Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Building Permit 09.0856
DATE TtilE CITY OF PRIOR LAKE INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED r0 ADDRESS . 53B B (,1 77 �T:l, /. )r 4 �/ It - / ' OWNER CONTR. r ^ %, PHONE NO. PERMIT NO. f, , /' �/►: C ,, v r • ®O YVUa}'3 ❑ FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING RI 0 EX/GRAD/FILLING ❑ FOUNDATION O MECH RI ❑ COMPLAINT ❑ FRAMING ❑ WATER HOOKUP ❑ FIREPLACE RI ❑ INSULATION D SEWER HOOKUP ❑ FIREPLACE FINAL NAL 0 PLUMBING FINAL 0 GASLINE AIR TST ❑ SITE INSPECTION D MECH FINAL , , 0 COMMENTS: r A 0"/ C (. f F d j tlt 4 ? j Alb ��® 0 IR / D WORKS r. - .I ..: :..K 0 • - CT ACTION AND PROCEED O Co =1 '' o' - +` . 't FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Inspector: 1 , Owner/Contr CA i 7:8)0 FOR NEXT INSPECTION 24 IN DVANC OR T#IE EXT HOURS t A � CODE, AEQUIRE`MEN2SARFFOE YOURPZRSDNAL HE4LTm A SAFETYI Ln4rwr J 0 us Z Q N r1 � iii � LL re U W LT, Q ki 3 . 1 D aaaJ O Q w i N c�0 re re w Z z 111 La j�O 2 o Q W U LL LL W y 0 C10013 ' ce o o W = re n 0 at N 0 0 a7J CO c 0 w O J z O 0 Z O U 0 0. 2 i Z w z - xxz? v- o 0 0 W pp�n'a'mu • ` N Z a to a 7 70 w W Z X p J W Q J W W W a 23 v�a 2 0 0 z Iry 0000 11111 CL a H W re W Z U O �o ti CW J 0 0 N V O % J Q O Z • ∎ W - Z O z 111 l'-. < W W 3 w O O U U J �O O ZQ N W Y a J q a. r• N Z � 0 0 0 0 w z O 000t v � Zr 2 0 0 0 N 0 i 0 LL LL LL? LL N O ❑ I:3 c U ? Q 0 a 0a00'6(O 0 O Zr a O - N z ui a -J CL u . L ' - Z w W a r Q In 1 Z Z t , 9 C) u tTC9 1 1 > N N la x z W c O W O >> Q �� �� z U Q 0. J Q Z YY? cJ k D O V = a 1... w ? L ; 0 ? N 0 a � c s i� � �c x i ' d a ' W W w w r0 '3 JwQJ f V U 2 O. 2 co a. 2 � ,.. ry ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ i s j Vy W L 1 a r a u F j i C O � - C g 11 ' cz z a ° w 0.k 0 - Q U in Y • h _ 2t 1 cc 1 < F- �- 4 O �� - ` U Z s N w J q rt re Q O Z a _ < z w • ± ac C Ow 1 "' Z 0 0 0M v9 z � t r �Q T" 3 0 v tit a o O LLu.u. O t ` , _ ❑ ❑ j $44:: Z a u) E. w z)- LL7 [r J re t i 2 lr Z w °g55W o Z .d 0 2 W W u, z a w p� o' a cL Z E. U LL LL 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ , re W L Z C � W C 0 'A Z H 0 • Z YY O V U F- pOLL� r- r) a p c 0 I1Z J W 0 O i = Z Z - 2 2 Z_ N i v a s o o z F o 1 . JW< J W W W W W a� z U U f \' ' re z J p W c4 c4 0 x dr`°�� O a U LL Y U o �V�' ~ O Q o o J co Z 1 L.; a 3 n G 0 z v N � C i- f - a OZ O p W F- a U U J a u) Z Z o2 ~ QQ Z cn W 4 r4 c ct c ° LL ~ p) re Z F- zar =Q W Q ; p 0 o 0 O u u o Uf y /Li � ❑ i ❑ c U? Q 0 n ❑❑❑❑'g V )0k 9 c A 1 .1 1 \ 1 1 4 V 4 I - 0 - § g ® > § ��2 � �� 2 s all w0�� 1 § � 2 C © 0 0000 ❑0 w re § co } • - z D D -IC" § k 0 co o ® • �% I- E 0 § § ■< ` § § r. ILL $ z & 2_222■ — 0 J § ■ G @ O ' 0 a 0 §D . o o§ 1- o N a co \ 0 0 u§ § oOOO _ - g 2 0 I LU § CL a 1 k 2 . 0 i w� 1 _ 00 I• 0 5 Q �ilk z . « § . PA IL 2 a ix 2 0 oz 8 % P 4( ® % 2 z �� & 2 co w w . . -1 W re re § �R 2 §2� 0 0 0 0 U � � 0 0 u.u-u2Ik ,© g § 2 2 0 a 000000 0 O 0 E. W z _ 1 ; - J H ~ �ZUUa W —. 0s ii 0. z w 7, - + U ti ti LI Z 0 40 C.10000 w cc Z ti 4... > C 0 Z x o M x IIJ -I ./ _ O. Q W Z O 1.7. 2 Z 03 r 0 O w w 0 = O 00LJ 0 o Q 0 a N 0 a. z x wx m x r w C o '�' a w w _ a 0000❑❑ W X Et' W U 0 Z a a LL = y N W ` 4 >.: G F t2 W a , Z J Z 5 1 .% o °z� 0 kJ U. 0 C z 0 Z o W F= 0- 0 0 a �z _ I- 22 a 3 a 0.174 � N z Z z a. W a 0 W W W (0 O~ 3 .c .c W 2 y W }} Q' Z 00W(1)Z1- Y \ ` V , N o 0 Z 0 d' NOW. LL y 3 0 0 i v? a 0 a 0000❑❑ 0 w 0 ❑ c s b kA, 1, 0 a~ o W Z _ z� y .. .. • 1 0 `=zvva I Z w �ggS • ( 2U1Wy m : v S z Q o w �5 Z 0 {L CD 1I • thig--- ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ - w CO �� c ° o W ) 6 ■ » a 1 ` 111, m o a J . o Q 1:7; °' a . - U c _ z fx z t ? . . w 3�3 2 0 • 0 a 0 °xw�O°x N O z a 0 o z - o ad _iWQ J W w w W W Gt, a 2 , v t Z ctyy ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O w UJ -� a a LL � � 1 � Z rice! O W J- w + V z 0 1:02:i 19 �1 z . r W 1- �, _ Q , w D. 1 ! C Oa G w 0 o 2 �� O O O V U 0 a E3 a 0 a ❑❑❑❑1,❑ V _ 05 ❑ * ler, P- i( fitt J W Z Z �N. ~ 2 V V Q pi 0 55 5 1 ! O LL {L < Z Q `� W `�► 0000❑❑ D U O to 3 0 W o 3 0 N 1L • Z O El G aaJ W 8 0 W O »a �� ZO o V 4 0 H E OO -- U W t = Z cc z _ 2 2 Z? • W � co N c U d � LI' Z d O G Z 1 O © J W a 0 J W Z W W W W W a2 y i 0 0 Z (..n ` p� V 04(0 o 0 Cy Y U ~ Z U 0 X um cWy 4 ' 0 N LL H Q co a � 0 Z H N a 3 n w Ot 0 Z o p w F ' a h- f- mt p4 O • U ~U a Z a N U UJ 111 U -J q a. r.: ai Z pz2gJZ t O u. 0 �a 0 O LLLLU N o 3 0 0 li. V N 0 c U? a 0 a 0 0 ❑❑D C) 0 ❑ J iu Z Q co M d F. �u' � _ 0 W � V Q "`' z > ui O ��oc< ° z Z Z < 4 W N ❑ ❑ ❑D ❑❑ 4 . ). ...) 0 CL h --, W s 0 `t W 03 w Z cil W 6 _ » a PA _ so° Lc G • + c2 F- E OOLLJ O U W p c F N _ ± Z ce z_zzZ? 1 .-4-' W a. 6 c z 0 w O 0 a IW X 4 U o O z X o j W W W W ri ' a �3w a � ), V U Z ❑ ❑DD ❑❑ . �� a a LL LIJ 4 O Q U O 11, i F- Z o to mc Y V Z1 z 1 Q_ z co a II LL V O 0 z z 0 z w • H J • l� a F 3 4 4' re O Oa z o N a. Z 1 Y W W J A I L _ (1) Z f - Zf � < J 0 O O O to V V Oa o la ge w Z OO *zu.in 2 _ '�' 0 0 a v m 0 D 5 ? Q O a DDDDSD U N o4 O J H - w Z Z 2 �..; rz J CL LL , W Li H gg g= a w w (7 I p p O U LL IL0 Z Z ii 1 r 0 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ ; - [ U W ° 0 N p aaQ m Z C t� -� z _ » _ c 0 0 4 0 Ci H 2 OOLL-J 1 z o 0 1.7 0., la 1 O V U X z CC z 0 c 0. a c 0 0 a � w 0 z o UI- m p re 04 • a 2 3 vi a s IL W W W X R 0000❑❑ ■ Z v d d ° ' LL = a. F- • re Z Q O W W W O< U LL n re Z 1 7 - � ti O z U N ° a re 0 O O (9 1- N Z Q F' 0 �► la a— zpzg z W U U 0 a 1 41 Z O O ix Z Z H- �.� � ' ix 0 0 0 4( V PO 0 3 2 LLLLLL_ M O D U C. U? Q 0 a ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ 0 A : ❑ ❑X . J o w Z _ Z ~ p a' Li Fr QZ00 z 2g gS Z > O aa a❑ Z w O� Wwu� _ c N 8 Y.LLLC7 a ' Z E. 1 w N o D W x re ' LL N et Q W Z J Z > > Z Z O 0 w Ne G % a ' H E OOLiJ O0 d W ci- s 0 x z ix Z_x=ZZ W a to 0 V O W m w re m LL a Z N v a 2sw2x c c z I- o J W a J W W W W w a23 V w i Z c ‘ u . ‘0() r 4 O O a 0 W W W V p Y f Y V O L f- re co co a �� Z Z ° • a 3 P. w O Z g O w F- a I- 4 Lid a . Z (9 a (9 f. N Z co W W J W i. z ? W Y o a A � O N re Z HZ a� < re 2 O V V O W W Z OOWaNZ/- O O y � a 0 0 aLWLL �v) o 3 0 0 N CO ❑ ❑ ❑ v? a 0 a 0000 ❑ V 5. _ 2 z§ s u ] �LLre 0 kI Z14 g2 I § . °. ° 0 0■WW■ z o ■ �« § u��o r ❑00000 . 2 S D • W _ o e u. 6 § §Z z 0 k d 4 4 z 0 E §§ 111 0 $ 0 § - 0 O & 2_222§ 0 k k c k . 0 a. zxtu§\ 7 . , § §§ N % a ■ ■■a � Q U w z a 0 0 § z IY OOCOOO j a a ix 2 < 0 % w w �� k § - S § \ \ a@ 2 �� k / 0 ,� § § a § § . 4 _ w 0 � 2 § Z2 � -I -. s LLI k cc Z 0 § o S Z • 2 00d4z� 2 0 00 a t-to 0 § o aaa ■� to o (C1 o 5 c3 2 0 a 0 OOO'O 0 . - ' / . , � ■ 0 a~ I W z _ z H J a' LL U E ri- id 11 a 6 z w 555 a z k. j...0.0.0. 0 \ W O 2 la Ul y ` L 1.. Z Q ce 0000❑❑ o VI ce \ ks1 ' t ‘t D O C ddJ J m c O giG F- X 0QITJ ) �v W O U 0 0. O ; ci 000< ' 1:: 01 a w IX _ —____ 3 0 = CO a `+ 0 Q. m y \ 1 N 0 to, VF- �V Q ,,,-1 W W Z - C Erj la La r e ILI N 0000 ❑0 `F' j'+ ` P 1 O O cc W cc cc o 1 •, � o Q U \ o IQ W o U. Y V z V) V p n 0: 0 z 0 Z W F' fl O 6J W U. W CO Ce W H *? 2 ' k %` re O re W O g V o it c re zLii _ ` � ` ��Z "v � i O N � j `V ❑ 0 0 � v t.3 ? 4 0 a ❑ 0 0 0 4 0 M �- z Z Ili v J 1i x U LL Z U r Q Q te © 2gggZ • ■ a WWu i` z c��wwv� _ W --_- 1 O��Q c E" t u, U LL u. o 1 W iIf 1 gal c N v, 0000❑❑ v � Ww _ 0 Vi N O g il 1 Z O sn J = = =Z I\ O U U 0 0 4 0 LY F - E Q O 1i J P. N a 0 000< U N O 0- 8 W _ = Z LL W N 0 a s , C O Z X O W t� a3 W U ILI r e Z QC 0000❑ '► a a O F 1Y Z W '‘ Z. i l1 I- O A- � 4k IL N U 01 • Z pp ? 0z g p w H 1 - 0 3 p f - a Z rn w , W E zp O ZaZ Z W 1Y OC Q C a co z I-° "' M cri\t) cc re 6 0 0 LL 0 N °o 0 1 0 ❑ ❑ 5 ? Q 0 a 0 0 ❑000 0 0 a L a 3 Fe - L ,r - to / v ui W r•• z U U Q 0 c ` • . z a t V {L{L�9 .. _ I. w N 0 0 0 0 0 0 ` 4 \ � V M uJ x x 0 2 Z p 0 , i 00 o O W w Z » 2 z U V ' lam W 1 F m 0 000 . W it N c i' z s Z_xsz_ 33 a. o w s w O N 0 a. 2xWxsx • ` 0 0 z I" O w w 00000 0 k z °x o w O. a 11 / H > ° J r W . Q 0 sa.1 Yw z / 0 O Z oo g � o v ° a ■ O z c N ►- W x 02 �� O�Op a Z v �Y N w w W a 0 O ?oz z W \ �' Y a Oc A �! a x x C Z 0z�g- � � 0 0 0 y C) OW Z W Z 00 N2 F w - 2 v� 0 0 0 a c o °O o i ii N " v? < O a � ❑00 0 - 0", ❑ J �r W Z Z ~ h P J CC u.re V W P F U w Q Z w U ; o a W W J Z Q 41 c C\ Uu.tL w y oo❑ U 0 �^ w x 0 O N sr C IL m w Z W O » Z o 0 o a: F- Z 08 0 d w o • w Z a' Z_S=Z w cc 0 LU 1i N O ? N tq 0 a gxw .- c o Z X O J w a J w W W w w i x a 3v�a2 U U Z 0000❑❑ o re a a LL = f- } Z J r W 0 V Z sil V c io .,, ,i,„ z �Z l, O Z W N ~ H i O Z �) H 0 a Z �. N V W C�� N O ZC Z LJ.I Y r4 w o - p 11. dl C4 Z o O O O V O Z w Z 00 C4X_F- 2 l\ 0 U U a G 0 �u o 1. to ❑ �❑ . 5 ? Q 0 a � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ 0 �■ J ui Z Q H aZ 00 Z w ® ° Q R 5= > C7` W z Q ,d O LuULLLL(7 x Z 6 La r 000000 O 0 0 N z w z c 0 J Z c 0 q a. au ci a. D n < 4. i ; Z Ce Z - IIZ I �� ! 0 ; can ° �„ g N O 0 d D 0 I 5 `, [] UJ Ili L] z O O a�3 `, 0 0 W W ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ 1 AL C O C o O C O = ` C a a a I- Ille --.. N.. ›: ca :1 1 0 z c.) cc a o IQ Y W '% Z U O Y� 6 � ~O 11 Z Z V to 1 N � � � � g 0 Z O O W )- %1 < : �, a z a 0— a Z w W re. a � z Zc? z W Y re q DU W W W O ,c �NZ F W - O O O U V d Di 0 Z O LL Ia Z1Ttn o 3 U 0 1. 5z a 0 a' 0000❑ 0 ❑ ❑ c w z _ • I� 0 Ili w Cg , 2 J E ri ° 5 • 5 5 2 _ �, o 0 a ed Ez, i o ��� z Q 0 U. 1i 0 V1 W z 1,.., ° 1 0000❑❑ v = > re /' a w x ..... V ,J y O N 0 c m c 0 O < U 0. o Ir I E OOLLJ + 0 c 0 C ° • ( �/ w • 0 z z _ x x z ? u (1) - 0 " o. N • v a Dxw�Dx # w fa Z x w w z a�3 d ce w AI 0 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ `C _ a a LL X • 4 ` h > 2 J W II ix (.1.: h O a U O u. W W Z d a Q z , OD ti �, .c H o; V 0 v, N a 3 ^ o+ Rc a z M 0 z w H o �' a o o z O 0 Q 0 I N Z Y 'Li o o < q W re re u. N 0' W Gmde <W \ .200 a V U d e V W W N Z H o a 0 u, Si p � = t = 0 V 1 ❑ ❑ c 5 z a 0 a 0❑00A V W O z 1� 7.1 O u. r y U E. ~ Z V V Q S z 4. � a ww N d n z a .4 1. ui 00000 0 _� 0 W 9 `c - C y 0 0 i .(.. i / 2.4.- ce N CI 0 Z YYZ C [ I S O 0 o t 0 1- a 0 OOLLZ J ` S� u! d v a i C P. = z z �ssz LL 1 �d( a z % co V d 'V - Q - ? 0 o z X 0 JWQCilJW ( . S ) LU W uj X ILI X LIJ uj ip (i. o , k i z g Y V nO °� LL f' p Z z 0 z � 1 V N -4._ Y H 3 v W ce O O F- 1 < < oC 4.Z N z o' ~ a W d M ! 41 5 0 • 4 T N ij ❑ v? Q 0 a 0000 ❑ 0 1 11/ 2 _ Z to J i f' Z V V a W ka ° 5552 0 0 aaa� w (92 W� o V ti {L C9 4: V z ( Q "23 ` s v W ? 1,, U I w _ 0 W glob. p a0. - %-,k) + LL OO O N y 0 r = YY Z ! CO E 0 IX F- S P. S 1 z Q' ? - == Z Z , J r �` W 4' co U w M I W z X d \ W 2 O i a ' S C •S , 0 0 2 X O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ W W m w �L S ".f U U Q a a 0 _ R o ~ } r 5 A 0 ` U no p Z U to LL O a Le o � ti Z if < a u. t- co z i J Z W J N v v O a re W z 0 2 v ` o a cz H G = W4.ta. ?�it/! 0 O O O t U V 5 Z a O a ❑❑❑❑, 0 ` o J Z - I-- vim' LL Z t Z 4 t' ....a, �- � 5gg z o � ' a 0. W w y O Q ' W ❑❑0❑❑❑ p r, v O , W = rt er O J.).... LL N 0 o aaJ m c O PK la ci o d ? Fe oo LL J 2 0 D o t a a j Z 1- ct z-= =z? 0 ; v- O O 0 W m PC a'a'mLL a O Z v1 V 2. D 0 /- M W W W W co pc W CZ a� n 0 0 Z pC O 000❑❑ ,ti.......? 1 0 0 p = v a a LL I Q J re o a et 0 P go o (f a U o re LO o Z P N N a 3 ,, a O o W F- P a 1- i- N Z 0< 2rz a Z y U 0 J W a � Ca z zo?g z W Y z z o < A 17- z O W OWC W Z O0 ILI 2 Z 0 0 0 • V V a o o °�?�v, p 3 0 c3 ; vs ❑ ❑ c 5z a 0 a 0❑00❑Ak 0 t z ` I- tu 2 J 6,2 11:114; Z00 °g o 4aa O a U' W W M Z Z cc ° — ❑❑❑ ❑`l ❑ l > w O ......_ s ,,, si 1 J CC S 0 a 0 m z Lti 0 J = YY= � � Z O V V 0. O F Be OO LLJ A J F- `m W j W �� H 0 OO(7Z 4:. y W c N Q 1 45 = z a z_sxz n 0 0 W mrtr4remu- J A N Z m U d :E :c W :E 7; W w z X 4, W J 1.1 U U s Z M N a ty W W z ... V Q a ti Y C) O " V O c? • 3 0 z Z w H < 3 4 f- O a �n v v .J uy a 0 e n O 2< 2 W u, s a' ° a <L V (1) d' W 0 0 W� < W 2 o 0 V U H } C O re LLI z O LLLL o C CI 0 c5? < O a ❑ )(❑❑❑❑ V ieQ r Qi 0 , J 1 t J M J x � x 0 i. z VU Q Z ` j� °5 55= a VI � a ` o 0 z t� O2IL � �0 (` �I Q o 3 0000 ❑❑ . � , W 0 x x 111 L Z Col 0 6 a - • 0 © j Z c 0 K J Z Y z 0 0 U 0. iu F- p LL 9 J 4› i 2,___ , V c d C ° C.) o W m mLL �'` w Z a ° G 1 U) 0 a. z x F m x (,, z f O `' z 00000 0 X11 + a a 0 .. ° / `1 ry o iv Y 0 z �� 1y a O Y 2 o4 �Z p z 0 • `! aNi: " a p W F— Y Q II Pi o4 g z O ~C9- a z V1 .,,,f„.., co U U J W a N O zoz z W 0 '! Y c Q A W j U a x z I- lil DJ } O U ° Z p u . U . U v) 2 V �' � r U U to 3 • c 1. U? a O a 00000 0 0 a ❑❑ 1 4+ \ J 1\i" 1-- W ,' Z z � w > , N Lww7 ( IA? ti. j z w kl , 1 ! 0 _VC a ) W Q 1 0 o. o. J J = Q ., u, , e 0 4 ( 1 i . . . . . 0 c > ei • Q. O s 2 1/0 d O J 2 x LL Z C Sq W p aaQ r ✓ � m o 0 G 0 oo LL J � ( 0 z d w a. o 2 Z 1- re Z • , . .J 0 • c N C=4 • ( 0 d m x W wm x C . z a 41 ? ?W ` 1 • W 111 I4. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ C Vii,` Y: 0' C. Q. V , 3 ' O O 0 M �, W W �/ V Z ty • o 11/ O ^ LL �� t ps t4 0 z o p w FN- a t 4 ' a a o. IL. W W W 0 m 4 < l iL II. A O 0 Ce CC ft O O t 0 U 4 DA } a 0 Z a a 0 a ❑❑❑❑ ❑ 0 O JQ w s Z _ Z F- F J Q' 4 S Z W CI V aaa❑ j Coi i p 14 ULL LL(7 N z a N ce z O 000❑❑ w 1 U 0 ct _ o • .1. W • O aaQ . w y o W H Ix Ix 0 0 0O o< S o • 0 0 0. a. 0 S a Z ce Z_SS= _ 4 0 W a 3 U a 00 Sw � �i1 O°" w a. 0 Z p I . • m Z QC • `� a �3 m a � �1 W W W W k. v 0000❑❑ ' 0 0 z M r a a LL x .T CC Y W °� 0 a U u. 0 IQ J Z O �T 0 . Y � qC a , O z �� ua o°D+ a O Z 0 O Z W N , • } 0 OI a O 0 < 0� a Z -i- < co z z 0? _ W - t H WU W w W Hza - z aW s -. -a Y S ce A ix ct re a O ce W O u 0 0 0 t U I. V C.) y 1 3 U/ 5z a 0 a `6 00 ❑0❑ 0 - ❑ 0 E r 7 ,r ■ _ ft ] ■ LL re / 11 � « La � .� li \ u, 4 ) o■ww • > § 5oLLo D ° % 0 z z i OoOCOe . > 2 N k J m cc _ � ) 2 § §� / § L ce E §§� z 0 § 22222 .... 2 Q LU ■ ■ / / • �� 0 2 k _ a2§ 2 2 z 0 . 000000 0 CZ CC § X $ lob LU Lu 0 % |} & 2 a § \ ee § 0 u. ° 2 �z z « e o ,k o 0 I e � k k �2 2 2 2 k 2 � Z w � � u �z■ �— �u /\ 0 7 La 0 �u.u.3I0 ��� \ �� '\ Q■ « o a 00000 U � o o ƒ Q' J i z _ Z uj F- J z LL : XZ W< W k" w. � 3 c. 1 W z J kl � ce D ...._ 00000.14 `I w re CO t, -.1. lb dL V NI cc w O w Z aa- LL n O tu 0 OOZ O U 0 ~ O V 0 a' 0 O0O V W m�a'a'mLL \ ■ V 3 c a a '' N 1 0 a E w a j ?w ` ai O ? 1 a �3Na � 1 w w Z ru w k. 0000❑❑ w ��LL z „ i- Yu I% 0 z J 0 W u. ca ' gp O V O Y oC p z 0 z 0 0 ' a V `� 0 a = 0 f_ 0 a Z v < 3 4 d a H 2 z J W A H 0 0 Oa w Z 0 2 ►i ° Q O N 0 0 LLLL.4. co 0 ' O 0 0 a U V c z a 0 a 000000 U h 0 0 x: dose f4-rG °A /o, p F PR/0 DATE RECEIVED CITY OF PRIOR LAKE -L � 1. White File City v , vrn /� 0 BUILDING PERMIT, 3. 2. Yell Applicant TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE AND UTILITY CONNECTION PERMIT Permit No. BP OF. 005a DIRECTIONS 1. DATE SPACES NUMBERED 1 THRU 17 MUST BE FILLED IN .0 BEFORE PERMIT IS ISSUED (Please Print or Type and sign at bottom) / " �/ ✓ /v 9 BUILDING INFORMATION 2. SITE ADDRESS ( / �I�) ZONING 11. SIZE OF STRUCTURE 5 0 / r " ✓� wood r �/ (Height) (Width) (Depth) 3. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 12. NO. OF STORIES LOT BLOCK PID 13. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ADDITION ft VCS1/10q( Sit y M OWNER (Name) (Address) (Tel. No.) 14. FLOOR AREA APPORTIONMENT USE I I IIeS d' — 4 ova - TfJS{ = 5 '1 1 C , D 1 } M n v�J 0c4 LN W I tAlee U 1 553 l Z 5. ARCHITECT (Name) (Address) (Tel. No.) 6. 'B,U1ILDE,Rq t � (Name (Address) A t , 1 ��p . Tel. No.) 15. NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS OR SEATS \inn f V &SyYIrV � O) 1+Ovj11Y ,647,9 uril ;; ' (X) OCCUPANTS 7. TYPE F WORK • Fireplace 0 Septic 0 Deck 0 Re- roofing 0 Porch O SEATS New Construction Alteeratio e s • 0 w tit n 0 Finish Attic 0 4 '- f Re -si ing 0 Finish Basement 0 16. PROJECT COSTNALUE Chimney 0 Misc. Ili I! I'�(. a. LI al >y Flf `(,V + C 8. PROPERTY AREA OR ACRES 9. PROPERTY DIMENSIONS 01( 8. SIZE 17. COMPLETION DATE Sq. Ft. Width Depth Yes No I hereby certify that I have fumished information on this application which is to the best of my knowledge true and correct. I also certify that I am the owner or authorized agent for the above mentioned property and that all construction will conform to all existing state and local laws and will proceed in accordance with submitted plans. I am aware that the buildi official can revoke this emit for just cause_ Furthermore, I hereby agree that the city official of aad�gn e may enter upon the property to perform ineed1d irl X C !/ Signature License No. Date FOR ADMINISTRATIVE USE SETBACKS: Required MATERIAL FILED WITH APPLICATION Actual SOIL TESTS 0 ENERGY DATA 0 Front Back Side Side BUILDING DEPARTMENT VALUATION OFF STREET PARKING PILING LOGS 0 PERCOLATION TESTS 0 USE OF BUILDING SPACES REQ. PLANS & SPECS 0 SETS SPACES ON PLAN SURVEY 0 COPIES PERMIT VALUATION 5CO PLOT PLAN 0 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: 1 11 III IV V Amount Brought Forward $ City: y Occupancy Group A B E F H I M R S U Park Support Fee $ Division 1 2 3 4 SAC $ Permit Fee $ 26 Collector Street Fee Plan Checking Fee $ `G . Sewer Tap $ .�/- License Check Fee $ State Surcharge $ • ,7 v Pressure Reducer $ Penalty $ Meter Hom $ Septic System $ Water Meter $ Other $ Sewer & Water Connection Fee $ •.to . $ Water Tower Fee Water Tap $ This • ..1' a i . - uilding Permit Wh Ap roved. Builder's $ s Deposit $ I By _ •. _ Date �® Other ' Certificate of Occup y Total Due $ / . Issued Paid 44 7,5 Recei ". O 4 7 Date /0. /9. U ? By . This is to certify that the request in the above application and accompanying documents is in accordance with the City Zoning Ordinance and may pr. •:._:•L' s requested. This document when signed by the City Planner constitutes a temporary Certificate of Zoning complian and allows fonst on to co nce. Bef e • c ancy, a Ce ; .9 - of Occupancy must be Issued. City Planner Date Special Conditions if any 24 hour notice for all inspections 447 -4230 I 01 PR./.0 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BUILDING PERMIT, Date Rec'd TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE /0I /6 , 08 - -- 4, 111110'" E 5� AND UTILITY CONNECTION PERMIT �[� W 8 . 0 P21 d 748 1. White File PERMIT O. 08 0,9 67 2. Pink City 3. Yellow Applicant lease ' or print and sign at bottom) ADD ZONING (office use) o ' ' ' 1 w� D L Pc • LE N I i • — k .. v , / v (/‘ . /41 "").,........_ ' -4-625o ■ w ~ i kil ' .. . 'Cc , 1 1 V ± ry r fC d\ V �w k ."Aj - vI � C ❑ Fireplace ch 6 � C "'• 3 Y ' t_____ V _ :: 1 hereby certify that I :v< ,,, I am the owner or authorized agent for the above - mentioned pro < d at t, N rrr miffed plans. I am aware that the building X '� /` . se. F <.._ orm needed inspections. official can rev. r jus c. � a � '�iil� 1� / ature Date Permit Valuation ZZ Q a Park Support Fee # $ Permit Fee $ 360. 5 SAC # $ Plan Check Fee $ 23 p, 53 Water Meter Size 5/8"; 1 ", $ State Surcharge $ /!.! d Pressure Reducer $ Penalty $ Sewer /Water Connection Fee # $ Plumbing Permit Fee $ Water Tower Fee # $ Mechanical Permit Fee $ Builder's Deposit $ Sewer & Water Permit Fee $ Other $ Gas Fireplace Permit Fee $ TOTAL DUE $ /_ / 9 0 ? r /tion comes Your Building Permit When Approved Paid / R. QS Re t No. 65139 03 Date ! G/. /6o_ (>6' B � V Bur. ing Official Date This is to certify that the request in the above application and accompanying documents is in accordance with the City Zoning Ordinance and may proceed as requested. This document when signed by the City Planner constitutes a temporary Certificate of Zoning compliance and allows construction to commence. Before occupancy, a Certificate of Occupancy must be issued. Planning Director Date Special Conditions, if any 24 hour notice for all inspections (952) 447 -9850, fax (952)447 -4245 4646 Dakota Street S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 .\''.."\\ 7---.Ff:;2_ — \\--\ • • • • '.,•';'"7 . • i O� PR�o� CITY OF PRIOR LAKE RECEIPT # 56 9 3 9 A �, 4646 DAKOTA STREET S.E. v PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372 U (952) 447 -9800, FAX (952) 447 -4245 DATE: /0 , /(p. 0 iJ 4 INNESO t ,), ;4,,A, Received of the sum of 6 / I'• U3 dollars for the purpose of f. D b. 066.7 Invoi e # /// $ bi •03 Al./ Rec: • Clerk for the City of Prior Lake Phillips & Temro Ind. November 7, 2008 EM Products Division 5380 Cottonwood Lane SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 Attention: Mr. Marko Popovich Re: Paint Booth Engineering Calculation Dear Mr. Popovich; Having been responsible for the design of your paint booth when it was originally purchased, and now having worked intimately with you on the design of the modification of that same booth from 16'W x 20'L —to- 20'W x 28'L; I will hereby certify that the attached three (3) CAD generated trench drawings, and the hand drawn trench sketch, and the hand written calculation sheet, all of them bearing my signature, are correct and accurate. Res , tfully, d e ...• ..../ . i Thomas E. Chellberg - President 14250 JUDICIAL ROAD • BURNSVILLE, MN 55306 • 952,887.2099 • 800.999 -1881 • Fax: 952.887.0032 4 _ lir EM PRODUCTSTM CUSTOMER Phillips Temro Industries Inc. TM Prior Lake, MN 55372 PH 952 -440 -9200 CONTACT ■ 5380 C Lane FX 952 - 440 -3400 DATE SHEET OF P 4 IN r B o a 774^ !. E+N! v . wo oett4NS i.. D14 6,vsiolds , A 2Cr /ties RILL N b'► ,4 r.t- $"66,6 i=t- U , o /4 ' 60 Ft fit ^` TA . ' ; E . yrE•U T") i,.,.trcA f R,: f 54 .v/1 R..G. .'- b : 6 b 1a :.• 41` .r sp. Y k,h,c . .T " etio)a r .. ,*/ 0 17f f 1 , ' (,A/1.'. , . #-- • o 1 a ' • I l i SUBJECT; BY: EM PRODUCTS"" CUSTOMER w _ _ _ _ _ _ .. Phillips & Temro Industries Inc. PH 952- 440 -9200 CONTACT 1111118 530 Cottonwood Lane FX 952 -440 -3400 TM Prior Lake, MN 55372 DATE SHEET OF 3`' 7 x . 2 -. x . y I • . . 0 a _. . .._ . . .... ... . • . . .. .. . , . . . .. ti . . . . .. . . . . . . 36 . .. .. • .. ... . . • .. •. .. . . . .. • .. . • . . :. . .,. . . ,.......... SUBJECT: BY: 08/15/2008 11:02 FAX 952 884 8766 MET -CON METRO Z002 � P1. J 0.9 CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BUILDING PERMIT, Date Rec'd TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE 'Sr AND UTILITY CONNECTION PERMIT g e 0 e) " AWES D t. white Pile PERMIT NO. Q S . 2. Pink Cry "7A Q 1 Ydlow aPPti �"t'�+ (Please type or print and sign at bottom) ADDRESS ZONING (Aux Imo 5 80 6,0140mAmod Lase .F.._ - LEGAL DESCRIPTION (office use only) LOT BLOCK ADDITION PID OWNER rrro I 6/ I 5 OW N _ R Ake. pr Rey (Phone) N �� - bf - 7 VJ (Address) a 5 7 5 1,; t/ LA he / Lakeville / 41 N 55611/ BUILDER (Company Name) � Leif- ( dl OM (Phone) `17 2 - B - 6 z5 / (Contact Name) IT ' i : , l ,1 if � " ¢ — � i 1 < • t ' /� / (Phone) 'a .. � / (Address) 10 64 0 L yJ i tea �2 /UL L) W k " I / A Mich, N! N 3 5 - zo _ TYPE OF WORK ❑ New Construction ❑Deck ['Porch ❑Re- Roofing ❑ c- Siding ❑Lower Level Finish ❑ Fireplace , Addition ❑Alteration ['Utility Connection CODE: QLR.C. ®I.B.C. ❑ Misc Type of Construction: 1 6P III IV V A -, Occupancy Group: A B E orP � I M R S U PROJECT COST /VALUE S. i ( Z'� l+� (90V Div 1 3 4 5 (excluding land) I hereby certify th 1 have furnished information on this appltcadoa which is to die bent ormy knowledge true and correct. false certify that Tam the owner or authorized agent For the above.mendoned properly and that an construction will conform to all existing smtc and local taws and will proceed in accordance with submitted plans, 1 am ;ware that she building official ea voice t penny pt as , Furthermore hereby agree that the dry official or a designee may enter upon the property to perform needles Ans. b � x / Signature Contractor's License No. Date Permit Valuation ',.so, a be, - Park Support Fee , j' . # 3 $ Z 5SO. - Permit Fee $ 4 . 1.5 SAC !$2g - #.3 $ 541S. • Plan Check Fee $ 4 5 (4 ,4 I Water Meter Size 5/8 "; 1"; $ s— i State Surcharge $ 404-- Pressure Reducer $ .te►— Penalty $ Sewer/Water Connection Fee . # 3 $ 4 Soo. Plumbing Permit Fee $ ,. Water Tower Fee lOOD,• # 3 5 3 boa ,' Mechanical Permit Fee $ Builder's Deposit $ Sewer & Water Permit Fee $ . Other $ Gas Fireplace Permit Fee $ - TOTAL DUE $ O Z 7, Da fig 4 �. , ( �fo Nr ?� 419 , This . > . / ' anon 4 • * our Building Permit cn A .oved Paid Zi s' .SA 4.. 4 G Recei 0. ..170A31.5 Date q !4 • d b By O Bui ding Official Date — This is to certify that the request In the above application end accompanying documents is in accordance witn the City Zoning Ordinance and may proceed as req uested. This document when signed by the City Planner constitutes a temporary Certificate of Zoning compliance and allows c nstruclion to commence, Before occupancy, a Certificate of Occupancy must he 1 I li _ PlaDning j/"/c o S pec i a l . nn n ,f 24 hour notice for all inspect' (952) 447 -9850, fax (952) 447 -4245 4646 Dakota Street S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 • " ' . • , O* PRAD E. U e., White - Building �rwrrBSO�A �Canaoi- Engineering Pink - Planning BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST NAME OF APPLICANT t - (. 2>,,-; 1 T er.,1 c.. rt L..., A APPLICATION RECEIVED 7b O The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit application for construction activity which is propos at: E. S 2) 6 0 Qi't ..3 k ,,.a c oo 0 Nc: c' • Accepted k Accepted With Corrections Denied Reviewed By: Date: 9- 1/6-e is Comments: everse,Skie . fig A,dditional infonratlani 1 a As4► pe9vir (./ Pr;d / r'4ti ( Ce/ '4'c, r P Occotri , 2. C.,1( r., /our/44k car 1 . ‘ qL g„ ,' 1.. s, ,", 3 , f , ce Rt-i q twA \r_.s f A L� V G / 7 1 r' /1 �Cs r <<31,S R s : flif , CPr '#''C.c 4 O © 'CC v pcA► --.c . 7 "The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid." ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FOR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS • Surface storm water drainage flowing to the perimeter of this lot to and from adjoining properties must be conveyed to the roadway and /or to the rear of the lot in drainage swales within the drainage easement. • All bare soil areas must be protected from eroding into neighboring properties through the properly installed and maintained silt fence or bales. • The silt fence required by the erosion control plan must be installed prior to any earthwork being started. • The builder is responsible for maintaining the erosion control measures until the turf is established. • The rock construction entrance must be installed at the time of backfilling of the foundation. 6: \Admin Wept info \ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FOR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS.doc 0 13 " -° 41 .1 mi (355) Building yINNESO�P Canary - Engineering Pink - Planning BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST NAME OF APPLICANT f " C0.l t`lerta. 0 Cons STRvcrtcr.l APPLICATION RECEIVED b /b /06 The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit application for construction activity which is proposed at: 5 d Corror.i Weep LA06 S • e, Accepted Accepted With Corrections Denied f� ,l'� Reviewed By: 1`U Date: ° a Comments: 1. Sofa r wtC E PVC Pc. * obi , AR6- Ak errs IQtAtei -, z • Sc-t re t TS RAJ te a- A l e v e, utlEe- +4...)(cA LS 3, >IZ"ov tfl,5' S1 ("Jc0 Pc -.4N5 et= P-cwet. F(Zim'lglw SISr's4 -t .4.16 Pa C - v-c. p...NN &-5 A. Pte o v to �G (#1c1_ V wr I c AT' 1 w..• j►. A.-.- f't' r °F-S 5 . actl Most- I VIE ) M- 0 e Atr. Fon. F1ovci4 PAdfur Beer i to . Pp-.v lo s- F45r 12-es Pow SP eP0546 AketCSreep 1- PP- tae Tec4AN t c.4%. P;E -wait- !N I0orcT low es N ( "s v...arra& 130,4440 Coin por t T Roof- , "The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid." O� PR/0 H U t r1 White - Building yr �P C ry - Engineering NNE50 in - Planning BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST NAME OF APPLICANT C I \ 0,1 APPLICATION RECEIVED µ' The Building, Engineering, and Planning Departments have reviewed the building permit application for construction activity which is proposed at: Accepted Accepted With Corrections Denied Reviewed Date: I ('7o • Comments: - ; 27 6 C b'?' Occ. a.r. .,49.o . av- xrt- LC C 4 6� "The issuance or granting of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid." ti C)Q PRI p4, CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BUILDING PERMIT, D ate Recd u B TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF ZONING COMPLIANCE AND UTILITY CONNECTION PERMIT */s/ E S (3'V I. white File PERMIT NO . / 3 . Pink Applicant o City � v 3. Yellow J (Please type or print and sign at bottom) ADDRESS ZONING (office use) 63& 6,011D0 war t: LEGAL DESCRIPTION (office use only) LOT BLOCK ADDITION PID OWNER l� /CC t3 884. (Name) I"'��C � ft�� � v�0� I 0�/�SR�Phone) (Address) (`j76 V i4j e r124Vt , L- / Fi\ t 00 (CV I N . 556 at 3 6A) Nia - & c66 -5P1 ,a<7t; BUILDER L SPR i N Z L .R 6R d' (Phone) 51-44 ' S-V 0 3 0 (Company Name) (Phone (Contact Name) c -- - -- - -�\ Q•-� Q— �C:.�c \S ��'1 (Phone) e---0- r 7 3 - SCE) ` 12 8 - (Addre:- �. _• vrr . — x$(03 B(1 �/L K � 4`1 w t4 t1& Rte LA- - cam' l l o TYPE OF WORK ❑ New Construction ['Deck ['Porch [Me- Roofing DRe-Siding ['Lower Level Finish ❑ Fireplace ['Addition DAlteration ['Utility Connection CODE: LJI.R.C. B.C. kgMisc: P" 1 3 20 0 2_ Type of Constructio : I II III IV V A B n Occupancy Group: A B E F HI MR S U PROJECT COST /VALUE $ G- 1 r Division: 1 2 3 4 5 (excluding land) 1 hereby certify that I I ve ` rnis -c info r� tion • this application which is to the best of my knowledge true and correct. I also certify that I am the owner or authorized agent for the above - mentioned proAl .nd at dl cy struc./ will conform to all existing state and local laws and will proceed in accordance with submitted plans. I am aware that the building ermore, I hereby agree that the city official or a designee may enter upon the roe to perform needed ins official can rev. • ANN r Ius c. , se. F y g ty g y p property rtY inspections. p P X �►�: � G.' a z_ 'rIi' '8 / s., ature Contractor's License No. Date Permit Valuation Park Support Fee # $ Permit Fee $ ` ?4 5.00 SAC # $ Plan Check Fee $ Z 37 ...c3 Water Meter Size 5/8 "; 1 "; $ State Surcharge $ /1 • © v Pressure Reducer $ _ Penalty $ Sewer /Water Connection Fee # $ Plumbing Permit Fee $ Water Tower Fee # $ Mechanical Permit Fee $ Builder's Deposit $ Sewer & Water Permit Fee $ Other $ Gas Fireplace Permit Fee $ TOTAL DUE $ V t 1 .07 fr ' ' mes Your Building Permit Whey Approved _ /o D Paid Receipt No. t Date By i i / Bui , ing Official Date This is to certify that the request in the above application and accompanying documents is in accordance with the City Zoning Ordinance and may proceed as requested. This document when signed by the City Planner constitutes a temporary Certificate of Zoning compliance and allows construction to commence. Before occupancy, a Certificate of Occupancy must be issued. Planning Director Date Special Conditions, if any 24 hour notice for all inspections (952) 447 -9850, fax (952) 447 -4245 4646 Dakota Street S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 • • • o* PRI°. Date Rec'd AN C ill CITY OF PRIOR LAKE PLUMBING PERMIT /0. 2.1. OB / /� I. Blue File PERMIT O 2. Ye App 08 08 8 S 3. Yellow Applicant (Please type or print and sign at bottom) ADDRESS ZONING (office use) 5 C noexx . 1 e,- LEGAL DESCRIPTION (office use only) LOT BLOCK ADDITION PID OWNER (N ame ) Ir2,5`6I. 'Y1O (Phone) 1121 -- �? - (Address) G 12) V P,r La. n e .. Lo,J t v 111 e_ I . A) ESO APPLICANT (Name) Fart b d 71 O`4 - "33o 1 b u,YYi��I 9 ° � (Phone) 4 '� (Address) 515 ,t L I `t" e . Ai. l baccA,t J- 0c L (Address) (City) 5 - . 7 Code) (Contact Person) -. 3 Olio r& (Phone) 561 ` /0409 APPLICANT SIGNATURE I t» a r -f DATE /000)08 APPLICANT PLEASE COMPLETE BELOW Quantity Type of Fixture Quantity Type of Fixture Bath Tub with or without shower Rough - ins Dishwasher Water Heater Floor Drain Water Softner Lavatory (Bathroom Sink) Stand Pipe (Washing Machine) Laundry Tray (1 or 2 compartment sink I Sewage Ejector Shower Stall Backflow Assembly Sinks Backflow Assembly Test Bar Sink Lawn Sprinkler Water Closet (Toilet) Other w A s r c -'R Alp 7 L. b AA, ,' n Z le oof - DP - rsiA5 / FEE SCHEDULE Industrial, Commercial & Multi - family 1% of job cost with a $39.50 minimum Residential, New One & Two - Family $99.50 c7/ Residential, Additions & Alterations $39.50 Estimated Cost $ /t/ 3 ' / Building Permit # PLUMBING PERMIT FEE $ go' 5. 5'0 ` STATE SURCHARGE $ ./ .50 TOTAL PERMIT FEE $ /67`t , 00 (Office Use OnloAli This ApI!Lc Your Buil, ing Permiproved Paid o Receipt No. B Da fp. 2,./.. D e , By /// : uilding 0 1 Dat 7 / 1141 11111 1 ! our notice for all inspections (952) 447 -9850, fax (952) 447 -4245 16200 Eagle Creek Ave., S.E., Prior Lake, MN 55372 -1714 - Ac PR i CITY OF PRIOR LAKE Date Rec'd u 1 HEATING /AIR CONDITIONING /FIREPLACE PERMIT / p . 12, . 0 t .... / , ,,&"-" w/o a A Q klyEso 1. Pink File 2. Green City PERMIT NO. O G7 r Q �! p 3. Yellow Applicant T/ (Please type or print and sign at bottom) ADDRESS ' L ` ZONING (office use) .3 gC Ca t70 , (, c•rr� L-kke .5.6 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (office use only) . LOT BLOCK ADDITION PID OWNER (Name) ve5f T v - eet•td 05 (Phone) 4/Z - 53Z-760© (Address) F 0 &x 62 5 - KO150 , IA) ®(- Jay /(o APPLICANT (Name) 8 4 K ev ., r, r,a 6ceo/le / (Phone) 4 .-So 2- 33 /- 71 (Address) /576c .fie -dean 1 ✓4 5..:1 -e Z f;.,.' bit,. 1 1- 3 :5 - e . 2 / (Address) (City) (Zip Code) (Contact Person) ti.,, c p Al e.,, ' A f" (Phone) 607 3 34/ 7qS / APPLICANT SIGNATURE ���`- DATE / c/Z / /e tc- APPLICANT PLEASE COMPLETE BELOW :NEW CONSTRUCTION ❑ REPLACEMENT ❑ ALTERATIONS FURNACE MAKE AND MODEL FUEL FLUE SIZE RETURN OPENINGS INPUT OUTPUT TYPE OF SYSTEM HEATING OR POWER PLANT PLEASE NOTE: Air Conditioner ❑Warm Air Plants ❑ Steam Units and Fireplaces Cannot Encroach ❑Gravity ❑ Hot Water ❑ Mechanical ❑ Radiation into Required Side Yard Setbacks. ['Air Conditioning ❑ Special Devices Fireplaces with Box Additions or ❑Vent. System 0 Other Devices Cantilevers to the Outside of Buildings Require a Building Permit. FIREPLACE MAKE AND MODEL FEE SCHEDULE Industrial, Commercial & Multi- Family 1% of job cost Residential, Gas Fireplace $49.50 $49.50 minimum Residential, Heating & A/C (New Construction) $149.50 Residential, Additions & Alterations $49.50 Residential, Heating Only (New Construction) $64.50 Residential, AC Only $49.50 Estimated Cost $ 17 Building Permit # 0?. t d? 92 HEATING PERMIT FEE $ / 79 7.5 �� STATE SURCHARGE $ .50 enGav TOTAL PERMIT FEE $ / $0. 7 5 • %,� . (Office Use (nly) This A c. • ) n B • 1 11 • s3'.t21 ' Building Per t W n Approved 1c ( 0(� Paid _ / E2 3 / Receipt No. �- O 7/ � p ,/ J9 Qr By Bulgy .. Official Date Date f 4 our notice for all inspections (952) 447 -9850, fax (952) 447 - 4245 4646 Dakota Street S.E., Prior Lake, Minnesota 55372 �� N .�� �� . • It Metropolitan Council It Environmental Services August 25, 2008 Bob Hutchins Building Official City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 Dear Mr. Hutchins: The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Division has determined SAC for the EM Products addition to be located at 5380 Cottonwood Lane SE within the City of Prior Lake. This project should be charged 3 SAC Units, as determined below. SAC Units Charges: Warehouse /Storage 18,864 sq. ft. @ 7000 sq. ft. /SAC Unit 2.69 Fixture Units 10 £u. @ 17 f,u./SAC Unit 0.06 Total Charge: 2.75 or 3 The business information was provided to MCES by the applicant at this time. It is the City's responsibility to substantiate the business use and size at the time of the final inspection. If there is a change in use or size, a redetermination will need to be made. If you have any questions, call me at 651- 602 -1118. Sincerel , arral Karon Cappaert SAC Technician Environmental Services Division KC:kb: 080825B4 cc: J. Nye, MCES Mike Bonasera, Met -Con Companies www.metrocouncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1005 • Fax (651) 602 -1477 • TTY (651) 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer Page 1 of 2 Larry Poppler From: Larry Poppler Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 12:40 PM To: 'Mike Bonasera'; 'dan.behrens @bcmgrading.com' Cc: Ross Bintner; Steve Albrecht; Danette Walthers; Jeff Matzke; Bob Hutchins Subject: FW: EM Products Mike and Dan, The City is in receipt of the EM Products report prepared by Braun Intertec regarding the soil infiltration testing performed on November 4, 2008. The actual infiltration rates on the site are substantially less than the infiltration rate assumptions made during the design. The hydrology features of this site need to be modified to meet the City hydrology rules. Ross Bintner the City's Water Resources Engineer has offered comments below that may be helpful in re- designing a system that functions according to City and Scott WMO standards. Please work with Ross on any re- design plans and calculations. At this point it will be difficult to design and construct a system that meets the rules prior to ground freeze up. Typically these systems need to be constructed prior to Certificate of Occupancy. I anticipate that EM Products will be anxious to occupy the addition space prior to May when the when this drainage issue can be properly addressed. In order to allow EM Products the ability to receive a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy,prior to May, I propose the following: 1. Re- design of the system to meet the City and Scott WMO standards. Work with the City on approval of that system. 2. Prepare an estimate for construction of that system. 3. Provide a Letter of Credit or Cash Escrow to the City of Prior Lake for 125% of the cost estimate for construction of the system. I also understand that a Letter of Credit or Cash Escrow is needed for the landscaping on this project. 4. Provide the City with a Right of Entry for construction of the system. Each of these above items should be provided or resolved prior to the Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. The Letter of Credit or Cash Escrow will be used by the City if the construction of the proposed system is not completed prior to July 1St 2009. The Letter of Credit or Cash Escrow will be returned once the construction, operation and maintenance agreement, and as -built drawings of the system are complete and approved by the City. In talking with Bob Hutchins, it is anticipated that the addition will be ready for EM Products by January 1st, 2009. Please work diligently to resolve this drainage issue and provide the City with the above necessary items so that these items do not delay the Temporary Certificate of Occupancy approval. Please contact me with any questions or concerns. Larry Poppler, P.E. Assistant City Engineer City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 952- 447 -9832 1poppler@cityofpriorlake.com Email Updates. Sign up now. From: Ross Bintner Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 4:14 PM To: Larry Poppler Subject: EM Products Larry, 12/16/2008 Page 2 of 2 After reviewing the infiltration test and visiting the site it's apparent that design changes will be required to meet volume control and rate control at the EM products site. Infiltration tests showed no infiltration in the system as it is currently constructed. The system also had 3" of water standing and frozen when I visited yesterday. The infiltration cells were built to a dimension that assumed an infiltration rate, and check dikes were built to a height that assumed an infiltration rate. Two hydrology - related permit conditions must be met before a certificate of occupancy can be issued: 1) Revise design and system to meet permit requirements. 2) Maintenance agreement. The design engineer should proposes changes to meet the rules given the results of the infiltration results. I suggest that given the poor surface infiltration results the plan be revised to modify the top 2' -4 ?' of soils to promote storage and infiltration of water subsurface. Further, an underdrain should be considered to prevent standing water conditions, and the planting plan should be revisited to confirm water tolerant plants that thrive in tight soils were chosen. The downstream drainage path should also be confirmed, as it appeared that the recent county road project may have changed the nearby ditch grades. Offsite treatment options could also be explored. Remember, this project was given approval contingent on meeting Prior Lake hydrology rules serving as equivalent to Scott WMO rules. If the design changes such that the rules can no longer be met, a variance will be required (must be approved by the Scott WMO) and a security should be required such that the City will be able to construct facilities to mitigate any shortfalls this project creates. Ross T Mauler, P.E. 0t� Water Resources Engineer P; 952A47:9631 C 962,292 2080 F: 952,440 4246 E: rbtntner c tvo norls e corn 4fiks`t t' htto :/View citvofortortake .com ` terR so ar s. silent Prior Lake Email Updates. Sign up now. 12/16/2008 1 \ • MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY Division of Construction Codes and Licensing REPORT ON PLANS Plans and specifications on plumbing: EM Products, 5380 Cottonwood Lane, Prior Lake, Scott County, Minnesota, Plan No. 095667 OWNERSHIP: Mr. Preston Reynolds, 9575 Livery Lane, Lakeville, Minnesota 55044 SUBMITTER(S): Faribo Plumbing & Heating, Inc., 513 Central Avenue, Faribault, Minnesota 55021 Plans Dated: Date Received: October 10, 2008, September 25, 2008 Date Reviewed: October 13, 2008 SCOPE: This review is limited to the design of this particular project only insofar as the provisions of the Minnesota Plumbing Code, as amended, apply, and does not cover the water supply or sewerage system to which this plumbing system is connected. The review is based upon the supposition that the data on which the design is based are correct, and that necessary legal authority has been obtained to construct the project. The responsibility for the design of structural features and the efficiency of equipment must be taken by the project designer. Approval is contingent upon satisfactory disposition of any requirements included in this report. Special care should be taken to insure that the material and installation of the plumbing system are in accordance with the provisions of the Minnesota Plumbing Code. A copy of the approved plans and specifications should be retained at the project location for future reference. A set of the identified plans and specifications is being returned to Faribo Plumbing & Heating, Inc. INSPECTIONS: All plumbing installations must be tested and inspected in accordance with the requirements of the Minnesota Plumbing Code. As specified in Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2830, no plumbing work may be covered prior to completing the required tests and inspections. Provisions must be made for applying an air test at the time of the roughing -in inspection as outlined in Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2820, subpart 2, of the code. A manometer test, as specified in Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2820, subpart 3, is required at the time of the finished plumbing inspection. It is the responsibility of the contractor /installer to notify the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry when an installation for a state contract job, licensed facility, or project in an area where there is no local administrative authority is ready for an inspection and test. To schedule inspections, contact the state plumbing standards representative for your region, or call Jim Peterson at 651/284 -5889. REQUIREMENT(S): 1. All plumbing shall be installed in accordance with the Minnesota Plumbing Code (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.0320). 2. The submitted plans indicate that the new fixtures will be served by existing waste piping. Verify that the existing pip is sized to accommodate the added fixtures (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2310). Please note that fixture units values for pumps or sewage ejectors shall be computed on the basis of one fixture unit for each gallon per minute flow (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2300, subpart 2). 3. The sump must be designed in accordance with Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2440. The following items must be included in the construction of the sump: a. A gate valve and check valve must be provided on the sump pump discharge line, must be accessible and located outside of the sump. b. An air -tight cover must be provided for the sump. EM Products Plumbing Plan No. 095667 Page 2 October 13, 2008 4. Verify that the building is served by a full -sized vent stack (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2520, subpart 1). 5. It is recommended that a cleanout be provided where new waste and vent piping connects with existing plumbing to facilitate required testing of the new installation. 6. The flammable waste interceptor shall be constructed in accordance with the Minnesota Plumbing Code, Minnesota Rules, part 4715.1120. The interceptor shall include: a. A minimum holding capacity of 35 cubic feet. b. At least 3 feet of depth below the invert of the discharge pipe. c. A water seal of not less than 3 inches on the inlet and not less than 18 inches on the outlet. d. The interceptor shall be located so it is readily accessible for service and maintenance. 7. The Roof Plan indicates that an overflow scupper will be provided for the roof area served by the roof drain near grid intersection A/2, but the plans do not show an overflow scupper for the roof area served by the roof drain near grid intersection A/3. Verify that the roof is designed for the maximum possible depth of water that will pond thereon as determined by the relative levels of roof deck and overflow weirs, scuppers, edges, or serviceable drains in combination with the deflected structural elements (see Minnesota Rules, part 1305.1503). In determining the maximum possible depth of water, all primary roof drainage means shall be assumed to be blocked. 8. In no case shall water from roofs be allowed to flow upon the public sidewalk (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2700). Verify that the discharge from all rainwater leaders will meet this requirement. 9. If plastic pipe is used for the drain, waste and vent system: a. PVC plastic pipe shall comply with ASTM Standard D2665, D2949, F891. b. It must be installed in accordance with Minnesota Rules, part 4715.0580(F) and part 4715.0600. Above -grade horizontal runs of plastic waste and vent pipe cannot exceed 35 feet in total length. Above -grade vertical stacks constructed of plastic pipe may exceed 35 feet in total height only if an approved expansion joint is used. c. Solvent weld joints in PVC and CPVC pipe must include use of a primer which is of contrasting color to the pipe and cement (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.0810, subpart 2). 10. The plans indicate that hubless cast -iron pipe and PVC plastic pipe will be used for the storm drain piping in the building. Verify that the hubless cast -iron pipe complies with CISPI Standard 301 -2005 and verify that the PVC storm drain piping complies with Minnesota Rules, part 4715.0560. 11. The plumbing system shall be tested in accordance with Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2820. Only thermoplastic pipe materials may be tested hydrostatically (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2820, subpart 2). NOTE(S): 1. The scope of this project consists of a warehouse addition. The plumbing includes the following: a. A trench drain that discharges to a flammable waste interceptor. • EM Products Plumbing Plan No. 095667 Page 3 October 13, 2008 b. A sump basin is provided downstream of the flammable waste interceptor to pump the waste to the sanitary sewer in the existing building. c. Two roof drains will be added to the existing building to drain the roof areas that abut the addition. The roof areas in the addition drain to downspouts. The fixtures connect to the existing sanitary sewer and to the existing water distribution system. 2. This facility is served by existing municipal sewer and water services. 3. The plans and specifications were prepared by a licensed plumber. Only the plumber who has prepared the plans may use the plans for construction. If another plumber is contracted to install the plumbing, they must submit their own plans and specifications for the project. 4. Please note that an updated Plumbing Plan Review Application is available on our web site at: http: / /www.doli. state. mn.us /pdf /peplumbplanrevapp.pdf Authorization for construction in accordance with the approved plans may be withdrawn if construction is not undertaken within a period of two years. The fact that the plans have been approved does not necessarily mean that recommendations or requirements for change will not be made at some later time when changed conditions, additional information, or advanced knowledge make improvements necessary. Approved: Scott A. Sawy , .E. Public Health Engineer Plumbing Plan Review and Inspections Unit 443 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 -4343 651/284 -5803 SAS:ss cc: Faribo Plumbing & Heating, Inc. Mr. Preston Reynolds Mr. Robert Hutchins, Building Official File MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY Division of Construction Codes and Licensing REPORT ON PLANS Plans and specifications on plumbing: EM Products, 5380 Cottonwood Lane, Prior Lake, Scott County, Minnesota, Plan No. 095667 OWNERSHIP: Mr. Preston Reynolds, 9575 Livery Lane, Lakeville, Minnesota 55044 SUBMITTER(S): Faribo Plumbing & Heating, Inc., 513 Central Avenue, Faribault, Minnesota 55021 Plans Dated: Date Received: October 10, 2008, September 25, 2008 Date Reviewed: October 13, 2008 SCOPE: This review is limited to the design of this particular project only insofar as the provisions of the Minnesota Plumbing Code, as amended, apply, and does not cover the water supply or sewerage system to which this plumbing system is connected. The review is based upon the supposition that the data on which the design is based are correct, and that necessary legal authority has been obtained to construct the project. The responsibility for the design of structural features and the efficiency of equipment must be taken by the project designer. Approval is contingent upon satisfactory disposition of any requirements included in this report. Special care should be taken to insure that the material and installation of the plumbing system are in accordance with the provisions of the Minnesota Plumbing Code. A copy of the approved plans and specifications should be retained at the project location for future reference. A set of the identified plans and specifications is being returned to Faribo Plumbing & Heating, Inc. INSPECTIONS: All plumbing installations must be tested and inspected in accordance with the requirements of the Minnesota Plumbing Code. As specified in Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2830, no plumbing work may be covered prior to completing the required tests and inspections. Provisions must be made for applying an air test at the time of the roughing -in inspection as outlined in Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2820, subpart 2, of the code. A manometer test, as specified in Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2820, subpart 3, is required at the time of the finished plumbing inspection. It is the responsibility of the contractor /installer to notify the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry when an installation for a state contract job, licensed facility, or project in an area where there is no local administrative authority is ready for an inspection and test. To schedule inspections, contact the state plumbing standards representative for your region, or call Jim Peterson at 651/284 -5889. REQUIREMENT(S): 1. All plumbing shall be installed in accordance with the Minnesota Plumbing Code (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.0320). 2. The submitted plans indicate that the new fixtures will be served by existing waste piping. Verify that the existing pip is sized to accommodate the added fixtures (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2310). Please note that.fixture units values for pumps or sewage ejectors shall be computed on the basis of one fixture unit for each gallon per minute flow (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2300, subpart 2). 3. The sump must be designed in accordance with Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2440. The following items must be included in the construction of the sump: a. A gate valve and check valve must be provided on the sump pump discharge line, must be accessible and located outside of the sump. b. An air -tight cover must be provided for the sump. EM Products Plumbing Plan No. 095667 Page 2 October 13, 2008 4. Verify that the building is served by a full -sized vent stack (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2520, subpart 1). 5. It is recommended that a cleanout be provided where new waste and vent piping connects with existing plumbing to facilitate required testing of the new installation. 6. The flammable waste interceptor shall be constructed in accordance with the Minnesota Plumbing Code, Minnesota Rules, part 4715.1120. The interceptor shall include: a. A minimum holding capacity of 35 cubic feet. b. At least 3 feet of depth below the invert of the discharge pipe. c. A water seal of not less than 3 inches on the inlet and not less than 18 inches on the outlet. d. The interceptor shall be located so it is readily accessible for service and maintenance. 7. The Roof Plan indicates that an overflow scupper will be provided for the roof area served by the roof drain near grid intersection A/2, but the plans do not show an overflow scupper for the roof area served by the roof drain near grid intersection A/3. Verify that the roof is designed for the maximum possible depth of water that will pond thereon as determined by the relative levels of roof deck and overflow weirs, scuppers, edges, or serviceable drains in combination with the deflected structural elements (see Minnesota Rules, part 1305.1503). In determining the maximum possible depth of water, all primary roof drainage means shall be assumed to be blocked. ' 8. In no case shall water from roofs be allowed to flow upon the public sidewalk (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2700). Verify that the discharge from all rainwater leaders will meet this requirement. 9. If plastic pipe is used for the drain, waste and vent system: a. PVC plastic pipe shall comply with ASTM Standard D2665, D2949, F891. b. It must be installed in accordance with Minnesota Rules, part 4715.0580(F) and part 4715.0600. Above -grade horizontal runs of plastic waste and vent pipe cannot exceed 35 feet in total length. Above -grade vertical stacks constructed of plastic pipe may exceed 35 feet in total height only if an approved expansion joint is used. c. Solvent weld joints in PVC and CPVC pipe must include use of a primer which is of contrasting color to the pipe and cement (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.0810, subpart 2). 10. The plans indicate that hubless cast -iron pipe and PVC plastic pipe will be used for the storm drain piping in the building. Verify that the hubless cast -iron pipe complies with CISPI Standard 301 -2005 and verify that the PVC storm drain piping complies with Minnesota Rules, part 4715.0560. 11. The plumbing system shall be tested in accordance with Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2820. Only thermoplastic pipe materials may be tested hydrostatically (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2820, subpart 2). NOTE(S): 1. The scope of this project consists of a warehouse addition. The plumbing includes the following: a. A trench drain that discharges to a flammable waste interceptor. EM Products Plumbing Plan No. 095667 Page 3 October 13, 2008 b. A sump basin is provided downstream of the flammable waste interceptor to pump the waste to the sanitary sewer in the existing building. c. Two roof drains will be added to the existing building to drain the roof areas that abut the addition. The roof areas in the addition drain to downspouts. The fixtures connect to the existing sanitary sewer and to the existing water distribution system. 2. This facility is served by existing municipal sewer and water services. 3. The plans and specifications were prepared by a licensed plumber. Only the plumber who has prepared the plans may use the plans for construction. If another plumber is contracted to install the plumbing, they must submit their own plans and specifications for the project. 4. Please note that an updated Plumbing Plan Review Application is available on our web site at: http://www.doli.state.mn.us/pdf/pe_plumbplanrevapp.pdf Authorization for construction in accordance with the approved plans may be withdrawn if construction is not undertaken within a period of two years. The fact that the plans have been approved does not necessarily mean that recommendations or requirements for change will not be made at some later time when changed conditions, additional information, or advanced knowledge make improvements necessary. Approved: Scott A. Sawyer, P.E. Public Health Engineer Plumbing Plan Review and Inspections Unit 443 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 -4343 651/284 -5803 SAS:ss cc: Faribo Plumbing & Heating, Inc. Mr. Preston Reynolds Mr. Robert Hutchins, Building Official File 443 Lafayette Road N. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF (651) 284 -5005 St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 L ABOR & INDUSTRY 1 -800- DIAL -DLI www.doli.state.mn.us TTY: (651) 297 -4198 October 3, 2008 Faribo Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 513 Central Avenue Faribault, Minnesota 55021 Gentlemen/Ladies: Subject: REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Regarding Plumbing at EM Products, 5380 Cottonwood Lane, Prior Lake, Scott County, Minnesota, Plan No. 095667 We are NOT able to grant approval at this time of the plans and specifications submitted for the above - designated project. The following comments outline the changes and/or additional information that must be submitted so that we can further evaluate the plans and specifications for compliance with the standards of this department: 1. The plumbing plans were reviewed for this project and it has been determined that the submitted fee payment is incorrect. The plans show one 4 -inch trench drain, one flammable waste interceptor, and two roof drains. The trench drain provides a total of six drainage fixture units, which results in a $150 Plumbing System Review Fee. The flammable waste interceptor results in a $70 Interceptor Review Fee and the two roof drains result in the $150 minimum Storm Drainage System Review Fee, for a total review fee of $370. An accelerated plan review was requested, which doubles the fee to $740. Since a fee payment of $340 has been submitted, provide a $400 check or money order to account for the balance of the review fee. 2. The submitted plans indicate the installation of a sewage ejector. A sewage ejector may be installed only if drainage by gravity is not possible (see Minnesota Rules, part 4715.2430 and part 4715.1160, subpart 1). If a gravity drain branch of sufficient size is available within 100 feet of the new work and sufficient elevation exists to drain the new fixtures by gravity, a gravity system must be employed. Please provide invert elevations of the existing plumbing and the new work which show that a gravity drainage system is not feasible or revise the plans to show a gravity system. 3. Indicate the size of the existing sanitary pipe that is connected to by the new sump pump discharge pipe. 4. The plans show floor grates in the paint booth. Indicate whether the floor grates represent trench drains that will be connected to the plumbing system. This information can be provided to you in alternative formats (Braille, large print or audiotape). An Equal Opportunity Employer Faribo Plumbing & Heating, Inc. Plumbing Plan No. 095667 Page2 October 3, 2008 Please submit the requested information promptly so we may complete our plan review. No construction related to the above - referenced plans shall begin until approval is provided by our office. When submitting additional information, please refer to Plan No. 095667. If you have any questions, please contact me at 651/284 -5803. Sincerely, Scott A. Sawyer, P.E. Public Health Engineer Plumbing Plan Review and Inspections Unit Construction Codes and Licensing Division SAS:ss cc: Mr. Robert Hutchins, Building.Official Scott A. Sawyer, P.E. ITCO ALLIED ENGINEERING CO. AN ALLIANCE OF INSTANT TESTING COMPANY AND ALLIED TEST DRILLING Jobsite and Laboratory Testing, Geotechnical Services, Commercial, Residential and Municipal 7125 West 126th Street, Suite #500, Savage, Minnesota, 55378 Telephone: (952) 890 -7366 Fax: (952) 890 -5883 Soils Inspection Report September 23, 2008 Mike Bonasera Met -Con Metro 10640 Lyndale Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55420 • Project EM Products Warehouse Addition, Prior Lake • Date of Inspection: September 19, 2008 © 2:30 pm Inspector: Ken Schaaf, ITCO A technician from ITCO Allied Engineering Co. arrived to perform a visual inspection of a roll test done for the new parking lot of the warehouse addition. The parking lot area was divided into two different areas, with a fine sand on the north end and a fine sandy loam at the south section, which comprised approximately two thirds of the area. The fine sand wasn't amendable to test rolling but the sandy loam held up extremely well, showing little or no deflection at any point. On the fine sandy area we would recommend adding a generous amount of water immediately before compacting and depositing class #5. The sand was quite dry and rutted up by the truck traffic needed to remove the four feet of organic and otherwise unsuitable soils at the north end of the site. Charge Code: Mobilization #701 1 Soil Inspection #602 1 Mileage #612 14 • • Pads constructed of engineered fill could be subject to a loss of consolidation if left unbuilt upon over a single winter. Penetrating frost combined with a season of freeze -thaw cycles might loosen soils to the depth of the frost. This applies to fill composed of either granular of fine - grained cohesive material. All pads left exposed for one winter should be inspected by a geotechnical engineer or technician. Instant Testing Company Reviewed By: / /e /(/ .. / 4.i.. , „1/ / 4eA( Ken Schaaf, Soil Technician • Robert Sullentrop, P.E' Minnesota Reg. #17823 • • Post -it® Fax Note 7671 Date 11 1pag 7 To fja�i 3 From Co. Co./Dept. Phone M, Phone ri ' ( J Fax qq "1 �1� Fax � 8o to 'd dss�ai • • ITCO ALLIED ENGINEERING COMPANY • AN ALLIANCE OF INSTANT TESTING COMPANY AND ALLIED TEST DRILLING Jobsite and Laboratory Testing, Geotechnical Services, Commercial, Residential and Municipal 7125 West 126 Street, Suite 500, Savage, Minnesota 55378 Telephone: 952 - 890 -7366 Fax: 952 -890 -5883 • September 25, 2008 • Mike Bonasera Met -Con Metro " 'Phone: 952- 884 -6250 10640 Lyndale Avenue South Fax: 952- 884 -8766 Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 RE: EM Products Warehouse Addition 5380 Cottonwood Lane Southeast Prior Lake, .Scott County; Minnesota • As requested, site visits were conducted on September 23 S 25, 2008 at • 8:45 A.M. and 8:35 A.M. respectively to evaluate and test soils for construction of an addition to a existing commercial building. Construction plans prepared by Cities Edge Architects dated September 16, 2008, (revised)•were available for review at the site. 9/23/08: At the time of the inspection, asphalt from the driveway and loading area at the east side of the existing building had been removed, including a partial excavation of the underlying class 5 base within the north section of the proposed building pad. An area approximately 40' x 60' adjacent to the loading docks, and a strip approximately 10'• wide at the north pad line had been excavated to• approximate footing elevation. The base soils consisted of a'grey /tail "silty /sandy lean • clay with an isolated patch of horizon' "B 'soils observed• near the mid -point of the north footing line. Soil moisture was below optimum with some minor water noted at the excavation base in the NW. The depth of the subcut to achieve footing grade,'averaged 4 1/4 feet in the west to zero in the east. To evaluate•the strength of the soils, a 5 /8th inch diameter smooth probe was used to penetrate the excavation base at random. With full body weight applied, the probes indicated only minimal penetration with the exception of approximately 15' approaching the NE corner of the north'footing line, where the soils indicated somewhat lower strength due to a increase in moisture. A 1 5 /8th inch fluted handauger probe put down near mid -point of the footing line indicated 15" of the previously referenced horizon "8" soil, underlain by a well consolidated lean clay. To assess the relative loadbearing of,the soils within the footing line, dynamic cone penetrometer tests were conducted at 3 locations. The dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP), uses a eight kilogram • 2.4 d6S :2T 80 to '40o • • (17.6 pound) hammer to drive a 20 millimeter diameter conical point into the soil, with the penetration recorded in millimeters per blow. From the DCP readings, a per blow, penetration average was recorded and a N -value derived. This N- value, is an empirical relationship we have established to equate the dynamic cone data to the more familiar blows per foot (BPF) standard penetration soil boring test. Test #1 - West End (Footing Excavation) DCP Depth Per Blow Avq. / N -Value Estimated Load 158 MM (6.2 ") 16.0 MM / N -21 Exceeds 4000 PSF Test #2 - Mid -point (Footing Excavation) DCP Depth Per Blow Avg. / N -Value Estimated Load 135 MM (5.3 ") 13.4 MM / N -23 Exceeds 4000 PSF Test #3 - East End (Footing Excavation) DCP Depth Per Blow Alta /ANT-Value 'Estimated Load 694 MM (27.3 ") 41.8 14M1 N -7.4 - 2727 PSF 9/25/08: Observations were made within the completed excavation for the east footing line, a clean -out area at the SW pad corner, and engineered .fill placed within the pad interior. Soils at the base of the east footing line and SW excavation consisted of a well consolidated sandy lean clay, with probes indicating only minimal penetration of. 3" or less. Engineered fill placed within the building pad interior, consisted of a fine loamy sand, with the exception of the NE section, where a crushed limestone class. 5''arid'sand mix'had been placed. Dynamic Cone Penetrometer tests were conducted on the cohesive subgrade soils at the east footing line, and at random locations for engineered fill at the pad interior. Test #4 - Mid -point East Footing Line DCP Depth Per Blow Avq. / N -Value Estimated Load 219 MM (8.6 ") 12.3 MM / N-24 Exceeds 4000 PSF Test #5 - Interior East Section (Engineered Fill) DCP Depth Per Blow Avg. / N -Value Estimated Load 324 MM (12.8 ") 25.8 MM / N -12 Exceeds 4000 PSF • E•d doo :TO 8o To 400 • Test #6 - Interior NW Section (Engineered Fill) .DCP Depth Per Blow Ava. / N -Value Estimated Load 164 MM (6.5 ") 10.9 MM / N -26 Exceeds 4000 PSF Test #7 - Interior Mid- South'Section (Engineered Fill) DCP Depth Per Blow Ava. / N -Value Estimated Load 581 MM (22.9 ") 30.5 MM / N -10.5 3625 PSF In our opinion, the observed and tested subgrade soils and engineered fill are acceptable, and would be expected to meet an assumed net allowable bearing capacity requirement of 1500 PSF for the proposed construction. It is our understanding that a subsurface geotechnical investigation has been conducted on the site. As the data from this report has not been made available to us, our observations and subsequent evaluations are limited in scope to soil conditions observed within the foundation excavation, and to the elevations achieved by shallow probes and dynamic cone penetrometer tests. Sincerely, Itco Allied Engineering Company' Reviewed By: , / 171..w/ / . ary Sta dish Robert P. Sullentrop, P.E. Senior Inspector Mn. Reg.#. - 17823 #701 - 0 / #605 - 3 / #610 - 1/4 / *304 - 7 (DCP) / #612 - 28 MET- CON1.DOC b'd d00 :T0 BO TO 700 ITCO ALLIED ENGINEERING COMPANY AN ALLIANCE OF INSTANT TESTING COMPANY AND ALLIED TEST DRILLING Jobsite and Laboratory Testing, Geotechnical Services, Commercial, Residential and Municipal 7125 West 126 `" Street, Suite 500, Savage, Minnesota 55378 Telephone: 952- 890 -7366 Fax: 952 - 890 -5883 • September 30, 2008 Mike Bonasera Met -Con Metro Phone: 952 - 884 -6250 10640 Lyndale Avenue South f Fax: 952 - 884 -8766 Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 RE: EM Products Warehouse Addition j 5380 Cottonwood Lane Southeast Prior Lake, Scott County, Minnesota As requested, site visits'wereconduc # ed on September 25 & 26, 2008 at 3:00 P.M. and 7:25 A.M. respectively,lto evaluate and test soils and inspect footing forms and reinforcement for an addition to a commercial building. Construction plans prepared by Cities Edge Architects dated September 16, 2008, (revised) were available for review.at the site. On 9/25/08 observations were made on 4orms and reinforcement at the north and east footing lines. Config.ired as a standard strip footing with a keyway, at 36" x 12" W /(3 - #5) and transverse rods at 24" O.C., including a stoop step -out and integgal pad at the north and east wall respectively. Reinforcements bars- at.the north line were doweled to the footings of the existing'•building:.' A 'single 12" bulkhead within the west section ofthe•north footing, indicated proper alignment and spacing`of ; the . reirf orcement through the jump area. Pad forms integral with.the east footing were constructed at 10' x 4' and included a single mat of'4 x'8 - #5 bars. Reinforcement was completed at corner !junctures with full cross -laps. All reinforcement was elevated by wire attached to form braces for a minimum 3" coverage, with splice lengths at 48 bar diameters or greater. All'rod crossings and splice junctures were securely wire wraped. • On 9/26/08 soils were evaluated within the completed section of the south fooing line. A 5 /8th inch diameter smooth probe was used to penetrate the excavation base at randdm, indicated that the lean clays at footing elevation were well consolidated. To assess the relative loadbearing capacity of the soils within the south footing line, a dynamic cone penetrometer tests was conducted near the mid -point of the trench. The !dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP), uses a eight kilogram (17.6 pound) hammer to drive a 20 millimeter diameter conical point into the soil, :with the penetration recorded in • • S•d doo :TO BO TO '400 millimeters per blow. From the DCP readings, a per blow, penetration average was recorded and a N -value derived. This N- value, is an empirical relationship we have established to equate the dynamic cone data to the more familiar blows per foot (BPF) standard penetration soil boring test. Test #8 - South Footing Line (Near Mid- point) ' DCP Depth Per Blow Avg. / N *VaIue Estimated Load 170 MM (6.7 ") 12.8 MM / N -24 Exceeds 4000 PSF f r j . Observations were also made at the 8 anterior loadbearing pads represented by engineered fill at approximately 2' below existing fill grade. Probes conducted at each location indicated a high level of consolidation consistent with DCP test results obtained during fill placement of the pad interior. Thetw.o 4' x 7' pads located adjacent to the east wall of the existing building produced a modest increase in penetration, as these pads appeared to have been consolidated with a somewhat smaller Compaction device. Our observations would indicate that the aforementioned work, was satisfactory and appropriate for the pplication, and in compliance the construction plans or accepted engineering standards. Sincerely, Itco Allied Engineering Company Reviewed By: . , (.71?..,j 1 = ( dry St dis Robert P. Sullentrop, P.E. Senior Inspector Mn. Reg.# - 17823 .#701 - 0 / #605 - 1 3/4 / #610 - 1/4 /', #304 - 1 (DCP) / #612 - 28 MET- CON2.DOC • • • • 9 ' d d00 :T0 80 TO 4 ITCO ALLIED ENGINEERING COMPANY AN ALLIANCE OF INSTANT TESTING COMPANY AND ALLIED TEST DRILLING Jobsite and Laboratory Testing, Geotechnical Services, Commercial, Residential and Municipal 7125 West 126 Street, Suite 500, Savage, Minnesota 55378 Telephone: 952- 890 -7366 Fax: 952- 890 -5883 fJ [y1 October 2, 2008 OCT 6 2008 By . Mike Bonasera Met -Con Metro Phone: 952 - 884-6250 10640 Lyndale Avenue South Fax: 952 -884 -8766 Bloqmington, Minnesota 55420• RE: EM Products Warehouse Addition 5380 Cottonwood Lane Southea3t Prior Lake, Scott County, Mifne *o As requested, site visits were c nd4ct , -d on September 30, and October 1, 2008 at 9:20 A.M. and 10:05 A.M. r. pectively, to evaluate and test soils and inspect footing forms and'repnforcement for an addition to a commercial building. Construction p1 -'s prepared by Cities Edge Architects dated September 16, 2008, (revised) were available for review at the site. On 9/30/08, observations were made n c orms and reinforcement completed within the west section of i e south footing line, a distance of approximately 70' from the east wall of the existing building to a mid - section bulkhead. I spectibns were continued on 10/1/08 to include the east end of the south footing and segments of . the loading dock area terminating at tie previously poured area of the east footing. Forms for the re. erenced footings were placed consistent with previously constructed keyway footings at 36" x 12" W /(3 - #5) and #5 transverse rods at 2." O.C. Reinforcement was securely doweled to he footings of the existing structure in the SW, with corner junct res provided with full bar ctoss -laps. All bars were wire ti d at junctures and elevated by wire attached to form braces or on masi.nry bricks fora minimum 3" coverage, with splice lengths at 48 bap diameters or greater. Observations made on two bulkheads wit in the footing lines, indicated proper alignment and clearance of the reinforcement through the jump areas. Soils were evaluated within the footin. lines, with full body weight applied to a 5 /8th inch diamete smooth probe. The probes conducted at random indicated penetrat.on consistent with an acceptable level of consolidation. To assess the relative loadbearing capacity of the soils dynamic cone pen - trometer tests were conducted at random within the strip footings, a d a loadbearing pad adjacent to the existing building, where soils wer removed, replaced and re- I'd d92 :b0 80 20 X00 • compacted because of above optimum moisture. The dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP), uses a eight killbgram (17.6 pound) hammer to drive ,a 20 millimeter diameter conical point into the soil, with the penetration recorded in millimeters per blow. From the DCP readings, • a per blow, penetration average was recorded and a N -value derived. This N- value, is an empirical relationship we have established to equate the dynamic cone data to the more familiar blows per foot (BPF) ' standard penetration soil boring test. Test #9 - 9/30/08 - North /South Ftg. (Ref: Grid D -4) DCP Depth Per Blow Ava../ ii- Value Estimated Load 730 MM (28.7 ") 25.9 MM / NI 4000 PSF Test #10 - 10/01/08 - 4' x',7' P*d (Ref: Grid A.1 -2) DCP Depth Per Blow Avq.p Y -Value Estimated Load 869 MM (34.2 ") 45.8 MM F N-66 2375 PSF • p 4 Test *11 - 10/1/08 - East/West Flboting (Loading Dock Area) DCP Depth Per Blow Avg .'N/ 4 - Value Estimated Load 869 MM (8.7 ") . 13.0 MM / NI-24 Exceeds 4000 PSF Our observations and tests indicate lhat the aforementioned work, was satisfactory and appropriate for the application, and in compliance the construction plans or accepted engineering standards. Sincerely, Itco Allied Engineering By: Company Reviewed B P Y • c -2 ° 14- " t �. Gary Standish Robert P. Sullentrop, P.E. • Senior inspector Mn. Reg:# - 17823 CC: Paul - City of Prior Lake Buildiig'Inspections Fax: (952 -447 - 4245) #701 - 0 / #605 - 2 3/4 / #610 - k/4/ #304 - 3 (DCP) / #612 - 28 MET- CON3.DOC h Z•d d92 :O BO 20 400 Oct 15 08 10:16a p.1 ITCO ALLIED ENGINERING COMPANY AN ALLIANCE OF INSTANT TESTING CMPANY AND ALLIED TEST DRILLING Jobsite and Laboratory Testing, Geotechnicai Se r ices, Commercial, Residential and Municipal • 7125 West 126 Street, Suite 5011, Savage, Minnesota 55378 Telephone: 952 -890 -7366 11 Fax: 952 - 890 -5883 • I October 13, 2008 Mike Bonasera Met -Con Metro Phone: 952-884-6250 10640 L Y ndale Avenue South Fax: 952- 884 -8766 Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 RE: EM Products Warehouse Additio 5380 Cottonwood Lane Southeas Prior Lake, Scott County; Min es•ta' As requested., a site visit was coihdu te on October 10, 2008 at 2:15 P.M. to evaluate and test foundation backfill placed within an addition to a commercial building'. .on plans prepared by Cities Edge Architects dated Septemb =r 16, 2008, (revised) were • available for review at the site. At the time of the inspection backfill as being placed within the north, east and a portion of the so th.wall of the addition. The granular backfill was evaluated at r -nd•m with full body weight applied to a 5 /8th inch diameter smo•tli probe. The probes indicated acceptable consolidation with the ex.ep ion of soils placed at the foundation interior at the loading_d•ck' area in the southeast. Probe penetration averaged 2 3/4 feet indi•at',ing a consolidation level below other areas within the structure, is our, understanding that due to trench width limitations• in. the.sout 'ea t a flat plate compactor was used in this area of the building. • To assess the relative loadbearing c- parity of the soils, 3 dynamic cone P enetrometer tests were conduct =d k,ithin the foundation backfill zones. The dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP), uses a eight kilogram (17.6 pound) hammer to drive a 20 mi 1ineter diameter conical point into the soil, with the penetration .eciorded in millimeters per blow. From the DCP readings, a per blow, p :nejtration average was recorded and a N -value derived. This N -value is an empirical relationship we have established to equate the dynam ,cone data to the more familiar blows per foot (BPF) standard penetr.tion soil boring test. Test *12 - North Wall Interior (Ne.r id-point 1' Below Grade) DCP Depth Per Blow Avg. / -alue Estimated Load 420 MM (16.5 ") 29.5 MM / N 10.5 3625 PSF • • Oct 15 08 10:16a p.2 • Test #13 - North Wall Exterior (Near Mid -point At Grade) DCP Depth Per Blow Avg; f -Value Estimated Load 650 MM (25.6 ") 44.2 MM / N-7 2500 PSF Test #14 - South Interior Wall (Loading Dock 2 1/2' Below Grade) DCP Depth Per Blow Alm ! N-Valse Estimated Load 865 MM (34.1 ") 118.9 MM,/ N -2.7 875 PSF • Based on our observations and tests, we recommend that compaction as applied to successive lifts of fill placed within the area represented by test #14, be modified to increase soil consolidation to a minimum of 1000 PSF. Compaction as applied by a vibratory drum roller, placement of soil in shallow lifts, and the addition of moisture would be effective to increase soil stitength. Sincerely, Itco Allied Engineering Company Reviewed By: "(41110 , \� Gary Standish Robert P. Sullentrop, P.E. Senior Inspector Mn. Reg.# - 17823 CC: Paul - City of Prior Lake Bu4.ldiog Inspections Fax: (952- 447 -4245) *701 - 0 / #605 - 1 / *610 - 0 /4304 - 3 (DCP) / #612 - 14 MET- CON3.DOC • • Oct 15 08 10:16a p.3 • ITCO ALLIED. 1NGINEERING ALLIANCE OF INSTANT TESTING C PANY & ALLIED TEST DRILLING • Jobsite and Laboratory Testing, Geoteclinifal Services Commercial, Residential and Municipal 7125 West 126 Street, Stte #530, Savage, Minnesota 55378 Telephone: 952 -890 -7366 1 - Fax: 952 -89Q -5883 CONCRETE CYLINDER 4" x 8" 1 Mike Bonasera Met -Con Metro 10640 Lyndale Avenue'Soutar Bloomington,MN 55420 PROJECT:EM Products Warehousel Addition COMPRESSION TESTED: 10/07/08 'IREPRTED: Oct 10, 2008 ORDERED BY:CYLINDER CAST BY:Gary Standish FIELD DATA FIELD ID NUMBER DATE CAST 09/30/08 AGE TO BE TESTED, DRYS 7 SLUMP, INCHES AIR CONTENT, PERCENT PART OF STRUCTURE Footing LOCATION OF POUR West End of South Footing PLANT TICKET NUMBER TRUCK NUMBER - 672 TIME BATCHED • TIME ARRIVED 10:20 •TEMPERATURE OF MIX TIME OF TEST 10:30 MIX NUMBER CONCRETE FURNISHED BY 'Gemstone COMPRESSIVE STRENG AS PER A.S.T -M• C39 • LABORATORY NUMBER 08 -398 RECEIVED: 10/01/08 DAYS ON JOBSITE & ENROUTE 1 DAYS LABORATORY CURED, ASTM C:39 6 AGE AT TEST DAYS 1 7 LOAD AT FAILURE, POUNDS 1 .34000 STRENGTH, P.S.I. 1 2710 SPECIFIED STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS 3000 REMARKS: COPIES TO: CHARGE CODE: 2- 501,3--50 - 509,0.5 - 601 Signed: f Pe. G *don J. Kopacek P ofessional Engineer - Rcpstration No 7254 Oct 15 08 10:17a p ITCO ALLIED ENGINEERING ALLIANCE OF INSTANT TESTING COMPANY & ALLIED TEST DRILLING Jobsite and Laboratory Testing, Geotecltical Services Commercial, Residential and Municipal 7125 West l26` Street, Suite #500, Savage, Minnesota 55378 Telephone: 952- 890 -7366 Fax: 952- 890 -5883 CONCRETE CYLINDER 4" x 8" Mike Bonasera 1 Met -Con Metro 10640 Lyndale Avenue South Bloomington,MN 55420 PROJECT : EM Products Warehou$e Adc.d.tion COMPRESSION TESTED: 10/03/05 REPORTED: Oct 10, 2008 ORDERED BY:CYLINDER CAST BY:Gary Stand 5h FIELD DATA FIELD ID NUMBER DATE CAST 09/26/08 AGE TO BE TESTED, DAYS 7 SLUMP, INCHES AIR CONTENT, PERCENT PART OF STRUCTURE Footing LOCATION OF POUR Mid Point of North Footing PLANT 1 TICKET NUMBER TRUCK NUMBER 709 TIME BATCHED TIME ARRIVED 8 :50 TEMPERATURE OF MIX TIME QF TEST 8:58 MIX NUMBER CONCRETE FURNISHED BY i Cemstone COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AS PER A. S.T.M. C39 LABORATORY NUMBER , RECEIVED: 09/30/08 DAYS ON JOBSITE & ENROUTE 4 DAYS LABORATORY CURED, ASTMS C339I 3 AGE AT TEST DAYS 7 LOAD AT FAILURE, POUNDS 36000 STRENGTH, P.S.I. 2860 SPECIFIED STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS 3000 REMARKS: COPIES TO: . CHARGE CODE: 2- 501,3 - 506,1-$09 P Signed: e G3rdan J. Kopacek Professional Engineer - Registration No. 7254 Oct 15 08 10:17a p• ITCO ALLIED NGINEERING ALLIANCE OF INSTANT TESTING CO Q PANY & ALLIED TEST DRILLING Jobsite and Laboratory Testing, Geotechnical Se ices Commercial, Residential and Municipal 7125 West 126` Street, Suite 4510, Sava e, Minnesota 55378 Telephone: 952- 890 -7366 Fax: 952- 890 -5883 CONCRETE CYLINDER 4" x 8" Mike Bonasera Met -Con Metro 10640 Lyndale Avenue: South' Bloomington,MN 55420 PROJECT: EM Products Warehouse COMPRESSION TESTED: 10/03/08 R1$'ORTED: Oct 10, 2008 ORDERED BY:CYLINDER CAST BY:Gary Standis FIELD DATA FIELD ID NUMBER DATE CAST 09/26/08 AGE TO BE TESTED, DAYS 7 SLUMP, INCHES AIR CONTENT, PERCENT PART OF STRUCTURE Footing LOCATION OF POUR West End of North Footing PLANT TICKET NUMBER TRUCK NUMBER 670 TIME BATCHED TIME ARRIVED 7:35 TEMPERATURE OF MIX . TIME OF TEST 7:55 MIX NUMBER CONCRETE FURNISHED BY Cemstone COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH '' PER A.S. T.M. C39 LABORATORY NUMBER 08 -392 RECEIVED: 09/30/08 DAYS ON JOBSITE Fx ENROUTE 4 DAYS LABORATORY CURED, ASTM C39 3 AGE AT TEST DAYS 7 LOAD AT FAILURE, POUNDS 39000 STRENGTH, P.S.I. 3100 SPECIFIED STRENGTH AT 28 DAMS 3000 REMARKS: COPIES TO: CHARGE CODE: 2-501,3-506,1-509,0.75+-601 . 4' 0 ,0/ sign }i: 0 !� G•cdon J. Kopacek Professional Engineer - Registration No. 7254 Oct 20 08 12:34p p' ITCO ALLIED ENGIN ERING COMPANY AN ALLIANCE OF INSTANT TESTING COMPANY AND ALLIED TEST DRILLING Jobsite and Laboratory Testing, Geotechnical Services, Cornmercial, Residential and Municipal 7125 West 126 Street, Suite 500, Sage, Minnesota 55378 Telephone: 952 -890 -7366 nn : 952- 890 -5883 • OCT 2 0 2008 October 20, 2008 By Mike Bonasera Met -Con Metro Phone: 952 - 884 -6250 10640 Lyndale Avenue South Fax: 952- 884 -8766 • Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 • RE: EM Products Warehouse Addition, 5380 Cottonwood Lane Southeast', Prior Lake, Scott County, Mjnnes•ta As requested, site visits were nhade •ct•ber 14 & 16, 2008 at 11:33 A.M. & 7:40 A.M. respectively, to in-pe t forms /reinforcement and evaluate and test interior foundatio ' b =ckfill, for an addition to a commercial building. Construction :.p an prepared by Cities Edge Architects dated September 16, 2008, (r - vised) were available for review at the site. On 10/14/08 a soils evaluation was m -}3e for interior foundation backfill, and a retaining wall footi 4 located at the loading docks within the southeast corner of the b i3.ing. Backfill placement continued along the south and east It -rior walls, with additional excavation completed within the soUt ,loading dock area to accommodate a larger compaction device, as reco I e ded in our inspection of 10/10/08. Soil within the reference • interior backfill zones and retaining wall footing trench, were : luated at random with a 5 /8th inch diameter smooth probe. With fu'il body weight applied, the probes indicated only minimal penetration , • o sistent with soils exhibiting acceptable consolidation. Observations were also made on torms a d reinforcement for the keyway footing of the proposed ,loadi' g•dock retaining wall. Configured per Plan detail 9/S201 at '4' x 1' W/6 - #5 cont. & #5 bars transverse at 24" 0.C. (upper), and e "h" - #5 bars at 12" O.C. tied to (2) - #5 bars cont. (Lo,wer).', 'he longitudinal bars were installed as unbroken lengths, there o.e eliminating splice considerations, with the vertical re ''niorcement positioned to provide approximately 18" to 19" of exposure',a «ove the footing surface. Reinforcement crossings were securel ire tied, with bars suspended by wire from form braces, or elevate• en masonry bricks for the appropriate clearance of 2" (upper) ;na 3" (lower) respectively. On 10/16/08, a inspection was cionduc e. on forms and reinforcement placed for the vertical element of t e'loading dock retaining wall, ref. plan detail 9/S201. ReinforCem =nt was completed with 12"