HomeMy WebLinkAbout4I - 1994 Variance Report
AGENDA #:
PREPARED BY:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
BACKGROUND:
DISCUSSION:
ALTERNATIVES:
STAFF AGENDA REPORT
4 (L)
DONALD RYE, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
1994 VARIANCE SUMMARY REPORT
FEBRUARY 21, 1995
Section 2-3-4 (H) of the City Code requires that a Summary Report be
submitted to the City Council by the Planning Commission concerning all
variances to applicants during the previous year.
Attached is a copy of the 1994 Variance Summary Report. The report
follows the format of previous reports and provides a clear picture of the
types of variance considered by the Commission.
The report notes the preponderance of side yard setback variances on
substandard lots of record and suggests that an ordinance amendment to
deal with this could be considered.
On Monday, February 13, 1995, the Planning Commission approved the
report and it is herewith transmitted to the Council.
The Council has the following alternatives:
1. Refer the report back to staff and Planning Commission for
additional specified information.
2. Accept report for filing.
RECOMMENDATION: The recommendation is to approve Alternative 2.
ACTION REQUIRED:
'VA94SR"
-1-
16200 Eagle Creek Ave., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTIlNITY EMPLOYER
'f""
T
,.
VA9o\RP
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council Members,
Planning Commissioners,
City Manager, Frank Boyles,
City Planner, Don Rye
Assistant City Planner, Deb Garross
Gina Mitchell, Associate Planner
February 13, 1995
1994 Variance Summary: Section 2-3-4 (H)
TO:
Section 2-3-4 (H) of the City Code requires that a summary report be submitted to the City
Council which discusses all variances granted the previous year. The summary provides
statistical information on the types of variances granted, as well as trends that have
become evident during the year. This Variance Summary is the fifth analysis of variances
granted during a year's time. Please see the attached Figures 1-A, 1-B, and 2, and
Appendices A-D for comparison.
The 1994 Budget anticipated 40 variance applications for the year. The fee level in effect
was $75. This would have provided $3,000 to the City. In actuality, there were 39 variance
applications submitted in 1994. Of these, 34 were approved, three applications were
withdrawn (two were refunded their application fee), and two applications were denied.
These applications provided a total of $2,775.00 to the City.
APPLICATIONS WHICH WERE DENIED:
There was one variance application denied by the Planning Commission in 1994. There
were several applications with multiple variances requested. On occasion, only parts of the
variance requests were approved. Often the requested variances were inconsistent with the
four hardship standards or past precedent. In many situations, the Planning Commission
granted lesser variances then what was requested.
Portions of two variance requests were denied by the Planning Commission and appealed to
the City Council, one of which was approved. The City Council denied one of the two
variance applications that went directly to them by means of an administrative land
division. .
APPLICATION DENIED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
The variance that was denied by the Planning Commission was a request for a 2.77' side
yard variance from the 10' side yard setback requirement. A single family home was built
within Prior Lake in 1974, on a lot over 1 acre in size. The variance request was to allow
reconstruction of an existing deck. This request was denied because there was no record of
a building permit being issued for the existing deck, and approval of such variance would
have legitimized a situation that was done illegally.
16200 Eagle Creek Ave., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
, -
T
, ,.
/
APPUCATION DENIED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION & APPEALED TO
THE CITY COUNCIL:
An application for a 15' lakeshore and a 9' side yard variance was requested for the
reconstruction of an existing deck and walkway for a property developed within Eagle
Creek Township. The Planning Commission approved the lake shore variance as requested,
denied the 9' side yard variance, and approved a 5' side yard variance. The rationale for not
approving the 9' variance was that there were other options for accessing the home which
would not require a 9' side yard variance. The City Council approved this application as
requested based upon findings and facts including the relocation of the entry of the home
would change the design of the home and create an undue hardship for the applicant, and
the four hardship standards had been met.
The Planning Commission partially denied a variance request for an applicant who was
seeking a 5' south and a 3' north side yard variance. The Planning Commission denied the
3' north side yard variance because it was inconsistent with an established policy of
granting up to one 5' side yard variance for substandard lots of record. This request was
appealed to the City Council, and the decision of the Planning Commission was upheld.
APPLICATIONS REVIEWED BY THE CITY COUNCIL :
An administrative land division and variance application was submitted for a property
located on the Grainwood peninsula. The applicants were requesting 6 variances including:
lot width at the 904 contour of Prior Lake and the front setbacks, as well as 5' side yard
variances for each proposed lot. The City Council denied the administrative land division
and variance requests based the fact that the applicants had reasonable use of their
property in a similar manner as other lots in the area, and the division was not consistent
with the intent of the Shoreland Management District.
The City Council approved the requests for an administrative land division and 5 variances
(3 lot width and 2 lot area) for a property located in a R-2 Shoreland District Zone. A patio
and privacy fence encroached over the common property line, and a lot line adjustment was
necessary to provide clear title to the properties.
APPROVED APPLICATIONS:
Although there were 34 applications approved, the result was 103 approved variances. On
the average, 3 variances were approved per application. The majority of the approved
applications contained side yard variances (27), lakeshore variances (18), front yard
variances (14), minimum lot size variances (10), and impervious surface variances (10).
There were 7 variances granted for minimum lot width and 4 variances for cul-de-sac
length. There were 2 variances granted for: state highway right-of-way setback, lot
coverage, the platting of streets without temporary turn arounds (Knob Hill), and minimum
separation between dwellings and farm buildings. One variance has also been granted for
each of the following: rear yard setback, required number of parking stalls, additional
building permit beyond the four per quarter-quarter section, boat ramp width, and size of
an accessory structure in the R-1 Zone. (See Figure 1-A, 1-B, and Appendix E for
comparisons).
Figure 2 represents the variance applications approved for improvements to properties.
There were 15 variances for new single family home constructions, (6) new townhome
constructions, (5) home additions, (5) decks, and (2) new garages. There was also one
variance granted for the construction of a new business, parking lot, pole barn, and a
pavilion.
The rationale cited as the basis for variance approval included "not detrimental to the
health, safety, and welfare of the community," "platted under a previous government unit,"
"precedent in the area," hardship of the ordinance," "substandard lot size," ''hardship of the
, ,.
site," "no increase in a legal non-conforming setback," "consistent with the character of the
area," and "findings and facts."
Of the 34 approved variances, 12 had conditions of approval attached to them. Five of
these conditional variances required that gutters be installed or the roof line designed to
control drainage. Five were conditional upon any significant trees lost be replaced. Two
dealt with the removal of existing buildings. Five of the variances had a combination of two
to six conditions attached to their approval. Many of these conditions applied specifically to
the site in question, and few generalities of requirements were listed as conditions.
An important part of this summary is to evaluate the zoning of properties that applied for
variances in 1994. The majority of the approved variances were in the R-1SD district
(70). Other zones included: R-1 (12), R-2SD (8), PUD (8), A-I (2), and R-2, B-2, and I-lone
each.
Seventy-nine (79) of the 103 variances approved, or 77% were for properties located within
the Shore1and Districts of our community. Of these 78 variances granted in the Shoreland
District many were to properties that were substandard in lot width and/or area. This is
evident by the fact that all of the approved lot width, lot area, lot coverage, and impervious
surface coverage variances were granted to properties located within the Shoreland
District. Almost all of the front and side yard variances approved were for properties
located in the Shoreland District. It should also be noted that the Shoreland District
encompasses approximately one-third (1/3) of all the single family lots in the community, a
majority of which were subdivided under township jurisdiction and annexed into the
community.
Another explanation for the number of variances within the Shoreland District is the
scale of the improvements on these smalllakeshore lots. This represents a trend in
Prior Lake towards larger homes, especially on lakeshore parcels. In many cases,
applicants were proposing to demolish a small cabin to build a new single-family dwelling.
This trend has led to an increase in variance applications. In order to allow for residential
development or improvements on these substandard lots (which were subdivided with cabin
use in mind) variances to the Zoning Ordinance will be necessary to accommodate single
family homes of today's standards, and will be likely to continue.
Side yard setbacks on substandard lots of record should be monitored in future variance
summaries. In the past five years there have been 56 side yard setback variances granted.
The Planning Commission has generally granted up to one 5' side yard variance for
substandard lots of record. An amendment to the Zoning Ordinance is the optimum
practice when it appears that variances from the standard will be a common place. The
Planning Commission may want to consider such an amendment in the future.
~~-....,.---~~-~_._~.,.__...".'" '
, . ,.
VARIANCES GRANTED IN 1994
FRONT YAAO SETBACK
REAR Y ARC SETBACK
LAKESHORE SEl'BACK
SIDE YARD SETBACK
STATE HIGHWAY SEl'BACK
MINIMUM LOT SIZE
LOT WIDTH
LOT COVERAGE
Note: More tnan one variance may have been
Figure 1-A
8
4
11
15
14
9
8
'::::::::::::::::::::::::::.-. 5
18
12
:::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:,:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:,:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.: 10
o
o
::::::::::::;:::::. 4
2
5
..., 5
5
:::::::::::::.1 3
'2
7
8
25
27
~ 1990
1991
I ~ 1992
t.....J 1993
.1994
o
I
5
10
15
NUMBER PER YEAR
. Miscellaneous includes: installation of 5treets wilt10ut tempora/Y tum
arcunds; additional dWelling unit per 1/4. 1/4 sectlon; reduction in tne number
of par1<tng stBIls; boat ramp widtn; size of an accessory building in R-l Zone
20
25
30
I
I
VARIANCES GRANTED IN 1994
Figure 1-8
o
o
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 0
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:,.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: 4
10
SUBDIVISION ORD.
4
CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH
SIGN ORD. 83-05 2
o
o
o
o
MISCELLANEOUS
~; 1990
. 1991
~. 19921
11= I
(<.:.:':.:.:':':.! 1993 I
f:;;;;;;:;::::::;;:::; i
i: 19941
DWEWNG/FARM SEPARATION
ADD'L SFD IN RURAL AREA
o
2 4 6 8 10
NUMBER PER YEAR
12
Note: More than one variance may have been
* Miscellaneous includes: installation of streets without temporary turn
arounds; additional dwelling unit per 1/4, 1/4 section; reduction in number of
parking stalls; boat ramp width; size of accessory building in R-1 Zone
t/)'
wi
-
t-
o:
W ~i
Q.O)
00)
o:~
C. ZI
0-\
1-0
w~
o z:
<t <tl
:Ea:C\J
cn"~
I- t/)I ~
Z W ._
WOu.
:EZ:
W <tl
> -I
o 0:1
0: <tj
Q. >1
:E :Ei
-0
LLo:
Ou..
t/)
WI
c..1
~I
en
w
:E
o
J:
~
:E
<C:-
u.LO
-
W-
....J
(!J
Z
en
~
w
z
\
l
en
w
<!:J
<:
0:_
<:~
<!:J
~
w
z
en
::>
o
w
z
::iff
....J
w
()
en
~
~
,/
en
w
~
o
I
z_
~~
o
I-
~
Z
~en
en
w
z
en~
::::>-
CO
~
W
Z
--------,------- ----,-- T
en
~-
U!:e.
w
o
J
/
,/
en
z
o
I-
B-
O!:e.
<:
w
~
o
J:
~
)
c:
o
>
[
~
c:
ta
C
...
ta
,Q
~
(5
0-
-
.2
0)
c:
32
...
ta
0-
W
W
o
3
u
z
en
::::>
o
w
z
:5
-I
W
U
en
~
-II
I ---.---..,_.."" '----'
APPENDIX A
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
VARIANCES GRANTED IN 1990
TYPES OF VARIANCES:
1) Lakeshore Variances: 14
Ranqe: 15' to 50'
Mean: 28.5'
Mode: 25'
2) Side Yard Variances: 12
Ranqe: 2' to 5.8'
. Mean: 4 . 4 I
Mode: 5'
3) Front Yard Variances: 8
5 in Subdivisions
Ranqe: 5' to 12'
. Mean: 6 . 4 '
Mode: 5'
1 from Hiqhwar Riqht ot Way
2 from Center ine
4) Minimum Lot Size: 5 (31,160' sq. was an acreaqe variance)
Ranqe: 120' sq. to 5,000' sq. (or to 31,160' sq.)
Mean: 2,417.55' sq. (without 31,160' sq.)
5) Lot Width: 3
25' @ 904
50' @ Front
Tract < 90'
6) Rear Yard Variances: 2
5'
14 '
7) Lot Cover Variances:
6%
10%
2
8)
Subdivision Ordinance
6-6-4 (A): 1
(Waiving frontaqe)
9) Section 4.1N4: 1
(Homes within 50')
10)
Additional Home on a
40 Acre Site: 1
MEAN: Averaqe
MOCE: Value Occurring Most Frequently
APPENDIX B
CI~Y OF PRIOR LAKE
VARIANCES GRANTED IN 1991
~YPES OF VARIANCES:
1) Lakeshore Variances:
Range: 15' to 55'
Mean: 3a.~'
Mode: 44'
9
2) Side Yard Variances:
Range: 2' to 6'
Mean: 3 . 6 '
Mode: 2 . 5 '
7
3) Front Yard Variances: 4
3 in Subdivisions
Range: 6.5' to 30'
Mean: 16.75'
1 from County Rd. Right of Way
4) Minimum Lot Size: 5
Range: 1927' sq. to 3,702' sq.
Mean: 2,754' sq.
5) Lot Width: 2
15' @ Front
6) Lot Cover Variances: 3
Range: 4% to 9%
Mean: 6%
7) Subdivision Ordinance
6-6-2 (E): 1
(Lengthening CUl-de-sac)
MEAN: Average
MODE: Value Occurring Most Frequently
r .
--.-- .
APPENDIX C
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
VARIANCES GRANTED IN 1992
TYPES OF VARIANCES:
1) Lakeshore Variances: 8
Ranqe: 14' to 137'
Mean: 43'
2) Side Yard Variances: 26
Ranqe: 0.5' to 40'
Mean: 4.91'
Mode: 5 . 0 '
3) Front Yard Variance: 11
8 in Subdivisions
1 from Highway Right-of-Way
2 from Center Line
Ranqe: 0.1' to 76.5'
Mean: 14 . 3 '
Mode: 5 . 0 '
4) Minimum Lot Size: 5
Range: 55 sq. ft. to 32,610 sq. ft.
Mean: 8,704.2 sq. ft.
5) Lot Width: 7 6) Lot Cover Variances: 6
Range: 0.58' to 67' Range: 4% to 11%
Mean: 24.1' Mean: 8%
7) Subdivision Ordinance: 2 8) Ordinance 83-05: 2
section 6-6-2 (B) : 1 (Sign Ord. Variance)
section 6-6-2 (I) : 1
9) Additional Density in Rural Service area: 2
MEAN: Average
MODE: Value Occurring Most Frequently
CITY OF PRIOR LAKE
TYPES OF VARIANCES GRANTED IN 1994
Appendix D
1.) Front Yard Setback: 14
Range: 3.45' to 36.5'
Mean: 8.64'
Mode: 5'
3.) Lakeshore Setback: 18
Range: 9' to 75'
Mean: 30.73'
Mode: 25'
5.) State Highway Setback: 2
Range: 11' to 30'
Mean: 20.5'
6.) Minimum Lot Size: 10
Range: 278 sq. ft. to 7,600 sq. ft.
Mean: 2,019 sq. ft.
7.) Lot Width: 6
Range: 3.2' to 40'
Mean: 18.56
8.) Lot Coverage: 2
Range: 1% to 1.2%
Mean: 1.1%
9.) Impervious Surface: 10
Range: 0.4% to 7.4%
Mean: 3.18%
Mode: 1%
10.) Cul-de-sac length: 4
Range: 100' to 1,520'
Mean: 545'
2.) Rear Yard Setback: 1
Mode: 4.5'
4.)
Side Yard Setback:
Range:
Mean:
Mode:
27
0.1' to 70'
8.46'
2_'
.n
Miscellaneous: 8
. Installation of streets without temporary turn arounds (2)
. Separation between dwelling units and farm buildings (2)
. Additional dwelling unit beyond the 4 units per quarter-quarter section (1)
. Reduction in the number of required parking stalls (1)
. Boat ramp width (1)
. Size of an accessory structure in the R-1 Zone (1)
MEAN:
MODE:
average
value occurring most frequently
1 ". '
, ",---,--,,--_. T
I
" -,-----'~'