HomeMy WebLinkAbout8A - P.L./S.L. Watershed Report
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E.
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
MEETING DATE: March 15,2004
AGENDA #: SA
PREPARED BY: Frank Boyles, City Manager
AGENDA ITEM: PRIOR LAKE I SPRING LAKE WATERSHED REPORT - "OVERVIEW OF
PRIOR LAKE VOLUME MANAGEMENT" (Shannon Lotthammer,
Administrator) )
PRESENTATION: At the March 1, 2004 City Council Work Session, the City Council viewed a
presentation prepared by Shannon Lotthammer, the Prior Lake I Spring Lake
Watershed District Administrator, regarding the management of surface water on
Upper and Lower Prior Lake. The presentation summarizes an outlet channel and
lake volume study, identifies potential issues, the implications of those issues, as
well as addresses opportunities or partnership between the Watershed and the
City.
In an effort to further communicate the report to the public, Shannon will be
present to give a similar presentation for the public. The Council, of course, will
have an opportunity to ask additional questions as a follow-up to their earlier work
session. No Council action necessary or expected for this agenda item.
www.cityofpriorlake.com
1:\COUNCIL\AGNRPTS\2004\WATE~~~.447.4230 / Fax 952.447.4245
Overview of Prior Lake
Volume Management
City of Prior Lake Planning Commission
February 23, 2004
Purpose
. Summarize the Outlet Channel and Lake
Volume Management Study
. Highlight Watershed District's efforts to address
volume management/lake level issues
. Discuss implication for future development
within the watershed
. Discuss opportunities for further partnership
with City of Prior Lake
1
Background
. Prior Lake is landlocked with natural overflow
at about 916 feet
· Historically had extreme lake level fluctuations
. Flooding concerns
. No wake ordinance at 904 feet
. Outlet and channel first operated in 1983
. Frequency of operation has increased
Outlet Channel and Lake Volume
Management Study
. Completed in May 2003
. Two main areas of focus:
. Managing Prior Lake levels in the face of increasing
development
· Operating the Prior Lake Outlet Channel after 20
years of use, given increasing development
. Process involved many stakeholders, including
cities, Scott County, state agencies, townships
2
Study Com.ponents
. Assessment of current and future conditions
. Modeled future land use conditions and associated
runoff and lake levels
. Analysis of management options
. Selection of strategies
. Conceptual plan for volume management and
addressing outlet system needs
Future Conditions Model
. Lake and outlet channel
. Based on city and county Comprehensive Plans
. Examined effects of outlet improvements,
volume management and future development
. Peak water levels of Prior Lake
. Duration of lake levels above 904.0
. Used to evaluate volume management options
3
Example model result (1999 compared to year 2020)
IfDl
I I I I I
I I I I I
.1- Peak Lake Level
- 1/ increases 1.6 feet under
future (40 years)
I
/
-.: Future increased
. I
-. '"
: " discharge to the
1 Lake is 3 000 ac- ft
,
1""
'I .-
. . 'IJ' -.Ii""" ':"11
-
Duration over 904 =
- 30 days existing conditions
- 79 days future (40 years)
conditions
I I I I I
I I I I I I
IIII
IiIiI
g
c
o
i-
iii
I
4!
:-
i
~1DIl
IIIDl
..
-------...........---
0..
- - Existing
. . . -Future
Analysis of Managetnent Options
. Evaluated strategies to address future conditions
. Five strategies were selected:
. Outlet Structure Modifications
. Rilles for New Development
. Land Management Program for Upstream Storage
. Low home floodproofing, buy-out or emergency
preparedness
. Outlet Channel Improvements
4
Managem.ent Plan
. Addition of up to 3,000 acre-feet of storage in
the watershed
. District rules
. Land management (filter strips, wetlands)
. Outlet system improvements
. Oudet structure, channel
. Low home floodproof111g, buy-out or emergency
preparedness
Im.plem.entation Status
. New rules adopted in 2002, revised in 2003
. Pursuing wetland restoration and enhancement
projects
. Two scheduled for construction in 2004
. Preliminary design for Outlet Channel
Improvements
. Outlet improvements will be designed in 2004
. Constructed when channel improvements are
completed
5
So how does this all apply to City of
Prior Lake development?
· Acquiring additional storage can be difficult and
expensIve
. Another option for managing volume is to
create less runoff from new development
. Study also evaluated effects of development
density on future lake levels
Developtnent Scenarios
. "High Density Residential"
. Extension of municipal services to the watershed
southwest of Spring Lake
. Development density of approx. 4 units per acre.
. "Medium Density Residential"
. More moderate density, approximately V2 acre lots
. Scenarios compared to 1999 lake levels
6
Watershed District,
City of Prior Lake
& Annexation Areas
Legend
o PLSLINO
c:J Qty of Prior Lake
Annexation Ai'll.. by Yall/'
D-
O-
--
lIB-
D-
O,...
0,...
D-
=:~
Modeling Results
Even with outlet & channel improvements and more
storage, development density will impact water levels,
duration over 904.0 and flooding
Scenario Peak Lake Lake Level Homes With Low
Level (feet) Above 904.0 Floors Below
(days) Peak Water Level
1999, Existing Land Use 904.9 30 20
(Current Conditions)
2020, High Density 905.2-905.4* 33-36* 23-24*
Residential (4 units/acre)
2020, Medium Density 905.0-905.2* 29-33* 22-23*
Residential (approx. Y2 acre
lots)
*Range depends on amount of upstream storage that is accomplished through wetland
restoration, additional ponding (beyond current rule and ordinance requirements), and best
management practices.
7
Options for Addressing Future
Development Impacts
. Decreased density
. Below the 3.6 units/acre net density allowed by the
R-L/MD designation
. Identify and protect specific areas for open
space and water storage
. Encourage low-impact development techniques
8
Benefits
. Improved water quality
. Lower runoff volumes
. Less potential for flooding
. Fewer recreational impacts
. Protection of groundwater recharge areas
. Potential for more open space and wildlife
habitat
Partnership Opportunities
. City-Watershed District partnership to increase
storage and protect inflltration areas
. Promote low-impact development
. Homeowner and business-owner education to
decrease runoff from current developments
. Continued coordination on development review
and long-term planning
9
Questions /Discussion
Thank you!
10