Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993 September Planning Commission Minutes..' i . PR,rp� r + >C P1 P 41/ NNES O � REGULAR PLANNING I AGENDA Thursday, September 2, 1993 7:30 p.m. 1. Call meeting to order. a) Review minutes of previous meeting. 7:35 p.m. 2. VARIANCE - GERALD SONNENBERG 8:00 P.M. 3. VARIANCE - JOHN BEAUPRE 8:30 p.m. 4. VARIANCE - JERRY YOUNG 9:00 p.m. 5. PUBLIC HEARING - THE WILDS PUD - REZONING All times stated on the Planning Commission Agenda, with the e:aeptimu of Prblie Hearings, are approximate and may start a few minutes earlier or Mier tbo the atdteduled tithe. 4629 Dakota St. SE., Prior lake, Minnesota 55372 / Ph (612) 4474230 / Fax (612) 4474245 AN EQUAL oEFtlRiUPriY 0610A R PLANNING COMMIS: MMENIJ MS September 2,1993 The September 2, 1993, Planning Commission Meeting was called to order by Chairman Arnold at 7:30 P.M. Those present were Commissioners Amold, Greenfield, Loftus, and Secretary Rita Schewe. Commissioner Roseth arrived at 7:35 P.M. Director of Planning Horst Graser and Associate Planner Gina Mitchell arrived at 7:42 P.M. ITEM I - REVIEW MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETWG MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY GREENFIELD, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS WRITTEN. Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Greenfield, and Arnold. MOTION CARRIED. A recess was called at 7:32 P.M. and reconvened at 7:35 P.M., at which time the next agenda item was scheduled. ITEM H - GERALD SONNENRERG - VARIANCE Gerald Sonnenberg -14870 Maple Trail, is requesting a 4 foot setback variance from die 50 foot setback from Highway 13 in order to construct a three- season porch over an existing deck. When the house was built in 1977, the setback requirement was 25 feet and the deck was legal when built. When the City changed the setback requirement to 50 feet in 1983, a variance is needed to do any alterations. As the Director of Planning Horst Graser and Associate Planter Gina Mitchell were not present, Chairman Arnold begin reading the Planning Report of September 2, 1993, until the arrival of Mr. Graser at 7:42 P.M. Mr. Graser continued the presentation. The subject site is 88 X 135 feet and the dock has a legal non - conforming setback of 46 feet from the right-of-way line of State Think Highway 13. The proposed construction would not encroach further into the setback, would improve the appearance of the property, and will not affect the neighborhood. The haniship is trot the result of the applicant but in a code change by the City of Prior Lake. Recommendation by Staff is to approve the variance as requested. Chairman Arnold read into the record the responses from the following: phone Calls from Barb Elliott -6757 Rustic Road and Ron Noonan -14867 Maple Trail, in favor of the variance. A letter was received from Ron Evans -14888 Maple Trail, also suppporting the variance. Comments from the Commissioners were: on the structure already built, headship is caused by change in code, and all were in consensus of approval. MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY GREENFIELD, TO APPROVE A FOUR (4) FOOT SETBACK VARIANCE FROM THE FIFTY (50) FOOT SETBACK REQUIREMENT FROM STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY 13 RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE. RATIONALE BEING THE PLANKNG rn4mIISSM01 Seprm� 1 1993 EXISTING DECK IS A LEGAL NON - CONFORMING STRUCTURE, THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WOULD NOT ENCROACH ANY FURTHER INTO THE CURRENT SETBACK, THE HARDSHIP WAS CAUSED BY A CHANGE IN THE CODE BY THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE AND NOT THE APPLICANT, AND IT WOULD NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY. Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Greenfield, Roseth, and Amold. MOTION CARRIED. A recess was called at 7:50 P.M. as the next scheduled item was for 8.:00 P.M., at which time the meeting was reconvened. ITEM HI -.JOHN BEAUPRE- VARIANCE John Beaupre-5504 Candy Cove Trail stated he has a purchase agreement on property located at 15271 Fairbanks Trail and as there is not a garage on the site now, is requesting a 5 foot variance in order to build. The sale is contingent on the approval of a variance. Horst Graser presented the information as per memo of September 2, 1993. The request is for a 5 foot west sideyard setback variance from the 10 foot sideyard setback requirement Previous variances granted to the subject site were for a 5 foot east sideyard variance for a house addition in 1984 and a 5 foot east sideyard variance for a porch and deck in 1991. The subject site is fat near the building pad and slopes sharply down to the rear and is approximately 50 X 150 feet There has been precedence set of variances granted in the neighborhood. The proposed construction goes beyond any previously established variance perimeters. The Planning Commission has never issued two 5 foot sideyard variances. The maximum sideytud variances have been 5 feet and 3 feet The neighborhood is in a period of transition and development. Mr. Graser suggested a change in the garage design and a 3 foot variance be granted instead of the 5 foot as requested. John Beaupre stated the change suggested would of be practical or aesthetically pleasing to the existing construction. Comments from the Commissioners were: Commissioners Greenfield read the hardship findings into the record and with that interpretation, does not approve of the variance. Commissioners Roseth voiced concerns on stating a precedence if a double variance was granted for the property. Commissioner Loftus stated the lot is substandard. felt if a variance is granted it should be as the applicant requested, rather than reducing the request to 3 feet Conimisdoner Arnold stated that granting a variance would set a precedence. MOTION BY GREENFIELD. SECOND BY ROSETTE, TO DENY THE REQUESTED VARIANCE FOR 15271 FAIRBANKS TRAIL, CITING THAT THE APPLICANT HAS NOT PROVEN HARDSHIP FINDINGS 1 TO 4 AS OUTLINED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL OF AN AESTHETICALLY PLEASING DESIGN Is NOT RECOGNIZED AS CRITERIA FOR GRANTING A VARIANCE. Vote taken signified ayes by Greenfield, Roseth, and Arnohi Nay by Loftus. MOTION CARRIED. Variance was denied ITEM IV - JERRY YOVAG--YARIADEL Jerry Young -5465 Shore Trail, stated he wishes to construct a dock over an existing patio and is requesting a rear yard and east sideyard variance. . \,w�iate Planner Gina Mitchell, presented information as per planning report of September 2, 1 The application as submitted was for a 20 X 12 foot deck over an existing patio. The variance requested is a 38 foot rearyard variance from the Shoreland District setback requitement and a 5 foot east sideyard variance from the 10 foot sideyard setback requitement. After review of the survey and existing conditions, Staff determined that a 10 X 20 deck is the maximum depth allowed in accordance with the variance notification. The subject site is 50 X 286 and is in a well established single family neighborhood that has been granted variances. The side and rear yard hardships are not the result of the applicant nor the City of Prior Lake, but the result of actions of a previous governing body. Comments from the DNR stated they are opposed to the variance and the utility shed located on the property by the lakeshote should be removed prior to construction. Comments from Ed McCorkel of 5475 Shore Trail were in support of the variance and a letter from Linda Weicher of 5455 Shore Trail also supported the request A phone call from Jeannie Robbins was of the same opinion as the DNR in regards to removing the shed. Comments from the Commissioners were on: site line of deck, and the existing slab and shed should be removed. Mr. Young stated he plans to remove the slab but cannot do so because of the cost at this time and the utility shed is needed for their life style. MOTION BY LOFTUS, SECOND BY ROSETH, TO APPROVE A 38 FOOT REARYARD VARIANCE FROM THE 75 FOOT SHORELAND DISTRICT SETBACK REQUIREMENT AND 5 FOOT EAST SIDEYARD VARIANCE FROM THE 10 FOOT SIDEYARD REQUIREMENT REQUIREMENT, CONTINGENT UPON THE REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING SLAB BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. RATIONAL BEING t rIMRAL ENFORCEMENT OF THE ORDINANCE WOULD BRING ABOUT A HARDSHIP PRECEDENCE HAS BEEN SET, AND THE SUBJECT SITE WAS MAA77M UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF A PREVIOUS GOVERNMENT. After discussion on the contingency, a friendly amendment was made as follows: THE SLAB SHALL BE REMOVED BY SEPTEMBER 1, 1994. This was agreeable with the applicant. Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Roseth, Arnold, and Greenfield. MOTION CARRIED. A brief recess was called at 9:00 P.M. and reconvened at 9:02 P.M. ITEM V - PUBLIC HEARING . THE WELDS PUD . REZO NINC The Public Hearing was called to order at 9:02 P.M. by Chairman Arnod. The public was in attendance and a sign -up sheet was circulated. Mr. Graser presented the information as per memorandum of September 2, 1993. The objective of this hearing is to consolidate the commercial district of The Wilds Planned Unit Development under one PUD Zoning. Prior Lake Developmmnt L.P. has consented to the consolidation of the entire 580.4 acres under one PUD. Only under a PUD concept can a City deviate hem sundords of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. Robert Hoffman, Counsel Consultant, suggamd an amendment to the PUD section of the Zoning Ordinance. John O'Loughlin. 2988 Valley View Road, Shakopee, MN - stated he is pleased with The Wilds development and what has been done. Discussion by the Commissioners followed on the issue and what procedure to follow on the: resolution. K ANNING COMMISSION September 2.1993 1w 3 MOTION BY GREENFIELD, SECOND BY LOFTUS, TO RESCIND RESOLUTION 93-06PC THAT WAS APPROVED JULY 1, 1993. RATIONALE BEING DUE TO THE AMENDMENT VOTED ON TWO MEETINGS PAST WHICH CLARIFIED THE USE OF B -3 ZONING IN A PUD ZONE, THAT 93 -06PC SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH RESOLL - TION 93 -12PC AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. Vote taken signified ayes by Greenfield, Loftus, Arnold, and Roseth. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION BY GREENFIELD, SECOND BY LOFTUS, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 93 -12PC AS A REPLACEMENT RESOLUTION FOR 93-06PC. RATIONALE BEING TO CONSOLIDATE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT UNDER ONE PUD. Vote taken signified ayes by Greenfield, Loftus, Arnold, and Roseth. MOTION CARRIED. MOTION BY ROSETH, SECOND BY LOFTUS, TO CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. Vote taken signified ayes by Roseth, Loftus, Amold, and Greenfield. MOTION CARRIED. Public Hearing closed at 9:30 P.M. Associate Planner Gina Mitchell presented information an a policy that would give Staff clearer directions on enforcing Section 6-4-2. This policy would be used in the interim until a tree preservation ordinance is in place. A motion was forced to adopt the policy as stated and was withdrawn when the Comttistionas indicated they wished to discuss the item further. MOTION BY ROSETH, SECOND BY GREENFIELD, TO ADOPT THE FOLLOWING POLICY FOR CLARIFICATION OF SECTION 6d-2: STAGE Ml: SE ETCH PLAN OR PRELIMINARY PLAT. A GENERAL OVERVIEWIDESCRIMON IN MAP AND WRITTEN NARRATIVE OF THE FOLLOWING: [A] SPECIES: [B] SIZE OF THE VEGETATION REGION(S): [C] DENSITY OF THE VEGETATION REGION(S). [D] GENERAL DIAMETERS AND SIZE RANGES OF THE VEGETATION. [E] HEALTH CONDITIONS OF THE VEGETATION. [F] AFTER REVIEW OF THE ABOVE (A -E), STAFF MAY REQUIRE A SURVEY WHERE DEEMED APPROPRIATE. Vote taken signified ayes by Roseth, Greenfield, Amold, and Loftus. MOTION CARRIED. Commission Greenfield began a discussion on how so handle apparent violations that surface when applications are reviewed, and on conditions and contingencies placed on variances. Mc Graser suggested a workshop with the City Attorney could possibly be arranged is she frame to clarify the Commissioners position and what legal procedures to follow. MOTION BY ROSETH, SECOND BY LOFTUS, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. Vote taken signified ayes by Roseth, Loftus, Arnold and Greenfield. MOTION CARRIED. The meeting adjourned at 10:06 P.M. Tapes of the meeting are on file at City Hall. Horst W. Graser Director of Planning Rita M. Sdewe Rig Secretary PLANNW,C0b0USSION Sepnemw22.1993 /F P R /Oj� I b 'Y N k: S REGULAR PLANNING COACHMION AGENDA 7ltursday, September 16, 1993 6:30 p.m. 6:30 p.m. 8:00 p.m. 8:35 p.m. 1. Call meeting to order. a) Review minutes of previous meeting. 2. NEIGHBORHOOD City -wide conclusion WSTRICT MEETING 3. VARIANCE - Andy Valdmsnb 4. VARIANCE - George Lambrvu All times stated on the Planning Canmission Agenda, with the eiaeptioa of Arhus Hearings, are approximate and any start a few mlatstes earlier or inter than the ached" time. 4629 Dakota St. SE., Prior Lake, Mtruiesota 55372 / Ph (612) 4474230 / Fax (612) 074M AN EQM OeramVHiY BVLO Fn PLANNYNG CGNDUSSION Muri ES September 16, IM The September 16, 1993, Planning Commission Meeting was called to order by Chairman Arnold at 6:30 P.M. Those present were Commissioners Arnold, Greenfield, Director of Planning Horst Grasa, Associate Planner Gina Mischell, Consultant Blau Tremem, and Secretary Rita Schewe. As these was not a quorum present, the minutes were moved to a later time in the agenda Commissioner Roseth arrived at 7:30 P.M. Commissioner Loftus arrived at 8:13 P.M. The final meeting of the neighborhood districts which mchxW the entire city was called to order by Chairman Arnold He then introduced Horst Grater, Director of Planting, who gave a brief summary of the reason for initiating the neighborhood meetings and what was hoped to be accomplished. The input from the citizens will be part of the Comptehetaive Plat 2010 outlining the goals and objectives for the City of Prier Labe. Blair 7tremem was retained as a cousuluot to the City to prepare a draft of this input to the eve plat. E.K. Whiting -14897 MaWwu Road, stated that the taxes are high, the tax base seeds to be increased, and industry is not the panacea it scars to be. Mc Whiting made the comment that building smaller less valuable bermes genially take mere our of the system then %ey put is. Far a house less than $135, 000.00, the goods and services provided for that home are generally mere expensive than the taxes that it generates. Higber priced houses would produce mare taxes and there could be fewer children, which would help the educational system. We are at a junction of where we can go with the smaller homes and struggle with the tax brae, a have a uppedarieWle field of larger hones and lots. Mc Whiting Stab the "open feeling should be maintained is Prior Lake. Thera are a lot of artificial and tamer d barriers betweri neighborhoods and a Will system would connect the neighborhoods He do asked the question if Prier Lake will have recess to the County Road 18 bridge. Karen Matz -15510 Breezy Point Road, L.akdrom Neighborhood. stated she envisions a city open to a wide variety of price ranges and types of people Does not believe Prior Lake shoud or an set themselves apart to be " attained ". Anyone who ante to Prior lake 10 yeas ago beasts of the country feeling did not have a guarantee the open space would always be there format To have the open space people should purchase property outside the city limits when Wit h the standard, to buy inside the city limits and expect die spaciouaiess to remain fool euly themselves We are a lakeshom cwmmu uily, and a bedroom community, which is not a bad thing to be and we should capitalize on the fact this is a nice phoe to live. '[late is a Bleat majority of people who feel the same way. We Dad to be market drivan. Taxes ate out the bws but whack are the issue. Parks and tails are nice but need to be maintained and cause a problem if an the property. We should not put fences around Prior Lake. Commissioner Greenfield quoted from Staff's report on The Wilds project to die Memopolitau Council of 65% of housing in Prior Lake is below $120AO0.00 and almost 3% is above $200,000.00. E.K. Whiting-14897 Manitou Road, did test fat houm would be More Oran iva dace hid it less valuable in Prior Lake and that most people don't expect to have a new 'starW boa. Prior Lake is at a crossroads now to decide if to go with mass housing and taxes will have ro imerease. 14.ADVIL mOOamASSlmtt swume.16, im Paac t If there are more children, this in turn will increase classrooms, teachers and more money is needed for the school systems. Jim Riccioli-4290 Grainwood Circle, believes there should be a mixture of housing. He felt larger lots should be considered in the Jeffers Pond area In the older neighborhoods, the owners have a difficult time to improve their property because of the ordinances that are in effect today. The City should make sun; the lots platted now we large enough if the owners wish to improve in the future. Potential businesses should be planned for rather than shut out and a second industrial park planned Trails and sidewalks are a public facility and are used. John O'Loughlin -2988 Valley View Road, Shakopee, wanted to know how he can have his land rezoned for commercial and what he has to do. Mr. Graser explained the procedures and what has to take place for this to happen. A discussion followed on how to incorporate the Sioux community into the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Tremere gave a short summary on the procedures and that it is a political and policy issue. Marianne Whiting -14897 Manitou Road, stated that when people are out on the trails and sidewalks, they are aware of the community. We should have stores for people from adjoining towns to be able to shop here. The question was asked if a walkway would connect the Wagon Bridge to Wind Song area and location of the corridor from 35W to bypass Burnsville area Mrs. Whiting thanked the Commissioners for having the neighborhood meetings. A request from the audience asking for a continuance of the format after the regularly scheduled meetings. The was agreed on by the Commissioners. A recess was called at 7:57 P.M. and reconvened at 8:00 P.M. The Meeting was called to order at 8:00 P.M. by Chairman Arnold. ITEM I. REVIEW MINI AF PREVIOUS MEETING MOTION BY ROSETH, SECOND BY GREENFIELD, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS WRITTEN. Vote taken signified ayes by Roseth, Greenfield, and Arnold. MOTION CARRIED. ITEM H - ANDY VALDMANIS _ VARIANCE Mr. Andy Valdmanis of 5237 - 46th Ave. South, Minneapolis, stated he has a lot at 5405 Shore Trail and had received a variance for the property in August, 1992, but due to die length of time taken by the surveyor, when he brought in the plans for a building penrdL his variance had expired. The variances are requested to construct a house and garage and tine has been some minor changes made. Gina Mitchell, Associate Planner, presented the information as per pig repast of September 16, 1993. A 5 foot east sideyard setback from the 10 foot sideyard setback requirement and a 5% impervious surface variance from the 30% impervious surface requitement is being requested. The lot is 50 : 280 which results in a lot of substandard width. The area was platted under Eagle Creek Township. The survey has been revised since the previous variance was granted and shows the home located 35 fat further from the lakeshore. A 15' X 35' detached garage has been added in addition to the garage attached to the house. This revision try have changed the impervious surface coverage of the lot. PLANNM COMMMION Sepo"M IG 1993 Pw2 Rc con❑7iendation from Staff is to approve the 5 foot east sideyard variance but to deny the 5% impervious surface variance as hardship is caused by the design created by the applicanL A condition in the previous variance was that the existing cabin be removed during the winter to allow the applicant to remove the debris over the ice rather than up the steep bank on the property. Staff recommends this condition be included in the motion again. Comments from the Commissioners were on; reasons for two garages on properly, removal of old cabin, type of surface on driveway, design of sunictwe, and reduction of the impervious coverage. Commissioner Loftus abstained from comments as he had just arrived. Mr. Valcimanis stated he would have no problem in reducing the width of the driveway to meet the code requirement. MOTION BY ROSETH, SECOND BY G REENFIELD , TO APPROVE A FIVE (5) FOOT EAST SIDEYARD SETBACK FROM THE TEN (10) FOOT SIDEYARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT FOR 5405 SHORE TRAIL, AS THE LOT IS SUBSTANDARD IN WIDTH, THE VARIANCE IS SIMILAR TO THE VARIANCE GRANTED IN AUGUST OF 1992, PRECEDENCE HAS NOT BEEN SET, AND HARDSHIP WAS CREATED BY A PREVIOUS GOVERNING BODY, AND TO DENY THE FIVE (5)% IMPERVIOUS SURFACE VARIANCE FROM THE 30% IMPERVIOUS SURFACE REQUIREMENT OF THE SHORELAND DISTRICT AS THE HARDSHIP WAS CREATED BY THE APPLICANT AND NOT BY ANY ORDINANCE OR MUNICIPALITY. THE CABIN IS TO BE REMOVED PRIOR TO AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT FOR THE NEW HOME. Vote taken signified ayes by Roseth. Greenfield, and Araoid. Cammistiooer Loftus abstained. MOTION CARRIED. A recess was called at 8:32 P.M. and reconvened at 8:35 P.M. George Lambrou -3124 Fairview Road, stated be is proposing to construct a 24' X 26' attached garage. The elevation of the garage and driveway will be 5 fed higher than the house and Use& the variances to allow the water to drain to the mad. Associate Planner Gibs Mitchell presented the information as per the planning report of September 16, 1993. The variances requested are, a 315 foot setback variance from the 85 foot County Road setback requirement, a 9 foot front yard variance for the 25 foot front yard setback requirement, aid a 4 foot east sideyard variance o om the 10 foot sideyard setback requiretnemt The existing home was built 6.5' from the east property line and the proposed page will mot encroach further into the sideyard. The neighborhood is undergaing conversion of cabins to single family homes. This property was platted and developed under Spring Lake Township. A letter from Brad Larson, Scott County Highway Engineer, was entered into the mead stating that Scott County does not object to the request, but would defer its position to be the straw as die City's position due to the future potential jurisdiction of County Rod 18 being assumed by Print Lake. Recommendation from Staff is to approve the variances requested as the criteria of the four hardship standards of the Toning Ordinance have been met Deb Garross, Assistant City Plane, gave a brief oudinc of the setbacks associated to the ootmty road P[wtaN24a coanusslorl Sq mbr 16.1993 i �mments f om cite Co+_anissioners were on: past and present county road setbacks, unusual Linersection, and the be applicant aware of Scott County's fine plans for County Road 81. MOTION BY GREENFIELD, SECOND BY LOFTUS, TO APPROVE A 31.5 FOOT SETBACK VARIANCE FROM THE 85 FOOT COUNTY ROAD SETBACK REQUIREMENT, A 9 FOOT FRONT YARD VARIANCE FROM THE 25 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT, AND A 4 FOOT EAST SIDEYARD VARIANCE FROM THE 10 FOOT SIDEYARD SETBACK REQUIREMENT FOR 3124 FAIRVIEW ROAD. RATIONALE BEING THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS THE ONLY LOGICAL LOCATION, PRECEDENCE HAS BEEN SET BY PREVIOUS VARIANCES IN THE AREA, HARDSHIP IS NOT THE RESULT OF THE APPLICANT NOR THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BUT OF A PREVIOUS GOVERNMENT, AND IT WOULD NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY. Vote taken signified ayes by Greenfield, Loftus, Arnold, and Rosetb. MOTION CARRIED. At this time the Neighborhood Meeting was recalled to continue the discussion Greg Matz, 15510 Breezy Point Road, Rated he has been involved with development and the realty business approximately 20 years. He I= been involved in the smsauoding conisnuaides when they were going through their "growing pains". One of ths iraes that wre up that W. Matz took exception to was the larger lots and limiting the value of barren to built. Anyone who wishes to live here should be able to do so and not be limited or have 10 wait to "attain" the privilege to live in Prior Cape. The City and the County bah provide the mill tale that are necessary to raise the taxes to pay the bills and the value of the bonne has lWe w do with it Using the word attain could produce a very touchy ism in regards to the Bgaal Opportunity Act Any time you limit people, be it financial, home buying, and the enjoyment thesed , we need to be very careful. A city has to grow or it will die. Mr. Matz would a No to = the City be own n wrapped up in large Wage house issues. Then should be van= sin of loss to accooaoodate an levels of i.derest Discussion continued with comments from Commissioner Loftas, Oteenn" Mt B.K. Whiting. and I& Blair Tempe. At this point Chairman Arnold announced this is not a debate and all patties concerned have had a change to voice their opinions Conumissiomer Greenfield thanked Blair Tremere for his efforts and coWcibttdaw to the neighborhood meetings. MOTION BY ROSETH, SECOND BY ARNOLD, TO ADJOURN 71HE MFETIJO. Vote taken signified ayes by Loftus, Arnold. Rofeth, and Greenfield. MOTION CARRIED. The meeting adjourned at 9:20 P.M. 7lipes of the meeting an an file at City Hall. Horst W. Greser Director of Planning Rita M. Schewe Recording Secretary MANN= OOMMUSION sww"w 1 1993