Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8A Wetland Consv Act AGENDA #: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: DATE: INTRODUCTION: BACKGROUND: DISCUSSION: STAFF AGENDA REPORT 8A JOEL RUTHERFORD, WATER RESOURCES COORDINATOR CONSIDER RESOLUTION 94-01, ADOPTING THE PERMANENT RULES FOR ADMINISTERING THE WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT JANUARY 18, 1994 The purpose of this Agenda item is to consider adopting the "permanent rules", which are to be used to administer the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991. The City has been administering the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) using the "interim rules". These rules were developed by the Minnesota Board of Soil and Water Resources to allow Local Government Units (LGU) the ability to administer the WCA during the interim, while the permanent rules were being developed. The "permanent rules" are complete, and all LGU's must decide whether to adopt these rules, or choose to have someone else administer the WCA. To administer the Wetland Conservation Act, the Minnesota Board of Water and Resources was directed to develop rules. While the "permanent rules" were being developed, LGU's, including the City of Prior Lake, were using the "interim rules". The latest date for which LGU's could use the interim rules was December 31, 1993. For LGU's deciding not to adopt the "permanent rules", a moratorium goes into effect which restricts any and all wetland filling and draining. The moratorium can be ended upon an agreement by the LGU that it will administer the WCA, using the permanent rules. -1- 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER l r The "permanent rules" are similar in many ways to the "interim rules". However, there are amendments that will require changes in how the WCA will be administered. Some of the more significant changes are as follows: (1) Wetland replacement is now a minimum of 2:1, versus 1:1 under the "interim rules." (2) "Banking" procedures are more complex. Individuals and LGU's who wish to restore, and in certain cases create wetlands, will be required to follow the procedures established by the rules. These procedures require a deed covenant be recorded which states the wetland was restored or created for mitigation banking purposes. Standards have been developed which determine the "values" of the replacements. These "values" are then used when "withdrawals" are made from the bank. The bank has been established and administered by the Board of Soil and Water Resources. Individuals, agencies, or other groups who wish to "deposit" into the wetland bank may find the procedures too cumbersome to invest the time and resources required. Many of these procedures were developed to protect any wetlands restored or created from future filling and draining. (3) Notices must now be published in the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) Monitor, as well as the local newspaper, when replacement plan applications have been submitted. The rules allow LGU's to publish a "General Notice", once a year, which applies to all "small wetland impacts" (see attached form). This notice will limit the individual notices requiring publication in the EQB Monitor, to only those with larger impacts. If Resolution 94-01 is adopted, staff will publish this "General Notice". It is estimated that the administering of the "permanent rules" will require a significant amount of staff time. There is money available from the state to help pay for this administration. Staff is working with the agencies involved, to collect these funds. The total dollar amount available is not intended to cover all the costs, but it may cover as much as 50%. It has been suggested that more money will be available for next year. -2- - .,.. .', ......-...-_._~.,......~-_.~_.........~.._............-_".,.,.."_'.'_M____~'"W~... The law was intended to restrict filling and draining of wetlands, achieveing "no net loss", replacing lost wetlands, and protecting existing wetlands. The rules written for the Wetland Conservation Act will cause developers to fill and drain only when absolutely necessary. When wetlands cannot be avoided, costs to fill (or drain), and replace will be higher than what they were in the past. The City has few options. If the Council elects to not adopt these rules, a moratorium goes into place which prohibits all draining and filling. The City may have the option of entering into a cooperative agreement with the county, or the City could hire a consultant to administer these rules. Staff feels the City should administer these rules, using existing staff. Existing City Codes have already been amended which require individuals to comply with the Wetland Conservation Act. ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives are as follows: 1. Adopt Resolution 94-01. 2. Do not adopt Resolution 94-01. 3. Table this item for additional information. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend the City adopt resolution 94-01. ACTION REQUIRED: A motion to adopt resolution 94-01. JRAG7A.WRT -3- T "__. ."~""_._-. RESOLUTION 94-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE FOR ADOPTING THE PERMANENT RULES OF THE WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: WHEREAS, the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 (WCA) requires local government units (LGUs) implement this law by adopting the rules and regulations promulgated by the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) pertaining to wetland draining and filling; and WHEREAS, the BWSR is requesting LGUs adopting the penn anent rules of the WCA notify them of the LGU decision regarding adoption; and WHEREAS, the LGU is responsible for making WCA detenninations for landowners; and WHEREAS, the City of Prior Lake previously assumed responsibilities of the LGU for wetland alterations within the City of Prior Lake under the interim rules. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA, that it hereby accepts the responsibility as the LGU for the WCA within the legal boundaries of Prior Lake as of January 19, 1994, within the guidelines as set forth by the WCA and rules. Passed and adopted this 18 th day of January, 1994. Yes No Andren Greenfield Kedrowski Schenck Scott Andren Greenfield Kedrowski Schenck Scott Frank Boyles City Manager City of Prior Lake { Seal } WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT EQB MONITOR GENERAL NOTICE FOR SMALL WETLAND IMPACTS Local Government Unit Date LGU Official Area Code, Telephone Address ( Street, Box Number, Etc.) City State Zip Code The (Name of LGU) during the year (year) hereby provides notice that it will not be publishing individual notice for small wetland impacts in the Environmental Quality Board Monitor. Small wetland impacts include all projects which will fill less than one-tenth acre of wetland; and all those which will fill less than one-quarter acre of wetland, and result from a private road fill or the construction or expansion of a single family dwelling unit or a farm building when the project cannot be modified so as to avoid the fill. Persons interested in receIvmg' mailed notice of each project within the jurisdiction of the above mentioned LGU can be put on a mailing list by contacting the LGU at the address listed above. Authorized LGU Official Date send to: EQB Monitor Room 300, Centennial Office Bldg. 658 Cedar Street Sl Paul, MN 55155 phone: (612) 296-8253 FAX: (612) 296-3698 (publication dales art every other Monday with one week lead time) a:cqbsmnot.for (BwsR/JJ lO/'2JJ/93) -,..--~_._'---'-_..._-_.__.,-~-,~......._._--~--_.,._...'._._-"--"-._-'-_~__N"~_',__"~_~_,~,,,__u