HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-65
16200 Eagle Creek Avenue S.E.
Prior Lake, MN 55372-1714
PRELIMINARY PLAT
RESOLUTION 04.65
RESOLUTION OF THE PRIOR LAKE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "STERLING SOUTH
2ND ADDITION" SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OUTLINED HEREIN.
WHEREAS:
WHEREAS:
WHEREAS:
WHEREAS:
WHEREAS
WHEREAS:
MOTION BY: ZIESKA
SECOND BY: BLOMBERG
The Prior Lake Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on March 8, 2004 to consider an
application from Shamrock Development for the preliminary plat of Sterling South 2nd Addition; and
Notice of the public hearing on said preliminary plat has been duly published and posted in accordance
with the applicable Minnesota Statutes and Prior Lake Ordinances; and
All persons interested in this issue were afforded the opportunity to present their views and objections
related to the preliminary plat of Sterling South 2nd Addition for the record at the Planning Commission
hearing; and
The Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed the preliminary plat according to the applicable
provisions of the Prior Lake Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and found said preliminary plat to be
consistent with the provisions of said ordinances; and
The Prior Lake City Council considered an application for preliminary plat approval of Sterling South 2nd
Addition on AprilS, 2004; and
The City Council finds the preliminary plat of Sterling South 2nd Addition to be consistent with the provisions
of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, subject to the listed conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE,
MINNESOTA:
A. The above recitals are incorporated herein as if fully set forth.
B. The preliminary plat of Sterling South 2nd Addition is approved subject to the following conditions:
1) The street connection to Oakes Lane should be eliminated and replaced with a cul-de-sac.
2) The wetland mitigation plan must be approved prior to any grading on the site. If the mitigation plan is not
approved as proposed, the units located closer than 30' to the 100-year flood elevation of the wetland must be
adjusted to meet the required setback.
3) The developer must obtain permission for the construction of the 3 units on Lot 89. If that permission is not
forthcoming, the 3 units must be eliminated.
4) The developer must provide an access easement to Sterling South at the Wilds for the use of the segment of Wilds
Lane located between Wilds Parkway and Sterling South at the Wilds prior to final plat approval.
paae.ryj f . I k
WWW.Clopnorae.com
r: \resoluti\planres\2004\04-65 .doc
Phone 952.447.4230 / Fax 952.447.4245
5) The private streets must be platted as outlots.
6) Provide elevations and sample floor plans for the proposed building types in Sterling South 2nd Addition.
7) No grading will be permitted until the following EnginE~ering issues have been addressed:
Wetlands
a. The City requires upland buffer area to bel a minimum width of 20 feet and average width of 30 feet
around the perimeter of all wetlands. The buffer areas illustrated on the plans do not appear to meet the
average buffer size required by the City. ThE~ City requires preservation of areas where natural vegetation
exists in buffer strip areas. Grading in the buffer area should be avoided where natural vegetation can be
preserved. Many areas show 15' of buffer. Because of the "jagged" line of the proposed wetland buffer,
additional signage will be necessary.
b. We recommend excavating both mitigation areas down an additional two feet to ensure positive
hydrology. This does not appear to have bee!n done for the northern mitigation area.
Hvdroloaic/Hvdraulic. Water Quality. and Gradina Comments
c. The low exposed opening elevations for stmctures adjacent to pond 3 may need to be raised depending
on the EOF elevation of the pond. There should be a minimum of 2 ft of freeboard between the low
exposed opening and the EOF of the pond. The EOF near Street A is above the low floor elevation for lot
7 block 1.
d. A skimmer structure should be used at the outlet of pond 2. In addition to providing skimming, this
structure should decrease the discharge ratE~ for the 2 year event so that the 2 year rate leaving the site
matches the existing rate.
e. Grading is shown beyond the property lines near lot 18. Show the existing easement on the plans.
f. Define the access route more clearly for the pond.
8) Address the following Engineering issues in the final plans:
Watermain
a. Show 8" watermain for the project instead of 12" watermain. Label existing watermain size.
Passed and adopted this 5th day of April, 2004.
YES NO
Haugen X Haugen
Blomberg X Blomberg
LeMair X LeMair
Petersen X Petersen
Zieska X Zieska
{Seal} Frank Boyles, .
r: \resoluti\planres\2004\04-65 .doc
Page 2