HomeMy WebLinkAbout10A Street Lighting Policy Report O � PRIp�
h �
v � 4646 Dakota Street SE
Priar Lake, MN 55372
` ��NNESD� P
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 2013
AGENDA #: 10A
PREPARED BY: LARRY POPPLER, CITY ENGINEER / INSPECTIONS DIRECTOR
PRESENTED BY: LARRY POPPLER
AGENDA ITEM: CONSIDER A REPORT REGARDING THE CITY'S STREET LIGHTING POLICY
DISCUSSION: introduction
The purpose of this agenda item is to determine if the City Council would like to
modify the City's street lighting policy.
Hi StOry
The City has had a long-standing policy bf paying for street light energy and
maintenance costs. Annual costs exceed $100,000. Because of the City's
position regarding the payment of ongoing energy and maintenance costs, a policy
was developed to standardize street lights in the community. Working with the
local energy companies, we have identified three lighting styles for use on certain j
roadway types. For residential streets, the colonial or traditional light is used (see
graphic).
At the last Council meeting, Mike Van Arc asked that the City Council allow his
neighbors to install a metal light on an existing power pole rather than follow the
City's st�eet lighting policy. Mr. Van Arc also submitted a petition from four
property owners on Rutgers requesting a street light, but not in accordance with
the Council's policy. His rationale was the cost of the lights (he said $50). The
City Council directed that the staff prepare a report and bring it to the City Council
on October 28.
Current Circumstances
The lighting policy was adopted to promote safe travel for pedestrians and
vehicles and to assure that over time the same style of lights would exist on each
street. Lighting requests are made at the recommendation of the City Engineer or
by resident petition. Lights are to be placed at intersections, at 300-foot spacing
and in cul-de-sacs. One hundred or 150 watt traditional lights are used on
neighborhood streets. The policy provides for one set of guidelines for new
subdivisions and another for existing subdivisions.
For existing neighborhoods, traffic lights are allowed where the daily traffic count is
2,000 (this is the typical loading of a collector street), and the City Engineer finds a
significant improvement in safety. The lighting is installed at City expense and the
City pays ongoing maintenance and energy costs.
Where residents request additional lights for an existing neighborhood, a petition is
required which represents 60% of the properties affected by the proposed light for
Phone 952.447.9800 / Faac 952.447.4245 / www.cityofpriorlake.com
100 lineal feet on each side of the proposed light. New street lights must meet
current design requirements and shall match in style and wattage to those already
in place. For existing developments the streetlights are purchased by affected
residents; and the City pays the energy and maintenance costs in perpetuity.
Conclusion
The Council should determine if changes to the street lighting policy are
appropriate.
ISSUES: The Council may wish to consider the following in making its determination:
• The current policy has been in place since 2007. Six lights have been installed
by petition following this policy. Those who followed the policy may feel they
were penalized if it is changed. By contrast, the policy has dictated the lighting
style for approximately 400 lights installed on City or development projects.
• The policy provides that the lights must meet the City's standards to be eligible
for City-paid maintenance and energy costs. These costs are far more
significant over the life of the light than the light itself. This was intended to be
the motivation for agreeing to pay for the City-required lighting style.
• The purpose of the policy is to ultimately have the same lighting style on every
residential street. Any modification that allows other lighting styles undermines
that objective.
• The wooden pole light is about $150 in the Rutgers' case, where the traditional
street light with a standalone fiberglass pole is $900 (costs vary based upon
the immediate circumstances such as transformer location and power run).
• The portion of the existing policy that addresses petitioned lights has not been
extensively used (six lights since 2007). This may suggest that a change is
needed to this portion of the policy. The Council could direct that the policy be
revised to have the City pay 50% of the lights up to some maximum dollar
amount. This will increase the street lighting budget, but would motivate
people to use the petition portion of the policy to install the lighting styles the
City desires.
• The current policy is silent on installation of street lighting on reconstruction
projects. It is current practice for the City to install new fiberglass lighting at
strategic locations only. The lighting costs are assessed. In existing
neighborhoods it is more difficult to locate lighting as certain property owners
disagree with locations due to bedroom locations or other reasons. The policy
could be amended to give guidance on installation of street lights on
reconstruction projects.
• The policy could be amended to allow LED lighting option. Currently the power
companies do not allow this option, but it may be coming soon.
FINANCIAL As determined by City Council direction.
I M PACT:
ALTERNATIVES: 1. Retain the existing policy.
2. Direct the staff to modify the policy as the Council deems appropriate.
RECOMMENDED As determined by the Council.
MOTION:
2
NOTES:
1.SHOEBOX LIGHT TO BE LOCATED ON COLLECTOR
STREETS AND MAJOR INTERSECTIONS WITH 250 WATT
HIGH-PRESSURE SODIUM LAMP.
2. TRADITIONAL LIGHT TO BE LOCATED ON RESIDENTIAL o
STREETS WITH 150 WATT HIGH-PRESSURE SODIUM
LAMP
0
3.DECORATIVE LIGHTS TO BE LOCATED AS DIRECTED BY �
CITY ENGINEER WITH 150 WATT HIGH-PRESSURE I I—I I '' I I I-
SODIUM LAMP.
4.LIGHTS INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS I I • ' 4 .• . I I—
SPECIFICATIONS. — I I I I
� � DECORATIVE ALTERNATIVE
ELECTRICAL
OUTLET '
BANNER
ROD
i
25-30' STEEL
POLE
15'
FIBERGLASS FIBERGLASS
POLE � POLE
� I�� �I �� III,,.� I ��� -
10% OF 10% OF — I I I I I I I I I I I
POLE +2' POLE +2'
-���—���—�� —���—���—��
� �
SHOEBOX TRADITIONAL DECORATIVE
APPROVED oF eR��.� PLATE #
��� STREET LiGHT
"�� ° TYPES 106
RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING POLICY
Implemented 2007
PURPOSE
The Street Lighting Policy has been established to promote the safe travel of city streets in a
manner both fair and affordable to the City and its residents. Residential street lighting
promotes pedestrian and traffic safety by illuminating key intersections, traveled roadways, and
public trails. Lighting requests shall come either by recommendation of the City Engineer or by
resident petition. The capital costs of residential street lighting are determined by the policy
outlined below.
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
The design layout and details of new street lighting must meet the following standards:
• Street lights shall be placed at all intersections
• Street lights shall be installed every 300 feet between intersections
• Street lights shall be installed at the end of cul-de-sacs
• Shoe box style lights shall be installed at all intersections with collector streets, County
roadways, and MnDOT highways.
• Street light type must match the styles outlined in Plate #106
� 100 or 150 watt high pressure sodium lights are required for "traditional" or "decorative"
style street lights.
• 150 or 250 watt high pressure sodium lights are required for "shoebox" style street lights.
NEW SUBDIVISIONS
All new subdivisions must provide street lighting that meets the design requirements outlined as
a part of this policy. All lighting plans require approval by the City and the utility company
responsible for street light operation and maintenance.
The developer shall pay the full capital cost of every light to be installed; this includes poles,
fixtures, underground wiring, and all appurtenant work. The developer shall pay operation and
maintenance for the light system until the City accepts the project, at which time the billing shall
be transferred to the City.
Where a developer wishes to install more lights than warranted by City policy, the monthly
operation and maintenance costs of the additional lights shall be borne by the residents of the
development through their homeowner's association or similar organization.
Where a developer wishes to install non-standard lights, the residents of the development
through their homeowners' association or similar organization are responsible for complete
, maintenance and monthly operation costs.
EXISTING SUBDIVISIONS
Where traffic safety clearly warrants, a streetlight may be placed upon the recommendation of
the City Engineer's office or the Traffic Safety Committee. The basis of such warrants shall be a
minimum Average Daily Traffic of 2000 vehicles or a layout such that, in the City Engineer's
City of Prior Lake
Residential Street Lighting Policy
1
estimation, significant improvement in safety might be obtained by the placement of a
streetlight. Since the benefit of such installations extends to the City as a whole, these will be
done at city expense. Residents concerned with safety at a particular intersection may call the
Engineering Department at 952-447-9830.
When residents request additional lighting for their neighborhoods, they must do so by petition
— signed by 60% of the properties affected by the proposed light. The affected area shall be 100
linear feet on either side of the proposed light or lighting area, on both sides of the street. The
placement of the proposed light shall be specified in the petition. Petitioners shall approach the
City prior to circulating their petition to obtain direction as to where streetlights are warranted
for their neighborhoods. New street lights must meet current design requirements. In existing
developments new lights shall match in style and wattage those already in place.
If approved, each streetlight shall be purchased by the affected residents. Payment shall be
made prior to the installation of the light and shall include the cost of poles, fixtures,
underground wiring, and all appurtenant work. The method of payment shall be as directed by
the City Finance Department. The City shall assume operation and maintenance costs for a light
from the time it is energized by the utility company.
City of Prior Lake
Residential Street Lighting Policy
2