Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7A - MSA EngineersAGENDA NUMBER: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: DATE: 7A LARRY ANDERSON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 94-52, AWARDING BID FOR PROJECT 93-02 (CARRIAGE HILLS PARKWAY STREET IMPROVEMENTS) AND AUTHORIZE MSA CONSULTING ENGINEERS TO PERFORM CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING SERVICES AUGUST 15, 1994 INTRODUCTION: BACKGROUND: DISCUSSION: The purpose of this Agenda item is to accept or reject the bids received and to enter into a contract for the construction of Project 93-02. Resolution 94-52 has been prepared for Council action on the award of bid. Also this Agenda item is for Council to consider authorizing MSA Consulting Engineers to perform the construction engineering services on this project. On July 18, 1994, the City Council approved the Advertisement for Bids for the improvement of Carriage Hills Parkway. A bid opening will be held on August 15, 1994, and the results of the bid opening will be presented to the Council at the Ineeting with a recommendation for award. Resolution 94-52 will be presented at the meeting with the results of the bid opening included in the Resolution. The City has submitted the plans to the State Aid office for their approval to use Municipal State Aid Funds. Approval of the Award of Bids needs to be contingent upon approval of the plans by the State Aid office. The City is in the process of acquiring right of way for the project. On August 11, 1994, the City has a hearing to determine Public Need for the eminent domain proceedings. The Bid Award needs to be contingent upon the court determining Public Need for Project 93-02. The reason the City is proceeding with the bid at this time is to reduce the City's Municipal State Aid balance by September 1, 1994, so that the 1995 allocation will be higher by approximately $14,000.00. 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ALTERNATIVES: RECOMMENDATION: FINANCIAL IMPACT: ACTION REQUIRED: AG815B.ENG The vast majority of work will be done in 1995. The contractor will have the option of starting work in 1994 within the existing right of way which was platted with the Carriage Hills Plat. The contract documents prohibit work to be done in areas where the right of way has not been acquired. The eminent domain proceedings will provide the balance of the right of way to the contractor in mid November, 1994. The contract documents allow the City 90 days to award the contract in the event the contingencies are not met prior to the meeting. If the project bid is awarded, the construction engineering services need to be authorized by Council. The construction engineering work will be done on an hourly basis with a cost not to exceed $41,475.00 without further authorization. The construction engineering cost is approximately 8% of the estimated construction cost. The following is a list of the alternatives: Approve Resolution 94-52 awarding the contract for Project 93-02 to the lowest responsible bidder for the Base Bid amount. Approve a motion authorizing MSA Consulting Engineers to perform construction engineering services for Project 93-02. 2. Do not approve Resolution 94-52 for specific reasons. 3. Table this item for specific reasons. The recommendation will vary depending on bids received. Project 93-02 will be paid for by Municipal State Aid Funds and Ad Valorem Tax Levy, which was included in the 1994 bond issue. Make a motion to approve or deny Resolution 94-52. Make a motion to authorize MSA Consulting Engineers to perform construction engineering services on Project 93-02 at a cost not to exceed $41,475.00,.~ithout further authorization. RESOLUTION 94-52 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID FOR PROJECT NO. 93-02, (CARRIAGE HILLS PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS) MOTION BY: WHEREAS , SECONDED BY: pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the street construction improvement project on Carriage Hills Parkway by the consu'uction of grading, sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, aggregate base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing, sidewalk, landscaping, and appurtenant work; bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to the law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: CONTRACTORS BASE BID o AND WHEREAS, it appears that of is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA, that The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to enter into the attached conU'act with , of in the name of the City of Prior Lake for the street construction improvement project on Can'iage Hills Parkway by the construction of grading, sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, aggregate base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing, sidewalk, landscaping and appurtenant work; according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Managen 4629 Dakota St. S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372-1714 / Ph. (612) 447-4230 / Fax (612) 447-4245 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER o The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Award of the Bid to is contingent upon the plans and specifications for Project 93-02 being approved by the office of State Aid and Scott County Court determining public need for Carriage Hills Parkway. Passed and adopted this 15th day of August, 1994. Andren Greenfield Kedrowski Schenck Scott YES NO Andren Greenfield Kedrowski Schenck Scott Frank Boyles City Manager City of Prior Lake {Seal} PROPOSED CARRIAGE HILLS PARKWAY KNOB HILL LOW] AMEND~ NO. I TO _THE CITY_0F .P~IOR LAKE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THE WILDS ~OLF CLUB RESIDENTIAL pLAN UNIT DEVELOPMENT THIS AME,N-DMENT NO. 1 is made this day of , 1994, to that certain Development Agreement dated October 22, 1993, (the "Agreement"), by and between the City of Prior Lake, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and Prior Lake Development, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership ("Developer"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Deveicper and City entered the Agreement Uo develop certain property in the City; and W~{ERFF. AS, Developer has requested certain amendmen~ be made to the Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City at City Council meetings on August 1, 1994 and August 15, 1994, agreed to certain amendments to the Agreement as being in the best interests of both parties. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and guarantees contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Section 6.21 of the Agreement is hereby modified and replaced as follows: 6.21 Se~u~itY for Pa~ent and PerfQrmance- For the purpose of assuring and guaranteeing =o the City =hat the Developer Improvements to be constructed, installed and furnished by the Developer as set forth in the Agreement for the improvements in the plat of Sterling South and shall be constructed, installed and furnished according to the terms of this Agreement, and to ensure that the Developer shall pay all claims for work done and materials and supplies furnished for the performance of this Agreement, and for the improvements contemplated in the Developer's Agreement for the plat of Sterling South. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City with the Letter of Credit and the ~a~ent and Performance Bond as follows: (a) The Letter of Credit in the amount of $1,000,000 to secure the Agreement and the contemplated improvements set forth in the Developer's Agreement for Sterling South in the amount of $858,335, which amount represents 125% of the estimated cost of improvements for Sterling South. o (b) The Pa?~ent and Performance Bon~ in the amount cf $4,048,¢95 to secure the improvements contemplated by the Agreemen~ ~ogether with the improvements contemplated by the Developer's Agreement for Sterling South. The Developer Improvements estimated by the Developer's engineer and approved by the City Engineer for the Agreement are set out in the Developer and City Cost Summary attached as E~hibit C for the Wilds Phase I and Exhibit D for Sterling South. Upon final completion of the Developer Improvements satisfacto~f to the City Engineer as contemplated by the Agreement as well as those contemplated by the Developer's Agreement for Sterling South, the City Engineer shall accept the completed-Developer Improvements for both projects, in writing. The warranty Period (twelve [12] months) shall begin on the date of completion. During the Warranty Period, the Developer shall submit a warranty bond in the amount of $750,000 and a Letter of Credit in the amount of $421,667 to the City for any and all costs of maintaining or repairing the Developer Improvements contemplated by the Agreement and the Developer Improvements contemplated by the Sterling South Developer's Agreement, during the Warranty Period. Section 6.28 of the Agreement is hereby modified and replaced as follows: 6.28 Permanent Sani~.ry Sewer_.Syste~. The Developer shall commence construction of the permanent gravity off- site trunk sanitary sewer system on or before June 1, 1995. The construction shall be completed on or before August 1, 1995. The off-site trunk sanitary system shall extend from The wilds to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) interceptor running along County Road 21 and shall be constructed in accordance with the approved engineerin~ drawings. The Developer understands and agrees that there shall be no further extensions of the above completion date granted tc the Developer by the City. In addition, the - 2 - ! I' Developer acknowledges and agrees that in consideration of the City granting this extension of the completion date from October 1, 1994 to Au~dst 1, 1995, Developer waives any claims it might othe_~wise have had for reimbursement for the incremental costs of oversizing or for extra depth construction as defined in the Agreement or for any other costs associated with the construction of the permanent sanitary sewer system. The Developer is responsible for construction of the sanitary sewer line along County Road 82. The original plans called for this line to be a 15 inch DIP pipe. The Developer shall install either an i8 inch RCP or 18 inch DIP sanitary, sewer pipe. The class of pipe will be approved by the City based upon the structural strength of the pipe and the depth of bury. In the event an lS inch DIP is used, the pipe will be encased in plastic. The Developer will be responsible for temporary pumping of the sanitary sewer until the permanent sanitary sewer is completed. The parties agree that the City has reimbursed the Developer for the incremental costs of oversizin? or for the extra depth construction as defined in this Agreement. 3. Section 6.29 of the Agreement is hereby modified and replaced as follows: 6.29 .~r.~anent Water System. The Developer shall complete construction of the permanent water system (the Permanent Water System) includin? the water booster station, on or before November !, !994. The Permanent Water System shall include the off-site water main, the booster station, and the water distribution system depicted on and constructed in accordance wi~h ~he approved engineering drawings. The specifications and engineering drawings for the booster station shall be approved by the City and the Minnesota Department of Mealth prior to initiation of construction. The Developer shall bear all costs related to the construction of the Permanent Water System, including the booster station, and the first phase water distribution system, except the standby generator for the booster sta%ion which shall be trailer mounted and oversized as requested by ~he City. The City will reimburse the Developer in the amount of $30,000 for the expense of furnishing a portable, oversized standby generator. 4. Section 6.30 of the Agreement is hereby modified and replaced as follows: 6.30 The Agreement provided that the Developer was responsible for estimated additional construction costs of a water main of $42,000 for the construction of the water main along the south right-of-way of County Road 82. In - 3 - AUG-i$-/99m !1:52 ~ROM LOMMEN-NELSGN. MPLS. TO 944?4245 m.05 consideration of the DeveloPer looping the water main connection to Fremont Road, the City agrees to waive the additional $42,000 estimated additional cons~-~uction cost as originally required in paragraph 6.30 of the Agreement. 5. . Paragraphs tl and 14 of Exhibit I to %he Agreement are hereby amended to read as follows: 11. The Developer will be responsible to pay for improvements to County Road 83 when ~he roadway is widened to a four lane facility. The Developer's cost will be determined by pro-rating the cost of the improvements from wilds Trail, to and including the intersection of County Road 83/CSA}t 42, and the Developer shall pay {7/32) - 21.875% of the improvement cost. To secure the Developer financial obligations for these contemplated improvements, the Developer shall execute and deliver a Confession of Jud,c~nent substantially in the form of Exhibit K and shall comply with all of the financial covenants set forth on Exhibit L attached hereto and incorporated herein. 14. Except as modified by paragraph 11 above, the Letter of Credit shall remain in effect until the Warranty Period expires for the improvements to be constructed within the scope of the Agreement. 6. City and Developer agree that no financial aspect of the Agreement will be amended except as contained on this Amendment No. 1. 7. Except as amended, modified or changed by %his ~endment No. 1 to the Agreement, all other covenants, provisions and/or guarantees of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. DEVELOPER: PRIOR LAKE DEVELOPMENT, L.P. CITY OF PRIOR LAKE By: RRB, Inc., Its General Partner By Richard Burtness Its Its Mayor By Its City Manager - ¢ - m~JG-15-199~ 11:~6 FROM LOMMEN-NELSON, MPLS. TO 9~7~2~ P.02 EXHIBIT K STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF SCOTT FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT City of Prior Lake, a Minnesota municipal corporation, Claimant, vs. CON~ESSION OF JUDGMENT Prior Lake Development, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership, Respondent. The City of Prior Lake, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Prior Lake Development, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership (hereinafter referred to as "PLD"), execute this statement and Confession of Judgment pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, §~545.22 and 548.23, and as and for such purpose jointly and severally state, and agree as follows: 1. On October 21, 1993, PLD and City executed a development agreement whereby the Developer agreed to develop certain property in the City. Said Agreement was subse_c/uently amended by Amendment No. 1 entered into as of the day of August, 1994 (collectively the "Development Agreement"). As a condition for the City executing Amendment No. I to the Development Agreement, PLD agreed to enter into this summary Confession of Judgment to secure certain obligations of PLD under =he terms of the Developmen~ Agreement, in place of providing the City with a Letter of Credit and with a Payment and Performance Bcnd for certain future improvement obligations under the terms of the Development Agreement. 2. Paragraphs 11, 12 and 13 of Exhibit I of the Development Agreement requires that the Developer pay for improvements to County Road 83 when the roadway is widened to a four lane facility. PLD's cost for said improvements is based on a formula as follows: 7/32 (21.875%) of the cost for widening the roadway to a four lane facility from Wilds Trail to and including the intersection of County Road 83/CSHA 42. PLD Aid~--iS-199~ 12:~3 ~ROM LOMMEN-NELSON, MPLS. TO 9~?~2~5 P.02 covenants and agrees that i% will promptly remit its prorata share of the improvement costs of paragraphs 11, 12, and 13 of Exhibit I of the Development Agreement to the City upon receipt of a written demand for payment from the City or in the event PLD is in breach of the financial covenants contained in ~xhibit L of the Agreement and issue a written demand for payment. In the event PLD fails to pay the full amount of the demanded cost payment within five (5) days after said written demand, then PLD irrevocably authorizes and appoints any attorney designated by City of any court of record in the State of Minnesota to appear for it in any such court of record, waive on its behalf the issuance of service and process and hereby authorize said attorney to confess judgment against PLD, its successors and/'or assigns for the amount of Five Hundred Thousand ($500,000) Dollars. PLD further represents and agrees that said Five Hundred Thousand ($500,000) Dollar sum certain does not exceed the amount of the above contingent liability. Additionally, PLD agrees to bear the costs of any action brought to confess judgment together with reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by the City to enter said judgment. PLD shall finally be liable for interest at the legal rate on any judgment confessed pursuant to the terms contained herein. 3. PLD hereby consents to the immediate execution of any judgment confessed against it, waives any notice, waives any right to service of process, waives any right to interpose any defense or answer, and waives any stay of execution thereon. In addition, PLD waives and releases all errors which may intervene in such action and ratifies and confirms all that said attorney may do in connection with such action or by virtue thereof. The failure of City to enforce this Confession of Judgment in the event of any failure to pay shall not constitute a waiver of the right to do so at any subsequent time. Dated: , 1994. THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE Its Mayor By Its City Manager PRIOR LAKE DEVELOPMENT, L.P. Its - 2 - AUG-15-199~ 11:~? ~ROM LOMMEN-WELSON, MPLS. TO STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) COUNTY OF SCOTT ) ss: On this day of August, 1994, before me a Notary Public within and for said County and State, personally appeared Richard Burtness, to me known to be the President of RKB, Inc., a Minnesota corporation and general partner of Prior Lake Development, L.P., a Minnesota limited partnership, who being by me duly sworn, did state and verify that Prior Lake Development, L.P. is the limited partnership named in the foregoing instrument, that the facts and statements set forth in said instrument are true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, and he/she executed the same as his/her own ~ree act and deed. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DR~FTED Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, P.A. 1800 IDS Center (GRK) 80 South 8th Street Minneapolis, ~N 55402 (612) 339-8131 AUG-l~-!994 I~:55 FROM LOMMEN-NELSON,MPLS RS TO 9~74~4S P.10 EXHIBIT L Financial Covenants As long as Developer's obligations set forth in paragraph I1 of Exhibit i of the Development Agreement are not satisfied, the following obligations of the Company under th~_s Agreement sh~ll be absolute, unconditional, irrevocable, and shall be strictly adhered to in accordance 'with the following terms, conditions and obligations: 1. Transfer of A$$e~m. The Developer shall not, without the prior written consent of the City, transfer its interest in any of its assets having a fair market value in excess of Ten Thousand ($10,000) Dollars to any entity, corporate, partnership, individual or otherwise, for consideration of less than fair market value. 2. Compliance with Environmental LawS. The Developer shall comply with al! ecological, environmental, inland wetland, pollution control and other similar laws, codes, regulations, standards, and order applicable to the development which is the subject of the Agreement and keep said property free from all hazardous waste material and all other affluent or debris of any type which would constitute a health hazard or risk or would otherwise interfere with the current or intended use of the properties of the Developer. 3. Debt Service Covetable To Ratio. Allow the debt service coverage ratio to be less than 1.2 to !. Debt service coverage ratio means, as of any date, the ratio of consolidated net income for the Developer for the most recently completed four consecutive fiscal quarters plus (i) all deductions for taxes levied and respective income which are taken into account in computing net income for such period and (ii) fixed charges deducted in computing consolidated net income for such period to the total debt service payment obligations and expenses of the Developer incurred in its business. 4. C~ent. Ratlo. Allow the ratio of current assets of the Developer to current liabilities of the Developer to be less than 2 to 1. 5. Payment of all Dgv~loDer Obligations. The Developer shall pay when due and payable, after giving effect to any applicable grace period, the principal of or interest on any of its indebtedness, unless the Developer's obligation to pay, or the acceleration or required prepa.vment of, such indebtedness is being contested or any right of set-off is being asserted by the Developer in good faith by appropriate proceedings and adequate reserves in respect thereof have been established on the books of the Developer. T !': 1 AUG-!~-199~ 1S:56 ~ROM LO~MEN-NELSON.~PLS RS TO 9~2~ P. ll 6. Judcments/Pro~in~_s. The Developer shall not cause any judgment or order for pal~ment of money to be entered by any court where a warrant of attachment or execution or similar process be issued or levied against the Developer and such judgment, order, warrant, or process shall continue unsatisfied, undischarped or unstayed for thirty (30) consecutive calendar days. Developer shall not commence any voluntary case under the Federal Bankruptcy Laws nor shall it file a petition seeking to take advantage of any other laws, domestic or foreipn, relatin~ to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, a winding up or composition for adjustment of debts make a ~eneral assignment for the benefit of creditors or seek the appointment of a trustee, receiver, custodian, liquidator, or the like over the Developer or acquiesce to such an appointment. 7. Financial Statements and Information to be Furnished by Develop~. As soon as available and in any event within thirty (30) days after the last day of each month, balance sheets of the Developer at the end of such monthly period of the Developer for such period and for the elapsed portion of the fiscal year ended as with the last day of such period, all certified as correct by an officer of the company, shall be furnished to an agent of the City. In addition, as soon as available and in any event within ninety (90) days after the end of each fiscal year of the Developer, an audited statement of assets and liabilities of the Developer a5 the end of such fiscal year and the related statements of income and cash flow of the Developer for such fiscal year shall be ~urnished to an agent of the City. All such financial stasements delivered pursuant to these financial covenants shall be complete and correct and present fairly, in accordance with ~enerally accepted accounting principles, except for chan~es therein or %herefrom that are described in a certificate or report accompanyin~ such statement and that have been approved in writing by the Developer's then current independent certified public accountants (if any) the financial position of the Developer as at the respective dates on the results of operations for the respective periods to which such statements relate, and the furnishing of the same to the agent of the City shall constitute a representation and warranty by the Developer made on the date the same are furnished to the City to that effect and to the further effect that, except as disclosed or reflected in such financial statements, as at the respective dates thereof, the Developer had no liability, contingent or otherwise, or any unrealized or anticipated loss, that singly or in the aggregate has had or might have a materially adverse effect on the Developer. $ = \$~ATA\i &?72G\G~\wi. LD$\EX]4IBIT. L