Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4E - Street Lighting Policy CONSENT AGENDA: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: DATE: 4 (e) ROBERT BARTH, ENGINEERING INTERN CONSIDER APPROVAL OF STREET LIGHTING POLICY FEBRUARY 21, 1995 INTRODUCTION: This item has been placed on the Council agenda so that Council can consider approval of a residential street lighting policy. On December 5, 1994 staff presented Council with the results of its research into street lighting issues as well as a draft street lighting policy. Staff intended that Council provide direction on this matter so that further work might better reflect the desires of Council. The Prior Lake City Council Minutes for December 5, 1994 (item 7B under old business) summarize Council input: Robert Barth, Engineering Intern, identified nine issues regarding the City's residential street lighting policy, and presented an overhead indicating the areas within the City that are well lit and areas in which no street lighting exists. Discussion occurred regarding the type of policy or ordinance the City should consider. Council concurred that a revised street lighting policy should be developed consistent with City code. The policy would provide a means through which existing and new developments can obtain street lighting if they agree to pay for the initial capital and installation costs and the number, location, and type meet the City's criteria. The City would assume responsibility for ongoing operation and maintenance costs. Council directed staff to look at City-wide coordination with schools, busses and pick-up spots. Council concurred that the laying of underground power lines and mountings for lights during road construction would save money in the future when lighting of the area is required. Attached is a copy of the residential street lighting policy recommended for approval this evening. BACKGROUND: Council directives 94-82 and 94-05 directed the engineering staff to research and draft new guidelines with respect to residential street lighting. The City Subdivision Ordinance provides that: "6-7-5: STREET LIGHTING: Street lighting shall be provided to conform with standards adopted by council." Our existing policy allows for street lighting at major intersections only. The City does not provide lighting between intersections unless a clear 16200 Eagle Creek Ave., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER T ,. DISCUSSION: ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDATION: ACTION REQUIRED: BBAGE2.WRT -.-,. ,.... traffic hazard exists. The current policy does not address new developments; where, generally, developers wish to provide more comprehensive lighting plans - plans that provide street lights for intersections, between intersections, and at the ends of cul-de-sacs. Current policy does provide that the City pay all ongoing energy and maintenance costs for its street lights. At present developers do not pay the complete capital cost of the street lights installed in their developments. They usually enter a lease agreement with the utility, and the City assumes the monthly payment once the utility energizes the lights. Lease agreements require less initial capital, but entail monthly payments two to three times above what would be paid under an operation and maintenance agreement. Staff left the Council meeting of December 5, 1994 with the impression that Council was satisfied with the draft street lighting policy. Consequently, staff altered the draft only slightly. In the course of discussion, Council made several recommendations. Council recommended that developers pay the complete capital cost of the street lights in their developments as well as operation and maintenance through the warranty period. Council recommended that the City accept no non-standard lighting systems. Council recommended that, in existing subdivisions, the full capital cost of a new street light be the responsibility of the benefitting residents. Lastly, Council recommended that ongoing operation and maintenance costs be the responsibility of the City except, as noted above, for new developments under warranty. City Manager Boyles does not believe this is a financially prudent position for the City to take, but recognizes that this has been the City's position to date. In regards to lighting collectors, state aid roads and county roads, Council accepted that this should be tackled on a project by project basis. The alternatives are as follows: 1) Adopt the new residential street lighting policy. 2) Table this item with specific direction. 3) Deny. Recommendation is for Alternative No.1. The Engineering Department proposes that the residential street lighting policy be incorporated into the Engineering Guidelines Manual. Approval by Council would satisfy the subdivision code which references standards adopted by Council. Staff recommends that Council approve the residential street lighting policy. motion to adopt the policy entitled Lighting Policy." T ,. RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING POLICY 1-\'Z.\\~S BACKGROUND: The City intends that this street lighting policy promote the safe travel of city streets in a manner both fair and affordable to the City and its residents. Residential street lighting promotes pedestrian and traffic safety to the extent that the City shall approve street lighting where warranted by such concerns. Lighting requests shall come either by recommendation of the City Engineer or by resident petition. The capital costs of residential street lighting shall be the responsibility of those residents, or any portion of those residents, determined to be affected by the light. NEW SUBDIVISIONS: All lighting plans require approval by the City and the utility responsible for street light operation and maintenance. In new subdivisions street lights shall be placed at intersections, every 300 feet between intersections where intersections are more than 600 feet apart, and at the ends of cul-de-sacs where the distance from said end to the intersection of the cul-de-sac with the street is greater than 300 feet. Within their developments, developers shall also install lights to City standards at the intersections of residential streets with collector streets. The developer shall pay the full capital cost of every light to be installed; this includes poles, fixtures, underground wiring, and all appurtenant work. The developer shall pay operation and maintenance for the light system until the City accepts the project, at which time the billing shall be transferred to the City. 100 or 150 watt high pressure sodium lights in traditional or cobra-head style (as approved by the City and the utility) shall be the standard for new subdivisions. Where a portion of the development is already lit, new lights shall match in style and wattage those already in place. In cases where developers wish to install more lights than warranted by city policy, or wish to install non-standard lights, monthly operation and maintenance becomes the responsibility of the development's residents through their homeowner's association or similar organization. The City will not take over such non-standard systems, though City approval shall still be required. EXISTING SUBDIVISIONS: Where traffic safety clearly warrants, a street light may be placed upon the recommendation of the City Engineer's office. The basis of such warrants shall be a minimum Average Daily Traffic of 2000 vehicles or a layout such that, in the City Engineer's estimation, significant improvement in safety might be obtained by the placement of a street light. Since the benefit of such installations extends to the City as a whole, these will be done at City expense. When residents request additional lighting for their neighborhoods, they must do so by petition - signed by 60% of the neighbors affected by the proposed light. The affected area shall be 100 linear feet on either side of the proposed light, on both sides of the street. The placement of the proposed light shall be specified in the petition. Petitioners shall approach the City prior to circulating their petition to obtain direction as to where street lights are warranted for their neighborhoods. Lights shall be approved only as they meet the following warrants for existing subdivisions: intersections, between intersections at intervals of 300 feet where the distance between intersections is greater than 600 feet, and at the ends of cul-de-sacs where the distance from said end to the intersection of the cul-de-sac with the street is greater than 300 feet. If approved, each street light shall be purchased by the affected residents. Payment shall be made prior to the installation of the light and shall include the cost of poles, fixtures, underground wiring, and all appurtenant work. The method of payment shall be as directed by the City Finance Department. The City shall assume operation and maintenance costs for a light from the time it is energized by the utility. In existing developments new lights shall match in style and wattage those already in place. If no lights be currently in place, then 100 or 150 watt high pressure sodium lights in cobra-head or traditional style shall be the standard. BBSL.ARCH Update: 2/07/95 . - '"f.'.._....,.__...,~.._.'__m.'_~.~"-.. _. ~'_-y-_ . _,--'H