Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout9A Amend Bolton Menk Contract for Downtown South Study O .� PRIp H � U t� 4646 Dakota Street SE � Prior Lake, MN 55372 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: MAY 13, 2013 AGENDA #: 9A PREPARED BY: LARRY POPPLER, CITY ENGINEER / INSPECTIONS DIRECTOR PRESENTER: LARRY POPPLER AGENDA ITEM: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH BOLTON AND MENK FOR THE SOUTH DOWNTOWN TRAFFIC STUDY DISCUSSION: Introduction The purpose of this agenda item is to consider approval of a resolution amending the professional services contract with Bolton and Menk for the completion of the south downtown traffic study. Hi StOry Prior Lake's 2030 Vision and Strategic Plan recently updated by the City Council prioritizes economic development as one of the city's most important goals. In fact in 2012 the city council made community and economic development one of its top three goals. This is particularly important in the downtown which is relatively small and is divided by a county road which will eventually carry 27,000 vehicles per day. This means that traffic must flow smoothly into the downtown via north and southbound TH13, east and westbound County Road 21 and local roadways like Arcadia, Colorado, Pleasant and Duluth. In 2005 the City and County finalized a year and half long study which selected the alignment of County State Aid Highway 21 through Prior Lake from County State Aid Highway 82 to Revere Way. This study identified several improvements necessary to maintain adequate access to the Prior Lake downtown. Based on intersection spacing, downtown access, right of way impact, TH 13 / CR 21 operation, and community involvement, a concept was chosen. This option keeps County Road 21 at its current location and included Main Avenue having right in/right out access only so the intersection does not fail as the result of added traffic over time. A full signalized access would be provided at Arcadia Avenue. Additionally a 3 /4 access would be provided at Pleasant Street from TH 13. This configuration, approved by the City Council in 2005, has commonly been called the "Baseline Option". Since south downtown is guided in the City Comprehensive plan as "Town Center", the alignment for County Road 21 contemplated a"developer driven" connection of Duluth to the full access intersection at Arcadia. On January 3` 2012 the City Council held a work session to discuss County Road 21 in the downtown area. At the work session, the City Council reviewed several long term alternatives for this area and directed staff to initiate a study of our south downtown to lead a process to determine the ideal street connections. The Council felt that in the interest of long term planning and to increase the involvement of downtown businesses and residents, that a study be undertaken now. The recommendations from this study are to provide the framework for future downtown development by defining proper street configurations for access and egress purposes so existing and new residents and businesses can plan with some degree of certainty. On April 2" 2012, the City Council approved a professional services contract with Bolton & Menk for the completion of the downtown south traffic study and on May 7 2012 the Council provided direction on the study goals as follows. 1) Assemble the findings and recommendations from the previously completed projects, plans, and studies into one plan for the Downtown South Area. 2) Develop a plan for a future street network in the Downtown South Area that is consistent with the CH 21 Plan, provides connectivity and facilities for multiple modes (i.e. pedestrians, and bicyclists) between Downtown and other destinations, provides access to Downtown South businesses, and provides access for traffic between Duluth Street and the intersection of CH 21 and Arcadia Street. 3) Develop a street network for the Downtown South Area that reduces right-of-way acquisition and considers the City's options for implementation. On October 8, 2012, the City Council held a work session to go over the options. Progress had been made as study options were reduced from 13 to 5. One of these options is the Baseline option. This includes the proposed changes at the intersections of Hwy 13/CH 21, Hwy 13/Duluth Avenue, Hwy 13/Pleasant Street, and CH 21/Main Avenue, as consistent with previous studies, but does not include any plans within the Downtown South area. Two additional options (9B & 9C) were added after comments were received from the Citizens and Business Group. Each of the seven alternatives are shown in the downtown south study report. An open house was held on November 27, 2012 and was well attended. Comments from the public were taken are included within the Downtown South report appendix. On December 12 2012 the City Council discussed the Downtown South Study. At the time, the Technical Evaluation Panel was recommending option 9C. The City Council felt additional information was needed before a decision could be made on the alignment and directed that staff identify what information remained to be collected based upon Council comments and how such information should be assembled. At a work session in February, the staff reviewed the open questions with the City Council and recommended that given the ongoing work load of staff and the fact that Bolton & Menk has completed all aspects of the Downtown South Study to date, that we secure a quote from them to complete the study. Current Circumstances The City has also been reviewing the possibility of erecting an additional traffic signal at Franklin Trail and Highway 13. Developers have expressed interest in 2 locating at pharmacy in this location together with three additional retail uses for a total of 35,000 sq.ft. The development is contingent upon a new signalized intersection at TH13 and Franklin Trail. We have discussed this possibility with the county who may ultimately take over TH13 and who understand the data which must be amassed in order for MnDOT to consider whether the intersection should be allowed. Development representatives intend to be present at the meeting to respond to any questions that councilors may have. Whether or not this development occurs, this aspect of the study should be done to determine if this is the best roadway scenario to support future development in the downtown. If it is, then the road should be reflected in our comprehensive plan and contemplated in the Capital Improvement Program. As indicated above, adding this intersection would require the approval of MnDOT. MnDOT requires specific traffic projections before considering any such proposal. Therefore this work was added to the quote from Bolton and Menk. Considering the current signal spacing in the region, a new signal at Franklin Trail and Highway 13 may be appropriate. The City has asked for a quotation from Bolton & Menk for the completion of additional work to review option 6 from the study as directed by the City Council. The quote is broken down into the following four work tasks: 1. Access Manaqement Plan alona Highway 13 — The access management plan evaluates and determines access and a supporting roadway network vision for the corridor through the City of Prior Lake from CSAH 42 to CR 81. MNDOT requires this information to provide any approvals for an additional signal on Highway 13. This information will also be useful in guiding future access points along the corridor. 2. Subarea: Traffic Study of Hiqhway 13 and Duluth Avenue — As the City has undertaken the Downtown South Study; issues at the intersection of Highway 13 and Duluth Avenue were identified. The State is planning to reconstruct the signal at Highway 13 and Duluth in 2015. This task studies the configuration of the intersection including access and geometry of the roadway in anticipation of the 2015 project. 3. Subarea: Hiphwav 13 and Franklin Trail — This traffic impact study reviews the trip generation of the Arcadia connection to Franklin trail as well as the uses at the intersection to determine if or when a signal would be "warranted" in the future. 4. Downtown South Study Update - The Downtown South Study did not incorporate a signal at the intersection of Franklin Trail and Highway 13. The study update reviews two additional concept plans. This will provide a text amendment to the study report and will include meetings with the public, Citizen Business Group, Technical Evaluation Panel, and the City Council. The two options to be studied further include: 6B: Addition of a full access at Highway 13 and Franklin Trail 6C: Addition of a full access on Highway 13 and Franklin Trail and conversion of Duluth and Highway 13 to a 3 /4 access. ISSUES The study process and this amendment encourages considerable input and participation from downtown business owners, residents and technicians familiar with transportation matters. There is both support and opposition to the concepts under consideration. 3 Any alternative including the baseline option has direct impacts to the downtown area including both residents and business owners. Direct impacts include: • Safety and Mobility • Connectivity and Accessibility • Environmental • Economics • Compatibility with Existing Plans The process of studying our downtown began long ago, well before the 2005 Corridor Study. What we have not done is completed the study so the roadways are laid out, included in our Comprehensive Plan, and in our Capital Improvement Program. The following projects over the years demonstrate that the City has made considerable commitments to its downtown: • A downtown design plan was completed, adopted and has directed the development of downtown for two decades. • The City's comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance were amended to be consistent with the design plan and included the concept of transitional town center to communicate the city's intention to support the development of its downtown in the long term. • A Downtown Streetscaping project of $2.5 million was commissioned and accomplished to provide additional parking, make the downtown more amendable to pedestrians and encourage the public to visit and more extensively use the downtown area. • Twelve buildings were improved because of City funded farade improvement program which included three new private buildings (Speiker, Lakefront Plaza and Rock Creek). • The Arcadia/ County Road 21 road reconstruction project was completed at a cost of $2.1 million. • The Library Resource Center, City Hall and Police Station were built downtown as a commitment by the City that the downtown is and will continue to be the center of this community. • At least two phases of the downtown south study have been completed. However, the study is not quite complete because questions remain unanswered. The staff requested Traffic Safety Advisory Committee input on the next steps of the downtown study at their April 25 2013 meeting. While the committee had concerns over the additional cost of the study, they recommend that the final study steps be undertaken. The Highway 13 and Duluth Avenue intersection has issues due to the close proximity of access points on Duluth. Furthermore, direct residential driveways are located on Duluth between Highway 13 and Anna Trail. A signal and access directly from Highway 13/Franklin Trail and the Arcadia signal on County Road 21 would alleviate traffic on Duluth Avenue and provide a more direct supporting roadway network. As a new roadway, the City would control access points. The extension of Arcadia to TH13 including the additional signal has not been analyzed by MnDOT the approving authority, as MnDOT would require this study information. A three quarter access from TH13 northbound to Pleasant depends upon the results of the overall intersection analysis. The final 4 configuration of the Duluth and TH13 intersection is also not finalized. Once these decisions are made, then the key downtown transportation decisions will have been made for inclusion in our comprehensive plan and finally into our Capital Improvement Program for construction someday. Conclusion City Staff recommends the approval of the additional work quoted by Bolton & Menk for the completion of the Downtown South Study. The evaluation of Option 6 with a signal could change the recommendation of the Technical Evaluation Panel and provide the City Council with the answers it needs to make a decision. The goal is to provide a comprehensive study that can shape the future of the downtown. Without this information, it is will continue to be difficult for the City Council to make final decisions on the future of our Downtown. Whether current developers are interested or not, a decision on this roadway connection in our south downtown needs to be made so that the public and future investors can make decisions. FINANCIAL The amendment to the contract adds a total of $50,810 to the contract with IMPACT: Bolton & Menk. Funding for these additional services is proposed to come from General Fund Reserves. To date, the City has spent a total of $41,167.50 with Bolton & Menk for the South Downtown Study. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Approve a resolution amending the professional services contract with Bolton & Menk for the completion of the downtown south traffic study. 2) Deny this item and provide direction to City Staff. 3) Defer this item and provide direction to City Staff. RECOMMENDED Alternative No. 1 MOTION: 5 O � PRIp ti U � � 4646 Dakota Street SE `�tN�so'��' Priar Lake, MN 55372 RESOLUTION 13-xxx A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH BOLTON AND MENK FOR SOUTH DOWNTOWN TRAFFIC STUDY Motion By: Second By: WHEREAS, On April 2 �d , 2012 the City of Prior Lake entered into a professional services contract with Bolton & Menk for the completion of the downtown south traffic study; and, WHEREAS, As the downtown south traffic study has evolved, additional work is needed to deliver the study; and, WHEREAS, Bolton & Menk has provided a letter dated March 25�, 2013 detailing the added services which will be performed to deliver the south downtown traffic study. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA as follows: 1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein. 2. The professional services contract with Bolton & Menk for the south downtown traffic study is hereby amended to include additional services as discussed in the March 25�, 2013 letter from Bolton & Menk. 3. The amount of the professional services contract with Bolton & Menk for the south downtown traffic study is hereby increased by $50,810.00. 4. Funding for these engineering services will be funded by General Fund Reserves. The general fund budget #101-43050-303 will be amended for these additional services. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 25T" DAY OF MARCH 2O13. YES NO Hedber Hedber Keene Keene McGuire McGuire Morton Morton Souku Souku Frank Boyles, City Manager • BOt_TON � M�N K, INC. . Consulting Engineers & Surveyors �► 1222� t�odlet Avar�e •�xnsWle, l�i 53337 Ptior4e {�63) �90-0� • Fax (953) i�(�-�fl65 www.boNon�rdc.com March 25, 2013 Mr. Larry Poppler, P.E. City Engineer Prior Lake, MN RE: Downtown South Study Amendment Request Prior Lake, MN Project No.: T42.104814 Dear Mr. Poppler, The purpose of this letter is to detail additional scope of work items and request of additional fee to complete the following tasks associated with the Downtown South Study as requested by the City on March 1, 2013. The scope of work is based on recent discussions between MnDOT and the City of Prior Lake concerning access considerations and options on Highway 13 at Duluth Avenue and Highway 13 at Franklin Trail. MnDOT currently classifies Highway 13 as a Principal Arterial with one (1) mile primary intersection access spacing. Metropolitan Council identifies the highway as a Minor Arterial and does not specifically identify access spacing. Further discussions with the agencies indicate that the MnDOT classification has precedence as far as access spacing, whereas the Metropolitan Council classification is used primarily for funding. Since there is an apparent discrepancy, we propose a plan to identify the access spacing for the corridor. The Access Management Plan will identify the access and corridor management vision for the TH 13 corridor through the City of Prior Lake. The Plan will identify the primaty and secondary access locations and spacing. The Plan can be used as the official document for the access spacing on the corridor, as opposed to the functional classification category. This will assist in resolving discrepancies on the access vision and set up an access plan that can be used as the basis for access decisions, including at Hwy 13/Franklin Trail. In coordination with the Access Management Plan, two subarea traffic studies will be completed at Highway 13 at Duluth Avenue and Highway 13 at Franklin Trail. The subarea studies will identify how the intersections will function, be designed, and if signals can be justified based on existing and proposed future growth. The Downtown South Study will be updated with concepts based on the corridor vision and the subarea studies. The services include the following: • Access Management Plan along Hwy 13 • Subarea Traffic Study of Hwy 13 at Duluth Avenue • Subarea Traffic Study of Hwy 13 at Franklin Trail • Downtown South Study Report Update with up to Two Additional Concepts Downtown South Study, Prior Lake March 25, 2013 Page 2 The following work plan details the proposed additions to the Bolton & Menk scope of services and requested fee. TASK 1: HIGHWAY 13 ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN Objective: Develop an Access Management Plan to evaluate and determine an access and supporting roadway network vision far the corridor through the City of Prior Lake from CSAH 42 to CR 81. The Hwy 13 corridor will be analyzed to deternune the future vision for access along the corridor. The access spacing will incorporate the previous studies and designs on the corridor including the 150`'' Street/TH 13 Intersection Study and Hwy 13/Main Avenue/160"' Street Intersection Design. The access vision will take into account the access needs, existing signals, and supporting roadway network. The future access spacing along Hwy 13 will be considered in discussions between the City, Scott County and MnDOT and will also incorporate discussions with the City of Savage. The plan will incorporate the following subtasks. 1. Data Collection a. Existing Access Inventory — Identify the public and private access points along the corridor 2. Development of an access management strategy for the corridor. • Develop goals of the study • Identify and assemble the previous studies and established segment access visions • Identify access spacing guidelines for TH 13 3. Development of up to three access management scenarios including: a. Identification of primary and secondary access locations b. Identification of appropriate intersection types for each type of access c. This does not include concept layouts or capacity needs analysis. 4. Organization of and attendance of one (1) City of Savage Coordination Meeting 5. Organization of and attendance at three (3) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Meetings including agenda and minutes as necessary. TAC includes MnDOT, Scott County, Prior Lake, and Savage (if needed). 6. Organization of and attendance at two (2) Open Houses including presentation boards, PowerPoint presentation, newsletter and minutes 7. Attendance at two (2) City Council Work Sessions or Meetings including PowerPoint presentation 8. Access Management Plan • Detail the need of the plan • Identify current conditions • Discuss scenarios considered • Define next steps Proposed not-to-exceed cost for Task 1 is $17,750. Downtown South Study, Prior Lake March 25, 2013 Page 3 TA5K 2: SUBAREA TRAFFIC STUDY: HIGHWAY 13 AND DULUTH AVENUE Objective: Deternune the future configuration of the Hwy 13/Duluth Avenue intersection assuming a traffic signal is either maintained at the intersection or it is reconfigured as a 3 /a access As determined through the Downtown South Study, the future intersection and access configuration near Duluth Avenue has not been fully studied. There are multiple driveway and street accesses adjacent to the intersection that may have to be reconfigured to alleviate geometric issues and accommodate future traffic volumes. This work is proposed to include the following subtasks. 1. Data Collection a. 2-hour AM and PM turning movement counts at the five driveways on Duluth Avenue between Hwy 13 and Park Nicollet Avenue b. 2-hour AM and PM turning movement counts at Duluth Ave/Park Nicollet Ave and Duluth Ave/Anna Trail (just north of Hwy 13) c. 24-hour approach volumes at Hwy 13/Duluth Avenue 2. Development of up to three (3) intersection access concepts using available survey data 3. Traffic analysis of the concepts using Synchro and traffic simulation model 4. Traffic signal warrant analysis at Hwy 13/Duluth Avenue 5. Safety evaluation of the concepts 6. Study Report 7. Organization of and attendance at two (2) Open Houses with adjacent businesses including presentation boards, PowerPoint presentation, newsletter and minutes. Fee estimate assumes that this is concurrent with Hwy 13/Franklin Trail Open Houses. Proposed not-to-exceed cost for Task 2 is 8,895. TASK 3: SUBAREA TRAFFIC STUDY: HIGHWAY 13 AND FRANKLIN TRAIL Objective: Determine the future configuration of the Hwy 13/Franklin Trail intersection. This will include a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) evaluation for the Diggers Property to evaluate the impacts of the proposed development on the adjacent intersections. The analysis will build upon the information available from the Downtown South Study including the existing traffic volumes, 2030 traffic volumes, existing analysis and the 2030 analysis. This work is proposed to include the following subtasks. 1. Data Collection a. 2-hour AM and PM peak turning movement traffic counts at Duluth Avenue/Anna Trail and at Franklin Trail/Park Nicollet Avenue b. 2-hour AM and PM peak turning movement counts at Hwy 13/CR 12 and Hwy 13/CH 23 (Panama Ave/Five Hawks Ave). It is assumed that counts at Hwy 13/160"' are available from the Hwy 13/Main/160` reconstruction project. c. 24-hour approach volumes at Hwy 13/Franklin Trail 2. Trip generation and distribution of one (1) proposed development plan for the Diggers Property to the adjacent intersections for Concepts 6B and 6C 3. Development and analysis of existing Build traffic volumes at the adjacent intersections for Downtown South Study, Prior Lake March 25, 2013 Page 4 Concepts 6B and 6C without a connection to the north 4. Development and analysis of 2030 No-Build traffic volumes at the adjacent intersections for Concepts 6B and 6C without a connection to the north 5. Development and analysis of 2030 (Only Diggers Property) Build traffic volumes at the adjacent intersections for Concepts 6B and 6C without a connection to the north 6. Signalized Corridor Analysis from 160''' St SE to CR 12 using Traffic Simulation Software to understand if a signal could function acceptably within the current signalized corridor 7. Traffic signal warrant analysis at Hwy 13/Franklin Trail for Concepts 6B and 6C both with and without a connection to the north 8. Safety Analysis at the adjacent intersections 9. Update Access Concept as needed for Hwy 13 at Franklin Trail 10. Organization of and attendance at two (2) Open Houses with adjacent businesses including presentation boards, PowerPoint presentation, newsletter and minutes. Fee estimate assumes that this is concurrent with Hwy 13/Duluth Avenue Open Houses. 11. Study Report Proposed not-to-exceed cost for Task 3 is 9,505. TASK 4: DOWNTOWN SOUTH STUDY UPDATES Objective: Update the Downtown Study completed on December 10, 2012 with up to two additional concepts The results from Tasks 1 to 3 will influence the proposed alternative(s) for evaluation. This work assumes that Tasks 1 to 3 have been completed and the information will be disseminated into Task 4 as appropriate. Currently, the following two alternatives have been preliminarily identified for possible evaluation. 1. Concept 6B: Addition of a full access signalized intersection at Hwy 13/Franklin Trail 2. Concept 6C: Addition of a full access signalized intersection at Hwy 13/Franklin Trail and removal of the full access signalized intersection at Hwy 13/Duluth Ave and installation of a 3 /a Access at Hwy 13/Duluth Ave. The work anticipated to be needed to complete the updates for the two additional concepts include: 1. Update traffic volume forecasts and traffic distribution as needed 2. Evaluation of the expected Levels of Service at each intersection 3. Development of the concepts showing approximate geometry and lanes 4. Development of a cost estimate for each concept 5. Complete the Evaluation Matrices with each concept 6. Update Hwy 13 access spacing in the Study as developed under Task 1 7. Organization of and attendance at two (2) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Meetings including agenda and minutes as necessary. TAC consists of MnDOT, Scott County, and Prior Lake. 8. Organization of and attendance at one (1) Citizens and Business Group Meeting including agenda, minutes, and responses to questions and comments Downtown South Study, Priar Lake March 25, 2013 Page 5 9. Organization of and attendance at one (1) Open House including presentation boards, PowerPoint presentation, newsletter and minutes 10. Attendance at two (2) City Council Work Sessions or Meetings including PowerPoint presentation 11. Complete report addendum to include above elements, the recommended concept and implementation schedule if needed Proposed not-to-exceed cost for Task 4 is 14,660. The total requested cost to complete Tasks 1 to 4 described in this amendment is $50,810. We look forward to providing one or more of these professional engineering service tasks to you on this project, and appreciate your consideration of Bolton & Menk. Please contact me if you have further questions, need additional information, or wish to discuss this request for additional services. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK,INC. c Christopher S. Chromy, P.E., P.T.O.E. Transportation Services Manager r p � I � � '�, l�D U .. 1� �., � � lp l6 � . 00 , Oj � � �}I �I �I �I� � .. .. .-_ . . _ .— . __-,. I - O = n 1 � O � I �--� ��''' � � I � I � � I O H ..-_ ._-. .. _ .. ._ I .._I._ � i O N SIJIuei��uy�al � I N i� �o I o� � , , t�i� I, � ''. aaau �u 00 � � � _°° I o °° / Id M 3 , ^i �n o; �i;;eal i N � � , . __ � aaaui�u3 I I I I I o I� � �r r, ,� � ' � � u, � � ;�afoad rn r-i � ! I� �i C _ _ _ GJ .• o p , � aauue�d � i M 'I � N I Q � uoi�e�aodsueal I ^ I � � � � � ' 1 � I— v�lv' W.. _-- _- - � ' o O c Ja�8U2 O O � ;�afoad NI�'',-�1!,m Irnl,°lo H � � w _ _ , . _ I j � a��ey� °. ° O ui �edi�uiad °° i N ��., ,�r i��� I � . ,__ j � -- _- � � W � J T � I �I i � LJ,I , t � � � v � O � m i� I, � I '.. I a d �, "� '��, .0 F� +� �n 7 v � , � a c +� p� a � � +�-� I I - �a U E c - fII � .� � U Q � �'.. �Q '. Q'' C �, � I �. �I W�i I v� Y � - �^ F- � � Y � a � Q � � _�� � v I � � Y v�i 0 I �i � J I a�o a1 }, p� � � V '�, � I � ' � .. N � N � a I � I � �, , � o ++ m' m m � � 2 J � ° � � � O w Q � �I�I� O �ao' �� �� 3 3' 3 I ' � a oc F- �, � •• o p� w m � a __ e_n ti_n dn 'I � I � , � _ � Y _'_ = o I�',¢ v� a � - _ o � N J Z o O, O o , l 3 o a . � � N cri �t , c o • ~ l _ _�_ I _ � -- -- - � � _ 0 CU DETAILED COST ESTIMATE - Amendment �. �. :. . � � . � .. . � C . � .� ' i �, V .. ��.. � .. � � v u m ;° a `� u m � ai `m � n � m� � c v v m � c o c '� .E , i c� u Totals �� ° m °- m I�°u t � � ,, .. . . . .... u a� � a j n_ w I 1- c a L . � ��� a m . W . u TASK NO. WORK TASK DESCRIPTION , � I i t- _ i , � ,_ 1.1 Data Collection . I 1 2 6 ' 9 I - - __- . - - __ - . 1.2 Access Management Strategy , 1 1 4 1 2 9 1 3 Access Mana�ement Scenarios (up to 3 total�_ 1 1 I 4 1 6 6 19 - - ---- -- -' 14 City of Savage Coordinatio M eeti� (1) I 2 r 2� � 4 _ _ -- _ _ _- - - - - �1.5 Tec hnical Adv C Meetings (3) 6 12 12 , � 30 .___ _- _ - - - -- 1.6 O en Houses (2) -_ . ._ 2� 8 16 �- _ _ 42 p - - - - - g 22 i 1. 7 Cit Council Work Sessions or Co M s 2 2 4 12 4 j � g � 1 1.8 Acc M ana ement Plan ' 2 2 12 2 12 8 3 8 L -- SUBTOTAL Ht�41RS - TAS�C 1; _� 2S � 64 � 4 �_58 � 14 J_173_� � � 2.1 Data Collection • � 1 � 2 22 25 I __ _ _ _ __ - _- _- __ I - - 2.2 Access Concepts (up to 3 total) 1 2 ' 12 3 18 -_ - _ _ -- 'I 2.3 T A an d Simulation 1 10 1 1 _- _ _- _ --- --- --�___.. - _ r 2.4 Signal Warra A �� 1 � ! 2 � I 3 � - . _ .--- _- -- --- - -- - - - 2. 5 Sa Evaluation 1 4 _ 5 - - - _,' _ _- 2.6 Study Repart _ _ .- _ _ 1 � 1 � 1 _ _ 8 1_ 1 2 ~ 2J Open Houses (2): Concurrent wrth Hwy 13/Franklin O H. 1 6 6 10 23 i ,�� - - su�x ora�. Hou�s - �ask �- zS -� �'3 � a a �= z ^ �°� � � 3.1 Data Collecti 1 2 14 17 � 3.2 Trip Generation and Distnbution 1 t 2 3 - -- _- -- - __ _ _ _ _.. ..- � -- 3.3 2012 N an d B wld Analysis ' 1 ' __ 6 _ 7 _ --- - - . _ - _Y _- _- � 4 I 5 3.5 2030 Build Analysis 1 , � q � 5 J � 3A 2030 No-Build Anal sis 1 I __ _ 3.6 Signalized Corridor Analysis 2 16 ' �I 18 _ _ _ _ _- _ -- - - __- - - 3J Traffic Signal Warra A naly sis 1 4 5 � __ _ . _ _ _ --�- -= - 3.8 Safety Analysis 1 2 I 3 � _ - - - _ - - - - _- - 3 .9 A C Updates 1 � 4 1 5 '� 3.10 0 en Houses 2 . . �1 I 6 6 10 - ', 23 - - _ - - - _ - -- _ __ P_ � ) - � 3.11 Study R 1 f 1 I 1 8 __ 11 _ - -- -- I�_ � _-. SU$TOTAL HOURS - TASK 3 = ' � �.� �6 j�1-� 62 _[:14 , 103 _J � •. � . . . ... 4.1 2030 Traffic Volume Forecasts and Distribution � 1 I 4 5 .- _ __ -_ _ - _ -_ _ _ __ _ _ __ - _ I - _ _ _ � 4.2 Tra Analysis 1 8 9 - - -- _ ___ -- - ----- ---- _ -_ _ i _ _ 43 Concepts (up to 2) � 1 2 I 8 2 14 4.4 Cos Es 1 2 3 - __ -- -- - � . 4.5 Evaluation Matrices � 1 � 6 , 7 I - _ _ - __ __ --- -._ ---- _- �_ _ 4.6 H 13 Access Spa cing Up 1 1 - - . - -- -- - -- _ _ _ � 4.7 TAC Meetings (2) 6 ' 8 I 14 _ -- __ __ _ __ _ _ ._ _ _ - 4.8 CBG Meeting (1) . 10 10 � 6 r .--- f 26 � _ - _ _ � - - - - 4.9 Open House (1) 6 10 8 4 28 � _ _ _-- - 4.10 City Council Work Sessions or Council Meetings (2) -�� 8 12 _ 6 I � 28 __ - - - 2 4.11 Report Addendum i 1 1 1 6 9 � ' . . �.... �R`�� 'iRT+ �P"�#1J�k r'! � 'tA,4,5 y.,r.. . ...�R� �k��� :,�'. %`E, : � .. Downtown South Study City of Prior Lake, Minnesota Section 2- Page 2