Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986 July Planning Commission MinutesCITY OF PRIOR LAKE PLANNING COMMSION AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING JIII,Y 31, 1986 7 :30 P.& 7:30 P.N. 7:35 P.K. W,9iB� 4 o,�,l REVIHi KnOM OF PREVI00B NEB m (612) 4{74290 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E. P.O. BOX 369 PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 56372 The July 31, 1986 Prior Lake Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chairman Larson at 7:32 P.M. Present were Commissioners Loftus, Arnold, City Planner Graser and Assistant Planner Garross. Absent were Commissioners Wells and Roseth. MOTION BY ARNOLD TO APPROVE THE JULY 17, 1986 PLANNING ODM41SSION MINUTES AS PRESENTED, SECONDED BY LOFIUS. UPON A VOTE TN M, THE MOTION WAS DULY PASSED. Item I, Public Hearing to consider a rezoning request for Willows 6th Addition was called to order. Greg Balling, Engineer for K s S Development was present to answer questions. Mr. Balling camnented briefly on the request. City Planner Graser commented per memo dated July 28, 1986. Ton Schneider, 16840 Elm Street, questioned the procedure involved with regard to the timing and sequence of events for rezoning and coaprehensive plan amendments. William Brasted, Inguadona Beach, had questions with regard to C -1, Conservation Districts and Inguadona Beach Circle. The Planning Commissioners discussed the proposed density of development, traffic flow, and the proximity of the holding pond to the C -1 District. Concern was also expressed regarding the proposed future development of the property located directly to the east of the Willows 6th Plat. MOTION BY LOPTUS TO APPROVE THE RHQUEST'ED REZCNINGS AS PUBLISHED, FOR THE PiELIMnVW PLAT OF WILLOWS 6TH ADDITION. THE REZONINGS WERE GRANTED ON THE BASIS THAT THEY ARE SUBSTANTIALLY CONSISTENT WITH THE ODMFRNHENEIVE PLAN ADD THAT THE PROPOSED CHANGES WOULD NOT HAVE A DETRIMENTAL AFFECT ON THE CITY'S UTILITY SYSTEM. SECONDED BY ATMD, UPON A VOTE TAKEN, THE MOTION WAS DULY PASSED. MOTION BY ARIM TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR REZONING OF THE WILLOWS 6TH ADDITION, SECONDED BY LOFIUS. UPON A VOTE TARN, THE MOTION WAS DULY PASSED. MOTION BY AIMM TD AWWRNU THE JULY 31, 1986 SPECIAL PRIOR LAM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SECONDED BY LMUS. UPON A VOTE TAKEN, THE MOTION WAS DULY PASSED. THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:35 P.M. (612) 447.4230 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E. P.O. BOX 359 PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE PLANNING ODMMISSION MIN n%S JULY 17, 1986 The July 17, 1986 Prior Lake Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Loftus at 7:40 P.M. Present were Commissioners Rosette, Wells, City Planner Graser and Planning Assistant Garross. Absent were Commissioners Arnold and Larson. MOTION BY %)SETH TO APPRWE THE JULY 2, 1986 PRIOR LAKE PLANIEW COMMISSION MINUIES AS pRESENTID, SBDDNDEU BY WELLS. UPON A VOTE TAKEN, THE MOTION WAS DULY PASSED. Item II, Staff Discussion and Update. City Planner Graser commented on the special Planning Commission meeting scheduled for July 31, progress regarding the proposed Health Care Center for Prior Lake, MBewakanton Sioux Comprehensive Plan, scheduling of the Planning Commission retreat, shoreland management ordinance and progress achieved on the Bob Brawn P.O.D. At this time a 10 minute recess was called. The meeting resumed at 8:00 P.M. Item III, Public Hearing continuation to consider an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for Raspberry Ridge, was called to order. Bob Walsh, developer, Greg Kopischke, Westwood Planning, Leonard Brooks, owner, Mike Olson, Attorney and John Gerten were present to answer questions. City Planner Graser cemented per memo dated 7/17 /86 which addressed the concerns raised in "Manitou Drive Citizens' Response to Raspberry Ridge ". Norbert Traxler, attorney for the area residents opposed to Raspberry Ridge, commented that any Public Hearing to consider rewording the Camp Plan and Storm Water Management Plan should be held prior to granting a Camp Plan amendment for the plat of Raspberry Ridge. Noreen Baillif, 14897 Manitou Road, cemented that the Planning Omnission felt it important that the Mdewakanton Indian Cammuity develop a comprehensive plan. She questioned why a comp plan was important for the Indians but did not appear to be important with regard to Raspberry Ridge. Kathleen Jobst, 15110 Martinson Island, questioned whether wetlands could be built upon. (612) 447.4230 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E. P.O. BOX 359 PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372 Kathy Abrams, 14 877 Manitou Road, stated that a copy of the Raspberry Ride proposal had been submitted to the Metro Council. She further commented that the response from the Met Council was that they would not recommend FBA financing because the conservation areas were not being preserved as indicated in the City Comp Plan. Norbert Traxler, Attorney, felt the public should be notified of the policy changes being recommended by staff with regards to the Camp Plan, Storm Water Management Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Camnissioners discussed procedure and the appropriate steps that should be taken in order to amend the Capp Plan and Storm Water Management Plan. Mary Gilbert, Chatonka Beach, CCMmented that because the City did not follow proper procedure in the past, she is currently involved in a litigation case. Greg Kopischke, Westwood Planning, commented that the developer was seeking approval from the Planning Commission to grant the necessary Capp Plan amendments. He further stated that the requests of the City Council, Planning Commission and Staff had been complied with in regards to the Raspberry Ridge Plat. • • •.' 1 • iU "+ I ;F ;I' M •,1 I :Y: v11 '1 IY '1: 'IY- 1 C. 1 •'. L:A• • •• I•' i;l+ '• Mli. 1 ,1" • " /' :A• r. N:A s I : • • •• . 11 A' ;IA1:1 ?' 1:1' • 31 III' •.' A' I "1'Y:.I U'1 V is I:I' •• • /_ II J DI I✓ I I:y '•• 's1 • H• •I V:1: •' Y': S'1'� OH' :I" H' :1" IDY36� •. i 1 Is K • •" 1 1" I:C 1 1 V • •U • I NI` 'y 1` : I/� • I it 1 • • •' )1• I MDTICN BY WELLS TO MU TO RBDUEST 7U AMEND WE COMPRBHENSM PLAN TO INODRPORATE RASPBMW RIDGE, SECONDED BY LCPIUS. DPON A VOTE TARN, 2 AM (WM S, LUMS), 1 RAY (ROSE!$) THE MOTION CARRIED. NOTION BY ROSETH TO CUM 7HE PUBLIC HEARING FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AME DM V FOR RASPBERRY RIDGE, SECONDED BY WELLS. [EON A VMS MUM, 7HE HNION WAS DULY PASSED. At this time a 2 minute recess was called. The meeting resumed at 900 P.M. Item IV, Variance request for Dean and Marie Jansen. The application requested that Lot 84 Northwood Addition, be split into 2 equal halves. Dean Jansen, owner and James Patrick Leavitt, attorney, were present to answer questions. Attorney Leavitt commented that the applicant owns a deep lot with an easement road which bisects the parcel near the center of the lot. The lakeward portion of the lot is flat and in his opinion is suitable for a second building site. City Planner Graser commented per memo dated 7/17/86. Andy Pelecis, abutting neighbor to the north favored the lot split however he would be opposed to the construction of a through road. John Sweeney, Lot 87 owner, had no objection to the lot split. Jerry Holden, owner of lot to south, had no objection to the lot split. He would object to through traffic being allowed into the area. The Planning Commissioners were concerned over setting a precedent to allow substandard lots to be split, and the problem of inadequate access to the lakeward portion of the property. SAM • 'J.'1: • Ii1 Y:G w: W"O e 1 k# Y' V • •14:1 ••t 1•'�: - r4. 1: 1: G.•I' I 1'M;c f••1 I'll �1 I: Y'1 Y • H N:-IJ' :IY I: 1 IS - .!" •' 1:1: M :� +••1 i1 Ok II•• • " J i :1 1:: • I r 11111 RMON BY ROSE19 TO AATf MM MW J l7. 1986 MR= 1ABE RAM= MEWSMU MM M, SOMMED BY NE S. URN A V= MM, M MM MB MLY MM. WE M88TIM AO OMMID AT IWO P.M. • • PLANN3M CD[MIISSION FGFaIDA JULY 2, 1966 7:30 P.M. 7:30 P.M. 7:35 P.M. 9:15 P.M. 9:30 P.M. 1a 10-. i,_, PUBLIC HFAPM (612) 447. 4230 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E. P.O. SOX 389 PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 65372 '' • UM PLANNING ODMMIISSION MINUTES JULY 2, 1986 The July 2, 1986 Prior Lake Planning Camnission meeting was called to order by Chairman Larson at 7:30 P.M. Present were Camaissioners Arnold, Loftus, Rosh, Wells, City Attorney Glenn Kessel, City Planner Graser and Planning Intern Deb Garross. uyY •i, •,yt b7i./ V. vll,t IM:. : la. , ba, MOTION BY LARSON TO DENY THE REQUEST FOR 6 FOOT MW YARD VARIANCE FOR 14173 COMMERCE AVENUE N.E. DUE TO LACK OF A DEMONSTRATED HARDSHIP AND THAT LIGHTING MAY ILLUMINATE WMRD INTO THE BMW AND OTHER PROFOMES, SECONDED BY AIMD. UPON A VOTE TARN, 2 AYES (IARSON & ARNOLD), 3 NAYS (LCFRUS, WELLS, ROSETH) THE MOTION DID NOT PASS. Item II, Comprehensive Plan Amendment Hearing was called to order. The purpose of the hearing was to consider a petition by the Miewakanton Sioux Community (MSC) to amend the Prior Lake Comprehensive Plan. Bill Block, Consulting Engineer, and Ron Robinette were present to answer questions. Mr. Block cemented that the MSC was requesting that the City of Prior Lake extend sewer and water service to the Reservation. City Planner Graser cmmented per memo dated June 26, 1986. Mark Svensky, resident of Prior Lake inquired about capacity of the serer main, proposed location for the installation of the utilities with respect to County Road 83, future improvements planned for County Road 83, and possible development trends projected for the land area located adjacent to the trunk sewer and watenmain. Barb Sennes cammented that County Road 83 would be upgraded but not blacktopped. Barb Kohout, County Road 83 resident, questioned whether residents would be allowed to receive sewer and water service from the T:- nposed extension. (912) 447. 4230 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E. P.O. BOX 359 PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372 Mr. Cemensky caimiented that no rules exist for governing development on the Reservation. Pat Paul, Metro Council Representative, commented that the Planning Commission should view this issue as a unique situation and circumstance. She also commented on the other agencies involved with this matter. She stated that approval from the Planning Commission was required at this time in order to allow the MSC to meet their deadlines. Barb Sennes, Metro Planning, commented that the Metro Council Staff felt that plans submitted by the MSC contained sufficient information concerning the development proposed for the Reservation. City Attorney Kessel, commented that proper permits must be signed by authoritative groups. The Planning Commissioners had concerns regarding maintenance of the utilities, the impacts that the amendment would have on the City of Prior lake, whether proper permits had been acquired and the precedent that might be set by approving the amendment without more detailed documentation and information from the petitioner. MOTION BY LARSON TO TABLE THIS ITEM FOR 2 WEEKS OR TO A DATE AGREEABLE BY STAFF AMID APPLICANT. THE PURPOSE FOR CONTINUATION WOAD BE TO ALLOW THE MSC TIME TO PREPARE MORE DETAILED DOCN?22MION SUCH AS: 1. CAPITOL, IMPROVEIEDS PLAN 2. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ENTIRE RESERVATION (INCLUDE ZONING, INDUSTRIAL & COMMERCIAL, AND LAND USE SCHEME). 3. CONTRACTUAL AGREE MW BETWEEN CITY AND ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES (INDIAN AFFAIRS, NEW COUNCIL, ETC.). 4. A FIRM STATEMENT PROM THE METRO COUNCIL REGAIDING SEWER ALLOCATION AMID HOW THE CITY AND THE PIWERVATION WOULD BE APFECEID BY THE AMEDM4M. 5. DOCUMENTATION THAT NECESSARY PERMITS HAVE BEEN APPROVED SEOOMDID BY ATMD. UPON A VOTE TAKEN, 2 AYES (LARSON & ARNOLD), 3 NAYS (LOFTUS, WELLS, ROSETH). THE MOTION DID NOT PASS. MOTION BY LOFTUS TO GIVE APPROVAL FOR AN AMENDMENT TO PAGE 10 OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH WOULD INCORPORATE THE POLLOWIN3 POINTS: EXTENDING TRUNK SEWER AND WATER M THE RESERVATION FOR THE 120 ACRES AS PER ATTACHED MAP. ANY ADDITIONAL RESERVATION IAN) RBCEIVING SERVICE WILL REQUIRE AN AMENDMENT HEARING. 2. THAT SUCH UTILITY SERVICE WILL BE IN THE BEST IlNTEREST OF THE MSC BY PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL DOMMENT OPPORTUNITIES, MORE AND BETTER HOUSING AND INCREASE THE GENERAL QUALITY OF LIFE ON THE RESERVATION. 3. THAT 120 ACRES (PER EXHIBIT "A") BE RECOGNIZED AS TRIBUTARY TO THE TRUNK SEWER WITH NO OVERSIZING RBQUIRBD. 4. THE MMWO.ITAN CNUWIL RECOGNIZE THE RESERVATION FLOW AS A SEPARATE ITEM WITH A SEPARATE ALLOCATION WITH METERING. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT ESTABLISHED AND PRIOR LAKE ACCEPT BOTH TRUNKS ONCE INSTALLED AND MAINTAIN THE SYSTEM. ALL UNUSED SEWER CAPACITY SHALL BELONG TO PRIOR LAKE UNLESS A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS SOBMITTFA IDENTIFYING FUTURE LAND USE. THE MSC DEVELOP A 5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND A LONG RANGE DEVELOPMENT GUIDE FRAME TO HEAD OFF ANY FUTURE POTENTIAL CONFLICTS WITH RESPECT TO LAND USE AND URBAN SERVICES ACCEPTABLE TO STAFF. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY ODUNCM OF PRIOR LAKE TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT AS TO WHO HAS WHAT RESPONSIBILITY WITH RESPECT TO ANY FEES FOR UTILITIES, INSPECTIONS AND ACCESS CHARGES. APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT IS GRANTED ON THE BASIS THAT THIS IS A UNIQUE SITUATION AND CIRCUMSTANCE. MOTION SECONDED BY ROSETH. UPON A VOTE TAKEN, 4 AYE (LOFTUS, ROISETH, WELLS, ARNOLD), 1 NAY (LARSON) LACK OF SUFFICIENT INFORMATION ON WHICH TO BASE A DECISION. THE MUTTON CARRIED. MOTION BY ROSETH TO CLOSE THE MSC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PUBLIC HEARING, SECONDED BY ARNOLD. UPON A VOTE TAKEN, THE MOTION WAS DULY PASSED. At this time a 5 minute recess was called. The meeting resumed at 9:40 P.M. Item III, Public Hearing in order to consider a Omprehensive Plan Ame anent for Raspberry Ridge Subdivision was called to order. Bob Walsh, developer, was present to answer questions. City Planner Graser commented per memo dated June 30, 1986. Norbert Traxler, Attorney, presented a document 'Manitou Drive Citizen's Response to Raspberry Ridge Development Plan and Rezoning ', Exhibit W. The document outlined several concerns about the procedural process involved with the preliminary plat approval for Raspberry Ridge. Norene Mae, 14957 Manitou Road, explained that a State Archaeologist would investigate the 5 Indian Mounds locate] along Mamtou Road and that the lard should not be disturbed until the archaeological review has been cowleted. Bob Walsh camented that his Archaeologist felt there were no Indian Mounds however he would check back with the archaeologist. The Planning Commissioners had concern over the points raised by the residents in document "Exhibit A.' They also expressed desire to continue this matter to a future date in order to allow adequate time to review the docu ent. MOTION BY ROSERH TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR RASPBERRY RIDGE TO JULY 17, 1986 AT 8:00 P.M. THE ITEM WAS CONTINUED IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE COMMISSION AND STAFF TIME TO RMM AND COMM ON THE INPM TICK PRESENTED. SECONDED BY ARNOLD. UPON A VOTE TAKEN, THE M71'ION WAS DULY PASSED. MOTION BY ARNOLD TO (SASE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON RASPBERRY RIDGE, SEODNDED BY WELLS. UPON A VOTE TAKEN, THE MOTION WAS DULY PASSED. Item IV, Variance Request for Beverly Mechtel. The application requested a 17 foot lakeshore variance for 16558 Inguadona Beach Circle SW. Betty Mechtel was present to answer questions. City Planning Intern Deb Garross commented per memo dated June 27, 1986. At this time a letter from abutting property owners, Ken & Evelyn Falkum, 16568 Lnguadona Beach Circle, was presented to the Commission. Also, a phone call from Joy Meyer, 16548 Inguadona Beach Circle, was eceived by Garross. Both the letter and phone call expressed no objection :.o the variance request. MOTION BY ARNOLD TO APPROVE A 17 FOOT LAKESHORE VARIANCE FOR 16558 INGLA(DONA BEACH CIRCLE SW, SINCE IT IS CONSISTENT WITH EXISTING DEVELOPMENT AND NOT OONTRARY TO THE PUBLIC INTEREST OR DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH AND WELFARE OR PROPERTY VALUES OF THE GOM4LNITY, SECONDED BY WELLS. UPON A VOTE TAKEN, THE MOTION WAS DULY PASSED. Item V, Variance Continuation for Jerry Mahoney. The application requested a 15 foot front yard variance for 14270 Glendale Avenue. Jerry Mahoney commented that he was willing to reduce the size of the garage from 20 to 15 feet in order to increase the distance between Oakland Beach Avenue and the garage. The applicant is not willing to move the garage per staff's recommendation because a tree would be lost and the view from the neighboring properties would be impaired. Planning Intern Garross commented on the request per memo dated June 19, 1986 and stated for the record that she had received a phone call from Betty Weiland in support of the Mahoney proposal. Letters from Judith and John Huck, Pat Bergren and Betty Reemes who were all in support of the Mahoney variance were also submitted to the Commission. The Planning Camnissioners felt that a hardship was involved in this case however they were concerned that if the variance were to be approved a precedent would be set which would allow development into the front yard setback. A precedent such as this would be contrary to the public interest. MOTION BY LOFTUS TO GRANT A 9 FOOT VARIANCE POE 14720 GLENDALE AVENUE. A VARIANCE WOULD NOT BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE NEIGH MUM SINCE FEW HOUSES WOULD BE DEVELOPED ALONG THE DEAD END STREET OR IN 'IDE C-1 DISTRICT LOCATED TO THE WEST OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE MOTION FAILED DOE TO LMT( OF A SECOND. MOTION BY ARNOLD TO DENY A 9 FOOT VARIANCE FOR 14720 GLENDALE AVENUE PER AMENDED RMUEST BECAUSE OF THE PRECEDENT THAT WOULD BE SET, SECONDED BY LARSON. UPON A VOTE %V= 4 AYES (AMW, WELLS, LAP", ROSETH)r 1 NAY (LOFSLS). 7HE MOTION CARRIED. MOTION BY ARNOLD TO AAIOM THE JULY 2, 1986 PRIOR LAIC± PIMM G COMrtISSION MEETING, SECONDED BY LOFTUS. UPON A VOTE TAKEN, 7HE NOTION WAS DULY PASSED. THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 11:20 P.M. t k^ CITY OF PRIOR LAKE PLANNING OOMMSICK AGENDA JULY 17, 1986 7:30 P.M. CALL TO OR= 7:30 P.M. REVIM NUMNS OP PREVIOUS NBBTUS 7:35 P.M. STAPP D7SQISSIUM AM UPOAIE S:00 P.N. OONP PEAR Golfr RTEN 9:00 P.M. PAT LSNV= JR. VARVWE (812) 17.4290 1020 DAKOTA STREET S.E. P.O. BOX 360 PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 66772 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 17, 1986 The July 17, 1986 Prior Lake Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Loftus at 7:40 P.M. Present were Commissioners Roseth, Wells, City Planner Graser and Planning Assist Garross. Absent were Commissioners Arnold and Larson. MOTION BY ROSETH TO APPROVE THE JULY 2, 1986 PRIM LAKE PLANNING OJllQ3SIGM MIN[TPFS AS PRESENTED, SEOO DED BY WELLS. UPON A VOTE TAKEN, THE MOTION WAS DULY PASSED. Item II, Staff Discussion and Update. City Planner Graser commented on the Special Planning Commission meeting scheduled for July 31, progress regarding the proposed Health Care Center for Prior Lake, �n Sioux C®prehennive Plan, scheduling of the Planning Commission retreat, shoreland management ordinance and progress achieved on the Bob Brain P.D.D. At this time a 10 minute recess was called. The meeting resumed at 8:00 P.M. Itcm III, Public Hearing continuation to consider an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for Raspberry Ridge, was called to order. Bob Walsh, developer, Greg Kopisd*e, Westwood Planning, Leonard Brooks, owner, Mike Olson. Attorney and John Gerten were present to answer questions. City Planner Graser commented per mmno dated 7/17/86 which addressed the concerns raised in "Manitou Drive Citizens' Hesponse to Raspberry Ridge•. Norbert Traxler, attorney for the area residents opposed to Raspberry Ridge, commented that any Public Hearing to consider rewording the Coup Plan and Storm Water Management Plan should be held prior to granting a Comp Plan amwKUent for the plat of Raspberry Ridge. Noreen Baillif, 14897 Manitou Road commented that the Planning Commission felt it important that the Mdewakanton Indian Community develop a comprehensive plan. She questioned why a camp plan was important for the Indians but did not appear to be important with regard to Raspberry Ridge. Kathleen Jobst, 15110 Martinson Island, questioned whether wetlands could be built upon. (612; 447-4290 4629 DAKOTA STREET S.E. P.O. BOX 369 PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA 55372 xatirj Abrams, 14877 Manitou Road, stated that a copy of the Raspberry Ridge proposal had been sutmmitted to the metro Council. She further commented that the response from the Met Council was that they would not recommend FHA financing because the conservation areas were not being preserved as indicated in the City Camp Plan. Norbert Traxler, Attorney, felt the public should be notified of the policy changes being recommended by staff with regards to the Camp Plan, Storm water Management Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Ccumiissioners discussed procedure and the appropriate steps that should be taken in order to amend the Camp Plan and Storm Water Management Plan. Mary Gilbert, Chatonka Beach, commented that because the City did not follow proper procedure in the past, she is currently involved in a litigation case. Greg Kopischke, Westwood Pla =wingt commented that the developer was seeking approval from the Planning Commission to grant the necessary Comp Plan amendments. He further stated that the requests of the City Council, Planning Commission and Staff had been complied with in regards to the Raspberry Ridge Plat. MOTION BY IMMS TO REOOMNED THAT 7HE CITY COUNCIIL SCHEDULE PflORE PUBLIC BEARINGS IN OLDER TO REVIEW OOCPREDENSIVE ALAN POLICIES 1-6 AND 7HE STOOK WATER PWM MT PLAN, AND ALSO TD OMMM WHETIMR THE PLANS ARE 7O BE VIEWED AS GUIDES OR T•TTERML ENFORCED. UPON A VOTE TN=, IRE MOTION MRS DULY PASSED. POTION BY ROSETH 10 REO"E D TO 7HE CITY CDUNCIIL THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE ALAN ANOMPSW BE APPROVED TO ACODNNODATE 7HE PLAT OF RASPBOW RIDGE. THE PLAT HAS BEEN RE WNSISTENT WITH PAST POLICY AND AS SUCH, THE RBMW40V TTON IS TO GRANT THE NECESSARY AMEN== TO RUM THE LAID USE ALAN TO ACCOMMODATE 7HE PLAT. THE MOTION DIE) DUE TO LACK OF A SECOND. MOTION BY WELLS To DENY THE REQUEST TO AM3D THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO I NCURPORATE RASPBMW RIDGE, SB OM M BY LOTUS. UPON A VOTE VKE N, 2 AYES (WILTS, LOME), 1 NAY (ROSOM) 7HE M7TiL>rN CARRIED. PMCN BY FJOSM TO CLQBE THE PUBLIC BEND G FOR ODNPREIENSIVE PLAN AM MOMM FOR RASpBgM RIDGE, SEA BY WEBS. UPON A VOTE MUM, 7HE MOTION WAS DULY PASSE). At this time a 2 minute recess was called. The meeting resumed at 9n30 P.N. Item IV, Variance request for Dean and Marie Jansen. The application requeuted that Lot 84 Northwood Addition, be split into 2 equal halves. Dean Jansen, owner and James Patrick Leavitt, attorney, were present to answer questions. At- tornev Leavitt ccr=ented that the applicant owns a deep lot with an easement road which bisects the parcel near the center of the lot. The lakeward portion of the lot is flat and in his opinion is suitable for a second building site. City Planner Graser concerted per mono date] 7/17/86. Andy Pelecis, abutting neighbor to the north favored the lot split however he would be opposed to the construction of a through road. John Sweeney, Lot 87 owner, had no objection to the lot split. Jerry Hoiden, owner of lot to south, had no objection to the lot split. He would object to through traffic being allowed into the area. The Planning Cmeissionere were concerned over setting a precedent to allow substandard lots to be split, and the problem of inadequate access to the lakeward portion of the property. yDrION BY ROSETH TJ DENY THE WtIANCE APPLICATION TD SPLIT LOT 84 NORMNOM ADDITION nM TWO BMAL HALVES, SINCE IT WCNAD Eb'=LJSH A DANGEROUS AND IFdMVERSIBLE DEVEGtE?WT PATTERN THAT IS DK M ISTMTT WITH GOOD PLANNING AND D ETRI rtsarau. TO THE GENERAL HEALTH AND %Iff2 E ON THE CITY, SBOOMW BY WELLS. UPON A VOTE TAREM, THE MJTICN WAS DULY PASSED. MOTION BY ROSETH TO ADJOURN 712E JULY 17, 1986 PRIOR LARK PLANNING O@l4JSSION Nom, saMMM BY WELLS. UPOM A VOTE TAM, THE MMOM WAS DULY PASM- THE MEETING AD700RN80 AT 10:20 P.M.