Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5H - Comp Plan Amend re Godson's Way ( FR 1p4 C-.31 4646 Dakota Street SE Prior Lake, MN 55372 4tINNEsO1P CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: JUNE 23, 2014 AGENDA#: 5H PREPARED BY: DAN ROGNESS, COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR PRESENTED BY: DAN ROGNESS AGENDA ITEM: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 3, LAND USE ELEMENT, OF THE PRIOR LAKE 2030 COM- PREHENSIVE PLAN RELATED TO THE METROPOLITAN URBAN SERVICE AREA (MUSA) AND THE ORDERLY ANNEXATION AREA (OAA) DISCUSSION: Introduction The purpose of this item is to consider amending the 2030 Comprehensive Plan to include four new single family residential lots of Godsons Way subdivision within MUSA as identified in Figure 3.3 of the Plan, and to consider removing those phased Annexation Areas identified in Figure 3.4 that have been previously annexed into the City of Prior Lake. History On July 8, 2013, the City Council approved the annexation of approximately 10.5 acres by ordinance on the northern edge of The Enclave at Clearly Lake. This property was anticipated with the platting of The Enclave to include an additional four single family lots at the end of a cul-de-sac. Subsequent to the annexation, Planning Commission and City Council approved the preliminary plat for God- sons Way to include four lots. On April 28, 2014, the City Council approved the final plat of Godsons Way. Current Circumstances The Metropolitan Council informed the city that it would not issue a sanitary sewer extension permit to serve the four lots in Godsons Way until it amended its Com- prehensive Plan in order to include that property into the city's Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA), as provided for in Figure 3.3 of the Plan. In addition, the Metropolitan Council asked that the Orderly Annexation Area map be updated to remove those phases that have already been annexed into the city, as provided for in Figure 3.4 of the Plan. Therefore, both of these actions are now being recommended by the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council. Conclusion City staff supports approval of the MUSA map amendment based on the following factors: 1. The 2005 preliminary plat for The Enclave at Cleary Lake showed an an- ticipated development at the end of Natures Way; in fact, the city ap- proved a temporary cul-de-sac within an easement outside of the plat, but within the proposed 4-lot development, rather than have it end within The Enclave plat. 2. The 2013 annexation of the Hunter property was approved by the City Council, due largely to the previously approved preliminary plat for The Enclave at Cleary Lake; these four lots were anticipated with the ap- proved Cleary Lake subdivision. 3. The 2014 approved final plat for Godsons Way follows the preliminary plat for these four single family lots, and the temporary cul-de-sac will now be reconstructed to meet city standards as a permanent cul-de-sac. 4. The 4-lot subdivision of Godsons Way fully complies with the city's Sub- division Ordinance and Public Works Design Manual. In addition, the twelve criteria listed in Section 3.6 of the Prior Lake 2030 Comprehen- sive Plan, "Staging of Development", page 45 (attached), are being met based on City staff's analysis of Godsons Way. 5. A draft completion of Section 5, "Water Resources", of the Met Council's Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form is attached, which shows no negative conclusions or responses to adding sanitary service to four lots. City staff supports approval of the Orderly Annexation Area map; this is more of a house-cleaning amendment to remove those annexation areas already an- nexed into the city. ISSUES: These two amendments to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan align the plan with recent actions by the City, including a plat approval and various annexations. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 16, and recommended approval of both amendments. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Motion and a second, as part of the consent agenda, to approve amend- ments to Chapter 3, Land Use Element, of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan to add the Godsons Way plat area within the Residential MUSA (Figure 3.3) and to remove Annexation phasing areas 3.1, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 6.1, 6.2 and 8.3 from the OAA (Figure 3.4 showing them now as part of the city). 2. Motion and a second to table action and ask City staff to provide additional information as requested by the Council 3. Motion and a second to recommend denial of the amendments. RECOMMENDED Alternative #1 MOTION: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Preliminary and Final Plats of Godsons Way. 2. Section 3.6 of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Draft Comprehensive Plan Amendment application to the Met Council. 4. Figure 3.3, Undesignated MUSA Reserve Map (existing version). 5. Figure 3.4, Prior Lake/ Spring Lake Annexation (existing version). 2 600* PRIp1I 4646 Dakota Street SE 4iiiv,vEsolt' Prior Lake.MN 55372 RESOLUTION 14•xxx A RESOLUTION AMENDING CHAPTER 3, LAND USE ELEMENT, OF THE PRIOR LAKE 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RELATED TO THE METROPOLITAN URBAN SERVICE AREA(MUSA)AND THE ORDERLY ANNEXATION AREA(OAA) Motion By: Second By: WHEREAS, The City Council previously annexed approximately 10.5 acres per Ordinance No. 113-09 to include four residential lots, later platted as Godsons Way subdivision; and WHEREAS, The 10.5-acre annexed property must be included with the Residential Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) as shown in Figure 3.3 of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan in order to receive a sanitary sewer extension permit from the Metropolitan Council; and WHEREAS, Figure 3.4 of the Comprehensive Plan, showing phased annexation areas within the Prior Lake Spring Lake Orderly Annexation Area (OAA), must also be amended to exclude all areas previously annexed into the city of Prior Lake, including areas 3.1, 4.1,4.2, 4.3, 6.1, 6.2 and 8.3. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PRIOR LAKE, MINNESOTA as follows: 1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein. 2. The City Council of Prior Lake approves amendments to Figures 3.3 and 3.4 of Chapter 3 (Lane Use Element) of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan subject to Metropolitan Council approval, and authorizes city staff to submit such amendments to the Metropolitan Council. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 23rd DAY OF June, 2014. VOTE Hedberg Keeney McGuire Morton Soukup Aye ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Nay ❑ E ❑ 0 0 Absent 0 0 0 0 0 Abstain 0 0 0 0 0 Frank Boyles, City Manager ,, i k....__,,, `‘. ,- `,N.,‹ *,•-•' -„ .\--45 , -- ----,, ) ) ,-;' ) ,,1 I 1 'S'�%.,.s`t'• rr�Y ,A ..31�c^ 1 �".�yl-`-��`- \\-JI /lJl s' �„ ._-. -,ri.=^._ / ..->.'"•••.....c....„----,,.\ .....77-------__.&,""'t-,...____ ----- ,..., — ```'-' i I rT•�•�rO mac s~- • G — \ \\ Ltriii,l -/\ .',.... •�c `� 27 ._---- 1 ) NISI 1f: Q 1 ^0u� 1 ` `�__" - __.. _ f /eS 1(( our, r ;1%1 .3 / •' .,s •3 �.'� `�--j=Lls,. ' !�r_ sc; l I. S■S i• lk_.s`i`uyt- 111116 CL-J' 1\\i —m3�= ', £ -t�M, ; ,..,------7----7-s=--'�_ _ • 'or It o. , •h/-•- a $,1.11 i 1 ; !» 4.!, „1 ax .V `"�srtn_.„ i 1\y o ' •,1 ,..0. o�Li 1 ..�"` Silt. _ •'••, ' �_ ri s n , 1� _'� \\ l� .z ik !7 � •�Wit;s i � tsss j °i F•iil° d` ,•, .�s.iJ� _ 54. '. ��� ,.. \\11111 1 • -�. 14` .i x,{' " -----="44-7'6iIL' c'r.� -, `?a ... 5\ o '' y� Wl��I;\ �;�! KK 1t ,./........)1.‘'.:;,--;,'‘-":1„....1.0-31 -�r,� \''''\':,:. \.°: .. 6)1.1) '�-r =�. ilie'y\ .\' :---- Ate ---t "'T'(�1�_ fcc*' t 11- } v�e�. � �cts. _'sti' ,.,• r .C"" cc, * ��t�1:1-1 . .1-•• 3 � . \ . ,_ "R.1 y (,t 1►•;;[ _. .--1.•,%•'-. {?„1 \ `t ~o', ,—,T, J'_-• ` . 1 fit.. , N lilt`•' F _- _ -o!„ / IP 1 1.-'''', 'a.j --is �r � ;r' t L la/'t1` £ 4I '�.-/• jl1~_is ��N� 4'�1 4 /1 } 'i 11 cTs�N-'n'1 trt. ..?�,-iI 4. , ; _fctivt VOL ii I- III\ �� ' ;:,,,'L t or ly' c. A( \ I , ,.,, ' b.�� ._ N \� h'` %11111 ` �, �; all as.l.n /• kWh 1 1 Gr' �a■ u \ I(I Ill .I - . 1r1 11 C4>di.R I — r 1 JSP t,:i \ \ Iz - MI Alf f\% •,1 \ II <`i�� 'I 'c,7:.5, 11 i1 �r:•a 1 > I ? �* > \ ill m \ 1 1 .I I / cse \ ,, 4 I'-. \-r%r A 1 Et; N�. `♦\ -�.�J1111-.. _ i.l .\.&_*3+ — �'� 1�'-� e' �Y g..„ c'''— �I 1 I., - _ :,'` ',T.: ry 4?>r VrV • MXOPI.?,KH Oi°IYt✓t✓tiY pN CO Yi 47�4 {tIKI KH si^v4v1 c_. s r• '.� rrfr-1Y. ri K°alar ir.o. 11xdull UOIaO']PUB 21ItJ — '71 1 i^n•sr:%1,.il11rPa.1i1 i0f 0114114 I0YCY1 t itr I136• II Mlnnl WO, vl pp \ / J W 1� I T� ,�_:r illig ii 111IIkit l» i V-ve" �" E $ _r..r..,Soa, J ••\ r N Cegy \ ce OV `•b. 'yob \ Lit d' ♦ �y \ • • a >- zo • -- Z ..° ZY Z , r— ~�i ,, Ogcw l i i i_ _ `1 ./ aG J• 1 \ \ I I I oz '�' _ .� I I Z vi vi \ •` \ r\ AVM S3 _I._ a \ ` \ \ )_ _ \ __� aRLYN `,_` J \ `` ! `,rte ir------_,__________,_---Wa . 1 11Z \\ 1 11 1 tI 1 N II 1 .0 II I O , Y I o . � - -- _ ___1 L- - - ( 1 111'1111 �� !Hip 1 1 51 g i g Iii;lilliiiiiiilaillii:al 1 al II!! Hid is61igi in M:9!'GY.0:9 ilii VC Ri1G WY i;ili`Pd � -macz am>rSSa .Se,U snaspap --- -' — } r.'!i<:#rs _ z \�' _421 ��$ MSS IL5Y.V.W1E.1 P.M 555eM 5We ( M .,4g � tiv � .�i„ai: Nir.I o� nu rm ;Ei uelc[`dmpelr� — & `a Hca.•,.,,:.,a,-a ejyoi 4.i.l I 1il1 GSYJTdd 3>3a[d V arc 13rs 1. 1•53Wr aia m o 't! N \ • s $ EA 5 GG:Qs < N 2 I g a gg G o}ti de b \ ', N- a J y, i 4[5 ``\�•1 \:I ``\ _D' DJ>DDG D>5•g] PDD�D S• +1 r ce J p 1en `\' C1�3>>�Dp>pDd DDDJp >D p' V \ a yTI his ZN ;11 `� - N\ ``\ DD >p C93 DD• DD I'+ A tom♦• ` `\ `� ..moo `I sO \\ dyy I n E`er "` S1ne #I .4+;� _ \\ I\ \" R ; spy ger /I , �* �e '.•'+ -g 1 E.O. r �.i:. • .D• �`S \ .n 4 g� ' \�.. 44+44,-.4: \--.i7s oS ,ti. r 3 b^A bs' SYa 1 , . t2.x gt .sem:._- I1 aL� ab :41, F 0 E ��e g .q$�q — _. _. — .._1_ — _-. — _.. — — — -.._ — '. mss. ��iiy i _ '_ — --- T -- '. 5 Y �� T E 'hag Eo4 ' i ¢ V -11,111— -;::- 'a11— `� 5 s ,:-- f Sia dos $ i O ./ diP.S�c.7 .. _ �!__-'\ ui: 1' aft ihu I Qx SEn j c 543 I V o I i r•i�Ai �Ait k q Seo` 8 I. e'y- I Xt. C_ . 44.- _i t C'S' -t, -figIii �i I ; ':!gyp 'f �y,1�,� 4"C_l�-lf � �� __ ikitc.e.4 ___,,,,, yt\ c !$E3 d I § ir,z-� a€ 8no I • •'tea.i. i•.��sr jst rlsl d: ,�:e 9 IA?" I ``. �.y��. {L � �_ Ill .a -;11, E c I �{.{ S: 41 '� 1 , s.,,, :.•::,\,_.„1,t I,. , iii7. -•;:::-,, e gI ! ti`O.4Kq 7 ire. -- — s R 61fi; a h �ass8 `>�3 „� rT 13 00 8f as ¢°Gel a't I gn iE $g� na3 mbgQi \ 8 `\ • o? e8 Ea.;-5 ii!, 91:41v,1 '4 m s21 5sae" I m€i El; N�IR� m8 3 4g I` 4�g N l s S P] — -_ — -_ ` _ _ _ _" _ g ,4s' g I i B �20 Z PO opssr F 'c/1 I I i I 1"I.:4:4 lL }IIIc_1!•.! !j .11 � 4,0 I t I 1 gP I"• Ill a gk23 gxo d`$3 z o �: a gog w p€I€5, �+ Y z.-0 9 1te -.VE'i 06 2 5i ? Vg o c ke3� S e� ii1 70 > 31$g 81, a. 'i gt:!: �,m s� €g� 4 4 t� ISe 61 3 Yo § f rg sz §� .. 9 g= 3t�YE.i- IIR$19. Ego3 2 r g# ,_ !g68g,E4g;z g•. g u...,c,1 -.. mei m mo .-5u•zknaost�r;rtig,sKpis'58s li b 8 `s s � d I • ',--•,.\ \ \ N. r L:11. r 4a,1 f". AI 7.-/' 0 ok'it."0, ....—————————— 141 16 NH _ ° 'P ----- ® N I • c • ��— 1 LL / r R c L��i ° h NN t. I SS 1 _�R ?R ° is • " n 65 V J� `$ h Vi,1 r h S l R I ; icsh CVLkY �--a ' ` Tp`�5� 3; .s'wv• c 14 $ 1 k m L6'ZL9 M,Zt,Sf.PiS — () 11 x xfggl0. L! 411 fir f7 a:, 1 A PiA IIIIII I - r: ',CM'3.YL,YC.CJ4 N a ti a •-sa • 4 \ li RIi 1 . 3v' « .11 \I v v. Taut ..ip„,, g q . ~�h v h V V 4 h 1.;-- 4 101:‘111111:kt. i ' 1,' S� *..jam I fist" � ( 2 {f \ • Vis' is ti 111111 I 4.esT S4 Of { 17s13 711 ifri) CI) Y eit q fir. 'R.Ya 1� F. if X III sv csta'i y It I x \-1 .. . .,...., ... 1 • .. 77JRR II wy i' l i C J r 1L, j t .- .} \- °°rs,�ea ti , 'tea u $gr�;; \3 p, .-- ` : L_.. __.L' arox u , I�a + R L_ i < d Y I!1 tEl a /°, —`� .' s i I - $ / i . i • • In order to insure that development which is proposed does not strain City resources, the City will apply the following criteria in judging whether a proposed development is eligible to have sanitary sewer services extended. • Property shall be contiguous to property already within the MUSA. • MUSA designation shall only be given to developments having a recorded final plat and a signed developer's agreement with surety covering necessary infrastructure improvements to be installed as part of the development. • Where applicable, utility improvements will address health, safety and environmental issues and concerns. • The development will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • The development will provide adequate water supplies. • The development will provide adequate roads and streets to serve the development. • The development will provide for adequate sanitary sewer facilities. • The development will proceed consistent with applicable environmental policies and regulations. • The developer and benefiting property owners shall assume the primary responsibility for financing improvement costs. The City will participate in such financing only under extraordinary circumstances. • Preliminary plan approval shall not constitute a guarantee that a MUSA allocation will be made to the subject property. • The development shall proceed under the understanding that the project will be maintained in accordance with the limitations imposed by the City and the Metropolitan Council regarding MUSA availability and potential sewage flows from the project. The City and Metropolitan Council shall be indemnified by the developer against any claims arising as a result of future limitations on MUSA availability. • The City agrees to annually report on all allocations of undesignated MUSA reserve to the Metropolitan Council. Figure 3.3 shows those areas in the City which have potential to be included in the MUSA during the course of the next 25 years. The shaded areas shown have an area of approximately 3,933 acres. 3.7 ORDERLY ANNEXATION AREA In 1972, the City of Prior Lake and Spring Lake Township entered into an orderly annexation agreement covering Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 11, 12 and the east half of Sections 5 and 8. By 2000, the terms and conditions of the 1972 agreement had become outdated or invalid, so in 2003 a new agreement was negotiated between the City and Spring Lake Township. This agreement provides for the staged annexation of more than 3,000 acres by the year 2024. The large majority of this acreage will be annexed by 2014. Sections 1, 2, 3 and part of 10 and 11 have since been incorporated into the City. 741- 04 rRlo� u M The City of Prior Lake 2030 Comprehensive Land Use Plan 45 if�NNE5fl2� It Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form . "� _ � � - `'a �.F ,� ,�` ,Ct. ` are "` _� � s t 4� r t�r.7 120. Does the amendment affect any airport functions? ❑ Not applicable. Site is not within airport compatibility area or search area. ❑ No. The site is within airport compatibility area or search area, but no impacts. Explain below: ❑ Yes. The CPA site es_ within an airport compatibility area or search area, and experiences off-airport impacts related to the following: ❑ Aircraft Noise. Describe whether the community has adopted land use compatibility guidelines, including preventive and corrective noise abatement and/or mitigation measures being applied. ❑ Airport Safety Zoning. Indicate whether the community participates on a joint airport/community zoning board, has an approved airport zoning ordinance, and how those requirements relate to the proposal. ❑ Airport Infrastructure. Describe how the proposal affects or is affected by the provision of services or facilities to the airport (e.g. roads, utilities, police/fire, etc.). SECTION 5: WATER RESOURCES http://www.metrocouncil.org/plannino/LPH/LPHSect5.pdf ',Wastewater � 1x ws '� � �'' r 4 � � � ,�.,x x iiz� tCs� i r 'i n�,�;. z '� r��,, su;�P_ � ' �, "�r` a , 6 r . rain 'h aati rv� r ('�., c,_: �. �' ':. aa� dde �a. .ua rrF ��. ,.?� 'G 21, What type of wastewater treatment will be used to serve the proposed amendment? ❑ Individual Sewage Treatment System (ISTS) ❑ Privately Owned / Community Treatment System ❑ Local / Municipal Owned Wastewater Treatment Plant DR Pt:F*1 ® Regional Wastewater Treatment 22. Wastewater Flow: Complete the following table to show whether the amendment increases or decreases wastewater flow compared to the currently planned land use and sewer flow projections{ Year Total Community Flow Total Community Flow Pre-Amendment (mgd) Post-Amendment(mgd)__ 2010 4.2 4.2 2020 4.8 4.8 2030 5.6 5.6 mgd = million gallons per day May 2011 6 tMetropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form 23. Does thelocal wastewater system have adequate capacity or staged capacity to 1 r accommodate the proposed amendment? -1 Yes. ❑ No. Explain response below: The system design flows reflect a population of 56,000 people over the 2030 Land Use Plan area. The projected flows represent the anticipated sewer flows for Prior Lake at full development of the 2030 Land Use Plan,plus additional sewer district areas,and reflect a population of approximately 46,000 people. The system is designed for a larger population to maintain flexibility in applying density requirements to future developments,including the Orderly Annexation Area(OAA) with Spring Lake Township. The Godsons Way property is located within South 21 Sewer District, Sub-District S21-25,of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan,Figure 8.1,Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan. 24. Does the regional wastewater system have adequate capacity or staged capacity to accommodate the proposed amendment? ® Yes. ❑ No. Explain response below: The system is designed for a larger population to maintain flexibility in future developments. The reserve capacity in the system allows for instances of higher density use and orderly annexations within the approved OAA. The phasing areas of development within the OAA is 5-7 years behind the scheduled years. The Godsons Way property is located within South 21 Sewer District,Sub-District S21-25,of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan,Figure 8.1,Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan. 25. Has the community and/or Metropolitan Council identified an inflow and infiltration (I/I) problem? ❑ Yes. ® No. If Yes, describe steps taken to address the I/I issue and plans for action below: 26. Identify regional interceptor(s) that will be impacted by these changes and indicate if ! flows will be diverted from one interceptor service area to another below. Prior Lake Interceptor(MCES-7120)-The Prior Lake Interceptor will ultimately serve all of Prior Lake municipal limits and the Orderly Annexation Area as outlined in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. 27. Does the amendment include any wastewater flow to an adjacent:community? For new I Inter-community agreements, the receiving community Must also amend the sewer element of its plan. ❑ Yes. Enclose a copy of the inter-community agreement with the amendment submittal. ® No. ` 4aa� .., �t�6!�''., 28. Will stormwater runoff generated from the amendment be treated on-site? ❑ No. Check one of the following and describe: ❑ Runoff will not receive treatment. Describe below: ❑ Runoff will be treated off-site. Identify off-site treatment facility below: ❑ Yes. Describe type and level of on-site pollutant removal treatment/mitigation plans below: 7 May 2011 - of Et�m9 ��oala CO ii iiis u ems EV- �o i'��Eommml/ CO 10.01,2P Mli'°=m e tBE�o =E 3E $�B_i8lrps 11 me e�.£ mE38- W��r 1 @ t m u N3 •1 " 44r rISN �m IIM4-, -111 'i, Y :r%1M C F ,11 . . 1 �,a::;: � ....■� 1!� �` . L .y 1�`�'1 Rte; �' �`� y 1 ..1 r LSI lik: N= s,'. ,...- \-- 1; :11..:::5 44:7;.‘.,... , mt., ii Him. mi.-: lDWI ip ►„ i ,,, ® ; 116.1A1 ithlkiAlmu- i t eN;;per 4� ,i is k ��%x 1 1 ♦ aaa k " Iii �-, A''Pitt 4 oii1""*. 4r;., nli 1 T s IRs 's 0 lg _ m III f : yHI11rT\\ I\ vxmin ;,; •••• 1o \ �h4 . � ::, . � _trr "--'-g" V Ell f 6 , '','.1.,-■ '')Iiid $ =1111111 3T. tIN1 a. mayS ■rt aS: - li se w.i mi - Di .rnsl�....., I 111HPI4 I 1 :P.• /ii. Immi ii it I EP& r_4( 111111' '- A ••• ---_..imm.- %I '''''''' 471r 1 kohl illy y pisi11111 f' i r...6 ,,,,„, - ,d,__, III imIIIII:211 ME ELL - . ...IR - ro ,,, 11 IR ,_ , 0. ,... ao , w alz `= Lco m W g W o 0 0 01 Q Q cc `mL LC . w/ I- Q a a og P zKzaQ 4,- N O 0 w K w cr � H W U U Y O J b$91. o \,..uE WZi 4111. C cg ai 5 v occ ° a a a D.81 a ° a�1� � — 0 0 N i \ ": M ) N. W Ct r. .. all\ W goo• a^,,, .. rQ lik--A -Blom III go- Nin.1717i ,,,,) laraik.T1,rit9 MI litialiger-99 iilligitill !Ago ._,N,,,,ii,,„ -„g_.,&.-", A.,..--,. „i;,.14,/ 1.4ritii , 16.... _ . ..." A.........r.„,..A,,,,„_„,, g AllEtW*4 '741'11 E r1@I r ANAL IL\ !Ii i,' �n... ��� I:11� ij J�111111111621. Z-4—.1.1v:01J —.i1i1-1im---i,ui ...1tl !��lo.m,a.‘,1l..ci-.;.3... ,,A,,,S4,-.:4 "...%.r.".,tt..-.-t( ■I 111111 '!}'r.:,../..6-■rr ` r n�i.�� iIJJ'■ 1, 4:7- off; rZ� a pi �F�..>.� gi„_rtA 14 i1la1i w1 NIIitm4l4ii 1_r1ml1Ilos.eI 1.od1m111aN1om1.lirei1• smillEum...iv IIII MEMO W ��� .+� J h, `t �'� a `� o �� ■nomMI L�It."'" a �� �I •A 1r#7,7•1",,ii 4 ,fur4.4,;.-ft mu- ilia:.:41.- .11,s.— .:ikt--.2309pputrilifjp. . .. ■im. � w 1ii.I L giiiil p,Zl I/ I 1 �0r �� :r�lli`.. ,n�� i per ii irr r\ �'+.`fir .�l■ 7T�■i�■ OKI O ggraw4 th f14 a ae „1 1� V . 1'm dim-�:10 .., v.,. ,., ._ A • Ftwo,i7i' polititami , ,, -..-. , .,...,,, ......,. itir c„,= 0 7 „_. , )V ... .r. a* in!n E .r. F2 _ 111111111r7m _, :::'� �,Cie sm 0. ��� ', 1 .,-�� FOP W ®l11IV 111.171411 IP 1 s wall -,Imi g /II• � imocQCL iLNM 0 o my^ m^EP Ix 1 1 _ ,. J-. a. � `E �-ss d s r W Q pm C'm9 �2' mu ��T/ m c '1 W 0 o S g i€ NE s o m'`'agi 1 8 6 W 1 1 1 § m l"_ R 4i l Sn g. Rin A k' A ll �o§ .ft .g?.