HomeMy WebLinkAbout09 11 1975,
i,
MINUTES of the INreeeodings of the Village Council of the Village of Prior lake in the County of Scott and State of:
Minnesota, including all accounts audited by sold Council.
September 11, 1975
The Common Council of the City of Prior Lake met in special session on
"
September 11, 1975 at 730 P.M. M ayor Stock called the meeting to order.
f
Present were Mayor Stock, Councilmen Busse, Haberkorn, Oakes and Willi&M,
Administrator McGuare, Engineer Anderson and Attorney Sullivan.
Mayor Stock read the Notice of Hearing for the Water Tower Assessment.
Councilman Oakes explained the $150.00 Water Tower Assessment.,
Notion was made by Williams to approve the assessment roll as prepared, and
to file it with the County A uditor's Office, seconded by Oakes and upon
a vote taken it was duly passed.
ayor Stock read the Notice of Hearing for Sewer and Water Project 75-2,
d then, the meeting over to<Councilman Oakes. Mr. Oakes_ explained
he assessment policy and the cast of the project. He then asked for
estions from the floor.
vid'TogtnM a Dennis Remus stated that:they should not be assessed for .G
ving;and that the acreage may be incorrect.
as Wells stated that he should'aot be assessed for 151 feet because he
of part of his lot.
onard Tupa stated that his acreage should be .75 acres instead of 1.07
,
crea, according to the County Auditor's Office.
endell Uith PI4124 -D stated that his acre age.ia incorrect.
NcW Jl 1 JA- stated that the acreage for parcels PL2180 PL4133 and
was incorrect 'improvements:
,.
for all the
Arndt PIM9 -H stated that his > ent�ireaassesament should be rechecked,
nce n*W*Gck stated that a good portion of his lot is under water and
FRIbbe
acreage rechecked,
t.Robbs LakesidexPark stated that his front footage Was incorrect.
Norbert Traxler representing parcels "PI,3t,0, PI,341, and P1.2-280-D' stated that
e accuracy of assessments on all three parcals should be rechecked.
and that he objected to the vost per acre for the storm sewer.
Parcel #PhG►131 should be rechecked to see, ; the 110 front feet is correct.
Motion was made by Oakes that the assessment roll for _Project ?5Q be
approved with the possible modification as noted, and that it be4iled
frith the County Auditor's Office,, seconded by Busse and upon a vote taken
it was duly _ pas sed .
P�
Mayor Stock read the Notice of Hearing for the Paving ,& Storm Sewer'Pro3ects
and then turned the meeting over to Councilman Haberkorn. Meunc
Haberkorn explained the Paving Assessment policies and then asked for
questions. Several residents of Red Oaks expressed their concern over
the increased coat of paving.
Councilman Oakes instructed the Engineers to prepare a complete breakdown
of the paving costs for Red Oaks.
Mr. Ray Gormley presented a list of items that had to be repaired on the
1�feat Avenue paving project. Th list was turned over to the Engineers for
r.
action.i
; :
requested that his
W endell h requ paving assessment be rechecked.
qW
Tom lvester
-stated that Spring Brook Park Road, is not satisfactory.: This
was referred to,.the Engineers,
Nrg S elld & Mr. Barden objected to their Storm Sewer Assessment.
Motion was m by ,'Oakes to continue the assessment hearing for Project 74
until January 26, . 7:30 P.M., seconded by Haberkorn and upon :a vote,.
taken it was, duly passed.