Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBuilding Permit 09. 0856 continued Oct 20 08 12:35p p.2 O.C. vertical and horizontal ire to the footingcembeddedll #5 vertical rods were securely wire properly positioned for 1 1/2" extensions at 12" 0.C., with the mat prop clearance at the west cont. b3 /4 tophchamfer at each s side o of r the wall designed to produc section. The contractor had completed the foundation backfill within the building interior for which DCP tests were conducted to assess the consolidation or loadbearing capacity of the soils. The dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP), uses conical kilogram soil,l)withTntheto drive a 20 millimeter diameter penetration recorded in millimeters per blow. From the DCP readings, a per blow, penetration average was recorded and a N -value derived. This N-value, n empirical to relationship familiar have blows (BPF) equate the dynamic cone standard penetration soil boring test. Test #15 - Foundation Backfill (Mid -point South Wall) DCP Depth Per Blow Avg. / N -Value Estimated Load 299 MM (11.8 ") 18.3 MM / N -18 Exceeds 4000 PSF Test #16 - Foundation Backfill (South Section East Wall) DCP Depth Per Blow Avg. / N -Value Estimated Load 480 MM (18.9 ") 30.3 MM / N -10.5 3625 PSF Our inspections indicated that the aforementioned andr work, in was satisfactory and appropriate for the application with the project plans, approved revisions or accepted engineering stadard wall during inspections, will cylinders, on the under separate retaining wall 9 cover at appropriate dates. Sincerely, Revie ed By: Itco Allied Engineering Company o pac Gary Standish Gordon J. opacek, P.E. Senior Inspector CC: Paul - City of Prior Lake Bui ding IIn12ectioons Fax: (952 -447 - 42 45 ) #701 - 0 / #605 1 3/4 / #610 MET- CON5.DOC • Nov 06 08 02:06p p.l ITCO ALLIED ENGINEERING COMPANY AN ALLIANCE OF INSTANT TESTING COMPANY AND ALLIED TEST DRILLING Jobsite and Laboratory Testing, Geotechnical Services, Commercial, Residential and Municipal 7125 West 126' Street, Suite 500, Savage, Minnesota 55378 Telephone: 952 -890 -7366 Fax: 952 - 890 -5883 November 5, 2008 Mike Bonasera Met -Con Metro Phone: 952 -884 -6250 10640 Lyndale Avenue South Fax: 952 - 884 -8766 Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 RE: EM Products Warehouse Addition 5380 Cottonwood Lane Southeast Prior Lake, Scott County, Minnesota At the request of the building contractor, site visits were made on October 27, and 30, 2008 at 1:15 P.M. and 8:45 respectively, to evaluate and test soils, and inspect structural steel frame work, welds, bolted connections, and the placement of metal roof decking for an addition to a commercial building. Construction plans prepared by Cities Edge Architects dated September 16, 2008, (revised) were available for review at the site. On 10/27/08, a soils assessment was made on engineered backfill placed within the southeast building interior following the installation of the final pre -cast wall panels, and at the'recycling inclosure and loading docks at the building south exterior. When evaluated with full body weight applied to a 5 /8th inch diameter smooth probe, the referenced fill zones indicated penetration consistent with soils of acceptable strength, except isolated areas within the exterior fill zones. The probes indicated moderately soft soils to a depth 18" within 4 to 5 feet of the building wall in the recycling enclosure and east loading dock ramp. The soil conditions were communicated to the contractor, with additional compaction completed in the respective areas. To assess the relative consolidation of the fill zones, a dynamic cone penetrometer test was conducted at the east loading dock ramp, which represents the location of greatest fill depth. The dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP), uses a eight kilogram (17.6 pound) hammer to drive a 20 millimeter diameter conical point into the soil, with the penetration recorded in millimeters per blow. From the DCP readings, a per blow, penetration average was recorded and a N -value derived. This N- value, is an empirical relationship we have established to equate the dynamic cone data to the more familiar blows per foot (BPF) standard penetration soil boring test. Test #18 - East Loading Dock Ramp (Mid- Section) DCP Depth Per Blow Avg. - /.N -Value Estimated Load 576 MM (22.7 ") 26.7 MM / N -11.5 3875 PSF Nov 06 08 02:06p p.2 Observations made on the perimeter pre -cast wall panels, indicated that the units were well supported on the vertical axis by diagonal braces securely anchored into the subgrade soils at the building fillet welded ul full The panel connections were completed with cap plates to wall embeds, with angle stock and expansion bolts securing adjoining panel corner junctures. Observations made on interior structural components of the building; included two central east /west W30 beams providing support for bar joists, and bearing on (4) each W12 x 72 I -beam columns. The north section (plan grid 2) includes a lower crane rail and support haunches at column locations, reference detail 10 /S202.and Comprised O of a 4 W24 4 "x 55 I-beam rail, a perpendicular W12 x 58 support diagonal braces, a crane rail to vertical column angle brace, and 3/8" stiffner plates. The opposing or north wall crane rail (plan grid 1), was secured by welds to panel embed plates, and a series of tri -group 1/2" projection flanges welded to panel embeds at beam junctures. I Beams providing bearing support for the bar joists at the north /south perimeter walls were fillet welded to embed plates. Observations made on the beam to column, beam to beam junctures, indicated that the break -off tension control type ASTM A -325 bolts were in place per plan detail 4/S202 and had been tensioned as the bolt ends were snapped off, except for (1) standard structural bolt at beam to beam connection near grid ref B /2, which was hand tightened and the nut securely welded. All column to beam bolts within the crane rail area were placed with the nut in a "up" or beam flange flage clinch web co and welded after tensioning. stiffners required at each side of beam framing over columns were installed and shop welded. Column base plates were properly secured to support pad anchor bolts, with welds completed at three locations where bolts were not full depth of the mating nut. A non- shrink grout per detail 6/S201 had been completed at all column /pad locations. Visual examination of the bar joists indicated that they were erected with sufficient bearing provided at the ends of the joists, and secured 1/4 inch fillet welds, at least 2 inches long on each side of the bearing end, at the central beam junctures and wall angle channels. Several connections at the central beam used threaded fasteners provided by pre - drilled holes within the beam flange. Per joist Brg. detail 12/S202 the lower bar joist cords were welded to channels (L 3 x 3 x 3/16" x 8 ") at column locations. Where required, Horizontal and diagonal bar joist bridging braces were installed and secured with welded connections, with end stabilizers welded to angle channel secured by expansion bolts at wall panels. All shop and field welds for the aforementioned work were satisfactory, with acceptable penetration, with no porosity, or under cutting observed. The installation of a Nucor- Vulcraft 1 1/2" type "B" wide rib 20 gage roof decking was nearing completion at the time of the inspection in accordance with plan detail 3S/202. The deck panels were attached with Hilti penetration fasteners at bar joists, and at the end seams in a 36/4 and 36/7 pattern respectively. Panel side laps between the 5 foot mid -span supports were secured with #10 Tex Screws as required per plan detail. Although not completed at the time of the inspection, side Nov 06 08 02:06p p laps junctures to perimeter walls be completed with 5 /8th inch diameter puddle welds, at 6" O.C. The bearing and attachment points of the decking relative to side laps and end seams, were provided by "L" channel stock welded at the upper bar joists face, and channels welded to wall panel embeds. The referenced roof deck attachments indicated satisfactory penetration and retention. Also included in our inspection on 10/30/08 was a review of forms and reinforcement placed within a 36" deep excavation for a paint booth exhaust pit adjacent to the north interior wall of the addition. Formed as a 8" slab in a "T" configuration, with 6' wide legs and reinforced as a single mat of #4 bars each way at 10" x 18" O.C. Our inspections indicated that the aforementioned work was satisfactory and appropriate for the application, and in compliance with the project plans or accepted engineering standards. Sincerely, Itco Allied Engineering Company Reviewed By: fa,s7 Gary Standish Robert P. Sullentrop, P.E. Senior Inspector Mn. Reg# 17823 CC: Paul - City of Prior Lake Building Inspections (Fax: 952 - 447-4245) #701 - 0 / #605 - 2 / #610 - 1/4 / #304 - (1) / #612 - 28 MET- CON7.DOC Dec 01 08 08:52a p.1 ITCO ALLIED ENGINEERING COMPANY AN ALLIANCE OF INSTANT TESTING COMPANY AND ALLIED TEST DRILLING Jobsite and Laboratory .Testing, Geotechnical Services, Commercial, Residential and Municipal 7125 West 126 Street, Suite 500, Savase, Minnesota 55378 Fax: 952 890 - 5883 Telephone: 952 November 26, 2008 . • Mike Bonasera Phone: 952 - 884-6250 Met -Con Metro Fax; 952 -884 -8766 .` • 10640 Lyndale Avenue South 55420 . Bloomington, Minnesota , RE: EM Products Warehouse Addition 5380 Cottonwood Lane Southeast ota • Prior Lake, Scott County, At the request of the building contractor, and inspect fa o and November 20, 24, and 25, 2008 to evaluate reinforcement for a paint booth/exhaust 11/20/08 (2:15 P.M.): . p A ins ection was conduced on forms and efe reinforcement toontl0 /30/06) . redesigned paint booth/exhaust pit, r the Located parallel to the north s inteTior wa l the t the bui d ment placed construction was configured as a diagonal dog -leg segment. The subgrade forms were set for a poured wall sections at 4' high, on a previously poured Reinforcement consisted of a single centerline a° Where r b equired, on v and horizontal axis for a 14" to 15" grid. rod splice lengths were acceptable, with full bar wraps at corner junctures, and all crossings 11/24/08 (9:00 A.M.): Forms had been' removed from the paint booth /exhaust pit wall sections, . and a fine granular backfill completed. af5 /thoinchill soils were evaluated with full body .to a within the smooth probe. The probes indicated penetration 9 granular soil consistent with an acceptable level of consolidation for floor slab placement. 11/25/08 (8:45 A.M.): ervations were made on decking and reinforcement con f 1 d / 1 Obs over the paint booth p t south di leg had been placed to span the tyypp e "B" wide ribl b 20 D gage roof decking Reinforcement integral with east and west poured walls of the pit. the design, included a single mat of #4 bars at 12" 0.C., elevated for Dec 01 08 08:53a p.2 1 1/2" coverage. Top of wall perimeter embedded #4 horizontal tie back rods, were bent to extend above the mat of #4 bars, and 30" to 32" within the deck area and the adjoining floor slab. • Our inspections indicated that the aforementioned work was satisfactory and appropriate for the application, and in compliance with the project plans or accepted engineering standards. • Sincerely, Itco Allied Engineering Company Reviewed By: J 'G- y Sta dish Robert P. Sullentrop, P.E. Senior Inspector Mn. Reg# 17823 CC: Paul - City of Prior Lake Building Inspections (Fax: 9 -A47 -4245) #701 - 0 / #605 - 1 3/4 / #610 - 1/4 / #612 - 42 • MET- CON8.DOC' • • • • • • • . ». ITCO ALLIED ENGINEERING COMPANY AN ALLIANCE OF INSTANT TESTING COMPANY AND ALLIED TEST DRILLING Jobsite and Laboratory Testing, Geotechnical Services, Commercial, Residential and Municipal 7125 West 126 ' Street, Suite 500, Savage, Minnesota 55378 Telephone: 952 - 890 -7366 Fax: 952 - 890 -5883 • December 17, 2008 Mike Bonasera Met -Con Metro Phone: 952 -884 -6250 10640 Lyndale Avenue South Fax: 952 -884 -8766 Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 • RE: EM Products Warehouse Addition 5380 Cottonwood Lane Southeast Prior Lake, Scott County, Minnesota Subject: Final Special Inspection /Testing Compliance Report The following are special inspections and testing activities as contracted for by the contractor or his'agent. Reports and test results for the referenced work has been forwarded to the contractor, copies are available upon request from our office. Inspections: (16) Inspections - Between September 19, 2008 and November -25, 2008. Evaluation of soil corrections, subgrade soils and engineered • fill for building and parking lot construction. Inspections on • forms /reinforcement for placement of footings, column pads, dock leveler and recycling enclosure pads, retaining walls, and poured walls for paint booth exhaust pit. Inspections on structural steel frame work, welds, bolted connections, and metal roof decking. Soil Compaction or.Consolidation Testing: (18) Dynamic cone penetrometer tests - (Ref. A.S.T.M STP -399). 'Conducted between September 23, and October 27, 2008 to evaluate the relative loadbearing capacity of subgrade soils /engineered fill for construction of footings /pads, and backfill for foundation and loading ramp areas. Concrete Testing - Per A.S.T.M. C39: (36) Cylinders - cast by Itco Allied Engineering Company between September 26 and. November 26, 2008 and delivered for compression testing, on footings /column pads, slabs, poured walls and retaining walls. .This final report certifies that we have provided special inspections and /or testing as ordered by the builder, in accordance with the project plans and recognized engineering standards for this project. The inspections and /or tests were performed by qualified personnel under my supervision. Based upon the observations and reports of that personnel, it is our judgment that activities referenced as "special inspections and testing ", listed within the body of this document; conform to the best of our knowledge, with the city approved plans, specifications, addenda, and change orders. Sincerely, Instant Testing Company Reviewed By: ouy Cli'L±C94-`1L-±7^A, Gary Standish Robert P. Sullentrop, P.E. Senior Inspector Minnesota Reg. #17823 CC: City.of Prior Lake Building Inspections MET-CON9.DOC • VERSICO RooFING SYSTEMS September 8, 2008 Mr. Kurt Rose Rose - Fleischaker Associates 333 Washington Ave North Suite 302 Minneapolis MN 55401 RE: EM Products Prior Lake, MN Dear Mr. Rose: In response to your recent inquiry, this letter is to confirm the Carlisle's Polyisocyanurate HP Insulation, at a two layers of 2 -inch thickness, meets Factory Mutual (FM) 4450 test criteria and also meets the Underwriters Laboratories (UL) 1256 test criteria. Note that the above is referenced in IBC Section: 1508 and 2603.4.1.5. If you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, 'A de( Brian P. Chamberlain Senior Project Analyst POBox 1289, Carlisle, PA 17013 • Tel: 800.992.7663 • Fax: 717- 960 -4036 • www.versico.com VERSICO V R S l �' O R O O F I N G S Y S T E M S .r td�iPaxlt lxG e s . : f six ..-- « s;iiarnatl s F a .c is SJi s is { I [[[tJ S '.ss: i x } p I a i s „ ii}x ^ zyk - 1 I .,.el......... _tee'" a , , f *s tt I i r�yya t cxug' ` r 7.1 _ . s ' , .z. t i. . x .. .. 3's r 1 ,J ' _ 4.m i i y .. , 2 t .r , 1 a i % + -xE £Es " s {S� 4. 3,F 's �' i+.r ,4?� 'i ^' - s al,�- �� -i f Z � �S �-;� � � � � r a{ � ( ,I s;! y ..r:':', uc:r ^ : .. I•, : ' ; +i F^.x.:_. axp i ii,.'r„L'{ Fllst 4. T A 'x � S . - ., '"I t, , e ... `a , � s ". i}' .. I � 4` ?, S.: t s � : . s ._£. s, - ; , j s u ; ik� 5�..^L , :. -ie 2°? - er';: t .. Ails: .''.t'k:a ', ,� �£ ' h... - " I . " . <;� • r€ =: , , , ,�, , q , i%t . EE.r " < - ... ' , ,,m;i:i v i t " �-r' a 1 { x ea xl s� - s=p ^4 -r .. x.. : ; `?�,. -, q j �3 g i t ; r 1 ,p u i '.- l s ..:+: -srlsx . T - W.`� {' # y ' ,p*LY � . � - - A i „hd :'12.e.�a,v l i , E, ... ?. x e t a .. t fr y ,f�. if !} m<d' �I i .t 9� C�'t 4 »..�'- �xC::S:Li�. t � ^^ iY f . «......_:_ -. .lYT L"j; ]SK� �1 1' R ' it t.. �� icfin� � :�: fs..�:..:.:� =.z: ee:.:. l y ��.� , - ;?�,. ��' ... a - ; ^:'r�;�}' - �'�:- ,:� �a .. _..T � � 7 j�` -. ' ?s. 1 t. i��s:artrsa�:z�� t �3 ,,. 3> x s r � s x s,a ^. '�. a 7 > ti ps,, -r � � -,., '�. ..� �, } �� x „�3 ..' S � l � i `� 4 . , .... x'� � t dt'i , d k '^' u �6 4, � ? i 'nZ i” rih � s g } t i C �' .1 sir, . L_ :::::::71,..N:: _ � + V r {3x j� s ,,72t .0 ^ .'' , s y aka T r-S e r ° 3" y ^c ;' ,.x .+ 1" y fi t 3� 3 }- r a ' {"'r ' {sa5 i �a ; -. - y.� ;x,,, r .,� -dy”' � � ^?+.( a ::;74;:,,,,,, T ; � +a1,4. y -;S1 .., s `S ( {t : E r si c.e 1 t!:ri }o 6 a a A '11 F} ,, ti , fit Y Y t a '1,;'L) �1 I y T L ( tt x,f4 t 2,..i sf I t t 1P - < E' a rlt t n . w w- ./ , s1 x „. tf s '' z , a atl 1 s • ' ::-c. . o- � }. r .2Ax.3 +. h' k j ttz»_ .._.. A sx' '. r. a tJtJ � a ' t a s z t :. . £;:m:: ; ::::::.::u.: :::..:...�. ,. r2 ss :,:r. T. s 1 _,.•-•_ 7..- s:: 2: v... i +.r <S�r.[:'sSe•2. "eyy.��rr'sf .� : �' "st aa,b ..: s ° � .i.t; d��cS'�:^��i.? st'J�A ::z:a:_I'.,Srcrs »- :; ::;...... Wsj 4i » e.r x; . ix ,. x C r ,tt a�> 1::: . . :1 d,„ q -, s x � r.- z 'E . usfc , a .................�. :..1...... , �.. •T., s x Y . - � .�....... _ ^. a.:r.. n...i........! . " , t fi t, i..,.._,. ... ,'a t± : r',. � . >. «� ^ a' i �u sy • i.. _�_+ i z•.�:.::L ...,._ ^_a , u. :..:.:>':. t ..^ , •r� cr _� . : f �� ^•rir;C:r��-:S s. �a� ; ..... ». ,..�_....... l: �' r s -. t � It i,r � x ^s r ^,axps, ,': e..�s� i +; ? ,.... .,..._z .,... a .,.5' 7 �.,.. z � ur � � {fs '`' � F i �, ? r ,r<asa cg�g, At a. F �...F .} � x a i t ^:a}ai::.: -;d }t :::v�"c'•:i '* ., , t . {,5 .e ._..m --. c._ —' K. -.... rr, .. ; ,f .. u,� .^t .`t C. `; �t' .z...? a . _ 6z ....t + r . t F h .......... ; ..at0!:::!:'':-2731, 7I i ;zy gi', e _.4.- .,i..r : i- - e' = .. m. �t I I£ l . s } 'i''_s.^;.i e�C..l�F`:'a - <� t. E .. d . . �...; - .., j -tx ;; �� �'^ vs C s 3 r - �.�n. 3x£r" :. ttL�S' s. r u �f'is tt � `��-^C 1 � ch 11�'.�'ry r i s r s _ t z s2 t t t. v f. s 5,.rgE r c , ..s... 3u. i " 3 !.r £ x 3..^ f a^t. y v ,..i f rc.t S 1 1:: P' r� S a �' a r ' K _ t�". .fie °s^ 3 ..r z Sac -F ^> - . b �n ,. _ • * _ t u , a s . x .. ., . R :G . P,nnlai BALLASTED ROOFING SYSTEM T a The VersiGard® Ballasted Roof System �E„� f �, Incorporates either 45 -mil or 60 -mil reinforced » 6t or non - reinforced time tested EPDM membrane. _,�. C � � f Features and Benefits � 3 • The entire system, insulation, EPDM membrane o-� ° i and ballast are loose laid, allowing the flexible - r' ; character €sties of the roofing system to move with t� thermal expansion. , ► �` I �.' • Non reinforced sheet widths up to 50' wide reduce field seams and lower installation costs, 9 �� v }' 4} 5 (r • UL Class A Ratings can be achieved over combus ' � ` r and non combustible decks. � ' r= �� ii, • The system is easily Installed over a variety of insulation y7' !: types (EPS, Extruded Polystyrene, Perlite, Polyiso- 9: � ',:;;; 4. ,,, : .\, \ f,„ itz . , :" . , ';': L cyanurate, High Density Wood Fiberboard). x �` t ,, -i9 fi L'' VI • Standard ballasted roofs incorporate a minimum of 10 Ibs. per square foot of #2 size ballast, Additional , �. : i ti� g ; , , wind uplift can be achieved when different ballast � � TL a � k specifications are followed, � � ''4 it • 5 year, 10 -year, and 15 -year Membrane System h Warranties are available. Also, a 1€1 year, 15 -year 9 l � l r and 20 -year Total Roofing System Warranty is available. ' - ` Standard wind speed coverage is 55 mph. Additional �`` wind speed warranties are available. a ` , • A warranted system is installed by an Authorized - �. ` :- Versico Roofing Contractor. A completed warranted ,' , ,, t ,k � syst is inspected b a trained Versico Field <i Service Representative to ensure conformance ` �' with Versico specifications. v a= q y 1 - } A eA L MLa � A SINGE SOURCE FOR SING E -PLY ?COFINCG i i �� t'^ � Versico, LLC PO Box U89, Carlisle, PA 17013 Tal A00.992.7663 Fnx • ?1/.960,403 W ?b; www.verstco.com V E R S 'I �C 0 R 0 O F I N' G S Y' S T E M' S >,.'' '''''''AA' . vERS14404. RD VER SIGARD .045" & .060" NON - REINFORCED EPDM Typical Properties and Characteristics Typical Physical Property Test Method ASTM SPEC. (Pass) 045" & .060" Non Reinforced Tolerance on Nominal Thickness, 0 /0 ASTM 0 412 *10 t10 ASTM D 412 1305 (9) 1650 (11.3) Tensile Strength, min, psi ( M Pa} ...._....._.................... ...._......._...._...._......._ AST .... ....................._..__... _-.._ ._..._...- .........v_.......... _................__.....__...-._........._...._........,............._.,....... ..__.........._..._.._._._..... Elongation, Ultimate, min, % ASTM D 412 300 480 • Tear Strength, min, Ibf /in (kN /m) ASTM 0 624 (Die C) 150 (26.3) 200 (35.0) Factory Seam Strength, min. Modified Membrane . Membrane ASTM D 816 Rupture Rupture �, « — _ T Y __ Resistance to Heat Aging* ASTM D 573 Properties after 4 weeks 0 240 °F (116 °C) Tensile Strength, min, psi (MPa) ASTM 0 412 1205 (8,3) 1500 (10.3) Elongation, Ultimate, min, % ASTM D 412 200 225 Tear Resistance, min, Ibf /in (kN/m) ASTM D 624 125 (2i.9) 215 (37.6) Linear Dimensional Change, max, % ASTM D 1204 ±1.0 "� _ _ -0.4 T ___ _ _ Ozone Resistance* ASTM D 1149 No Cracks No Cracks Condition after exposure to 100 pphm Ozone in air for 168 hours 0 104 °F (40 °C) Specimen is at 50% strain Brittleness Temp., max, deg. F (deg. C)* ASTM D 746 49 (-45) -67 ( -55) Resistance to Water Absorption' ASTM 0 471 +8.0, -2.0 +2.0 Atter 7 days immersion 0 158 °F (70 °C) Change in mass, max, % Water Vapor Permeance* ASTM E 96 max, perm (Proc B or BW) 0.1 .05 Resistance to Outdoor (Ultraviolet) Weathering' ASTM G 155 No Cracks No Cracks Xenon -Arc, 7560 kJ /m' total radiant No Crazing No Crazing exposure of .70 W /m5 irradiance, 176 °F (80 °C) Black Panel Temp. • Not a Quality Control Test due to the Time required for the fesf or the complexity of the test. However, all tests are run on a statistical basis to ensure overall long -term performance of the sheeting. * See Technical Data Bulletin for Reinforced Typical Properties & Characteristics. sip% APPB04E� � '' S s. �a J } t a ` t 4< 4 s. ,+{ n v � r I MF - 73 L� ' 3i , { � .: , .. - s t 4 r , r :T s �ii� rj ,. . ,, , s ' „ 3 s t �'Y a t ,' 6' S .�': „, . t i , 't-` r it tii � ,"... 9_ {, y a Exist ae iS..ss.z . - . : s M 4' aft x,n ,IV:: s ,i. Io :�i 1 ` i. .a " r�i 1p 4 t '�k ,717.0 # �,O= 3, t y01 , A l : 1 = }...,''.10: . s >, . i _ i x t ;' } . t s~' 11 f . r P i K e t .- °i , F : ' s, ..� t�f r f 3 q d .. New Deck Type a Q t t� 4 j 41 3 c �E3 d, �t s � �i]! s� IE� B 4 � �a . N f f n ( a . s � ° r i tt i 4r{� � ra .s. 7� P � � �1 i cr M.. � . . y , ..,":',;14T'i ;', tt 3 f -' C 1 r 1i ;;. �r 7 i. j :, `i ,' tiii f r 4£,,� 7 i �. ittsuldtton } 4 tI p r i w IY 1 t f } I 1 x y i 1 , :.�. a� y i 1� 4 4 J. t I t 1� � fi� E` C t i I i � T � rFogY,IrK � er s < '� l riM:�;, 1 _ i r} t �a}.< k i r t xl, 11 � i; iY- t 4 '. n } v =, +x e'. 1 t r lfi, .0%,1 .4 4 'l r mi.„ ,- _ z t sir c� " 1 akf i ° t t. aoa iP, t °s k� ?. 1521 ., Y � �� ; 4 RecQrrinlended;�i 4r I r l'''4:441': 4 1 : ; :';'sslP . ..r. • r i r4. �..°�,34 �1 4 r , r u e t,.%' 41AraSii. -1f1NI I) 1AatfbF`f r'^ • ,..: ;.. �: �S':I et _ 3 .. j , , i .jf}���, Y � ` I # "5� ..�,; r ,..;,. � _ � ..:. z � -aaw�� »�� . ; >. ,�;.... ° c+ `j zsc : ;:3;�s3 _ insu ii 4 s } r r i t ie i� r xs L L ;�t", ifiz h f4 �{ s f i a: i� l ry � € : si Yr 1 i l t 1 t i i - , k ' t, s ? �.. r3, rr i, 3 �, f 4y r F F t ' ` F ""z k itaSU� ti41 s r f se i, , 1 t t d q a i a s 3F r Y 4 s',. r x s 0. s 4 t )10 f , r~ 5, f iil't r r{ i,}1 !. 2 1=6" 1 : V ,s � 11 a `jxsS a s y l II t l r ?. , a r �� f- r I ! ��� w5 t la a� S Atrttofitrfiift r , r r' _ , , , 'M t �. . p 4 _. - ' .tom, ° M . . y $ r -41 ' fl� . / t h � � C :1 i ''+ r ' t7 � Si1 4 iP'r C r t t t h �� {�i �s n 6i t � ( $ � v t ° k a � } i l ! � t V J 4 f }' I ,. s7i ) I. i S sr t i C Ii r i ) t{ }11; tr t t t a 1 i a 1 yy 7 ...... t tJ t� lnrkrrl24t :�sr.i CiitaI4i {!1,4 iI t't4tAfrgi'A4' I >t :0 r,..a/AN :.�i s s .�.,. .T.1 t. .Sir. { C4, i i ` rtr iai'_i ; C ids i 4a sir 7 i s s1¢ Jr e r ..., (Fa l R 1 p.. .i s r f I i S. .3 t�- .1 1 ''1*PIlldst 0 trans { d p fi . `�Yl t. ,l Ji ,,? s, °k' 4f r �'s fotp r �hr t X11 {*° .l ` ° -, t .- 7' # °ls!"°,{. 9 0 �+' i r, i.:�ti �� ., ;rM..,, s, Ui �� -.i rte- r h � � k 1 ,rvS i+.., r,_...z { X�.. .� s..� - :.-r�..�,a,'.:it� ..� � F� r. tr 7 �Zo- �.� !' .. S ,. HJ� ... ' y.. e ..Ct x. n,.� �,k. m �„r. ,.v— ea'^^'^k . ,V � E - R S 1 � O R . -O � t� F = 1 N � -� _ � �� Y S T � M S .T <r. f if hSrr`t i' ;31 . n t t . St 7 - lrii•ii 'r ? J^u 'lair .._ <t ;t"x r tr , :• , "v +; - . z .,r t y7cl : asr , r.� 1r1t ttr .t . -' > t ire I t� :xi t %�x , t< , nE �} :� :(•ris .. _.. �,,, it, r z _ J . t ;! : - ; ;� : o r 4 r • x •i - f, 2 ,.. S ii,, r s ',.. =.{ i. ��• s���i�xs� ::� .:.�,<,.< .,� „hr;:a_s: I��tW -g.. � ` �;�i ��-: i� s s, ::MY =�3 � { 9 - . .�r � _ u 3 , ^axs zc.e,�a. a J,.rz...e.src.:. , i+.. .. -. . :: t:A r . a its:>s -.'w-o$ ° taz.r:,x, ;g,3 s. :{: j E>.-. F'.- a.. : i 7 -.4;t, rRl � z .. e �i � ic;� =i:« ( r „ % �. ? �J;r"I- .kl��� � r _ ;t v . 5::• Ti.: an: °. : ::n •:2iF•Sx "r'i?ii %2• %'^':ii �T � ^" : ,- "'.,�a.3. ��'���. , :x'.'.^s ' ° �. "r:? r�..EizSxi � . .:, r . , r J . - ,l r x $`C t ;� sp _ i o*vtn ' to t >• E .. t .-mac. - .. t &f ' " F? .,• t E . - -:I ....;;. AS. i - - .I x ., - r .t.. , - tai. "}� - } ea _:�'e - t y ,r r r cP.L.� -r S} -0s• if nrk'2 t ie- ...off : I s 'ix} 5 :. -- G !i ® Y . *e p t " e r „ 1„1,-4 - 7 . rz,= k x i 4 of t ' r �, I I _ � �t �r.,�-r. � I f a � i i � 'mot �6 �t� et t � rt i ���i .11 � si � k' � � t7 � It ti r `(x`c• z P 7 s t ... , a °� ,�, c flit, £i. m r 3 tI 8 tr£ f ' $- C=1,. P i # c� x. F K r r �., 1.. 4 fi .. x t g $ " " i. ,, . t - t., r �, ^ '' 4 1 - _ t � c c s '{ . p- . * �i El i s trr . ) a, i " tr t F ' �r... s, q. af�, �� h .e: +�l �NSF ���i ;a; t _ ..'s'k � � . c?"'K�^-: ^.•. , "� ' r r' a e {� � �j }� � .� }�:((. Itiirii1E:F f i a 'Pi ,>{ ; ! }''r'`kl 33' >zt ti '3F.,it7"- n , e;1 a - '� - :r' C' �^" - �5i {[6i , 7 t , .! .I .t.k`r aB 1'7 7 i -, i il p ' rti. � ' c r i - 't•: 1 t o U St 2 Y i , r , , , ! 4 � - i3? , i . _...�5 .. {£ Ir : 1 , ! IK --! Jw# S !,. T vs l.Fd. , -_ , ,J i it . rElt T1 i ,... a :•.a r .. '. s' a', ..�a�- i3 - «.. - 8 :.' . 3 , d° } y tl .. z ... a .., - ._ .., x : a . s i•:- r E'° i'6i •t3e ; ? .:.... .. .. ....r.. . , .. { , , e : , £� . -3. .,..f-u ...,.. ItA.zk{� y � 3 : k.xa�..... r �t .. .,,, s I -ti r I xs ,, s 'a ''y�,�� . - < ;: r<3�a :�s�a.� ±4�t� Z ( F ,_. ._ c. e._ <. .t<4 i,xs ? a eSCr z 5px,:.,c a c_e::hs - £i,L'•.�rax : r e ..- a.u.,. e ::: «::.� � c ( -f. x �: t. :.v { . 4r _,., , L. .£;..: {� ?"= 'f'i:�r�,•r .. =r .rr � It i '{� e s.,, -'-an. -- .f, :z•= : sr a ?-- : Ytra • :»., s - :ipo 3 a r . 14 -�ro i .. r:I[;vt: lull?' . i:: _ r �a:(at; i"r"-= :1- r... -:. I•'k<; . -: -,.. C t @p rs s. a. ...,, -x...� . fr.� _ .1. 7 , .,E3 E r -:......a::_°x..:^ 'r of r:-s.a- .4r,.k'FI - ' x. t .._.-...•.. <- > „1 . rrac! ^. j . - r-^z : ^m. �f�c. ., r . ra F, _ . c s'� re, s -. t.:::_ "' ° ° ... r .tr s �.:cr_...x:rrCs� . El,.,.rp : -,z•: - -ax:a: »s:;:: :::c:..,c:,.. . », -,.,,, ., <.. ._.. [, [�� ` '�' ,rx s; ie � s•: � ^••r zd. :- �•,- . {..- .... ?.-., ,rtr;• - ..� s r i:0 t :k r r xr (e �,. ce ?:e13 x . ra a „ -•i: ,r -v TA s; t 3VV •xr. 1 c: 3 1 s:.- g i: l ; Pi s tt ,a � e f * °r .'sr �e ::..,,; s,...... -., a...,,., :t:- r sf ra',h;;f;?; 11:: - ' , , , ITA. ; g ._. u , - . x t 7 •. -. a 8r... ; , : c :f - 'gv 4 t c .: } , , x a-..! a� i t f }^. � r r , r ,£ 'zl Tr i� ��1 r - +_ a , 4 E' .v e E 4 r i t - � t � �.. . t '�< r.•t. t � a -,:. _ - �.,-e' t.. r s a e .,- , ■x � s :� �'�at � ��£r �t~ t � a� � � ��rYr �i e � , i=r; r x "i !. 'l c' c sa_ m Ez; ''F�. c q t t 1 ._ _ ,, t o a ,r _ �° .� � . -i�� ! t 1 co ..,3 ,tr.., i ..x x '-'7: �" v t } POLYISOCYANURATE INSULATION INSTALLATION - BALLASTED FOR VERSICO ROOFING SYSTEMS Versico Polyiso or Polyisocyanuratef insulation is loose laid over the roof deck, The insulation must fit together tightly to prevent Versico Flat and Tapered Polyiso MP -M separation, movement and damage during membrane installation, Vers Membrane is then loose laid over the Versico Polyiso insulation consists of state of -the art Poly iso insulation, Adjoining sheets of membra are seamed together foam with superior fire performance characteristics and according to curren Versi 5peciflcations. The assembly of the ability to retain high R- values ranging from 6.0 to 25.0 insulation and mem is held in place Versico Polyiso is manufactured with exceptional s trength, with a minimum of 10 Ibs, of ballast per square foot. using dimensionally stable facers, which add durability to the boards. INSTALLATION - FULLY- ADHERED Versico Polyiso MPH and Tapered MP -H feature polyisocy anurate laminated to heavy, black, fiber- reinforced felt Install Versico Polyiso or Polyisocyanurate insulation with facers, Versico Polyiso Insulation is recommended for use perforated side down, Mechanically attach the insulation for Fully- Adhered, Mechanically- Attached and Ballasted boards to the substrate, typ every 2-square feet. Coat VersiGard and VersiWeld Roofing Systems to . Tapered MP -H the insulation and membrane with Substrate Adhesive at a is manufactured with a tapered profile promote positive coverage rate of 60 square feet per gallon finished surface, drainage while maintaining the highest thermal efficiency Roll the coated membrane on to the coated insulation and available in a tapered system. Flat and tapered Polyiso is broom to insure contact. Complete the roofing system per available in 25 psi. Versico Specifications. STANDARD SIZES '1TU S; rY d �l1 "i'Y IT Nominal Thickness MP -H r , ,1 I T Inches LTTR Value 1.0" 6.0 1.2" 7.2 - a s 1.3' 7.8 t.5" 9 0 1.6' 9,6 w • 1.8° 109 R l(Ir rk r 4 ' � 57Y4Z • 2.0' 12.1 t �� {1r1 t t Y a S °a 2.3" 140 , 2.5" 15.3 sb 2.7" 166 w e 3.0" 18.5 � ha x x t 3.2" 19.8 3# x m _4 3.4" 21� �? p t � ty ?sd t y • 3.8" 23.7 c #� a t . ''x° . . C .'. s ar k ` '$ � 4. 0" 25.0 4i' vy � 1c r ' c a c42 t '- k''.:,.:'.':',„:',.`."-!.t...' 5 ' . aej • ' 2 r„ `S yet a4s3 a 'J'fa • Avai4'ahlo in L x 4 and 4' x H' panels n 4 ickness of 1' to 4 • Available 11125 psi formula - : ' ''...:":.; - ::*:S':".... 3 '� ^ � i ' et • Avaiiaulc slopes are �f i 'f y.�, Y. " , ' le' and'h" per loot. ?� �� � � �'.. � :� S n� �� ' x + i 3 :-. . ¢ Y ' a S b T i o'o c term ihermel Resisience Values are based on Gi284 -Ot (pending) 8nd CAN /dCC 5770 r ,'• ^',.,i x`...s lt � - ;'' ., . •:' h ' d. . wn y "''Cc fora '' i'' r l ime 5 e,, overa caF g x a a Ui° : >, ro -' Of heNhichnessesa var labt etrp�n regye !V ; inche to milli meter conversion, l -inch- 75.4•mm w •* When an tITR VrNUe grrater th:3n i6.6 is required, Versico recommends mufliple layers nl - '` "'* , Er ' a x insu with 63avaredet?h.a. 1, 11 44 i £ � r` P a �' { , 3 t - .. f... ,. rp ": ; 9 ^ yi VERSICO SINGLE SOURCE FOR SINGLE -PLY ROOFING Versico, LLC PO Box 1289, C�r'Isle, PA 17073 Tel: 600.992.7663 Fax: 717.960.4036 Web www.versieo.carn 1= w0-- ,° h➢h t txtYti!'E/xN k ` y ,'.,9 n •4 i ' 4 00a ^.Y4. eht ..1d .`aa.3.r( 2 3 `h C2' ,,. 4 1 04 .iz.r 4 55144546 @ IIn 18 - k ^:d5:.f' ,.. ..+ 4 tlhU f tin. z?t , V E R S I C O R O O F I N G S Y T E M S a+S�2 � t :' eS d t P t r t ry , p { a3 7, 4 ry�Q It �F � r # .. t kt x7 j a i s S r < l i . s.... .,rs '' It o It F` . t u , n r srsit [ [kt`St�tN i t,k�„ '. 4 t z z a...i s . a'ii.:,€ et ? 'x'}Lr' x .. . 4s S � e��s LY I S a iNsuLATioN „ a[�.:zu:!;a:!>r, liq,4000,- r � "[ C�ti4f�?' VERSICO POLYISO - TYPICAL PROPERTIES FM STANDARD 4450/4470 APPROVAL Property Test Method Typical Results ... ,, P Y YPic ..._ .._ Dimensional Stability ASTM 0 2726 < 29'o linear change 7 days Versico Polyiso is approved for Class 1 insulated steel, woo , Water Absorption ASTM C 209 < 1% by volume Water concrete and gypsum roof deck construction for both 1.60 Moisture Vapor Transmission ASTM E 96 < One (1) perm and 1 - windstorm classifications (may be mopped or Compressive strength ASTM 01621 20 psi minimum (138kPa) mechanically attached to concrete roof deck). Refer to FM Approval Guide for details on specific systems, Product Density ASTM U 1622 Nominal 20 1bs lcu.lt pp p y flame Spread ASTM E 84 25" (foam core) (based on lull 10 min. test) - - 9 UL STANDARD 1256 CLASSIFICATION Service Temperature 100 degrees F to +250 degrees F Max. • rhepgysicafpropen iesiistedabovearep Iue • insulated metal deck construction assemblies o ffered s aser lest toour dsander ) anu i s crtonormr tlman uri clurmgvar iatr o n.thisdata is offered as a service to our customers ar is su act to chan Ml informa can b e c • Construction #120 and #123 by contacting Versico. •• Tho numerical rati a detnnnined by ASTM fast Megtod E are not intended lo refect manrds pr by this o r any o ther materimrunder actual hACnn dition,. ••• Also available In 25 psi minimum. UL STANDARD 790 CLASSIFICATION MECHANICALLY- ATTACHED • Class A with most roof membrane systems. • See UL Building Materials Directory. Versico Polyiso or Polyisocyanurate insulation is Mechanically - Attached to the roof deck with Versico UL STANDARD 263 FIRE RESISTANCE Insulation Plates and Fasteners typically every 8-square feet. CLASSIFICATION (ASTM E 119) • The VersiGard or VersiWeld Membrane is installed over the insulation and Mechanically- Attached along the seam -__....._........_....,...-----......_.._.........._......_.._..-._.. .......... ............................... _.._...... area to the roof deck with Versico Fasteners and Plates or Some Classifications for fire resistance are P225, P230, P259, P508, Versico Fasteners and Batten Bar. Adjoining sheets of P510, P514, P701, P713, P717, P718, P719, P720, P722, P723, P724, membrane are seamed together according to current P725, P727, P729, P730, P732, P801, P814, P815, P818, P819, P823 and Versico Specifications. P828. See UL Fire Resistance Directory for updated listings. STORAGE PACKAGING Nominal Thickness Pieces /Package Square Feet /Package Inches 4'x 8' 4' x 4' Factory applied packaging is only intended for protection 1. 0 45 1472 736 during transit. When stored outdoors or on the job site, 1.2 38 1216 608 • i packages should be stacked on pallets at least four 1.3 34 1088 544 inches above ground level and completely covered 1.5 30 992 496 with a weatherproof covering such as a tarpaulin. 1.6 28 _._. _..... .. . 896 448 1.8 25 ............. 832 _....... 416 _... ... .. _.... VERSICO POLYISO 2.0 23. 736 368 23 _.. 20 fiao 320 REGULATORY COMPLIANCES 2 5: 18 576 288 2.7 17 544 2!2 • Federal Specifications — HH- l 1972/GEN and HH - 1972/2 30 15 240 .... 480 .. ...... ..._.. 3.2 14.._._ ..................._.. 448 ....._ 224 Class 1 .... .. 3.4 13.._ ................. ......_.................. _44 22 ... .. • ASTM 1289.01 3 . 8 - -_.._. _ 12_..... _. - 384 192. • Metro -Dade County, Florida Product Quality Standards 4.0 11 352 ._ 176 and Title 25 Foam Flammability Criteria (License #TC 1231) Packages per 45' Truck 24 48 • BOCA, ICBO, SBCCI Sections on Foam Insulation • the physical properties listed above are presented as typical average values as determined by • CCMC No. 12464 -L accepted ASTM test methods and are subject to normal manufacturing variation. This data if offered as a service to our customers and is subject to change. AD information can be confirmed by contacting Versico: For more information and samples •• Me numerical ratings as determined by AVM fast Method al are mil Intended to refecthaserds please call: 1. 800. 992.7663 presented by this deny other material under actual fire conditions. ••• Also available in 25 psi minimum. • _ t.,F? - ,'-pia } ,x..t„ 4 S ti..,,4t,'LM,3. I, k l:, 1 ,. ,,+4 S se F a'iW.,i t r � .4 4'? b_ . . ±,a' , t - ....ki.,. .1 „- . i` .J.i ..,...1... •�`,.LP : . r 4 4.: ,. k _4. .• i. i ., ., - ... ,,. -.} , .i' x.... !.r:, _ , 1 , 6 44 70s !I A r s I 1 i 1 - 1 , I , ----, -s A L.-L. c-A-A---e'k i ,---- s A-, ,--, - Pe)--)(. ---- 4r 1 1 , , I I lz) 1 , - ,...,,-,-. yo I l 'i I I 1 vo two 0 vc-f)._ 2_0 IAJ.z , 13 67 x 3 0 ) f k - (MO° - 72.0a 0 8° 1;51-0 la .4 t-i Ev_P 1'33'4- k- I 1 '1" . 2-S 7 /3, ii I, ii 1 ta 53. 4 1 i 1 ----- 3 - - 2_ B.K ., ---- ' 25 ,- -- , I 1 S A ( - "t 4 , L.. z- . 7 I (c).=> , ( - 7 ( 'i 7 3oo o )(ZOO I 0 0 4-co coils — a 5, ">3 0 EA F-1-4.. ait, Y-- Z- ------------------------- 1, I I 1 Memorandum DATE: August 15, 2008 " 44 ✓e o "166P TO: Danette Walthers, Community Development/Natural Resources Director FROM: Robert D. Hutchins, Building Official RE: Site plan review for EM Products Addition Following are the results of the Site plan review for the EM Products Addition. Our review was based on the 2007 Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) which adopted with amendments the 2006 International Building Code (IBC) with handicap regulations of the Minnesota Accessibility Code Chapter 1341. Also requirements of the 2007 Minnesota State Fire Code (MSFC) which adopted with amendments the 2006 International Fire Code (IFC). 1. Sheet G0001: Complete a Building Code analysis. IBC Chapter 5. Include the following: Cr The present Code is based on the 2007 Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) A CPDt which adopted with amendments the 2006 International Building Code (IBC). Allowable Floor Area. Recalculate the combined size of building to include the addition. Recalculate f and p by including the addition. Location on Property. Provide the East side setback dimension from the Southeast corner of the building to the property East line. 0 Height and Number of stories. There is a second story in the existing building. ()Occupant load calculation and Exiting determination. \ ()plumbin fixture count. d2. Submit signed Civil plans. Provide a cross on existin , ildmg and addition roof drainage/layout 1 V _ ` pan. . Provide fire lanes for fire apparatus response. Signage to read:" No Parking Fire Lane by order of Fire Department ". Indicate on Site plan. Locate by onsite Fire Hydrant. IFC 1001.7.1. 4 Submit signed a Certificate of Survey. J:\LETRMEMO\DRC\08EMaddDRC.DOC The following are building plan comments: &Submit signed Stru Ural, HVAC, plumbing, fire /smoke alarm, 0 sirs and sprinkler plans. Provide signed drawings of roof framing system and precast wall panels. Submit a detail of the South exterior stairs. May be submitted at a later date. /7. An S.A.C. determination must be completed by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services. Contact Kelly Barnebey at kelly.barnebey @metc.state.mn.us or 651- 602 -1421 for the determination. Presently, there is a charge of $5175.00 per SAC unit which is collected at the time of the building permit issuance. •8 Submit Energy Envelope Calculations. MN Energy Code 7670.0100 i Submit a soils report. . . . Submit the Structural Engineers requirements for Special Inspections IBC 1701.5. See / enclosed. ' _. Provide a narrative describing the type of work and processes of the occupant. l Provide interior ventilation for all areas. Warehouse /manufacturing areas require 0.06 creffik. ` CFM per square foot of floor area. MSBC 1346.0403.3 Table 6.1 ANSI/ASHRAE Addendum n to ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62 -2001. r13. Will there be storage of or driven motorized vehicles into any area? If there is, state the number of vehicles and type of fuel source powering vehicle. ille \ fi' Provide fire extinguishers minimum 2A 10BC rated, within 75 feet travel distance of all areas. UFC 1002. 15. Submit a building permit for the Spray Booth. The booth must be tested and listed by G • J an accredited testing laboratory. &a i4VAL Laos. Ar MOA X6. List types, and quantities, location of storage and Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) of combustible and flammable liquids. e.(E go If installed, in -rack sprinklers, early suppression fast response sprinklers or other r approved system that meets the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) section 231c is required for all storage areas where the top of the pile storage is over 12 feet above the floor or grade. • Provide documentation that roofing materials meet IBC 1508 and 2603.4.1.5. This review is based on civil and building plans dated August 5, 2008. Other code items will be addressed when the final plans are submitted. The building plans must be reviewed by the Cities Developmental Review Committee (DRC) which consists of representatives of Planning, Engineering, Parks, Finance, and Building Departments. The DRC must approve the site plans before a building permit can be issued. C 2 _. .. ... . .... .- . . '11 l 'ile \ - lb AtiMt --0, .40:s1.1 ..)/4444 .4.1e3 '•bk. A ." • : APAc 1 . , . , 0 . Memorandum DATE: September 8, 2008 TO: Jeff Matzke, City Planner FROM: Larry Poppler, Assistant City Engineer CC: Steve Albrecht, Public Works Director /City Engineer RE: EM Products (City Project #08 -133) The Engineering Department has reviewed the site plan received on September 5, 2008 for the subject project and we have the following comments: Grading Plan 1. Show detail on curb opening for the drainage on the north side of the proposed parking lot. Detail should show how curb is modified, width, slope, etc. 2. Part of the work is shown outside the construction limits. Construction limits line - type is too similar to the contour line -type. Please adjust line -types and add each to legend. Hydrology and Hydraulics 1. Include results of infiltration test in storm water plan. 2. Show how proposed system meets volume control requirement. — How are existing and proposed discharge volumes calculated? If these values are referenced from HydroCAD model — please explain assumptions and provide reference to summary sheet. 3. Infiltration design will require O &M manual and maintenance agreement. This requirement will be a condition of final approval and occupancy permit. C:\Documents and Settings\bob\Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \OLKS\EM Products 091208.DOC METCON METRO DIVISION C O M P A N I E S CONSTRUCTION SERVICES September 3, 2008 . --- --- L Mr. Robert D. Hutchins r SEP 0 5 2008 Building Official �1L City of Prior Lake By Re: Site Plan Review for EM Products Addition Dear Robert: In response to your memo dated August 15, 2008 regarding your plan review of the EM Products Addition project, please note the following: 1. Complete a Building Code Analysis — see attached updated plan sheet A001 which now includes a code analysis for this project. 2. Submit signed Civil plans — see attached updated Civil plans that are now signed. 3. Provide existing building and addition roof drainage/ layout plan — see attached plan sheet A102. 4. Provide fire lanes for fire apparatus response — see notes added to site plan for fire lane signage. 5. Submit signed a Certificate of Survey — see attached copy of the survey completed by Sunde Land Surveying dated 6/10/2008. 6. Submit signed Structural, HVAC, plumbing, etc. — see attached Structural plans, and see emergency lighting/ exit sign notations on the floor plan. All other items will be submitted at a later date as stated. 7. SAC determination by Metropolitan Council — see attached letter from Metropoliten Council determining the sac units for this project. 8. Submit Energy Envelope calculations — see attached certificate prepared by the Architect. 9. Submit a soils report — Braun Intertec has completed borings, and the soils report should be available approximately 9/5/08. This will be submitted under separate cover or an electronic copy emailed. 10. Submit the Structural Engineers requirements for Special Inspections — see attached Special Inspection Program Summary Schedule executed by all parties. 11. Provide a narrative describing the type of work and processes of the occupant — see attached narrative labeled "Engine Exhaust Systems ". 12. Provide interior ventilation for all areas — This will be addressed in the HVAC submittal. There are PRV's and louvers planned for this purpose. 13. Will there be storage of or driven motorized vehicles into any area? — The far east bay of the new addition will receive on average two diesel powered Semi flatbeds per day for loading/ unloading. There will also be LP powered forklifts used in this area. A Carbon Monoxide detection system is planned. This will also be addressed on the HVAC submittal. 14. Provide Fire Extinguishers — see architects notations for fire extinguishers on the updated floor plan. 10640 Lyndale Ave South Suite 4 • Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 • Phone: (952) 884 -6250 • Fax: (952) 884 -8766 Equal Opportunity Employer • 15. Submit a building permit for the Spray Booth — the Occupant has stated that they will be relocating the existing spray booth into the new addition. 16. Provide MSDS of combustible and flammable liquids — see attached MSDS sheets 17. Provide fire sprinkler accommodations for rack storage, if installed — the occupant has not made a final decision on whether there will be rack storage in the new addition. If there will be, the fire sprinkler system will be installed to accommodate this. 18. Provide documentation that roofing materials meets IBC 1508 and 2603.4.1.5 - The roofing contractor is gathering this information and will be submitted under separate cover. Please advise if there is any additional information you need beyond that listed above. Sincerely, Met -Con Companies Metro Division /p Mike Bonasera General Manager CeII — 952 - 224 -6043 MET v CON C' l) NI I' n N 1 l CONSTRUCTION SERVICES tV A41 c-"T'S Alb ljr v Ve /$ .5 F-2-- Sr. aG,4-1 /my os 4 er, v.• Z l. Z 4 s S F S$ . S 3 = r. 2.54 a2 0. r im s 7 4s- 2S Isrm,u,ta.✓ s4 ZS 4. 44.a v, r loot. • x ZSo r Q Go '�- X44 S. zS PC C o k t e g ' K 61 fs.z5 ,c 6,57. 4 4 S { 4.4! sr. 5 s00 -• /s o,e.c.,..,0 f co. - S . a o Of 2511 000_- rod - )L' G0O • • x ° • • • • CITY OF PRIOR LAKE BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT COMMERCIAL & MULTI -UNIT FIRE PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Project Name: rrn '0� c--r5 4 ( Job Address: 5 ©-r L,_,(, ( 06 LAA,-"� E • Provide access roadway for fire apparatus in accordance with Section 503 of the International Fire Code (IFC). This includes the following: All- weather driving surface. IFC 503.2.3 20 feet of unobstructed width. IFC 503.2.1 Z 4 ( ) 13 feet 6 inches of vertical clearance. Adequate turning radius capable of supporting fire apparatus. IFC 503.2.4 The r. ' ' • - - , a s i rinklered building. 60 feet for a non - sprinklered building. ( ) Dead end access in excess of 150 feet long shall be provided with a p a turnaround. IFC 503.2.5 4 T�� S Access roadways shall be extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building per IFC 503.1.1. Where access cannot be provided, an approved fire protection system shall be provided. V An adequate and approved access for Fire Department equipment must be provided during construction. If on site pavement is not provided when construction begins an approved roadway surface must be installed with approved dimensions which will support fire vehicles and equipment. • Non - sprinklered Building: Fire hydrants are required per IFC 508. All portions of the exterior of any non - sprinklered building must be within 150 feet of an approved fire hydrant. • Sprinklered Building: Buildings with a sprinkler system require one hydrant within 150 feet of the fire department connection and a hydrant(s) within 300 feet of all portions of the exterior. The fire department connection shall be located on the front of the building. The PIV must be located a minimum of the height of the building away. E , -; - Wier vit ° o r. �ic - � Nor 4 D /SO , / i /5 /j0' K. ovide not less than one standpipe for use during construction. Fire sprinkler /riser permit uired before building permit issued. International Building Code 3311. 1 sog l oo t To Fly 70 774is 14 78© D. /. FIREPLAN 6 Submit 8 -1/2 x 11 inch site plan for development of emergency response plan. • Submit plans for underground storage tank installation to the State Fire Marshal for approval. Upon approval, submit approved plans to the Building Inspection Department which will conduct the inspection and testing. • Provide information or see instructions as indicated below for special hazards. Please supply information, plans, specifications, as applicable. ( ) Places of assembly, IFC Chapter 10. ( ) Cellulose nitrate storage in excess of 25 lbs., IFC Chapter 42. ( ) Storage and handling of combustible fibers, IFC Chapter 29. ( ) Garages, repair, IFC Chapter 22. ( ) Dry cleaning operation, IFC Chapter 12. ( ) Application of flammable finishes including dip tanks, spray booths, etc., IFC Chapter 20. Welding and cutting operations, IFC Chapter 26. Refrigeration equipment using other than air or water and more than 20 lbs., IFC Chapter 6. ( ) Compresses gases, flammable, IFC Chapter 30. ( ) Compresses gases, non - flammable, IFC Chapter 30. ( ) Cryogenic fluids, IFC Chapter 32. ( ) Explosives or blasting agents (storage or use), IFC Chapter 33. ( ) Flammable and combustible liquids, IFC Chapter 34. ( ) Hazardous chemicals, storing and handling of hazardous materials including toxic chemicals, poisonous gas, hazardous waste as defined by DOT and EP regulations, IFC Chapter 27. ( ) High piled combustible storage, IFC Chapter 23. -- This includes requirements for fire sprinklers designed for proposed commodity and storage arrangement, building access, access doors, smoke and heat removal, curtain boards, and hose connections. ( ) Liquefied petroleum gases, IFC Chapter 38. FIREPLAN All hydrants shall be accessible to the fired department apparatus by roadways meeting above Y � pp Y Ys S requirements. Hydrants shall be located within 5 feet of the curb so that apparatus can pull along side for the connection. City design manual • Provide fire lanes for fire apparatus response. Signage should read: "No Parking Fire Lane by order of the Fire Department." Location and number to be determined. • Provide numbers of addresses in such a way to be plainly visible from the street or road fronting the property per IFC 505. Numbers shall contrast with their background. • Townhouse projects must have directional signs designating the numbering sequence of units for each individual roadway. • Provide approved key box to be installed in accessible location per IFC 506. This is required when access to a structure is unduly difficult or where immediate access is necessary for life safety or fire fighting purposes. Key boxes shall contain keys to gain necessary access. Key boxes also recommended for building where entry may be delayed and to prevent damage as result of forcible entry. Obtain order forms from the Building Inspection Department. • Fire extinguishers are required for this project per IFC 906. Extinguishers are required to be a minimum 2A10BC rated and located within 75 feet travel distance of all areas. This distance decreases for more hazardous occupancies. Location and size to be determined. • Submit plans for required fire protection equipment to the Building Inspection Department per IFC 901.2. Requirements based on the 2003 Minnesota State Building Code. Submit two copies of detailed shop drawings before installation to receive approval and permit. (One copy will be returned.) The contractor should submit installation permit application with plans. ( ) Automatic fire extinguishing systems (sprinklers). ( ) Sprinkler systems of more than 20 heads must be monitored by an approved 24 -hour station. ( ) Fire hydrant systems. ( ) Wet standpipe systems. ( ) Fire alarm systems. ( ) Cooking appliance and vent extinguishing systems. () Fire pumps. ( ) Other extinguishing systems. • Fire alarm plans must be submitted by State licensed electrician or low voltage contractor. • Protection systems installed that are not required are subject to approval by the Fire Department and must meet code requirements. PIREPLAN \ rn f J . l\ ----c:------ ..-- -----'-. ( . o �` ` / / / rn / pp ` h k3 "e z i ., rye �\ i f ir' • /' / / / r . ...i! ' / i / .` i / 111111111 / A *'N'''''.-N / OD / / ' i ~ ' il J i / / T. A m ./ / / N 0 0 A /Ill —' / (S / / / I i 4. ., l ti H , L 7 1 ( p(-2 ...,,,,,,., GT1 e8/4/oe I - z rvA_ 6 tom` —v' IQ J p(H('''.'\.( (\.. ;,- ��. i, A _Sic. , ' j V� c-----' S 05 Or e A r T" ,- , . -t/'/i L 1p " „, e-L 5 f / I I I (/u 5 C"--t ,, 0 S 1 I j Gboo ( ,wc___ ,-Y, F ...„,_ „,.- . ::,....,,_,� , t1 kt IX.Ci•e_,,, cc .P -7 (■,-\s ? i LJ. ,. A°"I "Y- pr W!' _ ,, 5 l c. D tzk- Ni t i ..�►��.i�s + L - — r , . . o #/92K(' ( iL " 5-- i A Al /tea j _ ..v 6''' V L )G E '1 1 rifkre.-R- t ill w` :F' , IT rte, ► c oo P(---Prr- w 11, 11 h6- c( rla),<--. _ 0,1:"4717-i Cs ifl ei...---Bri-r.. C,C7 ' —e-5 ( i C Z -(' 4 . . t y Ca4, cr /--/9A4 6 0t44" i S P 12-44-4( 6007-N- 4 1 i I ..•.,. ....... - - - - . - - - -- - -- - - COMcheck Software Version 3.5.1 I Envelope Compliance Certificate ( Minnesota Commercial Code Report Date: 09/05/08 Data filename: 11:10EA BACKUPV DrivetPROJECTS42008‘08028(Prier Lake. MN - EM Products Warehouse Addition)‘Specifications\EM Products Envelope.ock Section 1: Project Information Project Title: EM Products Construction Site: Owner/Agent: Designer/Contractor: 5380 Cottonwood Lane SE Mike Bonasera Cohn Evenson Prior Lake, MN Met.Con Companies Cities Edge Architects 10640 Lyndale Ave $ 103 15th Ave NW Suite 4 Willmar, MN 56201 Bloomington MN 55420 612.850.1206 952,884.6250 oevenson@cthesedgearcMecls.com Section 2: General Information Building Location (Mr weather data) Scott, IViinnesoU Climate Zone: 15 -eating Degree Days (base 65 degrees F): 8499 Cooling Degree Days (base 65 degrees Fi: 895 Project Type: Addition Vertical Glazing / Wall Area Pot 0% Buildiett_TY.Pit Hoot Area Warehouse/Storage10.001-25,000 ft2 20152 Section 3: Requirements Checklist Eraveiope PASSES D ...j!. Climate..Specific Requirements: component Name/Description Gross Area Cavity Cont. Proposed Budget or Perimeter R-Value R-Value U-Factor U-Factor Roof 1: Non-Wood Joist/Rafter/Truss 20152 0,0 23 6 0.041 0.045 Exterior Wall 1. Other, HC 1 0 3901 — -- 0.042 0 068 Door 2 Solid 24 .._ — 0.090 0.113 Exterior Wall 2, Other, HC 1.0 3115 ._. --- 0.042 0.068 Exterior Wall 3: Other, HC 1 0 31051 — — 0.042 0.068 Door 3 Solid 24 -- -- 0.090 0.113 Door 4. Overhead 72 -- — 0.059 0.113 Door 5: Overhead 64 — — 0.059 0.113 Door 6 Overhead 196 — -- 0.059 0.113 Floor 1: Slab-On-Grade:Unheated, Vertical 4 ft. 458 — 23,6 — — (a)Budget U-factors are used for software baseline calculations ONLY, and are not code requirements Air Leakage, Component Certification, and Vapor Retarder Requirements: j 1 AD joints and penetrations are caulked, gasketed, weather-stripped, or otherwise sealed. j 2 Windows, doors, and skylights certified as meeting leakage requirements j 3 Component R-values & U-tactors labeled as certified ._ _ _ „____.... _____. ._____...... . , .___ . _ ......_.... ... ... ., ........ , . ... Projed Title: EM Products Report date: 09/05/08 Data filename. HACEA BACKUPQ Drive‘PROJECTS\2008\08028(Prior Lake, MN - EM Products Warehouse Addition)\Specifications■EM Products Envelope ock Pana 1 nf 7 sj 4 Insulation installed according to manufacturers instructions, in substantial contact with the surface being insulated, and in a manner that achieves the rated R-value without compressing the insulation j 5 Vapor retarder installed Section 4: Compliance Statement Compliance Statement The proposed envelope design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The p ..... t.. t velope system has been designed to meet the Minnesota Comm d rcial Code requirements in COMcheck Version 3.5,1 and t. ... ply tth the ma .....„ . irernents in the Requirements Checklist . i 4 021 - Name - Title Signature Date h g eiieetti 1 4 4 4 ,,i,„ ,....„ _ ..., Project Title: EM Products Report dater 09105/08 Data filename: 1-1:10EA BACKURJ DrivekPROJECTSk2008!08028(Prior Lake, MN - EM Products Warehouse Addition)kSpecificationstEM Clrewif Infie =rvt oormir4n. , 1 ' - i ' , ii m i ll I i! H i L 17--c-isiLi...f.., 1 lig g 0 a . O N I ____I 0 Q i 1 1 ii 1 1 = _ - L .1 Q ' - — 0 : i IV 1 Q .; rE i t t II 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIII% T IIIIIIIIIIIIIII -✓ 9 - - �� ■� ■aA �. 3i - e ; „co z iii`\ �� W � tx �O \1 00 7 W U P I . o: IL e i IIE IPI I i ( m . , _..., a • !-1-14 ,,ii N. =.--- 0 ''''''''-‘'......'-s--° . di 9 I i ° • ° `• mit u I 1 s � u z l_ • 41 a e. a Z cll. o H a C7 2 H.; 0 0 '0 CD o. a LI 0- y w ti .c .Li CD CO n C) Z Pi 0 M t- q �°s g A) 0 , ec 0 )71 0 I t es. C ii 0 O 7 N O' \ L. N O �� to wi 0 O �'• H cr tal 5 LA I a: 4 I ar I VI o 6 ,� `-• • 0 o `e go c CD CD CD pa CA go CA P UQ a r co 0� 0t. 0< O V • 1 b C b b O t�• -. iv C r* J w rr E. O '� D CD - 0. 0 1 0 tZ 0 ,,, `�—" 2. cn 5 LA 5 + CD O et w y 2. a a a Pi Cr " a v, o ts ,I 0 0 0 0 0 0 . O a '+ cli �.-• N N • g O C a , O , , r) O O 0 w CD 0 O - O O O — O CD 0 0 . E CD cr) E: a' CD 172 Po Po A) cr .. C. cA p ' n ' r* p CD G O. O O O O O 0 0 0 g v N o o cm fD o a _ I Engine Exhaust Systems Phillips & Temro Industries Silencer Division is a comprehensive manufacturer of industrial silencers for a multitude of applications suitable for diesel, gas and gaseous engines. We cover a size range of engine silencing from as small as 20 horsepower up to 10,000 horsepower. Today, we serve leading manufacturers and distributors in various markets including Power Generation, Off - Highway and Industrial Mobile equipment, Commercial Marine and Gas Compression. Phillips & Temro is a leader in these markets because we offer a full range of standardized silencers and accessories as well as custom engineered sound attenuation solutions to meet our customer's requirements. Our engineering staff within the Silencer Division is fully capable to design and manufacture exhaust systems to a high level of performance through computer system modeling, analysis and testing. Our silencers are designed and developed utilizing a full complement of computer generated models and acoustic performance analysis tools. These software tools together with bench testing data collection allow our engineering team to accurately design high performing silencing systems. Metal Stamping, Fabrication, Painting, and Welding From quantities of ten to several thousand, the highly trained team at FTI is ready to produce high quality rretal assemblies to meet our customer's application. We focus on the entire metaI fabrication process which includes: cutting, metal preparation, forming, welding, painting, and final assembly. Integrated manufacturing capabilities including CAD /CAM, CNC machining, and CMM inspection ensure the complete control of the entire manufacturingprocess and strict adherence to cusbmer specifications. Relevant Capabilities: CNC laser and plasma cutting CNC vertical and horizontal machining Annealing Metal stamping and forming up to 600 ton Progressive die stamping up to 150 ton MIG and TIG welding Powder coat and wet spray painting Special Structural Testing and Inspection Program Summary Schedule Project Name: EM Products Warehouse Add'n Architects Project No. Location: Prior Lake, MN Permit No. (1) Technical (2) Type of Specific Report Assigned Article Table Description (3) Inspector (4) Frequency (5) Firm (6) 1704.3 1704.3 Structural steel high strength bolting, welding, material SI -T / SI -S Periodic TA verification, columns 1704.4 1704.4 Concrete independent engineered design mix, curing, and SI -T Periodic TA verification of strength for removal of formwork and use of the concrete 1704.4 1704.4 Concrete slump, air and temperature of fresh concrete SI -T Continuous TA 1704.4 1704.4 Reinforcing steel installed in concrete SI -T/ SI -S Periodic TA 1704.4 1704.4 Anchor bolts for structural steel columns installed in SI -T/ SI -S Periodic TA I concrete 1704.5 1704.5.1 Structural unit and veneer masonry erection tolerances, SI -T Periodic TA grout, mortar and reinforcing 1704.4 1704.4 Erection of precast members SI -T Periodic TA 1704.7 1704.7 Earthwork excavation and fill - determine psf of base of SI -T Periodic TA excavation, All engineered /borrowed fill, lifts, all compaction Note: This schedule shaft be filled out and included in a Special Structural Testing and Inspection Program. (If not otherwise specified, assumed program will be "Guidelines for Special Inspection & Testing" as contained in the State Building Code and as modified by the state adopted IBC.) *A complete specification -ready program can be downloaded directly by visiting CASE at www.cecm.org* (1) Permit No. to be provided by the Building Official (2) Referenced to the specific technical scope section in the program. (3) Use descriptions per IBC Chapter 17, as adopted by Minnesota State Building Code. (4) Special Inspector — Technical (SIT); Special Inspector — Structural (SIS) (5) Weekly, monthly, per test/inspection, per floor, etc. (6) Name of Firm contracted to perform services. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (Each appropri resentative all sign below) c- --� _ � ►,r� r� �_ �� Firm: sfo./ J .,l'0 " 0 Ifr 'r3 Contractor: /�/l //ti i � r� �lL .A .t2, — ( h % Le. Date: - 3 -0: M �- Architec 1f•!;. ', F irm: C rhes C l ti T« s Date: D I AER V d d SER: � � _ Firm: / C .7Z aAfG ih'distri zleq Date: G SI -S: i ` a l.'�� / Firm: / TCo A //,‘ t �( �4e,, � , D ate : . ` TA: >/l i _ I 1.14— Firm: 1 7 A 1 jte-( 4- a e a,r,., Date: Side. A ( s) F: Firm: d Date: if requested by engineer /architect of record or building official, the individual names of all prospective special inspectors and the work they intend to observe shall be identified as an attachment. Legend: SER = Structural Engineer of Record SI -T = Special Inspector - Technical TA = Testing Agency SI-S = Special Inspector - Structural F = abricator Accepted for the Building Department By 0 C� Date [ /S /8 BCSD PROI9 4/03 11 -22 -2004 1.20PM FROM EASIWAY SYSTEMS INC 763 972 6206 P.2 MATERIAL SAFETY DATA .SHEET Prepared November 1, 2004 • • MANUFACTURER: SUPPLIER: EASIWAY SYSTEMS, • INC, • 540 River Street P.O. Box 70 Delano, MN 55328 Business Phone: 1-612. 972 -6306 Emergency Phone: 1•. 8004249300 SECTION I • PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION AND USE PRODUCT NAME:, EASI -GRIP 309 PRODUCT USE: Cleaner1 SECTION 1I • HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS • • CAS OSHA ACGIH PEI,. TLV • Phosphoric Acid 7884.38.2 lmg/ma Not 8% Applic. SECTION Iii - PHYSICAL DATA _ APPEARANCE: Colorless liquid BOILING POINT: 212 °F SPECIFIC GRAVITY: 1.10 SECTION IV • FIRE OR EXPLOSION HAZARD FLASHPOINT; None. PECET\TF,ED EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Not applicable. FIRE & EXPLOSION HAZARDS: Not applicable. NOV 2 2 2004 FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES: Not applicable. 4 BY: .. SECTION V • REACTIVITY DATA • STABILITY: Stable under normal conditions of storage and handling. INCOMPATIBILITY: Strong alkali and chlorine bleach. HAZARDOUS . P:OLYJ A EA N:.WiJl not , occur. • 11 -22 -2004 1:20PM FROM EASIWAY SYSTEMS INC 763 972 6206 P.3 • EIG 309 SECTION VI • HEALTH HAZARD DATA ROUTES OF ENTRY: Inhalation and .ingestion. EFFECTS OF EXPOSURE: Skin - Irritation and dermatitis. • Eyes - Irritation and burning. • inhalation . Upper respiratory tract irritation. CARCINOGENICITY: No SECTION VII • PRECAUTION$ FOR SAFE HANDLING AND USE PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT: Use with good ventilation. Wear safety glasses or goggles and gloves when handling. When spraying wear approved respirator ' •with a DFM ffiter, • LEAK AND SPILLS PROCEDURE: Contain spill area, neutralize with soda ash (sodium car- bonate) or dilute caustic soda. Flush area with plenty of water. WASTE DISPOSAL Dispose of in accordance with local, county, state and federal regulations.. Do not store with or near strong alkali or chlorine containing compounds. Do not weld, cut, braze or drill drums that are empty. SECTION VIII • FIRST AID MEASURES EYE CONTACT: Flush with plenty of water for 15 minutes, remove contact lenses, call physician. $KIN CONTACT: Wash with. plenty of water. INHALATION (BREATHING): Remove to fresh air. INGESTION (SWALLOWING); Call physician immediately, do not Induce vomiting, drink 1 =2 • glasses of water. SECTION IX • SARA 313 INFORMATION This product contains the. following substances subject to the reporting requirements of Section 313 of Title 111 of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 and 40 CFR Part 372; Chemical Name CAS Number % by Weight Pitili010100111, 766448.2 ' $.0% • • , 13 -277 PAGE: 1 AATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET FOR COATINGS, RESINS AND RELATED MATERIALS HAZARD RATING 0 - MINIMAL 3 - SERIOUS 1 - SLIGHT 4 - SEVERE 2 - MODERATE * - CHRONIC . HMIS RATING HEALTH - * 2 FLAMMABILITY - 3 REACTIVITY - 0 ;ECTION I HEBOYGAN PAINT COMPANY DATE OF PREPARATION 01/01/08 439 NORTH 25th STREET / P.O. BOX 417 TRANSPORTATION EMERGENCY (800) 688 -4005 HEBOYGAN, WI 53082 -0417 EMAIL: custsery @shebpaint.com 'ELEPHONE: (920) 458 -2157 PRODUCT CLAES TRADE NAME - MFG PRODUCT NO. SURFACE COATING 111 -HEAT LOW HAPS SATIN , t 13 -277 ;ECTION II - HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS ACGIH TLV. ACGIH STEL OSHA PEL OSHA CEILING LEL % VAPOR PRESS % BY 4T INGREDIENT CASIM PPM mg /m3 PPM mg /m3 PPM mg /m3 - PPM mg /m3 VOLUM mm /Hg DEG F Wght - Toluene (Toluol) (skin) VHAP 108 -88 -3 50.00 188.0 - - - -- 200.0 300.0 1.000 22.00 1 68. 4.26 ® r - 6.39 ?J Silicone Resin 28630 -33 -3 4I n -Butyl Acetate 123 -86 -4 150.0 713.0 200.0 950.0 150.0 710.0 1.700 8.400 068. 25.7 41 utyl Isobutyrate 97 -85 -8 100.0 0.960 3.000 1 68. 15.2 ;�bropanol 67 -63 -0 400.0 983.0 500.0 1230. 400.0 980.0. - 2.000 33.00 0 68. • Copper as Cu (dust) 7440 -50 -8 1.000 1.000 0 - -- 1.62 5.000 0 . - -- 2.16 _ Manganese as Mn HAP 7439 -96 -5 0.200 - 41 Graphite (dust) 7782 -42 -5 2.000 2.500 0 - - 1.94 VM &P Naphtha 64742-89 -8 300.0 •1370. 1800. 300.0 0.900 15.00 0 100 • Ethyl Benzene VHAP 100 -41 -4 100.0 434.0 125.0 543.0 100.0 435.0. 1.000 10.00 0 79. 0.12 Ethyl Cellulose 9004 -57 -3 • • -This toxic chemical is subject to the reporting requirements of both Section 313 of the Emergency ' anning"aad communfty i` 1 Right -to -Know Act of 1986 (40CFR372) and the Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources Administrative aide Chapter NR465.iJ - { I I VHAP - VOLATILE HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT (VAPOR) HAP = HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT (SOLIDI: F ii ' f :I I ( skin) OSHA Skin Absorption Hazard VOC content determined by EPA method MAR 0 4 2008 . I 'l PJ -This chemical is on the Pennsylvania and New Jersey Right -to -Know lists. J ?% ti WI -This chemical is subject to reporting procedures outlined in the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources miniatratt9 Code Chapters NR438 and /or NR445. MP -This constituent chemical is toxic to fish and has been iden tified as a Marine Pollutant. DO NOT allow this product to be introduced into watersheds or wetlands. ;ECTION III - PHYSICAL DATA RILING RANGE 100 -490 F VOC KG /KG SOLIDS =4.59 VOC (WITH WATER AND EXEMPT SOLV) = 6.16 LBS /GAL 738 GMS /LITER % HAPS BY WEIGHT= 7.01 VOC (LESS WATER AND EXEMPT SOLV) = 6.16 LBS /GAL 738 GMS /LITER VAPOR DENSITY EVAPORATION RATE %VOLATILE %VOLATILE WEIGHT SPECIFIC AVG SOLV BY WEIGHT BY VOLUME PER GALLON GRAVITY DENSITY APOR DENSITY HEAVIER THAN AIR EVAPORATION RATE SLOWER THAN ETHER 82.12 90.57 7.4975 .9 6.8 13 -277 PAGE: 2 SECTION IV - FIRE & EXPLOSION HAZARDS ROPER SHIPPING NAME - PAINT, 3, UN1263, II SHIPPING LABEL - FLAMMABLE LIQUID (3) LABEL FLASHPOINT 40 F XTINGUISHING MEDIA: Use carbon dioxide or dry chemical for small fires. For large fires, use an alcohol -type or multi- urpose foam extinguishing agent. Water may be ineffective to extinguish fires involving this type of product. NUSUAL FIRE & EXPLOSION HAZARDS: This material is HIGHLY VOLATILE and readily gives off vapors which may travel along he ground or be moved by ventilation( Keep containers tightly closed. Isolate from heat, electrical equipment, parks and open flames. Sealed containers may explode if exposed to extreme heat. Do not apply to hot surfaces. This roduct may become electrostatically charged during mixing, filtering or pouring. Bond and ground metal containers. PECIAL FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES: Water spray may be ineffective. Water may be used to cool closed containers to •revent pressure build -up and possible autoignition when exposed to extreme heat. Water fog nozzle settings are .referable. A self- contained positive pressure breathing apparatus with full -face piece should be worn in addition to ull firefighting safety equipment. .Keep unnecessary people away, isolate hazards, stay upwind, keep out of low areas. SECTION V -. HEALTH HAZARD :FFECTS OF OVEREXPOSURE: Irritation of the respiratory tract or acute nervous system depression characterized by headache lizziness, staggered gait, confusion, unconsciousness, coma. There is no applicable information available regarding the :arcinogen potential for this product as a whole, however any relevant information regarding any ingredient's status :s a potential, suspect, or confirmed carcinogen is listed in SECTION V of the MSDS. :hronic overexposure may damage the liver and /or kidneys, blood cells, cause cardiac sensations, hearing effects, :id /or cause birth or fertility defects in lab animals. iepeated and prolonged exposure to some solvents has been associated with permanent brain and nervous system damage. : ntentional misuse by deliberately concentrating & inhaling vapors from this product may be harmful or fatal. iARNING: This product when heated to temperatures in excess of 300 deg. F in the presence of air can form formaldehyde rapors. Formaldehyde is a potential carcinogen and a known skin and respiratory sensitizer. Vapors may irritate eyes. r0LUENE may be harmful to the fetus of laboratory animals. Intentional misuse by deliberate inhalation of TOLUENE has peen associated with liver, kidney, nasal and brain damage. Repeated exposure to TOLUENE has been associated with high `requency.hearing loss in lab animals. Acute massive exposure to toluene can cause transient hematuria and ilbuminuria. Cardiac arrhythmias can occur after inhalation. + Toluene is a potential chronic health hazard. Exposure Limits for Formaldehyde: OSHA (PEL): TWAm0.75 ppm. OSHA (STEL) =2ppm. OSHA(action level):TWA- 0.5ppm. ACGIH (TLV) (CEILING): TWA =0.3 ppm, 0.37 mg /m3. NIOSH: TWA ..0.016 ppm. * Formaldehyde is a chronic health hazard chemical. Ingestion of alcohol can increase the effects of overexposure from some solvents in this product. this product contains Silicone Resin CAS# 28630 -33 -3 which is on the Pennsylvania and New Jersey Right -to -Know Lists: (Dimethyl, diphenyl, methyl, phenyl silicone resin) this product contains toluene (toluol) which is on the New Jersey and Pennsylvanin Right -to -Know Lists: oenzene, methyl- CAS# 108 -88 -3 This product contains butyl acetate which is on the New Jersey and Pennsylvania Right -to -Know list: CAS #123 -86 -4 (acetic acid, butyl ester) Prolonged and continuous exposure to excessive concentration of dust of any kind without using a dust mask may have an adverse pulmonary effect on some people. This overexposure may result in coughing, sputum, and reduced lung capacity. Pre - existing asthmatic conditions may worsen. Persona with lung diseases should not work in dusty areas unless a physician certifies their fitness to wear a respirator. (OSHA 1910.134). Liquid paint does not readily release dust. Exposure Limits For Manganese: OSHAIPEL): Ceiling - 5mg /m3. ACGIH(TLV): TWA = 0.2 mg /m3 for dust and compounds. This product contains a metal oxide inorganic pigment which is the result of high temperature calcination. Although it consists of metal and oxygen atoms arranged in a crystalline structure, the toxicological properties of the pigment is not considered to be those of the metal or its metal oxides. This is a man made mineral that duplicates the properties of the natural product. Exposure Limits For Copper.(dusc & mist): (CAS# 7440 -50 -8) OSHA (PEL): TWA 1 mg /m3. ACGIH ITLV): TWA = 1 mg /m3. OSHA (PEL): TWA =0.1 mg /m3 (fume). This product contains Manganese which is currently listed by OSHA & ACGIH as a dust & fume hazard. Manganese metal has been identified as a potential neurotoxin. Prolonged or repeated exposure may cause manganese poisoning. This product contains manganese which is on the New Jersey Environmental Hazardous Substance List/Right-to-Know List. CAS #7439 -96 -5 This product contains Graphite. Natural Graphite is listed by OSHA and ACGIH as a nuisance duet hazard. Synthetic Graphite is listed by ACGIH as a nuisance dust hazard. Cases of pulmonary fibrosis, emphysema and corpulmonale may result from prolonged inhalation of Graphite dust. 13 -277 PAGE: 3 4p( Limits For Natural Graphite: (CASH 7782 -42 -5) OSHA (PEL): TWA 2.5 mg /m3 (as respirable dust) .GI. .LV): TWA = 2 mg /m3 (respirable fraction of dust) (Synthetic) OSHA (PEL): TWA = 10 mg /m3 (total dust); 5mg /m3 as respirable dust). its product contains Crystalline Silica (Quartz). Prolonged overexposure to respirable silica dust may cause Silicosis, non - cancerous lung disease. Crystalline silica is also considered a probable carcinogen by IARC and as a reasonable iticipated human carcinogen by NTP. Silicosis is made worse by smoking. (posure Limits For Silica - Crystalline: (CASK 14808 -60 -7) (Quartz) OSHA (PEL): TWA = 0.1 mg /m3 (as respirable dust) :GIH(TLV): TWA = 0.1 mg /m3 (as respirable fraction). " Crystalline silica is a potential chronic health hazard. cposure Limits For Inert and Nuisance Dust Particulates Not Otherwise Classified: OSHA (PEL): TWA =15 mg /m3 (total dust) mg /m3 (respirable fraction). ACGIH(TLV): TWA m 10 mg /m3 (total dust). CHYLBENZENE (CASH 100 -41 -4) is present in this product. Ethylbenzene has been classified by IARC as a possible human srcinogen group 213. • Ethylbenzene is a potential chronic health hazard and is on the New Jersey Right -to -Know list. 'ODICAL CONDITIONS PRONE TO AGGRAVATION BY EXPOSURE: Preexisting eye, skin, central nervous system, digestive tact, and respiratory tract. May adversely affect persons with liver, kidney k blood forming organ disorders. 7UTE(S) OF ENTRY: Inhalation, akin contact absorption, eye contact. Products that are free - flowing liquids or pastes re not expected to have routes of exposure for dust. Dried product residue may exhibit dust inhalation hazards. 4HALATION: May cause moderate irritation to the respiratory tract. Overexposure may have toxic and /or narcotic effects. ay cause congestion, headache, dizziness, weakness, nausea, and /or drowsiness. FIRST AID: Remove to fresh air. If reathing is difficult, give oxygen. If not breathing, give artificial respiration and get emergency medical assistance. tE CONTACT: Liquid, vapor or dust may cause moderate to severe irritation, redness, tearing, blurred vision & pain. rolonged or chronic overexposure may cause eye damage. FIRST AID: Flush eyes with large amounts of water for at cast 15 minutes. Hold eyelids apart to flush the entire contaminated area. Get medical help if irritation persists. <IN CONTACT: May cause moderate to severe skin irritation. May cause burning sensations, defatting and /or dermatitis. ironic overexposure may cause akin cracking and /or eczema. FIRST AID: Remove contaminated clothing and shoes. Wash rea with soap and water. Get medical attention as needed. :<IN ABSORPTION: May be absorbed through akin tissues. Chronic overexposure to the skin without using protective srriers (gloves, aprons, etc.) may cause toxic effects. 4GESTION: Single dose oral toxicity is low. May cause irritation to the gastrointestinal tract. Ingestion may su ::,1')usea, discomfort, diarrhea. dizziness and vomiting. FIRST AID: DO NOT INDUCE VOMITING! Contents of this product Ds,; ; /inhalation hazard. If aspirated into the lungs, may cause chemical pneumonitis and /or pulmonary edema which 'can a fatal. Never leave individual unattended, keep head low to prevent aspiration. SEEK IMMEDIATE MEDICAL ATTENTION! >ECTION VI - REACTIVITY DATA PABILITY: _ UNSTABLE _XX_STABLE 1COMPATABILITY (Materials to avoid): Keep away from all oxidizing materials, avoid strong acids & alkalis (caustics) ld never distill solvents to dryness. Material can react violently under such conditions. 4ZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: Oxides of oxygen /nitrogen, acrid or toxic fumes from acids, aldehydes, amines, sulfur, 3d /or silicon compounds. Incompletely burned hydrocarbons. 4ZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: May Occur _XX_Will Not Occur 7NDITIONS TO AVOID: Container is not a pressure vessel. Never use pressure to empty. Do not drag, puncture or drop Dntainer (prevent sparking). Dust particles from this product may pose a flammable or explosion hazard. Avoid dust :cumulations. Containers should be grounded. ;ECTION VII - SPILL OR LEAK PROCEDURES PEPS TO BE TAKEN IN CASE MATERIAL IS RELEASED OR SPILLED: Remove all sources of ignition(flames), electrical static or rictional sparks. Provide good ventilation to spill area. Dike spill area and add inert absorbent. Remove spilled sterial with non - sparking tools. Avoid breathing vapors and use respirator protective devices (SEE SECTION VIII). Only roperly trained personnel should clean spilled hazards. Follow,local, state and federal spill notification rules. %STE DISPOSAL: Waste must be disposed in accordance with federal, state and local regulations. Empty "containers must s handled with care as they contain product residue. Before disposing any container, remove as much residue as possible. sate liquid or dried product should be incinerated or fuel blended at an approved treatment storage disposal facility. 3 not reuse containers unless they are properly recycled. SECTION VIII - SAFE HANDLING & USE INFO 1. fORY PROTECTION: In outdoor or open areas with unrestricted ventilation, use NIOSH approved dust mask to rotect from overspray or solid airborne particulates. In reatricted areas, use a NI05H approved combination organic spor and particulate respirator. In confined areas, use an airline type respirator hood or self contained breathing pparatus. - consult the OSHA confined space regulations. 13 -277 PAGE: 4 VENTILATION: Provide sufficient ventilation to keep hazards at levels below current ACGIH TLV and OSHA PEL of the most hazardous ingredient in SECTION II. Solvent vapors must be removed from the lower levels of work areas and all ignition sources eliminated. Remove decomposition products formed by welding or flame cutting coated surfaces. Dust and particle hazards are elevated during sanding, grinding, or surface preparation of previously coated surfaces. SKIN PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS: Chemical resistant gloves are recommended. Use neoprene, nitrile, or butyl rubber. Cover as much of the exposed skin as possible with appropriate impervious clothing. If skin creams are used, keep the area protected by the cream to a minimum. Do not use akin creams to protect skin when working with acids or acid catalysts. EYE PROTECTION: Eye protection should be worn in any type of industrial operation. The use of chemical goggles and a full face shield to prevent splash from liquids is recommended. Contact lenses should not be worn. OTHER PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT: The use of chemical resistant protective suit is suggested. Avoid any skin contact with vapors, mists, or spray. Prevent contact of materials with clothing if possible. Remove and wash contaminated clothing before re -use. Use an industrial type professional cleaning service, do not wash at home. Do not wear contaminated clothing or shoes away from the workplace. Leather products contaminated with this product should be discarded. HYGIENIC PRACTICES: Emergency eye wash stations and safety showers are recommended. Wash hands prior to eating, using the washroom or smoking. Precautions must be taken so that persons handling this product do not breathe the vapors or have it contact the skin or eyes. In spray operations, protection must be afforded against exposure to both vapor and spray mist. SECTION IX - SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN HANDLING AND STORAGE: Store large quantities in buildings designed and protected for storage of flammable liquids. Reference storage conditions in OSHA 1910.106. Avoid high temperature areas and open flames. Do not store above 120 F. Keep closures tight and container upright to avoid leakage. OTHER PRECAUTIONS: Maintain a clean work area. Use only in a well ventilated area. VHAP= VOLATILE HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT CAUTION! DO NOT TAKE INTERNALLY. Avoid breathing vapor /dust. WARNING! Sudden release of hot organic chemical vapors from equipment operating at elevated temperatures or sudden intro duction to vacuum conditions may result in vapor ignition. WARNING! This product contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer or reproductive harm. NOTICE: The HMIS rating for this material involves data and interpretations compiled from the various material suppliers of the component ingredients. This information will vary from supplier to supplier. The rating is intended for rapid and general identification of this product's hazards. To adequately deal with the safe handling of this material, all information contained in the MSDS must be reviewed as part of an ongoing Hazard Communication Program. This product complies with the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) 40 CFR 700 -799. The Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) complies with 29 CFR 1910.1200, Hazardous Communication Std. In the event of a TRANSPORTATION RELATED INCIDENT involving this product, CALL 1- 800 -68B -4005. REGULATORY INFORMATION: This product contains a Marine Pollutant. Do not allow this product to be spilled into or near watersheds or bodies of water. SARA Title III: This product is regulated under Section 311- 312 (40CFR370): Immediate (Acute) Health Hazard, Delayed (Chronic) Health Hazard, Fire Hazard. • 41 -3237B PAGE: 1 ; SAFETY DATA SHEET r , , i -; FOR COATINGS, RESINS AND RELATED MA t - - - -_ - -_ iliill HAZARD RATING 0 - MINI 3 - SERIOUS + MAR ?_ " r „7, ill 1 - SLIGHT 4 - SEVERE i ir ' '- 2 - MODERATE * - CHRONIC , , �< i { 1 _ --.-.._, ._. - _ �J HMIS RATING HEALTH - * 2 - -- FLAMMABILITY _ 3 REACTIVITY _ 0 0 - SECTION I 3HEBOYGAN PAINT COMPANY DATE OF PREPARATION 01/01/08 L439 NORTH 25th STREET / P.O. BOX 417 TRANSPORTATION EMERGENCY (800) 688 -4005 3HEBOYGAN, WI 53082 -0417 EMAIL: custserv@shebpaint.com CELEPHONE: (920) 458 -2157 TRADE NAME MFG PRODUCT NO. PRODUCT CLASS _, 41 -32378 SURFACE COATING --- - -- HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS SECTION II - ACGIH TLV ACGIH STEL OSHA PEL OSHA CEILING LEL % VAPOR PRESS % BY f - CAS# PPM mg /m3 PPM mg /m3 PPM • mg /m3 PPM mg /m3 VOLUM mm /Hg DEG F Wght NT INGREDIENT 64742 -89 -8 300.0 1370. 1800. 300.0 0.900 15.00 0 100 VM &P Naphtha VHAP 100 -41 -4 100.0 434.0 125.0 543.0 100.0 435.0 1,000 10.00 0 79. 0.19 C Ethyl WI n -Butyl Acetate 123 -86 -4 150.0 713.0 200.0 950.0 150.0 710.0 1.700 8.400 0 68. 23.2 # Dioxide (duet) 1317 -60 -2 10.00 15.00 0 , file' Titanium T .§ 'slstone (dust) 1317 -65 -3 10.00 15.00 PAA 64 -17 -5 1000. 1900. 1900. 3.300 44.00 t 68. thanol This toxic chemical i subject to the reporting requirements of both Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community figh to -Know Act of 1986 (40CFR372) and the Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources Administrative Code Chapter NR445. 0- 44!rVHAP = VOLATILE HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT (VAPOR) HAP = HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT (SOLID) (s) in) = OSHA Skin Absorption Hazard VOC content determined by EPA method 24. ' -,.Y04� s chemical is subject to reporting procedures outlined in the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Administrative ` '0. c ; hap ters NR438 and /or NR445. s dtF.rr��,� - 1 s a IO - - III - PHYSICAL DATA -f � O"E' 16 730 F VOC KO /KO SOLIDS =.66 VOC (WITH WATER AND EXEMPT SOLV) = 4.23 LBS /GAL 507 GMS /LITER f s ', % HAPS BY WEIGHT= 1.47, VOC (LESS WATER AND EXEMPT SOLV) = 4.23 LBS /GAL 507 GMS /LITER f��e' AFOR DENSITY EVAPORATION RATE tVOLATILE tVOLATILE WEIGHT SPECIFIC AVG SOLV ',' BY WEIGHT BY VOLUME PER GALLON GRAVITY DENSITY �` f HEAVIER THAN AIR EVAPORATION RATE SLOWER THAN ETHER 39.79 60.76 10.6324 1.276 6.96 , N I - V - FIRE & EXPLOSION HAZARDS ---- - - - ^ -- ---------- ---------------- G NAME - PAINT, 3, UN1263, II r v,,i,ABEL - FLAMMABLE LIQUID (3) LABEL FLASHPOINT 40 F j; '''' 6 , Use carbon dioxide or dry chemical for small fires. For large fires, use an alcohol -type or multi - ya�y�.i n9uishing agent. Water may be ineffective to extinguish fires involving this type of product. , y E ix + PLOSION HAZARDS: This material is HIGHLY VOLATILE and readily gives off vapors which may travel along V R Qved by ventilation! Keep containers tightly closed. Isolate from heat, electrical equipment, f ' y z domes. Sealed containers may explode if exposed to extreme heat. Do not apply to hat surfaces. This cv j r ` e electrostatically charged during mixing, filtering or pouring. Bond and ground metal containers. E @ Ait- ,,, EA Ya 41 -3237B PAGE: 2 SPECIAL FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES: Water spray may be ineffective. Water may be used to cool closed containers to prevent pressure build -up and possible autoignition when exposed to extreme heat. Water fog nozzle settings are preferable. A self- contained positive pressure breathing apparatus with full -face piece should be worn in addition to full firefighting safety equipment. Keep unnecessary people away, isolate hazards, stay upwind, keep out of low areas. SECTION V - HEALTH HAZARD EFFECTS OF OVEREXPOSURE: Irritation of the respiratory tract or acute nervous system depression characterized by headache dizziness; staggered gait, confusion, unconsciousness, coma. There is no applicable information available regarding the carcinogen potential for this product as a whole, however any relevant information regarding any ingredient's status as a potential, suspect, or confirmed carcinogen is listed in SECTION V of the MSDS. Chronic overexposure may damage the liver and /or kidneys, blood cells, cause cardiac sensations, hearing effects, and /or cause birth or fertility defects in lab animals. Repeated and prolonged exposure to some solvents has been associated with permanent brain and nervous system damage. Intentional misuse by deliberately concentrating & inhaling vapors from this product may be harmful or fatal. Ingestion of alcohol can increase the effects of overexposure from some solvents in this product. TOLUENE may be harmful to the fetus of laboratory animals. Intentional misuse by deliberate inhalation of TOLUENE has been associated with liver, kidney, nasal and brain damage. Repeated exposure to TOLUENE has been associated with high frequency hearing loss in lab animals. Acute massive exposure to toluene can cause transient hematuria and albuminuria. Cardiac arrhythmias can occur after inhalation. • Toluene is a potential chronic health hazard. Exposure to XYLENE can affect the cardiovascular, pulmonary, CNS, and gastrointestinal systems. Liver enzymes, serum electrolytes, EKG and chest X -ray should be done in cases of massive exposure to xylene. ETHYLBENZENE (CASH 100 -41 -4) is present in this product. Ethylbenzene has been classified by IARC as a possible human carcinogen group 2B. • Ethylbenzene is a potential chronic health hazard and is on the New Jersey Right -to -Know list. This product contains xylenes, mixed isomers which is on the New Jersey and Pennsylvania Right -to -Know Lists. (benzene, dimethyl -) CASH 1330 -20 -7 This product contains butyl acetate which is on the New Jersey and Pennsylvania Right -to -Know list: CAS 1123 -86 -4 (acetic acid, butyl ester) Rutile Titanium Dioxide may contain natural occuring trace amounts of metals listed in California's safe drinking water act of 1986 in the following concentrations: Arsenic up to 30ppm, Cadmium up to 2ppm and Lead up to l0ppm. • Exposure Limits For Silica - Crystalline: (CASH 14808 -60 -7) (Quartz) OSHA (PEL): TWA . 0.1 mg /m3 (as respirable dust) ACGIH(TLV): TWA . 0.1 mg /m3 (as respirable fraction). • Crystalline silica is a potential chronic health hazard. Prolonged and continuous exposure to excessive concentration of dust of any kind without using a mask may have an adverse pulmonary effect on some people. This overexposure may result in coughing, sputum, and reduced lung capacity. Pre - existing asthmatic conditions may worsen. Persons with lung diseases should not work in dusty areas unless a physician certifies their fitness to wear a respirator. (OSHA 1910.134). Liquid paint does not readily release dust. This product contains Titanium Dioxide, which is currently listed by OSHA and ACGIH as a nuisance dust hazard. Exposure Limits for Titanium Dioxide(duet): OSHA (PEL): TWA .15 mg /m3 (total dust) 5mg /m3 (respirable) ACGIH(TLV): TWA .10 mg /m3 (total dust). Exposure Limits For Calcium Carbonate: (CASH 1317 -65 -3) OSHA (PEL): TWA .15mg /m3 (total dust), 5mg /m3 (respirable) ACOIH(TLV): TWA .10mg /m3 (total dust). This product contains Calcium Carbonate, which is listed by OSHA and ACGIH at a nuisance dust hazard. Excessive exposure results in irritation to eyes, ears, nose. Injury to skin or mucous membranes can occur by direct mechanical action or by rigorous skin cleaning for removal of dirt. This product contains'Crystalline Silica (Quartz). Prolonged overexposure to respirable silica dust may cause Silicosis, a non - cancerous lung disease. Crystalline silica is also considered a probable carcinogen by IARC and as a reasonable anticipated human carcinogen by NTP. Silicosis is made worse by smoking. This product contains ethanol which is on the New Jersey and Pennsylvania Right -to -Know lists: ethyl alcohol CASH 64 -17 -5 This product contains Zinc Oxide which is currently listed by OSHA & ACGIH as a nuisance dust & fume hazard. Prolonged overexposure to Zinc Oxide dust may produce symptoms known as "Zinc Oxide Chills ". These symptoms usually dissappear within 24 hours. • This product contains stoddard solvent which is on the New Jersey and Pennsylvania Right -to -Know Lists. CASH 8052 -41 -3 MEDICAL CONDITIONS PRONE TO AGGRAVATION BY EXPOSURE: Preexisting eye, skin, central nervous system, digestive tract, and respiratory tract. May adversely affect persons with liver, kidney & blood forming organ disorders. ROUTE(S) OF ENTRY: Inhalation, skin contact absorption, eye contact. Products that are free- flowing liquids or pastes are not expected to have routes of exposure for dust. Dried product residue may exhibit dust inhalation hazards. INHALATION: May cause moderate irritation to the respiratory tract. Overexposure may have toxic and /or narcotic effects. May cause congestion, headache, dizziness, weakness, nausea, and /or drowsiness. FIRST AID: Remove to fresh air. If breathing is difficult, give oxygen. If not breathing, give artificial respiration and get emergency medical assistance. EYE CONTACT: Liquid, vapor or dust may cause moderate to severe irritation, redness, tearing, blurred vision & pain. Prolonged or chronic overexposure may cause eye damage. FIRST AID: Flush eyes with large amounts of water for at least 15 minutes. Hold eyelids apart to flush the entire contaminated area. Get medical help if irritation persists. 41 -3237B PAGE: 3 KIf 'TACT: May cause moderate to severe skin irritation. May cause burning sensations, defatting and /or dermatitis. hr, overexposure may cause akin cracking and /or eczema. FIRST AID: Remove contaminated clothing and shoes. Wash rea with soap and water. Get medical attention as needed. KIN ABSORPTION: May be absorbed through skin tissues. Chronic overexposure to the skin without using protective arriers (gloves, aprons, etc.) may cause toxic effects. NGESTION: Moderately toxic. May cause nausea, abdominal discomfort, vomiting, diarrhea, dizziness, drowsiness, lack f coordination, unconsciousness and gastrointestinal harm. Kidney /liver damage and /or red blood breakdown may occur. IRST AID: DO NOT INDUCE VOMITING! If conscious, give two glasses of milk or water at once. If unconscious, consider astric lavage. SEEK IMMEDIATE EMERGENCY MEDICAL ASSISTANCE! SECTION VI - REACTIVITY DATA TABILITY: UNSTABLE _XX_STABLE NCOMPATABILITY (Materials to avoid): Keep away from all oxidizing materials, avoid strong acids & alkalis (caustics) nd never distill solvents to dryness. Material can react violently under such conditions. 4ZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: Carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, incompletely burned hydrocarbons, and other rritating or toxic vapors. 4ZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: May Occur _XX_Will Not Occur )NDITIONS TO AVOID: Keep away from high heat, flame, spark, or static discharges. If exposed to extreme heat, sealed ontainers may explode. Container is not a pressure vessel. Do not use pressure to empty containers. SECTION VII - SPILL OR LEAK PROCEDURES CEPS TO BE TAKEN IN CASE MATERIAL IS RELEASED OR SPILLED: Remove all sources of ignition(flames), electrical static or rictional sparks. Provide good ventilation to spill area. Dike spill area and add inert absorbent. Remove spilled aterial with non - sparking tools. Avoid breathing vapors and use respirator protective devices (SEE SECTION VIII). Only roperly trained personnel should clean spilled hazards. Follow local, state and federal spill notification rules. %STE DISPOSAL: Consult licensed waste handling and /or transportation facility. Follow local, state and federal as ; Do not incorporate into municipal sewage treatment facilities. Empty containers retain product follow label and MSDS warnings even after container is emptied. ; ECTION VIII - SAFE HANDLING & USE INFO 3SPIRATORY PROTECTION: In outdoor or open areas with unrestricted ventilation, use NIOSH approved dust mask to -otect from overspray or solid airborne particulates. In restricted areas, use a NIOSH approved combination organic Ipor and particulate respirator. In confined areas, use an airline type respirator hood or self contained breathing. )paratus. Consult the OSHA confined space regulations. iNTILATION: Provide sufficient ventilation to keep hazards at levels below current ACGIH TLV and OSHA PEL of the most izardous ingredient in SECTION II. Solvent vapors must be removed from the lower levels of work areas and all ignition :urces eliminated. Remove decomposition products formed by welding or flame cutting coated surfaces. Dust and particle :zards are elevated during sanding, grinding, or surface preparation of previously coated surfaces. IN PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS: Chemical resistant gloves are recommended. Use neoprene, nitrile, or butyl rubber. Cover much of the exposed skin as possible with appropriate impervious clothing. If akin creams are used, keep the area •otected by the cream to a minimum. Do not use skin creams to protect akin when working with acids or acid catalysts. 'E PROTECTION: Eye protection should be worn in any type of industrial operation. The use of chemical goggles and a full .ce shield to prevent splash from liquids is recommended. Contact lenses should not be worn. 'HER PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT: Using a suit or apron to prevent contamination of clothing is recommended. Prevent prolonged in contact with contaminated clothing. Remove and wash all contaminated clothing before re -use. Never wear contaminated othes or shoes away from the workplace. Use an industrial type professional cleaning service, do not wash at home. 'GIENIC PRACTICES: Emergency eye wash stations and safety showers are recommended. Wash hands prior to eating, using .e washroom or smoking - . Precautions must be taken so that persons handling this product do not breathe the vapors or ve it contact the skin or eyes. In spray operations, protection must be afforded against exposure to both vapor d spray mist. SECTION IX - SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS E "TIONS TO BE TAKEN IN HANDLING AND STORAGE: Store large quantities in buildings designed and protected for storage nable liquids. Reference storage conditions in OSHA 1910,106. Avoid high temperature areas and open flames. Do t score above 120 F. Keep closures tight and container upright to avoid leakage. HER PRECAUTIONS: Maintain a clean work area. Use only in a well ventilated area. VHAP.VOLATILE HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT UTION! DO NOT TAKE INTERNALLY. Avoid breathing vapor /dust. 41 -3237B PAGE: 4 NOTICE: The HMIS rating for this material involves data and interpretations compiled from the various material suppliers of the component ingredients. This information will vary from supplier to supplier. The rating is intended for rapid and general identification of this product's hazards. To adequately deal with the safe handling of this material, all information contained in the MSDS must be reviewed as part of an ongoing Hazard Communication Program. This product complies with the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) 40 CFR 700 -799. The Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) complies with 29 CFR 1910.1200, Hazardous Communication Std. In the event of a TRANSPORTATION RELATED INCIDENT involving this product, CALL 1- 600 -680 -4005. WARNING! Sudden release of hot organic chemical vapors from equipment operating at elevated temperatures or sudden intro duction to vacuum conditions may result in vapor ignition. WARNING! This product contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer or reproductive harm. SARA Title III: This product is regulated under Section 311- 312 (40CFR370): Immediate (Acute) Health Hazard, Delayed (Chronic) Health Hazard, Fire Hazard. • FROM Egan Oil FAX N0. :7634212658 Feb. 10 2006 04 :08PM P1 PFTRON CORPORATION, 16700 Glendale Dr., New Berlin, WI 53151 Phone: 414497 -4680 MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET I. PRODUCa`DENT ICON _ ' • • �12 : • PETRO SOL 726B • II. INO14 DIFNTS Ingredients • , 46 wt T Wr YA Sev, Hydrotreated Solvent neutral paraff 54 < 80 5m Wm (mist) Polyolefin succinate Confidential <5 not established . Balancer proprietary blend of lubricants, emulsifiers, rust inhibitors & preservatives. ' • II,ISICAI; PATH of n F nt: over 212 °F Va r Ik : No Data ,yppor density: No Data Soec,Oravity : 0.893 % vow (by vol.): < 3 'Sol ility ip Water: Emulsifies Eli 5% = 10.2 Evaporation Rang (nbutac y1): less than 1 Carance & odor: amber fluid, sweet odor • ' Vim., FTR E A ND EXPLOSIO DATA Flammable Limits in Air, (% by Volute) j..ower: No Data ! or No Data . .'i mash int• 350°F (C.O.C.) ' shingiMedia: CO2, Dry Foam Spe Fir ri e ghting Pry: Coo1 fire - exposed containers with water spray to prevent rupture, Treat as petroleum fire • Use self- contained breathing apparatus in confined areas. Unusual Fire attd E ploslanHazard: Contains combustible hydrocarbons, Never weld, drill or cut on or near . containers (including empties). . . V MEAL T HAZARD HP ATION ' • Inhalation: TLVJTWA fn. product nut established Refer to Section II. Skin Gontas: May de -fat skin, causing irritation, rash or dermatitis t Skin A6son,ti�: No Frye Contact: May cause redness, itching. in est•on: LD$0 not established for product. May be harmful if Ingested, • . • 4 .e and ' t . . * •.. re . . E_q: Immediately flush with water for 15 minutes; calla physician Sisk, Wash with soap and water. jnkelati�tl: If irritation occurs, remove to fresh air and avoid further inhalation. Seek medical attention, Inacstion: Call a physician. Contains Petroleum, Do not induce vomiting. Contains no ingredients listed as carcinogens by NCP, IARC. or OSHA. Mf 5: HEALTH 5 1 FLAMMABILITY --1 REACTIVITY = 0 1:777., • .._.. HEALTHO. PLAMMAFBILITY REACTIVITY= 0 ; •:: 1:111)11. ---�. . i f ^`,,, L FEB Z • r • QOM :Egan 0t1 FRX N0. :7634212658 Feb. 10 2006 04:09PM P2 PETRO SOL'1, CT NITY DA • Condidons txmtrib to inst Intense heat; open flame ligeolibillW Strong oxidizing agents. >Aa._.rdeus„ m o P k a: Oxides of carbon, are potential combustion products. Hazardous Polvrnerization: Will not occur. • - VII. DISPOS CONSIDE 1ONS $lep to be t en f material is relcasedllr spilled: Contain & recover free product. Use clay or other absorbent for •'' •: small amounts. Do not allow product to enter sewers or waterways. Extinguish all sources of ignition, including . �'; sparks. '. W e digosaL: Product is suitable for Licensed landfills, incineration or reclamation in accordance with local, state and federal regulations. "'' KRA Informagm Product and ingredients aria not listed by EPA as hazardous waste (40CFR, Part 261D), Product does not exhibit the hazardous characteristics of ignitability, corrosivity, or reactivity; and does not contain any environmental contaminants. • ' r VII[. s,.,Eg PL ROT BCTION OIiMA . - 7t entil t' n r u' eti : local ventilation or general { �tcs i orx: If e misting occurs; use NIOSH approved respirator for hydrocarbon vapors. 4 deg: Dace shield or goggles, when handling concentrate. (domes: Impervious to oil, is recommended. e • Otheaquipment: Eyewash facility, safety shower. If contact is unavoidabk, use impervious protective gear. • #•.' 11LI N�LiN[+ AND 9TORACOB I Wash contaminated clothing before reuse. Avoid contact with eyes. Avoid breathing mists. Do not ingest `' product. • y Keep containers closed when not in use. Store away from open flames and heat. Ilsoner shjpalAg,nanag: NMFC - Petroleum Oil, Lubricating oil X. R.ECita..ATORY 1N,,,, ,QRMATION •, S T�► ITI___ Ill; Contains n.o "Extremely Hazardous Substances". CgRCT.g: not applicable Section 13: Contains no listed materials pi plicabble aired: • -,. RC : Not listed as hazardous waste _5.,: Not regulated POT Hazard lg>�e sue,_.. None UQ : Not regulated IMO; Not regulated . Not regulated A 1 D : Not regulated ` - Date: 06 - - Prepared By: RUSSELL TURAY - 2 - . ' Petro Sol 726E .,-H.: v1at,ria1 -Safety Data Sheets Page 1 of 8 . . eforalobil Material Safety -Data Sheets lew S_earch Get This Document IIa RTF Format 02631-00 MOBIL DTE 25 ATERIAL SAFETY DATA BULLETIN . PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION • RODUCT NAME x UPPLIER: EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION 225 GALLOWS RD. ?IIRFAX, VA 22037 4 - Hour Health and Safety Emergency (call collect): 609 -737 -4411 4 - Hour Transportation Emergency: iEMTREC: 800 -424 -9300 202 -483 -7616 IBES AND FUELS: 281- 834 -3296 • -ora”ct and Technical Information: ynts and Specialties: 800 - 662 -4525 800 -443 -9966 • iei Products: 800- 947 -9147 IDS Fax on Demand: 613 -228 -1467 IDS Internet Website: http: / /emmsda.ihssolutions.com/ • COMPOSITION /INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS tEMICAL NAMES AND SYNONYMS: PET. HYDROCARBONS AND ADDITIVES RECETVED .OBALLY REPORTABLE MSDS INGREDIENTS: MAY 0 2004 ne. BY: e Section 8 for exposure limits (if applicable)• HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION der normal conditions of use, this product is not considered hazardous cording to regulatory guidelines (See section 15). ERGENCY OVERVIEW: Dark Amber Liquid. Note: Pressurized mists may rm a flammable mixture. DOT ERG No. : NA I CAL HEALTH EFFECTS: Under normal conditions of intended use, Lb product does not pose a risk to health. Excessive exposure f result in eye, skin or respiratory irritation. :far.thergheaith . effec t•s /toxicological';clata:, . ee :X;:Section 1 / /.wwiw :hoary:exxonmobil con]/ sims /nsims.asnx C - Icinn A I Material Safety Data Sheets Page 2 of 8 . FIRST AID MEASURES :YF - "'QNTACT: Flush thoroughly with water. If irritation occurs, call �)ician. • KIN CONTACT: Wash contact areas with soap and water. Remove and lean oil soaked clothing daily and wash affected area. NJECTION INJURY WARNING: If product is injected into or under he skin, or into any part of the body, regardless of the ppearance of the wound or its size, the individual should be valuated immediately by a physician as a surgical emergency. ven though initial symptoms from high pressure injection may be • inimal or absent, early surgical treatment within the first few ours may significantly reduce the ultimate extent of injury. NHALATION: expected to be a problem. • However, if respiratory rritation, dizziness, nausea, or unconsciousness occurs due to xcessive vapor or mist exposure, seek immediate medical ssistance. If breathing has stopped, assist ventilation with a echanical device or mouth-to-mouth-resuscitation. VGESTIO.N: Not expected to be a problem. Seek medical attention if iscomfort occurs. Do not induce vomiting. . FIRE - FIGHTING MEASURES STINGUISHING MEDIA: Carbon dioxide, foam, dry chemical and water fog. ?ECIAL FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES: Water or foam may cause frothing. 5e water to keep fire exposed containers cool. Water spray may used to flush spills away from exposure. Prevent runoff from ire control or dilution from entering streams, sewers, or •ng water supply. PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT: For fires in enclosed areas, fire • _ghters must use self - contained breathing apparatus. USUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS: Note: Pressurized mists may form flammable mixture. )MBUSTION PRODUCTS: Fumes, smoke, carbon monoxide, sulfur oxides, .dehydes and other decomposition products, in the case of :complete combustion. .ash Point C (F) : > 200 (392) (ASTM D -92) . .ammable Limits (approx.% vol.in air) = LEL: 0.9 %, UEL: 7.0% 'PA HAZARD ID: Health: 0, Flammability: 1, Reactivity: . 0 . ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES •TIFICATION PROCEDURES: Report spills /releases as required to propriate authorities. U.S. Coast Guard and EPA regulations • quire immediate reporting of spills /releases that could reach y waterway including intermittent dry creeks. Report ill /release to Coast Guard National Response Center toll free mber (800)424 -8802. In case of accident or road spill notify EMTREC (800) 424 -9300. OCEDURES IF MATERIAL IS RELEASED OR SPILLED: ND SPILL: Shut off source taking normal safety precautions. Take asures to minimize the effects on ground water. Recover by mping or contain spilled material with sand or other suitable s '-bent and remove mechanically into containers. If necessary, •' �e of adsorbed residues as directed in Section 13. 1L.: SPILL: Confine the spill immediately with booms. Warn other ips in the vicinity. Notify port and other relevant authorities. hove from the surface by skimming or with suitable absorbents. If ; - ..3m ct,tedOby ;r au.hori:ti.es they site 'mfrr.suitabledispersants • • j: / /www. h0st l:- exxanmaobil •:c0m /n8iTna/nsiumacnx • Sr P1IYA A ". vlaterial Safety Data Sheets Page 3 of 8 Should be considered where recommended in local oil spill :rocedures. 7 AVIRONMENTAL PRECAUTIONS: Prevent material from entering sewers, gat ^r sources or low lying areas; advise the relevant authorities f )has, or if it contaminates soil /vegetation. >ERUNAL PRECAUTIONS: See Section 8 . HANDLING AND STORAGE ANDLING: High pressure injection under the skin may occur due to the upture of pressurized lines. Always seek medical attention. No pecial precautions are necessary beyond normal good hygiene ractices. See Section 8 for additional personal protection dvice when handling this product. TORAGE: Keep containers closed when not in use. Do not store in open r unlabelled containers. Store away from strong oxidizing gents and combustible materials. Do not store near heat, parks, flame or strong oxidants. PECIAL PRECAUTIONS: Prevent small spills and leakages to avoid slip azard. MPTY CONTAINER WARNING: Empty containers retain residue (liquid nd /or vapor) and can be dangerous. DO NOT PRESSURIZE, CUT, WELD, RAZE, SOLDER, DRILL, GRIND OR EXPOSE SUCH CONTAINERS TO HEAT, LAME, SPARKS, STATIC ELECTRICITY, OR OTHER SOURCES OF IGNITION; 3EY MAY EXPLODE AND CAUSE INJURY OR DEATH. Do not attempt to efill or clean container since residue is difficult to remove. npty drums should be completely drained, properly bunged and romptly returned to a drum reconditioner. All containers should disposed of in an environmentally safe manner and in ;c. "lance with governmental regulations. • EXPOSURE CONTROLS /PERSONAL PROTECTION :CUPATIONAL EXPOSURE LIMITS: • ten mists /aerosols can occur, the following are recommended: 5 mg /m3 .s oil mist)- ACGIH Threshold Limit Value (TLV), 10 mg /m3 (as oil mist) ACGIH Short Term Exposure Limit .(STEL), 5 mg /m3 (as oil mist) - OSHA rmissible Exposure Limit (PEL) NTILATION: If mists are generated, use adequate ventilation, local haust or enclosures to control below exposure limits. SPIRATORY PROTECTION: If mists are generated, and /or when ntilation is not adequate, wear approved respirator. E PROTECTION: If eye contact is likely, safety glasses with side ields or chemical type goggles should be worn. IN PROTECTION: Not normally required. When splashing or liquid ntact can occur frequently, wear oil resistant gloves and /or her protective clothing. Good personal hygiene practices ould always be followed. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES ��_•a1 physical properties are given below. Consult Product Data Sheet specific details. ?.EA1 ANCE._: gaasd .`): / /wwwlostl: xxor obit co insztnensi• sasnx .. cici,,,,,, , ,4aterial Safety Data Sheets Page 4 of 8 'OLOR: Dark Amber ODOR: Mild ODOR THRESHOLD -ppm: NE O .i0 POINT C (F) : > 316 (600) 'ELTING POINT C (F) : NA LASH POINT C(F): > 200(392) (ASTM D -92) LAMMABILITY (solids): NE • .UTO FLAMMABILITY C(F): NA XPLOSIVE PROPERTIES: NA • XIDIZING PROPERTIES: NA APOR PRESSURE -mmHg 20 C: < 0.1 APOR DENSITY: > 2.0 VAPORATION RATE: NE ELATIVE DENSITY, 15/4 C: 0.876 OLUBILITY IN WATER: Negligible ARTITION COEFFICIENT: > 3.5 ISCOSITY AT 40 C, cSt: 44.2 ISCOSITY AT 100 C, cSt: 6.6 • OUR POINT C(F): < -18(0) • REEZING POINT C(F): NE • DLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND: NE 4S0 EXTRACT, IP -346 (WT. %): <3, for mineral oil only k =NOT APPLICABLE NE =NOT ESTABLISHED D= DECOMPOSES )R FURTHER TECHNICAL INFORMATION, CONTACT YOUR MARKETING REPRESENTATIVE • ) STABILITY AND REACTIVITY OT'r'�ITY (THERMAL, LIGHT, ETC.) : Stable. )r,.)IONS TO AVOID: Extreme heat and high energy sources of ignition. 4COMPATIBILITY (MATERIALS TO AVOID): Strong oxidizers. s DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: Product does not decompose at ibient temperatures. • • • i:AZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Will not occur. • TOXICOLOGICAL DATA -ACUTE TOXICOLOGY-- - ?;AL TOXICITY (RATS): Practically non -toxic (LD50: greater than 2000 `_i ---Based on testing of similar products and /or the k • OPonents . "i MAL TOXICITY (RABBITS): Practically non -toxic (LD50: greater than *00 mg /kg). -- -Based on testing of similar products and /or the _.Ponents. ?HTION TOXICITY (RATS): Practically (LC50: greater s mg /1). -- -Based on testing of similar products'and /or the s . fT (RABBITS): Practically non - irritating. (Draize score: ; than 6 but 15 or less). -- -Based on testing of similar ri ucts and /or the components. • Vi z ;, >„ ;; rt IRRITATION (RABBITS): Practically non - irritating. (Primary a tion Index: greater than 0.5 but less than 3). -- -Based . of similar products and /or the components. ir ACUTE TOXICITY DATA Although an acute inhalation study was not with this product, a variety of mineral and synthetic such as those in this product, have been tested. These n ;'es had virtually no effect other than a nonspecific y a tunatoay response in the lung to the aerosolized mineral oil. `s sence.o additives: in:. othein :te:sted;:fortulatians•-vUn Ww .. host-- 1< eXxonnaobil .corniasimsiosimsiasnx :' .. . •i/67 '; • vfaterial Safety Data Sheets Page 5 of 8 approximately the same amounts as in the present formulation) did lot alter the observed effects. -- cFTBCHRONIC TOXICOLOGY (SUMMARY)-- - ro• jnificant adverse effects were found in studies using repeated .eri„al applications of similar formulations to the skin of aborato.ry animals for 13 weeks at doses significantly higher han those expected during normal industrial exposure. The nimals were evaluated extensively for effects of exposure hematology, serum chemistry, urinalysis, organ weights; icroscopic examination of tissues etc.). -- REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY (SUMMARY)-- - o teratogenic effects would be expected from dermal exposure, based n laboratory developmental toxicity studies of major components n this formulation and /or materials of similar composition. -- CHRONIC TOXICOLOGY (SUMMARY)--- ' • epeated and /or prolonged exposure may cause irritation to the skin, • yes or respiratory tract. Overexposure to all mist may result a oil droplet deposition and /or granuloma formation. For ineral base oils: Base oils in this product are severely • Divent refined and /or severely hydrotreated. Chronic mouse skin • tinting studies of severely treated oils showed no evidence of arcinogenic effects. These results are confirmed on a ›ntinuing basis using various screening methods such as Modified • nes Test, IP -346, and /or other analytical methods. For rnthetic base oils: The base oils in this product have been :sted in the Ames assay and other tests of mutagenicity with pgative results. These base oils are not expected to be :r : with chronic dermal exposures. -SENSITIZATION (SUMMARY)-- - 't expected to be sensitizing based on tests of this product, rmponents, or similar products. • . ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION VIRONMENTAL FATE AND EFFECTS:. . the absence of .specific environmental data for this product, this sessment is based on information for representative products. OTOXICITY: Available ectoxicity.data (LL50 >1000 mg /L) indicates at adverse effects, to aquatic organisms are not expected from is product. BILITY: When released into the environment, adsorption to sediment 1 soil will be the predominant behavior. 2SISTENCE AND DEGRADABILITY: This product is expected to be ierently biodegradable. " ;IMULATIVE POTENTIAL: Bioaccumulation is unlikely due to the very v ....tter solubility of this product, therefore bioavailability • aquatic organisms is minimal. • , .aWWw. host .- exxonmobi , l..C.OM/,P67:18143SiMS S933L ..?if 1' f1C14 faterial Safety Data Sheets Page 6 of S 3. 'DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS ASTE DISPOSAL: Product is suitable for burning in an enclosed, ont burner for fuel value. Such burning may be limited mt to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. In adlcion, the product is suitable for processing by an approved . =_cycling facility or can be disposed of at an appropriate overnment waste disposal facility. Use of these methods is .abject to user compliance with applicable laws and regulations :id consideration of product characteristics at time of disposal. MA INFORMATION: The unused.product, in our opinion, is not . ?ecifically listed by the EPA as a hazardous waste (40 CFR, • art 261D), nor is it formulated -to contain materials which re listed hazardous wastes. It does not exhibit the hazardous iaracteristics of ignitability, corrosivity, or reactivity. The zused product is not formulated with substances covered by the )xicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP). However, used cod.uct may be regulated. 1. TRANSPORT INFORMATION iA DOT: NOT REGULATED BY USA DOT. • :D /ADR: NOT REGULATED BY RID /ADR. 10: NOT REGULATED BY IMO. IT';::•?1OZ' REGULATED BY IATA. 'ATIC ACCUMULATOR (50 picosiemens or leas): YES • . REGULATORY INFORMATION OSHA HAZARD COMMUNICATION STANDARD: When used for its intended rposes, this product is not classified as hazardous in cordance with OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1200. Labeling: Product is not dangerous as defined by the European Union ngerous Substances /Preparations Directives.•EU labeling not. quired. vernmental Inventory Status: All components comply with TSCA, - NECS /ELINCS, AICS, METI, and DSL. S. Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) Title III: is product contains no "EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES ".. • RA (311/312) REPORTABLE HAZARD CATEGORIES: None. • • is product contains no chemicals subject to the supplier notification ements of SARA (313) toxic release program. a following product ingredients are cited on the lists below: 3MICAL NAME CAS NUMBER. LIST CITATIONS • j / ww. w•: host4< exxonmob iLeom/psirnsipsiisrns.asDx :: "sxio:nna 4ateriat Safety Data Sheets • Page 7 of 8 :INC (ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS) (0.08 %) 7440 -66 -6 22 ;INC ALKYL DITHIOPHOSPHATE 68649 -42 -3 22 0.67 %) - ' jGULATORY LISTS SEARCHED - -- =A.�IH ALL 6 =IARC 1 11 =TSCA 4 16 =CA P65 CARC 21 =LA RTK =ACGIH Al 7 =IARC 2A 12 =TSCA 5a2 17 =CA P65 REPRO 22 =MI 293 • =ACGIH A2 8 =IARC 2B 13 =TSCA 5e 18 =CA RTK 23 =MN RTK =NTP CARC 9 =OSHA CARC 14 =TSCA 6 19 =FL RTK 24 =NJ RTK =NTP SUS 10 =OSHA Z 15 =TSCA 12b 20 =IL RTK 25 =PA RTK 6 =RI RTK ode key: CARL= Carcinogen; SUS = Suspected Carcinogen; REPRO= Reproductive 6. OTHER INFORMATION • 9E: HYDRAULIC OIL • • ATE: PRODUCTS OF EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION AND ITS AFFILIATED COMPANIES tE NOT FORMULATED TO CONTAIN PCBS. ealth studies have shown that many hydrocarbons pose potential human ?alth risks which may vary from person to person. Information provided i this MSDS reflects intended use. This product should not be used for :her applications. In any case, the following advice should be msidered: • 1D77. RIAL LABEL PA • • .der normal conditions of intended use, this product does not pose a sk to health. Excessive exposure may result in eye, skin or spiratory irritation. Always observe good hygiene measures. First • d: Wash skin with soap and water. Flush eyes with water. If ercome by fumes' or vapor, remove to. fresh air. If ingested do not • duce vomiting. If symptoms persist seek medical assistance. Read d understand the MSDS before using this product. r Internal Use Only: MHC: 1* 1* 1* 1* 1 *, MPPEC: A, TRN: 602631 -00, IS: 400327, CMCS97: 970826, REQ: US - MAREMTING, SAFE USE L 3 Approval Date: 230CT2002 • Formation given herein is offered in good faith as accurate, but shout guarantee. Conditions of use and suitability'of the product for :ticular uses are beyond our control; all risks of use of the product therefore assumed by the user and WE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIM ALL ZRANTIES OF EVERY KIND AND NATURE, INCLUDING WARRANTIES OP 2CHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE IN RESPECT TO THE s OR SUITABILITY OF THE PRODUCT. Nothing is intended as a :ommendation for uses which infringe valid patents or as extending sense under valid patents. Appropriate warnings and safe handling )cedures should be provided to handlers and users. Alteration of this :1••. -nt is strictly prohibited. Except to the extent required by law, lcation or retransmission of this document, in whole or in part, is permitted. Exxon Mobil Corporation and its affiliated companies ume no responsibility for accuracy of information unless the document the most lcurrent available from an official EpconMobil distribution • • < /wwysi.�host� exxonmobilcom/psinis/p suns :aspx `5/6/2Od44 laterial Safety Data Sheets Page 8 of 8 ystem. Exxon Mobil Corporation and its affiliated companies neither epresent nor warrant that the format, content or product formulas ontained in this document comply with the laws of any other country xcept the United States of America. re, .red by: ExxonMobil Oil Corporation nvironmental Health and Safety Department, Clinton, USA gMerget1.0Y N14101.1=3 Copyright 2001 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Privacy & Legal • • • ) • • ::://www.hogbkexxonmobil.cornffisimepsims.a .:5/6/2004 Material Safety Data Sheet MANUFACTURER: True Value Manufacturing 201 3andus Road Cary, IL 60013 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBER: TECHNICAL INFORMATION: HMIS: 800/228 -5635 ext 017 847/639 -5383 H [2] DATE: March 19, 2003 SUPERSEDES: New F [3] R [0] SECTION 1- PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION PRODUCT CODE: TVS -9. . w PRODUCT NAME: True Valu PRODUCT CLASS: Solvent .Program SECTION 2 - HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS INGREDIENT CAS NUMBER WT.% OCCUPATIONAL VAPOR EXPOSURE LIMITS PRESSURE TLV PEL mmH•@20 °C (S)Xylene 1330 -20 -7 75 -90 100 ppm 100 ppm 14.0 (S)Ethyl Benzene 100 -41 -4 10 -25 100 ppm 100 ppm 12.0 glEOW MAR 1.4 200 (S) - This ingredient is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 313 SARA Title III. — NA - Not applicable. NE - Not established. SECTION 3 - PHYSICAL DATA B • VAPOR DENSITY: [X] HEAVIER [] LIGHTER THAN AIR BOILING RANGE: 277 -293 °C EVAPORATION RATE: [X ] FASTER [] SLOWER THAN ETHER 99 -100% VOLATILE VOLUME APPEARANCE /ODOR: Clear liquid /light aromatic DENSITY: 7 -8 Wt(Ibs) /Gal VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND(VOC): Less than 870 g/I pH: NA SECTION 4 - FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA FLAMMABILITY CLASSIFICATION OSHA Class IC FLASH POINT 79 °F LEL 1.1 DOT Flammable Liauid,UN1993 EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: [X] FOAM [] ALCOHOL FOAM [X] c02 [X] DRY CHEMICAL [X] WATER FOG UNUSUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS: Vapors may travel along the ground or may be moved by ventilation a considerable distance to an ignition source. Never use welding or cutting torch on or near drum (even empty) because product (or residue) can ignite explosively. • SPECIAL FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES: Use water spray to cool fire exposed surfaces. Avoid spraying water directly Into storage containers due to danger of boil over. HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: Carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and other harmful gases /vapors. • Page 2 TVS -9 True Value Xylol SECTION 5 - HEALTH HAZARD DATA EFFECTS OF OVEREXPOSURE: EYE CONTACT: Contact may cause mild to severe irritation, including stinging, tearing, swelling and redness. SKIN CONTACT: Contact may cause moderate irritation. Prolonged or repeated contact may dry the skin. Symptoms may include redness, itching, burning, drying and cracking of skin, burns and other skin damage. Prolonged and /or repeated contact may cause moderate to severe dermatitis. Chronic symptoms may indude drying, swelling, scaling, blistering, cracking and severe tissue damage. JNGESTION: If swallowed, this material may irritate the mucous membranes of the mouth, throat, and esophagus. It may be readily absorbed by the stomach and intestinal tract. Symptoms include a burning sensation of the mouth and esophagus, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, staggering gait, drowsiness, Toss of consciousness, and delirium, as well as additional central nervous system effects. There is a danger of aspiration into the lungs during vomiting. INHALATION: May cause headache, nasal and respiratory irritation, nausea, drowsiness, breathlessness, fatigue, central nervous system depression, and Toss of consciousness. CARCINOGENICITY: Norte listed with NTP, IARC, or OSHA. MEDICAL CONDITIONS PRONE TO AGGRAVATION BY EXPOSURE: Individuals with pre - existing nervous system disease, neurological conditions, skin disorders, impaired hearing, liver, or kidney function, or chronic respiratory diseases, and women attempting to conceive should avoid exposure to this product. PRIMARY ROUTE(S) OF ENTRY: [X] DERMAL [X] INHALATION [X] INGESTION EMERGENCY AND FIRST AID PROCEDURES: EYE CONTACT: Flush immediately with large amounts of water while holding eyelids open. Get medical attention. SKIN CONTACT: Immediately flush with water while removing contaminated clothing. Launder clothes before reuse. Flush skin with water for at least 15 minutes. If irritation persists, get medical attention. INGESTION: Call physidan immediately. Do not induce vomiting, If individual is drowsy or unconcious place individual on the left side with head down. INHALATION: Remove to fresh air. Get medical attention if breathing difficulty persists. SECTION 6 - REACTIVITY DATA STABILITY: Stable HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Will not occur. INCOMPATIBILITY (Materials to avoid): Strong oxidizing agents. SECTION 7 - SPILL OR LEAK PROCEDURES STEPS TO BE TAKEN IN CASE MATERIAL IS RELEASED OR SPILLED: Remove all sources of ignition. Contain spill. Absorb spill with vermiculite, floor absorbent or other absorbent material. Prevent run -off to sewers, streams or other bodies of water. WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD: Observe all federal, state and local regulations regarding proper disposal. SECTION 8 - SAFE HANDLING AND USE INFORMATION RESPIRATORY PROTECTION: Not required with normal use. If required, use NIOSH approved respirator. VENTILATION: Sufficient ventilation should be provided to keep air contaminant concentration below applicable OSHA or ACGIH limits. PROTECTIVE CLOTHING: Safety glasses with splash guards to prevent eye contact. Solvent resistant gloves to prevent skin contact. OTHER. PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT: Eyewash facility and safety shower in the event of a spill. HYGIENIC PRACTICES: Wash -hands before eating, drinking or smoking. SECTION 9 SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN HANDLING AND STORING: Store in a cool dry area. Close container after each use. All containers (five gallons or larger) should be grounded when material is transferred. Keep out of reach of children. Do not store near food, water or feed. OTHER PRECAUTIONS: Keep from freezing. Avoid prolonged skin contact. Do not take internally. The information contained in this MSDS is based on information and data provided by the supplier of the raw material used in the manufacture of this product. Although True Value Manufacturing believes such information and data to be reliable, True Value Manufacturing makes no ■v'arranty, expressed or implied, regarding the accuracy and completeness of such information and data. • CITY OF PRIOR LAKE DRC PROJECT REVIEW CHECKLIST PROJECT NAME: EM PRODUCTS SITE PLAN An application for a site plan review of a building addition on a site located south of CSAH 21, north of Cottonwood Lane, and east of Fish Point Road. APPLICANT: Met -Con Construction CONTACT PERSON: Mike Bonasera 952 - 884 - 6250 SITE INFORMATION PID #: 25- 296 -001 -0 LOCATION: 5380 Cottonwood Lane EXISTING ZONING: C - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: C -BO PROJECT REQUEST: Review site plan. DISTRIBUTE TO: APPLICATION FOR: ♦ Frank Boyles ♦ Jeff Matzke Administrative Land Division ♦ Ralph Teschner ♦ Larry Poppler Comprehensive Plan Amend. ♦ Bob Hutchins ♦ Doug Hartman Conditional Use Permit ♦ Jane Kansier ♦ Bill O'Rourke Home Occupation ♦ Ross Bintner ♦ Paul Snook Rezoning ♦ Site Plan Preliminary Plat DNR — Janelle Mirsch PUD ♦ County Planning Dept. ♦ Minnegasco Final Plat ♦ County Hwy. Dept. Watershed Dist. - Variance MNDOT ♦ Integra Vacation SMDC ♦ Xcel Energy Met. Council ♦ Mediacom Cable Date Received 8/8/08 Date Distributed 8/14/08 Date Due 8S#'08 Complete Application 8/14/08 Date Distributed to 8/14/08 DRC Meeting 8/28/08 Date DRC Publication Date N/A Tentative PC Date N/A Tentative CC N/A Date 60 Day Review Date 10/14/08 Review Extension 12/14/08 I: 108 files \08 site plans\met -con for em products \referral.doc Page 1 I have reviewed the attached proposed request (EM Products Site Plan Review) for the following: Water City Code Grading Sewer Storm Water Signs Zoning Flood Plain County Road Access Parks Natural Features Legal Issues Assessment Electric Roads /Access Policy Septic System Gas Building Code Erosion Control Other Recommendation: Approval Denial Conditional Approval Comments: Signed: Date: Please return any comments by Thursday. August 28, 2008, to Danette Walthers, Community Development & Natural Resources Director City of Prior Lake 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 Phone: (952) 447 -9813 Fax: (952) 447 -4245 e -mail: dwalthers ©cityofpriorlake.com I: \08 files \08 site plans\met -con for em products\referral.doc Page 2 Geotechnical Evaluation Report EM Products Addition 5380 Cottonwood Lane SE Prior Lake, Minnesota Prepared for Met -Con Companies Professional Certification: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. .��� stirurr i . ( . _12 • Grego rtra. t:f ^r' SED Principa gi -er — • psor-Ecsto AL License Number: 24017 • ENG NFEr� September 8, 2008 . �'`'' Project BL -08- 03823 Braun Intertec Corporation , ■ I . Braun Intertec Corporation tflYYEARS s"jl BRAUN i• 4f IN1 LRITC ti " September 8, 2008 Project BL -08 -03823 Mr. Mike Bonasera Met -Con Companies -. Metro Division 10640 Lyndale Avenue 5, Suite 4 r ° ,, Bloomington, MN 55420 E. ' 4 Re: Geotechnical Evaluation / p.y" EM Products Addition -; 5380 Cottonwood Lane SE #.,, Prior Lake, Minnesota i °e Dear Mr. Bonasera: We are pleased to present this Geotechnical Evaluation Report for the EM Products Addition. The purpose of the geotechnical evaluation was to provide geotechnical information and recommendations , k regarding the design and construction of the proposed project. E i J 'q 4. 4 g18�1 Please see the attached report for a detailed discussion on the field exploration results and our r,>l x. recommendations. The report should be read in its entirety. Thank you for making Braun Intertec your geotechnical consultant for this project. If you have questions ,..t k , i i4 about this report, or if there are other services that we can provide in support of our work to date, please } ' I call Bryan Field at 952.995.2254 or Greg Bialon at 952.995.2380. I ,,� Sincerely, I"� ' r' ''' 4 -11 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 1I af ro l p ` Bryan C. Field, EIT " 1 Staff Engineer 1° y Gregori:i: • `E " p,s, ., Principal Engineer GeoRpt -EM Products Addition i.: rlei riricn., " ve,n 01 r . IA !il 1 in „"r413 •c°rth,' curd !• list Table of Contents Description Page A. Introduction 1 A.1. Project Description 1 A.2. Purpose 1 A.3. Background Information and Reference Documents 1 A.4. Site Conditions 1 A.S. Scope of Services 2 B. Results 2 B.1. Boring Locations and Elevations 2 B.2. Exploration Logs 3 B.2.a. Log of Boring Sheets 3 B.2.b. Geologic Origins 3 B.3. Geologic Profile 3 B.3.a. Geologic Materials 3 B.3.b. Pavement 3 B.3.c. Fill 4 B.3.d. Alluvial Deposits 4 B.3.e. Glacial Deposits 4 B.3.f. Groundwater 4 B.4. Laboratory Test Results 4 B.5. Infiltration Testing 5 C. Basis for Recommendations 5 C.1. Design Details 5 C.1.a. Building Structure Loads 5 C.1.b. Pavements and Traffic Loads 5 C.1.c. Anticipated Grade Changes 5 C.1.d. Precautions Regarding Changed Information 6 C.2. Considerations impacting Design and Construction 6 C.2.a. Site Development 6 C.2.b. Building Pad Preparation 6 C.2.c. Pavement Support 7 C.2.d. Reuse of Onsite Soils 7 C.2.e. Disturbance of Onsite Soils 7 D. Recommendations 8 D.1. Building Subgrade Preparation 8 D.1.a. Excavations 8 D.1,b. Excavation Dewatering 9 D:1.c. Selecting Excavation Backfill and Additional Required Fill 9 D.1.d. Placement and Compaction of Backfill and Fil 9 ^ ` Table of Contents (continued) Description Page D.2. Spread Footings - ` ' , . ' 10 D.2a. Embedment Depth 10 D.2.b. Net Allowable Bearing Pres ure . ` 10 D.2.c. Settlement 10 D]. Interior Slabs 10 D.3.a. Subgrade Modulus 10 D��b Moisture Vapor Protection 10 D.4. Exterior Slabs . 11 D.4.a. Subgrade - . � 11 D.4.b. Frost Protection - ` ` �� ` ' 11 D.5. Retaining/Below Grade WaIIs... 12 D.5.a. Drainage Control 12 D.5.b. Selection, Pacement and Compaction of BackfiII ' 12 8.5.c Configuring and Resisting Lateral Loads 13 D.6. Pavements 14 D.6,a. Subgrade preparation 14 D.6.b. SubgradeProof-RnU 15 O\Gz. 4sxumedR*m|ue . 15 D.6.d. Design Sections 16 D.6.e. Materials and Cornpaction ._ '--- 16 D.6'[ SubQradeDrainage.. . , 16 D.7. Infiltration Pond � � 17 DO Utilities ' � � � 17 0.8.a. 5ubgr deStabNzadon' ' 17 D.8.b. Selection, Placement and Compaction of Backfill 17 D.9. Construction Quality Control - - ~ --------_.---------.. l7 D.9.a. Excavation Observations 17 D.9,b Materials Testing . 17 D.9.c. Pavement Subgrade Proof-Roll —.—__-_—__ D.9.d. Cold Weather Precautions � � 18 E. Procedures � IO E.1. Penetration Test Borings 18 E.2. Material Classification and Testing 19 E.2.a. Visualand Manual Classification 19 [.2.b. Laboratory Testing 19 E.3. Groundwater Measurements. __��._'�' 19 F. Qualifications 19 F.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions 19 F.1.a. Material Strata. , - � - 19 fiRAVN .^ . Table of Co (continued) Description Page F.l.b. Groundwater Levels 20 F.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility 20 f.2.a. Plan 8evkem/''.--, 20 F.Ib. Construction Observations and Testing . 20 F.3. Use of Report 20 F.4. Standard of � � '' ^ ' 20 Appendix Boring Location Sketch Log of Borin Sheets ST-1 to ST-3 Descriptive Terminology R A 4 t4 �1 TcK' A. Introduction A.1. Project Description This Geotechnical Evaluation Report addresses the building addition proposed for the existing EM Products building at 5380 Cottonwood Lane SE in Prior Lake, Minnesota. We understand the proposed project will include the construction of a 20,632 square foot building addition on the east side of the existing building. The current project will also include the construction of a small new heavy -duty pavement area on the southeast corner of the proposed addition to expand the current loading dock and an infiltration pond located north of the proposed addition. A paved automobile parking area on the west side of the existing building may be constructed in the future. A.2. Purpose The purpose of the geotechnical evaluation was to provide you and your design team with geotechnical information and recommendations regarding design and support of the proposed building addition and pavement and pond expansions, A.3. Background Information and Reference Documents To facilitate our evaluation, we were provided with or reviewed a Proposed Site Plan prepared by Cities Edge Architects dated August 5, 2008. A.4. Site Conditions The existing EM Products building appears to be a single story, slab -on- grade structure and is assumed to be supported on typical spread footing foundations. The existing building floor slab elevation is unknown and a benchmark elevation of 100.0 was assumed for this elevation. The building addition is proposed for the east side of the existing structure. The proposed addition currently consists of bituminous paved parking and drive areas, Met -Con Companies Project BL -08- 03823 September 8, 2008 Page 2 Ground surface elevations across the addition area are variable, ranging from about 94.9 to 97.4 at the boring locations. The ground surface elevations generally slope downward toward the existing building. A.5. Scope of Services Our scope of services for this project was originally submitted to Mike Bonasera of Met -Con Companies. We received authorization to proceed on August 21, 2008. Our scope of services was later modified by Mike Bonasera with the addition of an infiltration boring at an area north of the proposed building addition. Tasks performed in accordance with our authorized scope of services included: • Staking and coordinating the clearing of underground public utilities at the exploration locations. • Performing two penetration test borings to nominal depths of 20 feet below grade in the building area and one power auger boring in the future pond area to 7 1/2 feet below grade. • Performing an infiltration test in the power auger boring at a depth of 7 1/2 feet below grade. ■ Performing laboratory tests on selected penetration test samples. ■ Preparing this report containing a CAD sketch, exploration logs, a summary of the geologic materials encountered, results of laboratory and infiltration tests, and recommendations for structure subgrade preparation and the design of foundations, floor slabs, exterior slabs, utilities, and pavements. Our scope of services was performed under the terms of our June 15, 2006, General Conditions. B. Results B.1. Boring Locations and Elevations The borings were denoted as ST -1 to ST -3 and were performed at the approximate locations shown on the Soil Boring Location Sketch included in the Appendix. BRAUN ATFRT Met -Con Companies Project BL -08 -03823 September 8, 2008 Page 3 The boring locations were selected by Met -Con Companies and Braun Intertec and staked by Braun Intertec personnel. We staked the boring locations by referencing the existing floor slab at the northeast corner of the building. A benchmark elevation of 100.0 was assumed for this location. B.Z. Exploration Logs B.2.a. Log of Boring Sheets Log of Boring sheets for our penetration test borings are included in the Appendix. The logs identify and describe the geologic materials that were penetrated, and present the results of penetration resistance and other in -situ tests performed within them, laboratory tests performed on penetration test samples retrieved from them, and groundwater measurements. Strata boundaries were inferred from changes in the penetration test samples and the auger cuttings. Because sampling was not performed continuously, the strata boundary depths are only approximate. The boundary depths likely vary away from the boring locations, and the boundaries themselves may also occur as gradual rather than abrupt transitions. B.2.b. Geologic Origins Geologic origins assigned to the materials shown on the logs and referenced within this report were based on: (1) a review of the background information and reference documents cited above, (2) visual classification of the various geologic material samples retrieved during the course of our subsurface exploration, (3) penetration resistance and other in -situ testing performed for the project, (4) laboratory test results, and (5) available common knowledge of the geologic processes and environments that have impacted the site and surrounding area in the past. B.3. Geologic Profile B.3.a. Geologic Materials The general geologic profile at the site consists (proceeding down from the ground surface) of a section of bituminous over a layer of fill and alluvial and glacial soil deposits. The following sections discuss the strata in more detail. B.3.b. Pavement A pavement section was encountered at boring locations ST -1 and ST -2. The bituminous section encountered at both boring locations was 5 inches underlain by 9 inches of aggregate base. It should be eRAUti it 1. Met -Con Companies Project BL -08 -03823 September 8, 2008 Page 4 noted that the aggregate base layer often becomes contaminated with the underlying subgrade soils over time and it can be difficult to ascertain the actual aggregate base thickness. B.3.c. Fill Fill was encountered at the boring locations. The fill consisted of lean clay, silty sand and silty clayey sand in thickness on the order of 2 1/2 feet in the proposed building area and 7 1/2 feet in the proposed pond area. The recorded penetration resistances in the fill soils ranged from 6 to 10 blows per foot (BPF). B.3.d. Alluvial Deposits Alluvial soils were encountered below the fill soils at boring locations ST -1 and ST -2. The alluvial soils consisted of fat clay, lean clay, silty sand, poorly graded sand with silt and silt. , The recorded penetration resistances in the alluvial soils ranged from 2 to 9 BPF, indicating soft to rather stiff consistencies. B.3.e. Glacial Deposits Below the fill and alluvium soils, glacial soils were encountered at boring location ST -2. The glacial soils consisted of sandy lean clay. The recorded penetration resistance in the glacial clays was 9 BPF, indicating rather stiff consistency. B.3.f. Groundwater Groundwater was not observed as our borings were advanced. After completion of Borings ST -1 and ST -2, these boreholes were left open during the infiltration test performed on ST -3, and re- checked for groundwater prior to being backfilled. When re- checked, groundwater was observed at both borings at depths of 8 1/2 and 14 feet;, below grade, corresponding to approximate elevations of 86 and 82, respectively. Seasonal and annual fluctuations of groundwater should be anticipated. B.4. Laboratory Test Results We performed moisture content tests, Atterberg limit tests and samples were washed through a number 200 sieve in accordance with ASTM procedures, on select samples recovered from the borings. The BRAUN Met -Con Companies Project BL- 08- 03823 September 8, 2008 Page 5 laboratory test results are shown on the Log of Boring Sheets included in the Appendix, across from the associated soil sample. B.5. Infiltration Testing Borehole infiltration testing was conducted in accordance with the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) method E -18. The test indicated that the infiltration rate at Boring ST -3 averaged about 1/4 inch per hour at a nominal depth of 7 1/2 feet. C. Basis for Recommendations Design Details C.1.a. Building Structure Loads We understand the proposed building addition will consist of a 20,632 square foot single story structure adjoining the east side of the existing building. It is assumed the addition will have a finished floor elevation that will match the existing building. Based on conversations with Dave Bruns of Heyer Engineering, the column loading will not exceed 60 pounds per square foot at a 40 foot by 40 foot bay spacing equating to 96 kips (96,000 pounds) and wall loads will not exceed 4 kips per lineal foot for the proposed building addition. C.1.b. Pavements and Traffic Loads As part of the addition, the existing loading dock pavement area may be expanded on the south side of the proposed addition. This area is anticipated to require a heavy -duty pavement section. We assume an average daily traffic of 4 semi- trucks for the heavy duty areas. Based on the provided documents, the future parking lot would be for automobile use and parking. Average daily traffic is anticipated to be around 100 automobiles per day. C.1.c. Anticipated Grade Changes The proposed building addition will have a floor slab elevation that matches the existing building. Given the ground surface elevations at the borings locations, the proposed building addition is anticipated to require fills on the order of 5 feet over current grades to obtain proposed grades. RRAliN INTER H Met -Con Companies Project BL -08 -03823 September 8, 2008 Page 6 C.1.d. Precautions Regarding Changed Information We have attempted to describe our understanding of the proposed construction to the extent it was reported to us by others. Depending on the extent of available information, assumptions may have been made based on our experience with similar projects. If we have not correctly recorded or interpreted the project details, we should be notified. New or changed information could require additional evaluation, analyses and /or recommendations. C.2. Considerations impacting Design and Construction C.2.a. Site Development Based on the results of our borings, it is our opinion the proposed building addition can be designed using typical spread footing foundations. However, some soil correction excavations may be required below the proposed building foundations and slabs to remove potentially compressible fill soils and soft native clays. The unstable clayey fill soils may also affect pavement construction and design. C2.b. Building Pad Preparation The soil borings performed for the addition encountered approximately 2 1/2 feet of previously placed fill soils overlying native alluvial and glacial soils. A majority of the fill soils do not appear to have been placed in a manner suitable for building support. Given these circumstances, leaving these soils in place below slabs and foundations would, in our opinion, result in a high risk of detrimental settlement. As a result, we recommend the previously placed fill should be removed from below the proposed building and oversize areas. After excavation of the unsuitable fill soils, the underlying alluvial soils should generally be suitable for foundation, slab and fill support. However, some areas of rather soft native clayey soils were encountered in the borings and could require additional removal. A geotechnical engineer should observe the excavation bottoms prior to placing fill to determine if any additional removal is required. We anticipate the existing building is supported on suitable native soils or engineered fill. However, based on the borings, excavation depths for soil corrections for the addition may be anticipated to extend below existing foundation grades. Care should be taken not to undermine the foundations of the existing building. The exact horizontal and vertical proximity of these excavations in relation to the existing foundations will not be known until the time of excavation. Engineered fill can then be placed to reestablish the proposed building subgrades. LRAUtti Met -Con Companies Project BL -08 -03823 September 8, 2008 Page 7 C.2.c. Pavement Support In preparation of the future pavement subgrades, some areas of unstable clayey soils should be anticipated. These soils may be difficult to properly prepare for pavement support. Typical scarification, drying and recompaction procedures as outlined in Section D.6. should first be applied to these areas. Depending on the depth of the unstable clayey soils, weather and site conditions, additional correction methods may be necessary in some areas. We recommend the owner and contractor anticipates some removal and replacement of these soils with imported sand, aggregate base or crushed rock. C.2.d. Reuse of Onsite Soils The non- organic native and fill clayey and sandy soils generally appear suitable for reuse, although probably not directly. Laboratory testing indicates the native clayey soils are generally above their estimated optimum moisture contents and these soils would likely need to be moisture conditioned (dried) prior to reuse to allow for proper compaction. The excavation contractor should note that moisture conditioning of clayey soils can be labor intensive and difficult, requiring significant amounts of time. The best months for drying soils are typically from June through August. The actual amount of onsite soils suitable for reuse as structural fill for the building pad is unknown. Test pits could be performed to help quantify the amount of onsite soils suitable for reuse. C.2.e. Disturbance of Onsite Soils The contractor should note the onsite clayey soils are highly susceptible to disturbance, especially the encountered fat clay. The fat clay has a high swell potential and precautions need to be taken not to disturb these soils. Disturbance of these soils may cause areas that were previously prepared or suitable for pavement or structure support to become unstable and require additional moisture conditioning, compaction, subcutting and /or constructing structures flexible enough to withstand the differential soil heave or constructing isolated deep foundations below the depth of the active zone. Care should be taken to avoid disturbing the onsite soils. ti 3 Ir : r , Met -Con Companies Project BL -08 -03823 September 8, 2008 Page 8 D. Recommendations In accordance with our findings and authorized services, the following sections provide our geotechnical recommendations for subgrade preparation, foundations, below grade walls, interior and exterior slabs, utilities and pavements. D.1. Building Subgrade Preparation D.1.a. Excavations For building pad preparation, we recommend removing the bituminous, aggregate base and previously placed fill soils. If present, we also recommend all previously placed underground utilities, slab, and foundations be removed from proposed building and oversize areas. Based on the borings, excavation depths are expected to average 4 feet. Table 1 provides the anticipated soil correction depths at the soil boring locations for the proposed building addition prior to placing engineered fill to reach proposed grades. However, all excavation subgrades should be observed by a geotechnical engineer prior to fill placement. Table 1. Anticipated Excavation Depths - Building Ground Anticipated Depth Approximate Approximate Surface of Excavation Bottom Elevation Depth Below Floor Elevation Boring Elevation (feet) (Estimated) (100.0) ST -1 94.9 4 90 1/2 9 1/2 ST -2 95.9 4 911/2 81/2 Excavation depths will likely vary between the boring locations. Portions of the excavations may also be deeper than indicated by the borings. Contractors should also be prepared to extend excavations in wet or fine - grained soils to remove disturbed bottom soils. Based on the borings, excavation depths for soil corrections for the addition may extend below existing foundations grades. Care should be taken not to undermine the foundations of the existing building. A geotechnical engineer should observe the excavation bottoms prior to fill or foundation placement. To provide lateral support to replacement backfill, additional required fill and the structural loads they will support, we recommend oversizing (widening) the excavations 1 foot horizontally beyond the outer Met -Con Companies Project BL -08 -03823 September 8, 2008 Page 9 edges of the building perimeter footings, or pavement limits, for each foot the excavations extend below bottom -of- footing or pavement subgrade elevations. D.1.b. Excavation Dewatering We recommend removing groundwater from the excavations. Sumps and pumps can be considered for excavations in low - permeability silt- and clay -rich soils, similar to the soils encountered by the borings. Sump pits should be excavated outside of the building pad and oversize area. D.1.c. Selecting Excavation Backfill and Additional Required Fill Structural backfill should consist of non- organic, on or off -site soils. Fill containing foreign debris or organic material should not be reused as structural fill. For backfill placed 10 feet or more below the proposed floor slab elevation of the structure (below elevations 90), we recommend the use of clean sand with less than 7 percent by weight passing a number 200 sieve as backfill. The clean sand backfill will help reduce the risk of differential settlement between the varying backfill depths, caused by consolidations of the thicker fills under their own weight. D.1.d. Placement and Compaction of Backfill and Fill We recommend the backfill and fill be placed in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in thickness. We recommend fill soils be compacted to the minimum densities summarized in Table 2, determined in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Test Method D 698 (standard Proctor). The fill should be within 3 percentage points of its optimum moisture content. However, clayey fill should be placed from 3 percentage points above and 1 percent below its optimum moisture content. Table 2. Compaction Recommendations Summary Location Minimum Compaction (Standard Proctor) Below Foundations 98% Below interior and Exterior Slabs 95% Exterior Wall Backfill in Landscape Areas 90% Within 3 feet of Pavement 100% Below 3 feet in Pavement Areas 95% Met -Con Companies Project BL -08 -03823 September 8, 2008 Page 10 D.2. Spread Footings D.2.a. Embedment Depth For frost protection, we recommend embedding perimeter footings 42 inches below the lowest exterior grade. Interior footings may be placed directly below floor slabs. We recommend embedding building footings not heated during winter construction, and other unheated footings associated with canopies, stoops or sidewalks 60 inches below the lowest exterior grade. D.2.b. Net Allowable Bearing Pressure We recommend sizing spread footings to exert a net allowable bearing pressur square foot (psf). This value includes a safety factor of at least 3.0 with regard o I eafftig capacity failure. The net allowable bearing pressure can be increased by one -third its value for occasional transient Toads, but not for repetitive loads due to traffic, or for other live loads from snow or occupancy. D.2.c. Settlement We estimate that total and differential settlements among the new footings will amount to less than 1 and 1/2 inch, respectively, under the reported loads. Because the existing building will not likely settle along with the proposed addition, up to 1 inch of differential settlement could occur between the existing building and the addition. To accommodate this settlement, we recommend installing expansion joints between the existing building and the addition, or dowelling the new footings into the existing footings. D.3. Interior Slabs D.3.a. Subgrade Modulus The floor slab subgrade is anticipated to consist of engineered sand fill suitable for floor slab support. We recommend using a modulus of subgrade reaction, k, of 200 pounds per square inch per inch of deflection (pci) to design the slabs with a sand subgrade. If a different subgrade material is to be used, we should be contacted to provide an updated modulus of subgrade reaction. D.3.b. Moisture Vapor Protection If floor coverings or coatings less permeable than the concrete slab will be used, we recommend that a vapor retarder or vapor barrier be place immediately beneath the slab. Some contractors prefer to bury the vapor retarder or barrier beneath a layer of sand to reduce curling and shrinkage, but this practice risks trapping water between the slab and vapor retarder or barrier. ft A , J hi i Met -Con Companies Project BL -08 -03823 September 8, 2008 Page 11 Regardless of where the vapor retarder or barrier is placed, we recommend consulting with floor covering manufacturers regarding the appropriate type, use and installation of the vapor retarder or barrier to preserve warranty assurances. D.4. Exterior Slabs D.4.a. Subgrade We recommend pavement, aggregate base, and organic or unstable fill soils be removed from beneath any proposed exterior slabs adjoining the proposed buildings. We anticipate these corrections would be performed as part of the mass grading /soil correction for the addition. D.4.b. Frost Protection Exterior slabs are anticipated to be underlain with areas of silty sand and clayey soils, which are considered moderately to highly frost susceptible. If these soils become saturated and freeze, unfavorable amounts of heaving could occur. Grading to direct surface drainage away from buildings helps limit the potential for saturation and subsequent heaving to occur. Still, even limited amounts of movement can create tripping hazards to building residents, employees and guests. One way to help limit the potential for heaving to occur is to remove frost - susceptible soils present below the overlying slab "footprints" down to bottom -of- footing grades, and replace them with non- frost - susceptible (NFS) backfill consisting of sand having Tess than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing a #200 sieve. If the banks of excavations to remove frost - susceptible soils from below exterior slabs are not sloped, abrupt transitions between frost - susceptible and NFS backfill will exist along which unfavorable amounts of differential heaving may still occur. Such transiti ns could exist between exterior slabs and pavements, between slabs and sidewalks, and along the slabs themselves should excavations be confined only to the building entrances. NSF backfill is also likely to be more permeable than the soils it replaces, and so can also trap infiltrating surface drainage and groundwater that can contribute to heaving at transitions. To address these issues, we recommend: • Sloping the banks of excavations to remove frost - susceptible soils at a 3:1 (horizontal :vertical) or flatter gradient. • Sloping the bottoms of the excavations to drain away from the building. tki • Met -Con Companies Project BL -08 -03823 September 8, 2008 Page 12 • Installing perforated drainpipes along the bottom outer edges of the excavations to collect and dispose of surface drainage and groundwater that could otherwise accumulate within the backfill and contribute to heaving. One alternative for reducing frost-related heave is to place at least 2 inches of extruded polystyrene foam insulation below the slabs and extend it approximately 4 feet beyond the outer edges of the slabs. The insulation may have to be buried below a cushion of sand or gravel to protect it during construction. Another alternative is to support the slabs on frost -depth footings, and suspending the slabs at least 4 inches above the underlying subgrade soils to accommodate heaving without it affecting the slabs. D.S. Retaining /Below Grade Walls D.5.a. Drainage Control We recommend installing subdrains behind the retaining/below grade walls, adjacent to the wall footings, below the slab elevation. Preferably the subdrains should consist of perforated pipes embedded in washed gravel, which in turn is wrapped in filter fabric. Perforated pipes encased in a filter "sock " and embedded in washed gravel, however, may also be considered. We recommend routing the subdrains to a sump and pump capable of routing any accumulated groundwater to a storm sewer or other suitable disposal site. General waterproofing of retaining walls surrounding occupied or potentially occupied areas is recommended even with the use of free- draining backfill because of the potential cost impacts related to seepage after construction is complete. D.5.b. Selection, Placement and Compaction of Backfill Unless a drainage composite is placed against the backs of the exterior perimeter below -grade walls, we recommend that backfill placed within 2 horizontal feet of those walls consist of sand having less than 50 percent of the particles by weight passing a #40 sieve and less than 5 percent of the particles by weight passing a #200 sieve. If day soil must be considered for use to make up the balance of the below- grade wall backfill (assuming a drainage composite or sand is placed against the backs of the walls), post- compaction consolidation of the clay occurring under its own weight can be expected to continue beyond the end of construction. The magnitude of consolidation could amount to between 1 and 3 percent of the clay backfill thickness, or wall height, and if not accommodated for, could cause slabs to settle unfavorably or be damaged. El RAs Met -Con Companies Project BL -08 -03823 September 8, 2008 Page 13 We recommend that the construction of grade- supported slabs not occur immediately after below- grade walls are backfilled, so that post - compaction consolidation of the clay can be monitored to estimate how much the slabs could settle. The length of the delay will vary based on backfill composition, compaction criteria, the thickness of the backfill or depth of the structure, and performance criteria — factors that may result in slab construction being delayed several weeks to several months. Should clay still be considered for use as backfill below slabs or pavements, however, we further recommend that: • The bottoms of the excavations required for below -grade wall construction are wide enough to accommodate compaction equipment. • Backfill is placed at moisture contents at least equal to, but not more than three percentage points above, its optimum moisture content. • Backfill is placed in loose lifts no thicker than 6 inches prior to compaction. • The relative compaction of the backfill is measured through density testing at intervals not exceeding, one test per 50 horizontal feet for each vertical foot of backfill placed. We recommend a walk behind compactor be used to compact the backfill placed within about 5 feet of the retaining walls. Further away than that, a self - propelled compactor can be used. Compaction criteria for below - grade walls should be determined based on the compaction recommendations provided above in Section D.1. Exterior backfill not capped with slabs or pavement should be capped with a low - permeability soil to limit the infiltration of surface drainage into the backfill. The finished surface should also be sloped to divert water away from the walls. D.5.c. Configuring and Resisting Lateral Loads Below -grade wall design can be based on active earth pressure conditions if the walls are allowed to rotate slightly. If rotation cannot be tolerated, then design should be based on at -rest earth pressure conditions. Rotation up to 0.002 times the wall height is generally required when walls are backfilled with sand *. Rotation up to 0.02 times the wall height is required when walls are backfilled with clay. is Met -Con Companies Project BL -08 -03823 September 8, 2008 Page 14 To design for sand backfill, excavations required for wall construction should be wide enough and flat enough so that sand is present within a zone that (1) extends at least two horizontal feet beyond the bottom outer edges of the wall footings (the wall heel, not the stem) and then (2) rises up and away from the wall at an angle no steeper than 60 degrees from horizontal. We anticipate these geometric conditions will be met if the excavations meet OSHA requirements for the types of soils likely to be exposed in the excavation, and the wall footings are cast against wood forms rather than any portion of the excavation. Recommended equivalent fluid pressures for wall design based on active and at -rest earth pressure conditions are presented below in Table 3. Assumed wet unit backfill weights, and internal friction angles are also provided. The recommended equivalent fluid pressures in particular assume a level backfill with no surcharge — they would need to be revised for sloping backfill or other dead or live loads that are placed within a horizontal distance behind the walls that is equal to the height of the walls. Our design values also assume that the walls are drained so that water cannot accumulate behind the walls. Table 3. Recommended Below -Grade Wall Design Parameters Wet Unit Equivalent Fluid Equivalent Fluid Weight Friction Angle Pressure, Active Case Pressure, At -Rest Case Backfill (pcf) (deg) (pcf) (pcf) Sand 115 34 30 - 50 120 26 50 70 Resistance to lateral earth pressures will be provided by passive resistance against the retaining wall footings, and by sliding resistance along the bottoms of the wall footings. We recommend assuming a passive pressure equal to 300 pcf and a sliding coefficient equal to 0.45. These values are un- factored. D.6. Pavements D.6.a. Subgrade preparation Based on the results of the borings, the conservative approach would be to excavate bituminous, aggregate base and fill soils from the paved areas and surface compact the resulting subgrade. The excavations should be oversized laterally one foot beyond the edge of the pavement for every vertical foot of excavation below the pavement section. A less conservative approach would be to strip the bituminous, aggregate base and fill soils to a minimum depth of 3 feet vertically of the pavement subgrade. The resulting subgrade should then be surface compacted. This approach would likely leave some fill soil in place and would include a slightly increased risk of settlement of the bituminous pavement. A third option would be to strip the bituminous and aggregate base from the proposed pavement areas. Then, the subgrade soils should be evaluated, and if unstable fill or organic soils exist at a , Met -Con Companies Project BL -08 -03823 September 8, 2008 Page 15 proposed elevations, be subcut and replaced with suitable material. The third option would leave the fill soil in place and involve an increased risk of settlement of the bituminous pavement than the second option. The owner must assume the risks associated with the second or third options, or the fill should be removed from below the pavement and oversized areas. After stripping, we recommend the subgrade be surface - compacted with a large self-propelled vibratory compactor. We recommend the existing subgrade be surface compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of standard Proctor density if within 3 feet of the proposed pavement subgrade. If below 3 feet, surface compaction to 95 percent should be adequate. If there are areas where the subgrade cannot be compacted, we recommend that the upper 2 feet of the resulting subgrade be scarified to a moisture content not more than 2 percent above optimum or 1 percent below, and compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of its standard Proctor maximum dry density. If there are areas which still cannot be compacted, we recommend that the unstable materials be subexcavated to a depth of 3 feet and be replaced by materials which can be compacted. Subcut backfill materials should consist of clean sands, aggregate base or crushed rock free of fines. Where fill is required, we recommend that it be compacted to minimum of 100 percent of standard Proctor density within 3 feet of the subgrade. For fills more than 3 feet below final subgrades, 95 percent compaction should be sufficient. D.6.b. Subgrade Proof - Roll Prior to placing aggregate base material, we recommend proof - rolling pavement subgrades to determine if the subgrade materials are loose, soft or weak, and in need of further stabilization, compaction or subexcavation and recompaction or replacement. A second proof -roll should be performed after the aggregate base material is in place, and prior to placing bituminous or concrete pavement. D.6.c. Assumed R - value After site grading, we anticipate the pavement subgrades will generally consist of silty sand and lean clay soils. Laboratory tests to determine an R -value for pavement design were not included in the scope of this project. Based on our experience with similar projects in the area, however, it is our opinion that an R -value of 10 can be assumed for design purposes. Met -Con Companies Project BL -08- 03823 September 8, 2008 Page 16 D.6.d. Design Sections For the above subgrade and assumed traffic (Section C.1), we recommend the following minimum section thicknesses be used for pavement design. The light duty section is recommended for the future parking areas and the heavy -duty section is recommended for the drive and loading dock areas. Table 4. Recommended Bituminous Pavement Thicknesses Course Light Duty (inches)* Heavy Duty (inches) Bituminous 3 5 Gravel Base 7 9 * No borings were performed in the future parking area and designs are based on soils encountered in Borings ST -1 through ST -3. It is recommended that soils along the west side of the existing building be observed with borings and /or test pits prior to construction to evaluate their properties for pavement support. The above pavement design is based upon a 20 -year performance life. This is the amount of time before major reconstruction is anticipated. This performance life assumes maintenance, such as seal coating and crack sealing, is routinely performed. The actual pavement life will vary depending on variations in weather, traffic conditions and maintenance. D.6.e. Materials and Compaction We recommend specifying crushed aggregate base meeting the requirements of Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn /DOT) Specification 3138 for Class 5 or Class 7. We recommend that the bituminous wear and base courses meet the requirements of Specifications 2360, Type MV. We recommend the aggregate gradations for the asphalt mixes meet Gradation Number 3 (Mn /DOT Table 2360) for the base course and wear courses. We recommend that the aggregate base be compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of its maximum standard Proctor dry density. We recommend that the bituminous pavement be compacted to at least 92 percent of the maximum theoretical density. D.6.f. Subgrade Drainage We recommend installing perforated drainpipes throughout pavement areas at low points in the pavement areas. The drainpipes should be placed in small trenches extended below the aggregate base material. =' -r: Met -Con Companies Project BL -08 -03823 September 8, 2008 Page 17 D.7. Infiltration Pond Based on our infiltration test results, we recommend using a design infiltration rate of 1/4 inch per hour for the silty clayey sand encountered in Boring ST -3. The infiltration rate can be further evaluated prior to construction of the infiltration pond with a double ring infiltration test within an excavated area at the bottom of pond elevation. D.8. Utilities D.8.a, Subgrade Stabilization The alluvial soils and stable fill soils encountered at typical invert elevations generally appear suitable for the pipe support and we anticipate that utilities can be installed per manufacturer bedding requirements. However, if unstable or compressible soils are encountered at pipe invert elevations, they should be subcut and replaced with engineered backfill or crushed rock. We recommend a geotechnical engineer observe all utility trench excavations. D,8.b. Selection, Placement and Compaction of Backfill We recommend selecting, placing and compacting utility backfill in accordance with the recommendations provided above in Section D.1. D.9. Construction Quality Control D.9.a. Excavation Observations We recommend having a geotechnical engineer observe all excavations related to subgrade preparation and spread footing, slab -on- grade and pavement construction. The purpose of the observations is to evaluate the competence of the geologic materials exposed in the excavations, and the adequacy of required excavation oversizing. D.9.b. Materials Testing We recommend density tests be taken in excavation backfill and additional required fill placed below spread footings, slab -on -grade construction, beside foundation walls behind basement walls, and below pavements. k it A r�: Met -Con Companies Project BL -08 -03823 September 8, 2008 Page 18 We recommend Marshall tests on bituminous mixes to evaluate strength and air voids, and density tests to evaluate compaction. We also recommend slump, air content and strength tests of Portland cement concrete. D.9.c. Pavement Subgrade Proof -Roll We recommend that proof - rolling of the pavement subgrades be observed by a geotechnical engineer to determine if the results of the procedure meet project specifications, or delineate the extent of additional pavement subgrade preparation work. D.9.d. Cold Weather Precautions If site grading, and construction is anticipated during cold weather, all snow and ice should be removed from cut and fill areas prior to additional grading. No fill should be placed on frozen subgrades. No frozen soils should be used as fill. Concrete delivered to the site should meet the temperature requirements of ASTM C 94. Concrete should not be placed on frozen subgrades. Concrete should be protected from freezing until the necessary strength is attained. Frost should not be permitted to penetrate below footings. E. Procedures E.1. Penetration Test Borings The penetration test borings were drilled with a truck- mounted core and auger drill equipped with hollow -stem auger. The borings were performed in accordance with ASTM D 1586. Penetration test samples were taken at 2 1/2- or 5 -foot intervals. Actual sample intervals and corresponding depths are shown on the boring logs. The power auger boring was conducted in general accordance with, ASTM D 1452, "Soil Investigation and Sampling by Auger Borings." The soil classifications and strata depths were inferred from the cuttings brought to the surface by rotation of the auger and should be considered approximate. Cuttings from the representative soil Payers were placed into jars. Met -Con Companies Project BL -08 -03823 September 8, 2008 Page 19 E.2. Material Classification and Testing E.2.a. Visual and Manual Classification The geologic materials encountered were visually and manually classified in accordance with ASTM Test Method D 2488. A chart explaining the classification system is attached. Samples were sealed in jars or bags and returned to our facility for review and storage E.2.b. Laboratory Testing The results of the laboratory tests performed on geologic material samples are noted on or follow the appropriate attached exploration logs. The tests were performed in accordance with ASTM or AASHTO procedures. E.3. Groundwater Measurements The drillers checked for groundwater as the penetration test borings were advanced, and again after auger withdrawal. The boreholes were allowed to remain open for an extended period of observation as noted on the boring logs. The boreholes were then backfilled. F. Qualifications F.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions F.1.a. Material Strata Our evaluation, analyses and recommendations were developed from a limited amount of site and subsurface information. It is not standard engineering practice to retrieve material samples from exploration locations continuously with depth, and therefore strata boundaries and thicknesses must be inferred to some extent. Strata boundaries may also be gradual transitions, and can be expected to vary in depth, elevation and thickness away from the exploration locations. Variations in subsurface conditions present between exploration locations may not be revealed until additional exploration work is completed, or construction commences. If any such variations are revealed, our recommendations should be re- evaluated. Such variations could increase construction costs, and a contingency should be provided to accommodate them. Met -Con Companies Project BL -08 -03823 September 8, 2008 Page 20 F.1.b, Groundwater Levels Groundwater measurements were made under the conditions reported herein and shown on the exploration logs, and interpreted in the text of this report. It should be noted that the observation period was relatively short, and groundwater can be expected to fluctuate in response to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, seasonal freezing and thawing, surface drainage modifications and other seasonal and annual factors. F.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility F.2.a. -Plan Review This report is based on a limited amount of information, and a number of assumptions were necessary to help us develop our recommendations. It is recommended that our firm review the geotechnical aspects of the designs and specifications, and evaluate whether the design is as expected, if any design changes have affected the validity of our recommendations, and if our recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the designs and specifications. F.2.b. 'Construction Observations and Testing It is recommended that we be retained to perform observations and tests during construction. This will allow correlation of the subsurface conditions encountered during construction with those encountered by the borings, and provide continuity of professional responsibility. F.3. Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of the parties to which it has been addressed. Without written approval, we assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our evaluation, analyses and recommendations may not be appropriate for other parties or projects. F.4. Standard of Care In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. Appendix c ABe, k' ? a m �1 D W a?,�5 e > a VJOS3NNIW 'DAY - I UOI d 3 y 3S 3NV1 OOOMNOUOD 0865 R m 33 o ° NOIIIOOV S1OEICIO ld W3 LL W $ T to gg I— UJ i Y = - w NOI1VfOVA3 1VOINH03103'J o d y H013NS NOI1V001 ONI8081IOS � 0 �,m & 8 in ? v �u a ! ASo" k W 2 o z z� 0 Q m N W b or J h a y W W ^ C W C G C S ° 6 G C f P z a g LA 18 5 p i > w /., i M , by / P / 4, w 7 / I o o / / i I // / l� / 0 fff ° / ;` 0 ' / y / / f a � ' ,q tik;,,f.' .,,,,,/ e, ..3 / il I , . j -, .,'-, 40 1 - -.. /1,4 ./`? / 1 ! 7 ,i i l , T F , --, � N , ,,, , �. (/ _ _ { � E I I � ° / , q �� o s ; ,„,,,,,/ 2/ . l , A , 1 I I o ,, ` i % �y / { ti I j "R , \ \ , �a'� r. j I i / /. o ff \/ +.. ,, m , , °/ �� �I ■ ∎ / / (�./ -,, y , . - "\ / \ o '° </ O� `-, r / / / E a \ (..)0, \ BRAUN' LOG OF BORING INTERTEC Braun Project BL -08 -03823 BORING: ST -1 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION EM Products Addition LOCATION: See attached sketch 5380 Cottonwood Lane SE Prior Lake, Minnesota DRILLER: S. McLean l METHOD: 3 114" HSA, Autohammer DATE: 8 /27 /08 1 SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC Symbol Tests or Notes 94.9 0.0 S Y (ASTM D2488 or D2487) PAV 5 inches of bituminous over 9 inches of aggregate Benchmark: Surface 93.7 1.2 base. elevations at the boring FILL *X VA FILL: Lean Clay, dark gray, black and dark brown, wet locations were referenced to the floor — .:44 su 0 15 slab at the overhead .;. 4 , 6 door on the northeast 90 9 4.0 :INV. _ _ _ _ end of the existing CL j LEAN CLAY, -with Silty Sand seams, gray to brown, building. A benchmark wet, medium. elevation of 100.0 was N (Alluvium) I 7 assumed for this 0 — ® location. .� 87.9 7.0 f iA o e-- ' SP- POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT, fine - to — SM coars - grained brow wet to wa very loose. l 4 85.9 9.0 (Alluvium) Q ° POORLY GRADED SILT, fine-grained, An open triangle in the water level (WL) column SP- ca ill SM brown, waterbearing, very SAND loose, with indicates the depth at v _ (Alluvium) `+ 2 which groundwater was 82.9 12,0 observed while drilling. Groundwater levels SILTY SAND, fine grained, browh, waterbearing, loose. fluctuate. v - (Alluvium) `+ 7 0 80.9 14.0 E SILT, brown to gray, wet, loose. — (Alluvium) > 9 � a U — N co N _. cn 73.9 21.0 pq 7 END OF BORING. Water not observed with 19 1/2 feet of hollow -stem _, auger in the ground. w w — Water not observed to cave -in depth of 14 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. 0 °' _ Water observed at a depth of 8 1/2 feet when z' rechecked 2 hours after withdrawal of the auger. I — a U — 0 z E o 0 0 _ 0 o J BL=08 -03823 Braun lntertec Corporation ST-1 page 1 of 1 LOG OF BORING INTERTEC Braun Project BL -08- 03823 BORING. ST -2 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION -- -- EM Products Addition LOCATION: See attached sketch. 5380 Cottonwood Lane SE Prior Lake, Minnesota DRILLER: S. McLean METHOD: 3 114" HSA, Autohammer DATE: 8/27/08 [SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes 95.9 0.0 Symbol (ASTM 02488 or D2487) % PAV 5 inches of bituminous over 9 inches of aggregate — 94.7 1.2 base. FILL ;:;4; FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium- grained, dark gray -- t and dark brown, moist. - s'Oo! %eoe ` + 10 10 26 99 ; 4.0 ! :!: SM SILTY SAND, fine- to medium- grained, brown, moist, loose. (Alluvium) " 7 — o 88.9 7.0 I CL / FAT CLAY, with a trace of roots, Tight brown to light — % gray, wet, rather soft to medium, 5 51 LL=-88 (Alluvium) A PL =25 c % P1 =63 o r 1 m m a A 7 83.9 12.0 e,/ CL LEAN CLAY, with waterbearing Sand seams, brown, — ' wet, soft to, medium. 3 DI"' % (Alluvium) 1 a 2 0 77.9 18.0 j _ ili ' CL SANDY LEAN CLAY, with a trace of Gravel, gray, wet, rather stiff. e (Glacial Till) 74 21.0 fl 9 END OF BORING. — Water not observed with 19 1/2 feet of hollow -stem — auger in the ground. w e — Water not observed to cave -in depth of 17 feet — o immediately after withdrawal of auger, c a _ Water observed at a depth of 14 feet when rechecked 1 hour after withdrawal of the auger. i m O.' C7 — N 0 V — z 5 0 m w o — 8 0 BL -08 -73823 Braun Intertec Corporation ST page 1 of 1 BRAUN" LOG OF BORING INTERTEC Braun Project BL-08-03823 BORING: ST -3 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION - — EM Products Addition LOCATION: See attached sketch. 5380 Cottonwood Lane SE Prior Lake, Minnesota DRILLER: S. McLean I METHOD: Power Auger DATE: 8/27/08 I SCALE: 1" = 4' Elev. Depth feet feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL Tests or Notes 97 4 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) FILL zo; FILL: Silty Clayey Sand, fine- to medium- grained, dark ••;• brown to black, moist. •• °• •a°e° ••• y O ++ s °i° v 89.9 7.5 •••• — Infiltration test performed at 7 1/2-foot depth. 0 _ 0 cti — a C o` — a 0 o — c — 5 l— a, b — a) a) 2 0 N - C - W Z Q 7 a ' 0 — M c0 0 2 0 CD 0 O BLOB 03823 Braun Interlec Corporation ST -3 page 1 of 1 , BRAUN Descriptive Term of Soil AVa Standard D 2487 - 00 I N T E RT E C L: / Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes „ : ,9„,1,1„, (Unified Soil Classification System) _ Soils Classification Particle Size Identification Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and -- - Group Names Using Laboratory Tests a Group Boulders over 12 Symbol Group Name ° Cobbles 3 to 12' Gravels Clean Gravels C„ > 4 and 1 < C < 3 c Gravel w c _ - - GW Well- graded gravel More than 50° o of 5% or less Vines e _ Coarse 3,4" to 3' r c coarse fraction _ ____�.__ CL,< 4 and/or 1 > C,> 3 c - GP Poorly graded gravel" Fine No. 4 to 3!4" -o v v r , retained on Gravels with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel "';' Sand c No 4 sieve More than 12% fines ` Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravel''' `` Coarse No 4 to No. 10 o ° o — Medium No. 10 to No 40 0., ry Sands Clean Sands C, 6 and 1 < C < 3 ° SW Well-graded sand " d 50% or more of g Fine No. 4U to No. 200 rii t z 5 % or less fines ' C < 6 and /or 1 > C 3 c SP Poorly graded sand " Silt < No. 200, PI < 4 or ii coarse fraction - below "A" line V o passes Sands with Fines Fines classify as ML or SM Silty sand ' '' Clay <No- 200. PI 2 and E No 4 sieve More than 12 %' Fines classify as CL. or CH SC Clayey sand ' °" on or above 'A" line cu __ PI > 7 and plots on or above "A" line i CL Lean clay - w -- Silts and Clays Inorganic - - -- Y 0 v Liquid limit PI < 4 or plots below A' Iinel ML Silt " "' Relative Density of 0 v ! less than 50 Liquid limit - oven dried OL Organic clay ' "' C0 esionleSS Soils a a Organic < 0 75 c m o ____ -_ -, Liquid limit - not dried OL Organic silt ` Very loose 0 to 4 BPF q `o di PI plots on or above "A" line CH Fat clay Loose. 5 to 10 BPF a , E d Silts and clays Inorganic PI plots below "A" l d `o - Medium dense 11 to 30 BPF ow line MH p z Liquid limit Elastic silt' c o _- Dense .. _...... ... 31 to 50 BPF 50 or more Liquid limit - oven dried Organic clay ° Organic _- < 0.75 OH 9 Y , Very dense over 50 BPF Liquid limit- not dried OH Organic silt " ' " Highly Organic Soils Primarily organic matter, dark in color and organic odor PT Peat Consistency of Cohesive Soils a Based on the malehal passing the 3-In (75mmi sieve Very soft 0 to 1 BPF b. If field sample contained cobbles or boulders. or bolt add 'with cobbles or boulders or both' to droop name Soft 2 t0 3 BPF c C,= D.,, %D.,, C, =;D,i: Rather soft 4to5BPF D x o Medium ..,..._ 6 to 8 BPF Rather stiff 9 to 12 BPF 0 If soil contalns215 h, sand add won sand' to group name. Stiff 13 (0 16 BPF (levels avels with 51c 12 % Imes recluse dual symbols - GW we!l.araded gravel wdt, silt Very stiff ...._...__._.__._ _. 17 to 30 BPF 0W-GO well-graded grave: wdri clay Hard over 30 BPF GP -GM poorly graded gravel with sill GP -GC coon) graded gravel with clay t It fines classify as CL -ML use dual symbol GC -GM or SC -SM g. II fines are organic ado valh Of ganic fines' to group name. h If coil contans Z 15",6 gravel. add "with gravel' to group name. Sands wetn Sec 12% fines recube Seal symbols Drilling Notes SW-SM well- graded sand weh sift SW well graded sand,'th clay Standard penetration test borings were advanced by 3 1/4' orb 1/4' SP poorly graded Banc wnh silt ID hollow -stem augers unless noted otherwise. Jetting water was used SP Sc poorly graded Banc with clay to clean out auger prior to sampling only where indicated on logs if Atterberg I s prof in hatched area. sal is a CL - ML. silty clay Standard penetration test borings are designated by the prefix "ST" k. If sod contauls 1CIO 29% plus No 200. add 'with sand' or'with gravel" whichever is predominant. I It sol!corlans230 %plus No 200 predominantly sand add'sandy to group name. (Split Tube). All samples were taken with the standard 2" OD split - tube m If soil 0031a:052 30^A plus No 200 predominantly gravel add gravelly' to group name sampler, except where noted n PI 2 4 and plots on or above 'A fine. b. PI <4 or plots below A line Power auger borings were advanced by 4" or 6" diameter continuous - p PI plots on or above A line flight. solid-stern augers. Soil classifications and strata depths were m- g PI plots oeldw A fine. (erred from disturbed samples augered to the surface and are. therefore. 60 rdrill.11111111r somewhat approximate Power auger borings are designated by the prefix .B.9 g Y 50 Hand au er borin s were advanced manual) with a 1 1/2" or 3 1!4' J .? , e ' diameter auger and were limited to the depth from which the auger could II_ 40 • ,' III be manually withdrawn. Hand auger borings are indicated by the prefix w ® G o�r4.■ `T BPF: Numbers indicate blows per foot recorded in standard penetration c 30 - test also known as "N value. The sampler was set 6" into undisturbed :.-• , ' ,■■■ Solt below the hollow-stern th ' i auger. Driving resistances tget were then counted th ey , for second and third 6 ncrements s and added to et BPF. Where the 20 - ' differed significantly. they are reported in the following form 212 for the N co , o second and third 6"' increments, respectively. i d _ ,' G' MH 111111 WH: WH indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of hammer 10 ' and rods alone, driving not required. 7 out ' ML or OL 4 . WR: WR indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of rods alone. hammer weight and driving not required. 0 10 16 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Liquid Limit (LL) TW indicates thin - walled (undisturbed) tube sample. Laboratory Tests Note: All tests were run in general accordance with applicable ASTM standards DD Dry density, pct OC Organic content. % WD Wet density. pcf S Percent of saturation, % MC Natural moisture content, SG Specific gravity LL Ligiuid- Itmit `1/ C Cohesion, psi PL Plastic limit. % 0 Angle of internal friction PI Plasticity index. % qu Unconfined compressive strength, psf P200 5 passing 200 sieve qp Pocket penetrometer strength. tat Re. 1417 Contractor's Material and Test Certificate for Aboveground Piping PROCEDURE Upon completion of work, inspection and tests shall be made by the contractor's representative and witnessed by an owner's representative. -- All defects shall be corrected and system-left in service before contractor's personnel finally leave the job. A certificate shall be filled out and signed by both representatives. Copies shall be prepared for approving authorities, owners, and contractor. It is understood the owner's representative's signature in no way prejudices any claim against contractor for faulty material, poor workmanship, or failure to comply with approving authority's requirements or local ordinances. -- ---- -- •- - -- p __- - - - --- - - - - --- )) Property name E tom. 0 D LjC7 S Date_ - — Z/ ?;m Property address s" 0o 4�N u, p Lp e pRibiz 1,6\--K.E imp Accepted by approving authorities (names) a_ D ia t � L �^ Address �f 1 Plans — - -- — — - -- _ Yes No Installation conforms to accepted plans — _ No Equipment used is approved Yes If no, explain deviations Has person in charge of fire equipment been instructed as '<Y\ es — No to location of control valves and care and maintenance of this new equipment? If no, explain? Instructions Yes _ • No Have copies of the following been left on the premises? — es _ No 1. System components instructions No 2. Care and maintenance instructions Yes __ No 3. NFPA 25 ZYes Location of Supplies buildings system Year of Orifice Temperature Make Model manufacture size Quant • rating I/ C 0 - - -- - " y ' I SS Sprinklers - !'--- F i t- 6 2.8 rp S..) to • 2406 11'. - - 1 t$S Pipe and Type of pipe A J - I fittings Type of fittings P\IJS % — Maximum time to operate !arm Alarm device through test connection va : •r Ty. - e � _ Model Minutes Seconds WINF o li� �O, i ndicator .. _ -_„ — i Dry valve a Model I Serial no. • Make Model no. ,,Rme y pip a Alarm • : Time to trip "'' reached operated through test Water Air Trip point o. rat • connections pressure pr- - : air • -- - •re test outlets properly • Minutes i Seconds • psi psi •si Minutes ' Seconds ! Yes ! No Without! • Q.O.D. l . With !Q.O.D.; i -- If no, explain �1 1 Measured from time inspector's test connection is opened Reprinted with pa material i i from NFPA not the complete In e an d offc p official of Sprinler Systems, the National FierProtecction9Association, on the referenced subject Quincy, hich is represented This reprinted material s etd o only by the standard in its entirety. Nmerican Fire Sprinkler Association AFSA Form # AF063 — . _ _, n..:a.. + A n nnllnc Tevec 7c9gA . i2/18/2008 09:47 651494951.4- GENERAL SPRINKLER CR PAGE 01/01 Dpaation .. • Pneumatic E Electric HVdreulic i Piping sups ! • i- _ - ^ Yes J No Detecting media supervised j Does • valve operate tram • al t remote. or both ❑ Yes No ' control etatIo� • Delu. • and I ^ jJ Yas r7 No ru Pre-: on j Is tyre an flCCessihle facility in each circuit . lv I for te'.tiae? I If - .'flirt in Ycc Np Does each circuit . -, T- Doe:: each circuit 1vlake i Modal i strparvl .. aiarm7 I opera', Irmtm ume 10 vents releaae7 es No I Ye- Np . Minutes Saco .c^ .t • Make and Setting I Static: preceure " "� • end f loo r , . • Aasidua! pressure � �., F low rate • ., - .. (flowing) • I �..,... �.,, ..._... ;e 1es Inlet IDsi) r • h; • — • • .si) j Flow(ppm) • I , Hydrostatic tests shall Ira made al not leas than, 200 psi (13.8 bat) for 2 hours or 50 pal (3.4 bar) ,�� • above eta* ca3Ure in excess of 150 psi (10.2 bar) fora hours. Differential o t •pips valve c1e Ppers snar be L ett ° '''""O� - : Test ns ge. Al) Aaboveground piping leakage shall b e stopped ,..„., descr ption open during the test t° f r event.dama ''•,.. In 2 hours. Test p es 40 psi tanks at normal rwater level 0 nd air pressure and mmlea pressure dro0, which snail not exceed 11/2 pal (0.1 bar) in 24 hours, All piping hydrostatically rested at - ' �{ Dry piping pneumatically tasted �' ( ' bar) 1Or _Hours If no, state reason Eq ipn'wnt operates properly 25 Yes No Ks A ; Do you certify a- the eprinItler COntr8Cter that addittvee and , COrrOSiVe Chemiceia, el Ur derivatives I of sodium silicate, brine. Or other corrosive chemicals were not used for testing systems or Stopping. leaks? • XII Yee = No Drain i Pee long of gauge leaved near water Residua pressure p Tests lest ! auDply'test connection: ssure with valve In teat - -___ P51 („_ bar) , connection open wide: pal ( bar) i • Underground mains and lead In connections to system risers flushed before connection made to aprinkler piping w Verified by copy of the U m It Foro. 855 � tl,,` flushed by installer of underground Y No (r77�-- �e, Explain sprinkler piping +'Icy +� j �-•�, - i'h..) wZ ., riq __ - Yes. No J it pgwder•fastener* rivan fastener* are used in eancrote, has ` - �./s��bl representative sample testing be eatletsctoiily }� NO 1 If no. explain • cornWeted? ` ,A Blank tearing ; Number used .I- a:ations rte, __ gaskets j ! I Number removed Welding piping ► Yea I No ... If yes, .. • - • • , DO you certify as the sprinkler contractor that welding procedures Comply `+ With the requirements of atleaztAW$ Sal? _ I-^, No Welding . Do you cerdty that the welding was Performed by welders qualified in 1 / Y - - compliance with the requirements of at least AWS S2.1? /�'+r. Y es l_ No • Do you certify that the welding was carried out in compliance with a documented ,-Yea , - i quality control procedure to ensure that all dlece are retrieved, that openings L. No in piping are smooth, that slag and other welding r83idue ere removed, and Ince • the Internal diameters °f are not penetrated? • Cutouts 1 Do you certify that you have a control feature to ensure that (ol =) ) au cutouts (discs) are retrieved?' Yea No • Hydraulic 1 Nameplate provltletl If data no, explain . • • nameplate Yee L. No I Dare left in Service wtltr all control valves open • Remarks • Name of sp �� I !) . e r c ontr 10 ec t i 1 < LE-R. ! Teeter witnessed by Signatures I For p • _ - `) Ttfs Date Aa..1 / °•1 CI 'Ye,. PxacC ,19,-.4 �, o6, .61.4 // I For f Co 3C1°r (; tied) Title Dale Additional explanations and • DEPAR�'iIAENT OF PR BUILDING AND INSPECTION INSPE RECORD SITE ADDRESS 5380 CoTre:›Nwo* D LA S. E. NATURE OF WORK art Pr. oo�c.TS ao��r•e�l USE OF BUILDING t / c /R PERMIT NO. OR - 'MS DATE ISSUED ' f l b o8 CONTRACTOR rte-T • Caw Met .o C` sr. PHONE SSZ. s e q - Gzso NOTE: THIS IS NOT A PERMIT FOR ANY OF THE INSPECTIONS BELOW THE PERMIT IS BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT INSPECTOR DA JFOOTING 1 124 1'9/ II / O I I FOUNDATION (Prior to Back#iil) 1 7 h K i4 1 1 t lS PLACE NO CONCRETE UNTIL ABOVE HAS BEE SIGNED ROUGH - INS FRAMING INSULATION ELECTRICAL PLUMBING kje5 P , tI HEATING (if required) GAS LINE AIR TEST ti I lt COVER NO WORK UNTIL ABOVE HAS BEEN SIGNED 1 SPf4,NKLialt. I? .' . 1 R t+ I it/ iejo5 I FINALS GRADING (Prior to Sodding) '£vi• k„t3 *Ito UILDING P � 4130 to E ECTRICAL PLUMBING ;5 ' 1� (21 t t tp HEATING S p9-A + O K NOT O IN CC 4,. B { aa UPY UNTIL A VE HAS BEEN 1 41 1 G' ll NED NOTICE This card must be posted near an electrical service cabinet prior to rough -in inspections and maintained until all inspections have been approved. On buildings and additions where no service cabinet is available, card shall be placed near main entrance. FOR ALL INSPECTIONS (952) 447 -9850 a r ., e 1 .. ........._ w t 1 I ! 1 , ,