the maintenance of the parks, equipment is in terrible condition, ice rink facility could be shared with other communities, a kid center at the Priordale Mall, street signs have been spray painted, not sufficient running trails, hockey rinks are not maintained, and roads are in poor condition. Could the Parks and Recreation Department promote more community activities, and thought there were not many children activities at Lakefront Days. Tom Foster -5795 Shannon Trail, thought a citizens committee could be formed on water cleanup, commercial corridor by Mystic Lake, and a stronger alliance with the Sovereign Nation should be considered. We need to be better neighbors than we have in the past John O'Loughlin -2988 Valley View Road, Shakopee, stated he wants his property on the tax roll and would like to see sewer and water extended. Commissioner Greenfield thanked the audience for attending and becoming involved in planning for Prior Lake's future. Commissioner Roseth announced that the final community wide neighborhood meeting will be September 16, 1993, and gave acknowledgement to Commissioner Greenfield for his idea of initiating the neighborhood meetings. (NOTE: Comments made by the audience from the floor were not audibk on the tape) A recess was called at 8:30 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 8:40 P.M. ITEM III - ZONIN . ORDINANCE AMENDMENT A ..OWIN . OINMERCrsi. INDUSTRIAL USES Director of Planning Horst Graser presented the information as per planning report of August 19, 1993. With the processing of The Wilds Planned Unit Development (PUD), it brought to the forefront an unnecessarily restrictive section of the PUD chapter of the zoning code regulating commercial land uses (Section 6.11 A.5 a -d). It is also recommended that the provision of Paragraph b, requiring 75% of the total dwelling units be constructed before any comenerolal can be built, be stricken. Prior Lake should not 6e commercial development which may have regional markets to a housing development framework. Stafrs recommendation is to approve the amendment as stated in Ordinance 93 -23. Comments from the Commissioners were on; PUD status, and percentage number for dwelling units MOTION BY GREENFIELD, SECOND BY ARNOLD, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 93-23 AS STATED WITH THE ADDITION OF THE FOLLOWING TO PARAGRAPH B: THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND OR CITY COUNCIL MAY ESTABLISH A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL DWELLING UNITS TO BE CONSTRUCTED BEFORE ANY COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN A MULTI -USE PUD. Vote taken signified ayes by Greenfield, Aruohi, Roseth, and Loftus. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Graser introduced Gina Mitchell who will be the Associate Planter for Prior lake as James Hayes is leaving to returtffo graduate school. PLANNING COMML -" August 19.1993 PW ITEM ry SIGN ORDINANCE woRKSHOP Stephen Griuman of Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., gave a summary on sign verbage, regulations, and importance to the community as a whole. More signs are not necessarily merrier and clutter looses its effectiveness. Good communications is the objective and regulations protects as well as limits. All of the businesses would be uniform in signage. Input from the Commissioners would be welcome to incorporate into the sign ordinance. Special events signage should have lesser restrictions. Health, safety, and welfare is used for rationaL Comments from the Commissioners were on: billboards not allowed, filing fees for temporary signs, over regulation encroaches on somebody's freedom, signs should not be in the median of highways, difficulty of enforcement, and what are other communities doing. Associate Planner James Hayes read into the record the agenda of the Minnesota Valley Transit Authority, meeting of August 16, 1993, outlining MTC's signage program. This agreement must be reviewed and approved by City Council if the City of Prior Lake is entering into the agreement. Mr. Grittman stated that possibly a draft of the sign ordinance would be available the middle of September. ITEM V - WILLIAM KALAL - VARIANCE William Kalal -4119 Colorado Street, had removed his single garage and applied for a building permit for a 34 X 24 foot garage, it was determined that he was too close to the property and would need a variance. Associate Planner James Hayes, presented the information as per memo of August 19, 1993. The request is for a 4 foot west sideyard variance from the 10 foot setback requiremen a 4 foot rearyard variance from the 10 foot setback requirement for detached sttucuaa, and a 13.6% impervious surface from the 30% impervious surface requirement of the Sboreland District Precedence has been found in the neighborhood on five variances that were granted. A letter from DNR was received and their recommendation is to deny the variances requested. If the structure was reduced to 24 X 24, the sideyard variance could be eliminated, sad the impervious coverage greatly reduced. The garage could be located 4 feet closer to the house without interfering with the existing tree and eliminate the rearyatd setback variance. DNR does not believe hardship has been demonstrated. Recommendation from Staff is deny the application as proposed due to the lack of hardship demonstrated. However, Staff would not object to granting a 6.5% impervious surface variance so that a 24 X 24 foot garage may be constructed within the required setbacks of 10 feet on die west and south sides of the lot. Commissioner Arnold stated that hardship has not been demonstrated and supports the recommendation of Staff. There is no topographic hardship and if granted. a precedence would be set. Commissioner Loftus felt the turning radius to drive out of driveway is a safety Comm and reduction of the structure should be considered. Commissioner Greenfield suggested moving the garage to the east, and reducing the size to 30 X 34 feet Commissioner Roseth would support one variance but not two, moving garage to the east, and removal of a era. MOTION BY LOFIUS, TO APPROVE THE 13.6% IMPERVIOUS SURFACE VARIANCE FROM THE 30% REQUIREMENT FOR 4119 COLORADO STREET. PLANNING aoatlrnsssox AWW 19,1993 Ibae 3 Discussion followed and due to the lack of a second the motion was lost MOTION BY GREENFIELD, SECOND BY LOFTUS, TO GRANT A FOUR (4) FOOT SOUTH REAR YARD VARIANCE, JUSTIFICATION BEING THAT THE PREVIOUS GARAGE WAS MOVED FROM A ZERO (0) LOT LINE AND THERE IS EQUITY IN THE FACT THAT IT IS BEING BROUGHT INTO CONFORMANCE WITH THE PRESENT DAY CODE, AND TO ALLOW EGRESS FOR THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY. Vote taken signified ayes by Greenfield, Loftus, and Roseth. Nay by Arnold. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY ROSETH, TO APPROVE BUT NOT TO EXCEED. THE 13.6% IMPERVIOUS SURFACE VARIANCE FROM THE 30% REQUIREMENT OF THE SHORELAND DISTRICT FOR 4119 COLORADO STREET, JUSTIFICATION BEING THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE ISSUES TO ALLOW A TURNAROUND FOR EGRESS, AND TO REPLANT THE EXISTING TREE THAT HAS TO BE MOVED OR REPLACE WITH A 2 1/2 INCH CALIPER TREE. Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus and Roseth, Nays by Arnold and Greenfield. MOTION DID NOT PASS. Discussion followed on the tumaround surface covering. MOTION BY GREENFIELD, SECOND BY LOFTUS, TO APPROVE THE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE VARIANCE, NOT TO EXCEED 12 %, FOR 4119 COLORADO, THE OWNER AGREES TO PLACE PERMEABLE SURFACE IN THE TURNAROUND, REPLANT THE TREE THAT HAS TO BE MOVED OR REPLACE WITH A 2 1/2 INCH CALIPER TREE. JUSTIFICATION THAT THE SIZE OF THE GARAGE BE OFFSET BY THE PERMEABLE SURFACE OF THE TURNAROUND. Vote taken signified ayes by Greenfield, Loftus and Roseth. Nay by Arnold. MOTION CARRIED. Reorganization of Planning Commission. Dave Wuelhwr has resigned and no one has beat appointed to fill the vacancy as of yet It was suggested to vote for the Chairperson and Vice - chairperson at this meeting and not wait for the new member. MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY ROSEIH, TO NOMINATE CHUCK ARNOLD FOR THE POSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRPERSON. Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Roseth, and Greenfield. Arnold abstained. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY ROSETH, TO NOMINATE ALLEN GREENFIELD FOR THE POSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION VIA. Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Roseth, Arnold, and Greenfield. MOTION CARRIED. C=Wssioner Greenfield suggested that dw chakpmm or vWvdmkp== work wilk Staff coordinating work activities for the Planning Camorission. Commissioner I.oftas Atit the presiding chairperson should set the tote for parliamentary procedures but all the Coromtisdoom P1.ANNIKO o01111l4slmd AUSM 19.190. FW4 should be encouraged to bring topics to the meeting. Mr. Grassi stated it is the chairman's responsibility keep the items on a time limit, to summarize and bring the moping to a close in a timely fashion. MOTION BY GREENFIELD, SECOND BY ARNOLD, TO Ann., RESOLUTION 93-A#1 RECOGNIZING JAMES HAYES ASSOCIATE PLANNER, FOR HIS EFFORTS AND PRECISE REPORTS AND WISHING HIM WELL IN HIS NEW VENTURE Vote taken signified ayes by Greenfield Arnold, Loft" and Roseth. MOTION CARRIED. The resolution was presented to Jaynes Hayes acknowledging his efforts for ft City of Prior Lake Discussion followed on the Council liaison to the Planning Commission. Decision was trade to notify the City Manager that the group as a whole would not be interested in a liaison perwn. MOTION BY ARNOLD, SECOND BY LOFIUS, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Arnold Rosetb, and Greenfield. MOTION CARRIED. The meeting adjourned at 11:12 P.M. Tblpes of the mee ft are on file at City Hell. Horst W. Graser Director of Planning Rita M. Scbewe Revorfm SWOMY PLANNING OOWAISSSM Augur 19,1993 Page 3