Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09 16 2013 EDA Report 8A 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: September 16, 2013 AGENDA #: 8A PREPARED BY: Casey McCabe, Community Development Specialist AGENDA ITEM: EDAC BUSINESS & INDUSTRY FORUM RESPONSE AND ACTION PLAN DISCUSSION: Introduction The purpose of this agenda item is to provide the EDA with an opportunity to review and comment on the proposed action items and responses to comments received during the EDAC Business & Industry Forum (B&I) before the responses are sent to meeting attendees. History On April 25 the EDAC hosted the 2013 Prior Lake Business & Industry Forum at Fong’s th Event Center in Prior Lake. Approximately 50 people attended from 5:00-7:00 PM. The primary purpose of this event was to provide an open forum for business leaders, property owners, developers and local elected and appointed officials to gather and discuss concerns or issues facing Prior Lake businesses as well as promote the positive steps taken by the EDAC and the City of Prior Lake to address concerns and issues identified during previous events. The B&I Forum helps fulfill some of the duties and responsibilities of the EDAC, including; 1) serving as a liaison between city government and the community; and 2) making recommendations to the EDA or City staff regarding economic development issues, strategy development and implementation and other initiatives that can be undertaken by the EDA to expand and strengthen business retention & expansion. Current Circumstances Approximately 40 comments were received during the B&I Forum. The EDAC members determined they would like to respond to all comments received during the forum and either detail the action that has occurred, the proposed action, or note if action is unnecessary or desired results are not achievable. During their May 20 meeting, the EDA reviewed the list of comments received during the th B&I Forum and approved a motion to direct the EDAC to evaluate the comments received through the Business & Industry Forum and formulate responses to be considered by the EDA before sending. Conclusion Attached to this report is a list of comments received, responses and proposed EDAC action items for EDA review. Once the EDA is comfortable with the EDAC responses and proposed action items, the attached information will be made available to meeting attendees and others on the EDAC page of the City website. ISSUES: The EDAC is very eager to provide a response to the comments received during the B&I Forum so the attendees are aware the EDA, EDAC and city staff are working to address their comments and concerns. However this does not mean that the EDA should feel pressured to approve the proposed actions with little consideration. Each proposal is an obligation which will require time and potentially money to implement. Moreover certain of the proposals may be more difficult to complete than others. Neither the EDAC nor the EDA want to establish a reputation of promising to do something and then fail to follow through. In light of the above, the EDA could decide to establish a subcommittee consisting of one representative each from the EDA, EDAC and staff to review each proposed action, the time line for completion and the cost and prepare recommendations for consideration by the EDA at a future meeting. FINANCIAL Some of the proposed action items may need to have financial resources included as part of IMPACT: the solution or as part of further analysis. Staff time will be required for all listed action items. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Motion and second to approve the EDAC Business and Industry Forum responses and action items, as proposed or with further amendments. 2.Establish a subcommittee to review the proposals in more detail and make recommendations to the EDA at a future meeting. 3.Provide direction to staff and continue discussion at a future meeting. RECOMMENDED If the EDA believes that the responses in the attachment adequately address the questions MOTION: then Alternative 1. If additional review is desired, then Alternative 2 would be appropriate.. ATTACHMENT: 1. Business & Industry Forum Comments & Responses